GC226 Lumbar Spine Pathology

A unified guide to lumbar spine pathology covering clinical assessment, investigations, degenerative disease, disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, inflammatory disease, emergencies, and management.

Lumbar Spine Pathology — Unified GC226 Notes

These notes consolidate GC226 Lumbar Spine Pathology Parts A–G into one clinical sequence:

  1. assess the patient and screen for emergencies;
  2. localise the lesion on examination;
  3. choose and interpret investigations;
  4. understand the underlying pathology;
  5. distinguish the major causes of low back pain; and
  6. select conservative, interventional, or surgical management.

The central rule is: treat the patient and their symptoms, not an incidental image finding. Most low back pain is benign and improves without surgery, but neurological compromise, infection, malignancy, fracture, instability, and deformity must not be missed. [1–7]

Epidemiology: According to WHO, low back pain is the most disabling condition. Lifetime prevalence is up to 83%; musculoskeletal disorders carry the highest global disease burden. In Hong Kong, 20% of GP consultations involve back complaints. Most episodes are benign: 60% subside within 1 week, 90% within 6 weeks, and 95% within 12 weeks. [4]


1. Essential Anatomy and Terminology

The spinal cord usually ends at the L1–L2 vertebral level as the conus medullaris. Below this level, the canal contains the cauda equina, so most lower lumbar compression produces lower motor neuron nerve-root findings rather than myelopathy.

TermMeaningClinical implication
RadiculopathyDysfunction of one nerve rootDermatomal pain/sensory loss, myotomal weakness, and reflex change
SciaticaRadicular pain along the sciatic distribution, usually extending below the kneeCommonly L5 or S1 root irritation
MyelopathySpinal cord dysfunctionUMN signs below the lesion; points to cervical/thoracic or conus pathology rather than a routine lower lumbar lesion
Neurogenic claudicationLeg pain, heaviness, paraesthesia, or weakness caused by lumbar canal narrowingWorse with standing/extension; relieved by sitting or flexion
Cauda equina syndrome (CES)Compression of multiple lumbosacral rootsSaddle sensory loss and bladder, bowel, sexual, or bilateral leg dysfunction; a surgical emergency
SpondylolysisDefect or stress fracture of the pars interarticularisOften causes activity-related pain in a young athlete
SpondylolisthesisTranslation of one vertebra relative to the nextMay cause stenosis and indicates potential instability
SpondylosisDegenerative disc, osteophyte, and facet changesCommon with age and may be asymptomatic

ZoneNeural structure at riskTypical lesion
Central canalThecal sac and multiple cauda equina rootsLarge central disc or severe central stenosis; may cause CES
Lateral recessTraversing rootPosterolateral/paracentral disc herniation
ForamenExiting rootForaminal stenosis or far-lateral disc
ExtraforaminalExiting root beyond the pedicleFar-lateral disc herniation

The root-localisation rule

At L4/5, a posterolateral disc compresses the traversing L5 root, while a foraminal or far-lateral disc compresses the exiting L4 root.

  • Posterolateral = one root down
  • Far lateral = same-level exiting root
  • Large central = multiple bilateral roots

RootMain motor testKey sensory areaReflex
L2Hip flexionUpper anterior thigh—
L3Knee extensionLower anterior thigh/kneeKnee jerk contribution
L4Knee extension/ankle dorsiflexionMedial leg and malleolusKnee jerk
L5Great-toe dorsiflexion, hip abductionDorsum of foot/first web spaceNo reliable routine reflex
S1Plantarflexion/eversion; toe walkingLateral foot and soleAnkle jerk
S2–S5Pelvic floor and sphinctersSaddle/perianal areaAnal wink/bulbocavernosus

2. Clinical Assessment of Low Back Pain

Ask four linked questions:

  1. What is the diagnosis? Characterise onset, site, radiation, severity, and aggravating or relieving factors.
  2. How severe is it? Establish neurological compromise, structural pathology, and functional limitation.
  3. Is surgery urgent and is the patient ready? Consider CES, progressive weakness, comorbidities, and operative risk.
  4. What is the functional context? Walking distance, work, sleep, aids, home support, and rehabilitation potential.

PatternTypical clues
Myofascial/mechanical strainAcute after loading or awkward posture; local tenderness; usually improves within weeks
Discogenic painAxial/midline pain worse with sitting, bending, or lumbar flexion
Facet painParavertebral/referred pain worse with extension and ipsilateral rotation
RadiculopathyPain below the knee in a dermatome, with possible sensory, motor, or reflex deficit
Spinal stenosisLeg heaviness, burning, numbness, or weakness on standing/walking; flexion relief
Inflammatory back painOnset before 40, insidious, > 3 months, prolonged morning stiffness, better with exercise and worse with rest
Tumour/infectionProgressive night or rest pain, constitutional symptoms, fever, malignancy or immunosuppression history
FractureAcute focal pain after trauma, or minimal trauma with osteoporosis/steroid exposure

Pain confined to the lower back, buttock, or posterior thigh is often referred pain. True sciatica usually extends below the knee in a dermatomal distribution.

Screen every patient for:

  • new back pain at age <20 or > 55;
  • significant trauma or minor trauma with osteoporosis;
  • fever, immunosuppression, diabetes, steroid exposure, or IV drug use;
  • known malignancy, unexplained weight loss, or constitutional symptoms;
  • night pain or pain unrelieved by rest;
  • deformity or focal percussion tenderness;
  • progressive motor or sensory deficit;
  • bilateral sciatica or weakness;
  • saddle anaesthesia; and
  • new urinary retention/overflow, bowel dysfunction, reduced anal tone, or sexual dysfunction.

Cauda equina syndrome — act immediately

Suspect CES with bilateral leg symptoms, saddle sensory disturbance, or new bladder/bowel/sexual dysfunction. Arrange emergency MRI and immediate spinal surgical review. Do not delay for outpatient imaging or a trial of conservative treatment.

FeatureNeurogenicVascular
Provoked byStanding and walking; lumbar extensionWalking/exertion
Relieved bySitting or flexion; “shopping-cart sign”Stopping, even while standing
CyclingOften tolerated because the spine is flexedMay still provoke symptoms
Walking distanceVariable with postureMore reproducible
PulsesUsually normalReduced or absent
SkinUsually normalTrophic change, hair loss, ulceration
UphillOften easier because of flexionOften harder because demand rises

3. Examination

Use Look → Feel → Move/Neurology → Circulation, while also examining the hip and abdomen when appropriate.

  • Observe from front, side, and behind for scoliosis, kyphosis, loss of lordosis, gibbus, scars, sinuses, and muscle wasting.
  • Note an antalgic or forward-flexed gait, foot-drop/steppage gait, Trendelenburg gait, or a sciatic list.
  • Look for quadriceps wasting (L3/4) or calf wasting (S1).
  • A broad-based or spastic gait with hyperreflexia suggests a cord lesion above the lumbar region.

  • Palpate and percuss each spinous process: focal tenderness raises concern for fracture, infection, or tumour.
  • Assess paraspinal tenderness and spasm.
  • Palpate the sacroiliac joints.
  • Examine the hip because hip OA, avascular necrosis, and other hip disease can mimic lumbar pain.

MovementInterpretation
FlexionOften painful in discogenic disease; assess finger-to-floor distance
ExtensionOften painful in facet arthrosis or stenosis
Lateral flexion/rotationIpsilateral extension-rotation loads the facet
Schober testMark the lumbosacral midpoint and 10 cm above; an increase <5 cm suggests restricted lumbar flexion, classically in axial spondyloarthritis

TestPositive resultMeaning
Straight-leg raise (SLR)Reproduction of the patient’s radicular pain below the knee at about 30–70°L5/S1 root irritation, usually disc-related
Lasègue manoeuvreSymptoms recur when the ankle is dorsiflexed after slightly lowering a positive SLRSupports neural tension
Crossed SLRRaising the unaffected leg causes pain in the affected legLess sensitive but more specific for a sizeable disc herniation

What the disc / SLR slides show: sagittal and axial drawings of nucleus pulposus protruding into the canal; clinical photos of lumbar palpation and the supine straight-leg raise — flexion/bending loads the disc; SLR stretches the irritated root. [1] | Femoral stretch | Anterior-thigh pain with prone knee flexion/hip extension | Upper lumbar L2–L4 root irritation |

Hamstring tightness above 70°, back pain alone, or posterior-thigh discomfort without the patient’s usual below-knee symptoms is not a positive SLR.

  • Test lower-limb tone, power by myotome, sensation by dermatome, knee and ankle jerks, plantar responses, and clonus.
  • UMN signs in the legs imply cervical/thoracic cord or conus involvement, not an isolated lower lumbar root lesion.
  • When CES is suspected, assess perianal sensation, anal tone, and voluntary contraction.
  • Palpate femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis pulses; use ABPI if vascular claudication is possible.

4. Investigations

Imaging should confirm a clinical hypothesis. Degenerative discs and bulges are common in asymptomatic adults, so an abnormal MRI is not automatically the pain generator.

Treat symptoms, not images

A lesion matters when its level, side, and neural structure match the history and examination. A non-concordant disc bulge should not drive surgery.

Order according to the suspected pathology:

TestMain use
FBC/WCC, CRP, ESRInfection, inflammation, malignancy; obtain blood cultures before antibiotics if septic
CRP appears 6–8 hours after onset of infection; ESR rises with high fibrinogen causing RBC aggregation [3]
Calcium, phosphate, ALPMetabolic bone disease and bony metastases
Albumin/globulin, SPEP ± serum free light chainsMyeloma screen
Renal/liver profileSystemic disease and treatment planning
PSA or selected tumour investigationsDirected search for a suspected primary; not indiscriminate screening
HLA-B27Supports axial spondyloarthritis in the correct clinical context; not diagnostic alone

CRP rises and falls relatively quickly. ESR responds more slowly and is affected by anaemia, immunoglobulins, and fibrinogen; a markedly elevated ESR with a relatively normal CRP should raise the possibility of paraproteinaemia.

LetterReview
AAlignment and vertebral lines
BBony structures: fracture, lysis, sclerosis
CCollapse or loss of vertebral height
DDisc spaces
EEndplates
FForamina
GGirdle/sacroiliac joints
HHeight of bodies and discs
IIliopsoas shadows
JPars interarticularis

X-rays are useful for alignment, deformity, fracture, spondylolisthesis, and established degeneration, but a normal film does not exclude early infection, tumour, disc herniation, or neural compression.

ModalityBest use
MRIDisc and nerve-root pathology, stenosis, CES, infection, tumour, marrow disease, cord/conus pathology
CTFracture configuration, pars defects, detailed bone anatomy, surgical planning
CT myelogramCanal/root assessment when MRI is contraindicated or non-diagnostic
SPECT/CTActivity of a pars stress reaction; a “hot” lesion has greater healing potential

On T2 MRI, a desiccated “black disc” indicates loss of water content. Review sagittal alignment and disc height, then axial central canal, lateral recesses, foramina, facets, ligamentum flavum, thecal sac, and nerve roots.

  • Uncomplicated acute mechanical pain: no immediate imaging; review if it fails to improve.
  • Trauma or suspected instability: X-ray, then CT when fracture definition is needed.
  • Progressive neurological deficit or CES: emergency MRI.
  • Fever, immunosuppression, night pain, or focal percussion tenderness: inflammatory markers, cultures, and urgent MRI.
  • Known cancer or suspected malignancy: MRI, appropriate blood tests, and tissue diagnosis where needed.
  • Inflammatory back pain: SI-joint radiographs may be normal early; MRI SI joints can detect active sacroiliitis.

5. Degeneration, Disc Disease, and Radiculopathy

PhaseStructural changeTypical clinical result
DysfunctionAnnular tears and facet synovitisEpisodic axial pain
InstabilityDisc-height loss, ligamentous laxity, abnormal motionRecurrent pain, disc herniation, degenerative slip
StabilisationOsteophytes, facet hypertrophy, disc fibrosisStiffness and spinal stenosis

Disc-height loss transfers load posteriorly to the facets. The annulus bulges, facets hypertrophy, and ligamentum flavum buckles inward, producing circumferential canal narrowing.

StageDefinition
BulgeBroad, usually circumferential extension with annulus intact
ProtrusionFocal herniation with a base wider than the outward dome
ExtrusionDisc material extends through the annulus with a narrower neck
SequestrationFree fragment separated from the parent disc

Posterolateral herniation is most common. Lower levels, especially L4/5 and L5/S1, are most often affected. Extruded and sequestered fragments may resorb through inflammation and macrophage activity, supporting an initial conservative approach when there is no emergency deficit.

FeatureDiscogenicFacet
Worse withFlexion, sitting, bendingExtension and ipsilateral rotation
PainUsually axial/midline; may coexist with radiculopathyParavertebral with buttock/thigh referral
MechanismAnnular fissure, inflammatory cytokines, nociceptive ingrowth, endplate changeSynovial OA and capsular loading after disc-height loss
MRI cluesPosterior annular high-intensity zone, Modic endplate changeFacet hypertrophy, effusion, arthrosis
InnervationAnnular nociceptive ingrowth after tearBilevel dorsal-ramus innervation of synovial membrane and capsule [5]
Degenerative consequenceEndplate Modic change, cytokine releaseOsteophytic overgrowth of articular processes may impinge on the nerve root [5]
Targeted interventionSelected epidural/root treatment for radicular inflammationDiagnostic medial branch/facet block; radiofrequency treatment in selected responders

Both can weaken ankle/toe dorsiflexion. Hip abduction and ankle inversion weakness favour L5 radiculopathy because these functions are supplied outside the common peroneal nerve. A common peroneal lesion more selectively affects dorsiflexion and eversion.


6. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is narrowing of the central canal, lateral recess, or foramen by disc bulge, osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, ligamentum flavum thickening, spondylolisthesis, or a developmentally narrow canal with short pedicles.

  • central stenosis: bilateral neurogenic claudication and diffuse leg symptoms;
  • lateral recess stenosis: traversing-root radiculopathy;
  • foraminal stenosis: exiting-root radiculopathy; and
  • severe central narrowing: possible CES.

Extension narrows the canal and foramina; flexion enlarges them. This explains the shopping-cart sign, easier cycling, and often better tolerance of uphill than downhill walking.

Quantitatively, extension decreases spinal canal size by ~11% and foraminal size by ~15%, while flexion increases canal size by ~11% and foraminal size by ~12% (Inufusa et al., Spine 1996). [6]

Management

Start with education, activity modification, analgesia, flexion-based conditioning, core strengthening, and treatment of modifiable factors. An epidural injection may offer temporary relief for selected radicular symptoms.

Consider surgery for:

  • persistent, function-limiting symptoms despite adequate conservative treatment;
  • progressive neurological deficit; or
  • CES.

Use decompression alone for stable stenosis. Add fusion when there is clinically relevant instability, such as spondylolisthesis or destabilising facet resection. Fusion should not be added routinely because it increases operative burden and can contribute to adjacent-segment degeneration.

Patients with congenitally short pedicles have a developmentally narrow canal and are prone to symptomatic stenosis at any level, even with modest degenerative change. Reoperation rates after lumbar stenosis surgery are approximately 13% of patients overall, with 50% of reoperations at adjacent levels (~3.3% per year). [6]

Foraminal stenosis results from an overriding superior articular process (due to spondylolisthesis or disc-height loss) or a far-lateral disc herniation. [6]


7. Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis

A pars interarticularis stress injury is commonest at L5 and is associated with repetitive extension/rotation in young athletes. It causes insidious activity-related back pain; radicular symptoms usually imply associated slip or another compressive lesion.

Possible findings include hamstring tightness, short stride, flattened lordosis, and pain on extension. Use radiographs first, CT for bony definition, MRI for marrow oedema/neural structures, and SPECT/CT selectively to identify an active stress reaction.

TypeMechanism
DysplasticCongenital posterior-element/facet abnormality
IsthmicPars defect
DegenerativeDisc and facet degeneration causing instability; often L4/5
TraumaticAcute non-pars fracture
PathologicalTumour, infection, or other bone disease

Meyerding grades: I 0–25%, II 25–50%, III 50–75%, IV 75–100%, and V > 100% (spondyloptosis).

Slippage can kink the central canal and narrow the foramen through disc-height loss and superior articular-process encroachment. If surgery requires decompression in an unstable segment, fusion is added to prevent worsening translation.


8. Sacroiliac and Inflammatory Disease

SI-joint pain can refer to the buttock, posterior thigh, or groin and overlap with disc, facet, and hip pain. No single provocation test is definitive; use a cluster such as FABER, thigh thrust, compression, distraction, and Gaenslen tests. A substantial response to image-guided diagnostic injection supports the SI joint as the pain source.

Key features are:

  • onset before 40 and insidious course;
  • symptoms for at least three months;
  • prolonged morning stiffness;
  • improvement with exercise but not rest;
  • night pain, especially in the second half of the night;
  • alternating buttock pain;
  • enthesitis (blue-highlighted skeletal sites of enthesopathy are characteristic), uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, or family history.

AS affects both sexes; the male-to-female ratio is approximately 6:1 in patients < 16 years and 2:1 in those ≥30 years. It is a spondyloarthropathy (axial and/or peripheral) that is rheumatoid-factor negative. [5]

HLA-B27 supports but does not establish the diagnosis. Plain SI-joint films may be normal early; MRI can show active bone-marrow oedema. ESR and CRP can also be normal.

Management includes exercise/physiotherapy and NSAIDs first. Persistent active axial disease may require biologic therapy such as TNF or IL-17 inhibition under specialist care. Conventional DMARDs have little efficacy for purely axial disease, though some may help peripheral arthritis.


9. Sinister and Non-Spinal Causes

Consider pyogenic spondylodiscitis, vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, or TB in a patient with fever, immunosuppression, bacteraemia risk, night pain, focal percussion tenderness, or raised inflammatory markers. MRI is the key imaging test. Obtain cultures and, when required, image-guided biopsy before targeted antimicrobial therapy.

Operate when there is an epidural abscess with neurological compromise, mechanical instability/deformity, failure of medical treatment, or a need for source control.

A known cancer patient with new severe back pain, weakness, sensory change, or sphincter symptoms requires urgent assessment for metastatic epidural spinal cord/conus compression. Arrange urgent MRI, start corticosteroid treatment when clinically indicated, and involve spinal surgery and oncology immediately. Staging investigations must not delay treatment of neurological compression.

Think of traumatic, osteoporotic, steroid-related, or pathological vertebral collapse. X-ray may identify wedging or height loss; CT defines the fracture pattern, while MRI identifies marrow oedema, posterior-element/neural involvement, and malignant features.

Keep aortic aneurysm, nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, hip disease, pancreatobiliary disease, and other visceral sources in the differential when the history or examination is not mechanically concordant.


10. Management Framework

  • Explain the diagnosis and favourable natural history when appropriate.
  • Encourage continued tolerable activity; avoid prolonged bed rest.
  • Use physiotherapy, graded conditioning, core strengthening, and ergonomic/activity modification.
  • Choose analgesia following the WHO analgesic ladder [7]:
    • Step 1 — Non-opioids (paracetamol, NSAIDs) ± adjuvants.
    • Step 2 — Weak opioids (codeine, tramadol) ± adjuvants, if pain persists.
    • Step 3 — Strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl) + non-opioid ± adjuvants, if pain persists.
  • Long-term opioids are generally undesirable; steroids may be used in selected situations.
  • Consider targeted injections (epidural, facet/medial branch block, SI-joint injection) for selected radicular, facet, or SI-joint pain; they may be diagnostic and temporarily therapeutic but are not a cure.

  1. Pain: a confirmed, concordant pain generator with disabling symptoms despite adequate conservative care.
  2. Neurology: progressive deficit or neural compression requiring decompression.
  3. Instability: painful/pathological motion requiring stabilisation and fusion.
  4. Deformity: fixed or progressive malalignment requiring correction and fusion.

ApproachExamplesPrinciple
DirectDiscectomy, flavectomy, laminotomy, laminectomy, foraminotomy, facetectomyPhysically removes the compressive structure
IndirectInterbody cage restoring disc heightOpens the foramen/canal through distraction without directly removing all compressive tissue

Removing a large portion of a facet can itself create instability and may necessitate fusion.

ProblemTypical operation
Concordant disc herniation with persistent radiculopathy or progressive deficitMicrodiscectomy/discectomy
Stable central stenosisLaminotomy or laminectomy/decompression
Foraminal stenosisForaminotomy ± limited facetectomy
Stenosis with instability/spondylolisthesisDecompression + instrumented fusion
Sagittal deformity/rigid kyphosisOsteotomy and long-segment correction/fusion
CESEmergency decompression of the cause

Endoscopic techniques: Endoscopic flavectomy (ipsilateral and contralateral decompression) is an emerging minimally invasive option for lumbar stenosis, allowing bilateral decompression through a unilateral approach. [7]

During posterior lumbar surgery, prone positioning with the abdomen free reduces intra-abdominal pressure and epidural venous engorgement. Lumbar flexion also opens the interlaminar space for access.


11. High-Yield Exam Integration

FeatureConus medullarisCauda equina
LesionTip of cord around L1–L2Roots below the conus
PatternMore symmetric; mixed UMN/LMN possibleOften asymmetric; LMN
Radicular painLess prominentOften severe
Saddle lossOften symmetricMay be patchy/asymmetric
Sphincter dysfunctionEarly and prominentMay be later, but early in massive compression

  • Posterolateral L4/5 disc → L5 traversing root.
  • Far-lateral/foraminal L4/5 disc → L4 exiting root.
  • Positive SLR → the patient’s radicular pain below the knee at 30–70°.
  • Flexion-provoked axial pain → think disc; extension-provoked pain → think facet/stenosis.
  • Neurogenic claudication needs flexion/sitting for relief; vascular claudication improves by simply stopping.
  • Hyperreflexia and upgoing plantars are not explained by a routine lower lumbar root lesion.
  • Spondylolysis is a pars defect; spondylolisthesis is a slip; spondylosis is degeneration.
  • Stable stenosis → decompression; stenosis with instability → consider decompression plus fusion.

High Yield Summary

  1. Start with emergencies and red flags:

    • Ask about urinary retention/overflow, bowel or sexual dysfunction, saddle anaesthesia, bilateral symptoms, and progressive weakness
    • Cauda equina syndrome and metastatic neurological compression require emergency MRI and immediate spinal review
  2. Localise before imaging:

    • Combine dermatome, myotome, reflex, and nerve-tension testing
    • Posterolateral disc = traversing root; foraminal/far-lateral disc = exiting root
    • At L4/5: posterolateral → L5; far lateral → L4
  3. Distinguish the pain pattern:

    • Flexion/sitting provocation → discogenic
    • Extension/rotation provocation → facet or stenosis
    • Morning stiffness with exercise relief → inflammatory
    • Standing/walking symptoms relieved by sitting/flexion → neurogenic claudication
  4. Investigate selectively:

    • MRI for neural compression, infection, tumour, and other sinister pathology
    • CT for fracture, pars defects, and detailed bone anatomy
    • X-ray for alignment, deformity, fracture, and spondylolisthesis
    • Direct blood tests according to the suspected infection, inflammation, malignancy, or metabolic disease
  5. Correlate images with symptoms:

    • Treat a lesion only when its level, side, and neural structure match the clinical findings
    • Incidental disc bulges and degeneration are common
  6. Use conservative care first when safe:

    • Encourage activity, rehabilitation, conditioning, and appropriate analgesia
    • Escalate for persistent disabling concordant symptoms or progressive neurological deficit
  7. Remember the four surgical indications:

    • Pain after adequate non-operative care
    • Neurology
    • Instability
    • Deformity
  8. Choose decompression versus fusion:

    • Stable stenosis → decompression
    • Clinically relevant pre-existing or iatrogenic instability → decompression plus fusion
    • Do not add fusion routinely

Active Recall — Unified Lumbar Spine Pathology

[1] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part A.pdf. [2] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part B.pdf. [3] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part C.pdf. [4] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part D.pdf. [5] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part E.pdf. [6] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part F.pdf. [7] Lecture slides: GC 226. Lumbar Spine Pathology_Part G.pdf. [13] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf; Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf. [14] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf. [15] AOS material: AOS - Radiology.pdf.

On this page

No Headings