GC055 Generalized Lymphadenopathy

Generalized lymphadenopathy is the enlargement of lymph nodes in two or more non-contiguous anatomical regions, often indicating systemic infections, autoimmune disorders, or malignancies.

This lecture, delivered by Dr. Harry Gill (Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, HKU), approaches generalized lymphadenopathy from a haematologist's perspective. The overarching message is: when you encounter generalized lymphadenopathy, you must systematically distinguish between infective, neoplastic, autoimmune, and drug-related causes — and if neoplasia is suspected, the definitive diagnostic tool is an excisional/core biopsy, never an FNA alone. [1]

The lecture is case-based, walking through four clinical scenarios that illustrate the major differential diagnoses (scrub typhus, CLL, DLBCL, and Hodgkin lymphoma) and the principles of investigating and managing lymphomas. It then transitions into a systematic review of lymphoma classification, investigations, staging, and treatment modalities.

Learning Objectives [1]

  1. List the differential diagnosis of enlarged lymph nodes
  2. Classify major subtypes of lymphoma
  3. Understand common clinical presentations of lymphomas
  4. Understand the principles of investigations in lymphoma
  5. Understand the treatment principles of lymphomas
  6. List the major modalities of treatment of lymphomas


Core Concepts: Differential Diagnosis of Generalized Lymphadenopathy

"Differential diagnoses of generalized lymphadenopathy: Neoplastic – leukaemias, lymphomas/LPD; Infective (with predilection to involvement of RES) – Viral (EBV, CMV), bacterial, mycobacterial, parasitic, dimorphic fungi; Autoimmune; Drugs." [1][2]

This four-bucket framework is the single most important differential from the lecture. In practice, also ask whether the process is acute or persistent and use epidemiology, exposures and node distribution to choose targeted tests rather than ordering every serology on the list.

CategoryMechanism / Why It Causes Generalized LADKey Examples
NeoplasticMalignant lymphoid cells proliferate and accumulate in multiple lymph node stations. In leukaemias, malignant cells circulate systemically.Leukaemias (CLL, ALL), lymphomas (HL, NHL), lymphoproliferative disorders
InfectiveOrganisms that target the reticuloendothelial system (RES) — i.e., monocytes/macrophages in lymph nodes, spleen, liver — cause reactive hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue at multiple sites simultaneouslyEBV, CMV, HIV, disseminated TB, Talaromyces marneffei, Toxoplasma gondii
AutoimmuneChronic immune activation drives polyclonal lymphocyte expansion and reactive lymph node enlargementSLE, RA, Sjögren syndrome
DrugsDrug hypersensitivity can trigger lymphocyte activation and pseudo-lymphomatous LN enlargementPhenytoin (classic), hydralazine, DRESS syndrome

Why 'RES-tropic' infections?

The reticuloendothelial system (RES) = mononuclear phagocyte system (liver Kupffer cells, splenic macrophages, lymph node macrophages). Organisms that infect or are cleared by these cells cause simultaneous hepatosplenomegaly AND generalized lymphadenopathy — this combination is a major clinical clue pointing towards infective or haematological malignant causes.

CategorySpecific Causes
ViralEBV, CMV, HIV (acute and chronic — PGL), acute viral hepatitis, HHV-8
BacterialAtypical: Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Salmonella sp., Rickettsia sp., Orientia tsutsugamushi (scrub typhus); Pyogenic; Syphilis
MycobacterialDisseminated TB
FungalTalaromyces marneffei (dimorphic fungus, important in SE Asia / HIV)
ParasiticToxoplasma gondii
NeoplasticCLL/SLL, ALL, lymphomas (HL, DLBCL, FL, BL, MCL, MZL, NK/T-cell), Waldenström macroglobulinaemia
AutoimmuneSLE, RA (Felty syndrome), Sjögren syndrome, celiac disease
DrugsPhenytoin, hydralazine, serum sickness, DRESS
InflammatoryCastleman disease, Kikuchi disease, Kimura disease, Rosai-Dorfman disease, sarcoidosis
EndocrineHypothyroidism, Addison's disease

[3][4]


Case-Based Learning (Slide-by-Slide)

M/30, good past health, fever and rash for 3 days after hiking. Generalized LN 1-2 cm; liver edge and spleen tip palpable. CBC: mild thrombocytopenia, slightly low Hb. LDH 350. [1]

Key teaching points:

  • Peripheral blood film showed atypical lymphocytes. [1]
  • What the slide image shows: large pleomorphic reactive lymphocytes with abundant deeply basophilic cytoplasm that scallops around adjacent red cells. The population is heterogeneous, unlike the monotonous blasts of acute leukaemia. Morphology is a clue, not a stand-alone diagnosis.
  • The lecture then lists the differential diagnoses of atypical lymphocytosis / infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome: [1]

Viral infections (EBV, CMV, HIV, acute viral hepatitis); Bacterial (atypical organisms e.g. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Salmonella sp., Rickettsia sp.); Mycobacterial (disseminated TB); Dimorphic fungi (Talaromyces marneffei); Parasitic (Toxoplasma gondii); Drug reactions / hypersensitivity.

N.B. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia may mimic this (especially if the blood film is not carefully assessed). [1]

Exam Trap: ALL Mimicking Infectious Mononucleosis

This is explicitly flagged in the lecture slides. ALL blasts can look like atypical lymphocytes on a peripheral blood film if you are not careful. Always consider ALL in young patients with "atypical lymphocytes" — confirm with flow cytometry if suspicious. The distinguishing features: ALL blasts have very high N/C ratio, fine chromatin, and nucleoli; atypical lymphocytes in viral infections are larger, with more cytoplasm and irregular nuclear outlines.

Investigation workup shown in Case 1 [1]:

  • CXR clear, blood culture no growth, sputum AFB negative
  • Mycoplasma serology non-reactive
  • CMV IgG+/IgM- (past infection, not acute)
  • CMV pp65 negative (reported in the historical case; this assay is not a routine first-line test for an immunocompetent mononucleosis-like illness)
  • Monospot test and EBV serology negative (heterophile tests can be falsely negative early and are less reliable in children; interpret an EBV-specific panel in relation to illness timing)
  • Widal's test negative (a historical lecture-era test; a negative result does not reliably exclude enteric fever)
  • HIV 1/2 Ab negative (a historical antibody-only result does not exclude very early acute HIV; current evaluation starts with a fourth-generation Ag/Ab assay, adding HIV RNA when acute infection is strongly suspected)
  • Toxoplasma serology non-reactive
  • Urine for Legionella Ag negative

Diagnosis: Orientia tsutsugamushi antibody titre: 256 on admission, 1024 at week 2. Dx = Scrub typhus. An eschar was present on his left inner thigh. [1]

Reading the visual sequence: the titre rises exactly fourfold (256 → 1024), providing paired-serum evidence of recent infection; the accompanying clinical photograph localises the inoculation eschar in a site that could easily be missed without a complete skin examination.

Why is this important? Generalized lymphadenopathy after hiking in an endemic region can be caused by mite-borne scrub typhus. A ≥4-fold rise between properly timed acute and convalescent antibody titres supports the diagnosis, but confirmation is retrospective. Early disease is better sampled with PCR from an eschar swab/tissue or whole blood where available. An eschar is a highly useful clue but is neither invariably present nor unique to scrub typhus. When clinical suspicion is high, treatment should not wait for convalescent serology; doxycycline is first-line. [16]


M/62, easy bruising 2 weeks. Generalized LN 2-3 cm, hepatosplenomegaly. Platelet count 3 × 10⁹/L (profoundly thrombocytopenic). LDH 550. [1]

Peripheral blood film findings [1]:

  • Numerous "smear" or "smudge" cells — fragile lymphocytes disrupted during film preparation. They are common in CLL but not pathognomonic; diagnosis requires a persistent clonal B-cell lymphocytosis with the appropriate flow phenotype. [17]
  • Abnormal small-to-medium sized lymphoid cells with high N/C ratio, round nuclei, condensed chromatin, no nucleoli, smooth cytoplasmic border
  • No polychromasia, no spherocytes, no rouleaux
  • Genuine thrombocytopenia with occasional giant platelets

What the slide image shows: a monotonous background of small mature-appearing lymphocytes with coarsely clumped chromatin, punctuated by numerous pale streaked smudge-cell remnants. The striking paucity of platelets is real; occasional large platelets suggest increased peripheral turnover, but the film alone cannot separate immune destruction from marrow infiltration.

Further investigations [1]:

  • Multiparametric flow cytometry: CD19+, CD5+, CD23+, CD20 (dim), surface Ig (dim), CD79b (dim). T-cell and NK markers negative.
    • This is the classic CLL immunophenotype: CD5+/CD19+/CD23+ with dim CD20 and dim surface immunoglobulin
  • BMA + trephine: heavy infiltration by abnormal lymphoid cells
  • Cytogenetics: normal karyotype
  • FISH: del(17p) consistent with TP53 loss → adverse risk
  • Platelet serology: antibodies against GpIb/IX and GpIIb/IIIa were reported in the case. This can support immune thrombocytopenia in a difficult case but is not a primary or definitive diagnostic test; CLL-related marrow failure, drugs, infection and other causes still require clinical/marrow correlation. [18]
  • PET-CT: generalized LN and hepatosplenomegaly with low-level FDG uptake in this case. Uptake intensity can help target biopsy but cannot by itself classify a lymphoma as indolent or exclude transformation.

High Yield: CLL Immunophenotype

CD5+, CD19+, CD23+, CD20 dim, surface Ig dim, CD79b dim. This is the classic CLL phenotype and distinguishes CLL from mantle cell lymphoma (which is CD5+ but CD23- and has bright CD20/surface Ig). Know this for EMQs.

Staging and Management [1]:

  • The slide labels this Binet stage C because the platelet count is < 100 × 10⁹/L. Important nuance: Rai/Binet staging does not distinguish immune cytopenia from marrow-failure cytopenia, so document the mechanism rather than assuming all thrombocytopenia reflects tumour burden. [19]
  • Adverse risk due to TP53 loss → del(17p) and/or a pathogenic TP53 mutation predicts poor response to chemoimmunotherapy; both FISH and TP53 sequencing should be checked before each treatment line. [19]
  • The historical case used ibrutinib and, after progression, obinutuzumab + venetoclax, achieving CR.

Current CLL treatment frame

Do not treat based on Binet stage, lymphocyte count, or del(17p) alone. Start therapy only for iwCLL-defined active disease (progressive marrow failure, massive/progressive/symptomatic nodes or spleen, rapid lymphocyte progression, steroid-refractory autoimmune cytopenia, symptomatic extranodal disease, or disease-related constitutional symptoms). Modern first-line choices are targeted: fixed-duration venetoclax–obinutuzumab or a second-generation covalent BTK inhibitor such as acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib (with regimen choice guided by TP53 status, comorbidity, interactions and patient preference). Chemoimmunotherapy is generally avoided in TP53-aberrant disease. Sequencing after resistance depends on the prior drug class and mechanism. [19][20]

Why TP53 matters: TP53 is the "guardian of the genome." When cells are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, DNA damage occurs, and TP53 is needed to trigger apoptosis. If TP53 is deleted/mutated, the leukaemia cells cannot undergo p53-mediated apoptosis → chemoresistance. This is why targeted agents (BTK inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors) that bypass the p53 pathway are needed.

CLL Key Facts from Lecture [1]:

  • Most prevalent lymphoid malignancy in North America and Europe; less common in Asians
  • Median age 72 years; M:F = 2:1
  • Usually diagnosed incidentally (asymptomatic lymphocytosis or LAD/splenomegaly)
  • Only ~20% have symptomatic disease at diagnosis
  • Staging: Binet staging / Rai Staging
  • May transform to aggressive large cell lymphoma = Richter transformation [5][6]

M/63, weight loss, rapidly enlarging bilateral cervical LN for 1 month. LN 3-5 cm, firm, non-tender. CBC/LRFT/electrolytes normal. LDH and urate grossly elevated. [1]

Why LDH and urate are elevated: High LDH reflects high cell turnover and tissue destruction by rapidly proliferating tumour cells. High urate reflects high purine catabolism from rapid cell turnover. Both are markers of aggressive lymphoma and risk factors for tumour lysis syndrome (TLS).

Diagnostic Investigation — Histology [1]:

  1. Effaced nodal architecture
  2. Sheets of large abnormal lymphoid cells
  3. IHC: CD19+, CD20+, CD79a+, PAX5+. T-cell and NK cell markers negative.
  4. Consistent with DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA

What the histology image shows: the normal follicular architecture has disappeared and is replaced by a diffuse sheet of discohesive large lymphoid cells with vesicular chromatin and conspicuous nucleoli. This is the architectural and cytological meaning of “diffuse large B-cell”; the B-lineage IHC panel then establishes lineage, while MYC/BCL2/BCL6 testing and the full clinicopathological context refine classification and risk.

Simple cytological assessment (e.g. fine-needle aspirations) are NOT acceptable [1]

Critical Exam Point: FNA Alone Is Insufficient

An adequate biopsy of the representative site is essential for histologic, immunohistochemical and genetic assessment. Excisional biopsy is preferred when feasible. Multiple large cores are an accepted alternative when excision is impractical or unsafe; if a core is nondiagnostic and suspicion remains, proceed to excision. FNA alone lacks architecture and is insufficient for an initial lymphoma diagnosis. [21]

Staging and Pre-treatment Workup [1]:

  • PET-CT: hypermetabolic LN in bilateral cervical, thoracic, and intraabdominal regions
  • BM biopsy: not involved
  • Ann-Arbor Stage IIIB (both sides of diaphragm, B symptoms = weight loss)
  • ECG + Echo: normal (pre-treatment cardiology baseline for anthracycline)
  • HBsAg positive → risk of HBV reactivation with rituximab-containing immunosuppression
  • HBV DNA undetectable
  • G6PD normal (for co-trimoxazole prophylaxis)

Treatment [1]:

  • Entecavir prophylaxis started (antiviral to prevent HBV reactivation)
  • R-CHOP: Rituximab + Cyclophosphamide + Doxorubicin (Hydroxyl-daunorubicin) + Vincristine (Oncovin) + Prednisolone
  • Achieved CR after 3 cycles, completed 6 cycles, remained in CR

Current staging and treatment caveats: PET-CT is the standard baseline/response modality for FDG-avid DLBCL. Routine marrow biopsy is usually unnecessary when PET-CT has been performed, unless a discordant indolent lymphoma or another marrow disorder is suspected and the result would change management. [22][23] First-line therapy remains curative: R-CHOP is appropriate for many patients, while polatuzumab-R-CHP is an evidence-based alternative for selected intermediate/high-risk advanced LBCL. Primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months is commonly taken directly to second-line CAR-T when eligible; later chemosensitive relapse may still proceed through salvage therapy to autologous transplant. [23]

For HBV, screen HBsAg, total anti-HBc and anti-HBs before systemic anticancer therapy. HBsAg-positive patients and patients with past HBV receiving anti-CD20 therapy need antiviral prophylaxis (entecavir or tenofovir are high-barrier options) started before/at therapy and continued for at least 12 months after anti-CD20 treatment, with HBV DNA/ALT monitoring; local hepatology guidance may extend this interval. [24]

DrugMechanismKey Side Effects
Rituximab (R)Anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody → ADCC (via FcγRIIIa on effector cells), complement-mediated lysis (C1q binding → MAC formation), direct effects (antiproliferative signalling, apoptosis, cell-growth inhibition)Infusion reactions, HBV reactivation, hypogammaglobulinaemia, PML (rare)
Cyclophosphamide (C)Alkylating agent → cross-links DNA → prevents replicationMyelosuppression, nausea, infertility; haemorrhagic cystitis is dose-related (mesna is used with higher-dose urotoxic regimens, not routinely with standard R-CHOP dosing)
Doxorubicin / Hydroxydaunorubicin (H)Topoisomerase II inhibitor + DNA intercalation → DNA strand breaksCardiotoxicity (cumulative, dose-dependent → dilated cardiomyopathy), myelosuppression, alopecia
Vincristine / Oncovin (O)Vinca alkaloid → binds tubulin → inhibits microtubule assembly → mitotic arrestPeripheral neuropathy (dose-limiting), constipation/ileus, jaw pain
Prednisolone (P)Glucocorticoid → lympholytic, anti-inflammatoryHyperglycaemia, immunosuppression, osteoporosis, mood changes, gastric ulceration

DLBCL Key Facts from Lecture [1]:

  • 30% of all NHLs
  • Subclassification: GCB vs ABC molecular subtype
  • Nodal > extranodal presentation; BM involvement < 10%
  • ~2/3 of patients are cured
  • Prognostic factors: IPI (clinical), MYC rearrangement (genetic)
  • The slide-era sequence was auto-HSCT for chemosensitive relapse; CAR-T for R/R CD19+ DLBCL. Current sequencing moves CAR-T into second line for eligible primary-refractory or ≤12-month relapsed disease. [23]

F/35, dry cough 2 months, fever, night sweats, weight loss 10 kg over 2 months. Non-smoker, good past health. 3 cm left supraclavicular fossa LN, rubbery, non-tender. No hepatosplenomegaly. [1]

What the imaging shows: the frontal CXR has marked right paratracheal/anterior mediastinal widening with relatively clear lung fields. CT then demonstrates a bulky anterior mediastinal soft-tissue mass encasing or closely abutting the great vessels; this explains the cough and signals the need to assess airway, vascular and SVC compromise before sedation or biopsy. The lecture lists the differential diagnoses of a mediastinal mass:

1. LN — lymphoma / metastatic LN; 2. Thymoma; 3. Germ cell tumour; 4. Others — retrosternal goitre, dilated aortic arch, neurofibroma [1]

Anterior Mediastinal Mass: The 4 T's

A useful mnemonic (not from the lecture but widely taught): Thymoma, Teratoma/germ cell tumour, Terrible lymphoma, Thyroid (retrosternal). The lecture's list aligns with this.

Diagnostic Investigation — Histology [1]:

  1. Distorted nodal architecture with thick fibrotic bands
  2. Typical multinucleated Reed-Sternberg cells
  3. Prominent infiltration by inflammatory cells (reactive lymphocytes, eosinophils, plasma cells)
  4. CD20 negative, CD15+, CD30+, T- and NK-cell markers negative

What the histology image shows: broad collagen bands divide the node into nodules. Scattered lacunar/Hodgkin–Reed–Sternberg-type cells sit within a mixed reactive background rich in small lymphocytes, eosinophils and plasma cells. The malignant cells are the minority; the fibrous architecture plus the phenotype supports nodular-sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Dx = Nodular Sclerosis Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage IIB [1]

Why fibrotic bands + RS cells + mixed inflammatory infiltrate = NS cHL: The RS cells are the malignant cells but comprise < 1% of the tumour mass. The bulk is reactive inflammatory cells. In NS subtype, collagen bands divide the tumour into nodules. RS cells secrete cytokines that recruit eosinophils, T cells, and plasma cells. This is why the biopsy looks "busy" with mixed inflammatory cells.

Pre-treatment workup [1]:

  • CBC showed eosinophilia (common in cHL due to IL-5 secretion by RS cells)
  • LDH and urate elevated
  • Baseline ECG, echocardiogram (for anthracycline = doxorubicin/adriamycin)
  • Lung function studies (for bleomycin → pulmonary fibrosis risk)
  • HBsAg negative, anti-HBs positive, anti-HBc negative → vaccinated/immune, no reactivation risk
  • Oocyte preservation before starting chemotherapy (fertility preservation in young woman)

Treatment in the lecture case: ABVD [1]

Do not generalise the case's four-cycle schedule

Stage IIB is heterogeneous: bulk, mediastinal anatomy and other risk features determine whether it follows an early-unfavourable or advanced-stage pathway. Modern treatment is PET-adapted and protocol-specific. ABVD remains an important backbone; after a negative interim PET, bleomycin is often omitted to reduce pulmonary toxicity. Depending on stage, risk, region and access, involved-site radiotherapy, brentuximab-AVD or nivolumab-AVD may be considered. The exact number of cycles in this one case is not a universal rule. [25][26]

DrugMechanismKey Side Effects
Adriamycin (Doxorubicin) (A)Topoisomerase II inhibitor, DNA intercalationCardiotoxicity (cumulative), myelosuppression, alopecia
Bleomycin (B)Generates free radicals → DNA strand breaks (greatest activity in G2/M)Pneumonitis/pulmonary fibrosis (potentially severe and sometimes irreversible), skin hyperpigmentation, Raynaud phenomenon
Vinblastine (V)Vinca alkaloid → inhibits microtubule polymerization → mitotic arrestPeripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression, constipation
Dacarbazine (D)Alkylating agent → methylates DNANausea/vomiting, myelosuppression, flu-like syndrome

Supportive measures [1]:

  • Adequate hydration + febuxostat (xanthine oxidase inhibitor) was used in this high-burden case for TLS prophylaxis; contemporary prophylaxis is risk-adapted (hydration plus allopurinol or rasburicase according to risk, renal function and urate)
  • Regular CBC and LRFT monitoring
  • Interim PET-CT after 2 cycles → CR achieved
  • End-of-treatment PET-CT after 4 cycles → continued remission

Relapse and Salvage [1]:

  • Relapsed 8 months after remission
  • Brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30 mAb linked to MMAE via a protease-cleavable linker) — an antibody-drug conjugate (immunoconjugate). CD30 is expressed on RS cells. Upon binding CD30 and internalisation, the linker is cleaved intracellularly, releasing MMAE (monomethyl auristatin E), a microtubule-disrupting agent that causes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Additional mechanisms include a bystander effect on adjacent tumour cells, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis by macrophages, and immunogenic cell death via endoplasmic reticulum stress. [1]
  • Failed after 3 cycles
  • Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor) as salvage → achieved CR after 4 cycles

The slide records an individual historical sequence, not a universal salvage algorithm. Relapsed/refractory cHL is now planned around timing of relapse, transplant fitness and prior exposure; salvage therapy is usually used to achieve metabolic response before autologous transplant in eligible patients, while PD-1 blockade and brentuximab-containing strategies may be used before or after transplant. [25][26]

Why checkpoint inhibitors work in cHL: RS cells characteristically overexpress PD-L1 (through amplification of 9p24.1 which encodes PD-L1 and PD-L2). This allows RS cells to "hide" from T cells by engaging PD-1 on T cells and sending an inhibitory signal. Anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) blocks this interaction, unleashing the T-cell anti-tumour response.


Lymphoma Classification

"Don't attempt to recite the WHO classification — it is beyond your scope!" [1]

This is the lecturer telling you: focus on the practical classification.

Lymphoma = neoplasm of the lymphoid system (lymphoid organs/cells of B-, T- or NK- origin). In general, lymphoma usually refers to mature lymphoid neoplasm. The accurate diagnosis of lymphoma requires integration of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. [1]

Practical Classification [1]

This slide maps lymphoma subtypes to their cell of origin in B-cell development:

Developmental StageNeoplasms
Precursor B-cell (bone marrow)B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma
Pre-germinal centreMantle cell lymphoma; CLL/SLL (some)
Germinal centreFollicular lymphoma; Burkitt lymphoma; DLBCL (some); Hodgkin lymphoma
Post-germinal centreMarginal zone / MALT lymphomas; Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; CLL/SLL (some); Plasma cell myeloma

How to read the B-cell maturation diagram: progenitors mature in marrow, naïve B cells populate the follicular mantle, antigen drives a germinal-centre reaction (centroblast → centrocyte with somatic hypermutation/class switching), and selected cells leave as memory B cells or plasma cells. The neoplasms line up with these compartments: lymphoblastic disease before maturation; mantle cell/part of CLL before the germinal centre; follicular, Burkitt and some DLBCL in the germinal centre; and marginal-zone, lymphoplasmacytic and plasma-cell neoplasms after it. This is a conceptual cell-of-origin map, not proof that each entity has a single linear origin.

How to read the T/NK diagram: T-cell progenitors migrate from marrow to thymus, pass through a CD4+/CD8+ stage, then leave as naïve CD4 or CD8 cells that become effector/memory cells after antigen exposure. NK cells arise outside that thymic αβ T-cell route. Thus T-lymphoblastic lymphoma maps to precursor thymocytes, while most T/NK lymphomas map to mature peripheral compartments.

Current taxonomy is the integrated WHO-HAEM5 framework: morphology, immunophenotype, genetics, clinical setting and anatomic site all contribute to the final entity. The slide's high-grade/low-grade tree is useful for behaviour, but it is deliberately not a substitute for formal WHO classification. [27]

Major CategorySubdivisionsExamples
B-cell lymphomas & B-LPDsHigh-gradeDLBCL, Burkitt lymphoma, Mantle cell lymphoma
Low-gradeFollicular lymphoma, MZL, CLL/SLL, (MCL also can behave indolently), Waldenström macroglobulinaemia
T-cell lymphomasPeripheral T-cell lymphomas
NK/T-cell lymphomasExtranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (nasal type)
Hodgkin lymphomaClassical HL (95%)NS, MC, LR, LD subtypes
NLPHL (very rare)"Popcorn cells", CD20+

FeatureHodgkin LymphomaNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Proportion~10% of lymphomas~90% of lymphomas
AgeBimodal: peaks at 20s and 70sVaries by subtype
Hallmark cellReed-Sternberg (RS) cellVaries (e.g., large B cells in DLBCL)
Immunophenotype (classical)Usually CD30+, often CD15+; PAX5 weak; CD20 usually absent/weak but can be positiveVaries (e.g., CD20+ in many mature B-cell lymphomas)
Spread patternOften orderly/contiguous, especially earlyMore often non-contiguous; pattern varies by entity
Extranodal diseaseUncommonCommon
B symptomsCommon (especially advanced)Variable
PrognosisGenerally good; majority curedDepends on subtype
EBV associationPresent in a subset (especially mixed-cellularity and in some epidemiological settings)Defining or associated in selected entities (e.g. extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, some BL/DLBCL)

[1][7]


Viral infections: EBV, HTLV-1, HHV-8, HCV Bacterial infection: Helicobacter pylori, Chlamydia psittaci Impaired/altered immunity: Congenital immunodeficiency; Acquired immunodeficiency — HIV, organ/stem cell transplantation, aging, chronic immunosuppressive drugs; Autoimmune — RA, SLE, Sjögren syndrome, celiac disease

Agent / ConditionAssociated Lymphoma
EBVHL, BL (endemic), NK/T-cell lymphoma, PTLD
HTLV-1Adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma
HHV-8Primary effusion lymphoma, multicentric Castleman disease
HCVSplenic MZL, nodal MZL
H. pyloriGastric MALT lymphoma
Chlamydia psittaciOcular adnexal MALT lymphoma
Sjögren syndromePulmonary/parotid MALT lymphoma
Hashimoto thyroiditisThyroid MALT lymphoma
HIV/transplant immunosuppressionDLBCL, BL, PTLD

[1]


1. Accurate history taking and physical examination 2. Proper tissue diagnosis 3. An adequate biopsy of the representative site is essential for histologic, immunohistochemical and genetic assessment 4. Simple cytological assessment (e.g. fine-needle aspirations) are NOT acceptable


Investigations in Lymphoma

  1. Accurate diagnosis
  2. Staging
  3. Detect complications of lymphoma
  4. Determine prognosis
  5. Determine suitability or fitness for treatment
  6. Detecting complications of treatment
  7. Assessing response to treatment

InvestigationPurpose
CBCDetect cytopenias (marrow infiltration, autoimmune), lymphocytosis (CLL)
Liver and renal function testsBaseline organ function; detect infiltration
Serum electrolytes (Na, K, Ca, PO4)Baseline; detect TLS, hypercalcaemia
LDH and uratePrognostic markers; TLS risk assessment
CXRMediastinal mass, pulmonary disease, prior infections
ESRPrognostic marker for early-stage cHL
SPE (Serum protein electrophoresis)Detect paraprotein (WM, myeloma)
β2-microglobulinPrognostic marker for follicular lymphoma
BM aspiration + trephine biopsySelective: suspected discordant/indolent lymphoma, unexplained cytopenia or another marrow disorder; not routine for PET-staged HL and most DLBCL [22][23]
PET-CTBaseline staging and Deauville metabolic response assessment for FDG-avid lymphomas; CT/MRI and pathology remain important where FDG avidity or site demands it [22]

InvestigationWhy
ECG + EchocardiogramRisk of cardiotoxicity with anthracyclines (doxorubicin)
Lung function studiesRisk of pulmonary fibrosis with bleomycin
HBsAg, total anti-HBc, anti-HBs; HCV testingIdentify active/past viral hepatitis and reactivation risk (especially anti-CD20 therapy) [24]
HIV serologyLymphomas may be presenting feature of HIV/AIDS
G6PD assay when indicatedCheck before planned oxidant drugs according to regimen/local protocol; G6PD deficiency changes prophylaxis choices

Why might G6PD be checked?

Some regimens require Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis or other drugs with oxidative potential. If the planned agent and local protocol make G6PD status relevant, testing helps select a safer option. It is not a universal diagnostic test for lymphoma and prophylaxis is regimen- and risk-specific.


The staging graphic is spatial: stage I marks one nodal region; stage II adds regions but keeps them on one side of the diaphragm; stage III crosses the diaphragm; stage IV shades extranodal organs diffusely. Modern practice uses the Lugano modification with PET-CT for FDG-avid lymphoma. Stage is an anatomic description, not a universal measure of curability—advanced indolent lymphoma and advanced aggressive lymphoma behave very differently. [22]

StageDefinition
ISingle lymph node region, or single extralymphatic site (I_E)
IITwo or more lymph node regions on the same side of the diaphragm; may include localised extralymphatic involvement
IIILymph node regions on both sides of the diaphragm; may include spleen (III_S)
IVDiffuse involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs (e.g., bone marrow, liver, lung, skin)

Suffixes:

  • A = No systemic symptoms
  • B = Presence of B symptoms: Fever > 38°C, Drenching night sweats, Unexplained weight loss > 10% body weight in 6 months

The A/B suffix remains central in Hodgkin lymphoma; Lugano does not require routine A/B designation for NHL. Metabolic response is reported with the five-point Deauville scale rather than simply “CR by size.” [22]


Principles of Management of Lymphomas [1]

Multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy +/- monoclonal antibodies (e.g. anti-CD20 in CD20+ B-cell lymphomas) Targeted therapy (BTK or BCL-2 inhibitors) (e.g. in CLL) Multiple cycles of chemotherapy with interim and end-of-treatment assessment by imaging +/- biomarkers The use of immuno-conjugates, checkpoint inhibitors, bi-specific antibodies for certain subtypes of lymphoma Supportive care with the prevention of tumour lysis syndrome and management of disease/treatment complications HSCT (autologous HSCT, in general) is reserved for selected relapsed patients who are chemo-sensitive CAR-T cell therapy for specific subtypes of B lymphomas (e.g. R/R DLBCL)

ModalityMechanismExample/Indication
Chemo + mAbCytotoxic + targeted killing of CD20+ cellsR-CHOP for DLBCL; ABVD for cHL
BTK inhibitorBlocks B-cell receptor signalling → prevents proliferation/survivalIbrutinib for CLL
BCL-2 inhibitorDirectly induces apoptosis by releasing pro-apoptotic proteins from BCL-2Venetoclax for CLL
ImmunoconjugatemAb delivers cytotoxic payload directly to tumour cellBrentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30-MMAE) for cHL
Checkpoint inhibitorBlocks PD-1/PD-L1 interaction → restores T-cell anti-tumour activityPembrolizumab for R/R cHL
Auto-HSCTHigh-dose chemo → ablate marrow → rescue with own stem cellsChemosensitive relapsed lymphoma
CAR-T cell therapyPatient's T cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD19 → direct tumour killingR/R CD19+ DLBCL

  • Anti-CD20 (slide 41): the antibody Fab binds CD20 while its Fc recruits immune killing. The diagram separates complement-dependent cytotoxicity (C1q → membrane attack complex), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity/phagocytosis through Fc receptors, and direct pro-apoptotic signalling. Different anti-CD20 antibodies bind different CD20 epitopes and are not interchangeable merely because the target is shared.
  • Brentuximab vedotin (slide 42): anti-CD30 targeting causes internalisation; lysosomal cleavage releases MMAE, which disrupts microtubules and causes mitotic arrest/apoptosis. Free payload can contribute a local bystander effect. This is targeted delivery, not an immune checkpoint drug.
  • Checkpoint maps (slides 43–44): antigen recognition through TCR–MHC is surrounded by activating and inhibitory receptors. PD-L1/PD-L2 engagement of PD-1 applies an inhibitory brake; anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 blocks that brake and restores antitumour T-cell function. It does not bind the tumour antigen in the way rituximab or brentuximab does.
  • CAR-T (slides 45–47): an antibody-derived scFv binds a surface antigen without MHC presentation; a hinge/transmembrane region anchors the receptor; CD28 or 4-1BB provides co-stimulation; CD3ζ supplies the activation signal. The manufacturing loop is leukapheresis → T-cell selection/engineering → ex-vivo expansion and release testing → lymphodepleting chemotherapy → infusion and toxicity monitoring. The slide's simplified loop omits manufacturing time, bridging therapy and the risks of CRS, ICANS, infection and prolonged cytopenia.

Adoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a CAR. CAR is a recombinant receptor construct consisting of: (1) extracellular single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of an antibody recognizing a tumor-associated cell surface antigen; (2) a spacer or hinge plus transmembrane region; and (3) intracellular co-stimulatory (CD28 or 4-1BB) and CD3ζ signalling domains. [1]

The CAR structure also includes a costimulatory signalling domain (CD28 or 4-1BB) between the hinge and the CD3ζ chain, which enhances T-cell activation and persistence. [1]

CAR-T manufacturing process [1]:

  1. Patient's blood cells are collected and T cells are isolated
  2. T cells are genetically modified to express the CAR
  3. CAR-T cells are expanded ex vivo
  4. CAR-T cells are infused back into the patient for treatment

The key side effects to know: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) — massive cytokine release causing fever, hypotension, hypoxia, multi-organ dysfunction. Neurotoxicity (ICANS) — confusion, seizures, cerebral oedema.


Important Lymphoma Subtypes (Detailed)

  • 10% of all lymphoma cases
  • Bimodal age distribution: peak in early 20s and mid-70s
  • Slight male predominance
  • Usually presents with painless lymphadenopathy involving neck and chest
  • B symptoms in advanced disease
  • Majority cured with combination chemotherapy ± radiation
  • Classical cHL (95%): CD15+, CD30+; subtypes: NS (70%, equal M/F, age 15-35, mediastinal), MC, LR, LD
  • NLPHL (5%): "popcorn cells", CD20+, very rare

  • 30% of all NHLs; composed of large B cells with diffuse growth pattern
  • Subclassification: molecular (GCB/ABC), pathologic, defined entities (primary CNS DLBCL, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma)
  • Nodal > extranodal; BM involvement < 10%
  • A substantial majority can be cured; R-CHOP remains a standard backbone, with pola-R-CHP used for selected patients [23]
  • Relapse sequence is timing-dependent: CAR-T in eligible primary-refractory/early-relapse disease; salvage plus auto-HSCT remains important for later chemosensitive relapse [23]

  • One of the fastest-growing human malignancies; very short doubling time
  • Deregulated high-level expression of cMYC from reciprocal translocation: t(8;14), t(2;8), or t(8;22)
  • Bulky abdominal mass, B symptoms and extranodal disease are important presentations; marrow/CNS involvement varies by epidemiological subtype and disease burden
  • Urgent treatment required; prevention of TLS; Rituximab + multi-agent chemo; cure > 80%

  • Prototypical and most common indolent lymphoma
  • Most patients diagnosed at advanced stage
  • The slide's “anti-CD20 + purine analogue/alkylator” line is only one historical treatment frame. Localised disease may be treated with involved-site radiotherapy; asymptomatic low-tumour-burden advanced disease may be observed; symptomatic/high-burden disease uses an anti-CD20-based regimen selected for age, fitness and goals. Not every patient needs immediate systemic therapy.
  • Associated translocation: t(14;18) → overexpression of BCL-2 → anti-apoptotic [7]

  • 3 subtypes: extranodal MZL of MALT type, nodal MZL, splenic MZL
  • Associated with chronic antigenic stimulation:
    • Gastric MALT → H. pylori
    • Cutaneous MALT → B. burgdorferi
    • Ocular adnexal MALT → C. psittaci
    • Nodal/splenic MZL → HCV
    • Pulmonary/parotid MALT → Sjögren syndrome
    • Thyroid MALT → Hashimoto thyroiditis

These are epidemiological associations, not one-to-one diagnostic rules; C. psittaci prevalence in ocular adnexal MALT varies markedly by geography. In gastric MALT lymphoma, test for and eradicate H. pylori because antimicrobial therapy can induce lymphoma regression in appropriate disease.

  • Indolent B-cell neoplasm; IgM monoclonal gammopathy in blood + clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells in BM
  • Symptoms: hyperviscosity (headache, visual changes, mucosal bleeding), cryoglobulinaemia, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia
  • BM/tissue infiltration → anaemia, hepatosplenomegaly, LAD
  • Autoimmune phenomena: polyneuropathy

  • 6% of all NHLs; median age mid-60s; striking male predominance
  • Advanced-stage at presentation; extranodal involvement common (BM, PB)
  • Peculiar tendency to invade the GI tract — "lymphomatous polyposis" of the large bowel
  • Associated translocation: t(11;14) → overexpression of cyclin D1 [7]

  • Geographical predilection for Asian and South American populations

  • Commonly locally invasive, destroying nasal and midline facial structures

  • Other non-nasal sites: skin, GI tract, CNS, testes

  • Primary nodal presentation is rare

  • EBV-driven lymphoma

  • What the clinical images show: prominent unilateral periorbital swelling/erythema and a deeply ulceronecrotic palatal–nasal lesion. Together they demonstrate the characteristic angio-destructive midline phenotype; they are not pictures of simple “generalized lymphadenopathy.” [1]

  • The slide lists SMILE components (dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase and etoposide; cisplatin belongs to other schedules). Current therapy is stage- and fitness-specific and should be specialist-led: localized disease requires involved-site radiotherapy combined with an anthracycline-free L-asparaginase-containing regimen; advanced/extranasal disease uses multi-agent asparaginase-based systemic therapy. Plasma EBV DNA is followed as a response biomarker. [28]

  • Aggressive NK-cell leukaemia/lymphoma: fever, rash, hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia, haemophagocytosis


Clinical Approach to Generalized Lymphadenopathy

  • LN characteristics: Duration, rate of growth (rapid = aggressive malignancy; waxing-waning = low-grade lymphoma), pain/tenderness
  • Constitutional/B symptoms: Fever, night sweats, weight loss > 10% in 6 months
  • Localizing symptoms: Sore throat, cough, rash, pruritus, alcohol-induced pain (cHL)
  • Exposure: Travel/hiking (scrub typhus, TB), cats (toxoplasmosis), raw meat (toxoplasmosis), insect bites, sexual history (HIV, syphilis), IVDU (HIV)
  • Medications: Phenytoin, hydralazine
  • Past medical history: Autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency, prior malignancy, transplant

What to ExamineWhy
LN characteristics: site, size and trend (thresholds are site- and context-dependent), consistency, fixation/matting and tendernessNo single texture or size diagnoses malignancy; supraclavicular location, persistence/progression, systemic symptoms and firm/fixed nodes increase concern
Drainage basin: oral cavity, oropharynx, thyroid, skinIdentify primary source
HepatosplenomegalySuggests systemic disease (haem malignancy, infection)
Tonsils (part of lymphoid system)Tonsillar enlargement in IM, lymphoma
Skin: rashes, eschars, petechiaeViral exanthems, scrub typhus, ITP
Signs of SVCO: facial/upper limb swelling, dilated chest wall veinsMediastinal mass compressing SVC

  1. Blood: CBC with differential, peripheral blood film, LFT, RFT, electrolytes, LDH, urate, ESR, β2-microglobulin, SPE
  2. Microbiology selected by exposure/syndrome: EBV, CMV, fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab (with HIV RNA when acute infection is suspected), TB testing/cultures, toxoplasma or rickettsial PCR/paired serology as appropriate. Avoid indiscriminate historical panels such as routine Widal testing.
  3. Imaging: CXR or targeted ultrasound/CT initially; PET-CT after lymphoma is suspected/confirmed for staging FDG-avid disease and selecting a representative biopsy target
  4. Tissue diagnosis: Excisional biopsy preferred; multiple adequate cores if excision is impractical. FNA alone is insufficient for initial classification. [21]
  5. BM aspiration + trephine: selective rather than automatic in PET-staged HL/DLBCL [22][23]
  6. Pre-treatment: regimen-specific cardiopulmonary assessment, pregnancy/fertility discussion, three-test HBV screen, HCV/HIV testing, and other safety tests such as G6PD when relevant

These are important differentials that often appear in EMQs and minicases [4][8]:

ConditionKey Features
Kikuchi diseaseYoung Asian women; fever + cervical LAD; neutropenia; self-limiting (1-4 months); histology: paracortical necrosis + histiocytic infiltrate; must rule out SLE
Kimura diseaseAsian males; painless cervical LN/subcutaneous mass; eosinophilia + raised IgE; no constitutional symptoms
Castleman diseaseUnicentric (75%) vs multicentric (25%); a/w HHV-8 (multicentric), POEMS syndrome; Dx by histology
Rosai-Dorfman diseaseBenign; LAD + subcutaneous nodules
SarcoidosisBilateral hilar LAD on CXR; non-caseating granulomas; raised ACE

Exam Intelligence

TrapCorrect Reasoning
FNA is adequate for lymphoma diagnosisFALSE — excisional/core biopsy required for architecture assessment
ALL blasts = atypical lymphocytesCareful blood film assessment needed; ALL can mimic infectious mononucleosis
CD5+ lymphocyte neoplasm = always CLLMCL is also CD5+; discriminator: CLL is CD23+, dim CD20/sIg; MCL is CD23-, bright CD20/sIg, cyclin D1+
All lymphomas need urgent treatmentIndolent lymphomas (FL, CLL early stage) may be observed ("watch and wait"); Burkitt lymphoma needs urgent treatment
HBsAg+ patient can proceed directly to rituximabMust start antiviral prophylaxis (e.g., entecavir) first to prevent HBV reactivation
PET-CT is used for all lymphomas equallyPET-CT is central for FDG-avid lymphomas (DLBCL, HL); avidity and the best imaging strategy vary by entity. SUV alone cannot label a node “indolent” or “aggressive.”
Hodgkin lymphoma always spreads contiguouslyHL often spreads in an orderly contiguous pattern, especially early, but this is a teaching tendency rather than an inviolable diagnostic rule

FeaturePoints to HLPoints to NHL
Contiguous nodal spread✓×
Extranodal diseaseRareCommon
RS cells with "owl eye" nuclei✓×
CD30 strong, CD15 often positive, PAX5 weakTypical cHL pattern (CD20 may be absent, weak or occasionally positive)Not interpreted without morphology/context
CD20+NLPHL or NHL×
Mediastinal mass in young adultNS cHLPrimary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (also possible)
"Lymphomatous polyposis" of colon×MCL
Nasal/midline facial destruction×NK/T-cell lymphoma
  • GC 060 (High WCC): CLL often presents with incidental lymphocytosis + LAD; may undergo Richter transformation to DLBCL [5]
  • GC 086 (Splenomegaly): Lymphomas and CLL are common causes of splenomegaly. Massive splenomegaly is more typical of myeloproliferative neoplasms, but moderate splenomegaly is common in CLL, HL, and NHL.
  • GC 061 (HIV): HIV causes persistent generalized lymphadenopathy (PGL) in chronic infection. HIV-associated lymphomas (DLBCL, BL, primary effusion lymphoma) are AIDS-defining illnesses. [13]
  • GC 218 (Neck mass): Lymphadenopathy is a key differential for neck mass. Persistence/progression, supraclavicular location, firm fixation, systemic symptoms and aerodigestive red flags should prompt expedited investigation; no single 1-cm/2-week rule is diagnostic. [14]
  • Block A – Allergology: DRESS syndrome can cause generalized LAD with fever, liver/kidney injury, eosinophilia/atypical lymphocytes. Onset can be delayed (weeks to months). [15]

High Yield Summary

  1. Differential diagnosis of generalized LAD: Neoplastic (leukaemias, lymphomas), Infective (EBV, CMV, HIV, TB, dimorphic fungi, parasites), Autoimmune (SLE, RA), Drugs (phenytoin, DRESS)
  2. Atypical lymphocytosis DDx: Viral (EBV, CMV, HIV, hepatitis), bacterial (Mycoplasma, Legionella, Salmonella, Rickettsia), mycobacterial, fungal (Talaromyces), parasitic (Toxoplasma), drugs — and ALL can mimic this if blood film not carefully assessed
  3. Lymphoma diagnosis requires architecture — excision is preferred; adequate cores are acceptable when excision is impractical; FNA alone is insufficient
  4. CLL immunophenotype: CD5+, CD19+, CD23+, dim CD20/sIg; smudge cells support but do not diagnose CLL
  5. Hodgkin lymphoma: cHL usually CD30+, often CD15+, with weak PAX5 and variable/usually absent CD20; nodular sclerosis commonly presents with a mediastinal mass. Treatment is stage/risk- and PET-adapted, not “ABVD for everyone”
  6. DLBCL/LBCL: curative first-line therapy includes R-CHOP or selected pola-R-CHP; second-line CAR-T is now standard for many eligible primary-refractory/early-relapse cases
  7. Burkitt lymphoma: among the fastest-growing malignancies; IG::MYC rearrangement (usually t(8;14)); abdominal/extranodal presentations; urgent specialist treatment and TLS prevention
  8. Pre-treatment checklist is regimen-specific: cardiac assessment for anthracyclines, pulmonary assessment if bleomycin is planned, fertility/pregnancy discussion, three-test HBV screen, HCV/HIV testing, and G6PD when the intended drug makes it relevant
  9. HBV reactivation prevention: HBsAg+ patients—and anti-HBc+ patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy—need a prophylaxis/monitoring plan before treatment; continue a high-barrier antiviral for at least 12 months after anti-CD20 therapy
  10. Ann Arbor staging: I (single region), II (≥2 same side of diaphragm), III (both sides), IV (disseminated extralymphatic); suffix B = fever/night sweats/weight loss > 10%
  11. NK/T-cell lymphoma: Asian predilection; nasal/midline destructive; EBV-driven; treatment includes L-asparaginase
  12. Novel/targeted therapies: second-generation BTK inhibitors or fixed-duration venetoclax-based therapy in CLL; PD-1 or brentuximab-based therapy in cHL; CAR-T and bispecific antibodies in selected relapsed LBCL

Active Recall - Lecture Notes


[1] Lecture slides: GC 055. Generalized lympadenopathy.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Generalised Lymphadenopathy_ Differential diagnosis and principle of management.pdf [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p. 395-396) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (p. 87-88) [5] Lecture slides: GC 060. High white cell count.pdf (p. 33) [6] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count_ acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf (p. 24) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p. 178) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p. 203) [13] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p. 1064) [14] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p. 203) [15] Senior notes: Block A - Fundamentals of Allergology.pdf (p. 15) [16] CDC. Clinical Overview of Scrub Typhus. Updated 2024. [17] Susman D, et al. Lymphocytosis with Smudge Cells Is Not Equivalent to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Case Rep Oncol. 2021. [18] Provan D, et al. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Advances. 2019. [19] Hallek M, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood. 2018. [20] Lymphoma Research Foundation Workshop. Consensus recommendations from the 2024 workshop on treatment selection and sequencing in CLL/SLL. Blood Advances. 2025. [21] NICE. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: diagnosis and management — biopsy recommendations. [22] Cheson BD, et al. Lugano classification for initial evaluation, staging and response assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2014. [23] Thieblemont C, et al. Large B-cell lymphoma: EHA Clinical Practice Guidelines. HemaSphere. 2025. [24] Hwang JP, et al. Hepatitis B virus screening and management for patients with cancer prior to therapy: ASCO update. J Clin Oncol. 2020. [25] European Hematology Association. Hodgkin lymphoma: EHA Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2026. [26] National Cancer Institute. Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)—Health Professional Version. Updated 2025. [27] WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid Tumours, WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed., Volume 11. IARC, 2024. [28] d'Amore F, et al. Peripheral T- and natural killer-cell lymphomas: ESMO-EHA Clinical Practice Guideline. HemaSphere. 2025.

On this page

No Headings