GC052 Fever And Purulent Sputum

Fever accompanied by purulent (pus-containing) sputum is a clinical presentation indicative of a lower respiratory tract infection, most commonly bacterial pneumonia or an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Fever and Purulent Sputum — Comprehensive Exam-Ready Notes

This GC lecture by Dr. James C.M. Ho covers lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) presenting with the classic duo of fever + purulent sputum. The lecture is structured around a case of a 35-year-old male smoker developing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) after a preceding URTI, and then broadens into the full spectrum of LRTIs, influenza, and bronchiectasis. [1]

Why this matters for exams: Pneumonia remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Hong Kong. It is a bread-and-butter topic tested across MCQ, SAQ, minicase, and OSCE formats. The examiners love testing: pathogens by clinical setting, CURB-65, empirical antibiotic principles, complications (especially empyema vs lung abscess), and influenza antivirals. Past papers confirm this is heavily examined. [1][3]

Learning Objectives (from slide 46): [1]

  1. Pneumonia: common pathogens in different settings, clinical features, diagnostic approach and investigations, empirical antibiotic treatment, complications
  2. Influenza: clinical features and management
  3. Bronchiectasis: clinical features and management


The lecture lists five categories of LRTI: acute bronchitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, and lung abscess. [1]

High Yield — LRTI Categories

Know these five categories cold. An exam question may present a patient with fever and purulent sputum and ask you to differentiate between them. The distinguishing features are the clinical context, CXR findings, and chronicity.

LRTIKey Distinguishing Features
Acute bronchitisSelf-limiting, viral, no consolidation on CXR, clear chest or scattered rhonchi
Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitisBackground COPD/chronic bronchitis, increased sputum volume/purulence/dyspnoea
BronchiectasisChronic copious sputum, clubbing, HRCT shows dilated bronchi
PneumoniaConsolidation on CXR + systemic features (fever, rigors)
Lung abscessAir-fluid level on CXR/CT, prolonged fever, foul sputum

II. The Case Scenario — Walk-Through

The lecture builds around this case. Let's dissect it systematically because exam minicases follow the same structure.

  • M/35, chronic smoker, good past health
  • URTI symptoms (sore throat, running nose) 10 days ago ← the preceding viral illness
  • Increasing cough and greenish sputum over past 5 days
  • Progressive SOB with right pleuritic chest pain for 3 days
  • High swinging fever with chills and rigor for 3 days
  • Seen by GP → oral antibiotics + paracetamol → worsening → A&E

  • Respiratory distress, mentally alert
  • Chest: dullness, bronchial breath sound, and coarse inspiratory crackles over right lower chest
  • BP 90/50 mmHg (hypotension → urgent sepsis/haemodynamic assessment; this alone does not define septic shock)
  • SpO₂ 92% on room air (hypoxaemia)

Why this is CAP and not something else:

  • Onset in the community (not hospitalised)
  • Preceded by URTI → secondary bacterial infection is classic
  • Consolidation signs (dullness + bronchial breath sounds + crackles) = lobar consolidation
  • Systemic toxicity (high swinging fever, chills, rigor)

Why is he sick?

  • Hypotension (BP 90/50) raises concern for sepsis with haemodynamic compromise; septic shock requires assessment after initial resuscitation (including vasopressor requirement and lactate), not BP alone
  • Hypoxaemia (SpO₂ 92%) suggests significant parenchymal involvement
  • These features push him into the "severe CAP" category

Slide 6 CXR read: the film shows dense right mid-to-lower-zone air-space opacity, in keeping with the bedside right-sided consolidation signs. Always read the whole image systematically: side marker and technical quality, lobar distribution/silhouette signs, air bronchograms, pleural fluid, cavitation, additional lobes and any obstructing lesion.


III. Pneumonia — Core Concepts

Inflammation of lung parenchyma, commonly due to infective agents (bacteria, viruses or fungi). [1]

This is important: pneumonia = parenchymal inflammation. Bronchitis = airway inflammation. That's why you see consolidation on CXR in pneumonia but not in bronchitis.

Classification AxisTypes
AnatomicalLobar pneumonia, multi-lobar, bronchopneumonia
AetiologicalBacterial, viral, fungal
ClinicalCAP, HAP, VAP, aspiration

Anatomical Classification — What's the Difference?

  • Lobar pneumonia: consolidation filling an entire lobe. Classic for S. pneumoniae. CXR shows dense homogeneous opacification with air bronchograms.
  • Bronchopneumonia: patchy consolidation centered around airways, often bilateral and basal. Classic in elderly, debilitated patients. CXR shows patchy infiltrates.
  • Multi-lobar: involvement of ≥2 lobes. A poor prognostic factor.

The slide quotes 2021–2022 figures and a 2007 mortality chart. Treat these as dated teaching snapshots rather than current denominators. The current official HealthyHK dataset reports that pneumonia remained the second leading cause of death in 2024, with 11,395 deaths (21.8% of registered deaths) and 80,485 inpatient discharges and deaths (3.4% of all inpatient discharges and deaths). [9]

2007 Mortality Breakdown (pie chart from lecture slide): [1]

Cause of DeathDeaths% of Total
Malignant neoplasms12,31630.8%
Heart disease6,37215.9%
Others5,84314.6%
Pneumonia (all forms)4,97812.5%
Cerebrovascular diseases3,5138.8%
Chronic lower respiratory diseases2,0965.2%
External causes1,8544.6%
Nephritis / nephrotic syndrome / nephrosis1,3473.4%
Septicaemia7371.8%
Diabetes mellitus5061.3%
Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis4011.0%

Source shown on the slide: Hospital Authority and Department of Health, HKSAR. [1] These historical percentages should not be directly interpreted as a trend without checking changes in coding, population age structure and denominators.


This is one of the most exam-tested slides in the entire lecture. You must know this table.

Causative pathogens depend on clinical settings and host factors. [1]

PathogenGramCAPHAPAspiration
Streptococcus pneumoniaeGram ++++-
Haemophilus influenzaeGram - (lecture labels it Gram + but it's actually Gram -)++-
Mycoplasma pneumoniaeAtypical+--
Chlamydophila pneumoniaeAtypical+--
Legionella pneumophilaAtypical+--
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosaGram -+/-+++
MRSAGram ++/-++-
Bacteroides spp (anaerobes)Anaerobe-+++ (historical slide emphasis)

High Yield — Pathogen Patterns

Memory framework:

  • CAP: S. pneumoniae remains a core empirical target; additional coverage depends on severity, comorbidity, local resistance and recent microbiology.
  • HAP: resistant Gram-negatives and MRSA become relevant, but broad coverage is selected from local antibiograms and individual risk rather than applied automatically.
  • Aspiration: think mixed oral flora and host/setting-specific Gram-negatives. Current ATS/IDSA guidance advises against routine extra anaerobic coverage unless lung abscess or empyema is suspected. [10]

Common Exam Trap

Don't forget Mycobacterium tuberculosis — especially in HK or another endemic setting. If a question shows subacute fever, weight loss, night sweats, haemoptysis or compatible imaging and routine culture is unrevealing, investigate for TB using the current local pathway. The lecture's numerical attribution of TB among CAP is source- and era-specific, so do not use it as a current prevalence estimate. [1][2]

Sputum colour clues (from supporting material) [2][4]:

  • Rusty sputum → S. pneumoniae (classic for lobar pneumonia)
  • Currant-jelly sputum → Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • Foul-smelling, dark sputum → anaerobic lung abscess
  • Pink frothy sputum → pulmonary oedema (not infection!)

These are classic associations, not reliable organism tests. Green/yellow sputum reflects neutrophil myeloperoxidase and does not by itself prove bacterial infection; identify pathogens with appropriate microbiology.


V. Community-Acquired Pneumonia — Clinical Features

Cough, sputum, haemoptysis, dyspnoea, pleuritic chest pain; fever, chills, rigor; confusion, constitutional or systemic symptoms.

Why each symptom occurs:

  • Cough + sputum: inflammatory exudate in alveoli stimulates cough reflex; purulent sputum = neutrophilic response to bacterial infection
  • Haemoptysis: necrosis of alveolar tissue or inflamed bronchial mucosa
  • Pleuritic chest pain: inflammation reaching the visceral/parietal pleura → sharp, stabbing pain worse with inspiration
  • Fever/chills/rigor: systemic inflammatory response; rigor (uncontrollable shaking) suggests bacteraemia
  • Confusion: especially in elderly; marker of severe disease (the "C" in CURB-65)

Chest: percussion dullness, bronchial breath sound, coarse crackles, increased vocal resonance. Vital signs: BP, SpO₂; mental state.

Why these signs occur — from first principles:

  • Percussion dullness: consolidated (solid) lung transmits percussion energy poorly → dull note (vs resonant normal air-filled lung)
  • Bronchial breath sounds: normally heard only over trachea. When lung is consolidated, it conducts sound from central airways to the chest wall without filtering → harsh, hollow quality heard peripherally
  • Coarse crackles: secretions in airways "pop" open during inspiration
  • Increased vocal resonance (including whispering pectoriloquy and aegophony): consolidated lung transmits voice sounds more efficiently than air-filled lung

Travel, Occupation, Contact, Clustering

This is crucial for identifying atypical pathogens and notifiable diseases:

  • Travel: Legionella (contaminated water systems, hotels), TB (endemic areas), MERS (Middle East)
  • Occupation: healthcare workers (TB, influenza), farmers (Q fever, melioidosis)
  • Contact: household contacts with similar illness → viral, TB
  • Clustering: outbreak → influenza, COVID-19, Legionella

Usually refers to M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila. Syndrome of pneumonitis, fever, and a relatively normal WBC, without identifiable bacterial pathogens. Prominent systemic complaints.

Why "atypical"?

  • These organisms don't grow on standard blood agar/chocolate agar (hence "without identifiable bacterial pathogens")
  • They cause interstitial rather than alveolar inflammation → less sputum production
  • Systemic symptoms (headache, myalgia, malaise) are disproportionately prominent vs respiratory symptoms
  • WBC is typically normal (unlike typical bacterial pneumonia where WBC is elevated)
  • CXR often shows patchy/interstitial infiltrates rather than dense lobar consolidation

Modern caveat — phenotype does not identify the pathogen

The classic “typical versus atypical” symptom pattern has substantial overlap. A normal WBC, dry cough or interstitial-looking film may raise a hypothesis, but none reliably identifies the organism or safely selects antibiotics on its own. Use severity, epidemiology, exposure history, microbiology and local guidance.

Past Paper Alert

2021 MCQ Q89: A 36-year-old lady with CAP, sputum culture grew only oral commensals, treated with augmentin + doxycycline with rapid improvement. Most likely causative organism? Answer: D. Mycoplasma pneumoniae — because no growth on standard culture + response to doxycycline (which covers atypicals). [3]


VI. Clinical Approach to CAP

The lecture outlines four steps: (1) Establish diagnosis, (2) Identify causative pathogens, (3) Assess clinical severity, (4) Empirical antibiotic treatment. [1]

Compatible respiratory symptoms and signs + Chest X-ray: consolidations in lobar pneumonia; patchy infiltrates in bronchopneumonia.

In hospital, obtain a chest X-ray promptly to confirm suspected pneumonia. In community care, pneumonia can be diagnosed clinically when imaging is unavailable, and an initially normal film does not absolutely exclude early, dehydrated or immunocompromised pneumonia. Reassess and repeat or escalate imaging when clinical suspicion remains high. NICE also recognises lung ultrasound as an adjunct where trained expertise is available. [9]

The slide's investigation list:

  • Complete blood counts (total WBC and differential counts)
  • Electrolytes, liver and renal function tests
  • Arterial blood gases
  • Atypical pneumonia serology
  • Nasopharyngeal aspirate if influenza or atypical pneumonia suspected
  • Urinary antigen test for Legionella and pneumococcus
  • Sputum and blood cultures

Why each investigation matters:

InvestigationPurposeKey Points
CBC with differentialAssess WBC response; leukocytosis suggests bacterial; normal/low WBC in atypical or immunocompromisedVery high WBC ( > 11) or very low WBC ( < 4) = poor prognosis
Electrolytes, LFT, RFTUrea > 7 is CURB-65 criterion; detect SIADH (hypoNa); assess organ functionUrea > 8 = poor prognostic factor
ABGQuantify hypoxaemia and ventilation when severe illness, low saturation or hypercapnia is suspectedPaO₂ < 8 kPa (60 mmHg) is a poor prognostic marker
Atypical serologyMostly retrospective diagnosisNot a routine acute-management test
Upper-respiratory sampleMolecular assay for influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses when the result affects treatment or infection controlPCR/other molecular testing has superseded routine NPA antigen testing in hospital
Urinary antigenDetect Legionella serogroup 1 and S. pneumoniaeRemains positive even after antibiotics started
Sputum cultureIdentify pathogen and susceptibilityPrioritise severe CAP or MRSA/Pseudomonas risk; obtain a good-quality sample
Blood culturesDetect bacteraemiaTarget to severe CAP or when the result is likely to change management

Current testing principle

Do not order the entire slide list reflexively. Current guidance favours targeted microbiology: severity, epidemiology, prior resistant isolates, recent hospital/parenteral antibiotic exposure, outbreak/infection-control implications and whether the result will change therapy. Pneumococcal or Legionella urinary antigen is generally reserved for selected/severe or epidemiologically suggestive cases. [9][10]

Past Paper Alert — Urinary Antigen

2023 MCQ Q40: 65-year-old woman with renal impairment, fever, cough, yellowish sputum, RLL consolidation, normal WBC and no growth on routine sputum culture. Which investigation helps confirm aetiology? Answer: C. Urinary Legionella antigen in the supplied options—the systemic/renal clue and failure of routine aerobic culture point toward Legionella. Remember that urinary antigen mainly detects L. pneumophila serogroup 1, so a negative test does not exclude all legionellosis. [3]

Microbiological diagnosis is retrospective. Initial management is based on clinical setting and host factors: co-morbidities, immunocompetent vs immunocompromised status, and previous antibiotic use. [1]

This is a critical teaching point: you almost never know the pathogen when you start treatment. You must use clinical context to make your best guess and start empirical therapy.

Need to cover Streptococcus pneumoniae in ALL cases of CAP. Need to cover Legionella pneumophila in SEVERE cases of CAP.

Why cover Legionella in severe CAP?

  • Legionella causes severe disease with multi-organ involvement
  • It is an intracellular pathogen → beta-lactams alone won't work
  • It requires an active non-beta-lactam agent, commonly a macrolide or respiratory fluoroquinolone in guideline regimens
  • This is why severe-CAP protocols include appropriate atypical/Legionella coverage; follow the current local regimen rather than adding a drug ad hoc

CURB-65:

  • C — Confusion
  • U — Urea > 7 mmol/L
  • R — Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min
  • B — Blood pressure (SBP < 90 mmHg OR DBP ≤ 60 mmHg)
  • 65 — Age ≥ 65
CURB-65 ScoreMortalityDisposition
0-1LowUsually ambulatory if clinical and social circumstances are safe
2IntermediateHospital assessment; supervised treatment is usually appropriate
3-5HighUrgent senior assessment; consider critical-care referral

Apply to the case: The 35-year-old man scores 1 from the supplied data (DBP 50; the respiratory rate and urea are not given). SpO₂ 92% does not earn a CURB-65 point. Nevertheless, hypotension, hypoxaemia and respiratory distress mandate hospital management and urgent sepsis/critical-care assessment. This illustrates why CURB-65 supplements rather than replaces clinical judgement. [9]

Lecture poor-prognosis list: old age, hypoxaemia (PaO₂ < 8 kPa), high (> 11 × 10⁹/L) or low WBC (< 4 × 10⁹/L), high urea (> 8 mmol/L), multilobar involvement, bacteraemia. [1]

The unit on slide 18 should be ×10⁹/L, not ×10⁹/mL.

High Yield — CURB-65 vs Poor Prognostic Factors

CURB-65 is a quick bedside scoring tool. The "poor prognostic factors" list is broader and includes lab values (WBC extremes, bacteraemia) and imaging (multilobar). Know both for exams — CURB-65 for disposition decisions, prognostic factors for SAQ answers asking "what features suggest poor prognosis."

Lecture-era rule: administer appropriate antibiotics within 6–8 hours.

Current NICE guidance is more specific: start antibiotics as soon as possible after the diagnosis is established and within 4 hours of hospital presentation; suspected sepsis or shock follows the urgent sepsis pathway. Review IV therapy by 48 hours and narrow/switch to oral therapy when possible. [9]

Lecture-era example: a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor ± macrolide or tetracycline; duration 7–10 days.

Do not memorise this as a universal prescription. Choose the agent and route from the current local antimicrobial guideline, illness severity, allergies, renal/hepatic function, recent antibiotics, local resistance and prior microbiology. For uncomplicated clinically stable adult CAP, NICE recommends stopping after 5 days unless microbiology requires longer treatment or instability persists. [9]

Why this combination?

  • Amoxicillin-clavulanate (Augmentin): covers S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae (including beta-lactamase producing strains), and many Gram-negatives. The clavulanate inhibits beta-lactamase enzymes that would otherwise destroy amoxicillin.
  • Macrolide (clarithromycin/azithromycin) or doxycycline: covers atypical pathogens (Mycoplasma, Chlamydophila, Legionella) which are intracellular and not covered by beta-lactams. Added especially in severe CAP to cover Legionella.

The slide lists recent antibiotics/hospitalisation, nursing-home residence and immunosuppression as MDR risks. [1]

The old “healthcare-associated pneumonia” shortcut has been abandoned. Nursing-home residence alone does not mandate broad-spectrum therapy. Stronger triggers for MRSA or Pseudomonas evaluation include prior respiratory isolation/colonisation and recent hospitalisation with parenteral antibiotics; severe CAP increases the consequence of missing these organisms. Obtain cultures, use locally validated risks and de-escalate promptly when results permit. [10]

The slide lists O₂/ventilatory support, chest physiotherapy, fluids, COPD bronchodilators and arrhythmia control.

  • Prescribe oxygen to a target: commonly 94–98%, or 88–92% pending blood gases when hypercapnic respiratory failure is a risk. [16]
  • Give fluids according to haemodynamics and the sepsis pathway; avoid indiscriminate loading in cardiac/renal dysfunction.
  • Routine chest physiotherapy is not required for uncomplicated pneumonia; use respiratory physiotherapy/airway-clearance techniques for retained secretions or coexisting suppurative airway disease.
  • Treat bronchospasm and organ complications on their own indications.

Why AF in pneumonia?

  • Infection → systemic inflammation → autonomic imbalance + hypoxia + fever → triggers atrial fibrillation, especially in elderly patients
  • AF with rapid ventricular response can worsen haemodynamic status
  • Usually reverts with treatment of the underlying infection

VII. Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP)

Pneumonia occurring > 48 hours after hospitalization.

This time threshold is critical — it distinguishes HAP from CAP that was incubating at the time of admission.

Mostly related to aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions colonized by hospital-acquired organisms.

Why hospitals are different: The oropharynx becomes colonized with Gram-negative bacilli and resistant organisms within 48 hours of hospital admission (due to altered mucosal defences, exposure to antibiotics, supine positioning, and invasive devices).

General debility and old age, cigarette smoking, COPD, aspiration, post-GA, H₂ blockers or antacids, nasogastric tube, mechanical ventilation (VAP).

Why H₂ blockers/antacids? They raise gastric pH → allow bacterial colonization of the stomach → retrograde colonization of the oropharynx → aspiration. This is a classic exam question.

The slide proposes broad Gram-positive, Gram-negative, MRSA, antipseudomonal, ESBL and anaerobic coverage, with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem as examples.

That list is not a blanket contemporary regimen. Base initial therapy on the hospital's HAP antibiogram, prior respiratory cultures, illness severity and recent IV antibiotic exposure. Empiric MRSA coverage is reserved for recognised MRSA risk or high mortality risk; dual antipseudomonal therapy is likewise reserved for selected high-risk cases. Obtain respiratory cultures, narrow therapy when susceptibilities return, and avoid routine anaerobic or carbapenem coverage without an indication. A 7-day course is generally recommended for HAP/VAP, adjusted to clinical, radiological and laboratory response. [11]

SettingEmpirical AntibioticsKey Pathogens
CAPCurrent local regimen by severity and resistance riskPneumococcus plus setting-appropriate typical/atypical pathogens
Severe CAPHospital protocol; ensure severe-CAP atypical coverage and obtain microbiologyAdd concern for Legionella and resistant organisms only when risk-supported
HAPLocal HAP antibiogram; selected MRSA/antipseudomonal coverageHospital flora shaped by prior cultures and recent antibiotics
Aspiration syndromeDecide first: pneumonitis versus bacterial pneumoniaDo not add anaerobic therapy routinely unless abscess/empyema is suspected

VIII. Aspiration Pneumonia

Altered consciousness, alcoholism, vomiting, dysphagia and oesophageal diseases, neurological disorders (bulbar palsy), nasogastric tube feeding, severe dental or URTI, terminal illness, drowning.

Common thread: All these conditions impair airway protective reflexes (gag, cough, swallowing coordination) → aspiration of oropharyngeal or gastric contents into the lower respiratory tract.

Usually affects dependent parts of lungs:

  • Lower lobes (especially on the right)
  • Posterior segments of upper lobes (in those mostly recumbent)

Distribution follows body position at aspiration: upright aspiration favours basal lower-lobe segments (often right-sided); supine aspiration favours posterior upper-lobe and superior lower-lobe segments. The right main bronchus makes right-sided involvement common, but left-sided disease does not exclude aspiration.

Videofluoroscopic swallowing test (VFSS) — to confirm swallowing dysfunction and guide feeding strategy.

Slide 27 image: the radiograph demonstrates radiopaque contrast tracking into the right tracheobronchial tree and dependent lung after a swallow study—direct visual evidence of aspiration. VFSS should identify the phase/mechanism of dysphagia and test compensatory strategies, not merely label aspiration present or absent.

First distinguish:

  • Aspiration pneumonitis: chemical injury after a witnessed macroaspiration, often abrupt; provide supportive care and reassess. Prophylactic antibiotics are not routinely indicated unless bacterial infection subsequently becomes likely.
  • Aspiration pneumonia: established infection after aspiration; treat according to the current local pneumonia guideline and setting. Do not routinely add anaerobic coverage unless lung abscess or empyema is suspected. [10]

Reduce recurrence with multidisciplinary swallow assessment, appropriate positioning and feeding assistance, oral hygiene, medication/sedation review and treatment of reversible causes. Slide 28 shows a PEG tube, but PEG does not eliminate aspiration risk (oropharyngeal secretions and reflux can still be aspirated); tube feeding decisions require goals-of-care and nutritional assessment.


IX. Complications of Pneumonia

This is a favourite exam topic, especially distinguishing lung abscess from empyema.

  • Severe pneumonia → widespread alveolar consolidation → V/Q mismatch → hypoxaemia
  • May progress to ARDS if overwhelming inflammation

  • Bacteraemia → sepsis → septic shock → organ dysfunction (renal, hepatic, coagulopathy)

Air-fluid level/cavity; may be polymicrobial. The slide suggests 4–6 weeks of antibiotics and no percutaneous drainage in most cases.

Visual pattern: a thick-walled intraparenchymal cavity containing an air–fluid level suggests lung abscess, but CT is useful when the diagnosis, anatomy, underlying obstruction or alternative cavitating disease is uncertain.

Treatment duration is guided by clinical and radiological response rather than an automatic fixed number. Most abscesses drain through the bronchial tree; percutaneous/endoscopic/surgical drainage is reserved for selected cases such as failure of appropriate therapy, poor spontaneous drainage or an obstructing lesion.

  • Reactive pleural effusion adjacent to pneumonia
  • Initially sterile (simple parapneumonic effusion) → may become infected → complicated effusion → empyema

The slide defines empyema by pleural pus or positive Gram stain/culture and prescribes prolonged antibiotics plus pleural drainage.

Current BTS guidance adds a practical decision pathway: use thoracic ultrasound to confirm a safely accessible collection and sample it. Frank pus requires drainage. If the aspirate is not purulent, measure pleural pH promptly: pH ≤7.2 indicates high-risk complicated parapneumonic effusion/pleural infection and supports intercostal drainage; pH 7.2–7.4 requires LDH plus the clinical and imaging context. Antibiotic duration is individualised to source control and response rather than fixed at 4–6 weeks for every patient. [17]

Key difference from lung abscess: Empyema = pus in the pleural space (needs drainage). Lung abscess = pus in the lung parenchyma (usually drains via bronchi, no external drainage needed).

Past Paper Alert — Empyema

2016 SAQ Q3: "Name five features of pleural fluid that would suggest empyema thoracis." Lecture-era/exam answers include: (1) frankly purulent appearance, (2) positive Gram stain, (3) positive culture, (4) low pH, (5) low glucose, and (6) high LDH. For present practice, the BTS drainage threshold is pH ≤7.2; if pH is > 7.2 but < 7.4, LDH > 900 IU/L plus persistent fever, large volume, low glucose, CT pleural enhancement or ultrasound septation strengthens the case for drainage. [3][17]

2020 MCQ Q45: 50-year-old man with persistent fever despite oral Augmentin for 5 days, RLZ stony dullness with bronchial breath sounds and crackles above. Most likely diagnosis: B. Empyema thoracis — the stony dullness indicates fluid (empyema), with overlying consolidation above the fluid level. [3]

Electrolyte abnormalities e.g. hypoNa due to SIADH; acute myocardial infarction; cardiac arrhythmia (AF).

Hyponatraemia in pneumonia may reflect non-osmotic ADH release, volume depletion, renal dysfunction or medication effects. It is associated with Legionella but is not organism-specific; assess serum/urine osmolality and volume status before diagnosing SIADH.


Causes: diffuse bronchopulmonary diseases (e.g. bronchiectasis), recurrent aspiration, immunocompromised (HIV, malignancies), bronchial obstruction (tumour, foreign body).

The slide suggests CT thorax, bronchoscopy, sputum AFB/cytology and immunodeficiency blood tests.

Why investigate recurrent pneumonia aggressively? A single episode of CAP in a young, healthy person doesn't need extensive workup beyond standard. But recurrent pneumonia (≥2 episodes in 1 year or ≥3 ever, with radiographic clearing between episodes) demands investigation for an underlying structural, immunological, or malignant cause.

The distribution directs the work-up: recurrence in the same lobe raises obstruction, foreign body or focal structural disease; recurrence in different lobes raises aspiration, diffuse airway disease or systemic immune dysfunction. CT is central; bronchoscopy, AFB testing and cytology are targeted to the pattern and risk factors rather than ordered automatically.


XI. Influenza

Influenza A and B. Immunogenic surface antigens: Haemagglutinin (H) and Neuraminidase (N).

Why H and N matter:

  • Haemagglutinin (H): binds sialic acid on host respiratory epithelial cells → mediates viral entry
  • Neuraminidase (N): cleaves sialic acid → releases progeny virus from infected cells → allows spread

Mechanism of neuraminidase activity and inhibition (adapted from NEJM 2005;353:1363–1373): [1]

The slide describes antigenic shift as a major antigen change and drift as a minor change. Antigenic drift: minor changes in antigens. It links pandemics to a novel virus and little population immunity. [1]

ConceptMechanismClinical Consequence
Antigenic driftProgressive mutation and immune selection in surface antigens of influenza A and BSeasonal epidemics; basis for periodic vaccine-strain updates
Antigenic shiftAbrupt acquisition of a novel influenza A HA and/or NA, usually through reassortmentCan create pandemic potential if the virus also transmits efficiently between humans and population immunity is low

Important correction: antigenic shift is a mechanism of influenza A, not B, and a subtype switch such as “H3N2 to H1N1” is not itself proof that shift occurred. Novel antigenicity alone also does not guarantee either high pathogenicity or a pandemic—efficient sustained human transmission is required.

In Hong Kong, influenza is more common from January to March and from July to August.

This remains a useful HK pattern: CHP describes increased activity usually from January to March/April and July to August, although influenza circulates year-round and actual season timing varies. [14]

Slide 34 graph: the bars are monthly influenza isolates in 2004, not a current surveillance curve. It visually shows an H3N2-dominant peak around March and another around July, while the consultation-rate line varies much less. Use live CHP surveillance—not the 2004 graph—to infer the current circulating subtype or epidemic intensity.

URTI symptoms: running nose, sore throat, cough and sputum. Fever, myalgia, arthralgia. Lower respiratory tract or systemic involvement.

Distinguishing influenza from common cold: Influenza has prominent systemic symptoms (high fever, myalgia, prostration) that are disproportionate to respiratory symptoms. Common colds have predominant nasal symptoms with mild or no systemic upset.

The slide lists rapid antigen testing on NPA, RT-PCR, viral culture and serology.

  • Rapid antigen test: fast but less sensitive; a negative result does not reliably exclude influenza when prevalence or suspicion is high
  • Molecular assay (for example RT-PCR): preferred for hospitalised patients because of its higher sensitivity and specificity
  • Viral culture: takes days; mainly for epidemiological surveillance
  • Serology: retrospective (paired sera); not useful for acute management

Test all patients admitted with suspected influenza using a molecular assay. If a critically ill ventilated patient has a negative upper-respiratory molecular test but suspicion remains, test a lower-respiratory specimen. Do not delay empiric antiviral treatment in priority groups while waiting for the result. [13]

Personal hygiene, symptomatic treatment, specific antivirals.

F. Antivirals

Interfere with viral uncoating inside cell. Effective only against influenza A. Severe toxic effects, mainly neurological. Rapid emergence of drug resistance. Not useful in treating avian flu.

These are not recommended for currently circulating seasonal influenza because resistance among influenza A viruses is widespread; they also have no influenza B activity. [12]

Interfere with release of progeny influenza virus from infected host cells, thus stopping spread of infection in respiratory tract. Effective against both influenza A and B. Most effective when given as early as possible (ideally within 48 hours). E.g. oseltamivir (Tamiflu), zanamivir (Relenza).

Timing nuance: benefit is greatest when treatment starts within 48 hours, especially in otherwise healthy outpatients. However, start treatment promptly even after 48 hours for hospitalised patients, severe/complicated/progressive illness or people at higher risk of complications; do not wait for test confirmation. [12]

FeatureAmantadine/RimantadineNeuraminidase Inhibitors
MechanismBlock M2 ion channel → prevent viral uncoatingBlock neuraminidase → prevent viral release
CoverageInfluenza A onlyInfluenza A and B
AdministrationOralOseltamivir: oral; Zanamivir: inhaled
TimingWithin 48hWithin 48h
ResistanceRapid, widespreadLess common but emerging
Side effectsNeurological (severe)GI upset (oseltamivir); bronchospasm (zanamivir)
Current roleNot recommended for seasonal influenzaCommon first-line class; choice depends on host, route and local guidance

Slide 38 mechanism: neuraminidase normally cleaves terminal sialic acid so newly budded virions detach from the host-cell surface. A neuraminidase inhibitor blocks that cleavage, so progeny virions remain tethered/aggregate at the cell surface and onward spread is reduced. It does not literally reverse infection already established in the cell.

Annual seasonal influenza vaccination remains the principal preventive measure; use the current Hong Kong CHP recommendations because eligible groups and vaccine formulations are season-specific. [14]


XII. Bronchiectasis

Pathological dilatation of bronchi. Generalized or localized. Cause: mostly idiopathic (needs to exclude other causes e.g. post-infection, TB).

Why does bronchiectasis develop? The "vicious cycle" hypothesis: infection → inflammation → structural damage to bronchial walls → impaired mucociliary clearance → mucus pooling → further infection → more damage. The end result is irreversible dilation of bronchi.

Causes to exclude:

  • Post-infectious: childhood measles/pertussis/severe pneumonia, TB
  • Immunodeficiency: hypogammaglobulinaemia, HIV
  • Cystic fibrosis (sweat test)
  • Primary ciliary dyskinesia (specialist pathway based on compatible lifelong history; nasal nitric oxide and confirmatory ciliary/genetic testing)
  • Aspiration/GORD (barium studies/pH monitoring)
  • Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)
  • Autoimmune: RA, SLE

Symptoms:

Chronic sputum production and cough, infective exacerbations, haemoptysis (usually infective), weight loss, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnoea.

Signs:

Cachexia, clubbing, coarse crackles, associated COPD, respiratory failure.

Why clubbing? Chronic suppurative lung disease → likely related to circulating growth factors (VEGF, PDGF) from chronically inflamed tissue → nail bed vasodilation and connective tissue proliferation.

Progressive lung damage, lung abscesses, empyema, brain abscesses.

Brain abscess is a rare metastatic complication of chronic suppurative infection. Its presence should prompt a search for bacteraemia, endocarditis and a right-to-left shunt rather than assuming bronchiectasis alone explains it.

The slide lists CXR/HRCT, immunoglobulins, autoantibodies, aspiration/reflux studies, ciliary/sperm analysis, sputum culture/AFB, neutrophil testing and sweat testing.

InvestigationWhat It's Looking For
Thin-section CT thoraxConfirms bronchiectasis and maps distribution: broncho-arterial ratio > 1 ("signet-ring" sign), lack of normal tapering and visible peripheral bronchi
Slide 43 shows severe bilateral lower-lobe-predominant cystic/saccular bronchiectasis with clusters of dilated, thick-walled bronchi. [1]
ImmunoglobulinsHypogammaglobulinaemia (common variable immunodeficiency)
Total IgE and Aspergillus sensitisation testingABPA screen
Autoimmune testsOnly when symptoms/signs suggest an autoimmune disease
Aspiration/reflux assessmentWhen symptoms or history suggest aspiration; not a blanket barium/pH study
PCD testingLifelong wet cough, neonatal respiratory distress, chronic otitis/sinusitis, infertility or laterality defect; specialist nasal nitric oxide/ciliary/genetic pathway
CF testingCompatible phenotype, family history, malabsorption, pancreatitis or characteristic microbiology
Routine and mycobacterial sputum culturesBaseline and exacerbation microbiology; exclude NTM before long-term macrolide monotherapy

Use a minimum aetiology panel for everyone, then phenotype-directed tests rather than ordering the entire historical slide list. A cause can change treatment (for example immunoglobulin replacement, ABPA therapy, CF/PCD care or aspiration management). [15]

E. Treatment [1]

The slide lists H. influenzae, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa and then several antipseudomonal antibiotic classes.

Send sputum before antibiotics where feasible and choose treatment from the patient's previous cultures/susceptibilities, current severity, allergies and local guidance. Do not give antipseudomonal therapy merely because bronchiectasis is “long-standing.” Chronic Pseudomonas infection is clinically important because it is associated with more exacerbations and worse outcomes; new isolation should trigger specialist assessment for an eradication strategy. Exacerbations are often treated for about 14 days, especially with Pseudomonas or severe disease, but shorter courses can be appropriate in selected mild, rapidly responding cases. [15]

The slide lists ICS ± LABA for concomitant airflow obstruction/bronchospasm. Long-term macrolides — immunomodulating rather than antibiotic effect (e.g. azithromycin, erythromycin). Watch out for prolonged QTc. Postural drainage. Surgery for very limited disease. Lung transplantation.

Do not prescribe ICS routinely for bronchiectasis itself; use it for a separate indication such as asthma, COPD or ABPA. Bronchodilators are individualised to symptomatic airflow obstruction. [15]

Long-term macrolides are for patients at high exacerbation risk despite optimised standard care, under specialist supervision. Before starting, exclude active NTM infection (macrolide monotherapy can select resistance), review ECG/QTc, drug interactions, liver function and hearing/balance risk. [15]

Airway clearance is core therapy: every patient should be taught a personalised technique by an experienced respiratory physiotherapist. This may include active-cycle breathing, autogenic drainage, positive-expiratory-pressure devices or gravity-assisted positioning; “postural drainage” is only one option. The 2025 ERS guideline also supports long-term inhaled antibiotics for selected high-exacerbation-risk patients with chronic Pseudomonas infection despite standard care. [15]


  • Sputum Gram stain and culture: a good quality specimen should have > 25 PMNs and < 10 squamous epithelial cells per low-power field
  • When blood cultures are indicated, obtain appropriate sets from separate venepunctures before antibiotics if this does not delay urgent treatment
  • MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry increasingly replacing traditional culture for rapid pathogen identification

  • Fever = core temperature ≥38.0°C (oral ≥37.5°C)
  • Swinging/hectic fever pattern: suggestive of abscess or empyema (wide temperature fluctuations)

  • CXR for pneumonia: look for consolidation, air bronchograms, pleural effusion, cavity/air-fluid level
  • CT thorax: for complications (abscess, empyema, underlying tumour) and for bronchiectasis diagnosis (HRCT)

  • From respiratory DI sessions [8]: Interpreting ABG in the context of pneumonia:
    • Type 1 respiratory failure: low PaO₂, normal/low PaCO₂ (pneumonia)
    • Type 2 respiratory failure: low PaO₂, high PaCO₂ (severe pneumonia with exhaustion, or underlying COPD)

Exam Traps to Avoid

  1. Confusing HAP with CAP timing: HAP = onset > 48 hours after hospitalisation. A patient admitted yesterday with a cough has CAP, not HAP.

  2. Forgetting severe-CAP atypical coverage: ensure the hospital regimen covers Legionella, while also following current local guidance and microbiology.

  3. Lung abscess vs empyema management: Lung abscess = prolonged antibiotics, usually NO drainage. Empyema = prolonged antibiotics + DRAINAGE (intercostal tube).

  4. Treating adamantanes as current influenza therapy: they act only on influenza A but are not recommended for seasonal influenza because of widespread resistance. Neuraminidase inhibitors cover A and B.

  5. Normal WBC in pneumonia: Doesn't exclude bacterial pneumonia — it may indicate atypical pathogen OR immunosuppression OR overwhelming infection (leucopenia = poor prognosis).

  6. Antigenic shift vs drift: shift is an abrupt major change in influenza A that can create pandemic potential; drift is gradual antigenic evolution in A and B that drives seasonal epidemics. A novel virus must also transmit efficiently between humans to cause a pandemic.

  7. Over-localising aspiration: right-sided disease is common, but distribution depends on body position; supine aspiration favours posterior upper-lobe and superior lower-lobe segments.


High Yield Summary

  1. Pneumonia

    • Inflammation of lung parenchyma.
    • Classify by setting (CAP/HAP/aspiration), anatomy (lobar/bronchopneumonia), and aetiology.
    • CAP: choose current local therapy by severity, resistance risk, allergy and prior microbiology; ensure severe-CAP atypical coverage.
    • HAP: use the local antibiogram; add MRSA/dual antipseudomonal coverage only when risk-supported and de-escalate with cultures.
    • Aspiration: distinguish pneumonitis from pneumonia; extra anaerobic coverage is not routine unless abscess/empyema is suspected.
  2. CURB-65

    • Score 2 generally prompts hospital assessment; 3–5 is high risk. Never let the score override hypoxaemia, shock, complications or unsafe social circumstances.
  3. Complications

    • Respiratory failure, sepsis, lung abscess, parapneumonic effusion/pleural infection, hyponatraemia, AF and MI. Empyema requires source control; pH ≤7.2 supports drainage even without frank pus.
  4. Influenza

    • H and N antigens. Influenza A shift can create pandemic potential. Treat priority groups promptly even after 48h and do not wait for testing. Adamantanes are not recommended.
  5. Bronchiectasis

    • Pathological bronchial dilatation, mostly idiopathic.
    • HRCT diagnostic.
    • Acute exacerbation: culture first when possible and use prior microbiology; antipseudomonal therapy only when indicated.
    • Long-term: personalised airway clearance for all; selected long-term macrolide/inhaled-antibiotic strategies under specialist monitoring.
    • Complications include brain abscess.

Active Recall - Fever and Purulent Sputum


[1] Lecture slides: GC 052. Fever and purulent sputum.pdf (slides 1-47) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p62, p68) [3] Past papers: 2016 Fourth Summative SAQ.pdf (Q3), 2020 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ paper.pdf (Q45), 2021 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ.pdf (Q89), 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q40), 2023 Fourth Summative Minicase.pdf (Case 1), 2024 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q1-4, Q37) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p220-221) [5] Lecture slides: GC 101. Diagnosis of infections.pdf [6] Lecture slides: GC 048. Fever.pdf [7] Lecture slides: GC 016. Radiology of Common Medical and Surgical Problems.pdf; Respiratory- Introduction to Resp investigations (CXR, CT thorax and lung function tests).pdf [8] Lecture slides: DL_Data_Interpretation_20141023.pdf (p8, p18) [9] Hong Kong Department of Health, HealthyHK — Pneumonia (2024 statistics); NICE, NG250: Pneumonia—diagnosis and management (2025) [10] ATS/IDSA, Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia (official guideline, 2019) [11] ATS/IDSA, Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (official guideline, 2016) [12] US CDC, Influenza Antiviral Medications: Summary for Clinicians (current season) and Influenza Antiviral Drug Resistance [13] US CDC, Overview of Influenza Testing Methods [14] Hong Kong Centre for Health Protection, Seasonal Influenza [15] European Respiratory Society, Clinical practice guideline for the management of adult bronchiectasis (2025) [16] British Thoracic Society, Guideline for oxygen use in healthcare and emergency settings [17] British Thoracic Society, Guideline for pleural disease (2023)

On this page

No Headings