Acute Cholangitis
Acute bacterial infection of the biliary tract due to obstruction, classically presenting with Charcot's triad of fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain.
1. Definition
Acute cholangitis is a clinical syndrome of bacterial infection of the biliary tract arising from a combination of biliary obstruction and bacterial contamination [1][2][3]. The name itself is instructive:
- "Chol-" = bile (Greek: cholē)
- "-ang-" = vessel/duct (Greek: angeion)
- "-itis" = inflammation
So cholangitis literally means "inflammation of the bile ducts." In clinical practice, we use the term to mean infection of the bile ducts — because the inflammation here is driven by bacteria, not autoimmunity or chemicals.
Key Conceptual Distinction
Biliary obstruction alone → obstructive jaundice (sterile). Biliary bacterial contamination alone → often clinically silent. Biliary obstruction + significant bacterial contamination → Acute Cholangitis (clinical infection of bile duct) [1][2].
Both components are necessary. This is the single most important concept to grasp.
Acute cholangitis is one of the two most common complications of CBD stones, the other being acute biliary pancreatitis [1]. It ranges from a mild, self-limiting illness responsive to antibiotics and fluid resuscitation to fulminant suppurative cholangitis with septic shock and multi-organ failure requiring emergency biliary drainage.
2. Epidemiology
2.1 Global Epidemiology
- Acute cholangitis accounts for approximately 1–9% of hospital admissions for gallstone-related disease.
- The incidence rises with age (peak in the 6th–7th decade) because gallstone prevalence increases with age and biliary instrumentation/stenting becomes more common.
- Males and females are affected roughly equally when corrected for the underlying cause; however, because gallstones are more common in females (the classic "4 F's" — Fair, Fat, Fertile, Forty), the raw numbers skew slightly female for stone-related cholangitis.
2.2 Hong Kong Context
In Hong Kong and Southeast Asia, the following epidemiological features are particularly relevant:
| Feature | Relevance to Hong Kong |
|---|---|
| Choledocholithiasis | Remains the most common cause worldwide and in Hong Kong [1][2]. |
| Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) | Also known as "Hong Kong disease" / oriental cholangiohepatitis — a uniquely Southeast Asian entity involving recurrent cholangitis from intrahepatic pigment stones and strictures [1][4]. Peak prevalence in the 30s–40s, equal sex distribution. |
| Clonorchis sinensis | Liver fluke endemic to areas where raw/undercooked freshwater fish is consumed; causes chronic biliary inflammation predisposing to RPC and cholangiocarcinoma [1][4]. |
| Hepatitis B | Highly prevalent in Hong Kong; chronic liver disease and cirrhosis contribute to altered bile composition and immunocompromise. |
| Ageing population | Increased biliary stenting and ERCP procedures → rising incidence of post-procedural/stent-related cholangitis. |
| Malignant biliary obstruction | Pancreatic head carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and periampullary tumours are important causes of cholangitis in the elderly [3][5]. |
3. Relevant Anatomy and Function of the Biliary System
Understanding acute cholangitis demands a solid grasp of biliary anatomy and the normal defence mechanisms that keep bile sterile.
3.1 Anatomy of the Biliary Tree
Key anatomical points:
- The gallbladder consists of fundus, body, infundibulum (Hartmann's pouch), and neck. The neck tapers into the cystic duct, which joins the CHD to form the CBD [1].
- The CBD is approximately 7–8 cm long and runs in the free edge of the lesser omentum (hepatoduodenal ligament) alongside the portal vein (posterior) and hepatic artery proper (left). It passes behind the first part of the duodenum and through the head of the pancreas before entering the second part of the duodenum at the major duodenal papilla (of Vater).
- The Sphincter of Oddi is a muscular sphincter at the distal end of the CBD/ampulla of Vater. It controls the flow of bile (and pancreatic juice) into the duodenum and acts as a mechanical barrier preventing duodenal-biliary reflux [1][3].
- Normal CBD diameter: ≤ 6–8 mm on ultrasound (may be up to 10 mm in elderly or post-cholecystectomy patients). Dilatation > 8 mm suggests obstruction.
- Normal ductal pressure: 7–14 cm H₂O [3]. This is a critical number — when obstruction raises ductal pressure above 25 cm H₂O, bacteria reflux into hepatic veins and peribiliary lymphatics, causing bacteraemia and potentially septic shock [3].
3.2 Normal Biliary Defence Mechanisms
The bile duct is normally sterile despite its connection to the bacteria-laden duodenum. This is maintained by several mechanisms [1]:
| Defence Mechanism | How it works |
|---|---|
| Continuous flushing action of bile flow | Antegrade bile flow physically washes bacteria back into the duodenum — like a river current preventing upstream migration. |
| Bacteriostatic activity of bile salts | Bile salts are detergents; they disrupt bacterial cell membranes and inhibit growth. |
| Biliary mucus and secretory IgA | These act as anti-adherence factors, preventing bacteria from colonising the ductal epithelium (similar to the mucosal immune barrier in the gut). |
| Sphincter of Oddi | A mechanical barrier at the ampulla that prevents duodenal reflux and ascending bacterial contamination [1][3]. |
Why does cholangitis occur after sphincterotomy?
After endoscopic sphincterotomy (done during ERCP to remove CBD stones), the Sphincter of Oddi is permanently divided. This ablates the mechanical barrier, allowing free reflux of duodenal contents into the biliary tree. That is why patients with prior sphincterotomy, biliary stents, or choledochal surgery are at increased risk of recurrent cholangitis — the normal barrier is permanently disrupted [1][2].
4. Etiology (Causes of Biliary Obstruction)
Acute cholangitis requires obstruction + infection. The causes of obstruction are therefore the etiological framework [1][2][3][5]:
4.1 Causes — Tabulated by Frequency
| Cause | Details | Relative Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Choledocholithiasis (CBD stones) | Most common cause worldwide and in Hong Kong [1][2][3]. Stones migrate from gallbladder via cystic duct or form de novo in CBD. | Most common (~30–70% of cases) |
| Benign biliary strictures | Post-surgical injury (e.g., after cholecystectomy), chronic pancreatitis, PSC, post-radiation. | Common |
| Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) | Pancreatic head carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, periampullary carcinoma, porta hepatis lymph node metastases [2][3][5]. | Common in elderly |
| Indwelling biliary stents / post-instrumentation | Stent occlusion by sludge/biofilm → obstruction proximal to stent; foreign body serves as nidus for bacterial colonisation [1][2]. Disrupted sphincter post-sphincterotomy. | Increasingly common |
| Parasitic infection | Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini, Ascaris lumbricoides — adult worms or eggs obstruct bile ducts [1][4]. Particularly important in Hong Kong/Southeast Asia. | Important regionally |
| Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) | Intrahepatic pigment stone formation + strictures → stasis → recurrent infection. "Hong Kong disease" [1][4]. | Important in Hong Kong |
| Choledochal cysts | Congenital dilatation of bile ducts → stasis → risk of cholangitis (and cholangiocarcinoma) [1]. | Rare |
| Mirizzi syndrome | Large stone impacted in cystic duct/Hartmann's pouch compressing the CHD externally → obstruction → cholangitis [1]. | Rare |
| Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) | Chronic fibrosing inflammation of bile ducts → strictures → stasis → cholangitis. Strong association with ulcerative colitis [1]. | Rare in Asia |
| Biliary-enteric anastomosis stricture | Stricturing at the site of surgical anastomosis (e.g., hepaticojejunostomy) → stasis → ascending infection. | Post-surgical |
4.2 Focus on Hong Kong-Specific Etiologies
4.2.1 Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis (RPC) — "Hong Kong Disease"
- Definition: Recurrent syndrome of bacterial cholangitis associated with intrahepatic pigment stones and intrahepatic biliary strictures [1][4].
- Pathophysiology — a vicious cycle:
- Initiating event: Parasitic infestation (e.g., Clonorchis sinensis from raw freshwater fish) → epithelial damage → bacterial translocation → stricture formation → biliary stasis [4].
- Stone formation: Bacteria (especially E. coli, Klebsiella) produce β-glucuronidase → cleaves conjugated bilirubin glucuronide → unconjugated bilirubin → complexes with calcium → calcium bilirubinate (brown pigment) stones [1][4].
- Malnutrition: Low-protein diet historically common in Asia → relative enzyme deficiency → favours formation of unconjugated bilirubin [4].
- Vicious cycle: Stone formation → obstruction → stasis → recurrent infection → more inflammation → more stricturing → more stones [1][4].
- Key differences from typical gallstone disease: Stones form de novo within intrahepatic ducts (not in gallbladder), are brown pigment (not cholesterol), and predominantly affect the left intrahepatic ducts [4].
- Complications: Biliary sepsis, liver abscess, secondary biliary cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma [4].
4.2.2 Clonorchis sinensis Infection
- Lifecycle: Humans are the definitive host; adult flukes reside in the biliary tract and lay embryonated eggs that pass in faeces [4].
- Transmission: Consumption of poorly cooked freshwater fish (淡水魚) [4].
- Clinical spectrum: Asymptomatic → acute cholangitis → RPC → increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma [4].
- Diagnosis: Stool microscopy for eggs, duodenal aspirate, USG for adult flukes, intra-operative choledochoscopy [4].
- Treatment: Praziquantel 25 mg/kg PO TDS × 1 day [4].
5. Pathophysiology
This is the crux of understanding acute cholangitis. Let's build it from first principles.
5.1 The Two-Hit Model
Acute cholangitis requires the combination of: (1) biliary obstruction AND (2) significant bacterial contamination [1][2][3].
Why does obstruction alone not cause cholangitis? Because without bacteria, you simply have sterile bile building up → obstructive jaundice. The bile becomes concentrated and stagnant, but there is no infection.
Why does bactobilia alone not cause cholangitis? Because in the absence of obstruction, the continuous flow of bile washes bacteria into the duodenum, and bile salts kill remaining organisms. Up to 16% of patients undergoing biliary surgery have positive bile cultures without clinical infection [1].
5.2 Step-by-Step Pathophysiology
| Step | Event | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biliary obstruction occurs | Stone impaction, tumour compression, stricture, stent occlusion, or parasites block bile flow. |
| 2 | Bile stasis develops | Loss of the flushing action of bile. Stagnant bile loses its bacteriostatic effect. IgA and mucus barrier become overwhelmed. |
| 3 | Bacterial colonisation | Bacteria ascend from the duodenum (most common route) or arrive via portal venous haematogenous spread [1]. |
| 4 | Intraductal pressure rises | Normal: 7–14 cm H₂O [3]. With obstruction, pressure rises progressively. |
| 5 | Pressure exceeds 25 cm H₂O | Bacteria and endotoxins reflux into hepatic veins and peribiliary lymphatics → bacteraemia → systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) → sepsis [3]. |
| 6 | Impaired antibiotic penetration | Excretion of antibiotics into bile is impaired in biliary obstruction — this is why antibiotics alone are often insufficient and biliary drainage is mandatory [3]. |
| 7 | Septic shock / suppurative cholangitis | If undrained, purulent bile (pus) fills the ducts under high pressure → overwhelming sepsis → multi-organ failure → death. |
Why Antibiotics Alone Are Not Enough
A common exam mistake is thinking that antibiotics alone can treat cholangitis. In biliary obstruction, antibiotic excretion into bile is impaired [3] — so even if the right antibiotics are given IV, they cannot reach therapeutic concentrations in the obstructed biliary tree. That is why biliary drainage is mandatory in moderate-to-severe cholangitis. Think of it like trying to put out a fire in a locked room — you need to open the door (decompress the duct) before the water (antibiotics) can reach the flames.
5.3 Bacteriology
The organisms responsible reflect the gut flora (since infection ascends from the duodenum) [1][2][3]:
| Category | Organisms | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Gram-negative rods (most common) | Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter sp. | These are the dominant pathogens [1][2][3]. They produce endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide) which drive the septic response. |
| Enterococci (Gram-positive) | Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium | The most common Gram-positive organisms in biliary infections [1][2][3]. |
| Anaerobes | Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium sp. | More common in severe/complicated infections and in patients with prior biliary-enteric anastomosis [1][3]. |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | More common in patients with biliary stents — important because it requires broader-spectrum antibiotic coverage [2]. |
High-Yield: The most common organism in acute cholangitis is E. coli. If a stent is present, think Pseudomonas in addition to the standard organisms. Anaerobes are more common in severe disease and post-biliary-enteric surgery [2].
5.4 Disrupted Barrier Mechanisms
In addition to the primary two-hit model, the normal barrier mechanisms described above can be disrupted iatrogenically [1]:
- After endoscopic sphincterotomy: Permanent loss of sphincter of Oddi function → free duodenal-biliary reflux.
- Biliary stent insertion: Foreign body serves as a nidus for bacterial biofilm + stent occlusion causes incomplete drainage.
- Choledochal surgery / biliary-enteric anastomosis: Surgical disruption of the normal anatomy removes the anti-reflux mechanism.
In these patients, the threshold for developing cholangitis is much lower because one of the two "hits" (bacterial contamination) is essentially always present.
6. Classification
6.1 Anatomical Classification
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Ascending cholangitis | Infection ascending from the duodenum → most common type in clinical practice [2]. |
| Descending cholangitis | Infection spreading from the liver/portal system → less common, seen in liver abscess or haematogenous seeding. |
6.2 Pathological Classification
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Non-suppurative (simple) cholangitis | Infected bile without frank pus. Responds to antibiotics + elective drainage. |
| Suppurative cholangitis | Frank purulent bile under pressure. This is the severe, life-threatening form. Requires emergency biliary decompression. Characterised by Reynolds' pentad. |
6.3 Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG24) Severity Grading
The Tokyo Guidelines are the internationally accepted severity grading system for acute cholangitis. They stratify patients to guide the urgency of biliary drainage [6]:
| Grade | Severity | Criteria | Management Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I | Mild | Acute cholangitis that does not meet criteria for Grade II or III. Responds to initial medical treatment (antibiotics + supportive care). No organ dysfunction. | May respond to antibiotics alone initially; early elective biliary drainage. |
| Grade II | Moderate | Associated with any TWO of: WBC > 12,000 or < 4,000/mm³; fever ≥ 39°C; age ≥ 75; bilirubin ≥ 5 mg/dL; albumin < 0.7 × lower limit of normal. Does not meet Grade III. Does not respond to initial medical treatment. | Requires early biliary drainage (within 24–48 hours). |
| Grade III | Severe | Associated with organ dysfunction in any ONE system: cardiovascular (hypotension requiring vasopressors), neurological (altered consciousness), respiratory (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300), renal (oliguria, Cr > 2.0 mg/dL), hepatic (PT-INR > 1.5), haematological (Plt < 100,000/mm³). | Requires urgent/emergency biliary drainage + organ support (ICU). |
Tokyo Guidelines Severity Grading — Exam Must-Know
- Grade I (Mild): No organ dysfunction, responds to antibiotics.
- Grade II (Moderate): Does not respond to initial treatment OR has risk factors (high WBC, high fever, elderly, high bilirubin, low albumin).
- Grade III (Severe): Organ dysfunction — this is suppurative cholangitis / biliary sepsis. Emergency drainage is life-saving.
6.4 Other Classifications
| Classification | Details |
|---|---|
| By etiology | Stone-related vs. non-stone (malignant, stricture, stent, parasitic) [2]. |
| Primary vs. Secondary | Primary cholangitis = PSC (autoimmune). Secondary = all other causes (obstruction-related). The term "primary" distinguishes PSC from secondary sclerosing cholangitis [1]. |
| IgG4-associated cholangitis | Infiltration of biliary system with IgG4-positive plasma cells, mostly in elderly males. Part of the IgG4-related disease spectrum. Responds to corticosteroids [2]. |
7. Clinical Features
7.1 Symptoms
The clinical presentation of acute cholangitis follows directly from the pathophysiology: biliary obstruction + infection → pain (from ductal distension) + jaundice (from obstruction) + fever (from infection/bacteraemia).
7.1.1 Charcot's Triad (present in 50–70% of patients) [1][2]
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Fever (with or without rigors/chills) | Bacteraemia: when intraductal pressure exceeds ~25 cm H₂O, bacteria and endotoxins reflux into hepatic veins and lymphatics → systemic inflammatory response → fever. Rigors (shaking chills) indicate bacteraemia with endotoxaemia — the body's thermoregulatory "reset" to a higher set-point [3]. |
| Right upper quadrant (RUQ) / epigastric abdominal pain | Distension of the bile duct wall by impacted stone or increased intraductal pressure stimulates visceral afferent pain fibres (carried via the coeliac plexus and splanchnic nerves to T6–T9 dermatomes). The pain is typically constant and dull (unlike the colicky pain of biliary colic which is from gallbladder contraction against a stone in the cystic duct). |
| Jaundice | Biliary obstruction → conjugated bilirubin cannot be excreted into the duodenum → accumulates in the blood → deposits in skin and sclerae (yellow). Conjugated bilirubin is water-soluble → excreted by the kidneys → dark urine (tea-coloured). Reduced bilirubin reaching the gut → less stercobilinogen → pale/clay-coloured stools. |
Charcot's Triad
7.1.2 Reynolds' Pentad (present in < 10% of patients) [1][2]
This represents Charcot's triad PLUS two additional features indicating progression to suppurative cholangitis with septic shock:
| Additional Feature | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Hypotension (shock) | Overwhelming bacteraemia → massive release of endotoxins (LPS from Gram-negative bacteria) → activation of inflammatory cascade (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) → systemic vasodilation + increased capillary permeability + myocardial depression = distributive (septic) shock. This is the same pathway as any Gram-negative sepsis. |
| Altered mental status (confusion) | Cerebral hypoperfusion from shock + direct neurotoxic effects of systemic endotoxaemia + metabolic encephalopathy (hepatic dysfunction from cholestasis, renal dysfunction from shock) → decreased consciousness ranging from confusion to obtundation. |
High-Yield: Reynolds' pentad = Charcot's triad + Shock + Confusion. It indicates suppurative cholangitis, a surgical emergency requiring immediate biliary drainage. Mortality without drainage is extremely high (approaching 50–100%) [1][2].
7.1.3 Other Symptoms
| Symptom | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Nausea and vomiting | Visceral afferent stimulation from biliary distension triggers the vomiting centre via vagal afferents. Also common in any systemic sepsis. |
| Dark urine | Conjugated (water-soluble) bilirubin excreted renally → urine becomes tea/cola-coloured. This is conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia because the obstruction is post-hepatic. |
| Pale stools (acholic stools) | Reduced bilirubin entering the gut → less conversion to stercobilinogen/stercobilin → clay/putty-coloured stools. |
| Pruritus | Bile salt deposition in the skin due to cholestasis → activates itch receptors (pruritoceptors). More common in chronic/subacute obstruction than in acute cholangitis. |
| Anorexia and malaise | Systemic inflammatory response + hepatic dysfunction. |
7.2 Signs
7.2.1 General Examination
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Fever (often high-grade, > 38.5°C, with rigors) | Bacteraemia with endotoxin release → pyrogenic cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6) act on the hypothalamic thermoregulatory centre → febrile response. Rigors indicate the temperature is being "reset" to a higher set-point. |
| Jaundice (scleral icterus first) | Conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia. Sclera have high elastin content with affinity for bilirubin → icterus visible when serum bilirubin > 34 μmol/L (~2 mg/dL). Best detected in natural daylight. |
| Tachycardia | Systemic inflammatory response → increased sympathetic drive + if hypovolaemic from sepsis → compensatory tachycardia. |
| Hypotension (in severe cholangitis) | Septic shock — see above. |
| Dehydration | Poor oral intake + fever + third-space losses from sepsis. |
7.2.2 Abdominal Examination
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| RUQ tenderness | Palpation over the distended, inflamed bile duct and surrounding peritoneum → localised somatic pain. The gallbladder fossa and CBD lie beneath the right costal margin at the intersection with the lateral border of the rectus abdominis (the hepatic point). |
| Murphy's sign — typically NEGATIVE (important distinguishing feature) | Murphy's sign is positive in acute cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder), NOT in cholangitis. In cholangitis, the primary pathology is in the bile duct, not the gallbladder. However, if concurrent cholecystitis is present (e.g., from a stone impacted at the cystic duct), Murphy's sign may be positive. |
| Hepatomegaly | Biliary obstruction → bile duct distension → secondary hepatic congestion and inflammation → liver may be palpably enlarged and tender. In chronic/recurrent cholangitis (e.g., RPC), hepatomegaly may be more pronounced due to parenchymal changes. |
| No peritonism (usually) | Cholangitis is an intraductal infection. Unlike perforated viscus or appendicitis, there is no peritoneal soiling — so generalised peritonitis with guarding and rigidity is typically absent unless there is perforation or concomitant pathology. |
Cholangitis vs. Cholecystitis — Don't Confuse Them
- Cholangitis = infection of the bile duct → Charcot's triad (Fever + Pain + Jaundice); Murphy's sign typically negative; jaundice is prominent.
- Cholecystitis = inflammation of the gallbladder → Murphy's sign positive; fever; RUQ pain; jaundice is uncommon (only ~20%, usually from Mirizzi syndrome or co-existing CBD stone).
The key differentiator: Jaundice is much more prominent in cholangitis. Murphy's sign is positive in cholecystitis but not cholangitis.
7.2.3 Signs of Complications / Severity
| Sign | Significance |
|---|---|
| Altered mental status | Part of Reynolds' pentad — indicates suppurative cholangitis / septic encephalopathy. |
| Oliguria | Renal hypoperfusion from septic shock → acute kidney injury. |
| Cold, clammy skin | Late sign of distributive shock → compensatory peripheral vasoconstriction. |
| Metabolic acidosis (on ABG) | Tissue hypoperfusion → anaerobic metabolism → lactic acidosis. |
| Petechiae / bleeding | Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from sepsis + impaired hepatic synthesis of clotting factors from biliary obstruction + reduced vitamin K absorption (fat-soluble vitamin requiring bile salts for absorption). |
8. Summary of Pathophysiology → Clinical Feature Connections
| Pathophysiology | Clinical Feature |
|---|---|
| Biliary obstruction → ↑ intraductal pressure → ductal distension | RUQ / epigastric pain |
| Obstruction → conjugated bilirubin retention | Jaundice, dark urine, pale stools, pruritus |
| Bacterial contamination + stasis → infection → bacteraemia | Fever, rigors, raised WBC, positive blood cultures |
| Intraductal pressure > 25 cm H₂O → cholangiovenous reflux [3] | Bacteraemia → SIRS → sepsis → septic shock |
| Septic shock → organ hypoperfusion | Hypotension, altered mental status, oliguria, metabolic acidosis |
| Impaired antibiotic excretion in obstructed system [3] | Failure of antibiotics alone → need for biliary drainage |
| Cholestasis → reduced bile salt in gut | Fat malabsorption, vitamin K deficiency → coagulopathy |
High Yield Summary
Definition: Acute cholangitis = bacterial infection of biliary tract due to obstruction + bacterial contamination (both required).
Most common cause: Choledocholithiasis (CBD stones). In Hong Kong, also think of RPC and Clonorchis sinensis.
Normal biliary defences: Bile flow flushing, bile salt bacteriostasis, mucosal IgA, Sphincter of Oddi barrier.
Pathophysiology: Obstruction → stasis → bacterial overgrowth → raised intraductal pressure → cholangiovenous/lymphatic reflux when pressure > 25 cm H₂O → bacteraemia → sepsis. Antibiotic excretion is impaired in obstruction → biliary drainage is mandatory.
Bacteriology: Gram-negative rods (E. coli, Klebsiella) most common; Enterococci; anaerobes in severe cases; Pseudomonas if stent present.
Clinical features:
- Charcot's triad (50–70%): Fever + RUQ pain + Jaundice
- Reynolds' pentad ( < 10%): Charcot's triad + Hypotension + Altered mental status = suppurative cholangitis = surgical emergency
Tokyo Guidelines severity:
- Grade I (Mild): Responds to antibiotics
- Grade II (Moderate): Does not respond / has risk factors
- Grade III (Severe): Organ dysfunction → emergency drainage
Key distinguishing point: Murphy's sign is positive in cholecystitis, NOT cholangitis. Jaundice is prominent in cholangitis, often absent in cholecystitis.
Active Recall - Acute Cholangitis (Definition to Clinical Features)
1. What two conditions must coexist for acute cholangitis to develop?
Show mark scheme
Biliary obstruction AND significant bacterial contamination. Obstruction alone causes sterile obstructive jaundice; bacteria alone causes asymptomatic bactobilia.
2. What is the normal biliary ductal pressure, and at what threshold do bacteria reflux into the bloodstream?
Show mark scheme
Normal: 7-14 cm H2O. Cholangiovenous/lymphatic reflux occurs when pressure exceeds 25 cm H2O, leading to bacteraemia and potentially septic shock.
3. Name the components of Charcot's triad and Reynolds' pentad, and state the approximate percentage of patients presenting with each.
Show mark scheme
Charcot's triad (50-70%): Fever, RUQ pain, Jaundice. Reynolds' pentad (less than 10%): Charcot's triad plus Hypotension and Altered mental status (confusion). Reynolds' pentad indicates suppurative cholangitis.
4. Why are antibiotics alone insufficient to treat moderate-to-severe acute cholangitis?
Show mark scheme
Antibiotic excretion into bile is impaired when the biliary system is obstructed. Therefore, therapeutic antibiotic concentrations cannot be achieved at the site of infection. Biliary drainage is mandatory to decompress the system and allow source control.
5. A patient with a biliary stent develops acute cholangitis. What additional organism should you cover for, compared to standard cholangitis, and why?
Show mark scheme
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biliary stents act as foreign bodies that serve as nidus for biofilm formation; Pseudomonas is commonly associated with healthcare-associated/foreign body-related infections and requires broader-spectrum antibiotic coverage.
6. Explain the pathophysiology of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) and state why it is called 'Hong Kong disease'.
Show mark scheme
RPC involves intrahepatic pigment stone formation due to bacterial beta-glucuronidase cleaving conjugated bilirubin to unconjugated bilirubin, which complexes with calcium to form calcium bilirubinate stones. Parasitic infection (e.g., Clonorchis sinensis) initiates epithelial damage leading to strictures, stasis, and recurrent infection in a vicious cycle. Called 'Hong Kong disease' because it is found exclusively/predominantly in Southeast Asian populations.
References
[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholangitis, Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, Primary sclerosing cholangitis, Mirizzi syndrome sections) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute cholangitis, Choledocholithiasis, Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis sections) [3] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p16 — Cholangitis: biliary pressure, cholangiovenous reflux, impaired antibiotic excretion, mandatory drainage) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md and maxim.md (Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, Clonorchis sinensis sections) [5] Lecture slides: HCC and Gallstone acute cholangitis_Prof TT Cheung.pdf [6] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p7 — Acute Cholangitis pathogenesis)
Differential Diagnosis of Acute Cholangitis
Framing the Problem
The classic presentation of acute cholangitis — fever, RUQ pain, and jaundice — is not unique to cholangitis. Several other conditions in the right upper quadrant and hepatobiliary system can present with overlapping features. The differential diagnosis essentially asks: "What else could cause fever + abdominal pain + jaundice (or any combination thereof)?" [1][7].
The key to narrowing the differential lies in understanding which component dominates and what the timeline and associated features are. Let's work through this systematically.
Approach to the Differential
Think about acute cholangitis as sitting at the intersection of three clinical domains:
- Causes of RUQ pain (hepatobiliary, duodenal, thoracic referred pain)
- Causes of obstructive jaundice (intraluminal, mural, extramural)
- Causes of fever with abdominal pain (intra-abdominal sepsis)
The differential includes conditions that share at least two of the three Charcot's triad features.
Detailed Differential Diagnosis
The conditions listed below are explicitly mentioned in the senior notes as the differential diagnosis of fever and abdominal pain in the context of suspected cholangitis [1][7][8]:
1. Acute Cholecystitis [1][7][8][9]
| Feature | Acute Cholecystitis | Acute Cholangitis |
|---|---|---|
| Primary pathology | Inflammation of the gallbladder (from cystic duct obstruction) | Infection of the bile duct (from CBD obstruction) |
| Jaundice | Uncommon (~20%) — only if Mirizzi syndrome or co-existing CBD stone | Prominent — because the CBD itself is obstructed |
| Murphy's sign | Positive (inspiratory arrest on RUQ palpation — gallbladder is inflamed and tender) | Typically negative (the gallbladder is not the inflamed organ) |
| Fever | Present but usually lower-grade initially (chemical → secondary bacterial infection over 48h) | Often high-grade with rigors from the outset (bacteraemia from cholangiovenous reflux) |
| Pain character | Starts as biliary colic that persists > 6 hours, becomes constant with peritoneal signs | Constant RUQ/epigastric pain, less peritoneal involvement |
| LFT | Usually normal or mildly deranged (obstruction limited to gallbladder) [9] | Cholestatic pattern (↑ ALP, ↑ GGT, ↑ conjugated bilirubin) — because the CBD is obstructed |
| USG | 5 cardinal signs: gallstones, distended GB, wall thickening > 3 mm, pericholecystic fluid, sonographic Murphy's sign [9] | Dilated CBD ± stone, ± dilated intrahepatic ducts |
Why the confusion arises: Both conditions involve gallstones and present with RUQ pain and fever. The critical distinction is jaundice (prominent in cholangitis, rare in cholecystitis) and Murphy's sign (positive in cholecystitis, negative in cholangitis). Also, both can coexist — a patient can have a stone in the cystic duct (cholecystitis) AND a stone in the CBD (cholangitis) simultaneously.
Exam Pearl — Cholecystitis vs Cholangitis
Students commonly conflate these two. Remember:
- Cholecystitis = gallbladder problem → Murphy's positive, jaundice rare, LFT often normal.
- Cholangitis = bile duct problem → Charcot's triad, Murphy's negative, cholestatic LFT. If the LFT shows a significantly cholestatic pattern (markedly raised ALP/GGT/bilirubin), think duct, not gallbladder [9].
2. Choledocholithiasis (without infection) [7][10]
- Definition: Obstruction of CBD/CHD by gallstone without superimposed infection [10].
- Presentation: RUQ pain, obstructive jaundice (dark urine, pale stools), cholestatic LFT — but no fever and no rigors.
- Why it mimics cholangitis: Same stone, same duct, same jaundice. The difference is the absence of infection — no fever, no leukocytosis, no positive blood cultures. Essentially, this is "one hit" (obstruction) without the "second hit" (bacteria).
- Why it matters: Choledocholithiasis can progress to cholangitis if the obstruction persists and bacteria colonise the stagnant bile. Urgent treatment prevents this progression.
- USG: Dilated CBD ( > 8 mm), gallstone in CBD visible in only ~1/3 of cases due to obscuring duodenal gas [10].
3. Liver Abscess [1][7][8][11]
This is a critical differential because it can present almost identically to cholangitis and requires entirely different management.
| Feature | Liver Abscess | Acute Cholangitis |
|---|---|---|
| Fever pattern | Swinging fever (high spikes followed by remission — "picket-fence" pattern), chills, rigors [11] | High-grade fever with rigors, but usually more constant |
| Pain | RUQ pain, tender hepatomegaly | RUQ pain, hepatomegaly less prominent |
| Jaundice | Not significant (abscess is focal — the unaffected liver parenchyma continues to excrete bilirubin) [11] | Prominent (entire biliary outflow is obstructed) |
| LFT | Mildly deranged, ALP may be elevated, but bilirubin often near-normal | Cholestatic pattern (markedly raised ALP, GGT, bilirubin) |
| Imaging | CT abdomen with contrast: double-target sign (rim-enhancing lesion with central hypodensity), cluster sign [11]. USG: multiloculated cystic mass. | USG: dilated CBD ± stone. CT shows dilated ducts. |
| Aetiology clues | Klebsiella (especially in > 60 years old + DM in Hong Kong); ascending biliary infection itself; portal venous spread from appendicitis/diverticulitis [11] | CBD stone, stent, stricture, tumour |
Why the confusion arises: Both present with fever and RUQ pain. The route of spread for pyogenic liver abscess is often ascending biliary infection (20–30% of cases) [11] — meaning cholangitis and liver abscess can coexist. In fact, liver abscess is a recognised complication of untreated cholangitis.
High-Yield: USG abdomen should always rule out liver abscess when cholangitis is suspected — the presentations are similar, and abscess requires image-guided drainage, not ERCP [2][8].
4. Acute Biliary Pancreatitis [1][7][8][12]
- Mechanism: A gallstone migrates down the CBD and impacts at the ampulla of Vater, obstructing both the CBD and the pancreatic duct (of Wirsung) → pancreatic enzyme activation → autodigestion → acute pancreatitis [12].
- Overlap: Shares RUQ/epigastric pain and fever with cholangitis; obstructive jaundice may be present if the CBD remains obstructed.
- Key distinguishing features:
- Pain: Classically epigastric, radiates straight through to the back, relieved by sitting up or leaning forward [12]. Cholangitis pain is more purely RUQ.
- Amylase/Lipase: Markedly elevated ( > 3× upper limit of normal). In cholangitis, amylase may be mildly elevated but not to this degree.
- Nausea and vomiting: More prominent in pancreatitis.
- CT findings: Pancreatic inflammation, peripancreatic fat stranding, ± necrosis. In cholangitis, the pancreas is normal.
- Co-existence: Pancreatitis and cholangitis can occur simultaneously from the same impacted ampullary stone. Always check amylase/lipase in suspected cholangitis [2][8].
5. Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis (RPC) [1][4][7][8]
- Definition: Recurrent bacterial cholangitis due to intrahepatic pigment stones and intrahepatic strictures [4].
- Why it's a separate differential: RPC presents with recurrent episodes of Charcot's triad (1–2 episodes/year), but the underlying pathology is intrahepatic (left lobe predilection), not simply a CBD stone.
- Key clues: Southeast Asian patient ("Hong Kong disease"), middle-age onset (30s–40s), history of recurrent cholangitis episodes, CT showing central dilated bile ducts with peripheral tapering and left lobe atrophy [4].
- Why it matters: Management is fundamentally different — standard ERCP may be inadequate (cannot access intrahepatic strictures); may require PTBD, hepaticojejunostomy, or hepatobiliary resection of the affected segment [4].
6. Mirizzi Syndrome [7][8][13]
- Definition: CHD obstruction caused by extrinsic compression from an impacted stone in Hartmann's pouch or cystic duct [13].
- Presentation: Can present identically to cholangitis — fever, RUQ pain, jaundice. In fact, acute cholangitis is one of the presenting manifestations of Mirizzi syndrome [13].
- Key clue: Jaundice with palpable gallbladder — this is an exception to Courvoisier's Law [13].
- Chronic inflammation from the impacted stone can erode the bile duct wall, causing a cholecystobiliary fistula (Csendes classification) [13].
- Imaging: USG shows dilated biliary tree above the level of stone impaction + stone at GB neck + contracted GB. ERCP may demonstrate the fistula [13].
- Why it mimics cholangitis: The obstruction of the CHD leads to stasis, which predisposes to ascending infection — the mechanism is the same, just the cause of obstruction is different (external compression vs. intraluminal stone).
7. Infected Choledochal Cyst [7][8]
- Definition: Congenital dilatation of the intra/extrahepatic biliary system that becomes secondarily infected.
- Presentation: RUQ mass + pain + jaundice + fever — the classic triad of choledochal cyst includes RUQ mass, pain, and jaundice [8].
- Key clue: Young patient (most diagnosed before age 10, ~60%), palpable RUQ cystic mass.
- Risk: Untreated cysts carry significant risk of cholangiocarcinoma — hence radical excision + Roux-en-Y reconstruction is the definitive management.
8. Biliary Leak [1][7]
- Context: Usually post-operative (e.g., after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, liver resection, or biliary surgery). Bile leaks from the cystic duct stump, hepatic duct injury, or accessory ducts.
- Presentation: Fever, abdominal pain, ± jaundice, ± bile-stained drain output.
- Why it mimics cholangitis: Bile is irritant to the peritoneum and becomes secondarily infected → localised or generalised peritonitis with fever and RUQ pain.
- Key clue: Recent biliary surgery and clinical deterioration in the post-operative period.
9. Malignant Biliary Obstruction (MBO) [2][3][5]
- Causes: Pancreatic head carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, periampullary carcinoma, porta hepatis lymph node metastasis [2][3].
- Typical presentation: Painless progressive obstructive jaundice in an elderly patient — this is the classic "textbook" presentation of MBO [14]. Weight loss, anorexia, and a palpable non-tender gallbladder (Courvoisier's sign) are suggestive.
- When it mimics cholangitis: MBO can cause secondary cholangitis when the obstructed bile becomes infected. In this scenario, the patient with known or occult malignancy develops superimposed fever and sepsis on top of their obstructive jaundice.
- Biliary obstruction + infection → cholangitis, and the principles of management are the same: biliary drainage is mandatory [3]. However, the underlying cause requires entirely different oncological management.
10. Non-Biliary Mimics
These conditions can occasionally present with RUQ pain and/or fever, mimicking biliary pathology:
| Condition | Key Distinguishing Feature | Why It Can Mimic |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Appendicitis [1][7][8] | Pain starts peri-umbilical, migrates to RLQ (McBurney's point). No jaundice. Rovsing's sign positive. | Early appendicitis can cause vague upper abdominal pain before localising. High appendix (retrocaecal/subhepatic) may cause RUQ pain. |
| Peptic Ulcer Disease [8][12] | Epigastric pain, relationship to meals, ± GI bleeding. No jaundice. | Perforated posterior duodenal ulcer can mimic biliary/pancreatic pathology with referred pain. |
| Acute Hepatitis [8] | Prodromal symptoms (malaise, anorexia), hepatocellular LFT pattern (markedly raised AST/ALT >> ALP), viral serology positive. | Causes jaundice + RUQ tenderness + fever. But the LFT pattern is hepatocellular (transaminases dominant), not cholestatic. |
| Right lower lobe pneumonia [8][9] | Cough, dyspnoea, pleuritic chest pain, crackles on auscultation. CXR infiltrate. | Diaphragmatic irritation from basal pneumonia can cause referred RUQ pain and fever — a classic "trap" in exams. |
| Myocardial infarction [8][12] | Inferior MI can cause epigastric/RUQ pain. ECG changes, troponin elevation. | Vagal stimulation from inferior MI causes nausea, vomiting, and epigastric discomfort that mimics biliary colic or pancreatitis. |
The Right Basal Pneumonia Trap
In exams, a patient with fever, RUQ pain, and raised WBC may have a right basal pneumonia rather than a biliary problem. Always examine the chest and order a CXR — this is why an erect CXR is part of the standard workup for RUQ pain [2].
Summary Table — Quick Differentiation
| Diagnosis | Pain | Jaundice | Fever | Murphy's | Key Investigation | Key Distinguishing Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Cholangitis | RUQ, constant | ✅ Prominent | ✅ High + rigors | − | USG: dilated CBD | Charcot's triad, cholestatic LFT |
| Acute Cholecystitis | RUQ, > 6h | ± Rare (~20%) | ✅ Lower-grade | + | USG: 5 cardinal signs | Murphy's sign, GB wall thickening |
| Choledocholithiasis | RUQ | ✅ | ✗ No fever | − | USG: dilated CBD | No infection — just obstruction |
| Liver Abscess | RUQ, tender hepatomegaly | ± Minimal | ✅ Swinging | − | CT: rim-enhancing lesion | Focal liver lesion, blood cultures |
| Acute Pancreatitis | Epigastric → back | ± | ✅ | − | Amylase/lipase > 3× ULN | Sits up/leans forward, marked amylase |
| RPC | RUQ | ✅ | ✅ Recurrent | − | CT: left lobe intrahepatic duct dilatation | Recurrent episodes, SE Asian, intrahepatic stones |
| Mirizzi Syndrome | RUQ | ✅ | ✅ | ± | ERCP: extrinsic CHD compression | Palpable GB + jaundice, fistula |
| Hepatitis | RUQ | ✅ | ✅ Low-grade | − | Hepatocellular LFT, viral serology | AST/ALT >> ALP (hepatocellular pattern) |
| Pneumonia | RUQ (referred) | ✗ | ✅ | − | CXR: consolidation | Respiratory symptoms, CXR findings |
Systematic Approach to Narrowing the Differential
When a patient presents with features suggestive of cholangitis, use this step-by-step approach:
Always Order These in Suspected Cholangitis
When working up a patient with possible cholangitis, the following investigations help differentiate the differential:
- Bloods: CBC, LFT (cholestatic vs hepatocellular pattern), amylase/lipase (r/o pancreatitis), blood culture [2]
- Erect CXR (r/o pneumonia, free air under diaphragm from perforation) [2]
- USG abdomen (dilated duct? Stone? Liver abscess? GB wall thickening?) [2]
- If inconclusive: MRCP, CT abdomen with contrast (r/o liver abscess or malignant obstruction), or EUS [2]
High Yield Summary
Core differential of acute cholangitis (conditions sharing fever + RUQ pain ± jaundice):
- Acute cholecystitis — Murphy's positive, jaundice rare, GB pathology on USG
- Choledocholithiasis — jaundice without fever (no infection yet)
- Liver abscess — swinging fever, tender hepatomegaly, CT double-target sign; similar presentations, must rule out on USG [2]
- Acute biliary pancreatitis — epigastric pain radiating to back, amylase > 3× ULN
- RPC — recurrent episodes, Southeast Asian, intrahepatic pigment stones, left lobe
- Mirizzi syndrome — palpable GB + jaundice (exception to Courvoisier's Law)
- Infected choledochal cyst — young patient, RUQ mass
- Biliary leak — post-operative context
- Malignant biliary obstruction — painless progressive jaundice in elderly, superimposed infection = cholangitis
- Non-biliary mimics: Right basal pneumonia, acute hepatitis, inferior MI, peptic ulcer, appendicitis
Key differentiating tools: LFT pattern (cholestatic vs hepatocellular), Murphy's sign (cholecystitis vs cholangitis), amylase (pancreatitis), CXR (pneumonia), USG (ductal dilatation vs focal liver lesion vs GB pathology), blood cultures.
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Acute Cholangitis
1. A patient presents with fever, RUQ pain, and jaundice. Murphy's sign is positive. What is the most likely diagnosis and why does Murphy's sign help differentiate?
Show mark scheme
Acute cholecystitis with possible co-existing CBD stone causing jaundice (or Mirizzi syndrome). Murphy's sign is positive in cholecystitis because the inflamed gallbladder is tender when pressed against the examining hand during inspiration. In pure cholangitis, the gallbladder is not the primary inflamed organ, so Murphy's sign is typically negative.
2. How do you distinguish a liver abscess from acute cholangitis at the bedside and on investigations?
Show mark scheme
Liver abscess: swinging fever, tender hepatomegaly, jaundice is minimal (focal lesion, rest of liver compensates). Cholangitis: Charcot's triad with prominent jaundice, cholestatic LFT. On imaging, USG/CT in liver abscess shows a focal rim-enhancing cystic lesion (double-target sign on CT), while cholangitis shows dilated CBD with or without stone. Both may have positive blood cultures.
3. A patient with RUQ pain and fever has markedly raised AST/ALT (>1000 IU/L) with only mildly raised ALP. Is this more likely cholangitis or hepatitis? Explain using LFT pattern.
Show mark scheme
Hepatitis. Cholangitis produces a cholestatic LFT pattern (ALP and GGT raised disproportionately to transaminases, with raised conjugated bilirubin). A hepatocellular pattern (AST/ALT much greater than ALP) points to hepatitis (viral, drug-induced, autoimmune). However, note that very early acute biliary obstruction can cause a transient transaminase spike, so clinical correlation is needed.
4. Why should you always check amylase/lipase and order a CXR when working up suspected acute cholangitis?
Show mark scheme
Amylase/lipase: to rule out acute biliary pancreatitis, which can coexist with cholangitis (same impacted ampullary stone). Amylase greater than 3 times upper limit of normal suggests pancreatitis. CXR: to rule out right basal pneumonia (diaphragmatic irritation can cause referred RUQ pain mimicking biliary pathology) and to look for free air under diaphragm (perforated viscus).
5. Name three conditions where jaundice occurs with a palpable gallbladder, and explain why this is an exception to Courvoisier's Law.
Show mark scheme
1. Malignant biliary obstruction (the gallbladder is non-fibrosed and distends - this is actually Courvoisier's Law itself, not the exception). Exceptions include: 2. Double impaction (stone in CBD causing jaundice plus stone in cystic duct causing mucocele of a fibrosed GB). 3. Mirizzi syndrome (impacted stone in Hartmann's pouch compresses CHD externally). 4. RPC (pathology is in bile ducts, not GB, so GB is not fibrosed and can distend). In these exceptions, despite gallstone disease, the gallbladder is palpable because either the obstruction pattern is unusual or the gallbladder itself is not chronically inflamed.
References
[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholangitis — clinical manifestation, differential diagnosis) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute cholangitis — urgent investigations, management) [3] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p16 — Cholangitis: biliary pressure, impaired antibiotic excretion, mandatory drainage) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md and maxim.md (Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis sections) [5] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (malignant causes of biliary obstruction) [7] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p6–7 — Acute Cholangitis clinical manifestations, pathogenesis) [8] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Mirizzi syndrome — differential diagnosis list: choledocholithiasis, acute cholecystitis, liver abscess, infected choledochal cysts, biliary leaks, acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis, RPC) [9] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholecystitis — Murphy's sign, LFT findings, USG cardinal signs) and maxim.md (Acute calculous cholecystitis) [10] Senior notes: maxim.md (Choledocholithiasis) [11] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Liver abscess) and maxim.md (Liver abscess) [12] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute pancreatitis — clinical manifestation, differential diagnosis) [13] Senior notes: maxim.md (Mirizzi syndrome) [14] Senior notes: maxim.md (Obstructive jaundice — painless progressive obstructive jaundice)
Diagnostic Criteria
The Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) — The Standard Framework
The Tokyo Guidelines (originally TG07, revised TG13, and most recently TG18) are the internationally accepted diagnostic criteria for acute cholangitis. They provide a structured, stepwise approach: first determine whether cholangitis is present (diagnosis), then grade its severity (which dictates urgency of drainage). Let's break this down from first principles [1][7].
The logic is straightforward: acute cholangitis = systemic inflammation/infection + biliary obstruction/cholestasis. The criteria are designed to capture both components, then confirm with imaging.
TG18 Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Cholangitis
| Category | Criteria |
|---|---|
| A. Systemic inflammation | A-1. Fever ( > 38°C) and/or shaking chills OR A-2. Laboratory evidence of inflammatory response: abnormal WBC count ( < 4,000 or > 10,000/mm³), ↑ CRP, or other changes indicating inflammation |
| B. Cholestasis | B-1. Jaundice (total bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL / ~34 μmol/L) OR B-2. Abnormal liver chemistries: ↑ ALP, ↑ GGT, ↑ AST, ↑ ALT (beyond 1.5× upper limit of normal) |
| C. Imaging | C-1. Biliary dilatation on imaging OR C-2. Evidence of an etiology on imaging (e.g., stone, stricture, stent) |
Interpretation [1]:
| Diagnostic Level | Criteria Required |
|---|---|
| Suspected diagnosis | ONE item from A (systemic inflammation) AND ONE item from B (cholestasis) |
| Definite diagnosis | Meets criteria for suspected diagnosis PLUS ANY item from C (imaging evidence) |
Why This Structure Makes Sense
Think about it: a patient with fever + cholestatic LFT could have cholangitis, but they could also have acute hepatitis with secondary bacterial infection, or even cholecystitis with mild LFT derangement. Adding the imaging criteria (dilated duct, visible stone/stricture/stent) confirms that the problem is truly in the biliary tree. That is why a "definite" diagnosis requires imaging confirmation.
Exam Must-Know — Diagnostic Criteria
A common exam pitfall: students remember Charcot's triad but forget the formal Tokyo Guidelines criteria. The TG18 criteria are more sensitive than Charcot's triad (which is only present in 50–70% of cases). You can diagnose cholangitis even without jaundice — as long as you have systemic inflammation + abnormal liver chemistries + imaging findings [1].
Severity Grading (TG18) — Determines Urgency of Drainage
Once the diagnosis is established, severity grading determines how urgently you need to drain:
| Grade | Severity | Criteria | Clinical Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I | Mild | Does not meet Grade II or III criteria. Responds to initial antibiotics + supportive care. | May attempt antibiotics first; early biliary drainage planned. |
| Grade II | Moderate | Meets ≥ 2 of: WBC > 12,000 or < 4,000; fever ≥ 39°C; age ≥ 75; total bilirubin ≥ 5 mg/dL (~85 μmol/L); albumin < 0.7 × lower limit of normal. Does not respond to initial medical treatment. | Requires early biliary drainage (within 24–48 h). |
| Grade III | Severe | Organ dysfunction in ≥ 1 system: Cardiovascular (hypotension needing vasopressors), Neurological (altered consciousness), Respiratory (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300), Renal (oliguria or creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL), Hepatic (PT-INR > 1.5), Haematological (platelets < 100,000/mm³) | Urgent/emergency biliary drainage + ICU admission + organ support. This is suppurative cholangitis. |
High-Yield: Grade III = Reynolds' pentad territory. Any organ dysfunction = Grade III = emergency drainage. Don't wait.
Diagnostic Algorithm
The following algorithm integrates clinical assessment, laboratory workup, imaging, and severity grading into a systematic approach:
Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown
Overview: What We Need to Know and Why
When investigating suspected acute cholangitis, we need to answer four questions:
- Is there systemic infection? → Bloods (CBC, CRP, blood cultures)
- Is there biliary obstruction/cholestasis? → LFT, bilirubin
- Where is the obstruction and what is causing it? → Imaging (USG → MRCP/CT → ERCP)
- How severe is it? → Organ function markers (RFT, clotting, ABG, lactate)
A. Laboratory Investigations
A1. Complete Blood Count with Differential (CBC D/C)
| Finding | Interpretation | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leukocytosis with neutrophil predominance | Active bacterial infection / systemic inflammation | Bone marrow releases neutrophils in response to bacterial endotoxins and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, G-CSF). Neutrophils are the "first responders" to bacterial infection. |
| Left shift (↑ band forms) | Marrow is "ramping up" — pushing immature neutrophils into circulation | When demand exceeds the marrow reserve of mature neutrophils, immature forms (bands) are released. Indicates significant bacterial infection. |
| Leukopenia ( < 4,000) | Paradoxically indicates severe sepsis | Overwhelming infection consumes neutrophils faster than the marrow can replenish them, OR endotoxin-mediated marrow suppression. This is a bad prognostic sign — part of TG18 Grade II/III criteria. |
| Thrombocytopenia | DIC from sepsis OR hypersplenism from underlying cirrhosis | Important to check before any invasive procedure (ERCP, PTBD) — coagulopathy increases bleeding risk [1][15]. |
A2. Liver Function Tests (LFT)
This is arguably the most important blood test in suspected cholangitis because it distinguishes cholestatic (obstructive) from hepatocellular patterns.
| Marker | Expected Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| ↑ ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase) | Elevated, often markedly | ALP is concentrated in the bile duct epithelium (cholangiocytes) and the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes. Biliary obstruction causes bile to back up → cholestasis induces synthesis and release of ALP into blood. This is the hallmark of an obstructive/cholestatic pattern [1][2][15]. |
| ↑ GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase) | Elevated, often markedly | GGT is found in biliary epithelium and hepatocyte canalicular membranes. Rises with ALP in cholestasis. GGT confirms that a raised ALP is of biliary origin (vs. bone, pregnancy, etc.) [1][2]. |
| ↑ Conjugated (direct) bilirubin | Elevated | The obstruction prevents conjugated bilirubin from being excreted into the duodenum → it refluxes back into the blood. It is water-soluble → filtered by kidneys → dark urine [1][2]. |
| ↑ AST/ALT | Mildly to moderately elevated | In cholangitis, transaminases may be elevated (hepatocyte injury from back-pressure of bile, ischaemia from sepsis), but ALP and GGT rise disproportionately more than AST/ALT. If AST/ALT >> ALP, think hepatocellular cause (hepatitis), not cholangitis [1][15]. |
LFT Pattern Recognition — Exam Must-Know
Note on early biliary obstruction: In the very early hours of acute obstruction (e.g., a stone suddenly impacts), AST/ALT can spike transiently ( > 1000 IU/L) before the cholestatic pattern declares itself. This is because acute rise in intraductal pressure causes direct hepatocyte injury. Don't be misled — repeat LFT in 24–48h and the cholestatic pattern will emerge [15].
A3. Inflammatory Markers
| Marker | Finding | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ↑ CRP | Elevated (often markedly) | Hepatic acute-phase reactant produced in response to IL-6. Useful for monitoring treatment response (falls with successful drainage). Part of TG18 Criterion A. |
| ↑ ESR | Elevated | Less specific than CRP; takes days to rise and fall. |
| Procalcitonin | Elevated in bacterial sepsis | More specific for bacterial infection than CRP. Increasingly used in severe sepsis to guide antibiotic duration. Not yet universally adopted in TG18 criteria. |
A4. Clotting Profile (PT/INR)
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Prolonged PT / elevated INR | Two mechanisms: (1) Vitamin K deficiency — bile salts are needed for absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) in the gut; biliary obstruction → no bile salts in gut → impaired vitamin K absorption → reduced synthesis of factors II, VII, IX, X [1][15]. (2) Hepatic synthetic dysfunction from sepsis-related hepatic injury or underlying liver disease. |
| Corrects with IV vitamin K | Confirms the cause is vitamin K malabsorption (obstructive), not intrinsic liver failure. If it does not correct, suspect severe hepatic dysfunction or DIC. |
A5. Renal Function Tests (RFT)
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| ↑ Creatinine, ↑ Urea | Acute kidney injury from sepsis-induced renal hypoperfusion (pre-renal), OR hepatorenal syndrome in patients with underlying chronic liver disease. Part of TG18 Grade III criteria. |
| Electrolyte abnormalities | Metabolic acidosis (lactic acid from tissue hypoperfusion), hyperkalaemia (from renal dysfunction). |
A6. Serum Amylase and Lipase
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Mildly elevated amylase | Common in cholangitis — mild pancreatic irritation from a stone near the ampulla. |
| Markedly elevated ( > 3× ULN) | Suggests concurrent acute biliary pancreatitis — an impacted ampullary stone obstructing both CBD and pancreatic duct [2][10][15]. |
High-Yield: Always check amylase in suspected cholangitis — cholangitis and pancreatitis can coexist from the same stone [2].
A7. Blood Culture — The Most Important Microbiological Investigation
| Detail | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Must be taken BEFORE starting antibiotics | Antibiotics can sterilise the blood quickly, making cultures falsely negative. |
| At least 2 sets from different sites | Increases sensitivity, helps distinguish true bacteraemia from contaminant. |
| Request aerobic AND anaerobic bottles | Anaerobes (e.g., Bacteroides fragilis) are common in severe cholangitis [1][7]. |
| Request antibiotic susceptibility testing | Guides de-escalation of empirical antibiotics to targeted therapy [1]. |
| Positive in ~20–70% of cases | Depends on timing relative to antibiotic administration and severity. Positive cultures are common in the presence of bile duct stones and other obstructive causes [1]. |
Blood Culture — Absolutely Must Do
A8. Bile Culture
| Detail | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Obtained at the time of ERCP or PTBD | When bile is aspirated during drainage, it should be sent for culture and sensitivity [1]. |
| Higher sensitivity than blood cultures | Bile cultures are positive in up to 80–100% of cholangitis cases (vs. 20–70% for blood cultures). |
| Organisms may differ from blood cultures | Polymicrobial infection is common; bile cultures may reveal additional organisms not detected in blood. |
A9. Urinalysis
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Conjugated bilirubin in urine (bilirubinuria) | Conjugated bilirubin is water-soluble → filtered by kidneys → appears in urine. Indicates post-hepatic (obstructive) jaundice. Absent urobilinogen (because bilirubin never reaches the gut to be converted). |
A10. Other Blood Tests
| Test | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Arterial blood gas (ABG) | In severe cholangitis: metabolic acidosis (lactic acidosis from tissue hypoperfusion), respiratory compensation. Part of severity assessment. |
| Lactate | Marker of tissue hypoperfusion. Elevated lactate ( > 2 mmol/L) indicates sepsis-related organ dysfunction. |
| Blood glucose | Infection can cause hyper- or hypoglycaemia. DM is a risk factor for liver abscess (important differential). |
| Group and save / cross-match | Pre-procedural preparation for ERCP/PTBD/surgery. |
| Tumour markers (CEA, CA 19-9) | If malignant biliary obstruction is suspected as the underlying cause. Not diagnostically useful (lack sensitivity and specificity) but serial assay after resection may detect recurrence [15]. |
B. Radiological Investigations
The imaging strategy is stepwise — start with the simplest, most available test and escalate if needed.
B1. Erect Chest X-Ray (CXR) and Abdominal X-Ray (AXR)
These are baseline investigations, not primarily to diagnose cholangitis, but to exclude mimics and detect complications [2]:
| Modality | Findings | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Erect CXR | Right basal consolidation → pneumonia (mimics RUQ pain); right-sided pleural effusion (complication of subphrenic/hepatic abscess); free gas under diaphragm (perforation — unlikely in cholangitis but must exclude) [2] | Rule out non-biliary causes of fever + RUQ pain. |
| AXR | Aerobilia (gas in biliary tree — seen as branching radiolucencies over the liver) → indicates communication between bowel and biliary tree (prior sphincterotomy, biliary-enteric anastomosis, cholecystoenteric fistula, gas-forming infection) [2]; radio-opaque gallstones (~15% visible); pancreatic calcification (chronic pancreatitis) | Aerobilia in a septic patient suggests ascending infection through a disrupted sphincter. |
B2. Transabdominal Ultrasound (USG) — The First-Line Imaging
| Detail | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Why first-line | Readily available, non-invasive, no radiation, bedside (can be done in a sick patient in the emergency department), quick [1][2]. |
| What to look for | 1. CBD dilatation ( > 8 mm, or > 10 mm post-cholecystectomy / elderly) — indicates distal obstruction. 2. Intrahepatic duct dilatation — indicates obstruction at or above the hilum. 3. CBD stone — echogenic focus with posterior acoustic shadow within the CBD. 4. Gallstones in the gallbladder — suggests choledocholithiasis as the likely cause. 5. Liver abscess — hypoechoic/anechoic collection in liver parenchyma → important differential to rule out [2]. 6. Gallbladder abnormalities (wall thickening, distension, pericholecystic fluid → cholecystitis). |
| Limitations | Distal CBD is poorly visualised due to overlying duodenal gas — CBD stones are only visible in ~33–50% of cases on USG [1][10][15]. Early obstruction may not yet have caused visible ductal dilatation. Operator-dependent. Body habitus (obesity) limits visualisation [15]. |
B3. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
| Detail | Explanation |
|---|---|
| What it is | Non-contrast, T2-weighted MRI sequence that makes bile and pancreatic fluid appear bright white against dark surrounding tissue [15][16]. Essentially a non-invasive "cholangiogram" without needing to inject contrast into the ducts. |
| Indications | Normal or equivocal USG but high clinical suspicion for cholangitis [1]. Intermediate pre-test probability of CBD stone. Need to evaluate for alternative diagnoses missed on USG. |
| Advantages | Non-invasive, no radiation, no contrast injection into ducts (no risk of introducing infection), excellent visualisation of both intrahepatic and extrahepatic ducts, can detect stones as small as 2–3 mm [1][15][16]. |
| Limitations | Does NOT permit therapeutic intervention — if you find a stone, you still need ERCP to remove it [1][4][16]. Can miss very small stones ( < 3 mm). Requires patient cooperation (lying still for ~15 min). Contraindicated in patients with certain metallic implants/pacemakers. |
| Key findings | Filling defect (dark) within a bright bile-filled duct = stone. Abrupt duct cutoff = stricture or tumour. Ductal dilatation upstream of obstruction. "Double duct sign" (both CBD and pancreatic duct dilated) → periampullary pathology (e.g., pancreatic head cancer). |
High-Yield: MRCP has largely replaced ERCP as the diagnostic tool for choledocholithiasis/cholangitis when therapeutic intervention is not immediately needed. ERCP is now reserved primarily for therapeutic indications [1][10][15].
B4. CT Abdomen (with IV contrast)
| Detail | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Indications | Rule out liver abscess (double-target sign, rim enhancement) [2][11]. Rule out malignant biliary obstruction (pancreatic mass, cholangiocarcinoma, lymphadenopathy) [2][3]. Evaluate for RPC (central dilated bile ducts with peripheral tapering, left lobe atrophy) [4]. Evaluate for complications (abscess formation, perforation). |
| Advantages | Excellent anatomical detail, can detect mass lesions, staging of malignancy, available in emergency setting. |
| Limitations | Less sensitive than MRCP for detecting small CBD stones. Radiation exposure. IV contrast risks (allergy, nephrotoxicity — especially relevant if AKI from sepsis). |
| Key cholangitis-specific findings | Dilated CBD ± visible stone, periductal enhancement (inflamed duct walls "light up" with contrast), intrahepatic duct dilatation, ± liver abscess. |
B5. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
| Detail | Explanation |
|---|---|
| What it is | An endoscope with an ultrasound transducer at its tip, positioned in the duodenum to image the CBD, pancreatic head, and ampulla from very close range, eliminating bowel gas interference [10][15]. |
| Indications | Alternative to MRCP when MRCP is contraindicated (e.g., metallic implants) or when MRCP is equivocal [2][10]. High suspicion for CBD stone despite negative MRCP. Suspected periampullary/pancreatic malignancy (allows FNAC or trucut biopsy for tissue diagnosis) [15]. |
| Advantages | Superior sensitivity for small CBD stones (comparable to MRCP). Can obtain tissue biopsy (FNAC). EUS-guided therapeutic interventions increasingly available (EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography as rescue when ERCP fails). |
| Limitations | Invasive (endoscopic procedure), requires sedation, operator-dependent, limited availability. |
C. Invasive Cholangiographic Investigations (Diagnostic + Therapeutic)
C1. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) — 1st Line for Drainage
ERCP is the cornerstone investigation/intervention in acute cholangitis because it is both diagnostic and therapeutic [1][2][7][14].
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Procedure | Side-viewing duodenoscope is passed into the second part of the duodenum → the major duodenal papilla (ampulla of Vater) is identified → a catheter is introduced into the bile duct → contrast is injected → fluoroscopic images delineate the biliary tree. |
| Diagnostic role | Confirms the level and cause of obstruction (stone, stricture, tumour) [1][7]. Allows bile aspiration for culture [1][2]. Direct visualisation of the ampulla (detect periampullary tumours). |
| Therapeutic role | Biliary drainage and decompression — this is the primary goal in acute cholangitis [2][14]. Sphincterotomy (cutting the sphincter of Oddi to widen the opening). Stone extraction (wire baskets, stone extraction balloons, mechanical lithotripsy) [10]. Plastic stent placement (to maintain duct patency and drainage) [2]. In the acute setting, the role is biliary drainage and decompression in unstable patients, NOT necessarily stone removal — stone removal can be deferred to interval ERCP after sepsis resolves [2]. |
| Technique in cholangitis | Aspirate bile duct first to remove bile and pus → decompress the biliary tree → reduce risk of inducing bacteraemia during contrast injection [2]. Then inject contrast and place a plastic stent. |
| Potential complications | Perforation, bleeding from papillotomy, pancreatitis [7][14]. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs in ~3–5% of cases. |
| Relative contraindications | Altered GI anatomy (e.g., Billroth II gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction) — the duodenoscope cannot reach the papilla in these configurations [7][14]. Poor respiratory function (sedation risk). Coagulopathy (bleeding risk from sphincterotomy). |
ERCP in Cholangitis — Critical Concept
The primary role of ERCP in acute cholangitis is BILIARY DRAINAGE AND DECOMPRESSION, not stone removal [2][14]. In an unstable septic patient, the goal is to decompress the obstructed, infected biliary system as quickly and safely as possible. Stone removal can wait until the patient is stable. Think of it as draining the abscess — you don't need to find and remove every stone in a sick patient; you need to relieve the pressure.
Post-ERCP management of concerns [16]: If a patient develops fever and tachycardia after ERCP, the differential includes: persistent cholangitis (unsuccessful drainage, migrated/blocked stent, resistant organisms), or ERCP complications (flare-up sepsis, pancreatitis, perforation). Investigate with AXR (stent position) and bloods [16]. If abdominal pain develops post-ERCP, consider perforation (CT: retroperitoneal free gas) or post-ERCP pancreatitis (amylase) [16].
C2. Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD)
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| When used | Indicated when ERCP is unsuccessful, unavailable, or contraindicated [1][2][7]. |
| Procedure | Under USG or fluoroscopic guidance, a needle is inserted percutaneously through the liver into a dilated intrahepatic bile duct (not the CBD directly) [2]. Position is confirmed with contrast injection. A drainage catheter is then placed over a guidewire. |
| Route | Left hepatic duct is preferred — accessed via a subcostal approach, which is less painful than the intercostal approach for the right duct and less likely to transgress the pleural space [1]. |
| Advantages | Easy output monitoring (external drainage catheter allows measurement of bile output and assessment of adequacy of drainage) [2]. Can be internalised later (internal-external drainage). Similar efficacy and complication rates as ERCP [2]. Can access hilar and intrahepatic obstruction that ERCP cannot reach (e.g., Klatskin tumour, RPC with intrahepatic strictures) [4][15][16]. |
| Limitations | More invasive than ERCP (traverses liver parenchyma). Risk of bleeding (haemobilia), biliary peritonitis, pneumothorax (right-sided approach), catheter dislodgement. Risk of fluid and electrolyte loss through external drainage [2]. Requires dilated ducts for safe access. |
| Confirmation of adequate drainage | Steady decline in serum bilirubin concentration over subsequent days [1]. |
| Complications | Bacteraemia (thus antibiotic prophylaxis required), haemobilia [16]. |
C3. Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it is | The diagnostic component of the percutaneous transhepatic approach — contrast is injected through the percutaneous needle to opacify the biliary tree [16]. |
| Preferred over ERCP when | Obstruction at or above the level of confluence of hepatic ducts (e.g., Klatskin tumour, PSC, RPC) [16] — ERCP opacifies the ducts from below and may not visualise above a complete obstruction, whereas PTC accesses from above. |
| Therapeutic extension | After diagnostic PTC, the procedure can be extended to PTBD (drainage catheter), stone extraction, stricture dilatation, or stent placement across malignant strictures [1][16]. |
D. Summary of Investigation Modalities — When to Use What
E. Comparison Table of Cholangiographic Modalities
| Feature | MRCP | ERCP | PTC / PTBD | EUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invasiveness | Non-invasive | Invasive (endoscopic) | Invasive (percutaneous) | Invasive (endoscopic) |
| Diagnostic | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Good | ✅ Excellent for distal CBD |
| Therapeutic | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (1st line) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Emerging (EUS-guided drainage) |
| Sensitivity for CBD stones | ~90–95% | ~95% | ~95% | ~95% |
| Risks | Minimal (MRI contraindications) | Pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding | Bleeding, haemobilia, pneumothorax, bacteraemia | Sedation, perforation (rare) |
| Access to hilar/intrahepatic ducts | ✅ Good | ❌ Limited (from below) | ✅ Excellent (from above) | ❌ Limited |
| Bile culture | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Preferred for | Diagnostic workup | Therapeutic drainage (1st line) | Failed ERCP / hilar obstruction | MRCP contraindicated / tissue biopsy |
F. Key Imaging Findings to Recognise
| Finding | Modality | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Dilated CBD > 8 mm | USG, CT, MRCP | Biliary obstruction |
| Intrahepatic duct dilatation | USG, CT, MRCP | Proximal/hilar obstruction |
| Filling defect in CBD | MRCP, ERCP | CBD stone |
| Abrupt duct cutoff | MRCP, ERCP | Stricture or tumour |
| Double duct sign | CT, MRCP | Simultaneous dilatation of CBD + pancreatic duct → periampullary pathology (pancreatic head cancer) |
| Aerobilia | AXR, CT | Gas in biliary tree — prior sphincterotomy, biliary-enteric anastomosis, gas-forming infection [2] |
| Periductal enhancement | CT with contrast | Inflamed bile duct walls in cholangitis |
| Double-target sign | CT with contrast | Liver abscess — rim-enhancing lesion with central hypodensity |
| Central duct dilatation with peripheral tapering + left lobe atrophy | CT | RPC [4] |
High Yield Summary
Diagnostic Criteria (TG18):
- Suspected: Systemic inflammation (fever OR raised WBC/CRP) + Cholestasis (jaundice OR abnormal LFT)
- Definite: Suspected criteria + Imaging evidence (biliary dilatation OR etiology such as stone/stricture/stent)
Severity Grading: Grade I (mild) → antibiotics; Grade II (moderate) → early drainage 24–48h; Grade III (severe, organ dysfunction) → emergency drainage
Key bloods: CBC, LFT (cholestatic pattern: ALP ↑↑, GGT ↑↑, conjugated bilirubin ↑↑), RFT, CRP, clotting, amylase, blood culture before antibiotics
Imaging ladder: USG abdomen (1st line) → MRCP (if USG equivocal, high suspicion) → ERCP (1st line therapeutic — diagnostic + therapeutic) → PTBD (if ERCP fails/contraindicated) → Surgical ECBD (last resort)
ERCP key points: In acute cholangitis, role is biliary drainage and decompression, NOT stone removal initially. Aspirate bile first to decompress before injecting contrast. Complications include perforation, bleeding, pancreatitis. Contraindicated in altered GI anatomy (Billroth II, Roux-en-Y).
PTBD: Access via intrahepatic ducts (not CBD), left hepatic duct preferred (subcostal, less pain, avoids pleura). Similar efficacy to ERCP. Preferred for hilar/intrahepatic obstruction.
QMH escalation: ERCP → PTBD → ECBD
Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations of Acute Cholangitis
1. State the TG18 diagnostic criteria for 'suspected' and 'definite' acute cholangitis.
Show mark scheme
Suspected: ONE item from Category A (fever/chills OR lab evidence of inflammation such as abnormal WBC/raised CRP) AND ONE item from Category B (jaundice OR abnormal liver chemistries such as raised ALP/GGT/AST/ALT). Definite: meets suspected criteria PLUS imaging evidence (biliary dilatation OR etiology such as stone, stricture, stent).
2. What LFT pattern is expected in acute cholangitis and why? How does it differ from acute hepatitis?
Show mark scheme
Cholestatic pattern: ALP and GGT markedly elevated, conjugated bilirubin elevated, AST/ALT mildly elevated. This is because biliary obstruction induces ALP synthesis from cholangiocytes and canalicular membranes. In hepatitis, the pattern is hepatocellular: AST/ALT markedly elevated (hepatocyte necrosis) with ALP only mildly elevated.
3. Why is blood culture considered the most critical microbiological investigation in acute cholangitis?
Show mark scheme
Blood culture identifies the causative organism and its antibiotic susceptibility, enabling targeted therapy and de-escalation from empirical antibiotics. Must be taken BEFORE starting antibiotics (as antibiotics can sterilise blood quickly). Bacteraemia occurs because raised intraductal pressure (greater than 25 cm H2O) causes cholangiovenous reflux of bacteria into the bloodstream.
4. A patient with suspected cholangitis has a normal USG abdomen but your clinical suspicion remains high. What is your next investigation and why?
Show mark scheme
MRCP. USG has limited sensitivity for distal CBD stones (only 33-50% visible due to duodenal gas) and may be falsely negative in early obstruction (duct not yet dilated). MRCP is non-invasive, non-contrast T2-weighted MRI that provides excellent biliary visualisation and can detect stones as small as 2-3mm. It does not allow therapeutic intervention, so if a stone is found, ERCP would still be needed for treatment.
5. In the acute setting of cholangitis, what is the primary role of ERCP? Why should bile be aspirated before injecting contrast?
Show mark scheme
Primary role is biliary drainage and decompression, NOT stone removal. Bile should be aspirated first to decompress the biliary tree and reduce intraluminal pressure, thereby reducing the risk of inducing further bacteraemia during contrast injection. Stone removal can be deferred to interval ERCP after sepsis resolves.
6. When is PTBD preferred over ERCP? What is the preferred access route and why?
Show mark scheme
PTBD is preferred when ERCP is unsuccessful, unavailable, or contraindicated (e.g., altered GI anatomy such as Billroth II or Roux-en-Y, poor respiratory function). Also preferred for obstruction at or above the hepatic duct confluence (e.g., Klatskin tumour, RPC). The left hepatic duct is preferred because the subcostal approach is less painful than the intercostal route for the right duct and is less likely to transgress the pleural space.
References
[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholangitis — diagnostic criteria, biochemical tests, radiological tests, ERCP, PTBD, surgical drainage) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute cholangitis — urgent investigations, ERCP, PTBD, management) [3] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p16 — Cholangitis: biliary pressure, impaired antibiotic excretion, mandatory drainage) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md and maxim.md (Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis — investigations, imaging findings) [7] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p6–7 — clinical manifestations, pathogenesis; p13–15 — management, ERCP, surgical treatment) [10] Senior notes: maxim.md (Choledocholithiasis — investigations, MRCP, EUS, ERCP) [11] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Liver abscess) and maxim.md (Liver abscess — imaging findings) [14] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p14 — ERCP as first line, complications, relative contraindications) [15] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Choledocholithiasis — LFT, USG, MRCP, ERCP; Malignant biliary obstruction — biochemical tests, tumour markers, imaging) and maxim.md (HBP investigations — USG, EUS, CT, MRCP, PTC, ERCP) [16] Senior notes: maxim.md (HBP investigations — MRCP, PTC/PTBD, ERCP; Post-ERCP complications management)
Management of Acute Cholangitis
Guiding Principles — Why We Treat the Way We Do
Before diving into specifics, let's ground the entire management framework in the pathophysiology we've already established. Acute cholangitis = obstructed + infected biliary tree. Therefore, management must address three pillars simultaneously [1][2][3][17][18]:
- Resuscitate the patient — they are septic; support the circulation and organs.
- Kill the bacteria — IV antibiotics to control the infection.
- Relieve the obstruction — biliary drainage to decompress the system (because antibiotics alone cannot work in an obstructed system — their excretion into bile is impaired [3]).
After the acute episode is controlled, a fourth pillar becomes relevant:
- Treat the underlying cause — to prevent recurrence (e.g., cholecystectomy for gallstones, stent for malignant stricture, hepatectomy for RPC).
The mnemonic from the senior notes captures this perfectly:
RAD — Acute Management Framework (Must Know!)
R = Resuscitation (NPO, IV fluids, monitor vitals & I/O) A = Antibiotics (IV, broad-spectrum, targeting biliary pathogens) D = Drainage (biliary decompression — urgency determined by severity grading)
Then: Definitive management of the underlying cause once acute sepsis resolved [2].
Master Management Algorithm
Pillar 1: Resuscitation (R)
This is standard sepsis management — the same principles you'd apply to any patient with sepsis from any source. The biliary focus simply adds specific nuances [1][2][17][18].
| Intervention | Rationale | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Keep the patient fasting (NPO) | Bowel rest reduces cholecystokinin (CCK) release → reduces gallbladder contraction and bile flow → reduces pressure in the obstructed system. Also prepares the patient for potential ERCP/surgery [2][7][17]. | "Keep the patient fast" [7]. |
| Intravenous fluid resuscitation | Sepsis causes vasodilation + capillary leak + third-space losses → intravascular volume depletion → tissue hypoperfusion. Aggressive IV crystalloid restores circulating volume and supports organ perfusion [1][2][17][18]. | Target urine output > 0.5 mL/kg/h as a marker of adequate renal perfusion. |
| Monitor vitals and I/O Q1h | Continuous monitoring of vitals to look for signs of failure of conservative treatment [1][2]: ↑ Temperature/Pulse; ↓ BP/Consciousness level/Urine output; increased abdominal tenderness and guarding. | These are red flags indicating deterioration — triggers for escalation to urgent drainage. |
| Blood cultures × 2 before antibiotics | Identify the causative organism and guide de-escalation from empirical to targeted therapy [2]. Must be taken before antibiotics (antibiotics sterilise blood quickly). | Aerobic + anaerobic bottles, from two different venepuncture sites. |
| Correct coagulopathy | Obstructive jaundice → impaired bile salt delivery to gut → reduced absorption of fat-soluble vitamin K → deficiency of clotting factors II, VII, IX, X → coagulopathy [1]. Must correct before any invasive procedure (ERCP, PTBD). | IV Vitamin K (phytomenadione) 10 mg slow IV. Effect takes ~6–12 hours. For urgent procedures, consider fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for immediate correction. |
| Analgesics | Pain control is humane and reduces sympathetic drive (which worsens tachycardia and vasoconstriction). | Paracetamol, NSAIDs (with caution if renal function impaired), opioids if needed. Avoid morphine if concurrent pancreatitis suspected (potential sphincter of Oddi spasm) [19]. |
| Organ support if needed | Grade III (severe) cholangitis with organ dysfunction may require ICU admission. | Vasopressors for refractory hypotension (noradrenaline first-line in septic shock), mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure, renal replacement therapy for AKI. |
High-Yield: Recognize signs of shock — hypotension, oliguria, changes in mental status, cold and clammy skin, and metabolic acidosis — these are signs that the patient is moving towards Grade III and requires emergency intervention [1].
Pillar 2: Antibiotics (A)
Why Antibiotics Matter — But Aren't Enough
Antibiotics target the bacteria driving the infection. However, recall the critical pathophysiology: excretion of antibiotics into bile is impaired in biliary obstruction [3]. This means that even with the correct antibiotic given IV, therapeutic concentrations at the site of infection (within the obstructed biliary tree) may not be achieved. This is why biliary drainage is mandatory — you must open the system for the antibiotics to work [3].
That said, antibiotics are essential to control the systemic sepsis (bacteraemia) and prevent progression to multi-organ failure while drainage is being arranged.
Empirical Antibiotic Regimens
Empirical antibiotics must cover the expected biliary pathogens: Gram-negative rods (E. coli, Klebsiella) + Enterococci + Anaerobes [1][7].
| Regimen | Components | When to Use | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| IV Cefuroxime + Metronidazole | 2nd-gen cephalosporin (Gram-neg cover) + nitroimidazole (anaerobic cover) | Mild-to-moderate cholangitis [7] | Cefuroxime covers most community-acquired Gram-negatives; metronidazole ("metro" = uterus in Greek, but the drug targets anaerobes by forming toxic free radicals in anaerobic bacteria that lack protective enzymes). |
| IV Augmentin (Amoxicillin-Clavulanate) | Aminopenicillin + β-lactamase inhibitor | Mild cholangitis [2] | Covers Gram-positives (including Enterococci), many Gram-negatives, and some anaerobes. The clavulanate inhibits bacterial β-lactamase enzymes that would otherwise destroy the amoxicillin. |
| IV Piperacillin-Tazobactam (Tazocin) | Extended-spectrum penicillin + β-lactamase inhibitor | Severe cholangitis [2][7] | Broader spectrum than Augmentin — covers Pseudomonas aeruginosa (critical if stent-related cholangitis), Enterococci, Gram-negatives, and anaerobes. Tazobactam inhibits a wider range of β-lactamases. |
| Metronidazole + 3rd-gen cephalosporin (Ceftriaxone) | As described | Alternative regimen [1] | Ceftriaxone provides excellent Gram-negative cover including many resistant organisms; add metronidazole for anaerobes. Note: ceftriaxone does not cover Enterococci. |
| Metronidazole + Fluoroquinolone (Ciprofloxacin/Levofloxacin) | As described | Alternative regimen (e.g., penicillin allergy) [1] | Fluoroquinolones provide Gram-negative and some Gram-positive cover. Use with caution due to increasing resistance and side effects (tendon rupture, QT prolongation). |
Duration and De-escalation
- Empirical antibiotics for 7 days [2], or until the source is controlled (drainage achieved) and clinical response is seen.
- De-escalate to targeted therapy once blood/bile culture and sensitivity results are available.
- In mild cases that respond quickly to drainage, shorter courses (3–5 days) may be adequate per TG18 recommendations.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Procedures
- Antibiotics are recommended before ERCP, especially in acute cholangitis — the biliary tract is normally sterile, and instrumentation can introduce or exacerbate infection [16][20].
- If ERCP results in incomplete drainage, antibiotics should be continued after the procedure [20].
Pillar 3: Drainage (D) — Biliary Decompression
This is the most critical pillar. Without drainage, the obstructed, infected biliary tree acts like an undrained abscess — no amount of antibiotics will clear the infection if the pus (infected bile) remains under pressure [3].
When to Drain — Guided by Severity
| TG18 Grade | Drainage Timing | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Grade I (Mild) | Elective/early — antibiotics first, drain when available | Most respond to antibiotics initially. However, early drainage is still recommended to prevent deterioration. |
| Grade II (Moderate) | Early drainage within 24–48 hours | Does not respond to initial medical treatment, or has risk factors for deterioration. Delay increases morbidity. |
| Grade III (Severe) | URGENT/EMERGENCY drainage | Organ dysfunction present. Urgent if Reynolds' pentad, not responding to antibiotics for 24h [2]. Every hour of delay increases mortality. |
15% Rule
15% of patients will NOT respond to antibiotics and require emergency biliary decompression [1]. This is why you must continuously monitor — if the patient is not improving within 24 hours, escalate to drainage regardless of severity grade.
Drainage Modalities — The Escalation Ladder
The QMH practice drainage escalation is: ERCP → PTBD → ECBD [1]. Let's detail each step.
D1. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) — 1st Line
ERCP +/- biliary stenting is the first-line approach for biliary drainage in acute cholangitis [2][7][14].
Breaking down the name: "Endoscopic" = using an endoscope; "Retrograde" = going backwards (against the normal flow of bile, from the duodenum up into the duct); "Cholangio-" = bile duct; "Pancreatography" = imaging of the pancreatic duct. So ERCP = using an endoscope to image and access the bile and pancreatic ducts from below.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Role in acute cholangitis | Biliary drainage and decompression in unstable patients — NOT stone removal [2]. The priority is to decompress the infected system, not to clear every stone. |
| Technique | 1. Aspirate bile duct first → removes bile and pus → decompresses biliary tree → reduces risk of inducing bacteraemia during contrast injection [2]. 2. Inject contrast → delineate anatomy, level and cause of obstruction. 3. Place plastic stent (temporary, requires scheduled change) to maintain duct patency and drainage [2]. 4. ± Sphincterotomy (cut the sphincter of Oddi with electrocautery to facilitate drainage/stone extraction). |
| Stone removal timing | Remove stone now OR interval ERCP after sepsis resolves [2]. In a sick, unstable patient, just stent and drain. Come back for definitive stone removal when the patient is stable. |
| Stent types | Plastic stent — for acute drainage (temporary, cheaper, requires scheduled replacement every 3 months as they occlude). Self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) — for malignant obstruction (more durable, longer patency, but more expensive and difficult to remove) [1][15]. |
| Mortality | < 5% with endoscopic drainage [2] — compared to ~30% mortality with surgical exploration of CBD [2]. |
| Methods of stone retrieval (when stable) | Wire baskets — literally a wire cage that captures the stone. Stone extraction balloon — inflated below the stone and pulled down to sweep it out. Mechanical lithotripsy — crushes large stones too big to extract whole [10]. |
| Potential complications [7][14] | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Perforation | Intraperitoneal perforation: duodenal wall perforated → free gas under diaphragm on CXR → requires operative treatment (will not seal spontaneously). Retroperitoneal perforation: bile duct perforated when cutting the ampulla (retroperitoneal portion of D2) → no free gas under diaphragm, but retroperitoneal gas may be present on CT → usually conservative treatment (seals spontaneously) [1]. |
| Bleeding from papillotomy (sphincterotomy) | Electrocautery incision through the sphincter may transect a blood vessel at the papilla. Usually controlled endoscopically (adrenaline injection, clips, cautery). |
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis | Occurs in ~3–5% of ERCPs. Cannulation and contrast injection can traumatise the pancreatic duct orifice → oedema at the ampulla → obstruction of pancreatic duct → enzyme activation → pancreatitis. Prevention: pancreatic duct stent placement, rectal NSAIDs (diclofenac/indomethacin) [16]. |
| Infection (flare-up sepsis) | Injecting contrast into an obstructed system can worsen bacteraemia. That's why aspirate first before injecting contrast [2]. |
| Relative contraindications for ERCP [7][14] | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Altered GI anatomy — Billroth II gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y | The side-viewing duodenoscope cannot reach the papilla when the normal duodenal anatomy has been surgically altered. In Billroth II, the duodenal stump is closed; in Roux-en-Y, the efferent limb is too long for a standard scope. May require balloon-assisted enteroscopy ERCP or surgical approach. |
| Unstable patient (absolute) | Cannot tolerate sedation/prone position. Stabilise first, then drain. If too unstable for ERCP, consider bedside PTBD. |
| Uncorrected coagulopathy | Sphincterotomy carries bleeding risk. Either correct coagulopathy first, or use nasobiliary drain or direct stent placement without sphincterotomy as an alternative in patients with coagulopathy [1]. |
| Contrast allergy (absolute) | Risk of anaphylaxis. |
Nasobiliary Drain — The Coagulopathy Option
In patients where sphincterotomy cannot be performed (e.g., due to coagulopathy), a nasobiliary drain catheter can be placed during ERCP without cutting the sphincter. This permits active decompression of the CBD by aspiration and provides a route for irrigation of the biliary system. The catheter exits through the nose, allowing bedside monitoring of bile output [1].
Papillary Balloon Dilatation (Balloon Sphincteroplasty) — an alternative to sphincterotomy:
- Dilates the ampulla with a balloon rather than cutting it, attempting to preserve the biliary sphincter [1].
- Lower risk of bleeding than sphincterotomy.
- Safety has been questioned (higher risk of pancreatitis in early studies); endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the method of choice [1].
D2. Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) — 2nd Line
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| When used | Indicated when ERCP is unsuccessful, unavailable, or contraindicated (e.g., altered GI anatomy, poor respiratory function preventing sedation/prone position) [1][2]. |
| Procedure | Under USG/fluoroscopic guidance, a needle is inserted percutaneously through the liver into a dilated intrahepatic bile duct (NOT the CBD directly) [2]. Guidewire → catheter placement → external drainage. |
| Preferred access | Left hepatic duct — subcostal approach is less painful than intercostal route for right duct and less likely to transgress the pleural space [1]. |
| Efficacy | Similar efficacy and complication rates as ERCP [2]. |
| Advantages | Easy output monitoring — external drainage catheter allows direct measurement of bile output [2]. Can be internalised later (internal-external drainage). Can access hilar and intrahepatic obstruction that ERCP cannot reach from below (e.g., Klatskin tumour, RPC) [4]. |
| Limitations | More invasive (traverses liver parenchyma). Risk of bleeding (haemobilia), pneumothorax (right-sided approach), bile leak, catheter dislodgement. Risk of fluid and electrolyte loss through external drainage [2]. |
| Confirmation of adequate drainage | Steady decline in serum bilirubin over subsequent days [1]. |
Management of cholangitis: Resuscitation → Treat sepsis with intravenous antibiotic → Decompression of biliary system: Endoscopic vs percutaneous → Definitive management [3][17][18].
D3. Surgical Drainage — Exploration of Common Bile Duct (ECBD) — Last Resort
Surgical drainage is reserved for patients in whom other methods of biliary drainage cannot be performed or have failed [1][7][15].
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Indications [7][15] | Failure of endoscopic drainage OR Deterioration despite endoscopic drainage. |
| Approach | Open approach for emergency case; laparoscopic approach in selected elective cases [7][15]. |
| Procedure | Open/laparoscopic ECBD → choledochotomy (incision into CBD) → removal of stones → placement of T-tube for post-operative drainage and subsequent cholangiogram [1][2]. |
| Mortality | ~30% in the emergency setting — significantly higher than endoscopic drainage ( < 5%) [2]. This is precisely why surgery is the last resort. |
| T-tube | A T-shaped rubber tube placed in the CBD after exploration. The horizontal limb sits inside the CBD; the vertical limb exits through the abdominal wall. Allows post-operative bile drainage + subsequent T-tube cholangiogram to check for residual stones. However, T-tubes are associated with complications (infection, bile leak, tube dislodgement) and are falling out of favour [10]. |
Surgical Treatment — Key Slide Points
Decompression by exploration of common bile duct (ECBD) [7][15]:
- Indications: failure of endoscopic drainage; deterioration despite endoscopic drainage
- Open approach for emergency case
- Laparoscopic approach in selected elective case
This is the last step in the QMH escalation: ERCP → PTBD → ECBD [1].
D4. Therapeutic EUS (EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage) — Emerging Option
- EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography is an emerging technique when ERCP fails [2].
- The echoendoscope is used to puncture the bile duct from the stomach or duodenum under ultrasound guidance, and a stent is placed transmurally.
- Still requires specialised expertise and equipment; not universally available but increasingly used as a rescue option before resorting to surgery or PTBD.
Summary: Drainage Escalation
| Step | Modality | Mortality | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st line | ERCP +/- biliary stenting | < 5% | Standard approach for all grades |
| 2nd line | PTBD | Similar to ERCP | ERCP fails/contraindicated |
| Emerging | EUS-guided biliary drainage | Data evolving | ERCP fails, expertise available |
| 3rd line (last resort) | Surgical ECBD + T-tube | ~30% | Both ERCP and PTBD fail |
Pillar 4: Definitive Management — Treating the Underlying Cause
Definitive treatment should be deferred until cholangitis has been treated and the proper diagnosis is established [1][18]. Once the acute sepsis is controlled and the patient is stable, address the underlying etiology to prevent recurrence.
| Underlying Cause | Definitive Management | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Choledocholithiasis (gallstones) | ERCP for stone removal (lithotripsy) + Laparoscopic cholecystectomy [2][10] | Early cholecystectomy (during the same admission, rather than interval) is now preferred — reduces risk of recurrent biliary events. Stone removal at ERCP: sphincterotomy + wire basket / balloon extraction / mechanical lithotripsy [10]. Note: ascending cholangitis is still possible after cholecystectomy due to biliary stasis from ERCP-induced CBD dilatation or ageing-related CBD dilatation [2]. |
| Stent occlusion | Stent removal and replacement [1] | Patients with indwelling stents and cholangitis usually require repeated imaging and stent exchange. Plastic stents occlude every ~3 months; metal stents last longer but can also occlude (sludge, tumour ingrowth/overgrowth). |
| Benign biliary stricture | Endoscopic stent placement / balloon dilatation [2] | Serial dilatation and stenting over months may be needed. If refractory, surgical biliary-enteric anastomosis (hepaticojejunostomy). |
| Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) | Determined by resectability [1][3][17][18] | Establish diagnosis → Delineate level and cause of obstruction → Treat suppurative cholangitis → Definitive treatment [3][17]. Resectable: Surgical resection (e.g., Whipple operation for pancreatic head/periampullary tumour). Unresectable: Palliative stenting (metallic stent preferred for durability) or palliative surgical bypass (hepaticojejunostomy / choledochojejunostomy) [1]. |
| RPC | Regular ductal clearance + surgical resection [2][4] | ERCP is difficult for intrahepatic access → PTBD, T-tube drainage, hepaticocutaneojejunostomy (HCJ) for acute drainage [4]. Long-term: regular USG surveillance, ERCP stone clearance/stricture dilatation. Resection of affected hepatobiliary segment + biliary-enteric anastomosis (hepaticojejunostomy) — indicated for atrophic liver segment, failed non-operative treatment, or suspected cholangiocarcinoma [4]. |
| Parasitic infection | Praziquantel (for Clonorchis sinensis: 25 mg/kg PO TDS × 1 day) [4] | Eradicate the parasite to break the cycle of epithelial damage → stricture → stasis → stone formation. |
Management According to Clinical Scenario — Synthesis
| Scenario | Acute Management | Drainage Approach | Definitive Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I cholangitis from CBD stone | NPO, IVF, IV Augmentin, monitor | Elective ERCP (sphincterotomy + stone extraction) | Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| Grade II cholangitis from CBD stone | NPO, IVF, IV Tazocin, monitor closely | Early ERCP within 24–48h (stent ± stone extraction) | Interval stone removal if deferred + cholecystectomy |
| Grade III cholangitis (Reynolds' pentad) | Aggressive resuscitation, IVF, vasopressors if needed, IV Tazocin, ICU | URGENT ERCP → PTBD if fails → ECBD if both fail | Once stable: definitive treatment of cause |
| Cholangitis from malignant obstruction | NPO, IVF, IV antibiotics, correct coagulopathy | ERCP stenting (plastic → metal when diagnosis confirmed) OR PTBD if hilar obstruction | Staging workup → resection if operable; palliative stenting/bypass if not |
| Cholangitis from stent occlusion | NPO, IVF, IV Tazocin (cover Pseudomonas) | ERCP: stent removal and replacement | Evaluate for underlying cause of stent dysfunction; regular stent exchange programme |
| RPC with acute cholangitis | NPO, IVF, IV antibiotics | PTBD (ERCP often inadequate for intrahepatic access) | Regular ductal clearance; hepatobiliary resection + HJ if indicated |
Post-ERCP Monitoring — Detecting Complications
After ERCP, watch for [16]:
| Complication | Clinical Clue | Investigation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent cholangitis | Ongoing fever, tachycardia post-ERCP | AXR (stent migration/blockage), bloods | Unsuccessful drainage, migrated/blocked stent, or resistant organisms → repeat ERCP or PTBD [16] |
| Flare-up sepsis | Fever spike immediately post-procedure | Blood cultures, repeat bloods | Continued antibiotics, ensure adequate drainage [16] |
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis | Epigastric pain, elevated amylase ( > 3× ULN) | Amylase/lipase, CT if severe | Supportive (NPO, IVF, analgesics) |
| Perforation | Abdominal pain, peritonism, surgical emphysema | CT abdomen: retroperitoneal free gas [16] | Intraperitoneal: surgery. Retroperitoneal: usually conservative (seals spontaneously) [1]. |
| Bleeding | Haematemesis, melaena, drop in Hb | OGD | Endoscopic haemostasis (adrenaline injection, clips, cautery) |
Complications of Sphincterotomy — Short-Term and Long-Term
| Time Frame | Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term | Acute pancreatitis | Ampullary oedema → pancreatic duct obstruction → enzyme activation |
| Perforation (intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal) | Electrocautery cut extends beyond the sphincter | |
| Bleeding | Transection of papillary vessels | |
| Infection | Introduction of bacteria during instrumentation | |
| Long-term | Recurrent cholangitis | Loss of sphincter of Oddi barrier → free duodenal reflux → ascending infection, especially if biliary stasis persists |
| Stone recurrence | Altered biliary dynamics post-sphincterotomy; ~5% risk of recurrent biliary events even after cholecystectomy [10] | |
| Papillary stenosis | Scarring at the sphincterotomy site → re-stenosis → obstruction |
High Yield Summary
Management Framework = RAD:
- R: Resuscitation — NPO, IV fluids, monitor vitals & I/O Q1h, blood cultures before antibiotics, correct coagulopathy
- A: Antibiotics — Mild: IV Augmentin or Cefuroxime + Metronidazole; Severe: IV Piperacillin-Tazobactam (Tazocin) × 7 days
- D: Drainage — urgency by TG18 severity:
- Grade I → antibiotics first, plan early ERCP
- Grade II → early ERCP within 24–48h
- Grade III → URGENT ERCP
- Drainage escalation (QMH): ERCP → PTBD → ECBD
ERCP Key Points:
- 1st line for drainage; mortality < 5%
- Role: biliary drainage and decompression, NOT stone removal in unstable patients
- Aspirate bile first before injecting contrast
- Complications: perforation, bleeding from papillotomy, pancreatitis
- Contraindications: altered GI anatomy (Billroth II, Roux-en-Y), coagulopathy, contrast allergy
PTBD: 2nd line; access via intrahepatic ducts (not CBD), left hepatic duct preferred; similar efficacy to ERCP
Surgical ECBD: Last resort; indications = failure or deterioration despite endoscopic drainage; open for emergency, laparoscopic for selected elective; mortality ~30%
Definitive Management (after acute episode):
- Gallstones → ERCP stone removal + early laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Stricture → endoscopic stenting/dilatation
- MBO → staging → resection (Whipple) or palliative stent/bypass
- Stent occlusion → stent exchange
- RPC → regular ductal clearance ± hepatobiliary resection + HJ
Key principle: antibiotics alone are insufficient because antibiotic excretion is impaired in biliary obstruction → biliary drainage is mandatory
Active Recall - Management of Acute Cholangitis
1. State the RAD mnemonic for acute cholangitis management and explain each component.
Show mark scheme
R = Resuscitation (NPO, IV fluids, monitor vitals and I/O Q1h, blood cultures before antibiotics, correct coagulopathy). A = Antibiotics (IV broad-spectrum: mild = Augmentin or Cefuroxime + Metronidazole; severe = Piperacillin-Tazobactam for 7 days). D = Drainage (biliary decompression: urgency based on TG18 severity grading; escalation ERCP then PTBD then ECBD).
2. What is the primary role of ERCP in acute cholangitis, and why should bile be aspirated before injecting contrast?
Show mark scheme
Primary role is biliary drainage and decompression, NOT stone removal in unstable patients. Bile should be aspirated first to decompress the biliary tree and reduce intraluminal pressure, thereby reducing the risk of inducing further bacteraemia during contrast injection. Stone removal can be deferred to interval ERCP after sepsis resolves.
3. A patient with acute cholangitis fails ERCP due to Billroth II anatomy. What are the next two drainage options in order, and what are the key considerations for each?
Show mark scheme
1st: PTBD - percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage via intrahepatic duct (not CBD), left hepatic duct preferred (less painful subcostal approach, avoids pleural transgression). Similar efficacy to ERCP. Risk: fluid/electrolyte loss, bleeding, pneumothorax. 2nd: Surgical ECBD (exploration of common bile duct) with T-tube placement. Open approach for emergency. Mortality approximately 30%. Reserved as last resort when both ERCP and PTBD fail.
4. Why are antibiotics alone insufficient to treat moderate-to-severe acute cholangitis? Connect this to the pathophysiology.
Show mark scheme
Antibiotic excretion into bile is impaired when the biliary system is obstructed. Therefore, even with correct IV antibiotics, therapeutic concentrations cannot be achieved at the site of infection within the obstructed biliary tree. Biliary drainage is mandatory to decompress the system, allow source control, and restore antibiotic penetration. Additionally, the obstructed system acts like an undrained abscess - pus under pressure - which antibiotics alone cannot sterilise.
5. After resolving acute cholangitis from a CBD stone, what is the definitive management plan? Why is ascending cholangitis still possible even after cholecystectomy?
Show mark scheme
Definitive: ERCP for stone removal (sphincterotomy plus wire basket or balloon extraction or mechanical lithotripsy) followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (same admission preferred). Ascending cholangitis is still possible after cholecystectomy because: (1) ERCP-induced CBD dilatation leads to biliary stasis; (2) ageing-related CBD dilatation; (3) sphincterotomy permanently ablates the sphincter of Oddi barrier, allowing free duodenal reflux. Approximately 5% risk of recurrent biliary events.
6. List three potential complications of ERCP sphincterotomy and explain the difference between intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal perforation in terms of CXR findings and management.
Show mark scheme
Complications: (1) Post-ERCP pancreatitis, (2) Perforation, (3) Bleeding from papillotomy. Intraperitoneal perforation (duodenal wall): free gas under diaphragm on erect CXR, requires operative treatment (will not seal spontaneously). Retroperitoneal perforation (bile duct at ampulla): NO free gas under diaphragm on CXR but retroperitoneal gas may be seen on CT, managed conservatively (usually seals spontaneously).
References
[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholangitis — treatment: general principles, medical treatment, ERCP, PTBD, surgical drainage) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute cholangitis — acute management RAD, ERCP technique, PTBD, surgical drainage, long-term management) [3] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p16 — Cholangitis: impaired antibiotic excretion, biliary drainage mandatory; p17 — Management of cholangitis: resuscitation, antibiotics, decompression, definitive management) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md and maxim.md (Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis — management, PTBD, hepatobiliary resection) [7] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p13 — NPO, IVF, antibiotics: Cefuroxime, Metronidazole, Piperacillin-Tazobactam; p14 — ERCP first line, complications, contraindications; p15 — Surgical ECBD indications) [10] Senior notes: maxim.md (Choledocholithiasis — ERCP stone removal methods, surgical exploration, T-tube) [14] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p14 — ERCP first line, potential complications, relative contraindications for ERCP) [15] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Malignant biliary obstruction — ERCP with endoprosthesis, PTBD, stent types, palliative management) [16] Senior notes: maxim.md (Post-ERCP management, ASGE antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, ERCP procedure details) [17] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p15 — Management: establish diagnosis, delineate level/cause, treat suppurative cholangitis, definitive treatment) [18] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p17 — Management of cholangitis: resuscitation, treat sepsis, decompression endoscopic vs percutaneous, definitive management) [19] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute pancreatitis management — avoid morphine, analgesic choice) [20] Senior notes: maxim.md (ASGE guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis before GI endoscopy — ERCP in cholangitis)
Complications of Acute Cholangitis
Framework — Why Complications Occur
To understand the complications of acute cholangitis, think about the disease as an escalating cascade with three domains of damage:
- Local complications — direct consequences of infected bile under pressure within the biliary tree and surrounding structures.
- Systemic complications — consequences of bacteraemia and sepsis once bacteria and endotoxins reflux from the biliary system into the circulation (when intraductal pressure exceeds 25 cm H₂O [3]).
- Iatrogenic complications — consequences of the interventions (ERCP, PTBD, surgery) used to treat cholangitis.
Additionally, there are long-term complications from recurrent or inadequately treated cholangitis.
Let's work through each systematically.
A. Local Complications — Direct Extension of Biliary Infection
These result from the infected bile under pressure eroding into, or extending beyond, the bile duct into adjacent structures.
A1. Liver Abscess (Pyogenic)
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Infected bile under high pressure in the intrahepatic ducts → bacteria disseminate into the surrounding hepatic parenchyma → focal collection of pus forms → pyogenic liver abscess [4][11][21]. This is essentially the "path of least resistance" — the infected bile breaks through the duct wall into the liver tissue. |
| Why right lobe is more common | The right hepatic lobe is larger and receives a greater proportion of portal blood flow, making it more susceptible to haematogenous and biliary seeding [11]. |
| Clinical clue | Patient with cholangitis who develops swinging (spiking) fever despite adequate biliary drainage — fever pattern shifts from the constant high fever of cholangitis to a "picket-fence" swing pattern typical of an abscess. Tender hepatomegaly with minimal jaundice improvement [11]. |
| Diagnosis | CT abdomen with contrast: double-target sign (rim-enhancing lesion with central hypodensity) [11]. USG: hypoechoic collection in liver parenchyma — which is why USG should always be performed in cholangitis workup to rule out co-existing abscess [2]. |
| Management | IV antibiotics (prolonged course, 4–6 weeks) + image-guided percutaneous drainage (aspiration if < 5 cm, catheter placement if > 5 cm) [11]. |
Liver Abscess — Common Complication to Watch For
Liver abscess is listed as a complication of gallstone disease [21] and is a well-recognised sequela of cholangitis. In Hong Kong, Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess is particularly important in patients > 60 years old with DM — if Klebsiella is identified, urgently consult ophthalmology to rule out endophthalmitis (metastatic infection of the eye) and monitor for meningitis [11].
A2. Gallbladder Empyema
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | If the cystic duct is simultaneously obstructed (e.g., by a stone in the cystic duct while another stone obstructs the CBD), the gallbladder becomes a closed, infected space. Stagnant bile becomes infected → pus fills the gallbladder = empyema ("em-" = in, "pyema" = pus). |
| Clinical clue | Tender, palpable RUQ mass + septic-looking patient. Essentially, this is severe acute cholecystitis superimposed on cholangitis. |
| Management | Percutaneous cholecystostomy for drainage in the acutely septic patient; definitive cholecystectomy once stable. |
A3. Biliary Stricture Formation
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Repeated episodes of cholangitis cause chronic inflammation → fibrosis → stricturing of the bile duct wall. Each episode of infection and healing lays down more scar tissue, narrowing the duct lumen progressively [4]. This is the fundamental pathology in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) — stasis + stricturing + recurrent infection in a vicious cycle [4]. |
| Consequence | Strictures perpetuate obstruction → predispose to further cholangitis episodes → more stricturing. Without definitive treatment (e.g., resection, biliary-enteric anastomosis), the cycle is self-reinforcing. |
| Long-term risk | Chronic inflammation from recurrent stricturing is a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma (malignant transformation of biliary epithelium) [4]. |
A4. Biliary Fistula
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Chronic inflammation and high intraductal pressure can erode the bile duct wall into adjacent structures, creating abnormal communications: cholecystobiliary fistula (between gallbladder and CBD, as in Mirizzi syndrome) [1], or cholecystoenteric fistula (between gallbladder and bowel — can cause gallstone ileus). |
| Clinical significance | Fistulae allow free passage of duodenal bacteria into the biliary tree (further perpetuating infection) and can cause complications such as gallstone ileus (large stone passes through fistula into bowel and impacts at the ileocaecal valve). |
B. Systemic Complications — Consequences of Bacteraemia and Sepsis
These complications arise when the infection is no longer contained within the biliary tree and has spilled into the systemic circulation. The pathophysiology is: increased biliary pressure > 25 cm H₂O → bacteria reflux to hepatic veins and lymphatics → bacteraemia and septic shock [3].
B1. Sepsis and Septic Shock (Biliary Sepsis)
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Gram-negative bacteria (especially E. coli, Klebsiella) release endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) into the bloodstream → activates the innate immune system → massive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) → systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) → if uncontrolled → sepsis → septic shock [1][3]. |
| Pathophysiology of septic shock | Distributive shock: cytokines cause systemic vasodilation (loss of vascular tone) + increased capillary permeability (fluid leaks into interstitium) + myocardial depression (cytokine-mediated) → profound hypotension refractory to fluids alone → requires vasopressors. |
| Clinical presentation | Reynolds' pentad — Charcot's triad (fever, RUQ pain, jaundice) + hypotension + altered mental status (confusion) [1][2]. This represents suppurative cholangitis — frank pus under pressure in the bile duct with overwhelming sepsis. Present in < 10% of patients but carries very high mortality without emergency drainage [1][2]. |
| Recognition | Signs of shock: hypotension, oliguria, changes in mental status, cold and clammy skin, metabolic acidosis [1]. |
| Why drainage is life-saving | Excretion of antibiotics is impaired in biliary obstruction [3] — antibiotics alone cannot sterilise the obstructed, infected system. You must remove the source (decompress the bile duct) to break the septic cycle. Biliary drainage is mandatory [3]. |
Biliary Sepsis — The Critical Complication
Septic shock from cholangitis (Grade III, TG18) is a surgical emergency. Mortality without drainage approaches 50–100%. With timely endoscopic drainage, mortality drops to < 5% [2]. Every hour of delay matters.
B2. Multi-Organ Failure
When sepsis is not controlled, it progresses to multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) — the sequential or simultaneous failure of multiple organ systems:
| Organ System | Manifestation | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Refractory hypotension, need for vasopressors | Vasodilation, myocardial depression from cytokines, capillary leak |
| Respiratory | Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) | Cytokine-mediated alveolar-capillary membrane damage → non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema → severe hypoxaemia. Neutrophils activated by sepsis marginate in the pulmonary vasculature and release proteases/oxidants that damage the alveolar epithelium. |
| Renal | Acute kidney injury (AKI) — oliguria, rising creatinine | Renal hypoperfusion from shock + direct nephrotoxicity from endotoxins + potential nephrotoxicity from antibiotics (aminoglycosides). Also, obstructive jaundice itself predisposes to hepatorenal syndrome via bile salt-mediated renal vasoconstriction. |
| Hepatic | Worsening liver function (rising bilirubin, falling albumin, prolonged PT) | Direct hepatocyte injury from biliary back-pressure + sepsis-related ischaemic hepatitis ("shock liver") + pre-existing cholestasis. |
| Haematological | Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) | Endotoxin activates the coagulation cascade → widespread microvascular thrombosis → consumption of clotting factors and platelets → paradoxical bleeding (consumption coagulopathy). Clinically: petechiae, oozing from IV sites, bleeding from mucosal surfaces. Lab: ↓ platelets, ↓ fibrinogen, ↑ D-dimer, prolonged PT/APTT. |
| Neurological | Altered mental status, confusion, coma | Cerebral hypoperfusion + metabolic encephalopathy (hepatic, uraemic) + direct endotoxin neurotoxicity. Part of Reynolds' pentad. |
High-Yield: Multi-organ failure is the cause of death in fatal cholangitis. The progression is: cholangitis → bacteraemia → SIRS → sepsis → septic shock → MODS → death. Early drainage interrupts this cascade.
B3. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Endotoxin (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria activates tissue factor on endothelial cells and monocytes → triggers the extrinsic coagulation cascade → widespread activation of thrombin → microvascular fibrin deposition → consumption of clotting factors (especially fibrinogen) and platelets → bleeding tendency. Simultaneously, fibrinolysis is activated to dissolve the microthrombi → D-dimer rises. |
| Clinical significance | DIC compounds the coagulopathy already present from vitamin K deficiency (biliary obstruction → impaired bile salt delivery to gut → impaired absorption of fat-soluble vitamin K → reduced synthesis of factors II, VII, IX, X). The combination makes haemorrhagic complications particularly dangerous. |
| Lab findings | ↓ Platelets, ↓ fibrinogen, ↑↑ D-dimer, prolonged PT and APTT, fragmented red cells (schistocytes) on blood film. |
C. Complications Related to Biliary Obstruction Itself
Even before sepsis develops, the obstruction component of cholangitis causes its own set of problems:
C1. Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | If the obstructing stone is impacted at the ampulla of Vater, it blocks both the CBD and the main pancreatic duct (of Wirsung) → pancreatic enzyme stasis → premature intrapancreatic activation of trypsinogen → autodigestion of pancreatic tissue → acute pancreatitis [1][21]. |
| Why it's a complication of cholangitis | Cholangitis and biliary pancreatitis share the same underlying cause (impacted ampullary stone). They frequently coexist — always check amylase/lipase in cholangitis [2]. |
| Clinical clue | Epigastric pain radiating straight through to the back, relieved by sitting forward. Amylase/lipase > 3× upper limit of normal. |
| Management | ERCP within 24–72 hours for sphincterotomy and stone extraction when cholangitis and pancreatitis coexist [1][22]. |
C2. Coagulopathy from Vitamin K Deficiency
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Biliary obstruction → bile salts do not reach the duodenum → impaired emulsification and absorption of fats → impaired absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) → vitamin K deficiency → reduced hepatic synthesis of clotting factors II, VII, IX, X (the "vitamin K-dependent factors") → prolonged PT/INR → bleeding tendency [1]. |
| Clinical significance | Must be corrected before any invasive procedure (ERCP, PTBD, surgery) — IV vitamin K takes 6–12h to take effect; for urgent procedures, give FFP for immediate correction. |
C3. Malnutrition and Fat Malabsorption
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Chronic/recurrent biliary obstruction → bile salts don't reach the gut → impaired fat emulsification → steatorrhoea (pale, fatty, foul-smelling stools that float) + malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K). Patients become malnourished, particularly with recurrent episodes (as in RPC). |
D. Iatrogenic Complications — From the Treatments We Use
The drainage procedures themselves carry risks. These are important to know for exams because they frequently come up in the context of "complications of ERCP/PTBD."
D1. Complications of ERCP
Potential complications of ERCP [7][14][16]:
| Complication | Incidence | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis | ~2–5% (most frequent complication) [16][23] | Manipulation of the papilla → oedema at the ampulla → obstruction of pancreatic duct orifice → premature enzyme activation → pancreatitis. Injection of contrast into the pancreatic duct increases risk. | Supportive (NPO, IVF, analgesics). Prevention: rectal NSAIDs (diclofenac/indomethacin), pancreatic duct stent, guidewire cannulation before contrast injection [16]. |
| Ascending infection / flare-up sepsis | ~1% [16] | Injection of contrast into an obstructed system → increases intraductal pressure → forces more bacteria into the bloodstream → transient worsening of bacteraemia. This is why aspirate bile first before injecting contrast [2]. Also occurs from unsuccessful drainage, migrated/blocked stent, resistant organisms [16]. | Ensure adequate drainage; if stent blocked/migrated → repeat ERCP or PTBD; broaden antibiotic coverage. Investigation: AXR (check stent position) [16]. |
| Post-sphincterotomy bleeding | ~2% [16] | Electrocautery incision through the sphincter transects a blood vessel at the papilla. Risk factors: intra-operative bleeding, coagulopathy, initiation of anticoagulants within 3 days, active cholangitis [16]. | Resuscitation → localisation → endoscopic haemostasis (injection of 1:10,000 adrenaline, clip application). Prevention: correct coagulopathy, cut along the right axis within the safety zone [16]. |
| Perforation | ~1% [16] | Intraperitoneal perforation (duodenal wall): free gas under diaphragm on CXR → requires operative treatment (will not seal spontaneously) [1]. Retroperitoneal perforation (bile duct at ampulla — retroperitoneal portion of D2): no free gas under diaphragm; retroperitoneal free gas on CT → usually conservative treatment (seals spontaneously) [1][16]. | Intraperitoneal: laparotomy + repair. Retroperitoneal: NPO, IV antibiotics, monitoring. |
| Papillary stenosis | Late complication | Scarring at the sphincterotomy site → fibrosis → re-stenosis of the ampulla → biliary obstruction → recurrent cholangitis. | Repeat sphincterotomy or balloon dilatation. |
| Stent occlusion | Expected with plastic stents (~3 months) | Sludge (bile sludge/biofilm), tumour ingrowth (through the stent mesh in metal stents), or tumour overgrowth (tumour grows over the ends of the stent) [15][21]. | Stent exchange (routine for plastic stents); sweeping or re-stenting for metal stents [21]. |
| Stent migration | Variable | Stent moves from its intended position → loss of drainage → recurrent obstruction and cholangitis. | Endoscopic retrieval and repositioning/replacement. Investigation: AXR to check stent position [16]. |
D2. Complications of PTBD
| Complication | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bleeding / Haemobilia | The percutaneous needle traverses liver parenchyma → may puncture a branch of the hepatic artery or portal vein (structures that run alongside bile ducts in the portal triad) → blood enters the biliary tree (haemobilia) or peritoneal cavity [15][16]. | Management: stabilise + resuscitate; clamp the PTBD catheter; perform cholangiogram via PTBD to delineate whether catheter is in artery/vein; remove catheter slowly to control bleeding — do NOT remove immediately as this may convert to free haemoperitoneum [15]. |
| Bacteraemia | Manipulation of the infected biliary system → bacteria reflux into the bloodstream. | Antibiotic prophylaxis is required for PTC/PTBD [16]. |
| Bile leak / biliary peritonitis | Bile leaks from the percutaneous tract into the peritoneal cavity. | Usually self-limited if catheter drains adequately; may require peritoneal drainage if peritonitis develops. |
| Pneumothorax | Right-sided intercostal approach → needle transgresses the pleural space. | This is why the left hepatic duct is preferred (subcostal approach) — less likely to transgress the pleural space [1]. |
| Fluid and electrolyte loss | External drainage catheter diverts bile externally → loss of bile salts, water, bicarbonate, electrolytes. | Monitor I/O carefully; replace losses; consider internalising the drainage (internal-external catheter) [2]. |
| Catheter dislodgement | Catheter pulled out accidentally → loss of access. | Secure the catheter properly; if dislodged, may need re-insertion. |
D3. Complications of Surgical ECBD
| Complication | Detail |
|---|---|
| High mortality (~30%) in emergency setting | Due to operating on a septic, unstable patient with biliary obstruction. The anaesthetic risk, surgical stress response, and compromised hepatic/renal function all contribute [2]. |
| Biliary leak | From the choledochotomy site or T-tube insertion site. |
| T-tube complications | Infection around the tube site, bile leak on removal, tube dislodgement, retained stone in the T-tube tract [10]. |
| Wound infection | Operating in a contaminated field (infected bile). |
| Incisional hernia | Long-term complication of laparotomy. |
E. Long-Term Complications of Recurrent / Chronic Cholangitis
These are particularly relevant in the context of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) [4]:
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Secondary biliary cirrhosis | Chronic, repeated biliary obstruction → persistent cholestasis → periductal fibrosis extends into hepatic parenchyma → progressive hepatic fibrosis → cirrhosis. This is "secondary" biliary cirrhosis because the cause is known (obstruction), as opposed to "primary" biliary cholangitis (autoimmune) [4]. |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | Chronic inflammation of biliary epithelium → chronic cell turnover and repair → increased risk of malignant transformation (inflammation → dysplasia → carcinoma sequence). This is analogous to how chronic ulcerative colitis predisposes to colorectal cancer, or how Barrett's oesophagus predisposes to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. RPC, PSC, liver fluke infection (Clonorchis sinensis), and choledochal cysts all carry significantly elevated risk of cholangiocarcinoma [4]. |
| Recurrent cholangitis | Even after definitive treatment (e.g., cholecystectomy), ascending cholangitis can recur due to: ERCP-induced CBD dilatation (loss of normal duct calibre → stasis); ageing-related CBD dilatation; permanent loss of Sphincter of Oddi barrier after sphincterotomy [2]. |
| Hepatic atrophy | Segmental or lobar atrophy from chronic obstruction of the corresponding intrahepatic duct (the affected liver segment shrinks because bile cannot drain → chronic injury → fibrosis → atrophy). Particularly common in RPC affecting the left lobe [4]. |
F. Summary Table — All Complications at a Glance
| Category | Complication | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Local | Liver abscess | Swinging fever, tender hepatomegaly, CT double-target sign |
| Gallbladder empyema | Tender RUQ mass + septic patient | |
| Biliary stricture | Recurrent obstruction, vicious cycle (RPC) | |
| Biliary fistula | Cholecystobiliary or cholecystoenteric communication | |
| Systemic | Biliary sepsis / septic shock | Reynolds' pentad; Grade III cholangitis |
| Multi-organ failure | ARDS, AKI, DIC, hepatic failure, encephalopathy | |
| DIC | ↓ Plt, ↓ fibrinogen, ↑ D-dimer, bleeding | |
| Obstruction-related | Acute biliary pancreatitis | Ampullary stone; amylase > 3× ULN |
| Coagulopathy | Vitamin K malabsorption → ↑ PT/INR | |
| Fat malabsorption | Steatorrhoea, fat-soluble vitamin deficiency | |
| Iatrogenic (ERCP) | Post-ERCP pancreatitis | Most common ERCP complication (~2–5%) |
| Perforation | Intraperitoneal (surgery) vs retroperitoneal (conservative) | |
| Bleeding | Post-sphincterotomy; correct coagulopathy | |
| Flare-up sepsis | Failed drainage, blocked stent, aspirate bile before contrast | |
| Stent occlusion / migration | Recurrent obstruction; AXR to check position | |
| Iatrogenic (PTBD) | Bleeding / haemobilia | Portal triad puncture |
| Pneumothorax | Right intercostal approach → use left subcostal | |
| Fluid/electrolyte loss | External bile drainage | |
| Long-term | Secondary biliary cirrhosis | Chronic obstruction → hepatic fibrosis |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | Chronic inflammation → malignant transformation | |
| Recurrent cholangitis | Post-sphincterotomy/cholecystectomy; CBD dilatation | |
| Hepatic atrophy | Segmental chronic obstruction (RPC, left lobe) |
High Yield Summary
Complications of acute cholangitis can be remembered as LOCAL → SYSTEMIC → IATROGENIC → LONG-TERM:
Local: Liver abscess, gallbladder empyema, biliary stricture, biliary fistula.
Systemic: Biliary sepsis / septic shock (Reynolds' pentad) → multi-organ failure (ARDS, AKI, DIC, hepatic failure, encephalopathy). Mechanism: biliary pressure > 25 cm H₂O → cholangiovenous reflux → bacteraemia → SIRS → sepsis → MODS. Biliary drainage is mandatory because antibiotic excretion is impaired in obstruction.
Iatrogenic: ERCP complications = pancreatitis (most common, ~2–5%), perforation (intraperitoneal = surgery; retroperitoneal = conservative), bleeding, flare-up sepsis, stent occlusion/migration. PTBD = bleeding/haemobilia, pneumothorax, bacteraemia, fluid loss. Surgical ECBD = high mortality (~30%).
Long-term (especially in RPC): Secondary biliary cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma, recurrent cholangitis, hepatic atrophy.
Key principle: The most dangerous complication is septic shock with multi-organ failure — early biliary drainage is life-saving and the single most important intervention to prevent this cascade.
Active Recall - Complications of Acute Cholangitis
1. A patient with cholangitis develops a swinging fever despite biliary drainage. What complication should you suspect, how do you diagnose it, and how do you manage it?
Show mark scheme
Suspect pyogenic liver abscess. Diagnose with CT abdomen with contrast showing double-target sign (rim-enhancing lesion with central hypodensity). Manage with prolonged IV antibiotics (4-6 weeks) plus image-guided percutaneous drainage (aspiration if less than 5cm, catheter placement if greater than 5cm). If Klebsiella is isolated, consult ophthalmology to rule out endophthalmitis.
2. Explain the pathophysiology of how acute cholangitis leads to septic shock and multi-organ failure, starting from intraductal pressure.
Show mark scheme
Biliary obstruction raises intraductal pressure above 25 cm H2O. At this pressure, bacteria and endotoxins reflux into hepatic veins and peribiliary lymphatics (cholangiovenous reflux), causing bacteraemia. Gram-negative endotoxins (LPS) activate the innate immune system, triggering massive cytokine release (TNF-alpha, IL-1, IL-6) leading to SIRS then sepsis. Sepsis causes vasodilation, capillary leak, myocardial depression leading to distributive shock. Organ hypoperfusion causes ARDS, AKI, DIC, hepatic failure, encephalopathy. Antibiotics alone are insufficient because their excretion into bile is impaired in obstruction, so biliary drainage is mandatory.
3. Name the most common complication of ERCP and explain how it occurs. What measures can prevent it?
Show mark scheme
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (2-5% incidence). Occurs due to manipulation of the papilla causing oedema at the ampulla, obstructing the pancreatic duct orifice, leading to premature enzyme activation. Also from inadvertent contrast injection into the pancreatic duct. Prevention: rectal NSAIDs (diclofenac or indomethacin), pancreatic duct stent placement, guidewire cannulation before contrast injection to avoid injection into the pancreatic duct.
4. Differentiate intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal perforation after ERCP in terms of mechanism, CXR findings, and management.
Show mark scheme
Intraperitoneal perforation: perforates the duodenal wall; CXR shows free gas under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum); requires operative treatment because it will not seal spontaneously. Retroperitoneal perforation: perforates the bile duct at the ampulla (retroperitoneal portion of D2); CXR shows NO free gas under diaphragm but CT may show retroperitoneal gas; managed conservatively as it usually seals spontaneously.
5. Why does recurrent pyogenic cholangitis predispose to cholangiocarcinoma and secondary biliary cirrhosis?
Show mark scheme
Cholangiocarcinoma: chronic inflammation of biliary epithelium from recurrent infection causes chronic cell turnover and repair, leading to the inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence (malignant transformation of biliary epithelium). Secondary biliary cirrhosis: chronic repeated biliary obstruction causes persistent cholestasis, periductal fibrosis extends into hepatic parenchyma, progressive fibrosis leads to cirrhosis. Called secondary because the cause (obstruction) is identified, distinguishing it from primary biliary cholangitis (autoimmune).
6. A patient develops fever and tachycardia after ERCP for cholangitis. What are the possible causes and how do you investigate?
Show mark scheme
Differential: (1) Persistent cholangitis from unsuccessful drainage, migrated or blocked stent, or resistant organisms. (2) ERCP complications including flare-up sepsis, post-ERCP pancreatitis, or perforation. Investigations: AXR to check stent position (migration, blockage). Blood cultures, repeat bloods (CBC, LFT, CRP, amylase). If abdominal pain is prominent, CT abdomen to look for retroperitoneal free gas (perforation) or evidence of pancreatitis.
References
[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute cholangitis — treatment, ERCP complications, PTBD, surgical drainage; Mirizzi syndrome — biliary fistula) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Acute cholangitis — acute management RAD, ERCP, PTBD, long-term management; post-cholecystectomy complications) [3] Lecture slides: Malignant biliary obstruction.pdf (p16 — biliary pressure, cholangiovenous reflux, impaired antibiotic excretion, mandatory drainage; p17 — management of cholangitis) [4] Senior notes: felixlai.md and maxim.md (Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis — complications: biliary sepsis, pancreatitis, abscess, fistula, cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma) [7] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p7 — pathogenesis; p14 — ERCP complications: perforation, bleeding from papillotomy, pancreatitis; p15 — surgical ECBD indications) [10] Senior notes: maxim.md (Choledocholithiasis — T-tube complications, stone removal methods) [11] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Liver abscess — overview, microbiology, route of spread) and maxim.md (Liver abscess — pathogens, investigations, management, complications) [14] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p14 — ERCP potential complications, contraindications) [15] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Malignant biliary obstruction — ERCP stent complications, PTBD bleeding management) [16] Senior notes: maxim.md (ERCP complications, post-ERCP management, PTC/PTBD complications, ASGE antibiotic prophylaxis) [21] Lecture slides: GC 200. RUQ pain, jaundice and fever Cholecytitis and cholangitis Imaging of GI system.pdf (p5 — Complications of gallstone disease: acute cholangitis, liver abscess, acute pancreatitis) [22] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Acute pancreatitis — ERCP indications, biliary pancreatitis management) [23] Senior notes: felixlai.md (ERCP complications table — post-ERCP pancreatitis most frequent, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, papillary stenosis, stent stenosis/migration)
Peritonitis
Peritonitis is inflammation of the peritoneum, typically caused by bacterial infection due to perforation of an abdominal viscus or contamination of the peritoneal cavity, presenting with severe abdominal pain, rigidity, and systemic sepsis.
Acute Cholecystitis
Acute inflammation of the gallbladder, most commonly caused by obstruction of the cystic duct by gallstones, leading to distension, ischemia, and potential infection.