GC235 Osteoporotic Related Fractures

Fragility fractures occurring at sites such as the hip, vertebrae, and distal radius due to reduced bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration characteristic of osteoporosis.

Osteoporotic Related Fractures

This lecture (GC 235, Prof. Christian Fang) is a core orthopaedic lecture paired with the endocrine-focused GC 031 (Dr. David Lui). Together they form the complete exam-testable syllabus on osteoporosis and fragility fractures. GC 235 emphasises the surgical decision-making side: how to classify hip fractures, choose between internal fixation and arthroplasty, manage distal radius fractures and vertebral collapses, recognise atypical femoral fractures, and understand the key anatomy (blood supply to the femoral head, trabecular patterns). GC 031 emphasises the medical side: diagnosis via DEXA, risk factors, pharmacotherapy, and fracture risk stratification. Both are high-yield for Fourth Summative SAQ, MCQ, and minicases.

Learning Objectives (from the slides) [1]:

  1. Osteoporotic hip fractures – diagnosis, treatment, pathological considerations
  2. Osteoporosis – definition, diagnosis, treatment
  3. Other fragility fractures – distal radius, vertebral collapse
  4. Atypical femoral fractures (bisphosphonate-related)

1. Osteoporosis – Definition, Pathophysiology & Diagnosis

"Systemic skeletal disorder characterised by low bone mass, micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility and consequent increase in fracture risk." [1]

Why this matters from first principles: Bone is not static. It constantly remodels – osteoclasts resorb old bone, osteoblasts lay down new bone. When resorption exceeds formation (↑ osteoclast activity or ↓ osteoblast activity), net bone mass falls. The trabeculae thin and disconnect, cortices thin, and the bone loses its structural scaffold, making it fracture with forces that would never break healthy bone.

Key Distinction: Osteoporosis vs Osteomalacia

Osteoporosis: ↓ total bone mass, but the mineral-to-osteoid ratio is normal. The bone that exists is properly mineralised – there's just not enough of it.

Osteomalacia: ↓ mineralisation of osteoid. There is osteoid present but it fails to calcify properly (e.g. vitamin D deficiency in adults, rickets in children). The mineral-to-osteoid ratio is reduced.

Most common metabolic bone disease. 1 in 3 postmenopausal women, 1 in 5 men ≥50 years will sustain an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime. 1 osteoporotic fracture occurs every 3 seconds worldwide. [2]

  • Hip and vertebral fractures are the hallmark complications [2].
  • > 50% of hip fracture survivors cannot return to their premorbid state; 10% need extra help in daily care [1].
  • 1-year mortality after hip fracture in the elderly is approximately 20–30% (mostly from medical complications: PE, pneumonia, MI).

Age-stratified 12-month mortality after hip fracture (local data shown on slides) [1]:

Admission Age12-Month Mortality
≤ 708.5%
71–8012.5%
81–9018.4%
91+25.8%

Death rates within a year after a hip fracture are up to 4.5 times higher than death rates among same-age women who have not broken a hip (LeBlanc et al., Arch Intern Med 2011) [1].

CategoryT-ScoreMeaning
Normal≥ −1.0BMD within 1 SD of young adult mean
Osteopenia−1.0 to −2.5Low bone mass, increased fracture risk
Osteoporosis≤ −2.5Significantly reduced BMD
Severe osteoporosis≤ −2.5 + fragility fractureEstablished disease with clinical consequence
  • T-score: number of standard deviations below the peak bone mass of a 30-year-old of same sex and ethnicity. Used in postmenopausal women and men ≥50.
  • Z-score: compared to age-matched controls. Used in premenopausal women and men < 50. If Z ≤ −2.0 → suspect secondary cause [3].
  • FRAX score: 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) or hip fracture. Useful for treatment decisions in osteopenia [3].

Osteoporosis diagnosis is shown on the lecture slide with the DEXA thresholds [1].

The lecture categorises risk factors into two groups [1]:

A. Increased risk of FALLS:

FactorWhy it matters
Concurrent medical illnessGeneral debility → impaired balance
Drugs – tranquillisers, alcoholCNS depression → impaired coordination
Dementia / Sarcopenia / Visual impairmentCannot perceive hazards, cannot react
Reduction in protective responsesCannot break fall effectively
Loss of local shock absorbers↓ subcutaneous fat over greater trochanter

B. Loss of bone strength:

FactorWhy it matters
Drugs – corticosteroids, anticonvulsants, thyroxine, alcoholCorticosteroids ↑ osteoclast activity and ↓ osteoblast activity; AEDs induce hepatic CYP450 → ↑ vitamin D catabolism
SmokingDirect toxic effect on osteoblasts; ↓ oestrogen levels
Vitamin D deficiency↓ intestinal calcium absorption → secondary hyperparathyroidism → ↑ bone resorption
Calcium deficiencyInsufficient substrate for bone mineralisation
Physical inactivityWolff's law – bone responds to mechanical loading; no load → bone loss

Secondary causes worth screening for: Cushing's/exogenous steroids, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism, myeloma, CKD (renal osteodystrophy), IBD, RA, drugs (PPI, cyclosporine) [3][4].


2. Osteoporotic Hip Fractures – The Core of the Lecture

82-year-old woman, walks with stick, IHD on aspirin, slip and fall on level ground, left hip pain, unable to walk. [1]

Physical exam findings:

  • Left hip painful to any movement
  • Lower limb shortened
  • Externally rotated [1]

Why shortened and externally rotated? The hip flexors (iliopsoas) and external rotators pull the distal fragment upward and outward once the femoral neck fractures. The leg cannot resist gravity and muscle pull, so it shortens and rotates externally. This is the classic posture of a displaced neck of femur fracture.

Shenton's line is an imaginary curved line drawn along the inferior border of the superior pubic ramus and the medial border of the femoral neck. If this line is disrupted (broken), a femoral neck fracture is present [1].

This is a simple, high-yield radiological sign on AP pelvis X-ray.

The proximal femur is divided into distinct fracture zones [1]:

  • Intracapsular – femoral neck (within the hip joint capsule)
  • Extracapsular – subdivided into:
    • Trochanteric: basal, pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric (transtrochanteric)
    • Subtrochanteric: defined as the region within 5 cm below the lesser trochanter [1]

This classification determines blood-supply risk and implant choice.

The blood supply to the femoral head is retrograde – retinacular arteries from the medial and lateral circumflex femoral arteries run along the neck beneath the capsule to reach the head. The ligamentum teres artery is NOT effective in adults. The epiphyseal blood supply is dominant. [1]

Key vascular anatomy (from slide diagrams) [1]:

  • The medial femoral circumflex artery (branch of profunda femoris) is the dominant supply; it forms an extracapsular arterial ring around the base of the femoral neck.
  • From this ring, ascending cervical (retinacular) arteries travel within the retinacula of Weitbrecht along the femoral neck to form a subsynovial intracapsular arterial ring near the femoral head.
  • The lateral femoral circumflex artery contributes ascending, transverse, and descending branches.
  • The foveolar artery (from the obturator artery via the ligamentum teres) supplies only a small area around the fovea and is insufficient in adults.

Why this is critical: An intracapsular fracture can tear these retinacular vessels. Because the blood supply runs retrogradely (from distal to proximal along the neck), any displacement of an intracapsular fracture risks devascularising the femoral head → avascular necrosis (AVN). This is the entire rationale for the surgical decision tree.

FeatureIntracapsular (Neck of Femur)Extracapsular (Trochanteric)
LocationWithin the hip joint capsuleOutside the capsule
Blood supply riskHIGH – retinacular vessels disruptedLOW – good blood supply in trochanteric region
AVN riskHigh (especially if displaced)Negligible
Non-union riskHighLow (cancellous bone heals well)
Key concernSave vs replace the femoral headRestore neck-shaft angle, choose correct implant

Intracapsular fracture – worry of AVN, non-union. Extracapsular fracture – worry of fixation stability and mechanical alignment. [1]

Garden classification is the standard classification for femoral neck fractures [1]:

Garden GradeDescriptionDisplacementTrabecular Pattern
IIncomplete / valgus impactedUndisplacedTrabeculae angulated into valgus
IIComplete but undisplacedUndisplacedTrabeculae aligned normally
IIIComplete, partially displacedDisplacedTrabeculae disrupted, femoral head rotated
IVComplete, fully displacedDisplacedNo trabecular continuity, head free-floating

Simplified for clinical practice: Garden I & II = undisplaced; Garden III & IV = displaced [1].

AVN risk [1]:

  • Minimally displaced fracture → < 10% AVN risk
  • Displaced fracture → ~50% AVN risk

Trabecular pattern: compressive (medial calcar) and tensile (lateral) trabeculae are shown on the slide. The alignment of these trabeculae on X-ray helps determine the Garden grade [1].

Considerations: AGE, Displacement, Save the femoral head in young age / undisplaced [1].

Other factors [1]:

  • Time of presentation → AVN risk increases after 6 hours
  • Patient's general health
  • Risk factors for internal fixation failure: osteoporosis, too comminuted, sepsis

Factors with increased risk for fixation failure: Old age, Osteoporosis, Vertical fracture pattern, Delayed presentation [1]

ScenarioTreatmentRationale
Undisplaced (Garden I/II)Internal fixation (cannulated screws)Prevent displacement; preserve native hip; AVN risk low (< 10%)
Displaced (Garden III/IV) – Young patientReduction + Internal fixationSalvage the joint – young patients tolerate reoperation if needed; native hip is worth saving
Displaced (Garden III/IV) – Old patientHemiarthroplastyPrevent reoperation and control pain; AVN rate ~50% makes fixation unreliable

Garden I (valgus impacted fracture) → internal fixation to prevent displacement [1]

What the Garden films show: valgus-impacted neck (Garden I) with subtle trabecular angulation vs frankly displaced Garden IV head–neck discontinuity — undisplaced → screws; displaced elderly → arthroplasty. [1]

High Yield – Garden I Trap

A valgus impacted (Garden I) fracture may look nearly normal on X-ray. The trabeculae appear angulated into valgus. If missed and untreated, it can displace → converting a simple fixation case into a hemiarthroplasty case. Always look for disruption of Shenton's line and abnormal trabecular angulation.

41/F, Garden IV fracture → Reduction and Internal Fixation (not hemiarthroplasty) because she is young [1]. At 6 months: union achieved, no collapse/shortening, returned to recreational walking status.

Total Tip Apex Index = 12 mm (measured on immediate post-op X-ray) [1]. The tip-apex distance (TAD) measures how close the screw tip sits to the apex of the femoral head on AP + lateral views combined. A TAD < 25 mm is the target to minimise risk of screw cut-out.

Hemiarthroplasty types [1]:

TypeDescriptionFeatures
Monoblock (Austin Moore – AMA)One-piece, uncementedCheap, simple; can be press-fit; risk of loosening
Modular Cemented UnipolarSeparate head and stem, cementedMore secure fixation; one articulation point
Modular Cemented BipolarTwo articulating surfaces (inner + outer bearing)Theoretically reduces acetabular wear; more expensive
  • Cemented vs uncemented: Cemented prostheses (e.g. Thompson) provide immediate stability and allow immediate weight-bearing; uncemented (Austin Moore) rely on bone in-growth.
  • Mono-bloc vs Modular: Modular allows intra-operative adjustment of head size.

Post-operative precautions (to prevent dislocation) [5]:

  • Do not squat or cross legs
  • Do not flex hip > 90°
  • Use abduction pillow
  • Use high-low chair

3. Extracapsular (Trochanteric) Fractures

85-year-old woman, fall on level ground, right hip pain → X-ray shows extracapsular fracture [1].

Aim: Return to pre-injury status [1]

Restoration of neck-shaft angle. Avoid varus alignment of proximal fragment. Stabilize fracture to facilitate early mobilization. [1]

Why avoid varus? The normal neck-shaft angle is ~130°. If the proximal fragment tilts into varus (angle decreases), the abductor mechanism moment arm shortens → Trendelenburg gait and increased stress on the implant → fixation failure.

Two types of pertrochanteric fractures [1]:

FeatureStableUnstable
Fracture patternOblique patternReverse obliquity
ComminutionMinimalSignificant
ExtensionNoneSubtrochanteric extension
ImplantSliding hip screw (DHS)Cephalomedullary nail

Recognize the unstable patterns and choose an intramedullary device to reduce risk of fixation failure [1]

FeatureDHS (Sliding Hip Screw)Cephalomedullary Nail
Cost~$1000 (cheap)~$7000 (expensive)
Technical difficultyEasierMore difficult
Iatrogenic fracture riskLessHigher (nail insertion can split femur)
Fracture pattern requiredSimple, stableUnstable, reverse oblique, subtrochanteric
BiomechanicsExtramedullary; allows controlled collapseIntramedullary – mechanically stronger, shorter lever arm
CollapseMay allow excessive collapse in unstable patternsLess chance of excessive collapse

DHS length: 2 holes as good as 4 holes (Bolhofner JOT 1999, McLoughin JOT 2000) [1]

Why does the DHS allow "sliding"? The lag screw passes through a barrel on the side plate. As the fracture settles (bone resorbs at the fracture site), the screw slides within the barrel, allowing controlled impaction. This converts shear forces to compressive forces at the fracture site → promotes healing. However, in unstable patterns, excessive sliding leads to varus collapse.

Why is intramedullary fixation biomechanically stronger? The nail sits inside the medullary canal, closer to the mechanical axis. The bending moment (distance from load to implant) is much smaller than with an extramedullary plate, so less stress on the implant.

The lecture shows the AO classification [1] – used to categorise fracture complexity and guide implant choice. The key clinical takeaway is the stable vs unstable distinction described above.

AO stability spectrum [1]: The AO 31-A classification subdivides trochanteric fractures into a 3 × 3 grid (A1.1–A3.3). A curved dividing line separates stable from unstable patterns:

AO GroupPatternStability
31-A1 (.1, .2, .3)Pertrochanteric simpleMostly stable
31-A2 (.1, .2, .3)Pertrochanteric multifragmentaryTransition zone – increasingly unstable
31-A3 (.1, .2, .3)Intertrochanteric / reverse obliqueUnstable

As comminution and fracture complexity increase (A1 → A3, .1 → .3), the pattern shifts from stable to unstable, guiding the switch from DHS to cephalomedullary nail [1].


4. Distal Radius Fractures

A: Extra-articular (within width of joint) – Colles or Smith fracture [1] B: Partial articular – Barton fracture [1] C: Complete articular [1]

FractureMechanismDisplacementKey Feature
Colles'FOOSH (fall on outstretched hand), dorsiflexionDorsal displacement, dorsal angulation"Dinner fork" deformity
Smith'sFall on flexed wrist (or direct blow to dorsum)Volar displacementReverse Colles'
Barton'sAxial load + shearPartial articular fracture-dislocationUnstable – often needs surgery

Problems with acute displacement of distal radius fractures [1]:

  • Pain
  • Unstable fracture
  • Nerve impingement (median nerve)
  • Loss of reduction
  • Skin and tendon impingement

Changes in wrist mechanics may lead to arthrosis, especially with intra-articular steps [1]. Even small articular incongruities (step-offs) at the radiocarpal joint accelerate cartilage degeneration.

"Reduction if necessary, Stabilization if necessary, Rehabilitation ALWAYS" [1]

Steps for closed management:

  1. Hematoma block – inject local anaesthetic into the fracture haematoma [1]
  2. Closed reduction – longitudinal traction → disimpact fragment [1]
  3. Casting – 3-point fixation [1]

BEWARE: Bad cast (too tight or too loose) → loss of reduction [1]

Evaluate patient's functional demand, do a neurological exam (median nerve), fluoroscopy, CT assessment [1]

Most do NOT need an operation: non-displaced fractures, well reduced stable fractures, very low demand patients, geriatric [1]

Absolute indications for surgery: [1]

  • High-grade open fracture
  • Acute (progressing) median nerve palsy
  • Associated carpal dislocation

High Yield – Median Nerve in Distal Radius Fracture

Always examine the median nerve (sensation over thenar eminence and palmar aspect of radial 3.5 fingers; motor – thumb opposition/abduction). The median nerve runs through the carpal tunnel just volar to the distal radius. A displaced fragment or haematoma can compress it acutely. Progressive median nerve palsy = urgent surgical indication.

Operative treatment: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) with locking plate – used for displaced intra-articular fractures [1].

Cast immobilizationSurgical repair
Bone healingAfter 4 weeksImmediate stability
MobilizationAfter cast removalEarly mobilization
RehabPT/OT – ROM exercises + strengtheningStrengthening after 4-6 weeks

5. Vertebral Compression Fractures

F70, fall injury and back pain [1] – typical presentation of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Clinical features:

  • Acute mechanical back pain after minimal trauma (or spontaneous)
  • Height loss, progressive kyphosis ("dowager's hump")
  • Pain worse with sitting/standing, better lying down
  • Tenderness on percussion over affected spinous process

Radiological signs [1]:

  • Intravertebral vacuum cleft – a horizontal radiolucent line within the collapsed vertebral body (seen on lateral X-ray), indicating osteonecrosis/non-union of the vertebral body.

What the vertebral XR panel shows: thoracolumbar wedge compression on lateral film, sometimes with a blue-arrowed intravertebral vacuum cleft — fragility collapse, not always “just a sprain.” [1]

  • Kyphotic angle (θ) – measured between lines drawn along the superior and inferior endplates of the fractured vertebra on lateral X-ray or sagittal CT. Progressive kyphosis (e.g. > 40°) may warrant intervention.
  • Anterior wedging of the vertebral body is the hallmark deformity on lateral imaging.

Principle: Reduction if necessary, Stabilization if necessary, Rehabilitation ALWAYS [1]

From GC 031 [2]:

  • Conservative: Symptoms usually improve in 6-8 weeks. Analgesia, bracing, physiotherapy.
  • Vertebral body augmentation: Kyphoplasty / Vertebroplasty – inject cement into collapsed vertebral body.
  • Open surgical intervention – indications [2]:
    • Significant neurological deficits
    • Progressive and severe kyphotic deformity
    • Intractable pain

This is a distinct entity from typical osteoporotic fractures [1].

Reduced bone turnover → microfractures accumulation → stress fracture → eventual displacement with minimal trauma [1]

Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclasts so effectively that bone remodelling virtually stops. While this prevents bone resorption, it also prevents the normal repair of micro-damage. Over years, these micro-cracks accumulate → eventually a stress fracture develops → completes with trivial force.

Cellular mechanism of bisphosphonate action (slide diagram) [1]:

  1. Panel A – Untreated postmenopausal bone: Osteoclasts actively resorb bone → resorption > formation → high bone turnover, net bone loss.
  2. Panel B – Early bisphosphonate therapy: Bisphosphonate molecules bind to bone mineral at sites of active resorption and accumulate in bone. Resorption still exceeds formation; turnover remains high initially.
  3. Panel C – After ~6 months of therapy: Osteoclasts undergo early apoptosis → fewer osteoclasts → resorption ≈ formation → low steady-state bone turnover similar to premenopausal rates. However, this suppressed turnover also reduces the capacity to repair micro-damage, which over years leads to atypical fracture risk.

  • Prodromal bilateral thigh pain (the lecture case: F72 with bilateral pain for 5 months before fracture) [1]
  • Mechanical pain with walking
  • Pain on percussion, rotation, and axial loading of the thigh [1]
  • History of bisphosphonate use > 3 years [1]

"Beak" sign on X-ray and "dreaded black line" [1]

The beak sign is a cortical thickening ("bumpy") on the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft with a small transverse lucent line – the stress fracture. The dreaded black line is a wider transverse radiolucent line indicating incomplete fracture propagation.

  • Both-sided open reduction if bilateral involvement [1]
  • Stop bisphosphonate, consider switching to teriparatide (anabolic agent) to promote bone formation and healing.

Benefit of bisphosphonates still outweighs risks [1] – atypical fractures are rare compared to the huge number of fragility fractures prevented.

Fractures prevented vs bisphosphonate-associated AFFs per 100,000 women (slide data) [1]:

Years of RxPopulationClinical fractures preventedHip fractures preventedAFFs
3Asian330918
5Asian52417438
10Asian831360236
3White5411492
5White8592868
10White136359138

The benefit-to-risk ratio narrows with prolonged use (especially > 5 years in Asian women), supporting the practice of bisphosphonate drug holidays after 3–5 years in lower-risk patients [1].


Vertebral collapse, Proximal humerus, Olecranon, Distal femur, Pelvic insufficiency fracture [1]

7.1 Upper vs Lower Limb Fractures

Lower limb – for locomotion: Difficulty with pain control with weight bearing. Significant morbidity with displacement/delayed union. [1]

Upper limb – for self-care function: Better managed by immobilization. Usually recovers with time and rehabilitative training. [1]

Translation: Lower limb fractures in the elderly almost always need surgical fixation because you need the patient walking to prevent the lethal cascade of immobility (pneumonia, DVT/PE, pressure sores, deconditioning). Upper limb fractures can often be managed conservatively.


Old age patient with fall and hip pain, unable to walk, pain on weight bearing. Repeated X-rays – no abnormality. Use advanced imaging: [1]

  • MRI (Most sensitive) – shows bone oedema on T2
  • Bone Scan
  • CT

Why does this happen? Impacted fractures (especially Garden I) may not show a clear fracture line on plain X-ray. The trabeculae are crushed together rather than separated. MRI detects the bone marrow oedema surrounding the fracture, making it the gold standard.


9. General Assessment & Management Principles

General assessment: Mode of injury, Associated injury, General state, Medical conditions, Local features [1]

Management principles: [1]

  • Avoid extensive immobilization
  • Pain control
  • Early function
  • Management of osteoporosis
  • Fall prevention

Non-pharmacological: [1]

  • Exercise (weight-bearing)
  • Sunlight (endogenous vitamin D synthesis)
  • Nutritional (Vitamin D + Calcium) – Ca 1200 mg/day, Vit D 800-1000 IU/day
  • Risk factor modification (smoking cessation, alcohol reduction)

Pharmacological: [1]

DrugMechanismKey Points
Bisphosphonates (Alendronate)Inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorptionFirst-line; S/E: GI upset, ONJ (jaw osteonecrosis), atypical femoral fractures (> 3 yrs)
TeriparatideRecombinant PTH analogue → stimulates osteoblastsAnabolic; for very high risk; max 2 years use; S/E: dizziness, hypercalcaemia
DenosumabRANKL inhibitor → ↓ osteoclast differentiationPotent antiresorptive; S/E: rebound vertebral fractures if stopped abruptly
Strontium ranelateDual: ↑ bone formation + ↓ resorptionRarely used now (CV risk)
SERMs (Raloxifene)Selective oestrogen receptor modulatorReduces vertebral fractures but NOT hip fractures; suitable for low-risk postmenopausal women
HRTOestrogen replacementEffective but ↑ breast cancer, CVD, VTE risk; now rarely used for osteoporosis alone

Risk LevelCriteriaRecommended Treatment
Very highMultiple fractures; Recent MOF within 2 yrs; T ≤ −3.0; Fracture on antiresorptiveAnabolic agents (teriparatide)
HighAge ≥65 + T ≤ −2.5; FRAX MOF > 20% or hip > 3%; Prior fracture > 2 yrs agoPotent antiresorptives (bisphosphonates / denosumab)
LowAge < 65; T ≤ −2.5; No prior fracturesRaloxifene (for females)

From the supporting material on falls management [7]:

  • Screen all persons > 65 annually for fall history
  • Modify risk: review medications (especially tranquillisers, antihypertensives), correct vision, physiotherapy for balance, home hazard assessment
  • Vitamin D 800 IU/day reduces falls in those with low baseline levels
  • Hip protectors may reduce hip fractures in nursing homes but compliance is poor


Exam Intelligence

TrapCorrect Thinking
Giving hemiarthroplasty to a young patient with displaced NOFWrong – young patients get reduction + internal fixation to salvage the native joint, accepting higher reoperation risk
Using DHS for an unstable intertrochanteric fractureWrong – unstable patterns (reverse oblique, subtrochanteric extension, comminution) need cephalomedullary nail
Missing an occult hip fracture because X-ray is normalAlways get MRI if clinical suspicion is high with normal X-ray
Confusing osteoporosis with osteomalaciaOsteoporosis = ↓ bone mass, normal mineralisation; Osteomalacia = ↓ mineralisation of osteoid
Thinking bisphosphonate-related atypical fractures mean bisphosphonates should be avoidedBenefits of bisphosphonates still outweigh risks [1]
Teriparatide causing atypical femoral fractureNo – atypical femoral fractures are a bisphosphonate S/E. Teriparatide S/E = dizziness, hypercalcaemia
Saying raloxifene prevents hip fracturesNo – raloxifene reduces vertebral fractures only, not hip fractures [7]

  • Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis → treat with alendronate (bisphosphonate) [8]
  • Iatrogenic steroid (e.g. repeated knee injections for OA) → most likely cause of osteoporosis in a middle-aged man [9]
  • Teriparatide side effect = dizziness (not atypical fracture, not GI reflux, not hypocalcaemia) [10]
  • Long-term PPI → bone fractures (proven association) [11]
  • Post-hip fracture DVT → classic SAQ scenario (see 2024 SAQ Q8) [12]

High Yield Summary

  1. Intracapsular NOF fracture

    • Displaced + old → hemiarthroplasty. Displaced + young → reduction + internal fixation. Undisplaced → internal fixation.
  2. Extracapsular fracture

    • Stable → DHS. Unstable → cephalomedullary nail. Always restore neck-shaft angle.
  3. Blood supply

    • Retrograde via retinacular arteries – disrupted by intracapsular displacement → AVN.
  4. Garden classification

    • I/II = undisplaced. III/IV = displaced. AVN: undisplaced ~10%, displaced ~50%.
  5. Distal radius

    • Most don't need surgery. Absolute surgical indications: high-grade open fracture, progressive median nerve palsy, carpal dislocation.
  6. Vertebral compression fracture

    • Conservative → improves in 6-8 weeks. Surgery only for neuro deficit, severe kyphosis, intractable pain.
  7. Atypical femoral fractures

    • Bisphosphonate > 3 years. Prodromal bilateral thigh pain. Beak sign / dreaded black line. Benefits of bisphosphonates still > risks.
  8. Osteoporosis

    • T ≤ −2.5. Treat: lifestyle + pharmacotherapy (bisphosphonates first-line; teriparatide for very high risk).
  9. Occult hip fracture

    • Normal X-ray + clinical suspicion → MRI (most sensitive).
  10. Management principles

  • Avoid immobilization, pain control, early function, treat osteoporosis, prevent falls.

Active Recall - Lecture Notes

[1] Lecture slides: GC 235. Osteoporotic Related Fractures.pdf [2] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf [3] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (Endocrinology – Metabolic bone disease) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (Section 2.4 – Osteoporosis) [5] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (Hip fracture management) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf [7] Medicine lecture slides: Management of Falls in Older Persons - Moncada LV 2011 (AAFP).pdf [8] Past papers: 2020 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ paper.pdf (Section B, Q4) [9] Past papers: 2024 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q31) [10] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q29) [11] Past papers: 2022 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q40) [12] Past papers: 2024 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Q8)

On this page

No Headings