Brain tumours

Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are secondary malignant tumors that arise from the hematogenous spread of a primary cancer elsewhere in the body to the brain parenchyma.

Brain Metastases

Brain metastases (cerebral metastases) are secondary intracranial tumours that arise when malignant cells from a primary cancer elsewhere in the body spread to the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges, or dura. The term derives from the Greek "meta" (beyond/change) + "stasis" (standing/position) — literally, cancer that has "moved beyond" its original position.

"Commonest intracranial tumour overall" — this is a critical GC lecture point [1]. Brain metastases outnumber primary brain tumours by approximately 10:1 in clinical practice.

High Yield — GC Lecture Point

Brain metastases are the commonest intracranial tumour overall, and their incidence is rising as cancer survival improves. [1] This means that any adult presenting with new neurological symptoms and a history of cancer (even remote) should have brain metastases at the top of the differential.

The concept of malignancy in intracranial tumours differs fundamentally from extracranial tumours: primary brain tumours rarely metastasise outside the CNS (because there is no lymphatic drainage), so TNM staging is not useful for primary brain tumours [2]. However, brain metastases are, by definition, already Stage IV disease for the primary cancer and carry a fundamentally different prognostic and therapeutic framework.


Epidemiology

  • Brain metastases occur in 20–40% of all cancer patients during the course of their disease.
  • Rising incidence as cancer survival improves [1] — this is a key GC lecture point. As systemic therapies improve and patients live longer, the brain (protected by the blood-brain barrier, which many chemotherapy agents cannot cross) becomes a "sanctuary site" where metastases can develop unchecked.
  • Estimated incidence: 8.3–14.3 per 100,000 population per year in developed countries, though autopsy series suggest the true figure is higher (~25% of all cancer deaths have brain metastases at autopsy).
  • In Hong Kong, the most relevant primaries are lung cancer (the most common cancer in males) [3] and breast cancer (the most common cancer in females, lifetime risk 1 in 16 in HK) [4], both of which are leading causes of brain metastases.

  • Peak age: 50–70 years (reflecting peak cancer incidence).
  • No strong sex predilection overall, but sex-specific primaries (breast in females, lung slightly more in males in HK) create different patterns.
  • In children, brain metastases are rare; intracranial tumours in children are much more likely to be primary (medulloblastoma, cerebellar astrocytoma, etc.) [2].

The risk factors for brain metastases are essentially the risk factors for having an advanced primary cancer:

CategoryKey Factors
Primary tumour typeLung (especially adenocarcinoma, SCLC), breast, melanoma, RCC, colorectal — these have the highest brain tropism
Stage at diagnosisAdvanced/metastatic disease at presentation
Tumour biologyHER2-positive breast cancer (higher brain metastasis rate than HER2-negative), triple-negative breast cancer, ALK-rearranged or EGFR-mutant NSCLC, BRAF-mutant melanoma
Delayed systemic treatmentInadequate control of systemic disease
Prior historyHistory of extracranial metastases (bone, liver, lung) increases risk of subsequent brain involvement
Young age at cancer diagnosisParadoxically, younger patients may have higher rates of brain metastases because they survive longer for metastases to develop
Blood-brain barrier "sanctuary"Many systemic therapies cannot penetrate the BBB effectively, allowing occult brain micrometastases to grow

Relevant Neuroanatomy

Understanding where brain metastases tend to lodge and why requires knowledge of cerebral vascular anatomy and the concept of the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Cerebral Blood Supply and Metastatic Distribution

  • Brain metastases distribute roughly in proportion to cerebral blood flow and brain parenchymal volume:
    • ~80% cerebral hemispheres (supratentorial) — because they receive ~80% of cerebral blood flow
    • ~15% cerebellum (posterior fossa)
    • ~5% brainstem
  • This vascular distribution explains why adults predominantly develop supratentorial metastases [2].
  • Metastases tend to lodge at the grey–white matter junction (corticomedullary junction), where blood vessels narrow and tumour emboli get trapped.

Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB)

The BBB is formed by:

  1. Tight junctions between cerebral capillary endothelial cells
  2. Astrocytic foot processes (end-feet) wrapping around capillaries
  3. Pericytes embedded in the basement membrane
  4. Basement membrane itself

The BBB is selectively permeable and excludes most large molecules and many drugs. This is clinically crucial because:

  • It explains why many chemotherapy agents are ineffective against brain metastases (they cannot cross).
  • It explains why the brain acts as a "sanctuary site" — systemic disease may be well controlled but brain disease progresses.
  • When metastases grow, they disrupt the BBB locally (forming the "blood-tumour barrier"), which paradoxically may allow some contrast agents and certain drugs to enter the tumour — this is why contrast-enhanced MRI can detect brain metastases (contrast leaks through the disrupted BBB and enhances the tumour).

Cerebral Oedema Surrounding Metastases

  • Brain metastases cause vasogenic oedema in the surrounding white matter (as opposed to cytotoxic oedema seen in ischaemic stroke).
  • Mechanism: The disrupted BBB at the tumour allows plasma proteins and fluid to leak into the extracellular space of the white matter.
  • This peritumoral oedema is often disproportionately large relative to the metastasis itself and is a major contributor to symptoms (mass effect, raised intracranial pressure).
  • This is why dexamethasone is so effective — it restores BBB integrity and reduces vasogenic oedema.

Functional Neuroanatomy — Clinical Correlates

The symptoms produced by brain metastases depend entirely on their location:

LocationFunctionDeficit When Affected
Frontal lobeMotor cortex, executive function, personality, speech (Broca's area on dominant side)Contralateral hemiparesis, personality change, expressive aphasia
Parietal lobeSensory cortex, spatial awareness, calculationContralateral hemisensory loss, neglect (non-dominant), acalculia
Temporal lobeMemory, auditory processing, speech (Wernicke's area on dominant side)Memory impairment, receptive aphasia, visual field defect (superior quadrantanopia)
Occipital lobePrimary visual cortexContralateral homonymous hemianopia
CerebellumCoordination, balance, gaitIpsilateral ataxia, dysmetria, nystagmus, truncal ataxia
BrainstemCranial nerve nuclei, consciousness, vital centresCN palsies, altered consciousness, long tract signs
Pituitary/hypothalamic regionEndocrine regulationHormonal dysfunction, visual field defects (bitemporal hemianopia)

Why Grey-White Junction?

Tumour cell emboli travel through the arterial system. As arteries branch into smaller arterioles and capillaries at the grey-white matter junction, the calibre narrows sharply. Tumour emboli get physically trapped at this transition zone, explaining the predilection for the corticomedullary junction.


Etiology

Brain metastases spread via haematogenous or direct invasion. [1]

RouteMechanismExample
Haematogenous (most common)Tumour cells enter the systemic venous circulation → right heart → pulmonary circulation → left heart → arterial system → brainBreast, melanoma, RCC, colorectal
Direct arterialLung tumours can bypass the venous route — tumour cells enter the pulmonary veins directly → left heart → brainLung cancer (explains why lung is the #1 cause)
Direct invasionTumour from adjacent structures (skull base, paranasal sinuses) grows directly into the brainHead and neck cancers, NPC (locally relevant in HK)
CSF dissemination (leptomeningeal)Tumour cells spread through the CSF, coating the meningesBreast, lung, melanoma, leukaemia, lymphoma
Retrograde venous (Batson's plexus)Tumour cells travel retrograde through the valveless vertebral venous plexus to the craniumPelvic/abdominal tumours

Common origins: Lung, breast, colon, kidney, melanoma… [1]

The most common primary sites for brain metastases, in approximate order of frequency:

Primary CancerKey PointsApproximate % of Brain Mets
LungThe single most common cause of brain metastases. NSCLC (especially adenocarcinoma) and SCLC both have high brain tropism. SCLC has such high rates (~50–80%) that prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is standard.40–50%
BreastSecond most common overall. HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes have the highest rates (~30–55% of metastatic HER2+ patients develop brain mets).15–25%
MelanomaHighest propensity per case (~40–50% of metastatic melanoma patients develop brain mets), but lower absolute numbers because melanoma is less common than lung/breast.5–20%
RCC (renal cell carcinoma)Often presents with solitary brain metastasis; classically hypervascular mets with risk of haemorrhage.5–10%
ColorectalLess brain-tropic than the above, but common cancer so still significant.3–5%
OthersThyroid, ovarian, testicular (GCT), sarcoma, unknown primaryVariable

High Yield — Hong Kong Context

In Hong Kong, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and the most common primary leading to brain metastases. NPC (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), while classically a head and neck tumour with strong HK relevance, can also cause brain metastases via direct extension through the skull base or haematogenous spread. Always consider NPC in a HK patient with cranial nerve palsies and a nasopharyngeal mass.

Not all cancers metastasise to the brain equally. The "seed and soil" hypothesis (Stephen Paget, 1889) explains this:

  1. Seed factors (tumour cell intrinsic):

    • Expression of adhesion molecules that bind to cerebral endothelium (e.g., integrins, selectins)
    • Ability to cross the BBB (via secretion of proteases like MMPs, or by transcytosis)
    • Expression of colonisation factors (e.g., serpins that protect against plasmin-mediated apoptosis in the brain microenvironment)
    • EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements, HER2 amplification — all associated with higher brain metastasis rates
  2. Soil factors (brain microenvironment):

    • Astrocytes can be "co-opted" by tumour cells — they provide growth factors and protect tumour cells from immune attack
    • The brain's unique immune environment (immune privilege, lack of conventional lymphatic drainage until recently discovered meningeal lymphatics) allows tumour cells to evade immune surveillance
    • Rich glucose supply supports metabolically active tumour cells

Pathophysiology

Understanding the pathophysiology requires walking through the metastatic cascade:

Detailed Steps:

  1. Local invasion: Primary tumour cells acquire mesenchymal phenotype (epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EMT), allowing them to invade surrounding tissues and access vasculature.

  2. Intravasation: Tumour cells enter the bloodstream. For lung cancer, this is especially efficient because pulmonary veins drain directly into the left heart, giving tumour cells immediate access to the systemic arterial circulation (no first-pass through the liver filter).

  3. Survival in circulation: Most circulating tumour cells (CTCs) die due to shear stress, anoikis (apoptosis from loss of cell-matrix attachment), and immune attack. Those that survive often form tumour cell-platelet aggregates that shield them from NK cell killing.

  4. Arrest at cerebral microvessels: CTCs arrest at the grey-white matter junction where vessels narrow. They adhere to the cerebral endothelium via adhesion molecules.

  5. Extravasation across BBB: Tumour cells secrete proteases (MMPs, cathepsins) and inflammatory mediators that disrupt tight junctions. They may also undergo transcytosis (passing through endothelial cells). Some tumours (especially melanoma) are particularly adept at crossing the BBB.

  6. Colonisation: Once in the brain parenchyma, tumour cells must adapt to the unique microenvironment. They co-opt astrocytes (which produce growth factors like IL-6, TGF-β) and interact with microglia. They upregulate pathways for survival in the brain's glucose-rich environment.

  7. Angiogenesis: Growing metastases secrete VEGF and other angiogenic factors to develop their own blood supply. This new vasculature is abnormal and leaky.

  8. Vasogenic oedema: The abnormal tumour vasculature (lacking normal BBB properties) leaks plasma proteins and fluid into the surrounding white matter, causing disproportionate oedema. This oedema compresses surrounding brain tissue.

  9. Mass effect and raised ICP: The combination of tumour mass + oedema + possible obstruction of CSF flow (especially posterior fossa tumours obstructing the 4th ventricle) leads to raised ICP.

Pathophysiology of Specific Complications

The Monro-Kellie doctrine states that the cranial vault is a fixed-volume compartment containing three components:

  • Brain tissue (~80%)
  • Blood (~10%)
  • CSF (~10%)

Any increase in one component must be compensated by a decrease in another, or ICP rises. Brain metastases increase the "brain tissue" component (tumour + oedema), and may also increase CSF volume if they obstruct CSF pathways (obstructive hydrocephalus).

Why is the headache worse in the morning? During sleep, the recumbent position impairs venous drainage from the head (jugular veins are at the same level as the heart), and the normal nocturnal dip in blood pressure reduces CSF absorption. Both effects increase ICP, which peaks in the early morning.

  • Brain metastases cause seizures in ~20–35% of patients.
  • Mechanism: Tumour cells and surrounding oedema disrupt the normal excitatory/inhibitory balance in cortical neurons. Cortical irritation (from tumour invasion, iron deposition from microhaemorrhage, or glutamate release) lowers the seizure threshold.
  • Cortical metastases are more likely to cause seizures than deep metastases because cortical neurons are the generators of seizure activity.
  • Melanoma metastases have a particularly high rate of seizures (~67%) because they are frequently haemorrhagic (blood products are irritant to cortex).

  • Certain metastases are prone to intra-tumoural haemorrhage:
    • Melanoma (most notorious)
    • RCC
    • Choriocarcinoma
    • Thyroid carcinoma
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Mechanism: These tumours develop abnormal, fragile neovasculature that ruptures easily. The tumour may also invade vessel walls, weakening them.
  • A patient presenting with acute "stroke-like" onset of neurological deficit + known cancer should prompt suspicion for haemorrhagic brain metastasis (not just primary intracerebral haemorrhage).

High Yield — Mnemonic for Haemorrhagic Brain Metastases

"MR CT" — Melanoma, RCC, Choriocarcinoma, Thyroid. These are the classic haemorrhagic brain metastases. HCC can also be added (some use "MR CT + HCC").


Classification

CategoryDefinitionClinical Significance
SolitarySingle brain metastasis with no other known metastasesBest surgical candidate; best prognosis
SingleSingle brain metastasis with extracranial metastases presentSurgery may still be considered depending on systemic disease control
Oligometastatic (limited)2–4 brain metastasesMay be candidates for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)
Multiple≥5 brain metastases (some definitions use ≥4)Typically treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or systemic therapy

Important Distinction — Solitary vs. Single

Students often confuse "solitary" and "single." A solitary brain metastasis means it is the ONLY metastasis in the entire body (brain is the sole site of metastatic disease). A single brain metastasis means there is one in the brain, but there may be metastases elsewhere (e.g., bone, liver). This distinction matters for surgical decision-making and prognosis.

  • Supratentorial (80–85% in adults): cerebral hemispheres
  • Infratentorial (15–20%): cerebellum, brainstem
  • Leptomeningeal (carcinomatous meningitis): diffuse involvement of meninges by tumour cells in CSF — a distinct and poor-prognosis entity

(See Etiology section above)

  • May present before the primary disease [1] — brain metastasis can be the first manifestation of cancer (the primary is discovered after)
  • May develop when the primary disease is long in remission and without extraneural metastasis [1] — the brain acts as a sanctuary site
  • Synchronous: discovered at the same time as the primary
  • Metachronous: discovered after initial treatment of the primary

The Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) is used to estimate prognosis in brain metastasis patients based on:

  • Age
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)
  • Number of brain metastases
  • Presence of extracranial metastases
  • Primary tumour type and molecular subtype (e.g., HER2 status for breast cancer, EGFR/ALK status for NSCLC)

Median survival ranges from ~3 months (unfavourable GPA score, e.g., multiple brain mets from SCLC with poor KPS) to >24 months (favourable GPA score, e.g., single brain met from HER2+ breast cancer with good KPS treated with surgery + SRS).


Clinical Features

The clinical presentation of brain metastases depends on: (a) the location of the metastasis, (b) the size and number of lesions, (c) the degree of oedema, and (d) the rate of growth.

SymptomApproximate FrequencyPathophysiological Basis
Headache40–50%Raised ICP from mass effect (tumour + oedema) stretching pain-sensitive structures (dura, blood vessels, falx, tentorium). The brain parenchyma itself is insensitive to pain. Worse in the morning because recumbent position impairs venous return and increases ICP.
Focal neurological deficits30–40%Direct destruction/compression of brain tissue by the tumour or displacement by oedema. The specific deficit depends on location (see table in Anatomy section).
Cognitive/behavioural changes30–35%Frontal lobe involvement → personality change, apathy, disinhibition. Diffuse disease or raised ICP → generalised cognitive slowing, confusion.
Seizures20–35%Cortical irritation by tumour cells, blood products (if haemorrhagic), oedema, electrolyte shifts. More common with cortical and melanoma metastases. Can be focal (localising value) or generalised.
Nausea and vomiting25–30%(1) Raised ICP stimulates the vomiting centre in the medulla (area postrema). (2) Posterior fossa metastases directly compress the brainstem vomiting centre. Classically projectile and worse in the morning.
Visual disturbance10–15%Occipital metastases → homonymous hemianopia. Raised ICP → papilloedema → transient visual obscurations (TVOs) [5]. CN6 palsy (false localising sign of raised ICP) → horizontal diplopia.
Gait disturbance/ataxia10–20%Cerebellar metastases → ipsilateral limb ataxia, truncal ataxia, wide-based gait. Or frontal lobe involvement → gait apraxia.
Speech/language disturbance5–15%Dominant hemisphere (usually left) involvement: Broca's area (frontal) → expressive/non-fluent aphasia; Wernicke's area (temporal) → receptive/fluent aphasia.
Acute "stroke-like" presentation5–10%Intra-tumoural haemorrhage (especially melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma) → sudden onset focal neurological deficit mimicking a stroke.
Constitutional symptomsVariableFrom the primary cancer: weight loss, fatigue, anorexia. Not from the brain metastasis itself (brain tumours rarely cause systemic inflammatory symptoms).

Special Presentations Worth Noting:

  • Brain metastases may present before the primary disease is known [1]. A patient with no cancer history presenting with new seizures, headache, or focal deficit may have their cancer diagnosed because of the brain metastasis.
  • "Silent" metastases: Small metastases in "non-eloquent" brain areas (e.g., right frontal pole, non-dominant temporal) may be asymptomatic and found incidentally on staging imaging.
  • Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: Presents differently from parenchymal metastases — multifocal cranial nerve palsies, radiculopathy, communicating hydrocephalus, headache, cognitive decline. Diagnosis requires CSF cytology or MRI showing leptomeningeal enhancement.

SignPathophysiological Basis
PapilloedemaRaised ICP is transmitted along the subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerve → impaired axoplasmic flow → swelling of the optic disc [5]. Bilateral. Absence does NOT exclude raised ICP (may take time to develop, or optic atrophy may have supervened).
Focal motor deficits (hemiparesis, monoparesis)Contralateral motor cortex or corticospinal tract compression/destruction by tumour or oedema. Upper motor neuron pattern: spasticity, hyperreflexia, upgoing plantar (Babinski sign).
Sensory deficitsContralateral parietal lobe or thalamic involvement → hemisensory loss.
Visual field defectsDepending on location: homonymous hemianopia (occipital), superior quadrantanopia (temporal — Meyer's loop of optic radiation), inferior quadrantanopia (parietal — dorsal optic radiation).
Cranial nerve palsiesBrainstem metastases → individual CN palsies. CN6 is a false localising sign of raised ICP (long intracranial course, vulnerable to displacement).
Cerebellar signsIpsilateral limb ataxia (hemisphere lesion), truncal ataxia (vermis lesion), nystagmus, dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, intention tremor, past-pointing.
Signs of herniationUncal herniation: ipsilateral CN3 palsy (fixed dilated pupil), contralateral hemiplegia. Tonsillar herniation: brainstem compression → Cushing's triad (bradycardia, hypertension, irregular respiration) → cardiorespiratory arrest.
Cushing's triadA LATE sign of critically raised ICP with brainstem compression: (1) Hypertension (Cushing response — brain attempts to maintain cerebral perfusion by raising MAP), (2) Bradycardia (baroreceptor reflex to hypertension), (3) Irregular respirations (brainstem respiratory centre dysfunction).
Signs of the primary cancerClubbing (lung cancer), mastectomy scar (breast cancer), pigmented skin lesion (melanoma), thyroid mass, flank mass (RCC), hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy. Always examine thoroughly.

"History & Examination crucial — Look for primary & screen for other foci" [1] — GC lecture slide emphasising that clinical assessment must always look for the underlying primary cancer.

Critical GC Lecture Point — A Cancer Patient With a Solitary Brain Mass

"Cannot presume to be metastasis. DDx: primary brain tumour, abscess… History & Examination crucial. Look for primary & screen for other foci. SPECT. Serum tumour markers (!). Surgery + histology if in doubt." [1]

This is an extremely high-yield GC exam point. Even in a known cancer patient, a solitary brain lesion could be a primary brain tumour, an abscess (especially if immunosuppressed from chemotherapy), or another pathology. Never assume it is a metastasis without proper workup.

Critical GC Lecture Point — Multiple Lesions in a Cancer Patient

"Multiple lesions in a cancer patient can be something else" [1] — the slide specifically shows differential diagnoses including cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis, and metastases. In an immunocompromised cancer patient (e.g., on chemotherapy, or with HIV), ring-enhancing lesions could be toxoplasmosis or CNS lymphoma rather than metastases.

LocationSymptomsSigns
Frontal lobePersonality change, apathy, disinhibition, executive dysfunction, incontinence (if bilateral), expressive aphasia (dominant hemisphere)Contralateral hemiparesis (if motor strip involved), grasp reflex, frontal release signs (primitive reflexes), gait apraxia
Parietal lobeHemisensory disturbance, difficulty with calculations, spatial disorientation, inability to recognise objects by touch (astereognosis)Contralateral hemisensory loss, hemineglect (non-dominant), astereognosis, agraphaesthesia
Temporal lobeMemory impairment, receptive aphasia (dominant), auditory hallucinations, déjà vu (if seizure focus), superior visual field defectSuperior quadrantanopia (contralateral), Wernicke's aphasia (dominant), memory deficits
Occipital lobeVisual field loss (patient may not notice), visual hallucinations (formed images)Contralateral homonymous hemianopia with macular sparing (PCA territory), cortical blindness (if bilateral), Anton's syndrome (bilateral occipital — patient denies being blind)
CerebellumUnsteady gait, clumsiness, vertigo, nausea/vomiting (especially if 4th ventricle compressed)Ipsilateral limb ataxia, truncal ataxia, nystagmus, dysmetria, intention tremor, dysdiadochokinesia, scanning (cerebellar) dysarthria
BrainstemDiplopia, dysphagia, facial weakness, hearing loss, hiccupsCN palsies (III, IV, VI, VII, IX, X, XII), long tract signs (UMN), crossed signs (ipsilateral CN + contralateral hemiplegia = classic brainstem pattern), nystagmus
Sellar/suprasellarVisual disturbance, hormonal dysfunction (amenorrhoea, galactorrhoea, impotence), headacheBitemporal hemianopia, hormonal deficiencies (hypopituitarism)
Pineal regionHeadache (obstructive hydrocephalus), upgaze palsyParinaud syndrome (upgaze palsy, light-near dissociation, convergence-retraction nystagmus) [6]

Special Clinical Scenarios

  • In ~10–15% of brain metastasis cases, the brain lesion is the first manifestation of cancer — the primary is unknown at presentation.
  • Most commonly from: lung (especially adenocarcinoma), melanoma, RCC.
  • Workup for unknown primary: CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, PET-CT, tumour markers, tissue biopsy of the brain lesion for immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify the primary.
    • IHC: TTF-1 (lung adenocarcinoma), CK7/CK20 profile (various), HMB-45/S100/Melan-A (melanoma), PAX8 (RCC/thyroid), ER/PR/HER2 (breast)

  • Distinct from parenchymal brain metastases.
  • Tumour cells coat the leptomeninges (pia + arachnoid) and float in CSF.
  • Clinical features: multifocal, involving any level of the neuraxis — cranial neuropathies (especially CN III, VI, VII), radiculopathies, cauda equina syndrome, communicating hydrocephalus, headache, cognitive decline.
  • Diagnosis: CSF cytology (may need repeated LPs — sensitivity ~50% per LP, improves to ~90% with 3 LPs), MRI with gadolinium showing leptomeningeal enhancement.
  • Prognosis: very poor (median survival 4–6 weeks untreated, 2–4 months with treatment).
  • Most common primaries: breast, lung, melanoma, haematological malignancies.

High Yield Summary

Definition: Brain metastases are secondary intracranial tumours from haematogenous or direct spread of a primary cancer to the brain. They are the commonest intracranial tumour overall [1].

Epidemiology: Incidence rising as cancer survival improves [1]. Most common primaries: lung, breast, colon, kidney, melanoma [1]. In HK, lung cancer is the leading cause.

Key pathophysiology: Haematogenous spread → arrest at grey-white junction → BBB disruption → tumour growth + vasogenic oedema → raised ICP. Dexamethasone works by restoring BBB integrity and reducing oedema.

Clinical features: Headache (worse in morning), focal neurological deficits, seizures, cognitive changes, nausea/vomiting. Signs: papilloedema, hemiparesis, visual field defects, cerebellar signs, herniation signs.

Critical GC lecture points:

  • Brain metastases may present before the primary disease [1]
  • May develop when primary disease is long in remission [1]
  • A solitary brain mass in a cancer patient CANNOT be presumed to be metastasis — DDx includes primary brain tumour and abscess [1]
  • Multiple brain lesions in a cancer patient can be something else (cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis) [1]
  • History & Examination crucial: look for primary & screen for other foci; SPECT; serum tumour markers; surgery + histology if in doubt [1]

Haemorrhagic mets mnemonic: "MR CT" — Melanoma, RCC, Choriocarcinoma, Thyroid

Solitary vs Single: Solitary = only metastasis in the body; Single = one in brain but other mets elsewhere.


Active Recall - Brain Metastases (Definition to Clinical Features)


[1] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf (slides 33–34) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161 — Intracranial Tumours) [3] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.51 — Lung Cancer; p.55 — Brain metastasis) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p.205 — Carcinoma of Breast) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Opthalmology.pdf (p.90 — Papilloedema) [6] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.526 — Clinical manifestation by location) [7] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.13–14 — Breast cancer Stage IV treatment including brain metastases) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p.17 — Choice of imaging modality for brain lesions)

Differential Diagnosis of Brain Metastases

The differential diagnosis of an intracranial mass lesion in a patient with known or suspected cancer is one of the most clinically important reasoning exercises in neuro-oncology. The GC lecture makes this point emphatically:

"Cannot presume to be metastasis. DDx: primary brain tumour, abscess… History & Examination crucial. Look for primary & screen for other foci. SPECT. Serum tumour markers (!). Surgery + histology if in doubt." [1]

"Multiple lesions in a cancer patient can be something else" — the GC slide specifically illustrates four possibilities side by side: cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis, and metastases [1].

High Yield — GC Exam Point

A solitary OR multiple brain lesion(s) in a cancer patient must NOT be assumed to be metastasis. 10–15% of solitary cerebral mass lesions in patients with pre-existing cancer are NOT metastases [2]. The differential includes primary brain tumours, brain abscess, and other pathology. This distinction directly changes management — you would not irradiate an abscess, and you would not give antibiotics for a glioma.


When you encounter an intracranial mass on imaging, your differential is shaped by answering several key questions:

  1. Is it intra-axial or extra-axial? (Within the brain parenchyma, or outside it — arising from meninges, bone, etc.)
  2. Is it solitary or multiple?
  3. Does the patient have a known or suspected primary cancer?
  4. Is the patient immunocompromised? (Chemotherapy, HIV, transplant)
  5. What are the imaging characteristics? (Enhancement pattern, location, oedema, haemorrhage, calcification, diffusion restriction)
  6. What is the clinical tempo? (Acute, subacute, chronic)

Comprehensive Differential Diagnosis Table

The differentials are organised by the most likely clinical scenarios a student will encounter.

DiagnosisKey Distinguishing FeaturesWhy It Can Mimic Brain Metastasis
Brain metastasisWell-circumscribed, at grey-white junction, disproportionately large surrounding vasogenic oedema relative to lesion size, often ring-enhancing if large (central necrosis). MRI: round, contrast-enhancing [9].—
High-grade glioma (GBM)Irregularly shaped with infiltrative borders (fingerlike projections of tumour extending along white matter tracts), heterogeneous enhancement, central necrosis. MRI: ↓T1W, heterogeneous enhancement with surrounding vasogenic oedema ± central necrosis [9]. Typically crosses midline via corpus callosum ("butterfly glioma"). Rarely, can be multifocal (multicentric GBM).Both are enhancing, cause oedema, and can present identically on clinical grounds. GBM tends to be more infiltrative with less well-defined margins, but overlap exists.
Brain abscessRing-enhancing lesion with restricted diffusion on DWI (bright on DWI, dark on ADC — because pus is viscous and restricts water movement). Smooth, thin ring of enhancement. Clinical: fever, recent infection/surgery, dental procedure, IV drug use, endocarditis.Both cause ring enhancement and surrounding oedema. The key discriminator is DWI: abscess restricts diffusion, metastasis usually does NOT. Clinical context (fever, source of infection) is crucial.
Radiation necrosisOccurs in previously irradiated field (prior WBRT or SRS), typically 6–24 months after radiation. Can look identical to recurrent/progressive metastasis on conventional MRI. Distinguished by: MRI perfusion (low rCBV in radiation necrosis vs. high in tumour), PET (low FDG uptake), SPECT (low thallium uptake in necrosis) [10][1].This is a major clinical dilemma — radiation necrosis vs. tumour recurrence. Advanced imaging or biopsy required.
Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL)Classically a solitary or multifocal T2W-iso/hypointense, contrast-enhancing lesion in subcortical/periventricular regions with prominent diffusion restriction on DWI [9]. Homogeneous enhancement in immunocompetent patients (ring enhancement in immunocompromised). Often dramatic response to steroids (can "disappear" — the "vanishing tumour" phenomenon).Can present as a solitary enhancing mass. Key differences: periventricular location, diffusion restriction, and dramatic steroid response.
Low-grade gliomaNon-enhancing, expansile, ↑T2W signal without surrounding vasogenic oedema [9]. Slow clinical course with seizures as presenting feature.Usually does NOT mimic metastasis because it does not enhance and lacks oedema. Included for completeness.
MeningiomaExtra-axial (outside brain parenchyma), dura-based, strong homogeneous enhancement with a "dural tail" sign, T1W-hypo/isointense, T2W-iso/hyperintense [9]. Displaces brain rather than infiltrating it.Location distinguishes it — extra-axial vs. intra-axial. However, an en-plaque meningioma or one invading brain can occasionally mimic.

Key Discriminators — Solitary Mass in Cancer Patient

The GC lecture [1] lists the workup steps: History & Examination → Look for primary & screen for other foci → SPECT → Serum tumour markers (!) → Surgery + histology if in doubt.

In practice:

  • DWI: Abscess restricts; metastasis usually does not
  • SPECT: Helps differentiate recurrent tumour (high uptake) from radiation necrosis (low uptake) [10]
  • Perfusion MRI: High rCBV in tumour, low in necrosis/abscess
  • Location: Grey-white junction favours metastasis; periventricular favours lymphoma; extra-axial favours meningioma
  • Borders: Well-circumscribed = metastasis; infiltrative = glioma

This is the scenario where the GC lecture specifically warns: "Multiple lesions in a cancer patient can be something else" [1].

DiagnosisKey Distinguishing FeaturesWhy It Enters the Differential
Brain metastasesMultiple well-circumscribed enhancing lesions at grey-white junctions, variable sizes, disproportionate oedema. Most common cause of multiple enhancing brain lesions in an adult with cancer.—
CNS lymphomaPeriventricular, may be multiple. In immunocompromised patients (chemotherapy, HIV): ring-enhancing. Prominent DWI restriction. High cellularity lesions. [1][9]GC lecture specifically lists CNS lymphoma as a DDx of multiple brain lesions in a cancer patient. Cancer patients may be immunosuppressed (from chemo), predisposing to PCNSL (especially EBV-driven in HIV).
ToxoplasmosisMultiple ring-enhancing lesions in immunocompromised patients, classically at the basal ganglia. Positive Toxoplasma IgG serology. Responds to empirical anti-toxoplasma therapy (pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine). [1]GC lecture specifically lists this as a DDx. Cancer patients on immunosuppressive chemotherapy or with concurrent HIV can develop toxoplasmosis. If empirical trial of anti-toxoplasma therapy shows improvement at 2 weeks, diagnosis confirmed.
NeurocysticercosisMultiple cystic lesions, often with a visible scolex ("dot" within the cyst), ring or nodular enhancement, perilesional oedema, calcification in older lesions. Serology positive for cysticercosis. Travel or residence in endemic area. [1]GC lecture specifically lists cysticercosis as a DDx. In HK, consider in patients who have lived in or travelled to endemic regions (South/Southeast Asia, Central/South America, Sub-Saharan Africa).
Multiple brain abscessesRing-enhancing with DWI restriction, fever, raised inflammatory markers, source of infection (endocarditis, lung abscess, dental). Thin smooth ring (vs. thick irregular ring in tumour).Immunocompromised cancer patients can develop haematogenous brain abscesses. Infective endocarditis (especially in patients with indwelling lines/ports) can shower septic emboli to the brain.
Demyelinating disease (tumefactive MS)Incomplete ring enhancement (open ring sign — enhancement along the advancing edge of demyelination), large lesion with relatively little mass effect for its size, may show DWI restriction at the leading edge. Young female, prior neurological episodes.Rare mimic. Tumefactive MS can produce large enhancing lesions that may be mistaken for metastases, especially in a patient whose cancer history is coincidental.
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)Non-enhancing (usually), multifocal white matter lesions, NO mass effect, NO oedema. JC virus reactivation in immunosuppressed patients.Included because cancer patients on immunosuppressive therapy can develop PML. However, PML typically does NOT enhance and does NOT cause mass effect, making it less likely to be confused with metastases if imaging is carefully reviewed.
Sarcoidosis (neurosarcoidosis)Leptomeningeal or parenchymal enhancing nodules, cranial neuropathies (especially CN VII), elevated ACE, hilar lymphadenopathy on CXR, non-caseating granulomas on biopsy.Rare, but sarcoid granulomas can produce multiple enhancing brain lesions. Serum ACE level and systemic signs help differentiate.

Practical Clinical Reasoning — Multiple Ring-Enhancing Lesions

When you see multiple ring-enhancing lesions in a cancer patient, think systematically:

  1. Is the patient immunocompromised?

    • Yes → Consider toxoplasmosis (basal ganglia, responds to empirical Rx), CNS lymphoma (periventricular, DWI restriction), PML (non-enhancing), fungal abscess
    • No → Metastases most likely
  2. Is there DWI restriction within the lesion?

    • Yes → Abscess (pus restricts diffusion) or CNS lymphoma (highly cellular)
    • No → Metastasis more likely
  3. Where are the lesions?

    • Grey-white junction → Metastases
    • Periventricular → CNS lymphoma
    • Basal ganglia → Toxoplasmosis
    • Cystic with scolex → Cysticercosis
  4. If in doubt → Surgery + histology [1]

In ~10–15% of brain metastasis cases, the brain lesion is the presenting symptom and no cancer is known. The differential here is broader:

DiagnosisKey Features Distinguishing from Metastasis
High-grade glioma (GBM)Infiltrative borders, crossing midline, single lesion most common. Most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults.
MeningiomaExtra-axial, dural tail, homogeneous enhancement, compresses rather than invades brain [9]. Usually benign (WHO Grade I).
Brain abscessFever, DWI restriction, source of infection.
PCNSLPeriventricular, DWI restriction, responds dramatically to steroids.
Pituitary adenoma / CraniopharyngiomaSellar/suprasellar location, bitemporal hemianopia, hormonal dysfunction. Craniopharyngioma: 50% have calcifications on imaging [11].
Acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma)Cerebellopontine angle mass, sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, unsteadiness. Arises from nerve sheath cells [2].
HaemangioblastomaPosterior fossa, cystic with enhancing mural nodule, may be associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease.
Epidermoid / Dermoid cystNon-enhancing, DWI restriction (epidermoid), off-midline (epidermoid) or midline (dermoid).
Demyelination (tumefactive MS)Open ring sign, young female, prior episodes.
Cerebral infarct (subacute)Subacute infarcts can enhance (luxury perfusion) and mimic a tumour. Follows a vascular territory. DWI shows restricted diffusion acutely.
Cerebral haemorrhageHaemorrhagic metastases (melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma) can be misdiagnosed as primary intracerebral haemorrhage. Always follow up with contrast MRI after the acute phase.

The "Diagnostic Trinity" for Distinguishing Brain Metastasis from Mimics

Three key tools are emphasised in both the GC lecture and senior notes:

  • Uses isotopes like thallium-201 to detect abnormalities in the BBB.
  • Functions: (1) Distinguish benign from malignant brain lesions, (2) Predict histological grade of brain tumours, (3) Select areas for biopsy [10].
  • High uptake in active tumour (metastasis, recurrence) vs. low uptake in radiation necrosis, abscess.
  • This is specifically listed on the GC lecture slide as a step in the workup of a solitary brain mass in a cancer patient [1].

The GC lecture slide specifically includes an exclamation mark after "serum tumour markers" — emphasising this as high yield. Relevant markers include:

MarkerPrimary Suggested
CEAColorectal, lung (adenocarcinoma), breast
CA 15.3Breast
AFPHCC, germ cell tumours
PSAProstate
β-hCGChoriocarcinoma, germ cell tumours
CA 19-9Pancreatic, biliary
S100, LDHMelanoma
ThyroglobulinThyroid (differentiated)

  • Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation of brain tumours [10].
  • Stereotactic biopsy for deep-seated or multiple lesions.
  • Open surgical resection with intraoperative histology for accessible solitary lesions.
  • IHC panel on tissue: TTF-1 (lung/thyroid), CK7/CK20 (various), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (RCC/thyroid/gynae), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45/Melan-A (melanoma), PSA/NKX3.1 (prostate) [12].

High Yield — IHC for Determining Site of Origin of Metastasis

IHC distinguishes tumours that appear morphologically similar. Key markers for tracing the primary origin of a brain metastasis: TTF-1 (lung/thyroid), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (renal/thyroid/gynae), PSA/NKX3.1 (prostate), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45 (melanoma) [12]. This is vital when the brain metastasis presents before the primary is known.


FeatureMetastasisGBMAbscessPCNSLMeningioma
AxisIntra-axialIntra-axialIntra-axialIntra-axialExtra-axial
LocationGrey-white junctionWhite matter, can cross corpus callosumVariable, often MCA territoryPeriventricularDural-based
MarginsWell-circumscribedInfiltrative, irregularSmooth thin ringRelatively well-definedSmooth, dural tail
EnhancementSolid or ringIrregular ring, thick wallsRing (smooth, thin)Homogeneous (immunocompetent), ring (immunocompromised)Strong, homogeneous
DWI restrictionUsually absentVariablePresent (key!)Present (high cellularity)Usually absent
OedemaDisproportionately largePresent, extensivePresentMay be presentMay be present
MultiplicityOften multipleUsually single (rarely multicentric)Can be multiple (septic emboli)Can be multipleUsually single
T2W signalVariable↓T1W, heterogeneousT2 bright centreIso/hypointense (distinctive)Iso/hyperintense
SpecialHaemorrhage (melanoma, RCC)Butterfly pattern if corpus callosumFever, ↑WCCVanishes with steroidsCalcification, hyperostosis

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (diffuse coating of meninges with tumour cells) has its own differential:

DiagnosisDistinguishing Features
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosisKnown cancer, multifocal CN palsies, CSF cytology positive for malignant cells, leptomeningeal enhancement on gadolinium MRI
Infectious meningitis (TB, fungal, bacterial)Fever, meningism, CSF: ↑protein, ↓glucose, ↑WCC, specific stains/cultures positive. TB: basal enhancement pattern similar to carcinomatous meningitis
NeurosarcoidosisLeptomeningeal nodular enhancement, ↑CSF protein, ↑ACE, systemic sarcoidosis features
Meningeal lymphoma/leukaemiaHaematological malignancy history, CSF flow cytometry positive for clonal lymphocytes

Cancer patients are often immunocompromised (from chemotherapy, steroids, or underlying disease). This shifts the differential significantly:

ConditionClue
ToxoplasmosisCD4 < 100, basal ganglia ring-enhancing lesions, positive IgG serology, empirical response to anti-toxoplasma therapy at 2 weeks
CNS lymphoma (EBV-driven)CD4 < 50, periventricular, DWI restriction, CSF EBV PCR positive
PMLNon-enhancing, multifocal white matter, NO mass effect, CSF JC virus PCR positive
Fungal abscess (Aspergillus, Cryptococcus)Prolonged neutropenia (Aspergillus) or CD4 < 100 (Cryptococcus), India ink/CrAg for Cryptococcus
Brain metastasisStill possible — cancer patients can develop metastases AND be immunocompromised simultaneously

2025 Fourth Summative Q81 [13]: A 55-year-old woman with progressive headache, worse in morning, aggravated by coughing/bending, with nausea, projectile vomiting, and blurry vision — the answer is Brain tumour. This question tests recognition of raised ICP features (morning headache worsened by Valsalva, projectile vomiting, visual disturbance from papilloedema). The key point is that any new headache with these "red flags" must prompt imaging to rule out an intracranial mass — whether primary or secondary.

2025 Fourth Summative Q61 [13]: A 56-year-old man on chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer with severe low back pain, lower limb power 3/5, and MRI showing pathological L1 collapse with cord compression. The answer is Start high-dose steroids and arrange urgent orthopaedic consultation for decompressive surgery. While this tests spinal cord compression rather than brain metastasis, it reinforces the principle that in oncological emergencies involving CNS metastatic disease, high-dose steroids (dexamethasone) are the immediate first step before definitive local treatment [7].


High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Brain Metastases

Key GC exam points (must know):

  1. A solitary brain mass in a cancer patient cannot be presumed to be metastasis [1]. DDx includes primary brain tumour and abscess. 10–15% of solitary lesions in cancer patients are NOT metastases [2].
  2. Multiple brain lesions in a cancer patient can be something else: cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis [1].
  3. Workup: History & Examination → Look for primary & screen for other foci → SPECT → Serum tumour markers (!) → Surgery + histology if in doubt [1].
  4. SPECT functions: distinguish benign from malignant, predict histological grade, select biopsy areas [10].
  5. Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [10].

Key imaging discriminators:

  • DWI restriction → abscess (pus) or CNS lymphoma (cellular), NOT typical metastasis
  • Grey-white junction → metastasis
  • Periventricular → CNS lymphoma
  • Infiltrative crossing corpus callosum → GBM
  • Extra-axial with dural tail → meningioma
  • Cystic with scolex → cysticercosis

Key IHC markers for unknown primary: TTF-1 (lung), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (RCC/thyroid), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45 (melanoma), PSA (prostate) [12].


Active Recall - DDx of Brain Metastases

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf (slides 33–34) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161, p.164 — Intracranial Tumours, Brain Metastasis) [7] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.30–31 — Oncological emergencies) [9] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431 — MRI appearance of common tumours) [10] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.534 — SPECT scan functions, surgical biopsy) [11] Senior notes: Block A - I keep on bumping into people on my side_ pituitary tumours; hypopituitarism.pdf (p.6 — Craniopharyngioma calcifications) [12] AOS material: AOS - Pathology.pdf (p.45 — IHC for determining site of origin of metastatic tumours) [13] Past papers: 2025 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q81 p.37, Q61 p.24)

Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for Brain Metastases

Unlike many medical conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis with ACR/EULAR criteria, or diabetes with specific glucose thresholds), brain metastases do not have a single set of formal "diagnostic criteria" in the way a student might expect. Instead, the diagnosis rests on a convergence of evidence from three pillars:

  1. Clinical context — history of known malignancy (or clinical features suspicious for an occult primary)
  2. Characteristic neuroimaging — contrast-enhanced MRI brain showing typical lesion(s)
  3. Exclusion of mimics — confirming the lesion is not a primary brain tumour, abscess, or other pathology

The key diagnostic principle, as emphasised in the GC lecture:

"Cannot presume to be metastasis. DDx: primary brain tumour, abscess… History & Examination crucial. Look for primary & screen for other foci. SPECT. Serum tumour markers (!). Surgery + histology if in doubt." [1]

When Is Histological Confirmation Required?

In a patient with a known primary cancer and multiple brain lesions in characteristic locations (grey-white junction, well-circumscribed, with disproportionate oedema), the clinical-radiological diagnosis is usually sufficient — biopsy is not routinely needed.

However, histological confirmation IS required when:

  • The brain lesion is solitary (could be primary brain tumour — 10–15% of solitary cerebral mass lesions in cancer patients are NOT metastases [2])
  • There is diagnostic uncertainty on imaging
  • The primary cancer is unknown (need IHC to identify origin)
  • There is a long interval since original cancer diagnosis (increased possibility of second primary)
  • The lesion characteristics are atypical for metastasis (e.g., diffusion restriction suggesting abscess or lymphoma)
  • Surgery + histology if in doubt [1]

CriterionDetails
1. ClinicalKnown or suspected extracranial malignancy, OR new neurological symptoms (headache with red flags, focal deficit, seizures) prompting investigation
2. ImagingContrast-enhanced MRI brain [3] showing: well-circumscribed enhancing lesion(s), typically at grey-white junction, with disproportionate surrounding vasogenic oedema
3. ExclusionAlternative diagnoses (primary brain tumour, abscess, infection, demyelination) considered and excluded by clinical context, advanced imaging (DWI, perfusion, SPECT [1][10]), and/or histology
4. Histology (when needed)Tissue confirmation via surgical resection or stereotactic biopsy, with IHC to confirm metastatic origin and identify primary [12]
5. Primary identifiedWorkup identifies the primary cancer (or confirms known primary as source)

The following algorithm walks through the clinical reasoning from the moment an intracranial mass is suspected. Note how the algorithm branches based on whether the patient has a known cancer and whether the lesion is solitary or multiple.

High Yield — Algorithm Key Decision Points

  1. CT brain is 1st line in acute/emergency settings [8] — detect haemorrhage, mass effect, hydrocephalus. But CT is inferior to MRI for detecting small metastases and posterior fossa lesions.
  2. MRI with contrast is the gold standard for brain metastases [3][8] — better soft tissue delineation, detects smaller lesions, essential for posterior fossa/brainstem.
  3. PET-CT is NOT good for brain because the background metabolic activity of normal brain is too hypermetabolic [14] — contrast MRI is preferred.
  4. If solitary lesion + known cancer → cannot presume metastasis → SPECT → tumour markers → surgery + histology if in doubt [1].

Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown

Investigations for brain metastases serve four purposes:

  1. Detect and characterise the brain lesion(s)
  2. Identify the primary cancer (if unknown)
  3. Stage the systemic disease (extent of extracranial metastases)
  4. Assess fitness for treatment (surgical vs. non-surgical candidacy)

A. Neuroimaging — The Core Investigations

  • Role: Plain CT is the imaging of choice in most acute settings [8]. Often the first test obtained when a patient presents with acute neurological symptoms (seizure, sudden deficit, headache with red flags).

  • Why CT first?

    • Fast (~1 minute scan time), widely available, no contraindications from metallic implants.
    • Excellent for detecting acute haemorrhage (appears hyperdense/white on CT because clotted blood has high protein density → high Hounsfield units).
    • Detects mass effect (midline shift, effacement of sulci and ventricles) and hydrocephalus.
  • CT without contrast — Findings in brain metastases:

    • Iso- or hypodense mass lesion(s)
    • Surrounding hypodense oedema
    • Mass effect (midline shift, compression of ventricles)
    • Haemorrhage within the lesion (hyperdense) — suggests melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma
  • CT with IV contrast — Findings in brain metastases:

    • Enhancement indicates disruption of BBB [2] — the contrast (iodinated) leaks through the damaged BBB into the tumour, making it appear hyperdense. Normal brain tissue does not enhance (due to intact BBB) [2].
    • Patterns: solid homogeneous enhancement (small metastases) or ring enhancement (larger metastases with central necrosis).
    • IV contrast is indicated for suspected abscess, metastases, tumour, venous sinus thrombosis [8].
  • Limitations of CT:

    • Lower sensitivity than MRI — misses small metastases (especially < 5mm) and posterior fossa lesions (beam-hardening artefact from petrous bone).
    • Cannot reliably differentiate between different types of enhancing lesions (metastasis vs. abscess vs. glioma).

High Yield — Why Does Contrast Enhancement Occur?

Normal brain tissue does not enhance on CT or MRI because the BBB prevents contrast from leaking into the extracellular space [2]. Enhancement occurs when there is:

  • Structure outside the BBB (e.g., meningioma — the meninges have no BBB, so meningiomas enhance homogeneously) [2]
  • Disruption of the BBB (e.g., high-grade tumours including metastases, inflammation, infarction) [2]

This is why metastases enhance: the tumour neovasculature lacks normal tight junctions, so contrast leaks through.

  • MRI with contrast is the investigation of choice for brain metastases [3]. Generally preferred over CT [2] for brain tumour evaluation.

  • Why MRI is superior to CT for brain metastases:

    • Better soft tissue delineation [2] — can distinguish different tissue types (tumour, oedema, normal brain, necrosis) far better than CT.
    • Especially useful at skull base, craniocervical junction, brainstem [2] — areas where CT suffers from beam-hardening artefacts.
    • No ionising radiation.
    • Higher sensitivity for small metastases (detects lesions as small as 2–3mm with thin-slice gadolinium-enhanced sequences).
    • Multiple specialised sequences provide complementary information.
  • Key MRI sequences and their roles:

SequenceWhat It ShowsFindings in Brain Metastases
T1-weighted (T1W)Anatomy. Fat = bright, fluid = dark, blood products = variable.Lesion appears iso/hypointense (dark). Haemorrhagic mets may show T1 hyperintensity (bright) due to methaemoglobin.
T1W + Gadolinium (T1+Gd)Enhancement of BBB disruption. THE key sequence.Round, well-circumscribed contrast-enhancing lesion(s) with variable signal ± surrounding oedema [9]. Ring enhancement if central necrosis.
T2-weighted (T2W)Water/oedema = bright.Surrounding vasogenic oedema appears hyperintense (bright). Tumour may be iso/hyperintense.
FLAIRLike T2 but suppresses CSF signal → oedema stands out better.Peritumoral oedema very conspicuous. Better than T2 for detecting small cortical/subcortical metastases.
DWI / ADCDiffusion restriction — high cellularity or viscous fluid.Metastases usually do NOT restrict diffusion (unlike abscess which restricts, or lymphoma which restricts). Exception: highly cellular metastases or acute haemorrhage.
SWI / GRE (Susceptibility)Blood products, calcification.Detects microhaemorrhage within metastases (blooming artefact). Particularly useful for haemorrhagic mets (melanoma, RCC).
MRI perfusion (DSC-MRI)Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV).High rCBV in tumour recurrence/metastasis vs. low rCBV in radiation necrosis. Useful for the recurrence vs. radiation necrosis dilemma.
MR spectroscopy (MRS)Metabolite profiles (choline, NAA, lactate, lipid).Metastases show ↑choline (cell membrane turnover), ↓NAA (neuronal loss), ± ↑lipid/lactate (necrosis). Helps differentiate from abscess (amino acid peak) or glioma.
  • Typical MRI appearance of brain metastases [9]:

    • Round, well-circumscribed contrast-enhancing lesion
    • Variable signal on T1/T2W images
    • Surrounding oedema (if large)
    • Involve multiple regions, especially if multiple intracranial compartments
    • Located at the grey-white matter junction
  • Comparison with other lesions on MRI [9]:

LesionMRI Appearance
High-grade glioma↓T1W, heterogeneous enhancement with surrounding vasogenic oedema ± central necrosis [9]. Infiltrative borders.
Low-grade glioma↑T2W, non-enhancing expansile lesion without surrounding vasogenic oedema [9].
Primary CNS lymphomaSolitary/multifocal T2W-iso/hypointense, contrast-enhancing lesions in subcortical regions, classically with prominent diffusion restriction on DWI [9].
MeningiomaExtra-axial, dura-based T1W-hypo/isointense, T2W-iso/hyperintense lesion with strong homogeneous enhancement [9].

High Yield — MRI Appearances of Brain Lesions

These MRI descriptions from Adrian Lui's senior notes [9] are extremely high yield for radiology stations and MCQs. The key differentiators are:

  • Metastasis: well-circumscribed, enhancing, grey-white junction, disproportionate oedema
  • GBM: infiltrative, heterogeneous enhancement, central necrosis, crosses midline
  • PCNSL: periventricular, DWI restriction, homogeneous enhancement
  • Meningioma: extra-axial, dural tail, homogeneous enhancement
  • Low-grade glioma: non-enhancing, no oedema, T2 bright
  • Specifically listed on the GC lecture slide as part of the workup for a solitary brain mass in a cancer patient [1].
  • Uses isotopes such as thallium-201 to detect abnormalities in BBB [10].
  • Functions [10]:
    1. Distinguish benign from malignant brain lesions
    2. Predict histological grade of brain tumours
    3. Select areas for biopsy
  • Clinical utility in brain metastases: Primarily used to differentiate tumour recurrence (high thallium uptake) from radiation necrosis (low uptake) after prior treatment with SRS or WBRT. Active tumour tissue has high metabolic activity and takes up thallium avidly; necrotic tissue does not.
  • FDG PET-CT:

    • Principle: Injection of 18FDG tracer → tissues with ↑metabolic rate show ↑glucose uptake → tracer retained because FDG cannot be incorporated into glycolysis → tissues with ↑metabolic rate "light up" (SUVmax > 2.5) [14].
    • Limitation for brain: PET-CT is NOT good for brain as the background activity is too hypermetabolic [14]. Normal grey matter has very high FDG uptake, making it difficult to distinguish tumour from normal brain. This is why contrast MRI is preferred over PET-CT for brain metastasis detection.
    • Role: Primarily used for staging the body (detecting other metastatic sites — bone, liver, adrenal, lymph nodes) rather than the brain itself.
    • Can sometimes help in differentiating recurrent tumour (high FDG uptake) from radiation necrosis (low FDG uptake), but MRI perfusion and SPECT are generally more useful for this purpose in the brain.
  • Amino acid PET tracers (e.g., 11C-methionine, 18F-FET):

    • These have low background uptake in normal brain → much better contrast between tumour and normal tissue.
    • Increasingly used in specialised centres for differentiating tumour recurrence from radiation necrosis and for biopsy targeting.
    • Not yet widely available.

When brain metastasis is the first presentation, or the primary is uncertain:

InvestigationRationale and Key Findings
Thorough history and examinationHistory & Examination crucial — Look for primary & screen for other foci [1]. Examine: lungs (cough, haemoptysis), breast (lump, nipple discharge, mastectomy scar), skin (pigmented lesions → melanoma), thyroid (mass), abdomen (hepatomegaly, flank mass → RCC), lymph nodes.
CT chest, abdomen, pelvis (CT TAP)Systematic search for the primary tumour and other metastatic sites. Covers lung, liver, adrenals, kidneys, pancreas, pelvis. Contrast-enhanced preferred for characterisation.
PET-CT (whole body)High sensitivity for occult primary and distant metastases [14]. Covers entire body. But NOT good for brain (see above).
Serum tumour markers (!) [1]CEA (colorectal, lung, breast), CA 15.3 (breast), AFP (HCC, germ cell), PSA (prostate), β-hCG (choriocarcinoma, germ cell), CA 19-9 (pancreatic, biliary), CA 125 (ovarian), S100/LDH (melanoma), thyroglobulin (thyroid). The GC slide specifically marks this with an exclamation mark [1].
Mammography + breast USGFor female patients to exclude breast primary [7].
CXRQuick screening for lung mass, hilar lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion [14].
Tissue biopsy of brain lesionIf primary cannot be identified by other means → stereotactic biopsy or surgical resection → IHC panel to determine origin [12].
IHC Panel for Unknown Primary Brain Metastasis [12]
MarkerPrimary SuggestedWhy It Works
TTF-1Lung adenocarcinoma, thyroidThyroid Transcription Factor-1: a nuclear transcription factor expressed in lung alveolar epithelium and thyroid follicular cells
CDX2Colorectal / lower GICaudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2: expressed in intestinal epithelium
PAX8Renal, thyroid, gynaecologicalPaired box gene 8: expressed in developing kidney, thyroid, and Müllerian duct derivatives
ER/PR/HER2BreastEstrogen/Progesterone Receptors and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2: breast cancer biomarkers that also guide treatment
PSA/NKX3.1ProstateProstate-Specific Antigen: expressed almost exclusively by prostatic epithelium
S100/HMB-45/Melan-AMelanomaMelanocyte-specific markers
CK7/CK20Various (pattern helps differentiate)CK7+/CK20− = lung, breast, thyroid, ovarian. CK7−/CK20+ = colorectal. CK7+/CK20+ = upper GI, pancreas, urothelial.
PD-L1NSCLC, melanoma, othersProgrammed death-ligand 1: predictive marker for immunotherapy response [12]
Ki-67All (prognostic)Labels nuclei of actively cycling cells, quantifies tumour proliferation index [12]

Once brain metastases are confirmed, the systemic extent of disease must be evaluated because it determines prognosis (GPA score) and treatment strategy:

InvestigationWhat It Assesses
CT TAP with contrastLiver, adrenal, lung, bone, lymph node metastases
PET-CTOccult metastases throughout the body (except brain). High sensitivity for occult metastasis [14]
Bone scan (99mTc scintigraphy)Bone metastases — detects increased osteoblastic activity, reasonably sensitive and specific for bone metastases in CA breast/lung/prostate, but less sensitive for tumours with little osteoblastic activity (e.g., MM) [3]
MRI spineIf symptoms suggest spinal cord compression or leptomeningeal disease
CSF cytologyIf leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is suspected (headache, multifocal CN palsies, radiculopathy). May need repeated LPs (sensitivity ~50% per LP, ~90% with 3 LPs).

TestRationale
CBC/differentialAnaemia (chronic disease, marrow infiltration), thrombocytopenia (DIC from advanced cancer, bone marrow metastases), leucocytosis (infection, steroid use)
LRFT (liver and renal function)Baseline before treatment. Deranged LFTs may suggest liver metastases. Renal function important before contrast imaging and chemotherapy.
Calcium, phosphateHypercalcaemia of malignancy (especially breast, lung, RCC, myeloma). Mechanisms: PTHrP secretion, local osteolysis, lymphokine production [15].
Clotting profileCoagulopathy (DIC, liver dysfunction) — important before any surgical procedure or LP. Cancer-associated VTE is common [16].
LDHElevated in high tumour burden, melanoma (prognostic marker).
AlbuminNutritional and prognostic marker.
Tumour markersAs above — serum tumour markers (!) [1]

AssessmentPurpose
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) or ECOG PSDetermines fitness for treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy). KPS ≥ 70 generally required for active treatment.
Diagnosis-Specific GPA (DS-GPA)Prognostic scoring system incorporating age, KPS, number of brain mets, presence of extracranial mets, and tumour-specific molecular markers. Guides treatment intensity.
Neurocognitive assessmentBaseline cognitive function before WBRT (important for monitoring neurocognitive decline as a treatment complication).
Ophthalmological assessmentFundoscopy for papilloedema (raised ICP), visual field assessment.
Functional MRI (fMRI) and DTI tractographyFor pre-operative planning: fMRI identifies important cortical areas, DTI identifies important tracts to guide surgical resection [9]. Used when surgery is planned near eloquent cortex.
ECG/EchoBaseline cardiac function, especially if cardiotoxic chemotherapy (anthracyclines) or anti-HER2 therapy is planned [7].

ScenarioFirst-Line InvestigationKey Additional Investigations
Acute presentation (seizure, sudden deficit, decreased consciousness)Plain CT brain [8] — fast, excludes haemorrhage, detects mass effectContrast MRI brain when stable
Subacute neurological symptoms in known cancer patientContrast MRI brain [3]CT TAP, PET-CT for restaging
Staging scan in newly diagnosed cancer (asymptomatic)Contrast MRI brain [3] if primary has high brain tropism (lung, breast, melanoma)Routine brain MRI is standard in staging NSCLC and SCLC
Solitary brain mass in cancer patientContrast MRI brain with DWI/perfusion + SPECT + serum tumour markers + consider surgery/biopsy [1]Surgery + histology if in doubt [1]
Brain mass as first presentation (no known cancer)Contrast MRI brain [3] + CT TAP + PET-CT + tumour markersBiopsy for histology + IHC to identify primary [12]
Post-treatment surveillance (after SRS/WBRT)Contrast MRI brainSPECT or MRI perfusion to differentiate recurrence vs. radiation necrosis [1][10]
Suspected leptomeningeal diseaseContrast MRI brain + whole spine + LP for CSF cytologyRepeat LP x3 if initial cytology negative

High Yield Summary — Investigations for Brain Metastases

Gold standard imaging: Contrast-enhanced MRI brain [3][9]. CT brain is first-line in emergencies [8].

Why PET-CT is NOT ideal for brain: Background brain metabolic activity is too hypermetabolic [14] → use MRI instead.

Enhancement mechanism: Normal brain does not enhance because of intact BBB. Enhancement = BBB disruption (tumour, infection) or structure outside BBB (meningioma) [2].

GC workup for solitary mass in cancer patient: History & Examination → Look for primary → SPECT → Serum tumour markers (!) → Surgery + histology if in doubt [1].

SPECT functions: Distinguish benign vs malignant, predict histological grade, select biopsy areas [10].

IHC for unknown primary: TTF-1 (lung/thyroid), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (renal/thyroid/gynae), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45 (melanoma), PSA (prostate) [12].

MRI appearance of brain metastases: Round, well-circumscribed, contrast-enhancing, variable T1/T2 signal, surrounding oedema, at grey-white junction, may involve multiple compartments [9].


Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigation of Brain Metastases

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf (slides 33–34) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.161–162, p.164 — Intracranial Tumours, CT brain ± contrast) [3] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.55 — Brain metastasis: MRI with contrast) [7] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.8, p.14 — Breast cancer diagnostic workup and Stage IV treatment) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Radiology.pdf (p.17 — Choice of modality for brain imaging) [9] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.431 — MRI appearance of common tumours) [10] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.534 — SPECT scan functions) [12] AOS material: AOS - Pathology.pdf (p.45 — IHC for site of origin, predictive markers, Ki-67) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.143–144 — PET-CT brain limitation, staging modalities) [15] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (p.24 — Mechanisms of malignant hypercalcaemia) [16] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf (p.16 — Malignancy-associated VTE)

Management of Brain Metastases

Management of brain metastases requires a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach involving neurosurgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuroradiology, palliative care, and allied health professionals. Treatment decisions are individualised based on:

  1. Number, size, and location of brain metastases
  2. Primary tumour histology and molecular profile (e.g., EGFR, ALK, HER2, BRAF status — determines systemic therapy options and prognosis)
  3. Extent of extracranial disease (controlled vs. progressive)
  4. Patient fitness — Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age, comorbidities
  5. Prognostic score — Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA)
  6. Symptoms and urgency — raised ICP, herniation, seizures

The goals of treatment range from cure (rare, possible with solitary metastasis and controlled primary) to palliation (symptom control, quality of life, extending survival). Brain metastases represent Stage IV disease for the primary cancer.



Immediate Management — Medical Stabilisation

Before any definitive treatment, the patient must be stabilised. The immediate priorities are controlling cerebral oedema and managing seizures.

High-dose dexamethasone (for peritumoral vasogenic oedema) [3]

Multiple brain metastases / leptomeningeal carcinomatosis — systemic steroid, palliative whole-brain radiotherapy [7]

  • Drug: Dexamethasone ("dexa" = potent, "methasone" = synthetic corticosteroid — specifically chosen because it has minimal mineralocorticoid effect, so less sodium/water retention, and has a long half-life ~36–54 hours)
  • Dose: Loading dose 10 mg IV followed by 4–8 mg every 6 hours (typical high-dose regimen). Taper once definitive treatment initiated and oedema controlled.
  • Mechanism: Restores blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity → reduces vasogenic oedema → decreases mass effect → lowers ICP. It does this by:
    • Reducing expression of VEGF (a key driver of BBB permeability)
    • Stabilising endothelial tight junctions
    • Reducing perivascular inflammation
  • Why dexamethasone and not other steroids? Dexamethasone has essentially zero mineralocorticoid activity (no salt and water retention → no worsening of oedema), the longest duration of action among glucocorticoids, and excellent CNS penetration.
  • Clinical effect: Dramatic improvement often within 6–24 hours. Patients may go from obtunded to conversant overnight. This is one of the most gratifying interventions in clinical medicine.
  • Side effects (important because patients may be on steroids for weeks-months):
    • Hyperglycaemia (steroid-induced diabetes) — monitor glucose
    • Immunosuppression → opportunistic infections (PJP prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole if prolonged use)
    • Proximal myopathy (steroid myopathy) — "paradox: you give steroids to improve function, but long-term use causes weakness"
    • Gastric ulceration → co-prescribe PPI
    • Cushing's syndrome (moon face, central obesity, skin thinning)
    • Insomnia, psychiatric disturbance
    • Osteoporosis
    • Adrenal suppression → must taper, never stop abruptly

High Yield — Dexamethasone Is an Oncological Emergency Drug

Dexamethasone is the universal first step in brain metastases, spinal cord compression, and SVCO management. In the context of brain metastases, it is both a temporising measure and an ongoing adjunct. The AOS material lists systemic steroid as the immediate treatment for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis as an oncological emergency [7].

  • Indication: Only if the patient has had a seizure. Prophylactic anticonvulsants are NOT recommended in brain metastasis patients who have not had seizures (AAN guideline). The evidence shows no benefit of prophylaxis and significant drug interaction risks.
  • Drug of choice: Levetiracetam (Keppra) — preferred because:
    • Does not induce hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes (unlike phenytoin, carbamazepine)
    • Therefore does not interact with chemotherapy drugs, targeted therapies, or dexamethasone
    • Fewer side effects
    • IV and oral formulations available
  • Why NOT phenytoin? Phenytoin is a potent CYP450 inducer → accelerates metabolism of dexamethasone, chemotherapy agents (especially temozolomide, irinotecan), and many targeted therapies → reduces their efficacy. It also has a narrow therapeutic window and requires drug level monitoring.

  • Cancer patients with brain metastases are at very high VTE risk (Khorana score often elevated; immobility from neurological deficits; hypercoagulable state of malignancy).
  • Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with LMWH is generally recommended post-operatively and during hospitalisation, though the risk of intratumoural haemorrhage (especially melanoma, RCC) must be balanced.
  • DOACs are increasingly used in cancer-associated VTE, but evidence in brain metastases is evolving due to haemorrhage concerns.

Definitive Treatment Modalities

Single brain met: surgery + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [3]

Rationale: Surgical resection provides immediate decompression (reducing mass effect and ICP), obtains tissue for histological diagnosis, and can achieve local control. For a solitary or single accessible metastasis, surgery offers the best chance of durable local control when combined with post-operative SRS.

Indications:

  • Solitary or single brain metastasis [3] that is surgically accessible (not in eloquent cortex or deep brainstem)
  • Lesion causing significant mass effect or obstructive hydrocephalus (urgent decompression needed regardless of number of mets)
  • Diagnostic uncertainty — Surgery + histology if in doubt [1] (e.g., solitary lesion in cancer patient where metastasis vs. primary brain tumour vs. abscess cannot be distinguished radiologically)
  • Large symptomatic lesion (typically > 3 cm) where SRS alone would be less effective (radiation necrosis risk increases with larger volumes)
  • Good KPS (≥ 70), controlled or absent extracranial disease, reasonable life expectancy (> 3 months)

Contraindications:

  • Multiple brain metastases (> 3) — surgery cannot address all lesions
  • Inaccessible location (deep brainstem, thalamus, basal ganglia) — unacceptable surgical morbidity
  • Poor KPS (< 70) — high perioperative risk, low benefit
  • Uncontrolled widespread extracranial disease — surgery unlikely to change overall trajectory
  • Coagulopathy (must correct before surgery)
  • Radiosensitive tumours (e.g., SCLC, lymphoma, germ cell tumours) — better treated with radiation/chemotherapy

Technique:

  • Craniotomy with image-guided (neuronavigation) resection
  • Functional MRI (fMRI) and DTI tractography for pre-operative planning when lesion is near eloquent cortex [10]
  • Intraoperative techniques: cortical mapping, awake craniotomy (for lesions near speech or motor areas)
  • Goal: maximal safe resection — remove entire lesion with a margin while preserving neurological function
  • Post-operative: typically followed by SRS to the surgical cavity (rather than WBRT) to reduce local recurrence while preserving neurocognition

Evidence: Landmark RCTs (Patchell 1990, Vecht 1993) demonstrated that surgery + WBRT is superior to WBRT alone for solitary brain metastasis, improving median survival from ~4 months to ~10 months and functional independence.

Stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy for limited brain metastases [7][17][18]

"Stereotactic" = "stereo" (three-dimensional) + "tactic" (arrangement) — means precisely targeting a point in 3D space. "Radiosurgery" = using radiation as a surgical tool, delivering a high dose to a small, precisely defined volume in a single fraction (or a few fractions if "stereotactic radiotherapy" / SRT).

Mechanism: Delivers a highly focused, high-dose beam of radiation to the metastasis with rapid dose fall-off at the margins, sparing surrounding normal brain. This causes DNA double-strand breaks in tumour cells → mitotic catastrophe → tumour cell death, while the surrounding brain receives minimal dose.

Types of SRS delivery:

SystemTechnology
Gamma Knife~200 cobalt-60 sources converging on a single point; frame-based (most established)
CyberKnifeRobotic linear accelerator with real-time image guidance; frameless
Linear accelerator-based SRSModified LINAC with cone or micro-multileaf collimator

Indications:

  • Limited brain metastases [7][17][18] — generally 1–4 lesions (some centres now treat up to 10–15 with SRS if total volume is small)
  • Each lesion typically ≤ 3–4 cm in maximum diameter (larger lesions → higher risk of radiation necrosis)
  • Post-operative SRS to the surgical cavity (replacing post-op WBRT to reduce neurocognitive decline)
  • Recurrence after prior WBRT (salvage SRS)
  • Any histology (works even for classically "radioresistant" tumours like melanoma and RCC, because the high single-fraction dose overcomes radioresistance)

Contraindications:

  • Too many lesions (relative — depends on total volume and institutional protocol)
  • Very large lesions ( > 4 cm) — high risk of radiation necrosis; consider surgery instead
  • Lesions with significant mass effect requiring urgent surgical decompression
  • Leptomeningeal disease (diffuse, cannot be targeted with SRS)
  • Poor KPS with limited life expectancy (no benefit from SRS if survival < 1 month)

Advantages over WBRT:

  • Preserves neurocognitive function (does not irradiate the entire brain)
  • Can be repeated for new metastases
  • Single-session or few-session treatment (convenient)
  • High local control rates (~80–90% at 1 year for small lesions)

Complications:

  • Radiation necrosis (~5–25%): develops 6–24 months post-SRS. Can mimic tumour recurrence on MRI (both enhance). Distinguished by SPECT, MRI perfusion, or biopsy. Managed with corticosteroids, bevacizumab (anti-VEGF — reduces vascular permeability), or surgical resection.
  • Peritumoral oedema (acute, usually responsive to dexamethasone)
  • Seizures (rare)
  • Cranial nerve injury (if lesion near CN, e.g., posterior fossa lesions near CN V, VII, VIII)

High Yield — SRS vs. WBRT: The Modern Shift

The trend in neuro-oncology over the past decade has been to favour SRS over WBRT wherever possible because WBRT causes significant long-term neurocognitive decline (memory, executive function). Current evidence supports SRS for 1–4 brain metastases, with emerging data supporting SRS for even higher numbers if the total tumour volume is small. Post-operative SRS to the cavity has largely replaced post-operative WBRT for resected solitary metastases.

Multiple brain met / inoperable: WBRT [3]

Palliative whole-brain radiotherapy for multiple brain metastasis not amenable to stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy, or for leptomeningeal metastases [7][17][18]

Mechanism: Irradiates the entire brain with a moderate dose of radiation, targeting both visible metastases and microscopic deposits that may not yet be detectable on MRI. Typical dose: 30 Gy in 10 fractions (the classic palliative regimen) or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (shorter, for patients with poor prognosis).

Indications:

  • Multiple brain metastases not amenable to SRS [7][17][18] — typically ≥ 5 or high total volume
  • Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis [7][17][18]
  • Widely disseminated brain disease with poor KPS where SRS to each lesion is impractical
  • Post-operative adjuvant after resection of solitary metastasis (increasingly replaced by SRS in current practice, but still used in some settings)
  • Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in SCLC [14] — a specific form of WBRT given to SCLC patients who respond well to initial treatment, to prevent subsequent brain metastases

Contraindications:

  • Very poor prognosis (KPS < 50, expected survival < 1 month) — WBRT takes 2–3 weeks to deliver and several more weeks for maximal effect; patients may not survive long enough to benefit → best supportive care more appropriate
  • Prior WBRT (re-irradiation with WBRT carries high risk of neurotoxicity; SRS may be used for re-treatment)
  • Patient refusal

Complications (the major concern):

  • Neurocognitive decline — the most significant long-term toxicity. WBRT damages hippocampal neural stem cells → progressive memory loss, executive dysfunction, personality change. This occurs in ~50–90% of long-term survivors.
    • Mitigation strategies:
      • Hippocampal-avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) — uses IMRT to shape the radiation field, sparing the hippocampus. The NRG CC001 trial demonstrated significant preservation of memory with HA-WBRT + memantine vs. standard WBRT.
      • Memantine — NMDA receptor antagonist (same drug used in Alzheimer's disease) given during and after WBRT to reduce neurocognitive decline. "Memantine" → "memory" + "maintain" — the name hints at its purpose.
  • Fatigue during treatment
  • Alopecia (usually temporary but can be permanent)
  • Somnolence syndrome (delayed, 1–6 months post-WBRT: excessive drowsiness, fever, anorexia — self-limiting)
  • Leukoencephalopathy (late, especially combined with methotrexate)

D. Systemic Therapy

Systemic therapy plays an increasingly important role in brain metastases, driven by the development of agents that can penetrate the BBB and by the recognition that the "blood-tumour barrier" in established metastases is often leaky enough to allow some drug entry.

The efficacy of targeted therapy depends entirely on the primary tumour's molecular profile:

PrimaryMutation/MarkerAgentBBB Penetration / CNS Efficacy
NSCLCEGFR mutationOsimertinib (3rd gen TKI)Excellent CNS penetration; intracranial response rate ~70%. Now standard 1st-line for EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
NSCLCALK rearrangementLorlatinib (3rd gen ALK inhibitor)Very high CNS penetration; intracranial response rate ~80%.
NSCLCROS1 rearrangementEntrectinib, lorlatinibGood CNS activity
BreastHER2 positiveTucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabineHER2CLIMB trial: significant intracranial response and OS benefit in HER2+ breast with brain mets. Tucatinib is a small-molecule TKI that crosses the BBB.
BreastHER2 positiveTrastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)Antibody-drug conjugate with CNS activity (DESTINY-Breast trials)
MelanomaBRAF V600E mutationDabrafenib + trametinibIntracranial response rate ~55–60%. Combination BRAF + MEK inhibitor.

Targeted therapy with tyrosine-kinase inhibitor against EGFR, ALK, ROS1 etc [17] — for Stage IV NSCLC.

High Yield — Systemic Therapy Revolution in Brain Metastases

Traditional teaching was that systemic therapy does not work for brain metastases because of the BBB. This is now outdated. Newer-generation targeted agents (osimertinib, lorlatinib, tucatinib) have been specifically designed with high CNS penetration. For EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases, osimertinib may defer or even replace the need for upfront brain radiation.

Agent ClassExamplesCNS Activity
Anti-PD-1Nivolumab, pembrolizumabModerate CNS activity in melanoma brain mets (~20–25% intracranial response rate as monotherapy). Better in combination.
Anti-CTLA-4IpilimumabModerate activity
CombinationNivolumab + ipilimumabBest evidence in melanoma brain mets: intracranial response rate ~55% (CheckMate 204 trial).
Anti-PD-L1Atezolizumab, durvalumabUsed in lung cancer; some CNS activity

Systemic chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (especially for those with positive PD-L1 expression) [17] — for Stage IV NSCLC.

  • Generally poor CNS penetration for most agents.
  • Some agents with reasonable CNS activity:
    • Temozolomide — oral alkylating agent, crosses BBB well. Standard for primary brain tumours (GBM) but modest activity in brain metastases from melanoma.
    • Capecitabine — crosses BBB; used in breast cancer brain metastases (often combined with tucatinib).
    • High-dose methotrexate — used in CNS lymphoma; can penetrate BBB at high doses.
    • Cisplatin/carboplatin-based regimens — some CNS penetration; used for SCLC brain metastases.

Palliative chemotherapy (especially for those with visceral crisis) [7] — AOS notes define visceral crisis as "severe organ dysfunction, not the mere presence of visceral metastases" [7].

  • Indication: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
  • Agents: Intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine (liposomal), or thiotepa
  • Route: Via lumbar puncture or Ommaya reservoir (a subcutaneous reservoir connected to a ventricular catheter, allowing repeated intraventricular drug administration without repeated LPs)
  • Limitation: Modest efficacy; median survival improvement only 2–4 months

Best supportive care [7][17][18]

Indication: Patients with very poor prognosis (low KPS, widespread uncontrolled extracranial disease, poor DS-GPA score, expected survival < 1–3 months) where the toxicity and time commitment of active treatment outweighs benefits.

Components:

  • Dexamethasone for symptom control (oedema, headache)
  • Anticonvulsants if seizures present
  • Analgesics (WHO pain ladder)
  • Palliative care referral — symptom management, advance care planning, psychosocial support
  • End-of-life care — comfort measures, dignity therapy, family support

ScenarioManagementSource
Solitary brain metastasis, good KPS, accessibleSurgery + post-operative SRS [3][7]Standard of care; best local control + tissue diagnosis
1–3 small brain metastases, good KPSSRS alone [7][17][18]Preserves neurocognition; high local control
Multiple brain metastases, not amenable to SRSWBRT (ideally HA-WBRT + memantine) [3][7][17][18]For widespread disease; neurocognitive side effects a concern
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosisSystemic steroid + WBRT ± intrathecal chemotherapy [7][17][18]Poor prognosis regardless; treatment is palliative
SCLC, good response to initial chemo, no brain metsProphylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) [14]Reduces incidence of brain mets and improves OS
EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metsOsimertinib ± upfront SRSCNS-penetrant TKI; may defer radiation
HER2+ breast with brain metsTucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine; T-DXdHER2CLIMB and DESTINY trials
BRAF-mutant melanoma with brain metsDabrafenib + trametinib; nivolumab + ipilimumabHigh intracranial response rates
Very poor KPS, widespread diseaseBest supportive care [7][17][18]Dexamethasone, symptom control, palliative care

Special Management Considerations

A critical cross-topic point: known malignant intracranial neoplasm (primary or metastatic) is an ABSOLUTE contraindication to thrombolytic therapy [19][20]. This applies to fibrinolytics used for AMI (e.g., tPA, streptokinase) and for acute ischaemic stroke. The reason is the risk of catastrophic intratumoural haemorrhage — the abnormal tumour vasculature can rupture under the hypocoagulable state induced by fibrinolytics.

High Yield — Absolute Contraindication to Thrombolysis

Known malignant intracranial neoplasm (primary or metastatic) is an absolute contraindication to thrombolytic therapy for AMI and ischaemic stroke [19][20]. This is a commonly tested point in both cardiology and neurology exam questions. If a patient with known brain metastases presents with a STEMI, primary PCI (not fibrinolysis) is the only reperfusion option.

  • Cancer patients are at high risk for VTE (malignancy-associated hypercoagulable state).
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation (for DVT/PE) in patients with brain metastases is generally NOT contraindicated, but requires careful risk-benefit assessment:
    • Higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage with melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma mets
    • LMWH traditionally preferred over warfarin in cancer-associated VTE
    • DOACs (edoxaban, rivaroxaban) now have evidence in cancer-associated VTE but less data specifically in brain metastases

  • Surveillance MRI brain every 2–3 months after treatment
  • Response criteria: RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology — Brain Metastases) criteria — based on changes in enhancing tumour size, new lesions, clinical status, and steroid use
  • Challenge: Distinguishing tumour recurrence/progression from treatment effects (radiation necrosis, pseudoprogression):
    • MRI perfusion: high rCBV = tumour recurrence; low rCBV = radiation necrosis
    • SPECT: high uptake = tumour; low uptake = necrosis [1][10]
    • Amino acid PET (if available)
    • Biopsy if diagnostic uncertainty persists

High Yield Summary — Management of Brain Metastases

Immediate: High-dose dexamethasone for vasogenic oedema [3][7]. Anticonvulsants only if seizures have occurred (NOT prophylactic). Levetiracetam preferred over phenytoin (no CYP450 interactions).

Solitary met, good KPS: Surgery + SRS [3]. Provides tissue diagnosis + local control.

Limited mets (1–4): SRS alone [7][17][18]. Preserves neurocognition.

Multiple mets / inoperable: WBRT [3][7][17][18]. Ideally hippocampal-avoidance + memantine to reduce cognitive decline.

Leptomeningeal disease: Systemic steroid + WBRT ± intrathecal chemotherapy [7][17][18].

Systemic therapy: Increasingly important. Osimertinib (EGFR-mutant NSCLC), tucatinib (HER2+ breast), dabrafenib + trametinib (BRAF-mutant melanoma), nivolumab + ipilimumab (melanoma) all have significant CNS activity.

SCLC: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces brain met incidence and improves OS [14].

Absolute contraindication: Known malignant intracranial neoplasm is an absolute contraindication to thrombolysis [19][20].

Poor prognosis: Best supportive care — dexamethasone, symptom control, palliative care [7][17][18].


Active Recall - Management of Brain Metastases

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf (slides 33–34) [3] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.55 — Brain metastasis management) [7] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.13–14 — Breast cancer Stage IV; p.31 — Oncological emergencies) [10] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.533–534 — SPECT functions, MRI, surgical biopsy) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.149–150 — SCLC treatment, PCI) [17] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.7 — Lung cancer Stage IV treatment including SRS and WBRT) [18] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.17 — NPC Stage IVA/IVB treatment including SRS and WBRT) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p.20 — Absolute contraindications to thrombolysis) [20] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p.138 — Contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy)

Complications of Brain Metastases

Complications of brain metastases can be divided into:

  1. Complications of the disease itself (from the metastases and their effects on the brain)
  2. Complications of treatment (from surgery, radiation, steroids, and systemic therapy)

Both categories are clinically important and are commonly examined. Understanding them requires revisiting the pathophysiology: brain metastases create problems through mass effect, oedema, destruction of brain tissue, obstruction of CSF pathways, and disruption of normal neuronal function — all within the rigid, non-expandable cranial vault (Monro-Kellie doctrine).


A. Complications of the Disease

This is the most feared and immediately life-threatening complication. The cranial vault is a fixed-volume compartment — any increase in its contents (tumour + oedema + obstructed CSF) must be compensated or ICP rises.

  • Mechanism: Tumour mass + vasogenic oedema → ↑brain volume. If the metastasis obstructs CSF flow (especially posterior fossa lesions compressing the 4th ventricle or aqueduct of Sylvius), obstructive hydrocephalus develops → ↑CSF volume. Both raise ICP.
  • Symptoms: Headache (worse in morning — recumbent position impairs venous drainage, and nocturnal hypoventilation raises pCO₂ → cerebral vasodilatation → ↑ICP), projectile vomiting (medullary vomiting centre stimulation), nausea, progressive drowsiness, blurred vision (transient visual obscurations from papilloedema).
  • Signs: Papilloedema (bilateral disc swelling from transmitted ICP along optic nerve sheath → impaired axoplasmic flow → disc oedema) [21], CN VI palsy (false localising sign of raised ICP — the long intracranial course of CN VI makes it vulnerable to compression/stretching as the brain shifts) [21], Cushing's triad (late: hypertension + bradycardia + irregular respiration — indicates brainstem compression).
  • Management: High-dose dexamethasone [3], head of bed elevation to 30°, avoid straining/Valsalva, urgent neurosurgical referral. If hydrocephalus: CSF diversion (external ventricular drain or ventriculoperitoneal shunt). Definitive treatment of the metastasis (surgery or radiation).

The most lethal complication — occurs when raised ICP forces brain tissue across rigid dural reflections (falx, tentorium) or through the foramen magnum.

TypeAnatomyClinical FeaturesWhy It Happens
Subfalcine (cingulate)Cingulate gyrus herniates under the falx cerebri to the contralateral sideContralateral leg weakness (ACA compression), midline shift on imagingUnilateral supratentorial mass pushes ipsilateral hemisphere under the falx
Uncal (transtentorial)Medial temporal lobe (uncus) herniates over the tentorial edgeIpsilateral fixed dilated pupil (CN III compression — parasympathetic fibres on outer surface are compressed first → loss of pupillary constriction), contralateral hemiplegia (cerebral peduncle compression), progressive ↓consciousnessTemporal lobe mass or large lateral supratentorial mass pushes uncus medially and downwards
TonsillarCerebellar tonsils herniate through the foramen magnumNeck stiffness, ↓consciousness, respiratory arrest, deathPosterior fossa mass or generalised ↑ICP pushes tonsils downwards → brainstem compression → cardiorespiratory arrest
Upward (ascending)Cerebellum herniates upward through the tentorial notchObstructive hydrocephalus, midbrain compressionPosterior fossa mass pushes superiorly
  • Clinical significance: Herniation is a neurosurgical emergency. Once tonsillar herniation occurs with brainstem compression, death follows rapidly unless decompressed. Signs of impending herniation (deteriorating GCS, unilateral fixed dilated pupil, Cushing's triad) require immediate action: IV mannitol/hypertonic saline, dexamethasone, and emergency neurosurgical decompression.

High Yield — CN III Palsy in Uncal Herniation

The ipsilateral fixed dilated pupil is the classic sign of uncal herniation. Why ipsilateral? The uncus herniates medially and compresses CN III on the same side. The parasympathetic fibres (Edinger-Westphal nucleus fibres) run on the outer surface of CN III and are compressed first → loss of pupillary constriction → fixed dilated pupil. This is a surgical emergency.

  • Frequency: 10–20% of patients with brain metastases [2]; higher with cortical involvement, melanoma (~67%), haemorrhagic metastases.
  • Mechanism: Cortical irritation by tumour cells, peritumoral oedema disrupting electrolyte balance across neuronal membranes, blood products (iron-catalysed free radicals) from haemorrhagic metastases lowering the seizure threshold, and glutamate release from injured neurons.
  • Types: Focal seizures (with or without secondary generalisation). Focal seizures have localising value — a right arm jerking seizure localises to the left precentral gyrus.
  • Seizures arise only from supratentorial lesions (infratentorial i.e. cerebellar cortex is inhibitory in nature) [2].
  • Status epilepticus: Continuous or rapidly recurring seizures without recovery of consciousness between episodes. A medical emergency requiring IV benzodiazepines → IV phenytoin/levetiracetam → general anaesthesia if refractory.
  • Management: Levetiracetam preferred (no CYP450 interactions with chemotherapy and dexamethasone). Prophylactic anticonvulsants NOT recommended if no seizures have occurred (AAN guideline).

  • Which metastases bleed? Melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma, thyroid (mnemonic "MR CT") — and also HCC. These tumours develop abnormal, fragile neovasculature and can invade blood vessel walls.
  • Presentation: Sudden "stroke-like" onset — acute headache, new focal deficit, rapid ↓consciousness. Can be catastrophic if large. May be the presenting feature of a previously undiagnosed cancer.
  • Why it matters clinically: A patient presenting with an apparent spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) who has underlying cancer may actually have a haemorrhagic brain metastasis. Once the acute phase settles, contrast MRI should be performed to look for an underlying enhancing mass within the haematoma.
  • Management: Supportive (BP control, reverse anticoagulation if applicable, manage raised ICP). Surgical evacuation if life-threatening and accessible. Definitive treatment of the underlying metastasis once stable.

  • Mechanism: Posterior fossa metastases (cerebellar) can compress the 4th ventricle or aqueduct of Sylvius, blocking CSF flow from the 3rd ventricle to the 4th ventricle and onwards to the subarachnoid space.
  • Consequence: Upstream dilatation of lateral and 3rd ventricles → rapidly rising ICP → headache, vomiting, drowsiness, papilloedema. Can progress to herniation if untreated.
  • Management: Emergency CSF diversion (external ventricular drain), followed by definitive treatment of the posterior fossa metastasis (surgery or SRS).

  • Cancer patients have a baseline hypercoagulable state (Trousseau's syndrome). Brain metastases further increase VTE risk through immobility (hemiparesis, bed rest), dehydration, and the prothrombotic effects of dexamethasone.
  • Brain metastasis patients have among the highest VTE rates of any cancer subgroup (~20–30% incidence).
  • Dilemma: Therapeutic anticoagulation for DVT/PE carries a risk of intratumoral haemorrhage, especially with melanoma/RCC metastases. LMWH is traditionally used; IVC filters considered if anticoagulation is contraindicated.

  • Mechanism: Brain metastases (or associated oedema, surgery, or whole-brain radiation) can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary axis → inappropriate ADH release → water retention → dilutional hyponatraemia [22].
  • Clinical: Hyponatraemia presenting as confusion, lethargy, seizures, coma if severe. Must distinguish from cerebral salt wasting (which also causes hyponatraemia but with volume depletion).
  • CNS causes of SIADH include: meningitis, encephalitis, brain abscess, head trauma, SAH, CVA, raised ICP [22].
  • Management: Fluid restriction (1st line), hypertonic saline if severe/symptomatic, treat the underlying cause.

  • Although uncommon, metastases to the pituitary or hypothalamus can cause hormonal dysfunction.
  • The posterior pituitary receives its blood supply from the systemic circulation (vertebral artery branches) → systemic metastases are more likely to affect the posterior pituitary first [23] → diabetes insipidus (polyuria, polydipsia) may be the presenting feature.
  • Anterior pituitary involvement leads to progressive hypopituitarism (GH, ACTH, TSH, LH/FSH deficiency in that order — most sensitive axes fail first).

  • Cognitive decline: Progressive deterioration in memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed. Caused by direct tumour destruction of cognitive networks, oedema, and raised ICP. Bilateral frontal metastases → apathy, personality change, loss of social inhibition.
  • Depression: Common (~25–40% prevalence in brain tumour patients). Multifactorial: biological (frontal lobe damage, neurochemical disruption), psychological (reaction to diagnosis), and iatrogenic (dexamethasone-induced mood changes).
  • Fatigue: Overwhelming exhaustion, unrelated to exertion. Caused by disease burden, raised ICP, medications (dexamethasone, anticonvulsants), and systemic cancer effects.

  • Some brain metastases can shed tumour cells into the CSF → leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC).
  • Clinical: Multifocal cranial neuropathies, radiculopathies, communicating hydrocephalus, headache, spinal cord dysfunction.
  • Prognosis: Very poor (median survival 4–6 weeks untreated, 2–4 months treated).
  • Management: systemic steroid + palliative WBRT [7]. ± intrathecal chemotherapy.

B. Complications of Treatment

ComplicationMechanism and Notes
Post-operative haemorrhageBleeding into the surgical cavity or epidural/subdural space. Risk higher with haemorrhagic metastases.
Neurological deficitNew or worsened deficit if surgery involves eloquent cortex (motor, speech, sensory areas). Minimised by image-guided surgery, fMRI/DTI planning, awake craniotomy, and intraoperative monitoring [2].
InfectionWound infection, meningitis, brain abscess. Cancer patients often immunosuppressed.
CSF leakEspecially after posterior fossa surgery. CSF rhinorrhoea requires antibiotics to prevent ascending meningitis [23].
SeizuresCortical irritation from surgical manipulation.
Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism)Postoperative complication caused by injury to cerebellar vermis or dentate nuclei during resection of tumours in the midline cerebellum. Appears 1–2 days after surgery. Characterised by impaired language production with emotional lability. Resolves within weeks to months. [10]
Venous thromboembolismImmobility peri-operatively + cancer hypercoagulable state.

2. Complications of Radiation Therapy

ComplicationTimingMechanism and Notes
Peritumoral oedemaAcute (days-weeks)Radiation-induced inflammation → transient worsening of oedema. Managed with dexamethasone.
Radiation necrosisTypically 1–3 years after RT [2]Focal necrosis near original tumour site. S/S: focal neurological deficit, raised ICP. Very similar to high-grade tumours on imaging. MRI shows lack of clearly defined T2W lesion and high oedema-to-enhancement volume ratio. Mx: symptomatic with steroids; bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) for refractory cases; surgical resection if diagnostic doubt. [2]
Cranial nerve injuryLateIf metastasis near cranial nerves (e.g., posterior fossa near CN V, VII, VIII).
ComplicationTimingMechanism and Notes
Fatigue, loss of appetiteAcute (during treatment) [2]Very common. Due to systemic radiation effects and inflammation.
Nausea/vomitingAcuteRadiation to brainstem vomiting centre.
Radiation dermatitis and alopeciaAcuteSkin and hair follicle damage. Alopecia may be permanent after WBRT.
Initial worsening of prior neurological S/SAcuteDue to reactive swelling → should pre-treat with steroids [2]
Acute encephalopathyAcute (uncommon)S/S: severe headache, nausea, drowsiness, fever, focal neuro. Uncommon except with very high dose. [2]
Neurocognitive deficitsChronic (3 months – 1 year onwards)WBRT causes ↓learning and memory at 3 months–1 year, with long-term ↓↓QoL [2]. Mechanism: damage to hippocampal neural stem cells and white matter tracts. Mitigation: hippocampal-avoidance WBRT + memantine.
Radionecrosis1–3 yearsAs above — focal necrosis, mimics tumour recurrence [2].
Vasculopathy and ischaemic strokeLateRadiation-induced endothelial damage → accelerated atherosclerosis, Moyamoya-like vasculopathy.
HypopituitarismLateUp to 80% after cranial irradiation. Low threshold to screen [2]. Mechanism: radiation damages the hypothalamus and pituitary → GH deficiency (most common, ~94% after cranial RT in children), ACTH deficiency (~43%), TSH deficiency (~10%) [10].
Ocular toxicityLateCataract, optic neuropathy, dry eye [2]. Cataracts form because the lens epithelium is exquisitely radiosensitive.
OtotoxicityLateSensorineural hearing loss [2] — especially if combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy [10].
Secondary brain tumoursVery late (years-decades)Radiation-induced neoplasms (meningiomas, gliomas, sarcomas). Risk increases with time.
Somnolence syndromeSubacute (1–6 months)Excessive drowsiness, fever, anorexia. Self-limiting. Due to transient demyelination.
LeukoencephalopathyLateDiffuse white matter damage. Risk ↑↑ if combined with methotrexate (synergistic neurotoxicity).

High Yield — Chronic Complications of Cranial Irradiation

The chronic complications of WBRT are extremely important and commonly tested:

  1. Neurocognitive deficits — the most significant, affects QoL profoundly [2]
  2. Hypopituitarism — up to 80%, must screen with basal hormones [2]
  3. Radionecrosis — mimics tumour recurrence, distinguished by SPECT/perfusion MRI [2]
  4. Secondary brain tumours — long-term risk, especially meningiomas
  5. Vasculopathy — ischaemic stroke risk [2]

These are the reasons the field has shifted towards SRS (which spares the rest of the brain) over WBRT wherever possible.

Since patients with brain metastases often require prolonged dexamethasone, steroid complications are extremely common and clinically significant:

ComplicationMechanismClinical Significance
Steroid-induced hyperglycaemia / diabetesGlucocorticoids promote gluconeogenesis, reduce peripheral glucose uptake, induce insulin resistanceRequires glucose monitoring; may need insulin or oral hypoglycaemics
ImmunosuppressionLymphocyte apoptosis, suppression of cytokine release, impaired macrophage functionIncreased risk of opportunistic infections (PJP, Candida, reactivation of TB/hepatitis B). PJP prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole if prolonged high-dose steroids.
Proximal myopathy (steroid myopathy)Direct toxic effect on type II muscle fibres → proximal muscle wasting and weaknessDifficult to distinguish from tumour-related weakness. Improves with steroid taper.
Gastric ulceration / GI bleedingSteroids impair mucosal defence mechanisms and prostaglandin synthesisCo-prescribe PPI (omeprazole/pantoprazole)
Cushing's syndromeExogenous hypercortisolismMoon face, central obesity, skin thinning, easy bruising, striae, buffalo hump
Psychiatric effectsAltered serotonergic and dopaminergic signallingInsomnia (very common), agitation, psychosis, depression, euphoria
Osteoporosis↓Osteoblast activity, ↑osteoclast activity, ↓intestinal calcium absorptionVertebral compression fractures. Consider bone protection if prolonged use.
Adrenal suppressionExogenous steroids suppress the HPA axis → adrenal atrophyMust taper gradually — abrupt cessation → Addisonian crisis (hypotension, shock, death).
Skin changesCollagen loss, capillary fragilityThin skin, easy bruising, poor wound healing (important post-surgery)
VTESteroids are prothrombotic (increase clotting factors, impair fibrinolysis)Adds to already elevated VTE risk in cancer patients

Agent ClassKey Complications
EGFR TKIs (osimertinib, erlotinib)Skin rash (acneiform), diarrhoea, interstitial lung disease (rare but serious), QTc prolongation (osimertinib)
ALK TKIs (lorlatinib)Hyperlipidaemia, neurocognitive effects (mood changes), peripheral neuropathy
Anti-HER2 (trastuzumab, tucatinib)Cardiotoxicity — trastuzumab can cause cardiomyopathy/heart failure (monitor LVEF with echo)
BRAF/MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib)Pyrexia (very common with dabrafenib), skin toxicity (cutaneous SCC), retinal vein occlusion (trametinib)
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab)Immune-related adverse events (irAEs): colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, thyroiditis/hypophysitis, dermatitis, myocarditis. Hypophysitis from ipilimumab can cause secondary adrenal insufficiency.
CisplatinOtotoxicity [10], nephrotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, nausea/vomiting
TemozolomideMyelosuppression (lymphopenia → PJP risk), nausea, hepatotoxicity

  • Local recurrence after surgery or SRS: ~20–30% at 1 year.
  • Distant brain recurrence (new metastases elsewhere in the brain): reflects the ongoing metastatic potential of the primary cancer.
  • The challenge of distinguishing recurrence from radiation necrosis is a major clinical problem [2]. Both present as new/enlarging enhancing lesions. MRI perfusion, SPECT [1], and amino acid PET are used. Radiation necrosis typically appears 1–3 years post-RT, with lack of clearly defined T2W lesion and high oedema-to-enhancement volume ratio [2]. Treatment: steroids, bevacizumab, or surgical resection.

  • Untreated brain metastases: median survival ~1 month [2].
  • WBRT alone: median survival ~3–6 months.
  • Surgery + WBRT: ~10–12 months [2].
  • Surgery + SRS: ~12–15 months.
  • Favourable subtypes with targeted therapy (EGFR-mutant NSCLC, HER2+ breast): can exceed 2 years.
  • Cause of death: brain herniation, progressive neurological deterioration, systemic disease progression, or treatment-related complications (pulmonary embolism, infection).

CategoryKey Complications
DiseaseRaised ICP, brain herniation (uncal/tonsillar), seizures, intratumoral haemorrhage, obstructive hydrocephalus, VTE, SIADH, cognitive decline, leptomeningeal dissemination
SurgeryHaemorrhage, neurological deficit, infection, CSF leak, posterior fossa syndrome [10]
SRSAcute oedema, radiation necrosis (1–3y) [2], CN injury
WBRTNeurocognitive deficits [2], hypopituitarism (up to 80%) [2], ototoxicity [2][10], secondary tumours [2], vasculopathy [2], leukoencephalopathy, somnolence syndrome
DexamethasoneHyperglycaemia, immunosuppression, myopathy, GI ulceration, Cushingoid features, osteoporosis, psychiatric effects, adrenal suppression, VTE
Systemic therapyCardiotoxicity (trastuzumab), irAEs (checkpoint inhibitors), ototoxicity (cisplatin), myelosuppression

High Yield Summary — Complications of Brain Metastases

Disease complications: Raised ICP → brain herniation (uncal: ipsilateral CN III palsy + contralateral hemiplegia; tonsillar: respiratory arrest → death). Seizures (20–35%, cortical mets). Haemorrhage (melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma, thyroid — "MR CT"). Hydrocephalus (posterior fossa mets compressing 4th ventricle). VTE (cancer hypercoagulability + immobility). SIADH.

WBRT chronic complications: Neurocognitive deficits (memory loss, most significant) [2], hypopituitarism (up to 80%, screen for) [2], radionecrosis (1–3y, mimics recurrence) [2], secondary brain tumours, vasculopathy/stroke, ototoxicity, cataracts [2][10].

Steroid complications: Hyperglycaemia, immunosuppression (PJP prophylaxis), proximal myopathy, GI ulceration (PPI), adrenal suppression (never stop abruptly).

Clinical pearl: Radiation necrosis vs. tumour recurrence is the most common diagnostic dilemma post-treatment. Distinguished by SPECT (low uptake = necrosis), MRI perfusion (low rCBV = necrosis), biopsy if still uncertain [1][2].

Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) — postop complication of midline posterior fossa surgery, impaired language production, resolves over weeks to months [10].


Active Recall - Complications of Brain Metastases

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 108. A mass in the brain brain tumours.pdf (slides 33–34) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.162–165 — Clinical presentation, investigations, management, complications of brain tumours; radiation complications) [3] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.55 — Brain metastasis management) [7] AOS material: AOS - Cancer Medicine.pdf (p.14, p.31 — Oncological emergencies, Stage IV breast cancer treatment) [10] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p.534 — Radiotherapy complications including ototoxicity, endocrine abnormalities, posterior fossa syndrome) [21] AOS material: AOS - Ophthalmology (Ans:Notes).pdf (p.3 — CN VI palsy as false localising sign of raised ICP, papilloedema) [22] Senior notes: Block A - Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders.pdf (p.21 — CNS causes of SIADH) [23] Senior notes: Block A - Two cases of polyuria and polydipsia.pdf (p.3 — Posterior pituitary blood supply, metastases to pituitary); Block A - I keep on bumping into people on my side_ pituitary tumours; hypopituitarism.pdf (p.11 — CSF rhinorrhoea complication)

High Yield Summary

Definition: Brain metastases are secondary intracranial tumours from haematogenous or direct spread of a primary cancer to the brain. They are the commonest intracranial tumour overall [1].

Epidemiology: Incidence rising as cancer survival improves [1]. Most common primaries: lung, breast, colon, kidney, melanoma [1]. In HK, lung cancer is the leading cause.

Key pathophysiology: Haematogenous spread → arrest at grey-white junction → BBB disruption → tumour growth + vasogenic oedema → raised ICP. Dexamethasone works by restoring BBB integrity and reducing oedema.

Clinical features: Headache (worse in morning), focal neurological deficits, seizures, cognitive changes, nausea/vomiting. Signs: papilloedema, hemiparesis, visual field defects, cerebellar signs, herniation signs.

Critical GC lecture points:

  • Brain metastases may present before the primary disease [1]
  • May develop when primary disease is long in remission [1]
  • A solitary brain mass in a cancer patient CANNOT be presumed to be metastasis — DDx includes primary brain tumour and abscess [1]
  • Multiple brain lesions in a cancer patient can be something else (cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis) [1]
  • History & Examination crucial: look for primary & screen for other foci; SPECT; serum tumour markers; surgery + histology if in doubt [1]

Haemorrhagic mets mnemonic: "MR CT" — Melanoma, RCC, Choriocarcinoma, Thyroid

Solitary vs Single: Solitary = only metastasis in the body; Single = one in brain but other mets elsewhere.

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Brain Metastases

Key GC exam points (must know):

  1. A solitary brain mass in a cancer patient cannot be presumed to be metastasis [1]. DDx includes primary brain tumour and abscess. 10–15% of solitary lesions in cancer patients are NOT metastases [2].
  2. Multiple brain lesions in a cancer patient can be something else: cysticercosis, CNS lymphoma, toxoplasmosis [1].
  3. Workup: History & Examination → Look for primary & screen for other foci → SPECT → Serum tumour markers (!) → Surgery + histology if in doubt [1].
  4. SPECT functions: distinguish benign from malignant, predict histological grade, select biopsy areas [10].
  5. Histological examination of biopsy specimen remains the most important component of diagnostic evaluation [10].

Key imaging discriminators:

  • DWI restriction → abscess (pus) or CNS lymphoma (cellular), NOT typical metastasis
  • Grey-white junction → metastasis
  • Periventricular → CNS lymphoma
  • Infiltrative crossing corpus callosum → GBM
  • Extra-axial with dural tail → meningioma
  • Cystic with scolex → cysticercosis

Key IHC markers for unknown primary: TTF-1 (lung), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (RCC/thyroid), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45 (melanoma), PSA (prostate) [12].

High Yield Summary — Investigations for Brain Metastases

Gold standard imaging: Contrast-enhanced MRI brain [3][9]. CT brain is first-line in emergencies [8].

Why PET-CT is NOT ideal for brain: Background brain metabolic activity is too hypermetabolic [14] → use MRI instead.

Enhancement mechanism: Normal brain does not enhance because of intact BBB. Enhancement = BBB disruption (tumour, infection) or structure outside BBB (meningioma) [2].

GC workup for solitary mass in cancer patient: History & Examination → Look for primary → SPECT → Serum tumour markers (!) → Surgery + histology if in doubt [1].

SPECT functions: Distinguish benign vs malignant, predict histological grade, select biopsy areas [10].

IHC for unknown primary: TTF-1 (lung/thyroid), CDX2 (colorectal), PAX8 (renal/thyroid/gynae), ER/PR/HER2 (breast), S100/HMB-45 (melanoma), PSA (prostate) [12].

MRI appearance of brain metastases: Round, well-circumscribed, contrast-enhancing, variable T1/T2 signal, surrounding oedema, at grey-white junction, may involve multiple compartments [9].

High Yield Summary — Management of Brain Metastases

Immediate: High-dose dexamethasone for vasogenic oedema [3][7]. Anticonvulsants only if seizures have occurred (NOT prophylactic). Levetiracetam preferred over phenytoin (no CYP450 interactions).

Solitary met, good KPS: Surgery + SRS [3]. Provides tissue diagnosis + local control.

Limited mets (1–4): SRS alone [7][17][18]. Preserves neurocognition.

Multiple mets / inoperable: WBRT [3][7][17][18]. Ideally hippocampal-avoidance + memantine to reduce cognitive decline.

Leptomeningeal disease: Systemic steroid + WBRT ± intrathecal chemotherapy [7][17][18].

Systemic therapy: Increasingly important. Osimertinib (EGFR-mutant NSCLC), tucatinib (HER2+ breast), dabrafenib + trametinib (BRAF-mutant melanoma), nivolumab + ipilimumab (melanoma) all have significant CNS activity.

SCLC: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces brain met incidence and improves OS [14].

Absolute contraindication: Known malignant intracranial neoplasm is an absolute contraindication to thrombolysis [19][20].

Poor prognosis: Best supportive care — dexamethasone, symptom control, palliative care [7][17][18].

High Yield Summary — Complications of Brain Metastases

Disease complications: Raised ICP → brain herniation (uncal: ipsilateral CN III palsy + contralateral hemiplegia; tonsillar: respiratory arrest → death). Seizures (20–35%, cortical mets). Haemorrhage (melanoma, RCC, choriocarcinoma, thyroid — "MR CT"). Hydrocephalus (posterior fossa mets compressing 4th ventricle). VTE (cancer hypercoagulability + immobility). SIADH.

WBRT chronic complications: Neurocognitive deficits (memory loss, most significant) [2], hypopituitarism (up to 80%, screen for) [2], radionecrosis (1–3y, mimics recurrence) [2], secondary brain tumours, vasculopathy/stroke, ototoxicity, cataracts [2][10].

Steroid complications: Hyperglycaemia, immunosuppression (PJP prophylaxis), proximal myopathy, GI ulceration (PPI), adrenal suppression (never stop abruptly).

Clinical pearl: Radiation necrosis vs. tumour recurrence is the most common diagnostic dilemma post-treatment. Distinguished by SPECT (low uptake = necrosis), MRI perfusion (low rCBV = necrosis), biopsy if still uncertain [1][2].

Posterior fossa syndrome (cerebellar mutism) — postop complication of midline posterior fossa surgery, impaired language production, resolves over weeks to months [10].

On this page

No Headings