GC227 Cervical Spine Pathology
Cervical spine pathology encompasses a range of disorders affecting the cervical vertebrae, intervertebral discs, spinal cord, and surrounding structures, including degenerative disc disease, herniation, stenosis, myelopathy, fractures, and inflammatory conditions that can result in neck pain, radiculopathy, or neurological deficits.
Cervical Spine Pathology — Comprehensive Exam-Ready Notes
This lecture (GC 227, Prof. Graham Shea) is an orthopaedic surgery lecture divided into three modules [1]:
- Module 1 – Imaging of the Cervical Spine: How to read and interpret cervical X-rays and advanced imaging systematically.
- Module 2 – Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy: The two major clinical syndromes arising from cervical spine degeneration/pathology, their examination, investigation, and management.
- Module 3 – Cervical Trauma and Spinal Cord Injury: Emergency management of cervical fractures, spinal cord injury syndromes, surgical indications, complications, and rehabilitation.
Why it matters clinically: Cervical spine pathology spans elective orthopaedics (spondylotic myelopathy) and acute trauma (spinal cord injury). Both scenarios are high-stakes — a missed cervical fracture can cause permanent quadriplegia, and delayed myelopathy surgery leads to irreversible neurological decline.
Exam relevance: This lecture is repeatedly tested in Fourth Summative MCQs (2020 Q57, 2022 Q62, 2025 Q43, Q88), SAQs (2023 Q8), and EMQs (2023 Q11). Questions often focus on clinical signs of myelopathy, spinal cord syndromes, X-ray interpretation landmarks, and emergency management principles.
Module 1: Imaging of the Cervical Spine
The lecture teaches a structured approach [1]:
| Step | What to Assess | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage / Adequacy | Must see skull base to C7/T1 junction | An inadequate film cannot rule out pathology. If C7/T1 not visualised, need swimmer's view or CT |
| Alignment | Four smooth lordotic lines on lateral view | Anterior vertebral line, Posterior vertebral line, Spinolaminar line, Spinous process tips |
| Bone | Vertebral body shape, endplates, fractures | Look for destruction, compression, teardrop fragments |
| Disc space | Height of disc spaces | Loss of disc height → spondylodiscitis, degeneration |
| Soft tissue | Prevertebral soft tissue width | Swelling suggests haematoma or abscess |
Adequate coverage should be from the skull base down to the C7/T1 junction. [1]
Why Adequacy Matters
Many cervical injuries occur at the cervicothoracic junction (C6-T1). If your lateral X-ray does not show C7/T1, you cannot exclude a fracture there. This is a classic exam trap — the answer to "what is wrong with this XR?" may simply be "inadequate XR – can't tell."
Four alignment lines: Anterior vertebral line, Posterior vertebral line, Spinolaminar line, Spinous process tip line. [1]
Why four lines? Each line traces a different anatomical boundary:
- Anterior vertebral line — traces the front of the vertebral bodies. Disruption suggests vertebral body fracture or subluxation.
- Posterior vertebral line — traces the back of the vertebral bodies (forms the anterior wall of the spinal canal). Disruption here means the spinal canal is compromised.
- Spinolaminar line — posterior wall of the spinal canal. Disruption suggests posterior element fracture or ligamentous injury.
- Spinous process tips — most posterior landmark. Widened interspinous space ("fanning") suggests posterior ligamentous disruption.
All four lines should follow a smooth lordotic curve. Any step-off or angulation is abnormal.
Destruction of inferior C5 endplate, superior C6 endplate, reduced C5/6 disc space, resulting in focal kyphosis — due to bacterial spondylodiscitis affecting C5/C6. [1]
Why does spondylodiscitis cause focal kyphosis? The intervertebral disc has no blood supply in adults; it relies on the vertebral endplates. Bacterial infection (usually haematogenous Staph aureus) seeds in the richly vascularised endplates and destroys the disc → loss of anterior column height → segmental kyphosis.
Oblique views facilitate assessment of foraminal narrowing secondary to decrease in disc height and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy. [1]
The uncovertebral joints (joints of Luschka) are unique to the cervical spine. They sit on the lateral margins of the vertebral bodies. Hypertrophy of these joints narrows the neural foramen, compressing exiting nerve roots → radiculopathy.
6 mm at C2 / < ½ vertebral body depth. 22 mm at C6 / < 1 vertebral body depth. [1]
| Level | Normal Width | Rule of Thumb |
|---|---|---|
| C2 (upper cervical) | ≤ 6 mm | < half the vertebral body depth |
| C6 (lower cervical) | ≤ 22 mm | < one vertebral body depth |
Why the difference? The oesophagus and trachea lie anterior to the lower cervical spine, so normal soft tissue is thicker below C4. Increased prevertebral soft tissue swelling at any level suggests haematoma (fracture/vascular injury) or abscess (infection).
Normal cervical lordosis of 15–20 degrees. [1]
Loss of lordosis (straightening) may be a sign of muscle spasm, degenerative change, or ligamentous injury. Fixed kyphosis is important for surgical planning.
Midsagittal diameter of the spinal canal: Relative stenosis if < 12 mm; absolute stenosis if < 10 mm. [1]
Dynamic stenosis = distance from posteroinferior corner of cranial vertebra to anterosuperior edge of caudal lamina. Dynamic stenosis if < 12 mm. [1]
Dynamic instability if positional change > 3.5 mm or > 11° between adjacent vertebrae. [1]
| Measurement | Threshold | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Midsagittal AP diameter | < 12 mm = relative stenosis, < 10 mm = absolute | Predisposes to cord compression |
| Dynamic stenosis distance | < 12 mm | Canal narrows further with movement |
| Olisthesis (slip) | > 3.5 mm or > 11° change on flexion/extension | Unstable segment |
Why dynamic views? Static X-rays may miss instability. Flexion and extension views reveal abnormal motion between segments.
ADI (atlanto-dental interval) should be < 4 mm; assess in flexion and extension views. SAC (space available for the cord) should be > 14 mm. [1]
Causes: rheumatoid arthritis, Down's syndrome. [1]
Why RA and Down syndrome? Both conditions feature ligamentous laxity:
- RA: Synovial pannus erodes the transverse ligament of C1, allowing C1 to slide forward on C2 (atlantoaxial subluxation).
- Down syndrome: Generalised ligamentous laxity predisposes to atlantoaxial instability (important for anaesthetic clearance and sports participation).
The ADI is the distance between the anterior arch of C1 and the dens. The SAC (Steel's rule of thirds: dens = ⅓, cord = ⅓, safety space = ⅓) is what's left for the spinal cord. If SAC < 14 mm, cord compression is likely.
Basilar invagination: odontoid prolapsing into the foramen magnum. [1]
Chamberlain's line: Line joining posterior hard palate to opisthion (dens should not pass). McGregor's line: Line joining posterior hard palate to most caudal point of occipital curve (dens should be < 4.5 mm above). [1]
Causes: congenital (achondroplasia) and acquired (rheumatoid arthritis). [1]
Why does this matter? The odontoid migrating upward compresses the brainstem/upper cervical cord at the foramen magnum — can be lethal or cause severe myelopathy.
Module 2: Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
The lecture shows a slide of pathological causes [1]. These include:
- Disc protrusion/herniation (most common acute cause)
- Osteophyte formation (most common chronic cause — cervical spondylosis)
- OPLL (ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament)
- Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy/buckling
- Facet joint hypertrophy
- Subluxation/instability
Why the cervical spine is vulnerable: The cervical canal is narrower than the lumbar canal, and the spinal cord (rather than cauda equina) runs through it. Even modest compression can cause devastating myelopathy.
Clinical features of cervical myelopathy: Numbness or sensory disturbance (fingers, upper limb); Loss of hand dexterity; Poor proprioception + spastic gait; Motor weakness and sphincteric dysfunction appear in the late stage; Pain is NOT a predominant feature. [1]
UMN signs below level of compression; LMN signs at the level of compression. [1]
High Yield: Pain is NOT a predominant feature of myelopathy
This is a critical exam discriminator. Myelopathy presents with insidious loss of function (clumsiness, gait difficulty), NOT pain. If the chief complaint is pain, think radiculopathy. This was directly tested in 2025 MCQ Q43 — "neck pain" is NOT a common symptom of cervical myelopathy.
Why UMN below and LMN at the level?
- At the level of cord compression, the anterior horn cells (LMN cell bodies) are directly damaged → LMN signs (wasting, fasciculations, hyporeflexia) in the corresponding myotome.
- Below the level, the descending corticospinal tracts are interrupted → UMN signs (spasticity, hyperreflexia, Babinski sign) in the limbs below.
| Sign | How to Perform | What It Shows | Lecture Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hoffman's sign | Flick the DIP of the middle finger into flexion | Involuntary thumb/index finger flexion (hyperreflexic C8 reflex) | Positive = dis-inhibition of C8 reflex → lesion above C8 |
| Finger escape sign | Arms outstretched, palms down, fingers adducted | Ulnar 2-3 fingers drift into abduction/flexion | Deficient adduction/extension of ulnar fingers (Ono et al. 1987) |
| 10-second test | Rapidly open and close fists for 10 seconds | Count complete cycles; normally > 20 | Look for slow, incomplete finger extension; dyssynergy between wrist and fingers |
| Inverted supinator reflex | Tap brachioradialis tendon | Absent brachioradialis contraction + hyperactive finger flexion (C8) | Signifies lesion at C5/6 or above (Babinski 1910) |
| Scapulohumeral reflex | Tap scapular spine/acromion | Trapezius contraction with scapular elevation | Cord compression above C3 vertebral body |
Hoffman's sign: Involuntary finger flexor contraction due to activation of a monosynaptic stretch reflex. Positive response represents dis-inhibition of a C8 reflex, indicates lesion above C8. [1]
Finger escape sign: Present arms with fingers forward and palms down. Deficient adduction and/or extension of ulnar 2 or 3 fingers. [1]
10 second test: Number of complete cycles of movement within 10 seconds. Rhythm of movement. Difficult, slow and incomplete finger extension. Exaggerated (failure of synergy between wrist and finger). [1]
Inverted supinator reflex: Introduced by Babinski in 1910. Signifying lesion at C5/6 or above. Two components: Absence of contraction of brachioradialis + Hyperactive contraction of finger flexors (C8). [1]
Scapulohumeral reflex: Cord compression above C3 vertebral body. [1]
Why is the inverted supinator reflex important? It demonstrates both LMN (absent brachioradialis at C5/6 — the level of damage) and UMN (hyperreflexic C8 finger flexors — below the level) in a single reflex test. This beautifully localises a C5/6 cord lesion [1] [2].
Long tract signs: Lower limb hyperreflexia, Clonus and upgoing Babinski, Dorsal column function (Romberg, Tandem walking), Lhermitte sign (severe demyelination and hyper-excitability of dorsal column). [1]
Sphincter function: Urinary frequency, Retention, Overflow incontinence, Change in bowel habit. [1]
Functional assessment: Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. [1]
Lhermitte sign explained: An electric shock-like sensation radiating down the spine/limbs on neck flexion. It indicates dorsal column irritability — the flexion mechanically stretches an already compromised posterior cord. Classically associated with MS but also seen in cervical myelopathy.
Four scoring categories: Upper limb motor and sensory, Lower limb function, Urinary sphincter. Score from 0–17. Guide of disease severity, facilitates decision making for surgery, and monitoring of disease progression/recovery. [1]
The JOA score is the standard functional outcome measure for CSM. A lower score = worse function. It is used to document baseline severity, decide on surgical intervention, and track post-operative recovery.
Spinal cord ascends approximately one segment during its development. Cervical discs generally lie opposite spinal cord segments which are numbered one lower than the number of roots passing them. [1]
What this means: Because the cord is shorter than the vertebral column, the C5/6 disc level lies opposite the C6/7 cord segment. A disc at C5/6 compresses the C6 nerve root in the foramen (radiculopathy) and the C6/7 cord segment (myelopathy). This offset increases further down the spine.
MRI — basic interpretation: Level of lesion, location; Pathoanatomy (disc, osteophyte, OPLL, flavum); Obliteration of CSF space; Cord shape/cross-sectional area; Intramedullary signal change (myelomalacia). [1]
Myelomalacia = T2 hyperintense signal within the cord on MRI, representing gliosis/necrosis from chronic compression. This is an ominous sign — it suggests irreversible cord damage and poorer surgical outcomes.
Plain CT scan to delineate OPLL. Dynamic X-rays to diagnose atlantoaxial subluxation in RA. Important to rule out other pathological process. [1]
Ectopic calcification as a cause of cord compression. Much more common in Asian vs non-Asian populations (up to 2–4%). Male predominance, affects younger population. More commonly affects cervical than thoracic spine. [1]
OPLL — High Yield for HKU Exams
Given HKU's patient population, OPLL is a particularly important cause of cervical myelopathy. CT is the best modality to delineate the extent of ossification (better than MRI for bone). OPLL can be missed on MRI alone because ossified bone can be confused with disc.
High prevalence of cervical spine involvement. Formation of retroodontoid pannus. Synovial inflammation predisposes to cervical instability: Atlantoaxial subluxation (C1/2), Subaxial subluxation, Vertical subluxation (basilar invagination). Use of RA medications reduces the incidence of cervical involvement. [1]
Why RA affects the cervical spine: The C1/C2 articulation has extensive synovial tissue. RA pannus erodes the transverse ligament and dens, causing instability. Modern DMARDs (especially biologics) have significantly reduced the incidence of severe cervical involvement.
Progressively deteriorating disorder: 75% deteriorate in a stepwise fashion, 20% deteriorate slowly and steadily, 5% have rapid onset with a stable plateau. At present, no good conservative treatment options. [1]
No Good Conservative Option for CSM
This is a key teaching point. Unlike radiculopathy (90% respond to conservative treatment), myelopathy is progressive and surgery is the only disease-modifying treatment. Conservative measures (collar, physio) may help symptoms but do not halt disease progression.
Progressive neurologic deficit; Significantly impaired ADL (JOA score); Compatible imaging findings. [1]
All three should be present. Imaging alone (e.g. cord compression on MRI) without clinical correlation is not an automatic indication for surgery.
| Factor | Favours Anterior | Favours Posterior |
|---|---|---|
| Sagittal alignment | Fixed kyphotic deformities | Preserved lordosis |
| Pathoanatomy | Disc protrusions into spinal cord | Infolding/thickening of ligamentum flavum |
| Number of levels | 1–2 levels | ≥ 3 levels |
| Subluxation/instability | Fusion indicated (either approach) | Fusion indicated (either approach) |
| Neck pain | — | Laminoplasty may cause more post-op axial neck pain |
General considerations: Fixed kyphotic deformities favour anterior approach. Disc protrusions better treated with anterior technique. Infolding/thickening of ligamentum flavum better treated with posterior technique. 3 level pathology or more favours posterior approach. Fusion is indicated if subluxation or instability. Laminoplasty patients may experience more post-op axial neck pain. [1]
Examples of procedures:
- Anterior: ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion), Corpectomy
- Posterior: Laminoplasty (open-door technique preserves posterior elements), Laminectomy ± fusion
Anterior surgery: Esophageal injury (intra-op or late due to implant), Vertebral artery injury, Airway compromise, Pseudoarthrosis (failed fusion), Adjacent level degeneration. [1]
Posterior surgery: Post-op kyphosis, Axial symptoms (shoulder and neck pain), C5 nerve root paresis. [1]
C5 palsy after posterior surgery is a well-known complication — the C5 root is tethered and short; posterior decompression allows the cord to drift backward, stretching C5 preferentially. Patients develop deltoid weakness post-operatively.
Cervical Radiculopathy
Clinical features: Unilateral arm pain or sensory disturbance; May have associated weakness; Dermatomal distribution; Neck pain. [1]
Signs: Spurling's test; Shoulder abduction test; Myotomal weakness; Reduced upper limb reflexes. [1]
Spurling's test: Extension + ipsilateral rotation + axial compression → narrows the neural foramen → reproduces radicular pain. A positive test is highly specific for foraminal nerve root compression [2].
Shoulder abduction test: Patient places ipsilateral hand on top of head — relieves radicular symptoms by reducing tension on the nerve root. Positive = reduction in pain.
| Root | Motor | Reflex | Sensory |
|---|---|---|---|
| C5 | Deltoid, biceps | Biceps jerk | Lateral arm (regimental badge) |
| C6 | Wrist extensors, biceps, brachioradialis | Brachioradialis jerk | Lateral forearm, thumb, index finger |
| C7 | Triceps, wrist flexors, finger extensors | Triceps jerk | Middle finger |
| C8 | Finger flexors, intrinsic hand muscles | — | Medial forearm, ring & little finger |
| T1 | Interossei | — | Medial arm |
Cervical myelopathy (symptoms may overlap — myeloradiculopathy); Peripheral nerve compression; Shoulder pathology. [1]
Myeloradiculopathy
Patients can have BOTH myelopathy and radiculopathy simultaneously. A patient with clumsy hands AND unilateral arm pain may have multi-level cervical spondylosis causing both. Always examine for upper motor neuron signs even when radiculopathy is suspected.
X-rays (AP/lateral, Oblique views for foraminal narrowing); CT scan; MRI scan (confirm nerve root/cord compression); NCV/EMG. [1]
NCV/EMG helps differentiate cervical radiculopathy from peripheral nerve entrapment (e.g. carpal tunnel, cubital tunnel). In radiculopathy, the sensory nerve action potential is preserved (because the lesion is proximal to the dorsal root ganglion), whereas in peripheral neuropathy it is reduced.
Limited evidence for use of neck collar and bedrest. Physical therapy: Traction, ROM exercises, Strength training and stretching. Medications: NSAIDs, Neuroleptics, Steroids. Epidural steroid injections. Up to 90% of patients have good response to conservative treatment measures. [1]
90% Conservative Response Rate — Key Exam Fact
Unlike myelopathy, cervical radiculopathy has an excellent natural history. Most patients improve with conservative measures. This is a frequently tested discriminator between radiculopathy and myelopathy management.
Indications: Persistent symptoms despite conservative management; Neurological deficits. Treatment options: Anterior — ACDF, artificial disc replacement; Posterior — posterior cervical foraminotomy. [1]
Module 3: Cervical Trauma and Spinal Cord Injury
21 yo male, dived into shallow end of swimming pool headfirst, sudden onset neck pain, unable to move immediately. [1]
This is a classic axial loading/compression mechanism — the most common cause of cervical burst fractures and complete spinal cord injury in young adults.
Bimodal distribution: Young adults — High energy trauma; Old adults — Low energy trauma, Osteoporotic bone, Pre-existing spinal stenosis. [1]
Why bimodal? Young patients sustain high-energy injuries (diving, MVA, falls from height) that fracture normal bone. Elderly patients have pre-existing spondylosis/stenosis so even a minor fall can cause cord injury (often central cord syndrome from hyperextension).
Polytrauma involves injuries to the spine in up to 30% of cases. Multiple spinal fractures occur in 3–5%. Examine and X-ray the whole spine. [1]
Always Image the Entire Spine
If one spinal fracture is found, there is a 3–5% chance of a non-contiguous second fracture elsewhere. This is a commonly tested principle.
Continue immobilization until clinical and radiological clearance: Cervical spine immobilization, Spine board, Log roll. [1]
A — Airway maintenance AND cervical spine protection; B — Breathing; C — Circulation; D — Disability (motor/sensory exam); E — Exposure (log-roll, per-rectal exam). [1]
Why is C-spine protection part of "A"? Because any airway manoeuvre (jaw thrust, intubation) risks further cervical injury. In-line stabilisation must be maintained during airway management.
Trauma series: CXR, AP pelvis, Lateral cervical spine. Polytrauma CT. [1]
NEXUS criteria to clear the cervical spine. [1]
The NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) criteria allow clinical clearance of the cervical spine without imaging if ALL five criteria are met:
- No midline cervical tenderness
- No focal neurological deficit
- Normal alertness
- No intoxication
- No painful distracting injury
If any one criterion is not met → image the cervical spine.
Rigid collar (correct size); Sand-bags and tape; Skull traction. [1]
Skull traction (Gardner-Wells tongs or halo ring) is used for reducible cervical fracture-dislocations. The weight is gradually increased under fluoroscopic guidance to reduce the subluxation before definitive fixation.
High/low energy trauma (MVA, fall from height, fall from level ground); Time of injury; Delay in diagnosis (unconscious, head injury, alcohol, multiple distracting injuries). [1]
Head to Toe: Head/chest wounds and cervical injury (relates to mechanism); Spine: Bruising, Tenderness, Stepping, Restricted movement. [1]
Stepping = palpable gap/step between spinous processes on posterior palpation → suggests ligamentous disruption or facet dislocation.
Sensory: Dermatome landmarks. Motor: Full ROM. Reflexes/Sphincter. [1]
The neurological exam in SCI must be documented using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) chart:
Motor level: Lowest myotome with a grade of at least 3 on manual muscle testing. Sensory level: Most caudal normally innervated dermatome for both pin prick and light touch. Neurological level of injury: Most caudal segment with normal sensory and antigravity motor function (MMT ≥ 3) on both sides. [1]
Period of temporary loss of function after injury (hours to days). Flaccid paralysis below level of lesion. Areflexia. Loss of bowel/bladder control. Spinal shock is over if bulbocavernosus and/or anal wink reflex has returned. Assess for motor and sensory function only after spinal shock is over. [1]
Spinal Shock vs. Neurogenic Shock
Spinal shock = temporary loss of ALL spinal cord function below the injury (flaccid, areflexic) — it is a neurological phenomenon. Neurogenic shock = loss of sympathetic tone → hypotension + bradycardia — it is a cardiovascular phenomenon. These are different entities, commonly confused in exams.
Bulbocavernosus reflex: Squeezing the glans penis (or pulling on a Foley catheter) → anal sphincter contraction. Its return signals the end of spinal shock. Only then can you determine if the injury is complete or incomplete.
Complete injury — poor prognosis: No motor or sensory recovery, including sacral roots, distal to the site of injury and at the end of spinal shock. Incomplete injury — good prognosis: Degree of sparing, Speed of recovery. [1]
The key distinction: A complete injury (ASIA A) has NO sacral sparing (no perianal sensation, no voluntary anal contraction, no motor function below the level). If there is ANY sacral sparing, the injury is incomplete and prognosis is significantly better.
Bilateral facet dislocation: Flexion-distraction injury; Bony and ligamentous instability; Associated with significant neurological deficit; Require emergent treatment via reduction, decompression, and surgical fusion. [1]
Flexion teardrop fracture: Results from flexion and axial loading; Triangular bony fragment over anteroinferior body; ± Posterior displacement of vertebral body with canal compromise. [1]
Bilateral facet dislocation typically results in > 50% anterolisthesis on lateral X-ray and is highly associated with spinal cord injury. It is a surgical emergency.
Flexion teardrop fracture is the most unstable cervical fracture — the small "teardrop" fragment at the anteroinferior corner of the vertebral body belies the massive ligamentous disruption posteriorly.
Incomplete Spinal Cord Syndromes
Central Cord Syndrome, Brown-Séquard Syndrome, Anterior Cord Syndrome, Posterior Cord Syndrome, Mixed, Cauda Equina Syndrome. [1]
Understanding the cord anatomy is essential:
- Corticospinal tract (motor, crossed) — lateral cord
- Spinothalamic tract (pain & temperature, crossed) — anterolateral cord
- Dorsal columns (fine touch, proprioception, vibration, uncrossed) — posterior cord
Pain and temperature — crossed. Motor — crossed. Fine touch and proprioception — uncrossed. [1]
Somatotopic arrangement in the corticospinal tract: Cervical fibres are medial, sacral/lumbar fibres are lateral. This is crucial for understanding central cord syndrome.
Most common incomplete SCI. Hyperextension injury in degenerative cervical spine. Quadriparesis initially, with recovery. Arms affected more than legs. Sensory sparing variable. Most patients regain ambulation. Persistent distal upper limb neurological deficits common. [1]
Why arms > legs? The cervical (arm) fibres in the corticospinal tract are medial/central. A central cord lesion damages these first while sparing the lateral sacral (leg) fibres. Hence, upper limbs are disproportionately affected.
Why is this the most common? Elderly patients with pre-existing cervical stenosis fall and hyperextend their neck. The cord is compressed between anterior osteophytes and posteriorly buckling ligamentum flavum, "pinching" the central cord.
This was directly tested in 2020 MCQ Q57: "A 65-year-old front seat passenger complained of acute neck pain and bilateral hand paraesthesia and weakness after a head-on collision accident. Physical examination of the lower limbs power and sensation was normal. Which of the following is suggestive of the diagnosis of central cord syndrome?" → Answer: A. Degenerative cervical spondylosis on X-ray [7]
Motor weakness on side of injury. Contralateral loss of pain and temperature. Unilateral fracture/subluxation. Prognosis good. [1]
Why this pattern?
- Ipsilateral motor loss: corticospinal tract has already crossed at the medullary decussation → damage at cord level = ipsilateral weakness
- Contralateral pain/temp loss: spinothalamic tract crosses 1-2 levels above entry → damage at cord level = contralateral loss
- Ipsilateral proprioception/vibration loss: dorsal columns don't cross until the medulla → damage at cord level = ipsilateral loss
This was directly tested in 2023 SAQ Q8: "A 20-year-old man sustained a fall from height. Imaging studies showed he had a hemitransection of his thoracic spinal cord. Describe the distribution of motor weakness / sensory loss..." [8]
Hyperflexion injury with bone or disc fragment. Anterior spinal artery compression. Motor and pain/temperature loss. Posterior column preserved. Prognosis poor. [1]
Why poor prognosis? The anterior spinal artery supplies the anterior two-thirds of the cord (motor and spinothalamic tracts). Infarction in this territory causes severe irreversible damage. The posterior columns (supplied by paired posterior spinal arteries) are spared → proprioception intact.
NASCIS: Methylprednisolone given within 8 hours of injury had better motor and sensory function at 6 weeks and 6 months. Higher rates of wound infection, pneumonia, sepsis so overall benefit is questionable. [1]
Steroids in SCI — Controversial
The NASCIS trials are historically important but methodologically criticised. Current practice varies — some centres still offer methylprednisolone within 8 hours as an option, but it is NOT a standard-of-care mandate. For exams, know the NASCIS result and its limitations. The 2023 SAQ Q8(f) asked: "Name one medication that could potentially improve functional recovery in SCI" → Answer: Methylprednisolone.
Structural: Instability; Decompression: Neurological deficit, Lack of improvement/deteriorating neurology; Polytrauma: To facilitate mobilization and rehabilitation. [1]
Respiratory problems: Respiratory muscle paralysis (Abdominal/intercostals T1–T12, Diaphragm C3–C5, Accessory muscles above C3); Decreased cough effort; Direct chest injuries; Autonomic dysfunction. [1]
| Injury Level | Respiratory Consequence |
|---|---|
| Above C3 | Ventilator-dependent (loss of diaphragm + accessory muscles) |
| C3–C5 | Partial diaphragm function, may need ventilatory support |
| Below C5 | Diaphragm intact but intercostals/abdominals lost → weak cough |
DVT: Mechanical prophylaxis via sequential compression device; Anticoagulation prophylaxis within 72 hours of injury. [1]
Pressure sores: Turning every two hours; Padding of at-risk areas; Frequent skin inspection. [1]
Functional goals by level of spinal cord injury. [1]
| Level | Key Function Preserved | Functional Goal |
|---|---|---|
| C4 | Diaphragm | Breathes independently, electric wheelchair with chin control |
| C5 | Biceps, deltoid | Assisted feeding, electric wheelchair with hand control |
| C6 | Wrist extensors | Tenodesis grip, transfers with board, drive adapted car |
| C7 | Triceps | Independent transfers, manual wheelchair |
| T1 | Intrinsic hand muscles | Full upper limb function, wheelchair independent |
| T6–T12 | Trunk stability increasing | Ambulation with long leg braces (limited) |
| L2+ | Hip flexors | Community ambulation with aids |
Multiple team approach. Develop the functions which remain normal. Compensate for those that have been lost. [1]
The multidisciplinary team includes: orthopaedic/neurosurgery, rehabilitation medicine, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, clinical psychology, social work, nursing, and urology.
Exam Intelligence
| Trap | Correct Thinking |
|---|---|
| "Myelopathy presents with pain" | Pain is NOT a predominant feature of myelopathy. Pain suggests radiculopathy or other pathology. |
| "Conservative treatment is effective for CSM" | No good conservative treatment for myelopathy. Surgery is the only disease-modifying option. |
| "Spinal shock = neurogenic shock" | Spinal shock = neurological (areflexia). Neurogenic shock = cardiovascular (hypotension + bradycardia). |
| "Central cord syndrome affects legs more" | Arms affected MORE than legs (cervical fibres are medial in corticospinal tract). |
| "Anterior cord syndrome has good prognosis" | Poor prognosis — anterior spinal artery territory infarction. |
| "Brown-Séquard has ipsilateral pain/temp loss" | Contralateral pain/temp loss (spinothalamic tract crosses). |
| "ADI should be < 3 mm" | ADI < 4 mm in adults (3 mm in children is the threshold in some references, but the lecture says 4 mm). |
| "Raised hemidiaphragm = central cord syndrome" | Raised hemidiaphragm = phrenic nerve injury (C3-5), not central cord. In 2020 Q57, this was a trap option. |
| "Bilateral hand numbness after whiplash → concern for respiratory compromise" | 2022 Q62: raised diaphragm on CXR suggests phrenic nerve (C3-5) involvement → respiratory risk. Hand symptoms alone (central cord) do not indicate respiratory compromise. |
For OSCE: Be able to demonstrate:
- Hoffman's sign — flick DIP of middle finger
- Finger escape sign — hands outstretched, watch ulnar fingers drift
- 10-second test — open/close fists rapidly
- Spurling's test — extension + ipsilateral rotation + axial compression
- Inverted supinator reflex — tap brachioradialis → finger flexion, no elbow flexion
- Bulbocavernosus reflex — for SCI assessment
Past Paper Questions
"A 65-year-old front seat passenger complained of acute neck pain and bilateral hand paraesthesia and weakness after a head-on collision accident. Physical examination of the lower limbs power and sensation was normal. Which of the following is suggestive of the diagnosis of central cord syndrome?"
A. Degenerative cervical spondylosis on X-ray B. Elevated right hemidiaphragm C. Left eye miosis and ptosis D. Loss of anal tone
Answer: A. Central cord syndrome is a hyperextension injury in a degenerative cervical spine [1]. Degenerative spondylosis narrows the canal, predisposing to central cord injury. Option B suggests phrenic nerve injury (C3-5), not central cord. Option C is Horner syndrome (sympathetic chain, not cord). Option D suggests complete cord injury, not the incomplete pattern of central cord syndrome [7].
"A 40-year-old man sustained a whiplash injury in a car crash. Which of the following findings suggests a high risk of respiratory compromise?"
A. Bilateral hand numbness and clumsiness B. Loss of cervical lordosis C. Raised diaphragm on chest radiograph D. Systemic hypotension and bradycardia
Answer: C. A raised hemidiaphragm indicates phrenic nerve palsy (C3-C5) — directly threatening respiratory function [1]. Bilateral hand numbness (option A) suggests central cord syndrome but does NOT indicate respiratory compromise. Loss of lordosis (B) is non-specific. Hypotension/bradycardia (D) is neurogenic shock — cardiovascular, not respiratory [9].
"A man with lower limb weakness, spasticity and bilateral Babinski sign, without any upper limb symptoms or signs." Location options include: Cervical spinal cord, Thoracic spinal cord, etc.
Answer: J. Thoracic spinal cord. UMN signs (spasticity, Babinski) in the lower limbs WITHOUT upper limb involvement localises the lesion to the thoracic cord. If the cervical cord were affected, upper limb signs would be expected [10].
"A 20-year-old man sustained a fall from height. Imaging studies showed hemitransection of thoracic spinal cord." (a) Distribution of motor weakness? (b) Distribution/modalities of sensory loss? (c) Where is the sensory level if loss from T10 downward? (d) Most likely abnormal finding on PR exam in SCI? (e) How is micturition affected acutely? (f) Name one medication for functional recovery? (g) Two delayed complications of neurogenic bladder?
Answers:
- (a) Ipsilateral motor weakness below the level of lesion (UMN pattern: spasticity, weakness in ipsilateral lower limb)
- (b) Ipsilateral loss of proprioception and vibration below the level; Contralateral loss of pain and temperature 1-2 levels below the lesion (Brown-Séquard pattern)
- (c) T8 or T9 — the contralateral pain/temp loss starts 1-2 segments below the lesion because the spinothalamic tract crosses 1-2 levels above entry
- (d) Loss of anal tone (lax anal sphincter)
- (e) Urinary retention (during spinal shock, the detrusor is areflexic → bladder cannot contract)
- (f) Methylprednisolone (NASCIS protocol)
- (g) UTI (recurrent), Renal calculi / Hydronephrosis / Renal failure [8]
"A 23-year-old man is carried in after diving head first into a river. He is speaking and his airway is open but he cannot walk or move his arms or legs. What is the first thing you must do?"
A. Examine him for other injuries B. Give him a tetanus vaccination C. Immobilise the cervical spine D. Place an intravenous line
Answer: C. In the ATLS primary survey, Airway with C-spine protection is step 1 [1]. The airway is open, so the next priority is cervical spine immobilisation to prevent secondary injury. This directly mirrors the lecture's emergency management teaching [11].
"A 70-year-old lady presented with a 6-month history of hand clumsiness and difficulty in using chopsticks. MRI of cervical spine showed cervical myelopathy. Which of the following is NOT a common symptom of cervical myelopathy?"
A. Gait instability B. Neck pain C. Sphincter disturbances D. Upper limb numbness
Answer: B. Neck pain. The lecture explicitly states "Pain is not a predominant feature" of cervical myelopathy [1]. Gait instability (spastic gait), sphincter disturbance (late stage), and upper limb numbness (early symptom) are all common features [12].
"A 70-year-old man with chronic neck pain sustains a fall on level ground, causing hyperextension. Plain X-rays show multiple osteophytes and narrowing of spinal canal. MRI shows T2 hyperintense signals within cervical spinal cord. What is MOST LIKELY present on clinical examination?"
A. Clumsy hand movement B. Foot drop C. Loss of proprioception in lower limbs D. Urinary retention
Answer: A. Clumsy hand movement. This is a classic central cord syndrome presentation — elderly patient with pre-existing spondylosis, hyperextension injury, T2 signal change (myelomalacia/oedema) in the cord. Arms are affected more than legs with loss of hand dexterity being the hallmark [1]. Foot drop (B) is a peripheral nerve/L5 root finding. Proprioception loss (C) would suggest posterior cord or dorsal column pathology. Urinary retention (D) is a late-stage finding, not the most likely [12].
- GC 110 (Paraplegia/Spinal Cord Compression) covers spinal cord syndromes from a neurology perspective, including transverse myelitis and spinal dysraphism — complements Module 3 of this lecture [3].
- GC 094 (Where is the Lesion) teaches neurological localisation, directly relevant to distinguishing cervical myelopathy from other causes of weakness [4].
- Ortho and Trauma - Spine lecture covers overlapping content on lumbar and cervical examination [5].
- Ryan Ho Neurology provides a concise framework for cervical spondylosis management (conservative vs surgical), cervical radiculopathy examination, and spinal cord tumour differentials [2].
- Block A - Rheumatology Interactive Tutorial reminds us that cervical radiculopathy is a differential for PMR/GCA shoulder pain [6].
High Yield Summary
Module 1 — Imaging: Systematic ABCDS approach. Must see C7/T1. Four alignment lines. Prevertebral soft tissue ≤6 mm at C2, ≤22 mm at C6. Stenosis < 12 mm (relative), < 10 mm (absolute). ADI < 4 mm. Dynamic instability > 3.5 mm / > 11°.
Module 2 — Myelopathy: Pain is NOT predominant. UMN below, LMN at the level. Know all myelopathic hand signs (Hoffman, finger escape, 10-sec test, inverted supinator). JOA score 0-17. No good conservative Rx. Surgery: anterior for kyphosis/disc, posterior for ≥3 levels/flavum. OPLL — Asian, young, male, CT best. RA — atlantoaxial subluxation, pannus. Radiculopathy: 90% respond to conservative Rx. Spurling's test. ACDF if persistent/deficit.
Module 3 — Trauma: ATLS (A with C-spine protection). NEXUS to clear. Spinal shock ≠ neurogenic shock. Bulbocavernosus reflex return = end of spinal shock. Complete (no sacral sparing) = poor prognosis. Central cord = arms > legs, hyperextension + spondylosis, good ambulatory recovery. Brown-Séquard = ipsilateral motor/proprioception loss + contralateral pain/temp loss, good prognosis. Anterior cord = motor + pain/temp loss, preserved posterior columns, poor prognosis. Methylprednisolone within 8 hours — controversial. Prevent secondary injury. Respiratory support if C3-5 involved.
Active Recall - Cervical Spine Pathology
[1] Lecture slides: GC 227. Cervical Spine Pathology.pdf (all modules and pages) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (pp. 172–173, Cervical Spondylosis and Radiculopathy sections) [3] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [4] Lecture slides: GC 094. Where is the lesion I.pdf [5] Lecture slides: Ortho and Trauma - Spine.pdf (pp. 2, 75) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Rheumatology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (p. 1, cervical radiculopathy as DDx) [7] Past papers: 2020 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ paper.pdf (Q57) [8] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Q8) [9] Past papers: 2022 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q62) [10] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q11, EMQ) [11] Past papers: 2024 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q2) [12] Past papers: 2025 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q43, Q88)
GC226 Lumbar Spine Pathology: Part G
Lumbar spine pathology Part G covers advanced or supplementary conditions affecting the lumbar spine, including spinal infections, tumors, inflammatory spondyloarthropathies, and post-surgical complications such as failed back surgery syndrome.
GC228 Knee Osteoarthritis: Part A
Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease characterized by progressive loss of articular cartilage, subchondral bone changes, and osteophyte formation, leading to pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility.