GC031 Back Pain In An Elderly Woman: Osteoporosis And Related Fractures

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration, predisposing elderly women to fragility fractures, commonly vertebral compression fractures presenting as acute or chronic back pain.

Back Pain in an Elderly Woman: Osteoporosis and Related Fractures

Big idea: Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease, clinically silent until fractures occur, and carries devastating morbidity and mortality—especially from hip and vertebral fractures. The lecture walks through a 70-year-old woman with back pain as the index case, then systematically covers the definition, bone biology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis (DXA, T-scores, FRAX), risk factors, clinical assessment, investigations, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, fracture risk stratification, and management of specific osteoporotic fractures. [1]

Learning objectives (verbatim from slides): [1]

  1. Understand the common types of osteoporotic fractures and their clinical presentation
  2. Learn the epidemiology of osteoporotic fracture
  3. Understand the diagnosis of osteoporosis and measurement of bone density
  4. Recognize the risk factors for osteoporosis
  5. Understand the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
  6. Learn the management of osteoporotic fractures

Clinical relevance: This is a bread-and-butter topic that spans endocrinology, geriatrics, orthopaedics, and primary care. It is heavily examined in both MCQ and SAQ/minicase formats, often through clinical vignettes of an elderly woman/man with a fracture or back pain.


Core Concepts and Mechanisms

"A systemic skeletal disease characterised by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture." [1]

Why this matters: The definition captures two inseparable elements—quantity (low bone mass) and quality (microarchitectural deterioration). Both contribute to bone fragility. A normal-density bone with disrupted microarchitecture can still fracture, and vice versa. This is why BMD alone doesn't perfectly predict fracture risk—hence the development of FRAX.

Osteoporosis vs Osteomalacia — A Common Exam Trap

Osteoporosis = normal mineral-to-osteoid ratio, but reduced total bone mass. Routine calcium, phosphate and ALP are typically normal in uncomplicated primary osteoporosis. Osteomalacia = defective mineralization of newly formed osteoid (unmineralized osteoid on histology). ALP is often elevated, commonly with secondary hyperparathyroidism; vitamin D deficiency is an important cause. [1] Thus, raised ALP in an older patient with back pain should prompt evaluation for osteomalacia, Paget disease, a healing fracture and other hepatic/bone causes rather than being attributed automatically to osteoporosis.

"In the adult skeleton, bone is constantly remodelled at multiple sites by the coordinated and sequential actions of bone-resorbing osteoclasts and bone-forming osteoblasts to repair microdamage and to adapt bone structure to the mechanical and metabolic needs." [1]

The cycle:

  • Activation → Resorption (osteoclasts dig out old/damaged bone) → Reversal → Formation (osteoblasts lay down new osteoid, which mineralizes) → Quiescence

  • This is "coupled": resorption and formation are linked so that bone removed ≈ bone replaced in health.

  • The resorption phase takes approximately 10 days; following resorption, macrophage-like cells appear at the reversal phase before osteoblast precursors are recruited, proliferate, differentiate, and secrete new bone matrix that then mineralises. [1]

"Osteocytes represent > 95% of all bone cells, are embedded in the mineral, function as mechanosensors and fine-tune bone remodelling by osteoblasts and osteoclasts." [1]

Key players:

CellFunctionRelevant Drug Target
OsteoclastsBone resorptionBisphosphonates, denosumab (anti-RANKL)
OsteoblastsBone formationTeriparatide (PTH analogue), romosozumab (anti-sclerostin)
OsteocytesMechanosensing; produce sclerostin (inhibits Wnt → inhibits osteoblast activity)Romosozumab

RANK/RANKL/OPG axis (from lecture diagram): [1]

  • Osteoblasts express RANKL on their surface
  • RANKL binds RANK on osteoclast precursors → osteoclast differentiation & activation → bone resorption
  • OPG (osteoprotegerin) is a decoy receptor produced by osteoblasts that binds RANKL and prevents it from activating RANK → inhibits resorption
  • Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that mimics OPG by binding RANKL

Sclerostin pathway:

  • Osteocytes secrete sclerostin, which inhibits the Wnt signalling pathway in osteoblasts → suppresses bone formation
  • Romosozumab blocks sclerostin → disinhibits Wnt → increases osteoblast activity (anabolic) AND decreases osteoclast activity (anti-resorptive) = dual effect [1]

Additional sclerostin biology (from lecture diagram): [1]

  • Mechanical unloading and oestrogen deficiency upregulate sclerostin production by osteocytes
  • Sclerostin also stimulates RANKL expression, thereby promoting osteoclast formation and activity — i.e., sclerostin is not only anti-anabolic but also pro-resorptive
  • Sclerostin inhibits osteoblast differentiation and reduces mineralisation
  • This explains why romosozumab (anti-sclerostin) has a dual effect: blocking sclerostin both disinhibits osteoblast-mediated formation and reduces RANKL-driven resorption

"Increased rate of bone remodelling in both cancellous and cortical bone" + "Negative remodelling balance." [1]

Why does this happen?

  • Peak bone mass is reached around age 20–40 [3]
  • After ~40, gradual bone loss occurs (~1% per year) [3]
  • In postmenopausal women: oestrogen deficiency → increased RANKL, decreased OPG → accelerated osteoclast activity → resorption >> formation → rapid bone loss in first 5–10 years post-menopause
  • In age-related (Type 2) osteoporosis: decreased calcium/vitamin D intake and absorption, decreased renal 1α-hydroxylase activity, secondary hyperparathyroidism → increased bone turnover [3]

What the remodelling images show: ageing recruits more remodelling units, but each osteoclast-cut resorption cavity is larger than the osteoblast-filled replacement packet. Repeated negative balance perforates and disconnects trabeculae and thins the cortex; this loss of connectivity explains why strength falls disproportionately to the reduction in bone mass. [1]

Role of oestrogen in bone remodelling (from lecture diagram): [1]

  • With oestrogen: oestrogen enhances bone formation by stimulating osteoblast differentiation and function; suppresses osteoclast differentiation via direct cellular effects and reduced RANKL production by activated T cells, MSCs, osteoblasts, and osteocytes; promotes osteoclast apoptosis; suppresses sclerostin; and is required for adequate mechanosensing and mechanotransduction by osteocytes
  • Oestrogen deficiency: RANKL production is upregulated (especially by activated T cells) → higher osteoclast number and activity (↑↑ bone resorption); individual osteoblast function is suppressed partly through upregulation of sclerostin (Wnt inhibitor), though total osteoblast number increases (↑ bone formation, but net bone loss); osteocyte mechanosensing is impaired (↓ mechanosensing)

Pathophysiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis [1]

Glucocorticoids cause osteoporosis through multiple mechanisms:

  • Decrease osteoblast differentiation, function, and lifespan (apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes)
  • Increase osteoclast lifespan
  • Decrease intestinal calcium absorption and increase renal calcium excretion → secondary hyperparathyroidism
  • Decrease sex hormones (suppress GnRH)
  • Myopathy → increased fall risk
  • Fracture risk increases rapidly, even before significant BMD decline (because of bone quality deterioration)

Additional GIOP mechanisms (from lecture diagram): [1]

  • Osteocyte apoptosis → decreased canalicular circulation → decreased bone quality → may lead to osteonecrosis
  • Decreased muscle mass → decreased mechanosensing (compounds osteocyte dysfunction)
  • Decreased sex steroids → increased RANKL and decreased OPG → drives the early, transient increase in osteoclast survival and bone resorption

Past Paper Alert — GIOP

2024 MCQ Q31: A 50-year-old man with weight gain, osteopenia, and L3 wedge fracture after receiving frequent injections for knee OA for > 1 year. Answer: D. Iatrogenic due to exogenous steroid (intra-articular steroid injections). [7]


Clinical Presentation

"Clinically silent until fractures occur." [1]

"Lifetime fracture risk could be as high as 40%." [1]

Common sites: Wrist, Vertebra, Hip [1]

FractureTypical MechanismClinical FeaturesKey Points
Distal radius (Colles')Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH)"Dinner fork" deformityOften the earliest osteoporotic fracture (younger post-menopausal women ~55–65y)
VertebralLifting, bending, or spontaneousAcute/chronic back pain, height loss, kyphosis ("dowager's hump")Many are subclinical (only ~1/3 come to clinical attention)
Hip (femoral neck / intertrochanteric)Fall from standing heightShortened, externally rotated limb; inability to weight-bearMost devastating; carries highest mortality

Radiograph recognition from the slide montage: the distal-radius image shows a metaphyseal wrist fracture, the lateral spine image shows anterior vertebral height loss/wedging, and the hip image shows a proximal-femoral fracture. The visual sequence also mirrors the typical age pattern: wrist fractures tend to appear earlier, vertebral fractures next, and hip-fracture incidence rises most steeply in the oldest age groups. [1]

Hip fractures: [1]

"One-year mortality rate: 20–30%" "40–60% of survivors cannot regain pre-fracture level of mobility within one year" "20–60% of previously independent patients require assistance with at least one ADL"

Vertebral fractures: [1]

"20% excess mortality 5-year post-fracture" "Acute and chronic back pain, deformity and height loss, diminished quality of life"


"The most common metabolic bone disease." [1]

"Osteoporotic fractures in lifetime: 1 in 3 postmenopausal women, 1 in 5 men aged ≥ 50 years." [1]

"1 osteoporotic fracture occurs every 3 seconds." [1]

"Hip and vertebral fractures as the hallmark complications." [1]

Key epidemiological features:

  • Exponential increase with age
  • Female predominance (W:M ratio for hip fractures in HK ≈ 2.2) [1]
  • The lecture's Hong Kong chart reports age-standardised hip-fracture incidence of 149 in men, 324 in women and 230 overall per 100,000 person-years (historical 2009 dataset). [1]
  • More recent Hong Kong data used in the 2024 Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong (OSHK) guideline estimate an overall standardised incidence of 190.4 per 100,000 person-years for 2005–2018. Do not mix values from different periods or standard populations. [15]

Diagnosis

WHO Diagnostic Categories: [1]

CategoryT-ScoreDefinition
Normal≥ −1.0BMD within 1 SD of young adult mean
Osteopenia−1.0 to −2.5BMD 1–2.5 SD below young adult mean
Osteoporosis≤ −2.5BMD ≥ 2.5 SD below young adult mean
Severe (established) osteoporosis≤ −2.5 + ≥ 1 fragility fractureBMD criteria + fracture history

"Low-trauma / low-energy fracture in a postmenopausal woman or elderly — defined as a fracture that occurs from a fall from standing height or lower." [1]

A low-trauma hip or vertebral fracture in the appropriate patient generally establishes osteoporosis and an indication for treatment irrespective of BMD. Other fragility fractures are powerful risk markers but should trigger DXA and a full clinical risk/secondary-cause assessment rather than being treated as an identical diagnostic shortcut in every patient. [15]

"Gold standard: the only means for diagnostic classification according to WHO diagnostic criteria." [1]

"Central DXA at hip and spine are the recommended sites." [1]

"BMD measurements at these regions of interest are the best predictor of fracture risk for the corresponding sites." [1]

"For every reduction of 1 SD, fracture risk increases by 1.5–2 times overall." [1]

T-score vs Z-score:

  • T-score = number of SDs from a young-adult reference mean → used in postmenopausal women and men ≥ 50. Current ISCD/OSHK positions use the uniform White female, non-race-adjusted NHANES III reference for femoral-neck/total-hip T-scores in both women and men; lumbar-spine T-scores use the manufacturer's reference database. [15][16]
  • Z-score = compared to age-matched population → used in premenopausal women and men < 50; Z-score ≤ −2.0 suggests secondary cause [3]

High Yield — T-score Interpretation

2022 MCQ Q17: 90-year-old man, fell, hip fracture → what would most likely be present? Answer: C. T-score of −3 on DEXA scan (i.e., osteoporosis). [8] This tests whether you know that hip fractures in the elderly are almost always associated with osteoporosis.

"Simple ethnic-specific web-based tool that integrates clinical information to predict a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture." [1]

The lecture uses FRAX to guide treatment in untreated postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 years. [1]

Why FRAX? BMD alone has poor sensitivity for predicting fractures. FRAX incorporates clinical risk factors (age, sex, BMI, prior fracture, parent hip fracture, glucocorticoid use, smoking, alcohol, rheumatoid arthritis, secondary osteoporosis) ± BMD to give a more clinically useful 10-year fracture probability.

Current-use nuance: the FRAX calculator accepts ages 40–90 years, but whether and how its result changes treatment depends on the population, indication and local guideline. It is country-specific, can be calculated without BMD or with femoral-neck BMD, and does not itself prescribe a universal intervention threshold. The 20% major-osteoporotic-fracture and 3% hip-fracture cut-offs shown later in the lecture are US-adapted examples, not universal Hong Kong thresholds. [15][22]


Risk Factors for Osteoporosis

T-score=Measured BMD−Young adult mean BMDYoung adult population SD\text{T-score} = \frac{\text{Measured BMD} - \text{Young adult mean BMD}}{\text{Young adult population SD}}
  • The formula is correct, but the reference database is not simply sex- and ethnicity-matched: current central-DXA T-score conventions use a uniform young White female NHANES III reference for hip measurements in both sexes, as described above. [15][16]

Risk factors:

  • Female sex
  • Increasing age
  • Low body weight ( < 45 kg)
  • Family history of osteoporosis or fragility fracture
  • Premature menopause (age < 40) or early menopause (age 40–45)
  • Low calcium intake
  • Lack of exercise or sedentary lifestyle
  • Smoking
  • Excessive alcohol intake ( > 3 standard drinks per day)
  • Lack of sun exposure
  • Prolonged immobilization

CategoryExamples
EndocrineCushing's, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism, type 1 DM, prolactinoma
GIMalabsorption (coeliac, Crohn's, gastrectomy), PBC
RheumatologicalRheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis
RenalCKD (renal osteodystrophy)
HaematologicalMultiple myeloma
DrugsGlucocorticoids, PPI, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones, aromatase inhibitors, anticoagulants, depo-medroxyprogesterone, chemotherapy, immunosuppressants, excessive thyroxine replacement [1]
OtherProlonged immobilisation, anorexia nervosa, thalassaemias, stroke (hemi-osteoporosis)

Medication entries in this broad screening list are not all equivalent in causality or effect size. Glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors and excess thyroid replacement are well-established hazards; associations for PPIs and anticoagulants depend on agent, dose, duration and confounding. Use the list to prompt medication review, not to assign causation automatically.

Drugs That Increase Osteoporosis Risk — Lecture Slide

The lecture specifically lists: glucocorticoid, PPI, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones as drugs increasing osteoporosis risk, and hypnotics, diuretics as drugs increasing fall risk. [1] Do not confuse these two categories.


Clinical Assessment

Detailed history of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and/or fractures:

  • Smoking and alcohol
  • Personal / parental history of fracture(s)
  • Fall risk
  • Estimate daily dietary calcium intake
  • Past health: prolonged sex hormone deficiency (age of menopause, use of HRT), type 1 diabetes, anorexia nervosa, rheumatological diseases, GI disease / malabsorption syndrome (gastrectomy, intestinal bypass, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease)
  • Drug history: glucocorticoid, PPI, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones (osteoporosis risk); hypnotics, diuretics (fall risk)

SystemFindingPotential Clinical Implication
GeneralLoss of height / kyphosisVertebral fracture
GeneralWeight gain / central obesityCushing's syndrome
GeneralWeight lossMalabsorption
GeneralGoitre / eye signsThyrotoxicosis
GeneralJoint diseaseRheumatoid arthritis
GeneralEunuchoidHypogonadism
TeethPoor dentitionIncreased risk of osteonecrosis of jaw (important before starting bisphosphonates/denosumab)
CNSMuscle weaknessVitamin D deficiency
CNSGait and balanceHigh fall risk

TestWhat It Detects/Excludes
CBCAnaemia (myeloma / coeliac disease)
Renal and liver function testsRenal or liver failure, alcohol abuse
Calcium, phosphate, PTHPrimary hyperparathyroidism, myeloma
ALPOsteomalacia, Paget's disease
25(OH)DVitamin D deficiency, osteomalacia
TSH ± fT4Hyperthyroidism
Testosterone (in men)Male hypogonadism
Fasting glucose, HbA1cDiabetes mellitus
24hr urine calciumHypercalciuria
Selected: BTMs, SPEP, cortisol, prolactin, anti-tTGMyeloma, Cushing's, coeliac disease

Why Check These Labs?

The labs do not measure BMD; they look for secondary causes, treatment contraindications and mimics such as osteomalacia. In uncomplicated primary osteoporosis, calcium, phosphate and ALP are usually normal. Raised ALP is not specific: consider osteomalacia, Paget disease, recent fracture and liver disease, then interpret it with 25(OH)D, calcium, phosphate, PTH and the clinical context. [1]


Management of Osteoporosis

"The objective of treating osteoporosis is to reduce the likelihood of fragility fractures by strengthening the skeleton or decreasing fall frequency, or both." [1]

Indications for therapy in postmenopausal women and men age ≥ 50: [1]

  • Prior hip or vertebral fracture
  • BMD T-score ≤ −2.5 at spine or proximal femur
  • BMD T-score between −1 and −2.5 (low bone mass) AND:
    • 10-year risk of major fracture ≥ 20% (FRAX)
    • 10-year risk of hip fracture ≥ 3% (FRAX)

The 20%/3% cut-offs reproduce the lecture's US-adapted example. They are not universal FRAX thresholds; use the current local guideline and clinical context. Prior hip/vertebral fracture and a qualifying T-score remain treatment-defining findings, while recent/multiple fractures may justify an anabolic-first strategy. [15][22]

  • Healthy balanced diet rich in calcium and vitamin D
  • Regular weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercises
  • Avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake
  • Adequate sunlight exposure

Calcium: [1]

  • Target: 800–1200 mg/day, ideally through dairy products
  • Supplements if dietary intake < 800 mg/day (calcium carbonate or calcium citrate)
  • Calcium carbonate is best taken with food because it depends more on gastric acidity; calcium citrate may be taken with or without food and is often preferred when gastric acidity is reduced
  • Side effects: dyspepsia, constipation

Vitamin D: [1]

  • Promotes calcium absorption in gut, maintains serum Ca/PO4 for mineralization, important for neuromuscular function
  • Major source: skin synthesis of cholecalciferol (D3) under UV light. There is no universally safe or sufficient fixed “10–15 minute” prescription: skin type, season, clothing, latitude and UV index all matter, and sunburn should be avoided
  • For patients with established osteoporosis, the 2024 OSHK guideline supports supplementation tailored to intake, deficiency and risk; the lecture uses 800–1000 IU/day (sometimes up to 2000 IU/day in obesity, limited sun or malabsorption). Do not extrapolate this automatically to every healthy adult. [15][20]
  • Major circulating form: 25(OH)D
  • The Hong Kong osteoporosis guideline retains a target of 25(OH)D ≥ 75 nmol/L in this clinical context. By contrast, the 2024 Endocrine Society disease-prevention guideline found no universal outcome-specific serum target for generally healthy people; these recommendations address different populations. [15][20]

Exercise: [1]

  • Weight-bearing exercises (brisk walking, jogging, Tai Chi, dancing, stair-climbing)
  • Benefits: retards bone loss, increases muscle mass/strength, improves balance and reduces falls, improves QoL

Pharmacological Management

CategoryDrugs
Anti-resorptivesHRT, Raloxifene, Bisphosphonates, Denosumab
Anabolic agentsTeriparatide, Abaloparatide, Romosozumab

Two targets for pharmacological intervention: (1) Inhibition of bone resorption (osteoclast), (2) Stimulation of bone formation (osteoblast). [1]

Drug2y Spine BMD ↑2y Hip BMD ↑RRR Vertebral #RRR Non-vertebral #
PO Raloxifene2–3%1%50%—
PO Bisphosphonates3–5%2–3%40–53%0–20%
IV Zoledronic acid5–6%3–4%70%25%
SC Denosumab6–8%3–4%68%20%
SC Teriparatide8–10%1.5–2%65–70%35%
SC Abaloparatide10%2–3%70–80%40%
SC Romosozumab11% (1y)4% (1y)48% (vs alendronate)20% (vs alendronate)

These are relative risk reductions (RRR) from different trials, populations, comparators and follow-up periods—not head-to-head absolute benefits and not a league table. Baseline fracture risk determines the absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat. [1]

Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) [1]

  • Mechanism: inhibits bone resorption, ↓ urinary Ca excretion, ↓ stromal cell cytokines
  • Advantages: ↓ menopausal symptoms, improves CVD risk factors (but NOT outcome events)
  • Disadvantages: endometrial cancer (must add progestogens if uterus intact), slight ↑ breast cancer risk, VTE
  • Mainly for young postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms — NOT indicated for osteoporosis alone [3]

Raloxifene (SERM) [1]

  • Oestrogen-agonistic on bone → 40% ↓ vertebral fracture, but NOT non-vertebral fractures

  • Oestrogen-antagonistic on endometrium and breast → ↓ incidence of invasive ER+ breast cancer

  • Side effects: VTE, hot flushes, leg cramps

  • Must discontinue during prolonged immobilization (VTE risk)

  • Preferable in young postmenopausal women when hip fracture risk is not particularly high

  • As patients age, may need to switch to more potent agents as the risk of hip fracture becomes higher [1]

  • Teaching point: vertebral fracture incidence is high early after menopause (rapid trabecular bone loss), while hip fracture incidence increases particularly after age 70 (predominant cortical bone loss) — this explains why raloxifene (vertebral-only protection) suffices early but not later [1]

Bisphosphonates [1]

"Mainstay of pharmacotherapy. Potent anti-resorptives."

  • Mechanism: pyrophosphate derivatives → bind to bone surface → taken up by osteoclasts → inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) in mevalonate pathway → osteoclast apoptosis
  • Renal excretion: check kidney function and the individual agent's label. Renal cut-offs are agent-specific; for example, current zoledronic-acid labelling contraindicates use with acute renal impairment or creatinine clearance < 35 mL/min (calculated before each dose), rather than a universal eGFR < 30 rule. [19]
  • Poor intestinal absorption (must take on empty stomach with plain water, remain upright 30 min)
  • Forms: Oral (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate) and IV (zoledronic acid)

Side effects: [1]

  • Upper GI irritation (oral bisphosphonates) — oesophagitis, ulceration
  • Acute phase reaction (IV bisphosphonates, especially first dose) — flu-like symptoms
  • Disabling muscle/bone pain — occasional
  • Rare but serious:
    • Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ): 1–10 in 100,000
    • Atypical femoral fracture (AFF): 20–50 in 100,000

High Yield — Antiresorptives in CKD

Do not use a single renal cut-off for every bisphosphonate: check creatinine clearance and the specific preparation's label. Denosumab is not renally cleared, but it is not a risk-free renal substitute. Advanced CKD—especially dialysis or CKD-mineral and bone disorder—greatly increases the risk of severe, sometimes fatal, hypocalcaemia. Correct hypocalcaemia, assess CKD-MBD and vitamin D/calcium status, and use specialist supervision and monitoring. [17][19]

Denosumab [1]

  • Human monoclonal antibody to RANKL
  • Very potent anti-resorptive
  • SC injection every 6 months
  • No renal dose adjustment is specified, but advanced CKD/CKD-MBD carries a boxed-warning risk of severe hypocalcaemia; this requires assessment and close monitoring rather than automatic substitution for a bisphosphonate. [17]
  • Side effects: rash; important rare harms include hypocalcaemia, MRONJ and AFF
  • Critical point: do not delay or stop denosumab without a plan. Discontinuation produces rebound bone turnover and can cause multiple vertebral fractures; transition to another anti-resorptive when it is discontinued. [15][17]

Teriparatide [1]

  • 1–34 amino-terminal fragment of PTH

  • Teriparatide also regulates renal tubular reabsorption of Ca²⁺ and phosphate, and intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption [1]

  • Key concept: High-level continuous PTH → bone resorption (cortical > trabecular). Low-dose intermittent PTH → anabolic action.

  • SC injection 20 μg daily. Use beyond 2 years over a patient's lifetime is reserved for patients who remain or return to high fracture risk; it is no longer an absolute two-year prohibition in the current US label. [18]

  • Side effects: mild leg cramps, injection site reactions, hypercalcaemia

  • Avoid in patients with bone metastases/skeletal malignancy, prior skeletal radiotherapy, Paget disease or other metabolic bone disease, or hereditary osteosarcoma predisposition. The osteosarcoma signal arose in rats; observational human studies have not shown an increased risk, although data beyond two years are limited. [18]

Past Paper — Teriparatide Side Effects

2023 MCQ Q29: 75-year-old woman starting teriparatide. Which is a known side effect? Answer: not AFF (that's bisphosphonates), not GI reflux (that's oral bisphosphonates). The correct answer to look for would involve hypercalcaemia or injection site reactions. Note: the question listed options A (AFF), B (dizziness), C (GORD), D (hypocalcaemia). The intended answer in the context of teriparatide side effects is likely B (dizziness) — teriparatide can cause orthostatic hypotension/dizziness. Hypercalcaemia is the classically tested side effect of teriparatide. [9]

Abaloparatide [1]

  • Synthetic analogue of PTH-related protein (PTHrP)
  • Similar to teriparatide: daily SC, limited to 2 years
  • Hypercalcaemia less common than teriparatide (3.4% vs 6.4%)
  • The slide states “FDA-approved 2017; not available in Hong Kong.” Treat the availability statement as a dated lecture snapshot and check the current Hong Kong formulary before prescribing

Romosozumab [1]

"Humanised monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin... DUAL EFFECT: increases bone formation (↑ P1NP) and decreases bone resorption (↓ sCTX)."

  • SC injection monthly for 1 year
  • Side effects: injection site reactions, small risk of hypocalcaemia, ONJ/AFF ( < 0.1%)
  • Caution in patients with high cardiovascular risk
  • The 2024 OSHK guideline contraindicates romosozumab in patients with a history of MI or stroke; product labels differ by jurisdiction (the US label says not to initiate within the preceding year). Follow the current local label and assess other cardiovascular risk factors. [15][23]
  • Limit to 12 monthly doses, then use an antiresorptive to preserve the BMD/fracture benefit. [15][23]

Fracture Risk Stratification:

Risk CategoryCriteriaTreatment
Low RiskAge < 65, T-score < −2.5, no prior fractureRaloxifene (female)
High RiskAge ≥ 65 + T-score < −2.5, OR FRAX MOF ≥ 20%/HF ≥ 3%, OR prior fracture > 24 monthsPotent anti-resorptive (bisphosphonate / denosumab)
Very High RiskMultiple fractures, recent MOF ≤ 24 months, T-score < −3.0, fracture on anti-resorptive therapyAnabolic agents (teriparatide, romosozumab)

This table reproduces the lecture's relative treatment tiers: its “low risk” row still has densitometric osteoporosis and does not mean “no fracture risk” or “no treatment.” Current Hong Kong guidance broadly supports raloxifene/HRT for selected younger postmenopausal women at lower hip-fracture risk, potent bisphosphonate or denosumab for high risk, and a bone-forming agent first for imminent/very-high risk, followed by an antiresorptive. Individualise for fracture site/recency, renal function, cardiovascular/VTE risk and patient preference. [15]


Atypical Femoral Fractures (AFFs) and Osteonecrosis of Jaw (ONJ)

"Occur in the subtrochanteric region or diaphysis of the femur with unique radiological features: predominantly transverse fracture line, periosteal callus formation, minimal comminution."

"More common with long-term bisphosphonate therapy ( > 7–8 years): 113 per 100,000 person-years."

"Also reported with denosumab, with even lower incidence."

Why? Prolonged suppression of bone remodelling → accumulation of microdamage → stress fracture in cortical bone of the femoral shaft. Patients often have prodromal thigh pain before complete fracture.

What the bilateral femur radiograph shows: one side has a complete, near-transverse diaphyseal fracture with little comminution and focal lateral-cortical “beaking”; the contralateral femur has lateral cortical thickening/periosteal reaction consistent with an incomplete stress lesion. AFF can be bilateral, so new thigh/groin pain warrants full-length femoral imaging and assessment of the opposite side. [1]

Current definition: exposed bone, or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula, persisting for > 8 weeks in a patient with current/previous antiresorptive therapy alone or in combination with immune modulators or antiangiogenic drugs, with no jaw radiotherapy or metastatic disease to the jaw. [21]

Incidence: 1:10,000 to 1:100,000

Risk factors: Age > 65, periodontitis, bisphosphonate use > 2 years, smoking, denture wearing, diabetes mellitus, invasive dental procedures (e.g. extractions).

Clinical implication: perform an oral assessment and optimise dental health before antiresorptive therapy; arrange professional dental review when disease or planned invasive work warrants it. Coordinate elective extractions individually, but do not create unnecessary treatment delay in a patient at imminent fracture risk. [15][21]

Perspective — ONJ and AFF Are Exceedingly Rare

The lecture emphasises that ONJ and AFF are exceedingly rare compared with the fractures they prevent. Comparative incidence data: [1]

EventIncidence per 100,000 person-years
Bisphosphonate-related ONJ~1
Bisphosphonate-related AFF (2 years of use)~2
Bisphosphonate-related AFF (8 years of use)~78
Major osteoporotic fracture — low-risk women~650
Major osteoporotic fracture — moderate-risk women~1,600
Major osteoporotic fracture — high-risk women~3,100

The risk of untreated osteoporotic fracture vastly exceeds the risk of these rare adverse effects.


Management of Osteoporotic Fractures [1]

  • Conservative management: symptoms usually improve in 6–8 weeks
  • Start with multimodal conservative care: analgesia, safe early mobilisation, rehabilitation/fall prevention and osteoporosis treatment. Routine vertebral augmentation is not supported: sham-controlled trials show no clinically important benefit from vertebroplasty, and evidence for kyphoplasty remains insufficient. Exceptionally, a carefully selected patient with severe, recent, imaging-confirmed fracture pain despite optimal care may discuss augmentation after full explanation of uncertain benefit and risk. [15]
  • Open surgical intervention for:
    • Significant neurological deficits
    • Progressive and severe kyphotic deformity
    • Intractable pain

  • Operative management: Geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway [1]
  • Surgery types depend on fracture location and displacement: [4]
    • Intracapsular (femoral neck): undisplaced → cannulated screws / DHS; displaced → hemiarthroplasty or THR
    • Extracapsular (intertrochanteric): DHS or cephalomedullary nail

  • Usually non-operative: manipulation and cast application for 4–6 weeks
  • Operative management in selected patients (e.g. intra-articular, unstable)

  • Treat the underlying osteoporosis (pharmacological + non-pharmacological)
  • Fall prevention measures [4]
  • Secondary fracture prevention: Fracture Liaison Service model

"Equivalent to rickets in children. Abnormal histology: unmineralized osteoid. Most common cause: vitamin D deficiency with very low serum 25(OH)D."

"ALP high in osteomalacia (from secondary hyperparathyroidism), normal in osteoporosis."

FeatureOsteoporosisOsteomalacia
Bone mass↓↓
Mineral:osteoid ratioNormal↓ (unmineralized osteoid)
ALPNormal↑
CalciumUsually normal↓ or normal
PhosphateNormal↓
25(OH)DVariableVery low
PTHNormal or slightly ↑↑ (secondary hyperPTH)
HistologyThin trabeculae, normal mineralizationWide osteoid seams, defective mineralization


Exam Intelligence

  1. MCQ: An elderly woman with back pain and height loss. X-ray shows wedge compression fracture. What is the diagnosis? → Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
  2. MCQ: What is the gold standard investigation for diagnosing osteoporosis? → DXA
  3. MCQ: T-score of −2.8 — what category? → Osteoporosis
  4. SAQ: List 4 risk factors for osteoporosis → Female sex, increasing age, low body weight, premature menopause, glucocorticoid use, smoking, alcohol, family history, low calcium, sedentary lifestyle
  5. MCQ: How does CKD affect antiresorptive choice? → Bisphosphonate renal limits are agent-specific (e.g. zoledronic acid CrCl < 35 mL/min); denosumab is not renally cleared but can cause severe hypocalcaemia in advanced CKD/CKD-MBD
  6. MCQ: Side effect of teriparatide → Hypercalcaemia
  7. MCQ: Mechanism of denosumab → Anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody
  8. SAQ/Minicase: Management of osteoporotic vertebral fracture → Conservative multimodal care is first-line; routine augmentation is unsupported; urgent specialist assessment/surgery for neurological compromise or instability
  9. MCQ: Romosozumab contraindication → History of MI or stroke
  10. MCQ: ALP is elevated with back pain in elderly → Think osteomalacia or Paget's, NOT osteoporosis

TrapCorrect Approach
Confusing osteoporosis and osteomalaciaALP normal in osteoporosis, elevated in osteomalacia
Treating FRAX as a treatment ruleIt estimates probability; use population-appropriate thresholds and local guidance. The calculator accepts ages 40–90
Memorising one renal cut-off for all bisphosphonatesCheck the agent-specific label and creatinine clearance; do not assume denosumab is safe in advanced CKD
Thinking raloxifene prevents hip fractureOnly prevents vertebral fractures, NOT non-vertebral
Thinking HRT is first-line for osteoporosis in elderlyOnly for young postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms
Assuming denosumab can be stopped freelyRebound bone loss and fracture risk after discontinuation
Not checking dental status before anti-resorptiveONJ risk

Past PaperQuestionKey Concept
2020 MCQ Q4 [6]Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis Tx in RAAnswer: Alendronate
2022 MCQ Q17 [8]90yo, hip fracture, what finding?T-score −3 on DEXA
2023 MCQ Q29 [9]Teriparatide side effectsKnow hypercalcaemia, NOT AFF/GORD
2024 MCQ Q31 [7]Man with steroid injections → wedge fractureIatrogenic steroid-induced OP
2023 Minicase Case 3 [10]Red flags for back painFever, neuro deficits, weight loss, age, trauma, steroid use
2025 MCQ Q61 [11]Metastatic vertebral collapse with cord compressionHigh-dose steroids + urgent decompressive surgery

High Yield Summary

  • Disease: low bone mass plus microarchitectural deterioration; clinically silent until wrist, vertebral or hip fragility fracture.
  • Diagnosis: central DXA T-score ≤ −2.5 in postmenopausal women/men ≥50; low-trauma hip or vertebral fracture can establish the diagnosis irrespective of BMD. FRAX estimates 10-year probability but does not set a universal treatment threshold.
  • Treatment: calcium/vitamin D adequacy, weight-bearing and resistance exercise, fall-risk reduction, smoking cessation and appropriate pharmacotherapy. Use potent antiresorptives for high risk and consider anabolic-first treatment for imminent/very-high risk, followed by an antiresorptive.
  • Safety: renal limits for bisphosphonates are agent-specific; denosumab has major hypocalcaemia risk in advanced CKD and must not be stopped without sequential therapy. MRONJ and AFF are rare relative to the fractures prevented.
  • Differential: uncomplicated primary osteoporosis usually has normal calcium/phosphate/ALP; osteomalacia has defective mineralisation and commonly raised ALP with vitamin D/phosphate abnormalities.
  • Fractures: hip fracture carries major one-year mortality and disability. Most vertebral fractures receive conservative care; routine vertebral augmentation is unsupported, while neurological compromise requires urgent specialist assessment.

Active Recall - Lecture Notes

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (all pages) [2] Lecture slides: GC 235. Osteoporotic Related Fractures.pdf [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p48–51) [4] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p215, p223, p252) [5] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p109) [6] Past papers: 2020 Fourth Summative Assessment MCQ paper.pdf (Q1–Q5, Section B) [7] Past papers: 2024 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q31) [8] Past papers: 2022 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q17) [9] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q29) [10] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative Minicase.pdf (Case 3, Section 1) [11] Past papers: 2025 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q61) [12] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p1656–1658) [13] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p1026) [14] Lecture slides: Injuries to bone and joint WCS.pdf (p7, p10) [15] Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong. 2024 OSHK Guideline for Clinical Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Hong Kong. [16] International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2023 ISCD Official Adult Positions. [17] US Food and Drug Administration. Prolia (denosumab) prescribing information, 2024. [18] US Food and Drug Administration. Forteo (teriparatide) prescribing information, 2024. [19] US Food and Drug Administration. Reclast (zoledronic acid) prescribing information, 2026. [20] Endocrine Society. Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: Clinical Practice Guideline, 2024. [21] American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—2022 Update. [22] University of Sheffield. FRAX fracture-risk assessment tool. [23] US Food and Drug Administration. Evenity (romosozumab-aqqg) prescribing information.

On this page

No Headings