Crohn's Disease
Crohn's disease is a chronic, relapsing transmural granulomatous inflammatory disorder that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus, most commonly the terminal ileum and colon, characterized by skip lesions and a tendency to form fistulas, strictures, and abscesses.
I. Definition
Crohn's Disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing-remitting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterised by patchy transmural inflammation, which may affect any part of the GI tract [1]. Let's break the name and definition down:
- Crohn's — named after Dr. Burrill Crohn who described it in 1932
- Patchy — the inflammation is not continuous; there are "skip lesions" (diseased segments interspersed with normal bowel)
- Transmural — "trans" = through, "mural" = wall; inflammation penetrates the full thickness of the bowel wall (mucosa → submucosa → muscularis propria → serosa). This is fundamentally different from UC which is limited to mucosa/submucosa, and it explains why CD causes fistulae, abscesses, and strictures while UC generally does not [1][2].
- Any part of the GI tract — from mouth to perianal area, though it most commonly affects the terminal ileum ± colon [2]
Indeterminate colitis accounts for ~10-15% of IBD patients who fail to be classified between UC vs CD, either due to inadequate tissue biopsy or a truly indeterminate form of disease. Surgical treatment for these patients follows UC principles [1][2].
Why the Terminal Ileum?
The terminal ileum is the most common site because: (1) it has the highest concentration of Peyer's patches (lymphoid tissue) in the GI tract — the immune-mediated pathology of CD preferentially targets these areas; (2) there is relative stasis at the ileocaecal valve allowing prolonged antigen exposure; (3) the terminal ileum has a unique bacterial flora composition with the highest bacterial load in the small bowel.
II. Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
- Incidence is rising globally, particularly in newly industrialised countries in Asia (including Hong Kong), though overall rates remain lower than in the West [1]
- CD prevalence: urban > rural areas, higher socioeconomic classes — this supports the "hygiene hypothesis" (see Etiology) [1]
- Hong Kong context: IBD incidence has been rising steadily since the 1980s. The HK IBD registry shows CD incidence approximately 1-2 per 100,000 — lower than Western countries (5-10 per 100,000) but rapidly increasing [1]
Age and Gender
- Peak age of onset for CD: in the third decade (i.e., 20–30 years old) [1]
- There is a possible second smaller peak around 50–70 years (bimodal distribution)
- Gender: CD F > M globally, but M > F in East Asia [1] — this is an important exam distinction. In Hong Kong, there is a slight male predominance, which is the opposite of Western data [1]
East vs. West Differences (High Yield for HKU Exams)
East Asian IBD (including Hong Kong) differs from Western IBD [1]:
| Feature | East Asia | West |
|---|---|---|
| Gender in CD | M > F | F > M |
| Family clustering | Less | More prominent |
| Surgery rates | Lower (5-8%) | Higher (~30-50% at 10 years) |
| Extraintestinal manifestations | Fewer | More common |
| Primary sclerosing cholangitis with UC | Less | More common |
| Penetrating and perianal disease in CD | Higher rates | Lower |
| CD location | More ileocolonic CD | More ileal-predominant |
High Yield
For HKU exams: remember that Hong Kong CD patients tend to be male, have more perianal/penetrating disease, less family history, and fewer extraintestinal manifestations compared to Western populations. This is a commonly tested distinction.
III. Risk Factors
Established Risk Factors for Crohn's Disease
-
Smoking — Smoking is a risk factor for Crohn's disease (but NOT ulcerative colitis — in fact, smoking is PROTECTIVE for UC) [2]
- Why? Smoking impairs Th1/Th17 immune regulation, reduces mucosal blood flow, and alters the gut microbiome. CD is predominantly a Th1/Th17-mediated disease, and smoking amplifies this pathway. UC is predominantly Th2-mediated, and nicotine appears to enhance mucus production and colonic mucosal blood flow, which are protective in UC.
- Smoking doubles the risk of CD, increases the risk of relapse, the need for surgery, and post-operative recurrence
-
Prior appendicectomy — Prior appendicectomy is a risk factor for Crohn's disease (conversely, protective for UC) [2]
- The mechanism is debated: appendicectomy may alter the gut immune landscape, removing an immune regulatory organ (the appendix contains significant lymphoid tissue)
-
Family history — Family history of IBD [2]
- First-degree relative with CD increases risk 5-20×
- Concordance rate in monozygotic twins ~50% for CD (vs. ~15% for UC), indicating a stronger genetic component in CD
- Less family clustering in East Asia compared to West [1]
-
Infectious gastroenteritis — Infectious gastroenteritis in the prior 1 year is a risk factor [2]
- Likely through disruption of the mucosal barrier and alteration of the gut microbiome, triggering an abnormal immune response in genetically susceptible individuals
-
Drug history
- NSAIDs can trigger flares (they inhibit protective prostaglandin synthesis in the gut, disrupt the mucosal barrier, and may increase intestinal permeability) [3]
- Oral contraceptives — modest increased risk, possibly through microvascular thrombosis
- Isotretinoin — previously suggested but now considered controversial
-
Diet
- High refined sugar, low fibre, high fat, high processed food diets are associated with increased risk
- Western diet in Asia may explain the rising incidence
-
Genetic factors
- NOD2/CARD15 gene mutation (chromosome 16) — the most well-established genetic association with CD (particularly ileal disease and stricturing phenotype)
- NOD2 is an intracellular receptor for bacterial muramyl dipeptide. Mutation → defective innate immune response to gut bacteria → paradoxical chronic inflammation
- ATG16L1 and IRGM genes — involved in autophagy (cellular "self-eating" of damaged organelles/bacteria). Mutations impair bacterial clearance
- IL23R gene — involved in Th17 differentiation
-
200 susceptibility loci identified by GWAS
- NOD2/CARD15 gene mutation (chromosome 16) — the most well-established genetic association with CD (particularly ileal disease and stricturing phenotype)
Smoking and IBD — The Classic Exam Question
Students frequently confuse this: Smoking is BAD for Crohn's, GOOD for UC. The mnemonic: "Crohn's = Cigarettes Cause it; UC = cigarettes are Useful (protective)." However, obviously you would never recommend smoking for UC patients!
IV. Anatomy and Function (Relevant to CD)
Understanding the anatomy is critical because CD's transmural, skip-lesion pattern directly determines its clinical manifestations and complications.
Terminal Ileum — The Most Common Site
- The terminal ileum is the last ~20-30 cm of the ileum before the ileocaecal valve
- Functions: absorption of vitamin B12 (cobalamin) and bile salts
- B12 absorption occurs ONLY in the terminal ileum → CD affecting this area → B12 deficiency → megaloblastic anaemia, subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord
- Bile salt absorption occurs in the terminal ileum → malabsorption of bile salts → bile salt diarrhoea (bile salts reach the colon and stimulate secretion) AND gallstone formation (reduced bile salt pool → cholesterol supersaturation of bile) [2]
- Contains the highest concentration of Peyer's patches (organized lymphoid tissue) — the initial site of immune activation in CD
Bowel Wall Layers (Why Transmural Matters)
| Layer | CD Involvement | Clinical Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Mucosa | Ulceration, aphthous ulcers | Bleeding, malabsorption |
| Submucosa | Oedema, fibrosis | Stricture formation |
| Muscularis propria | Inflammation, fibrosis | Dysmotility, strictures, obstruction |
| Serosa | Inflammation reaches surface | Fistulae (track to adjacent structures), abscesses (walled-off perforation), adhesions |
This is why fistula formation and abscess formation are features of CD but NOT UC [1][2]. In UC, inflammation is limited to mucosa/submucosa and never penetrates deeply enough to form fistulae.
Mesentery
- CD characteristically involves mesenteric fat wrapping ("creeping fat" / "fat wrapping") — the mesenteric fat hypertrophies and wraps around the inflamed bowel segment
- This is thought to be an attempt by the mesentery to contain transmural inflammation
- On surgical inspection, this is pathognomonic of CD
Perianal Anatomy
- Perianal disease occurs in up to 40% of CD patients [1] — a very common and debilitating manifestation
- The perianal region includes the anal canal, internal and external sphincters, and the ischiorectal and intersphincteric spaces
- Perianal CD includes: fistulae-in-ano, perianal abscesses, skin tags, fissures, and anorectal strictures
V. Etiology and Pathophysiology
The pathogenesis of Crohn's disease involves a complex interplay of four key elements. Think of it as a "perfect storm":
The Four-Hit Model
1. Genetic Susceptibility
-
NOD2/CARD15 (chromosome 16q12): The most important genetic risk factor
- NOD2 = "nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domain-containing protein 2" — an intracellular pattern recognition receptor (PRR) in macrophages and dendritic cells
- Normally recognises muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a component of bacterial peptidoglycan → triggers NF-κB pathway → appropriate antimicrobial response + defensin production
- Mutation → impaired bacterial sensing → defective defensin production → bacteria breach the mucosal barrier → compensatory over-activation of adaptive immunity → chronic inflammation
- Associated with ileal disease and stricturing phenotype
-
ATG16L1 and IRGM — autophagy genes
- Autophagy = "auto" (self) + "phagy" (eating) — cellular housekeeping that clears intracellular bacteria and damaged organelles
- Defective autophagy → impaired clearance of intracellular bacteria (e.g., adherent-invasive E. coli) → persistent immune stimulation
-
IL23R — interleukin-23 receptor
- IL-23 drives Th17 cell differentiation → IL-17 production → mucosal inflammation
- Variants can be protective or risk-enhancing
2. Environmental Triggers
- Smoking (see Risk Factors)
- Diet: Western diet (high sugar, fat, processed food; low fibre) alters microbiome composition
- Antibiotics: Early-life antibiotic exposure may alter the developing microbiome
- Hygiene hypothesis: Growing up in overly hygienic environments → reduced microbial exposure in childhood → immature immune regulation → exaggerated response to commensal bacteria later in life. This explains the higher prevalence in urban > rural areas and higher socioeconomic classes [1]
- Infections: Prior GI infections may trigger disease in susceptible individuals
- Stress: Does not cause CD but can trigger flares via the gut-brain axis (cortisol → altered gut permeability and immune function)
- Vitamin D deficiency: Vitamin D is immunomodulatory; deficiency is associated with increased CD risk and disease activity
3. Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis
- CD patients have reduced microbial diversity, particularly:
- Reduced Firmicutes (especially Faecalibacterium prausnitzii — a butyrate producer with anti-inflammatory properties)
- Increased Proteobacteria (especially adherent-invasive E. coli — AIEC)
- Butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid that is the primary energy source for colonocytes and has anti-inflammatory effects. Its reduction → mucosal energy deficit → barrier dysfunction
- Whether dysbiosis is a cause or consequence of CD remains debated, but it clearly perpetuates the inflammatory cycle
4. Epithelial Barrier Defect
- Increased intestinal permeability ("leaky gut") is a feature of CD, even in unaffected relatives of CD patients
- Defective tight junctions, reduced mucus layer, and impaired Paneth cell function (Paneth cells secrete defensins — antimicrobial peptides)
- Barrier breach → luminal bacteria/antigens access the lamina propria → immune activation
Immune Pathways in CD
- CD is primarily a Th1 and Th17-mediated disease (in contrast to UC which is Th2-mediated)
- Key cytokines:
- TNF-α: The master pro-inflammatory cytokine in CD → drives macrophage activation, granuloma formation, and tissue destruction. This is the therapeutic target of anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab)
- IFN-γ: Produced by Th1 cells → activates macrophages
- IL-12 and IL-23: Drive Th1 and Th17 differentiation respectively. Ustekinumab targets IL-12/23
- IL-17: Produced by Th17 cells → recruits neutrophils, perpetuates mucosal inflammation
- α4β7 integrin: A homing molecule on T cells that directs them to the gut. Vedolizumab blocks this
Granuloma Formation
- Non-caseating granulomas are the histological hallmark of CD (found in ~30-50% of biopsies)
- A granuloma is an organised collection of macrophages (epithelioid cells) ± multinucleated giant cells, surrounded by a collar of lymphocytes
- They form because macrophages cannot fully clear the antigenic stimulus → they aggregate and wall it off
- MUST exclude TB when granulomas are found — TB granulomas are typically caseating (central necrotic cheese-like material), but this distinction is not always clear on biopsy, and TB is common in Hong Kong [2]
CD vs TB — A Critical Distinction in Hong Kong
In Hong Kong, where TB is endemic, intestinal TB is a key differential for Crohn's disease. Both can cause granulomatous inflammation of the terminal ileum. Key distinguishers: TB granulomas are typically caseating and larger, TB AFB stain/culture may be positive, TB has systemic features (fever, night sweats, weight loss), and TB responds to anti-TB therapy. Tissue PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is helpful. If in doubt, a trial of anti-TB therapy is sometimes given first.
VI. Classification
Montreal Phenotypical Classification [1][2]
This is the standard classification system for CD, classifying by Age at diagnosis, Location, and Behaviour:
| Category | Code | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at onset | A1 | < 16 years old | |
| A2 | 17-40 years old | Most common | |
| A3 | > 40 years old | ||
| Disease Location | L1 | Ileal | 24.5% |
| L2 | Colonic | 32.3% | |
| L3 | Ileocolonic | 43.1% (most common) | |
| L4 | Isolated upper GI disease | Can be added to L1-L3 | |
| Disease Behaviour | B1 | Non-stricturing, non-penetrating (inflammatory) | 65.2% |
| B2 | Stricturing | 25.1% | |
| B3 | Penetrating | 16.1% | |
| P | Perianal fistula or abscess | 24.5% (modifier, added to B1-B3) |
Montreal Classification — What It Means Clinically
- B1 (Inflammatory) → predominantly mucosal inflammation → responds best to medical therapy
- B2 (Stricturing) → chronic inflammation → fibrosis → luminal narrowing → bowel obstruction. "Stricture" = "strictus" (Latin: drawn tight). Fibrostenotic strictures do NOT respond to anti-inflammatory drugs and need endoscopic dilatation or surgery
- B3 (Penetrating) → transmural inflammation breaches the serosa → fistulae and abscesses. "Penetrating" = the disease penetrates through the full wall
- P (Perianal) → added as a modifier to any B classification, e.g., B3P = penetrating disease with perianal involvement
Behaviour of disease determines management strategy [4]:
- Inflammatory disease (30%): medical treatment, surgical resection if refractory
- Fibrostenotic disease (50%): endoscopic dilatation, surgical (stricturoplasty or resection for small bowel, resection for large bowel)
- Fistulising disease (20%): drainage, medical (combined anti-TNF + azathioprine), surgical resection
Clinical Subtypes of CD [2]
| Subtype | Frequency | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Ileal disease | 24.5% | B12/bile salt malabsorption, RIF pain, obstruction |
| Ileocaecal disease | 43.1% | Most common; mimics appendicitis |
| Colonic disease | 32.3% | More like UC; bloody diarrhoea |
| Perianal disease | 8.4% (isolated) / up to 40% (any CD) | Fistulae, abscesses, skin tags |
| Others | Rare | CD confined to mouth, stomach, duodenum, or rectum |
Disease Activity — Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) [2]
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDAI | 150-220 | 220-450 | > 450 |
| General | Ambulatory, eating and drinking | Intermittent vomiting | Cachexia with BMI < 18 |
| Weight loss | < 10% | > 10% | |
| CRP | Usually > ULN | > ULN | Increased |
| Examination | Tender mass, no overt obstruction | Abscess formation, obstruction | |
| Treatment response | Ineffective for mild disease treatment | Persistent symptoms despite intensive treatment |
VII. Clinical Features
The clinical features of CD are directly determined by the disease location, behaviour, and severity. The transmural nature of inflammation is the root cause of most unique CD features.
A. Symptoms
1. Gastrointestinal Symptoms
a) Chronic Diarrhoea (most common presenting symptom)
- Mechanism: Multifactorial:
- Mucosal inflammation → impaired water/electrolyte absorption → osmotic and secretory diarrhoea
- Bile salt malabsorption (terminal ileal disease) → bile salts reach colon → stimulate colonic secretion (secretory diarrhoea)
- Bacterial overgrowth in strictured/stagnant loops → deconjugation of bile salts → fat malabsorption → steatorrhoea
- Fistulae bypassing absorptive surface → reduced transit time
- CD diarrhoea is typically non-bloody (unless colonic involvement) — this contrasts with UC where bloody diarrhoea is the hallmark
- When the colon is involved, there may be fresh blood in stool and urgency [5]
b) Abdominal Pain
- Typically right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain — because the terminal ileum/ileocaecal region is the most commonly affected [2][6]
- Mechanism: Transmural inflammation → serosal irritation → localised peritoneal pain in the RLQ
- Pain may be colicky (crampy, intermittent) — especially with stricturing disease → partial small bowel obstruction (SBO) → waves of peristalsis against obstruction
- Post-prandial pain — eating stimulates peristalsis → bowel contracts against a stricture → pain → patient stops eating → weight loss (this is "food fear")
- The RLQ mass from ileocaecal CD is a classic exam finding
c) Nausea and Vomiting
- More common in CD than UC because CD can affect the upper GI tract
- In moderate-severe disease: intermittent vomiting [2]
- In stricturing disease: vomiting due to small bowel obstruction
d) Perianal Symptoms
- Perianal disease in up to 40% of CD patients [1]
- Perianal pain, discharge (purulent or faecal), swelling
- Symptoms include: perianal abscess (throbbing pain, swelling, fever), fistula-in-ano (persistent discharge), anal fissure (sharp pain on defecation), skin tags (painless but characteristic — "sentinel tags")
- Mechanism: Transmural inflammation extends through the rectal wall into the perianal tissues → tracks through tissue planes → abscess → fistula
e) Oral Symptoms
- Oral aphthous ulcers — small, painful ulcers on the buccal mucosa, gums, or tongue
- Mechanism: CD can affect any part of the GI tract including the oral mucosa; aphthous ulcers represent mucosal inflammation
- Present in ~10% of CD patients; may be the first manifestation
f) Dysphagia / Odynophagia
- Rare; occurs with oesophageal or gastric CD
- Upper GI CD with stricturing may cause dysphagia
2. Systemic/Constitutional Symptoms
a) Weight Loss
- Very common and multifactorial:
- Reduced oral intake ("food fear" — eating provokes pain)
- Malabsorption (inflamed mucosa, reduced absorptive surface, bile salt malabsorption)
- Increased catabolism from chronic inflammation (TNF-α, IL-6 → systemic inflammatory response → muscle wasting)
- Protein-losing enteropathy (inflamed mucosa leaks protein into the lumen)
- In severe disease: cachexia with BMI < 18 [2]
b) Fever
- Low-grade fever in active disease (pro-inflammatory cytokines act on the hypothalamus)
- High fever suggests complication: abscess, perforation, or superimposed infection
c) Fatigue
- Anaemia (iron deficiency from chronic blood loss or malabsorption; B12 deficiency from terminal ileal disease; anaemia of chronic disease from chronic inflammation)
- Chronic inflammation itself causes fatigue via cytokine-mediated effects on the CNS
d) Growth Retardation (Paediatric CD)
- CD presenting before puberty can cause delayed growth and delayed puberty
- Mechanism: Chronic inflammation → high TNF-α/IL-6 → suppresses growth hormone axis; malnutrition; corticosteroid use further impairs growth
3. Extraintestinal Manifestations (EIMs)
Extraintestinal manifestations are fewer in East Asian CD compared to Western CD [1], but they still occur and are high-yield for exams.
EIMs can be classified by whether they correlate with disease activity or are independent of disease activity:
EIMs that Correlate with Disease Activity (flare when gut disease flares):
| EIM | Features | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Erythema nodosum | Painful, red, raised nodules on the shins (anterior tibiae) | Immune complex deposition in subcutaneous fat (panniculitis); Type III hypersensitivity |
| Oral aphthous ulcers | Painful oral ulcers | Direct mucosal inflammation (same disease process) |
| Peripheral arthropathy (Type 1 — large joint, pauciarticular) | Acute, asymmetric, affects large joints (knees, ankles, wrists); non-destructive | Circulating immune complexes deposit in synovium; molecular mimicry between gut bacterial antigens and joint antigens |
| Episcleritis | Red, uncomfortable eye without visual loss | Immune complex-mediated inflammation of the episcleral tissue |
EIMs Independent of Disease Activity (persist even when gut disease is quiescent):
| EIM | Features | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Pyoderma gangrenosum | Deep, necrotic ulcer with violaceous undermined border, often on legs; pathergy | Neutrophilic dermatosis; aberrant neutrophil chemotaxis |
| Axial arthropathy (sacroiliitis, ankylosing spondylitis) | Low back pain/stiffness, worse in morning, improves with activity; HLA-B27 associated | Molecular mimicry + genetic predisposition; shared antigens between gut and sacroiliac joint |
| Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) | Progressive fibrosis of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts → cholestasis → cirrhosis | Autoimmune; aberrant gut-homing lymphocytes colonise the liver; less common with UC in East Asia [1] |
| Uveitis (anterior) | Painful red eye, photophobia, visual loss | Autoimmune inflammation of the uveal tract |
| Peripheral arthropathy (Type 2 — small joint, polyarticular) | Symmetric, affects small joints of hands; may be persistent | Immune-mediated |
Remembering EIMs
Mnemonic for IBD extraintestinal manifestations: "A PIE SuCKS" — Aphthous ulcers, Pyoderma gangrenosum, Iritis/uveitis, Erythema nodosum, Sclerosing cholangitis, Cholelithiasis (CD), Kidney stones (CD), Sacroiliitis/ankylosing spondylitis
EIMs Specific to CD (due to terminal ileal disease/malabsorption):
| EIM | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Cholelithiasis (gallstones) | Terminal ileal bile salt malabsorption → depleted bile salt pool → cholesterol supersaturation of bile → cholesterol gallstones [2] |
| Nephrolithiasis (oxalate kidney stones) | Normally, calcium binds oxalate in the gut lumen → excreted in stool. With bile salt malabsorption, free fatty acids bind calcium instead → free oxalate is absorbed → hyperoxaluria → calcium oxalate renal stones |
| B12 deficiency | Terminal ileum is the sole site of B12 absorption → megaloblastic anaemia, neuropathy |
B. Signs
1. General Examination
- Cachexia / wasting: In severe disease; BMI < 18 — chronic inflammation + malabsorption + reduced intake
- Pallor: Anaemia (iron deficiency, B12 deficiency, anaemia of chronic disease)
- Clubbing: Digital clubbing can occur in CD (mechanism: circulating vasodilators from chronic inflammation → increased blood flow to fingertips → connective tissue hypertrophy)
- Oral aphthous ulcers: Visible on inspection of the oral cavity
- Skin signs: Erythema nodosum (shins), pyoderma gangrenosum (legs, peristomal)
- Eye signs: Episcleritis (red eye without pain/visual loss), anterior uveitis (painful red eye with photophobia)
- Joint signs: Swollen joints (peripheral arthropathy), restricted spinal mobility (sacroiliitis/AS)
2. Abdominal Examination
- RLQ tenderness — most common abdominal sign; reflects terminal ileal/ileocaecal inflammation [6]
- RLQ mass — tender mass in moderate disease [2]; this represents a phlegmon (inflamed adherent loops of bowel) or an inflammatory mass/abscess
- Why RLQ? Because the terminal ileum and caecum are in the right iliac fossa
- This can mimic appendicitis or appendicular mass — a critical differential in a young patient presenting with RLQ pain [6]
- Abdominal distension — if bowel obstruction is present (stricturing disease)
- Visible peristalsis — in thin patients with SBO, you may see bowel peristalsis through the abdominal wall
- Surgical scars — previous bowel resections, stoma sites (CD patients often require multiple surgeries)
- Abdominal tenderness — generalised if peritonitis (from perforation), localised to area of active disease
- Fullness/asymmetry — inflammatory mass or abscess
3. Perianal Examination (CRITICAL — Never Skip in CD!)
- Perianal skin tags — large, oedematous, "elephant ear" skin tags are virtually pathognomonic of CD
- Fistula openings — external openings visible perianally; may have purulent or faecal discharge
- Perianal abscess — tender, fluctuant, erythematous swelling
- Anal fissure — classically lateral in CD (vs. posterior midline in idiopathic/benign fissure) — because CD fissures arise from transmural inflammation, not from tearing of the anoderm
- Anorectal stricture — on digital rectal examination (DRE), the examiner may feel narrowing
- Faecal soiling — from fistula or sphincter damage
Always Examine the Perineum in Suspected CD
A common exam mistake is failing to examine the perianal region. Up to 40% of CD patients have perianal disease, and it may be the PRESENTING feature. If a young patient presents with recurrent perianal abscesses or fistulae, think CD.
4. Signs of Complications
- Signs of SBO: Abdominal distension, high-pitched/tinkling bowel sounds, visible peristalsis, vomiting
- Signs of abscess: Localised tenderness, fever, swinging pyrexia, palpable mass
- Signs of fistula: Abnormal openings (enterocutaneous fistula on the abdominal wall), pneumaturia or recurrent UTIs (enterovesical fistula), faeculent vaginal discharge (enterovaginal fistula)
- Signs of perforation: Peritonism (board-like rigidity, rebound tenderness, guarding), absent bowel sounds, tachycardia, hypotension
5. Nutritional Deficiency Signs
| Deficiency | Sign | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Iron | Koilonychia, angular stomatitis, glossitis | Chronic blood loss + malabsorption in duodenal/proximal jejunal CD |
| B12 | Glossitis, peripheral neuropathy, subacute combined degeneration | Terminal ileal disease/resection → B12 not absorbed |
| Folate | Megaloblastic anaemia | Proximal small bowel malabsorption or methotrexate use |
| Vitamin D | Bone tenderness, proximal myopathy | Fat malabsorption (bile salt deficiency) → fat-soluble vitamin malabsorption |
| Zinc | Acrodermatitis, poor wound healing | Small bowel inflammation → impaired absorption |
| Protein | Oedema (hypoalbuminaemia), muscle wasting | Protein-losing enteropathy + malabsorption + catabolism |
VIII. Disease Pattern Comparison: CD vs UC [1][2]
| Feature | Crohn's Disease | Ulcerative Colitis |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | GI tract, rectal sparing, skip lesions | Colon & rectum, continuous |
| Depth | Full thickness (transmural) | Mucosal/submucosal |
| Fistula | Common (intestinal/perianal) | Never |
| Benign stricture | Common | Rare |
| Perianal disease | Up to 40% | Rare |
| Histology pattern | Focal patchy | Diffuse continuous |
| Granuloma | ✓ (MUST exclude TB) | ✗ |
| Goblet cells | Preserved (✓) | Depleted (✗) |
| Distorted crypt architecture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cryptitis and crypt abscess | ✓ | ✓ |
| Endoscopic: skip lesions | ✓ | ✗ |
| Endoscopic: ulcers | Solitary, deep and focal (rose-thorn, longitudinal, serpiginous) | Shallow |
| Fistula formation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Abscess formation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Pseudopolyps | Less common | ✓ |
| Smoking | Risk factor | Protective |
| Appendicectomy | Risk factor | Protective |
The Cobblestone Mucosa
In CD, deep longitudinal and transverse ulcers criss-cross across the mucosa, with oedematous islands of surviving mucosa in between. This gives the "cobblestone" appearance on endoscopy — literally looks like a cobblestone street. This does NOT occur in UC because UC ulcers are shallow and continuous.
IX. Specific Pathological Features Explained
Skip Lesions
- Diseased segments separated by completely normal bowel
- Why? CD inflammation starts at Peyer's patches (discrete lymphoid follicles) → disease begins at these focal points → doesn't spread continuously like UC
Cobblestone Mucosa
- Deep linear ulcers with intervening oedematous mucosa
- The "cobblestones" are the islands of surviving swollen mucosa between ulcer tracks
Creeping Fat
- Mesenteric fat hypertrophy that wraps around the bowel
- The mesentery actively participates in CD inflammation — mesenteric adipocytes produce pro-inflammatory adipokines (TNF-α, leptin)
- Pathognomonic surgical finding
String Sign (on barium studies/CT)
- Severe narrowing of a bowel segment (typically terminal ileum) → a thin line of barium
- Represents a fibrostenotic stricture
Rose-Thorn Ulcers
- Deep, narrow, penetrating ulcers that project into the bowel wall on barium studies
- Named because they look like thorns on a rose stem
- Reflect the transmural nature of CD ulceration
High Yield Summary
Definition: CD = chronic relapsing-remitting IBD with patchy, transmural inflammation affecting any part of the GI tract (mouth to anus); most commonly affects the terminal ileum
Epidemiology: Peak onset 3rd decade; globally F > M but M > F in East Asia; rising incidence in HK; urban > rural, higher socioeconomic status
East Asia differences: More male, less family clustering, lower surgery rates, fewer EIMs, less PSC with UC, higher penetrating/perianal disease
Risk Factors: Smoking (CD risk, UC protective), prior appendicectomy (CD risk, UC protective), family history, prior GI infection, NSAIDs, NOD2/CARD15 mutations
Montreal Classification: Age (A1/A2/A3) + Location (L1 ileal / L2 colonic / L3 ileocolonic (43.1%, most common) / L4 upper GI) + Behaviour (B1 inflammatory 65.2% / B2 stricturing 25.1% / B3 penetrating 16.1% / P perianal 24.5%)
Key Clinical Features: Chronic non-bloody diarrhoea, RLQ pain, weight loss/cachexia, perianal disease (up to 40%), oral aphthous ulcers; EIMs (erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, sacroiliitis, PSC); nutritional deficiencies (B12, iron, vitamin D)
Key Signs: RLQ tenderness/mass, perianal skin tags/fistulae/abscesses, cachexia, clubbing, anaemia
Pathology: Non-caseating granulomas (must exclude TB), skip lesions, deep focal ulcers, cobblestone mucosa, transmural inflammation, creeping fat, fistulae and abscesses (never in UC)
Behaviour determines management: Inflammatory (30%) → medical; Fibrostenotic (50%) → endoscopic/surgical; Fistulising (20%) → drainage + biologics + surgery
Active Recall - Crohn's Disease: Definition to Clinical Features
1. A 25-year-old male smoker in Hong Kong presents with chronic diarrhoea and RLQ pain. Colonoscopy shows skip lesions with deep ulcers and non-caseating granulomas in the terminal ileum. What is the diagnosis, and what critical differential must be excluded in Hong Kong? Why?
Show mark scheme
Diagnosis: Crohn's disease. Must exclude intestinal TB because TB is endemic in HK, both cause granulomatous terminal ileitis. TB granulomas are typically caseating; send tissue for AFB stain/culture and TB PCR. If uncertain, trial of anti-TB therapy may be given.
2. Explain why smoking is a risk factor for Crohn's disease but protective for ulcerative colitis.
Show mark scheme
CD is Th1/Th17-mediated; smoking amplifies Th1 responses, impairs mucosal blood flow, and alters gut microbiome. UC is Th2-mediated; nicotine enhances mucus production and colonic blood flow, which are protective. Smoking doubles CD risk, increases relapse and surgical rates.
3. List the Montreal classification categories for Crohn's disease and state the most common location and behaviour.
Show mark scheme
Age: A1 (less than 16), A2 (17-40), A3 (over 40). Location: L1 ileal (24.5%), L2 colonic (32.3%), L3 ileocolonic (43.1% - most common), L4 isolated upper GI. Behaviour: B1 inflammatory (65.2% - most common), B2 stricturing (25.1%), B3 penetrating (16.1%), P perianal modifier (24.5%).
4. Why does Crohn's disease cause fistulae and abscesses but ulcerative colitis does not?
Show mark scheme
CD inflammation is transmural (full thickness: mucosa to serosa). When inflammation breaches the serosa, it can track to adjacent structures forming fistulae or become walled-off forming abscesses. UC inflammation is limited to mucosa/submucosa and never penetrates deeply enough.
5. A CD patient with terminal ileal disease develops gallstones and calcium oxalate kidney stones. Explain the pathophysiology of each.
Show mark scheme
Gallstones: terminal ileal bile salt malabsorption leads to depleted bile salt pool causing cholesterol supersaturation of bile forming cholesterol gallstones. Kidney stones: unabsorbed bile salts and free fatty acids bind calcium in the gut lumen, leaving oxalate free to be absorbed causing hyperoxaluria and calcium oxalate renal stones.
6. List 4 key differences between East Asian and Western IBD as stated in the lecture slides.
Show mark scheme
1. More male prevalence with CD in East Asia (vs F > M in West). 2. Less family clustering. 3. Lower rates of surgery (5-8%). 4. Higher rates of penetrating and perianal disease in CD. Also: fewer EIMs, less PSC with UC.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p2, p4, p5, p6, p8) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease section) [3] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Ulcerative colitis section, NSAID risk) [4] Senior notes: maxim.md (Surgical procedures for CD, management strategy by behaviour) [5] Lecture slides: GC 186. Lower and diffuse abdominal painfresh blood in stool.pdf [6] Lecture slides: GC 195. Lower and diffuse abdominal pain RLQ problems; pelvic inflammatory disease; peritonitis and abdominal emergencies.pdf
Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease
When a patient presents with features suggestive of Crohn's disease — chronic diarrhoea, abdominal pain (especially RLQ), weight loss, perianal disease, or extraintestinal manifestations — you need a systematic approach to the differential. The key question is: "What else could cause chronic intestinal inflammation, RLQ pain, or bloody diarrhoea?"
The differentials can be organised anatomically and by mechanism. Think about what CD looks like clinically and what other conditions mimic those features.
Approach to Differential Diagnosis
Differential Diagnoses — Detailed Breakdown
1. Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
This is the most important differential because both are IBD and share many features [2].
| Feature | Crohn's Disease | Ulcerative Colitis |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | GI tract, rectal sparing, skip lesions | Colon & rectum, continuous [1] |
| Depth | Full thickness (transmural) | Mucosal/submucosal [1] |
| Fistula | Common (intestinal/perianal) | Never [1] |
| Benign stricture | Common | Rare [1] |
| Perianal disease | Up to 40% | Rare [1] |
| Hematochezia | Rare | Common |
| Passage of mucus/pus | Rare | Common |
| Abdominal mass | Sometimes | Rare |
| Small bowel involvement | ✓ | ✗ (except backwash ileitis) |
| Histology | Focal patchy, transmural, non-caseating granulomas | Diffuse continuous, mucosal/submucosal, no granulomas |
| Endoscopy | Solitary, deep, focal ulcers; cobblestone; skip lesions | Shallow ulcers; pseudopolyps; continuous |
| Serological markers | ASCA positive | pANCA positive [3] |
| Smoking | Risk factor | Protective |
| Appendicectomy | Risk factor | Protective |
Why is this distinction important?
- Surgical approach differs fundamentally: UC is curable by total proctocolectomy (remove colon + rectum → disease is gone). CD is NOT curable by surgery — disease can recur anywhere in the GI tract, so the surgical principle is preservation of bowel length [4]. If you misdiagnose UC as CD, you might under-operate; if you misdiagnose CD as UC and create an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), Crohn's recurrence in the pouch is devastating.
- Indeterminate colitis (10%) — when you genuinely cannot distinguish: treat surgically as UC [1][2]
ASCA vs pANCA
A helpful mnemonic: ASCA = Affects CD ("A" for "Another bowel disease, not UC"). pANCA = prototypical of UC. Neither is diagnostic alone, but the combination ASCA+/pANCA− strongly suggests CD, while ASCA−/pANCA+ suggests UC.
2. Intestinal Tuberculosis
This is the critical differential in Hong Kong where TB is endemic [5][2].
| Feature | Crohn's Disease | Intestinal TB |
|---|---|---|
| Site | Terminal ileum (most common) | Terminal ileum / ileocaecal (also most common) |
| Granulomas | Non-caseating, small, scattered | Caseating, large, confluent |
| Ulcers | Longitudinal (along mesenteric border) | Transverse/circumferential (perpendicular to long axis — because TB spreads via lymphatics which run transversely) |
| Strictures | Common | Common |
| Fistulae | Common | Less common |
| Systemic features | Possible low-grade fever | Fever, night sweats, weight loss (more prominent) |
| CXR | Usually normal | May show pulmonary TB (but can be negative) |
| AFB stain/culture | Negative | May be positive (low sensitivity ~30%) |
| TB PCR | Negative | Higher sensitivity |
| Histology | Non-caseating, < 5 granulomas per section | Caseating, > 5 granulomas per section, larger granulomas |
| Response to anti-TB therapy | No improvement | Improves within 2-3 months |
Why does intestinal TB mimic CD?
- Both cause granulomatous inflammation of the terminal ileum with strictures and mass formation. The ileocaecal region is the site of highest lymphoid tissue concentration — TB bacilli are ingested, survive in macrophages, and preferentially settle where lymphoid tissue is abundant (Peyer's patches), just like the immune-mediated process of CD.
Key approach in Hong Kong:
- MUST do AFB smear and culture with sensitivity testing on all biopsies to rule out enteric TB [2][3]
- If histology is equivocal, a therapeutic trial of anti-TB therapy (2 months) is sometimes given before committing to CD diagnosis and immunosuppressive therapy (which would be disastrous in TB)
- Tissue TB PCR (GeneXpert) has improved sensitivity
- IGRA (QuantiFERON) and Mantoux test assess exposure but cannot distinguish latent from active TB
TB Before Biologics
Before starting any biologic therapy (anti-TNF, etc.) for CD, you MUST screen for latent TB (CXR + IGRA/Mantoux). TNF-α is critical for granuloma maintenance in TB — anti-TNF therapy can reactivate latent TB with devastating consequences (disseminated TB). This is especially important in Hong Kong.
3. Infective Colitis / Ileitis [2][5]
Infections including E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia and amebiasis should be excluded with stool studies [2].
| Organism | Key Features | Why It Mimics CD |
|---|---|---|
| Yersinia enterocolitica | Acute ileitis, RLQ pain, mesenteric lymphadenitis; may be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis [5] | Affects terminal ileum; can cause granulomatous inflammation; presents identically to acute CD flare |
| Campylobacter | Bloody diarrhoea, fever, abdominal cramps | Colonic inflammation on endoscopy can look like IBD |
| Salmonella | Enteritis with watery → bloody diarrhoea, fever | Ileocaecal involvement |
| Shigella | Dysentery (bloody mucoid diarrhoea), tenesmus | Rectal/colonic inflammation mimics UC or colonic CD |
| E. coli O157:H7 | Bloody diarrhoea, may cause HUS | Colonic inflammation and ulceration |
| Entamoeba histolytica | Amoebic dysentery, flask-shaped ulcers in colon | Chronic colitis, may form amoeboma (inflammatory mass) |
| Cytomegalovirus (CMV) | Immunosuppressed patients; deep colonic ulcers | Can superinfect existing IBD; deep ulcers mimic CD |
Why must you exclude infection before diagnosing CD?
- Starting immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, biologics) in a patient with undiagnosed infection is dangerous — you would worsen the infection
- Infective colitis is self-limiting (days to weeks) while CD is chronic and relapsing
- A single episode of bloody diarrhoea with positive stool cultures = infection, not IBD
- However, note that infectious gastroenteritis in the prior 1 year is actually a risk factor for triggering CD onset in genetically susceptible individuals [2]
Key discriminating factors:
- Acute onset (days) vs. chronic/relapsing course (weeks-months) in CD
- Travel history (TOCC — travel, occupation, contacts, clusters)
- Stool cultures, microscopy for ova/parasites, C. difficile toxin PCR [3]
4. Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) Infection [2][3]
C. difficile infection should be considered particularly in patients treated with antibiotics [2].
- Pseudomembranous colitis — C. difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) damage colonocytes → yellowish-white plaques (pseudomembranes) on endoscopy
- Why it matters in CD: C. difficile can superinfect patients with IBD who are on immunosuppression, causing a flare that looks like worsening disease but is actually infection. Always send C. difficile toxin PCR before escalating immunosuppression for an apparent flare [3]
- Distinguishing feature: Recent antibiotic use, abrupt watery diarrhoea (may become bloody), pseudomembranes on sigmoidoscopy
5. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) [2]
Presents with chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits in the absence of an organic cause [2].
| Feature | Crohn's Disease | IBS |
|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory markers | Elevated (CRP, ESR, faecal calprotectin) | Normal |
| Nocturnal symptoms | Common (wakes patient from sleep) | Rare (functional disorders spare sleep) |
| Weight loss | Common | Absent |
| Rectal bleeding | Possible (colonic disease) | Absent |
| Fever | Possible | Absent |
| Endoscopy/histology | Abnormal | Normal |
| Faecal calprotectin | Elevated | Normal (< 50 μg/g) |
Why is this differential important?
- IBS is extremely common (10-15% of the population) while CD is rare (~0.1%). Many patients initially diagnosed with IBS actually have early or mild CD. The key is that IBS has no objective evidence of inflammation — if inflammatory markers are elevated, you must investigate further.
- Faecal calprotectin is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [3] and is the best screening test to differentiate IBD from IBS. A normal faecal calprotectin essentially excludes active IBD.
6. Lactose Intolerance [2]
Intolerance to lactose-containing food such as dairy products. Presents with abdominal pain, diarrhoea and flatulence after ingestion of milk or milk-containing products [2].
- Why it mimics CD: Chronic diarrhoea and abdominal cramps after eating
- Why it's different: Symptoms are temporally related to lactose ingestion only, no systemic features, no weight loss, normal inflammatory markers, normal endoscopy
- Complication: CD patients can develop secondary lactose intolerance due to mucosal damage in the small bowel (brush border lactase is destroyed) — so both conditions can coexist
- Diagnosed by hydrogen breath test or trial elimination diet
7. Colorectal Cancer (CRC) [6][7]
- CRC is a less common but serious cause of hematochezia [6]
- CRC can present with change in bowel habits, weight loss, anaemia, and bowel wall thickening on CT — all features overlapping with CD
- IBD (UC > CD) is a risk factor for CRC [7] — so CRC can develop ON TOP of existing CD
- CD patients with colonic involvement have increased CRC risk, necessitating surveillance colonoscopy
- Key distinguishing features: Older age (usually > 50), progressive unrelenting symptoms, obstructive features (change in stool calibre, tenesmus), mass on imaging, biopsy shows adenocarcinoma
8. Ischaemic Colitis [6][8]
- Presents with rapid onset of abdominal pain, hematochezia or bloody diarrhoea [6]
- Typically in elderly patients with cardiovascular risk factors (HT, DM, AF, atherosclerosis) or thromboembolic risk factors (OCP) [8]
- Affects watershed zones: splenic flexure (Griffith's point) and rectosigmoid junction (Sudeck's point) [8]
- Key feature: generalised abdominal pain out of proportion to physical findings [8]
- Why it mimics CD: Segmental colonic inflammation, ulceration, stricture formation. However, ischaemic colitis is typically acute onset in elderly (not chronic relapsing in young patients), and the distribution follows vascular territories, not Peyer's patch distribution.
9. Acute Appendicitis [5][9]
Sometimes misdiagnosed with acute appendicitis — incidental finding of inflamed terminal ileum during operation [5].
- Why it mimics CD: Both cause RLQ pain, fever, tenderness, and sometimes a RLQ mass
- Ileitis causes include: Crohn's disease, TB, Radiation enteritis, Bacterial infection (Campylobacter, Yersinia, Salmonella) [5]
- Key distinguishing features:
- Appendicitis: Acute onset (hours), migratory pain (periumbilical → RLQ), anorexia, single episode
- CD: Chronic/relapsing course (weeks-months), diarrhoea is prominent, associated features (perianal disease, weight loss, EIMs)
- Pointing sign, Rovsing's sign, Psoas sign, Obturator sign are specific for appendicitis [9]
- Important scenario: A patient taken to theatre for suspected appendicitis is found to have a normal appendix but inflamed terminal ileum → this is acute ileitis → do NOT resect → biopsy and close → investigate for CD/infection post-operatively
10. Diverticular Disease [10]
- Right-sided diverticulitis is more common in Asian populations [10] → RLQ pain mimicking CD or appendicitis
- Clinical triad of diverticulitis: lower abdominal pain (RLQ in Asia) + fever + leucocytosis [10]
- Can cause strictures, fistulae (most commonly colovesical), and abscesses — similar complications to CD
- Why it mimics CD: Both cause segmental inflammation, strictures, fistulae, and abscesses
- How to distinguish: Diverticulitis is acute, episodic; CT shows pericolonic inflammation with diverticula; older age group; no skip lesions; no perianal disease; no EIMs
11. Radiation Colitis/Enteritis [5][6]
Occurs in weeks to years after abdominal or pelvic irradiation [2].
- History of radiation therapy for pelvic malignancy (cervical, prostate, rectal cancer)
- Acute radiation injury: within 6 weeks — diarrhoea, tenesmus, rectal bleeding
- Chronic radiation injury: months to years — strictures, fistulae, ulceration, bleeding
- Why it mimics CD: Chronic stricturing, fistulising colitis. But the distribution matches the radiation field exactly, and there is clear history of prior radiotherapy.
- Listed as a cause of ileitis [5] and PR bleeding [6]
12. Medication-Associated Colitis [2]
NSAIDs can cause chronic diarrhoea and bleeding [2].
- NSAIDs inhibit COX → reduced prostaglandin synthesis → loss of mucosal protection → ulceration, strictures (NSAID diaphragm disease), and bleeding throughout the small and large bowel
- Can mimic CD both clinically and endoscopically (small bowel ulcers, strictures)
- History of NSAID use is the key discriminating factor; resolves on cessation
13. Other Differentials
a) Small Bowel Lymphoma
- Can present with chronic abdominal pain, weight loss, malabsorption, and small bowel mass/stricture
- Particularly consider in immunosuppressed patients or those with coeliac disease
- Distinguished by biopsy showing lymphomatous infiltrate
b) Coeliac Disease
- Chronic diarrhoea, weight loss, malabsorption, iron/folate deficiency
- Affects the proximal small bowel (duodenum/jejunum) — different from CD which favours the terminal ileum
- Diagnosed by anti-tTG antibodies and duodenal biopsy showing villous atrophy
- No perianal disease, no fistulae, no granulomas
c) Meckel's Diverticulitis [5][9]
- Congenital remnant of the omphalomesenteric (vitelline) duct
- Rule of 2s: 2% of population, 2 feet from ileocaecal valve, 2 inches long, 2 types of ectopic tissue (gastric/pancreatic), presents before age 2 (in children)
- Can cause RLQ pain mimicking appendicitis or CD, or painless GI bleeding (ectopic gastric mucosa → acid → ulceration)
d) Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome [2]
- Presents with abdominal pain, altered bowel habits and bleeding
- Has a characteristic appearance on histology with a thickened mucosal layer and distortion of crypt architecture [2]
- Usually associated with rectal prolapse or excessive straining
e) Behçet's Disease
- Systemic vasculitis causing oral ulcers, genital ulcers, uveitis, and GI ulceration (especially ileocaecal region)
- Can closely mimic CD — distinguish by the presence of genital ulcers and pathergy test
Summary Table of Key Differentials
| Differential | Key Distinguishing Feature from CD |
|---|---|
| UC | Continuous colonic inflammation, no skip lesions, no fistulae, rectal always involved, pANCA+, shallow ulcers |
| Intestinal TB | Caseating granulomas, transverse ulcers, AFB+/PCR+, responds to anti-TB Rx; must exclude in HK |
| Infective colitis | Acute onset, positive stool cultures, self-limiting, TOCC history |
| C. difficile | Recent antibiotics, pseudomembranes, toxin PCR positive |
| IBS | No inflammation (normal CRP, calprotectin, endoscopy) |
| Lactose intolerance | Symptoms only with dairy, no inflammation |
| CRC | Progressive, older age, mass/stricture on imaging, biopsy shows adenocarcinoma |
| Ischaemic colitis | Acute onset, elderly, CVS risk factors, watershed zones |
| Appendicitis | Acute single episode, migratory pain, no chronic diarrhoea |
| Diverticular disease | Acute episodic, diverticula on CT, older age, right-sided in Asia |
| Radiation colitis | History of pelvic radiotherapy, distribution matches radiation field |
| NSAID enteropathy | History of NSAID use, resolves on cessation |
Investigations to Differentiate (Brief Overview)
This will be covered in detail in the Diagnosis section, but the key tests used to differentiate CD from its mimics include:
| Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Faecal calprotectin | Differentiates inflammatory (IBD) from non-inflammatory (IBS) causes — most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [3] |
| Stool cultures, ova/parasites, C. difficile toxin PCR | Excludes infectious causes [2][3] |
| ASCA / pANCA | ASCA common in CD; pANCA common in UC [3] |
| Colonoscopy + biopsy | Gold standard — tissue diagnosis; MUST do AFB smear and culture [2] |
| CXR, IGRA, Mantoux | Excludes pulmonary/latent TB |
| CT/MR enterography | Evaluates small bowel disease (strictures, fistulae, abscesses) — helps distinguish CD from lymphoma, TB |
| MRI anal canal | Evaluates perianal CD [3] |
| Anti-tTG antibodies | Excludes coeliac disease |
The 3 Things You Must Exclude Before Diagnosing CD in Hong Kong
- Intestinal TB — AFB smear/culture/PCR on all biopsies; CXR; IGRA
- Infection — stool cultures, ova/parasites, C. difficile toxin
- Malignancy — colonoscopy with biopsy (CRC); cross-sectional imaging (lymphoma)
Only after excluding these can you confidently diagnose CD and start immunosuppression.
Active Recall - Crohn's Disease: Differential Diagnosis
1. A 28-year-old male in Hong Kong presents with RLQ pain, chronic diarrhoea, and weight loss. Colonoscopy shows terminal ileal ulceration with granulomas. What is the most important differential diagnosis to exclude in this setting, and how would you do it?
Show mark scheme
Intestinal TB is the most important differential in Hong Kong. Exclude by: AFB smear and culture on biopsy specimens, tissue TB PCR (GeneXpert), CXR for pulmonary TB, IGRA/Mantoux for latent TB. TB granulomas are caseating and larger; TB ulcers are transverse. If equivocal, trial of anti-TB therapy for 2 months before committing to immunosuppression.
2. How does faecal calprotectin help in the differential diagnosis of Crohn's disease? What is it and what does a normal result tell you?
Show mark scheme
Faecal calprotectin is a neutrophil-derived protein (60% of neutrophil cytosol) released during intestinal inflammation. It is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD. A normal result (less than 50 microg/g) essentially excludes active IBD, helping differentiate IBD from IBS and other non-inflammatory causes. It also correlates with endoscopic disease activity and predicts relapse.
3. List 4 key clinical features that distinguish Crohn's disease from ulcerative colitis.
Show mark scheme
1. CD has skip lesions vs UC is continuous. 2. CD is transmural (full thickness) vs UC is mucosal/submucosal. 3. CD causes fistulae (common) vs UC never causes fistulae. 4. CD has perianal disease (up to 40%) vs UC rarely. Also acceptable: CD has rectal sparing, deep focal ulcers, non-caseating granulomas, ASCA positive; UC has pseudopolyps, shallow ulcers, pANCA positive.
4. Why is it dangerous to start immunosuppressive therapy for presumed Crohn's disease without first excluding infection and TB?
Show mark scheme
Immunosuppression (steroids, biologics like anti-TNF) suppresses the immune response. In undiagnosed infection, this would worsen the infection and potentially cause sepsis. In latent TB, anti-TNF agents block TNF-alpha which is critical for granuloma maintenance and TB containment, leading to reactivation and potentially disseminated TB. This is especially important in TB-endemic Hong Kong.
5. A patient with known Crohn's disease on azathioprine presents with acute watery diarrhoea after a course of amoxicillin. What diagnosis should you consider and how would you investigate?
Show mark scheme
C. difficile infection (pseudomembranous colitis). Investigate with stool C. difficile toxin PCR (toxins A and B). Important because C. difficile can superinfect IBD patients on immunosuppression after antibiotic use. Must exclude before escalating immunosuppression for a presumed CD flare.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p2, p6, p9) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease, differential diagnosis and diagnosis sections) [3] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p10, p11, p12) [4] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — surgical principles) [5] Lecture slides: GC 195. Lower and diffuse abdominal pain RLQ problems; pelvic inflammatory disease; peritonitis and abdominal emergencies.pdf (p20 — Ileitis) [6] Lecture slides: GC 186. Lower and diffuse abdominal painfresh blood in stool.pdf (p8 — Causes of PR bleeding) [7] Senior notes: maxim.md (Colorectal cancer — risk factors) [8] Senior notes: maxim.md (Ischaemic bowel — clinical features and pathogenesis) [9] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute appendicitis — differential diagnosis) [10] Senior notes: maxim.md (Diverticular disease — clinical features)
Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for Crohn's Disease
Important Principle: There Is No Single Diagnostic Test for CD
This is a critical point to understand from first principles. Unlike many conditions where a single blood test or imaging study clinches the diagnosis, Crohn's disease has no pathognomonic test. The diagnosis is made by integrating clinical presentation, laboratory findings, endoscopic appearance, histology, and imaging — essentially a pattern recognition exercise that requires you to piece together multiple lines of evidence while actively excluding mimics (especially intestinal TB and infections in Hong Kong).
The ECCO (European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation) guidelines state: "The diagnosis of CD is confirmed by clinical evaluation and a combination of endoscopic, histological, radiological, and biochemical investigations. No single gold standard exists."
Diagnostic Criteria
While there is no single set of universally accepted "diagnostic criteria" like the Jones criteria for rheumatic fever, the diagnosis of CD rests on demonstrating a characteristic constellation of findings:
| Domain | Characteristic CD Finding | Why This Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical | Chronic (> 6 weeks) diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weight loss, perianal disease | Acute diarrhoea (< 2 weeks) = likely infectious, not IBD |
| Endoscopic | Skip lesions, deep focal ulcers, cobblestone mucosa, aphthous ulcers, strictures, fistulae [2] | These patterns reflect the patchy transmural nature of CD |
| Histological | Focal patchy transmural inflammation, non-caseating granulomas (must exclude TB), preserved goblet cells, crypt architectural distortion [2] | Granulomas found in ~30-50% of biopsies; their absence does NOT exclude CD |
| Radiological | Small bowel wall thickening, strictures, fistulae, creeping fat, mesenteric lymphadenopathy on CTE/MRE | Demonstrates transmural and extraluminal disease invisible to endoscopy |
| Biochemical | Elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), elevated faecal calprotectin, ASCA positivity | Supports inflammatory aetiology; helps differentiate from IBS |
No Granuloma ≠ No Crohn's
A very common student mistake: expecting granulomas on every CD biopsy. Non-caseating granulomas are found in only ~30-50% of mucosal biopsies. Their presence strongly supports the diagnosis, but their absence does NOT exclude CD. The overall pattern of focal patchy chronic inflammation with architectural distortion is more important than the granuloma alone.
Diagnostic Algorithm
The approach to diagnosing CD follows a systematic pathway: History & Examination → Screening blood/stool tests → Endoscopy with biopsy → Cross-sectional imaging → Exclude mimics → Establish Montreal classification.
Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown
I. History and Physical Examination
Diagnosis begins with patient history and physical examination [3]:
History — systematically cover [3]:
- Bowel symptoms: Duration, frequency, consistency of diarrhoea; presence of blood/mucus; nocturnal symptoms (nocturnal diarrhoea is a red flag for organic disease — functional disorders spare sleep)
- Medications: NSAIDs (can trigger flares or cause NSAID enteropathy mimicking CD), antibiotics (C. difficile risk)
- Surgery: Previous appendicectomy (risk factor for CD), prior bowel resections
- Drug history: Immunosuppressants, biologics if known IBD
- Immunization status: Important before starting immunosuppression (need to ensure vaccinations are up-to-date, especially live vaccines which are contraindicated on biologics) [3]
- Travel history, sexual history (proctitis differentials: gonorrhoea, HSV, chlamydia), TB contacts, family history of IBD
Physical Examination [3]:
- General and abdomen: Nutritional status, pallor, fever, abdominal tenderness/mass, surgical scars
- Perianal region: skin tags, fissures, fistulas, abscess, PR exam — never skip this in suspected CD [3]
- Extraintestinal inspections: mouth, eyes, skin and joints [3] — oral aphthous ulcers, episcleritis/uveitis, erythema nodosum/pyoderma gangrenosum, peripheral arthropathy
The Complete IBD Examination
Think of it as a head-to-toe survey: Mouth (aphthous ulcers) → Eyes (episcleritis, uveitis) → Skin (erythema nodosum on shins, pyoderma gangrenosum) → Joints (swelling, restricted spinal movement) → Abdomen (tenderness, mass, scars) → Perianal (tags, fissures, fistulae, abscess) → General (nutritional status, clubbing, pallor). This is exactly what the lecture slide tells you to do [3].
II. Laboratory Tests
A. Blood Tests
Blood tests: CBP, CRP, ESR, albumin, ferritin [3]
| Test | Expected Finding in CD | Pathophysiological Basis | Clinical Utility |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBP (Complete Blood Picture) | Anaemia (microcytic or macrocytic), leucocytosis, thrombocytosis | Microcytic: iron deficiency from chronic GI blood loss or impaired duodenal iron absorption. Macrocytic: B12 deficiency from terminal ileal disease. Leucocytosis: active inflammation or infection/abscess. Thrombocytosis: reactive — platelets are acute phase reactants (IL-6 stimulates thrombopoiesis) | Detects anaemia type and guides supplementation; leucocytosis may suggest complication [2] |
| CRP (C-reactive protein) | Elevated (typically higher in CD than UC) [2] | CRP is synthesised by hepatocytes in response to IL-6 (released from activated macrophages in the inflamed bowel wall). CD's transmural inflammation generates more IL-6 than UC's superficial inflammation → higher CRP | CRP monitoring under therapy is useful to document efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment [2]. Rapidly responsive (half-life ~19 hours) — good for acute monitoring |
| ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) | Elevated | Fibrinogen (acute phase protein) coats RBCs → increased rouleaux formation → faster sedimentation. Less specific than CRP, slower to change | Trends over time; less useful for acute monitoring |
| Albumin | Hypoalbuminaemia | Malabsorption and protein-losing enteropathy [2] — inflamed mucosa leaks albumin into the gut lumen; reduced hepatic synthesis (negative acute phase reactant); reduced oral intake | Marker of nutritional status and disease severity. Low albumin = poor prognosis |
| Ferritin | Low (iron deficiency) or normal/high (acute phase reactant in active inflammation) | Ferritin stores iron but is also an acute phase reactant. In active CD, ferritin may be falsely "normal" despite true iron deficiency because inflammation elevates it | Check transferrin saturation alongside ferritin to assess true iron stores |
| Serum iron and vitamin B12 | Iron ↓, B12 ↓ | Iron: malabsorption (duodenal/proximal jejunal disease) + chronic blood loss. Vitamin B12 deficiency: terminal ileum is the SOLE site of B12 absorption → ileal disease or resection → deficiency [2] | Guides supplementation; B12 deficiency suggests ileal involvement |
Additional blood tests:
- LFT: Elevated ALP/GGT may suggest primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); assess liver function before starting hepatotoxic drugs (methotrexate, azathioprine)
- RFT: Baseline renal function; oxalate nephropathy in terminal ileal disease
- Hepatitis serology, HIV, TB testing [3] — mandatory before starting immunosuppression/biologics
- Hepatitis B reactivation can occur with anti-TNF therapy → screen HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs
- HIV affects treatment decisions and differential diagnosis
- TB screening (CXR + IGRA) is essential before anti-TNF therapy because TNF-α is critical for granuloma maintenance in TB
B. Serological Markers
| Marker | Association | Sensitivity/Specificity | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) | Common in Crohn's disease (CD) [2][3] | Sensitivity ~50-60% for CD; Specificity ~90% | ASCA = antibodies against the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Present in ~60% of CD. Suggests abnormal immune response to gut microbes |
| Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) | Common in ulcerative colitis (UC) [2][3] | Sensitivity ~60-70% for UC | pANCA targets perinuclear antigens in neutrophils. Present in ~65% of UC, ~10-15% of CD |
| Anti-OmpC antibody | Potential serological marker for IBD [2] | Less well-established | Antibody against outer membrane porin C of E. coli |
How to use serology in practice:
- ASCA+/pANCA− → strongly suggests CD
- ASCA−/pANCA+ → strongly suggests UC
- Neither is diagnostic alone — they are adjuncts, not definitive tests
- Most useful in indeterminate colitis to help lean towards CD or UC
C. Stool Tests
Stool examination: culture, Cl. difficile toxin, calprotectin [3]
| Test | What It Detects | Why It's Important |
|---|---|---|
| Faecal calprotectin | Neutrophil-derived protein, 60% of neutrophil cytosol [3] | Most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD [3]. Well correlated with endoscopic disease activity [3]. Predicts disease relapse, post-op relapse [3]. A normal result (< 50 μg/g) essentially excludes active IBD — brilliant for differentiating IBD from IBS without invasive endoscopy |
| Stool culture | E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter [2] | Must exclude infectious colitis before diagnosing CD |
| Microscopy | Ova, parasites [2] | Excludes parasitic infection (amoebiasis, giardiasis) |
| Antigen detection | E. coli O157:H7, Entamoeba, Cryptosporidium, Giardia [2] | More sensitive than microscopy for protozoa |
| C. difficile toxin PCR | Clostridium difficile toxin A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) [2][3] | Must be considered in patients treated with antibiotics [2]. Can superinfect IBD patients on immunosuppression — always check before escalating therapy for a "flare" |
Faecal Calprotectin — The Gatekeeper Test
Think of faecal calprotectin as the gatekeeper to endoscopy. In a young patient with chronic diarrhoea:
- Calprotectin < 50 μg/g → IBD is very unlikely → think IBS, lactose intolerance → avoid invasive endoscopy
- Calprotectin > 50 μg/g (especially > 250) → significant intestinal inflammation → proceed to endoscopy
It's also invaluable for monitoring: rising calprotectin in a patient in clinical remission predicts relapse before symptoms appear, allowing pre-emptive treatment escalation.
III. Endoscopy
Endoscopy is the cornerstone of CD diagnosis because it allows direct visualisation of the mucosa AND tissue sampling for histology.
A. Colonoscopy [3]
Colonoscopy is the primary endoscopic investigation for both UC and CD [3].
Technique and requirements:
- Ileocolonoscopy — the scope must be passed through the ileocaecal valve to intubate the terminal ileum, as this is the most commonly affected site in CD. A colonoscopy that does not examine the terminal ileum is incomplete for IBD evaluation.
- Biopsy should be taken from the left and right colon and rectum even if normal in appearance to assess for microscopic inflammation [2]
- Multiple biopsies from at least 5 sites (terminal ileum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectum) — this is essential because CD can have microscopic inflammation even where the mucosa looks macroscopically normal
- MUST do AFB smear and culture with sensitivity testing to rule out enteric TB [2] — this is mandatory in Hong Kong
Endoscopic findings in CD [2]:
| Finding | Description | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Skip lesions | Skip areas of involvement with segments of normal-appearing bowel interrupted by large areas of disease [2] | CD starts at discrete Peyer's patches → doesn't spread continuously |
| Aphthous ulcers | Small, shallow, round ulcers with erythematous halo; earliest endoscopic lesion | Focal inflammation at lymphoid follicles; earliest visible mucosal damage overlying Peyer's patches |
| Solitary, deep and focal ulceration [2] | Deep, linear or serpiginous ulcers | Transmural inflammation erodes deeply (unlike shallow UC ulcers which are limited to mucosa) |
| Cobblestone appearance | Polypoid mucosal changes; deep linear ulcers = "cracks"; inflamed tissues = "stones" [2] | Deep longitudinal and transverse ulcers criss-cross → oedematous surviving mucosa islands resemble cobblestones |
| Fistulae | Openings visible on mucosal surface | Transmural inflammation breaches serosa → tracks to adjacent structures |
| Strictures | Luminal narrowing — scope may not be able to pass | Chronic transmural inflammation → fibrosis → stricture |
| Abscesses | May see purulent material or localised swelling | Walled-off transmural perforation |
| Rectal sparing | Rectum appears normal | CD typically spares the rectum (unlike UC which always starts there) |
Contrast with UC endoscopic findings:
| Feature | CD | UC |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern | Skip lesions | Uniform and continuous lesions |
| Mucosa | Cobblestone, deep ulcers | Hyperemic mucosa, diffuse granularity, touch friability, petechiae [2] |
| Ulcers | Deep, focal | Shallow [2] |
| Other | Fistulae, abscesses, strictures | Pseudopolyps (hypertrophied masses of mucous membrane resembling polyps) [2] |
B. Sigmoidoscopy (for severe active disease) [3]
- In acute severe colitis, full colonoscopy is risky (risk of perforation in an acutely inflamed, thinned colon) → sigmoidoscopy is safer as it examines only the distal colon and rectum
- Allows assessment of disease extent and severity without the risks of full bowel preparation and full colonoscopy in a sick patient
- Biopsies can still be taken for histology and C. difficile toxin
C. OGD (for foregut symptoms in CD) [3]
- OGD is indicated when foregut symptoms are present — dysphagia, epigastric pain, nausea [3]
- Can reveal oesophageal, gastric, or duodenal CD (aphthous ulcers, strictures, granulomatous inflammation)
- Also important in paediatric CD where upper GI involvement is more common
D. Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy (SBCE) [3]
- Small bowel capsule endoscopy — the patient swallows a small wireless camera capsule that transmits images as it traverses the GI tract [3]
- Excellent for visualising the small bowel mucosa (which is not reachable by standard colonoscopy or OGD)
- Detects aphthous ulcers, mucosal erosions, and strictures in the small bowel
- Critical limitation: Should be avoided in patients with suspected intestinal stricture due to possibility of retained capsule [2] — the capsule can get stuck proximal to a stricture, causing obstruction. A patency capsule (dissolvable) should be used first if stricture is suspected.
E. Single or Double Balloon Enteroscopy [3]
- Single or double balloon enteroscopy allows deep intubation of the small bowel — can reach areas inaccessible to standard endoscopy [3]
- Enables therapeutic intervention (biopsy, dilatation, haemostasis) in small bowel disease
- More invasive and time-consuming than capsule endoscopy; typically reserved for cases where capsule endoscopy detects an abnormality that requires biopsy or treatment
IV. Histology
Biopsy specimens from colonoscopy undergo H&E staining. The key histological findings in CD:
| Finding | Description | Diagnostic Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Focal patchy involvement | Inflammation is not continuous; some crypts involved, adjacent crypts normal | Distinguishes from UC (diffuse continuous) |
| Transmural inflammation | Inflammatory infiltrate extends through all bowel wall layers | Only seen in full-thickness surgical specimens, not mucosal biopsies; on mucosal biopsy, submucosal inflammation may be hinted at |
| Non-caseating granulomas | Organised collections of epithelioid macrophages ± multinucleated giant cells without central necrosis | Found in ~30-50%; highly suggestive of CD when present. MUST exclude TB — TB granulomas are caseating [2] |
| Goblet cells preserved (not depleted) [2] | Goblet cells (mucus-secreting) are maintained | In UC, goblet cells are depleted due to diffuse mucosal damage |
| Distortion of crypt architecture | Crypt branching, shortening, disarray | Indicates chronic inflammation (not just acute) — distinguishes IBD from self-limiting infectious colitis |
| Crypt abscess and atrophy | Neutrophils accumulate within crypt lumina | Active inflammation; seen in both CD and UC (not specific) |
| Crypt branching, shortening and disarray [2] | Chronic architectural change | Chronicity marker; absent in acute infections |
Additional stains and tests on biopsy:
- AFB smear and culture — mandatory to exclude TB [2]
- TB PCR (GeneXpert) — higher sensitivity than AFB stain
- CMV immunohistochemistry — if deep ulcers in immunosuppressed patient (CMV superinfection)
V. Cross-Sectional Imaging
Endoscopy only sees the mucosal surface. CD is transmural — you need cross-sectional imaging to see the full bowel wall, extraluminal complications (abscesses, fistulae), and mesenteric involvement.
A. MR Enterography (MRE) [3]
MRE is the preferred imaging modality for small bowel CD assessment [3].
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Principle | MRI with oral contrast (to distend the small bowel lumen) + IV gadolinium (to enhance the inflamed bowel wall) |
| Advantages | No ionising radiation (crucial for young CD patients who need repeated imaging over a lifetime); excellent soft tissue contrast; superior for detecting fistulae and perianal disease |
| Key findings | Wall thickening (> 3mm), mural enhancement (indicating active inflammation), restricted diffusion (active inflammation), strictures, fistulae, abscesses, creeping fat, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, "comb sign" (engorged vasa recta in the mesentery = increased blood flow to inflamed segment) |
| Active vs fibrostenotic | MRE can distinguish active inflammatory strictures (wall enhancement, oedema, restricted diffusion) from fibrostenotic strictures (no enhancement, dark on T2) — this distinction guides therapy (anti-inflammatory drugs vs. surgery/dilatation) |
B. CT Enterography (CTE) [3]
CTE is an alternative to MRE [3].
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Principle | CT with oral contrast + IV contrast |
| Advantages | Faster, more widely available, better for detecting abscesses and evaluating for complications in acute settings |
| Disadvantages | Ionising radiation — cumulative dose is a concern in young patients with chronic disease; less sensitive for perianal disease |
| Key findings | Same as MRE: wall thickening, enhancement, strictures, fistulae, abscesses, "fat stranding" (haziness of mesenteric fat = inflammation) |
| When to use over MRE | Acute presentations (faster), claustrophobic patients, when MRI is unavailable, evaluation of extra-intestinal complications |
C. MRI Anal Canal [3]
MRI anal canal is the investigation of choice for perianal CD [3].
- 24.5% of patients with Crohn's disease have perianal disease; 83% required surgery [11]
- MRI and EAUS (endoanal ultrasound) necessary to document before the definitive treatment [11]
- MRI provides detailed soft tissue imaging of:
- Fistula tracts (course, complexity, relationship to sphincter)
- Abscesses (undrained collections)
- Sphincter integrity
- Classification: Parks classification of fistulae (intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric, extrasphincteric)
- Essential for surgical planning — the surgeon needs to know exactly where the fistula tracks before operating
D. Plain Radiographs
| Test | Indication | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|
| CXR | Indicated in patients presenting with fever or if perforation is suspected [2]; also for TB screening [3] | Pneumoperitoneum (free air under diaphragm = perforation); pulmonary TB (upper lobe infiltrates, cavitation) |
| AXR | Indicated to evaluate for colonic calibre [2] | Toxic megacolon: total or segmental non-obstructive dilatation of colon ≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm with systemic toxicity [2]; small bowel obstruction (dilated loops, air-fluid levels); thumb-printing (mucosal oedema) |
E. Barium Studies (Historical but Still Referenced)
| Study | Findings | Current Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barium enema | Detects aphthous ulcers, strictures, perforations with fistula tracts [2] | Largely replaced by colonoscopy and CTE/MRE |
| Small bowel follow-through (SBFT) | Nodularity, strictures and ulceration; "cobblestone" appearance; "string sign" due to luminal narrowing [2] | Largely replaced by MRE/CTE and capsule endoscopy; still useful if cross-sectional imaging is unavailable |
F. Ultrasound (USG)
- USG for diagnosis of ileal Crohn's disease [2] — bowel wall thickening > 3mm, hyperaemia on Doppler
- Endoanal USG can be used to identify fistula tracts [2] — alternative to MRI for perianal disease assessment
- Non-invasive, no radiation, inexpensive, but operator-dependent and limited by bowel gas
VI. Disease Activity Assessment
Once the diagnosis is established, quantifying disease activity guides treatment decisions.
Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) [2]
| Severity | CDAI Score | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Remission | < 150 | Asymptomatic |
| Mild | 150-220 | Ambulatory, eating and drinking, weight loss < 10%, CRP usually > ULN |
| Moderate | 220-450 | Intermittent vomiting, weight loss > 10%, CRP > ULN, tender mass, no overt obstruction, ineffective treatment for mild disease |
| Severe | > 450 | Cachexia with BMI < 18, abscess formation, obstruction, persistent symptoms despite intensive treatment |
The CDAI incorporates 8 variables over 7 days: number of liquid stools, abdominal pain rating, general well-being, extraintestinal features, anti-diarrhoeal use, abdominal mass, haematocrit, and body weight. It's primarily a research tool — in clinical practice, a combination of symptoms, CRP, calprotectin, and endoscopic findings guides management.
Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) [12]
- A simplified version of CDAI (only 5 variables, no 7-day diary needed): general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, abdominal mass, complications
- HBI > 15 = severe disease (indication for surgical consideration) [12]
- More practical for routine clinical use
Endoscopic Activity
- Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) — grades ulcer size, ulcerated surface area, affected surface area, and presence of narrowing
- Mucosal healing is now a key treatment target ("treat-to-target") — the goal is not just symptom control but endoscopic remission, as mucosal healing correlates with reduced complications, hospitalisations, and surgery
Faecal Calprotectin for Monitoring [3]
Faecal calprotectin is invaluable for monitoring:
- Well correlated with endoscopic disease activity [3]
- Predicts disease relapse, post-op relapse [3]
- Non-invasive alternative to repeated colonoscopy for tracking disease activity
- Rising calprotectin in clinical remission → subclinical inflammation → consider treatment intensification before clinical relapse
VII. Montreal Classification — Established at Diagnosis
After completing the diagnostic workup, the patient is classified using the Montreal classification [1]:
| Category | Code | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | A1 | < 16 years | |
| A2 | 17-40 years | Most common | |
| A3 | > 40 years | ||
| Location | L1 | Ileal | 24.5% |
| L2 | Colonic | 32.3% | |
| L3 | Ileocolonic | 43.1% | |
| L4 | Isolated upper GI | Modifier | |
| Behaviour | B1 | Inflammatory (non-stricturing, non-penetrating) | 65.2% |
| B2 | Stricturing | 25.1% | |
| B3 | Penetrating | 16.1% | |
| P | Perianal | 24.5% |
The Montreal classification is established using the combination of endoscopy (location, fistulae), imaging (strictures, fistulae, abscesses), and clinical assessment (perianal disease). It is dynamic — a patient initially classified as B1 may progress to B2 or B3 over time, requiring reclassification and treatment adjustment.
VIII. Pre-Treatment Screening Checklist
Before initiating therapy (especially immunosuppression/biologics), the following must be completed:
| Screening | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hepatitis serology (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs) [3] | HBV reactivation risk with immunosuppression |
| HIV testing [3] | Affects treatment and differential |
| TB testing (CXR, IGRA/Mantoux) [3] | Latent TB reactivation with anti-TNF agents |
| Varicella zoster immunity | Risk of severe varicella on immunosuppression |
| Immunization status [3] | Live vaccines contraindicated on biologics — complete before starting |
| Baseline TPMT/NUDT15 | Before azathioprine/6-MP — genetic polymorphisms cause fatal myelosuppression |
| Baseline LFT, RFT, CBP | Hepatotoxicity (methotrexate, azathioprine), myelosuppression monitoring |
Mandatory TB Screening Before Biologics
In Hong Kong, where TB is endemic, EVERY patient must have TB screening (CXR + IGRA) before starting anti-TNF therapy. Failure to do so can lead to reactivation of latent TB with potentially fatal disseminated disease. TNF-α is essential for forming and maintaining granulomas that contain TB bacilli — blocking TNF-α releases the contained bacteria.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease
No single diagnostic test exists — diagnosis requires integration of clinical, endoscopic, histological, radiological, and biochemical findings.
Key investigations:
- Blood tests: CBP, CRP, ESR, albumin, ferritin, B12, iron [3]
- Stool: culture, C. difficile toxin, calprotectin [3] — calprotectin is the gatekeeper (most sensitive marker, correlates with activity, predicts relapse)
- Serology: ASCA (CD), pANCA (UC) [3]
- Ileocolonoscopy + biopsies from all segments + AFB smear/culture [2] — gold standard
- MRE or CTE for small bowel evaluation [3]; MRI anal canal for perianal disease [3]
- Pre-treatment: Hepatitis serology, HIV, TB testing, immunisation status [3]
Endoscopic hallmarks: Skip lesions, deep focal ulcers, cobblestone mucosa, aphthous ulcers, strictures, fistulae
Histological hallmarks: Focal patchy transmural inflammation, non-caseating granulomas (30-50%, must exclude TB), preserved goblet cells, crypt architectural distortion
Disease activity: CDAI (mild 150-220, moderate 220-450, severe > 450) or HBI; CRP and calprotectin for monitoring
Montreal classification at diagnosis: A (age) + L (location) + B (behaviour) + P (perianal modifier)
Active Recall - Crohn's Disease: Diagnosis
1. What is faecal calprotectin, and why is it considered the gatekeeper test in the diagnostic workup of suspected IBD?
Show mark scheme
Faecal calprotectin is a neutrophil-derived protein (60% of neutrophil cytosol). It is the most sensitive marker of intestinal inflammation in IBD. A normal level (less than 50 microg/g) essentially excludes active IBD, differentiating it from IBS without invasive endoscopy. It correlates well with endoscopic disease activity and predicts disease relapse and post-operative relapse.
2. List the key endoscopic findings of Crohn's disease on ileocolonoscopy and explain the pathophysiological basis of cobblestone appearance.
Show mark scheme
Key findings: skip lesions, aphthous ulcers, solitary deep focal ulceration, cobblestone appearance, fistulae, abscesses, strictures, rectal sparing. Cobblestone appearance: deep longitudinal and transverse ulcers criss-cross the mucosa creating cracks, while intervening oedematous surviving mucosa forms raised islands (stones). This reflects the transmural nature of CD inflammation.
3. A colonoscopy biopsy in a young Hong Kong patient shows terminal ileal granulomas. What additional tests MUST be sent on the biopsy, and why?
Show mark scheme
MUST send AFB smear and culture with sensitivity testing, and TB PCR (GeneXpert), to rule out intestinal TB. In TB-endemic Hong Kong, intestinal TB causes granulomatous terminal ileitis indistinguishable from CD. TB granulomas are typically caseating; starting immunosuppression for misdiagnosed TB would be catastrophic.
4. Compare MR enterography and CT enterography for small bowel CD assessment. When would you prefer each?
Show mark scheme
MRE: preferred for routine assessment - no ionising radiation (critical for young patients needing repeated imaging), excellent soft tissue contrast, superior for fistulae and perianal disease, can distinguish active inflammatory from fibrostenotic strictures. CTE: preferred in acute presentations (faster, more widely available), better for abscesses. CTE disadvantage is cumulative radiation dose.
5. What pre-treatment screening investigations are mandatory before starting anti-TNF therapy for Crohn's disease, and why?
Show mark scheme
1. TB screening (CXR plus IGRA/Mantoux): anti-TNF blocks TNF-alpha which maintains granulomas containing TB - risk of latent TB reactivation. 2. Hepatitis B serology (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs): risk of HBV reactivation with immunosuppression. 3. HIV testing: affects treatment decisions. 4. Immunisation status: live vaccines contraindicated on biologics. 5. Baseline TPMT/NUDT15 if using thiopurines.
6. State the CDAI score ranges for mild, moderate, and severe Crohn's disease, and the HBI threshold indicating severe disease warranting surgical consideration.
Show mark scheme
CDAI: mild 150-220, moderate 220-450, severe greater than 450. HBI greater than 15 indicates severe disease and is an indication for surgical consideration. CDAI greater than 450 also indicates severe disease with features such as cachexia (BMI less than 18), abscess formation, obstruction, or persistent symptoms despite intensive treatment.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p2, p8) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease, diagnosis section) [3] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p10, p11, p12) [4] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — surgical principles) [11] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p45 — Perianal CD) [12] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p27 — Indications for surgery, HBI)
Management of Crohn's Disease
Overarching Principles
Before diving into specific drugs and procedures, let's establish the philosophy of CD management. This is fundamentally different from UC management because CD is NOT curable by surgery — it can recur anywhere in the GI tract after resection. Every management decision must be understood through this lens.
Principles of management [2]:
- To induce and maintain remission taking into account disease activity, disease site, disease behaviour and patient preference [2]
- Trend towards early introduction of immunomodulators and biologics in patients with adverse prognostic factors [2]:
- Young age < 40
- Extensive small bowel disease
- Perianal involvement
- Presence of strictures
- Presence of deep colonic ulcers
- Steroids required in initial treatment
- Avoidance of triggering factors — smoking cessation [2]
- Treatment goals have evolved from symptom control to "treat-to-target": the modern goal is mucosal healing (endoscopic remission) because this reduces complications, hospitalisations, and need for surgery
Step-Up vs Top-Down Approach
Traditionally, CD was managed with a "step-up" approach: start with mild drugs (5-ASA, antibiotics) → escalate to steroids → immunomodulators → biologics as disease worsens. The modern trend, especially for patients with adverse prognostic factors, favours a "top-down" or "accelerated step-up" approach: early introduction of biologics ± immunomodulators to prevent structural damage (strictures, fistulae) before it occurs. Think of it like rheumatoid arthritis — if you wait for joint destruction before starting DMARDs, the damage is irreversible. Same principle in CD: fibrosis and strictures are irreversible.
Management Algorithm Overview
I. Medical Treatment
The medical management of CD uses drugs with distinct roles: induction (getting the inflammation under control quickly) vs maintenance (keeping it under control long-term). Understanding which drug does what — and why — is fundamental.
A. Antibiotics
Antibiotics [2]:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Indications | Active luminal disease (for primary or adjunctive therapy for colonic CD but NOT isolated small intestine disease); Perianal diseases such as fistula; Septic complications of IBD such as abscess and wound infections [2] |
| Mechanism of action | Efficacy may be due to treatment of an undetected pathogen, bacterial overgrowth or an unsuspected microperforation [2] — they reduce the bacterial antigenic load driving the immune response |
| Examples | Ciprofloxacin / Metronidazole [2] |
| Clinical role | Adjunctive — not primary therapy for most CD. Most useful in perianal disease and septic complications |
Why ciprofloxacin and metronidazole specifically?
- Metronidazole ("metro" = relating to the uterus historically, but it's actually a nitroimidazole) — effective against anaerobic bacteria and some protozoa. The gut, especially the colon, is an anaerobic environment, so metronidazole targets the predominant colonic flora. Also has immunomodulatory properties.
- Ciprofloxacin — a fluoroquinolone effective against gram-negative aerobes. The combination covers a broad spectrum of gut bacteria.
Limitations: Metronidazole causes peripheral neuropathy with prolonged use (damages nerve axons — metallic taste and tingling are early warning signs). Ciprofloxacin can cause tendinopathy.
B. 5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA)
5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) [2]:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Role | Initial therapy in patients with mild to moderate Crohn's disease who do not have systemic symptoms based on its relative safety to other drugs [2] |
| Mechanism | Anti-inflammatory effect — 5-ASA acts locally on the intestinal mucosa. It inhibits the lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase pathways (reduces leukotriene B4 and prostaglandin synthesis), scavenges reactive oxygen species, inhibits NF-κB, and reduces TNF-α production. Think of it as a "topical mucosal anti-inflammatory." |
| Clinical role | Induction agent only — NO consistent evidence that 5-ASA is effective in maintenance of remission [2]. Mesalamine can be used as maintenance after surgical intervention but NOT after medically induced remission [2] |
| Dosage | Mesalamine = 2-4 g/day; Sulfasalazine = 3-6 g/day [2] |
Key drug distinctions:
| Drug | Formulation | Site of Action | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine (Pentasa/Asacol) | Oral (various release mechanisms), enema, suppository | Both ileitis and colitis | More commonly used; NOT useful in active diseases (i.e., limited efficacy in moderate-severe CD) [2]; Nephrotoxicity is the key adverse effect |
| Sulfasalazine | Oral | Colitis only | Colonic bacteria must cleave the drug to release the 5-ASA moiety (sulfapyridine is the carrier linked to 5-ASA by an azo bond — colonic bacteria break this bond) [2]. Cannot work in the small bowel because the bacteria needed for cleavage are in the colon |
Why sulfasalazine only works in the colon — explained from first principles: Sulfasalazine = sulfapyridine + 5-ASA linked by an azo bond. This bond is resistant to gastric acid and small bowel enzymes. Only colonic bacteria (which produce azoreductases) can cleave the bond → 5-ASA is released locally in the colon. For ileal disease, you need mesalamine formulations that release 5-ASA in the small bowel (e.g., Pentasa uses ethylcellulose-coated microgranules that release 5-ASA throughout the GI tract).
Adverse effects:
- Mesalamine: Nephrotoxicity [2] — interstitial nephritis (monitor renal function)
- Sulfasalazine: Nausea, headache, fever, agranulocytosis, pancreatitis, SJS [2]. Also associated with "sulfa" allergy and pregnancy complications including kernicterus (crosses placenta) and neural tube defects (inhibits absorption and metabolism of folic acid) [2] — always co-prescribe folic acid 5mg daily if using sulfasalazine in women of childbearing age
5-ASA in CD vs UC — An Important Distinction
5-ASA is much more effective in UC than in CD. In UC, 5-ASA is both an induction AND maintenance agent and is the backbone of mild-moderate UC treatment. In CD, 5-ASA has a limited role — only for mild disease, only for induction, and it's NOT effective for maintenance after medical remission. Many students incorrectly apply UC 5-ASA principles to CD. Don't make this mistake.
C. Glucocorticoids
Glucocorticoids [2]:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Indication | Indicated in patients who do not respond to 5-ASA and antibiotics [2] — the workhorse for inducing remission in moderate-severe CD |
| Clinical role | Induction agent only — Ineffective in maintenance of remission and NOT used for long-term [2] |
| Mechanism | Glucocorticoids suppress the immune system at multiple levels: inhibit NF-κB transcription → reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6); reduce leukocyte migration to inflamed tissue; induce apoptosis of T lymphocytes; stabilise lysosomal membranes. They are the most potent non-biologic anti-inflammatory available. |
Key drug distinctions:
| Drug | Route | Dosage | Special Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prednisolone | Oral | 40 mg/day reducing by 5 mg/day at weekly intervals; or 20 mg/day for 4 weeks reducing by 5 mg/day at weekly intervals [2] | More commonly used [2]; systemic effects (Cushingoid, osteoporosis, hyperglycaemia, adrenal suppression) |
| Budesonide | Oral (modified release) | 9 mg/day [2] | Indicated for terminal ileum or ileocaecal disease [2]; extensive first-pass effect in liver → less systemic side effects but also less effective [2]. ~90% hepatic first-pass metabolism → minimal systemic bioavailability |
| Hydrocortisone | IV | 100 mg QDS | Used in acute severe disease (hospital setting) |
| Methylprednisolone | IV | 60 mg/day | Alternative IV steroid |
Why budesonide for ileocaecal disease specifically? Budesonide modified-release formulations (e.g., Entocort) are designed to release the drug in the ileum and right colon — exactly where ileocaecal CD occurs. Because of the extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism (~90% is inactivated on first pass through the liver), systemic steroid side effects are minimised. However, this also means it's less potent than prednisolone for widespread or severe disease.
Critical rules about steroids in CD:
- Calcium and vitamin D supplements required for osteoprotective effect if prescribed for more than 12 weeks [2]
- Never use steroids for maintenance — they don't prevent relapse and cause cumulative toxicity (osteoporosis, cataracts, diabetes, adrenal suppression, avascular necrosis)
- Steroid-dependent = patient relapses when steroids are tapered or within 3 months of stopping → needs immunomodulator or biologic
- Steroid-refractory = no response despite adequate dose → needs escalation to biologic
D. Immunomodulators
Immunomodulators [2]:
These are the bridge between steroids (short-term induction) and long-term maintenance. Their onset of action is slow (2-3 months), so they cannot be used alone for acute flares.
Thiopurines: Azathioprine (AZA) / 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP)
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | AZA is a prodrug → converted to 6-MP → converted to 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) which incorporate into DNA of rapidly dividing immune cells (T lymphocytes) → inhibits purine synthesis → reduces T cell proliferation and clonal expansion. "Azathio-" (sulfur-containing) + "-prine" (purine analogue) — the name tells you it's a purine antimetabolite |
| Clinical role | Maintenance agent — used to maintain steroid-induced remission and allow steroid withdrawal ("steroid-sparing agent") |
| Onset | Slow — 2-3 months to reach full effect (because it takes time for the active metabolites to accumulate and for the pool of existing T cells to turn over) |
| Key screening | TPMT / NUDT15 genotyping BEFORE starting — thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and NUDT15 are enzymes that metabolise thiopurines. Genetic polymorphisms cause deficiency → toxic accumulation of 6-TGN → fatal bone marrow suppression. NUDT15 polymorphisms are particularly common in East Asian populations (including Hong Kong) — up to 2% are homozygous deficient |
| Adverse effects | Myelosuppression (dose-related and idiosyncratic), hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis (idiosyncratic — occurs in ~3%, usually within first month, contraindication to re-challenge), nausea, increased infection risk, lymphoma risk (especially hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in young males on combination AZA + anti-TNF) |
| Monitoring | Regular CBP (every 1-2 weeks initially, then every 3 months) to detect myelosuppression; LFT |
Methotrexate (MTX)
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Folate antagonist — inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) → blocks purine and thymidylate synthesis → inhibits rapidly dividing cells. At low doses used in autoimmune disease, the immunosuppressive effect is more complex — it promotes adenosine release (anti-inflammatory) and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines |
| Indication | Indicated in active or relapsing disease refractory to or intolerant of AZA or 6-MP [2] — second-line immunomodulator |
| Clinical role | Both induction and maintenance |
| Route | SC or IM (oral bioavailability is variable) |
| Adverse effects | Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFT), pneumonitis, myelosuppression, teratogenicity (ABSOLUTE contraindication in pregnancy — must ensure effective contraception) |
| Co-prescription | Folic acid 5 mg weekly (on a different day from MTX) to reduce side effects |
| Note | Methotrexate is NOT effective in UC unlike in Crohn's disease [2] — this is an important distinction |
E. Biologic Therapies
This is the most important and rapidly evolving area of CD management. Biologics are monoclonal antibodies that target specific components of the inflammatory cascade.
Anti-TNF-α Agents
Biologic therapies (Anti-TNFα) [2]:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Indication | Indicated in patients with refractory disease or patients with extra-intestinal manifestations and fistulas [2] |
| Clinical role | Induction agent AND Maintenance agent [2] — unlike steroids which are induction-only |
| Mechanism | TNF-α ("tumour necrosis factor alpha") is the master pro-inflammatory cytokine in CD, driving macrophage activation, granuloma formation, tissue destruction, and fistula formation. Anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies bind and neutralise TNF-α → rapidly suppress inflammation. They also induce apoptosis of TNF-expressing inflammatory cells and promote mucosal healing. |
Pre-treatment screening — MANDATORY [2]:
MUST screen for TB with CXR / QuantiFERON-TB Gold + HBV infection with HBsAg [2]:
- Requires TB prophylaxis with isoniazid or rifampicin [2] — if latent TB is detected, treat with isoniazid 9 months (or rifampicin 4 months) BEFORE or concurrently with anti-TNF
- Requires HBV prophylaxis with entecavir [2] — if HBsAg positive or anti-HBc positive, start antiviral prophylaxis to prevent reactivation
Key drugs:
| Drug | Structure | Route | Induction | Maintenance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infliximab (Remicade) | Chimeric (mouse-human) anti-TNF antibody | IV | 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks [2] | 5 mg/kg Q8 weeks [2] | 1st line biologic; response quicker and better [2]; "chimeric" = part mouse, part human → higher immunogenicity → anti-drug antibody formation |
| Adalimumab (Humira) | Humanised anti-TNF antibody | SC | 160 mg at 0 week, 80 mg at 2 weeks [2] | 40 mg Q2 weeks [2] | Response slower and less effective [2]; "humanised" = fully human → lower immunogenicity; convenient SC self-administration |
Stopping rules:
- Do not stop anti-TNF easily unless there is deep remission of at least 18 months with normal blood and endoscopic parameters [2]
- Deep remission = clinical remission + biochemical remission (normal CRP, calprotectin) + endoscopic remission (mucosal healing)
Contraindications [2]:
| Contraindication | Why |
|---|---|
| Latent untreated or active TB | TNF-α is essential for granuloma formation that contains TB bacilli → anti-TNF → granuloma breakdown → disseminated TB |
| Lymphoma | Anti-TNF may promote lymphoma progression (TNF-α has some anti-tumour activity) |
| Heart failure NYHA Class III-IV | TNF-α supports cardiac function in failing hearts paradoxically; anti-TNF worsens outcomes in severe HF |
| Demyelinating disease (Multiple sclerosis) | Anti-TNF can trigger or worsen demyelination (TNF-α has complex roles in myelin maintenance) |
| Optic neuritis | Related to demyelinating risk |
Adverse effects [2]:
- Reactivation of infection (e.g. TB/HBV)
- Lymphoma (especially hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma — rare but often fatal, particularly in young males on combination AZA + anti-TNF)
- Non-melanoma skin cancer
- Infusion reactions (infliximab — acute anaphylactoid reactions; delayed serum sickness-like reactions)
- Anti-drug antibodies → loss of response (more common with infliximab due to chimeric structure; co-administration with AZA reduces antibody formation — this is the rationale for combination therapy)
Combination Therapy: Anti-TNF + Immunomodulator
The landmark SONIC trial showed that combination of infliximab + azathioprine was superior to either agent alone for inducing steroid-free remission and mucosal healing in moderate-severe CD. Why? AZA reduces the formation of anti-drug antibodies against infliximab → maintains higher drug levels → better efficacy. This is now standard practice for moderate-severe CD, particularly with infliximab.
Other Biologics (Beyond Anti-TNF)
For patients who fail or are intolerant of anti-TNF agents:
| Drug | Target | Mechanism | Key Indications | Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vedolizumab (Entyvio) | α4β7 integrin | Blocks gut-homing of T lymphocytes — α4β7 integrin on T cells binds MAdCAM-1 on gut endothelial cells → T cell migration into gut mucosa. Vedolizumab blocks this → "gut-selective" immunosuppression without systemic immunosuppression | Moderate-severe CD failing anti-TNF; gut-selective → safer profile (less systemic infections) | IV Q8 weeks |
| Ustekinumab (Stelara) | IL-12/23 (p40 subunit) | IL-12 drives Th1 differentiation; IL-23 drives Th17 differentiation. Both pathways are central to CD pathogenesis. Ustekinumab blocks both → reduces Th1/Th17 inflammation | Moderate-severe CD failing anti-TNF; also effective for extraintestinal manifestations (psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis) | IV loading then SC Q8-12 weeks |
| Risankizumab (Skyrizi) | IL-23 (p19 subunit) | Selectively blocks IL-23 only (not IL-12) → more targeted than ustekinumab | Moderate-severe CD; increasingly used as first-line biologic in some guidelines | IV loading then SC |
| Upadacitinib (Rinvoq) | JAK inhibitor (JAK1) | Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors block intracellular signalling downstream of multiple cytokine receptors. JAK1 inhibition reduces signalling from IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-23 | Moderate-severe CD; oral administration (advantage) | Oral |
The Evolving Biologics Landscape
The field is moving rapidly. In 2025-2026, risankizumab (anti-IL-23) and upadacitinib (JAK1 inhibitor) have emerged as important options. The traditional hierarchy of "try anti-TNF first, then vedolizumab/ustekinumab" is being challenged by head-to-head trials showing comparable or superior efficacy of newer agents. For exams, know anti-TNF agents in detail (they remain the most commonly tested) and be aware of the newer options.
F. Small Molecules
| Drug | Class | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib | JAK inhibitor (pan-JAK, primarily JAK1/3) | Blocks multiple cytokine signalling pathways | Approved for UC; NOT approved for CD (failed in CD trials — interesting because it highlights that CD and UC have distinct immunological drivers) |
| Upadacitinib | Selective JAK1 inhibitor | More selective than tofacitinib | Approved for CD; oral — avoids injections/infusions |
| Ozanimod | S1P receptor modulator | Traps lymphocytes in lymph nodes → reduces lymphocyte trafficking to the gut | Approved for UC; trials ongoing in CD |
II. Surgical Treatment
Surgical treatment is NOT curative in Crohn's disease and is mainly used to treat complications only [2].
This is the most important principle. Unlike UC where total proctocolectomy removes ALL diseased tissue (because UC only affects the colon/rectum), CD can recur anywhere in the GI tract after resection. Therefore:
Surgical principles [4]:
- Preservation of bowel length (should document residual SB length) [4] — repeated resections can lead to short bowel syndrome (< 200 cm of remaining small bowel → malabsorption, dependence on TPN)
- Conservative and minimal resection as possible [2]
- Extended resection does not decrease recurrence [2] — you don't need wide margins. Even a 2cm margin is sufficient because recurrence is driven by systemic immune factors, not "missed" disease at the resection margin
- Bypass is NOT recommended since there is risk of malignant transformation in the bypassed segment [2]
Indications for Surgery
Emergency:
- Fulminant colitis [4]
- Toxic megacolon: non-obstructive colonic dilatation with systemic toxicity [4]
- Impending perforation [4]
- Life-threatening haemorrhage [4]
- Perforation / Sepsis [2]
Elective:
- Persistent symptoms refractory to medical treatment [2]
- Strictures (intestinal obstruction) [2]
- Abscess [2]
- Fistula [2]
- Malignancy: treatment (e.g. biopsy-proven adenoCA) or prophylaxis (e.g. dysplasia on surveillance Bx) [4]
- Luminal complications: SBO, abscess, enterocutaneous fistula [4]
- Perianal diseases: abscess, fistula, anorectal stricture [4]
- Debilitating EIM, except EIM independent of colitis activity — sacroiliitis, hepatobiliary complications [4]
Key point from lecture slides: Rarely curative but lead to long-lasting remissions in some patients. Low threshold for ileocolic CD [12].
Surgical Procedures by Location and Behaviour
1. Small Bowel Involvement [2]
- Small bowel resection with primary anastomosis — remove the diseased segment and join the healthy ends
2. Large Bowel Involvement [2]
| Procedure | Indication |
|---|---|
| Right hemicolectomy | MOST commonly performed [2] — because ileocaecal disease is the most common CD location |
| Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) | If rectum is spared (functional rectum preserved) |
| Total proctocolectomy with IPAA | In patients with limited perianal disease |
| Total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy | If rectum is affected / severely diseased perianal disease |
3. Ileocaecal CD [13]
80% of ileocaecal CD require surgery [13]. This is a remarkable statistic — the majority eventually need resection.
Key points from lecture slides [13]:
- An alternative to medical Tx in the early disease course — the LIR!C trial showed that laparoscopic ileocaecal resection is a valid alternative to infliximab for limited ileocaecal CD, with comparable quality of life at 1 year
- Technically more difficult due to: adhesion due to inflammation, phlegmon, shortened mesentery [13]
- Reduction of adhesive bowel obstruction (laparoscopic advantage) [13]
- Consider stopping medical Tx after one year of remission [13]
- From the Stevens et al. (Lancet 2020) data [14]: Resection group: 42% no Crohn's-related medication; 26% anti-TNF but none required 2nd OT. Infliximab group: 48% need resection — this demonstrates that early surgery for ileocaecal CD can reduce long-term medication burden
4. Strictures [2]
Management strategy for small bowel strictures [15]:
- If inflammatory → Medical therapy [15]
- If fibrostenotic → Stricturoplasty preferred; Resection if suspect malignancy or isolated stricture [15]
| Procedure | Indication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Heineke-Mikulicz stricturoplasty | Short stricture < 10 cm [2] | Incision along the length of the stricture → closure perpendicular to the bowel axis (same principle as pyloroplasty) → widens the lumen without removing bowel |
| Finney stricturoplasty | Long stricture 10-20 cm [2] | Bowel is folded into U-shape → side-to-side anastomosis created |
| Endoscopic balloon dilatation | Distal ileal strictures are sometimes amenable to balloon dilatation [2]; also for anastomotic strictures | Less invasive; can be repeated; limited to short strictures (< 4-5 cm) without acute inflammation or fistula |
| Resection | Suspicion of malignancy; failed dilatation/stricturoplasty | Remove the segment entirely |
Why stricturoplasty over resection when possible? Because it preserves bowel length. CD patients may need multiple operations over their lifetime — if you resect every time, you'll eventually cause short bowel syndrome. Stricturoplasty widens the narrowed segment without sacrificing bowel.
Important exception: NO role for stricturoplasty in Crohn's colitis since there is a 7% risk of malignancy over 20 years [2] — large bowel strictures in CD should be resected, not stricturoplastied, because of the CRC risk.
Non-operative treatment for partial obstruction applies in several situations including Crohn's disease [16] — if the patient has partial SBO from a known CD stricture, initial conservative management (bowel rest, IV fluids, nasogastric decompression) may resolve the episode without surgery.
5. Fistula Management
Enterocutaneous fistula: abnormal communications between 2 epithelialised surfaces [4].
Causes: FRIEND [4] — Foreign body, Radiation, Inflammation/infection, Epithelialization, Neoplasm, Distal obstruction.
SNAP management principle [2]:
| Step | Details |
|---|---|
| S — Sepsis control | Antibiotics + Percutaneous abscess drainage (CT-guided) [2] |
| N — Nutrition support | TPN aids closure of fistula [2] — bowel rest reduces fistula output; nutrition prevents catabolism |
| A — Anatomical location | Imaging to locate fistula: Fistulogram / CT or MR enteroclysis [2] |
| P — Procedure | Medical treatment by Infliximab OR Surgical treatment by en-bloc resection of bowel involving fistula with primary anastomosis and diverting stoma [2] |
Enterocutaneous fistula specific management [4]:
- Delineate anatomy of fistula: CT abdomen
- Replace fluid and electrolytes, chart fistula output
- Wound care, e.g. negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
- Bowel rest → drugs (loperamide, octreotide) → endoscopic/surgical closure [4]
6. Perianal CD [11]
This is high-yield and has its own dedicated algorithm from the lecture slides.
Key facts [11]:
- 24.5% of patients with Crohn's disease have perianal disease
- 83% required surgery
- More complicated courses of fistula tract
- MRI and EAUS necessary to document before the definitive treatment
- Anti-TNF ± AZA and/or seton drainage
Perianal CD Treatment Algorithm [11][17]:
Step-by-step explanation:
- Clinical assessment: exclude abscess — undrained sepsis will NOT respond to biologics. You must drain pus first.
- Antibiotics (ciprofloxacin/metronidazole) + AZA; MRI and endoscopy to delineate the anatomy [17]
- EUA (examination under anaesthesia) ± drainage ± seton — a seton is a suture/silastic loop threaded through the fistula tract that keeps it draining and prevents abscess re-accumulation. It establishes a "controlled fistula" while the inflammation is treated medically. [4]
- Infliximab induction (5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks) [17]
- If complete response → remove seton at week 6 → continue infliximab 8-weekly → eventual MRI assessment → if healed, stop IFX and continue AZA [17]
- If partial response → adalimumab [17]
- If no response → consider surgical intervention (defunctioning stoma ± proctectomy) [4][17]
Surgical options for perianal CD [2][4]:
- Simple fistula: Fistulotomy [2]
- Complex fistula: Seton drainage / Azathioprine / Biologics (Infliximab/Adalimumab) [2]
- If failed: defunctioning stoma ± proctectomy [4]
III. Nutritional Support
Nutrition is a critical and often underappreciated pillar of CD management:
| Modality | Indication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) | First-line induction therapy in paediatric CD (equivalent to steroids); adjunctive in adults | Polymeric formula exclusively for 6-8 weeks → induces remission by altering the gut microbiome and reducing antigenic exposure. Avoids steroid side effects in growing children. |
| Supplemental nutrition | All CD patients with malnutrition | Iron supplementation (IV preferred if oral intolerant), B12 injections (if terminal ileal disease/resection), vitamin D, calcium, folate |
| TPN | Fistula management, pre-operative optimisation, short bowel syndrome | Provides bowel rest; aids fistula closure; corrects malnutrition before surgery |
IV. Post-Operative Prophylaxis Against Recurrence
Since CD recurs after surgery (endoscopic recurrence at the neo-terminal ileum in ~70-80% at 1 year without prophylaxis), post-operative prophylaxis is essential:
| Risk Stratification | Prophylaxis |
|---|---|
| Low risk (first resection, short stricture, non-smoker) | Mesalamine or surveillance alone |
| High risk (smoker, penetrating disease, second resection, extensive disease) | Thiopurine (AZA/6-MP) or anti-TNF |
| Very high risk | Anti-TNF (infliximab/adalimumab) |
- Colonoscopy at 6-12 months post-surgery to assess for recurrence (Rutgeerts score)
- Faecal calprotectin predicts post-op relapse [3] — rising calprotectin before symptoms appear allows early intervention
V. Management of Dysplasia / CRC Surveillance
IBD-associated CRC risk factors [18]:
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis; History of colorectal neoplasia; Family history of CRC in first-degree relative; Smoking
- Disease duration; Disease extent; Cumulative inflammatory burden; Active inflammation endoscopically or histologically
- Stricture (UC, longer disease duration, proximal location, symptoms); Shortened tubular colon; Pseudopolyps
- Early age of disease onset; Male sex
Management of dysplasia [19]:
- Endoscopically visible dysplasia:
- Polypoid: polypectomy
- Non-polypoid: endoscopic resection if complete resection possible
- Surgery should be considered if not endoscopically feasible
- Endoscopically invisible dysplasia:
- Associated with high rate of CRC
- Referred to an experienced endoscopist
- If LGD or no dysplasia: 5% LGD changed to HGD or CRC; Surveillance or surgery?
- If invisible HGD or multifocal LGD, surgery should be offered
Summary Table: Drug Classes at a Glance
| Drug Class | Induction | Maintenance | Key CD Indication | Must-Know Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | Adjunct | No | Perianal, septic complications, colonic CD | NOT for isolated SB disease |
| 5-ASA | Yes (mild only) | No (unlike UC) | Mild CD without systemic symptoms | Sulfasalazine = colon only |
| Corticosteroids | Yes | No (never) | Moderate-severe CD | Budesonide for ileocaecal; never long-term |
| Thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) | No (too slow) | Yes | Steroid-sparing maintenance | Screen TPMT/NUDT15; pancreatitis risk |
| Methotrexate | Yes | Yes | AZA-intolerant/refractory | Teratogenic; NOT effective in UC |
| Anti-TNF | Yes | Yes | Moderate-severe, fistulising, EIMs | Screen TB/HBV; contraindicated in HF, MS |
| Vedolizumab | Yes | Yes | Anti-TNF failure; gut-selective | Slow onset; less effective in fistulising CD |
| Ustekinumab | Yes | Yes | Anti-TNF failure; also treats skin EIMs | Targets IL-12/23 |
| Surgery | N/A | N/A | Complications, refractory disease | NOT curative; preserve bowel length |
High Yield Summary — Management of Crohn's Disease
Principles: Induce and maintain remission; treat-to-target (mucosal healing); smoking cessation; early escalation in high-risk patients.
Medical therapy by role:
- Induction only: Corticosteroids (prednisolone, budesonide)
- Maintenance only: Thiopurines (AZA/6-MP)
- Both: Anti-TNF (infliximab 1st line, adalimumab), vedolizumab, ustekinumab, methotrexate
- 5-ASA: Induction in mild CD only; NOT effective for maintenance (unlike UC)
Anti-TNF key points: Screen TB (CXR + IGRA) and HBV; prophylaxis if positive. Contraindications: active TB, lymphoma, severe HF, MS. Infliximab = chimeric, IV; Adalimumab = humanised, SC. Don't stop unless deep remission ≥ 18 months.
Surgery: NOT curative; preserve bowel length. Indications: complications (stricture, abscess, fistula, perforation, bleeding), refractory disease (CDAI > 450, HBI > 15), malignancy. 80% ileocaecal CD require surgery — laparoscopic ileocaecal resection is a valid early alternative.
Strictures: Inflammatory → medical; Fibrostenotic → stricturoplasty (SB) or resection (LB). No stricturoplasty in colon (malignancy risk).
Fistulae: SNAP (Sepsis, Nutrition, Anatomy, Procedure). Anti-TNF ± AZA. Enterocutaneous: bowel rest → loperamide/octreotide → surgical closure.
Perianal CD: Drain abscess first → antibiotics + AZA → EUA + seton → infliximab → if partial: adalimumab → if failed: defunctioning stoma ± proctectomy.
Active Recall - Crohn's Disease: Management
1. Why are corticosteroids used for induction but NEVER for maintenance in Crohn's disease? What do you use for maintenance instead?
Show mark scheme
Steroids are effective for inducing remission by rapidly suppressing inflammation but are ineffective at preventing relapse (maintenance). Long-term steroid use causes cumulative toxicity: osteoporosis, diabetes, cataracts, adrenal suppression, avascular necrosis. For maintenance, use thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) as steroid-sparing agents, or biologics (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab) in moderate-severe disease.
2. List the contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and explain the mechanism for each.
Show mark scheme
1. Active or latent untreated TB: TNF-alpha maintains granulomas containing TB bacilli; blocking TNF causes granuloma breakdown and disseminated TB. 2. Lymphoma: TNF has some anti-tumour activity; blocking may promote lymphoma. 3. Severe heart failure (NYHA III-IV): TNF paradoxically supports cardiac function in failing hearts. 4. Demyelinating disease (MS): TNF has complex roles in myelin maintenance. 5. Optic neuritis: related to demyelinating risk.
3. Describe the SNAP principle for managing fistulae in Crohn's disease.
Show mark scheme
S = Sepsis control (antibiotics + CT-guided percutaneous abscess drainage). N = Nutrition support (TPN aids fistula closure, bowel rest reduces output). A = Anatomical delineation (imaging with fistulogram, CT or MR enteroclysis to locate fistula). P = Procedure (medical treatment with infliximab, OR surgical treatment with en-bloc resection of bowel + primary anastomosis + diverting stoma).
4. A patient with ileocaecal Crohn's disease has a 15cm fibrostenotic stricture of the terminal ileum. What surgical options are available and which would you choose?
Show mark scheme
Options: Heineke-Mikulicz stricturoplasty (short stricture less than 10cm - not suitable here), Finney stricturoplasty (long stricture 10-20cm - suitable for this 15cm stricture), endoscopic balloon dilatation (for short strictures only), or resection. Choose Finney stricturoplasty to preserve bowel length. Resection if malignancy is suspected. Extended resection does not decrease recurrence. No role for bypass due to malignant transformation risk in bypassed segment.
5. Outline the perianal CD treatment algorithm as described in the lecture slides, starting from initial assessment to management of non-responders.
Show mark scheme
1. Clinical assessment to exclude abscess. 2. Antibiotics + AZA, MRI and endoscopy to delineate anatomy. 3. EUA with drainage and/or seton insertion. 4. Infliximab 5mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks. 5. If complete response: remove seton at week 6, continue infliximab 8-weekly, MRI scan, then consider stopping IFX and continue AZA. 6. If partial response: try adalimumab, continue IFX and reassess 6-monthly. 7. If no response: consider surgical intervention (defunctioning stoma with or without proctectomy).
6. Why is TPMT/NUDT15 genotyping mandatory before starting azathioprine, and why is this particularly important in Hong Kong?
Show mark scheme
TPMT and NUDT15 are enzymes that metabolise thiopurines. Genetic polymorphisms cause enzyme deficiency leading to toxic accumulation of 6-thioguanine nucleotides causing fatal bone marrow suppression (pancytopenia). NUDT15 polymorphisms are particularly common in East Asian populations including Hong Kong (up to 2% homozygous deficient). Testing before starting treatment identifies patients who need dose reduction or alternative therapy.
References
[2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease, treatment section) [3] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p11 — faecal calprotectin) [4] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — surgical management; Surgical procedures for CD) [11] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p45 — Perianal CD) [12] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p27 — Indications for surgery) [13] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p41 — Ileocaecal CD) [14] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p43 — Stevens et al. LIR!C trial data) [15] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p28 — Small bowel stricture) [16] Lecture slides: GC 194. Intestinal obstruction colorectal cancer.pdf (p27 — Non-operative treatment) [17] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p49 — Perianal CD algorithm) [18] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p52 — IBD-associated CRC risk factors) [19] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p55 — Management of dysplasia)
Complications of Crohn's Disease
Understanding the complications of CD flows directly from understanding the pathology: transmural inflammation of a chronic, relapsing disease that can affect any part of the GI tract. Almost every complication can be traced back to one of these three features. Let's work through them systematically.
The complications can be organised into:
- Luminal/structural complications (direct consequences of transmural inflammation)
- Perianal complications
- Metabolic/nutritional complications (consequences of malabsorption)
- Malignant complications
- Extraintestinal manifestations (immune-mediated complications beyond the gut)
- Treatment-related complications
- Post-surgical complications
I. Luminal / Structural Complications
These are the hallmarks of CD that distinguish it from UC. They all stem from the transmural (full-thickness) nature of CD inflammation.
1. Fistula Formation
Fistulas are communication that connect two epithelial-lined organs [2].
Pathophysiology — explained from first principles [2]:
- Transmural inflammation leads to development of sinus tract — the inflammation erodes through the mucosa → submucosa → muscularis → serosa
- Sinus tract that penetrates the serosa gives rise to fistulas — once the inflammation breaches the outer wall of the bowel, it can track to any adjacent structure
- The sinus tract becomes epithelialised over time (lined by epithelium), which is why fistulae don't heal spontaneously — you can't easily close a tube that has its own lining
Types of fistula and their clinical presentations [2]:
| Fistula Type | Structures Connected | Clinical Presentation | Why These Symptoms? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteroenteric | Bowel loop → bowel loop | Palpable mass; diarrhoea (bypass of absorptive surface) | Inflammatory mass from adherent loops; short-circuiting of intestinal contents |
| Enterovesical | Bowel → bladder | Urinary symptoms due to UTI; pneumaturia (air in urine); faecaluria (faeces in urine) | Bowel contents (gas, bacteria, faecal material) enter the bladder → recurrent polymicrobial UTIs, air bubbles in urine |
| Enterovaginal | Bowel → vagina | Passage of gas or faeces through vagina | Bowel contents exit via vagina; extremely distressing for patients |
| Enterocutaneous | Bowel → skin surface | Drainage of bowel contents to surface of skin | Visible fistula opening on abdominal wall with faeculent/bilious output |
| Retroperitoneal | Bowel → retroperitoneum | Psoas abscess or ureteral obstruction with hydronephrosis | Inflammatory/infectious material tracks into retroperitoneal space → can compress the ureter or form abscess in the psoas muscle |
Enterocutaneous fistula [4][20]:
Causes: FRIEND [4] — Foreign body, Radiation, Inflammation/infection, Epithelialization, Neoplasm, Distal obstruction.
Management follows the SNAP principle [2][20]:
- S — Sepsis control: Abscess drainage, antibiotics [20]
- N — Nutrition support: High vs low output; Nutritional assessment and support [20]
- A — Anatomy: CTE or MRE to delineate [20]
- P — Procedure: Medication adjustment; Closure with biological agents; En-bloc resection of involved bowel and fistula [20]
High vs Low Output Fistula
A high-output fistula ( > 500 mL/day) is more likely to be proximal (jejunal) and causes severe dehydration, electrolyte disturbances (hypokalaemia, hyponatraemia, metabolic acidosis), and malnutrition. A low-output fistula ( < 200 mL/day) is more likely to be distal (ileal/colonic) and is more likely to close spontaneously. Output guides the intensity of fluid/electrolyte replacement and nutritional support.
2. Abscess Formation
Some sinus tracts may lead to abscess formation and present as acute localised peritonitis with fever, abdominal pain and tenderness [2].
Pathophysiology: Transmural inflammation breaches the serosa → a sinus tract develops → if the sinus is walled off by adjacent structures (omentum, mesentery, other bowel loops) instead of forming a free perforation, a contained collection of pus forms = abscess.
Types by location:
- Intra-abdominal (mesenteric, inter-loop, pelvic, subphrenic)
- Retroperitoneal (psoas abscess — a classic CD complication; presents with hip pain, flexion deformity of the hip, and swinging fever)
- Perianal (see below)
Clinical features:
- Persistent fever (especially swinging/spiking pyrexia) despite antibiotics
- No improvement in abdominal pain despite antibiotics
- Localised tenderness, palpable mass
- Leucocytosis, elevated CRP
Management: CT-guided percutaneous drainage + antibiotics. Surgical drainage if percutaneous drainage fails or is not feasible. Must drain abscess before starting biologics (undrained sepsis + immunosuppression = catastrophe).
Abscess perforation can lead to diffuse peritonitis [2] — a surgical emergency.
3. Phlegmon Formation
Some sinus tracts may present as a phlegmon [2].
- Phlegmon is a walled-off inflammatory mass without bacterial infection [2] — think of it as an organised collection of inflamed, adherent bowel loops and mesentery, but without frank pus
- Phlegmon may be palpable on abdominal examination [2]
- Ileal involvement is suggested by a mass in the RLQ [2]
- Differentiated from abscess on CT: phlegmon = solid inflammatory mass without a fluid collection; abscess = rim-enhancing fluid collection
- Management: often responds to medical therapy (steroids, biologics); surgery may be needed if it doesn't resolve
4. Stricture and Intestinal Obstruction
Strictures are common in CD [1] — they are listed as a key surgical complication [12].
Pathophysiology: Chronic transmural inflammation → fibrosis (replacement of normal tissue with collagen) → progressive luminal narrowing → intestinal obstruction. This is the natural progression of untreated or under-treated CD.
Two types of strictures — this distinction is CRITICAL for management:
| Type | Mechanism | MRE Findings | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory stricture | Active inflammation causing oedema and narrowing | Wall enhancement, T2 hyperintensity (oedema), restricted diffusion | Medical therapy [15] — anti-inflammatory drugs can reverse the oedema |
| Fibrostenotic stricture | Chronic fibrosis causing fixed narrowing | No enhancement, T2 hypointensity (fibrosis, no oedema) | Stricturoplasty preferred; Resection if suspect malignancy or isolated stricture [15] — fibrosis does NOT respond to medical therapy |
Clinical features of obstruction:
- Colicky abdominal pain (waves of peristalsis against the obstruction)
- Abdominal distension
- Vomiting (bilious if distal to ampulla; faeculent if distal SBO)
- Obstipation (complete obstruction) or reduced stool/flatus (partial)
- High-pitched/tinkling bowel sounds → later absent bowel sounds
Important points:
- NO role for stricturoplasty in Crohn's colitis since there is a 7% risk of malignancy over 20 years [2]
- Bypass is NOT recommended since there is risk of malignant transformation in the bypassed segment [2]
- In CD, colonic strictures should be considered malignant until proven otherwise (biopsy essential)
5. Perforation
Pathophysiology: Transmural inflammation can erode completely through the bowel wall → free perforation into the peritoneal cavity → generalised faecal/purulent peritonitis.
Types:
- Free perforation: Faecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity → generalised peritonitis → surgical emergency
- Contained perforation: Walled off by adjacent structures → forms abscess (see above)
- Perforation can also occur secondary to toxic megacolon (though this is more common in UC)
Clinical features:
- Sudden severe abdominal pain
- Peritonism: board-like rigidity, rebound tenderness, guarding
- Absent bowel sounds
- Tachycardia, hypotension, fever → septic shock
- CXR: pneumoperitoneum (free air under diaphragm) — though this may be absent in contained perforations
Management: Emergency laparotomy, resection of perforated segment, often with temporary stoma (anastomosis in the presence of peritoneal contamination is risky due to high leak rates).
6. Severe Bleeding [2]
- Massive GI haemorrhage occurs but is less common than in UC or diverticular disease
- Arises from erosion of transmural inflammation into blood vessels in the bowel wall
- Management: resuscitation → endoscopic haemostasis if possible → angiographic embolisation → surgical resection of the bleeding segment if all else fails
- Listed as a surgical indication: Severe bleeding [2]
7. Toxic Megacolon
Toxic megacolon is defined as total or segmental non-obstructive dilatation of colon ≥ 6 cm or caecum > 9 cm and the presence of systemic toxicity [2].
- More commonly associated with UC, but can occur in Crohn's colitis
- Pathophysiology: Severe transmural inflammation destroys the muscularis propria and neural plexus → loss of colonic tone → massive dilatation. The inflamed, thinned wall is at imminent risk of perforation.
- Presents with fever, tachycardia, hypotension, dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, hypoalbuminaemia and mental changes [2]
- Diagnosis is made by plain AXR [2]
- Management: bowel rest and total parenteral nutrition, fluid and electrolyte replacement and corticosteroids [2]. If no response within 24-48 hours → emergency surgery (total colectomy + end ileostomy)
- Fulminant colitis and impending perforation: thumb-printing sign on AXR are surgical emergencies [4]
II. Perianal Complications
Perianal diseases are common in CD, occurring in up to 40% of patients [1]. 24.5% of patients with Crohn's disease have perianal disease and 83% required surgery [11].
| Perianal Complication | Description | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| Perianal abscess | Acute, tender, fluctuant, erythematous swelling adjacent to the anus | Transmural inflammation of the rectum → tracks through the anorectal spaces → bacterial infection → pus collection |
| Perianal fistula | More complicated courses of fistula tract [11]; persistent purulent or faeculent discharge from an external opening near the anus | An abscess that drains spontaneously or is surgically drained → the track persists and epithelialises → chronic fistula |
| Anal fissure | Painful linear tear in the anal canal; classically lateral in CD (vs posterior midline in idiopathic) | Transmural inflammation of the anoderm; NOT from mechanical tearing |
| Skin tags | Large, oedematous, "elephant ear" perianal skin tags | Chronic lymphoedema from obstructed lymphatic drainage in inflamed perianal tissue; virtually pathognomonic of CD |
| Anorectal stricture | Narrowing of the anal canal/rectum causing difficulty with defecation | Chronic perianal inflammation → fibrosis → stricture |
MRI and EAUS are necessary to document before the definitive treatment [11] — because the anatomy of perianal fistulae is complex (relationship to sphincter muscles) and determines the surgical approach.
Management: Anti-TNF ± AZA and/or seton drainage [11] (see Management section for full algorithm).
III. Metabolic and Nutritional Complications
These arise primarily from terminal ileal disease or resection and chronic inflammation-driven malabsorption.
A. Malabsorption-Related
| Complication | Pathophysiology | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B12 deficiency | Terminal ileum is the sole site of B12 absorption → ileal disease or resection → no B12 uptake | Megaloblastic anaemia, peripheral neuropathy, subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord [2]; glossitis |
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Chronic GI blood loss + impaired iron absorption (duodenal/jejunal disease) | Microcytic hypochromic anaemia; fatigue, pallor, koilonychia, angular stomatitis |
| Anaemia of chronic disease | Chronic inflammation → hepcidin production by liver → hepcidin blocks ferroportin on enterocytes and macrophages → iron sequestration → reduced iron availability for erythropoiesis | Normocytic normochromic anaemia (or microcytic); low serum iron, normal/high ferritin |
| Fat-soluble vitamin deficiency (A, D, E, K) | Bile salt malabsorption (terminal ileal disease) → impaired fat absorption → fat-soluble vitamins not absorbed | Vitamin D: osteomalacia, osteoporosis; Vitamin K: coagulopathy (prolonged PT/INR); Vitamin A: night blindness; Vitamin E: neuropathy |
| Steatorrhoea | Bile acid malabsorption due to inflamed or resected terminal ileum; bacterial overgrowth from small bowel strictures and enterocolonic fistula [2] | Pale, greasy, smelly and bulky stool that floats on water and difficult to flush [2] |
B. Gallstones (Cholelithiasis) [2]
Altered bile composition since resection of the ileum interrupts the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids and causes bile to be supersaturated with cholesterol [21].
Step-by-step pathophysiology:
- Normal: bile salts are absorbed in the terminal ileum → return to the liver via portal circulation (enterohepatic circulation) → re-secreted into bile
- Terminal ileal disease/resection → bile salt malabsorption → depleted bile salt pool
- Bile becomes supersaturated with cholesterol (normally, bile salts keep cholesterol in solution)
- Cholesterol precipitates → cholesterol gallstones
- Additionally: reduced oral intake / TPN → bile stasis → further promotes stone formation [21]
C. Kidney Stones (Nephrolithiasis — Calcium Oxalate) [2]
Increased risk of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis [21].
Step-by-step pathophysiology [21]:
- Normal: dietary calcium binds dietary oxalate in the gut lumen → insoluble calcium oxalate complex → excreted in stool (never absorbed)
- In CD with fat malabsorption: unabsorbed fatty acids preferentially bind calcium in the gut lumen → calcium is unavailable to bind oxalate
- Free oxalate remains in the gut lumen → absorbed in the colon → enters the bloodstream → filtered by kidneys → hyperoxaluria
- Calcium binds to unabsorbed fatty acids leaving oxalate free to pass into the colon to be absorbed and then filtered by the kidneys [21]
- In the renal tubules: oxalate + urinary calcium → calcium oxalate kidney stones
Prevention [21]:
- Increased fluid intake
- Low oxalate diet
- Correction of metabolic acidosis with potassium citrate (citrate inhibits calcium oxalate crystallisation)
D. Metabolic Bone Disease [21]
Primary due to malabsorption of calcium and vitamin D, both of which are consequences of fat malabsorption [21].
- Also contributed to by corticosteroid use (steroids → osteoblast apoptosis, reduced calcium absorption, increased renal calcium excretion)
- Increased risk for osteomalacia, osteopenia, osteoporosis and secondary hyperparathyroidism [21]
- Osteomalacia = defective mineralisation of osteoid (soft bones)
- Osteoporosis = reduced bone mass
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism: low calcium → PTH secretion → bone resorption to maintain serum calcium
- Managed with magnesium, calcium and vitamin D supplements [21]
- DEXA scan for bone density monitoring
E. Short Bowel Syndrome
This is a complication of treatment rather than the disease itself — repeated bowel resections can lead to short gut syndrome [2].
- Defined as < 200 cm of remaining small bowel (or < 100 cm without colon)
- Loss of absorptive surface → global malabsorption → dependence on TPN
- Complications of short bowel syndrome include [21]: electrolyte deficiency (hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia), trace element deficiency (zinc, copper, selenium), iron deficiency, essential fatty acid deficiency, metabolic bone disease, gallstones, kidney stones, oesophagitis/PUD (gastrin hypersecretion), TPN-associated complications (line infections, liver disease)
- This is precisely why surgical principle = preservation of bowel length [4] and conservative and minimum resection [12] are emphasised
IV. Malignant Complications
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) [2]
CRC in IBD patients is preceded by dysplasia. Incidence of CRC in IBD: 18% after 30 years of colitis [22].
Pathophysiology: The dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in IBD differs from the sporadic adenoma-carcinoma sequence:
- Sporadic CRC: Normal mucosa → adenoma → carcinoma (discrete polyp)
- IBD-CRC: Chronic inflammation → flat dysplasia (not a polyp) → carcinoma. The chronic inflammatory milieu generates reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, and promotes clonal expansion of dysplastic cells across a wide field ("field cancerisation")
Risk factors for IBD-associated colorectal neoplasia [18]:
| Category | Risk Factors |
|---|---|
| Patient-specific | Primary sclerosing cholangitis; History of colorectal neoplasia; Family history of CRC in first-degree relative; Smoking; Early age of disease onset; Male sex [18] |
| Disease-specific | Disease duration; Disease extent; Cumulative inflammatory burden; Active inflammation endoscopically or histologically [18] |
| Endoscopic features | Stricture (UC, longer disease duration, proximal location, symptoms); Shortened tubular colon; Pseudopolyps [18] |
CRC Surveillance [23]:
AGA guideline 2010 [23]:
- Started at a maximum 8 years after UC or Crohn's colitis
- Optimal surveillance interval not clearly defined
- Left-sided or extensive colitis: within 1-2 years after initial screening colonoscopy
- After two negative examinations, every 1 to 3 years
- Individualised (i.e. presence of other risk factors)
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: yearly
- Ulcerative proctitis: not considered at increased risk
- Ideally, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed when the disease is in remission
Surveillance methods [2]:
- Chromoendoscopy — highest yield for dysplasia detection; involves topical application of methylene blue or indigo carmine to enhance mucosal irregularities
- High-definition white light colonoscopy — alternative when chromoendoscopy yield is decreased
- Narrow band imaging (NBI) — does NOT enhance dysplasia detection [2]
Small Bowel Malignancy
- CD patients have a modestly increased risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma, especially in chronically inflamed segments
- Also increased risk of small bowel lymphoma (particularly with immunosuppressive therapy)
- The risk is lower than CRC risk but is important because small bowel cancers are difficult to detect early
V. Extraintestinal Complications
These are immune-mediated manifestations occurring outside the GI tract. They were discussed in detail in the Clinical Features section but are also true complications of CD.
Extraintestinal manifestations [2][1]:
| System | Complications | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular | Arterial and venous thromboembolism (portal and mesenteric thrombosis / DVT) [2] | IBD patients have a 2-3× increased risk of VTE. Mechanism: chronic inflammation → endothelial activation, upregulation of tissue factor, platelet activation, hyperfibrinogenaemia. VTE can occur during flares AND in remission. Prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered during hospital admissions. |
| Hepatobiliary | Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); Fatty liver; Autoimmune liver disease [2] | PSC is more associated with UC but can occur in CD colitis. PSC independently increases CRC risk and is an indication for annual surveillance. |
| Gastrointestinal | Colorectal cancer [2] | See above |
| Ocular | Uveitis; Episcleritis; Scleritis; Iritis; Conjunctivitis [2] | Episcleritis correlates with disease activity; anterior uveitis may be independent. All patients with eye symptoms need urgent ophthalmology review. |
| Urogenital | Renal stones [2] | Calcium oxalate stones (mechanism above); also uric acid stones (from dehydration/diarrhoea → concentrated urine) |
| Haematology | Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia [2] | Rare; warm autoantibodies against RBCs; may be drug-related (sulfasalazine) |
| Endocrine | Vitamin B12 deficiency [2] | Terminal ileal disease/resection (mechanism above) |
| Dermatological | Erythema nodosum (more common); Pyoderma gangrenosum [2] | EN correlates with disease activity; PG is independent. PG can also occur at stoma sites (peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum). |
| Musculoskeletal | Arthritis; Ankylosing spondylitis; Osteoporosis; Osteomalacia [2] | Peripheral arthropathy (Type 1 large joint, correlates with activity; Type 2 small joint, independent). AS is HLA-B27 associated and independent of activity. Osteoporosis from malabsorption + steroids. |
VTE in IBD — Often Forgotten
Students often forget that IBD patients have a significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (DVT, PE, portal vein thrombosis). This is one of the most dangerous complications. All hospitalised IBD patients should receive VTE prophylaxis (LMWH) unless actively bleeding. IBD is an independent risk factor for VTE even in young patients.
VI. Treatment-Related Complications
The therapies we use for CD carry their own complications — an unavoidable trade-off:
| Treatment | Key Complications | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids (long-term) | Osteoporosis, diabetes, cataracts, adrenal suppression, avascular necrosis, Cushing's, growth retardation (paediatric) | Steroids suppress osteoblasts, promote insulin resistance, cause posterior subcapsular cataracts, suppress the HPA axis |
| Thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) | Myelosuppression, pancreatitis, hepatotoxicity, lymphoma (especially hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma), increased infections | Myelosuppression from 6-TGN accumulation; pancreatitis is idiosyncratic; lymphoma from chronic immunosuppression |
| Methotrexate | Hepatotoxicity, pneumonitis, myelosuppression, teratogenicity | Folate antagonism; cumulative hepatotoxicity → fibrosis |
| Anti-TNF agents | TB reactivation, HBV reactivation, lymphoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, infusion reactions, demyelination, heart failure exacerbation | TNF-α blockade removes TB containment, removes anti-tumour surveillance, triggers autoimmune demyelination in susceptible individuals |
| Vedolizumab | PML (theoretical, extremely rare — unlike natalizumab which targets α4 integrin non-selectively) | Vedolizumab is gut-selective (α4β7) so PML risk is essentially nil, unlike natalizumab (α4β1 in brain) |
| Thiopurine + Anti-TNF combination | Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) — rare but almost always fatal, particularly in young males | Dual immunosuppression → profound T-cell suppression → γδ T-cell lymphoproliferation |
VII. Post-Surgical Complications
A. Post-Resection Recurrence
- The most important long-term surgical complication: CD recurs in ~70-80% at the neo-terminal ileum within 1 year of surgery (endoscopic recurrence), and ~50% will have clinical recurrence within 5 years without prophylaxis
- Why at the neo-terminal ileum? After ileocaecal resection, the new "terminal ileum" (the anastomotic site) is exposed to the faecal stream and bacterial load — the same factors that drive disease in the original terminal ileum
- Assessed by colonoscopy at 6-12 months post-op using the Rutgeerts score (i0-i4 grading of endoscopic recurrence at the anastomosis)
- Prevented by post-operative prophylaxis (AZA, anti-TNF) and smoking cessation (smoking is the strongest modifiable risk factor for post-surgical recurrence)
B. Short Bowel Syndrome (Discussed Above)
Repeated bowel resections can lead to short gut syndrome [2] — hence the emphasis on conservative and minimum resection [12] and preservation of bowel length [4].
C. Anastomotic Complications
- Anastomotic leak: Leakage at the surgical join → peritonitis, sepsis. Risk increased by malnutrition, steroids, and active disease at the resection margin.
- Anastomotic stricture: Fibrosis at the anastomotic site → narrowing → obstruction. Can be managed with endoscopic balloon dilatation.
D. Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
- Any abdominal surgery → adhesion formation → bands of fibrous tissue can kink or compress bowel → mechanical obstruction
- Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection reduces adhesion formation compared to open surgery → reduction of adhesive bowel obstruction [13]
E. Stoma-Related Complications [21]
If a stoma is created (ileostomy or colostomy), potential complications include:
| Timing | Complication | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Early | Ischaemia/necrosis, retraction, peristomal abscess, high output (ileostomy) | High output → dehydration, electrolyte disturbances |
| Intermediate | Dermatitis (effluent irritation), granuloma, stenosis, fistula | Fistula: usually ileostomy, especially Crohn's disease [21] — CD can recur at the stoma site |
| Late | Parastomal hernia, prolapse | Parastomal hernia is the most common late complication |
VIII. Complications Specific to Disease Behaviour
Pulling it all together according to the Montreal classification [1]:
| Behaviour | Complications | Why |
|---|---|---|
| B1 (Inflammatory, 65.2%) | Malnutrition, anaemia, EIMs; may progress to B2 or B3 over time | Active inflammation causes systemic effects; ~50% of B1 patients will develop B2 or B3 within 20 years |
| B2 (Stricturing, 25.1%) | Intestinal obstruction, bacterial overgrowth proximal to stricture, short bowel syndrome (if multiple resections) | Fibrosis narrows the lumen; stagnant bowel proximal to stricture allows bacterial overgrowth |
| B3 (Penetrating, 16.1%) | Fistulae, abscesses, perforation | Transmural inflammation breaches the serosa |
| P (Perianal, 24.5%) | Perianal abscess, fistula, stricture, incontinence | Transmural rectal inflammation extends into perianal tissues |
Disease Behaviour Progresses Over Time
CD does not stay in one category. A patient initially classified as B1 (inflammatory) may progress to B2 (stricturing) or B3 (penetrating) over time as chronic inflammation leads to fibrosis or transmural damage. This is the rationale for the "top-down" or early aggressive treatment approach — by achieving deep remission early, you may prevent the irreversible structural complications (strictures, fistulae) from developing in the first place.
High Yield Summary — Complications of Crohn's Disease
Luminal complications (all from transmural inflammation):
- Fistulae: Enteroenteric (mass), enterovesical (pneumaturia, UTI), enterovaginal (faecal vaginal discharge), enterocutaneous (skin drainage), retroperitoneal (psoas abscess). SNAP management.
- Abscesses: Intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal, perianal. CT-guided drainage + antibiotics. Must drain BEFORE biologics.
- Strictures: Inflammatory (medical Rx) vs fibrostenotic (stricturoplasty/resection). No stricturoplasty in colon (7% malignancy risk). No bypass (malignant transformation risk).
- Perforation: Free → peritonitis → emergency surgery. Contained → abscess.
- Toxic megacolon: Colon ≥ 6 cm + systemic toxicity. Diagnosed by AXR. Medical → if fails → emergency colectomy.
Perianal: Up to 40%; 83% need surgery. MRI essential. Anti-TNF ± AZA ± seton.
Metabolic/nutritional: B12 deficiency (terminal ileal), iron deficiency, fat-soluble vitamins, gallstones (bile salt malabsorption → cholesterol supersaturation), kidney stones (hyperoxaluria), metabolic bone disease (vitamin D + steroids), short bowel syndrome.
Malignancy: CRC (18% at 30 years of colitis; preceded by dysplasia; surveillance from 8 years). Risk factors: PSC, disease duration/extent, active inflammation, family history.
EIMs: VTE (2-3× risk — prophylaxis in hospital), PSC, uveitis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, arthritis/AS, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.
Treatment-related: Steroid toxicity (osteoporosis, diabetes); thiopurine (myelosuppression, HSTCL); anti-TNF (TB/HBV reactivation, lymphoma).
Post-surgical: Recurrence (70-80% at 1 year without prophylaxis), short bowel syndrome, anastomotic leak/stricture, adhesive SBO, stoma complications.
Active Recall - Crohn's Disease: Complications
1. A CD patient presents with recurrent UTIs and pneumaturia. What type of fistula is this, and what is the step-by-step pathophysiology of its formation?
Show mark scheme
Enterovesical fistula (bowel to bladder). Pathophysiology: Transmural inflammation erodes through all bowel wall layers developing a sinus tract. The sinus tract penetrates the serosa and tracks to the adjacent bladder. Communication forms between bowel and bladder lumen. Bowel contents (gas, bacteria, faeces) enter the bladder causing pneumaturia (air in urine), faecaluria, and recurrent polymicrobial UTIs.
2. Explain the pathophysiology of calcium oxalate kidney stones in a patient with terminal ileal Crohn's disease.
Show mark scheme
Normally, dietary calcium binds dietary oxalate in the gut lumen forming insoluble calcium oxalate complex excreted in stool. In CD with terminal ileal disease, bile salt malabsorption leads to fat malabsorption. Unabsorbed fatty acids bind calcium preferentially, leaving free oxalate in the gut lumen. Free oxalate is absorbed in the colon, enters the bloodstream, filtered by kidneys causing hyperoxaluria. Oxalate combines with urinary calcium forming calcium oxalate kidney stones.
3. Why is short bowel syndrome a major concern in CD management, and what surgical principles are used to prevent it?
Show mark scheme
CD is not curable by surgery and recurs after resection. Repeated resections progressively shorten the small bowel. Short bowel syndrome occurs when less than 200cm of small bowel remains, causing global malabsorption and TPN dependence. Prevention: preservation of bowel length (document residual SB length), conservative and minimum resection, stricturoplasty preferred over resection where possible, extended resection does not decrease recurrence.
4. List the risk factors for IBD-associated colorectal cancer and state when surveillance should begin.
Show mark scheme
Patient-specific: PSC, history of colorectal neoplasia, FHx CRC in first-degree relative, smoking, early age of onset, male sex. Disease-specific: disease duration, extent, cumulative inflammatory burden, active inflammation. Endoscopic: stricture, shortened tubular colon, pseudopolyps. Surveillance begins at maximum 8 years after UC or Crohn's colitis (AGA 2010), repeated every 1-3 years. PSC patients require yearly surveillance.
5. A CD patient on azathioprine and infliximab develops persistent swinging fever and RLQ tenderness. CRP is markedly elevated. CT shows a rim-enhancing fluid collection adjacent to the terminal ileum. What is the diagnosis, the immediate management steps, and why must you address this before continuing biologics?
Show mark scheme
Diagnosis: Intra-abdominal abscess. Immediate management: CT-guided percutaneous drainage plus IV antibiotics. Must drain abscess before continuing biologics because anti-TNF therapy causes immunosuppression. Undrained sepsis combined with immunosuppression leads to uncontrolled infection and septic shock. Only after sepsis is controlled can biologics be safely continued or restarted.
6. Compare inflammatory versus fibrostenotic strictures in CD: how do they differ on MRE and in management?
Show mark scheme
Inflammatory stricture: MRE shows wall enhancement (gadolinium uptake indicates active inflammation), T2 hyperintensity (oedema), restricted diffusion. Management: medical therapy (steroids, biologics) as inflammation is reversible. Fibrostenotic stricture: MRE shows no enhancement, T2 hypointensity (fibrosis). Management: endoscopic balloon dilatation, stricturoplasty (small bowel), or resection (large bowel or suspected malignancy). Fibrosis does not respond to anti-inflammatory drugs.
References
[1] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p6, p8, p9) [2] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — Crohn's disease, complications and signs/symptoms of complications sections) [4] Senior notes: maxim.md (Inflammatory bowel disease — surgical management; Surgical procedures for CD) [11] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p45 — Perianal CD) [12] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p26, p27 — Surgery for CD) [13] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p41 — Ileocaecal CD) [15] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p28 — Small bowel stricture) [18] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p52 — IBD-associated CRC risk factors) [20] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p34 — Enterocutaneous fistula) [21] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Short bowel syndrome complications; CRC screening section) [22] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p51 — IBD-associated CRC) [23] Lecture slides: Inflammatory bowel disease.pdf (p56 — AGA guideline 2010)
Hemorrhoids
Hemorrhoids are dilated vascular cushions of the anal canal that become symptomatic when swollen, inflamed, or prolapsed, causing bleeding, pain, or pruritus.
Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by continuous mucosal inflammation and ulceration of the colon and rectum, typically presenting with bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain.