CFB PSY02 Classification And Diagnosis Of Psychiatric Illness

Classification and diagnosis of psychiatric illness involves the systematic categorization of mental disorders using standardized criteria such as the ICD and DSM to guide clinical assessment, communication, and treatment planning.

Classification and Diagnosis of Psychiatric Illness

This lecture is the conceptual backbone of your entire psychiatry rotation. Before you can assess, manage, or prescribe for any psychiatric patient, you need a shared language — and that language comes from classification systems. The lecture answers two fundamental questions:

  1. Why do we classify psychiatric illness? — Because unlike most of medicine, psychiatry lacks definitive biomarkers (no troponin for depression, no HbA1c for schizophrenia). Classification imposes order on subjective human experience so clinicians can communicate, select treatments, and predict outcomes.
  2. How do we classify psychiatric illness? — Through operationalised descriptions and criteria, currently DSM-5-TR and ICD-11, that combine symptom patterns, time course, severity or impairment, context and exclusions. A diagnosis remains a clinical synthesis rather than a score produced by a checklist.

Learning Objectives (from the slide deck) [1]

  • To learn the basic principles underlying the classification of psychiatric illness
  • To learn the diagnostic criteria of common psychiatric illness


1. Why Classify? Pros and Cons of Psychiatric Classification

Classification attempts to bring some order into the great diversity of phenomena encountered in clinical practice. [1]

Think of it this way: if every clinician described depression in their own words, no two psychiatrists could agree on who has it, what to prescribe, or what outcome to expect. Classification solves this by creating shared diagnostic categories.

"To identify groups of patients who share similar clinical features, so that suitable treatment can be planned and the likely outcome predicted." [1]

"Able to develop a standardized approach in diagnosis." [1]

Additional reasons from the PSY01 introductory lecture and supporting notes [2][3]:

  • Facilitates communication between patients, professionals, and researchers
  • Enables epidemiological research (you can't study prevalence if you can't define the condition)
  • Supports training and education
  • Guides medico-legal decisions (e.g., fitness to plead, involuntary admission criteria)

Past Paper Alert – 2021 SAQ Q3b

"List reasons to classify mental disorders" was directly examined. The mark scheme expects 4 reasons. Use the lecture's exact phrasing: (1) bring order to diversity, (2) identify groups with similar features for treatment planning and prognosis, (3) standardized diagnostic approach, (4) communication between professionals/researchers. [4]

ProblemExplanationLecture Example
Labelling and stigmatizationA diagnostic label can follow a patient for life and affect employment, insurance, relationships精神病, 精神分裂, 思覺失調, 心理病 — different Chinese labels for psychosis carry different stigma
Changing labels can change interpretationA euphemism may reduce stigma yet also obscure severity if it is not clearly explainedThe slide contrasts several Chinese labels; in practice use the person's preferred, current terminology and explain the condition and risk plainly
Same term, different meanings"Depression" means different things to a psychiatrist, a GP, and a patient—
Categorization distracts from the individualFitting a patient into a box may cause you to miss their unique psychosocial context—
Patients don't fit neatlySome presentations fall between or below named thresholds → hence other specified/unspecified categoriesDo not use schizoaffective disorder as a generic label for any mixture of mood and psychotic symptoms; it has longitudinal criteria
Comorbidity and symptom overlap are commonMultiple diagnoses may coexist, while the same symptom may contribute to more than one criterion setThe bipolar comorbidity diagram links anxiety, substance-use, sleep, eating, attention and personality pathology

The 2 most commonly used classification systems in psychiatry are: DSM and ICD. [1]

FeatureDSM-5-TRICD-11
DeveloperAmerican Psychiatric Association (APA)World Health Organization (WHO)
Current edition / statusDSM-5 published 2013; current text revision DSM-5-TR (2022), with later approved updates published online [11][12]Adopted in 2019 and in effect for health reporting from 1 January 2022; WHO published the clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements (CDDR) in 2024 [13]
ScopeMental disorders onlyAll diseases (Chapter 06 = mental disorders)
UseClinical, research, educational and administrative use, especially in the USA and widely referenced elsewhereWHO's global classification for health reporting and clinical documentation; implementation and local coding timelines vary by jurisdiction
ApproachDescriptive definitions; theoretical statements avoided; aetiology included only when clearly demonstrableSimilar operationalized criteria
Historical noteClear diagnostic criteria since DSM-III (1980) — this was a watershed moment that transformed psychiatry from psychoanalytic speculation to criterion-based diagnosisICD-10 (1992) was predecessor

High Yield for MCQ

When asked "Name ONE psychiatric classification system" → DSM or ICD. For the current versions, write DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. The 2021 SAQ specifically asked for one system for 2 marks [4].

DSM-IV Multi-Axial System (Historical but Examinable) [1]

The DSM-IV used a five-axis system. DSM-5 discontinued the formal axes; this is historical material, not the current documentation format.

AxisContentWhy It Existed
Axis IClinical disorders (e.g., MDD, schizophrenia, GAD)The "main" psychiatric diagnosis
Axis IIPersonality disorders + Intellectual disabilitySeparated because these are enduring, trait-based conditions that colour the presentation of Axis I disorders
Axis IIIGeneral medical conditionsTo remind clinicians that medical illness can cause or worsen psychiatric symptoms
Axis IVPsychosocial and environmental problemsContextual factors (unemployment, bereavement, legal problems)
Axis VGlobal Assessment of Functioning (GAF)A 0–100 scale to quantify functional impairment

Why was it removed? The multi-axial system was cumbersome for coding, created artificial separation between "mental" and "medical" conditions, and the GAF scale had poor inter-rater reliability. DSM-5 uses a single-axis system where all diagnoses are listed together.


Many operational diagnostic definitions use the following elements: [1]

  1. Cluster of symptoms — divided into:
    • Core symptoms (must be present; e.g., depressed mood OR anhedonia for MDD)
    • Associated symptoms (contribute to the count; e.g., insomnia, poor concentration)
  2. Duration and course — e.g., at least 2 weeks for a major depressive episode, at least 6 months of excessive worry for adult GAD, and at least 6 months of continuous disturbance for schizophrenia
  3. Severity, distress or functional impact — applied as specified for that disorder; never assume one generic threshold fits every diagnosis
  4. Exclusions and differentials — consider substances/medications, medical or neurological illness, development, culture and another disorder that better explains the presentation

Why Duration Matters

Duration thresholds improve consistency and help distinguish syndromes from brief fluctuations, but they are not biological switches and they do not determine urgency. A bereaved person can develop a major depressive episode if the full criteria are met; DSM-5 removed DSM-IV's bereavement exclusion. Assess suicide risk, psychosis, mania, delirium and severe functional change immediately, regardless of how recently symptoms began.


4. Types of Psychiatric Symptoms

The lecture organizes all psychiatric symptoms into six categories. This is a brilliant framework for understanding what kind of "abnormality" you're looking at.

Hallucination, delusion, disorganized speech, catatonia

These examples are phenomena that require precise description before diagnostic attribution. Hallucinations and delusions may occur in primary psychotic disorders, mood disorders, delirium, neurological or other medical illness, and substance/medication-related states. Culture, sleep-wake transitions and context also matter; the presence of one phenomenon does not by itself diagnose schizophrenia.

Depressed mood, worries, checking, recall of fearful or traumatic events Symptoms are excessive, irrational, and uncontrollable

Sadness, worry, checking and trauma memories all occur outside disorder. The slide's phrase "excessive, irrational and uncontrollable" is a useful contrast but not a universal test: assess persistence, context, proportionality, control, distress, functional impact and the specific criteria. Do not tell a depressed or traumatised person that their experience is simply "irrational."

Impaired cognitive functioning — e.g., cognitive decline in dementia Impaired social functioning — e.g., deficits in social-emotional reciprocity in ASD Impaired attention — e.g., ADHD

Here the problem is not an abnormal experience per se, but a deficit in a normally developed capacity.

Impaired sleep (insomnia, hypersomnia, parasomnia, circadian rhythm disorders) Impaired sexual and gender function (erectile disorder, gender dysphoria, paraphilia) Impaired eating (eating disorders) Impaired experience of pain and other somatic symptoms Impaired elimination (enuresis)

These examples involve basic functions or embodied experience, but the slide's grouping is only a teaching scaffold. Gender dysphoria should not be described as an "impaired gender function", and a paraphilic interest is not automatically a paraphilic disorder; diagnosis depends on the relevant criteria, distress/impairment and/or harm or risk to others.

Addiction, including non-substance (e.g., gambling) Impulse-control presentations (the slide gives trichotillomania)

The person has difficulty controlling a behaviour despite adverse consequences. Taxonomy caution: DSM-5/DSM-5-TR places trichotillomania under obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, not the disruptive/impulse-control chapter. Gambling disorder is classified with substance-related and addictive disorders.

Personality disorders

These represent enduring, pervasive patterns of inner experience and behaviour that deviate markedly from cultural expectations, are inflexible, and lead to distress or impairment.


5. Validity and Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis

PropertyPractical question
ValidityDoes the category capture a clinically meaningful condition rather than merely produce a label?
ReliabilityWould different trained assessors using the same information reach a similar conclusion?
UsabilityCan clinicians apply it without an impractical interview or rule set?
Cross-setting and cross-cultural applicabilityDo the description and thresholds remain useful across services, languages and cultures without mistaking difference for disorder?
Fit for different usersDoes it support clinical care, communication, research, service planning and coding while making the purpose of each use clear? [1]

These properties can conflict: a very simple rule may be reliable but invalid, while a nuanced formulation may be more faithful to the person but harder to standardise. Reliability is necessary for a useful classification, not proof that its categories are biologically discrete.

Ideally, there should be qualitative difference in biological underpinnings between diagnoses, but limited evidence is available that different disorders have distinct genetic factors, neurophysiology, neuropathology, and neuroimaging findings.

This is a critical concept. In cardiology, an MI has a clear biological marker (troponin rise + ECG changes + wall motion abnormality). In psychiatry, we have no equivalent. The current system relies on:

  • Self-report of psychiatric symptoms — inherently subjective
  • Distress or impairment in functioning — the symptoms must matter clinically
  • Diagnostic overlap and heterogeneity remain common. Schizoaffective disorder is not simply "both symptom groups at once"; its diagnosis depends on the longitudinal relationship between mood episodes and psychosis.

Clearer criteria result in higher reliability

Examples from the lecture:

  • "Pervasive low mood" is more reliable than "low mood" (adds a qualifier)
  • "Poor sleep at least 3 times per week" is more reliable than "poor sleep" (adds a frequency threshold)

The lesson: operationalize your criteria — make them measurable and quantifiable.

SourceTypeExamples
Information variancePatient-side/contextUnder-reporting may reflect fear, stigma, mistrust, memory, limited insight or privacy; apparent over-reporting may reflect severe distress, communication/cognitive factors or an external incentive. Establish evidence rather than assuming motive
Clinician-sideInadequate interviewing skill, wrong interpretation of information, lack of informants
Diagnostic varianceClinician-sideIncorrect or inadequate use of diagnostic criteria

6. Interviewing Skill and Measuring Symptoms

Begin with open-ended questions in history taking

  • Example: "How is your sleep in the past week?" Follow with focused questions when needed
  • Example: after the narrative, clarify sleep onset, awakenings, total sleep, opportunity and daytime impact Ask patients to elaborate Focus on one symptom at a time

Why begin open? It lets the patient describe experience in their own language and reduces premature framing. Closed questions are not inherently bad: they are useful for clarifying frequency, duration, risk and specific criteria after the narrative. Avoid leading, compound and accusatory wording.

Every symptom should be characterized along these dimensions:

DimensionExample
TypeHearing voices talking among themselves about the patient = 3rd person auditory hallucination
SeverityOccurs every day
DurationFor a month
Clinical significance"It affects my concentration"
Time-frame"In the past 1 week" or "When it first started"

SCID Example from the Lecture

The Chinese SCID slide shows a branching interview, not a flat checklist: screen for a distinct period of elevated or unusually irritable mood; if the initial stem is negative, probe observable irritability or conflict; then establish context, duration, change from baseline, impact and whether admission was required. Structured wording raises reliability, but the interviewer still needs clinical judgement and collateral information.

Screening tools — not for diagnosis, only for screening

ToolScreens ForNote
PHQ-9Depressive symptomsA higher score increases concern, but no cut-off establishes MDD; item 9 requires direct suicide/self-harm assessment
MDQ (Mood Disorder Questionnaire)Bipolar disorderScreening only; many false positives
Adult Autism Spectrum QuotientASD traitsNot diagnostic

Why the distinction matters: A positive screen means the patient needs further clinical assessment. It does not establish diagnosis, cause, severity of risk or treatment need by itself. Conversely, a low total score never overrides a concerning clinical history or response to a safety item.


The lecture lists the DSM-5 chapter groups and marks several with ✓ to indicate they were covered in detail [1]. For current use, consult DSM-5-TR and its approved updates rather than assuming this 2024 slide list is immutable [11][12].

DSM-5 CategoryCovered in Detail?Key Examples from Lecture
Neurodevelopmental disorders✓ASD, ADHD
Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders✓Schizophrenia, schizoaffective, delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder
Bipolar and related disorders✓Bipolar I, II, cyclothymia
Depressive disorders✓MDD, dysthymia, PMDD
Anxiety disorders✓GAD, panic disorder, phobias
Obsessive-compulsive and related disordersOCD, body dysmorphic disorder
Trauma- and stressor-related disordersPTSD, acute stress disorder, adjustment disorder
Dissociative disordersDissociative identity disorder, dissociative amnesia
Somatic symptom and related disordersSomatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, conversion disorder
Feeding and eating disorders✓Anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder
Elimination disordersEnuresis, encopresis
Sleep-wake disorders✓Insomnia disorder, parasomnias, narcolepsy
Sexual dysfunctions, gender dysphoria and paraphilic disorders
Disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders✓IED, ODD, conduct disorder, kleptomania, pyromania
Substance-related and addiction disordersAlcohol use disorder, opioid use disorder
Neurocognitive disorders✓Major neurocognitive disorder (dementia), mild NCD
Personality disorders✓Clusters A, B, C; BPD criteria detailed

8. Detailed Diagnostic Criteria — Disorder by Disorder

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders:

DisorderDuration
Brief Psychotic DisorderAt least 1 day and < 1 month, with eventual full return to premorbid functioning
Schizophreniform Disorder1 to < 6 months; functional decline is not required
SchizophreniaContinuous disturbance for ≥ 6 months, including ≥ 1 month of active-phase symptoms unless successfully treated
Schizoaffective DisorderMood episode plus schizophrenia Criterion A, and ≥ 2 weeks of delusions or hallucinations without a major mood episode during the lifetime illness; mood episodes occupy most of the illness duration
Delusional Disorder≥ 1 delusion for ≥ 1 month; schizophrenia Criterion A has never been met; function is not markedly impaired apart from consequences of the delusion(s)
Substance/medication-induced Psychotic DisorderTemporal relationship to substance
Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical ConditionEvidence of causative medical condition
CatatoniaA syndrome of psychomotor signs specified as associated with another mental disorder, due to another medical condition, or unspecified—not simply another duration-defined psychotic disorder

Diagnostic Criteria for Schizophrenia (DSM-5/DSM-5-TR):

Criterion A — Characteristic Symptoms: 2 or more of the following, each present for a significant portion of time during a 1-month period:

  1. Delusions
  2. Hallucinations
  3. Disorganized speech (e.g., frequent derailment or incoherence)
  4. Grossly disorganized or catatonic behaviour
  5. Negative symptoms (affective flattening, alogia, avolition)

At least one of the two or more symptoms must be delusions, hallucinations or disorganised speech. The slide's list is visually complete but omits this discriminator.

Criterion B — Social/occupational dysfunction: one or more major areas of functioning markedly below the level achieved prior to onset

Criterion C — Duration: Continuous signs of the disturbance persist for at least 6 months. This 6-month period must include at least 1 month of symptoms (Criterion A). May include periods of prodromal or residual symptoms.

Further exclusions — schizoaffective and bipolar/depressive disorders with psychotic features; substance/medication or another medical condition; and, where autism spectrum disorder or a childhood communication disorder is present, schizophrenia is added only when prominent delusions or hallucinations also meet the required duration.

Exam Discriminator: the timelines are necessary, not sufficient

Duration is the quickest discriminator, but it is not the only difference. Brief psychotic disorder requires eventual full return to premorbid functioning; schizophreniform disorder does not require the functional-decline criterion used for schizophrenia; all require the relevant symptom pattern and exclusions. Use: brief = 1 day to < 1 month, schizophreniform = 1 to < 6 months, schizophrenia = continuous disturbance ≥ 6 months.

Clinical Vignette from the Lecture — "Mr. Tung" [1]:

68-year-old divorced man, 6 weeks of voices discussing him and reading his thoughts aloud, referential/persecutory interpretations of people and media, disorganised speech, poor self-care and negative symptoms. This is his eighth episode over a 30-year illness, with marked occupational and relationship decline and poor insight.

This vignette illustrates:

  • Multiple Criterion A symptoms (hallucinations, disorganized speech, negative symptoms)
  • Functional decline (Criterion B) — former university student → unemployed, divorced
  • The current exacerbation is only 6 weeks, but the longitudinal 30-year course establishes duration; never diagnose from the latest episode alone
  • Chronic, relapsing course with poor insight and treatment non-adherence

Characteristic Symptoms: 5 or more during the same 2-week period; at least one must be (1) depressed mood or (2) loss of interest/pleasure:

#SymptomMnemonic hint
1Depressed mood most of the dayCore
2Marked diminished interest or pleasure (anhedonia)Core
3Significant weight loss (or gain)
4Insomnia or hypersomnia
5Psychomotor retardation or agitation
6Fatigue or loss of energy
7Feeling of worthlessness or excessive guilt
8Diminished ability to think or concentrate
9Recurrent thoughts of death

Mnemonic: SIG E CAPS (Sleep, Interest, Guilt, Energy, Concentration, Appetite, Psychomotor, Suicidality) — plus depressed mood.

Additional criteria:

  • Clinically significant distress or impairment
  • Not attributable to a substance or another medical condition
  • Establish whether there has ever been a manic or hypomanic episode; if so, reconsider unipolar MDD and assess the bipolar spectrum

Slide-era correction: bereavement and mixed episodes

The slide reproduces obsolete DSM-IV wording: DSM-5 removed the bereavement exclusion, and "mixed episode" is no longer the rule-out phrase shown. Bereavement does not protect against MDD, but normal grief should not be pathologised; decide from the complete syndrome, impairment, cultural context, longitudinal history and risk. A depressive episode may carry a with mixed features specifier, while any history of mania changes the diagnostic pathway.

Core vs Associated Symptoms

At least ONE of the two core symptoms (depressed mood OR anhedonia) MUST be present. You cannot diagnose MDD with 5 associated symptoms but neither core symptom. This is a common exam trap.

A distinct period of elevated, expansive or irritable mood AND persistently increased activity or energy, lasting at least 1 week and present most of the day nearly every day (or any duration if hospitalisation is necessary), plus 3 or more symptoms — 4 if mood is only irritable:

SymptomClinical Significance
Inflated self-esteem or grandiosityMay reach delusional intensity
Decreased need for sleepDifferent from insomnia — patient feels rested after minimal sleep
Overtalkativeness or pressure of speechCannot stop talking; speech is rapid, loud, hard to interrupt
Flight of ideasThoughts race from topic to topic with superficial connections
DistractibilityAttention drawn to irrelevant stimuli
Increased goal-directed activities or psychomotor agitationTaking on multiple projects, sexual indiscretions
Excessive involvement in potentially dangerous/regrettable activitiesSpending sprees, risky business ventures

The disturbance must cause marked social or occupational impairment, require hospitalisation to prevent harm, or include psychotic features, and it must not be attributable to a substance or another medical condition. This distinguishes mania from hypomania as well as from ordinary high energy.

Mood Disorders Classification from the lecture:

Depressive disorders: single/recurrent episodes, dysthymia, PMDD Bipolar disorders: episodic pathological elevation/irritability and energy; depressive episodes are common but their diagnostic role differs by subtype

  • Mania usually lasts ≥ 1 week unless hospitalisation is needed; hypomania lasts ≥ 4 consecutive days; "mixed episode" has been replaced by mixed-features specifiers
  • Depressive episodes can last for weeks or months
  • Inter-episode recovery varies; residual symptoms and functional impairment can persist
  • Subtypes: Bipolar I, Bipolar II, Cyclothymia
Bipolar IBipolar IICyclothymia
ManiaAt least one full manic episode (≥ 1 week, or any duration if hospitalisation is necessary; marked impairment, hospitalisation or psychosis)Never full maniaNo full manic episode
HypomaniaMay occurMust have hypomanic episode (≥ 4 days)Present
DepressionCommon but NOT required for diagnosisMust have major depressive episodeDepressive symptoms (not full MDE)
Duration——≥ 2 years of fluctuating mood

High Yield – 2023 MCQ Q22

"Which is a diagnostic criterion for Bipolar I disorder?" → Answer: a manic episode. The usual duration is at least 1 week, but any duration qualifies when hospitalisation is necessary. Irritable mood can satisfy the mood criterion, but if it is the only mood quality, 4 associated symptoms are required. A major depressive episode is not required for Bipolar I [5].

A. Excessive anxiety and worry occurring more days than not for at least 6 months, about a number of events or activities B. Difficult to control the worry C. 3 or more of:

SymptomWhy It Occurs
Restlessness / feeling keyed upChronic sympathetic activation
Easily fatiguedExhaustion from constant arousal
Difficulty concentrating / mind going blankWorry occupies cognitive bandwidth
IrritabilityLow frustration tolerance
Muscle tensionSustained fight-or-flight response
Sleep disturbanceRacing thoughts prevent sleep initiation

D. Clinically significant distress or impairment E. Not attributable to a substance or another medical condition, and not better explained by another mental disorder

For adults, at least 3 of the 6 associated symptoms are required; for children, only 1 is required. The worry must be difficult to control and span a number of domains rather than being confined to the focus of another disorder.

A panic attack is an abrupt surge of intense fear or discomfort that reaches a peak within minutes, with 4 or more of the following:

SymptomPathophysiology
PalpitationsSympathetic activation → ↑HR
SweatingSympathetic cholinergic activation
Trembling or shakingAdrenaline surge
Shortness of breathHyperventilation
Feeling of chokingSubjective throat tightness/choking sensation
Chest painMuscle tension, hyperventilation
Nausea or abdominal distressAutonomic and gastrointestinal symptoms
Dizziness, unsteadiness, faintnessCerebral vasoconstriction from hyperventilation → ↓CO₂
Derealization or depersonalizationDissociative response to extreme anxiety
Fear of losing control or going crazyCatastrophic misinterpretation
Fear of dyingCatastrophic misinterpretation
ParesthesiasRespiratory alkalosis → ↓ionized Ca²⁺
Chills or hot flushesAutonomic dysregulation

For panic disorder: recurrent unexpected panic attacks, with at least one attack followed by ≥ 1 month of persistent concern/worry about further attacks or their consequences, and/or maladaptive behavioural change related to the attacks.

Key distinction: The 1-month rule applies to what follows an attack, not to attacks occurring continuously for a month. Panic attacks are a specifier that can occur across disorders; panic disorder requires recurrent unexpected attacks plus the aftermath criterion and substance/medical/other-disorder exclusions. If attacks are exclusively cued by social scrutiny, for example, consider social anxiety disorder rather than automatically adding panic disorder.

Generalized anxiety disorder, Panic disorder, Agoraphobia, Social phobia, Specific phobia, Separation anxiety disorder, Selective mutism, Anxiety disorder substance-induced/another medical condition, OS/US Anxiety disorder

Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa, Binge-eating disorder, Pica, Rumination disorder, Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, OS/US

Diagnostic Criteria for Anorexia Nervosa:

A. Restriction of energy intake → significantly low body weight B. Intense fear of gaining weight OR persistent behaviour interfering with weight gain C. Disturbance in body image / undue influence of weight on self-evaluation / lack of recognition of seriousness D. Current subtype: restricting vs binge-eating/purging, based on behaviour during the last 3 months

Slide correction: no 3-month duration criterion

DSM-5/DSM-5-TR does not require anorexia nervosa itself to persist for 3 months. The 3-month window belongs to subtype specification. The BMI bands shown are adult severity specifiers, not diagnostic cut-offs or a substitute for medical-risk assessment; in children/adolescents use BMI percentile, developmental trajectory and clinical context. Fear of weight gain is common but the criterion can also be met by persistent behaviour that prevents weight gain, so avoid the slide's shorthand "fat phobia" as a universal description.

Insomnia disorder, Parasomnias, Hypersomnolence/Narcolepsy, Circadian rhythm disorders, Breathing-related sleep disorders (e.g., OSAS), Restless leg syndrome/PLMD

Diagnostic Criteria for Insomnia Disorder:

A. Dissatisfaction with sleep quantity or quality: difficulty initiating, maintaining, or early morning awakening B. Clinically significant distress or impairment C. At least 3 nights per week for at least 3 months D. Despite adequate opportunity for sleep E. Not better explained by another sleep-wake disorder and not attributable to a substance; coexisting mental or medical disorders do not exclude insomnia when the sleep complaint warrants independent clinical attention The older primary/secondary distinction has been replaced by insomnia disorder with relevant comorbidities documented

Key Point: Adequate Opportunity for Sleep

This criterion is important — a medical intern sleeping 4 hours because of on-call shifts does NOT have insomnia disorder. The disorder requires that the person has the opportunity to sleep but cannot. This rules out sleep deprivation due to external constraints.

A. Persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts:

  • Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity (e.g., failure of normal back-and-forth conversation)
  • Deficits in nonverbal communicative behaviours (e.g., abnormal eye contact and body language)
  • Deficits in developing, maintaining, and understanding relationships (e.g., absence of interest in peers)

B. Restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, or activities:

  • Stereotyped behaviours (e.g., lining up toys, echolalia)
  • Insistence on sameness (e.g., rigid thinking)
  • Fixated interests (e.g., unusual objects)
  • Hyper- or hypo-reactivity to sensory input (e.g., sounds, touch, lights)

All 3 social-communication/social-interaction domains are required, plus at least 2 of 4 restricted/repetitive domains. A checklist of isolated traits is not sufficient.

C. Present in the early developmental period, although features may become fully manifest only when social demands exceed capacity or may later be masked D. Impairment in functioning E. Not better explained by intellectual disability or global developmental delay; ASD and intellectual disability can co-occur when social communication is below that expected for general developmental level

2020 MCQ Q22 – Asperger vs ASD

A historical paper used the answer "Asperger disorder." Treat that as DSM-IV-era terminology: DSM-5/DSM-5-TR subsumes Asperger disorder within ASD, and absence of language delay alone does not establish the diagnosis. In a contemporary answer, describe the observed social-communication and restricted/repetitive features, developmental history, language/intellectual profile and functional impact [6].

Persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity

Inattention symptoms (persisting ≥ 6 months; ≥ 6 of 9 for children up to age 16, ≥ 5 for age 17+ and adults):

Careless mistakes, difficulty sustaining attention, doesn't listen, doesn't follow through, difficulty organizing, avoids sustained mental effort, loses things, easily distracted, forgetful

Hyperactivity-Impulsivity symptoms (same age-adjusted count and duration):

Fidgets, leaves seat, runs/climbs inappropriately, can't play quietly, "on the go," talks excessively, blurts out answers, can't wait turn, interrupts others

Present prior to age 12 Several symptoms in 2 or more settings Impairment in functioning Not exclusively during a psychotic disorder and not better explained by another mental disorder

Cluster A: "Odd/Eccentric" — Paranoid, Schizoid, Schizotypal Cluster B: "Dramatic/Emotional" — Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, Narcissistic Cluster C: "Anxious/Fearful" — Avoidant, Dependent, Obsessive-Compulsive

The familiar shorthand is A: odd/eccentric, B: dramatic/emotional/erratic, C: anxious/fearful. These are memory aids, not descriptions to apply to a person; diagnose from enduring, pervasive criteria and impairment rather than stereotypes.

Diagnostic Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD):

A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity, beginning by early adulthood, indicated by 5 or more of:

#CriterionKey Feature
1Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonmentCore fear
2Unstable and intense relationships (idealization ↔ devaluation)"Splitting"
3Identity disturbance: unstable self-image
4Impulsivity in ≥ 2 areas (spending, sex, substance, driving, binge eating)
5Recurrent suicidal behaviour, gestures or threats, or self-mutilating behaviourRequires direct current risk assessment; do not treat it as merely a diagnostic checkbox
6Affective instabilityMood shifts over hours, not weeks
7Chronic feelings of emptiness
8Inappropriate, intense anger
9Transient stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms

A. Significant cognitive decline from previous level in 1 or more domains: complex attention, executive function, learning and memory, language, perceptual-motor, social cognition — based on informants or cognitive tests B. Interfere with independent living C. Does not occur exclusively in delirium D. Not better explained by another mental disorder

Evidence for decline combines concern from the individual, a knowledgeable informant or clinician and preferably standardised cognitive assessment. The function criterion is the visual discriminator: major NCD interferes with independence in everyday activities; mild NCD does not, although greater effort or compensatory strategies may be needed.

Distinction: Major vs Mild NCD

If criteria A is met but the person can still live independently (Criterion B not met), the diagnosis is Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (previously "Mild Cognitive Impairment"). This is a crucial distinction in geriatric psychiatry.

Intermittent explosive disorder, Oppositional defiant disorder, Conduct disorder, Antisocial personality disorder, Kleptomania (stealing), Pyromania (fire setting), OS/US


The comorbidity diagram on the lecture slide shows Bipolar Disorder at the centre, with connections to Eating Disorder, ADHD, Sleep Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Substance-use Disorder, and Personality Disorder. [1]

How to read the diagram: each spoke means that a person assessed for bipolar disorder may also have eating, attention, sleep, anxiety, substance-use or personality pathology. It does not show that bipolar disorder causes each outer condition, that every apparent overlap is a separate diagnosis, or that all occur at the same frequency.

Clinical use: assess likely comorbidity and risk in a targeted way, but first test alternatives such as symptoms occurring only during a mood episode, substance/medication effects, sleep deprivation and shared diagnostic criteria. Prioritise acute risk and the problems causing the greatest impairment; not every valid diagnosis must be treated simultaneously.


From the PSY01 introductory lecture [2]:

Lecture-era heuristic: Organic/substance-induced > Psychoses > Mood disorders > Anxiety disorders

Use this as a safety prompt, not a rule that one label automatically cancels another. First consider delirium, neurological/medical illness, substances, medications and immediate risk. Then establish the longitudinal timing of psychotic, mood and anxiety symptoms and allow genuine comorbidity where criteria are independently met. A formulation can remain provisional while collateral, examination and investigations are gathered.

Clinical Application

A patient with delusions and low mood requires a timeline: did psychosis ever persist outside a major mood episode, did mood episodes occupy most of the total illness, and could a substance, medication, delirium or medical/neurological condition explain the change? Those answers—not a rank-order slogan—distinguish mood disorder with psychotic features, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia with depressive symptoms and secondary psychosis.


From the PSY01 lecture and senior notes [2][3]:

CategoricalDimensional
Disorders divided into discrete entitiesSymptoms placed on a spectrum/continuum
Based on assumption of underlying qualitative differenceRecognizes that many symptoms exist on a gradient
Used by DSM and ICDIncreasingly advocated (e.g., personality disorders in ICD-11)
Easy to use clinicallyBetter reflects biological reality but harder to implement

Why this matters for exams: DSM-5-TR remains largely categorical but uses dimensions and specifiers in many places. ICD-11 goes further for personality disorder by grading severity and allowing trait-domain qualifiers. In practice, categories answer "what syndrome?" while dimensions answer "how much, which features and how impaired?"


From 2021 MCQ Q25 [7] and 2023 MCQ Q23 [5]:

"Which of the following is a psychotic phenomenon?" → Answer: Thought broadcast

  • Psychotic phenomena include: delusions, hallucinations, thought disorder, passivity experiences (thought insertion/withdrawal/broadcast, made feelings/actions)
  • Elevation of mood and flight of ideas are manic phenomena, not intrinsically psychotic. Grandiosity becomes psychotic when it reaches delusional intensity.
  • A delusion is a fixed false belief not amenable to change in light of conflicting evidence and not ordinarily accepted within the person's cultural or subcultural context; assess conviction, preoccupation, distress and behavioural consequence [5].
  • Insight is often limited but is dimensional and may fluctuate; assess whether the person recognises the experience, illness and need for help rather than assigning insight from the symptom label alone

Exam Trap: visual hallucinations are a clue, not a diagnosis

A 2022 MCQ used visual hallucinations to favour a substance-induced or secondary cause over schizophrenia [8]. Clinically, visual hallucinations should prompt careful assessment for delirium, substances/withdrawal, medication effects, neurological or ophthalmic disease and sleep-related phenomena, but modality alone is not diagnostic. Auditory hallucinations are common in schizophrenia, yet can also occur across mood, trauma-related, medical and substance-related states.

The lecture concludes with a crucial message [1]:

The diagnosis of psychiatric disorders is based on good history taking (from patient and informants), mental state examination, collateral information, and observation. Accurate information → Accurate diagnosis

The arrow on the final slide is best read as accurate information is necessary for an accurate diagnosis, not sufficient by itself. Diagnostic reasoning also requires physical and neurological context, substance/medication review, cultural and developmental formulation, risk assessment, correct criteria use and longitudinal revision.

This is the clinical workflow:

  1. Good interview (begin open, elaborate, then use focused questions one phenomenon at a time)
  2. Measure and quantify (type, severity, duration, clinical significance, time-frame)
  3. Use screening tools appropriately (screening ≠ diagnosis)
  4. Apply diagnostic criteria systematically (symptom cluster + duration + impairment + exclusions)
  5. Assess collateral, baseline function, risk, physical/neurological illness, substances and medications
  6. Consider comorbidity, differentials and longitudinal formulation

High Yield Summary

  1. Core Takeaways for the Exam

  2. Summary

    • Current reference systems are DSM-5-TR (APA) and ICD-11 (WHO).
    • Classification improves communication, research and consistency, but categories can stigmatise, overlap and obscure the individual formulation.
    • Describe phenomena before naming a disorder; establish pattern, duration/course, severity or impairment, context and exclusions.
    • Reliability improves with operationalised definitions and good interviewing; validity remains limited when categories lack distinct biomarkers.
    • Information variance and diagnostic variance are different error sources; screening questionnaires address neither by themselves.
    • Key clocks: major depressive episode ≥ 2 weeks; adult GAD ≥ 6 months; schizophrenia continuous disturbance ≥ 6 months; insomnia ≥ 3 months at ≥ 3 nights/week; mania usually ≥ 1 week or any duration if hospitalisation is necessary; brief psychotic disorder 1 day to < 1 month. Anorexia nervosa has no 3-month diagnostic duration criterion.
    • Prioritise safety and secondary causes, then build a longitudinal differential and formulation; no rigid hierarchy replaces clinical reasoning.

Active Recall - Classification and Diagnosis of Psychiatric Illness


[1] Lecture slides: CFB (PSY02) Classification and Diagnosis of Psychiatric Illness.pdf (all pages) [2] Lecture slides: CFB (PSY01) An introduction to Psychiatry.pdf (p17) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Psychiatry.pdf (p4) [4] Past papers: 2021 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Q3) [5] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q22, Q23) [6] Past papers: 2020 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ paper.pdf (Q22, Q24) [7] Past papers: 2021 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ.pdf (Q25) [8] Past papers: 2022 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q26) [11] American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5-TR and approved criteria/text updates (2022-present) [12] American Psychiatric Association. APA Releases DSM-5-TR (18 March 2022) [13] World Health Organization. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders (2024)

On this page

No Headings