Brain tumoursGlial and neuronal tumours

Ependymoma

Ependymoma is a glial neoplasm arising from ependymal cells lining the ventricles and central canal of the spinal cord, most commonly occurring in the posterior fossa in children and the spinal cord in adults.

Ependymoma

Ependymoma (from Greek: ependyma = "upper garment" or "lining," referring to the ependymal cell lining of the ventricles; "-oma" = tumour) is a primary CNS neoplasm arising from ependymal cells that line the ventricular system and the central canal of the spinal cord [1][2]. These tumours can occur anywhere along the ventricular system or spinal cord but have a strong predilection for the posterior fossa (infratentorial) in children and the spinal cord in adults.

Key Concept

Ependymomas are tumours derived from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system [1]. They are classified as neuroepithelial tumours (a subtype of glioma). Although they may appear histologically "low-grade," ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics due to its poor clinical behaviour — because (1) it is slow-growing and hence not chemo-responsive, and (2) the majority are located near the brainstem and cerebellum, making complete resection difficult [1].


Epidemiology

  • Ependymomas account for approximately 2–5% of all primary intracranial neoplasms in adults and ~6–12% of all paediatric brain tumours [2][3].
  • Primary brain tumours are rare overall: ~6/100,000 per year [3]. Ependymomas represent a small but clinically significant subset.
  • Brain tumours account for 1–2% of all malignancies but 13% of all malignancy-related deaths [2].

  • Peak incidence in children: ~6 years of age [1].
  • Bimodal distribution: a paediatric peak (0–5 years) and a smaller adult peak (30–40 years).
  • In children, ependymomas are the third most common posterior fossa tumour (after pilocytic astrocytoma and medulloblastoma).
  • Spinal ependymoma is the commonest intramedullary spinal cord tumour in adults, with peak age 30–40 years, M > F [3].

  • Slight male predominance overall (M:F ≈ 1.2–1.5:1).

In children (2–12 years): 70% of brain tumours are infratentorial — the common posterior fossa tumours being medulloblastoma, cerebellar astrocytoma, and ependymoma [2]. In adults: 80–85% of brain tumours are supratentorial, and when ependymomas do occur in adults, they are more commonly spinal [3].

FeaturePaediatric EpendymomaAdult Ependymoma
Common site70% posterior fossa (4th ventricle) [1]Spinal cord (intramedullary) > supratentorial
Peak age~6 years30–40 years
BehaviourAggressive (location-dependent)More indolent (especially spinal myxopapillary)
ChemosensitivityPoorPoor

Risk Factors

  • High-dose ionizing radiation → associated with meningiomas and gliomas (the only proven environmental factor for brain tumours!) [2].
  • Ependymomas, as a subtype of glioma, fall under this risk umbrella.

Ependymomas can occur sporadically (majority) or in the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes:

SyndromeGeneAssociated Brain TumoursKey Features
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)NF2 (Merlin, Ch22q12)Bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningioma, ependymoma [4][5]Autosomal dominant; also spinal ependymomas
Turcot syndromeAPC (Type 2) or MMR genes (Type 1)Medulloblastoma (APC type) or GBM (MMR type); ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6]Familial colon cancer + brain tumours
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)APC (5q21-22)Medulloblastoma, ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6]>100 colonic polyps, extracolonic malignancies

NF2 and Ependymoma

NF2 features include: meningioma, ependymoma, acoustic schwannoma [5]. If you see multiple ependymomas (especially spinal) in a young patient, think NF2.

  • RELA fusion-positive ependymomas (supratentorial) — driven by ZFTA-RELA fusion (previously C11orf95-RELA); involves constitutive NF-κB pathway activation.
  • PFA (Posterior Fossa A) subgroup — associated with loss of H3K27 trimethylation, occurs in infants/young children, aggressive.
  • PFB (Posterior Fossa B) subgroup — occurs in older children/adults, better prognosis.
  • YAP1 fusion-positive ependymomas (supratentorial) — better prognosis.
  • Myxopapillary ependymoma — typically conus medullaris/filum terminale in young adults.

Anatomy and Function of the Ependyma

The ependyma is a single layer of ciliated epithelial (cuboidal to columnar) cells that lines:

  1. The ventricular system (lateral ventricles → 3rd ventricle → cerebral aqueduct → 4th ventricle)
  2. The central canal of the spinal cord

FunctionMechanism
CSF productionSpecialized ependymal cells in the choroid plexus secrete CSF
CSF circulationCilia on ependymal cells beat to facilitate CSF flow through ventricles
Brain-CSF barrierProvide a semi-permeable barrier between brain parenchyma and ventricular CSF
NeuroregenerationSubventricular zone ependymal cells may serve as neural progenitor cells

Understanding the ventricular system anatomy explains why ependymomas present where they do:

  • 4th ventricle (posterior fossa): The most common site in children. The tumour arises from the floor of the 4th ventricle (which is the dorsal surface of the pons and medulla). This explains why:

    • Tumours adhere to brainstem structures → difficult surgical resection
    • Tumours can extrude through the foramina of Luschka into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) or through the foramen of Magendie inferiorly
    • Obstruction of CSF outflow causes obstructive hydrocephalus
  • Lateral ventricles (supratentorial): More common in older children and adults; tend to be larger at presentation because the ventricle provides room to grow before causing symptoms.

  • Spinal cord: Commonest intramedullary tumour in adults. Cervical and thoracic segments most affected. Myxopapillary subtype characteristically arises at the conus medullaris / filum terminale.


Aetiology and Pathophysiology

Ependymomas arise from radial glial cells (ependymal progenitors) rather than mature ependymal cells per se. These progenitor cells retain proliferative capacity and reside in the subventricular zone.

The WHO 2021 (5th Edition) classification has fundamentally changed how we understand ependymomas — they are now classified by anatomical compartment + molecular features, not just histology.

Anatomical CompartmentMolecular SubtypeKey Molecular FeatureClinical Behaviour
SupratentorialZFTA-RELA fusion-positive (formerly RELA)NF-κB pathway constitutive activationAggressive, commoner subtype
SupratentorialYAP1 fusion-positiveHippo/YAP pathwayBetter prognosis
Posterior fossaPFA (Group A)Loss of H3K27me3 (epigenetic silencing); overexpression of EZHIPMost common, young children, aggressive, high recurrence
Posterior fossaPFB (Group B)Retained H3K27me3; frequent chromosomal gains/lossesOlder children/adults, better prognosis
SpinalMYCN-amplifiedMYCN amplificationAggressive subtype
SpinalMyxopapillaryUnknown driver; distinct morphologyIndolent; conus/filum terminale
SpinalSubependymoma—Very indolent, may be incidental

Understanding this is essential for linking pathophysiology → clinical features:

  1. Mass effect and local invasion

    • Posterior fossa tumours compress the cerebellum (→ ataxia, nystagmus), brainstem (→ cranial nerve palsies, long tract signs), and 4th ventricle floor
    • Supratentorial tumours cause focal neurological deficits depending on eloquent cortex involvement and seizures (cortical irritation)
  2. CSF obstruction → Obstructive hydrocephalus

    • A 4th ventricle ependymoma blocks CSF outflow through the foramina of Luschka and Magendie or the cerebral aqueduct
    • This causes non-communicating (obstructive) hydrocephalus → raised intracranial pressure (↑ICP) [3]
    • Mechanisms of ↑ICP: ↑brain volume (cerebral oedema, mass effect), ↑CSF volume (CSF obstruction), ↑blood volume (venous congestion) [3]
  3. CSF dissemination ("drop metastases")

    • Ependymoma cells can shed into the CSF → seed along the craniospinal axis
    • This is more common in high-grade ependymomas (WHO Grade 3) and posterior fossa tumours
    • Explains the need for craniospinal MRI staging at diagnosis
    • Extracranial metastasis is rare in brain tumours (∵ no lymphatic drainage) → TNM staging is not useful [3]
  4. Peritumoral oedema

    • Disruption of the blood-brain barrier → vasogenic oedema → worsens mass effect → contributes to ↑ICP

WHO CNS5 Classification (2021) — Current Standard

Ependymomas are now classified using an integrated diagnosis combining histology + molecular markers + anatomical location:

By Histological Grade

WHO GradeHistologyFeatures
Grade 1Subependymoma; Myxopapillary ependymoma*Well-circumscribed, slow-growing. *Note: myxopapillary upgraded to Grade 2 in WHO CNS5 due to late recurrence risk
Grade 2Ependymoma (classic)Perivascular pseudorosettes (hallmark), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic but less common)
Grade 3Anaplastic ependymomaHigh mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, necrosis, nuclear atypia

Histological Hallmarks

  • Perivascular pseudorosettes: Tumour cells arranged radially around blood vessels with an anuclear zone (the cell processes extend toward the vessel). This is the most characteristic histological feature — present in virtually all ependymomas.
  • True ependymal rosettes: Tumour cells forming a ring around a central lumen (mimicking the ependymal canal). Pathognomonic but less frequently seen.
  • These features help distinguish ependymoma from other gliomas.

By Anatomical Compartment and Molecular Type (WHO CNS5)

LocationSubtypeKey Marker
SupratentorialZFTA fusion-positiveL1CAM +, RELA fusion
SupratentorialYAP1 fusion-positiveYAP1 fusion
Posterior fossaPFAH3K27me3 loss, EZHIP overexpression
Posterior fossaPFBH3K27me3 retained
SpinalMyxopapillaryMucin-rich papillary architecture
SpinalSubependymomaClusters of tumour cells in glial fibrillary matrix
SpinalEpendymoma, MYCN-amplifiedMYCN amplification

Older Classification Retained for Context

Histological classification by cellular origin [3]:

Neuroepithelial tissue tumours include: gliomas (astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, ependymoma, glioblastoma multiforme) and medulloblastoma (neuronal) [3]


Clinical Features

High-grade diseases tend to present with subacute onset of signs/symptoms of ↑ICP. Low-grade diseases tend to present with slowly progressive focal neurological signs/symptoms (focal neurological deficits = negative symptoms; epilepsy = positive symptoms) [3].

Because ependymoma is often of intermediate grade but situated in the posterior fossa where it obstructs CSF flow early, the dominant presentation in children is ↑ICP from obstructive hydrocephalus.


A. Symptoms

This is the most common presenting symptom complex in paediatric posterior fossa ependymoma. Why? Because the tumour grows within the 4th ventricle → blocks CSF outflow → obstructive hydrocephalus → ↑ICP.

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
Generalised, dull, constant headache (worse in morning) [3]↑ICP is worse with recumbency (lying flat → ↑venous return to head → ↑intracranial blood volume). Morning headache occurs because the patient has been lying flat all night
Vomiting [3]Direct compression/irritation of the area postrema (vomiting centre) on the floor of the 4th ventricle; also occurs with ↑ICP (stimulation of medullary vomiting centre). In posterior fossa tumours, vomiting can be projectile and without nausea ("cerebellar vomiting")
Decreased consciousness [3]Progressive ↑ICP → compression of ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) in brainstem → ↓arousal
Visual disturbance / Transient visual obscurations (TVOs) [7]↑ICP transmitted along the optic nerve sheath → tourniquet effect → transient ischaemia of the optic nerve head. Also: CN6 palsy (see below) causes diplopia
Headache increasing with recumbency and early morning [7]Same mechanism as morning headache above
Nausea [7]Vagal stimulation and medullary compression

Paediatric Presentation Caveat

In infants (< 2 years), the cranial sutures are unfused, so ↑ICP may present with increasing head circumference (macrocephaly), bulging fontanelle, irritability, poor feeding, and "sun-setting" eyes (Parinaud-like upgaze palsy from pressure on the tectal plate) rather than classic headache and vomiting. Always measure head circumference in an infant with a suspected brain tumour.

Because 70% of paediatric ependymomas are in the posterior fossa, cerebellar symptoms are extremely common:

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
Unsteadiness / gait difficulty (truncal ataxia)Tumour in the vermis or compressing the flocculonodular lobe (archicerebellum) → impaired axial balance and truncal stability
Limb incoordination / clumsinessTumour involving the cerebellar hemisphere → impaired ipsilateral limb coordination (appendicular ataxia)
Dizziness / vertigoCompression of vestibular nuclei on the floor of the 4th ventricle or vestibulocerebellar connections

The floor of the 4th ventricle is the dorsal surface of the pons and medulla. Tumour adherence to / invasion of this area causes:

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
Dysphagia, dysarthriaLower cranial nerve (CN IX, X, XII) nuclear involvement
DiplopiaCN VI (abducens) palsy — a false localizing sign of ↑ICP (long intracranial course, vulnerable to stretching), or direct brainstem compression
Facial weakness, facial numbnessCN VII (facial) and CN V (trigeminal) involvement
HiccupsMedullary irritation (phrenic nerve nucleus/respiratory centre involvement)
Neck stiffness / head tilt (torticollis)Tonsillar herniation or direct involvement of upper cervical nerve roots by tumour extending through foramen of Magendie

Spinal ependymoma presents with gradual onset segmental pain ± neurological deficit of central cord pattern [3]

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
Back/neck pain (most common initial symptom)Local expansion within the spinal cord → stretching of pain-sensitive dura and nerve roots
Segmental sensory loss ("cape-like" distribution)Intramedullary tumour expands centrally → damages the crossing spinothalamic fibres in the anterior white commissure → dissociated sensory loss (loss of pain/temperature with preserved dorsal column function initially) = "central cord syndrome"
Weakness (upper > lower motor neuron at level, lower motor neuron below)Compression of anterior horn cells at tumour level (LMN) + compression of corticospinal tracts (UMN below the level)
Sphincter disturbanceLate feature; involvement of sacral cord/conus → bladder/bowel dysfunction

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
SeizuresCortical irritation by tumour → abnormal neuronal firing (epilepsy = positive symptom [3])
Focal neurological deficitsDepend on the eloquent cortex involved (e.g., hemiparesis if motor cortex, visual field defects if occipital lobe, aphasia if dominant hemisphere) = negative symptoms [3]
HeadacheMass effect + peritumoral oedema → ↑ICP
Personality/cognitive changesFrontal lobe involvement

B. Signs

SignPathophysiological Basis
Papilloedema [3][7]↑ICP → transmitted along the subarachnoid space of the optic nerve sheath → 'tourniquet' effect on optic nerve → ↓↓axonoplasmic outflow from optic disc → axonal swelling of disc [7]. Fundoscopy shows: swollen optic disc with blurred edges, dilated superficial capillaries, and NO spontaneous venous pulsation of the central retinal vein [7]
Enlarged blind spot → constricted visual fields (chronic)Acute papilloedema: enlarged blind spot (usually subclinical). Chronic: constricted VF [7] from progressive optic nerve axonal damage
CN VI (abducens) palsy [7]Binocular horizontal diplopia with incomitant exotropia [7] — CN6 has the longest intracranial course → vulnerable to stretching against the petrous ridge when ICP is raised. This is a false localizing sign (does not indicate the tumour is at the pons)
Cushing's triad (late feature) [3]Hypertension + bradycardia + irregular respiration. Occurs with impending brainstem herniation — the medulla is compressed → ischaemia of vasomotor centre → sympathetic surge (↑BP) → baroreceptor reflex (↓HR) → respiratory centre dysfunction (irregular breathing). This is a pre-terminal sign
In infants: macrocephaly, bulging fontanelle, "sun-setting" eyesUnfused sutures allow compensatory head expansion; upgaze palsy from tectal plate compression (Parinaud syndrome)

SignPathophysiological Basis
Truncal ataxia (wide-based gait, inability to sit unsupported)Vermis/flocculonodular lobe compression
Appendicular ataxia (past-pointing, dysdiadochokinesis, intention tremor)Cerebellar hemisphere involvement → impaired ipsilateral coordination
Nystagmus (often horizontal, gaze-evoked)Disruption of vestibulocerebellar connections
Dysarthria (scanning/staccato speech)Cerebellar speech area involvement
Hypotonia (ipsilateral)Loss of cerebellar facilitation of stretch reflex

SignPathophysiological Basis
Lower CN palsies (IX, X, XI, XII)Direct compression or infiltration of nuclei on 4th ventricle floor — absent gag reflex, vocal cord palsy, tongue deviation, trapezius/SCM weakness
CN VII palsy (LMN facial weakness)Facial motor nucleus in the pons
CN V signs (decreased corneal reflex, facial sensory loss)Trigeminal nucleus involvement
Long tract signs (hyperreflexia, Babinski sign, spasticity)Compression of corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts in the brainstem

SignPathophysiological Basis
Central cord syndrome (dissociated sensory loss)Intramedullary expansion damages crossing spinothalamic fibres → loss of pain/temperature in a "suspended" or "cape-like" distribution with preserved posterior columns
Segmental LMN signs at tumour levelAnterior horn cell destruction → muscle wasting, fasciculations, areflexia at that segment
UMN signs below the levelCorticospinal tract compression → spasticity, hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski sign
Sphincter disturbanceInvolvement of sacral parasympathetic (S2–S4) → bladder/bowel dysfunction

ScenarioClinical Clue
Myxopapillary ependymoma (conus/filum terminale)Low back pain, sciatica-like radiculopathy, cauda equina syndrome (saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention, lower limb weakness, absent ankle jerks)
Lateral extension through foramen of LuschkaCerebellopontine angle syndrome: ipsilateral sensorineural hearing loss (CN VIII), facial weakness (CN VII), trigeminal signs (CN V) — mimics vestibular schwannoma
NF2-associated multiple ependymomasMultiple spinal ependymomas + bilateral vestibular schwannomas + meningiomas [4][5]


  • In Hong Kong, brain tumours in children are the second most common paediatric malignancy (after leukaemia).
  • Ependymomas are managed primarily at Queen Mary Hospital (QMH) and Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH), which have dedicated paediatric neurosurgery and neuro-oncology teams.
  • The multidisciplinary approach (neurosurgery + radiation oncology + paediatric oncology) aligns with international standards.
  • Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1] — This is a critical exam point and reflects current international consensus. Unlike medulloblastoma, ependymomas are slow-growing and therefore not chemosensitive.
  • Hong Kong follows the WHO CNS5 (2021) classification for neuropathological diagnosis.
  • Familial syndromes such as NF2 and FAP, though uncommon, are seen in the Hong Kong population. Genetic counselling is available at clinical genetics services (e.g., QMH Clinical Genetics Service).

Clinical Approach Summary

The clinical approach to suspected ependymoma follows the general approach to intracranial tumours [3]:

  1. Recognise the presentation pattern: ↑ICP ± focal neurological deficits ± seizures
  2. Localise the lesion: Posterior fossa vs supratentorial vs spinal
  3. Consider age: Child with posterior fossa mass → think medulloblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, ependymoma
  4. Image: MRI brain ± spine with contrast (gold standard)
  5. Tissue diagnosis: Surgical resection (therapeutic + diagnostic)
  6. Molecular classification: WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis
  7. Stage: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology to assess for dissemination

High Yield Summary

  1. Definition: Primary CNS neoplasm from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system / central canal
  2. Epidemiology: Peak age 6y in children; 70% posterior fossa in paediatrics [1]; spinal ependymoma commonest intramedullary tumour in adults (peak 30-40y)
  3. Risk factors: Ionising radiation (only proven environmental factor), NF2, FAP/Turcot syndrome
  4. Pathophysiology: Mass effect → ↑ICP (CSF obstruction), cerebellar/brainstem compression, CSF drop metastases; extracranial metastasis is rare (no lymphatics)
  5. Classification: WHO CNS5 → anatomical + molecular (PFA, PFB, ZFTA-RELA, YAP1, myxopapillary, MYCN-amplified)
  6. Histology: Perivascular pseudorosettes (most characteristic), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic)
  7. Clinical features: Children → ↑ICP (headache worse in AM, vomiting, papilloedema) + cerebellar signs (ataxia, nystagmus) + CN palsies; Spinal → segmental pain + central cord syndrome
  8. Ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics [1] — slow-growing (not chemo-responsive), dangerous location
  9. Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1]
  10. Management cornerstone: Maximal safe surgical resection (1st line) ± adjuvant radiation therapy

Active Recall - Ependymoma (Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Classification, Clinical Features)

[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.360–361) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [4] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) — NF2 features [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) — FAP/Turcot syndrome associations [7] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Opthalmology.pdf (p.90) — Papilloedema pathophysiology

Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma

The differential diagnosis of ependymoma is fundamentally driven by where the tumour is and how old the patient is. This is because brain tumours have characteristic age-location patterns, and a mass in the posterior fossa of a 5-year-old has a very different differential from a spinal cord mass in a 35-year-old.

Tumour locations and types depend on age [2]:

  • Adults: 70% supratentorial – metastatic brain tumours, meningioma, gliomas (e.g. GBM)
  • Children 2–12 years: 70% infratentorial – medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, ependymoma, germ cell tumours
  • < 2 years / 12–18 years: 50% supra- and infratentorial [2]

The approach to differential diagnosis therefore follows a structured framework:

  1. Localise the lesion (posterior fossa vs supratentorial vs spinal)
  2. Consider the age (paediatric vs adult)
  3. Consider the imaging characteristics (solid vs cystic, enhancing vs non-enhancing, intra-axial vs extra-axial, calcifications, CSF dissemination)
  4. Consider clinical clues (tempo of onset, associated syndromes, tumour markers)

This is the classic scenario because 70% of paediatric ependymomas are in the posterior fossa [1][8]. The "big three" posterior fossa tumours in children are:

FeatureEpendymomaMedulloblastomaPilocytic Astrocytoma
Cell of originEpendymal cells (neuroepithelial)Granule cell precursors (embryonal/neuronal)Astrocytes (glial)
Peak age~6 years [1]5–7 years [8][9]5–15 years
SexM > F slightlyMales predominance [8][9]M = F
Exact locationFloor of 4th ventricle (arises from ependymal lining); may extend through foramina of Luschka/MagendieMidline cerebellar vermis [8][9]; fills 4th ventricle from aboveCerebellar hemisphere (lateral); may also arise in vermis
Growth patternSlow-growing, usually non-invasive [8]; plastic, moulds around structuresFast-growing, highly cellularVery slow-growing, well-circumscribed
HistologyPerivascular pseudorosettes, true ependymal rosettesHomer Wright rosettes (neuroblastic), small round blue cellsRosenthal fibres, biphasic (compact + loose microcystic), BRAF alteration
ImagingHeterogeneous, calcification (50%), arises from 4th ventricle floor, may extrude through foramina ("plastic" tumour)Homogeneously enhancing, midline vermian mass filling 4th ventricle, restricted diffusion on DWI (high cellularity)Cystic with enhancing mural nodule (classic); non-enhancing cyst wall
CSF dissemination~10% at diagnosis [8]High propensity to disseminate through subarachnoid space (leptomeningeal dissemination) [8][9]Rare
Chemo-sensitivityNot chemo-responsive [1]Chemo-responsive (vincristine/cisplatin/cyclophosphamide) [8][9]Low-grade; surgery usually curative; chemo reserved for inoperable/progressive
PrognosisIntermediate; depends on extent of resectionRisk-stratified; overall ~70–80% 5-year survival with current protocolsExcellent; >95% 10-year survival with GTR

High Yield Exam Point

Medulloblastoma occurs exclusively in the cerebellum in the midline cerebellar vermis [8][9], while ependymoma characteristically arises from the floor of the 4th ventricle (ependymal surface) and may extend laterally through the foramina of Luschka into the cerebellopontine angle. Pilocytic astrocytoma typically presents as a cystic mass with an enhancing mural nodule in the cerebellar hemisphere. These imaging patterns are key differentiators.

Additional Posterior Fossa DDx in Children

TumourKey Distinguishing Features
Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (AT/RT)< 3 years old (younger than typical ependymoma); aggressive; loss of INI1/SMARCB1; can mimic medulloblastoma on imaging but occurs at younger age
Brainstem glioma (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, DIPG)Arises within the pons (not the 4th ventricle); diffusely expands the pons; classic triad: CN palsies + long tract signs + ataxia without hydrocephalus initially; no role for biopsy historically (now molecular testing possible); dismal prognosis
Choroid plexus papilloma/carcinomaArises from choroid plexus (not ependyma); in children usually in lateral ventricle (< 2y) or 4th ventricle; cauliflower-like intensely enhancing mass; overproduction of CSF → communicating hydrocephalus
HaemangioblastomaMore common in adults (mean age 33y); highly vascular cystic + mural nodule mass; associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome; intense homogeneous enhancement of nodule; flow voids
Epidermoid/dermoid cystCPA location; does NOT enhance; restricted diffusion on DWI ("bright" on DWI); "cauliflower" or "mother of pearl" appearance

When ependymoma occurs in the posterior fossa of an adult, the differential shifts significantly because adults have 80–85% supratentorial tumours [3] and posterior fossa masses in adults are more commonly:

TumourKey FeaturesWhy It's Different from Ependymoma
Brain metastasisCommonest intracranial tumour in adults [10]; common origins: lung, breast, RCC, colorectal, melanoma [10]; typically at grey-white junction; multiple lesions; large oedema relative to lesion sizeMetastases are usually multiple, at the grey-white junction, with a known primary malignancy. Ependymoma is typically solitary and arises from ventricular lining
Vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma)CPA mass; CN VIII symptoms (sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo); "ice-cream cone" shape extending into IAM; T1-hypo, T2-hyper, homogeneous enhancementEpendymoma extending through foramen of Luschka can mimic CPA schwannoma, but schwannoma has characteristic IAM widening and CN VIII involvement first
MeningiomaExtra-axial, dura-based [11]; strong homogeneous enhancement; "dural tail" sign; T1-hypo/isointense, T2-iso/hyperintense; middle-aged F > MMeningioma is extra-axial (outside brain parenchyma), attached to dura. Ependymoma is intra-axial (arises from within the ventricular lining)
HaemangioblastomaSee above (VHL association, highly vascular)

Extra-axial vs Intra-axial

A crucial radiological distinction in brain tumour DDx:

  • Extra-axial = outside brain parenchyma (e.g. meningioma, schwannoma) — these displace brain, widen CSF spaces, have a "CSF cleft" sign
  • Intra-axial = within brain parenchyma (e.g. gliomas, metastases, ependymoma arising from ventricular lining and growing into parenchyma)

This distinction narrows the differential immediately.


Supratentorial ependymomas (especially in older children/young adults) must be differentiated from:

TumourKey Distinguishing Features
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO Grade 4)↓T1W, heterogeneous enhancement with surrounding vasogenic oedema (↑T2W) ± central necrosis [11]; adults > 50y; "ring-enhancing" lesion; rapid course; IDH-wildtype in most adult cases
Low-grade glioma (astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma)↑T2W, non-enhancing expansile lesion without surrounding vasogenic oedema [11]; young adults; seizures common; IDH-mutant; oligodendroglioma has "fried egg" cells + 1p/19q co-deletion
Primary CNS lymphomaSolitary/multifocal T2W-iso/hypointense, contrast-enhancing lesions in subcortical regions, classically a/w prominent diffusion restriction on DWI [11]; periventricular "butterfly" distribution; associated with EBV, immunosuppression [2]; homogeneous enhancement in immunocompetent, ring-enhancing in HIV/immunosuppressed
CraniopharyngiomaSellar/suprasellar location; calcification in 50% [12]; cystic + solid components; bimodal age (childhood + 40–60y); presents with hypopituitarism, growth retardation, bitemporal hemianopia, diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus [12]
Intracranial germ cell tumour (GCT)Midline (pineal or suprasellar region); peak age 10–14y; tumour markers: AFP, β-HCG; histological diagnosis mandatory if tumour markers normal to differentiate from PNETs, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, LCH [8][9]
Supratentorial PNET / embryonal tumourRare; aggressive; large heterogeneous mass with necrosis; young children
GangliogliomaYoung patients; temporal lobe; seizures (most common); cystic + solid; calcification in 30%; indolent
Choroid plexus tumourLateral ventricle in children < 2y; intensely enhancing; CSF overproduction

Ependymoma vs Craniopharyngioma in the Suprasellar Region

Although ependymomas are classically intraventricular, supratentorial ependymomas can occasionally be paraventricular or even in the suprasellar region. Craniopharyngiomas also occur suprasellarly and can have calcification — a feature shared with ependymomas. The key differentiator is that craniopharyngiomas arise from Rathke's pouch remnants (ectodermal origin), are extra-axial, and present with endocrine dysfunction, whereas ependymomas arise from ependymal cells (neuroepithelial origin) and are intra-axial/intraventricular.


Spinal ependymoma is the commonest intramedullary spinal cord tumour in adults [3]. The DDx for an intramedullary spinal lesion includes:

Tumour/LesionKey Distinguishing Features
Spinal astrocytoma2nd most common primary cord tumour; 60% in children, median age 35y; lower grade than brain counterparts but infiltrative → complete excision less likely [3]; more eccentric within cord; less well-defined margins on MRI than ependymoma; no haemosiderin cap
HaemangioblastomaHighly vascular; cystic + mural nodule; associated with VHL; intense enhancement; flow voids on MRI
Metastasis (intramedullary)Rare (< 5% of cord tumours); known primary (lung, breast most common); enhancing nodule; rapid progression
Demyelination (e.g. MS, NMOSD)Inflammatory, not neoplastic; typically shorter segment (MS: < 3 vertebral segments) or longitudinally extensive (NMOSD: ≥ 3 segments); clinical context of relapses/remissions; no mass effect; enhances in acute phase only
Sarcoidosis / transverse myelitisEnhancing cord lesion; clinical context (systemic sarcoidosis, post-infectious); dorsal subpial enhancement in sarcoidosis

Ependymoma vs Astrocytoma of the Spinal Cord

Both present with gradual onset segmental pain ± neurological deficit of central cord pattern [3]. However:

  • Ependymoma tends to be central, well-circumscribed, and often has a characteristic "haemosiderin cap" (dark rim on T2-weighted MRI from chronic micro-haemorrhage at tumour poles) — this is nearly pathognomonic. Gross total resection is often achievable.
  • Astrocytoma tends to be eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined, making GTR much harder. The pathology is lower grade than in brain but still infiltrative → complete excision less likely [3].

Myxopapillary ependymoma occurs at the conus medullaris/filum terminale. The DDx here includes:

LesionKey Features
SchwannomaIntradural extramedullary; well-circumscribed; "dumbbell" shape if extending through neural foramen; homogeneous enhancement
MeningiomaIntradural extramedullary; dural-based; "dural tail" on MRI; more common in thoracic spine, middle-aged females
Paraganglioma (filum terminale)Rare; intensely enhancing; can resemble myxopapillary ependymoma; serpentine flow voids
Dermoid/epidermoid cystDevelopmental; no enhancement; restricted diffusion (epidermoid); fat signal (dermoid)
Lipoma of filum terminaleBright on T1, drops signal on fat-sat; associated with tethered cord

F. DDx Framework by Clinical Presentation

Rather than starting from a known tumour location, you may encounter a clinical presentation that leads you to consider ependymoma. Here is a symptom-based DDx approach:

In a 6-year-old with acute onset unwell, effortless vomiting, unsteady gait, and double vision — with esotropic squint (CN VI palsy) — think raised ICP from a posterior fossa lesion. CN VI palsy in a child is a false localising sign of raised ICP. Neuroimaging (usually MRI brain with contrast) is needed to look for intracranial tumour [13].

DDxKey Differentiator
Spinal ependymomaCentral, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap, adult M > F
Spinal astrocytomaEccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined margins
MS / NMOSDRelapsing-remitting or neuromyelitis optica pattern; CSF oligoclonal bands; AQP4-Ab (NMOSD)
Spinal cord infarctAcute onset; anterior spinal artery territory; DWI restricted
SyringomyeliaCSF-intensity cavity within cord; associated with Chiari malformation; no enhancement
SarcoidosisSystemic features; dorsal subpial enhancement; ACE elevated

Think myxopapillary ependymoma (filum terminale), but also consider:

  • Disc prolapse (most common cause of cauda equina syndrome overall)
  • Schwannoma / neurofibroma
  • Meningioma
  • Metastasis (extradural compression)

Non-Neoplastic DDxWhy ConsideredHow to Distinguish
Brain abscessRing-enhancing lesion on imaging; can mimic tumourRestricted diffusion centrally on DWI (pus); fever, raised inflammatory markers; recent infection/surgery/immunosuppression
Tuberculoma / neurocysticercosisEnhancing intracranial lesion; endemic in HK for TBTB: ring/nodular enhancement, basal meningitis, CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis. NCC: cystic lesion ± scolex, calcification; travel to endemic area
Demyelination (tumefactive MS)Large (>2 cm) white matter lesion with incomplete ring enhancement; can mimic gliomaOpen ring enhancement (incomplete ring with enhancement facing grey matter); young female; prior neurological episodes; CSF oligoclonal bands
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)Presents with ↑ICP symptoms; papilloedema; but neuroimaging is NORMAL [7]No mass on imaging; obese young female; normal MRI (or empty sella, optic nerve sheath distension); LP shows elevated opening pressure with normal CSF composition

LocationMost Likely DDx (in order of frequency)
Posterior fossa (child)Medulloblastoma > Pilocytic astrocytoma > Ependymoma > AT/RT > DIPG
Posterior fossa (adult)Metastasis > Haemangioblastoma > Ependymoma > Meningioma > Schwannoma
Supratentorial (child)Pilocytic astrocytoma > Craniopharyngioma > GCT > PNET > Ependymoma
Supratentorial (adult)Metastasis > GBM > Meningioma > Oligodendroglioma > Primary CNS lymphoma > Ependymoma
Spinal intramedullary (adult)Ependymoma > Astrocytoma > Haemangioblastoma > Metastasis
Spinal intramedullary (child)Astrocytoma > Ependymoma > Ganglioglioma
Conus/filum terminaleMyxopapillary ependymoma > Schwannoma > Meningioma > Paraganglioma

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma

  1. The "Big Three" posterior fossa tumours in children: Medulloblastoma (vermis, highly chemo-sensitive, drops mets), Pilocytic astrocytoma (hemisphere, cystic + mural nodule, excellent prognosis), Ependymoma (4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina, chemo-resistant)
  2. Key imaging differentiators: Ependymoma = heterogeneous, calcified, "plastic" tumour extruding through foramina. Medulloblastoma = homogeneous, restricted diffusion. Pilocytic astrocytoma = cystic + enhancing mural nodule
  3. Spinal cord DDx: Ependymoma (central, haemosiderin cap, well-circumscribed) vs Astrocytoma (eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined)
  4. Histological diagnosis by surgical biopsy is mandatory to differentiate ependymoma from other tumours [8][9] — markers alone cannot distinguish it
  5. Brain metastasis is the commonest intracranial tumour in adults [10] — always consider metastasis in an adult with a brain mass
  6. CN VI palsy in a child = false localising sign of raised ICP [13] → investigate for posterior fossa tumour
  7. Secondary tumours are 6–10× more common than primary brain tumours [2]

Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma

References

[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.360–361) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [7] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Opthalmology.pdf (p.90) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.164) [11] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431) [12] Senior notes: Block A - I keep on bumping into people on my side - pituitary tumours; hypopituitarism.pdf (p.6) [13] AOS material: AOS - Ophthalmology (Ans:Notes).pdf (p.3)

Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Ependymoma

Diagnostic Criteria

Unlike many medical conditions (e.g., rheumatic fever, SLE), ependymoma does not have a formal set of clinical diagnostic criteria like the Jones criteria or SLICC criteria. The diagnosis of ependymoma is fundamentally a tissue diagnosis — it requires histopathological confirmation, ideally with integrated molecular profiling as per the WHO CNS5 (2021) classification.

Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation of brain tumours [8][9].

However, the working/provisional clinical diagnosis is established through a systematic approach:

  1. Clinical suspicion → symptom pattern (↑ICP, cerebellar signs, CN palsies, myelopathy) + age + tempo
  2. Neuroimaging → characteristic MRI features suggesting ependymoma
  3. Histopathological confirmation → obtained at time of surgical resection (preferred) or stereotactic biopsy
  4. Integrated diagnosis → combining histology + molecular markers + anatomical compartment (WHO CNS5)

WHO CNS5 Integrated Diagnostic Criteria for Ependymoma

The WHO 2021 (5th Edition) Classification of CNS Tumours requires a layered, integrated diagnosis for ependymoma consisting of:

LayerWhat It IncludesExample
1. Integrated diagnosisFinal combined diagnosis"Posterior fossa ependymoma, group PFA"
2. Histological classificationMorphological gradeEpendymoma (WHO Grade 2) or Anaplastic ependymoma (WHO Grade 3)
3. CNS WHO gradeI, II, or IIIGrade 2
4. Molecular informationMolecular subtypePFA (H3K27me3 loss), ZFTA-RELA fusion, YAP1 fusion, MYCN-amplified, etc.

All four layers are needed for a complete diagnosis. Histology alone is insufficient — molecular profiling is now mandatory for accurate classification, prognostication, and treatment planning.

The pathologist confirms ependymoma based on:

FeatureDescriptionDiagnostic Significance
Perivascular pseudorosettesTumour cells radially arranged around blood vessels with an anuclear zone (cell processes extend to vessel wall)Most characteristic — found in virtually all ependymomas
True ependymal rosettesTumour cells forming a ring around a central lumen (recapitulating the ependymal canal)Pathognomonic but uncommon (~10–30% of cases)
GFAP positivityGlial fibrillary acidic protein expression on immunohistochemistryConfirms glial lineage; positive in all ependymomas
EMA positivityEpithelial membrane antigen — intracytoplasmic dot-like or ring-like patternCharacteristic but not pathognomonic; highlights the intracellular lumina
Anaplastic features (Grade 3)Increased mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, necrosis, nuclear pleomorphismUpgrades to WHO Grade 3; associated with worse prognosis

MarkerTechniqueSubtype Identified
H3K27me3 loss (immunohistochemistry)IHCPFA (posterior fossa group A) — loss indicates aggressive subtype
EZHIP overexpressionIHCPFA confirmation
ZFTA-RELA fusionFISH, RNA sequencing, or break-apart FISH for RELASupratentorial ZFTA fusion-positive
L1CAM overexpressionIHC (surrogate for RELA fusion)Supratentorial ZFTA-RELA positive
YAP1 fusionFISH or sequencingSupratentorial YAP1 fusion-positive
MYCN amplificationFISH or copy number analysisSpinal MYCN-amplified ependymoma
DNA methylation profilingMethylation array (e.g., Heidelberg classifier)Gold standard for molecular subtyping across all compartments

The approach to diagnosing ependymoma follows the general approach to any suspected intracranial or spinal tumour. The algorithm below integrates clinical assessment, emergency management, imaging, and tissue diagnosis.

Key Algorithm Points

  1. CT is the emergency imaging modality — fast (1 minute), widely available, excellent for detecting hydrocephalus, haemorrhage, and calcification. However, MRI with contrast is generally preferred over CT [3][14] for definitive tumour characterisation.
  2. Never perform lumbar puncture if there is a posterior fossa mass with hydrocephalus — risk of tonsillar herniation through the foramen magnum (coning).
  3. Staging of the entire craniospinal axis is mandatory before surgery — because ~10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal dissemination at diagnosis [8][9], and the surgeon needs to know the full extent of disease.
  4. Surgery is both diagnostic and therapeutic — maximal safe removal as 1st line in all operable gliomas [1].

Investigation Modalities

A. Neuroimaging

Role: First-line emergency imaging; also useful for detecting calcification (present in ~50% of ependymomas).

Why CT first in emergencies? CT takes ~1 minute vs ~20–30 minutes for MRI, is widely available, and is highly sensitive for acute hydrocephalus and haemorrhage [15].

CT FindingInterpretation / Significance
Isodense to slightly hyperdense mass in the 4th ventricleEpendymoma typically appears isodense to brain. Hyperdensity may reflect calcification or high cellularity
Calcification (~50%)Punctate or coarse calcification within the tumour — more common in ependymoma than medulloblastoma; helps narrow DDx
Obstructive hydrocephalusDilated lateral and 3rd ventricles with a normal-sized 4th ventricle indicates obstruction at the aqueduct; dilated ventricles including 4th ventricle with mass in 4th ventricle = 4th ventricle obstruction
Contrast enhancementNormal brain tissue does not enhance (due to BBB). Enhancement indicates: (1) outside BBB, e.g. meningioma (homogeneously enhancing), or (2) disruption of BBB, e.g. high-grade tumours, inflammation [14]. Ependymomas show heterogeneous enhancement (mix of enhancing and non-enhancing areas) reflecting tumour heterogeneity (cystic areas, calcification, necrosis)
Extension through foraminaTumour "extruding" through foramina of Luschka (laterally into CPA) or Magendie (inferiorly) — a characteristic feature of ependymoma ("plastic" tumour that moulds through narrow spaces)

Note characteristics of lesions on CT: location/distribution, number (multiplicity → metastasis or disseminated infection), size, shape, outline (well-defined vs ill-defined), attenuation/density (specific attenuation e.g. gas, fat, soft tissues, calcification may suggest specific diagnoses), contrast enhancement (degree and pattern) [15].

Role: Definitive imaging modality for tumour characterisation, surgical planning, and staging.

MRI with contrast is generally preferred over CT [3][14] because:

  • Better soft tissue delineation [11]
  • Especially useful at skull base, craniocervical junction, brainstem [11] — precisely where posterior fossa ependymomas are located
  • Multiplanar imaging (axial, sagittal, coronal)
  • No ionising radiation (important in children)
  • Functional sequences available (DWI, perfusion, spectroscopy)
MRI SequenceEpendymoma FindingsInterpretation
T1-weighted (T1W)Isointense to slightly hypointense to grey matterSolid tumour tissue; cystic/necrotic areas may be hypointense (fluid signal)
T2-weighted (T2W) / FLAIRHeterogeneously hyperintenseReflects mixed solid and cystic components; surrounding vasogenic oedema appears as perilesional T2 hyperintensity
Post-gadolinium T1WHeterogeneous enhancementEpendymomas characteristically show patchy, heterogeneous enhancement — different from medulloblastoma (homogeneous) and pilocytic astrocytoma (mural nodule only). Enhancement = BBB disruption
DWI (Diffusion-Weighted Imaging)Variable; usually no marked restriction (cf. medulloblastoma and lymphoma which show prominent restriction)Medulloblastoma = very high cellularity → restricted diffusion (bright on DWI). Ependymoma = moderate cellularity → usually no striking restriction. This distinction is high-yield
SWI / GRE (Susceptibility)May show "blooming" artefact (haemosiderin, calcification)Calcification (50%) and micro-haemorrhage create susceptibility artefacts
MR Spectroscopy (MRS)Elevated choline (increased membrane turnover), reduced NAA (neuronal loss), possible lactate peakNon-specific for ependymoma but helps confirm neoplastic process vs non-neoplastic

Spinal MRI Findings (for spinal ependymoma):

FindingSignificance
Central, well-circumscribed intramedullary lesionEpendymoma expands the cord centrally (cf. astrocytoma which is eccentric)
"Haemosiderin cap" (dark rim at tumour poles on T2W/SWI)Near-pathognomonic for spinal ependymoma; reflects chronic micro-haemorrhage at the tumour-cord interface. NOT seen in astrocytoma
Homogeneous enhancement (spinal ependymomas tend to enhance more uniformly than intracranial ones)Reflects well-circumscribed, well-vascularised tumour with clear margins
Associated syrinxReactive syringomyelia above and/or below the tumour; caused by CSF flow obstruction within the central canal
Conus/filum terminale mass (myxopapillary)Sausage-shaped enhancing mass at the conus; may cause scalloping of vertebral bodies

Key MRI Differences Between Common Posterior Fossa Tumours in Children

FeatureEpendymomaMedulloblastomaPilocytic Astrocytoma
Location4th ventricle floor, extends through foraminaMidline vermis, fills 4th ventricleCerebellar hemisphere
EnhancementHeterogeneousHomogeneousMural nodule only
DWINo marked restrictionProminent restriction (high cellularity)No restriction
Calcification~50% (CT better for this)~20%Rare
Cystic componentCommonUncommonClassic: cystic with mural nodule
Extension through foraminaCharacteristic ("plastic" tumour)UncommonNo

Functional imaging is used for pre-operative planning [11]:

  • Functional MRI (fMRI): identify important cortical areas to guide surgical resection [11]
  • MRI diffusion tensor imaging (DTI, tractography): identify important tracts to guide surgical resection [11]

These are critical for supratentorial ependymomas near eloquent cortex (motor strip, language areas) and for posterior fossa tumours near vital brainstem tracts, ensuring the surgeon achieves maximal safe resection while minimising neurological morbidity.

Single photon emission CT (SPECT) utilises various isotopes such as thallium-201 to detect abnormalities in BBB. Functions: (1) distinguish benign from malignant brain lesions, (2) predict histological grade of brain tumours, (3) select areas for biopsy [8][9].

SPECT is not routinely used in modern practice (largely supplanted by advanced MRI techniques and PET), but may still appear in exam questions.


Lumbar Puncture (LP) — CSF Cytology

Role: Staging — detection of leptomeningeal dissemination (CSF "drop metastases").

When to perform: AFTER neuroimaging has confirmed no obstructive hydrocephalus or significant mass effect. Never perform LP if there is a posterior fossa mass causing raised ICP — risk of coning.

CSF ParameterExpected FindingInterpretation
CytologyPositive for malignant cells in ~10% of ependymomas at diagnosisConfirms leptomeningeal spread; upstages the disease (affects treatment: may warrant craniospinal irradiation)
ProteinMay be elevatedNon-specific; reflects BBB disruption
GlucoseUsually normal (cf. bacterial/TB meningitis where it is low)Helps exclude infectious aetiology
Opening pressureMay be elevated if communicating hydrocephalus component

Timing note: CSF cytology is ideally obtained pre-operatively (if LP is safe) or ≥ 14 days post-operatively (to avoid false positives from surgical contamination of CSF with tumour cells).

Measurement of tumour markers in serum and CSF should be obtained — AFP and β-HCG are measured to help differentiate germ cell tumours from other intracranial tumours such as PNETs, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma [8][9]. In ependymoma, AFP and β-HCG are negative — this helps exclude germ cell tumours from the differential.


There is no specific blood marker for ependymoma. However, baseline investigations are essential for:

InvestigationPurpose
CBC, coagulation profilePre-operative baseline; rule out thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy before surgery
Renal and liver functionPre-operative baseline; assess fitness for anaesthesia
Electrolytes (Na, K, Ca)Baseline; SIADH or cerebral salt wasting may develop post-operatively; also relevant if considering chemotherapy
Serum AFP, β-HCGTo exclude germ cell tumours (should be normal in ependymoma) [8][9]
Thyroid function, cortisolIf suprasellar extension → assess for pituitary dysfunction
Genetic testing (NF2 gene)If clinical suspicion of NF2 (multiple ependymomas, bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas) [5]

Ependymoma staging determines the extent of disease, which directly influences treatment planning (local RT vs craniospinal irradiation):

InvestigationPurpose
MRI of entire craniospinal axis with gadoliniumDetect leptomeningeal dissemination ("drop metastases") along the spinal cord. Important to image the entire spine because 33% may have multilevel involvement [3] (this principle from metastatic spinal disease applies broadly to CNS tumour staging)
CSF cytology (as above)Detect microscopic CSF dissemination
Post-operative MRI brain (within 24–72 hours)Assess extent of resection (gross total resection vs subtotal resection); presence of residual tumour is the single most important prognostic factor

Extracranial metastasis is rare in brain tumours (∵ no lymphatic drainage) → TNM staging is not useful [3]. Therefore, systemic staging (CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, bone scan) is NOT routinely required unless there is clinical suspicion of extremely rare extracranial spread.

Chang Staging System (historically used, still referenced):

StageDefinition
M0No evidence of metastasis
M1Microscopic tumour cells in CSF
M2Gross nodular seeding in cerebellar/cerebral subarachnoid space or in lateral/3rd ventricle
M3Gross nodular seeding in spinal subarachnoid space
M4Extracranial metastasis (extremely rare)

Histological confirmation is obtained at the time of surgical exploration for resection [8][9].

Surgical exploration and biopsy — histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation of brain tumours [8][9].

How tissue is obtained:

MethodWhen Used
Maximal safe surgical resection (preferred)Maximal safe removal as 1st line in all operable gliomas [1]. This is both therapeutic (debulking, restoring CSF flow, relieving mass effect) and diagnostic (provides ample tissue for histology + molecular analysis)
Stereotactic biopsyWhen the tumour is in an inoperable location (e.g., deeply seated, brainstem involvement) or when the diagnosis is uncertain and tissue is needed before planning definitive treatment
Open biopsyRarely needed; may be used for superficially accessible supratentorial lesions

What the pathologist reports:

ParameterDetails
Histological typeEpendymoma (classic), anaplastic ependymoma, myxopapillary ependymoma, subependymoma
WHO GradeGrade 1 (subependymoma), Grade 2 (ependymoma/myxopapillary), Grade 3 (anaplastic)
Molecular markersH3K27me3 (IHC), EZHIP, L1CAM, RELA/ZFTA fusion (FISH), YAP1 fusion, MYCN amplification
DNA methylation classGold standard molecular classification (if available)
Ki-67 proliferation indexHigher index = more aggressive; helps assess tumour behaviour but not formally part of WHO grading criteria
MarginsAssessment of completeness of resection (correlate with post-operative MRI)

ScenarioInvestigationRationale
Suspected NF2Audiometry, MRI IAMs (bilateral vestibular schwannomas), genetic testing for NF2 geneNF2 features: meningioma, ependymoma, acoustic schwannoma [5]; multiple spinal ependymomas should prompt NF2 workup
Suspected FAP/Turcot syndromeColonoscopy, APC gene testingFAP associated with medulloblastoma, ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6]
Pre-operative planning for eloquent cortexfMRI and DTI tractography [11]Map motor, language, and visual cortex/tracts to plan safe surgical corridors
Suspected recurrenceSerial MRI surveillance + consideration of PET (FDG or amino acid tracers)PET can differentiate recurrent tumour from radiation necrosis (both enhance on MRI)
Endocrine assessment (suprasellar or post-RT)GH, ACTH/cortisol, TSH/fT4, LH/FSH, prolactinPost-radiation endocrine abnormalities include: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9]
Ophthalmological assessmentVisual acuity, visual fields (perimetry), fundoscopyDocument papilloedema severity and any visual field loss; monitor post-treatment

PriorityInvestigationPurpose
Immediate (emergency)CT brain without contrastDetect hydrocephalus, mass effect, haemorrhage, calcification
UrgentMRI brain with gadolinium contrastTumour characterisation, localisation, surgical planning
Pre-operative stagingMRI entire spine with gadoliniumDetect leptomeningeal dissemination
Pre-operative stagingCSF cytology (if LP safe)Detect microscopic CSF seeding
Pre-operativeSerum AFP, β-HCGExclude germ cell tumour
Pre-operativeCBC, RFT, LFT, coagulation, electrolytesBaseline for surgery/anaesthesia
Pre-operative (if indicated)fMRI and DTI tractographyEloquent cortex mapping
Intra-operativeFrozen section → definitive histopathology + molecularTissue diagnosis (the gold standard)
Post-operative (24–72h)MRI brain with contrastAssess extent of resection (GTR vs STR)
Post-operative (≥14 days)CSF cytology (if not done pre-op)Staging for leptomeningeal spread
SurveillanceSerial MRI (brain ± spine)Monitor for recurrence

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Ependymoma

  1. There are no formal clinical diagnostic criteria — diagnosis is based on neuroimaging + histopathological confirmation + molecular profiling (WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis)
  2. Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [8][9]
  3. CT: first-line emergency imaging; look for calcification (~50%), hydrocephalus, mass in 4th ventricle
  4. MRI with contrast is preferred over CT [3][14] — better soft tissue delineation, especially at brainstem/skull base
  5. Key MRI features of ependymoma: heterogeneous enhancement, arises from 4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina ("plastic"), calcification; in spine: central, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap
  6. DWI distinction: Ependymoma = no marked diffusion restriction; Medulloblastoma = prominent restriction (high cellularity); Primary CNS lymphoma = prominent restriction
  7. Staging: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology. Extracranial staging is NOT routine (no lymphatic drainage → TNM staging not useful)
  8. Functional MRI and DTI tractography are used for pre-operative planning [11]
  9. Molecular markers: H3K27me3 loss (PFA), L1CAM/RELA fusion (supratentorial), MYCN amplification (spinal aggressive), DNA methylation profiling (gold standard)
  10. AFP/β-HCG should be normal — if elevated, think germ cell tumour instead

Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations for Ependymoma

References

[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [11] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.162) [15] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p.39, 50)

Management of Ependymoma

Before diving into the specifics, it is essential to understand the three foundational principles that govern ependymoma management:

  1. Maximal safe surgical resection is the 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — this is the single most important determinant of outcome. The extent of resection (gross total resection [GTR] vs subtotal resection [STR]) is the strongest independent prognostic factor.

  2. External radiotherapy (RT) is used as 2nd line if not fully operable, or as adjuvant after surgery [1] — RT improves local control, especially when GTR cannot be achieved.

  3. Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1] — This is a critical, repeatedly examined point. Ependymomas are slow-growing tumours with a low proliferative index, making them inherently resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy (which targets rapidly dividing cells). This distinguishes ependymoma management fundamentally from medulloblastoma, where chemotherapy is a cornerstone.

Why Is Chemotherapy Ineffective in Ependymoma?

Chemotherapy works by exploiting the rapid cell division of malignant cells — agents like vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide damage DNA or disrupt mitosis, preferentially killing cells in S-phase or M-phase. Ependymoma is slow-growing and hence not chemo-responsive [1]. The proportion of cells actively dividing (the "growth fraction") is low, so chemotherapy has limited targets. This is fundamentally different from medulloblastoma (a highly cellular embryonal tumour with a high growth fraction), where chemotherapy is effective.

The exception: chemotherapy may be used as a temporizing measure in very young children (< 3 years) to delay radiotherapy — not because it is effective against the tumour per se, but to spare the developing brain from the devastating neurocognitive effects of cranial irradiation. Even in this setting, chemotherapy is not expected to cure the disease.



Treatment Modalities

A. Emergency / Supportive Management

These measures address the immediate life-threatening complications of ependymoma (raised ICP, hydrocephalus) before definitive tumour-directed therapy.

Use: PO (or IV if severe) dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H or 8mg BD [16]

AspectDetail
DrugDexamethasone (dexa = "powerful," from Greek dexios = right/strong)
MechanismReduces vasogenic oedema around the tumour by stabilising the blood-brain barrier (BBB), decreasing capillary permeability, and inhibiting inflammatory mediators. This reduces the mass effect contribution from oedema (the tumour itself does not shrink, but the surrounding swelling does)
Dose10mg IV/PO loading dose, then 4mg Q4–6H (or 8mg BD) [16]
OnsetClinical improvement within 12–24 hours; maximal effect over 48–72 hours
Why dexamethasone specifically?It has minimal mineralocorticoid activity (unlike prednisolone), so it does not cause significant sodium/water retention — important when the brain is already oedematous
ContraindicationSuspect CNS lymphoma → steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]. Always biopsy before steroids if lymphoma is in the differential
Side effectsPeptic ulcer (need PPI prophylaxis), immunosuppression, hyperglycaemia/diabetes, proximal myopathy, Cushingoid features, insomnia, psychosis

Because posterior fossa ependymomas frequently cause obstructive hydrocephalus by blocking CSF outflow from the 4th ventricle, emergent CSF diversion may be life-saving.

ProcedureMechanismWhen Used
External ventricular drain (EVD)Burr hole through skull → catheter placed into lateral ventricle → CSF drained externally to a closed collection system. Allows ICP monitoring and controlled drainageAcute symptomatic hydrocephalus; temporizing measure before definitive surgery
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV)Puncturing the floor of the 3rd ventricle → drainage of hydrocephalus [1] — creates an internal bypass for CSF to flow directly from the 3rd ventricle into the prepontine cistern (basal cisterns), circumventing the obstructed aqueduct/4th ventriclePreferred when a longer-term diversion is needed before tumour surgery; avoids shunt dependence
Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shuntCatheter from lateral ventricle tunnelled subcutaneously to peritoneal cavity for permanent CSF diversionIf hydrocephalus persists after tumour resection (~20–40% of posterior fossa tumour patients); generally avoided pre-operatively because of the risk of upward herniation and theoretical risk of peritoneal tumour seeding

CSF shunting is used for hydrocephalus in posterior fossa lesions, leptomeningeal meningitis, and CSF metastases [16].

Anticonvulsants are used for treatment or secondary prophylaxis of seizures, usually levetiracetam (Keppra) [16]

IndicationDetail
Treatment of seizuresSupratentorial ependymomas may present with seizures due to cortical irritation
Secondary prophylaxisAfter a first seizure, anticonvulsants prevent recurrence
NOT for infratentorial lesionsUsually not for primary prophylaxis [16]. The cerebellar cortex is inhibitory in nature, so infratentorial tumours (including most ependymomas) do not typically cause seizures. Prophylactic anticonvulsants are not recommended for posterior fossa tumours
Preferred agentLevetiracetam — does not interact with dexamethasone or chemotherapy agents (unlike older agents like phenytoin/carbamazepine which induce CYP450 and reduce steroid/chemo levels)

B. Surgery (The Cornerstone of Treatment)

Surgical resection — maximal removal within safety limit. Aim: cytoreduction (↓ tumour mass) + functional preservation. The concept of 'resection margin' does not apply in neurosurgery [16].

This last point is crucial: unlike extracranial surgery (e.g., breast cancer lumpectomy where you aim for negative margins), brain surgery cannot sacrifice normal brain tissue to achieve wide margins. The surgeon removes as much tumour as safely possible while preserving neurological function.

Why is GTR so important in ependymoma?

  • Studies consistently show that gross total resection (GTR) is the single most powerful predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)
  • Patients with GTR have 5-year PFS ~50–75%, compared with ~20–40% for STR
  • This is because ependymomas are chemo-resistant, so you cannot "mop up" residual disease with chemotherapy the way you can with medulloblastoma
  • Radiation can improve local control after STR but is less effective than if the tumour is completely removed first
ApproachIndicationDetail
CraniotomyMost posterior fossa and supratentorial ependymomasFlap of bone cut and reflected [16] to expose the tumour. For posterior fossa lesions, a suboccipital/midline posterior fossa craniotomy is performed, often with the patient in prone or sitting position
Burr holeOften for biopsy [16]Used for stereotactic biopsy when resection is not feasible
CraniectomyWhen bone cannot be replaced (e.g., decompressive)Burr hole + removal of surrounding bone [16]
Laminectomy / laminoplastySpinal ependymomaPosterior approach to access the spinal cord; the dura is opened, and the tumour is dissected from the cord under microscopic guidance

Image-guided surgery [16]:

  • Frameless stereotaxy: small skull markers allowing intraoperative localisation of handheld probe in relation to skull, tumour (localised in pre-op imaging) ± important structures (by fMRI or tractography) → guidance of resection [16]

Functional monitoring [16]:

  • Evoked potentials: detection of cortical electrical response to sensory stimuli or peripheral motor response to cortical electrical stimuli [16] — critical during posterior fossa surgery to monitor brainstem function (brainstem auditory evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials) and during spinal cord surgery (motor evoked potentials)
  • Awake craniotomy: intraoperative electrical stimulation of cortex → observe speech response to map speech cortex → guide resection to avoid affecting speech [16] — relevant for supratentorial ependymomas near language areas

5-ALA-guided resection [16]:

  • 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) accumulated in tumour cells → intraoperative UV light application → tumour shows different colour [16] — helps distinguish tumour from normal brain, improving extent of resection (more commonly used in high-grade gliomas like GBM, but increasingly applied to other brain tumours)
LocationSurgical ChallengeSpecific Considerations
Posterior fossa (4th ventricle)Tumour adherent to brainstem floor (dorsal pons/medulla)The surgeon must balance maximal removal against risk of brainstem injury. GTR achievable in ~50–70%; if tumour is inseparable from brainstem, leave a thin rind of tumour ("near-total resection") rather than cause devastating brainstem damage
CPA extension (through foramen of Luschka)Involvement of lower cranial nerves (CN VII–XII), vertebral arteryRisk of postoperative lower CN palsies (dysphagia, aspiration, vocal cord palsy)
SupratentorialNear eloquent cortexUse fMRI, DTI, awake craniotomy, neuronavigation to preserve function
Spinal intramedullaryCord manipulationEpendymomas have a well-defined cleavage plane from normal cord → GTR achievable in ~80–90%. Use intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (MEP/SSEP). Astrocytomas lack this cleavage plane → GTR less likely
Myxopapillary (conus/filum)Nerve root involvementEn bloc resection preferred to avoid CSF seeding from piecemeal removal; if filum-based, may be resectable without cord sacrifice
ComplicationMechanism / Detail
Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism)Postoperative complication caused by injury to cerebellar vermis or dentate nuclei during resection of tumours in midline cerebellum. Appears 1–2 days after surgery and resolves within weeks to months. Characterised by impaired language production with emotional lability [8][9]. Incidence: ~25% of posterior fossa tumour resections in children
CSF leak / pseudomeningocoeleBreach in dural closure → CSF leaks through wound or subcutaneously
Wound infection / meningitisPost-craniotomy infection
Hydrocephalus~20–40% require permanent CSF diversion (VP shunt) post-resection, either from pre-existing damage to CSF pathways or from post-operative scarring
Cranial nerve palsiesEspecially CN VI, VII, IX, X after posterior fossa surgery → diplopia, facial weakness, swallowing difficulty, aspiration risk
HaemorrhagePost-operative haematoma at surgical site → may require re-operation
Neurological deficitsNew ataxia, hemiparesis, sensory loss depending on surgical manipulation

C. Radiation Therapy (RT)

RT is the primary adjuvant therapy after surgery for ependymoma. It works by causing DNA double-strand breaks in tumour cells through ionising radiation, leading to cell death (particularly in cells attempting to divide — but even slow-growing ependymoma cells must eventually divide, and damaged DNA accumulates with each attempted division).

External RT: as 2nd line if not operable [1] — meaning RT is used when surgery cannot achieve complete resection, or as adjuvant treatment after surgery.

Clinical ScenarioRT Recommendation
After GTR of intracranial ependymoma (WHO Grade 2 or 3)Adjuvant focal/conformal RT to the tumour bed is standard for most intracranial ependymomas, particularly WHO Grade 3 and PFA subtype
After STRRT is strongly recommended — local recurrence rates without RT after STR are very high (~70–80%). Consider second-look surgery to convert STR to GTR before RT if feasible
Inoperable tumourRT as primary treatment (after biopsy for tissue diagnosis)
Leptomeningeal dissemination (M+ disease)Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with a boost to the primary tumour bed and any macroscopic spinal deposits
Spinal ependymomaAdjuvant focal RT recommended after STR. After GTR of spinal ependymoma, the role of RT is debated — observation may be appropriate for WHO Grade 2 with clear margins (since spinal ependymomas have a well-defined cleavage plane and GTR is often curative)
Myxopapillary ependymomaAdjuvant local RT is generally recommended even after GTR because of high late recurrence rates
TechniqueDescriptionWhen Used
Conformal focal RTShaped radiation beams targeting the tumour bed ± residual tumour with a margin, while minimising exposure to surrounding normal brain. Standard dose: 54–59.4 Gy in 30–33 fractionsStandard adjuvant for intracranial ependymoma
Intensity-Modulated RT (IMRT)Advanced conformal technique that modulates beam intensity across the field to further spare normal tissueIncreasingly used; particularly useful for complex-shaped tumour beds near critical structures
Proton beam therapyUses protons instead of photons; protons deposit energy at a defined depth (Bragg peak) with minimal exit dose → superior dose conformality → reduced dose to normal brainParticularly advantageous in children (reduces late cognitive effects and secondary malignancy risk); not widely available (not currently available in Hong Kong; patients may be referred overseas)
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)High-dose, precisely targeted single-fraction or hypofractionated RT (e.g., Gamma Knife, CyberKnife, LINAC-based)May be used for small-volume recurrence or residual disease; NOT standard for primary adjuvant treatment of ependymoma
Craniospinal irradiation (CSI)Radiation to the entire brain and spinal cordReserved for M+ disease (leptomeningeal dissemination). Craniospinal radiation is avoided or delayed in children due to severe toxicity to the rapidly developing CNS such as neurocognitive impairment [8][9]

Complications of radiotherapy [8][9]:

TimingComplicationMechanism
Acute (during/immediately after RT)Fatigue, nausea, scalp erythema, temporary hair lossDirect radiation effects on rapidly dividing cells (skin, GI mucosa)
Subacute (1–6 months)Somnolence syndrome (children: excessive sleepiness, irritability, anorexia 4–8 weeks post-RT)Transient demyelination of white matter
Late (months to years)Ototoxicity [8][9]Cochlear damage from radiation to posterior fossa
Short stature (↓GH) [8][9]Radiation damage to hypothalamic-pituitary axis
Endocrine abnormalities: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9]Radiation-induced hypopituitarism
Neurocognitive impairment [8][9]White matter damage, particularly devastating in young children (< 3 years) — hence the drive to delay/avoid cranial RT in infants
Cerebrovascular abnormalities (stroke, intracranial haemorrhage) [8][9]Radiation-induced vasculopathy (endothelial damage → stenosis, moyamoya-like changes)
Secondary malignancyRadiation-induced second tumour (meningioma, glioma) — typically occurs > 10 years post-RT; risk increases with higher dose and younger age at treatment
Radiation necrosisFocal brain necrosis at treated site; can mimic tumour recurrence on MRI (both enhance); PET or advanced MRI techniques help distinguish

Why Delay RT in Very Young Children?

The developing brain in children < 3 years is exquisitely sensitive to radiation damage. Myelination, synaptogenesis, and cortical organisation are still actively occurring. Cranial irradiation at this age causes devastating, irreversible neurocognitive impairment (↓IQ, learning disabilities, behavioural problems). Therefore, in infants, the strategy is to use maximal surgical resection, with chemotherapy as a temporizing bridge to delay RT until the child is older (ideally ≥ 3 years). However, remember: chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — it is used solely to buy time, not as curative therapy.


Current Role in Ependymoma

Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1]

This cannot be overemphasised. Unlike medulloblastoma (where chemotherapy is integral to treatment), ependymoma is fundamentally a surgically and radiotherapeutically managed disease.

ScenarioRole of ChemotherapyRationale
Standard adjuvant therapyNoneEpendymoma is slow-growing → low growth fraction → poor chemo-responsiveness
Very young children (< 3 years)Temporizing to delay radiotherapyMultiple regimens used (e.g., carboplatin/vincristine, cyclophosphamide-based protocols) — response rates are low (~20–30%) but may buy 1–2 years before RT is needed
Recurrent disease (after surgery + RT)Limited role; last resortMay achieve transient stabilisation in some patients; no standard regimen with proven survival benefit. Agents: temozolomide, bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), lapatinib, platinum-based regimens
Clinical trialsExperimentalTargeted therapies and immunotherapies under investigation (e.g., EZH2 inhibitors for PFA, immune checkpoint inhibitors)

Ependymoma vs Medulloblastoma — Chemotherapy Comparison

Students often confuse the role of chemotherapy in these two posterior fossa tumours:

  • Medulloblastoma: Chemotherapy is used as an adjunct to surgery and radiotherapy [8][9] — it decreases incidence of recurrence, minimises craniospinal radiation exposure, delays or avoids irradiation to the developing brain and spinal cord, and treats high-risk disease [8][9]. Example regimen: Vincristine / Cisplatin / Cyclophosphamide [8][9].
  • Ependymoma: Chemotherapy alone has NO role [1]. Surgery + RT is the standard.

Do NOT prescribe adjuvant chemotherapy for ependymoma as you would for medulloblastoma.


Ependymomas recur in ~30–50% of cases, most commonly locally at the primary tumour site. Recurrence management follows a hierarchical approach:

PriorityStrategyDetail
1stRe-resectionIf the recurrence is resectable, re-operation with maximal safe resection offers the best chance of disease control. Many patients undergo 2, 3, or even more resections over their disease course
2ndRe-irradiationIf the patient has not received prior RT, or if re-irradiation is technically feasible (e.g., using SRS for a small focal recurrence), this can provide local control. Must balance cumulative dose to normal brain
3rdClinical trialsNovel therapies including targeted agents (e.g., EZH2 inhibitors for PFA, VEGF inhibitors) and immunotherapy
4thPalliative chemotherapyLast resort; limited efficacy
SupportivePalliative careFor patients with refractory, progressive disease — symptom management, quality of life, family support

Because ependymoma can recur years or even decades after initial treatment, long-term surveillance is mandatory:

TimepointInvestigationFrequency
First 3 yearsMRI brain ± spine with gadoliniumEvery 3–4 months
Years 3–5MRI brain ± spineEvery 6 months
Beyond 5 yearsMRI brain ± spineAnnually, continuing indefinitely
Endocrine screeningGH, thyroid, cortisol, gonadal axesAnnually (especially if cranial/craniospinal RT received) — ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9]
AudiometryHearing assessmentAnnually if posterior fossa RT (ototoxicity [8][9])
Neurocognitive assessmentNeuropsychological testingPeriodically in children post-RT to detect learning difficulties early
OphthalmologyVisual acuity, visual fieldsAs needed; monitor for late radiation-related visual changes

G. Special Populations

PrincipleApproach
SurgeryGTR remains the priority
RTDelayed as long as possible (ideally until ≥ 3 years old) to protect the developing brain
ChemotherapyUsed as a bridge to delay RT; not curative
Second-look surgeryIf STR at initial operation, consider re-resection after chemotherapy to convert to GTR
PrincipleApproach
ScreeningRegular spinal MRI surveillance in known NF2 patients
SurgeryFor symptomatic or growing lesions; multiple lesions may require staged surgeries
Genetic counsellingFor patients and family members
PrincipleApproach
SurgeryEn bloc resection preferred (piecemeal resection increases recurrence and CSF seeding risk)
RTAdjuvant focal RT recommended even after apparent GTR (high late recurrence rate; upgraded to WHO Grade 2 in WHO CNS5)

ScenarioSurgeryRTChemotherapy
Posterior fossa, child, operableGTR (1st line)Adjuvant focal RT (standard for Grade 2–3, PFA)None
Posterior fossa, child, inoperableBiopsy onlyExternal RT as primary treatment [1]None (or temporizing in infants)
Posterior fossa, infant < 3yGTR (1st line)Delay until ≥ 3yBridge therapy to delay RT
Supratentorial, operableGTR (1st line)Adjuvant focal RT (esp. Grade 3, RELA+)None
Spinal, adult, operableGTR (1st line)Post-STR; debated after GTR of Grade 2None
Myxopapillary, conus/filumEn bloc GTRAdjuvant focal RT (even after GTR)None
M+ disease (CSF dissemination)GTR of primaryCSI + boost to tumour bedNone
RecurrenceRe-resection if feasibleRe-irradiation if feasibleLast resort / clinical trial

High Yield Summary — Management of Ependymoma

  1. Maximal safe surgical resection is 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — GTR is the strongest prognostic factor
  2. External RT as 2nd line if not operable [1] — adjuvant focal RT is standard for most intracranial ependymomas post-surgery
  3. Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — fundamentally different from medulloblastoma
  4. Emergency management: Dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H [16] for peritumoral oedema; EVD/ETV for acute hydrocephalus
  5. Do NOT give steroids if CNS lymphoma is in the differential — steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]
  6. Anticonvulsants (levetiracetam) for seizures — NOT for infratentorial lesions, usually not for primary prophylaxis [16]
  7. Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) is a recognised post-operative complication [8][9]
  8. Late effects of RT: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
  9. Delay RT in infants < 3 years to protect the developing brain; use chemotherapy as a temporising bridge
  10. Long-term surveillance with serial MRI is mandatory — ependymoma can recur years to decades later

Active Recall - Management of Ependymoma

References

[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 165, 170) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.163)

Complications of Ependymoma

Complications of ependymoma can be organised into three major categories:

  1. Complications of the disease itself (the tumour and its effects)
  2. Complications of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy)
  3. Long-term sequelae (particularly relevant because many patients are children who survive for decades)

This framework makes clinical sense because you need to understand what the tumour does to the patient, what your treatments do to the patient, and what happens in the years that follow. Each complication is explained from its pathophysiological basis.


A. Complications of the Disease Itself

These are complications arising from the biological behaviour of the ependymoma — its location, growth, and potential for dissemination.

AspectDetail
MechanismEpendymoma is derived from ependymal lining of the ventricular system. Location = posterior cranial fossa (70%). Increased ICP due to obstructive hydrocephalus when tumour extends into ventricles [8][9]. The tumour within the 4th ventricle physically blocks CSF outflow through the foramina of Luschka and Magendie → CSF accumulates proximal to the block (lateral and 3rd ventricles dilate) → raised ICP
Clinical consequenceHeadache (worse in morning), vomiting, papilloedema, decreased consciousness. In infants: macrocephaly, bulging fontanelle, sun-setting eyes. If untreated → brain herniation → death
Why this is so common in ependymomaThe 4th ventricle is a narrow CSF bottleneck — even a small tumour can obstruct flow. This is why posterior fossa ependymoma commonly presents with hydrocephalus as the first manifestation, even when the tumour itself is relatively small
ManagementEmergency CSF diversion (EVD, ETV) followed by definitive tumour resection. ~20–40% of patients require a permanent VP shunt even after tumour removal

Herniation is the ultimate, life-threatening consequence of unchecked raised ICP. The brain is enclosed in a rigid skull (Monro-Kellie doctrine), so when one compartment expands, brain tissue is pushed through anatomical openings:

TypeMechanismClinical Features
Tonsillar herniation (most feared in posterior fossa tumours)Cerebellar tonsils pushed downward through the foramen magnum → compresses the medullaCushing's triad: hypertension, bradycardia, respiratory depression [16] → cardiorespiratory arrest and death. Also: neck stiffness, opisthotonus
Upward (transtentorial) herniationPosterior fossa pressure pushes cerebellum upward through the tentorial notchCompression of midbrain → bilateral pupil dilation, decerebrate posturing, rapid deterioration
Uncal herniation (more relevant in supratentorial tumours)Temporal lobe uncus herniates through tentorial notchIpsilateral CN III palsy (fixed dilated pupil), contralateral hemiplegia, then bilateral signs and coma

Critical Safety Point

Lumbar puncture is absolutely contraindicated in a patient with a posterior fossa mass and raised ICP. Removing CSF from the lumbar cistern creates a downward pressure gradient → accelerates tonsillar herniation → death. This is why neuroimaging (CT) must be performed before any LP in a patient with symptoms of raised ICP.

AspectDetail
MechanismTumour cells shed from the primary ependymoma into the CSF → circulate through the subarachnoid space → seed ("drop") along the craniospinal axis (brain surface, spinal cord surface, cauda equina)
IncidenceAround 10% of tumours will have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] at diagnosis. Higher in anaplastic (Grade 3) ependymomas and PFA molecular subtype
Clinical consequenceMultiple cranial nerve palsies (from basal meningeal deposits), radiculopathies, myelopathy, cauda equina syndrome, communicating hydrocephalus (tumour cells blocking arachnoid granulations → impaired CSF absorption)
Why extracranial metastasis is rareBrain tumours, including ependymoma, very rarely metastasise outside the CNS because the brain lacks a conventional lymphatic drainage system. The blood-brain barrier further limits haematogenous spread. This is why TNM staging is not useful for brain tumours [3]

SiteStructures DamagedResulting Deficit
4th ventricle floor (brainstem)Cranial nerve nuclei (VI, VII, IX, X, XII), respiratory centre, reticular formationCranial nerve palsies, respiratory compromise, decreased consciousness
CerebellumVermis (axial balance), hemispheres (limb coordination), deep nucleiAtaxia, nystagmus, dysarthria, hypotonia
Spinal cord (intramedullary)Anterior horn cells, corticospinal tracts, spinothalamic tracts, autonomic pathwaysCentral cord syndrome, weakness, sensory loss, sphincter dysfunction
Cerebral cortex (supratentorial)Motor cortex, sensory cortex, language areas, visual cortexHemiparesis, sensory loss, aphasia, hemianopia, seizures

AspectDetail
MechanismSupratentorial ependymomas irritate the cerebral cortex → abnormal synchronised neuronal firing → focal seizures ± secondary generalisation
FrequencyEpilepsy affects 50–80% of primary brain tumours and 10–20% of secondary tumours [16]. Specifically for ependymoma, seizures are mainly seen in supratentorial tumours
Important noteSeizures are always supratentorial (infratentorial, i.e. cerebellar cortex, is inhibitory in nature) [16]. Therefore, posterior fossa ependymomas do NOT cause seizures — if a child with a posterior fossa ependymoma has seizures, think about supratentorial dissemination or another cause

B. Complications of Treatment

1. Surgical Complications

Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): postoperative complication caused by injury to cerebellar vermis or dentate nuclei during resection of tumours in midline cerebellum. Appears 1–2 days after surgery and resolves within weeks to months. Characterised by impaired language production with emotional lability [8][9].

AspectDetail
PathophysiologyThe dentate nuclei and superior cerebellar peduncles form the dentato-thalamo-cortical pathway — a critical circuit linking the cerebellum to the frontal lobe speech/language areas. Surgical disruption of this pathway (direct injury, retraction, oedema, vascular compromise) results in mutism. The cerebellar vermis also has extensive connections to the limbic system → emotional dysregulation
Incidence~25% of children undergoing posterior fossa tumour resection (higher with midline vermian tumours — more common in medulloblastoma than ependymoma, but ependymoma surgery can also cause this)
Clinical featuresInitially complete mutism → then dysarthria → gradual recovery of speech (usually over weeks to months). Accompanied by emotional lability (inappropriate crying or laughing), behavioural regression, and sometimes axial hypotonia
PrognosisMost children recover speech, but many have residual dysarthria, word-finding difficulty, or reduced verbal fluency long-term
NerveMechanismConsequence
CN VI (abducens)Surgical manipulation or post-operative oedema at the ponsHorizontal diplopia, esotropia
CN VII (facial)Damage during dissection at 4th ventricle floor or CPALMN facial weakness → incomplete eye closure, facial asymmetry; risk of corneal exposure
CN IX, X (glossopharyngeal, vagus)Dissection near lower medulla/4th ventricle floorDysphagia, aspiration risk (vocal cord palsy, absent gag reflex) → may need temporary nasogastric feeding or tracheostomy. Aspiration pneumonia is a significant cause of postoperative morbidity
CN XII (hypoglossal)Lower medullary injuryTongue deviation, dysarthria
ComplicationMechanism
Postoperative haemorrhageBleeding into the surgical cavity (posterior fossa haematoma) → can rapidly become life-threatening due to re-development of mass effect and ↑ICP in the small posterior fossa
CSF leak / pseudomeningocoeleIncomplete dural closure → CSF leaks through wound or accumulates subcutaneously. Risk of ascending meningitis
Wound infection / meningitisBacterial contamination of surgical wound; meningitis from CSF leak
Persistent hydrocephalus~20–40% of posterior fossa tumour patients require permanent VP shunt because: (1) pre-operative hydrocephalus may have already damaged CSF absorptive capacity, (2) surgical debris/blood products in CSF impair arachnoid granulation function
New neurological deficitsCerebellar ataxia (worsened or new), hemiparesis (if supratentorial), myelopathy (if spinal surgery)
Spinal cord injury (spinal ependymoma surgery)Cord manipulation during intramedullary tumour removal → new motor/sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction. Mitigated by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (MEP/SSEP)

2. Radiotherapy Complications

Radiotherapy complications are divided by timing. These are particularly significant in ependymoma because (a) many patients are young children with developing brains, and (b) patients who survive long-term are at risk for delayed complications decades later.

Craniospinal radiation is avoided or delayed in children due to severe toxicity to the rapidly developing CNS such as neurocognitive impairment [8][9]

ComplicationMechanism
FatigueSystemic inflammatory response to radiation; CNS cytokine release
Nausea and vomitingParticularly with posterior fossa RT → irritation of area postrema (vomiting centre)
Scalp erythema and alopeciaRadiation damage to rapidly dividing hair follicle cells and skin
Acute cerebral oedemaRadiation-induced BBB disruption → vasogenic oedema → ↑ICP. Managed with dexamethasone
ComplicationMechanism
Somnolence syndromeTransient demyelination of irradiated white matter. Seen especially in children 4–8 weeks post-cranial RT. Presents with excessive sleepiness, irritability, anorexia, low-grade fever. Usually self-limiting over 2–4 weeks; managed supportively ± short course of steroids

These are the most devastating and the reason we try to minimise/delay RT in young children:

ComplicationMechanismDetail
Neurocognitive impairment [8][9]Radiation-induced white matter damage (leukoencephalopathy) → disrupted myelin sheaths → impaired neural connectivity and processing speedMost severe in children < 3 years at RT (peak myelination period). Manifests as: ↓IQ (progressive decline over years), learning disabilities, attention deficits, memory problems, reduced processing speed. This is the primary reason cranial RT is avoided/delayed in young children [8][9]
Endocrine abnormalities [8][9]Radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis↓GH (94%) → short stature; ↓ACTH (43%) → secondary adrenal insufficiency; ↓TSH (10%) → secondary hypothyroidism [8][9]. Also: precocious puberty (hypothalamic damage → early GnRH activation), hypogonadism (if craniospinal RT damages gonads directly)
Short stature [8][9]↓GH from pituitary damage + direct radiation to vertebral growth plates (if craniospinal RT) → reduced spinal growth. Double mechanismMay require GH replacement therapy
Ototoxicity [8][9]Radiation damage to the cochlea (sensory hair cells of the organ of Corti). Particularly relevant for posterior fossa RT where the cochlea is within the radiation fieldSensorineural hearing loss — typically high-frequency initially, may progress. Compounded if cisplatin chemotherapy also used (additive ototoxicity)
Cerebrovascular abnormalities (stroke, intracranial haemorrhage) [8][9]Radiation-induced vasculopathy → endothelial damage → accelerated atherosclerosis, intimal hyperplasia, vessel wall necrosis → stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm formation. May develop moyamoya-like patternIncreases long-term risk of ischaemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke. Onset may be years to decades after RT
Secondary malignancyRadiation-induced DNA damage in normal tissues → acquisition of oncogenic mutations → development of a new primary tumour within the irradiated fieldMost common: meningioma (most frequent radiation-induced brain tumour), high-grade glioma, sarcoma (in bone/soft tissue within RT field). Latency period: typically > 10 years. Risk is higher with higher dose and younger age at treatment
Radiation necrosisFocal vascular endothelial damage within the irradiated tumour bed → microvascular thrombosis → ischaemic necrosis of brain tissueOccurs months to years post-RT. Mimics tumour recurrence on MRI (both enhance with gadolinium). Differentiation: advanced MRI (perfusion, spectroscopy) or PET scan (necrosis = hypometabolic; recurrence = hypermetabolic). Management: dexamethasone, bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), or surgical resection if severe
LeukoencephalopathyDiffuse white matter injury from radiation → progressive demyelination and gliosisContributes to neurocognitive decline; seen on MRI as confluent T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensities

The Childhood Cancer Paradox and Long-Term Complications

Although childhood cancers are aggressive, prognosis is relatively good — 70% of children will survive, but they have a lot of long-term complications [17]. This is directly relevant to ependymoma survivors: the cure comes at a price. A child cured of ependymoma at age 6 must live with the consequences of surgery and RT for 70+ years. This is why there is enormous research focus on reducing treatment toxicity (e.g., proton therapy, avoiding unnecessary RT after GTR of favourable subtypes).

While chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1], it is sometimes used as a temporising bridge in infants to delay RT. When used, the following complications may occur:

AgentComplicationMechanism
Cisplatin/carboplatinOtotoxicity (cisplatin-induced) [8][9]Cisplatin accumulates in the cochlear hair cells → production of reactive oxygen species → hair cell apoptosis → irreversible sensorineural hearing loss (high frequency first). Additive with radiation ototoxicity
CisplatinNephrotoxicityDirect tubular toxicity → dose-dependent renal impairment. Requires aggressive hydration and electrolyte monitoring (hypomagnesaemia, hypokalaemia)
VincristinePeripheral neuropathyBinds tubulin → disrupts microtubule function → axonal transport impaired → sensorimotor neuropathy (distal, symmetrical). Also: constipation (autonomic neuropathy), jaw pain
CyclophosphamideHaemorrhagic cystitisMetabolite acrolein is toxic to bladder urothelium. Prevented by co-administration of MESNA (sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate), which binds acrolein in the urinary tract
All agentsMyelosuppression → neutropenic sepsisBone marrow suppression → neutropenia → risk of life-threatening infection. Managed with G-CSF support and empirical antibiotics if febrile
All agentsNausea and vomitingChemotherapy triggers the chemoreceptor trigger zone (area postrema). Managed with ondansetron (5-HT3 antagonist), dexamethasone, aprepitant (NK1 antagonist)

Recurrence is the most significant long-term disease-related complication, occurring in ~30–50% of ependymoma patients:

AspectDetail
PatternMost recurrences are local (at the primary tumour site) rather than distant. PFA subtype has the highest recurrence rate
TimingCan occur at any time — from months to decades after initial treatment. Late recurrences (> 5 years) are well-documented, hence the need for lifelong surveillance
Management challengeRecurrent ependymoma is harder to treat: re-operation carries higher surgical morbidity (scarring, altered anatomy), re-irradiation is limited by cumulative dose constraints, and chemotherapy remains ineffective
PrognosisWith each recurrence, the chance of cure diminishes. However, repeated re-resections can still achieve long-term disease control in some patients — ependymoma is one of the few brain tumours where aggressive re-resection at recurrence is advocated

These are often underappreciated but profoundly impact patients and families:

ComplicationMechanism / Context
Cognitive impairmentCombined effects of surgery (posterior fossa syndrome, cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome) + radiation (leukoencephalopathy) → ↓IQ, learning disabilities, executive dysfunction
Motor disabilityResidual cerebellar ataxia (from surgery or tumour), spasticity (from spinal cord involvement), weakness
Endocrine dysfunction requiring lifelong replacementGH deficiency (requiring daily GH injections during growth), hypothyroidism (levothyroxine), adrenal insufficiency (hydrocortisone)
Hearing lossCombined radiation + cisplatin ototoxicity → hearing aids or cochlear implants may be needed
Psychosocial impactDepression, anxiety, social isolation, educational underperformance, difficulty with employment in adulthood. Parents experience significant psychological burden (caregiver burnout, financial stress)
InfertilityIf craniospinal RT received → hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (hypothalamic-pituitary damage) or direct gonadal damage (scatter radiation to pelvis). Fertility preservation should be discussed before treatment when appropriate

CategoryKey Complications
DiseaseObstructive hydrocephalus, brain herniation, leptomeningeal dissemination (~10%), local neurological deficits, seizures (supratentorial only)
SurgeryPosterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) [8][9], CN palsies (aspiration risk), haemorrhage, CSF leak, persistent hydrocephalus, wound infection
RadiotherapyNeurocognitive impairment, endocrine dysfunction (↓GH 94%, ↓ACTH 43%, ↓TSH 10%), ototoxicity, short stature, cerebrovascular abnormalities, secondary malignancy [8][9], radiation necrosis
Chemotherapy (limited use)Ototoxicity (cisplatin) [8][9], nephrotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, haemorrhagic cystitis, myelosuppression
Recurrence~30–50%; mainly local; increasingly difficult to treat with each recurrence
Long-term QoLCognitive, motor, endocrine, hearing, psychosocial, fertility

High Yield Summary — Complications of Ependymoma

  1. Most common presenting complication: Obstructive hydrocephalus from 4th ventricle obstruction → raised ICP → potential for fatal brain herniation
  2. Around 10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] — always stage with craniospinal MRI
  3. Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): appears 1–2 days post-surgery, caused by injury to cerebellar vermis/dentate nuclei, characterised by impaired language production + emotional lability, resolves over weeks–months [8][9]
  4. Late effects of RT are the most significant long-term complications: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
  5. Childhood cancer paradox: 70% of children survive but have extensive long-term complications [17] — lifelong surveillance for endocrine, cognitive, hearing, and second malignancy screening is mandatory
  6. Recurrence rate ~30–50%, mostly local — aggressive re-resection is still advocated
  7. Secondary malignancy from RT (meningioma, glioma) — latency > 10 years
  8. Seizures are always supratentorial [16] — do not expect seizures from posterior fossa ependymoma

Active Recall - Complications of Ependymoma

References

[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.163) [17] Lecture slides: Block C - A child with cancer: paediatric cancers.pdf (p.2)

High Yield Summary

  1. Definition: Primary CNS neoplasm from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system / central canal
  2. Epidemiology: Peak age 6y in children; 70% posterior fossa in paediatrics [1]; spinal ependymoma commonest intramedullary tumour in adults (peak 30-40y)
  3. Risk factors: Ionising radiation (only proven environmental factor), NF2, FAP/Turcot syndrome
  4. Pathophysiology: Mass effect → ↑ICP (CSF obstruction), cerebellar/brainstem compression, CSF drop metastases; extracranial metastasis is rare (no lymphatics)
  5. Classification: WHO CNS5 → anatomical + molecular (PFA, PFB, ZFTA-RELA, YAP1, myxopapillary, MYCN-amplified)
  6. Histology: Perivascular pseudorosettes (most characteristic), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic)
  7. Clinical features: Children → ↑ICP (headache worse in AM, vomiting, papilloedema) + cerebellar signs (ataxia, nystagmus) + CN palsies; Spinal → segmental pain + central cord syndrome
  8. Ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics [1] — slow-growing (not chemo-responsive), dangerous location
  9. Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1]
  10. Management cornerstone: Maximal safe surgical resection (1st line) ± adjuvant radiation therapy

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma

  1. The "Big Three" posterior fossa tumours in children: Medulloblastoma (vermis, highly chemo-sensitive, drops mets), Pilocytic astrocytoma (hemisphere, cystic + mural nodule, excellent prognosis), Ependymoma (4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina, chemo-resistant)
  2. Key imaging differentiators: Ependymoma = heterogeneous, calcified, "plastic" tumour extruding through foramina. Medulloblastoma = homogeneous, restricted diffusion. Pilocytic astrocytoma = cystic + enhancing mural nodule
  3. Spinal cord DDx: Ependymoma (central, haemosiderin cap, well-circumscribed) vs Astrocytoma (eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined)
  4. Histological diagnosis by surgical biopsy is mandatory to differentiate ependymoma from other tumours [8][9] — markers alone cannot distinguish it
  5. Brain metastasis is the commonest intracranial tumour in adults [10] — always consider metastasis in an adult with a brain mass
  6. CN VI palsy in a child = false localising sign of raised ICP [13] → investigate for posterior fossa tumour
  7. Secondary tumours are 6–10× more common than primary brain tumours [2]

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Ependymoma

  1. There are no formal clinical diagnostic criteria — diagnosis is based on neuroimaging + histopathological confirmation + molecular profiling (WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis)
  2. Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [8][9]
  3. CT: first-line emergency imaging; look for calcification (~50%), hydrocephalus, mass in 4th ventricle
  4. MRI with contrast is preferred over CT [3][14] — better soft tissue delineation, especially at brainstem/skull base
  5. Key MRI features of ependymoma: heterogeneous enhancement, arises from 4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina ("plastic"), calcification; in spine: central, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap
  6. DWI distinction: Ependymoma = no marked diffusion restriction; Medulloblastoma = prominent restriction (high cellularity); Primary CNS lymphoma = prominent restriction
  7. Staging: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology. Extracranial staging is NOT routine (no lymphatic drainage → TNM staging not useful)
  8. Functional MRI and DTI tractography are used for pre-operative planning [11]
  9. Molecular markers: H3K27me3 loss (PFA), L1CAM/RELA fusion (supratentorial), MYCN amplification (spinal aggressive), DNA methylation profiling (gold standard)
  10. AFP/β-HCG should be normal — if elevated, think germ cell tumour instead

High Yield Summary — Management of Ependymoma

  1. Maximal safe surgical resection is 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — GTR is the strongest prognostic factor
  2. External RT as 2nd line if not operable [1] — adjuvant focal RT is standard for most intracranial ependymomas post-surgery
  3. Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — fundamentally different from medulloblastoma
  4. Emergency management: Dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H [16] for peritumoral oedema; EVD/ETV for acute hydrocephalus
  5. Do NOT give steroids if CNS lymphoma is in the differential — steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]
  6. Anticonvulsants (levetiracetam) for seizures — NOT for infratentorial lesions, usually not for primary prophylaxis [16]
  7. Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) is a recognised post-operative complication [8][9]
  8. Late effects of RT: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
  9. Delay RT in infants < 3 years to protect the developing brain; use chemotherapy as a temporising bridge
  10. Long-term surveillance with serial MRI is mandatory — ependymoma can recur years to decades later

High Yield Summary — Complications of Ependymoma

  1. Most common presenting complication: Obstructive hydrocephalus from 4th ventricle obstruction → raised ICP → potential for fatal brain herniation
  2. Around 10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] — always stage with craniospinal MRI
  3. Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): appears 1–2 days post-surgery, caused by injury to cerebellar vermis/dentate nuclei, characterised by impaired language production + emotional lability, resolves over weeks–months [8][9]
  4. Late effects of RT are the most significant long-term complications: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
  5. Childhood cancer paradox: 70% of children survive but have extensive long-term complications [17] — lifelong surveillance for endocrine, cognitive, hearing, and second malignancy screening is mandatory
  6. Recurrence rate ~30–50%, mostly local — aggressive re-resection is still advocated
  7. Secondary malignancy from RT (meningioma, glioma) — latency > 10 years
  8. Seizures are always supratentorial [16] — do not expect seizures from posterior fossa ependymoma

On this page

No Headings