GC080 Renal Replacement Therapies

Renal replacement therapies are life-sustaining treatments—including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation—that substitute for lost kidney function in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Renal Replacement Therapies

This lecture (GC 080) by Dr. SL Lui covers the full spectrum of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). It is structured into three pillars: peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD), and kidney transplantation. The lecture is clinically framed around what you need to know for ward-based decision-making: when to start RRT, how to choose between modalities, what can go wrong, and how to manage long-term complications—especially immunosuppression after transplantation.

Why this matters for exams: RRT is a perennial exam topic. Past papers have tested PD peritonitis diagnosis and management, complications of vascular access, immunosuppressive drug side effects, and indications for initiating RRT. The minicase format often presents a patient on PD with turbid effluent or a transplant recipient with rising creatinine and opportunistic infection. This lecture gives you the framework to answer all of these.

Learning Objectives (inferred from summary slides and deck structure):

  1. Understand the indications for initiating RRT
  2. Compare and choose between PD and HD
  3. Know the essential components, forms, and complications of PD
  4. Know the essential components, forms, and complications of HD
  5. Understand kidney transplantation: donor types, rejection, immunosuppression, and long-term complications


Core Concepts and Mechanisms

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) refers to therapy that replaces the functions of the failed kidneys in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). [1]

The kidneys perform four critical functions: (1) excretion of uremic toxins and metabolic waste, (2) regulation of fluid balance, (3) electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis, and (4) endocrine functions (EPO, active vitamin D, renin). RRT primarily addresses the first three. Endocrine functions are NOT replaced by dialysis—this is why ESKD patients still need EPO injections and vitamin D supplementation even on dialysis.

Dialysis works across a semi-permeable membrane. Uremic toxins in capillary blood diffuse down their concentration gradient into dialysis fluid on the other side of the membrane. [1]

Why this matters from first principles:

  • Diffusion drives solute removal: small molecules (urea, creatinine, K⁺) move from high concentration (blood) to low concentration (dialysate).
  • Ultrafiltration removes water: PD uses an osmotic gradient (usually generated by dialysate glucose), whereas HD uses a machine-controlled hydrostatic pressure gradient across the dialyzer membrane.
  • The membrane must be semi-permeable: allows small solutes and water through but blocks large proteins and blood cells.

In PD, the membrane is the patient's own peritoneum. In HD, it is an artificial synthetic membrane inside the hemodialyzer.


High Yield – When to Start RRT

Do not use a single eGFR threshold to start maintenance dialysis. Initiation is based on a composite assessment of symptoms, signs, quality of life, preferences, GFR, and laboratory abnormalities. Start when one or more clinically important consequences of kidney failure cannot be controlled conservatively. This often, but not invariably, occurs at a GFR of 5–10 mL/min/1.73m². [8]

The slide's “GFR < 10” and “uremic symptoms” bullets are a useful prompt, not a mandatory two-part rule. A stable, asymptomatic person with a low GFR may be monitored closely, whereas refractory kidney-failure complications can justify dialysis at a higher GFR. Access or pre-emptive transplant planning should begin earlier—KDIGO suggests considering it when GFR is < 15–20 mL/min/1.73m² or the estimated 2-year risk of kidney replacement therapy exceeds 40%. [8]

Uremic symptoms to watch for:

  • Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss
  • Fatigue, difficulty concentrating, encephalopathy
  • Pericarditis (friction rub) — an absolute indication for urgent dialysis
  • Pruritus, restless legs
  • Fluid overload refractory to diuretics
  • Persistent hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis refractory to medical management

Common Exam Trap

Do not confuse a memory aid with a treatment threshold. In AKI, AEIOU summarizes urgent situations—refractory acidosis, life-threatening electrolyte disturbance, selected dialyzable intoxications, refractory fluid overload, and severe uraemic complications—but clinical context and trends determine timing. In advanced CKD, the decision is usually planned and symptom/complication based rather than triggered by eGFR alone. [8][14]


Choice Between PD and HD

Factors to be considered when choosing between PD and HD for patients with ESRD include: (1) whether the patient has any contraindications to either PD or HD, (2) local health care reimbursement system, (3) patient's preference. [1]

History of major abdominal surgery which caused extensive scarring of the peritoneal membrane. [1]

Why? The qualifier in the slide matters: prior abdominal surgery alone does not exclude PD. Extensive adhesions or peritoneal scarring may reduce usable surface area, impair drainage, and create loculated collections. Active intra-abdominal infection, uncorrected major abdominal wall defects, or inability to perform exchanges without available assistance are other important suitability barriers; individual assessment is required.

Poor cardiac function such that the patient is unable to tolerate the hemodynamic changes during HD. Lack of suitable vascular access for HD. [1]

Why? During conventional intermittent HD, blood circulates through an extracorporeal circuit and fluid may be removed over a few hours. Patients with poor cardiac reserve can develop intradialytic hypotension, arrhythmias, or myocardial ischaemia; a high-flow AV access can also aggravate heart failure. These are modality-planning considerations rather than automatic absolute contraindications—prescription, frequency, ultrafiltration rate, access type, or modality may be adapted.

Hong Kong's public health care system has adopted a PD-first policy because PD is less costly. ESKD patients will be offered PD first in HA hospitals unless they have contraindications to PD. [1]

HK-Specific Exam Point

This is a classic exam question. HK HA uses a PD-first policy driven by cost-effectiveness. PD can be done at home with minimal infrastructure. HD requires dialysis centres, nurses, and expensive machines. Know this for SAQs asking "What modality would you offer first in a public hospital in HK?"

PD is usually performed by the patient at home on a daily basis. HD is usually performed by renal nurses in a HD center 2–3 times per week. [1]

Some patients prefer HD because they don't want the responsibility of self-care at home. Others prefer PD because it allows greater independence and flexibility. Younger, working patients may prefer APD (done overnight) or home HD.


Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)

Essential Components of PD

Essential components: (1) Peritoneal membrane, (2) PD catheter, (3) PD fluids. [1]

PD makes use of the peritoneal membrane as the dialysis membrane because it is thin, vascularized and has a large surface area. [1]

The peritoneum has a surface area roughly equal to body surface area (~1.7 m²). Its rich capillary network allows efficient diffusion of solutes and osmotic ultrafiltration. Over years, however, this membrane deteriorates (see PD failure below).

The PD catheter (commonly known as the Tenckhoff catheter) is a specially designed plastic tube with many side-holes in one end and two fibrous cuffs in the other end. [1]

  • Side holes at the intraperitoneal end allow PD fluid to flow in and out freely.
  • Two Dacron cuffs anchor the catheter: one sits in the rectus muscle, the other subcutaneously near the exit site. Tissue ingrowth into the cuffs creates a seal that prevents migration and serves as a barrier against bacterial tracking along the catheter.
  • Exit site is where the catheter emerges through the skin. In the slide photographs it is deliberately separate and lateral to the insertion scar because a subcutaneous tunnel lies between them.
  • Insertion: via a paramedian incision.

Ideally, the tip of the PD catheter should be located inside the pelvis pointing downwards. [1]

Why pointing downwards in the pelvis? The pelvic cavity is the most dependent part of the abdomen when the patient is upright, so fluid pools here. If the catheter tip is directed downward into the pelvis, drainage is most efficient.

Commonly used PDFs are balanced salt solutions, with glucose as the osmotic agent and lactate as the buffer. They do not contain potassium. [1]

ComponentValue
Volume2 L
Glucose1.5% / 2.5% / 4.25%
Potassium0 mmol/L
Sodium132 mmol/L
Calcium2.5–3.5 mmol/L
Magnesium0.5–1.5 mmol/L
Lactate35–40 mmol/L

These are representative lecture-slide formulations rather than universal bag specifications; exact electrolyte concentrations and buffers vary by commercial solution.

Key points to understand:

  • No potassium in PD fluid: ESKD patients are typically hyperkalemic. By having zero K⁺ in the dialysate, potassium diffuses from blood into the PD fluid down its concentration gradient. This is how PD removes excess potassium. However, some patients on PD may develop hypokalemia if they have good residual renal function or poor oral intake—they may need potassium supplementation.

  • Glucose as osmotic agent: Higher glucose concentration → greater osmotic gradient → more ultrafiltration (fluid removal). The 4.25% ("hypertonic") bag is used for fluid-overloaded patients. However, chronic exposure to high glucose concentrations damages the peritoneal membrane over time (→ PD failure).

  • Lactate as buffer: Lactate is converted to bicarbonate by the liver. This corrects the metabolic acidosis of ESKD. (Note: icodextrin-based fluids use glucose polymer instead of dextrose as the osmotic agent for long dwells, but this is beyond the core lecture content.)

Two Main Forms of PD

CAPD (Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis) and APD (Automated Peritoneal Dialysis). [1]

  • Patient manually performs 3–4 exchanges per day (each exchange: drain out old fluid → infuse new fluid → dwell for 4–6 hours).
  • Performed throughout the day — exchanges at breakfast, lunch, dinner, and bedtime is typical.
  • No machine needed — gravity-driven.
  • The peritoneal cavity always has fluid dwelling in it → "continuous."

Each CAPD exchange follows a three-step cycle: [1]

  1. Fill — fresh dialysis solution flows from the hanging bag through the catheter into the peritoneal cavity.
  2. Dwell — the solution remains in the abdomen for a set period (4–6 hours), during which uremic toxins diffuse in and excess water is osmotically drawn in.
  3. Drain — the used dialysate (now containing waste and excess fluid) drains out by gravity into a collection bag.

APD makes use of an APD machine to help the patient to perform the PD exchanges, usually at night when the patient goes to bed. [1]

  • A machine performs multiple short exchanges overnight while the patient sleeps.
  • Two subtypes:
    • NIPD (Nocturnal Intermittent PD): exchanges only at night; abdomen is dry during the day.
    • CCPD (Continuous Cyclic PD): machine does exchanges at night, but a long daytime dwell is left in the abdomen as well (for additional clearance).

FeatureCAPDAPD
APD machine neededNoYes
Timing of exchangesThroughout the dayAt night during sleep
Daytime exchange neededYesNo (NIPD) / Yes (CCPD)
Dialysis efficacySimilarSimilar
Quality of lifeDaytime manual exchangesFrees much of the daytime, but requires a machine overnight
Cost$$$$$

Practical interpretation: APD can suit work or school because most exchanges occur overnight, but quality of life is individual: alarms, sleep disruption, machine setup, prescription requirements, and patient preference all matter.

Complications of PD

Complications of PD: (1) PD catheter exit site infection, (2) PD-related peritonitis, (3) Peritoneal dialysis failure, (4) PD catheter malfunction, (5) Peritoneal leakage. [1]

Usually presents as redness and tenderness at the PD catheter exit site, sometimes associated with purulent discharge. PD catheter exit site infection may predispose to PD peritonitis. [1]

Why does exit site infection lead to peritonitis? Bacteria colonize the exit site → track along the catheter tunnel → enter the peritoneal cavity. This is why meticulous exit site care (daily cleaning, keeping it dry) is a critical part of PD patient education.

High Yield – PD Peritonitis

Main presenting symptoms: abdominal pain, turbid PD fluid, and fever. [1]

Causative organisms: usually gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria; occasionally fungi or mycobacteria. [1]

Predisposing factors: exit site infection, contamination of the PD catheter during PD exchanges, constipation or diarrhea. [1]

Why does constipation/diarrhea predispose to PD peritonitis? Bowel disturbance increases intestinal permeability and can promote transmural migration ("translocation") of gut bacteria into the peritoneal cavity. Always ask about bowel habits in a PD patient with peritonitis.

Diagnosis:

PD fluid microscopy shows elevated WBC count with neutrophil predominance. PD fluid culture identifies the causative organism. [1]

ISPD defines peritonitis when at least two of three criteria are present: (1) compatible clinical features such as abdominal pain and/or cloudy effluent, (2) effluent WBC > 100/μL after a dwell of at least 2 hours, with > 50% polymorphonuclear cells, and (3) a positive effluent culture. Cloudy effluent should be presumed to represent peritonitis until excluded. Send effluent for cell count/differential, Gram stain, and culture before antibiotics where this does not delay treatment. [9]

Treatment:

Empirical intraperitoneal antibiotics that cover common gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Cefazolin + Amikacin). Choice of antibiotics should be adjusted according to PD fluid culture results. [1]

The slide's cefazolin–amikacin combination is an example, not a universal prescription. After cultures are obtained, start empiric therapy promptly using the centre's resistance profile: cover gram-positive organisms with a first-generation cephalosporin or vancomycin and gram-negative organisms with a third-generation cephalosporin or an aminoglycoside; cefepime monotherapy is another accepted option. The intraperitoneal route is preferred unless the patient has systemic sepsis, then narrow treatment to culture and susceptibility results. [9]

Patients with refractory peritonitis might need to have their PD catheter removed and be put on temporary hemodialysis. [1]

When is peritonitis “refractory”? ISPD defines this as failure of the effluent to clear after 5 days of appropriate antibiotics. Catheter removal is indicated, although observation beyond day 5 can be reasonable if the effluent WBC is falling toward normal; fungal peritonitis requires immediate catheter removal. Relapsing, recurrent, and repeat peritonitis are separate defined patterns and may also prompt catheter removal depending on the organism and clinical course. [9]

Complication of repeated peritonitis:

Frequent PD-related peritonitis will damage the peritoneal membrane and eventually lead to peritoneal dialysis failure. [1]

Chronic exposure to dextrose-containing PD fluids and repeated peritonitis will cause fibrosis of the peritoneal membrane, eventually leading to PD failure. [1]

Mechanism from first principles: High-glucose PD fluid generates glucose degradation products (GDPs) and advanced glycosylation end-products (AGEs). These trigger chronic inflammation, neovascularization, and fibrosis of the peritoneal membrane. The membrane becomes thick and leathery. Result:

  • Loss of ultrafiltration capacity (can't remove fluid effectively)
  • Loss of solute clearance (can't remove uremic toxins effectively)

The lecture slide shows a dramatic comparison: normal thin peritoneum vs. markedly thickened peritoneum after 10 years on PD. Eventually, the patient must switch to HD.

A severe form is encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) — a cocoon-like thickening that encases the bowel, causing obstruction. This is a dreaded complication of long-term PD.

Occasionally, the tip of the PD catheter may migrate out of the pelvis, leading to poor drainage of the PD fluid. [1]

Clinical clue: The patient notices slow or incomplete drainage during exchanges. An abdominal X-ray (KUB) will show the catheter tip displaced superiorly or laterally instead of pointing downward in the pelvis. Management may involve laxatives (constipation can displace the catheter), repositioning under fluoroscopy, or surgical revision.

Occasionally, the PD fluid may leak out of the peritoneal cavity into the pleural cavity, the anterior abdominal wall, the perineum or the retro-peritoneal space. [1]

  • Pleural leakage (hydrothorax): PD fluid enters the pleural space through a diaphragmatic defect (pleuro-peritoneal communication). Presents as unilateral (usually right-sided) pleural effusion that worsens with PD exchanges. Diagnosed by high glucose content in the pleural fluid. May require thoracoscopic repair or switching to HD.
  • Abdominal wall leakage: Fluid tracks along the catheter tunnel or through a hernia. Presents as swelling around the catheter or inguinal region.
  • Genital edema: Fluid tracks into the scrotum/labia via a patent processus vaginalis.

Hemodialysis (HD)

Essential Components of HD

Essential components: (1) Vascular access, (2) HD machine, (3) Hemodialyzer. [1]

In HD, a vascular access is required to allow sufficiently high flow of blood from the patient to pass through the hemodialysis machine and then return to the patient. [1]

Blood flow rates of 200–400 mL/min are needed for effective HD. Normal peripheral veins cannot provide this flow. Hence, specialized vascular access is mandatory.

Three main types of vascular access: (1) Arteriovenous fistula (AVF), (2) Arteriovenous graft (AVG), (3) Tunneled cuffed double-lumen central venous catheter. [1]

TypeDescriptionKey Features
AVFSurgical anastomosis of a native artery to a native vein; the slide shows an end-cephalic-vein to side-radial-artery radiocephalic fistula [1]Lowest infection risk when usable. Requires time to mature as the vein dilates and arterializes; assess for a palpable thrill and audible bruit.
AVGSynthetic graft (e.g., PTFE) connecting artery to vein when native vessels are inadequateCan be used earlier (2–3 weeks). Higher infection risk than AVF. Prone to stenosis at venous anastomosis.
Tunneled cuffed catheterDouble-lumen catheter inserted into a central vein (internal jugular preferred), tunneled subcutaneously with a Dacron cuffUsed for immediate access or when AVF/AVG cannot be created. Highest risk of infection [1]. Dacron cuff reduces but does not eliminate infection risk.

High Yield – Vascular Access Hierarchy

The slide teaches the traditional hierarchy AVF → AVG → tunneled catheter, correctly highlighting that a functioning AVF has the lowest infection risk and a catheter the highest. Current KDOQI guidance instead starts with an individualized ESKD Life-Plan: the right access is the one that fits the patient's expected dialysis duration, vessels, comorbidity, prior access history, and future options. An AVF is therefore preferred when it is likely to mature and serve the plan—not automatically for every patient. [10]

Why can AVF be advantageous? It uses the patient's own tissue—no prosthetic graft or indwelling catheter for bacteria to colonize. Once mature, the arterialized vein can tolerate repeated needling and generally has low infection risk. The trade-off is failure to mature and the time needed before use.

Why does a catheter have the highest infection risk? The catheter is a foreign body that directly communicates with the central venous system. Bacteria from the skin can track along the catheter or colonize the lumen, causing exit site infection → tunnel infection → bacteremia/septicemia.

Reading the catheter photographs: the line enters the right internal jugular vein but exits on the upper chest after a subcutaneous tunnel. The cuff sits within that tunnel rather than at the venous puncture site, and the two external lumens separately withdraw and return blood.

Contains a blood pump (drives blood through the circuit at the required flow rate) and connects to the hemodialyzer where actual dialysis occurs.

Hemodialyzer in a HD machine is where the hemodialysis actually occurs. [1]

This is essentially a cylinder containing thousands of hollow fibres (the semi-permeable membrane). Blood flows through the inside of the fibres; dialysate flows on the outside in the opposite direction (counter-current flow maximizes the concentration gradient and therefore diffusion efficiency).

In-center HD and Home HD. [1]

FeatureIn-Center HDNocturnal Home HD
LocationHD Center (usually in hospital)Patient's home
Performed byRenal nursesPatient (self)
Frequency2–3×/weekDepends on machine used
Duration4–5 hours/sessionVaries (often longer, gentler sessions)
Dialysis efficacyDepends on delivered dose and adherenceLonger/more frequent prescriptions can increase weekly clearance
Quality of lifeTravel to centre and fixed scheduleMore autonomy for some; greater self-care burden for others
Cost$$$$
Need to train patientNoYes

How to read the slide's “higher efficacy/better QoL” claim: home HD permits longer or more frequent prescriptions, which can improve weekly clearance and haemodynamic tolerance. Benefits are not automatic; training, vascular access, home support, treatment burden, and the individual's goals determine whether it is the better option.

Complications of HD

Complications: (1) Vascular access complications, (2) Catheter access complications, (3) Complications during hemodialysis. [1]

Vascular access stenosis, vascular access thrombosis, upper limb ischemia. [1]

  • Stenosis: Neointimal hyperplasia (especially at the venous outflow of AVF or at the venous anastomosis of AVG) narrows the vessel. The lecture fistulogram shows a focal juxta-anastomotic narrowing near a radiocephalic AVF. Correlate an imaging stenosis with clinical indicators such as an altered thrill/bruit, cannulation difficulty, elevated venous pressures, recirculation, or poor clearance before intervention. Treatment may be angioplasty or surgical revision. [10]

  • Thrombosis: Often a consequence of underlying stenosis. The fistula loses its thrill and bruit. Urgent thrombectomy or thrombolysis is needed.

  • Upper limb ischemia (steal syndrome):

Elderly and diabetic patients with severe atherosclerosis are prone to develop ischemia in the limb bearing the AV fistula. [1]

Why? The AV fistula diverts arterial blood directly into the vein (low resistance pathway), "stealing" blood from the distal arterial bed. In patients with pre-existing peripheral vascular disease, the residual flow to the hand is insufficient → cold, painful, pale fingers → digital gangrene in severe cases. Management: may require ligation or banding of the fistula.

Catheter exit site infection, catheter-associated bacteremia, catheter malfunction. [1]

  • Exit site infection:

Usually localized to the skin and soft tissue around the catheter exit site. Uncontrolled exit site infection may spread along the subcutaneous tunnel into the systemic circulation, causing bacteremia or septicemia. [1]

The pathway: Exit site infection → Tunnel infection → Bacteremia → Septicemia (including metastatic infections like infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscess).

  • Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI): A feared complication, commonly caused by S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Obtain blood cultures and start empiric systemic coverage for both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms according to MRSA risk, allergy, and local susceptibility data; then tailor treatment. Catheter removal, exchange, or salvage depends on haemodynamic stability, organism, tunnel involvement, metastatic infection, and response—not simply a fixed vancomycin–gentamicin regimen. [10]

  • Catheter malfunction:

Blood clot can occlude the catheter lumen. [1]

Managed with thrombolytic lock (e.g., alteplase instilled into the catheter lumen) or catheter exchange.

Cardiovascular: Hypotension, Cardiac arrhythmia. Neuromuscular: Muscle cramps. Technical malfunctions: Air embolism, Blood loss. [1]

  • Intradialytic hypotension: The most common acute complication. Caused by rapid ultrafiltration (fluid removal) exceeding plasma refilling rate. Manifests as lightheadedness, nausea, cramps. Managed by reducing UF rate, giving saline bolus, Trendelenburg position.
  • Arrhythmia: Electrolyte shifts (especially potassium) during dialysis can trigger arrhythmias. Patients with pre-existing cardiac disease are most vulnerable.
  • Muscle cramps: Due to rapid fluid/electrolyte shifts.
  • Air embolism: Rare but potentially fatal. Modern HD machines have air detectors as safety mechanisms.
  • Blood loss: Circuit disconnection, membrane rupture, or post-needle removal bleeding.

Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for most patients with ESKD. [1]

Why is transplantation the best option? It offers the best quality of life, longest survival, freedom from dialysis schedules, correction of anemia and bone disease, and is more cost-effective long-term than chronic dialysis. However, it requires lifelong immunosuppression with its attendant risks.

Two Types of Kidney Donors

Living donors and deceased donors. [1]

In Hong Kong, the living donors are usually first-degree relatives or spouse of the patients. The living donors should be healthy and have normal renal function and structure. [1]

  • Why first-degree relatives? Better HLA matching (parent shares at least one haplotype with child; siblings have a 25% chance of being fully matched). Better outcomes with better matching. Also, HK law restricts living donation to close relatives or spouses to prevent organ trafficking.
  • Donor nephrectomy: Performed via laparoscopic nephrectomy (minimally invasive, faster recovery for the donor).

Deceased kidney donors have irreversible brain damage leading to brain stem death. They should have no known history of kidney diseases, long-standing HT or DM and have normal renal function. [1]

  • Donor nephrectomy: Open nephrectomy (the operation occurs in the context of multi-organ retrieval).
  • Current Hong Kong context: deceased solid-organ donation follows certified brain death. Brain death is assessed independently by two experienced doctors who are not part of the transplant team. Organ suitability is then determined by comprehensive clinical, laboratory, and organ-specific assessment. The slide's “no long-standing HT or DM” wording is too absolute: such comorbidities may affect suitability and organ quality but are not, by themselves, a universal exclusion rule. [11]

The transplanted kidney is placed superficially in the iliac fossa. The donor renal artery is anastomosed to an iliac artery, the renal vein to an iliac vein, and the donor ureter is implanted into the bladder. [1] The patient's own diseased native kidneys are usually left in situ unless there is a specific indication for native nephrectomy. The slide diagram therefore shows three kidneys: two native kidneys and the low pelvic graft. The curved iliac-fossa transplant scar and a readily palpable superficial graft are classic examination findings.

The main hurdle of successful kidney transplantation is acute rejection of the transplanted kidney by the host's immune system. [1]

Acute rejection involves both T-cell and antibody-mediated mechanisms. [1]

From first principles:

  • T-cell mediated rejection (cellular): Donor antigens (HLA) presented to recipient T cells → T cell activation → infiltration of graft by cytotoxic T cells → tubulitis and interstitial inflammation.
  • Antibody-mediated rejection (humoral): Recipient produces donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor HLA → complement activation on endothelium → peritubular capillaritis and glomerulitis → C4d deposition on biopsy.

Downstream pathways of graft injury (from slide diagram): [1]

  • Tubular epithelial cell injury: Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8⁺, CD103⁺) engage tubular cells via MHC–TCR/CD3 and Fas–FasL interactions, releasing perforin and granzyme B → cell damage and apoptosis. Injured tubular cells undergo TGF-β–driven epithelial–mesenchymal transition → production of α-smooth muscle actin and profibrotic molecules → interstitial fibrosis (linking acute rejection to chronic allograft injury).
  • Endothelial cell injury: Donor-specific antibodies bind endothelial alloantigens → complement fixation → endothelial damage → release of tissue factor and von Willebrand factor → platelet adhesion/aggregation and activation of the coagulation cascade → microvascular thrombosis.
  • Macrophage activation: T-helper cells (CD4⁺) release TNF and IFN-γ → macrophage activation → production of TNF-α, reactive oxygen species, and nitric oxide → additional tissue injury.

Long-term immunosuppressive treatment is needed to prevent rejection. Risk of rejection is highest in the first 3 to 6 months after transplantation. The degree of immunosuppression is therefore the heaviest during the first 3 to 6 months. [1]

Several immunosuppressive drugs are used concurrently in order to minimize the side effects of individual drug while achieving adequate level of immunosuppression. [1]

Why combination therapy? Each drug targets a different point in the immune activation cascade. Using multiple drugs at lower doses reduces the toxicity of any single agent while maintaining overall immunosuppressive efficacy (analogous to combination chemotherapy in oncology).

Prednisolone, Calcineurin inhibitors (Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus), Mycophenolate mofetil, mTOR inhibitors (Sirolimus, Everolimus), Azathioprine. [1]

High Yield – Immunosuppressive Drug Side Effects Table

DrugCommon Side Effects
PrednisoloneCushingoid facies, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, peptic ulcers, hypertension
CyclosporineNephrotoxicity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gum hyperplasia, gout
TacrolimusNephrotoxicity, hypertension, new-onset DM, tremors, GI upsets
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Diarrhea, vomiting, anemia, leukopenia, viral infections
Sirolimus / EverolimusProteinuria, hyperlipidemia, impaired wound healing, cytopenias, interstitial pneumonitis; can potentiate CNI nephrotoxicity when combined
AzathioprineGI upsets, hepatotoxicity, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia

Key exam discriminators:

  • Cyclosporine → gum hyperplasia + gout (unique to cyclosporine among CNIs)
  • Tacrolimus → new-onset DM + tremors (tacrolimus is more diabetogenic than cyclosporine)
  • Both CNIs cause nephrotoxicity — this is crucial because a rising creatinine post-transplant could be rejection OR CNI toxicity. Biopsy is often needed to distinguish them.
  • mTOR inhibitors are not intrinsically nephrotoxic in the same way as CNIs and may be used in CNI-sparing strategies, but combined exposure can potentiate CNI nephrotoxicity.
  • MMF → diarrhea (very common, sometimes dose-limiting) and viral infections (CMV, BK virus)
  • Azathioprine interacts dangerously with allopurinol (inhibits xanthine oxidase which metabolizes azathioprine → severe myelosuppression). This is a classic drug interaction exam question.

Biologic agents are polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, used either as induction therapy or for treatment of acute rejection. Examples: anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies (e.g., basiliximab). [1]

  • Induction therapy: Given at the time of transplantation to provide intense early immunosuppression while maintenance drugs ramp up.
  • ATG: Depletes T cells by binding to multiple T cell surface molecules → profound lymphopenia. Used for high-risk patients and severe rejection.
  • Anti-IL-2R antibodies (basiliximab): Block IL-2 receptor on T cells → prevent T cell proliferation. Used for lower-risk induction.

Early allograft dysfunctions: (1) Urological complications (e.g., urine leakage), (2) Vascular complications (e.g., renal vein thrombosis), (3) Infections (e.g., UTI, viral infection), (4) Drug toxicity (e.g., calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity). [1]

Clinical approach to rising creatinine post-transplant (early):

  1. Check volume status — is the patient adequately hydrated?
  2. Ultrasound the graft — look for hydronephrosis (obstruction at ureteric anastomosis), perinephric collection (urine leak, hematoma, lymphocele), assess vascular flow (renal vein thrombosis shows absent venous flow on Doppler).
  3. Check CNI trough levels — supratherapeutic levels suggest drug toxicity.
  4. Urine culture — UTI is very common.
  5. Transplant biopsy — if the above are non-diagnostic, biopsy distinguishes rejection from CNI toxicity from other causes.

Long-Term Complications

Long-term complications: (1) Infections, (2) Malignancy, (3) Cardiovascular disease, (4) Drug-related side effects, (5) Chronic allograft injury, (6) Recurrence of primary disease. [1]

Renal transplant recipients are immunocompromised and prone to opportunistic infections. Causative organisms include CMV, Pneumocystis jiroveci, BK virus, and M. tuberculosis. [1]

Pneumocystis Pneumonia (PCP):

Usually presents with acute onset of fever, cough and shortness of breath, associated with severe type I respiratory failure. CXR shows diffuse, bilateral, interstitial infiltrates. Diagnosed by microscopy with staining of BAL fluid for Pneumocystis jiroveci. Treated with high-dose septrin (co-trimoxazole). Transplant recipients are usually given septrin prophylaxis. [1]

Visual pattern and prophylaxis: the lecture radiograph shows diffuse bilateral perihilar/interstitial opacities. Symptoms may evolve subacutely with fever, dry cough, and progressive dyspnoea, although non-HIV transplant recipients can deteriorate rapidly; a normal early radiograph does not exclude infection. KDIGO recommends daily co-trimoxazole for 3–6 months after transplantation and for at least 6 weeks during and after treatment for acute rejection; longer courses depend on local protocol and ongoing risk. [12]

BK virus: A polyomavirus that reactivates under immunosuppression. Causes BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) which can mimic rejection on clinical grounds (rising creatinine). Diagnosed by BK viral load in blood and urine; confirmed by biopsy showing viral inclusions ("decoy cells" in urine). Treatment: reduce immunosuppression.

CMV: Causes fever, leukopenia, hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir is given for high-risk patients (D+/R−). Monitored by serial CMV viral loads.

Renal transplant recipients have increased risk of developing malignancies, including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). [1]

Why? Chronic immunosuppression impairs immune surveillance against virally-driven cancers and allows unchecked cell proliferation. PTLDs are most commonly EBV-driven B-cell lymphomas. Also increased: skin cancers (SCC > BCC, reversed from the general population), Kaposi sarcoma (HHV-8), cervical/anogenital cancers (HPV).

PTLD management: Reduce immunosuppression, rituximab (anti-CD20), chemotherapy.

Imaging clue from the lecture: the brain MRI shows a focal enhancing frontal mass. In a transplant recipient with headache, seizure, focal neurology, or cognitive change, include central-nervous-system PTLD alongside infection and other tumours; imaging raises suspicion but tissue and virological/haematological assessment establish the diagnosis.

CVD is the most important cause of death with a functioning graft in renal transplant recipients. [1]

Transplant recipients have multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (related to the underlying renal disease or the use of immunosuppressive drugs). [1]

Why so much CVD? Multiple compounding risk factors:

  • Pre-existing CKD-associated vascular disease
  • Steroids → hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, HTN
  • CNIs → HTN, hyperlipidemia
  • Tacrolimus → new-onset DM
  • mTOR inhibitors → hyperlipidemia

Aggressive cardiovascular risk factor management is essential: statins, BP control, glycemic control, smoking cessation.

Classic clinical exam findings:

  • Cushingoid features (prednisolone) — moon face, central obesity, striae, thin skin, buffalo hump
  • Gum hypertrophy (cyclosporine) — also caused by phenytoin and nifedipine; exam loves to ask for the differential

The slide describes slowly progressive graft dysfunction, proteinuria, hypertension, and biopsy interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) as “chronic allograft injury.” [1]

Modern pathology treats IF/TA as a nonspecific final pattern of chronic injury, not a single etiologic diagnosis. The clinician and pathologist should look for a cause: chronic active antibody-mediated or T-cell-mediated rejection, recurrent/de novo kidney disease, BK polyomavirus nephropathy, obstruction, vascular disease, hypertension, or drug toxicity. [13]

Exam Pearl

For a historical slide-recall question, recognize the term “chronic allograft injury.” In current clinical reasoning, do not stop at “IF/TA”: describe it as a biopsy pattern and identify its underlying cause whenever possible. The slide's unqualified “leading cause” claim should not be used as a universal contemporary ranking.

The cause of the renal transplant recipient's original kidney disease may recur in the transplanted kidney. Recurrence of IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy and FSGS are not uncommon. [1]

This is conceptually important: transplantation replaces the organ but not the underlying pathogenic mechanism. IgA nephropathy recurrence on biopsy is very common (~50%) but only causes graft loss in ~10%. FSGS (especially if due to a circulating permeability factor) can recur within hours of transplantation and is more aggressive.

Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for ESRD patients. Widespread use is limited by the shortage of donor kidneys. Advances in xeno-transplantation, gene editing technology, and regenerative medicine might offer hope. [1]

The final slides are historical news clippings from 2022–2023, including pig-heart transplantation and experimental kidney perfusion/transplantation in deceased recipients. A subsequent milestone was the first genetically edited pig-kidney transplant into a living recipient in March 2024. Xenotransplantation remains experimental: gene editing aims to reduce hyperacute rejection and improve human compatibility, but immune injury, infection risk, durability, ethics, and regulation remain unresolved. [15]


SettingIndications
AKI (often urgent)Start emergently for life-threatening fluid, electrolyte, or acid-base derangements. Also consider severe uraemic complications and selected dialyzable intoxications; use the broader clinical context and laboratory trends rather than isolated creatinine, pH, or potassium cut-offs. [14]
Advanced CKD/kidney failure (usually planned)Start for one or more uncontrolled consequences of kidney failure: attributable symptoms/signs, medically resistant acid-base/electrolyte abnormalities, inability to control volume/BP, or progressive nutritional/cognitive deterioration. This often occurs at GFR 5–10, but GFR alone is not an indication. [8]

FeatureIHDCRRT
Solute removalPredominantly diffusionModality-dependent: CVVH uses convection, CVVHD diffusion, and CVVHDF both
SpeedRapid (hours)Slow (continuous, 24/7)
Hemodynamic stabilityLess stable (rapid fluid shifts)More stable (gradual)
Often selected forHaemodynamically stable patients; rapid correction or toxin removalHaemodynamic instability; patients in whom gradual solute/fluid shifts are desirable, including acute brain injury/raised ICP
AnticoagulationShort durationProlonged (risk of bleeding)
CostLess expensiveMore expensive

This distinction is relevant for AKI scenarios in the ICU, not for chronic ESKD management. CRRT offers gentler control but has not shown a universal survival advantage over intermittent therapy; choose according to physiology, treatment goals, and local expertise. [14]

High Yield Summary

  1. Three forms of RRT

    • PD, HD, and kidney transplantation (treatment of choice for ESKD).
  2. When to initiate RRT

    • Symptoms, signs, quality of life, preferences, GFR, and laboratory abnormalities together; start for uncontrolled kidney-failure complications, not eGFR alone.
  3. HK PD-first policy

    • PD offered first in HA hospitals unless contraindicated.
  4. PD essentials

    • Peritoneal membrane, Tenckhoff catheter, glucose-based PD fluids (usually no K⁺). CAPD vs APD; APD frees daytime for some patients but modality fit is individual.
  5. PD peritonitis

    • Diagnose with at least 2 of 3: compatible features, effluent WBC > 100/μL after ≥2-hour dwell with > 50% PMNs, positive culture. Culture first, then prompt empiric IP gram-positive and gram-negative coverage guided by local resistance. Refractory disease may require catheter removal.
  6. HD essentials

    • Vascular access, dialyzer, and HD machine. A usable AVF has the lowest infection risk and a tunneled catheter the highest, but access selection follows the individual's ESKD Life-Plan.
  7. HD complications

    • Vascular stenosis/thrombosis, steal syndrome, catheter-related bacteremia, intradialytic hypotension.
  8. Transplant

    • Best modality but limited by donor shortage. Living vs deceased donors. Transplanted kidney placed in iliac fossa.
  9. Rejection

    • T-cell and antibody-mediated. Highest risk in first 3–6 months. Immunosuppression: prednisolone + CNI + MMF (triple therapy). Know side effects cold.
  10. Long-term transplant complications

  • Infections (CMV, PCP, BK virus, TB), malignancy (PTLD), cardiovascular disease, medication toxicity, recurrent disease, and chronic graft injury. IF/TA is a nonspecific biopsy pattern—seek the cause.

Active Recall - Renal Replacement Therapies


[1] Lecture slides: GC 080. Renal Replacement Therapies.pdf (all slides p1–p99) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p98, p111 — AKI management, RRT indications, IHD vs CRRT) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p25 — AKI and Renal Support) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Renal Replacement Therapies.pdf (p1 — student Q&A notes) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Chronic Kidney Disease and its Complications.pdf (p30 — CKD-MBD context) [7] Senior notes: Block A – Nephrology Data Interpretation.pdf (p1, p3, p7, p9, p13 — lab interpretation in renal failure) [8] KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD (Practice Points 5.4.1–5.4.3 and Table 41) [9] ISPD Peritonitis Guideline Recommendations: 2022 Update [10] KDOQI 2019 Vascular Access Guidelines and Implementation Tools, including the catheter-related bloodstream infection tool [11] Hong Kong Department of Health, Know More About Organ Donation and Organ Donation Flowchart [12] KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients — Summary (Pneumocystis prophylaxis) [13] Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury [14] KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury (sections 5.1 and 5.6) [15] Massachusetts General Hospital, World's First Genetically Edited Pig Kidney Transplant into Living Recipient (21 March 2024)

On this page

No Headings