Ependymoma
Ependymoma is a glial neoplasm arising from ependymal cells lining the ventricles and central canal of the spinal cord, most commonly occurring in the posterior fossa in children and the spinal cord in adults.
Ependymoma
Ependymoma (from Greek: ependyma = "upper garment" or "lining," referring to the ependymal cell lining of the ventricles; "-oma" = tumour) is a primary CNS neoplasm arising from ependymal cells that line the ventricular system and the central canal of the spinal cord [1][2]. These tumours can occur anywhere along the ventricular system or spinal cord but have a strong predilection for the posterior fossa (infratentorial) in children and the spinal cord in adults.
Key Concept
Ependymomas are tumours derived from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system [1]. They are classified as neuroepithelial tumours (a subtype of glioma). Although they may appear histologically "low-grade," ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics due to its poor clinical behaviour — because (1) it is slow-growing and hence not chemo-responsive, and (2) the majority are located near the brainstem and cerebellum, making complete resection difficult [1].
Epidemiology
- Ependymomas account for approximately 2–5% of all primary intracranial neoplasms in adults and ~6–12% of all paediatric brain tumours [2][3].
- Primary brain tumours are rare overall: ~6/100,000 per year [3]. Ependymomas represent a small but clinically significant subset.
- Brain tumours account for 1–2% of all malignancies but 13% of all malignancy-related deaths [2].
- Peak incidence in children: ~6 years of age [1].
- Bimodal distribution: a paediatric peak (0–5 years) and a smaller adult peak (30–40 years).
- In children, ependymomas are the third most common posterior fossa tumour (after pilocytic astrocytoma and medulloblastoma).
- Spinal ependymoma is the commonest intramedullary spinal cord tumour in adults, with peak age 30–40 years, M > F [3].
- Slight male predominance overall (M:F ≈ 1.2–1.5:1).
In children (2–12 years): 70% of brain tumours are infratentorial — the common posterior fossa tumours being medulloblastoma, cerebellar astrocytoma, and ependymoma [2]. In adults: 80–85% of brain tumours are supratentorial, and when ependymomas do occur in adults, they are more commonly spinal [3].
| Feature | Paediatric Ependymoma | Adult Ependymoma |
|---|---|---|
| Common site | 70% posterior fossa (4th ventricle) [1] | Spinal cord (intramedullary) > supratentorial |
| Peak age | ~6 years | 30–40 years |
| Behaviour | Aggressive (location-dependent) | More indolent (especially spinal myxopapillary) |
| Chemosensitivity | Poor | Poor |
Risk Factors
- High-dose ionizing radiation → associated with meningiomas and gliomas (the only proven environmental factor for brain tumours!) [2].
- Ependymomas, as a subtype of glioma, fall under this risk umbrella.
Ependymomas can occur sporadically (majority) or in the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes:
| Syndrome | Gene | Associated Brain Tumours | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) | NF2 (Merlin, Ch22q12) | Bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningioma, ependymoma [4][5] | Autosomal dominant; also spinal ependymomas |
| Turcot syndrome | APC (Type 2) or MMR genes (Type 1) | Medulloblastoma (APC type) or GBM (MMR type); ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6] | Familial colon cancer + brain tumours |
| Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) | APC (5q21-22) | Medulloblastoma, ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6] | >100 colonic polyps, extracolonic malignancies |
NF2 and Ependymoma
NF2 features include: meningioma, ependymoma, acoustic schwannoma [5]. If you see multiple ependymomas (especially spinal) in a young patient, think NF2.
- RELA fusion-positive ependymomas (supratentorial) — driven by ZFTA-RELA fusion (previously C11orf95-RELA); involves constitutive NF-κB pathway activation.
- PFA (Posterior Fossa A) subgroup — associated with loss of H3K27 trimethylation, occurs in infants/young children, aggressive.
- PFB (Posterior Fossa B) subgroup — occurs in older children/adults, better prognosis.
- YAP1 fusion-positive ependymomas (supratentorial) — better prognosis.
- Myxopapillary ependymoma — typically conus medullaris/filum terminale in young adults.
Anatomy and Function of the Ependyma
The ependyma is a single layer of ciliated epithelial (cuboidal to columnar) cells that lines:
- The ventricular system (lateral ventricles → 3rd ventricle → cerebral aqueduct → 4th ventricle)
- The central canal of the spinal cord
| Function | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| CSF production | Specialized ependymal cells in the choroid plexus secrete CSF |
| CSF circulation | Cilia on ependymal cells beat to facilitate CSF flow through ventricles |
| Brain-CSF barrier | Provide a semi-permeable barrier between brain parenchyma and ventricular CSF |
| Neuroregeneration | Subventricular zone ependymal cells may serve as neural progenitor cells |
Understanding the ventricular system anatomy explains why ependymomas present where they do:
-
4th ventricle (posterior fossa): The most common site in children. The tumour arises from the floor of the 4th ventricle (which is the dorsal surface of the pons and medulla). This explains why:
- Tumours adhere to brainstem structures → difficult surgical resection
- Tumours can extrude through the foramina of Luschka into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) or through the foramen of Magendie inferiorly
- Obstruction of CSF outflow causes obstructive hydrocephalus
-
Lateral ventricles (supratentorial): More common in older children and adults; tend to be larger at presentation because the ventricle provides room to grow before causing symptoms.
-
Spinal cord: Commonest intramedullary tumour in adults. Cervical and thoracic segments most affected. Myxopapillary subtype characteristically arises at the conus medullaris / filum terminale.
Aetiology and Pathophysiology
Ependymomas arise from radial glial cells (ependymal progenitors) rather than mature ependymal cells per se. These progenitor cells retain proliferative capacity and reside in the subventricular zone.
The WHO 2021 (5th Edition) classification has fundamentally changed how we understand ependymomas — they are now classified by anatomical compartment + molecular features, not just histology.
| Anatomical Compartment | Molecular Subtype | Key Molecular Feature | Clinical Behaviour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supratentorial | ZFTA-RELA fusion-positive (formerly RELA) | NF-κB pathway constitutive activation | Aggressive, commoner subtype |
| Supratentorial | YAP1 fusion-positive | Hippo/YAP pathway | Better prognosis |
| Posterior fossa | PFA (Group A) | Loss of H3K27me3 (epigenetic silencing); overexpression of EZHIP | Most common, young children, aggressive, high recurrence |
| Posterior fossa | PFB (Group B) | Retained H3K27me3; frequent chromosomal gains/losses | Older children/adults, better prognosis |
| Spinal | MYCN-amplified | MYCN amplification | Aggressive subtype |
| Spinal | Myxopapillary | Unknown driver; distinct morphology | Indolent; conus/filum terminale |
| Spinal | Subependymoma | — | Very indolent, may be incidental |
Understanding this is essential for linking pathophysiology → clinical features:
-
Mass effect and local invasion
- Posterior fossa tumours compress the cerebellum (→ ataxia, nystagmus), brainstem (→ cranial nerve palsies, long tract signs), and 4th ventricle floor
- Supratentorial tumours cause focal neurological deficits depending on eloquent cortex involvement and seizures (cortical irritation)
-
CSF obstruction → Obstructive hydrocephalus
- A 4th ventricle ependymoma blocks CSF outflow through the foramina of Luschka and Magendie or the cerebral aqueduct
- This causes non-communicating (obstructive) hydrocephalus → raised intracranial pressure (↑ICP) [3]
- Mechanisms of ↑ICP: ↑brain volume (cerebral oedema, mass effect), ↑CSF volume (CSF obstruction), ↑blood volume (venous congestion) [3]
-
CSF dissemination ("drop metastases")
- Ependymoma cells can shed into the CSF → seed along the craniospinal axis
- This is more common in high-grade ependymomas (WHO Grade 3) and posterior fossa tumours
- Explains the need for craniospinal MRI staging at diagnosis
- Extracranial metastasis is rare in brain tumours (∵ no lymphatic drainage) → TNM staging is not useful [3]
-
Peritumoral oedema
- Disruption of the blood-brain barrier → vasogenic oedema → worsens mass effect → contributes to ↑ICP
WHO CNS5 Classification (2021) — Current Standard
Ependymomas are now classified using an integrated diagnosis combining histology + molecular markers + anatomical location:
By Histological Grade
| WHO Grade | Histology | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | Subependymoma; Myxopapillary ependymoma* | Well-circumscribed, slow-growing. *Note: myxopapillary upgraded to Grade 2 in WHO CNS5 due to late recurrence risk |
| Grade 2 | Ependymoma (classic) | Perivascular pseudorosettes (hallmark), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic but less common) |
| Grade 3 | Anaplastic ependymoma | High mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, necrosis, nuclear atypia |
Histological Hallmarks
- Perivascular pseudorosettes: Tumour cells arranged radially around blood vessels with an anuclear zone (the cell processes extend toward the vessel). This is the most characteristic histological feature — present in virtually all ependymomas.
- True ependymal rosettes: Tumour cells forming a ring around a central lumen (mimicking the ependymal canal). Pathognomonic but less frequently seen.
- These features help distinguish ependymoma from other gliomas.
By Anatomical Compartment and Molecular Type (WHO CNS5)
| Location | Subtype | Key Marker |
|---|---|---|
| Supratentorial | ZFTA fusion-positive | L1CAM +, RELA fusion |
| Supratentorial | YAP1 fusion-positive | YAP1 fusion |
| Posterior fossa | PFA | H3K27me3 loss, EZHIP overexpression |
| Posterior fossa | PFB | H3K27me3 retained |
| Spinal | Myxopapillary | Mucin-rich papillary architecture |
| Spinal | Subependymoma | Clusters of tumour cells in glial fibrillary matrix |
| Spinal | Ependymoma, MYCN-amplified | MYCN amplification |
Older Classification Retained for Context
Histological classification by cellular origin [3]:
Neuroepithelial tissue tumours include: gliomas (astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, ependymoma, glioblastoma multiforme) and medulloblastoma (neuronal) [3]
Clinical Features
High-grade diseases tend to present with subacute onset of signs/symptoms of ↑ICP. Low-grade diseases tend to present with slowly progressive focal neurological signs/symptoms (focal neurological deficits = negative symptoms; epilepsy = positive symptoms) [3].
Because ependymoma is often of intermediate grade but situated in the posterior fossa where it obstructs CSF flow early, the dominant presentation in children is ↑ICP from obstructive hydrocephalus.
A. Symptoms
This is the most common presenting symptom complex in paediatric posterior fossa ependymoma. Why? Because the tumour grows within the 4th ventricle → blocks CSF outflow → obstructive hydrocephalus → ↑ICP.
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Generalised, dull, constant headache (worse in morning) [3] | ↑ICP is worse with recumbency (lying flat → ↑venous return to head → ↑intracranial blood volume). Morning headache occurs because the patient has been lying flat all night |
| Vomiting [3] | Direct compression/irritation of the area postrema (vomiting centre) on the floor of the 4th ventricle; also occurs with ↑ICP (stimulation of medullary vomiting centre). In posterior fossa tumours, vomiting can be projectile and without nausea ("cerebellar vomiting") |
| Decreased consciousness [3] | Progressive ↑ICP → compression of ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) in brainstem → ↓arousal |
| Visual disturbance / Transient visual obscurations (TVOs) [7] | ↑ICP transmitted along the optic nerve sheath → tourniquet effect → transient ischaemia of the optic nerve head. Also: CN6 palsy (see below) causes diplopia |
| Headache increasing with recumbency and early morning [7] | Same mechanism as morning headache above |
| Nausea [7] | Vagal stimulation and medullary compression |
Paediatric Presentation Caveat
In infants (< 2 years), the cranial sutures are unfused, so ↑ICP may present with increasing head circumference (macrocephaly), bulging fontanelle, irritability, poor feeding, and "sun-setting" eyes (Parinaud-like upgaze palsy from pressure on the tectal plate) rather than classic headache and vomiting. Always measure head circumference in an infant with a suspected brain tumour.
Because 70% of paediatric ependymomas are in the posterior fossa, cerebellar symptoms are extremely common:
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Unsteadiness / gait difficulty (truncal ataxia) | Tumour in the vermis or compressing the flocculonodular lobe (archicerebellum) → impaired axial balance and truncal stability |
| Limb incoordination / clumsiness | Tumour involving the cerebellar hemisphere → impaired ipsilateral limb coordination (appendicular ataxia) |
| Dizziness / vertigo | Compression of vestibular nuclei on the floor of the 4th ventricle or vestibulocerebellar connections |
The floor of the 4th ventricle is the dorsal surface of the pons and medulla. Tumour adherence to / invasion of this area causes:
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Dysphagia, dysarthria | Lower cranial nerve (CN IX, X, XII) nuclear involvement |
| Diplopia | CN VI (abducens) palsy — a false localizing sign of ↑ICP (long intracranial course, vulnerable to stretching), or direct brainstem compression |
| Facial weakness, facial numbness | CN VII (facial) and CN V (trigeminal) involvement |
| Hiccups | Medullary irritation (phrenic nerve nucleus/respiratory centre involvement) |
| Neck stiffness / head tilt (torticollis) | Tonsillar herniation or direct involvement of upper cervical nerve roots by tumour extending through foramen of Magendie |
Spinal ependymoma presents with gradual onset segmental pain ± neurological deficit of central cord pattern [3]
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Back/neck pain (most common initial symptom) | Local expansion within the spinal cord → stretching of pain-sensitive dura and nerve roots |
| Segmental sensory loss ("cape-like" distribution) | Intramedullary tumour expands centrally → damages the crossing spinothalamic fibres in the anterior white commissure → dissociated sensory loss (loss of pain/temperature with preserved dorsal column function initially) = "central cord syndrome" |
| Weakness (upper > lower motor neuron at level, lower motor neuron below) | Compression of anterior horn cells at tumour level (LMN) + compression of corticospinal tracts (UMN below the level) |
| Sphincter disturbance | Late feature; involvement of sacral cord/conus → bladder/bowel dysfunction |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Seizures | Cortical irritation by tumour → abnormal neuronal firing (epilepsy = positive symptom [3]) |
| Focal neurological deficits | Depend on the eloquent cortex involved (e.g., hemiparesis if motor cortex, visual field defects if occipital lobe, aphasia if dominant hemisphere) = negative symptoms [3] |
| Headache | Mass effect + peritumoral oedema → ↑ICP |
| Personality/cognitive changes | Frontal lobe involvement |
B. Signs
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Papilloedema [3][7] | ↑ICP → transmitted along the subarachnoid space of the optic nerve sheath → 'tourniquet' effect on optic nerve → ↓↓axonoplasmic outflow from optic disc → axonal swelling of disc [7]. Fundoscopy shows: swollen optic disc with blurred edges, dilated superficial capillaries, and NO spontaneous venous pulsation of the central retinal vein [7] |
| Enlarged blind spot → constricted visual fields (chronic) | Acute papilloedema: enlarged blind spot (usually subclinical). Chronic: constricted VF [7] from progressive optic nerve axonal damage |
| CN VI (abducens) palsy [7] | Binocular horizontal diplopia with incomitant exotropia [7] — CN6 has the longest intracranial course → vulnerable to stretching against the petrous ridge when ICP is raised. This is a false localizing sign (does not indicate the tumour is at the pons) |
| Cushing's triad (late feature) [3] | Hypertension + bradycardia + irregular respiration. Occurs with impending brainstem herniation — the medulla is compressed → ischaemia of vasomotor centre → sympathetic surge (↑BP) → baroreceptor reflex (↓HR) → respiratory centre dysfunction (irregular breathing). This is a pre-terminal sign |
| In infants: macrocephaly, bulging fontanelle, "sun-setting" eyes | Unfused sutures allow compensatory head expansion; upgaze palsy from tectal plate compression (Parinaud syndrome) |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Truncal ataxia (wide-based gait, inability to sit unsupported) | Vermis/flocculonodular lobe compression |
| Appendicular ataxia (past-pointing, dysdiadochokinesis, intention tremor) | Cerebellar hemisphere involvement → impaired ipsilateral coordination |
| Nystagmus (often horizontal, gaze-evoked) | Disruption of vestibulocerebellar connections |
| Dysarthria (scanning/staccato speech) | Cerebellar speech area involvement |
| Hypotonia (ipsilateral) | Loss of cerebellar facilitation of stretch reflex |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Lower CN palsies (IX, X, XI, XII) | Direct compression or infiltration of nuclei on 4th ventricle floor — absent gag reflex, vocal cord palsy, tongue deviation, trapezius/SCM weakness |
| CN VII palsy (LMN facial weakness) | Facial motor nucleus in the pons |
| CN V signs (decreased corneal reflex, facial sensory loss) | Trigeminal nucleus involvement |
| Long tract signs (hyperreflexia, Babinski sign, spasticity) | Compression of corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts in the brainstem |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Central cord syndrome (dissociated sensory loss) | Intramedullary expansion damages crossing spinothalamic fibres → loss of pain/temperature in a "suspended" or "cape-like" distribution with preserved posterior columns |
| Segmental LMN signs at tumour level | Anterior horn cell destruction → muscle wasting, fasciculations, areflexia at that segment |
| UMN signs below the level | Corticospinal tract compression → spasticity, hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski sign |
| Sphincter disturbance | Involvement of sacral parasympathetic (S2–S4) → bladder/bowel dysfunction |
| Scenario | Clinical Clue |
|---|---|
| Myxopapillary ependymoma (conus/filum terminale) | Low back pain, sciatica-like radiculopathy, cauda equina syndrome (saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention, lower limb weakness, absent ankle jerks) |
| Lateral extension through foramen of Luschka | Cerebellopontine angle syndrome: ipsilateral sensorineural hearing loss (CN VIII), facial weakness (CN VII), trigeminal signs (CN V) — mimics vestibular schwannoma |
| NF2-associated multiple ependymomas | Multiple spinal ependymomas + bilateral vestibular schwannomas + meningiomas [4][5] |
- In Hong Kong, brain tumours in children are the second most common paediatric malignancy (after leukaemia).
- Ependymomas are managed primarily at Queen Mary Hospital (QMH) and Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH), which have dedicated paediatric neurosurgery and neuro-oncology teams.
- The multidisciplinary approach (neurosurgery + radiation oncology + paediatric oncology) aligns with international standards.
- Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1] — This is a critical exam point and reflects current international consensus. Unlike medulloblastoma, ependymomas are slow-growing and therefore not chemosensitive.
- Hong Kong follows the WHO CNS5 (2021) classification for neuropathological diagnosis.
- Familial syndromes such as NF2 and FAP, though uncommon, are seen in the Hong Kong population. Genetic counselling is available at clinical genetics services (e.g., QMH Clinical Genetics Service).
Clinical Approach Summary
The clinical approach to suspected ependymoma follows the general approach to intracranial tumours [3]:
- Recognise the presentation pattern: ↑ICP ± focal neurological deficits ± seizures
- Localise the lesion: Posterior fossa vs supratentorial vs spinal
- Consider age: Child with posterior fossa mass → think medulloblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, ependymoma
- Image: MRI brain ± spine with contrast (gold standard)
- Tissue diagnosis: Surgical resection (therapeutic + diagnostic)
- Molecular classification: WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis
- Stage: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology to assess for dissemination
High Yield Summary
- Definition: Primary CNS neoplasm from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system / central canal
- Epidemiology: Peak age 6y in children; 70% posterior fossa in paediatrics [1]; spinal ependymoma commonest intramedullary tumour in adults (peak 30-40y)
- Risk factors: Ionising radiation (only proven environmental factor), NF2, FAP/Turcot syndrome
- Pathophysiology: Mass effect → ↑ICP (CSF obstruction), cerebellar/brainstem compression, CSF drop metastases; extracranial metastasis is rare (no lymphatics)
- Classification: WHO CNS5 → anatomical + molecular (PFA, PFB, ZFTA-RELA, YAP1, myxopapillary, MYCN-amplified)
- Histology: Perivascular pseudorosettes (most characteristic), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic)
- Clinical features: Children → ↑ICP (headache worse in AM, vomiting, papilloedema) + cerebellar signs (ataxia, nystagmus) + CN palsies; Spinal → segmental pain + central cord syndrome
- Ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics [1] — slow-growing (not chemo-responsive), dangerous location
- Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1]
- Management cornerstone: Maximal safe surgical resection (1st line) ± adjuvant radiation therapy
Active Recall - Ependymoma (Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Classification, Clinical Features)
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.360–361) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [4] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) — NF2 features [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) — FAP/Turcot syndrome associations [7] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Opthalmology.pdf (p.90) — Papilloedema pathophysiology
Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma
The differential diagnosis of ependymoma is fundamentally driven by where the tumour is and how old the patient is. This is because brain tumours have characteristic age-location patterns, and a mass in the posterior fossa of a 5-year-old has a very different differential from a spinal cord mass in a 35-year-old.
Tumour locations and types depend on age [2]:
- Adults: 70% supratentorial – metastatic brain tumours, meningioma, gliomas (e.g. GBM)
- Children 2–12 years: 70% infratentorial – medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, ependymoma, germ cell tumours
- < 2 years / 12–18 years: 50% supra- and infratentorial [2]
The approach to differential diagnosis therefore follows a structured framework:
- Localise the lesion (posterior fossa vs supratentorial vs spinal)
- Consider the age (paediatric vs adult)
- Consider the imaging characteristics (solid vs cystic, enhancing vs non-enhancing, intra-axial vs extra-axial, calcifications, CSF dissemination)
- Consider clinical clues (tempo of onset, associated syndromes, tumour markers)
This is the classic scenario because 70% of paediatric ependymomas are in the posterior fossa [1][8]. The "big three" posterior fossa tumours in children are:
| Feature | Ependymoma | Medulloblastoma | Pilocytic Astrocytoma |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell of origin | Ependymal cells (neuroepithelial) | Granule cell precursors (embryonal/neuronal) | Astrocytes (glial) |
| Peak age | ~6 years [1] | 5–7 years [8][9] | 5–15 years |
| Sex | M > F slightly | Males predominance [8][9] | M = F |
| Exact location | Floor of 4th ventricle (arises from ependymal lining); may extend through foramina of Luschka/Magendie | Midline cerebellar vermis [8][9]; fills 4th ventricle from above | Cerebellar hemisphere (lateral); may also arise in vermis |
| Growth pattern | Slow-growing, usually non-invasive [8]; plastic, moulds around structures | Fast-growing, highly cellular | Very slow-growing, well-circumscribed |
| Histology | Perivascular pseudorosettes, true ependymal rosettes | Homer Wright rosettes (neuroblastic), small round blue cells | Rosenthal fibres, biphasic (compact + loose microcystic), BRAF alteration |
| Imaging | Heterogeneous, calcification (50%), arises from 4th ventricle floor, may extrude through foramina ("plastic" tumour) | Homogeneously enhancing, midline vermian mass filling 4th ventricle, restricted diffusion on DWI (high cellularity) | Cystic with enhancing mural nodule (classic); non-enhancing cyst wall |
| CSF dissemination | ~10% at diagnosis [8] | High propensity to disseminate through subarachnoid space (leptomeningeal dissemination) [8][9] | Rare |
| Chemo-sensitivity | Not chemo-responsive [1] | Chemo-responsive (vincristine/cisplatin/cyclophosphamide) [8][9] | Low-grade; surgery usually curative; chemo reserved for inoperable/progressive |
| Prognosis | Intermediate; depends on extent of resection | Risk-stratified; overall ~70–80% 5-year survival with current protocols | Excellent; >95% 10-year survival with GTR |
High Yield Exam Point
Medulloblastoma occurs exclusively in the cerebellum in the midline cerebellar vermis [8][9], while ependymoma characteristically arises from the floor of the 4th ventricle (ependymal surface) and may extend laterally through the foramina of Luschka into the cerebellopontine angle. Pilocytic astrocytoma typically presents as a cystic mass with an enhancing mural nodule in the cerebellar hemisphere. These imaging patterns are key differentiators.
Additional Posterior Fossa DDx in Children
| Tumour | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (AT/RT) | < 3 years old (younger than typical ependymoma); aggressive; loss of INI1/SMARCB1; can mimic medulloblastoma on imaging but occurs at younger age |
| Brainstem glioma (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, DIPG) | Arises within the pons (not the 4th ventricle); diffusely expands the pons; classic triad: CN palsies + long tract signs + ataxia without hydrocephalus initially; no role for biopsy historically (now molecular testing possible); dismal prognosis |
| Choroid plexus papilloma/carcinoma | Arises from choroid plexus (not ependyma); in children usually in lateral ventricle (< 2y) or 4th ventricle; cauliflower-like intensely enhancing mass; overproduction of CSF → communicating hydrocephalus |
| Haemangioblastoma | More common in adults (mean age 33y); highly vascular cystic + mural nodule mass; associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome; intense homogeneous enhancement of nodule; flow voids |
| Epidermoid/dermoid cyst | CPA location; does NOT enhance; restricted diffusion on DWI ("bright" on DWI); "cauliflower" or "mother of pearl" appearance |
When ependymoma occurs in the posterior fossa of an adult, the differential shifts significantly because adults have 80–85% supratentorial tumours [3] and posterior fossa masses in adults are more commonly:
| Tumour | Key Features | Why It's Different from Ependymoma |
|---|---|---|
| Brain metastasis | Commonest intracranial tumour in adults [10]; common origins: lung, breast, RCC, colorectal, melanoma [10]; typically at grey-white junction; multiple lesions; large oedema relative to lesion size | Metastases are usually multiple, at the grey-white junction, with a known primary malignancy. Ependymoma is typically solitary and arises from ventricular lining |
| Vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) | CPA mass; CN VIII symptoms (sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo); "ice-cream cone" shape extending into IAM; T1-hypo, T2-hyper, homogeneous enhancement | Ependymoma extending through foramen of Luschka can mimic CPA schwannoma, but schwannoma has characteristic IAM widening and CN VIII involvement first |
| Meningioma | Extra-axial, dura-based [11]; strong homogeneous enhancement; "dural tail" sign; T1-hypo/isointense, T2-iso/hyperintense; middle-aged F > M | Meningioma is extra-axial (outside brain parenchyma), attached to dura. Ependymoma is intra-axial (arises from within the ventricular lining) |
| Haemangioblastoma | See above (VHL association, highly vascular) |
Extra-axial vs Intra-axial
A crucial radiological distinction in brain tumour DDx:
- Extra-axial = outside brain parenchyma (e.g. meningioma, schwannoma) — these displace brain, widen CSF spaces, have a "CSF cleft" sign
- Intra-axial = within brain parenchyma (e.g. gliomas, metastases, ependymoma arising from ventricular lining and growing into parenchyma)
This distinction narrows the differential immediately.
Supratentorial ependymomas (especially in older children/young adults) must be differentiated from:
| Tumour | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO Grade 4) | ↓T1W, heterogeneous enhancement with surrounding vasogenic oedema (↑T2W) ± central necrosis [11]; adults > 50y; "ring-enhancing" lesion; rapid course; IDH-wildtype in most adult cases |
| Low-grade glioma (astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma) | ↑T2W, non-enhancing expansile lesion without surrounding vasogenic oedema [11]; young adults; seizures common; IDH-mutant; oligodendroglioma has "fried egg" cells + 1p/19q co-deletion |
| Primary CNS lymphoma | Solitary/multifocal T2W-iso/hypointense, contrast-enhancing lesions in subcortical regions, classically a/w prominent diffusion restriction on DWI [11]; periventricular "butterfly" distribution; associated with EBV, immunosuppression [2]; homogeneous enhancement in immunocompetent, ring-enhancing in HIV/immunosuppressed |
| Craniopharyngioma | Sellar/suprasellar location; calcification in 50% [12]; cystic + solid components; bimodal age (childhood + 40–60y); presents with hypopituitarism, growth retardation, bitemporal hemianopia, diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus [12] |
| Intracranial germ cell tumour (GCT) | Midline (pineal or suprasellar region); peak age 10–14y; tumour markers: AFP, β-HCG; histological diagnosis mandatory if tumour markers normal to differentiate from PNETs, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, LCH [8][9] |
| Supratentorial PNET / embryonal tumour | Rare; aggressive; large heterogeneous mass with necrosis; young children |
| Ganglioglioma | Young patients; temporal lobe; seizures (most common); cystic + solid; calcification in 30%; indolent |
| Choroid plexus tumour | Lateral ventricle in children < 2y; intensely enhancing; CSF overproduction |
Ependymoma vs Craniopharyngioma in the Suprasellar Region
Although ependymomas are classically intraventricular, supratentorial ependymomas can occasionally be paraventricular or even in the suprasellar region. Craniopharyngiomas also occur suprasellarly and can have calcification — a feature shared with ependymomas. The key differentiator is that craniopharyngiomas arise from Rathke's pouch remnants (ectodermal origin), are extra-axial, and present with endocrine dysfunction, whereas ependymomas arise from ependymal cells (neuroepithelial origin) and are intra-axial/intraventricular.
Spinal ependymoma is the commonest intramedullary spinal cord tumour in adults [3]. The DDx for an intramedullary spinal lesion includes:
| Tumour/Lesion | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Spinal astrocytoma | 2nd most common primary cord tumour; 60% in children, median age 35y; lower grade than brain counterparts but infiltrative → complete excision less likely [3]; more eccentric within cord; less well-defined margins on MRI than ependymoma; no haemosiderin cap |
| Haemangioblastoma | Highly vascular; cystic + mural nodule; associated with VHL; intense enhancement; flow voids on MRI |
| Metastasis (intramedullary) | Rare (< 5% of cord tumours); known primary (lung, breast most common); enhancing nodule; rapid progression |
| Demyelination (e.g. MS, NMOSD) | Inflammatory, not neoplastic; typically shorter segment (MS: < 3 vertebral segments) or longitudinally extensive (NMOSD: ≥ 3 segments); clinical context of relapses/remissions; no mass effect; enhances in acute phase only |
| Sarcoidosis / transverse myelitis | Enhancing cord lesion; clinical context (systemic sarcoidosis, post-infectious); dorsal subpial enhancement in sarcoidosis |
Ependymoma vs Astrocytoma of the Spinal Cord
Both present with gradual onset segmental pain ± neurological deficit of central cord pattern [3]. However:
- Ependymoma tends to be central, well-circumscribed, and often has a characteristic "haemosiderin cap" (dark rim on T2-weighted MRI from chronic micro-haemorrhage at tumour poles) — this is nearly pathognomonic. Gross total resection is often achievable.
- Astrocytoma tends to be eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined, making GTR much harder. The pathology is lower grade than in brain but still infiltrative → complete excision less likely [3].
Myxopapillary ependymoma occurs at the conus medullaris/filum terminale. The DDx here includes:
| Lesion | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Schwannoma | Intradural extramedullary; well-circumscribed; "dumbbell" shape if extending through neural foramen; homogeneous enhancement |
| Meningioma | Intradural extramedullary; dural-based; "dural tail" on MRI; more common in thoracic spine, middle-aged females |
| Paraganglioma (filum terminale) | Rare; intensely enhancing; can resemble myxopapillary ependymoma; serpentine flow voids |
| Dermoid/epidermoid cyst | Developmental; no enhancement; restricted diffusion (epidermoid); fat signal (dermoid) |
| Lipoma of filum terminale | Bright on T1, drops signal on fat-sat; associated with tethered cord |
F. DDx Framework by Clinical Presentation
Rather than starting from a known tumour location, you may encounter a clinical presentation that leads you to consider ependymoma. Here is a symptom-based DDx approach:
In a 6-year-old with acute onset unwell, effortless vomiting, unsteady gait, and double vision — with esotropic squint (CN VI palsy) — think raised ICP from a posterior fossa lesion. CN VI palsy in a child is a false localising sign of raised ICP. Neuroimaging (usually MRI brain with contrast) is needed to look for intracranial tumour [13].
| DDx | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|
| Spinal ependymoma | Central, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap, adult M > F |
| Spinal astrocytoma | Eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined margins |
| MS / NMOSD | Relapsing-remitting or neuromyelitis optica pattern; CSF oligoclonal bands; AQP4-Ab (NMOSD) |
| Spinal cord infarct | Acute onset; anterior spinal artery territory; DWI restricted |
| Syringomyelia | CSF-intensity cavity within cord; associated with Chiari malformation; no enhancement |
| Sarcoidosis | Systemic features; dorsal subpial enhancement; ACE elevated |
Think myxopapillary ependymoma (filum terminale), but also consider:
- Disc prolapse (most common cause of cauda equina syndrome overall)
- Schwannoma / neurofibroma
- Meningioma
- Metastasis (extradural compression)
| Non-Neoplastic DDx | Why Considered | How to Distinguish |
|---|---|---|
| Brain abscess | Ring-enhancing lesion on imaging; can mimic tumour | Restricted diffusion centrally on DWI (pus); fever, raised inflammatory markers; recent infection/surgery/immunosuppression |
| Tuberculoma / neurocysticercosis | Enhancing intracranial lesion; endemic in HK for TB | TB: ring/nodular enhancement, basal meningitis, CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis. NCC: cystic lesion ± scolex, calcification; travel to endemic area |
| Demyelination (tumefactive MS) | Large (>2 cm) white matter lesion with incomplete ring enhancement; can mimic glioma | Open ring enhancement (incomplete ring with enhancement facing grey matter); young female; prior neurological episodes; CSF oligoclonal bands |
| Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) | Presents with ↑ICP symptoms; papilloedema; but neuroimaging is NORMAL [7] | No mass on imaging; obese young female; normal MRI (or empty sella, optic nerve sheath distension); LP shows elevated opening pressure with normal CSF composition |
| Location | Most Likely DDx (in order of frequency) |
|---|---|
| Posterior fossa (child) | Medulloblastoma > Pilocytic astrocytoma > Ependymoma > AT/RT > DIPG |
| Posterior fossa (adult) | Metastasis > Haemangioblastoma > Ependymoma > Meningioma > Schwannoma |
| Supratentorial (child) | Pilocytic astrocytoma > Craniopharyngioma > GCT > PNET > Ependymoma |
| Supratentorial (adult) | Metastasis > GBM > Meningioma > Oligodendroglioma > Primary CNS lymphoma > Ependymoma |
| Spinal intramedullary (adult) | Ependymoma > Astrocytoma > Haemangioblastoma > Metastasis |
| Spinal intramedullary (child) | Astrocytoma > Ependymoma > Ganglioglioma |
| Conus/filum terminale | Myxopapillary ependymoma > Schwannoma > Meningioma > Paraganglioma |
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma
- The "Big Three" posterior fossa tumours in children: Medulloblastoma (vermis, highly chemo-sensitive, drops mets), Pilocytic astrocytoma (hemisphere, cystic + mural nodule, excellent prognosis), Ependymoma (4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina, chemo-resistant)
- Key imaging differentiators: Ependymoma = heterogeneous, calcified, "plastic" tumour extruding through foramina. Medulloblastoma = homogeneous, restricted diffusion. Pilocytic astrocytoma = cystic + enhancing mural nodule
- Spinal cord DDx: Ependymoma (central, haemosiderin cap, well-circumscribed) vs Astrocytoma (eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined)
- Histological diagnosis by surgical biopsy is mandatory to differentiate ependymoma from other tumours [8][9] — markers alone cannot distinguish it
- Brain metastasis is the commonest intracranial tumour in adults [10] — always consider metastasis in an adult with a brain mass
- CN VI palsy in a child = false localising sign of raised ICP [13] → investigate for posterior fossa tumour
- Secondary tumours are 6–10× more common than primary brain tumours [2]
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.360–361) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [7] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Opthalmology.pdf (p.90) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.164) [11] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431) [12] Senior notes: Block A - I keep on bumping into people on my side - pituitary tumours; hypopituitarism.pdf (p.6) [13] AOS material: AOS - Ophthalmology (Ans:Notes).pdf (p.3)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Ependymoma
Diagnostic Criteria
Unlike many medical conditions (e.g., rheumatic fever, SLE), ependymoma does not have a formal set of clinical diagnostic criteria like the Jones criteria or SLICC criteria. The diagnosis of ependymoma is fundamentally a tissue diagnosis — it requires histopathological confirmation, ideally with integrated molecular profiling as per the WHO CNS5 (2021) classification.
Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation of brain tumours [8][9].
However, the working/provisional clinical diagnosis is established through a systematic approach:
- Clinical suspicion → symptom pattern (↑ICP, cerebellar signs, CN palsies, myelopathy) + age + tempo
- Neuroimaging → characteristic MRI features suggesting ependymoma
- Histopathological confirmation → obtained at time of surgical resection (preferred) or stereotactic biopsy
- Integrated diagnosis → combining histology + molecular markers + anatomical compartment (WHO CNS5)
WHO CNS5 Integrated Diagnostic Criteria for Ependymoma
The WHO 2021 (5th Edition) Classification of CNS Tumours requires a layered, integrated diagnosis for ependymoma consisting of:
| Layer | What It Includes | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Integrated diagnosis | Final combined diagnosis | "Posterior fossa ependymoma, group PFA" |
| 2. Histological classification | Morphological grade | Ependymoma (WHO Grade 2) or Anaplastic ependymoma (WHO Grade 3) |
| 3. CNS WHO grade | I, II, or III | Grade 2 |
| 4. Molecular information | Molecular subtype | PFA (H3K27me3 loss), ZFTA-RELA fusion, YAP1 fusion, MYCN-amplified, etc. |
All four layers are needed for a complete diagnosis. Histology alone is insufficient — molecular profiling is now mandatory for accurate classification, prognostication, and treatment planning.
The pathologist confirms ependymoma based on:
| Feature | Description | Diagnostic Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Perivascular pseudorosettes | Tumour cells radially arranged around blood vessels with an anuclear zone (cell processes extend to vessel wall) | Most characteristic — found in virtually all ependymomas |
| True ependymal rosettes | Tumour cells forming a ring around a central lumen (recapitulating the ependymal canal) | Pathognomonic but uncommon (~10–30% of cases) |
| GFAP positivity | Glial fibrillary acidic protein expression on immunohistochemistry | Confirms glial lineage; positive in all ependymomas |
| EMA positivity | Epithelial membrane antigen — intracytoplasmic dot-like or ring-like pattern | Characteristic but not pathognomonic; highlights the intracellular lumina |
| Anaplastic features (Grade 3) | Increased mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, necrosis, nuclear pleomorphism | Upgrades to WHO Grade 3; associated with worse prognosis |
| Marker | Technique | Subtype Identified |
|---|---|---|
| H3K27me3 loss (immunohistochemistry) | IHC | PFA (posterior fossa group A) — loss indicates aggressive subtype |
| EZHIP overexpression | IHC | PFA confirmation |
| ZFTA-RELA fusion | FISH, RNA sequencing, or break-apart FISH for RELA | Supratentorial ZFTA fusion-positive |
| L1CAM overexpression | IHC (surrogate for RELA fusion) | Supratentorial ZFTA-RELA positive |
| YAP1 fusion | FISH or sequencing | Supratentorial YAP1 fusion-positive |
| MYCN amplification | FISH or copy number analysis | Spinal MYCN-amplified ependymoma |
| DNA methylation profiling | Methylation array (e.g., Heidelberg classifier) | Gold standard for molecular subtyping across all compartments |
The approach to diagnosing ependymoma follows the general approach to any suspected intracranial or spinal tumour. The algorithm below integrates clinical assessment, emergency management, imaging, and tissue diagnosis.
Key Algorithm Points
- CT is the emergency imaging modality — fast (1 minute), widely available, excellent for detecting hydrocephalus, haemorrhage, and calcification. However, MRI with contrast is generally preferred over CT [3][14] for definitive tumour characterisation.
- Never perform lumbar puncture if there is a posterior fossa mass with hydrocephalus — risk of tonsillar herniation through the foramen magnum (coning).
- Staging of the entire craniospinal axis is mandatory before surgery — because ~10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal dissemination at diagnosis [8][9], and the surgeon needs to know the full extent of disease.
- Surgery is both diagnostic and therapeutic — maximal safe removal as 1st line in all operable gliomas [1].
Investigation Modalities
A. Neuroimaging
Role: First-line emergency imaging; also useful for detecting calcification (present in ~50% of ependymomas).
Why CT first in emergencies? CT takes ~1 minute vs ~20–30 minutes for MRI, is widely available, and is highly sensitive for acute hydrocephalus and haemorrhage [15].
| CT Finding | Interpretation / Significance |
|---|---|
| Isodense to slightly hyperdense mass in the 4th ventricle | Ependymoma typically appears isodense to brain. Hyperdensity may reflect calcification or high cellularity |
| Calcification (~50%) | Punctate or coarse calcification within the tumour — more common in ependymoma than medulloblastoma; helps narrow DDx |
| Obstructive hydrocephalus | Dilated lateral and 3rd ventricles with a normal-sized 4th ventricle indicates obstruction at the aqueduct; dilated ventricles including 4th ventricle with mass in 4th ventricle = 4th ventricle obstruction |
| Contrast enhancement | Normal brain tissue does not enhance (due to BBB). Enhancement indicates: (1) outside BBB, e.g. meningioma (homogeneously enhancing), or (2) disruption of BBB, e.g. high-grade tumours, inflammation [14]. Ependymomas show heterogeneous enhancement (mix of enhancing and non-enhancing areas) reflecting tumour heterogeneity (cystic areas, calcification, necrosis) |
| Extension through foramina | Tumour "extruding" through foramina of Luschka (laterally into CPA) or Magendie (inferiorly) — a characteristic feature of ependymoma ("plastic" tumour that moulds through narrow spaces) |
Note characteristics of lesions on CT: location/distribution, number (multiplicity → metastasis or disseminated infection), size, shape, outline (well-defined vs ill-defined), attenuation/density (specific attenuation e.g. gas, fat, soft tissues, calcification may suggest specific diagnoses), contrast enhancement (degree and pattern) [15].
Role: Definitive imaging modality for tumour characterisation, surgical planning, and staging.
MRI with contrast is generally preferred over CT [3][14] because:
- Better soft tissue delineation [11]
- Especially useful at skull base, craniocervical junction, brainstem [11] — precisely where posterior fossa ependymomas are located
- Multiplanar imaging (axial, sagittal, coronal)
- No ionising radiation (important in children)
- Functional sequences available (DWI, perfusion, spectroscopy)
| MRI Sequence | Ependymoma Findings | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| T1-weighted (T1W) | Isointense to slightly hypointense to grey matter | Solid tumour tissue; cystic/necrotic areas may be hypointense (fluid signal) |
| T2-weighted (T2W) / FLAIR | Heterogeneously hyperintense | Reflects mixed solid and cystic components; surrounding vasogenic oedema appears as perilesional T2 hyperintensity |
| Post-gadolinium T1W | Heterogeneous enhancement | Ependymomas characteristically show patchy, heterogeneous enhancement — different from medulloblastoma (homogeneous) and pilocytic astrocytoma (mural nodule only). Enhancement = BBB disruption |
| DWI (Diffusion-Weighted Imaging) | Variable; usually no marked restriction (cf. medulloblastoma and lymphoma which show prominent restriction) | Medulloblastoma = very high cellularity → restricted diffusion (bright on DWI). Ependymoma = moderate cellularity → usually no striking restriction. This distinction is high-yield |
| SWI / GRE (Susceptibility) | May show "blooming" artefact (haemosiderin, calcification) | Calcification (50%) and micro-haemorrhage create susceptibility artefacts |
| MR Spectroscopy (MRS) | Elevated choline (increased membrane turnover), reduced NAA (neuronal loss), possible lactate peak | Non-specific for ependymoma but helps confirm neoplastic process vs non-neoplastic |
Spinal MRI Findings (for spinal ependymoma):
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Central, well-circumscribed intramedullary lesion | Ependymoma expands the cord centrally (cf. astrocytoma which is eccentric) |
| "Haemosiderin cap" (dark rim at tumour poles on T2W/SWI) | Near-pathognomonic for spinal ependymoma; reflects chronic micro-haemorrhage at the tumour-cord interface. NOT seen in astrocytoma |
| Homogeneous enhancement (spinal ependymomas tend to enhance more uniformly than intracranial ones) | Reflects well-circumscribed, well-vascularised tumour with clear margins |
| Associated syrinx | Reactive syringomyelia above and/or below the tumour; caused by CSF flow obstruction within the central canal |
| Conus/filum terminale mass (myxopapillary) | Sausage-shaped enhancing mass at the conus; may cause scalloping of vertebral bodies |
Key MRI Differences Between Common Posterior Fossa Tumours in Children
| Feature | Ependymoma | Medulloblastoma | Pilocytic Astrocytoma |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina | Midline vermis, fills 4th ventricle | Cerebellar hemisphere |
| Enhancement | Heterogeneous | Homogeneous | Mural nodule only |
| DWI | No marked restriction | Prominent restriction (high cellularity) | No restriction |
| Calcification | ~50% (CT better for this) | ~20% | Rare |
| Cystic component | Common | Uncommon | Classic: cystic with mural nodule |
| Extension through foramina | Characteristic ("plastic" tumour) | Uncommon | No |
Functional imaging is used for pre-operative planning [11]:
- Functional MRI (fMRI): identify important cortical areas to guide surgical resection [11]
- MRI diffusion tensor imaging (DTI, tractography): identify important tracts to guide surgical resection [11]
These are critical for supratentorial ependymomas near eloquent cortex (motor strip, language areas) and for posterior fossa tumours near vital brainstem tracts, ensuring the surgeon achieves maximal safe resection while minimising neurological morbidity.
Single photon emission CT (SPECT) utilises various isotopes such as thallium-201 to detect abnormalities in BBB. Functions: (1) distinguish benign from malignant brain lesions, (2) predict histological grade of brain tumours, (3) select areas for biopsy [8][9].
SPECT is not routinely used in modern practice (largely supplanted by advanced MRI techniques and PET), but may still appear in exam questions.
Lumbar Puncture (LP) — CSF Cytology
Role: Staging — detection of leptomeningeal dissemination (CSF "drop metastases").
When to perform: AFTER neuroimaging has confirmed no obstructive hydrocephalus or significant mass effect. Never perform LP if there is a posterior fossa mass causing raised ICP — risk of coning.
| CSF Parameter | Expected Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Cytology | Positive for malignant cells in ~10% of ependymomas at diagnosis | Confirms leptomeningeal spread; upstages the disease (affects treatment: may warrant craniospinal irradiation) |
| Protein | May be elevated | Non-specific; reflects BBB disruption |
| Glucose | Usually normal (cf. bacterial/TB meningitis where it is low) | Helps exclude infectious aetiology |
| Opening pressure | May be elevated if communicating hydrocephalus component |
Timing note: CSF cytology is ideally obtained pre-operatively (if LP is safe) or ≥ 14 days post-operatively (to avoid false positives from surgical contamination of CSF with tumour cells).
Measurement of tumour markers in serum and CSF should be obtained — AFP and β-HCG are measured to help differentiate germ cell tumours from other intracranial tumours such as PNETs, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma [8][9]. In ependymoma, AFP and β-HCG are negative — this helps exclude germ cell tumours from the differential.
There is no specific blood marker for ependymoma. However, baseline investigations are essential for:
| Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CBC, coagulation profile | Pre-operative baseline; rule out thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy before surgery |
| Renal and liver function | Pre-operative baseline; assess fitness for anaesthesia |
| Electrolytes (Na, K, Ca) | Baseline; SIADH or cerebral salt wasting may develop post-operatively; also relevant if considering chemotherapy |
| Serum AFP, β-HCG | To exclude germ cell tumours (should be normal in ependymoma) [8][9] |
| Thyroid function, cortisol | If suprasellar extension → assess for pituitary dysfunction |
| Genetic testing (NF2 gene) | If clinical suspicion of NF2 (multiple ependymomas, bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas) [5] |
Ependymoma staging determines the extent of disease, which directly influences treatment planning (local RT vs craniospinal irradiation):
| Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| MRI of entire craniospinal axis with gadolinium | Detect leptomeningeal dissemination ("drop metastases") along the spinal cord. Important to image the entire spine because 33% may have multilevel involvement [3] (this principle from metastatic spinal disease applies broadly to CNS tumour staging) |
| CSF cytology (as above) | Detect microscopic CSF dissemination |
| Post-operative MRI brain (within 24–72 hours) | Assess extent of resection (gross total resection vs subtotal resection); presence of residual tumour is the single most important prognostic factor |
Extracranial metastasis is rare in brain tumours (∵ no lymphatic drainage) → TNM staging is not useful [3]. Therefore, systemic staging (CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, bone scan) is NOT routinely required unless there is clinical suspicion of extremely rare extracranial spread.
Chang Staging System (historically used, still referenced):
| Stage | Definition |
|---|---|
| M0 | No evidence of metastasis |
| M1 | Microscopic tumour cells in CSF |
| M2 | Gross nodular seeding in cerebellar/cerebral subarachnoid space or in lateral/3rd ventricle |
| M3 | Gross nodular seeding in spinal subarachnoid space |
| M4 | Extracranial metastasis (extremely rare) |
Histological confirmation is obtained at the time of surgical exploration for resection [8][9].
Surgical exploration and biopsy — histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation of brain tumours [8][9].
How tissue is obtained:
| Method | When Used |
|---|---|
| Maximal safe surgical resection (preferred) | Maximal safe removal as 1st line in all operable gliomas [1]. This is both therapeutic (debulking, restoring CSF flow, relieving mass effect) and diagnostic (provides ample tissue for histology + molecular analysis) |
| Stereotactic biopsy | When the tumour is in an inoperable location (e.g., deeply seated, brainstem involvement) or when the diagnosis is uncertain and tissue is needed before planning definitive treatment |
| Open biopsy | Rarely needed; may be used for superficially accessible supratentorial lesions |
What the pathologist reports:
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Histological type | Ependymoma (classic), anaplastic ependymoma, myxopapillary ependymoma, subependymoma |
| WHO Grade | Grade 1 (subependymoma), Grade 2 (ependymoma/myxopapillary), Grade 3 (anaplastic) |
| Molecular markers | H3K27me3 (IHC), EZHIP, L1CAM, RELA/ZFTA fusion (FISH), YAP1 fusion, MYCN amplification |
| DNA methylation class | Gold standard molecular classification (if available) |
| Ki-67 proliferation index | Higher index = more aggressive; helps assess tumour behaviour but not formally part of WHO grading criteria |
| Margins | Assessment of completeness of resection (correlate with post-operative MRI) |
| Scenario | Investigation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Suspected NF2 | Audiometry, MRI IAMs (bilateral vestibular schwannomas), genetic testing for NF2 gene | NF2 features: meningioma, ependymoma, acoustic schwannoma [5]; multiple spinal ependymomas should prompt NF2 workup |
| Suspected FAP/Turcot syndrome | Colonoscopy, APC gene testing | FAP associated with medulloblastoma, ependymomas, high-grade astrocytomas [6] |
| Pre-operative planning for eloquent cortex | fMRI and DTI tractography [11] | Map motor, language, and visual cortex/tracts to plan safe surgical corridors |
| Suspected recurrence | Serial MRI surveillance + consideration of PET (FDG or amino acid tracers) | PET can differentiate recurrent tumour from radiation necrosis (both enhance on MRI) |
| Endocrine assessment (suprasellar or post-RT) | GH, ACTH/cortisol, TSH/fT4, LH/FSH, prolactin | Post-radiation endocrine abnormalities include: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9] |
| Ophthalmological assessment | Visual acuity, visual fields (perimetry), fundoscopy | Document papilloedema severity and any visual field loss; monitor post-treatment |
| Priority | Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate (emergency) | CT brain without contrast | Detect hydrocephalus, mass effect, haemorrhage, calcification |
| Urgent | MRI brain with gadolinium contrast | Tumour characterisation, localisation, surgical planning |
| Pre-operative staging | MRI entire spine with gadolinium | Detect leptomeningeal dissemination |
| Pre-operative staging | CSF cytology (if LP safe) | Detect microscopic CSF seeding |
| Pre-operative | Serum AFP, β-HCG | Exclude germ cell tumour |
| Pre-operative | CBC, RFT, LFT, coagulation, electrolytes | Baseline for surgery/anaesthesia |
| Pre-operative (if indicated) | fMRI and DTI tractography | Eloquent cortex mapping |
| Intra-operative | Frozen section → definitive histopathology + molecular | Tissue diagnosis (the gold standard) |
| Post-operative (24–72h) | MRI brain with contrast | Assess extent of resection (GTR vs STR) |
| Post-operative (≥14 days) | CSF cytology (if not done pre-op) | Staging for leptomeningeal spread |
| Surveillance | Serial MRI (brain ± spine) | Monitor for recurrence |
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Ependymoma
- There are no formal clinical diagnostic criteria — diagnosis is based on neuroimaging + histopathological confirmation + molecular profiling (WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis)
- Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [8][9]
- CT: first-line emergency imaging; look for calcification (~50%), hydrocephalus, mass in 4th ventricle
- MRI with contrast is preferred over CT [3][14] — better soft tissue delineation, especially at brainstem/skull base
- Key MRI features of ependymoma: heterogeneous enhancement, arises from 4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina ("plastic"), calcification; in spine: central, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap
- DWI distinction: Ependymoma = no marked diffusion restriction; Medulloblastoma = prominent restriction (high cellularity); Primary CNS lymphoma = prominent restriction
- Staging: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology. Extracranial staging is NOT routine (no lymphatic drainage → TNM staging not useful)
- Functional MRI and DTI tractography are used for pre-operative planning [11]
- Molecular markers: H3K27me3 loss (PFA), L1CAM/RELA fusion (supratentorial), MYCN amplification (spinal aggressive), DNA methylation profiling (gold standard)
- AFP/β-HCG should be normal — if elevated, think germ cell tumour instead
Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations for Ependymoma
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [11] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.162) [15] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p.39, 50)
Management of Ependymoma
Before diving into the specifics, it is essential to understand the three foundational principles that govern ependymoma management:
-
Maximal safe surgical resection is the 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — this is the single most important determinant of outcome. The extent of resection (gross total resection [GTR] vs subtotal resection [STR]) is the strongest independent prognostic factor.
-
External radiotherapy (RT) is used as 2nd line if not fully operable, or as adjuvant after surgery [1] — RT improves local control, especially when GTR cannot be achieved.
-
Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1] — This is a critical, repeatedly examined point. Ependymomas are slow-growing tumours with a low proliferative index, making them inherently resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy (which targets rapidly dividing cells). This distinguishes ependymoma management fundamentally from medulloblastoma, where chemotherapy is a cornerstone.
Why Is Chemotherapy Ineffective in Ependymoma?
Chemotherapy works by exploiting the rapid cell division of malignant cells — agents like vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide damage DNA or disrupt mitosis, preferentially killing cells in S-phase or M-phase. Ependymoma is slow-growing and hence not chemo-responsive [1]. The proportion of cells actively dividing (the "growth fraction") is low, so chemotherapy has limited targets. This is fundamentally different from medulloblastoma (a highly cellular embryonal tumour with a high growth fraction), where chemotherapy is effective.
The exception: chemotherapy may be used as a temporizing measure in very young children (< 3 years) to delay radiotherapy — not because it is effective against the tumour per se, but to spare the developing brain from the devastating neurocognitive effects of cranial irradiation. Even in this setting, chemotherapy is not expected to cure the disease.
Treatment Modalities
A. Emergency / Supportive Management
These measures address the immediate life-threatening complications of ependymoma (raised ICP, hydrocephalus) before definitive tumour-directed therapy.
Use: PO (or IV if severe) dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H or 8mg BD [16]
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Drug | Dexamethasone (dexa = "powerful," from Greek dexios = right/strong) |
| Mechanism | Reduces vasogenic oedema around the tumour by stabilising the blood-brain barrier (BBB), decreasing capillary permeability, and inhibiting inflammatory mediators. This reduces the mass effect contribution from oedema (the tumour itself does not shrink, but the surrounding swelling does) |
| Dose | 10mg IV/PO loading dose, then 4mg Q4–6H (or 8mg BD) [16] |
| Onset | Clinical improvement within 12–24 hours; maximal effect over 48–72 hours |
| Why dexamethasone specifically? | It has minimal mineralocorticoid activity (unlike prednisolone), so it does not cause significant sodium/water retention — important when the brain is already oedematous |
| Contraindication | Suspect CNS lymphoma → steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]. Always biopsy before steroids if lymphoma is in the differential |
| Side effects | Peptic ulcer (need PPI prophylaxis), immunosuppression, hyperglycaemia/diabetes, proximal myopathy, Cushingoid features, insomnia, psychosis |
Because posterior fossa ependymomas frequently cause obstructive hydrocephalus by blocking CSF outflow from the 4th ventricle, emergent CSF diversion may be life-saving.
| Procedure | Mechanism | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| External ventricular drain (EVD) | Burr hole through skull → catheter placed into lateral ventricle → CSF drained externally to a closed collection system. Allows ICP monitoring and controlled drainage | Acute symptomatic hydrocephalus; temporizing measure before definitive surgery |
| Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) | Puncturing the floor of the 3rd ventricle → drainage of hydrocephalus [1] — creates an internal bypass for CSF to flow directly from the 3rd ventricle into the prepontine cistern (basal cisterns), circumventing the obstructed aqueduct/4th ventricle | Preferred when a longer-term diversion is needed before tumour surgery; avoids shunt dependence |
| Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt | Catheter from lateral ventricle tunnelled subcutaneously to peritoneal cavity for permanent CSF diversion | If hydrocephalus persists after tumour resection (~20–40% of posterior fossa tumour patients); generally avoided pre-operatively because of the risk of upward herniation and theoretical risk of peritoneal tumour seeding |
CSF shunting is used for hydrocephalus in posterior fossa lesions, leptomeningeal meningitis, and CSF metastases [16].
Anticonvulsants are used for treatment or secondary prophylaxis of seizures, usually levetiracetam (Keppra) [16]
| Indication | Detail |
|---|---|
| Treatment of seizures | Supratentorial ependymomas may present with seizures due to cortical irritation |
| Secondary prophylaxis | After a first seizure, anticonvulsants prevent recurrence |
| NOT for infratentorial lesions | Usually not for primary prophylaxis [16]. The cerebellar cortex is inhibitory in nature, so infratentorial tumours (including most ependymomas) do not typically cause seizures. Prophylactic anticonvulsants are not recommended for posterior fossa tumours |
| Preferred agent | Levetiracetam — does not interact with dexamethasone or chemotherapy agents (unlike older agents like phenytoin/carbamazepine which induce CYP450 and reduce steroid/chemo levels) |
B. Surgery (The Cornerstone of Treatment)
Surgical resection — maximal removal within safety limit. Aim: cytoreduction (↓ tumour mass) + functional preservation. The concept of 'resection margin' does not apply in neurosurgery [16].
This last point is crucial: unlike extracranial surgery (e.g., breast cancer lumpectomy where you aim for negative margins), brain surgery cannot sacrifice normal brain tissue to achieve wide margins. The surgeon removes as much tumour as safely possible while preserving neurological function.
Why is GTR so important in ependymoma?
- Studies consistently show that gross total resection (GTR) is the single most powerful predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)
- Patients with GTR have 5-year PFS ~50–75%, compared with ~20–40% for STR
- This is because ependymomas are chemo-resistant, so you cannot "mop up" residual disease with chemotherapy the way you can with medulloblastoma
- Radiation can improve local control after STR but is less effective than if the tumour is completely removed first
| Approach | Indication | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Craniotomy | Most posterior fossa and supratentorial ependymomas | Flap of bone cut and reflected [16] to expose the tumour. For posterior fossa lesions, a suboccipital/midline posterior fossa craniotomy is performed, often with the patient in prone or sitting position |
| Burr hole | Often for biopsy [16] | Used for stereotactic biopsy when resection is not feasible |
| Craniectomy | When bone cannot be replaced (e.g., decompressive) | Burr hole + removal of surrounding bone [16] |
| Laminectomy / laminoplasty | Spinal ependymoma | Posterior approach to access the spinal cord; the dura is opened, and the tumour is dissected from the cord under microscopic guidance |
Image-guided surgery [16]:
- Frameless stereotaxy: small skull markers allowing intraoperative localisation of handheld probe in relation to skull, tumour (localised in pre-op imaging) ± important structures (by fMRI or tractography) → guidance of resection [16]
Functional monitoring [16]:
- Evoked potentials: detection of cortical electrical response to sensory stimuli or peripheral motor response to cortical electrical stimuli [16] — critical during posterior fossa surgery to monitor brainstem function (brainstem auditory evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials) and during spinal cord surgery (motor evoked potentials)
- Awake craniotomy: intraoperative electrical stimulation of cortex → observe speech response to map speech cortex → guide resection to avoid affecting speech [16] — relevant for supratentorial ependymomas near language areas
5-ALA-guided resection [16]:
- 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) accumulated in tumour cells → intraoperative UV light application → tumour shows different colour [16] — helps distinguish tumour from normal brain, improving extent of resection (more commonly used in high-grade gliomas like GBM, but increasingly applied to other brain tumours)
| Location | Surgical Challenge | Specific Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior fossa (4th ventricle) | Tumour adherent to brainstem floor (dorsal pons/medulla) | The surgeon must balance maximal removal against risk of brainstem injury. GTR achievable in ~50–70%; if tumour is inseparable from brainstem, leave a thin rind of tumour ("near-total resection") rather than cause devastating brainstem damage |
| CPA extension (through foramen of Luschka) | Involvement of lower cranial nerves (CN VII–XII), vertebral artery | Risk of postoperative lower CN palsies (dysphagia, aspiration, vocal cord palsy) |
| Supratentorial | Near eloquent cortex | Use fMRI, DTI, awake craniotomy, neuronavigation to preserve function |
| Spinal intramedullary | Cord manipulation | Ependymomas have a well-defined cleavage plane from normal cord → GTR achievable in ~80–90%. Use intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (MEP/SSEP). Astrocytomas lack this cleavage plane → GTR less likely |
| Myxopapillary (conus/filum) | Nerve root involvement | En bloc resection preferred to avoid CSF seeding from piecemeal removal; if filum-based, may be resectable without cord sacrifice |
| Complication | Mechanism / Detail |
|---|---|
| Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) | Postoperative complication caused by injury to cerebellar vermis or dentate nuclei during resection of tumours in midline cerebellum. Appears 1–2 days after surgery and resolves within weeks to months. Characterised by impaired language production with emotional lability [8][9]. Incidence: ~25% of posterior fossa tumour resections in children |
| CSF leak / pseudomeningocoele | Breach in dural closure → CSF leaks through wound or subcutaneously |
| Wound infection / meningitis | Post-craniotomy infection |
| Hydrocephalus | ~20–40% require permanent CSF diversion (VP shunt) post-resection, either from pre-existing damage to CSF pathways or from post-operative scarring |
| Cranial nerve palsies | Especially CN VI, VII, IX, X after posterior fossa surgery → diplopia, facial weakness, swallowing difficulty, aspiration risk |
| Haemorrhage | Post-operative haematoma at surgical site → may require re-operation |
| Neurological deficits | New ataxia, hemiparesis, sensory loss depending on surgical manipulation |
C. Radiation Therapy (RT)
RT is the primary adjuvant therapy after surgery for ependymoma. It works by causing DNA double-strand breaks in tumour cells through ionising radiation, leading to cell death (particularly in cells attempting to divide — but even slow-growing ependymoma cells must eventually divide, and damaged DNA accumulates with each attempted division).
External RT: as 2nd line if not operable [1] — meaning RT is used when surgery cannot achieve complete resection, or as adjuvant treatment after surgery.
| Clinical Scenario | RT Recommendation |
|---|---|
| After GTR of intracranial ependymoma (WHO Grade 2 or 3) | Adjuvant focal/conformal RT to the tumour bed is standard for most intracranial ependymomas, particularly WHO Grade 3 and PFA subtype |
| After STR | RT is strongly recommended — local recurrence rates without RT after STR are very high (~70–80%). Consider second-look surgery to convert STR to GTR before RT if feasible |
| Inoperable tumour | RT as primary treatment (after biopsy for tissue diagnosis) |
| Leptomeningeal dissemination (M+ disease) | Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with a boost to the primary tumour bed and any macroscopic spinal deposits |
| Spinal ependymoma | Adjuvant focal RT recommended after STR. After GTR of spinal ependymoma, the role of RT is debated — observation may be appropriate for WHO Grade 2 with clear margins (since spinal ependymomas have a well-defined cleavage plane and GTR is often curative) |
| Myxopapillary ependymoma | Adjuvant local RT is generally recommended even after GTR because of high late recurrence rates |
| Technique | Description | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| Conformal focal RT | Shaped radiation beams targeting the tumour bed ± residual tumour with a margin, while minimising exposure to surrounding normal brain. Standard dose: 54–59.4 Gy in 30–33 fractions | Standard adjuvant for intracranial ependymoma |
| Intensity-Modulated RT (IMRT) | Advanced conformal technique that modulates beam intensity across the field to further spare normal tissue | Increasingly used; particularly useful for complex-shaped tumour beds near critical structures |
| Proton beam therapy | Uses protons instead of photons; protons deposit energy at a defined depth (Bragg peak) with minimal exit dose → superior dose conformality → reduced dose to normal brain | Particularly advantageous in children (reduces late cognitive effects and secondary malignancy risk); not widely available (not currently available in Hong Kong; patients may be referred overseas) |
| Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) | High-dose, precisely targeted single-fraction or hypofractionated RT (e.g., Gamma Knife, CyberKnife, LINAC-based) | May be used for small-volume recurrence or residual disease; NOT standard for primary adjuvant treatment of ependymoma |
| Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) | Radiation to the entire brain and spinal cord | Reserved for M+ disease (leptomeningeal dissemination). Craniospinal radiation is avoided or delayed in children due to severe toxicity to the rapidly developing CNS such as neurocognitive impairment [8][9] |
| Timing | Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Acute (during/immediately after RT) | Fatigue, nausea, scalp erythema, temporary hair loss | Direct radiation effects on rapidly dividing cells (skin, GI mucosa) |
| Subacute (1–6 months) | Somnolence syndrome (children: excessive sleepiness, irritability, anorexia 4–8 weeks post-RT) | Transient demyelination of white matter |
| Late (months to years) | Ototoxicity [8][9] | Cochlear damage from radiation to posterior fossa |
| Short stature (↓GH) [8][9] | Radiation damage to hypothalamic-pituitary axis | |
| Endocrine abnormalities: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9] | Radiation-induced hypopituitarism | |
| Neurocognitive impairment [8][9] | White matter damage, particularly devastating in young children (< 3 years) — hence the drive to delay/avoid cranial RT in infants | |
| Cerebrovascular abnormalities (stroke, intracranial haemorrhage) [8][9] | Radiation-induced vasculopathy (endothelial damage → stenosis, moyamoya-like changes) | |
| Secondary malignancy | Radiation-induced second tumour (meningioma, glioma) — typically occurs > 10 years post-RT; risk increases with higher dose and younger age at treatment | |
| Radiation necrosis | Focal brain necrosis at treated site; can mimic tumour recurrence on MRI (both enhance); PET or advanced MRI techniques help distinguish |
Why Delay RT in Very Young Children?
The developing brain in children < 3 years is exquisitely sensitive to radiation damage. Myelination, synaptogenesis, and cortical organisation are still actively occurring. Cranial irradiation at this age causes devastating, irreversible neurocognitive impairment (↓IQ, learning disabilities, behavioural problems). Therefore, in infants, the strategy is to use maximal surgical resection, with chemotherapy as a temporizing bridge to delay RT until the child is older (ideally ≥ 3 years). However, remember: chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — it is used solely to buy time, not as curative therapy.
Current Role in Ependymoma
Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma! [1]
This cannot be overemphasised. Unlike medulloblastoma (where chemotherapy is integral to treatment), ependymoma is fundamentally a surgically and radiotherapeutically managed disease.
| Scenario | Role of Chemotherapy | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Standard adjuvant therapy | None | Ependymoma is slow-growing → low growth fraction → poor chemo-responsiveness |
| Very young children (< 3 years) | Temporizing to delay radiotherapy | Multiple regimens used (e.g., carboplatin/vincristine, cyclophosphamide-based protocols) — response rates are low (~20–30%) but may buy 1–2 years before RT is needed |
| Recurrent disease (after surgery + RT) | Limited role; last resort | May achieve transient stabilisation in some patients; no standard regimen with proven survival benefit. Agents: temozolomide, bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), lapatinib, platinum-based regimens |
| Clinical trials | Experimental | Targeted therapies and immunotherapies under investigation (e.g., EZH2 inhibitors for PFA, immune checkpoint inhibitors) |
Ependymoma vs Medulloblastoma — Chemotherapy Comparison
Students often confuse the role of chemotherapy in these two posterior fossa tumours:
- Medulloblastoma: Chemotherapy is used as an adjunct to surgery and radiotherapy [8][9] — it decreases incidence of recurrence, minimises craniospinal radiation exposure, delays or avoids irradiation to the developing brain and spinal cord, and treats high-risk disease [8][9]. Example regimen: Vincristine / Cisplatin / Cyclophosphamide [8][9].
- Ependymoma: Chemotherapy alone has NO role [1]. Surgery + RT is the standard.
Do NOT prescribe adjuvant chemotherapy for ependymoma as you would for medulloblastoma.
Ependymomas recur in ~30–50% of cases, most commonly locally at the primary tumour site. Recurrence management follows a hierarchical approach:
| Priority | Strategy | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | Re-resection | If the recurrence is resectable, re-operation with maximal safe resection offers the best chance of disease control. Many patients undergo 2, 3, or even more resections over their disease course |
| 2nd | Re-irradiation | If the patient has not received prior RT, or if re-irradiation is technically feasible (e.g., using SRS for a small focal recurrence), this can provide local control. Must balance cumulative dose to normal brain |
| 3rd | Clinical trials | Novel therapies including targeted agents (e.g., EZH2 inhibitors for PFA, VEGF inhibitors) and immunotherapy |
| 4th | Palliative chemotherapy | Last resort; limited efficacy |
| Supportive | Palliative care | For patients with refractory, progressive disease — symptom management, quality of life, family support |
Because ependymoma can recur years or even decades after initial treatment, long-term surveillance is mandatory:
| Timepoint | Investigation | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| First 3 years | MRI brain ± spine with gadolinium | Every 3–4 months |
| Years 3–5 | MRI brain ± spine | Every 6 months |
| Beyond 5 years | MRI brain ± spine | Annually, continuing indefinitely |
| Endocrine screening | GH, thyroid, cortisol, gonadal axes | Annually (especially if cranial/craniospinal RT received) — ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%) [8][9] |
| Audiometry | Hearing assessment | Annually if posterior fossa RT (ototoxicity [8][9]) |
| Neurocognitive assessment | Neuropsychological testing | Periodically in children post-RT to detect learning difficulties early |
| Ophthalmology | Visual acuity, visual fields | As needed; monitor for late radiation-related visual changes |
G. Special Populations
| Principle | Approach |
|---|---|
| Surgery | GTR remains the priority |
| RT | Delayed as long as possible (ideally until ≥ 3 years old) to protect the developing brain |
| Chemotherapy | Used as a bridge to delay RT; not curative |
| Second-look surgery | If STR at initial operation, consider re-resection after chemotherapy to convert to GTR |
| Principle | Approach |
|---|---|
| Screening | Regular spinal MRI surveillance in known NF2 patients |
| Surgery | For symptomatic or growing lesions; multiple lesions may require staged surgeries |
| Genetic counselling | For patients and family members |
| Principle | Approach |
|---|---|
| Surgery | En bloc resection preferred (piecemeal resection increases recurrence and CSF seeding risk) |
| RT | Adjuvant focal RT recommended even after apparent GTR (high late recurrence rate; upgraded to WHO Grade 2 in WHO CNS5) |
| Scenario | Surgery | RT | Chemotherapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posterior fossa, child, operable | GTR (1st line) | Adjuvant focal RT (standard for Grade 2–3, PFA) | None |
| Posterior fossa, child, inoperable | Biopsy only | External RT as primary treatment [1] | None (or temporizing in infants) |
| Posterior fossa, infant < 3y | GTR (1st line) | Delay until ≥ 3y | Bridge therapy to delay RT |
| Supratentorial, operable | GTR (1st line) | Adjuvant focal RT (esp. Grade 3, RELA+) | None |
| Spinal, adult, operable | GTR (1st line) | Post-STR; debated after GTR of Grade 2 | None |
| Myxopapillary, conus/filum | En bloc GTR | Adjuvant focal RT (even after GTR) | None |
| M+ disease (CSF dissemination) | GTR of primary | CSI + boost to tumour bed | None |
| Recurrence | Re-resection if feasible | Re-irradiation if feasible | Last resort / clinical trial |
High Yield Summary — Management of Ependymoma
- Maximal safe surgical resection is 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — GTR is the strongest prognostic factor
- External RT as 2nd line if not operable [1] — adjuvant focal RT is standard for most intracranial ependymomas post-surgery
- Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — fundamentally different from medulloblastoma
- Emergency management: Dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H [16] for peritumoral oedema; EVD/ETV for acute hydrocephalus
- Do NOT give steroids if CNS lymphoma is in the differential — steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]
- Anticonvulsants (levetiracetam) for seizures — NOT for infratentorial lesions, usually not for primary prophylaxis [16]
- Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) is a recognised post-operative complication [8][9]
- Late effects of RT: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
- Delay RT in infants < 3 years to protect the developing brain; use chemotherapy as a temporising bridge
- Long-term surveillance with serial MRI is mandatory — ependymoma can recur years to decades later
Active Recall - Management of Ependymoma
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 165, 170) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p.170) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p.181) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.163)
Complications of Ependymoma
Complications of ependymoma can be organised into three major categories:
- Complications of the disease itself (the tumour and its effects)
- Complications of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy)
- Long-term sequelae (particularly relevant because many patients are children who survive for decades)
This framework makes clinical sense because you need to understand what the tumour does to the patient, what your treatments do to the patient, and what happens in the years that follow. Each complication is explained from its pathophysiological basis.
A. Complications of the Disease Itself
These are complications arising from the biological behaviour of the ependymoma — its location, growth, and potential for dissemination.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Ependymoma is derived from ependymal lining of the ventricular system. Location = posterior cranial fossa (70%). Increased ICP due to obstructive hydrocephalus when tumour extends into ventricles [8][9]. The tumour within the 4th ventricle physically blocks CSF outflow through the foramina of Luschka and Magendie → CSF accumulates proximal to the block (lateral and 3rd ventricles dilate) → raised ICP |
| Clinical consequence | Headache (worse in morning), vomiting, papilloedema, decreased consciousness. In infants: macrocephaly, bulging fontanelle, sun-setting eyes. If untreated → brain herniation → death |
| Why this is so common in ependymoma | The 4th ventricle is a narrow CSF bottleneck — even a small tumour can obstruct flow. This is why posterior fossa ependymoma commonly presents with hydrocephalus as the first manifestation, even when the tumour itself is relatively small |
| Management | Emergency CSF diversion (EVD, ETV) followed by definitive tumour resection. ~20–40% of patients require a permanent VP shunt even after tumour removal |
Herniation is the ultimate, life-threatening consequence of unchecked raised ICP. The brain is enclosed in a rigid skull (Monro-Kellie doctrine), so when one compartment expands, brain tissue is pushed through anatomical openings:
| Type | Mechanism | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Tonsillar herniation (most feared in posterior fossa tumours) | Cerebellar tonsils pushed downward through the foramen magnum → compresses the medulla | Cushing's triad: hypertension, bradycardia, respiratory depression [16] → cardiorespiratory arrest and death. Also: neck stiffness, opisthotonus |
| Upward (transtentorial) herniation | Posterior fossa pressure pushes cerebellum upward through the tentorial notch | Compression of midbrain → bilateral pupil dilation, decerebrate posturing, rapid deterioration |
| Uncal herniation (more relevant in supratentorial tumours) | Temporal lobe uncus herniates through tentorial notch | Ipsilateral CN III palsy (fixed dilated pupil), contralateral hemiplegia, then bilateral signs and coma |
Critical Safety Point
Lumbar puncture is absolutely contraindicated in a patient with a posterior fossa mass and raised ICP. Removing CSF from the lumbar cistern creates a downward pressure gradient → accelerates tonsillar herniation → death. This is why neuroimaging (CT) must be performed before any LP in a patient with symptoms of raised ICP.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Tumour cells shed from the primary ependymoma into the CSF → circulate through the subarachnoid space → seed ("drop") along the craniospinal axis (brain surface, spinal cord surface, cauda equina) |
| Incidence | Around 10% of tumours will have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] at diagnosis. Higher in anaplastic (Grade 3) ependymomas and PFA molecular subtype |
| Clinical consequence | Multiple cranial nerve palsies (from basal meningeal deposits), radiculopathies, myelopathy, cauda equina syndrome, communicating hydrocephalus (tumour cells blocking arachnoid granulations → impaired CSF absorption) |
| Why extracranial metastasis is rare | Brain tumours, including ependymoma, very rarely metastasise outside the CNS because the brain lacks a conventional lymphatic drainage system. The blood-brain barrier further limits haematogenous spread. This is why TNM staging is not useful for brain tumours [3] |
| Site | Structures Damaged | Resulting Deficit |
|---|---|---|
| 4th ventricle floor (brainstem) | Cranial nerve nuclei (VI, VII, IX, X, XII), respiratory centre, reticular formation | Cranial nerve palsies, respiratory compromise, decreased consciousness |
| Cerebellum | Vermis (axial balance), hemispheres (limb coordination), deep nuclei | Ataxia, nystagmus, dysarthria, hypotonia |
| Spinal cord (intramedullary) | Anterior horn cells, corticospinal tracts, spinothalamic tracts, autonomic pathways | Central cord syndrome, weakness, sensory loss, sphincter dysfunction |
| Cerebral cortex (supratentorial) | Motor cortex, sensory cortex, language areas, visual cortex | Hemiparesis, sensory loss, aphasia, hemianopia, seizures |
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Supratentorial ependymomas irritate the cerebral cortex → abnormal synchronised neuronal firing → focal seizures ± secondary generalisation |
| Frequency | Epilepsy affects 50–80% of primary brain tumours and 10–20% of secondary tumours [16]. Specifically for ependymoma, seizures are mainly seen in supratentorial tumours |
| Important note | Seizures are always supratentorial (infratentorial, i.e. cerebellar cortex, is inhibitory in nature) [16]. Therefore, posterior fossa ependymomas do NOT cause seizures — if a child with a posterior fossa ependymoma has seizures, think about supratentorial dissemination or another cause |
B. Complications of Treatment
1. Surgical Complications
Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): postoperative complication caused by injury to cerebellar vermis or dentate nuclei during resection of tumours in midline cerebellum. Appears 1–2 days after surgery and resolves within weeks to months. Characterised by impaired language production with emotional lability [8][9].
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Pathophysiology | The dentate nuclei and superior cerebellar peduncles form the dentato-thalamo-cortical pathway — a critical circuit linking the cerebellum to the frontal lobe speech/language areas. Surgical disruption of this pathway (direct injury, retraction, oedema, vascular compromise) results in mutism. The cerebellar vermis also has extensive connections to the limbic system → emotional dysregulation |
| Incidence | ~25% of children undergoing posterior fossa tumour resection (higher with midline vermian tumours — more common in medulloblastoma than ependymoma, but ependymoma surgery can also cause this) |
| Clinical features | Initially complete mutism → then dysarthria → gradual recovery of speech (usually over weeks to months). Accompanied by emotional lability (inappropriate crying or laughing), behavioural regression, and sometimes axial hypotonia |
| Prognosis | Most children recover speech, but many have residual dysarthria, word-finding difficulty, or reduced verbal fluency long-term |
| Nerve | Mechanism | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| CN VI (abducens) | Surgical manipulation or post-operative oedema at the pons | Horizontal diplopia, esotropia |
| CN VII (facial) | Damage during dissection at 4th ventricle floor or CPA | LMN facial weakness → incomplete eye closure, facial asymmetry; risk of corneal exposure |
| CN IX, X (glossopharyngeal, vagus) | Dissection near lower medulla/4th ventricle floor | Dysphagia, aspiration risk (vocal cord palsy, absent gag reflex) → may need temporary nasogastric feeding or tracheostomy. Aspiration pneumonia is a significant cause of postoperative morbidity |
| CN XII (hypoglossal) | Lower medullary injury | Tongue deviation, dysarthria |
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Postoperative haemorrhage | Bleeding into the surgical cavity (posterior fossa haematoma) → can rapidly become life-threatening due to re-development of mass effect and ↑ICP in the small posterior fossa |
| CSF leak / pseudomeningocoele | Incomplete dural closure → CSF leaks through wound or accumulates subcutaneously. Risk of ascending meningitis |
| Wound infection / meningitis | Bacterial contamination of surgical wound; meningitis from CSF leak |
| Persistent hydrocephalus | ~20–40% of posterior fossa tumour patients require permanent VP shunt because: (1) pre-operative hydrocephalus may have already damaged CSF absorptive capacity, (2) surgical debris/blood products in CSF impair arachnoid granulation function |
| New neurological deficits | Cerebellar ataxia (worsened or new), hemiparesis (if supratentorial), myelopathy (if spinal surgery) |
| Spinal cord injury (spinal ependymoma surgery) | Cord manipulation during intramedullary tumour removal → new motor/sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction. Mitigated by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (MEP/SSEP) |
2. Radiotherapy Complications
Radiotherapy complications are divided by timing. These are particularly significant in ependymoma because (a) many patients are young children with developing brains, and (b) patients who survive long-term are at risk for delayed complications decades later.
Craniospinal radiation is avoided or delayed in children due to severe toxicity to the rapidly developing CNS such as neurocognitive impairment [8][9]
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Fatigue | Systemic inflammatory response to radiation; CNS cytokine release |
| Nausea and vomiting | Particularly with posterior fossa RT → irritation of area postrema (vomiting centre) |
| Scalp erythema and alopecia | Radiation damage to rapidly dividing hair follicle cells and skin |
| Acute cerebral oedema | Radiation-induced BBB disruption → vasogenic oedema → ↑ICP. Managed with dexamethasone |
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Somnolence syndrome | Transient demyelination of irradiated white matter. Seen especially in children 4–8 weeks post-cranial RT. Presents with excessive sleepiness, irritability, anorexia, low-grade fever. Usually self-limiting over 2–4 weeks; managed supportively ± short course of steroids |
These are the most devastating and the reason we try to minimise/delay RT in young children:
| Complication | Mechanism | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Neurocognitive impairment [8][9] | Radiation-induced white matter damage (leukoencephalopathy) → disrupted myelin sheaths → impaired neural connectivity and processing speed | Most severe in children < 3 years at RT (peak myelination period). Manifests as: ↓IQ (progressive decline over years), learning disabilities, attention deficits, memory problems, reduced processing speed. This is the primary reason cranial RT is avoided/delayed in young children [8][9] |
| Endocrine abnormalities [8][9] | Radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis | ↓GH (94%) → short stature; ↓ACTH (43%) → secondary adrenal insufficiency; ↓TSH (10%) → secondary hypothyroidism [8][9]. Also: precocious puberty (hypothalamic damage → early GnRH activation), hypogonadism (if craniospinal RT damages gonads directly) |
| Short stature [8][9] | ↓GH from pituitary damage + direct radiation to vertebral growth plates (if craniospinal RT) → reduced spinal growth. Double mechanism | May require GH replacement therapy |
| Ototoxicity [8][9] | Radiation damage to the cochlea (sensory hair cells of the organ of Corti). Particularly relevant for posterior fossa RT where the cochlea is within the radiation field | Sensorineural hearing loss — typically high-frequency initially, may progress. Compounded if cisplatin chemotherapy also used (additive ototoxicity) |
| Cerebrovascular abnormalities (stroke, intracranial haemorrhage) [8][9] | Radiation-induced vasculopathy → endothelial damage → accelerated atherosclerosis, intimal hyperplasia, vessel wall necrosis → stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm formation. May develop moyamoya-like pattern | Increases long-term risk of ischaemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke. Onset may be years to decades after RT |
| Secondary malignancy | Radiation-induced DNA damage in normal tissues → acquisition of oncogenic mutations → development of a new primary tumour within the irradiated field | Most common: meningioma (most frequent radiation-induced brain tumour), high-grade glioma, sarcoma (in bone/soft tissue within RT field). Latency period: typically > 10 years. Risk is higher with higher dose and younger age at treatment |
| Radiation necrosis | Focal vascular endothelial damage within the irradiated tumour bed → microvascular thrombosis → ischaemic necrosis of brain tissue | Occurs months to years post-RT. Mimics tumour recurrence on MRI (both enhance with gadolinium). Differentiation: advanced MRI (perfusion, spectroscopy) or PET scan (necrosis = hypometabolic; recurrence = hypermetabolic). Management: dexamethasone, bevacizumab (anti-VEGF), or surgical resection if severe |
| Leukoencephalopathy | Diffuse white matter injury from radiation → progressive demyelination and gliosis | Contributes to neurocognitive decline; seen on MRI as confluent T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensities |
The Childhood Cancer Paradox and Long-Term Complications
Although childhood cancers are aggressive, prognosis is relatively good — 70% of children will survive, but they have a lot of long-term complications [17]. This is directly relevant to ependymoma survivors: the cure comes at a price. A child cured of ependymoma at age 6 must live with the consequences of surgery and RT for 70+ years. This is why there is enormous research focus on reducing treatment toxicity (e.g., proton therapy, avoiding unnecessary RT after GTR of favourable subtypes).
While chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1], it is sometimes used as a temporising bridge in infants to delay RT. When used, the following complications may occur:
| Agent | Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin/carboplatin | Ototoxicity (cisplatin-induced) [8][9] | Cisplatin accumulates in the cochlear hair cells → production of reactive oxygen species → hair cell apoptosis → irreversible sensorineural hearing loss (high frequency first). Additive with radiation ototoxicity |
| Cisplatin | Nephrotoxicity | Direct tubular toxicity → dose-dependent renal impairment. Requires aggressive hydration and electrolyte monitoring (hypomagnesaemia, hypokalaemia) |
| Vincristine | Peripheral neuropathy | Binds tubulin → disrupts microtubule function → axonal transport impaired → sensorimotor neuropathy (distal, symmetrical). Also: constipation (autonomic neuropathy), jaw pain |
| Cyclophosphamide | Haemorrhagic cystitis | Metabolite acrolein is toxic to bladder urothelium. Prevented by co-administration of MESNA (sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate), which binds acrolein in the urinary tract |
| All agents | Myelosuppression → neutropenic sepsis | Bone marrow suppression → neutropenia → risk of life-threatening infection. Managed with G-CSF support and empirical antibiotics if febrile |
| All agents | Nausea and vomiting | Chemotherapy triggers the chemoreceptor trigger zone (area postrema). Managed with ondansetron (5-HT3 antagonist), dexamethasone, aprepitant (NK1 antagonist) |
Recurrence is the most significant long-term disease-related complication, occurring in ~30–50% of ependymoma patients:
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Pattern | Most recurrences are local (at the primary tumour site) rather than distant. PFA subtype has the highest recurrence rate |
| Timing | Can occur at any time — from months to decades after initial treatment. Late recurrences (> 5 years) are well-documented, hence the need for lifelong surveillance |
| Management challenge | Recurrent ependymoma is harder to treat: re-operation carries higher surgical morbidity (scarring, altered anatomy), re-irradiation is limited by cumulative dose constraints, and chemotherapy remains ineffective |
| Prognosis | With each recurrence, the chance of cure diminishes. However, repeated re-resections can still achieve long-term disease control in some patients — ependymoma is one of the few brain tumours where aggressive re-resection at recurrence is advocated |
These are often underappreciated but profoundly impact patients and families:
| Complication | Mechanism / Context |
|---|---|
| Cognitive impairment | Combined effects of surgery (posterior fossa syndrome, cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome) + radiation (leukoencephalopathy) → ↓IQ, learning disabilities, executive dysfunction |
| Motor disability | Residual cerebellar ataxia (from surgery or tumour), spasticity (from spinal cord involvement), weakness |
| Endocrine dysfunction requiring lifelong replacement | GH deficiency (requiring daily GH injections during growth), hypothyroidism (levothyroxine), adrenal insufficiency (hydrocortisone) |
| Hearing loss | Combined radiation + cisplatin ototoxicity → hearing aids or cochlear implants may be needed |
| Psychosocial impact | Depression, anxiety, social isolation, educational underperformance, difficulty with employment in adulthood. Parents experience significant psychological burden (caregiver burnout, financial stress) |
| Infertility | If craniospinal RT received → hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (hypothalamic-pituitary damage) or direct gonadal damage (scatter radiation to pelvis). Fertility preservation should be discussed before treatment when appropriate |
| Category | Key Complications |
|---|---|
| Disease | Obstructive hydrocephalus, brain herniation, leptomeningeal dissemination (~10%), local neurological deficits, seizures (supratentorial only) |
| Surgery | Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) [8][9], CN palsies (aspiration risk), haemorrhage, CSF leak, persistent hydrocephalus, wound infection |
| Radiotherapy | Neurocognitive impairment, endocrine dysfunction (↓GH 94%, ↓ACTH 43%, ↓TSH 10%), ototoxicity, short stature, cerebrovascular abnormalities, secondary malignancy [8][9], radiation necrosis |
| Chemotherapy (limited use) | Ototoxicity (cisplatin) [8][9], nephrotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, haemorrhagic cystitis, myelosuppression |
| Recurrence | ~30–50%; mainly local; increasingly difficult to treat with each recurrence |
| Long-term QoL | Cognitive, motor, endocrine, hearing, psychosocial, fertility |
High Yield Summary — Complications of Ependymoma
- Most common presenting complication: Obstructive hydrocephalus from 4th ventricle obstruction → raised ICP → potential for fatal brain herniation
- Around 10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] — always stage with craniospinal MRI
- Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): appears 1–2 days post-surgery, caused by injury to cerebellar vermis/dentate nuclei, characterised by impaired language production + emotional lability, resolves over weeks–months [8][9]
- Late effects of RT are the most significant long-term complications: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
- Childhood cancer paradox: 70% of children survive but have extensive long-term complications [17] — lifelong surveillance for endocrine, cognitive, hearing, and second malignancy screening is mandatory
- Recurrence rate ~30–50%, mostly local — aggressive re-resection is still advocated
- Secondary malignancy from RT (meningioma, glioma) — latency > 10 years
- Seizures are always supratentorial [16] — do not expect seizures from posterior fossa ependymoma
Active Recall - Complications of Ependymoma
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.433) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, 170) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.1258–1264) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.530–534) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.163) [17] Lecture slides: Block C - A child with cancer: paediatric cancers.pdf (p.2)
High Yield Summary
- Definition: Primary CNS neoplasm from ependymal cells lining the ventricular system / central canal
- Epidemiology: Peak age 6y in children; 70% posterior fossa in paediatrics [1]; spinal ependymoma commonest intramedullary tumour in adults (peak 30-40y)
- Risk factors: Ionising radiation (only proven environmental factor), NF2, FAP/Turcot syndrome
- Pathophysiology: Mass effect → ↑ICP (CSF obstruction), cerebellar/brainstem compression, CSF drop metastases; extracranial metastasis is rare (no lymphatics)
- Classification: WHO CNS5 → anatomical + molecular (PFA, PFB, ZFTA-RELA, YAP1, myxopapillary, MYCN-amplified)
- Histology: Perivascular pseudorosettes (most characteristic), true ependymal rosettes (pathognomonic)
- Clinical features: Children → ↑ICP (headache worse in AM, vomiting, papilloedema) + cerebellar signs (ataxia, nystagmus) + CN palsies; Spinal → segmental pain + central cord syndrome
- Ependymoma is always considered malignant in paediatrics [1] — slow-growing (not chemo-responsive), dangerous location
- Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1]
- Management cornerstone: Maximal safe surgical resection (1st line) ± adjuvant radiation therapy
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Ependymoma
- The "Big Three" posterior fossa tumours in children: Medulloblastoma (vermis, highly chemo-sensitive, drops mets), Pilocytic astrocytoma (hemisphere, cystic + mural nodule, excellent prognosis), Ependymoma (4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina, chemo-resistant)
- Key imaging differentiators: Ependymoma = heterogeneous, calcified, "plastic" tumour extruding through foramina. Medulloblastoma = homogeneous, restricted diffusion. Pilocytic astrocytoma = cystic + enhancing mural nodule
- Spinal cord DDx: Ependymoma (central, haemosiderin cap, well-circumscribed) vs Astrocytoma (eccentric, infiltrative, ill-defined)
- Histological diagnosis by surgical biopsy is mandatory to differentiate ependymoma from other tumours [8][9] — markers alone cannot distinguish it
- Brain metastasis is the commonest intracranial tumour in adults [10] — always consider metastasis in an adult with a brain mass
- CN VI palsy in a child = false localising sign of raised ICP [13] → investigate for posterior fossa tumour
- Secondary tumours are 6–10× more common than primary brain tumours [2]
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Ependymoma
- There are no formal clinical diagnostic criteria — diagnosis is based on neuroimaging + histopathological confirmation + molecular profiling (WHO CNS5 integrated diagnosis)
- Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [8][9]
- CT: first-line emergency imaging; look for calcification (~50%), hydrocephalus, mass in 4th ventricle
- MRI with contrast is preferred over CT [3][14] — better soft tissue delineation, especially at brainstem/skull base
- Key MRI features of ependymoma: heterogeneous enhancement, arises from 4th ventricle floor, extends through foramina ("plastic"), calcification; in spine: central, well-circumscribed, haemosiderin cap
- DWI distinction: Ependymoma = no marked diffusion restriction; Medulloblastoma = prominent restriction (high cellularity); Primary CNS lymphoma = prominent restriction
- Staging: Craniospinal MRI + CSF cytology. Extracranial staging is NOT routine (no lymphatic drainage → TNM staging not useful)
- Functional MRI and DTI tractography are used for pre-operative planning [11]
- Molecular markers: H3K27me3 loss (PFA), L1CAM/RELA fusion (supratentorial), MYCN amplification (spinal aggressive), DNA methylation profiling (gold standard)
- AFP/β-HCG should be normal — if elevated, think germ cell tumour instead
High Yield Summary — Management of Ependymoma
- Maximal safe surgical resection is 1st line in all operable gliomas [1][3][16] — GTR is the strongest prognostic factor
- External RT as 2nd line if not operable [1] — adjuvant focal RT is standard for most intracranial ependymomas post-surgery
- Chemotherapy alone has NO role in ependymoma [1] — fundamentally different from medulloblastoma
- Emergency management: Dexamethasone 10mg then 4mg Q4H [16] for peritumoral oedema; EVD/ETV for acute hydrocephalus
- Do NOT give steroids if CNS lymphoma is in the differential — steroid causes acute lysis of lymphocytes → ↓ diagnostic yield on biopsy [16]
- Anticonvulsants (levetiracetam) for seizures — NOT for infratentorial lesions, usually not for primary prophylaxis [16]
- Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) is a recognised post-operative complication [8][9]
- Late effects of RT: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
- Delay RT in infants < 3 years to protect the developing brain; use chemotherapy as a temporising bridge
- Long-term surveillance with serial MRI is mandatory — ependymoma can recur years to decades later
High Yield Summary — Complications of Ependymoma
- Most common presenting complication: Obstructive hydrocephalus from 4th ventricle obstruction → raised ICP → potential for fatal brain herniation
- Around 10% of ependymomas have leptomeningeal spread [8][9] — always stage with craniospinal MRI
- Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism): appears 1–2 days post-surgery, caused by injury to cerebellar vermis/dentate nuclei, characterised by impaired language production + emotional lability, resolves over weeks–months [8][9]
- Late effects of RT are the most significant long-term complications: ↓GH (94%), ↓ACTH (43%), ↓TSH (10%), ototoxicity, neurocognitive impairment, cerebrovascular abnormalities [8][9]
- Childhood cancer paradox: 70% of children survive but have extensive long-term complications [17] — lifelong surveillance for endocrine, cognitive, hearing, and second malignancy screening is mandatory
- Recurrence rate ~30–50%, mostly local — aggressive re-resection is still advocated
- Secondary malignancy from RT (meningioma, glioma) — latency > 10 years
- Seizures are always supratentorial [16] — do not expect seizures from posterior fossa ependymoma
Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Pilocytic astrocytoma is a WHO grade I, slow-growing, well-circumscribed cerebellar tumor most common in children, often presenting as a cystic mass with an enhancing mural nodule.
Gangliocytoma
A gangliocytoma is a rare, benign (WHO grade I) central nervous system tumor composed of mature, neoplastic ganglion cells (neurons).