GC112 Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding Gynaecological Cancer
Abnormal vaginal bleeding in the context of gynaecological cancer refers to irregular, postmenopausal, or otherwise unexplained uterine or vaginal bleeding that may signal an underlying malignancy of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vagina, or vulva, warranting urgent investigation.
Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding & Gynaecological Cancer
This lecture bridges two critical domains: the clinical approach to abnormal vaginal bleeding (AVB) and the three major gynaecological cancers (cervical, endometrial, ovarian). The core insight is that abnormal vaginal bleeding is overwhelmingly benign in origin, but the clinician's primary job is to rule out malignancy — especially in older women and those with risk factors. The lecture systematically moves from differential diagnosis → history → examination → investigations → cancer-specific teaching (staging, spread, treatment, prognosis).
Learning Objectives (from GC 112): [1]
- Know the common causes of abnormal vaginal bleeding
- Know how to make a diagnosis — from history, examination, investigation
- Know how female cancers spread
- Know the general principles of treatment of common gynaecological cancers
Part 1: Causes of Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding
Cancer is NOT the commonest cause → there are many many more benign causes [2]
The key mental model is anatomical classification — start from below and work upwards:
| Anatomical Site | Benign Causes | Malignant Causes |
|---|---|---|
| Vulva/Vagina | Atrophic vaginitis, lacerations/trauma | Vulval cancer, vaginal cancer |
| Cervix | Cervical erosion (ectropion), cervical polyp | Cervical cancer |
| Uterus (Endometrium/Myometrium) | Fibroids, endometrial polyps, endometrial hyperplasia, dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB)/anovulation | Endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma |
| Pregnancy-related | Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, gestational trophoblastic disease | Choriocarcinoma |
| Ovary | Functional cysts | Oestrogen-secreting tumours (granulosa cell) |
Common Causes listed on GC 112 slide: Fibroid, endometrial polyps, pregnancy-related, hyperplasia, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, anovulation, cervical erosion, cervical polyp, atrophic vaginitis, lacerations — these can be benign or malignant and can arise from any part of the genital tract [1]
Important Distinction
The FIGO PALM-COEIN classification (Polyp, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma, Malignancy — Coagulopathy, Ovulatory dysfunction, Endometrial, Iatrogenic, Not yet classified) applies specifically to abnormal uterine bleeding in non-gravid reproductive-age women. This lecture's scope is broader — it covers per-vaginal bleeding from ANY anatomical source and at ANY age, including post-menopausal. Don't conflate the two in exams [2].
First triage before classification: assess haemodynamic stability, quantify current blood loss, obtain IV access/resuscitate if unstable, check haemoglobin and perform a pregnancy test in anyone with pregnancy potential. Anticoagulation can worsen bleeding but must not be assumed to be the only cause without anatomical/endometrial assessment.
- Anovulation/DUB: The most common cause of endometrial bleeding is irregular ovulation causing irregular periods [2]. Without ovulation, there is no progesterone to stabilize the endometrium, leading to erratic shedding.
- Fibroids: Submucosal fibroids distort the endometrial cavity and increase surface area, causing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).
- Endometrial polyps: Focal endometrial overgrowths that cause intermenstrual or post-menopausal bleeding.
- Cervical ectropion (erosion): Columnar epithelium extends onto ectocervix; fragile, bleeds on contact. Common with OCP use, pregnancy.
- Atrophic vaginitis: Post-menopausal oestrogen deficiency → thin, fragile vaginal mucosa → bleeding with minimal trauma.
Part 2: Clinical Approach — History
The history is structured around age/reproductive status, bleeding pattern, provoking factors, associated symptoms, and key past histories.
Ask where the patient is in her reproductive life: [1]
- Pre-menarche? → Think trauma, foreign body, precocious puberty, rare tumours (sarcoma botryoides)
- Pregnant? → Must exclude pregnancy-related causes (miscarriage, ectopic, molar pregnancy)
- Peri-menopausal? → Anovulatory cycles are common, but persistent AUB or endometrial-cancer risk factors require sampling; the slide's fixed “> 40” cutoff has been superseded by age/risk-based guidance
- Post-menopausal? → Must exclude endometrial cancer; also consider atrophic vaginitis, cervical cancer
Key questions: [1]
- Amount? — Quantify: number of pads/tampons, flooding, clots, haemodynamic symptoms
- Regular or irregular bleeding? — Regular heavy = structural cause (fibroid); irregular = anovulation or pathology
- Intermenstrual bleeding (IMB)? — Bleeding between periods → think polyps, cervical pathology, endometrial cancer
- Postcoital bleeding (PCB)? — Bleeding after intercourse → cervical ectropion, cervical polyp, cervical cancer
Contraceptive history — Can she be pregnant? Is she on hormones? [1] Cervical screening history (HPV testing and/or cytology according to the local programme) [1] Obstetric history [1] Drug history — Anticoagulation? HRT? [1] Family history — FHx of Ca ovary / breast / colon etc? [1]
Why each matters:
- Contraceptives: OCPs can cause breakthrough bleeding; missing pills → pregnancy risk
- Cervical screening: no regular screening increases the risk of undetected HPV-related precancer/cancer. Hong Kong now uses primary HPV testing in Department of Health services for ages 30–64, while ages 25–29 use cytology [11]
- Anticoagulants: Warfarin, DOACs can exacerbate or cause vaginal bleeding
- HRT: Unopposed oestrogen → endometrial hyperplasia → cancer
- Family history: Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer / HNPCC) confers 15–60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer [1]
Part 3: Clinical Approach — Physical Examination
Pallor (anaemia from chronic blood loss), bleeding tendency (petechiae, bruising), constitutional signs (weight loss, cachexia suggesting malignancy) [1]
Speculum examination: Can you see an abnormality? Lesion on vulva / vagina / cervix [1] Bimanual: Uterine size, adnexal masses [1] Rectal examination — assesses parametrial involvement in cervical cancer [1]
Exam Tip
In past paper SAQs, "aspects of physical examination to focus on" typically expects: (1) General examination for anaemia/pallor, (2) Abdominal examination for masses, (3) Pelvic/speculum examination [3]. Always mention all three in your answer.
Part 4: Investigations
Cervical smear — screening for CIN/cervical dysplasia [1] Colposcopy — magnified examination of cervix after applying acetic acid; identifies abnormal areas for biopsy [1] Cervical biopsy — definitive tissue diagnosis [1]
Reading the cervix photograph: the smooth pink ectocervix with a central os is a speculum view, not a diagnosis by itself. Screening samples exfoliated cells/HPV from an asymptomatic cervix; colposcopy magnifies the transformation zone and directs biopsy. A symptomatic friable, ulcerated or exophytic lesion needs urgent specialist assessment and tissue diagnosis, even if the last screen was normal.
Current Hong Kong screening context: screening is for asymptomatic people aged 25–64 who have ever had sexual experience. Ages 25–29 use cytology; ages 30–64 may use HPV testing every 5 years, co-testing every 5 years or cytology under the programme schedule. Department of Health services transitioned to primary HPV testing for ages 30–64 in 2023 [11].
Endometrial aspirate (e.g., Pipelle) — office-based blind sampling; first-line in AUB from age 45, or younger with persistent bleeding, failed treatment or unopposed-oestrogen risk [12] Hysteroscopy with targeted biopsy — direct visualisation of the uterine cavity; especially valuable for focal lesions, inadequate/negative blind sampling with persistent bleeding, or discordant imaging
Reading the procedure diagrams: a Pipelle passes through the cervix and samples endometrium by suction, but can miss a focal polyp. Hysteroscopy distends the cavity and lets the operator distinguish a smooth focal polyp from irregular/friable malignant tissue and biopsy it directly.
Ultrasound — transvaginal (TVS) or transabdominal (TAS) [1]
- On TVUS, identify the midline endometrial echo and measure the double-layer thickness in the sagittal plane. The lecture's ≥5 mm threshold is historical; older ACOG guidance used > 4 mm in an initial PMB episode, while an April 2026 ACOG update recommends TVUS plus endometrial tissue sampling for most patients with PMB. Persistent/recurrent bleeding requires histology regardless of a thin stripe [13]. Follow the local pathway.
This table synthesizes the MCQ theme from the 2021 Fourth Summative [6]:
| Clinical Scenario | Most Appropriate First-Line Investigation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Young woman, irregular cycles, acne, BMI 33, never sexually active | Serum FSH, LH and oestradiol (or pelvic USS) | Likely PCOS; hormonal profile needed. Cannot do pelvic exam/TVS if not sexually active |
| 44F, persistent intermenstrual bleeding, normal screen 1 year ago | Risk-based endometrial assessment; often sampling and/or hysteroscopy/TVUS | A normal cervical screen does not evaluate the endometrium; age alone is not the only trigger |
| 54F, PMB, breast cancer on tamoxifen | Prompt endometrial evaluation with TVUS and tissue sampling under the current pathway | Tamoxifen increases endometrial pathology risk; a thickness cutoff is less reliable |
| 44F, heavy PV bleeding, 4cm cervical mass with contact bleeding, smoker | Cervical biopsy | Visible cervical mass → biopsy for tissue diagnosis, NOT smear |
| 30F, secondary amenorrhoea post-chemo, hot flushes | Serum FSH, LH and oestradiol | Premature ovarian insufficiency from chemo; FSH will be elevated |
Part 5: Cervical Cancer
- 7th most common female cancer in Hong Kong in the slide's 2020 registry snapshot [1] — retain as historical local context, not a current rank
- Vaccination and effective screening reduce cervical-cancer burden, but the slide's local table actually shows a small positive 10-year ASR change (+1.2%) and a small mortality decline (−0.4%); do not invent a local downward incidence trend from the rank alone
Reading the 2020 registry figures: the table reports 556 registered cases, 159 deaths, age-standardised incidence 7.6 per 100,000 and 5-year relative survival 65.8% (2010–2018 cohort). The stage pie shows I 26.8%, II 22.1%, III 23.7%, IV 15.1% and 12.2% unstaged. These are dated population observations—not fixed personal survival estimates or current service performance.
Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) — causes virtually all cervical cancers; HPV16/18 are especially important [1] Earlier sexual exposure, multiple partners or a partner with HPV exposures — epidemiologic proxies for acquiring persistent HPV, not moral labels Smoking — impairs local cervical immunity [1] Lower socio-economic class — reduced access to screening [1] Long-duration combined oral contraceptive use — a modest association that diminishes after stopping; it is not explained simply by “ectropion allowing HPV access” Immunosuppression — HIV, transplant patients; impaired HPV clearance [1]
Age: Median 55 [1] Bleeding pattern: Postcoital bleeding — the hallmark symptom [1] Associated symptoms: [1]
- Early disease — not much (asymptomatic; picked up on screening)
- Late disease — back pain / leg oedema (pelvic sidewall involvement, lymphatic obstruction)
Contraceptive/Sexual history: Sexually active (or had been), ? OC pills [1] Cervical screening history: no regular HPV/cytology screening [1] Obstetric history: Parous [1] Family history: Probably not related (cervical cancer is NOT a hereditary cancer) [1]
This slide contrast means cervical cancer is predominantly infection-driven rather than a classic hereditary-cancer syndrome; it does not mean family history or rare genetic susceptibility can never modify risk.
Growth on cervix: exophytic (cauliflower), endophytic (infiltrative, barrel shape), ulceration [1]
Reading the paired speculum images: the upper cervix is smooth with an intact surface; the lower image shows an irregular, friable, ulcerated exophytic mass with contact bleeding. Describe what is visible—site, size, exophytic/endophytic pattern, ulceration and bleeding—then biopsy. Do not diagnose or exclude invasion by appearance alone.
For diagnosis: Take a biopsy [1] For management planning: [1]
- Blood tests: CBP, RFT, LFT
- Selected biomarkers/tumour markers may support prognosis or surveillance, but SCC antigen is not a substitute for biopsy and is not a generic diagnostic test
- Imaging: CT / MRI / PET-CT to assess renal tract, extent of spread, lymph node involvement
Why RFT? Cervical cancer commonly causes ureteric obstruction → hydronephrosis → renal impairment. This is staging-relevant (Stage IIIB).
Local spread: Direct extension to parametrium, vagina, bladder, rectum [1] Distal spread: Lymphatic → pelvic lymph nodes → para-aortic lymph nodes; haematogenous spread to lungs, liver, bone (rare, late) [1]
Reading the spread diagrams: direct spread proceeds from cervix into upper vagina/parametria, then pelvic sidewall, ureters, bladder or rectum. Lymph drains through paracervical/obturator/internal and external iliac chains, then common iliac and para-aortic nodes. Hydronephrosis can therefore reflect ureteric compression at the pelvic sidewall.
Cervical cancer uses Clinical / Pathology / Imaging staging [1]
This is important — cervical cancer staging is NOT purely surgical (unlike endometrial cancer). Imaging and clinical examination contribute.
| Stage | Extent | Slide's historical 5-Year Survival |
|---|---|---|
| I | Cervix only | 90% |
| II | Upper vagina or parametrium | 75% |
| III | Lower vagina, pelvic sidewall, pelvic/para-aortic LN | 55% |
| IV | Bladder/rectum mucosa or distant metastasis | 15% |
Detailed substaging (high yield for written exams):
| Substage | Key Feature |
|---|---|
| IA | Microscopic only, depth < 5 mm |
| IA1 | Stromal invasion < 3 mm |
| IA2 | Stromal invasion ≥ 3 mm and < 5 mm |
| IB | Clinically visible or measured invasion ≥ 5 mm |
| IB1 | ≥ 5 mm depth, < 2 cm greatest dimension |
| IB2 | ≥ 2 cm and < 4 cm |
| IB3 | ≥ 4 cm |
| IIA | Upper 2/3 vagina, no parametrial involvement |
| IIB | Parametrial involvement |
| IIIA | Lower 1/3 vagina |
| IIIB | Pelvic sidewall or hydronephrosis/non-functioning kidney |
| IIIC | Pelvic (IIIC1) or para-aortic (IIIC2) lymph node involvement |
| IVA | Bladder/rectum mucosa involvement |
| IVB | Distant metastases |
Key 2018 Update
IIIC is new in the 2018 FIGO staging: lymph node metastasis now upstages to Stage III regardless of tumour size/local extent. Notation uses "r" for imaging and "p" for pathology to indicate how lymph node status was determined [1].
The survival percentages are broad 2020-registry teaching estimates, not individual prognoses. Histology, nodal burden, tumour biology, treatment and contemporary outcomes all matter.
Reading the staging cartoon: stage I stays within the cervix; stage II extends to upper vagina/parametrium without pelvic sidewall; stage III reaches lower vagina/sidewall, causes hydronephrosis, or includes pelvic/para-aortic nodes; stage IV invades bladder/rectal mucosa or spreads distantly.
Treatment modalities: Surgery, Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy / immunotherapy [1]
| Stage | Primary Treatment | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IA1 (< 3 mm) | Cone biopsy / simple hysterectomy | Very early; fertility-sparing option with cone |
| Selected IA2–IB early disease | Fertility-sparing surgery, radical hysterectomy or radiotherapy according to size, nodal status, fertility goals and MDT assessment | Sentinel-node mapping/nodal staging may replace routine full pelvic lymphadenectomy in defined early-stage pathways |
| Early disease (if surgery not suitable) | Radiotherapy | Alternative to surgery |
| Stage IIB or above (late) | Chemoradiation (concurrent cisplatin-based chemo + radiotherapy) | Standard of care for locally advanced disease |
| Persistent/recurrent/metastatic | Biomarker- and fitness-directed systemic therapy | Platinum/taxane backbone; bevacizumab and immune-checkpoint therapy are selected by contraindications, PD-L1/MSI/MMR and prior therapy—not a one-drug recurrence rule [14] |
Advantages of surgery over radiotherapy: preserves ovarian function, avoids long-term morbidities of radiotherapy [1]
Surgical-route and ovarian nuance: open surgery remains the standard approach when a radical parametrectomy is required because minimally invasive radical hysterectomy produced worse oncologic outcomes; rare highly selected low-risk tumours under expert protocols are exceptions [14]. Ovarian preservation/transposition may be considered in younger patients—more readily with squamous histology—but is individualised for histology, stage, genetics and planned radiotherapy.
Long-term RT morbidities include: vaginal stenosis, radiation cystitis, radiation proctitis, lymphoedema, premature ovarian failure (if ovaries irradiated), secondary malignancies.
Stage, lymph node metastasis, histology [1]
- Stage is the most important prognostic factor
- Lymph node positivity dramatically worsens prognosis
- Histology: squamous cell carcinoma (most common, ~70–80%) vs. adenocarcinoma (worse prognosis stage-for-stage)
Part 6: Endometrial Cancer (Cancer Corpus Uteri)
- 4th most common female cancer in Hong Kong in the slide's 2020 registry snapshot [1]; the accompanying 2006–2020 plot shows rising age-standardised incidence with comparatively low, fairly stable mortality over that interval
- Predominantly a disease of post-menopausal women
- Most common gynaecological cancer in developed countries
Reading the registry panels: in 2020 the slide reports 1,186 cases, 121 deaths, age-standardised incidence 16.2 per 100,000 and 5-year relative survival 70.4% (2010–2018 cohort). The stage pie is dominated by stage I (68.6%), illustrating the benefit of bleeding as an early warning symptom; 5.8% were stage II, 8.1% stage III, 8.9% stage IV and 8.6% unstaged.
The unifying mechanism is unopposed oestrogen exposure on the endometrium:
Risk factor table from GC 112: [1]
| Category | Risk Factors |
|---|---|
| Age | Predominantly post-menopausal |
| Excessive endogenous oestrogens | Early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity, obesity, PCOS, oestrogen-secreting tumours (ovarian granulosa cell tumours), endometrial hyperplasia |
| Exogenous oestrogen | Unopposed oestrogen therapy, tamoxifen therapy |
| Miscellaneous | Family history of breast/ovarian/colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome (lifetime risk 15–60%), diabetes mellitus, hypertension |
Why each matters — first principles:
- Obesity: Adipose tissue contains aromatase → converts androgens to oestrone → chronic oestrogen exposure. Also: higher BMI → lower SHBG → more free oestrogen.
- Nulliparity/late menopause/early menarche: More lifetime ovulatory cycles → more cumulative oestrogen exposure without the protective effect of progesterone in pregnancy.
- PCOS: Chronic anovulation → no progesterone to oppose oestrogen.
- Tamoxifen: Anti-oestrogenic on breast tissue but pro-oestrogenic on endometrium → endometrial hyperplasia/cancer. This is a classic exam question!
- Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): Germline mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). Lifetime endometrial cancer risk 15–60%. Also associated with colorectal cancer.
- Unopposed oestrogen HRT: Without progestogen, oestrogen stimulates endometrial proliferation.
CFB (OG04) also lists these risk factors: Obesity, PCOS, Lynch syndrome, FHx of gynae/GI malignancy, unopposed oestrogen therapy, tamoxifen, persistent/long-standing AUB, no response to medical treatment [8]
2020 Minicase — Classic Endometrial Cancer Vignette
The 2020 minicase gives a 55F with: early menarche (10 years), nulliparous, BMI 36, diabetes, taking unopposed oestrogen, FHx endometrial + breast cancer. The answer is endometrial cancer — this is the "sinister cause" they want you to identify. Investigation: endometrial aspiration (Pipelle) and/or hysteroscopy with biopsy [5].
Abnormal bleeding presentations: [1]
- Change in menstrual pattern
- Prolonged bleeding
- Intermenstrual bleeding
- Irregular bleeding
- Post-menopausal bleeding
Key clinical pearl: Unlike cervical cancer (which is asymptomatic early), endometrial cancer presents early with bleeding — this is why prognosis is generally better.
"Corpus cancer — symptomatic at early stage (abnormal bleeding)" [1]
Lecture-era rule: “age over 40—sample” [1]. Current ACOG reproductive-age guidance uses older than 45 years as a first-line sampling trigger, and samples younger patients with persistent AUB, failed treatment or unopposed-oestrogen risk [12].
Post-menopausal bleeding requires prompt endometrial-cancer evaluation. The 5-mm slide threshold is not current; 2026 ACOG recommends TVUS plus tissue sampling for most patients [13].
Gold standard — hysteroscopy and biopsy [1]
Current investigation algorithm:
- PMB → prompt specialist pathway; in most patients combine TVUS with endometrial tissue sampling under the current local/ACOG pathway. Persistent or recurrent bleeding needs histology even with a thin endometrium [13].
- Reproductive-age AUB → pregnancy test first; sample at age > 45 or younger when persistent, treatment-resistant or exposed to unopposed oestrogen [12].
- Hysteroscopy with targeted biopsy → use when focal pathology is suspected, office sampling is inadequate/negative despite persistent bleeding, or imaging and histology disagree.
Spread pattern (from GC 112 slide 41, diagram) [1]:
- Direct extension: Through myometrium → serosa → adnexae
- Downward: To cervix, vagina
- Lymphatic: To pelvic → para-aortic lymph nodes
- Transperitoneal: Across peritoneal cavity (peritoneal deposits)
- Haematogenous: Lungs (late)
Reading the spread figure: arrows show downward cervical/vaginal extension, trans-tubal/adnexal or peritoneal spread, and lymphatic drainage from pelvic/lateral iliac to para-aortic nodes. This explains why myometrial depth, cervical stromal invasion, adnexal/peritoneal disease and nodal level each alter stage and adjuvant therapy.
The deck reproduces FIGO 2009 surgical staging [1]. FIGO revised endometrial-cancer staging in 2023 to integrate histologic type, LVSI and molecular classification where available; record the slide table for historical exam interpretation, but do not call modern staging “surgery alone” [15].
| 2009 Stage | Extent | Slide's historical 5-Year Survival |
|---|---|---|
| I | Uterus only | 90% |
| II | Cervix (cervical stromal invasion) | 75% |
| III | Outside uterus (serosa, adnexae, vagina, LN) | 45% |
| IV | Bladder/rectum or distant metastasis | 10% |
Detailed substaging:
| Substage | Feature |
|---|---|
| IA | No or < half myometrial invasion |
| IB | ≥ half myometrial invasion |
| II | Cervical stromal invasion |
| IIIA | Invades serosa/adnexae |
| IIIB | Vaginal/parametrial involvement |
| IIIC1 | Positive pelvic LN |
| IIIC2 | Positive para-aortic LN ± pelvic LN |
| IVA | Bladder/bowel mucosa invasion |
| IVB | Distant metastases (incl. intra-abdominal, inguinal LN) |
Why myometrial invasion depth matters: The deeper the invasion, the higher the risk of lymph node metastasis. Stage IA (< 50% myometrial invasion) has excellent prognosis; Stage IB (≥ 50%) has significantly higher LN metastasis risk.
Modern molecular layer: classify tumours, where possible, as POLE-mutated, mismatch-repair deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), or p53-abnormal. These groups materially change prognosis and adjuvant-treatment decisions, so an anatomic stage alone is incomplete [15][16].
Standard surgery for most operable disease: total hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with risk-adapted nodal staging [16]
- TH = Total Hysterectomy, BSO = Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy
Minimally invasive hysterectomy is preferred for apparent early-stage disease when feasible; sentinel-node mapping is commonly used for nodal staging rather than routine full lymphadenectomy [16]
Adjuvant treatment: [1]
- If LN positive → post-op chemo ± RT
- If high-risk group, even if LN negative → can consider brachytherapy ± chemotherapy
- If LN not done → give external RT if high risk
What defines “high risk” now? Risk grouping combines stage, histotype/grade, myometrial invasion, substantial LVSI and molecular class rather than a single old checklist [16].
Ovarian and fertility nuance: BSO is standard for most patients, but ovarian preservation can be considered in carefully selected premenopausal patients with low-grade, superficially invasive endometrioid disease, normal ovaries and no hereditary ovarian-cancer risk. Fertility-sparing progestin-based treatment is possible only for highly selected stage IA low-grade endometrioid disease with intensive surveillance; it is not represented in the 2023 slides [16].
| Feature | Cervical Cancer | Endometrial Cancer |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | Yes for asymptomatic average-risk people with a cervix: local age/method intervals apply | No population screening for average-risk asymptomatic people |
| Early symptoms | May be asymptomatic; invasive disease may cause postcoital/irregular bleeding or discharge | Often abnormal or postmenopausal bleeding, enabling earlier presentation |
| Key symptom | Postcoital bleeding | Post-menopausal bleeding / irregular bleeding |
| Cause | HPV infection | Unopposed oestrogen |
| Staging | FIGO clinical/pathological/imaging | FIGO 2023 anatomic + histologic/molecular, usually assigned after surgery when operable |
| Primary treatment (early) | Risk- and fertility-adapted surgery or RT | Minimally invasive TH-BSO with risk-adapted sentinel/nodal staging; selected fertility/ovarian preservation |
| Primary treatment (late) | Chemoradiation | Chemotherapy ± RT |
| Hereditary? | Predominantly persistent HPV-driven; not a classic single-gene hereditary syndrome | A subset is Lynch-associated; most cases are sporadic |
| Prevention | HPV vaccination, cervical screening | Weight management, progestogen in HRT |
| Prognosis (if treated early) | Good | Good |
Summary from GC 112: [1]
- "Cervical cancer — asymptomatic at early stage — need screening"
- "Corpus cancer — symptomatic at early stage (abnormal bleeding)"
- "If treated early, both have good prognosis"
While the lecture focuses on cervical and endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer is listed as one of the "common gynaecological cancers" on slide 17 [1]. Key points:
- 6th most common female cancer in HK (2020) [1]
- Often presents at an advanced stage; there is no effective population screening test for average-risk asymptomatic people
- Symptoms: abdominal distension, bloating, early satiety, pelvic/abdominal pain
- Tumour marker: CA-125 (non-specific)
- Staging: Surgical (FIGO)
- Treatment: Debulking surgery + platinum-based chemotherapy
- Hereditary risk: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations → high-grade serous carcinoma [9]
This integrates with the 2021 SAQ [10] and pathology AOS [9]:
| Application | Genetic Test | Cancer |
|---|---|---|
| Genetic susceptibility / hereditary cancer | BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutation testing | Ovarian (high-grade serous), breast |
| Genetic susceptibility / hereditary cancer | MMR gene testing (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) / microsatellite instability | Endometrial cancer (Lynch syndrome) |
| Diagnosis | Somatic FOXL2 mutation | Adult granulosa cell tumour of ovary |
| Treatment selection | BRCA testing (for PARP inhibitor eligibility) | Ovarian cancer |
| Immunotherapy eligibility | PD-L1 testing, MSI/dMMR status | Cervical and endometrial cancer |
| Endometrial prognostic/risk classification | POLE mutation, MMR IHC/MSI, p53 IHC, ER in selected NSMP tumours | Endometrial cancer |
Genetic Counselling Required
Germline testing requires informed consent and access to genetic counselling because results affect the patient and relatives. Tumour (somatic) testing still requires consent under local policy and can uncover a possible germline variant, so “somatic tests never need counselling” is too absolute; confirm potentially heritable findings in a germline sample.
From GC 112 slides [1]:
| Rank | Cancer |
|---|---|
| 1 | Breast |
| 2 | Colorectal |
| 3 | Lung |
| 4 | Corpus uteri (endometrial) |
| 5 | Thyroid |
| 6 | Ovary & peritoneum |
| 7 | Cervix |
| 8 | Non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
| 9 | Stomach |
| 10 | Non-melanoma skin |
High Yield Summary
-
Abnormal vaginal bleeding
- has many benign causes (ovulatory dysfunction, fibroids, polyps, cervical ectropion, atrophy) but first assess stability and pregnancy, then localise the source and exclude malignancy using age, persistence and risk factors—not a universal “over 40” rule.
-
Key investigations
- Visible cervical lesion → biopsy, not screening. Reproductive-age AUB → sample from > 45 or younger with persistence/failed treatment/unopposed-oestrogen risk. PMB → current prompt pathway with TVUS plus tissue sampling for most; persistent bleeding needs histology regardless of stripe thickness.
-
Cervical cancer
- Persistent high-risk HPV-driven; may cause postcoital bleeding but can be asymptomatic. Screening prevents/detects precancer in asymptomatic people; symptoms need diagnosis. Early treatment is fertility-, size-, node- and MDT-adapted; locally advanced disease usually receives chemoradiation.
-
Endometrial cancer
- Oestrogen-driven, presents with PMB/abnormal bleeding (symptomatic early).
- FIGO 2023 combines anatomy, histopathology and molecular class (POLEmut/MMRd/NSMP/p53abn).
- Treatment usually uses minimally invasive TH-BSO with risk-adapted sentinel/nodal staging and molecularly informed adjuvant therapy; selected fertility/ovarian preservation exists.
- Risk factors: obesity, nulliparity, PCOS, tamoxifen, Lynch syndrome.
-
Both have good prognosis if treated early.
-
Read the images
- Smooth versus friable/ulcerated cervix; Pipelle blind sampling versus targeted hysteroscopy; endometrial stripe on TVUS; direct, lymphatic and transperitoneal cancer spread.
-
Historical dataset
- Corpus > Ovary > Cervix applies to the slide's Hong Kong 2020 incidence chart, not automatically to the current registry.
Active Recall - Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding & Gynaecological Cancer
[1] Lecture slides: GC 112. Abnormal vaginal bleeding Gynaecological cancer.pdf [2] Lecture slides: Block C - Abnormal vaginal bleeding_ gynaecological cancer.pdf [3] Past papers: 2018 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Question 11) [4] Past papers: 2019 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Question 1) [5] Past papers: 2020 Fourth Summative Minicases.pdf (Case 3) [6] Past papers: 2021 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ.pdf (Questions 14–18) [7] Past papers: 2024 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Question 13) [8] Lecture slides: CFB (OG04) Menstrual Disorders.pdf (p22) [9] AOS material: AOS - Pathology.pdf (Molecular genetic testing in Gynaecological cancers) [10] Past papers: 2021 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Question 2)
[11] Hong Kong Department of Health. Cervical Screening Programme: Screening Targets and Recommendations and HPV-testing update (current programme accessed 2026).
[12] ACOG. Management of Acute Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Nonpregnant Reproductive-Aged Women — endometrial-sampling indications.
[13] ACOG. Updated Guidance on Evaluation of Postmenopausal Bleeding (April 2026), updating the earlier ≤4-mm TVUS-only pathway for most patients.
[14] ESGO/ESTRO/ESP. Cervical Cancer Pocket Guidelines (2023).
[15] FIGO. FIGO Staging of Endometrial Cancer: 2023.
[16] ESGO/ESTRO/ESP. Endometrial Carcinoma Pocket Guidelines (2026).
GC111 Raised Intracranial Pressure And Hydrocephalus
Raised intracranial pressure is an elevation of pressure within the cranial cavity above normal (> 20 mmHg), often caused by mass lesions, cerebral edema, or hydrocephalus—a pathological accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid within the ventricular system due to impaired production, flow, or absorption.
GC113 Can We Get Married Pre-marital, Pre-pregnancy And Pre-natal Counselling
Pre-marital, pre-pregnancy, and pre-natal counseling is a comprehensive genetic and medical assessment provided to couples before marriage, conception, or during pregnancy to identify hereditary disorders, optimize maternal-fetal health, and guide informed reproductive decision-making.