GC015 Imaging Of The Head And Neck

Diagnostic imaging of the head and neck encompasses radiographic, CT, MRI, and ultrasound techniques used to evaluate structures such as the brain, sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, thyroid, vasculature, and aerodigestive tract for pathology.

Imaging of the Head and Neck

This lecture, delivered by Dr. Jane J. Kim (Department of Radiology), is built around a single clinical scenario that every doctor will face: "Doc, I feel a lump." It teaches you how to think through a neck mass systematically — asking the right clinical questions, choosing the right imaging modality, and recognizing imaging findings — organized by three broad categories: inflammatory/infectious, neoplastic, and congenital. It also covers critical special considerations (contrast allergy, renal disease, pregnancy, MRI contraindications) that come up repeatedly in MCQs.

Why this matters for exams: The high-yield decisions are which modality to order and why, what contrast adds, and which findings change urgency. The central pitfall is a cystic adult neck mass that is mistaken for a benign developmental cyst.

Learning Objectives (inferred from slide structure):

  1. Develop a systematic approach to a patient with a neck mass (age, acuity, signs of infection, location).
  2. Select the appropriate imaging modality for inflammatory, neoplastic, and congenital neck masses.
  3. Recognize key CT and MRI findings of common neck pathologies.
  4. Understand special considerations: contrast allergy, renal disease, pregnancy, MRI contraindications.
  5. Avoid the critical pitfall of dismissing a cystic neck mass in an adult as benign.


"Adult or pediatric? Acute or subacute or chronic? Signs of infection? Location?" [1]

These four questions are the foundation. They determine the differential diagnosis and the imaging approach.

Clinical FeatureWhy It Matters
AgeChildren → congenital/inflammatory far more common. Adults → neoplasm must be excluded first.
AcuityAcute (days) → infection/inflammation. Chronic (weeks–months) → neoplasm or congenital.
Signs of infectionFever, pain, erythema and recent dental/pharyngeal symptoms favour inflammation. Deep infection or a drainage question usually needs contrast CT; ultrasound may answer a superficial paediatric question.
LocationDetermines which spaces are involved (submandibular, parotid, parapharyngeal, carotid, posterior triangle) and narrows differential.

The Three Categories of Neck Mass

The lecture organizes all neck masses into three groups: Inflammatory, Neoplastic, and Congenital. [1] This is the framework examiners use. Every question stem about a neck mass can be mapped to one of these.


Part 2: Inflammatory / Infectious Masses

The lecture presents three classic infectious scenarios:

  1. 42-year-old man — toothache → neck swelling, fever, pain → dental abscess [1]
  2. 10-year-old boy — fever, sore throat, neck swelling → pharyngitis with cervical adenitis [1]
  3. 21-year-old woman — right neck pain worse with eating/swallowing → acute sialadenitis from sialolith [1]

Contrast-enhanced CT is the workhorse for suspected deep neck infection because it is fast, widely available, maps the airway and deep spaces, and can show an odontogenic or osseous source. [1]

Why CT with contrast and not without?

  • IV contrast makes abscesses visible: the abscess wall enhances (picks up contrast) while the pus inside does not, creating the classic rim-enhancing fluid collection appearance. Without contrast, you cannot distinguish an abscess from surrounding oedematous tissue reliably.
  • Contrast also helps delineate vascular structures and their relationship to the infection (critical for surgical planning).

Do not automatically substitute a noncontrast CT. The slide presents eGFR below 30 or a prior iodinated-contrast reaction as reasons to omit contrast, but current guidance is more nuanced. In acute kidney injury or eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m², the radiologist and referring team should weigh diagnostic benefit against kidney risk and consider prophylactic isotonic fluid when appropriate. A prior severe reaction is a relative contraindication to the same contrast class; an alternative study/agent or a local premedication pathway may be used. A noncontrast scan can miss the distinction between phlegmon and drainable collection. [4]

CT FindingWhat It MeansClinical Significance
Fat strandingHazy increased density in normally dark fat planes"Important imaging sign of infection/inflammation" [1] — indicates oedema spreading through fascial planes
Rim-enhancing low-attenuation collectionPeripheral enhancement around fluidSupports abscess, especially with mass effect or gas, but CT is not perfectly specific: phlegmon or suppurative nodes can mimic it. Drainage depends on airway, size/site, clinical course and ENT/surgical assessment.
Reactive lymphadenopathyEnlarged, enhancing lymph nodesNodes are reacting to nearby infection; distinguish from malignant adenopathy

High Yield: Check the Teeth!

"If there is infection/inflammation in the neck, check the teeth!" [1] In the lecture case, the soft-tissue collection and the causative mandibular periapical lucency are best appreciated on different CT windows. Always inspect the teeth and jaw for an odontogenic source rather than stopping after finding the collection.

  1. Dental infection → submandibular abscess (Ludwig's angina if bilateral floor of mouth) [1]
  2. Pharyngitis → cervical adenitis, retropharyngeal edema/abscess [1]
  3. Sialolith (salivary gland stone) → acute sialadenitis [1]

CT has radiation — follow principle of ALARA. [1]

ALARA = As Low As Reasonably Achievable. In children, the thyroid is particularly radiosensitive, and lifetime cancer risk from radiation is higher because of more remaining years of life. For a superficial/localised paediatric lump, ultrasound can be an appropriate first test. If deep neck infection, airway compromise, complication or a potential drainage target is suspected, contrast CT is usually appropriate; use a paediatric low-dose protocol. [5]

Case 1: Submandibular abscess from dental infection

  • 42 yo M, toothache 2 days → neck swelling, fever, pain
  • Contrast CT shows a low-attenuation, rim-enhancing collection spanning the submandibular/floor-of-mouth region, with surrounding inflammatory change
  • The bone-window image shows mandibular periapical lucencies: inspect the teeth as well as the soft-tissue window to identify the source

Case 2: Cervical adenitis and retropharyngeal edema from Streptococcal pharyngitis

  • 10 yo M, fever, sore throat, neck swelling 2 days
  • CT shows asymmetric cervical fat stranding and several enlarged enhancing/reactive nodes, with central retropharyngeal oedema
  • There is no rim-enhancing drainable collection [1] — the visual distinction is cellulitis/adenitis plus oedema, not a mature abscess

Case 3: Acute submandibular sialadenitis

  • 21 yo F, right neck pain worse with eating (classic for salivary gland obstruction — eating stimulates saliva production, which builds up behind the stone causing pain)
  • Coronal CT shows an enlarged oedematous right submandibular gland; axial CT shows a small hyperattenuating calculus in the anterior floor of mouth along Wharton's duct

Bright on CT ("hyperattenuating"/"hyperdense"): Bone/calcium, Metal, Contrast [1] Dark on CT ("hypoattenuating"/"hypodense"): Air, Fat [1] Intermediate on CT: Soft tissue/muscle, Fluid [1]

Why does this matter? Understanding CT density is fundamental to reading any CT. The principle is simple: denser materials attenuate more X-rays and appear brighter. This is quantified using Hounsfield Units (HU):

MaterialApproximate HUAppearance
Air-1000Very dark
Fat-50 to -100Dark
Lung-500Very dark
Water0Dark grey
Soft tissue/muscle+30 to +60Grey
Acute blood+50 to +70Light grey/white
Bone+400 to +1000Bright white
Metal+2000+Extremely bright
IV contrast (enhanced vessels)+100 to +300Bright white

Clinical application examples:

  • A lipoma is confirmed by measuring its HU — it will be in the fat range (-50 to -100), matching subcutaneous fat
  • A sialolith appears bright because it is calcified
  • An abscess cavity appears dark (fluid density) surrounded by a bright rim (enhancing wall)

Part 4: Neoplastic Masses

A new neck mass in adult without signs of infection should be considered malignant until proven otherwise (malignant UPO = Until Proven Otherwise). [1]

This is a deliberately cautious lecture rule. Current AAO-HNS guidance defines increased risk more precisely: no convincing infectious cause and persistence for at least 2 weeks without significant fluctuation (or uncertain duration), or a mass that is firm, fixed, larger than 1.5 cm, or associated with skin ulceration. Such patients need prompt targeted examination, contrast CT or MRI, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rather than open biopsy. [6]

CT or MRI neck with contrast for suspected neoplasm. [1]

The slide's suprahyoid/infrahyoid split is a useful heuristic, not an absolute rule. Choose the modality for the clinical question, patient and local protocol:

LocationPreferred ModalityWhy
Suprahyoid neck (nasopharynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, parotid)Often MRISuperior soft-tissue contrast; strong for skull base, marrow, perineural and intracranial extension
Infrahyoid neck (larynx, hypopharynx)Often CTFast, less vulnerable to motion and excellent for mineralised cartilage/bone; MRI may still answer selected soft-tissue questions

MRI is study of choice for: NPC staging, intracranial/perineural invasion, parotid tumours, oral cavity tumours (tongue), generally suprahyoid neck. [1] CT is good for: generally infrahyoid neck (larynx, hypopharynx). [1]

Case 4: Base of tongue cancer with nodal metastases

  • 54 yo M, left neck mass 4 months, firm and fixed, tobacco + alcohol abuse
  • CT: primary tumour at base of tongue with enlarged cervical nodes
  • "In cases of malignant appearing cervical adenopathy, report should comment on primary" [1] — the radiologist must look for the primary tumour site
  • "Imaging important for staging information (TNM)" [1]

Case 5: HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer — THE CRITICAL PITFALL

A new cystic neck mass in adult should NOT be dismissed as branchial cleft cyst (BCC) or developmental lesion. Must exclude cystic nodal metastasis from HPV+ oropharyngeal SCC! [1]

This is highlighted repeatedly in the lecture for good reason. The scenario:

  • 37 yo M, new left-sided cystic neck mass
  • Outside hospital says "branchial cleft cyst"
  • WRONG. In an adult, this is HPV+ oropharyngeal SCC with cystic nodal metastasis until proven otherwise.

Critical Exam Pitfall: Cystic Neck Mass in Adults

"Pitfall: do not assume a new cystic neck mass in adult is branchial cleft cyst — must rule out HPV+ SCC or thyroid cancer." [1] Branchial cleft cysts can present in adults, but a persistent adult cystic neck mass must undergo a complete malignancy work-up and should not be labelled benign from imaging alone. Continue evaluation until a diagnosis is secured. [6]

HPV-associated OPSCC often arises in the palatine or lingual tonsil, may have a small/occult primary, and commonly presents with cystic cervical nodal metastases. p16 is a tumour-suppressor/cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor used by immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker in the appropriate oropharyngeal setting; it is not a universal stand-alone HPV test for every head-and-neck cancer. [1,7]

FeatureHPV+ OPCATraditional Tobacco/Alcohol OPCA
DemographicsYounger, male, non-smokersOlder, smokers + drinkers
Primary sitePalatine tonsil, lingual tonsil (base of tongue)Variable H&N subsites
Primary tumour sizeMay be very small or occultUsually visible
Nodal metastasesOften cystic — mimics branchial cleft cyst!Usually solid
PrognosisBetterWorse
Biomarkerp16 overexpression is the usual tissue surrogate in OPSCC; HPV-specific testing is added in defined caveat scenariosNot classified as HPV-mediated by p16
StagingSeparate AJCC systemStandard AJCC

Why are HPV+ nodes cystic? The tumour cells undergo cystic degeneration within the lymph node, producing a fluid-filled appearance that can be mistaken for a benign cyst on imaging.

25 yo Chinese woman with left neck mass 3 months → MRI is preferred for NPC staging. [1]

NPC is especially relevant for HKUMed because of its high prevalence in Southern Chinese populations. The 2023 MCQ Q64 directly tested NPC management.

Case: Large NPC with intracranial invasion (T4)

  • 44 yo M, several months of right-sided hearing loss and ear fullness
  • The preceding MRI case shows a nasopharyngeal primary with bilateral nodal metastases (T1N2 on the slide)
  • Axial T2 fat-saturated and coronal post-contrast T1 fat-saturated images then show a larger nasopharyngeal mass extending to the skull base/intracranial compartment → T4 [1]
  • The bright right mastoid fluid reflects Eustachian-tube obstruction and helps explain the unilateral hearing loss/ear fullness
  • Demonstrates why MRI is good for intracranial and perineural disease [1]

Why MRI over CT for NPC?

  • NPC arises in the nasopharynx, which is a deep suprahyoid structure surrounded by complex anatomy (skull base, cavernous sinus, cranial nerves)
  • MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast to delineate tumour extent
  • MRI good for intracranial and perineural disease [1]
  • Critical for T-staging: detecting skull base invasion, intracranial extension (T4)

Radiation concern in young patients:

Radiation dose of neck CT: 3 mSv (Annual background radiation dose: 3 mSv). Thyroid gland is most radiosensitive organ in neck. [1]

These are broad teaching estimates; actual dose varies substantially with scanner, patient size, scan range and protocol. MRI is preferred for NPC primarily because it better answers the staging question (skull base, intracranial and perineural extension), with radiation avoidance as an additional benefit.

Body Part CTApproximate Radiation Dose
Neck CT3 mSv
Chest CT7 mSv
Abdomen/Pelvis CT14 mSv
Annual background radiation3 mSv

Case: Adenoid cystic carcinoma of parotid with CN-VII involvement

  • 57 yo F, right-sided pain and facial paralysis
  • The axial T1 image shows the right parotid mass; the accompanying diagram traces CN VII from the parotid back through the stylomastoid foramen and facial canal
  • Coronal post-contrast fat-saturated T1 shows abnormal enhancement/thickening along that route toward the skull base
  • "MRI to check for perineural tumour spread" [1]

Adenoid cystic carcinoma is notorious for perineural spread — tumour cells can track along nerve sheaths far from the primary tumour. CT may show foraminal widening or bone change, but contrast-enhanced fat-saturated MRI is more sensitive for nerve enlargement, enhancement and denervation change.

MRI superior to CT for intracranial or perineural invasion. [1]

The paired axial post-contrast MR images show how vessels help localise a carotid-space mass [1]:

  1. Schwannoma — a smoothly marginated enhancing nerve-sheath mass that displaces adjacent vessels; the exact displacement pattern depends on whether it arises from the vagus or sympathetic chain.
  2. Carotid body paraganglioma — centred at the carotid bifurcation, typically splaying the internal and external carotid arteries (the lyre sign) and containing serpiginous flow voids from marked vascularity.

Why flow voids? Rapidly moving blood may produce no signal and therefore appears dark. Larger paragangliomas can have the classic salt-and-pepper appearance, best appreciated on T2-weighted imaging: dark vascular flow voids ("pepper") interspersed with bright slow-flow/haemorrhagic foci ("salt").

Case: 58 yo M, painless, slow-growing neck lump for several years

  • CT: "Typical fat attenuation on CT confirms diagnosis" [1]
  • The mass measures the same HU as subcutaneous fat (-50 to -100 HU)
  • On MRI: "Fat is bright on T1 (also: blood, melanin, protein, mineralization, gadolinium)" [1]
  • "Confirm it is fat with fat suppression" [1] — when you apply a fat-saturation pulse sequence, the bright signal from fat disappears. If the lesion goes dark on fat-sat, it's confirmed as fat.
  • A homogeneous fat-only mass with a thin capsule supports lipoma; thick septa, nodular non-fatty components or incomplete fat suppression require further assessment rather than assuming a simple lipoma.

T1 Bright Lesions Mnemonic

Things that are bright on T1-weighted MRI: Fat, blood (subacute), melanin, protein (concentrated), mineralization (paramagnetic), gadolinium contrast. If you see a T1-bright lesion, use fat suppression to determine if it's fat (signal drops) or something else (signal persists). [1]

"Look for a thorough radiology report in patient with suspicious cervical adenopathy — primary tumor, staging information." [1] "T1/T2 signal characteristics can help us (eg, T1 bright lesions)." [1]


Part 5: Congenital Masses

Start with ultrasound if suspected congenital mass. [1]

Why ultrasound first?

  • No radiation (critical in children)
  • Determines solid vs cystic nature
  • Assesses vascularity with Doppler
  • Cheap, readily available, no sedation needed
  • If US is unclear or the lesion is deep/extensive → MRI

MRI can be complementary to US — visualize full extent of lesion (deep, multifocal). May require sedation. [1] CT/MRI offers better anatomic localization and may be helpful as next step if US is unclear. [1]

Case 6: Second branchial cleft cyst

  • 6 yo boy, painless slowly enlarging lump, recent increase after viral URI
  • Grey-scale US shows a well-circumscribed, predominantly anechoic/hypoechoic lesion with posterior acoustic enhancement, establishing its cystic rather than solid nature
  • Doppler shows no internal vascularity; peripheral colour signal belongs to adjacent vessels, an important visual distinction
  • In a child this age and location, a branchial cleft cyst is a plausible leading diagnosis; an adult with the same cystic appearance still requires malignancy exclusion before accepting that label

Why does it enlarge after viral URI? Branchial cleft cysts are lined by lymphoid tissue. During an upper respiratory infection, this lymphoid tissue becomes reactive and inflamed, causing the cyst to swell.

Case 7: Venous malformation

  • 5 yo boy, soft compressible lump, bluish hue to skin
  • US and MRI both helpful for suspected pediatric vascular anomalies [1]
  • MRI to visualize full extent (deeper or extensive lesions) [1]
  • Doppler US shows compressible venous spaces with slow flow; flow can be sparse unless elicited by compression or dependent positioning
  • Rounded echogenic foci with shadowing are phleboliths (calcified thrombi), a strong clue to a venous malformation
  • MRI shows lobulated, very T2-bright venous channels that can cross tissue planes; dark internal foci may represent phleboliths or thrombi. MRI maps the trans-spatial extent before treatment.

Why is it compressible and bluish? Venous malformations are low-flow vascular anomalies made up of dilated venous channels. They compress because the blood can be squeezed out (like squeezing a sponge). The blue colour is venous blood visible through thin overlying skin.


Part 6: Special Considerations

The most important history is a previous allergic-like or unknown-type reaction to the same class of contrast. A prior severe reaction is a relative contraindication to reusing that class. When contrast is still necessary, involve radiology, identify the culprit agent if possible, consider a different agent within the class, and follow the current local premedication pathway. Premedication reduces but does not eliminate repeat reactions; breakthrough reactions still occur. [4]

The protocols pictured on the slide are institutional examples, not universal prescriptions: [1]

Slide exampleTimingRegimen shown
Standard UCSF pathwayStart 12 h before CTMethylprednisolone 32 mg orally at 12 h and 2 h, plus cetirizine 10 mg orally 1 h before
Accelerated UCSF pathwayStart 5 h before CTHydrocortisone 200 mg IV at 5 h and 1 h, plus diphenhydramine 50 mg IV 1 h before

Current ACR guidance notes that regimens shorter than 4–5 hours have not been shown effective. In a genuine emergency, delaying a time-critical scan may cause more harm than the theoretical benefit of premedication; the radiologist and treating team should select the safest diagnostic plan and ensure readiness to treat a reaction. Gadolinium reactions are uncommon but can still be severe, and MRI with gadolinium is not an automatic substitute merely because the prior reaction involved iodinated contrast. [4]

Renal Disease and Contrast

eGFRGuideline
≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m²Low risk. Little evidence that IV iodinated contrast is independent risk factor for AKI. [1]
AKI or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²Higher-risk group that should trigger radiologist–clinician risk–benefit discussion. This is a relative, not absolute, contraindication; isotonic saline prophylaxis is used when appropriate and not contraindicated. [4]

Use the terms carefully: contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI) is a temporal association, whereas contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI) attributes causation. Controlled studies suggest the independent nephrotoxic risk of modern IV iodinated contrast has historically been overstated, but uncertainty remains greatest in AKI and severe CKD. Do not lower the contrast dose to a nondiagnostic level; if the examination is justified, use a diagnostic protocol. [4]

Dialysis nuance: not every dialysis patient is anuric. Patients with meaningful residual urine output may still have kidney function worth preserving and are treated as high-risk. Do not start dialysis or alter its schedule solely to remove iodinated contrast. [4]

Do not use Group I agents if GFR < 30 [1] — risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a devastating fibrotic condition.

The ACR classifies gadolinium-based contrast agents by NSF risk [1]:

ACR GroupNSF RiskExamplesUse if GFR < 30?
Group I — greatest number of NSF casesHighestGadodiamide (Omniscan), Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadoversetamide (OptiMARK)Do not use
Group II — few, if any, unconfounded NSF casesVery lowGadobutrol, gadoteric acid, gadobenate, gadoteridol, gadopiclenol and gadoxetateMay use at the lowest diagnostic dose when clinically necessary
Group III—No agents are currently in this category—

At HKU, the agents used are Group II — gadobutrol and gadoteric acid — which may be given when GFR < 30 if clinically necessary. [1]

eGFR 30 Is a Decision Threshold, Not a Blanket Ban

AKI or eGFR below 30 identifies a higher-risk group that needs an individualised plan. Iodinated contrast may still be essential, and a Group II gadolinium agent has very low NSF risk when a contrast MRI is necessary. The diagnostic harm of withholding contrast also matters. [4]

The lecture prefers MRI and advises against gadolinium. The current, safer formulation is: [8]

  • Ultrasound and noncontrast MRI are preferred when they can answer the question; available evidence does not show fetal harm from clinically indicated MRI in any trimester, and no special first-trimester restriction is recommended.
  • Do not withhold CT when it is clinically necessary. For head/neck CT the fetus is outside the primary beam, so fetal exposure is low; protocol optimisation and radiology discussion are still appropriate.
  • Iodinated contrast may be used when it is needed for diagnosis and will affect care.
  • Gadolinium should not be routine, but it is not an absolute prohibition: use only when it substantially improves diagnostic performance and is expected to improve maternal or fetal outcome.

Gadolinium crosses the placenta and can recirculate through amniotic fluid, which is why the threshold for its use is high. The key comparison is not "radiation versus no radiation" in isolation, but the risk of the proposed examination versus the risk of delayed or missed diagnosis.

The slide lists orbital metal, reflux devices, insulin pumps, temporary pacing leads, aneurysm clips, shrapnel, infusion pumps, catheters, neurostimulators, cochlear implants and cardiac devices. Many contemporary devices are MR Conditional, while some older, temporary, damaged, abandoned or unidentified devices may be unsafe. Never infer safety from the device category alone. [9]

Screening questionSafe interpretation
Exact make/model and implant date known?Check manufacturer conditions and the institution's MR safety database; field strength, lead configuration, body region, specific absorption rate and monitoring requirements matter.
Possible orbital metallic foreign body?Take a focused exposure/injury history and review prior imaging. Obtain orbital radiographs or CT when the history indicates risk and clearance cannot otherwise be established—not simply because someone has ever welded or ground metal.
Aneurysm clip, pacemaker/ICD, cochlear implant or neurostimulator?Some are conditional and can be scanned under a dedicated protocol; an unknown clip/device is not assumed safe.
External pump or removable equipment?Keep MR-unsafe equipment outside the controlled area and follow the manufacturer's removal/reconnection instructions; never improvise.

The hazards are displacement/torque, radiofrequency heating, induced currents, device malfunction and image artefact. Final clearance belongs to the MR safety team under the current institutional policy. [9]


While the lecture focuses on clinical scenarios, it does reference T1/T2 characteristics:

TissueT1-WeightedT2-Weighted
FatBrightBright
Water/CSF/FluidDarkVery bright
MuscleIntermediateDark
Cortical boneDarkDark
Acute blood (deoxyhemoglobin)DarkDark
Subacute blood (methemoglobin)BrightVariable
Gadolinium-enhanced tissueBrightN/A
Tumour (most)Dark-intermediateBright

Fat-saturation sequences: When you suppress the fat signal, any T1-bright lesion that disappears is confirmed as fat (e.g., lipoma). If it remains bright, consider blood, melanin, protein, or contrast enhancement.


GC 218 covers the clinical approach to neck masses (history, examination, differential diagnosis). This imaging lecture is the direct companion — once you've clinically assessed the mass, this lecture tells you what scan to order.

Deep neck space infections and pharyngeal/oral cavity cancers are the primary pathologies imaged in this lecture.

The adenoid cystic carcinoma case with CN-VII involvement directly connects to salivary gland malignancies and facial nerve palsy.

CT brain imaging principles (density, Hounsfield units) are the same as taught in this lecture for neck CT.

Summary Tables

Clinical ScenarioFirst-Line ImagingWhy
Acute neck infection (adult)CT neck WITH IV contrastFast, 24/7, shows abscess + source
Acute neck infection (child)US if superficial/localised; contrast CT if deep, complicated or a drainage target is soughtAnswer the clinical question while applying ALARA
Suspected neoplasm — suprahyoidOften MRI with contrastBetter soft tissue, perineural/intracranial spread
Suspected neoplasm — infrahyoidOften CT with contrastLess motion artefact, good for mineralised cartilage/bone
NPC stagingMRISkull base, intracranial invasion
Suspected congenital mass (child)UltrasoundNo radiation, solid vs cystic, Doppler
Vascular anomaly (child)US + MRIUS initial, MRI for extent
AKI or eGFR < 30Individualised plan with radiologyNot a blanket ban: balance diagnostic benefit, contrast class/risk and prophylaxis
PregnancyUS or noncontrast MRI when equivalent; CT if clinically necessaryDo not delay necessary imaging; reserve gadolinium for exceptional benefit

PathologyCT Appearance
AbscessRim-enhancing low-attenuation collection supports the diagnosis; correlate clinically because phlegmon can mimic it
Cellulitis/inflammationFat stranding
Reactive lymphadenopathyEnlarged, mildly enhancing nodes
SialolithBright (calcified) stone in salivary duct/gland
LipomaFat attenuation (-50 to -100 HU)
Malignant lymph nodeHeterogeneous, irregular, may be cystic (HPV+), central necrosis

High Yield Summary

  1. Deep infection: contrast CT maps the airway, fascial spread, drainable collection and dental/salivary source; rim enhancement supports but does not by itself prove an abscess.
  2. Adult red flag: a persistent, firm/fixed or otherwise suspicious mass needs prompt contrast imaging and FNA. Do not dismiss a cystic adult node as a branchial cyst.
  3. Tumour imaging: MRI excels at NPC, skull base, perineural and intracranial spread; CT is fast and strong for bone/cartilage. The suprahyoid/infrahyoid split is a heuristic.
  4. Children/congenital lesions: ultrasound first for solid versus cystic and Doppler vascularity; MRI maps deep or trans-spatial extent.
  5. Visual clues: periapical lucency may reveal an odontogenic source; paraganglioma splays carotids and contains flow voids; venous malformation is compressible, low-flow, T2-bright and may contain phleboliths.
  6. Safety: eGFR below 30, pregnancy, a prior contrast reaction or an implanted device triggers an individualised protocol—not an automatic noncontrast scan or blanket MRI ban.

Active Recall - Imaging of the Head and Neck


[1] Lecture slides: GC 015. Imaging of the head and neck.pdf (all pages) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p.17, choice of modality) [4] American College of Radiology. ACR Manual on Contrast Media (current online manual; kidney disease, reactions, pregnancy and NSF): https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Contrast-Manual [5] American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Neck Mass/Adenopathy: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69504/Narrative/ [6] American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. Clinical Practice Guideline: Evaluation of the Neck Mass in Adults: https://www.entnet.org/quality-practice/quality-products/clinical-practice-guidelines/evaluation-of-the-neck-mass-in-adults/ [7] College of American Pathologists. Human Papillomavirus Testing in Head and Neck Carcinomas (2025 update): https://www.cap.org/cap-guidelines/human-papillomavirus-testing-in-head-and-neck-carcinomas/ [8] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/10/guidelines-for-diagnostic-imaging-during-pregnancy-and-lactation [9] American College of Radiology. ACR Manual on MR Safety 2024: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Radiology-Safety/MR-Safety [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p.5, imaging modalities comparison) [11] Lecture slides: Cross-sectional 2 CT-MRI 2025_JH.pdf (CT/MRI basics)

On this page

No Headings