Spinal Cord Injuries
Damage to the spinal cord resulting in temporary or permanent loss of motor, sensory, or autonomic function below the level of injury.
Spinal Cord Injuries
A spinal cord injury (SCI) is damage to the spinal cord that results in temporary or permanent changes in its motor, sensory, and/or autonomic function below the level of the lesion. The term breaks down from Latin/Greek roots: "spinal" (from Latin spina = thorn/backbone), "cord" (the cylindrical neural structure within the vertebral canal), and "injury" (from Latin injuria = wrongful damage).
SCI can be:
- Primary injury: the immediate mechanical disruption of neural tissue at the time of trauma (contusion, laceration, compression, distraction) — this is essentially irreversible at the moment it occurs.
- Secondary injury: the cascade of ischaemia, oedema, inflammation, excitotoxicity, and apoptosis that follows the primary insult, causing delayed neurological deterioration [1]. This is the window where early intervention can make a difference.
"Acute paraplegia is an EMERGENCY" — the spinal cord is "very unforgiving," and sphincter dysfunction represents a point of no return [1].
Key Concept
The distinction between primary and secondary injury is critical: you cannot undo primary mechanical damage, but you CAN mitigate secondary injury through rapid immobilisation, haemodynamic optimisation, and timely surgical decompression.
2. Epidemiology
- Global incidence: approximately 250,000–500,000 new SCI cases per year worldwide (WHO estimate). Traumatic SCI incidence is roughly 10–80 per million population per year depending on region.
- Hong Kong: SCI incidence is approximately 20–30 per million per year. Queen Mary Hospital and Princess Margaret Hospital are the major SCI referral centres.
- Prevalence: due to improved survival, the global prevalence of SCI is rising; estimated 2–3 million people living with SCI worldwide.
- Bimodal distribution [2]:
- Young adults (15–35 years): predominantly high-energy trauma (road traffic accidents, falls from height, sports injuries, assaults) [2]
- Older adults (≥ 65 years): predominantly low-energy trauma in the setting of osteoporotic bone and pre-existing spinal stenosis (meaning a minor fall can cause cord injury in an already narrow canal) [2]
- Male:Female ratio ≈ 3–4:1 (young males are overrepresented due to high-risk behaviours and occupational hazards)
- Falls (most common overall, especially in children and the elderly) [3]
- Road traffic accidents (RTA) (most common cause of death < 40) [4][3]
- Assaults (knife/bullet injuries — these produce specific injury patterns such as Brown-Séquard syndrome) [1][5]
- Sports/recreation-related injuries (diving into shallow water, rugby, equestrian)
- In Hong Kong, falls from height (especially construction-related) and RTAs are the leading causes.
- 50% cervical [6] — this is the most mobile segment of the spine and has the least bony protection relative to the range of movement
- 15% associated with non-adjacent level injuries [6] — meaning if you find one spinal fracture, you must image the entire spine because there may be another fracture elsewhere
- 25% associated with other organ injuries [6] — polytrauma is the norm, not the exception
Polytrauma involves injuries to the spine in up to 30% of cases. Multiple spinal fractures occur in 3 to 5% — examine and XR the whole spine. [2]
Exam Pearl
A common mistake is to stop looking after finding one spinal fracture. Up to 15% of spinal injuries are non-contiguous (at a different level), and polytrauma patients may have 2–3 fractures. Always image the whole spine.
| Category | Risk Factors | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Demographic | Young males (15–35), elderly (≥ 65) | High-energy behaviour; osteoporotic/stenotic spine |
| Pre-existing spinal disease | Pre-existing spinal stenosis, cervical spondylosis, OPLL, ankylosing spondylitis | Already narrowed canal → minor trauma causes disproportionate cord injury |
| Bone quality | Osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, chronic steroid use | Vertebral body fractures occur with minimal force |
| Connective tissue disorders | Down syndrome (absent/lax transverse ligament), Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos | Ligamentous hyperlaxity → atlantoaxial instability |
| Inflammatory | Rheumatoid arthritis (atlantoaxial subluxation), ankylosing spondylitis (bamboo spine) | Weakened transverse ligament (RA); rigid ankylosed spine fractures like a long bone (AS) |
| Behavioural | Alcohol/drug intoxication, high-risk sports, occupational hazards (construction workers) | Impaired judgment, high-energy mechanisms |
| Iatrogenic | Spinal surgery, intubation in unstable C-spine | Direct mechanical injury during procedures |
4. Anatomy and Function of the Spinal Cord
Understanding the anatomy is essential because the clinical features of SCI are a direct map of which tracts and segments are damaged.
- 33 vertebrae: 7 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral (fused), 4 coccygeal (fused)
- The spinal cord ends at approximately L1-L2 (conus medullaris) in adults. Below this, the cauda equina (Latin: "horse's tail") — a bundle of nerve roots, not spinal cord — occupies the vertebral canal.
- Critical clinical implication: injuries above L1 cause spinal cord syndromes (UMN); injuries below L2 cause cauda equina syndrome (pure LMN) [7][8].
This is used for assessing stability of the lower cervical spine and thoracolumbar spine [3]:
| Column | Components |
|---|---|
| Anterior column | Anterior 2/3 of vertebral body, disc, and anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) |
| Middle column | Posterior 1/3 of vertebral body, disc, and posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) |
| Posterior column | Remaining posterior arch (pedicles, laminae, facet joints, spinous processes, interspinous and supraspinous ligaments) |
Unstable fracture if 2/3 segments are disrupted [3]. This is the key principle — if two or more columns are broken, the spine cannot hold itself together and the cord is at risk of further damage from instability.
The cross-section of the spinal cord contains:
| Structure | Location | Function | What happens if damaged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corticospinal tract (lateral) | Lateral white matter | Voluntary motor (UMN) — fibres have already crossed in the medullary pyramids | Ipsilateral UMN weakness below the lesion (spasticity, hyperreflexia, upgoing plantars) |
| Dorsal columns (gracilis & cuneatus) | Posterior white matter | Proprioception, vibration, fine touch — fibres ascend ipsilaterally, cross in medulla | Ipsilateral loss of proprioception and vibration below lesion |
| Spinothalamic tract | Anterolateral white matter | Pain and temperature — fibres cross within 1–2 segments of entering the cord | Contralateral loss of pain and temperature (the crossing happens at the level of entry, which matters for central cord syndrome) |
| Anterior horn cells | Central grey matter (ventral) | LMN cell bodies | LMN signs at the level of lesion (flaccid weakness, fasciculations, areflexia) |
| Intermediolateral cell column | Lateral grey matter (T1–L2) | Sympathetic preganglionic neurons | Autonomic dysfunction (neurogenic shock, autonomic dysreflexia) |
| Sacral parasympathetic nuclei | S2–S4 | Bladder, bowel, sexual function | Bladder/bowel/sexual dysfunction |
- Anterior spinal artery (ASA): supplies the anterior 2/3 of the cord (corticospinal tracts, spinothalamic tracts, anterior horns). This is a single vessel — a "watershed" area vulnerable to ischaemia.
- Paired posterior spinal arteries (PSA): supply the posterior 1/3 (dorsal columns).
- Segmental radicular arteries: feed into the ASA and PSA. The most important is the artery of Adamkiewicz (usually arises T9–T12 on the left) — occlusion causes devastating anterior cord syndrome.
- Venous drainage: internal vertebral venous plexus (Batson's plexus) — valveless, which is why metastases from prostate, breast, lung, kidney, and thyroid spread to the spine so readily.
Why does anterior cord syndrome spare proprioception?
Because proprioception travels in the dorsal columns, which are supplied by the posterior spinal arteries. Anterior spinal artery occlusion therefore spares them while destroying motor function and pain/temperature sensation.
| Dermatome | Landmark |
|---|---|
| C4 | Clavicle / shoulder cape |
| C6 | Thumb |
| C7 | Middle finger |
| C8 | Little finger |
| T4 | Nipple line |
| T10 | Umbilicus |
| L1 | Inguinal ligament |
| L4 | Medial leg / knee |
| L5 | Dorsum of foot / great toe |
| S1 | Lateral foot / sole |
| S2-S4 | Perianal ("saddle") area |
| Root | Key Muscle | Action |
|---|---|---|
| C5 | Biceps/deltoid | Elbow flexion |
| C6 | Wrist extensors | Wrist extension |
| C7 | Triceps | Elbow extension |
| C8 | Finger flexors (FDP to middle finger) | Finger flexion |
| T1 | Hand intrinsics (abductor digiti minimi) | Finger abduction |
| L2 | Iliopsoas | Hip flexion |
| L3 | Quadriceps | Knee extension |
| L4 | Tibialis anterior | Ankle dorsiflexion |
| L5 | Extensor hallucis longus | Great toe extension |
| S1 | Gastrocnemius/soleus | Ankle plantarflexion |
The diaphragm is innervated by the phrenic nerve (C3-C5). This is clinically critical:
- Respiratory arrest if injury above C3 (loss of control of diaphragm → cannot breathe at all) [8]
- Diaphragmatic breathing if C5 or below (loss of control of intercostal muscles, but diaphragm preserved) [8]
- Paradoxical ventilation [6]: when intercostal muscles are paralysed, diaphragmatic contraction during inspiration draws the rib cage inward instead of expanding it — the chest and abdomen move out of phase.
C3, 4, 5 keeps the diaphragm alive
This classic mnemonic reminds you that C3-5 injuries are life-threatening because they compromise diaphragmatic function. Any cervical SCI patient needs immediate airway assessment.
5. Etiology (Focus on Hong Kong)
Trauma is the commonest cause of acute paraplegia [1][7].
| Mechanism | Examples | Hong Kong Context |
|---|---|---|
| Falls | Falls from height (construction), falls at home (elderly) | Leading cause in HK — construction industry falls, elderly falls at home |
| RTA | Motor vehicle collisions, motorcycle accidents, pedestrian struck | Second most common; high-speed collisions on highways |
| Assault | Stab wounds (knife), gunshot wounds | Gang fights with chopped/stabbed wounds can cause nerve and vascular injury [5] |
| Sports | Diving into shallow water, rugby, equestrian | Diving injuries particularly cause cervical SCI |
| Iatrogenic | Surgical positioning, epidural haematoma post-spinal anaesthesia | Rare but important |
| Category | Examples | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Degenerative | Spondylotic myelopathy (MC non-traumatic), OPLL | Very common in elderly HK population; chronic canal narrowing |
| Neoplastic | Primary or secondary tumours | Metastases from paired organs: thyroid, breast, lung, kidney, prostate (spread via Batson's plexus) [7] |
| Infective | TB spine (Pott's disease), epidural abscess, spondylodiscitis, viral myelitis | TB spine is particularly relevant in HK due to higher prevalence of TB compared to Western countries |
| Inflammatory | Transverse myelitis, MS, NMO, radiation myelopathy, paraneoplastic myelopathy | MS less common in HK Chinese population vs Caucasians; NMO (Devic's) relatively more common in Asians |
| Vascular | Spinal infarct (anterior spinal artery syndrome), vascular malformations (AVM, dural AVF) | Spinal infarct may follow aortic surgery or hypoperfusion states |
| Congenital/Developmental | Spinal dysraphism, syringomyelia, hereditary spastic paraplegia, Friedreich's ataxia | Spina bifida incidence reduced by folate supplementation |
| Degenerative (neurological) | MND, spinocerebellar ataxia | Progressive, no acute presentation |
| Metabolic | Subacute combined degeneration (B12 deficiency) | Combined posterior and lateral column disease |
| Disc herniation | Prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID) | L4/5 and L5/S1 most common levels; can cause cauda equina if massive central herniation |
Common causes of paraplegia: Spinal trauma, Spinal tumours, Degenerative conditions, Infection, Spinal dysraphism [1]
6. Pathophysiology
These are the immediate mechanical forces applied to the cord at the moment of injury:
- Compression: most common — fractured vertebral body or disc material pushes into the cord. Think of a burst fracture where bone fragments retropulse into the canal.
- Contusion: cord is bruised by transient compression/impact. The cord bounces back to normal position but the internal damage is done — central haemorrhagic necrosis of grey matter with relative white matter sparing (explains central cord syndrome).
- Laceration/transection: complete or partial cutting of the cord (e.g., knife or bullet wound — produces Brown-Séquard).
- Distraction: the cord is stretched longitudinally beyond tolerance (e.g., seatbelt injuries, hangings).
- Vascular disruption: tearing of vessels supplying the cord → ischaemia.
After the primary insult, a devastating cascade unfolds over hours to weeks:
Key points:
- Ischaemia is the main driver of secondary injury — the cord's blood supply is disrupted and autoregulation fails
- Excitotoxicity: damaged neurons release excessive glutamate → overactivation of NMDA receptors → massive calcium influx → cell death
- Inflammation: neutrophils infiltrate within hours, followed by macrophages — this initially worsens damage but is also necessary for debris clearance
- Oedema: vasogenic and cytotoxic oedema expand the zone of injury cranially and caudally
- Glial scar: astrocytes form a barrier (the "glial scar") that prevents axonal regeneration — this is why spinal cord injuries are so permanent
Secondary neurological injury occurs from instability due to bony and ligamentous injuries, and haematoma → this leads to delayed neurological deterioration [1]
Why is early immobilisation so important?
Because secondary injury is worsened by ongoing mechanical instability. If a spine is unstable (2/3 columns disrupted), any movement allows further compression, distraction, and vascular disruption of the already-injured cord. This is why we immobilise first and investigate later.
Spinal shock has TWO meanings [1]:
| Meaning | Mechanism | Clinical Features | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Neurological spinal shock | Flaccid paralysis and areflexia for 1–2 weeks after injury — peripheral neurons become temporarily unresponsive to brain stimuli due to sudden loss of tonic descending excitatory input | Flaccid paralysis (NOT spastic), absent deep tendon reflexes, absent bulbocavernosus reflex | 1–2 weeks (then hyperreflexia of UMN lesion occurs later) [1] |
| 2. Neurogenic (haemodynamic) shock | Interruption of sympathetics → loss of vasomotor tone below the lesion (T1–L2 sympathetic outflow disrupted) | Vasodilatation → hypotension, bradycardia (because unopposed vagal tone), warm flushed skin (unlike hypovolaemic shock where skin is cold and clammy) | Days to weeks |
Treatment of neurogenic shock: IV fluids and vasopressors/inotropes [1]
| Feature | Spinal Shock | Neurogenic Shock |
|---|---|---|
| BP/Pulse | Hypotension, Bradycardia | Hypotension, Bradycardia |
| Bulbocavernosus reflex | Absent | Present |
| Motor | Flaccid paralysis | Normal (motor deficit is from the cord injury itself, not the shock) |
The bulbocavernosus reflex (squeeze glans penis or tug on Foley catheter → anal sphincter contraction) is the first reflex to return after spinal shock resolves. Its return signals the end of spinal shock — at that point, whatever deficits remain are likely permanent.
Don't confuse these two!
Students commonly conflate neurological spinal shock (a period of areflexia) with neurogenic shock (a cardiovascular state of hypotension + bradycardia from sympathetic disruption). They are different phenomena that can coexist. Also, don't confuse neurogenic shock with hypovolaemic shock — in neurogenic shock, the patient is warm and bradycardic; in hypovolaemic shock, the patient is cold and tachycardic.
This is a chronic complication but worth understanding the pathophysiology now [8]:
- Lesion at or above T6 disrupts descending sympathetic regulation
- A noxious stimulus below the lesion (full bladder, constipation, skin pressure) generates a massive afferent signal
- This triggers a reflex sympathetic discharge below the lesion → vasoconstriction → severe hypertension (the brain cannot send inhibitory signals down through the damaged cord)
- The brain detects the hypertension via baroreceptors → sends vagal reflex → bradycardia + vasodilation above the lesion only (because the sympathetic inhibition cannot pass through the cord lesion)
- Result: paroxysmal HTN, throbbing headache, excessive sweating and flushing above the lesion, bradycardia, anxiety [8]
7. Classification
The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale classifies the severity of SCI:
Sensory: test pinprick and touch in each dermatome Motor: test the 10 key motor functions [1][6]
| Grade | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| A | Complete | No motor, No sensory, No sacral sparing below the neurological level |
| B | Incomplete | No motor, sensory only preserved below the level (including sacral segments S4-S5) |
| C | Incomplete | Motor function preserved below level, but > 50% of key muscles below the level have a muscle grade < 3 (cannot raise arms or legs off bed) |
| D | Incomplete | Motor function preserved below level, and ≥ 50% of key muscles below the level have a muscle grade ≥ 3 (can raise arms or legs off bed) |
| E | Normal | Motor and sensory function are normal |
Sacral Sparing — The Key Distinction
The difference between ASIA A (complete) and ASIA B (incomplete) is sacral sparing — if the patient has any sensation at S4-S5 (perianal area) or voluntary anal contraction, the injury is INCOMPLETE. This matters enormously for prognosis because incomplete injuries have far better recovery potential.
Complete injury — prognosis is generally poor. Incomplete injury — prognosis highly variable. [1]
| Level | Term | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| C1–C4 | High cervical tetraplegia | Respiratory failure (C3-5 → phrenic nerve), ventilator-dependent |
| C5–C8 | Low cervical tetraplegia | Upper and lower limb involvement, variable hand function |
| T1–T12 | Paraplegia | Lower limbs affected, upper limbs spared; above T6 → risk of autonomic dysreflexia |
| L1–L2 | Conus medullaris | Mixed UMN + LMN signs, early bladder/bowel involvement |
| Below L2 | Cauda equina | Pure LMN, saddle anaesthesia, bladder/bowel dysfunction |
7.3 By Spinal Cord Syndrome — Clinical Patterns
- Features: Loss of all sensory modality below lesion; LMN loss at level, UMN loss below level; Spastic bladder (or DSD)
- Causes: Trauma, transverse myelitis, acute compression; Benign tumours, spondylosis
- Pathophysiology: complete disruption of all ascending and descending tracts
- Features: Loss of pain and temperature below; UMN loss below with spastic bladder
- Causes: SC infarct, prolapsed disc; Radiation myelopathy, HTLV-1
- Pathophysiology: anterior spinal artery occlusion → infarction of the anterior 2/3 of the cord (corticospinal tracts + spinothalamic tracts + anterior horns). Dorsal columns are spared because they are supplied by posterior spinal arteries.
- Features: Loss of proprioception and vibration below; Variable weakness and bladder dysfunction
- Causes: Epidural metastasis; Spondylosis, MS, subacute combined degeneration, Friedreich's ataxia
- Pathophysiology: damage to dorsal columns. Motor function relatively preserved because corticospinal tracts are lateral.
- Features: Ipsilateral weakness + loss of proprioception; Contralateral loss of pain and temperature
- Causes: Knife or bullet injury; Tumour, spondylosis, MS, radiation necrosis
- Pathophysiology: hemisection of the cord. Motor tracts (corticospinal) and dorsal columns have already crossed above (or don't cross until the brainstem), so damage is ipsilateral. Spinothalamic tracts cross within 1–2 segments of entry, so the contralateral pain/temperature loss is from fibres that have already crossed from the opposite side.
- Best prognosis of all incomplete syndromes (because at least half the cord is intact)
- Features: Segmental suspended spinothalamic loss; Segmental ± UL > LL long-tract weakness; ± "cape-like" loss of pain and temperature
- Causes: Spinal stroke, traumatic contusion, transverse myelitis; Syringomyelia, intramedullary tumour
- Pathophysiology: the central cord is damaged first. The spinothalamic fibres cross centrally (in the anterior white commissure) → suspended (segmental) pain/temperature loss at the level of the lesion. The corticospinal tract is arranged somatotopically with cervical fibres medially and sacral fibres laterally (lamination) → central damage preferentially affects upper limb motor fibres → UL weakness > LL weakness. In syringomyelia, the expanding syrinx gradually destroys crossing spinothalamic fibres → "cape-like" dissociated sensory loss.
- Most common incomplete SCI in the elderly — typically from hyperextension injury in a patient with pre-existing cervical spondylosis.
- Features: Mixed LMN + UMN signs + saddle anaesthesia; Paralytic bladder and bowel incontinence
- Causes: Prolapsed IVD, trauma; Tumours
- Pathophysiology: the conus (L1-L2 level) contains the sacral parasympathetic outflow (S2-4) and the terminal portion of the cord where UMN and LMN overlap → mixed picture. Early bladder/bowel involvement because the sacral micturition centre is located here.
- Features: Pure LMN signs + saddle anaesthesia; Paralytic bladder and bowel incontinence
- Causes: Prolapsed IVD (L4/5, L5/S1); Tumours, spinal stenosis
- Pathophysiology: below L2, there is no spinal cord — only nerve roots (cauda equina). Compression produces purely peripheral nerve damage (LMN). Compression of cauda equina (below L2) [7].
- Key difference from conus: no UMN signs; pain is more prominent and radicular; bladder involvement may present later but is often irreversible once established.
Conus vs Cauda Equina
| Feature | Conus Medullaris | Cauda Equina |
|---|---|---|
| Motor | Mixed UMN + LMN | Pure LMN |
| Pain | Less prominent, bilateral | Prominent, often unilateral/radicular |
| Bladder/bowel | Early, severe | Late, but irreversible |
| Sensory | Saddle, bilateral, symmetric | Saddle, may be asymmetric |
| Reflexes | Variable (UMN and LMN mixed) | Absent (LMN) |
7.4 AO Classification of Cervical Spine Fractures [3]
| Region | Injury Type |
|---|---|
| Type 1: Occipital condyle, cranio-cervical junction | Type A: Bony injury only |
| Type 2: C1 ring, C1/2 joint | Type B: Tension band injuries |
| Type 3: C2 and C2/3 joint | Type C: Translation injuries |
| Injury Type |
|---|
| Type A: Compression injuries |
| Type B: Distraction injuries |
| Type C: Translation injuries |
| Type F: Facet joint injuries |
- Stable injury: ligaments not damaged [6]
- Unstable injury: ligaments disrupted [6]
- Mechanism of injury helps determine degree of stability [6]
Clinical signs of instability:
- "Step over spinous processes" for any tenderness, swelling or gap between spinous processes [6] — a gap indicates rupture of the interspinous ligament (i.e., unstable injury)
8. Clinical Features
8.1 Symptoms
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Weakness/paralysis of limbs below the lesion | Disruption of descending corticospinal tracts → loss of voluntary motor commands to anterior horn cells below the level |
| Tetraplegia (all four limbs) | Cervical cord injury → both upper and lower limb corticospinal tracts interrupted |
| Paraplegia (lower limbs only) | Thoracic or lumbar cord injury → lower limb corticospinal tracts interrupted, upper limbs spared |
| Clumsiness/loss of fine motor control | Damage to corticospinal tract (which carries fine, fractionated finger movements) and/or dorsal columns (loss of proprioceptive feedback) |
| Upper limb > lower limb weakness (central cord) | Central cord syndrome — somatotopic arrangement of corticospinal tract with cervical fibres medially → damaged first by central lesion |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Numbness/anaesthesia below a sensory level | Disruption of ascending sensory tracts (spinothalamic and/or dorsal columns) |
| Paraesthesia (tingling/pins and needles) | Partial damage to sensory tracts → aberrant signal transmission |
| Saddle anaesthesia | Damage to S2-S4 nerve roots or conus → loss of sensation in perineum, inner thighs, and perianal area |
| Band-like sensation at the level of injury | Segmental irritation of dorsal root at the level of the lesion |
| Dissociated sensory loss | Selective tract damage: anterior cord → lose pain/temperature but keep proprioception; dorsal cord → lose proprioception but keep pain/temperature |
| "Cape-like" loss of pain and temperature | Central cord / syringomyelia → crossing spinothalamic fibres at multiple segmental levels destroyed → bilateral suspended sensory loss in a cape distribution |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Painless acute retention of urine (AROU) | Loss of descending control to sacral micturition centre (S2-4) → detrusor cannot contract; loss of sensation → patient doesn't feel the full bladder [1][6] |
| Overflow urinary incontinence | Bladder fills beyond capacity → passive overflow due to paralysed detrusor |
| Faecal incontinence / constipation | Loss of voluntary control of external anal sphincter and disruption of colonic motility |
| Sexual dysfunction / impotence | Disruption of parasympathetic (S2-4 erection) and sympathetic (T11-L2 ejaculation) pathways |
| Priapism | Loss of sympathetic tone → unopposed parasympathetic vasodilation of penile blood vessels → sustained erection [6] — this is an ominous sign of severe SCI |
| Respiratory difficulty | Cervical injuries → loss of intercostal muscle function (T1-T12) and/or diaphragm (C3-5) |
| Pain Type | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Back/neck pain at the level of injury | Bony, ligamentous, and soft tissue damage; nerve root compression |
| Radicular pain (shooting, dermatomal) | Compression or irritation of individual nerve roots at the fracture level |
| Neuropathic pain (burning, electric) | Damage to spinothalamic tract and/or posterior horn → aberrant pain signalling |
8.2 Signs
During spinal shock phase (first 1–2 weeks):
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Flaccid paralysis below the lesion | Spinal shock → temporary complete loss of all reflex activity below the lesion due to sudden withdrawal of tonic descending facilitation [1] |
| Areflexia (absent deep tendon reflexes) | Same mechanism — the reflex arc's excitability depends on descending supraspinal facilitation, which is suddenly lost |
| Absent bulbocavernosus reflex | The sacral reflex arc is temporarily suppressed |
After spinal shock resolves (weeks to months):
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Spastic paralysis below the lesion | Hyperreflexia of UMN lesion occurs later [1] — loss of descending inhibitory pathways → anterior horn cells become hyperexcitable |
| Hyperreflexia | Loss of inhibitory UMN influence on spinal reflex arcs → exaggerated stretch reflexes |
| Clonus | Sustained rhythmic involuntary contraction due to hyperexcitable stretch reflex loop |
| Upgoing plantars (Babinski sign) | Loss of corticospinal tract input → primitive flexion withdrawal reflex (normally suppressed) re-emerges |
| Increased muscle tone / spasticity | Loss of descending inhibition → increased gamma motor neuron activity → increased muscle spindle sensitivity |
| LMN signs at the level of the lesion | Destruction of anterior horn cells at the injury level → flaccid weakness, muscle wasting, fasciculations at that specific segment |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Sensory level (sharp dermatomal boundary) | All ascending sensory fibres interrupted at a specific cord level → sensory loss below, normal above. The highest intact dermatome defines the "sensory level." |
| Segmental sensory loss at the level | Damage to entering dorsal root fibres at the injury level |
| Dissociated sensory loss | Selective tract involvement — depends on which syndrome |
| Lhermitte's sign (electric shock sensation down spine with neck flexion) | Demyelinated dorsal columns in the cervical cord are mechanically sensitive → flexion stretches them → paroxysmal discharge |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Neurogenic shock: hypotension, bradycardia, warm flushed skin | Interruption of sympathetics → loss of vascular tone (vasodilatation) and loss of cardiac sympathetic drive (T1-T4) → unopposed vagal bradycardia [1][8] |
| Paradoxical ventilation | When intercostal muscles are paralysed, diaphragmatic muscle contraction during inspiration draws the rib cage inward [6] |
| Diaphragmatic breathing | Loss of intercostal muscle innervation → sole reliance on diaphragm for ventilation |
| Lax anal tone | Loss of S2-4 innervation to external anal sphincter → flaccid [1][6] |
| Priapism | Loss of sympathetic tone → unopposed parasympathetic → sustained erection [6] |
| Distended bladder (palpable/percussable) | AROU from neurogenic bladder |
| Ileus / absent bowel sounds | Neurogenic ileus — loss of autonomic input to bowel → atonic gut |
| Poikilothermia (body temperature varies with environment) | Impaired thermoregulation [8] — loss of sympathetic control of cutaneous vasomotor responses and sweating below the lesion |
| Pressure sores | Loss of sensation → patient cannot feel prolonged pressure → tissue ischaemia → ulceration [8] |
Initial Assessment Checklist for SCI
On initial assessment, look for [6]:
- "Step over spinous processes" for tenderness, swelling, or gap
- Neurogenic shock signs: paradoxical ventilation, bradycardia, hypotension
- Neurological deficits: flaccid limbs, sensory level
- Anogenital signs: painless AROU, lax anal tone, priapism
A 28-year-old man sustained a fall from height. On admission, he was fully conscious. He was unable to move his lower limbs. His upper limbs were normal. [1]
What other symptoms and signs should you look for? UMN/LMN signs; sensory level & segmental loss; saddle anaesthesia; AROU; lax anal tone; spinal shock [1]
What was the likely level of spinal cord injury? Likely below T1; see sensory level [1]
What was the extent of injury? Determined by ASIA classification — need to assess motor and sensory function systematically.
9. Special Considerations
Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) [8][9]:
- Cause: spinal cord injury, pontine stroke
- Mechanism: interruption of descending control by pontine micturition centre → failure of detrusor-sphincter coordination → synchronous contraction of both detrusor and sphincters
- Consequence: ↑↑urinary tract pressure → upper tract damage
This is different from the initial areflexic bladder during spinal shock (where the detrusor is flaccid). After spinal shock resolves:
- Suprasacral lesion → spastic (reflex) bladder with DSD
- Sacral lesion / cauda equina → flaccid (paralytic) bladder → overflow incontinence
Patients with long-term indwelling catheters have a 16–20x risk of developing SCC (squamous cell carcinoma) in the bladder (NOT UCC, because of chronic irritation by catheter in bladder) [10].
Spinal cord injury: sensory level, motor deficits, anal tone should be assessed as part of head injury evaluation [3]. In polytrauma, always assume a spinal injury until proven otherwise.
Long-term issues include: dysreflexia, neurogenic bladder, spasticity, contracture, and skin problems [1]
High Yield Summary
-
SCI = primary (irreversible) + secondary (preventable) injury. Early immobilisation and haemodynamic support reduce secondary damage.
-
Epidemiology: bimodal (young males — high energy trauma; elderly — low energy + stenosis). 50% cervical. 15% non-contiguous. Always image the whole spine.
-
Three-column theory: unstable if ≥ 2/3 columns disrupted.
-
Spinal shock ≠ Neurogenic shock: Spinal shock = flaccid paralysis + areflexia (1–2 weeks). Neurogenic shock = hypotension + bradycardia from sympathetic disruption. Key differentiator: bulbocavernosus reflex absent in spinal shock, present in neurogenic shock.
-
ASIA classification: A = complete (no sacral sparing); B = sensory only; C = motor < grade 3 in > 50%; D = motor ≥ grade 3 in ≥ 50%; E = normal. Sacral sparing differentiates A from B.
-
Cord syndromes: Complete, Anterior (lose pain/temp + motor, keep proprioception), Dorsal (lose proprioception, keep motor), Brown-Séquard (ipsilateral motor + proprioception, contralateral pain/temp — best prognosis), Central (UL > LL weakness, cape-like sensory loss — most common in elderly with spondylosis), Conus (mixed UMN/LMN + early bladder), Cauda equina (pure LMN + saddle anaesthesia).
-
C3, 4, 5 keeps the diaphragm alive — injuries above C3 → respiratory arrest.
-
Autonomic dysreflexia: lesion at or above T6, noxious stimulus below → reflex sympathetic surge → severe HTN + bradycardia.
-
Initial assessment: step over spinous processes, neurogenic shock signs, neurological deficits (flaccid limbs + sensory level), anogenital signs (AROU, lax anal tone, priapism).
-
Prognosis: Complete injury — recovery rare. Incomplete injury — most recovery within 6 months. Loss of sphincter function is a poor prognostic factor. Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended (higher morbidity).
-
Long-term problems: autonomic dysreflexia, neurogenic bladder (DSD), spasticity, contractures, pressure sores, impaired thermoregulation.
Active Recall - Spinal Cord Injuries
[1] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [2] Lecture slides: GC 227. Cervical Spine Pathology.pdf (slides on epidemiology and polytrauma) [3] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.7 Spine trauma) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p1 — Trauma deaths) [5] Lecture slides: GC 182. Chopped and stabbed wound in gang fight Nerves and vascular injury; Classification of injuries.pdf [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.6 Spinal Trauma, p176-177) [7] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.3 Approach to spine diseases — Cauda equina syndrome) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Section 3.4.9 Paraplegia, p334-335) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p164 — Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia) [10] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Section on bladder cancer risk factors — SCC in SCI patients)
Differential Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Injury
When a patient presents with acute neurological deficit suggestive of spinal cord dysfunction — weakness, sensory level, sphincter disturbance — the differential diagnosis is not simply "trauma vs. not trauma." The real clinical challenge is threefold:
- Is this truly a spinal cord lesion? (vs. brain, peripheral nerve, NMJ, or functional)
- If spinal cord, what is the aetiology? (trauma, tumour, infection, vascular, inflammatory, degenerative, congenital)
- Is there a surgically treatable compressive lesion? (because this is a time-critical emergency)
The approach hinges on the tempo of onset (acute vs. subacute vs. chronic), the pattern of deficit (which cord syndrome), and the clinical context (trauma, cancer history, immunosuppression, etc.).
"The spinal cord is very unforgiving. Acute paraplegia is an EMERGENCY. Sphincter dysfunction — a point of no return." [1]
Before committing to a spinal cord differential, you must confirm the lesion is actually in the cord and not elsewhere. The clinical features of a spinal cord lesion are distinctive [11]:
| Spinal Cord | Brain (Hemispheric / Brainstem) | Peripheral Nerve / Cauda Equina |
|---|---|---|
| UMN signs below level, LMN at level | Contralateral UMN + higher cortical deficits (aphasia, neglect) or cranial nerve palsies (brainstem) | Pure LMN signs (flaccid, areflexic, wasting) |
| Sensory level on trunk | Hemisensory loss (face + arm + leg on same side) | Dermatomal / peripheral nerve distribution |
| Sphincter disturbance (early in conus, late in cord) | Sphincters usually spared (cortical lesions rarely cause incontinence acutely unless bilateral) | Sphincter dysfunction in cauda equina (late, irreversible) |
| Bilateral leg involvement common | Usually unilateral (hemiplegia) | May be unilateral or bilateral, asymmetric |
| No cranial nerve involvement | Cranial nerve involvement (brainstem) or cortical signs | No cranial nerve involvement |
Key mimics of spinal cord disease [12][13]:
- Stroke or TIA: occurs more rapidly, typically "negative" symptoms (weakness/numbness rather than tingling), unilateral, associated cortical signs [13]
- Migraine aura: spreading tingling or paraesthesia followed by numbness, evolves over 20–30 minutes over one half of body [13]
- Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS): ascending weakness with areflexia, but sensory level is absent; CSF shows albuminocytological dissociation
- Bilateral cerebral lesions (e.g., parasagittal meningioma, bilateral ACA territory infarct): can cause bilateral leg weakness mimicking paraplegia, but typically with cortical features
- Psychogenic / functional: bizarre distribution not conforming to known anatomical patterns [13]
How to Tell Cord from Cauda Equina
Both cause weakness + sensory loss + sphincter problems. The key difference: cord = UMN signs (spastic, hyperreflexic, upgoing plantars) with a sensory level. Cauda equina = LMN signs (flaccid, areflexic) with saddle anaesthesia and radicular pain. In practice, the conus medullaris at L1-2 can give a mixed picture.
Step 2: Differential Diagnosis by Tempo of Onset
This is the most clinically useful way to organise the differential, because the speed of onset narrows the aetiology dramatically [6][8]:
| Aetiology | Key Features | Why It Presents Acutely |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal trauma | History of trauma, bony tenderness, neurogenic shock | Direct mechanical destruction of cord tissue at the moment of impact |
| Spinal infarct (anterior spinal artery syndrome) | Sudden onset, anterior cord syndrome (motor + pain/temp loss, proprioception spared), risk factors: DM, AF, aortic surgery, hypotension [8][11] | Vascular occlusion → immediate ischaemic necrosis of the anterior 2/3 of cord (analogous to a stroke but in the cord) |
| Spinal epidural/subdural haematoma | Anticoagulant use, post-procedure, sudden back pain → progressive deficit | Rapid blood accumulation compresses the cord |
| Acute disc herniation (massive central) | Preceded by back pain, heavy lifting; cauda equina or conus syndrome | Large disc fragment suddenly compresses neural elements |
| Vascular malformation (AVM) with haemorrhage | Sudden deficit ± subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) | Rupture of abnormal vessels → haemorrhage into or around the cord |
| Aetiology | Key Features | Why It Presents Subacutely |
|---|---|---|
| Transverse myelitis | Acute/subacute progressive paraparesis, sensory level, autonomic dysfunction; may be idiopathic or a/w MS, NMO, SLE [14] | Inflammatory demyelination and oedema evolve over days |
| Epidural abscess | Fever, severe back pain, progressive neurological deficit; risk factors: IVDU, immunosuppression, diabetes | Infection forms and enlarges over days, causing progressive compression and direct cord inflammation |
| Spondylodiscitis / TB spine (Pott's disease) | Subacute back pain, constitutional symptoms, kyphosis; cord compression present at diagnosis in 40–70% [15] | Vertebral body destruction + abscess formation → gradual cord compression; TB classically disc-sparing early |
| Viral myelitis | Post-viral prodrome, rapidly ascending weakness | Direct viral invasion or post-infectious immune-mediated damage |
| Acute cord compression from metastasis | Known cancer, progressive back pain worse at night/lying down, rapid neurological deterioration | Tumour grows or pathological fracture collapses → acute-on-chronic compression |
| Guillain-Barré syndrome (mimic) | Ascending weakness, areflexia, no sensory level | Autoimmune peripheral nerve demyelination — NOT cord, but must be excluded |
| Aetiology | Key Features | Why It Presents Chronically |
|---|---|---|
| Spondylotic (cervical) myelopathy | Most common cause of cervical cord lesion in pt > 50 years [8]; insidious gait unsteadiness, clumsy hands, myelopathic hand signs | Slow osteophyte growth / ligamentum flavum hypertrophy → gradual canal narrowing; cord adapts until a critical threshold |
| Primary or secondary tumours | Progressive deficit, worse at night (intradural tumours), weight loss; metastases from thyroid, breast, lung, kidney, prostate | Tumour growth is slow (primary) or stepwise (metastatic with pathological fracture) |
| Syringomyelia | Cape-like dissociated sensory loss, central cord syndrome, may be a/w Chiari I malformation | Slowly expanding fluid-filled cavity (syrinx) within the cord |
| Multiple sclerosis | Relapsing-remitting course, optic neuritis, Lhermitte's sign, periventricular lesions on brain MRI; d/dx includes neurofibroma, syringomyelia, early MND [8] | Inflammatory demyelinating plaques accumulate over time |
| Subacute combined degeneration | B12 deficiency → posterior + lateral column disease (loss of proprioception + vibration + UMN signs); megaloblastic anaemia, glossitis | Demyelination from impaired myelin synthesis due to lack of B12 as a cofactor in methionine synthase |
| Motor neurone disease (MND) | Pure motor (no sensory loss), combined UMN + LMN signs, fasciculations, bulbar symptoms | Progressive degeneration of motor neurons |
| Hereditary spastic paraplegia | Family history, slowly progressive spastic paraparesis, usually minimal sensory involvement | Genetic → axonal degeneration in corticospinal tracts |
| Friedreich's ataxia | Onset < 25 years, ataxia, absent reflexes (despite UMN signs), cardiomyopathy, scoliosis | Trinucleotide repeat → mitochondrial iron accumulation → dorsal columns + corticospinal tracts + cerebellum degeneration |
| Spinal dysraphism / tethered cord | History from birth, lumbosacral skin abnormalities, progressive LL weakness + bladder dysfunction with growth | Congenital failure of neural tube closure; tethering stretches the cord as the child grows |
| Radiation myelopathy | History of radiation therapy, delayed onset (months to years), progressive myelopathy | Radiation-induced vasculopathy and demyelination |
| HTLV-1 associated myelopathy | Tropical spastic paraparesis, slowly progressive, anterior cord pattern | Retroviral-induced chronic inflammation |
| Spinal stenosis | Neurogenic claudication (leg pain with walking, relieved by sitting/flexion), chronic | Degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal → positional compression |
Differential diagnosis of back pain: Degeneration (spondylosis), Prolapsed intervertebral disc, Spinal stenosis, Cauda equina syndrome, Muscle/ligamentous injury (muscle strain), Fractures/injuries, Infection (TB spine, epidural abscess), Tumour (primary, metastases e.g. lung, breast, prostate), Inflammation (AS, PSA, RA), Extra-spinal causes/Referred pain (pancreatitis, AAA, uro/gynae causes, zoster) [3]
The clinical pattern tells you the location of the lesion within the cord, which in turn narrows the aetiological differential [6][8]:
| Syndrome | Differential Diagnosis | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Complete cord | Trauma, transverse myelitis, acute compression, benign tumours, spondylosis | Total cross-sectional cord destruction → only severe/complete insults produce this |
| Anterior cord | SC infarct, prolapsed disc, radiation myelopathy, HTLV-1 | Anterior spinal artery territory → vascular or ventral compressive causes |
| Dorsal cord | Epidural metastasis, spondylosis, MS, subacute combined degeneration, Friedreich's ataxia | Posterior column selective damage → metabolic, compressive from behind, or inflammatory |
| Brown-Séquard | Knife or bullet injury, tumour, spondylosis, MS, radiation necrosis | Hemisection → penetrating trauma is classic; lateral tumours/plaques can also do this |
| Central cord | Spinal stroke, traumatic contusion, transverse myelitis, syringomyelia, intramedullary tumour | Central damage → hyperextension in spondylotic canal (elderly); expanding syrinx (young) |
| Pure motor | Poliomyelitis, motor neurone disease, hereditary spastic paraplegias | Only motor tracts/neurons affected, no sensory involvement |
| Conus medullaris | Prolapsed IVD, trauma, tumours | Lesion at L1-2; sacral autonomic nuclei involved early → early bladder/bowel |
| Cauda equina | Prolapsed IVD (L4/5, L5/S1), tumours, spinal stenosis, arachnoiditis | Below L2 → pure peripheral nerve roots |
These are the conditions where delayed diagnosis leads to irreversible deficit:
| Condition | Why It's Urgent | Key Clues |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural abscess | Cord compression + direct infection → irreversible paraplegia if not drained | Fever + back pain + progressive deficit; IVDU, DM, immunosuppression |
| Epidural haematoma | Expanding haematoma compresses cord | On anticoagulants, post-procedure, sudden back pain → rapid deficit |
| Cauda equina syndrome | "Point of no return" for sphincters; usually irreversible unless very early intervention [11] | Saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention, bilateral radicular pain |
| Metastatic cord compression | Tumour rapidly destroys cord; dexamethasone + urgent radiation/surgery needed | Known cancer + back pain worse lying down + progressive deficit |
| Unstable spinal fracture | Secondary neurological injury from instability [1] → further cord damage | Trauma + gap between spinous processes + neurological deficit |
The 'Red Flags' for Serious Spinal Pathology
Always ask about:
- Cauda equina syndrome: faecal incontinence, painless urinary retention ± incontinence, saddle anaesthesia [3]
- Infection: fever, immunosuppression [3]
- Fracture: chronic steroid use, osteoporosis / metabolic bone disease [3]
- Malignancy: constitutional symptoms, history of cancer, age > 50 with new back pain
- Neurological deficit: progressive weakness or sensory loss
Missing these means missing a surgical emergency.
Step 5: Diagnostic Differentiation by Context
The main differential is:
- Traumatic SCI (obvious mechanism) — but you must also consider:
- Delay in diagnosis due to: unconscious patient, head injury, alcohol intoxication, multiple distracting injuries [2]
- Pre-existing pathology unmasked by minor trauma: cervical spondylotic myelopathy + hyperextension → central cord syndrome (elderly)
- Pathological fracture: metastasis or osteoporosis → low-energy mechanism causing fracture → cord compression
- Chronic condition with acute deterioration [1] — e.g., patient with ankylosing spondylitis whose rigid "bamboo spine" fractures like a long bone from a minor fall
The key differentiation is:
- Compressive (tumour, abscess, disc, haematoma) — requires urgent surgical decompression → MRI is the modality of choice; plain XR cannot make or exclude diagnosis of cord compression [16]
- Non-compressive (transverse myelitis, vascular, inflammatory, metabolic) — managed medically
D/dx of transverse myelitis includes: Non-inflammatory myelopathy by MRI spine (mechanical: disc herniation, vertebral body compression fractures...) [14]. The first step is always MRI to exclude compression.
| Condition | Onset | Pain | Motor Pattern | Sensory Pattern | Sphincters | Special Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traumatic SCI | Acute | At injury site | Depends on level/completeness | Sensory level | Often early | History of trauma, neurogenic shock |
| Spinal infarct | Hyperacute (minutes) | Sudden back pain | Anterior cord (motor loss) | Pain/temp loss, proprioception spared | Spastic bladder | Risk factors: AF, DM, aortic surgery |
| Epidural abscess | Subacute (days) | Severe, localised | Progressive UMN | Sensory level | Late | Fever, ↑WBC/CRP, IVDU |
| TB spine | Subacute–chronic | Insidious back pain | UMN below | Sensory level | Late | Constitutional symptoms, kyphosis |
| Transverse myelitis | Subacute (hours–days) | Girdle-like | Bilateral, often complete | Sensory level | Early | Post-viral, a/w MS or NMO |
| Metastatic compression | Subacute–acute | Night pain, worse lying down | Progressive UMN | Dorsal cord pattern | Late | Known cancer, weight loss |
| Cervical spondylotic myelopathy | Chronic | Neck stiffness | UMN in legs, myelopathic hands | Often subtle | Very late | Age > 50, Lhermitte's sign |
| Syringomyelia | Chronic | Painless burns on hands | Central cord (UL > LL) | Cape-like dissociated | Late | Chiari I malformation |
| B12 deficiency | Chronic | None | UMN (lateral columns) | Posterior columns (proprioception, vibration) | Usually spared | Megaloblastic anaemia, glossitis |
| MS | Relapsing-remitting | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable | Optic neuritis, Lhermitte's, brain lesions |
| Cauda equina | Variable | Radicular, bilateral | Pure LMN | Saddle | Late but irreversible | Usually L4/5 disc or tumour |
In the polytrauma setting, hypotension must be differentiated [17]:
| Neurogenic Shock | Hypovolaemic Shock | Cardiogenic Shock | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Interruption of neurogenic vasomotor control → inappropriate ↓HR, ↓SVR [17] | Blood loss → ↓preload | Pump failure → ↓CO |
| Heart Rate | Paradoxically slow HR (bradycardia) | Tachycardia | Variable |
| Skin | Warm, flushed, dry | Cold, clammy, pale | Cold, clammy |
| JVP/CVP | Low–normal | Low (↓CVP < 8) | High (↑CVP > 12) |
| Context | Compatible Hx of CNS injury [17] | Visible bleeding, pelvic fracture | MI, arrhythmia |
| Treatment | IV fluids + vasopressors | Volume resuscitation, stop bleeding | Inotropes, IABP |
A Trap in Polytrauma
In a polytrauma patient with a spinal injury AND hypotension, always assume hypovolaemic shock first and look for bleeding (chest, abdomen, pelvis, long bones). Neurogenic shock is a diagnosis of exclusion. If you assume neurogenic shock and the patient is actually bleeding, they will die from uncontrolled haemorrhage.
When a patient presents with urinary symptoms and SCI is suspected, the differential for the bladder dysfunction itself includes [18]:
- Neurogenic overactive bladder: Stroke, Spinal cord injury, Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease
- Non-neurogenic overactive bladder (idiopathic): post-operative pelvic surgery, secondary to bladder outlet obstruction
- Detrusor underactivity: diabetic neuropathy, cauda equina
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of SCI
-
Confirm it's a cord lesion: UMN below + LMN at level + sensory level + sphincter disturbance = cord. Pure LMN = cauda equina or peripheral. Cortical signs = brain.
-
Tempo narrows aetiology: Hyperacute = vascular/trauma. Subacute = infection/inflammation. Chronic = degenerative/neoplastic/metabolic.
-
Cord syndrome narrows further: Anterior cord → infarct. Central cord → syringomyelia/hyperextension injury. Brown-Séquard → penetrating trauma. Dorsal cord → B12/MS/metastasis.
-
Surgical emergencies not to miss: Epidural abscess, epidural haematoma, metastatic compression, cauda equina syndrome, unstable fracture.
-
MRI is the modality of choice for non-traumatic cord compression; plain XR cannot make or exclude the diagnosis.
-
In trauma: always assume hypovolaemic shock before neurogenic shock. Always image the whole spine (15% non-contiguous injuries).
-
Red flags: cauda equina symptoms, fever/immunosuppression, cancer history, progressive neurological deficit, chronic steroid use/osteoporosis.
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Injuries
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [2] Lecture slides: GC 227. Cervical Spine Pathology.pdf [3] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.3 Approach to spine diseases) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.6 Spinal Trauma, p176-177) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Section 3.4.9 Paraplegia, p334-335) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 1.3 Where and What is the Lesion, p45) [12] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Differential diagnosis of stroke) [13] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p72 — D/dx and Characteristic Presentations of sensory loss) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 6.2 Transverse Myelitis, p141) [15] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p80 — Skeletal TB / Pott disease) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p18 — Spinal trauma and non-traumatic cord compression imaging) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p16 — Neurogenic shock) [18] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Differential diagnosis of LUTS — overactive bladder)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Spinal Cord Injuries
The diagnosis of spinal cord injury is not a single "test" — it is a systematic process that answers five questions in order:
- Is there a spinal cord injury? (clinical assessment — ASIA)
- What is the level? (neurological examination — dermatomes/myotomes)
- Is it complete or incomplete? (sacral sparing — ASIA grade)
- Is it stable or unstable? (imaging — three-column theory)
- What is the cause? (context + imaging + supportive investigations)
The first three are determined primarily by clinical examination. The last two require imaging. There is no single "diagnostic criterion" like the Jones Criteria for rheumatic fever — instead, the diagnosis rests on a structured clinical-radiological framework.
B. Clinical Diagnostic Assessment
The ASIA classification (IMPORTANT!) [3] is the internationally accepted system for classifying spinal cord injury severity. ASIA stands for American Spinal Injury Association; ISNCSCI stands for International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.
Sensory: test pinprick and touch in each dermatome [6] Motor: in the 10 key motor functions listed [6]
The ASIA Examination systematically assesses:
Sensory examination — 28 dermatomes on each side (C2–S4/5), tested for:
- Light touch (tests dorsal column-medial lemniscal pathway)
- Pinprick (tests spinothalamic pathway)
- Each scored 0 (absent), 1 (impaired), 2 (normal) → maximum sensory score = 112 per side per modality
Motor examination — 10 key muscles on each side (5 upper limb, 5 lower limb):
| Root | Key Muscle | Action Tested |
|---|---|---|
| C5 | Elbow flexors (biceps) | Elbow flexion |
| C6 | Wrist extensors (ECRL, ECRB) | Wrist extension |
| C7 | Elbow extensors (triceps) | Elbow extension |
| C8 | Finger flexors (FDP to middle finger) | Finger flexion |
| T1 | Small finger abductors (ADM) | Finger abduction |
| L2 | Hip flexors (iliopsoas) | Hip flexion |
| L3 | Knee extensors (quadriceps) | Knee extension |
| L4 | Ankle dorsiflexors (tibialis anterior) | Ankle dorsiflexion |
| L5 | Long toe extensors (EHL) | Great toe extension |
| S1 | Ankle plantarflexors (gastrocnemius/soleus) | Ankle plantarflexion |
Each scored 0–5 (MRC scale) → maximum motor score = 50 per side
Key definitions:
- Neurological level of injury (NLI): the most caudal segment with both normal sensory AND motor function (grade ≥ 3 motor + grade 2 sensory on both modalities)
- Sensory level: most caudal dermatome with normal sensation
- Motor level: most caudal myotome with ≥ 3/5 power, provided the segment above is 5/5
Sacral sparing — the critical determinant of complete vs incomplete:
- Test: voluntary anal contraction (motor) + S4-S5 light touch/pinprick (sensory) + deep anal pressure (sensation)
- If ANY of these are present → incomplete (ASIA B–D)
- If ALL absent → complete (ASIA A)
ASIA Impairment Scale [3]:
Grade Type Definition A Complete No motor, No sensory, No sacral sparing B Incomplete No motor, sensory only (preserved below level including S4-5) C Incomplete > 50% of key muscles below the level have muscle grade < 3 (cannot raise arms or legs off bed) D Incomplete ≥ 50% of key muscles below the level have muscle grade ≥ 3 (can raise arms or legs off bed) E Normal Motor and sensory function are normal
ASIA C vs D — The Grade 3 Rule
The difference between C and D is whether the patient can move against gravity. Grade 3 = movement against gravity. If more than half the key muscles below the injury are weaker than grade 3, they literally cannot lift their limbs off the bed → ASIA C. If more than half can → ASIA D. This simple bedside distinction has enormous prognostic implications: ASIA D patients have a much higher chance of community ambulation.
Mechanism of injury helps determine degree of stability [6]:
On physical examination:
- "Step over spinous processes" for any tenderness, swelling or gap between spinous processes [6] — a palpable gap indicates rupture of interspinous ligament (i.e. unstable injury) [6]
Three-column theory (Denis) for thoracolumbar spine [3]:
- Unstable fracture if 2/3 segments disrupted [3]
- Anterior column: anterior 2/3 of vertebral body + disc + ALL
- Middle column: posterior 1/3 of vertebral body + disc + PLL
- Posterior column: posterior arch
You cannot definitively classify a patient as ASIA A (complete) during the spinal shock phase, because areflexia from spinal shock mimics complete injury. You must wait for the bulbocavernosus reflex to return (signalling end of spinal shock) before declaring an injury "complete" [3]:
| Spinal Shock | Neurogenic Shock | |
|---|---|---|
| Bulbocavernosus reflex | Absent | Present |
| Motor | Flaccid paralysis | Normal |
The bulbocavernosus reflex (squeeze glans penis or tug Foley catheter → look for anal wink) is the first sacral reflex to return. Once it returns, if there is still no sacral sparing, the injury is truly complete.
Don't Declare Complete Too Early
A patient in spinal shock looks like ASIA A — flaccid, areflexic, no sacral sparing. But this may be temporary. Only after the bulbocavernosus reflex returns can you reliably call it complete. This distinction matters because incomplete injuries (ASIA B–D) have far better recovery potential.
C. Imaging — The Diagnostic Workup
C1. Decision Rules: Who Needs Imaging?
Not every patient with neck pain after minor trauma needs imaging. Two validated clinical decision rules guide this:
NEXUS Mnemonic [2]:
- N — Neuro deficit (any focal neurological deficit)
- E — EtOH / intoxication (alcohol or drugs impairing assessment)
- X — eXtreme distracting injury (injuries so painful they may mask spinal tenderness)
- U — Unable to provide history (altered level of consciousness)
- S — Spinal tenderness (midline posterior cervical tenderness)
If ALL five criteria are ABSENT → the cervical spine can be cleared clinically without imaging [2]. If ANY one is present → imaging is required.
The logic: NEXUS identifies patients whose clinical examination is reliable enough to exclude significant injury without radiation. If the patient is alert, sober, non-tender, neurologically intact, and has no distracting injuries, the negative predictive value is > 99%.
An alternative (and arguably more sensitive/specific) tool:
- Any high-risk factor mandating imaging? (age ≥ 65, dangerous mechanism, paraesthesia in extremities) → If yes → image
- Any low-risk factor allowing safe assessment of ROM? (simple rear-end RTA, sitting in ED, ambulatory, delayed onset neck pain, no midline tenderness) → If yes → assess ROM
- Can the patient actively rotate the neck 45° left and right? → If yes → no imaging needed
NEXUS vs CCR
Both are validated for "clearing the c-spine" in alert trauma patients. CCR has slightly higher sensitivity (~99.4% vs 99.0%) and specificity. In practice, many centres use NEXUS because it is simpler. Neither applies to children < 16, GCS < 15, or known vertebral disease.
C2. Imaging Modalities — Systematic Overview
Investigation – Plain X-ray [1]:
- Readily available
- Show obvious fracture and malalignment
- Can miss subtle fracture
- Cannot exclude ligamentous instability
- Cannot exclude soft-tissue compressive lesion (e.g., haematoma)
| View | What It Shows | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|
| AP view | Alignment, spinous process spacing | 3 lines on AP should be smooth [6]: alignment of spinous processes, lateral margins of lateral masses/vertebral bodies |
| Lateral view | Most important single view | 4 lines on lateral should be smooth [6]: anterior vertebral body line, posterior vertebral body line, spinolaminar line, spinous process tips. Fracture lines, malalignment, soft tissue swelling |
| Open mouth (odontoid) view | C1-C2 specifically | Odontoid fracture, C1 fracture; Rule of Spence: sum of distance between lateral masses of C1 beyond vertebral body of C2 > 7mm → transverse ligament likely disrupted → unstable injury [6] |
C-spine lateral view: soft tissue rules [3]:
- 3×7=21 rule: prevertebral soft tissue — C1 ≤ 10mm, C3 ≤ 7mm, C7 ≤ 21mm
- Soft tissue swelling may indicate nearby fracture [6]:
- Above C4: ≤ 1/3 vertebral body width
- Below C4: ≤ 100% vertebral body width
Why does soft tissue swelling matter? Because a vertebral fracture causes local haemorrhage and oedema → the prevertebral soft tissue space widens. This may be the only clue on a lateral X-ray when the fracture line itself is occult.
Useful plain XR findings in spinal cord lesions [8]:
- Pedicle erosion → extradural metastases (tumour erodes the pedicle because it sits in the epidural space)
- Vertebral body collapse (pathological fracture from osteoporosis or malignancy)
- Narrow disc space, osteophytes, hypertrophic facet joints → spondylosis
- Expansion of intervertebral foramina → neurofibroma (tumour enlarges the foramen as it grows)
Plain XR: AP + lateral views should be ordered. For C-spine, ask for open mouth view. Flexion-extension views are not useful in the acute injury period due to muscle spasm [16].
Limitation of Plain XR
Plain XR cannot make or exclude the diagnosis of cord compression [16]. A normal X-ray does NOT rule out SCI. The cord is not visible on X-ray — you can only infer cord injury from bony or alignment abnormalities. This is why CT and MRI are essential in any patient with neurological deficit.
Investigation: CT [1]:
- Reasonably available
- Still cannot show soft-tissue injury [1]
CT Spine [16]:
- High sensitivity and specificity (for fractures)
- T and L-S spine within scan field in patients who undergo torso CT for assessment of other injuries [16] — this is a practical point: if a polytrauma patient gets a CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, the spine is already in the field → reconstruct spinal images from the same data
- Provides radiographic clearance when X-rays are inadequate [2]
| What CT Shows Well | What CT Does NOT Show |
|---|---|
| Fracture lines (even subtle ones) | Ligamentous injury |
| Bony canal narrowing | Cord oedema / contusion |
| Retropulsed fragments | Disc herniation (soft tissue) |
| Facet joint alignment | Epidural haematoma |
All injuries otherwise (i.e., not minor) → CT ± MRI (if focal neurological deficit) [3]
Investigation: MRI spine [1]:
- Difficult to arrange [1] (takes time, limited availability)
- Shows soft-tissue lesion, cord oedema [1]
MRI [16]:
- For ligamentous, spinal cord and soft tissue injuries
- Done when there are neurological deficits not explained by plain film or CT [16]
- Essential if there are neurological deficits [2]
- Useful for delineation of soft tissue injury (i.e., discoligamentous) [2]
For non-traumatic cord compression: MRI is the modality of choice unless contraindicated [16]
Contrast MRI spine: urgent if acute paraplegia [8]
MRI Interpretation — Basic Principles [2]:
- Level of lesion, location
- Pathoanatomy (disc, osteophyte, OPLL, flavum)
- Obliteration of the CSF space (indicates significant compression — the bright CSF signal disappears around the cord)
- Cord shape / cross-sectional area (cord compression causes flattening)
- Intramedullary signal change (myelomalacia) — T2 hyperintensity within the cord indicates oedema or gliosis; this is a poor prognostic sign
| MRI Sequence | What It Shows Best |
|---|---|
| T1-weighted | Anatomy (fat bright, CSF dark). Vertebral body marrow replacement (metastasis = dark on T1) |
| T2-weighted | Fluid bright (CSF, oedema bright). Cord oedema/contusion = bright signal within cord. Disc herniation well-delineated |
| STIR | Fat-suppressed T2 — excellent for bone marrow oedema (fractures glow bright) and ligamentous injury |
| T1 with gadolinium | Enhancement indicates active inflammation, infection, or tumour vascularity |
Key MRI findings and their interpretation:
| Finding | Interpretation | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| T2 hyperintensity in cord | Cord oedema / contusion | Confirms cord injury; extent correlates with severity |
| T1 hypointensity + T2 hyperintensity in cord | Haemorrhagic necrosis | Poor prognosis — irreversible damage |
| Loss of CSF signal around cord | Cord compression | Needs decompression if progressive |
| Disc material in canal | Disc herniation | Surgical target |
| T2 bright ligament signal | Ligamentous disruption | Indicates instability → may need surgical fixation |
| Epidural collection | Haematoma or abscess | Compressive lesion → may need urgent drainage |
| Vertebral body T1 low / T2 high | Metastasis, fracture (with oedema) | Check for pathological fracture |
MRI is the Only Way to See the Cord
The spinal cord itself is invisible on X-ray and poorly seen on CT. MRI is the only modality that directly visualises cord contusion, oedema, haemorrhage, and compression. Any patient with neurological deficit after spinal trauma MUST get an MRI.
Myelography / CT myelography: if MRI is contraindicated or not available [8]
- Involves intrathecal injection of contrast followed by CT scanning
- Contraindicated in patients with raised intracranial pressure
- Used when MRI cannot be performed (e.g., pacemaker, metallic implants, claustrophobia, patient too unstable for MRI)
- Shows subarachnoid space filling defects (compression)
D. Supportive Investigations
These do not diagnose the spinal cord injury itself but help identify the cause or complications:
CSF analysis: only if suspect transverse myelitis [8] May cause deterioration for cord compression! [8] — this is critically important. If there is any possibility of a compressive lesion, lumbar puncture is DANGEROUS because removing CSF below a block can cause the cord to herniate downward.
Send: R/M, cell count, C/ST, biochemistry, TB workup, viral studies, cytology ± VDRL, oligoclonal bands [8]
| CSF Finding | Suggests |
|---|---|
| Moderate lymphocytosis, normal glucose, normal/slightly ↑protein | Transverse myelitis |
| Oligoclonal IgG bands | MS (↑risk of progression into MS) |
| Very high protein ( > 5 g/L), nodular arachnoiditis | TB arachnoiditis |
| Malignant cells on cytology | Leptomeningeal metastasis |
| Elevated WBC + low glucose + high protein + positive C/ST | Bacterial infection |
NEVER LP Before Imaging in Suspected Cord Compression
If you suspect a compressive cause (tumour, abscess, haematoma), do NOT perform lumbar puncture until MRI has excluded a block. Removing CSF below a compressive lesion drops the pressure below the block relative to above it → can cause the cord to herniate further → catastrophic deterioration.
| Test | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Vitamin B12 | Rule out subacute combined degeneration [8] |
| FBC, CRP, ESR | Infection (abscess, spondylodiscitis), malignancy |
| RFT, LFT | Baseline; renal function for contrast imaging |
| Calcium, phosphate, ALP | Metastatic bone disease, osteoporosis |
| Coagulation profile | If haematoma suspected; anticoagulant use |
| Blood cultures | If epidural abscess/spondylodiscitis suspected |
| Tumour markers (PSA, etc.) | If metastatic disease suspected |
| NMO-IgG (anti-AQP4 Ab) | If longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (≥ 3 segments) → NMO spectrum disorder |
| ANA, anti-Ro, anti-La | SLE, Sjögren's as cause of myelitis |
| HIV antibody, VDRL | Infective/inflammatory causes of myelopathy |
| TSH | Hypothyroidism can cause myelopathy (rare) |
| Test | Purpose | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Nerve conduction study (NCS) | Differentiate cord (central) from peripheral nerve lesion | Normal NCS with UMN signs = cord lesion. Abnormal NCS = peripheral neuropathy/radiculopathy |
| Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) | Assess dorsal column conduction | Delayed or absent cortical potentials confirm cord conduction block; useful for intraoperative monitoring |
| Motor evoked potentials (MEP) | Assess corticospinal tract conduction | Useful intraoperatively to monitor motor pathways during spinal surgery |
| EMG | Assess denervation in muscles | Confirms LMN involvement at specific levels; differentiates from NMJ or myopathic disease |
- Assess neurogenic bladder function (detrusor pressure, sphincter coordination)
- Important for long-term management of bladder in established SCI
- Shows detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) in suprasacral lesions
| Scenario | Imaging | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| High energy trauma | CT whole spine | High sensitivity for fractures [16] |
| Patient at risk of fractures (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis) | CT whole spine | Rigid spine fractures easily; may be missed clinically [16] |
| Focal neurological deficits | CT + MRI (essential) | CT for bony; MRI essential if there are neurological deficits [2][16] |
| Minor injury, alert, NEXUS-negative | No imaging needed | Clinical clearance is safe |
| Minor injury, NEXUS-positive | Full C-spine XR (AP + lateral + open mouth view) or CT | Screening for fracture [3] |
| Non-traumatic progressive myelopathy | MRI — modality of choice | Plain XR cannot make or exclude dx of cord compression [16] |
| Suspected transverse myelitis (after MRI excludes compression) | MRI + CSF analysis | Demonstrate cord inflammation without compression |
| Suspected vascular lesion | MR angiography or DSA | Map AVM/AVF for treatment planning |
Clinical evaluation: aim to localise and delineate lesion [8]:
History [8]:
- Weakness, sensory loss, sphincter disturbance, pain
- Temporal course and spatial distribution
- Mechanism (high / low energy trauma; motor vehicle accident, fall from height, fall from level ground) [2]
- Time of injury [2]
- Delay in diagnosis (risk factors for missed SCI): unconscious, head injury, alcohol, multiple distracting injuries [2]
Physical Examination [8]:
- Motor: segmental weakness according to myotome
- Sensory: sensory level according to dermatome
- Cerebellar: for MS and Friedreich's ataxia
- Signs of cord compression: saddle anaesthesia, anal tone, perianal sensation [19]
- DRE: anal reflex, bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR, S2-4) [19]
- LL neurological examination [19]
Investigations [8]:
- Plain XR spine
- Contrast MRI spine: urgent if acute paraplegia
- Myelography / CT myelography: if MRI is C/I or N/A
- CSF analysis: only if suspect transverse myelitis (may cause deterioration for cord compression!)
- Vitamin B12 for subacute combined degeneration
Investigations for cervical spine pathology: X-rays (AP/lateral, oblique views for foraminal narrowing), CT scan, MRI scan (confirm nerve root/cord compression), NCV/EMG [2]
In unconscious or intubated patients, clinical clearance is impossible. The approach:
- Maintain immobilisation (hard collar + logroll precautions)
- CT cervical spine — if normal:
- Some centres accept CT-only clearance in obtunded patients (high sensitivity > 99%)
- Others require MRI within 48–72 hours to exclude occult ligamentous injury
- If CT abnormal → MRI
- If MRI abnormal → neurosurgical consultation
Spinal cord injury: sensory level, motor deficits, anal tone should be assessed as part of head injury assessment [3]. Always assume spinal injury in an unconscious trauma patient until proven otherwise.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of SCI
-
ASIA/ISNCSCI is the gold standard for classifying SCI: tests 28 dermatomes (pinprick + light touch) and 10 key muscles bilaterally. Sacral sparing (S4-5 sensation or voluntary anal contraction) distinguishes complete (ASIA A) from incomplete (ASIA B-D).
-
Cannot declare complete until spinal shock resolves — wait for bulbocavernosus reflex to return.
-
NEXUS criteria clear the c-spine clinically: N (neuro deficit), E (EtOH), X (extreme distracting injury), U (unable to provide history), S (spinal tenderness). All 5 absent → no imaging needed.
-
Three imaging modalities: Plain XR (readily available but misses subtle fractures and cannot see the cord); CT (high sensitivity for fractures but cannot show soft tissue); MRI (shows cord, ligaments, disc — essential with neurological deficit, but harder to arrange).
-
Plain XR cannot make or exclude cord compression — MRI is mandatory if neurological deficit present.
-
CSF analysis only if transverse myelitis suspected AND MRI excludes compression first — LP with a compressive lesion risks catastrophic deterioration.
-
CT whole spine for all significant trauma — 15% have non-contiguous injuries.
-
Three-column theory: ≥ 2/3 columns disrupted = unstable.
-
MRI key findings: T2 cord hyperintensity = oedema/contusion; T1 hypointensity = haemorrhagic necrosis (poor prognosis); loss of CSF signal = compression; ligament bright on T2/STIR = disruption.
-
Supportive blood tests: B12, NMO-IgG, ANA, HIV, VDRL to identify non-traumatic causes.
Active Recall - Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Injuries
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [2] Lecture slides: GC 227. Cervical Spine Pathology.pdf [3] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.7 Spine trauma; Section 2.3 Approach to spine diseases) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.6 Spinal Trauma, p176-177) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Section 3.4.9 Paraplegia, p334-335) and Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.1, p168-169) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p18 — Spinal trauma and non-traumatic cord compression imaging) [19] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p161, p166 — Physical examination for cord compression / AROU workup)
Management of Spinal Cord Injuries
Management of SCI follows a time-critical, phased approach. The fundamental principle is that you cannot reverse primary injury, but you CAN prevent secondary injury. Every minute of ongoing cord compression, ischaemia, or instability allows the secondary cascade (oedema, excitotoxicity, apoptosis) to extend the zone of damage. The management framework therefore moves through:
- Resuscitation (keep the patient alive — ABCDE)
- Protection (prevent further cord damage — immobilisation)
- Decompression (relieve ongoing cord compression — surgery)
- Stabilisation (restore spinal alignment and prevent future instability)
- Prevention of complications (DVT, pressure sores, bladder, etc.)
- Rehabilitation (maximise functional recovery)
Principles of Management: Resuscitation (NB: spinal shock); Collar & log roll to protect spine; Assume multiple injury / head injury; Imaging studies; Methylprednisolone(?); Surgery to decompress spinal cord; Mechanical stabilisation; Prevent/Treat complications; Rehabilitation [1]
Phase 1: Pre-Hospital and Emergency Department — Resuscitation and Protection
A. ABCDE Approach
ABCDE before any P/E [6]. The entire point is to keep the patient alive first. A dead patient has no spinal cord to save.
- Jaw thrust when C-spine injury IS a concern (eg. trauma) [20] — never head-tilt chin-lift in a suspected C-spine injury because extending the neck can worsen cervical cord compression
- If airway is not maintainable with basic manoeuvres → rapid sequence intubation (RSI) with manual in-line stabilisation (MILS) — this means one person holds the head and neck perfectly still while another intubates
- High cervical injuries (above C3-5) may cause respiratory arrest → immediate intubation and mechanical ventilation is life-saving [8]
Why? The phrenic nerve (C3, 4, 5) innervates the diaphragm. Lesions above C3 eliminate all spontaneous breathing. Lesions C3-5 may partially preserve diaphragmatic function but patients often need ventilatory support.
- Diaphragmatic breathing if C5 or below (loss of control of intercostal muscles) [8]
- Paradoxical ventilation if intercostal muscles are paralysed [6]
- High-flow O₂ (15 L/min via non-rebreather mask) for all trauma patients
- Monitor SpO₂ continuously — target SpO₂ > 92%
- Consider mechanical ventilation for:
- High cervical SCI with respiratory insufficiency
- Flail chest or associated thoracic injuries
- Fatigue from isolated diaphragmatic breathing
Neurogenic shock management [1][8]:
- Cause: sympathetic signal disruption [8]
- Presentation: vasodilatation → hypotension, bradycardia, warm, flushed skin [8]
- Treat with IV fluids and vasopressors/inotropes [1]
| Step | Intervention | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IV crystalloid bolus (e.g., Ringer's lactate or 0.9% NaCl) | Expand intravascular volume to compensate for relative hypovolaemia from venous pooling |
| 2 | Vasopressors (noradrenaline first-line, or phenylephrine) if fluid-refractory | Restore vascular tone lost from sympathetic disruption — noradrenaline provides both α₁ (vasoconstriction) and β₁ (cardiac inotropy) |
| 3 | Atropine for symptomatic bradycardia | Block excessive vagal tone that is now unopposed |
| 4 | Target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg for 5–7 days | Current AO Spine/AANS guidelines recommend augmented MAP to optimise cord perfusion pressure — the cord, like the brain, needs adequate perfusion to minimise secondary ischaemic injury |
Hypovolaemic Before Neurogenic
In polytrauma, always assume hypovolaemic shock first and actively search for bleeding (chest, abdomen, pelvis, long bones). Neurogenic shock is a diagnosis of exclusion. The classic trap: you assume the bradycardia is neurogenic, give vasopressors, and miss an intra-abdominal haemorrhage. If in doubt, resuscitate for blood loss AND neurogenic shock simultaneously.
- GCS assessment
- Pupillary examination
- ASIA neurological examination (as described in diagnostic section)
- Note: flaccid limbs + sensory level + AROU + lax anal tone + priapism = spinal cord injury until proven otherwise [6]
- Full log-roll examination of the spine — "step over spinous processes" for any tenderness, swelling or gap [6]
- Temperature monitoring — patients with high SCI are poikilothermic (cannot thermoregulate below the lesion) → cover with warming blankets
- Look for associated injuries — assume multiple injury / head injury [1]
Collar & log roll to protect spine [1]
| Method | Description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Rigid cervical collar (e.g., Philadelphia, Aspen) | Circumferential device around neck | Limits cervical flexion/extension/rotation to prevent further cord damage |
| Log-roll technique | Patient rolled as a unit (head, trunk, pelvis aligned) by ≥ 4 people | Prevents spinal rotation/flexion during transfers and examination |
| Spinal board | Rigid flat board for transport | Prevents spinal flexion during pre-hospital transport; remove as soon as possible (pressure sore risk) |
| Sandbags + tape | Placed either side of head and taped across forehead to the board | Additional immobilisation of the head/neck |
Extreme caution in transportation of patient in those likely to have spinal cord injury [6]
Why immobilise? An unstable fracture means the vertebral column cannot hold its alignment. Any movement (even routine nursing care) can cause further displacement → further cord compression → secondary neurological injury [1]. Immobilisation buys time until definitive imaging and treatment.
Phase 2: Medical Management
Management — Medical [6]:
- ABC support
- Prophylaxis for DVT, stress ulcers, AROU (urinary catheter)
- Analgesics
As detailed above: IV fluids + vasopressors, target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg × 5-7 days.
SCI patients have one of the highest rates of DVT/PE of any patient population (prevalence up to 80% without prophylaxis). Why? Loss of lower limb muscle pump + immobility + hypercoagulable state from trauma.
| Modality | Details | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices, graduated compression stockings | Start immediately |
| Pharmacological | Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, e.g., enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily) | Start within 24–72 hours once haemostasis confirmed (no ongoing haemorrhage) |
| Duration | Continue for 2–3 months post-injury or until fully ambulatory | Extended prophylaxis because SCI patients remain at risk for months |
VTE is the Leading Preventable Cause of Death in SCI
Without prophylaxis, DVT occurs in up to 80% and fatal PE in up to 5% of SCI patients. Mechanical prophylaxis starts day 1; pharmacological prophylaxis as soon as safely possible. This is one of the most important medical interventions in SCI management.
SCI patients are at high risk of stress-related mucosal disease (Curling-type ulceration) due to unopposed vagal stimulation to the stomach (particularly in high thoracic/cervical injuries where sympathetic innervation to the gut is lost).
| Agent | Details |
|---|---|
| Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) | e.g., omeprazole 40 mg IV/PO daily — first-line |
| H₂-receptor antagonist | e.g., ranitidine 50 mg IV TDS — alternative |
| Duration | Continue until patient is eating and mobile |
Prophylaxis for AROU (urinary catheter) [6]
Neurogenic bladder is universal in acute SCI — the patient cannot sense bladder fullness (loss of afferent sensation) and cannot voluntarily initiate micturition (loss of descending control to sacral micturition centre). An over-distended bladder risks:
- Detrusor muscle damage (myogenic stretch injury)
- Vesicoureteric reflux → hydronephrosis → renal damage
- UTI
| Phase | Catheter Type | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Acute (spinal shock) | Indwelling Foley catheter (14-18 Fr) | Continuous drainage during haemodynamic instability and immobility; allows accurate urine output monitoring |
| Subacute/chronic | Intermittent clean catheterisation (ICC) | Lower infection risk than indwelling; promotes bladder cycling; gold standard for long-term neurogenic bladder |
Contraindications to urethral catheterisation [21]:
- Absolute: urethral injury (blood at urethral meatus, high-riding prostate on DRE — typically associated with pelvic trauma)
- Relative: urethral stricture, recent urological surgery
If urethral catheterisation fails or is contraindicated → suprapubic catheterisation (SPC) [21].
- Neurogenic bowel → ileus initially, then constipation
- Regular bowel programme: scheduled glycerine suppositories, digital stimulation, stool softeners (docusate), adequate fibre intake
- Prevent faecal impaction (a common trigger for autonomic dysreflexia in chronic SCI)
Analgesics [6] — SCI pain is multifactorial:
| Pain Type | Agent | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Nociceptive (bone, soft tissue) | Paracetamol, NSAIDs (if no C/I), opioids for severe pain | Standard WHO analgesic ladder |
| Neuropathic (burning, shooting, below-level) | Pregabalin or gabapentin (first-line); amitriptyline or duloxetine (second-line) | Modulate hyperexcitable dorsal horn neurons; gabapentinoids bind α₂δ subunit of voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels → reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release |
| Spasticity-related | Baclofen (oral or intrathecal), tizanidine, diazepam | See spasticity section below |
High SCI (C3-C5) patients require:
- Early intubation if respiratory compromise
- Assisted cough techniques (quad cough — manual abdominal thrust synchronised with cough effort)
- Incentive spirometry and chest physiotherapy
- Tracheostomy if prolonged mechanical ventilation expected (facilitates weaning, bronchial toileting)
- Monitor vital capacity serially — a declining VC in a cervical SCI patient may indicate ascending oedema or deterioration
- Impaired thermoregulation [8] — patients become poikilothermic below the lesion
- Active warming/cooling measures as needed
- Avoid hypothermia (worsens coagulopathy in polytrauma) and hyperthermia (worsens secondary injury)
Methylprednisolone is associated with higher risk of morbidity and complications and should NOT be used. [6]
Methylprednisolone(?) [1] — the question mark in the lecture slides is deliberate.
The story: The NASCIS-II trial (1990) suggested that high-dose methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg bolus then 5.4 mg/kg/hr for 23 hours) within 8 hours of non-penetrating SCI improved motor recovery. This led to widespread use for decades [21].
The problem: Subsequent analysis and further trials (NASCIS-III, multiple Cochrane reviews) showed:
- The original NASCIS-II benefit was a post-hoc subgroup analysis (not pre-specified), making it statistically questionable
- Increased complications: wound infections, pneumonia, sepsis, GI haemorrhage, hyperglycaemia, avascular necrosis
- No mortality benefit
- No improvement in long-term neurological outcomes in well-designed replications
Current guideline (AO Spine 2017, AANS/CNS 2013, updated 2024): Routine use of methylprednisolone in acute SCI is NOT recommended. It may be considered as an option (not a standard) within 8 hours for non-penetrating SCI, but the risks likely outweigh the benefits.
Methylprednisolone — Do NOT Use
This is a classic exam point. The answer expected is: methylprednisolone should NOT be used in acute SCI because it increases morbidity (infection, GI bleed, hyperglycaemia) without proven neurological benefit. The NASCIS-II trial had significant methodological flaws. If asked about it, state the controversy and the current consensus against routine use.
| Steroid Setting | Recommendation | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Acute traumatic SCI | NOT recommended | NASCIS trials methodologically flawed; ↑ complications without proven benefit [6] |
| Acute cord compression from metastasis | High-dose dexamethasone (e.g., 16 mg/day) | Reduces vasogenic oedema around tumour; buys time before definitive RT/surgery [8] |
| Transverse myelitis | IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily × 3-5 days | Treats the underlying inflammatory/autoimmune process [8] |
Note the critical distinction: steroids are not recommended for traumatic SCI but are indicated for inflammatory myelopathy and metastatic cord compression — these are different diseases with different pathophysiology.
Phase 3: Surgical Management
Surgical treatment in unstable injuries [6]:
| Indication | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Unstable fracture (≥ 2/3 columns disrupted) | Spinal column cannot hold alignment → ongoing risk of secondary cord injury from movement |
| Surgical decompression if a patient with normal cord function or incomplete cord lesion progressively deteriorates [6] | Progressive deficit = ongoing compression → decompression can halt or reverse decline |
| Progressive neurological deficit [1] | The cord is being squeezed NOW → remove the compression before it becomes irreversible |
| Myelopathy / Radiculopathy [1] | Persistent cord or root compression causing functional deficit |
| Intractable pain [1] | Structural cause of pain (e.g., nerve root compression, instability) amenable to surgical correction |
| Spinal cord compression from haematoma, abscess, or disc | These are surgical emergencies — the compressive lesion must be evacuated |
Principles of Management — Surgical treatment if: Progressive neurological deficit; Myelopathy / Radiculopathy; Intractable pain [1]
Three goals of surgery [6]:
- Decompression of spinal cord — relieve external pressure on the cord
- Reduction of fractures or dislocation — restore normal alignment
- Fixation of unstable spinal elements — prevent future displacement
| Procedure | What It Does | When It's Used |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior corpectomy + fusion | Remove the vertebral body (corpectomy — from Latin corpus = body + Greek ektomē = cutting out) and replace with a cage/graft; stabilise with anterior plate | Anterior compression (burst fracture retropulsed fragments, disc herniation, tumour involving vertebral body); anterior corpectomy shown in lecture slides [1] |
| Posterior laminectomy | Remove lamina (the posterior arch of the vertebra — the "roof" of the canal) to decompress the cord from behind | Posterior compression, multilevel stenosis; useful when compression is from ligamentum flavum or posterior elements |
| Posterior laminoplasty | "Hinge open" the lamina rather than remove it — creates more space while preserving posterior elements | Multilevel cervical stenosis (particularly in OPLL or spondylosis) — preserves some posterior stability |
| Posterior instrumented fusion | Pedicle screws + rods to hold vertebrae in alignment | Unstable fractures, post-laminectomy instability, fracture-dislocations |
| Combined anterior-posterior (360°) fusion | Both approaches in one or staged operations | Severe instability (e.g., 3-column injury, fracture-dislocation with anterior + posterior disruption) |
| Closed reduction + traction | Skull tongs (e.g., Gardner-Wells) or halo ring with traction weights | Cervical facet dislocations — attempt closed reduction before open surgery if no disc herniation on MRI |
Timing of surgery — The Debate:
Current evidence (STASCIS trial, 2012; AO Spine guidelines) supports early surgery (within 24 hours) for acute traumatic SCI with ongoing compression:
- Earlier decompression → better neurological outcomes in incomplete SCI (ASIA B, C, D)
- Reduced duration of ICU stay and complications
- For complete SCI (ASIA A), the benefit is less clear but early stabilisation still prevents complications and facilitates rehabilitation
The latest AO Spine consensus (2024) recommends decompression within 24 hours whenever safely feasible, particularly for incomplete injuries.
Non-surgical immobilisation only in stable injuries [6]:
| Orthosis | Indication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Rigid cervical collar (e.g., Philadelphia, Miami J) | Stable cervical fractures, post-operative C-spine | Limits flexion/extension but does NOT fully immobilise |
| Halo vest | Unstable upper cervical fractures (e.g., odontoid type II in elderly), some C1 fractures | Most effective external cervical immobilisation; pins screwed into skull attached to vest |
| TLSO (thoracolumbar-sacral orthosis) | Stable thoracolumbar fractures (e.g., compression fractures with < 50% height loss, intact posterior ligaments) | Limits thoracolumbar motion; various types (Jewett, CASH, custom-moulded) |
Use: 2-3 months after injury to facilitate healing [6] Problems: pressure sores, weakening of muscles, soft tissue contractures, ↓pulmonary function, chronic pain syndrome [6]
Phase 4: Management by Specific Cause
Not all SCI is traumatic. The management differs significantly depending on the aetiology:
Principles of Management — Spinal Tumours [1]:
- Steroids to reduce oedema
- Surgical resection within safety limit
- Intraoperative monitoring with motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP)
- Adjuvant radiotherapy for some
For Metastasis [1]:
- Primarily ERT (external beam radiotherapy)
- Surgery for pain, instability, or lesions resistant to RT
- Palliative in nature
| Tumour Type | Primary Treatment | Adjuncts |
|---|---|---|
| Intradural extramedullary (schwannoma, meningioma) | Surgical excision (often curative) | Intraoperative MEP/SSEP monitoring |
| Intramedullary (ependymoma) | Surgical excision (discrete tumours) | ± Adjuvant RT if incomplete resection |
| Intramedullary (astrocytoma) | Biopsy + debulking (indistinct borders) | ± Adjuvant RT/chemo |
| Extradural metastasis | Primarily ERT; surgery if pain/instability/RT-resistant | Steroids (dexamethasone) to reduce oedema |
Conservative management: Physiotherapy, Analgesia [1] Surgical treatment if: Progressive neurological deficit; Myelopathy / Radiculopathy; Intractable pain [1]
| Approach | When | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Mild myelopathy, stable symptoms, no progressive deficit | Physiotherapy, cervical collar, NSAIDs, activity modification |
| Surgical | Progressive deficit, moderate-severe myelopathy, intractable radiculopathy | Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior corpectomy, posterior laminoplasty/laminectomy ± fusion |
- TB spine: anti-TB treatment (2HRZE / 9HR±E) ± surgery if neurological deficit or significant deformity [15]
- Epidural abscess: urgent surgical drainage + IV antibiotics (empiric: flucloxacillin + third-gen cephalosporin; adjust based on C/ST)
- IV methylprednisolone 1 g IV over 1 hour daily × 3-5 days [8]
- If refractory → plasma exchange (PLEX)
- Treat underlying cause (NMO → rituximab; MS → disease-modifying therapy; SLE → immunosuppression)
| Complication | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|
| DVT/PE | LMWH + IPC + compression stockings (start day 1) | Therapeutic anticoagulation; IVC filter if anticoagulation contraindicated |
| Pressure sores | 2-hourly turning, pressure-relieving mattress, skin inspection, adequate nutrition | Wound care, debridement, flap surgery for Grade III-IV ulcers |
| UTI | Intermittent catheterisation (lower infection risk than indwelling), aseptic technique | Antibiotics based on C/ST; NOT prophylactic antibiotics |
| Respiratory | Chest physiotherapy, assisted cough, incentive spirometry, early mobilisation | Antibiotics for pneumonia; ventilatory support as needed |
| Stress ulcers | PPI prophylaxis | Endoscopy if GI bleeding |
| Spasticity | Early physiotherapy, stretching, positioning | Baclofen (oral → intrathecal pump if severe); tizanidine; botulinum toxin for focal spasticity; diazepam |
| Contractures | Range-of-motion exercises, positioning, splinting | Surgical release if fixed |
| Autonomic dysreflexia | Identify and manage triggers (full bladder, constipation, skin issues) | Sit patient upright, loosen clothing, identify/remove trigger, sublingual nifedipine or GTN paste for severe HTN |
| Neurogenic bladder | ICC programme, anticholinergics for overactive detrusor | Long-term: ICC, suprapubic catheter, surgical options (augmentation cystoplasty, continent diversion) |
| Neuropathic pain | Early gabapentin/pregabalin | Combination therapy; TENS; psychology |
| Impaired thermoregulation [8] | Environmental temperature awareness, layered clothing | Active warming/cooling as needed |
| Depression/psychological | Early psychological assessment and support | CBT, SSRIs, peer support groups |
| Heterotopic ossification | NSAIDs (indomethacin) prophylaxis in high-risk | Excision if functionally limiting |
Rehabilitation [1] is arguably the most important long-term intervention. The goals are:
- Maximise residual function — train the patient to use whatever neurological function remains
- Prevent secondary complications — pressure sores, contractures, UTI, psychological decline
- Reintegrate into society — vocational rehabilitation, community support, assistive devices
| Discipline | Role |
|---|---|
| Physiotherapy | Strengthening exercises, transfer training, gait re-education (for incomplete injuries), respiratory physiotherapy |
| Occupational therapy | Activities of daily living (ADLs), assistive devices, wheelchair skills, home modifications |
| Speech therapy | If high cervical injury with ventilator → communication aids |
| Psychology | Adjustment counselling, depression screening, coping strategies |
| Social work | Housing, financial support, community reintegration |
| Vocational rehabilitation | Return to work assessment and support |
| Urology | Neurogenic bladder programme (ICC training) |
| Orthotics | Braces, splints, standing frames |
Prognosis [6]:
- Complete injury: recovery rare
- Incomplete injury: difficult to predict
- Most recovery occurs ≤ 6 months, many can eventually walk with aids
- Depends on level and extent of injury
- Loss of sphincter function is a poor prognostic factor
| ASIA Grade | Prognosis |
|---|---|
| A (Complete) | Very poor for motor recovery below the level; < 5% convert to useful motor function |
| B (Sensory only) | ~30% recover some useful motor function |
| C (Motor < 3) | ~75% will eventually walk (with aids) |
| D (Motor ≥ 3) | Majority achieve community ambulation |
Complete injury — prognosis is generally poor. Incomplete injury — prognosis highly variable. Long-term issues with dysreflexia, neurogenic bladder, spasticity, contracture, and skin problems [1]
High Yield Summary — Management of SCI
-
ABCDE first — jaw thrust (NOT head-tilt chin-lift) for airway in suspected C-spine injury. C3-5 injuries threaten the diaphragm.
-
Immobilise immediately: collar + log roll. Unstable spine = any movement worsens secondary injury.
-
Neurogenic shock: IV fluids + vasopressors (noradrenaline), target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg for 5-7 days. Always rule out hypovolaemic shock first.
-
Medical prophylaxis: DVT (LMWH + IPC), stress ulcers (PPI), AROU (urinary catheter), analgesics.
-
Methylprednisolone is NOT recommended for acute traumatic SCI — increases infection, GI bleed, hyperglycaemia without proven neurological benefit. BUT steroids ARE used for metastatic cord compression (dexamethasone) and transverse myelitis (IV methylprednisolone).
-
Surgery for: unstable fractures, progressive neurological deterioration, myelopathy/radiculopathy, intractable pain. Aim: decompression + reduction + fixation. Early surgery (within 24 hours) preferred for incomplete injuries.
-
Non-surgical immobilisation for stable injuries: spinal orthosis for 2-3 months. Problems: pressure sores, muscle weakness, contractures, decreased pulmonary function.
-
Tumours: primary → surgical resection ± adjuvant RT; metastasis → primarily ERT, surgery if pain/instability/RT-resistant.
-
Rehabilitation is lifelong: PT, OT, bladder programme (ICC), psychological support, vocational rehab.
-
Prognosis: Complete (ASIA A) → recovery rare. Incomplete → most recovery within 6 months. Loss of sphincter function is a poor prognostic factor.
Active Recall - Management of Spinal Cord Injuries
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.6 Spinal Trauma, p176-177) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Section 3.4.9 Paraplegia, p334-335) and Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.1, p168-169) [15] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p80 — TB spondylitis management) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p18 — Spinal trauma imaging) [20] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p7 — Airway management) [21] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Neurogenic shock management; Foley catheter indications/contraindications)
Complications of Spinal Cord Injuries
Complications of SCI are the major drivers of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost in the long term. Many patients survive the initial injury but then die or suffer significantly from preventable complications. The key principle is: the paralysed body doesn't stop having physiological needs — it just loses the ability to signal, regulate, and protect itself. Every complication below can be traced back to the loss of motor, sensory, or autonomic function.
The complications can be organised by timing (acute vs. chronic) and by system.
Long-term issues with dysreflexia, neurogenic bladder, spasticity, contracture, and skin problems [1]
A. Acute / Early Complications
Neurogenic (spinal) shock in SCI down to T1 [8]:
- Cause: sympathetic signal disruption [8]
- Presentation: vasodilatation → hypotension, bradycardia, warm, flushed skin [8]
- Diaphragmatic breathing if C5 or below (loss of control of intercostal muscles) [8]
- Respiratory arrest if above C3 (loss of control of diaphragm) [8]
Why it happens: The sympathetic chain exits the cord from T1–L2. Any cervical or upper thoracic SCI disrupts this entire outflow → the body cannot constrict its blood vessels or increase heart rate → profound vasodilatory hypotension with paradoxical bradycardia (because the vagus nerve, which exits the brainstem and is NOT affected by the spinal injury, is now unopposed).
Why it's dangerous: Hypotension reduces cord perfusion → worsens secondary ischaemic injury. Bradycardia can progress to cardiac arrest in high cervical lesions.
Management: IV fluids and vasopressors/inotropes [1]. Target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg.
Neurogenic vs Hypovolaemic Shock — Again
In polytrauma, neurogenic and hypovolaemic shock often coexist. A warm, bradycardic, hypotensive patient who is also bleeding from a pelvic fracture needs BOTH volume resuscitation and vasopressors. Never assume one diagnosis exclusively.
The most common cause of death in acute SCI, particularly for cervical injuries.
| Level | Respiratory Impact | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Above C3 | Respiratory arrest | Loss of phrenic nerve (C3-5) → no diaphragm function → apnoea |
| C3-C5 | Diaphragmatic breathing only, ↓vital capacity | Partial/complete phrenic nerve injury; intercostals paralysed |
| C5-T6 | Paradoxical ventilation [6], impaired cough | Intercostal muscles paralysed → cannot stabilise chest wall during inspiration; abdominal muscles paralysed → cannot generate adequate cough pressure for secretion clearance |
| Below T6 | Mild restriction | Loss of abdominal muscle tone reduces forced expiration and cough |
Specific respiratory complications:
- Atelectasis and pneumonia: the combination of poor cough, retained secretions, and immobility creates a perfect environment for lung collapse and lower respiratory tract infections. Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in both acute and chronic SCI.
- Pulmonary embolism: from DVT (see below) — a massive PE is a sudden, catastrophic complication.
- Ventilator dependence: high cervical SCI patients may require lifelong mechanical ventilation or diaphragmatic pacing.
Prevention: chest physiotherapy, assisted cough techniques (quad cough), incentive spirometry, early mobilisation where possible, suctioning of secretions, VTE prophylaxis.
SCI patients have the highest rate of DVT of any hospitalised population — up to 80% without prophylaxis.
Why? Virchow's triad is perfectly fulfilled:
- Stasis: paralysed lower limbs → no calf muscle pump → blood pools in deep veins
- Endothelial injury: trauma, surgery, catheterisation
- Hypercoagulability: trauma-induced coagulopathy with elevated tissue factor and reduced fibrinolysis
Clinical problem: the patient cannot feel leg swelling or pain (sensory loss below the level) → DVT is often clinically silent until it presents as massive PE.
Prevention: LMWH + intermittent pneumatic compression + compression stockings from day 1. Continue for 2-3 months.
Spinal injury and operation are recognised causes of paralytic ileus [22].
Why? Acute SCI disrupts the autonomic innervation of the gut. The sympathetic (T5-L2) and parasympathetic (vagus for proximal gut, S2-4 for distal gut) inputs are both affected to varying degrees. In the acute phase, there is a generalised loss of coordinated peristalsis → the gut becomes atonic.
Clinical features: abdominal distension, absent bowel sounds, vomiting, inability to tolerate oral feeds.
Management: NPO, nasogastric tube drainage, IV fluids, correction of electrolytes (especially K⁺ and Mg²⁺). Usually resolves within days as autonomic reflexes partially recover.
Risk: a distended gut elevates the diaphragm → further compromises the already-limited respiratory function in a cervical SCI patient. This is a vicious cycle.
Anogenital issues: spastic or paralytic bladder, incontinence ± constipation and sexual dysfunction [8]
In the acute phase (during spinal shock), the detrusor muscle is areflexic — it cannot contract. The patient cannot sense bladder fullness (loss of afferent S2-4 pathways) and cannot voluntarily initiate voiding (loss of descending control). The result is painless AROU.
Why painless? Because the afferent sensory fibres from the bladder (travelling via S2-4) are also disrupted → the patient has no urge to void and no suprapubic discomfort. This contrasts with mechanical obstruction (e.g., BPH) where the patient is in significant pain because the sensory pathways are intact.
Management: indwelling urethral catheter in the acute phase → transition to intermittent clean catheterisation (ICC) once stable.
High SCI causes unopposed vagal (parasympathetic) stimulation to the stomach → excessive gastric acid secretion → stress-related mucosal damage.
Prevention: PPI (omeprazole) or H₂-blocker from day 1.
B. Subacute Complications (Days to Weeks)
Others: pressure sores [8]
One of the most devastating and costly complications of SCI. Prevalence: 25–60% of SCI patients will develop a pressure ulcer at some point.
Why? Three factors converge:
- Loss of sensation: the patient cannot feel the pain of prolonged pressure on a bony prominence → no reflexive repositioning
- Immobility: cannot shift weight, roll, or adjust position
- Autonomic dysfunction: impaired vasomotor control below the lesion → poor microcirculation → tissue is more vulnerable to ischaemic damage from external pressure
Common sites: sacrum, ischial tuberosities (sitting), greater trochanters, heels, occiput (lying on hard spinal board).
Pathophysiology: sustained pressure > capillary closing pressure (~32 mmHg) → local tissue ischaemia → necrosis → ulceration → secondary infection → osteomyelitis → sepsis → death.
Grading (NPUAP/EPUAP):
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| I | Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin |
| II | Partial-thickness skin loss (blister or shallow ulcer) |
| III | Full-thickness skin loss (subcutaneous fat visible, bone/tendon NOT exposed) |
| IV | Full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle |
Prevention (far easier than treatment):
- 2-hourly turning/repositioning
- Pressure-relieving mattress (alternating air pressure)
- Regular skin inspection (especially over bony prominences)
- Adequate nutrition (protein, vitamin C, zinc for wound healing)
- Weight shifts every 15–30 minutes when seated in wheelchair
Treatment: offloading, wound debridement, moist wound dressings, VAC therapy, flap surgery for Grade III-IV ulcers, antibiotics if infected.
Pressure Ulcers Kill
Pressure ulcers are not trivial. They are a major cause of sepsis, prolonged hospitalisation, and death in SCI patients. Prevention is a core nursing and medical responsibility. A stage IV sacral ulcer with osteomyelitis can take months to heal and may require multiple surgeries.
Spasticity [1] — this is a hallmark late complication of UMN-type SCI.
Pathophysiology: After spinal shock resolves (1-2 weeks), the loss of descending inhibitory input from the cortex and brainstem (reticulospinal, vestibulospinal pathways) results in anterior horn cells becoming hyperexcitable → exaggerated stretch reflexes → velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone.
Think of it this way: normally, the brain sends "calm down" signals to spinal motor neurons. When those signals are cut off, the motor neurons fire excessively in response to even minimal stretch stimuli.
Clinical features: increased muscle tone (clasp-knife pattern), hyperreflexia, clonus, flexor or extensor spasms (often painful), muscle contractures if left untreated.
Double-edged sword: some degree of spasticity can be useful — it maintains muscle bulk (preventing atrophy), aids venous return (reducing DVT risk), and can be used functionally for standing/transfers. But excessive spasticity causes pain, interferes with function, causes contractures, and triggers autonomic dysreflexia.
Management:
- Physiotherapy: stretching, range-of-motion exercises, standing programmes
- Oral medications: baclofen (GABA-B agonist — reduces presynaptic excitatory neurotransmitter release), tizanidine (α₂-agonist — reduces spinal excitatory interneuron activity), diazepam (GABA-A agonist — general CNS depression)
- Focal: botulinum toxin injections for localised problematic spasticity
- Intrathecal baclofen pump: for severe, diffuse, refractory spasticity — delivers baclofen directly to the CSF around the spinal cord at much lower doses than oral (avoids systemic side effects like sedation)
- Surgical: tendon lengthening, neurectomy (rarely needed)
Contracture [1] — fixed shortening of muscles, tendons, or joint capsules.
Why? Immobility + spasticity → muscles held in shortened position for prolonged periods → fibrosis and permanent shortening of soft tissues → the joint becomes fixed in one position.
Common patterns: hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle equinus (plantarflexion), wrist flexion.
Prevention: daily range-of-motion exercises, proper positioning, splinting, stretching programmes.
Treatment: serial casting, dynamic splinting, surgical release if fixed.
C. Chronic / Late Complications
Autonomic dysreflexia (if lesion at or above T6) due to episodic autonomic fluctuation [8]
This is a medical emergency unique to SCI patients with lesions at or above T6.
Mechanism (from first principles) [8]:
- A noxious stimulus below the level of injury (most commonly a full bladder, constipation, skin pressure, UTI, ingrown toenail)
- Afferent signals travel to the spinal cord and trigger a massive reflex sympathetic discharge below the lesion → widespread vasoconstriction below the injury level → ↑↑BP
- The brain detects the hypertension via intact carotid/aortic baroreceptors → sends strong vagal reflex → bradycardia and attempted vasodilation above the lesion
- But the inhibitory sympathetic signals from the brain CANNOT pass through the damaged cord → the vasoconstriction below the lesion continues unchecked → BP keeps rising
S/S: paroxysmal HTN, throbbing headache, excessive sweating, flushing of skin, bradycardia, anxiety etc [8]
Why is it dangerous? Systolic BP can exceed 250–300 mmHg → risk of seizures, intracranial haemorrhage, retinal detachment, cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, death.
Why ≥ T6? Because the major splanchnic vascular bed (supplied by the greater splanchnic nerve from T5-T9) is the largest capacitance vessel system in the body. If the lesion is above T6, this entire bed participates in the unopposed sympathetic vasoconstriction → massive rise in BP. Lesions below T6 do not produce enough vasoconstriction to overwhelm the compensatory vasodilation above.
Emergency management:
- Sit the patient upright (uses gravity to lower BP)
- Loosen any tight clothing or constrictive devices
- Identify and remove the trigger:
- Check the bladder (blocked catheter? → flush or replace; no catheter? → catheterise)
- Check the bowels (faecal impaction? → digital disimpaction with anaesthetic gel)
- Check the skin (pressure ulcer, ingrown toenail, tight clothing)
- Pharmacological BP control if trigger cannot be immediately identified or BP remains dangerously high:
- Sublingual nifedipine (10 mg) — calcium channel blocker → rapid vasodilation
- GTN paste (2% topical) — direct smooth muscle relaxant
- IV hydralazine or labetalol for refractory cases
Autonomic Dysreflexia — The Full Bladder is the Commonest Trigger
In any SCI patient (T6 or above) who suddenly develops headache + hypertension + sweating above the lesion + bradycardia → think autonomic dysreflexia immediately. The first thing to check is the urinary catheter — is it blocked? Is the bag full? Is there a kink? 85% of episodes are triggered by bladder or bowel distension.
Anogenital issues: spastic or paralytic bladder [8]
This is one of the most functionally significant and dangerous long-term complications.
The two patterns (depending on level of lesion):
| Type | Lesion Level | Mechanism | Bladder Behaviour | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spastic (reflex/UMN) bladder | Suprasacral (above S2) | Loss of cortical inhibition → reflex arc intact → involuntary detrusor contractions | Small-capacity, overactive bladder with uninhibited contractions; detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) — detrusor and sphincter contract simultaneously | ↑↑urinary tract pressure → upper tract damage (hydronephrosis, renal failure) [8] |
| Paralytic (areflexic/LMN) bladder | Sacral (S2-4) or cauda equina | Destruction of the reflex arc → detrusor cannot contract at all | Large-capacity, flaccid bladder that fills passively and overflows | Overflow incontinence, UTI, bladder stones |
Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) is the most dangerous pattern [8]:
- Cause: spinal cord injury, pontine stroke
- Mechanism: interruption of descending control by pontine micturition centre → failure of detrusor-sphincter coordination → synchronous contraction of both detrusor and sphincters
- Consequence: ↑↑urinary tract pressure → upper tract damage
Long-term complications of neurogenic bladder:
- Recurrent UTIs (the most common complication of SCI overall): stagnant urine + instrumentation + impaired immune responses below the lesion
- Bladder stones (stagnant, alkaline urine + catheter as nidus)
- Hydronephrosis and renal failure (from high-pressure DSD or chronic reflux)
- Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: chronic irritation from indwelling catheter → squamous metaplasia → SCC (16-20× risk) [10]
Management: intermittent clean catheterisation (gold standard), anticholinergics (oxybutynin) for overactive detrusor, alpha-blockers for sphincter relaxation in DSD, botulinum toxin injection into detrusor, augmentation cystoplasty for refractory cases, regular surveillance for bladder cancer in long-term catheter users.
Patients with spinal cord injuries who have long-term indwelling catheters have a 16-20× risk of developing SCC in the bladder (NOT UCC because of chronic irritation by catheter in bladder) [10]
Loss of autonomic and voluntary control of defecation. Two patterns mirror the bladder:
- Suprasacral (reflex) bowel: intact reflex arc → stool held by spastic sphincter → responds to rectal stimulation (suppositories, digital stimulation)
- Sacral (areflexic) bowel: flaccid sphincter → faecal incontinence, no reflex defecation
Complications: constipation (commonest), faecal impaction (trigger for autonomic dysreflexia), bowel obstruction, megacolon, haemorrhoids.
Management: scheduled bowel programme (same time every day/every other day), digital stimulation or glycerine suppositories, adequate fluid/fibre, stool softeners (docusate), prokinetics (metoclopramide if needed).
Sexual dysfunction [8]
| Function | Innervation | Impact of SCI |
|---|---|---|
| Erection | Parasympathetic S2-4 (reflex erection) + Psychogenic erection (T11-L2 sympathetic) | Suprasacral lesion: reflex erection preserved (S2-4 arc intact) but psychogenic erection lost. Sacral lesion: both lost. |
| Ejaculation | Sympathetic T11-L2 | Often impaired in both suprasacral and sacral lesions → male infertility |
| Female arousal/orgasm | Parasympathetic S2-4 | Often impaired but pregnancy is possible |
Management: PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil — "Viagra") for erectile dysfunction; electroejaculation or vibratory stimulation for fertility; psychological support and counselling.
Impaired thermoregulation [8]
Why? Thermoregulation depends on:
- Cutaneous vasodilation/vasoconstriction (sympathetic T1-L2 control)
- Sweating (sympathetic cholinergic fibres)
- Shivering (motor — requires functioning skeletal muscles)
All three are disrupted below the lesion → the patient becomes poikilothermic below the injury level (body temperature drifts with environmental temperature).
Clinical significance: patients are at risk of both hypothermia (in cold environments — cannot shiver or vasoconstrict) and hyperthermia (in hot environments — cannot sweat or vasodilate). Hyperthermia can worsen secondary cord injury in the acute phase.
Present in 60-80% of SCI patients. Two major types:
| Type | Description | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Nociceptive (musculoskeletal) | Shoulder pain (from wheelchair propulsion), back pain, overuse syndromes | Mechanical stress on functioning joints that compensate for paralysed ones |
| Neuropathic (central/below-level) | Burning, shooting, electric-shock pain below the lesion; often diffuse and constant | Reorganisation of dorsal horn circuits after deafferentation → spontaneous ectopic firing of pain pathways; central sensitisation |
| Neuropathic (at-level) | Band-like burning at the sensory level | Damaged dorsal root entry zone → abnormal signal generation |
Management: pregabalin/gabapentin (first-line for neuropathic), amitriptyline/duloxetine, TENS, intrathecal drug delivery, psychological approaches (CBT), exercise.
Formation of mature lamellar bone in soft tissues (usually around paralysed joints — hip, knee, elbow).
Why? The exact mechanism is unclear, but involves aberrant mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in response to local inflammation + neurogenic signalling disruption. Incidence: 10-53% of SCI patients.
Clinical features: joint swelling, reduced ROM, warmth (can mimic DVT); if severe, complete ankylosis of the joint.
Diagnosis: elevated serum ALP (early), triple-phase bone scan (sensitive early), plain XR (once mature).
Prevention: NSAIDs (indomethacin), early mobilisation, low-dose radiation in high-risk patients.
Treatment: physiotherapy to maintain ROM; surgical excision once the bone is mature (wait ≥ 12-18 months — premature surgery leads to recurrence).
Why? Wolff's law — bone remodels in response to mechanical load. Paralysed limbs bear no weight → osteoclastic resorption exceeds osteoblastic formation → rapid bone loss below the level of injury (up to 40% bone mineral density loss in the first 2 years).
Consequence: fragility fractures from minimal trauma (transfers, physiotherapy). These fractures may go unrecognised because the patient cannot feel pain.
Prevention: standing programmes (standing frame), bisphosphonates (limited evidence in SCI), calcium and vitamin D supplementation, denosumab.
A late complication in 3-4% of SCI patients. A fluid-filled cavity (syrinx) develops within the injured cord, usually at or above the level of injury, and gradually expands.
Clinical features: progressive ascending neurological deficit (pain, weakness, sensory loss) months to years after the original injury — often presenting as a new "central cord syndrome" pattern.
Why? Altered CSF dynamics from arachnoid adhesions at the injury site → fluid is driven into the central canal → progressive cavitation.
Diagnosis: MRI — shows an intramedullary cystic cavity.
Management: observation for small/stable syrinx; surgical drainage (syringoperitoneal or syringopleural shunt) or untethering of scar tissue for progressive symptomatic syrinx.
| System | Acute | Subacute/Chronic |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Neurogenic shock (hypotension + bradycardia) | Autonomic dysreflexia (paroxysmal HTN); DVT/PE (ongoing risk) |
| Respiratory | Respiratory failure, aspiration, atelectasis | Pneumonia (leading cause of death), ventilator dependence |
| Urological | AROU (painless) | Neurogenic bladder (spastic or paralytic), UTI, stones, SCC of bladder (16-20× risk with long-term catheter), hydronephrosis, renal failure |
| GI | Paralytic ileus, stress ulceration | Neurogenic bowel, constipation, faecal impaction |
| Musculoskeletal | — | Spasticity, contractures, heterotopic ossification, osteoporosis, pathological fractures |
| Skin | — | Pressure ulcers |
| Neurological | Spinal shock, secondary neurological injury | Neuropathic pain, post-traumatic syringomyelia |
| Metabolic/Autonomic | Impaired thermoregulation | Impaired thermoregulation (chronic), metabolic syndrome, increased cardiovascular risk |
| Sexual/Reproductive | Priapism (acute) | Sexual dysfunction, infertility |
| Psychological | Acute stress reaction | Depression (very common), PTSD, adjustment disorder, suicide risk |
Complete cord transection: Complete paralysis & sensory loss below; Sphincter dysfunction; Poor functional prognosis [1]
Incomplete injury: Prognosis variable [1]
Sphincter dysfunction — a point of no return [1]
High Yield Summary — Complications of SCI
-
Respiratory failure is the #1 killer in acute cervical SCI. C3-5 controls the diaphragm. Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in both acute and chronic phases.
-
DVT/PE: highest risk of any hospitalised population. Start LMWH + IPC from day 1. Silent because patients cannot feel leg swelling.
-
Neurogenic shock: hypotension + bradycardia + warm skin from sympathetic disruption (T1-L2). Treat with IV fluids + vasopressors. Always exclude hypovolaemia first.
-
Autonomic dysreflexia: lesion ≥ T6. Noxious stimulus below lesion → massive reflex sympathetic discharge → severe HTN + bradycardia + headache + sweating above lesion. Commonest trigger = full bladder. Sit up, find and remove trigger, sublingual nifedipine if severe. Medical emergency — can cause stroke/death.
-
Neurogenic bladder: suprasacral = spastic (DSD → high-pressure → upper tract damage); sacral = paralytic (overflow incontinence). ICC is the gold standard. Long-term catheter → 16-20× risk of SCC (not UCC).
-
Pressure ulcers: loss of sensation + immobility + poor circulation. Sacrum, ischial tuberosities, heels. Prevention: 2-hourly turning, pressure-relieving mattress, nutrition. Stage IV → osteomyelitis → sepsis → death.
-
Spasticity + contractures: from loss of descending inhibition (UMN). Treat with physiotherapy, baclofen, tizanidine, botulinum toxin, intrathecal baclofen pump.
-
Impaired thermoregulation: poikilothermia below the lesion. Risk of both hypothermia and hyperthermia.
-
Neuropathic pain: present in 60-80%. Pregabalin/gabapentin first-line.
-
Post-traumatic syringomyelia: ascending deficit months-years later. MRI diagnosis. Surgery if progressive.
-
Depression: very common. Screen early, treat aggressively. Suicide risk is elevated in SCI populations.
-
Sphincter dysfunction is a point of no return — once established, it has the worst prognosis for recovery.
Active Recall - Complications of Spinal Cord Injuries
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 110. Paraplegia Spinal cord compression Transverse myelitis Spinal dysraphism Neuroimaging III Spinal Cord.pdf [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.6 Spinal Trauma, p176-177) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Section 3.4.9 Paraplegia, p334-335) and Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Section 9.1, p168-169) [10] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Section on bladder cancer risk factors — SCC in SCI patients) [22] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (p141 — Paralytic ileus causes including spinal injury)
Head Injury
Head injury is any trauma to the scalp, skull, or brain ranging from minor concussion to severe intracranial hemorrhage, potentially causing neurological dysfunction.
Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus is a condition characterized by abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid within the ventricular system of the brain, leading to increased intracranial pressure and ventricular dilation.