Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by continuous mucosal inflammation and ulceration of the colon and rectum, typically presenting with bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain.
1. Definition
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterised by diffuse, continuous mucosal inflammation limited to the colon [1][2]. The name itself tells you the disease:
- "Ulcerative" → ulcer-forming (Latin ulcus = sore/wound)
- "Colitis" → inflammation of the colon (Greek kolon = large intestine + -itis = inflammation)
Key defining features that separate UC from Crohn's disease (CD):
| Feature | UC | CD |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | Colon & rectum, continuous | Any part of GI tract, skip lesions |
| Depth | Mucosal / submucosal | Full thickness (transmural) |
| Fistula | Never | Common (intestinal / perianal) |
| Benign stricture | Rare | Common |
| Perianal disease | Rare | Up to 40% |
| Rectal sparing | No (almost always involves rectum) | Yes (rectal sparing) |
The inflammation most commonly begins in the rectum and extends proximally in a continuous fashion — there are no "skip lesions" [2]. Occasionally, patients with pancolitis may develop backwash ileitis (mild ileal inflammation from reflux of colonic contents through an incompetent ileocaecal valve), but this should not be confused with true small bowel Crohn's disease.
Indeterminate colitis accounts for 10-15% of patients with IBD who fail to be classified between UC and CD [1][2]. This can be due to inadequate tissue biopsy or a truly indeterminate form of disease. Surgical treatment for these patients is similar to UC [2].
Key Distinction
Think of UC as a "paint roller" — it paints the colon continuously from the rectum upward. Crohn's is a "spray can" — it splatters patches anywhere from mouth to anus, and goes deep through the wall.
2. Epidemiology
2.1 Global Epidemiology
- Peak age of onset: between the third and seventh decade [1]
- This is a broad bimodal peak — classically, the first peak is in the 30s and a second smaller peak around the 50s–70s [2]
- Compare with CD which peaks in the third decade
- Gender: F = M (no gender predominance) [1][2]
- In contrast, CD has F > M globally, but M > F in East Asia [1]
2.2 East vs West Differences (High Yield for HKU)
Key differences in Asian/Eastern IBD populations compared to Western populations [1]:
- More male prevalence with CD, ileocolonic CD
- Less family clustering (genetic factors play a smaller role relative to environmental factors in Asia)
- Lower rates of surgery (5–8%)
- Fewer extraintestinal manifestations
- Less primary sclerosing cholangitis with UC
- Higher rates of penetrating and perianal disease in CD
2.3 Hong Kong–Specific Data
The distribution of UC extent in Hong Kong is roughly equal thirds [2]:
- Proctosigmoiditis: 34.5%
- Distal UC (left-sided): 32%
- Pancolitis (extensive): 33.5%
Prevalence of IBD in Hong Kong has been steadily rising — thought to be related to Westernisation of diet, improved hygiene (the "hygiene hypothesis"), urbanisation, and changes in the gut microbiome.
CD: urban > rural areas, higher socioeconomic classes [1] — this pattern is shared to some extent with UC and supports the hygiene hypothesis (less childhood microbial exposure → aberrant immune development).
Exam Tip
The roughly equal distribution of disease extent in HK is a commonly tested fact. Know the Montreal classification and HK percentages.
3. Risk Factors and Protective Factors
3.1 Risk Factors
| Category | Risk Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Drug history | NSAIDs | NSAIDs inhibit COX → reduce protective prostaglandins in gut mucosa → impaired mucosal defence → flare of colitis. They also shift arachidonic acid metabolism toward leukotrienes (pro-inflammatory) |
| Family history | IBD in first-degree relative | Polygenic susceptibility; however less family clustering in East Asia [1] |
| Medical history | Infectious gastroenteritis in prior 1 year | Post-infectious dysbiosis may trigger immune dysregulation in genetically susceptible individuals [2] |
| Disease-specific | Primary sclerosing cholangitis | Bidirectional association — PSC is strongly associated with UC. Majority of patients with PSC have underlying UC; only ~5% of UC patients have PSC [2][4] |
| Other | Early age of disease onset, male sex (for CRC risk) | Earlier onset = longer cumulative inflammatory burden [1] |
3.2 Protective Factors
| Category | Protective Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical history | Prior appendicectomy | Protective for UC (but is a risk factor for CD). The appendix is a lymphoid organ rich in immune cells that may prime mucosal immune responses; removing it may reduce the likelihood of the aberrant Th2-driven immune response seen in UC |
| Social history | Smoking | Protective for UC but a risk factor for CD [2]. Nicotine increases colonic mucus production, decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-8), and improves mucosal blood flow — these protect the colonic mucosa. Patients who quit smoking are at increased risk of developing UC or experiencing flares |
Classic Exam Pitfall
Students often confuse which IBD is associated with smoking. Remember:
- Smoking PROTECTS against UC (think: nicotine patches were once trialled as UC therapy)
- Smoking WORSENS CD (doubles the risk of flare and surgery)
- Appendicectomy PROTECTS against UC but is a risk factor for CD
These are reversed between the two diseases.
4. Anatomy and Function (Relevant to UC)
4.1 The Colon
The colon extends from the caecum (ileocaecal valve) to the rectum, approximately 1.5 m in length. Anatomically divided into:
- Caecum and appendix → ascending colon → hepatic flexure → transverse colon → splenic flexure → descending colon → sigmoid colon → rectum
Key functions:
- Water and electrolyte absorption (Na⁺, Cl⁻, short-chain fatty acids)
- Storage of faecal material (the reservoir function)
- Fermentation by commensal bacteria (microbiome)
4.2 Colonic Wall Layers (Why Depth of Inflammation Matters)
From inside out:
- Mucosa (epithelium + lamina propria + muscularis mucosae) — UC is confined here + submucosa
- Submucosa (Meissner's plexus; blood vessels, lymphatics)
- Muscularis propria (inner circular, outer longitudinal; Auerbach's/myenteric plexus between)
- Serosa/adventitia
Because UC is limited to the mucosa and submucosa, it:
- Does NOT produce fistulae (fistulae require transmural inflammation to create a tract through the full wall)
- Does NOT produce deep strictures (rare — strictures in UC should raise concern for malignancy)
- Does NOT produce deep ulcers — ulcers are shallow (compare with CD: deep, "knife-cut" or "cobblestone" ulcers)
- DOES produce pseudopolyps — regenerating islands of mucosa surrounded by denuded/ulcerated mucosa give the appearance of polyps
4.3 The Rectum
The rectum is essentially always involved in UC (the "starting point" of the disease). This explains why:
- PR bleeding (haematochezia) is the hallmark symptom — the inflamed rectal mucosa is friable and bleeds easily, and blood is seen on the surface of stool
- Tenesmus (a painful, urgent desire to defecate with a sense of incomplete evacuation) — from rectal inflammation irritating stretch receptors
- Urgency and incontinence — inflamed rectum loses compliance (it becomes stiff and cannot stretch), so even small volumes of stool trigger the defecation reflex
4.4 Splenic Flexure (Clinical Relevance)
The splenic flexure is the key anatomical landmark for classifying UC extent (Montreal classification). It represents a "watershed" area of blood supply (between the SMA and IMA territories), making it vulnerable to ischaemia and a natural boundary for disease classification.
5. Etiology and Pathophysiology
UC is an immune-mediated disease arising from a complex interplay of:
- Genetic susceptibility
- Environmental triggers
- Gut microbiome dysbiosis
- Dysregulated mucosal immune response
5.1 Genetic Susceptibility
- Over 200 IBD susceptibility loci identified via GWAS
- HLA-DR2 is associated with UC (vs. HLA-DR1/DQ5 in CD)
- Key genes include those involved in epithelial barrier function (e.g., HNF4A, CDH1) and immune regulation
- However, family clustering is less prominent in East Asia [1], suggesting environmental factors play a proportionally larger role in Hong Kong
- Concordance rate in monozygotic twins: ~16% for UC (vs. ~50% for CD) — confirming that environment matters more in UC
5.2 Environmental Triggers
| Factor | Role |
|---|---|
| Westernised diet (high fat, high sugar, low fibre) | Alters gut microbiome composition; reduces short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production (butyrate is the primary fuel for colonocytes) |
| Urbanisation/improved hygiene | Hygiene hypothesis: less childhood microbial exposure → inadequate training of immune tolerance → aberrant immune response to commensal bacteria |
| Antibiotics in early life | Disrupt developing microbiome |
| NSAIDs | Directly damage mucosal barrier; divert arachidonic acid to leukotriene pathway |
| Stress | Activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis → increases gut permeability and inflammatory cytokines |
| Prior GI infection | Post-infectious dysbiosis → immune priming → loss of tolerance to commensals [2] |
5.3 Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis
- UC patients have reduced microbial diversity — especially a loss of Firmicutes (which produce butyrate, the main energy source for colonocytes)
- Increase in potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g., E. coli, Fusobacterium)
- The loss of butyrate-producing bacteria means colonocytes are "starved" → epithelial barrier breakdown → increased permeability → bacterial translocation → inflammation
5.4 Dysregulated Mucosal Immune Response
Here is the core pathophysiology, step by step:
Key immunological points:
- UC is characterised by an atypical Th2 response (unlike CD which is Th1/Th17-driven)
- IL-13 is a key cytokine in UC → directly damages epithelial cells and impairs barrier function
- NKT (Natural Killer T) cells are prominent in UC colonic mucosa
- The inflammatory infiltrate (neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells) is concentrated in the mucosa and submucosa — this is why inflammation doesn't extend transmurally
- Neutrophil infiltration into crypts → cryptitis and crypt abscesses (a hallmark histological feature shared with CD) [2]
- Chronic inflammation → crypt architectural distortion (branching, shortening, irregularity of crypts) — this is a hallmark of chronicity
- Goblet cell depletion — mucin-producing goblet cells are destroyed by the inflammatory process → loss of the protective mucus layer → further barrier compromise. (Note: In CD, goblet cells are preserved) [2]
5.5 Why UC Starts in the Rectum and Spreads Proximally
The rectum has the highest bacterial concentration in the colon and the thinnest mucus layer. In a genetically susceptible individual, this makes it the most vulnerable site for the initial breach of immune tolerance. The disease then spreads in a retrograde, continuous fashion because the immune response propagates along the contiguous mucosal surface.
6. Classification
6.1 Montreal Classification of UC Extent
The Montreal classification is the standard phenotypic classification for UC [2]:
| Code | Classification | Description | HK Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Proctitis | Involvement limited to the rectum (distal to the rectosigmoid junction, ~15 cm) | Part of proctosigmoiditis group |
| E2 | Left-sided UC (distal UC) | Involvement extending up to the splenic flexure | ~32% in HK |
| E3 | Extensive UC (pancolitis) | Involvement extending proximal to the splenic flexure | ~33.5% in HK |
From Felix's notes, the HK distribution uses a slightly different subdivision [2]:
- Proctitis = rectum only
- Proctosigmoiditis (34.5%) = rectum + sigmoid
- Distal UC (32%) = rectum + sigmoid + colon up to splenic flexure (= Montreal E2)
- Pancolitis (33.5%) = beyond splenic flexure (= Montreal E3)
- Backwash ileitis = ileal involvement (in the setting of pancolitis)
6.2 Disease Severity — Modified Truelove and Witts' Criteria
This is the classic bedside severity assessment for UC — used in clinical practice to determine need for admission and treatment intensity [2]:
| Parameter | Mild | Moderate | Severe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloody stools per day | < 4 | ≥ 4 | ≥ 6 |
| Pulse | < 90 bpm | ≤ 90 bpm | > 90 bpm |
| Temperature | < 37.5°C | ≤ 37.8°C | > 37.8°C |
| Haemoglobin | > 11.5 g/dL | ≥ 10.5 g/dL | < 10.5 g/dL |
| ESR | < 20 mm/h | < 30 mm/h | > 30 mm/h |
| CRP | Normal | ≤ 30 mg/L | > 30 mg/L |
Interpretation: Immediate admission is warranted in severe disease [2].
How to Remember Truelove and Witts' Severe Criteria
"6-90-37.8-10.5-30-30":
- ≥ 6 bloody stools/day
- Pulse > 90 bpm
- Temp > 37.8°C
- Hb < 10.5 g/dL
- ESR > 30 mm/h
- CRP > 30 mg/L
If ANY one systemic criterion (pulse, temp, Hb, ESR, CRP) is met along with ≥ 6 bloody stools/day → severe UC → admit immediately.
6.3 Comparison Between Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
This is an extremely high-yield comparison table for exams:
Clinical Features
| Feature | Crohn's Disease | Ulcerative Colitis |
|---|---|---|
| Haematochezia | Rare | Common |
| Passage of mucus or pus | Rare | Common |
| Abdominal mass | Sometimes | Rare |
| Upper GIT involvement | ✓ | ✗ |
| Small bowel involvement | ✓ | ✗ |
| Large bowel involvement | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rectal involvement | ✓ (usually spared) | ✓ (almost always involved) |
| Perianal involvement | ✓ | ✗ |
| Small bowel obstruction | Common | Rare |
| Large bowel obstruction | Common | Rare |
Biochemical Features
| Feature | CD | UC |
|---|---|---|
| ASCA (Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies) | Common | Rare |
| pANCA (perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) | Rare | Common |
Histological Features
| Feature | CD | UC |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern of involvement | Focal, patchy | Diffuse, continuous |
| Depth of inflammation | Transmural | Mucosal and submucosal |
| Granulomas | ✓ (MUST exclude TB) | ✗ |
| Goblet cells | Preserved (✓) | Depleted (✗) |
| Distorted crypt architecture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cryptitis and crypt abscess | ✓ | ✓ |
Endoscopic Features
| Feature | CD | UC |
|---|---|---|
| Skip lesions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Ulcers | Solitary, deep, and focal | Shallow |
| Fistula formation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Abscess formation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Stricture | ✓ | ✗ (rare; if present → suspect malignancy) |
| Pseudopolyps | ✗ | ✓ |
Why No Fistulae in UC?
Fistulae are abnormal tracts connecting two epithelial surfaces. They require transmural inflammation to burrow through the entire bowel wall. Since UC is limited to the mucosa and submucosa, the inflammation never reaches deep enough to create fistulae. This is a fundamental architectural difference from CD.
Pseudopolyps — What Are They?
Pseudopolyps (inflammatory polyps) are islands of regenerating mucosa surrounded by areas of mucosal ulceration and denudation. They are NOT true neoplastic polyps, but they indicate severe previous inflammation. They are characteristic of UC because the widespread, continuous shallow ulceration creates this "island" pattern. Pseudopolyps are a risk factor for IBD-associated CRC [1].
7. Clinical Features
7.1 Symptoms (with Pathophysiological Basis)
Clinical features are related to inflammatory damage in the GIT [1]:
A. Gastrointestinal Symptoms
| Symptom | Description | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Bloody diarrhoea (haematochezia) | The central feature of UC [2]. Passage of blood and/or mucus mixed with stool. | Inflamed, friable, ulcerated rectal and colonic mucosa bleeds easily. The mucosal surface is denuded and superficial vessels are exposed. Mucus production increases as a failed attempt at mucosal protection but also reflects goblet cell dysfunction. |
| Diarrhoea | Prolonged, fluctuating course. Stools are frequent, small-volume [2]. | 1) Excessive fluid secretion — inflammatory mediators (prostaglandins, histamine) stimulate Cl⁻ secretion from crypt cells → water follows osmotically. 2) Impaired fluid reabsorption — damaged colonic mucosa cannot absorb water and electrolytes normally. 3) The inflamed, non-compliant rectum loses its reservoir function → cannot store stool → frequent small-volume stools. |
| Tenesmus | Painful straining with a sensation of incomplete evacuation | Inflammation of the rectal wall irritates stretch receptors and pelvic floor nerves, creating a constant sensation of "needing to go" even when the rectum is empty. |
| Urgency and incontinence | Sudden, irresistible need to defecate; may result in faecal incontinence | The inflamed rectum loses compliance (becomes stiff and fibrotic) → reduced distensibility → even small volumes of stool trigger the defecation reflex. The internal anal sphincter may also be affected by inflammation. |
| Constipation | UC limited to the rectum (proctitis) may paradoxically present with constipation [1] | When only the rectum is inflamed, the proximal colon compensates by increased water absorption, leading to hard, infrequent stools proximal to the inflammation. The rectum itself produces mucus and blood but may not have enough volume to trigger normal defecation. This is a classic exam pitfall! |
| Abdominal cramps and pain | Colicky abdominal pain [1][2], typically in the left lower quadrant (where the sigmoid/descending colon lies) | Spasm of the inflamed colonic smooth muscle. Prostaglandins and leukotrienes released by inflammatory cells directly stimulate smooth muscle contraction and activate visceral pain afferents. |
| Rectal bleeding with bowel movement | Pain or rectal bleeding with bowel movement [1] | Direct mucosal ulceration and friability; passage of stool mechanically disrupts the fragile, inflamed mucosa |
Constipation in Proctitis
A common mistake is to think UC always presents with diarrhoea. In proctitis (E1), the patient may present with constipation because only the rectum is inflamed. The proximal colon overcompensates by absorbing more water. The patient may pass formed stools but with blood and mucus. Don't be fooled on the exam!
B. Constitutional Symptoms
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Fever | Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) act on the hypothalamic thermoregulatory centre to raise the set point. Also consider secondary causes: perforation with peritonitis or superimposed C. difficile infection [2] |
| Fatigue | Multifactorial: anaemia of chronic disease (hepcidin-mediated iron sequestration), iron deficiency anaemia (chronic blood loss), malnutrition, cytokine-driven sickness behaviour (TNF-α, IL-6 directly cause fatigue via CNS effects), and sleep disturbance from nocturnal symptoms |
| Anorexia | Circulating inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α → also called "cachectin") suppress appetite centres in the hypothalamus |
| Weight loss | Result of malabsorption, decreased oral intake [2]. In UC specifically: reduced food intake (patients avoid eating to avoid triggering symptoms), increased metabolic demand from chronic inflammation, and protein-losing enteropathy through the denuded mucosa |
C. Anaemic Symptoms
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Pallor, dyspnoea, palpitations, fatigue [2] | Chronic blood loss from the ulcerated colonic mucosa leads to iron deficiency anaemia. Additionally, anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) occurs because IL-6 stimulates hepatic hepcidin production → hepcidin blocks ferroportin → iron is trapped in macrophages and enterocytes → functional iron deficiency even if stores are adequate. Reduced oxygen-carrying capacity → compensatory tachycardia (palpitations) and increased respiratory rate (dyspnoea) |
7.2 Signs (with Pathophysiological Basis)
A. General Examination
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Pallor | Anaemia from chronic blood loss + ACD (see above) |
| Tachycardia | Compensatory response to anaemia and/or dehydration; if > 90 bpm → suggests severe disease (Truelove and Witts) |
| Fever | Systemic inflammatory response; > 37.8°C = severe disease |
| Dehydration (dry mucous membranes, reduced skin turgor, sunken eyes) | Chronic diarrhoea → fluid and electrolyte losses |
| Cachexia / weight loss | Chronic inflammation, malnutrition, protein-losing enteropathy |
| Clubbing | Rare in UC (more common in CD). Mechanism poorly understood; may relate to chronic hypoxia, circulating vasodilators (VEGF, PDGF), or inflammatory mediators causing connective tissue proliferation in nail beds |
B. Abdominal Examination
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Left lower quadrant tenderness | The sigmoid and descending colon (most commonly affected in left-sided UC) are tender due to active mucosal and submucosal inflammation |
| Diffuse abdominal tenderness | In extensive colitis/pancolitis |
| Abdominal distension | If toxic megacolon develops (non-obstructive dilatation due to inflammation extending into the muscularis propria → loss of smooth muscle tone → colonic atony) |
| Absence of palpable mass | Unlike CD, UC rarely produces a palpable mass because there is no transmural inflammation, no mesenteric thickening, and no fistula/abscess formation |
| Rebound tenderness / guarding | Suggests perforation with peritonitis — a surgical emergency |
C. Digital Rectal Examination
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Blood / mucus on the glove | Confirms rectal bleeding; the rectal mucosa is friable |
| Tenderness | Active proctitis |
| No perianal disease (fissures, fistulae, skin tags) | Perianal disease is characteristic of CD, NOT UC. If perianal disease is found in a patient labelled as "UC," reconsider the diagnosis |
7.3 Extraintestinal Manifestations (EIMs)
Extraintestinal manifestations are present in up to 25–40% of IBD patients globally, though fewer EIMs are seen in East Asian populations [1]. They can be divided into those that correlate with disease activity and those that are independent.
Key EIMs from lecture slides [1]:
- Musculoskeletal: peripheral or axial arthropathy
- Cutaneous: erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum
- Ocular: scleritis, uveitis
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
A. EIMs that Correlate with Disease Activity
These flare when the colitis flares and improve when the colitis is treated:
| System | Manifestation | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| Musculoskeletal | Peripheral arthropathy (type 1: large joint, pauciarticular, asymmetric) | Circulating immune complexes and cross-reactive antibodies (molecular mimicry between gut bacterial antigens and joint synovial antigens) deposit in joints → synovitis |
| Dermatological | Erythema nodosum (tender, red nodules on anterior shins) | Immune complex–mediated panniculitis (inflammation of subcutaneous fat). The anterior shin is affected because it is a watershed area with poor blood supply → immune complexes deposit here |
| Ocular | Episcleritis (painless, red eye without vision loss) | Immune complex deposition in the episcleral vessels |
B. EIMs that are Independent of Disease Activity
These may occur even when colitis is in remission:
| System | Manifestation | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| Musculoskeletal | Axial arthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis, sacroiliitis) — associated with HLA-B27 | Molecular mimicry; shared antigens between gut bacteria and spinal entheses. The HLA-B27 molecule may present cross-reactive peptides to cytotoxic T cells |
| Musculoskeletal | Osteoporosis / osteomalacia | Chronic corticosteroid use, chronic inflammation (cytokines increase osteoclast activity via RANKL), malabsorption of calcium and vitamin D |
| Dermatological | Pyoderma gangrenosum (deep, painful, violaceous ulcers with undermined edges, typically on lower limbs) — more common in UC than CD [2] | Neutrophilic dermatosis; aberrant neutrophil chemotaxis and function. The pathergy phenomenon (worsening at sites of trauma) is characteristic |
| Ocular | Uveitis (painful, red eye with photophobia and blurred vision) / Scleritis / Iritis | T cell–mediated inflammation of the uveal tract; may share antigens with colonic epithelium |
| Hepatobiliary | Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) | Chronic progressive inflammation and fibrosis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. Mechanism: aberrant homing of gut-primed T lymphocytes to the liver via the portal circulation (gut-liver axis). These T cells recognise cross-reactive antigens on biliary epithelium. Strong association with UC — majority of PSC patients have UC, but only ~5% of UC patients develop PSC [2][4] |
| Hepatobiliary | Fatty liver / autoimmune liver disease | Chronic inflammation, malnutrition, drug effects (corticosteroids, methotrexate) |
| Vascular | Arterial and venous thromboembolism (DVT, PE, portal/mesenteric vein thrombosis) | IBD is a prothrombotic state: inflammatory cytokines increase tissue factor expression, increase fibrinogen, decrease protein C/S, increase platelet activation, and promote endothelial dysfunction. Risk is 2–3× that of the general population |
| Urogenital | Renal stones (calcium oxalate) | Fat malabsorption → free fatty acids bind calcium → calcium is unavailable to bind oxalate in the gut → increased free oxalate is absorbed and excreted by the kidney → oxalate stones. (More common in CD with ileal disease, but can occur in extensive UC) |
| Haematological | Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia | Autoantibodies against RBC antigens; part of the generalised immune dysregulation |
| Endocrine | Vitamin B12 deficiency | Relevant mainly in CD with terminal ileal disease/resection. In UC, can occur with backwash ileitis or from secondary bacterial overgrowth |
| GI | Colorectal cancer | Chronic inflammation → oxidative DNA damage → dysplasia → carcinoma sequence. Risk factors include: disease duration, extent of colitis, severity of inflammation, PSC, pseudopolyps, strictures, family history of CRC [1] |
CRC Risk Factors in IBD
Risk factors for IBD-associated colorectal neoplasia (from lecture slides [1]):
Patient-Specific Factors:
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- History of colorectal neoplasia
- Family history of CRC in first-degree relative
- Smoking (+)
- Early age of disease onset (+)
- Male sex (+)
Disease-Specific Factors:
- Disease duration
- Disease extent
- Cumulative inflammatory burden
- Active inflammation endoscopically or histologically
Endoscopic Features:
- Stricture (UC, longer disease duration, proximal location, symptoms)
- Shortened tubular colon
- Pseudopolyps
7.4 Distinguishing UC Presentation from CD at the Bedside
| Feature | UC | CD |
|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Bloody, frequent, small-volume | May or may not be bloody; larger-volume if small bowel involved |
| Abdominal pain | LLQ, colicky, relieved by defecation | RLQ (ileal), may be obstructive |
| Rectal bleeding | Almost always present | Variable |
| Perianal disease | Absent | Common (fissures, fistulae, abscesses, skin tags) |
| Abdominal mass | Rare | RLQ mass (inflamed ileum/mesentery) |
| Mouth ulcers | Uncommon | Common (aphthous ulcers) |
| Malnutrition | Less common (colon mainly) | More common (small bowel malabsorption) |
8. Summary of Key Pathophysiological Connections
| Clinical Feature | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|
| Bloody diarrhoea | Friable, ulcerated mucosa + impaired water absorption + increased secretion |
| Tenesmus | Rectal inflammation irritating stretch receptors |
| Urgency | Reduced rectal compliance from fibrosis/inflammation |
| Constipation (proctitis) | Proximal colonic compensation + impaired rectal function |
| Pseudopolyps | Mucosal regeneration islands between areas of shallow ulceration |
| No fistulae | Inflammation confined to mucosa/submucosa (not transmural) |
| No granulomas | Th2-driven atypical immune response (not the Th1 granulomatous response of CD) |
| pANCA positivity | Autoantibodies against neutrophil myeloperoxidase — reflects the autoimmune component |
| PSC association | Aberrant gut-primed lymphocyte homing to biliary epithelium |
| Thromboembolism | Prothrombotic state from systemic inflammation |
| Pyoderma gangrenosum | Neutrophilic dermatosis; aberrant neutrophil function |
| CRC risk | Chronic inflammation → oxidative DNA damage → dysplasia-carcinoma sequence |
High Yield Summary
Definition: UC = chronic, relapsing IBD with diffuse, continuous mucosal/submucosal inflammation limited to the colon, almost always starting from the rectum and extending proximally.
Epidemiology: Peak age 30s–70s; M = F; rising incidence in Hong Kong (Westernisation); roughly equal thirds of proctosigmoiditis/distal UC/pancolitis in HK.
Risk Factors: NSAIDs, family history of IBD, prior GI infection. Protective: Smoking, appendicectomy (opposite to CD!).
Pathophysiology: Genetic susceptibility + environmental triggers → microbiome dysbiosis → epithelial barrier breach → atypical Th2 immune response → mucosal/submucosal inflammation → crypt abscesses, goblet cell depletion, shallow ulceration.
Classification: Montreal E1/E2/E3. Severity by Modified Truelove & Witts (severe = ≥ 6 bloody stools/day + any systemic feature).
Cardinal symptom: Bloody diarrhoea (+ mucus, tenesmus, urgency). Proctitis may present with constipation.
Key differences from CD: No skip lesions, no transmural disease, no fistulae, no granulomas, no perianal disease, shallow ulcers, pseudopolyps. pANCA+ (not ASCA+).
EIMs: Peripheral arthropathy, erythema nodosum, episcleritis (correlate with activity). PSC, ankylosing spondylitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis (independent of activity).
CRC risk: Increased with longer duration, greater extent, PSC, active inflammation, pseudopolyps, strictures, family history.
Active Recall - Ulcerative Colitis (Definition, Epidemiology, Etiology, Classification, Clinical Features)
1. A 28-year-old male with UC limited to the rectum (E1 proctitis) presents complaining of constipation rather than diarrhoea. Explain why this occurs.
Show mark scheme
In proctitis, only the rectum is inflamed. The proximal colon compensates by increasing water absorption, producing hard formed stools. The inflamed rectum produces blood and mucus but the lack of extensive colonic involvement means the secretory diarrhoea mechanism is not dominant. The impaired rectal compliance may also disrupt normal defecation coordination.
2. List 4 features that distinguish UC from CD on endoscopy and explain the pathophysiological basis for each.
Show mark scheme
1) Continuous inflammation (vs skip lesions in CD) — UC spreads contiguously from rectum due to mucosal-limited process. 2) Shallow ulcers (vs deep in CD) — inflammation confined to mucosa/submucosa. 3) Pseudopolyps present (regenerating mucosal islands between areas of shallow ulceration). 4) No fistulae (inflammation does not reach serosa since it is not transmural). Also accept: no granulomas (Th2 response vs Th1 granulomatous in CD), goblet cell depletion (inflammatory destruction of mucin-producing cells).
3. State the Modified Truelove and Witts criteria for SEVERE ulcerative colitis (all 6 parameters).
Show mark scheme
Severe UC: 1) >= 6 bloody stools per day, 2) Pulse > 90 bpm, 3) Temperature > 37.8C, 4) Haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL, 5) ESR > 30 mm/h, 6) CRP > 30 mg/L. Immediate admission warranted.
4. Explain why smoking is protective in UC but harmful in CD.
Show mark scheme
Nicotine increases colonic mucus production (protects the mucosal barrier which is key in UC), decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-8), and improves mucosal blood flow. In CD, smoking worsens disease because it impairs the innate immune response needed to clear transmural infection/inflammation, promotes granuloma formation, and increases intestinal permeability. The opposite effects on mucosal vs transmural disease explain the divergent impact.
5. Name 4 extraintestinal manifestations of UC and classify each as correlating with disease activity or independent of it.
Show mark scheme
Correlate with activity: 1) Peripheral arthropathy (type 1, large joint), 2) Erythema nodosum, 3) Episcleritis. Independent of activity: 4) Primary sclerosing cholangitis, 5) Pyoderma gangrenosum, 6) Ankylosing spondylitis, 7) Uveitis. (Any 4 with correct classification gets full marks.)
6. List 5 risk factors for IBD-associated colorectal neoplasia as per the lecture slides, covering patient-specific, disease-specific, and endoscopic categories.
Show mark scheme
Patient-specific: PSC, history of colorectal neoplasia, family history of CRC in first-degree relative, early age of onset, male sex. Disease-specific: disease duration, disease extent, cumulative inflammatory burden, active inflammation. Endoscopic: stricture, shortened tubular colon, pseudopolyps. (Any 5 from these categories.)
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (pp. 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 52) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis sections) [3] Lecture slides: GC 186. Lower and diffuse abdominal painfresh blood in stool.pdf [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Primary sclerosing cholangitis section)
Differential Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis
9.1 The Clinical Problem — Why Differential Diagnosis Matters
A patient presenting with bloody diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and rectal bleeding does NOT automatically have UC. The differential is broad because the colon has a limited repertoire of responses to injury — it becomes inflamed, it ulcerates, it bleeds. The key clinical challenge is distinguishing UC from conditions that mimic it, because management differs dramatically (e.g., treating infectious colitis with immunosuppression would be catastrophic; missing colorectal cancer is lethal).
The approach to differential diagnosis follows a logical framework:
9.2 Key Differentials — Detailed Breakdown
A. Crohn's Disease (CD) — The Most Important Differential
This is the single most important differential because both are IBD, share overlapping features, and roughly 10% of cases fail to be classified between UC and CD (indeterminate colitis) [1][2].
Why it can mimic UC: Both can present with bloody diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and extraintestinal manifestations. When CD is limited to the colon (colonic CD, ~32% of CD cases [2]), the clinical picture can be virtually indistinguishable from UC.
How to distinguish from UC:
| Feature | Favours CD | Favours UC |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | Skip lesions, rectal sparing | Continuous from rectum proximally |
| Depth | Full thickness (transmural) | Mucosal/submucosal |
| Fistulae | Common (intestinal/perianal) | Never |
| Perianal disease | Up to 40% | Rare |
| Benign stricture | Common | Rare (suspect malignancy if present) |
| Granulomas on biopsy | Present (must exclude TB) | Absent |
| Goblet cells | Preserved | Depleted |
| Ulcers | Deep, focal, cobblestone | Shallow, diffuse |
| Pseudopolyps | Rare | Present |
| Serological markers | ASCA positive | pANCA positive |
| Small bowel involvement | Yes (especially terminal ileum) | No (except backwash ileitis) |
| Upper GI involvement | Yes (mouth to anus) | No |
| Smoking | Risk factor (worsens disease) | Protective |
| Appendicectomy | Risk factor | Protective |
When to Think Indeterminate Colitis
If a patient has colonic-only IBD with features of BOTH UC and CD — e.g., continuous colitis with some deep ulcers, or diffuse colitis with a few skip areas — the label "indeterminate colitis" is applied. This occurs in ~10% of IBD patients [1]. The practical point is that surgical management follows UC protocols (i.e., proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is still an option, though pouch failure rates are slightly higher).
B. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Why it can mimic UC: IBS presents with chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits [2], which overlaps with mild UC.
Why it is NOT UC — first principles reasoning:
- IBS is a functional disorder — there is no organic pathology, no mucosal inflammation, no ulceration
- IBS does NOT cause:
- Bloody stools (if a patient has blood in the stool, it is NOT IBS until proven otherwise)
- Raised inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR, faecal calprotectin are all normal)
- Weight loss, anaemia, fever, or nocturnal symptoms
- Abnormal endoscopy or histology
Key distinguishing features:
| Feature | IBS | UC |
|---|---|---|
| PR bleeding | Absent | Present (hallmark) |
| Faecal calprotectin | Normal ( < 50 μg/g) | Elevated |
| CRP/ESR | Normal | Elevated |
| Endoscopy | Normal | Mucosal inflammation, ulceration, pseudopolyps |
| Nocturnal symptoms | Absent (functional pain does not wake patients) | Present (severe UC causes nocturnal diarrhoea) |
| Rome IV criteria | Meets criteria for functional disorder | Does not meet criteria |
Clinical pearl: Faecal calprotectin is the best non-invasive test to distinguish IBD from IBS. It is a neutrophil-derived protein (60% of neutrophil cytosol) and is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [5]. A normal faecal calprotectin essentially excludes active IBD and points toward IBS.
C. Infectious Colitis
Infection including E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, and amoebiasis should be excluded with stool studies [2]. C. difficile infection should be considered particularly in patients treated with antibiotics [2].
Why infectious colitis can mimic UC: Acute infectious colitis can produce identical symptoms — bloody diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, tenesmus, fever. On endoscopy, some infections (e.g., Shigella, E. histolytica) can cause diffuse colonic inflammation with shallow ulceration that looks exactly like UC.
Why the distinction is critical: Treating infectious colitis with immunosuppression (steroids, azathioprine) would worsen the infection catastrophically. Conversely, treating UC with antibiotics alone would not control the underlying immune-mediated process.
How to distinguish:
| Feature | Infectious Colitis | UC |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Acute (days to 1–2 weeks) | Chronic, insidious (weeks to months) |
| Duration | Usually self-limiting ( < 4–6 weeks) | Chronic, relapsing-remitting |
| Travel history | Often positive (endemic areas for amoebiasis, Salmonella, etc.) | Not relevant |
| Antibiotic use | Recent antibiotics → C. difficile [2] | Not a trigger (though antibiotics can worsen UC) |
| Stool culture / PCR | Positive for pathogen | Negative |
| Histology | Acute inflammation, no chronic architectural changes | Chronic architectural changes (crypt distortion, branching, goblet cell depletion) |
| Sexual history | Neisseria gonorrhoeae and HSV are associated with proctitis [2] | Not relevant |
Specific pathogens to consider:
| Pathogen | Key Features | Why It Mimics UC |
|---|---|---|
| C. difficile | Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis [2]; produces toxin A (enterotoxin) and toxin B (cytotoxin); pseudomembranes on endoscopy | Can cause diffuse colitis with bloody diarrhoea. Can also superinfect existing UC (always check C. diff toxin in UC flares!) |
| Salmonella / Shigella / Campylobacter | Acute dysentery with bloody stools, fever | Self-limiting; stool culture positive |
| E. coli O157:H7 | Produces Shiga toxin → haemorrhagic colitis, HUS | Bloody diarrhoea, abdominal cramps |
| Entamoeba histolytica | Travel to endemic areas (South/Southeast Asia, Africa) [2]; flask-shaped ulcers on biopsy | Chronic bloody diarrhoea; can cause amoebic liver abscess |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | Terminal ileitis (mimics CD more than UC); sometimes misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis [6] | RLQ pain, diarrhoea |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Must exclude enteric TB (especially in Hong Kong!) [3]; caseating granulomas, ileocaecal involvement | Can cause chronic colitis with granulomas (mimics CD more than UC) |
| CMV | Immunocompromised patients; can reactivate in patients on immunosuppression for UC | Can cause colitis with deep ulcers, may complicate existing UC (steroid-refractory UC should be tested for CMV) |
Must Exclude Infections Before Starting Immunosuppression
Every patient presenting with a first episode of colitis MUST have stool studies (microscopy for ova and parasites, culture, C. difficile toxin PCR) before immunosuppressive therapy is started. In Hong Kong specifically, TB testing is mandatory — TB can mimic IBD and immunosuppression in the setting of undiagnosed TB is life-threatening. Hepatitis serology and HIV testing should also be performed [5].
D. Ischaemic Colitis
Why it can mimic UC: Ischaemic colitis presents with rapid onset of abdominal pain, haematochezia or bloody diarrhoea [4]. On endoscopy, the mucosa may appear oedematous, friable, and ulcerated — resembling UC.
Why it is NOT UC — first principles reasoning:
- Ischaemic colitis results from inadequate blood supply to the colon (usually from low-flow states or atherosclerotic disease), NOT from immune-mediated mucosal inflammation
- It characteristically affects watershed areas (splenic flexure and rectosigmoid junction) — these are the boundaries between the SMA and IMA territories, and between the IMA and internal iliac arteries
- The pattern is segmental (not continuous from rectum) and spares the rectum (dual blood supply from IMA and internal iliac artery protects it) — this is the opposite of UC which STARTS at the rectum
Key distinguishing features:
| Feature | Ischaemic Colitis | UC |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Acute, sudden | Gradual, insidious |
| Risk factors | Advanced age, hypertension, DM, dehydration, laxative use, haemodialysis, OCP, AF, atherosclerotic disease [4] | Younger patients, family history of IBD |
| Distribution | Segmental, watershed areas; rectum usually spared | Continuous from rectum |
| CT findings | Segmental colonic wall thickening, "thumbprinting" (submucosal oedema/haemorrhage) | Continuous colonic wall thickening, loss of haustral pattern |
| Endoscopy | Segmental with sharp demarcation ("line of demarcation"), bluish/dusky mucosa | Continuous erythema, friability, shallow ulcers, pseudopolyps |
| Chronicity | Usually self-limiting (resolves in 1–2 weeks); can stricture | Chronic, relapsing |
E. Radiation Colitis / Proctitis
Radiation colitis occurs weeks to years after abdominal or pelvic irradiation [2].
Why it can mimic UC: Presents with chronic bloody diarrhoea, tenesmus, and rectal bleeding — identical symptoms to UC. The rectum is often involved (because pelvic radiation for cervical/prostate/rectal cancer directly damages it).
How to distinguish:
- History of prior radiation therapy is the key clue — always ask about cancer treatment history
- Acute radiation injury often occurs within 6 weeks of therapy [4]; chronic radiation proctitis can develop months to years later
- Endoscopy shows telangiectasias (dilated blood vessels) in the radiated segment, which are characteristic and not seen in UC
- The inflammation is limited to the radiation field, not continuous from the rectum
F. Medication-Associated Colitis
NSAIDs can cause chronic diarrhoea and bleeding [2].
Why it can mimic UC: NSAIDs inhibit COX → reduced prostaglandin-mediated mucosal protection → mucosal ulceration and bleeding. The resulting colitis can look like mild-to-moderate UC on endoscopy.
How to distinguish:
- Temporal relationship with NSAID use (symptoms improve on stopping the drug)
- NSAIDs can also trigger or worsen existing UC — so this can be both a differential AND a precipitant
- Other drug causes of colitis to consider: mycophenolate mofetil, ipilimumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis — increasingly common), oral contraceptives
G. Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS)
Presents with abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, and bleeding. Has a characteristic appearance on histology with a thickened mucosal layer and distortion of crypt architecture [2].
Why it can mimic UC: Rectal bleeding + altered bowel habits + rectal ulceration on endoscopy.
How to distinguish:
- Despite the name, there may be multiple ulcers (or even just mucosal erythema without a discrete ulcer)
- Caused by chronic straining and rectal prolapse — the mechanical trauma of repeated straining and mucosal prolapse causes ischaemic injury to the rectal mucosa
- Histology is distinctive: fibromuscular obliteration of the lamina propria with thickened muscularis mucosae — this is NOT seen in UC
- The surrounding rectal mucosa is normal (no diffuse inflammation), unlike UC where the entire rectal mucosa is inflamed
H. Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Why it must always be considered: CRC can present with PR bleeding, change in bowel habits, tenesmus, and weight loss [7] — all of which overlap with UC. Furthermore, UC itself is a risk factor for CRC, so the two conditions may coexist.
How to distinguish:
- CRC typically presents in older patients ( > 50) with progressive symptoms
- Constitutional symptoms, change in stool calibre, alternating diarrhoea and constipation, IO symptoms, metastatic symptoms (jaundice, SOB, bone pain) [7] suggest CRC
- Endoscopy reveals a mass/lesion rather than diffuse mucosal inflammation
- In UC, strictures should be considered malignant until proven otherwise by endoscopy with biopsy [2] — a stricture in UC is CRC until proven otherwise
I. Diverticular Disease
Diverticular bleeding presents as painless massive PR bleeding (rupture of vasa recta) [8] — this is a different pattern from UC (which causes chronic bloody diarrhoea, not acute massive haemorrhage). However, diverticulitis can cause lower abdominal pain with altered bowel habits and low-grade PR bleeding, which may overlap with UC.
How to distinguish:
- Diverticular disease is primarily a disease of older patients (rare before age 30) [8]
- Right-sided diverticula are common in Asians [8] — this is important for Hong Kong
- Clinical triad of diverticulitis: lower abdominal pain + fever + leucocytosis [8] — UC has more prominent diarrhoea and bleeding rather than localised pain with fever
- CT scan shows pericolonic inflammation with diverticula in diverticulitis vs. mucosal thickening without diverticula in UC
- Diarrhoea rather than abdominal pain is the predominant symptom in IBD [4], whereas abdominal pain predominates in diverticulitis
J. Causes of Ileitis (Relevant When Backwash Ileitis Raises Concern)
Causes of ileitis include [6]:
- Crohn's disease
- Tuberculosis
- Radiation enteritis
- Bacterial infection (e.g., Campylobacter, Yersinia, Salmonella)
These are sometimes misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis [6]. If a patient being worked up for "UC" has prominent ileal disease beyond mild backwash ileitis, these differentials must be considered — particularly CD and TB in the Hong Kong context.
9.3 Causes of PR Bleeding — Comprehensive Differential
From the lecture slides, the causes of PR bleeding should be systematically categorised [9]:
| Anatomical Location | Causes |
|---|---|
| Anal | Haemorrhoids; Anal fissures; Cancer |
| Colorectal | Cancer; Rectal ulcers; Diverticular bleeding; Angiodysplasia; Inflammatory bowel disease; Radiation proctitis; Ischaemic bowel; Infective colitis; Post-polypectomy bleeding |
| Small bowel | Meckel's diverticulum; Angiodysplasia, haemangioma; Small bowel tumour; Small bowel ulcer (NSAID-related); Crohn's disease; Aortoenteric fistula |
| Upper GI bleeding | Massive UGIB can present as haematochezia |
9.4 Summary — Approach to Differential Diagnosis of Suspected UC
The systematic approach involves asking four key questions:
| Question | What to Consider |
|---|---|
| 1. Is this organic or functional? | IBS (functional) vs. IBD/infection/cancer (organic). Faecal calprotectin is the best discriminator. |
| 2. If organic, is this infectious? | Always exclude infection FIRST: stool culture, C. diff toxin, ova & parasites, TB testing. Sexual history for STI-associated proctitis. Travel history for amoebiasis. |
| 3. If non-infectious, is this IBD? | UC vs. CD vs. indeterminate colitis. Use clinical, endoscopic, histological, and serological features. |
| 4. If non-IBD, what else? | Ischaemic colitis (elderly, vascular risk factors, segmental). Radiation colitis (prior radiation). Drug-induced (NSAIDs). CRC (mass on colonoscopy). SRUS (straining history, characteristic histology). Diverticular disease. |
The essential investigations to request during the differential diagnosis workup include [2][5]:
- Stool examination: culture, C. difficile toxin, calprotectin
- Blood tests: CBP, CRP, ESR, albumin, ferritin
- Serological markers: pANCA (UC), ASCA (CD)
- Hepatitis serology, HIV, TB testing
- Colonoscopy with biopsies (gold standard)
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of UC
-
Crohn's disease — most important differential; distinguish by distribution (skip lesions, rectal sparing), depth (transmural), complications (fistulae, perianal disease, strictures), and serology (ASCA+ vs. pANCA+). ~10% are indeterminate.
-
IBS — functional, no blood, no raised inflammatory markers, normal faecal calprotectin and endoscopy.
-
Infectious colitis — MUST exclude before starting immunosuppression. Stool studies mandatory. C. difficile in antibiotic users; amoebiasis in travellers; TB in Hong Kong. STI proctitis (gonorrhoea, HSV) in MSM.
-
Ischaemic colitis — elderly, vascular risk factors, acute onset, segmental distribution at watershed areas, rectal sparing.
-
Radiation colitis — history of pelvic/abdominal radiation; telangiectasias on endoscopy.
-
Drug-induced colitis — temporal relationship with NSAIDs; resolves on cessation.
-
SRUS — straining history; fibromuscular obliteration on histology.
-
CRC — always consider; strictures in UC are malignant until proven otherwise.
-
Diverticular disease — older patients, painless massive bleeding (diverticular bleed) or pain + fever + leucocytosis (diverticulitis).
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis
1. A 35-year-old woman presents with 6 weeks of bloody diarrhoea and abdominal cramps. Before starting corticosteroids, what 3 categories of infections must you exclude and how?
Show mark scheme
1) Bacterial: Stool culture for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Yersinia. 2) C. difficile: Stool PCR for toxin A and B (especially if recent antibiotic use). 3) Parasitic: Stool microscopy for ova and parasites, antigen detection for Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium, Giardia. Also: TB testing (AFB smear, culture, and/or IGRA) is mandatory in Hong Kong. Hepatitis serology and HIV testing should also be done before immunosuppression.
2. Name 4 clinical features that would favour Crohn's disease over ulcerative colitis in a patient presenting with chronic colitis.
Show mark scheme
Any 4 of: 1) Skip lesions on endoscopy (vs continuous in UC). 2) Perianal disease (fissures, fistulae, abscesses) - up to 40% in CD, rare in UC. 3) Rectal sparing. 4) Fistula formation (enteroenteric, enterovesical, enterocutaneous). 5) Deep ulcers or cobblestone appearance. 6) Small bowel involvement. 7) Non-caseating granulomas on biopsy. 8) Abdominal mass. 9) ASCA positive (vs pANCA positive in UC).
3. How does faecal calprotectin help distinguish IBS from IBD, and why is it the best non-invasive marker?
Show mark scheme
Faecal calprotectin is a neutrophil-derived protein constituting 60% of neutrophil cytosol. It is released when neutrophils infiltrate the intestinal wall during inflammation. It is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD and correlates well with endoscopic disease activity. In IBS (functional disorder with no mucosal inflammation), calprotectin is normal (below 50 mcg/g). An elevated calprotectin strongly suggests organic inflammatory pathology (IBD, infection) and warrants colonoscopy. A normal calprotectin essentially rules out active IBD.
4. Explain why ischaemic colitis typically spares the rectum, and how this helps distinguish it from UC.
Show mark scheme
The rectum has a dual blood supply from the IMA (superior rectal artery) and the internal iliac arteries (middle and inferior rectal arteries). This redundant supply protects it from ischaemia. Ischaemic colitis affects watershed areas (splenic flexure between SMA and IMA territories; rectosigmoid junction between IMA and internal iliac). In contrast, UC almost always starts at the rectum and extends proximally in a continuous fashion. Rectal sparing in a colitis case strongly argues against UC and favours ischaemic colitis or Crohn's disease.
5. A patient with known UC develops a colonic stricture. What is the most important concern and what should be done?
Show mark scheme
A stricture in UC should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. UC causes mucosal/submucosal inflammation, which rarely leads to benign strictures (unlike CD where transmural fibrosis commonly causes strictures). Therefore, any stricture in UC raises high suspicion for colorectal cancer arising from the chronic inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. The patient must undergo colonoscopy with multiple biopsies of the stricture to exclude malignancy.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (pp. 2, 6, 9, 11) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis sections: overview, etiology, clinical manifestation, differential diagnosis, diagnosis) [3] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease sections: comparison table, histological features) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Diverticular disease section: differential diagnosis including ischaemic colitis) [5] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 11 — Diagnosis: laboratory tests, faecal calprotectin) [6] Lecture slides: GC 195. Lower and diffuse abdominal pain RLQ problems; pelvic inflammatory disease; peritonitis and abdominal emergencies.pdf (p. 20 — Ileitis causes) [7] Senior notes: maxim.md (LGIB DDx table — colorectal carcinoma features) [8] Senior notes: maxim.md (Diverticular disease section) [9] Lecture slides: GC 186. Lower and diffuse abdominal painfresh blood in stool.pdf (p. 8 — Causes of PR bleeding)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm & Investigations for Ulcerative Colitis
10.1 Diagnostic Criteria — First Principles
There is no single gold-standard diagnostic test for UC. Unlike, say, diabetes (where a fasting glucose or HbA1c gives you a definitive cut-off), UC is diagnosed by the convergence of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histological findings combined with the exclusion of other causes of colitis (especially infection and CD). Think of it as a jigsaw puzzle — no single piece is diagnostic, but when you put together the clinical picture + endoscopy + histology + negative stool studies, the diagnosis becomes clear.
The key diagnostic pillars are:
- Compatible clinical presentation — chronic/relapsing bloody diarrhoea, tenesmus, urgency, +/- extraintestinal manifestations
- Endoscopic findings — continuous mucosal inflammation starting from the rectum, with characteristic features (see below)
- Histological confirmation — mucosal/submucosal inflammation with crypt architectural distortion, cryptitis/crypt abscesses, goblet cell depletion
- Exclusion of infections and other mimics — negative stool studies, negative TB testing
- Serological and biochemical support — pANCA positivity, raised inflammatory markers, raised faecal calprotectin
There Is No Single Diagnostic Criterion for UC
Unlike some conditions with formal diagnostic criteria (e.g., Jones criteria for rheumatic fever), UC is diagnosed by the combination of clinical history, endoscopy, histology, and exclusion of differentials. The diagnosis should be revisited if the clinical course is atypical — up to 10% of colitis cases initially labelled as UC may be reclassified as CD or indeterminate colitis over time.
10.2 Diagnostic Algorithm
The algorithm below reflects the systematic approach from clinical suspicion through to definitive diagnosis and disease classification:
10.3 History Taking — Targeted Questions
Patient history should cover [5]:
| Domain | Key Questions | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Bowel symptoms | Onset, duration, frequency, blood/mucus, urgency, tenesmus, nocturnal symptoms | Characterise the presentation; nocturnal symptoms suggest organic disease (not IBS) |
| Medications | NSAIDs (trigger flare/mimic UC); antibiotics (C. difficile risk) [2] | Must exclude drug-induced colitis and superimposed C. diff |
| Surgery | Prior appendicectomy (protective for UC; risk factor for CD) | Alters pretest probability |
| Drug history | Current medications, immunosuppression, biologics | Baseline before starting therapy; drug interactions |
| Immunisation status | Hep B, varicella, influenza, pneumococcal, COVID-19 | Must assess before starting immunosuppression [5] — live vaccines contraindicated on biologics/thiopurines |
| Sexual history | Neisseria gonorrhoeae and HSV are associated with proctitis [2] | STI proctitis can mimic UC proctitis, especially in MSM |
| Travel history | Areas endemic for parasitic infection such as amoebiasis [2] | Amoebic colitis mimics UC |
| Family history | IBD in first-degree relatives | Increases pretest probability |
10.4 Physical Examination
Physical examination should include [5]:
| Examination | Findings | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| General examination | Pallor, vital signs (fever, hypotension, tachycardia) [2] | Assess severity (Truelove & Witts); tachycardia + fever = severe |
| Abdomen | Tenderness (LLQ for left-sided UC; diffuse for pancolitis), distension (toxic megacolon), peritonism (perforation) | Localise disease; detect complications |
| Perianal region | Skin tags, fissures, fistulae, abscess, PR exam [5] | If perianal disease is found → strongly consider CD instead of UC (perianal disease is rare in UC) |
| Extraintestinal inspections | Mouth (aphthous ulcers), eyes (episcleritis, uveitis), skin (erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum), joints (arthropathy) [5] | Screen for EIMs; oral ulcers more suggestive of CD |
| Digital rectal examination | Blood/mucus on glove, rectal tenderness [2] | Confirms rectal involvement; assesses for rectal mass |
10.5 Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown
A. Laboratory Tests (Blood)
Blood tests: CBP, CRP, ESR, albumin, ferritin [5]
| Test | Expected Findings in UC | Pathophysiological Basis / Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| CBP (Complete Blood Picture) with differentials | Anaemia (may be microcytic from iron deficiency or normocytic from chronic disease); leucocytosis (active inflammation or infection); thrombocytosis (reactive) [2] | Iron deficiency anaemia: chronic blood loss from friable ulcerated mucosa → depleted iron stores → low MCV, low ferritin, low serum iron, high TIBC. Anaemia of chronic disease: IL-6 → hepcidin → iron sequestration → low serum iron but normal/high ferritin. Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia: rare EIM, Coombs-positive [2] |
| CRP (C-reactive protein) | Elevated in active disease; CRP in Crohn disease is typically higher than in ulcerative colitis [2]. CRP monitoring under therapy is useful to document efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment [2] | CRP is an acute-phase reactant produced by the liver in response to IL-6. In UC, the CRP rise is often modest (because inflammation is mucosal, not transmural), so a normal CRP does NOT exclude active UC. However, a significantly elevated CRP ( > 30 mg/L) in UC = severe disease (Truelove & Witts) and suggests deep/extensive inflammation |
| ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) | Elevated ( > 30 mm/h = severe) | ESR rises with increased fibrinogen and immunoglobulins in chronic inflammation. Less specific than CRP but included in Truelove & Witts criteria. Slow to rise and slow to fall — better reflects chronic disease activity |
| Albumin | Hypoalbuminemia [2] | Malabsorption and protein-losing enteropathy [2] — inflamed, denuded colonic mucosa leaks albumin into the lumen. Also: decreased hepatic synthesis due to chronic inflammation (negative acute-phase reactant) and reduced oral intake. Low albumin is a marker of disease severity and nutritional status |
| Ferritin | May be low (iron deficiency) or normal/elevated (acute-phase reactant in active inflammation) | Ferritin is both an iron storage marker AND an acute-phase reactant. In active UC, it can be misleadingly normal even with true iron deficiency. Always interpret with transferrin saturation and TIBC |
| Electrolyte profile | Hypokalaemia [2] | Chronic diarrhoea → loss of K⁺ in stool (colonic secretion is K⁺-rich). Can also lose bicarbonate → non-anion gap metabolic acidosis |
| RFT | Usually normal; assess baseline before starting nephrotoxic drugs (e.g., ciclosporin, 5-ASA can rarely cause interstitial nephritis) | Baseline renal function important for drug dosing |
| LFT | May show cholestatic pattern if concurrent PSC; elevated ALP/GGT | Screen for PSC; also baseline before azathioprine/methotrexate |
| Serum iron and vitamin B12 level | Low iron (chronic blood loss); vitamin B12 deficiency (rare in UC, more relevant in CD with ileal disease/resection) [2] | Iron deficiency from chronic GI blood loss; B12 deficiency relevant if backwash ileitis or post-surgical short bowel |
B. Serological Markers
Serological markers from lecture slides and notes [2][5]:
| Marker | Association | Sensitivity/Specificity | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| pANCA (Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) | Common in UC [2][5] | Sensitivity ~60–70% for UC; specificity ~85% | pANCA targets myeloperoxidase in neutrophil perinuclear granules. Positive pANCA supports UC diagnosis, but ~30–40% of UC patients are pANCA-negative, so a negative result does NOT exclude UC |
| ASCA (Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies) | Common in CD [2][5] | Sensitivity ~60% for CD; specificity ~85% | ASCA targets mannose epitopes in the yeast S. cerevisiae cell wall — these share structural similarity with microbial antigens in CD. ASCA-positive + pANCA-negative strongly favours CD |
| Anti-OmpC antibody | Potential serological marker for IBD [2] | Research stage | Targets outer membrane porin C of E. coli; reflects loss of immune tolerance to commensal bacteria |
Serological Markers Are Supportive, Not Diagnostic
pANCA and ASCA help differentiate UC from CD in indeterminate cases but are NOT diagnostic on their own. They have imperfect sensitivity and specificity. The combination of pANCA+/ASCA− favours UC, while pANCA−/ASCA+ favours CD. But endoscopy + histology remain the gold standard.
C. Stool Tests
Stool examination: culture, Cl. difficile toxin, calprotectin [5]
| Test | Target | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Stool culture | Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter [2] | Must exclude bacterial infection before immunosuppression |
| Microscopy | Ova, parasites [2] | Exclude amoebiasis (Entamoeba histolytica), Giardia, Cryptosporidium |
| Antigen detection | E. coli O157:H7, Entamoeba, Cryptosporidium, Giardia [2] | More sensitive than microscopy for certain parasites |
| PCR | C. difficile toxin A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) [2]; Shiga toxin | C. diff is critical to exclude — can cause initial presentation mimicking UC, or can superinfect existing UC causing a flare refractory to standard therapy |
| Faecal calprotectin | Intestinal inflammation (non-specific) | Neutrophil-derived protein, 60% of neutrophil cytosol [5]. Most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [5]. Well correlated with endoscopic disease activity [5]. Predicts disease relapse and postoperative relapse [5]. Normal value ( < 50 μg/g) essentially excludes active IBD. Values > 150–250 μg/g strongly suggest mucosal inflammation. Used for: (1) screening (IBD vs IBS), (2) monitoring treatment response, (3) predicting relapse |
Why is faecal calprotectin so useful? From first principles: when neutrophils infiltrate the inflamed intestinal wall (as happens in UC with cryptitis and crypt abscesses), they release their cytoplasmic contents into the lumen. Calprotectin constitutes 60% of the neutrophil cytoplasm. It is resistant to degradation by intestinal proteases, so it survives transit through the GI tract and can be measured in stool. The more mucosal inflammation there is, the more neutrophils infiltrate, and the higher the faecal calprotectin. This is why it correlates so well with endoscopic disease activity.
D. Infection Screening (Pre-Treatment)
Hepatitis serology, HIV, TB testing [5]
| Test | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Hepatitis B surface antigen + anti-HBc | Immunosuppression (steroids, thiopurines, biologics) can cause HBV reactivation → fulminant hepatitis. Must know HBV status before treatment. If positive → antiviral prophylaxis |
| Hepatitis C antibody | Baseline screening; potential hepatotoxicity of immunosuppressants |
| HIV testing | Immunosuppression in undiagnosed HIV is dangerous; also, HIV-associated enteropathy can mimic IBD |
| TB testing (IGRA / Mantoux + CXR) | MUST do AFB smear and culture with sensitivity testing to rule out enteric TB [2]. Anti-TNF biologics reactivate latent TB → disseminated TB → death. TB ileocolitis mimics CD. In Hong Kong (intermediate TB burden), this is mandatory before starting biologics |
Hong Kong Context — TB Screening Is Mandatory
Hong Kong has an intermediate burden of TB. AFB smear and culture with sensitivity testing must be done to rule out enteric TB [2]. This is non-negotiable before starting immunosuppression, especially anti-TNF agents. Enteric TB can cause granulomatous inflammation that mimics CD, and giving anti-TNF to a patient with undiagnosed TB is potentially fatal.
E. Radiological Investigations
| Modality | Indication | Key Findings | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| CXR | Indicated in patients presenting with fever or if perforation is suspected [2] | Free gas under diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum) | If free air → perforation → surgical emergency. Also baseline for TB screening (pulmonary TB) |
| AXR (Abdominal X-ray) | Indicated to evaluate for colonic calibre [2] | Dilated colon, mucosal oedema ("thumb-printing"), loss of haustral markings, "lead pipe" colon (chronic UC) | Toxic megacolon: total or segmental non-obstructive dilatation of colon ≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm with systemic toxicity [2]. AXR is the first-line investigation for suspected toxic megacolon. Also look for small bowel dilatation (ileus) |
| CT abdomen/pelvis | Not first-line for UC diagnosis, but useful for complications (abscess, perforation, toxic megacolon) or when colonoscopy is contraindicated | Colonic wall thickening, pericolonic fat stranding, "accordion sign" (alternating contrast and oedematous mucosa), complications | Helps differentiate UC complications from other surgical emergencies. Also useful in the acute setting when colonoscopy is unsafe |
| MR enterography (MRE) or CT enterography (CTE) | Small bowel assessment — mainly for CD [5] | Not typically needed in UC (no small bowel involvement); used if backwash ileitis vs. CD ileal disease is uncertain | MRE is preferred over CTE in young patients (no ionising radiation) [5]. If ileal disease is prominent, consider reclassifying as CD |
F. Endoscopy — The Gold Standard
Imaging and endoscopy [5]:
| Modality | When to Use | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopy | Colonic assessment in UC/CD [5]. Standard investigation for suspected UC. Allows full visualisation of colon + terminal ileum + tissue biopsy | The definitive diagnostic investigation for UC |
| Sigmoidoscopy | For severe active disease [5]. Used when full colonoscopy is too risky (risk of perforation in severe/fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon) | Safer in acute severe UC — avoids the need for full bowel prep and avoids manipulating a severely inflamed, dilated colon. Sufficient to confirm diagnosis (since UC always involves the rectum) and obtain biopsies |
Why colonoscopy and not just sigmoidoscopy?
- Colonoscopy allows you to see the full extent of disease (needed for Montreal classification E1/E2/E3, which determines treatment and surveillance strategy)
- Allows ileal intubation to assess for backwash ileitis or ileal disease that might suggest CD
- Biopsy should be taken from the left and right colon and rectum even if normal in appearance to assess for microscopic inflammation [2] — this is critical because treated UC may have patchy healing, and microscopic disease may exist without macroscopic changes
Contraindications to colonoscopy in UC context [10]:
- Known or suspected perforation
- Acute diverticulitis
- Fulminant colitis (use sigmoidoscopy instead)
Endoscopic Findings in UC
| Feature | Description | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform and continuous lesions | Disease starts at rectum and extends proximally without skip areas [2] | Continuous mucosal immune activation spreading retrograde from the rectum |
| Hyperaemic mucosa | Red, engorged mucosal surface | Mucosal engorgement — inflammatory mediators (histamine, prostaglandins, NO) cause vasodilation of mucosal and submucosal vessels [2] |
| Diffuse granularity of mucosa | Mucosa has a sandpaper-like, granular texture instead of smooth, glistening surface | Loss of the normal smooth mucosal surface due to widespread superficial oedema and inflammatory cell infiltration |
| Erosion, oedema, and exudates | Superficial mucosal breaks with mucopurulent exudate [2] | Neutrophil-mediated destruction of surface epithelium; exudate = fibrin, neutrophils, necrotic debris |
| Touch friability, petechiae, and bleeding | Mucosa bleeds on light contact with the endoscope [2] | The inflamed mucosa is so fragile (loss of epithelial integrity + dilated submucosal vessels close to the surface) that minimal mechanical trauma causes bleeding |
| Shallow ulceration | Ulcers are superficial, not deep [2] | Inflammation is limited to mucosa/submucosa — ulcers do not penetrate the muscularis propria (unlike the deep, transmural ulcers of CD) |
| Pseudopolyps | Hypertrophied masses of mucous membrane resembling polyps [2] | Islands of regenerating/hypertrophied mucosa projecting above surrounding denuded, ulcerated mucosa. Indicate prior severe inflammation. NOT neoplastic, but are a risk factor for IBD-associated CRC [1] |
| Loss of normal vascular pattern | Normal submucosal vascular pattern is obscured | Mucosal oedema and inflammatory infiltrate obscure the delicate submucosal vessels normally visible through transparent healthy mucosa |
| Loss of haustral folds | "Lead pipe" colon on imaging; featureless colon on endoscopy | Chronic inflammation → fibrosis of the submucosa → loss of the semilunar folds (haustra) that normally give the colon its segmented appearance. This is a sign of long-standing, burnt-out disease |
Endoscopic Severity Scoring — Mayo Endoscopic Subscore
The Mayo endoscopic subscore is widely used to grade endoscopic severity:
| Score | Findings | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Normal or inactive | No inflammation |
| 1 | Mild | Erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability |
| 2 | Moderate | Marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions |
| 3 | Severe | Spontaneous bleeding, ulceration |
This score is important because it correlates with treatment decisions and is used as an endpoint in clinical trials for UC therapeutics.
G. Histological Findings — Biopsy Interpretation
Histological findings in UC [2]:
| Feature | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Mucosal and submucosal (superficial) inflammation | Inflammatory infiltrate (neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells) confined to the mucosa and submucosa | Distinguishes UC from CD (which is transmural) [2] |
| Diffuse, continuous involvement | Inflammation involves the entire biopsy uniformly, without patchy or skip areas | Distinguishes from CD (focal, patchy) [2] |
| Cryptitis | Neutrophil infiltration into crypt epithelium | Active inflammation — neutrophils migrating from the lamina propria into the crypt lumen |
| Crypt abscesses | Collections of neutrophils within the crypt lumen | The crypt lumen fills with neutrophils, forming a microabscess. Shared with CD but more prominent in UC |
| Crypt architectural distortion | Crypt branching, shortening, and disarray [2] | A hallmark of chronicity — repeated cycles of destruction and regeneration lead to irregular crypt arrangement. Normal crypts are parallel, evenly spaced, and extend from muscularis mucosae to surface. Distorted crypts are branched, irregular, shortened |
| Goblet cell depletion | Reduced numbers of mucin-secreting goblet cells | Chronic inflammatory destruction of goblet cells → reduced mucus production → impaired mucosal barrier. In CD, goblet cells are NOT depleted [2] — this is a key distinguishing feature |
| Granulomas | Rare in UC [2] | If granulomas are found, consider CD (where they are common) or TB (caseating granulomas). Non-caseating granulomas in a colitis specimen should prompt reclassification to CD or "indeterminate colitis" |
| Basal plasmacytosis | Plasma cells at the base of the mucosa (between crypt bases and muscularis mucosae) | An early and sensitive marker of IBD chronicity — normally, the crypt bases are free of plasma cells. Their presence indicates chronic immune activation |
| Paneth cell metaplasia | Paneth cells appearing in the left colon (they are normally found only in the small bowel and right colon) | A marker of chronic mucosal injury and regeneration — the colonic epithelium undergoes metaplastic change in response to persistent inflammation |
Key Histological Features — UC vs CD
UC histology = "Diffuse, superficial, and depleted"
- Diffuse continuous involvement
- Superficial (mucosal/submucosal) inflammation
- Goblet cell depletion
- Crypt distortion with abscesses
- NO granulomas
CD histology = "Patchy, deep, and granulomatous"
- Focal patchy involvement
- Transmural inflammation
- Goblet cells preserved
- Non-caseating granulomas (MUST exclude TB)
H. Additional Endoscopic Modalities
From lecture slides [5]:
| Modality | Primary Role | Relevance to UC |
|---|---|---|
| Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) | Small bowel assessment in CD | NOT standard in UC (no small bowel disease). May be used if considering reclassification to CD |
| Single or double balloon enteroscopy | Small bowel assessment in CD | Deep small bowel visualisation; rarely needed in UC |
| OGD | Foregut symptoms in CD | UC does not involve the upper GI tract. If upper GI symptoms are present, consider CD |
| MRI anal canal | Perianal assessment in CD | UC does not cause perianal disease. If perianal pathology is found → reconsider CD |
10.6 Disease Extent Classification — Montreal System (Endoscopic)
Montreal phenotypic classification — according to extent of inflammation observed at colonoscopy [2]. This influences treatment modality and timing of starting surveillance and its frequency [2].
| Code | Classification | Description | Approximate HK Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Proctitis | Involvement limited to rectum | ~34.5% (proctosigmoiditis group) |
| E2 | Left-sided UC (distal UC) | Involvement extending up to the splenic flexure | ~32% |
| E3 | Extensive UC (pancolitis) | Involvement extending proximal to the splenic flexure | ~33.5% |
UC distribution from lecture slides [5]: Pancolitis: Entire colon 18%; Left colitis: Up to the left flexure 28%; Proctitis: Rectosigmoid 54%
HK vs Global Distribution Difference
Note the difference between global and HK data. Globally, proctitis is the most common form at ~54% [5], whereas in HK the distribution is roughly equal thirds [2]. This may reflect differences in when patients present (HK patients may present later with more extensive disease) or population genetics. Know both sets of numbers for exams.
Why does extent matter?
- Treatment: Proctitis (E1) can often be managed with topical (rectal) 5-ASA alone; left-sided (E2) may need combined oral + rectal; pancolitis (E3) always needs systemic therapy
- CRC surveillance timing: More extensive disease = earlier and more frequent surveillance colonoscopies
- Prognosis: Pancolitis has higher rates of hospitalisation, colectomy, and CRC risk
10.7 Severity Assessment — Modified Truelove and Witts' Criteria
This is not a diagnostic criterion per se, but is integral to the initial workup because it determines immediate management (outpatient vs. admission, oral vs. IV therapy):
| Parameter | Mild | Moderate | Severe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloody stools/day | < 4 | ≥ 4 | ≥ 6 |
| Pulse | < 90 bpm | ≤ 90 bpm | > 90 bpm |
| Temperature | < 37.5°C | ≤ 37.8°C | > 37.8°C |
| Haemoglobin | > 11.5 g/dL | ≥ 10.5 g/dL | < 10.5 g/dL |
| ESR | < 20 mm/h | < 30 mm/h | > 30 mm/h |
| CRP | Normal | ≤ 30 mg/L | > 30 mg/L |
Interpretation: Immediate admission warranted in severe disease [2].
Why these particular parameters?
- Bloody stools/day → directly reflects the extent and severity of mucosal ulceration and bleeding
- Pulse and temperature → systemic inflammatory response; tachycardia also reflects hypovolaemia from blood/fluid loss
- Haemoglobin → chronic blood loss severity
- ESR/CRP → magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response
10.8 Putting It All Together — The Diagnostic Synthesis
To make a diagnosis of UC, you need:
| Step | Requirement | Test |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Compatible clinical features | History + examination |
| 2 | Evidence of mucosal inflammation | Faecal calprotectin (screening); colonoscopy (definitive) |
| 3 | Characteristic endoscopic pattern | Continuous, rectal involvement, shallow ulcers, pseudopolyps, friability |
| 4 | Confirmatory histology | Mucosal/submucosal inflammation, crypt distortion, goblet cell depletion, no granulomas |
| 5 | Exclusion of infections | Stool studies (culture, C. diff, O&P), TB testing, Hep B/C, HIV |
| 6 | Exclusion of other mimics | Clinical context + endoscopy + histology to exclude ischaemic, radiation, drug-induced colitis, CRC |
| 7 | Classification | Montreal extent (E1/E2/E3) + severity (Truelove & Witts) |
When to reconsider the diagnosis: If the patient develops features atypical for UC (perianal disease, small bowel strictures, non-caseating granulomas on biopsy, poor response to standard UC therapy), reclassify as CD or indeterminate colitis. Up to 10% of patients are reclassified over time.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of UC
No single diagnostic criterion — UC is diagnosed by combining clinical features + endoscopy + histology + exclusion of infections.
Focused history: Bowel symptoms, drug history (NSAIDs, antibiotics), sexual history (STI proctitis), travel history (amoebiasis), family history, immunisation status.
Examination: General (pallor, fever, tachycardia) + abdomen + perianal (MUST check — perianal disease = think CD) + EIM screen (mouth, eyes, skin, joints).
Key blood tests: CBP, CRP, ESR, albumin, ferritin, pANCA (UC) vs ASCA (CD). Hepatitis serology, HIV, TB testing before immunosuppression.
Key stool tests: Culture, C. difficile toxin PCR, ova & parasites, faecal calprotectin (most sensitive non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation; neutrophil-derived; correlates with endoscopic activity; predicts relapse).
Endoscopy: Colonoscopy = gold standard. Use flexible sigmoidoscopy in acute severe UC (safer). Biopsy from left colon, right colon, and rectum even if normal-appearing. MUST do AFB smear and culture to exclude enteric TB.
Endoscopic findings: Continuous from rectum; hyperaemia; granularity; friability; shallow ulcers; pseudopolyps; loss of vascular pattern.
Histological findings: Mucosal/submucosal inflammation; diffuse continuous; crypt distortion and abscesses; goblet cell depletion; NO granulomas.
Radiology: AXR for toxic megacolon (≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm); CXR if perforation suspected.
Classify: Montreal E1/E2/E3 (determines treatment + surveillance). Severity by Modified Truelove & Witts (determines admission + treatment intensity).
Active Recall - Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis
1. A patient presents with acute severe UC (8 bloody stools/day, pulse 100 bpm, temp 38.2C, Hb 9.8 g/dL). Why should you perform flexible sigmoidoscopy rather than full colonoscopy?
Show mark scheme
In acute severe UC or fulminant colitis, full colonoscopy carries a high risk of perforation because the colonic wall is severely inflamed, thinned, and may be dilated. Full bowel preparation is also poorly tolerated and may precipitate toxic megacolon. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is safer — it does not require full bowel prep, is shorter, and is sufficient to confirm diagnosis and obtain biopsies since UC always involves the rectum. Full colonoscopy can be deferred until the acute episode has been treated.
2. List 4 stool tests you would order in a patient with suspected UC and explain the rationale for each.
Show mark scheme
1) Stool culture (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Yersinia) — exclude bacterial infectious colitis. 2) C. difficile toxin PCR (toxin A and B) — exclude antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis and C. diff superinfection. 3) Stool microscopy/antigen detection for ova, parasites, Entamoeba, Giardia, Cryptosporidium — exclude parasitic causes especially amoebiasis. 4) Faecal calprotectin — neutrophil-derived marker correlating with endoscopic disease activity; most sensitive non-invasive marker; helps distinguish IBD from IBS; predicts relapse.
3. Explain why biopsies should be taken from the left colon, right colon, and rectum even when these areas appear macroscopically normal on colonoscopy.
Show mark scheme
Three reasons: 1) Microscopic inflammation may exist even without macroscopic changes — especially in treated UC where patchy healing can occur. 2) Segmental biopsies are needed to determine the true extent of disease (Montreal classification E1/E2/E3), which affects treatment and surveillance planning. 3) Biopsies may reveal features that change the diagnosis — e.g., granulomas suggesting CD, or features of microscopic colitis. Also, AFB staining and culture of biopsies is needed to exclude enteric TB.
4. Describe 3 endoscopic features that distinguish UC from CD and explain the pathophysiological basis for each.
Show mark scheme
1) Continuous inflammation vs skip lesions — UC spreads contiguously from rectum due to mucosal-limited retrograde immune activation; CD has patchy transmural disease. 2) Shallow ulceration vs deep ulcers/cobblestoning — UC inflammation limited to mucosa/submucosa so ulcers stay superficial; CD transmural inflammation causes deep ulcers. 3) Pseudopolyps present in UC vs absent in CD — widespread shallow ulceration in UC creates islands of regenerating mucosa; in CD focal deep ulcers do not produce this pattern. Also accept: no fistulae in UC (not transmural), friability/granularity (diffuse superficial inflammation).
5. A patient with UC has a faecal calprotectin of 400 mcg/g but a normal CRP. Is active disease likely? Explain why CRP can be normal in active UC.
Show mark scheme
Active disease is very likely. Faecal calprotectin is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation and correlates directly with endoscopic activity. CRP can be normal in active UC because UC is a mucosal/submucosal disease — the inflammation may not be extensive or deep enough to generate a significant systemic acute-phase response. CRP is produced by the liver in response to IL-6, and the IL-6 levels in UC are often lower than in CD (where transmural inflammation produces a greater systemic inflammatory signal). Up to 50% of patients with active UC can have a normal CRP. Always trust faecal calprotectin over CRP for assessing UC activity.
6. What infection screening tests must be done before starting immunosuppressive therapy in UC, and why is each important?
Show mark scheme
1) Hepatitis B serology (HBsAg, anti-HBc) — immunosuppression/biologics can reactivate HBV causing fulminant hepatitis; need antiviral prophylaxis if positive. 2) Hepatitis C antibody — baseline screening; hepatotoxicity risk with immunosuppressants. 3) HIV testing — undiagnosed HIV with immunosuppression is dangerous. 4) TB testing (IGRA/Mantoux + CXR, AFB smear and culture of biopsies) — anti-TNF agents reactivate latent TB causing disseminated disease; mandatory in Hong Kong (intermediate TB burden). 5) Varicella status — need to know before live vaccine contraindications with biologics.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 52 — IBD-associated CRC risk factors) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis sections: overview, diagnosis, biochemical tests, radiological tests, endoscopic findings, histological findings) [5] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (pp. 7, 10, 11, 12 — Diagnosis: patient history, physical examination, laboratory tests, faecal calprotectin, imaging and endoscopy, UC distribution) [10] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Colonoscopy section — indications and contraindications)
Management of Ulcerative Colitis
11.1 Principles of Management
The management of UC follows a logical, step-wise framework built on two core goals [2]:
- Induction of remission — control the acute flare
- Maintenance of remission — prevent relapse long-term
Principles of management: to induce and maintain remission taking into account disease activity, disease site, disease behaviour, and patient preference [2].
The treatment strategy is determined by two axes:
- Disease extent (Montreal E1 / E2 / E3) — determines route of drug delivery (topical vs. oral vs. systemic)
- Disease severity (Truelove & Witts: mild / moderate / severe) — determines intensity of therapy (5-ASA → steroids → rescue → surgery)
Key treatment principles from notes [2]:
- Start with topical treatment if mild left-sided disease
- Start with oral treatment if extensive disease
- Combination therapy (topical + oral) is more effective in inducing remission
- Consider rescue therapy in steroid-refractory disease (Day 3)
- Consider surgical treatment if no improvement within Day 4–7 of rescue therapy
11.2 Management Algorithm — Overview
11.3 Medical Treatment — Drug-by-Drug Breakdown
A. 5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA)
The cornerstone of UC therapy — the first drug you reach for in mild-to-moderate disease [2].
Name breakdown: "5-amino" = the active amine group; "salicylate" = derived from salicylic acid (related to aspirin). These are anti-inflammatory agents that act locally on the colonic mucosa.
Initial therapy in patients with mild to moderate UC who do not have systemic symptoms based on its relative safety to other drugs [2].
Topical 5-ASA is the first-line treatment in mild to moderate UC in those who are willing to use rectal therapy including suppositories or enemas [2].
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism of action | Anti-inflammatory effect [2] — 5-ASA inhibits the NF-κB pathway, scavenges reactive oxygen species, inhibits lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase locally, and reduces neutrophil chemotaxis. It acts topically on the mucosa — this is why rectal formulations work so well in distal disease |
| Clinical role | Induction agent AND maintenance agent [2] — unlike steroids, 5-ASA is effective for BOTH induction and maintenance |
| Route of administration | Mesalamine: Oral / Enema / Suppository [2]; Sulfasalazine: Oral [2] |
| Dosage | Mesalamine: 2–4.8 g/day oral; rectal: 1 g suppository (proctitis) or 4 g enema (left-sided); Sulfasalazine: 3–6 g/day oral |
Choosing the route by disease extent:
| Extent | Preferred Route | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| E1 (Proctitis) | Suppository (e.g., mesalamine 1 g OD–BD) | The suppository reaches and coats the rectal mucosa directly. Oral 5-ASA is released too proximally and does not reach the rectum in adequate concentration |
| E2 (Left-sided) | Enema (e.g., mesalamine 4 g) ± oral 5-ASA | Enema fluid distributes up to the splenic flexure. Combination with oral is more effective than either alone |
| E3 (Pancolitis) | Oral 5-ASA + topical (enema/suppository) | Oral formulations are designed to release 5-ASA throughout the colon. Adding topical therapy boosts rectal/distal drug levels. Combination therapy is more effective in inducing remission [2] |
Key formulations and differences:
| Drug | Key Feature | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine (Pentasa / Asacol) | Pure 5-ASA in pH-dependent or time-dependent release coating | Nephrotoxicity is the key adverse effect [2] (interstitial nephritis — monitor creatinine annually). Pentasa releases 5-ASA throughout the small bowel + colon; Asacol releases in the terminal ileum and colon (pH > 7) |
| Sulfasalazine | 5-ASA linked to sulfapyridine via an azo bond; colonic bacteria cleave the bond to release 5-ASA | Adverse effects: Nausea, headache, fever, agranulocytosis, pancreatitis, SJS [2]. Associated with "sulfa" allergy and pregnancy complications including kernicterus (crosses placenta) and neural tube defect (inhibits absorption and metabolism of folic acid) [2]. Requires folic acid supplementation if used in pregnancy |
Why Sulfasalazine Is Less Preferred Than Mesalamine
Sulfasalazine requires colonic bacteria to cleave the azo bond and release active 5-ASA. The sulfapyridine carrier molecule is responsible for most of the side effects (nausea, headache, rash, agranulocytosis, male infertility via oligospermia). Mesalamine formulations bypass the need for a sulfapyridine carrier, delivering pure 5-ASA with fewer systemic side effects. However, sulfasalazine is cheaper and may have additional benefit for IBD-related joint disease (the sulfapyridine component has DMARD-like properties).
B. Glucocorticoids
The second-line agents for induction — used when 5-ASA fails or for moderate-severe disease [2].
Critical concept: Steroids are for induction ONLY — they are NOT maintenance agents.
Calcium and vitamin D supplements required for osteoprotective effect if prescribed for more than 12 weeks [2].
Clinical role = Induction agent (Induction of remission). Ineffective in maintenance of remission and NOT used for long-term [2].
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism of action | Glucocorticoids suppress the immune system broadly: inhibit NF-κB → reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6); inhibit phospholipase A₂ → reduce prostaglandin and leukotriene synthesis; reduce neutrophil migration; induce lymphocyte apoptosis. They are potent anti-inflammatory agents but have extensive systemic side effects |
| Why NOT for maintenance? | Chronic steroid use causes: osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, diabetes, cataracts, infection risk, Cushingoid features, avascular necrosis. The risk-benefit ratio is unacceptable for long-term use. Also, studies show steroids do NOT prevent relapse once stopped |
| Dosing | Prednisolone: 40 mg/day initially, reducing by 5 mg/week. Budesonide 9 mg/day — has extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism → fewer systemic side effects but also less potent. Budesonide MMX (multi-matrix) formulation specifically designed for colonic release in UC |
| IV formulation (severe UC) | Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV QDS or methylprednisolone 60 mg/day IV [2][11] |
Steroid-dependent vs. steroid-refractory:
| Term | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Steroid-dependent | Relapse when steroids are tapered below a certain dose, or relapse within 3 months of stopping | Escalate to thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) as steroid-sparing maintenance |
| Steroid-refractory | No response to adequate dose of IV steroids within 3–5 days | Escalate to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) or surgery |
C. Immunomodulators (Thiopurines)
These are the steroid-sparing maintenance agents — the drugs that keep patients in remission and allow steroids to be withdrawn [2].
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Drugs | Azathioprine (AZA) / 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) [2] |
| Mechanism of action | AZA is a prodrug → converted to 6-MP → metabolised to 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), which are purine analogues that incorporate into DNA → inhibit DNA synthesis → suppress rapidly dividing lymphocytes. This is why they are "immunomodulators" — they modulate the adaptive immune response by killing proliferating T and B cells |
| Clinical role | Maintenance agent. Steroid-sparing. Slow onset: takes 8–12 weeks to reach full effect (because you need to accumulate enough 6-TGN to suppress lymphocyte proliferation). This means steroids must be used as a "bridge" during the lag period |
| Key pre-treatment test | TPMT (thiopurine methyltransferase) genotype/phenotype: TPMT is an enzyme that inactivates 6-MP. ~10% of people have intermediate TPMT activity and ~0.3% have absent TPMT → these patients accumulate toxic levels of 6-TGN → severe myelosuppression. Must check TPMT before starting |
| Adverse effects | Bone marrow suppression (leucopenia, pancytopenia), hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis (idiosyncratic, 3–5%), nausea, increased infection risk, slightly increased lymphoma risk |
| Monitoring | Regular FBC (every 1–3 months), LFT, 6-TGN levels (therapeutic drug monitoring) |
Methotrexate is NOT effective in UC unlike in Crohn's disease [2] — this is an important exam point.
Why Does Methotrexate Work in CD But Not UC?
The exact reason is not fully understood, but it likely relates to the different immunological profiles. CD is driven by Th1/Th17 pathways, where methotrexate's folate antagonism and adenosine-mediated anti-inflammatory effects are particularly effective. UC is driven by an atypical Th2/NKT cell pathway that is less responsive to methotrexate's mechanism. Pragmatically: just remember that methotrexate has no proven efficacy in UC — don't use it.
D. Calcineurin Inhibitors (Rescue Therapy)
Rescue therapy agents: Cyclosporin and Tacrolimus [2].
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Drugs | Cyclosporin / Tacrolimus [2] |
| Mechanism of action | Calcineurin inhibitors block the calcineurin-NFAT pathway in T cells: calcineurin is a phosphatase that activates NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) → NFAT enters the nucleus → transcribes IL-2 (the key T cell growth factor). By blocking calcineurin, these drugs prevent IL-2 production → suppress T cell proliferation and activation. This is a rapid-acting immunosuppressive mechanism (unlike thiopurines which take weeks) |
| Clinical role | Rescue therapy in acute severe UC that is refractory to IV steroids [2]. Acts as a "bridge" to thiopurine maintenance (because thiopurines take 8–12 weeks to kick in) |
| Dosing | Cyclosporin: 2–4 mg/kg/day IV initially, then convert to oral; target trough level 150–300 ng/mL. Tacrolimus: oral or IV, target trough level 10–15 ng/mL (induction) |
| Contraindications | Renal impairment (nephrotoxic), uncontrolled hypertension, hypocholesterolaemia ( < 3.0 mmol/L → increased seizure risk with cyclosporin), active infection |
| Adverse effects | Nephrotoxicity, hypertension, tremor, seizures (cyclosporin — especially with low cholesterol/Mg²⁺), gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism (cyclosporin), diabetes (tacrolimus), opportunistic infections |
E. Biologic Therapies — Anti-TNFα
The big guns — used for moderate-severe UC refractory to conventional therapy [2].
Name breakdown: "Anti-TNF" = antibodies against Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha, a key pro-inflammatory cytokine. "Infliximab" = inf(usion) + -ximab (chimeric monoclonal antibody); "Adalimumab" = ada(ptive) + -mumab (fully human monoclonal antibody).
Indicated in patients with refractory disease to 5-ASA, immunomodulators, and steroids [2].
MUST screen for TB with CXR / QuantiFERON-TB Gold + HBV infection with HBsAg [2]:
- Requires TB prophylaxis with isoniazid or rifampicin [2]
- Requires HBV prophylaxis with entecavir [2]
| Property | Infliximab (Remicade) | Adalimumab (Humira) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Chimeric anti-TNF antibody (mouse/human) [2] | Humanised anti-TNF antibody [2] |
| Route | IV infusion | SC injection |
| Induction | IV 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6 [2] | SC 160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2 [2] |
| Maintenance | IV 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks [2] | SC 40 mg every 2 weeks [2] |
| Onset | Response quicker and better [2] | Response slower and less effective [2] |
| Key advantage | 1st line biologic [2]; faster onset; preferred for acute severe UC as rescue | Can be self-administered at home |
Do not stop anti-TNFα easily unless there is deep remission of at least 18 months with normal blood and endoscopic parameters [2].
Contraindications [2]:
- Latent untreated or active TB
- Lymphoma
- Heart failure of NYHA Class III–IV (TNF-α has compensatory effects in heart failure; blocking it worsens cardiac function)
- Demyelinating disease (Multiple sclerosis) (anti-TNF can worsen or trigger CNS demyelination)
- Optic neuritis
Adverse effects [2]:
- Reactivation of infection (e.g., TB/HBV) — TNF-α is critical for granuloma formation and containment of intracellular pathogens; blocking it allows dormant mycobacteria to reactivate
- Lymphoma — small absolute increase in risk (especially hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma when combined with thiopurines in young males)
- Non-melanoma skin cancer
- Infusion reactions (infliximab — chimeric antibody → can trigger anti-drug antibodies)
- Paradoxical psoriasis
Pre-Biologic Screening Checklist
Before starting ANY biologic (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitor):
- TB: CXR + IGRA/QuantiFERON. If latent TB → isoniazid prophylaxis for ≥ 4 weeks before starting biologic
- HBV: HBsAg + anti-HBc. If positive → entecavir prophylaxis
- HCV, HIV: Screen
- Varicella: Check immunity; vaccinate if non-immune (BEFORE starting, as live vaccines are contraindicated on biologics)
- Assess for active infections, heart failure, demyelinating disease
F. Newer Biologics and Small Molecules (Post-2020 Updates)
These are increasingly used in UC and are high-yield for 2025/2026 exams:
| Drug | Class | Mechanism | Role in UC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vedolizumab (Entyvio) | Anti-integrin (α4β7) | Blocks the α4β7 integrin on gut-homing lymphocytes → prevents them from binding to MAdCAM-1 on intestinal endothelium → stops lymphocyte trafficking to the gut. "Gut-selective" immunosuppression — does not suppress systemic immunity | Moderate-severe UC; induction and maintenance. Preferred in patients where infection risk is a concern (gut-selective, not systemic) |
| Ustekinumab (Stelara) | Anti-IL-12/23 (p40 subunit) | Blocks the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23 → suppresses Th1 (IL-12) and Th17 (IL-23) pathways | Approved for moderate-severe UC; induction (IV) then maintenance (SC) |
| Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) | JAK inhibitor (JAK1/3) | Blocks Janus kinase (JAK) signalling → inhibits the JAK-STAT pathway → reduces signalling of multiple cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23, IFN-γ). An oral small molecule (not a biologic antibody) | Moderate-severe UC; oral tablet. Advantages: rapid onset, oral route. Risks: herpes zoster, VTE, cardiovascular events, lipid elevation |
| Ozanimod (Zeposia) | S1P receptor modulator | Blocks sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors → traps lymphocytes in lymph nodes → prevents their migration to the inflamed colon | Moderate-severe UC; oral tablet. Requires cardiac monitoring at initiation (bradycardia risk) |
G. Antibiotics
Antibiotics have MINIMAL role in treatment of active disease in UC [2].
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Indications | Septic complications of IBD such as fulminant colitis [2]; pouchitis post-IPAA |
| Drugs | Ciprofloxacin / Metronidazole [2] |
| Why minimal role in active UC? | UC is an immune-mediated disease, not an infectious one. Unlike CD (where antibiotics help via treating microperforation, bacterial overgrowth, and perianal sepsis), the mucosal inflammation of UC is not driven by a specific pathogen |
11.4 Treatment by Severity — Summary Table
| Severity | Setting | Induction | Maintenance | Escalation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Outpatient | Topical 5-ASA (suppository/enema) ± oral 5-ASA | Continue 5-ASA (same route) | If refractory → add oral 5-ASA → oral steroids |
| Moderate | Outpatient | Oral 5-ASA + topical 5-ASA; add oral prednisolone (40 mg/day) if inadequate response | 5-ASA ± thiopurine (AZA/6-MP) if steroid-dependent | If steroid-refractory → biologics |
| Severe | Admit | IV hydrocortisone (100 mg QDS) ± VTE prophylaxis, fluid resuscitation, exclude C. diff/CMV | Bridge to thiopurine/biologic maintenance | If no response by Day 3 → rescue (infliximab/cyclosporin). If no response by Day 4–7 → surgery [2] |
11.5 Acute Severe UC — The Critical Pathway
Emergency surgery is needed in 20% of UC patients and 5–10% of Crohn's colitis patients [11].
Criteria (ECCO/ACG guidelines): ≥ 6 bloody stools/day + at least one of: Fever (37.8°C), tachycardia, anaemia ( < 10.5 g/dL), raised CRP [11].
Day-by-day management:
| Day | Action |
|---|---|
| Day 0 (Admission) | Assess severity (Truelove & Witts). Bloods (FBC, CRP, albumin, electrolytes). Stool for C. diff toxin + culture. AXR (check colonic calibre — exclude toxic megacolon). CT abdomen and pelvis if perforation suspected [11]. Start IV hydrocortisone 100 mg QDS. IV fluids. VTE prophylaxis (LMWH — IBD is a prothrombotic state). Nutritional support. Stop anticholinergics/opioids (increase toxic megacolon risk) |
| Day 1–2 | Monitor stool frequency, vital signs, bloods daily. Continue IV steroids |
| Day 3 | Assess response. Risk for colectomy (without 2nd line therapy): 24h stool frequency > 8; or stool frequency 3–8 + CRP > 45 mg/L → colectomy risk = 85% [11]. If no response → initiate RESCUE THERAPY |
| Day 3–5 | Rescue: Infliximab 5 mg/kg IV (preferred) or Cyclosporin IV [2][11]. Also consider flexible sigmoidoscopy to exclude CMV colitis (which mimics steroid-refractory UC; treat with ganciclovir if positive) |
| Day 5–7+ | If response to rescue → bridge to maintenance (thiopurine + infliximab or vedolizumab). If no response to rescue by Day 4–7 → SURGERY [2] |
Predictors of colectomy [2]:
- BO > 12/day on Day 2 of IV steroid → Colectomy = 55%
- BO > 8/day or BO 3–8/day + CRP > 45 on Day 3 of IV steroid → Colectomy = 85%
- (Stool frequency × 0.14 × CRP) on Day 3 of IV steroid ≥ 8 → Colectomy = 75%
- Colonic dilatation > 5.5 cm → Colectomy = 75%
- Ileus with ≥ 3 small bowel loops of gas → Colectomy = 73%
- High CRP, low albumin and pH, ESR > 75, temp > 38°C on admission → 5–9× risk [2]
The Day 3 Decision
Day 3 of IV steroids is the critical decision point in acute severe UC. If the patient has not responded (still ≥ 6 bloody stools + systemic features), you MUST escalate to rescue therapy immediately — do NOT continue IV steroids for another week hoping for improvement. Delay in escalation increases perforation risk and mortality. The Travis/Oxford criteria (stool frequency × 0.14 × CRP ≥ 8) is a validated predictor that should trigger urgent surgical consultation.
11.6 Surgical Treatment
Surgery is usually not indicated in UC but is potentially curative [2]. This is a crucial distinction from CD (where surgery is NOT curative and should be avoided as long as possible).
Indications for Surgery
Emergency indications [2][11]:
- Fulminant colitis (acute severe colitis failing medical treatment)
- Toxic megacolon > 6 cm [11]
- Perforation [11]
- Severe bleeding (unremitting bloody diarrhoea) [11]
- Failure of toxic dilatation to respond to 48 hours therapy [11]
- Deterioration despite optimal treatment [11]
- Patient choice [11]
- Chronic colitis with severe symptoms [11]
- Steroid-dependent [11]
- Recurrent attacks [11]
- Dysplasia or cancer [11]
- Malignancy: treatment (biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma) or prophylaxis (dysplasia on surveillance biopsy) [8]
- Refractory to medical treatment [2]
- Debilitating extra-intestinal manifestation (thromboembolic complications) [2]
- Extra-intestinal manifestation (except EIMs independent of colitis activity — sacroiliitis, hepatobiliary complications) [8]
Surgical Options
| Scenario | Procedure | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency (acutely ill) | 3-stage: Total abdominal colectomy + end ileostomy [2][11] | Rectum left in situ because it is an extraperitoneal organ and resection takes too long in a critically ill patient [2]. Foley catheter used to decompress rectum for 3–4 days [2]. Rectum left untouched; 2nd stage operation when patient is stable [11] |
| Stage 2 (recovery) | Completion proctectomy + IPAA [2][11] with diverting loop ileostomy | Done after patient recovers and steroids withdrawn (steroids impair anastomotic healing) |
| Stage 3 | Reversal of diverting loop ileostomy [2] | Final step — restores intestinal continuity |
| Elective (stable patient) | 2-stage: Total proctocolectomy + IPAA + diverting loop ileostomy [2] | IPAA in J-configuration [2]. Standard of care — avoids long-term stoma. Followed by reversal of loop ileostomy later |
| Poor sphincter function | Total proctocolectomy + permanent end ileostomy [8] | If anal sphincter is incompetent, IPAA is futile (patient would be incontinent). Permanent stoma is needed |
| Female wanting to maintain fertility | Total colectomy + ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) [8] | Avoids pelvic adhesions and thus infertility [8]. Disadvantage: diseased rectum remains → risk of rectal disease recurrence → needs ongoing surveillance |
Why is IPAA the standard of care?
- The "J-pouch" (ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis) creates a neorectum from the terminal ileum, folded into a J-shape and anastomosed to the anal canal
- Allows the patient to defecate per anum without a permanent stoma
- Mean stool frequency: ~6/day (acceptable for most patients)
- Maintains continence in most patients with intact sphincters
- Pouchitis — most common complication (~50% lifetime risk); presents with increased stool frequency, urgency, bloody stool, fever. Treated with metronidazole and ciprofloxacin [2]
- Pouch-vaginal / perineal fistula [2]
- Anastomotic stricture [2]
- Anastomotic dehiscence with sepsis [2]
- Sexual dysfunction / infertility [2] (pelvic dissection can damage autonomic nerves — hypogastric and pelvic splanchnic nerves)
- Pelvic nerve damage: impotence [8]
- Pouch dysfunction: increased faecal frequency, urgency, incontinence [8]
Surgery Is Curative in UC — But Not in CD
This is a fundamental difference. In UC, all the disease is in the colon and rectum. Removing the entire colon and rectum (total proctocolectomy) removes ALL diseased tissue → cure. In CD, disease can recur anywhere in the GI tract even after resection — so surgery is never curative and should be minimised.
11.7 CRC Surveillance in UC
Long-standing UC carries an increased risk of colorectal cancer through the inflammation → dysplasia → carcinoma sequence [1][2].
AGA Guidelines (2010) [12]:
- Surveillance colonoscopy started at a maximum 8 years after UC or Crohn's colitis [12]
- Optimal surveillance interval not clearly defined:
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: yearly [12] (PSC dramatically increases CRC risk)
- Ulcerative proctitis: NOT considered at increased risk [12]
- Ideally, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed when disease is in remission [12]
BSG Guidelines (2010) [13] — risk-stratified surveillance:
| Risk Category | Surveillance Interval | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Lower risk | Every 5 years | Extensive or left-sided colitis without active inflammation; Crohn's colitis < 50% involvement |
| Intermediate risk | Every 3 years | Extensive or left-sided colitis with mild inflammation; FHx of CRC > 50; pseudopolyps |
| Higher risk | Every year | Extensive or left-sided colitis with moderate-severe inflammation; stricture or dysplasia in past 5 years; FHx of CRC < 50 |
Surveillance methods [2]:
- Chromoendoscopy — highest yield for dysplasia detection; involves topical application of methylene blue or indigo carmine to enhance mucosal irregularities and facilitate targeted biopsies [2]
- High-definition white light colonoscopy — alternative with high diagnostic yield; preferred when chromoendoscopy yield is decreased or mucosa poorly visualised (inadequate prep, active inflammation, pseudopolyps, strictures) [2]
- Narrow band imaging (NBI) — does NOT enhance dysplasia detection [2]
Management of dysplasia [14]:
- Endoscopically visible dysplasia:
- Endoscopically invisible dysplasia:
11.8 Summary — Treatment Ladder
| Step | Drug Class | Examples | Role | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5-ASA | Mesalamine, sulfasalazine | Induction + maintenance | First-line for mild-moderate; topical preferred for distal disease |
| 2 | Corticosteroids | Prednisolone, budesonide MMX, hydrocortisone IV | Induction ONLY | Not for maintenance; taper once remission achieved |
| 3 | Thiopurines | AZA, 6-MP | Maintenance (steroid-sparing) | Slow onset (8–12 weeks); check TPMT first; methotrexate NOT effective in UC |
| 4 | Biologics | Infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab | Induction + maintenance | Screen for TB/HBV; contraindicated in active TB, NYHA III–IV HF, MS |
| 5 | Small molecules | Tofacitinib, ozanimod | Induction + maintenance | Oral; rapid onset; newer agents |
| Rescue | Calcineurin inhibitors / Anti-TNF | Cyclosporin, infliximab | Acute severe UC refractory to IV steroids | Bridge to maintenance; surgery if fails by Day 4–7 |
| Surgery | — | Total colectomy / proctocolectomy + IPAA | Curative | Emergency: 3-stage; Elective: 2-stage; complications include pouchitis |
High Yield Summary — Management of UC
Principles: Induce and maintain remission; treatment determined by extent (E1/E2/E3) and severity (Truelove & Witts).
Mild-moderate: 5-ASA first-line (topical for distal, oral + topical for extensive). Combination > monotherapy. If fails → oral steroids.
Moderate-severe outpatient: Oral steroids for induction → thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) for steroid-sparing maintenance. If steroid-refractory/dependent → biologics.
Acute severe UC (admit): IV hydrocortisone × 3 days → if no response → rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) → if no response by Day 4–7 → surgery.
Key predictors of colectomy: Stool freq > 8/day; stool freq 3–8 + CRP > 45; Travis index ≥ 8; colonic dilatation > 5.5 cm.
Biologics: Must screen TB (CXR + IGRA) + HBV (HBsAg). Contraindicated: active TB, lymphoma, NYHA III–IV HF, MS, optic neuritis.
Surgery is CURATIVE in UC. Emergency: 3-stage (colectomy + end ileostomy → completion proctectomy + IPAA → reversal of ileostomy). Elective: 2-stage (proctocolectomy + IPAA + loop ileostomy → reversal). Pouchitis is the most common complication (Rx: metronidazole + ciprofloxacin).
Methotrexate is NOT effective in UC. Antibiotics have MINIMAL role except for septic complications and pouchitis.
CRC surveillance: Start at 8 years for pancolitis. Chromoendoscopy is best for dysplasia detection. PSC → yearly surveillance. Proctitis → no increased risk.
Active Recall - Management of Ulcerative Colitis
1. A patient with acute severe UC has been on IV hydrocortisone for 3 days. Stool frequency is 10/day and CRP is 52 mg/L. What is the colectomy risk and what should you do next?
Show mark scheme
Stool frequency 3-8 + CRP > 45 on Day 3 gives colectomy risk of 85% (even higher with stool freq > 8). Alternatively, Travis index = stool frequency x 0.14 x CRP = 10 x 0.14 x 52 = 72.8, far exceeding threshold of 8. Must initiate rescue therapy immediately: IV infliximab 5 mg/kg (preferred) or IV cyclosporin. Urgent surgical consultation. If no response to rescue by Day 4-7, proceed to emergency total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy.
2. Explain why corticosteroids are used for induction but NOT maintenance in UC, giving at least 3 reasons.
Show mark scheme
1) Studies show steroids do NOT prevent relapse — they do not alter the natural history of the disease once stopped. 2) Chronic steroid use causes unacceptable side effects: osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, diabetes, cataracts, Cushingoid features, avascular necrosis, increased infection risk. 3) Steroids cause steroid dependency in some patients (relapse on taper), which itself becomes a problem requiring escalation to thiopurines or biologics. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation required if used for > 12 weeks.
3. List 5 things you must screen for before starting anti-TNF therapy in UC and explain the rationale for each.
Show mark scheme
1) TB (CXR + IGRA/QuantiFERON) — anti-TNF blocks granuloma formation needed to contain TB; reactivation causes disseminated TB. Prophylaxis with isoniazid if latent TB found. 2) HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBc) — immunosuppression causes HBV reactivation; prophylaxis with entecavir. 3) HCV — baseline screening. 4) HIV — immunosuppression in undiagnosed HIV is dangerous. 5) Varicella immunity — live vaccines contraindicated once on biologics; must vaccinate before if non-immune. Also assess for heart failure (NYHA III-IV is contraindication) and demyelinating disease (MS, optic neuritis).
4. Describe the 3-stage emergency surgical procedure for acute severe UC and explain why the rectum is left in situ at the first operation.
Show mark scheme
Stage 1: Total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy — removes the diseased colon. Rectum left in situ because: (a) rectum is extraperitoneal so dissection is technically demanding and time-consuming in a critically ill patient, (b) patient is often on high-dose steroids which impair healing — anastomosis would be at high risk of dehiscence. Foley catheter used to decompress rectal stump for 3-4 days. Stage 2: Completion proctectomy with IPAA (J-pouch) and diverting loop ileostomy — done when patient recovers and steroids are withdrawn. Stage 3: Reversal of diverting loop ileostomy — restores intestinal continuity.
5. A patient with E1 proctitis and another with E3 pancolitis both have mild UC. How does the route of 5-ASA administration differ and why?
Show mark scheme
E1 proctitis: topical 5-ASA suppository (e.g., mesalamine 1g OD-BD). The suppository delivers drug directly to the rectal mucosa. Oral 5-ASA is released too proximally and does not achieve adequate rectal concentration. E3 pancolitis: oral 5-ASA (e.g., mesalamine 2-4.8g/day) PLUS topical 5-ASA (enema or suppository). Oral formulations release 5-ASA throughout the colon. Adding topical therapy boosts drug levels in the distal colon/rectum. Combination therapy (oral + topical) is more effective than either alone for inducing remission.
6. When should CRC surveillance colonoscopy begin in a patient with UC pancolitis, and what is the recommended surveillance method with the highest yield for dysplasia?
Show mark scheme
Surveillance should begin at a maximum of 8 years after diagnosis of pancolitis (extensive colitis). The method with the highest yield for dysplasia detection is chromoendoscopy, which involves topical application of methylene blue or indigo carmine to enhance mucosal irregularities and facilitate targeted biopsies. High-definition white light colonoscopy is an alternative. NBI does NOT enhance dysplasia detection. Surveillance should ideally be performed when disease is in remission. Patients with concurrent PSC should have yearly surveillance. Proctitis alone is not considered at increased CRC risk.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 52 — IBD-associated CRC risk factors) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis sections: treatment, surgical treatment, complications, prevention) [8] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease: surgical indications; Surgical procedures for UC; Surgical procedures for CD) [11] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (pp. 18, 19, 20 — Surgical indications, emergency surgery, colectomy) [12] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 56 — AGA guideline 2010 for CRC surveillance) [13] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 57 — BSG guideline 2010 for risk-stratified surveillance) [14] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 55 — Management of dysplasia)
Complications of Ulcerative Colitis
The complications of UC can be organised into three categories:
- Local / intestinal complications — arising directly from the colonic disease
- Extraintestinal manifestations (covered in the Clinical Features section; cross-referenced here)
- Treatment-related complications — arising from medical or surgical therapy
This section focuses primarily on the local/intestinal complications and surgical complications, as they are the most clinically actionable and highest-yield for examinations.
12.1 Local / Intestinal Complications
A. Stricture
What it is: A segment of colonic narrowing causing partial or complete luminal obstruction.
Pathophysiology: Repeated episodes of inflammation cause submucosal fibrosis and smooth muscle hypertrophy in the colonic wall. Even though UC is "only" mucosal/submucosal, chronic relapsing inflammation leads to fibrotic remodelling of the submucosa that can narrow the lumen sufficiently to cause obstructive symptoms [2].
Clinical features:
- Symptoms of intestinal obstruction — colicky abdominal pain, distension, vomiting, constipation
- May be insidious (progressive narrowing of stool calibre) or acute (complete obstruction)
The critical point — malignancy:
Strictures in UC should be considered malignant until proven otherwise by endoscopy with biopsy [2].
Why? In Crohn's disease, strictures are extremely common and are usually benign (transmural fibrosis). But in UC, strictures are rare because the inflammation is superficial — it doesn't normally cause the deep mural fibrosis seen in CD. So when a stricture does appear in UC, the most likely explanation is that dysplastic or malignant tissue is causing the narrowing. This is the inflammation → dysplasia → carcinoma sequence manifesting as a mass/stricture. Every UC stricture must be biopsied extensively, and if biopsies are inadequate or show any degree of dysplasia, surgery should be strongly considered.
Endoscopic features that raise concern: stricture (ulcerative colitis, longer disease duration, proximal location, symptoms) [1].
UC Stricture = Cancer Until Proven Otherwise
This is a critical exam and clinical pearl. Benign strictures are common in CD (from transmural fibrosis) but RARE in UC (mucosal inflammation doesn't cause deep fibrosis). A stricture discovered in UC should trigger immediate and thorough endoscopic evaluation with multiple biopsies to exclude adenocarcinoma.
B. Fulminant Colitis
What it is: The most severe form of acute UC — a life-threatening medical emergency.
Clinical features [2]:
- Patients present with > 10 stools per day, continuous bleeding, abdominal pain, distension, and acute severe toxic symptoms including fever and anorexia
Pathophysiology:
- Fulminant colitis represents a state where the inflammatory process has become so intense that it overwhelms the body's compensatory mechanisms
- High risk of developing toxic megacolon as the inflammatory process extends beyond the mucosa to involve the muscle layers of the colon [2]
- This is the key pathophysiological concept: normally UC is limited to mucosa/submucosa, but in fulminant colitis, the inflammation breaches this boundary and damages the muscularis propria → loss of smooth muscle tone → colonic atony and dilatation
- Inflammation of the myenteric (Auerbach's) plexus → paralysis of colonic smooth muscle → the colon "stops moving"
- Simultaneously, inflammatory mediators (NO, prostaglandins) cause vasodilation and increased vascular permeability → massive fluid shifts into the bowel wall and lumen → further distension
Management principles:
- Immediate admission to hospital (meets Truelove & Witts severe criteria)
- IV hydrocortisone + IV fluids + VTE prophylaxis
- Aggressive monitoring (stool charts, vitals, daily bloods, serial AXR)
- Early surgical consultation — these patients can deteriorate rapidly to toxic megacolon → perforation → death
- 6–10% with ulcerative colitis have acute lower GI bleed needing emergency surgery (total colectomy) [15]
C. Toxic Megacolon
What it is: The most feared acute complication of UC — a true surgical emergency.
Definition [2]:
- Total or segmental non-obstructive dilatation of the colon ≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm AND the presence of systemic toxicity
Name breakdown: "Toxic" = systemic toxicity (sepsis-like state); "mega" = large (Greek megas); "colon" = the large bowel. So the name literally tells you: a dangerously dilated, toxic colon.
Pathophysiology (from first principles):
Clinical presentation [2]:
- Fever, tachycardia, hypotension, dehydration
- Electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia worsens colonic atony — a vicious cycle)
- Anaemia, hypoalbuminaemia
- Mental changes (encephalopathy from sepsis/metabolic derangement)
- Physical examination: abdominal distension, reduced/absent bowel sounds, diffuse tenderness, ± peritonism (if perforation has occurred)
Diagnosis [2]:
- Diagnosis is made by plain AXR
- Dilated colon ≥ 6 cm (transverse colon measured) or caecum > 9 cm
- Loss of haustral markings
- "Thumb-printing" sign (submucosal oedema/haemorrhage causing scalloped indentations along the colonic wall)
- Impending perforation: thumb-printing sign [8]
Management [2]:
- Bowel rest and total parenteral nutrition (TPN)
- Fluid and electrolyte replacement — aggressively correct hypokalaemia (K⁺ depletion worsens colonic atony)
- Corticosteroids (IV hydrocortisone)
- Stop all medications that reduce colonic motility — opioids, anticholinergics, loperamide, and codeine must be immediately discontinued as they worsen dilatation
- Nasogastric tube decompression + frequent position changes (rolling the patient) to help redistribute intraluminal gas
- Serial AXR (every 12–24 hours) to monitor colonic calibre
- Surgical intervention (emergency total abdominal colectomy + end ileostomy) if:
Why Stop Opioids and Anticholinergics in Toxic Megacolon?
Opioids bind μ-receptors on myenteric plexus neurons → reduce acetylcholine release → decreased peristalsis → colonic atony → WORSENS dilatation. Anticholinergics directly block the muscarinic receptors needed for smooth muscle contraction. Both drug classes can precipitate or worsen toxic megacolon and must be stopped immediately.
D. Perforation
What it is: A full-thickness breach in the colonic wall allowing luminal contents to enter the peritoneal cavity.
Pathophysiology [2]:
- Most commonly occurs as a consequence of toxic megacolon
- The massively dilated, paper-thin colonic wall (especially in the transverse colon where the diameter is greatest — Laplace's law: wall tension = pressure × radius) simply bursts
- Laplace's law explains why the largest-diameter segment perforates first: T = P × r / 2w (where T = wall tension, P = intraluminal pressure, r = radius, w = wall thickness). In toxic megacolon, r increases enormously while w decreases (thinned wall) → wall tension skyrockets → perforation
- Can also occur iatrogenically during colonoscopy in severe colitis (this is why full colonoscopy is contraindicated in fulminant colitis — use flexible sigmoidoscopy instead)
Clinical features:
- Sudden severe generalised abdominal pain
- Rigidity (board-like abdomen), rebound tenderness, guarding — signs of diffuse peritonitis
- Absence of bowel sounds (paralytic ileus from peritoneal contamination)
- Haemodynamic instability → septic shock
- CXR or erect AXR: free gas under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum)
Prognosis [2]:
- Perforation with peritonitis is associated with high mortality — reported mortality rates of 27–57% in toxic megacolon with perforation
- This underscores the importance of early surgical intervention when toxic megacolon is not responding to medical therapy
Management:
- This is a surgical emergency — emergency total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy
- Aggressive resuscitation: IV fluids, broad-spectrum IV antibiotics (cover gram-negatives and anaerobes), vasopressors if needed
- ICU admission
E. Severe Haemorrhage
What it is: Massive, uncontrollable lower GI bleeding from the diffusely ulcerated colonic mucosa.
Pathophysiology:
- The friable, ulcerated mucosa in severe UC contains exposed submucosal vessels
- In most UC cases, bleeding is chronic and low-grade (mixed with stool as bloody diarrhoea). However, in severe colitis, diffuse erosion into submucosal arterioles can cause massive acute haemorrhage
- 6–10% with ulcerative colitis have acute lower GI bleed needing emergency surgery (total colectomy) [15]
Management:
- Resuscitation: IV fluids, blood transfusion, correct coagulopathy
- If haemorrhage is uncontrollable despite medical therapy → emergency total abdominal colectomy + end ileostomy [2][11]
- Severe bleeding (unremitting bloody diarrhoea) is an indication for emergency surgery [2]
F. Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
This is the most important long-term complication of UC.
CRC in IBD patients is preceded by dysplasia [16]. Incidence of CRC in IBD: 18% after 30 years of colitis [16].
Pathophysiology — the Inflammation-Dysplasia-Carcinoma Sequence:
This is distinct from the sporadic adenoma → carcinoma sequence in non-IBD CRC. In IBD-CRC:
- The "field effect" of chronic diffuse inflammation means dysplasia can arise anywhere in the colon (not just in a single polyp)
- Dysplasia may be flat (invisible endoscopically) rather than polypoid — making detection much harder
- The risk is cumulative — longer disease duration = greater cumulative inflammatory burden = more DNA damage
Risk factors for IBD-associated colorectal neoplasia [1]:
| Category | Risk Factors |
|---|---|
| Patient-specific | Primary sclerosing cholangitis; history of colorectal neoplasia; family history of CRC in first-degree relative; smoking (+); early age of disease onset (+); male sex (+) |
| Disease-specific | Disease duration; disease extent; cumulative inflammatory burden; active inflammation endoscopically or histologically |
| Endoscopic features | Stricture (UC, longer disease duration, proximal location, symptoms); shortened tubular colon; pseudopolyps |
Why PSC is the strongest risk factor: PSC is associated with a 4-fold increase in CRC risk in UC patients, independent of disease duration or extent. The mechanism is thought to involve altered bile acid metabolism — PSC causes cholestasis and changes the bile acid pool, with secondary bile acids (e.g., deoxycholic acid) being directly genotoxic to colonic epithelium.
CRC Surveillance (covered in detail in the Management section; key points summarised here):
AGA Guidelines [12]:
- Started at a maximum 8 years after UC or Crohn's colitis
- Left-sided or extensive colitis: within 1–2 years after initial screening colonoscopy
- After two negative examinations, every 1–3 years
- PSC: yearly
- Ulcerative proctitis: NOT considered at increased risk
- Ideally performed when disease is in remission
BSG Guidelines — risk-stratified [13]:
| Lower risk → Every 5 years | Intermediate risk → Every 3 years | Higher risk → Every year |
|---|---|---|
| Extensive/left-sided colitis without active inflammation; Crohn's colitis < 50% involvement | Extensive/left-sided colitis with mild inflammation; FHx CRC > 50; pseudopolyps | Extensive/left-sided colitis with moderate-severe inflammation; stricture or dysplasia in past 5 years; FHx CRC < 50 |
12.2 Complications Related to Surgical Treatment (Post-IPAA)
Surgery (proctocolectomy + IPAA) is curative for UC but carries its own set of complications [2][8]:
A. Pouchitis
The most common complication of IPAA — lifetime incidence ~50%.
What it is: Inflammation of the ileal pouch (the J-pouch that was surgically created to act as a neo-rectum).
Pathophysiology:
- The ileal mucosa of the pouch undergoes colonic metaplasia over time (the ileum starts to resemble colon histologically — because it is now a reservoir exposed to faecal stasis and bacterial colonisation)
- This metaplastic mucosa is susceptible to the same dysregulated immune response that caused UC in the first place
- Bacterial overgrowth in the pouch (due to stasis) contributes to inflammation
- Pouchitis is more common in patients who had UC (vs. FAP) — supporting the idea that the underlying immune dysregulation "follows" the patient even after the colon is removed
Clinical features:
- Pouch dysfunction + systemic illness [8]
- Increased stool frequency (beyond baseline of ~6/day), urgency, watery/bloody stool, abdominal cramps, fever, malaise
- Diagnosis confirmed by pouchoscopy + biopsy (endoscopic evaluation of the pouch showing erythema, ulceration, and histological acute inflammation)
- Treated with metronidazole and ciprofloxacin — antibiotics work here because bacterial overgrowth is a major driver. Typically a 2-week course
- For chronic/recurrent pouchitis: oral budesonide, probiotics (VSL#3), immunomodulators, or biologics
- Rarely, pouch excision with permanent ileostomy if refractory
B. Pouch Dysfunction (Without Pouchitis)
- Increased faecal frequency (mean = 6/day), urgency, incontinence [8]
- This is the "new normal" after IPAA — the ileal pouch cannot replicate the storage capacity of the rectum perfectly
- Most patients adapt over 6–12 months
- Management: dietary modification (low-residue diet), loperamide for frequency, pelvic floor physiotherapy for incontinence
C. Pelvic Nerve Damage
- Impotence [8] — pelvic dissection during proctectomy risks injury to the autonomic nerves (hypogastric nerve = sympathetic, pelvic splanchnic nerves S2–S4 = parasympathetic)
- Sympathetic damage → retrograde ejaculation or ejaculatory failure (in males)
- Parasympathetic damage → erectile dysfunction (in males), sexual dysfunction (in females)
- Sexual dysfunction / infertility [2]
D. Pouch-Related Structural Complications
| Complication | Mechanism | Presentation |
|---|---|---|
| Pouch-vaginal / perineal fistula [2] | Anastomotic leak or localised sepsis tracking to an adjacent structure | Passage of faecal material or air through the vagina; perineal discharge |
| Anastomotic stricture [2] | Fibrosis at the pouch-anal anastomotic site | Progressive difficulty evacuating the pouch; increased straining; narrowed calibre of stool; can be treated with endoscopic balloon dilatation |
| Anastomotic dehiscence with sepsis [2] | Breakdown of the surgical anastomosis → faecal leak into the pelvis | Pelvic sepsis — fever, abdominal/pelvic pain, raised WCC/CRP; may require drainage ± defunctioning ileostomy |
E. Infertility (Females)
- Infertility [2] — IPAA involves extensive pelvic dissection that causes adhesions around the fallopian tubes and ovaries
- Studies show ~3-fold increase in infertility after IPAA compared to medical therapy alone
- Female who wants to maintain fertility: total colectomy + ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) — this avoids pelvic dissection [8]
- Trade-off: the rectum is left in situ → ongoing risk of rectal inflammation and CRC → needs continued surveillance
12.3 Extraintestinal Complications (Cross-Reference)
These were covered in detail in the Clinical Features section. A brief high-yield summary of the key EIM-complications:
| System | Complication | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatobiliary | Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) | Strong association with UC; majority of PSC patients have underlying UC; only 5% of UC patients develop PSC [4]. Leads to cholestasis → liver failure → cholangiocarcinoma. Dramatically increases CRC risk → annual surveillance colonoscopy [12] |
| Vascular | Arterial and venous thromboembolism | IBD is a prothrombotic state (2–3× risk). DVT, PE, portal/mesenteric vein thrombosis. Must give VTE prophylaxis during hospitalisation and flares |
| Dermatological | Pyoderma gangrenosum (more common in UC) | Deep painful ulcers with undermined, violaceous edges; pathergy phenomenon. Treat underlying UC + wound care + immunosuppression. Does NOT always correlate with disease activity |
| Musculoskeletal | Osteoporosis / Osteomalacia | Chronic steroid use + chronic inflammation → increased bone resorption. Calcium + vitamin D supplementation mandatory if steroids > 12 weeks |
| Haematological | Iron deficiency anaemia / Anaemia of chronic disease | Most common systemic complication; from chronic GI blood loss + hepcidin-mediated iron sequestration |
12.4 Prognostic Indicators
Patient diagnosed before age 16 has a more aggressive initial course [2] — younger onset is associated with more extensive disease, higher relapse rates, and greater cumulative inflammatory burden over a lifetime.
Patient diagnosed at older age is associated with a lower risk of colectomy [2] — older patients tend to have less extensive disease (more likely proctitis or left-sided) and may respond better to medical therapy, or may be less suitable surgical candidates.
12.5 Complications Summary — The Cascade
High Yield Summary — Complications of UC
Stricture: Rare in UC (unlike CD). Must be considered malignant until proven otherwise by endoscopy with biopsy.
Fulminant colitis: > 10 stools/day + continuous bleeding + toxic symptoms. High risk of toxic megacolon. Immediate admission, IV steroids, surgical standby.
Toxic megacolon: Colon ≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm + systemic toxicity. Diagnosed on AXR. Stop opioids/anticholinergics. Bowel rest + TPN + IV fluids + steroids. Surgery if no response to 48 hours therapy.
Perforation: Usually consequence of toxic megacolon. Associated with high mortality. Surgical emergency.
Severe haemorrhage: 6–10% need emergency colectomy. Indication for emergency surgery if uncontrolled.
CRC: Incidence 18% after 30 years. Inflammation → dysplasia → carcinoma sequence. Risk factors: PSC, disease duration, extent, cumulative inflammation, pseudopolyps, strictures, FHx CRC. Surveillance starts at 8 years; PSC = yearly; proctitis = not at increased risk. Chromoendoscopy has highest dysplasia detection yield.
Post-IPAA: Pouchitis (~50%; Rx metronidazole/ciprofloxacin), anastomotic stricture, pouch-vaginal fistula, dehiscence, sexual dysfunction/infertility. Female fertility preserved by IRA instead of IPAA.
Prognostic indicators: Age < 16 at diagnosis → more aggressive course. Older age at diagnosis → lower colectomy risk.
Active Recall - Complications of Ulcerative Colitis
1. A patient with long-standing UC is found to have a colonic stricture on surveillance colonoscopy. What is your immediate concern and what investigation must be performed?
Show mark scheme
Strictures in UC should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. Unlike CD (where transmural fibrosis commonly causes benign strictures), UC causes only mucosal/submucosal inflammation which rarely leads to benign strictures. Must perform colonoscopy with multiple biopsies of and around the stricture to exclude adenocarcinoma. If biopsies are inadequate or show any dysplasia, surgery (colectomy) should be strongly considered.
2. Define toxic megacolon, describe its pathophysiology from first principles, and name 3 medications that must be immediately discontinued.
Show mark scheme
Definition: Total or segmental non-obstructive dilatation of colon >= 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm with systemic toxicity. Pathophysiology: Severe inflammation extends beyond mucosa to involve muscularis propria and myenteric plexus (Auerbach's) in fulminant colitis. Destruction of smooth muscle and myenteric plexus + excessive nitric oxide release causes colonic atony and dilatation. Bacterial translocation through denuded mucosa causes systemic toxicity (sepsis). Wall becomes paper-thin with high risk of perforation per Laplace's law (tension = pressure x radius). Medications to stop: 1) Opioids (reduce peristalsis via mu-receptors), 2) Anticholinergics (block muscarinic receptors needed for contraction), 3) Loperamide/codeine (anti-motility). These agents worsen colonic atony and can precipitate perforation.
3. Describe the inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in UC and name 4 risk factors for IBD-associated CRC.
Show mark scheme
Sequence: Chronic mucosal inflammation generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) causing cumulative oxidative DNA damage. Mutations accumulate in tumour suppressor genes (p53, APC) and oncogenes (K-ras), leading first to low-grade dysplasia (LGD), then high-grade dysplasia (HGD), then invasive adenocarcinoma. Unlike sporadic CRC (adenoma-carcinoma sequence), IBD-CRC arises from flat dysplasia in a 'field effect' of diffuse inflammation. Risk factors (any 4): PSC, disease duration, disease extent, cumulative inflammatory burden, active inflammation, pseudopolyps, stricture, FHx of CRC in first-degree relative, early age of onset, male sex, shortened tubular colon.
4. A patient develops pouchitis 1 year after IPAA for UC. Explain the pathophysiology and first-line treatment.
Show mark scheme
Pathophysiology: The ileal J-pouch undergoes colonic metaplasia over time (exposed to faecal stasis and bacterial colonisation). This metaplastic mucosa becomes susceptible to the same dysregulated immune response that drove the original UC. Bacterial overgrowth in the stagnant pouch contributes to inflammation. Pouchitis is more common after UC (vs FAP), supporting the immune dysregulation hypothesis. First-line treatment: oral metronidazole and/or ciprofloxacin (antibiotics address the bacterial overgrowth component). Typically a 2-week course. For chronic/recurrent pouchitis, consider oral budesonide, probiotics (VSL#3), or biologics.
5. Why is perforation in toxic megacolon associated with such high mortality, and what does Laplace's law have to do with it?
Show mark scheme
Laplace's law states that wall tension (T) is proportional to intraluminal pressure (P) multiplied by radius (r) and inversely proportional to wall thickness (w): T = Pr/2w. In toxic megacolon, the radius increases massively (dilatation) while the wall becomes paper-thin (inflammation destroys muscularis propria). This causes wall tension to skyrocket beyond the structural limit, leading to perforation. Perforation releases faecal contents into the peritoneal cavity causing diffuse faecal peritonitis. The patient is already systemically toxic (sepsis from bacterial translocation), and the addition of faecal contamination triggers overwhelming septic shock. Mortality is 27-57% because of the combination of pre-existing systemic toxicity, faecal peritonitis, and the patient's debilitated state (malnourished, anaemic, often immunosuppressed from steroids).
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 52 — IBD-associated CRC risk factors) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis: complications, surgical treatment, prevention/CRC screening) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Primary sclerosing cholangitis section) [8] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease: surgical indications; Surgical procedures for UC) [11] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (pp. 18, 19, 20, 21 — Surgical indications, emergency surgery, colectomy, surgical options) [12] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 56 — AGA guideline 2010 for CRC surveillance) [13] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 57 — BSG guideline 2010 for risk-stratified surveillance) [15] Lecture slides: GC 186. Lower and diffuse abdominal painfresh blood in stool.pdf (p. 11 — IBD and PR bleeding) [16] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p. 51 — IBD-associated CRC, colitis-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, 18% incidence after 30 years)
Crohn's Disease
Crohn's disease is a chronic, relapsing transmural granulomatous inflammatory disorder that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus, most commonly the terminal ileum and colon, characterized by skip lesions and a tendency to form fistulas, strictures, and abscesses.
Intestinal Ischemia
Intestinal ischemia is insufficient blood flow to the intestines, either acute or chronic, caused by arterial occlusion, venous thrombosis, or nonocclusive hypoperfusion, potentially leading to bowel infarction and necrosis.