Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive immunodeficiency, typically presenting in infancy and early childhood, caused by defective integrin molecules (most commonly CD18) on white blood cells, leading to impaired leukocyte migration to infection sites and resulting in recurrent severe bacterial infections, delayed umbilical cord separation, and absent pus formation despite marked leukocytosis.
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Paediatric Setting
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) is a group of rare, inherited primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) characterised by defective adhesion and migration of leukocytes (principally neutrophils) from the bloodstream into tissues. The name tells you the pathology:
- "Leukocyte" → white blood cell (Greek: leukos = white, kytos = cell)
- "Adhesion" → the process of sticking to endothelium
- "Deficiency" → the molecules required for that sticking are absent or dysfunctional
Because neutrophils cannot leave the vasculature and reach sites of infection or tissue injury, patients develop recurrent severe bacterial and fungal infections with characteristically poor wound healing and absent pus formation, despite having markedly elevated peripheral blood neutrophil counts [1][2].
Pathophysiology: deficiency of neutrophil surface adhesion molecule (CD18) → inability to leave vasculature and migrate to site of infection/inflammation [1]
LAD falls under the phagocyte defect category of primary immunodeficiencies in the IUIS (International Union of Immunological Societies) classification [2][3].
Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- LAD is very rare: estimated incidence of approximately 1 per 1,000,000 live births worldwide.
- LAD-I (the classic and most common subtype) accounts for the vast majority of cases.
- No specific ethnic predilection, though consanguinity substantially increases risk given autosomal recessive inheritance.
- Neonates/early infancy: The hallmark presentation is in the neonatal period — delayed umbilical cord separation and omphalitis are often the first clues [1].
- Severe (complete deficiency) phenotypes present within weeks of birth; moderate (partial deficiency) phenotypes may present later in infancy or early childhood.
- Consanguinity (autosomal recessive inheritance — parents who are carriers)
- Family history of early infant death due to overwhelming infection
- In the Hong Kong context, while LAD is rare, awareness is important because:
- Hong Kong has a robust newborn examination system; delayed cord separation should trigger referral.
- Phagocyte defects account for approximately 14.9% of all primary immunodeficiencies [1].
- BCG vaccination is given at birth in Hong Kong — phagocyte defects (including CGD and LAD) can present with disseminated BCG disease, making early recognition critical.
Anatomy and Physiology of Normal Leukocyte Adhesion and Migration
Understanding LAD requires understanding how neutrophils normally exit the bloodstream — a process called the leukocyte adhesion cascade (also known as diapedesis or transendothelial migration).
This is a beautifully orchestrated, multi-step process:
Step-by-step:
-
Margination: Neutrophils move from the centre of the blood vessel to the periphery (near the endothelium). This happens naturally in post-capillary venules where flow is slower.
-
Rolling: Mediated by selectins (E-selectin, P-selectin on endothelium; L-selectin on leukocytes) and their carbohydrate ligands, particularly sialyl-Lewis X (sLeX). These are weak, transient bonds → the neutrophil "rolls" along the endothelium like a ball rolling along a surface. This is the step affected in LAD-II.
-
Firm Adhesion (Arrest): The critical step. Chemokines released at the infection site activate the neutrophil, causing a conformational change in surface integrins — specifically the β2-integrin family (CD18/CD11 complexes):
- LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18) — "Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1"
- Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) — "Macrophage-1 antigen" (also called CR3, complement receptor 3)
- p150,95 (CD11c/CD18)
These integrins bind to ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 (Intercellular Adhesion Molecules) on the endothelial surface → firm adhesion. This is the step affected in LAD-I (the common form).
-
Transmigration (Diapedesis): The neutrophil squeezes between endothelial cells, crossing the basement membrane into the tissue. This requires PECAM-1 (CD31) and other molecules.
-
Chemotaxis: Once in the tissue, the neutrophil follows a chemical gradient (C5a, IL-8, LTB4, bacterial formyl peptides) to the site of infection, where it performs phagocytosis and killing.
Why Do LAD Patients Have High Blood Neutrophil Counts?
If neutrophils cannot adhere to endothelium and leave the bloodstream, they accumulate in the circulation. The bone marrow also ramps up production in response to ongoing infection (via G-CSF). The result is persistent, marked leukocytosis/neutrophilia — often > 50,000–100,000/μL — even between infectious episodes. This is a key diagnostic clue: a child with recurrent infections AND sky-high neutrophil count should make you think LAD.
| Molecule | Location | Ligand | Step in Cascade | LAD Type if Defective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selectins (E, P, L) | Endothelium / Leukocyte | sLeX (fucosylated carbohydrates) | Rolling | LAD-II (defective fucosylation of sLeX) |
| β2-Integrins (CD18/CD11a,b,c) | Leukocyte | ICAM-1, ICAM-2 | Firm adhesion | LAD-I (defective CD18) |
| Kindlin-3 (FERMT3) | Leukocyte (intracellular) | Integrin activation | Integrin inside-out signalling | LAD-III |
Aetiology and Classification
Classification of LAD Subtypes
There are three recognised subtypes (LAD-I, LAD-II, LAD-III), each caused by distinct genetic defects affecting different steps in the adhesion cascade:
- Gene: ITGB2 (chromosome 21q22.3) — encodes the CD18 (β2-integrin) subunit
- Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
- Pathophysiology:
- CD18 is the common β-subunit shared by all β2-integrins (LFA-1, Mac-1, p150,95)
- Loss of CD18 → all three β2-integrins are absent or severely reduced on the leukocyte surface
- → Failure of firm adhesion to endothelium → neutrophils cannot leave the bloodstream
- → No neutrophil recruitment to tissue → no pus formation, poor wound healing, recurrent infections
- Phenotype severity depends on residual CD18 expression:
- Severe LAD-I: < 2% of normal CD18 expression → presents in neonatal period, often fatal within 1–2 years without HSCT
- Moderate LAD-I: 2–30% of normal CD18 expression → milder disease, may survive to adulthood but with significant morbidity (periodontitis, skin infections)
Ix: ↑ neutrophil (∵ trapped inside vessel) [1]
- Gene: SLC35C1 (chromosome 11) — encodes a GDP-fucose transporter in the Golgi apparatus
- Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
- Pathophysiology:
- Fucose is needed to synthesise sialyl-Lewis X (sLeX), the carbohydrate ligand on leukocytes that binds selectins
- Without the GDP-fucose transporter → sLeX is not properly fucosylated → defective selectin-mediated rolling
- Also affects fucosylation of other glycoproteins → Bombay blood group (Oh) phenotype, short stature, intellectual disability
- Key distinguishing feature: Associated with intellectual disability, short stature, and Bombay blood group
- Treatment: Oral fucose supplementation may partially correct the adhesion defect
- Gene: FERMT3 (chromosome 11q13) — encodes Kindlin-3, an intracellular protein required for integrin activation ("inside-out signalling")
- Inheritance: Autosomal recessive
- Pathophysiology:
- Kindlin-3 is required for the conformational change that activates integrins on both leukocytes AND platelets
- → Defective β1, β2, and β3 integrin activation
- → Combines features of LAD-I (defective leukocyte adhesion) + Glanzmann thrombasthenia (defective platelet aggregation due to dysfunctional αIIbβ3 integrin)
- Key distinguishing feature: Severe bleeding tendency in addition to recurrent infections
| Feature | LAD-I | LAD-II | LAD-III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | ITGB2 | SLC35C1 | FERMT3 |
| Defective protein | CD18 (β2-integrin subunit) | GDP-fucose transporter | Kindlin-3 |
| Step affected | Firm adhesion | Rolling | Integrin activation (all types) |
| Inheritance | AR | AR | AR |
| Neutrophilia | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| Pus formation | Absent | Reduced | Absent |
| Bleeding | No | No | Yes (Glanzmann-like) |
| Intellectual disability | No | Yes | No |
| Bombay blood group | No | Yes | No |
| Short stature | No | Yes | No |
Pathophysiology — Detailed Mechanistic Explanation
The neutrophil is the first-line phagocyte of innate immunity, essential for defence against bacteria and fungi. In LAD:
- Infection begins → endothelium becomes activated → upregulates ICAM-1, selectins
- Chemokines are released → should activate neutrophil integrins
- In LAD-I: Neutrophils lack CD18 → cannot firmly adhere → continue flowing past in the bloodstream → never reach the tissue
- Bacteria proliferate unchecked in the tissue → spreading infection, tissue necrosis
- The bone marrow compensates by producing more neutrophils → marked peripheral leukocytosis
- But all these extra neutrophils are useless — they are trapped in the circulation
Pus = collection of dead neutrophils + tissue debris + bacteria. If neutrophils cannot leave the bloodstream, they never accumulate at the infection site → absent pus formation despite severe infection [1]. This is a cardinal feature.
Clinical features: poor wound healing with absent pus formation [1]
Normal umbilical cord separation (typically 7–14 days of life) is an inflammatory process:
- After the cord is clamped, the stump undergoes dry gangrene
- Neutrophils migrate into the cord stump → enzymatic digestion and separation
- In LAD: Neutrophils cannot migrate into the tissue → the normal inflammatory separation process is severely impaired → delayed separation (often > 30 days) with associated omphalitis (umbilical stump infection) [1]
Wound healing requires:
- Neutrophils (early phase: debridement, clearing bacteria)
- Monocytes/macrophages (later phase: tissue remodelling)
Both cell types require β2-integrins for tissue entry → in LAD-I, wound healing is impaired at every stage.
The oral cavity is heavily colonised with bacteria. Normal gingival health depends on constant neutrophil surveillance in the gingival crevice. Without neutrophil migration:
- Bacteria proliferate → severe, destructive periodontitis
- Premature tooth loss is common in moderate LAD-I patients who survive infancy
Clinical Features
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Delayed umbilical cord separation (often > 30 days, sometimes > 60 days) | Cord stump separation is neutrophil-dependent; without neutrophil migration, the inflammatory process that digests the cord is absent [1] |
| Omphalitis (infection of umbilical stump) | Bacteria colonise the stump; no neutrophil defence → spreading infection [1] |
| Recurrent severe bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (cellulitis, abscesses, necrotising fasciitis) | Skin breaches are not defended by neutrophils; bacteria invade unimpeded |
| Recurrent severe pneumonia | Respiratory tract pathogens not cleared from alveoli |
| Recurrent otitis media and sinusitis | Mucosal surfaces undefended |
| Recurrent perianal and perirectal abscesses/infections | Perianal area is a common site of bacterial entry; no local neutrophil response |
| Poor wound healing — wounds that fail to heal or dehisce after minor trauma or surgery | Both the inflammatory and proliferative phases of wound healing require leukocyte migration [1] |
| Severe, destructive gingivitis/periodontitis (especially in moderate LAD-I older children) | Gingival crevice requires constant neutrophil surveillance; bacteria proliferate without it |
| Premature loss of primary and/or permanent teeth | Consequence of severe periodontitis with alveolar bone loss |
| Recurrent fevers (often without localising signs initially) | Systemic response to infection; but local signs may be muted because neutrophils cannot reach the site |
| Failure to thrive (in severe cases) | Chronic infection, chronic inflammation, poor nutritional intake |
High Yield Clinical Clue
A neonate with delayed umbilical cord separation (> 30 days) + omphalitis + marked leukocytosis (very high WCC) + absent pus at infection sites = think LAD until proven otherwise.
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Marked leukocytosis / neutrophilia (WCC often 30,000–100,000/μL; may exceed 100,000/μL during infection) | Neutrophils are produced in excess but cannot leave the vasculature → accumulate in blood [1] |
| Absence of pus at infection sites (wounds, abscesses appear "cold" — erythematous but without purulent collections) | No neutrophil accumulation in tissue → no pus [1] |
| Non-healing ulcers, particularly at sites of minor trauma, surgical wounds, or insect bites | Tissue repair requires leukocyte-mediated debridement |
| Necrotising soft tissue infections (may progress rapidly to gangrene) | Uncontrolled bacterial proliferation → tissue necrosis |
| Inflamed, hyperplastic, friable gingiva; loose teeth (in older children with moderate phenotype) | Chronic periodontal disease from unopposed bacterial growth |
| Omphalitis with delayed cord separation — erythema, oedema, foul-smelling discharge from umbilical stump | Direct consequence of impaired neutrophil tissue entry [1] |
| Hepatosplenomegaly (variable) | Chronic infection → extramedullary haematopoiesis; also reactive |
| Scars from prior infections and surgeries (poor quality, wide, or hypertrophic) | Poor wound healing |
| Absence of classical abscess formation — instead, infections spread as phlegmon/cellulitis without walling off | Abscess formation requires neutrophil accumulation to wall off infection; without this, infections spread diffusely |
Key Distinction from CGD
Both LAD and CGD are phagocyte defects causing recurrent infections, but they present differently:
- CGD: Neutrophils CAN reach the tissue but CANNOT kill ingested microbes → pus and granulomas ARE formed (the name "granulomatous" tells you). Typical organisms: catalase-positive bacteria and fungi.
- LAD: Neutrophils CANNOT reach the tissue at all → no pus, no granulomas. Peripheral blood shows very high neutrophil count [1][4].
AOS Paeds Q9 tested this distinction: a child with recurrent lymphadenitis, pus formation (culture grew Staph aureus), hepatosplenomegaly, BCG scar, and high IgG → answer was CGD, NOT LAD (because there WAS pus) [4].
Because the defect is in neutrophil adhesion (innate immunity), the organisms are those normally controlled by neutrophils:
| Organism Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Gram-positive bacteria | Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp. |
| Gram-negative bacteria | Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, enteric organisms |
| Fungi | Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. |
| Mycobacteria | M. tuberculosis, BCG (if vaccinated — relevant in Hong Kong where BCG is given at birth) |
Phagocyte defects commonly cause recurrent bacterial infections. Common pathogens: skin commensals, fungi [1]
- Severe LAD-I (< 2% CD18): Without haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), most children die within the first 1–2 years of life from overwhelming sepsis or necrotising infections.
- Moderate LAD-I (2–30% CD18): May survive to childhood or adulthood but with significant morbidity — severe periodontitis, recurrent infections, impaired quality of life.
Relevant Contextual Concepts from Lecture Slides
LAD is classified under phagocyte defects in the IUIS classification of primary immunodeficiencies.
Warning signs for PID in children include: ≥ 4 new ear infections in 1 year, ≥ 2 serious sinus infections in 1 year, ≥ 2 months on antibiotics with little effect, ≥ 2 pneumonias in 1 year, failure to thrive, recurrent deep skin/organ abscesses, persistent thrush after age 1, need for IV antibiotics, ≥ 2 deep-seated infections, family history of PID.
In the approach to PID: the type of infection suggests the immune defect — bacterial infections (especially skin, soft tissue, lung) with absent pus and very high WCC point to phagocyte adhesion defects.
Phagocyte defects present with recurrent bacterial and fungal infections, particularly of skin, lungs, and lymph nodes.
Flow cytometry for CD18 (and CD11a, CD11b, CD11c) expression on leukocytes is the key diagnostic test for LAD-I.
Neutrophil function tests include: NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium) test or DHR (dihydrorhodamine) flow cytometry for oxidative burst (CGD), and flow cytometry for adhesion molecules (LAD).
-
BCG at birth: Hong Kong's universal BCG vaccination programme means that phagocyte defects (CGD, LAD) may present with disseminated BCG disease — a feared complication. Any neonate with delayed cord separation + abnormal BCG reaction should prompt urgent immunological investigation.
-
Newborn examination: The baby check at birth and the postnatal visit should include assessment of umbilical stump healing. Delayed cord separation beyond 3 weeks warrants investigation.
-
Family-centred care and genetic counselling: Given AR inheritance, parents should be counselled about 25% recurrence risk for future pregnancies. Carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis (via chorionic villus sampling for ITGB2 mutation analysis) are available.
-
Consent/assent: For invasive investigations (bone marrow, genetic testing) in young children, parental consent is required. For older children (typically > 7 years with sufficient understanding), assent should be sought in addition to parental consent.
High Yield Summary
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Key Points for Exams:
-
Definition: AR-inherited primary immunodeficiency with defective leukocyte adhesion → neutrophils cannot leave bloodstream → recurrent severe infections without pus.
-
Most common type: LAD-I — deficiency of CD18 (β2-integrin subunit) due to ITGB2 gene mutation.
-
Cardinal features: Delayed umbilical cord separation + omphalitis + marked leukocytosis/neutrophilia + absent pus formation + poor wound healing [1].
-
Pathophysiology: CD18 absent → β2-integrins (LFA-1, Mac-1, p150,95) absent → no firm adhesion to endothelium → no neutrophil extravasation → no tissue defence.
-
Key investigation: Flow cytometry showing absent/reduced CD18 expression on leukocytes + persistent neutrophilia.
-
Distinguish from CGD: CGD has PUS and GRANULOMAS (neutrophils reach tissue but can't kill); LAD has NO PUS (neutrophils can't reach tissue at all) [1][4].
-
Treatment: HSCT is curative for severe LAD-I. Prophylactic antibiotics and aggressive treatment of infections are essential bridges.
-
LAD-II: Defective fucosylation → no selectin rolling → also has intellectual disability, short stature, Bombay blood group.
-
LAD-III: Defective Kindlin-3 → all integrin activation impaired → LAD-I features PLUS Glanzmann thrombasthenia-like bleeding.
Active Recall - Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.411, Phagocyte defects — LAD section) [2] Lecture slides: GC 144. A child with recurrent infections Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf; Block C - A child with recurrent infections_ Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf [3] Lecture slides: GC 096. Why do I always get sick.pdf [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9 — CGD vs LAD distinction) [5] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf [6] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (CGD and phagocyte defects section)
Differential Diagnosis of Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD)
When you encounter a child — particularly a neonate or young infant — with features suggestive of LAD (recurrent severe infections, delayed cord separation, absent pus, marked neutrophilia), the differential diagnosis must be systematic. The key is to think about why this child is getting recurrent infections and then narrow down the immune defect based on the clinical pattern.
High index of suspicion for early diagnosis and intervention. Vigilance — warning signs of primary immunodeficiencies. [3]
Differentials: exclude anatomical and functional disorders. [3]
The differential breaks down into several tiers:
- Other phagocyte defects (most important — same category as LAD)
- Other primary immunodeficiencies that present with recurrent bacterial/fungal infections in infancy
- Secondary causes of immunodeficiency (must always be excluded first)
- Non-immune causes of delayed cord separation or omphalitis
Tier 1: Other Phagocyte Defects
These are the most important differentials because they share the same category of immune defect and present with overlapping features — recurrent bacterial infections, skin commensals, fungi [1].
This is the most important differential to distinguish from LAD, and is a favourite exam question [4].
| Feature | LAD | CGD |
|---|---|---|
| Defect | Adhesion (CD18) — neutrophils can't leave vessels | Killing (NADPH oxidase) — neutrophils reach tissue but can't kill |
| Pus formation | Absent (no neutrophils in tissue) [1] | Present (neutrophils accumulate but can't kill → chronic inflammation → granuloma formation) [1] |
| WCC / Neutrophil count | Markedly elevated (trapped in blood) [1] | Usually normal or mildly elevated |
| Granulomas | No | Yes — the disease is named for this |
| Target organisms | Broad (bacteria, fungi) | Catalase-positive organisms (S. aureus, Aspergillus, Serratia, Nocardia, Burkholderia cepacia) [1] |
| BCG complication | Disseminated BCG possible | BCG dissemination is classic (BCG is catalase-positive) [1] |
| Inheritance | AR | Majority X-linked (60%), some AR [1] |
| Diagnostic test | Flow cytometry for CD18 | DHR (dihydrorhodamine) flow cytometry or NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium) test for oxidative burst |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | Variable | Common [1] |
AOS Exam Distinction — CGD vs LAD
AOS Paeds Q9 [4]: A 2-year-old boy with recurrent cervical lymphadenitis, draining pus (grew S. aureus), large BCG scar, hepatosplenomegaly, perianal sepsis, normal WCC, high IgG → Answer: CGD, NOT LAD.
The critical distinguishing features were: (1) PUS was present (rules out LAD), (2) WCC was normal (LAD would have very high WCC), (3) catalase-positive organism, (4) BCG scar abnormality. This is a must-know distinction.
- Defect: Maturation arrest of neutrophil precursors in bone marrow (mutations in ELANE, HAX1, G6PC3, etc.)
- Presentation: Recurrent severe bacterial infections from early infancy (similar to LAD)
- Key difference from LAD:
- Neutropenia (ANC < 200/μL) — the OPPOSITE of LAD which has marked neutrophilia
- Pus may still be absent (no neutrophils to form pus), but the mechanism is different (not enough neutrophils produced vs. neutrophils can't leave vessels)
- Why it matters: Both LAD and severe congenital neutropenia present with infections + absent pus, but the CBC immediately distinguishes them — sky-high neutrophils in LAD vs. near-zero neutrophils in Kostmann
- Defect: ELANE gene mutation → periodic oscillations in neutrophil count with a cycle of approximately 21 days
- Presentation: Recurrent fevers, mouth ulcers, and infections occurring in a predictable cyclical pattern
- Key difference from LAD: Neutropenia is episodic (not constant); between episodes, the WCC normalises. Serial CBCs over 6–8 weeks demonstrate the cyclical pattern. LAD has persistent neutrophilia.
- Defect: Absence of specific (secondary) granules in neutrophils → impaired bactericidal function
- Very rare
- Key difference: Neutrophils are present and can migrate but lack granule contents. Diagnosed on neutrophil morphology (bilobed nuclei, absent granules on smear).
- Defect: LYST gene mutation → defective lysosomal trafficking → giant granules in leukocytes → impaired chemotaxis and killing
- Key features: Partial oculocutaneous albinism, recurrent pyogenic infections, giant granules visible on peripheral blood smear, progressive neurological deterioration, risk of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)
- Key difference from LAD: Albinism is the distinguishing clinical clue. Giant granules on blood film are pathognomonic.
Tier 2: Other Primary Immunodeficiencies (PIDs) Presenting in Infancy with Recurrent Infections
"SPUR" infections: Disproportionate frequency, disproportionate severity, unusual microbes, unusual sites of infection, unusual clinical presentation [3]
- Defect: Combined T-cell and B-cell deficiency (many genetic causes; most common X-linked IL2RG)
- Presentation: All infections — bacterial, viral, fungal, opportunistic (PJP, BCG dissemination, Candida) [2]
- Key differences from LAD:
- Low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC < 2500/mL in infants) [2] — LAD has normal lymphocytes
- Failure to thrive, chronic diarrhoea, absent thymic shadow on CXR
- Infections include viruses and opportunistic organisms (LAD is mainly bacterial/fungal)
- WCC may be low or normal (not high)
- No delayed cord separation
- Defect: STAT3 mutation (AD, loss of function) → impaired Th17 response [2]
- Clinical features: pneumatocele, mucocutaneous Candidiasis, retained primary teeth, minimal trauma fracture and scoliosis [1]
- Key shared feature with LAD: Recurrent skin abscesses (often S. aureus)
- Key differences from LAD:
- Abscesses in HIES are classically "cold" (non-tender, non-inflamed) but DO contain pus — the neutrophils can reach the tissue, they just don't mount a proper inflammatory response
- Very high IgE levels, high absolute eosinophil count [2]
- Characteristic facies (coarse), skeletal abnormalities
- Normal neutrophil count
- CXR showing massive pneumatoceles [2]
- Defect: WAS gene mutation → defective WASp protein → impaired actin cytoskeleton in haematopoietic cells
- Clinical features: triad of immunodeficiency + thrombocytopenia + eczema [1]
- Micro-thrombocytopenia (low AND small platelets), bloody diarrhoea [2]
- Key difference from LAD: The triad is distinctive — eczema + small platelets + immunodeficiency. Bleeding tendency. LAD has no thrombocytopenia or eczema.
Initial evaluation: exclude secondary immunodeficiency — Examples: Diabetes, HIV, protein-losing states, CKD, malignancy, immunosuppression, drugs, structural defects [3]
In a child presenting with recurrent infections, you must always exclude secondary causes before diagnosing a PID:
| Secondary Cause | Key Features Distinguishing from LAD |
|---|---|
| HIV infection | Maternal history, CD4 depletion, opportunistic infections (PJP, CMV); HIV PCR diagnostic in infants |
| Malignancy (leukaemia, lymphoma) | Cytopenias (anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia), blasts on smear, organomegaly, bone pain |
| Immunosuppressive drugs (steroids, chemotherapy) | Clear drug history; iatrogenic neutropenia |
| Protein-losing states (nephrotic syndrome, protein-losing enteropathy) | Hypogammaglobulinaemia from urinary/GI loss; oedema |
| Diabetes mellitus | Polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss; impaired neutrophil function in hyperglycaemia |
| Malnutrition | Growth failure, wasting; common in developing countries; affects all arms of immunity |
Since delayed umbilical cord separation is the hallmark neonatal presentation of LAD, consider other causes:
| Condition | Mechanism | Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Normal variant | Some healthy neonates have delayed separation up to 3–4 weeks | No infections, normal WCC, normal wound healing |
| Urachal anomaly | Persistent urachus → wet umbilicus | Urine leaking from umbilicus, diagnosed by ultrasound/fistulogram |
| Omphalitis (isolated, non-immune) | Poor cord care, unhygienic practices | Single episode, normal WCC, responds to antibiotics, no recurrence |
| Omphalomesenteric duct remnant | Persistent vitelline duct → intestinal connection | Faecal or mucoid discharge from umbilicus |
The following mermaid diagram illustrates the clinical reasoning pathway when a child presents with recurrent severe infections and you are considering LAD versus its main differentials:
| Feature | LAD-I | CGD | SCID | Kostmann | Hyper-IgE | WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCC | ↑↑↑ | Normal | Low/Normal | ↓↓↓ | Normal | Normal/Low |
| Neutrophil count | Very high | Normal | Normal | Very low | Normal | Normal |
| Pus | Absent | Present | Variable | Absent | Present (cold) | Variable |
| Granulomas | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Delayed cord separation | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Eczema | No | No | No | No | Yes (atopic) | Yes |
| Thrombocytopenia | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (micro) |
| Bleeding | Only LAD-III | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Diagnostic test | CD18 flow cytometry | DHR/NBT | T-cell subsets, ALC | Bone marrow, ANC | IgE, eosinophils | Platelet size, WASp |
When you've established that the child likely has LAD, you need to determine the subtype:
| Feature | LAD-I | LAD-II | LAD-III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Most common | Very rare (< 10 families worldwide) | Very rare |
| Intellectual disability | No | Yes | No |
| Short stature | No | Yes | No |
| Bombay blood group | No | Yes | No |
| Bleeding tendency | No | No | Yes (Glanzmann-like) |
| Flow cytometry | Absent/reduced CD18 | Normal CD18; absent sLeX (CD15s) | Normal CD18 expression but impaired function |
| Response to fucose | No | Partial response to oral fucose | No |
Salient history: Family history and consanguinity, immunisation history and adverse reactions [3]
Identify "phenotype", age of presentation, progression of symptoms, pattern of pathogens, location of infections, features of immune dysregulation, investigation results, plot family tree (3 generations), consider Immunology referral [3]
When taking the history in a child with suspected LAD, specifically ask:
- Umbilical cord: When did it separate? Any infection of the stump? (Delayed cord separation → LAD)
- BCG reaction: Was it normal? Any dissemination? (Relevant in Hong Kong — abnormal BCG → CGD or SCID more than LAD, but LAD can also be affected)
- Pus formation: Have any infections produced pus? (No pus → LAD or severe neutropenia; pus → CGD, HIES)
- Wound healing: How do cuts and wounds heal? Any dehiscence? (Poor healing → LAD)
- Bleeding: Any easy bruising, prolonged bleeding? (Yes → LAD-III or WAS)
- Development: Any developmental delay? (Yes → LAD-II, SCID, Chediak-Higashi, ataxia-telangiectasia)
- Consanguinity: Parents related? (AR inheritance → higher risk)
- Family history: Siblings who died in infancy? Similar infections?
- Skin: Eczema? (WAS, HIES, atopic dermatitis with secondary infection)
- Teeth: Severe gingivitis? Premature tooth loss? Retained primary teeth? (LAD-I moderate → periodontitis; HIES → retained primary teeth)
First-line investigations: CBC and differentials, absolute lymphocyte count, liver and renal function tests, protein and globulin level, acute phase reactants (ESR/CRP), immunoglobulin profile (including IgE), serum and urine electrophoresis, C3/C4, ANA ± autoimmune serologies, HIV status (antigen or PCR), CXR/CT thorax/lung function [3]
Exam Tip: The WCC is Your Best Friend
In the differential diagnosis of phagocyte defects:
- Very high WCC with neutrophilia + absent pus = LAD
- Very low ANC + absent pus = Congenital neutropenia
- Normal WCC + pus/granulomas + catalase-positive organisms = CGD
- Normal WCC + cold abscesses + very high IgE = Hyper-IgE syndrome
The CBC is the single most useful first-line test to narrow the differential.
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of LAD
-
Most important differential: CGD — distinguished by presence of PUS and GRANULOMAS (neutrophils reach tissue in CGD but can't kill), NORMAL WCC, and catalase-positive organisms. LAD has NO pus, VERY HIGH WCC [1][4].
-
Other phagocyte defects: Severe congenital neutropenia (very LOW neutrophil count — opposite of LAD), cyclic neutropenia (periodic), Chediak-Higashi (albinism + giant granules).
-
Other PIDs: SCID (low lymphocytes, all infections), Hyper-IgE (cold abscesses with pus, high IgE, pneumatoceles), WAS (eczema + micro-thrombocytopenia).
-
Always exclude secondary immunodeficiency first: HIV, malignancy, immunosuppression, diabetes, protein-losing states [3].
-
Non-immune causes of delayed cord separation: Normal variant (up to 3–4 weeks), urachal anomaly, omphalomesenteric duct remnant.
-
LAD subtype differentiation: LAD-II = intellectual disability + Bombay blood group; LAD-III = bleeding tendency (Glanzmann-like).
-
First investigation: CBC with differential — the neutrophil count pattern immediately narrows the differential.
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of LAD
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.411, Phagocyte defects section) [2] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (PID classification table — SCID, WAS, HIES, CGD) [3] Lecture slides: GC 096. Why do I always get sick.pdf (p.19, p.21 — general principles, initial evaluation, SPUR infections, warning signs, first-line investigations) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9 — CGD vs LAD distinction)
Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Paediatric Setting
Diagnostic Criteria
There is no universally agreed-upon "scoring system" for LAD in the way that, say, the Jones criteria exist for rheumatic fever. Instead, LAD is diagnosed through a combination of clinical suspicion + characteristic laboratory findings + confirmatory flow cytometry + genetic testing. Think of it as a stepwise process rather than a checklist.
The following constellation should trigger investigation for LAD:
- Recurrent severe bacterial/fungal infections beginning in the neonatal period or early infancy
- Delayed umbilical cord separation (> 3–4 weeks, often > 30 days) with omphalitis [1]
- Absent pus formation at sites of infection despite severe tissue infection [1]
- Poor wound healing — wounds dehisce, ulcers fail to close [1]
- Marked persistent leukocytosis/neutrophilia even between infectious episodes [1]
- Severe periodontitis/gingivitis with premature tooth loss (in moderate phenotype surviving to childhood)
Approach to diagnosis of PID: Clinical history → Physical examination → Phenotypic investigations (Ig levels, vaccine responses, T/B/NK cell enumerations, lymphocyte subsets, cell function) → Genetic testing [5]
Definitive diagnosis of LAD-I requires:
| Criterion | Detail |
|---|---|
| Flow cytometry | Absent or markedly reduced expression of CD18 (and consequently CD11a, CD11b, CD11c) on peripheral blood leukocytes [5][7] |
| Severity grading | Severe: < 2% of normal CD18 expression; Moderate: 2–30% of normal CD18 expression |
| Genetic confirmation | Biallelic pathogenic variants in ITGB2 (LAD-I), SLC35C1 (LAD-II), or FERMT3 (LAD-III) |
For LAD-II and LAD-III, additional specific tests are needed (see below).
GC 144 High Yield — CBC Findings Pointing to Specific PIDs
Complete blood count findings in PID [7]:
- ANC high → leukocyte adhesion deficiency
- ALC low < 3000 (< 1 year) or < 1000 (> 1 year) → severe combined immunodeficiencies
- AEC high → primary atopic disorders
- ANC < 1 → severe congenital neutropenia
- PLT low → Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
This is the single most high-yield slide for in-house exams — the CBC immediately narrows your differential in a child with recurrent infections.
The diagnostic approach to LAD follows the general PID diagnostic framework, with specific branching for phagocyte defects:
Investigation Modalities — Detailed Explanation
First-Line Investigations (Screening)
These are the investigations you order when you suspect a PID in any child with recurrent infections. They help you categorise which arm of the immune system is likely affected.
First-line investigations: CBC and differentials, absolute lymphocyte count, liver and renal function tests, protein and globulin level, acute phase reactants (ESR/CRP), immunoglobulin profile (including IgE), serum and urine electrophoresis, C3/C4, ANA ± autoimmune serologies, HIV status (antigen or PCR), CXR/CT thorax/lung function [3]
Why this test: The CBC is the single most important first-line investigation. It immediately distinguishes LAD from other phagocyte defects and most other PIDs.
Key findings in LAD:
| Parameter | Finding in LAD | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Total WCC | Markedly elevated (typically 30,000–100,000/μL; can exceed 100,000/μL during active infection) | Neutrophils are produced in excess but cannot leave vasculature → accumulate in blood [1] |
| Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) | Very high — disproportionately elevated | The hallmark finding; ANC high → leukocyte adhesion deficiency [7] |
| Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) | Normal for age | Lymphocytes are not primarily affected in LAD |
| Haemoglobin | May be low (anaemia of chronic disease) | Chronic infection suppresses erythropoiesis |
| Platelets | Usually normal in LAD-I and LAD-II; may be low in LAD-III | LAD-III affects platelet integrin function → platelet dysfunction (but count may be normal; function is impaired) |
Age-specific normal ranges for WCC (crucial in paediatrics) [6][8]:
| Age | Normal WCC Range (×10⁹/L) |
|---|---|
| Full-term neonate | 18 ± 8 (10–26) |
| 1 year | 12 ± 6 (6–18) |
| 4–7 years | 10 ± 5 (5–15) |
| 8–12 years | 9 ± 4.5 (4.5–13.5) |
| Adult | 7.5 ± 3.5 (4–11) |
A neonate with a WCC of 80,000 is profoundly abnormal. But remember that neonatal WCC is normally higher than adults — a WCC of 20,000 in a neonate may be within high-normal range, whereas the same count in a 10-year-old is clearly elevated.
Leukocytosis: quantitative abnormality in WBC (cf qualitative defect in CGD, LAD) [6]
Rare causes of neutrophilia: leukocyte adhesion defect, Sweet syndrome [6]
Interpretation Pitfall
Do NOT dismiss a very high WCC in a neonate or infant as "reactive leukocytosis from neonatal sepsis" without considering LAD. In typical neonatal sepsis, the WCC may be elevated but usually < 30,000/μL and often shows a LEFT SHIFT (band forms, immature granulocytes). In LAD, the WCC is disproportionately and persistently elevated (often > 50,000/μL) with mature neutrophils, and it does NOT normalise between infectious episodes. A persistently sky-high neutrophil count is your red flag.
Why this test: To assess neutrophil morphology and exclude haematological malignancy or other phagocyte defects.
Key findings in LAD:
- Mature neutrophils in abundance — no left shift (i.e. no excess band cells or myelocytes, which you'd see in leukaemoid reactions or CML)
- No blasts (excludes leukaemia)
- No giant granules (excludes Chediak-Higashi syndrome)
- Normal morphology of other cell lines
PBS: look at number and morphology of different cell types, presence of blasts [6]
Why this test: To exclude antibody deficiency as the cause of recurrent infections, and to check for patterns suggestive of other PIDs.
Key findings in LAD:
- Usually normal or elevated IgG, IgA, IgM (elevated due to chronic antigenic stimulation from recurrent infections)
- Normal IgE (distinguishes from Hyper-IgE syndrome where IgE is > 2000 IU/mL)
IgGAME findings in PID [7]:
- High IgGAM → chronic granulomatous disease
- High IgE → Hyper-IgE syndrome, primary atopic disorder
- Low IgGAM → agammaglobulinaemia (e.g. XLA)
- High IgM → Hyper-IgM syndrome
In LAD, immunoglobulins are NOT the primary abnormality — this test is done to rule out other PIDs in the workup.
Why this test: Acute-phase reactants to assess for ongoing infection/inflammation.
Key findings in LAD:
- CRP often elevated during active infection (CRP is produced by the liver in response to IL-6 — this pathway is intact in LAD)
- ESR may be elevated
Why this test: Always exclude secondary immunodeficiency [3]. In infants < 18 months, maternal HIV antibodies cross the placenta → serology is unreliable → use HIV DNA PCR or p24 antigen instead.
Why this test: To identify causative organisms and guide antibiotic therapy.
Key findings in LAD:
- Common isolates: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Klebsiella, Candida spp.
- Note: Cultures from the WOUND SITE may be positive, but aspirated PUS is characteristically absent (you culture the wound edge or tissue, not a purulent collection)
Second-Line Investigations (Confirmatory / Specific for LAD)
Why this test: This is the gold standard phenotypic investigation for LAD-I. Flow cytometry uses fluorescently labelled monoclonal antibodies against surface molecules on leukocytes, then passes cells through a laser beam one at a time to quantify expression.
How it works (from first principles):
- A blood sample is taken and mixed with fluorescent antibodies against CD18 (the common β2-integrin subunit), and optionally CD11a, CD11b, CD11c (the α-subunits)
- The cells are passed through a flow cytometer → the laser excites the fluorescent label → the detector measures how much fluorescence each cell emits
- Normal cells show a bright fluorescence signal (high CD18 expression)
- LAD-I cells show absent or reduced fluorescence (absent/reduced CD18)
Key findings:
| LAD Subtype | CD18 Expression | CD11a/b/c Expression | Additional Flow Markers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severe LAD-I | < 2% of normal | Absent (all three depend on CD18 for surface expression) | — |
| Moderate LAD-I | 2–30% of normal | Reduced | — |
| LAD-II | Normal | Normal | Absent CD15s (sialyl-Lewis X) — use anti-sLeX antibody |
| LAD-III | Normal (expression is fine; function is impaired) | Normal | Requires functional integrin activation assays (see below) |
Phenotypic investigations: cell function, e.g. expression of surface markers on leukocytes [5]
Many IEIs require tailored investigations, and cannot be picked up by initial screening tests. Always consult immunology when clinically suspicious [7]
Why CD18 Is the Key Marker
CD18 is the common β-subunit shared by ALL β2-integrins (LFA-1 = CD11a/CD18, Mac-1 = CD11b/CD18, p150,95 = CD11c/CD18). If CD18 is defective, NONE of these heterodimers can form → NONE can be expressed on the cell surface. Therefore, testing for CD18 alone effectively screens for all three β2-integrin complexes simultaneously. This is elegant and efficient — one test catches the entire family of molecules.
Why this test: NOT to diagnose LAD — this test is for CGD (the main differential). It tests the oxidative burst of neutrophils.
- DHR: Neutrophils are stimulated (e.g. with PMA) → if NADPH oxidase is functional, reactive oxygen species are produced → DHR is oxidised to rhodamine-123 (bright fluorescence). In CGD: no oxidative burst → no fluorescence shift.
- NBT: Same principle but uses a colourimetric dye that turns from yellow (soluble) to blue-black (insoluble formazan) when reduced by superoxide. In CGD: no colour change.
Key finding: In LAD, DHR/NBT is NORMAL — neutrophils CAN produce an oxidative burst; the problem is they can't get to the tissue. This test distinguishes LAD from CGD.
DHR assay (or NBT test) → Abnormal → CGD; Normal → consider other phagocyte defects [5]
Low dihydrorhodamine reduction (DHR) → Chronic granulomatous disease [2]
If CD18 expression is normal on flow cytometry but clinical features strongly suggest LAD:
- Integrin activation assay: Leukocytes are stimulated with chemokines or inside-out signalling agonists, then CD18 conformational change is assessed by antibodies that recognise the activated (high-affinity) form of β2-integrins. In LAD-III, CD18 is present but cannot switch to the activated conformation → defective.
- Platelet aggregation studies: In LAD-III, platelet aggregation is impaired (Glanzmann-like pattern — absent aggregation to all agonists except ristocetin, because αIIbβ3 cannot be activated by Kindlin-3).
Why this test: Relevant for LAD-II specifically.
- In LAD-II, defective GDP-fucose transporter → impaired fucosylation of ALL glycoproteins, including the H antigen on red blood cells
- H antigen requires fucose → without fucosylation, H antigen is absent → Bombay blood group (Oh) phenotype
- This is the same blood group phenotype seen in naturally occurring Bombay phenotype individuals (common in parts of India, very rare elsewhere)
- Clinical significance: These patients CANNOT receive standard ABO blood — they can only receive blood from other Bombay phenotype donors. This is critical for transfusion management.
Genetic testing has an important role in: Diagnosis (all cases), Family studies, Prognostication, Prenatal diagnosis, Defining new diseases [5]
| LAD Subtype | Gene | Method |
|---|---|---|
| LAD-I | ITGB2 (chromosome 21q22.3) | Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for PID genes |
| LAD-II | SLC35C1 (chromosome 11) | Targeted sequencing |
| LAD-III | FERMT3 (chromosome 11q13) | Targeted sequencing |
Why genetic confirmation matters in paediatrics:
- Definitive diagnosis: Flow cytometry is suggestive; genetics is confirmatory
- Family counselling: AR inheritance → 25% recurrence risk for each pregnancy → parents need to know
- Carrier detection: Identify carrier parents and at-risk relatives
- Prenatal diagnosis: Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 10–12 weeks for ITGB2 mutation analysis in subsequent pregnancies
- Prognostication: Specific mutations may predict severity (null mutations → severe; missense mutations → moderate)
- HSCT planning: Confirmed genetic diagnosis helps justify and plan curative HSCT
Why this test: Part of baseline PID workup [3].
Key findings in LAD:
- May show pneumonia (recurrent infections)
- Thymic shadow should be present (normal) — unlike SCID where thymus may be absent
- No pneumatoceles (unlike Hyper-IgE syndrome)
Why: Usually from an infected wound or ulcer when the diagnosis is uncertain.
Key findings in LAD:
- Remarkable absence of neutrophil infiltration at the site of active infection
- Tissue necrosis with bacteria visible on Gram stain, but NO neutrophilic abscess formation
- This is the histopathological hallmark — the tissue is infected and dying, but there are no neutrophils defending it
| Investigation | Finding in LAD-I | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| CBC with differential | Marked leukocytosis/neutrophilia (WCC 30,000–100,000+) | First clue; ANC high → LAD [7] |
| PBS | Mature neutrophils, no blasts, no giant granules | Excludes leukaemia, Chediak-Higashi |
| Flow cytometry for CD18 | Absent (< 2%) or reduced (2–30%) CD18 expression | Gold standard phenotypic test |
| Flow cytometry for CD11a/b/c | Absent or reduced (dependent on CD18) | Confirms all β2-integrins affected |
| Immunoglobulins (IgG/A/M/E) | Normal or elevated | Excludes antibody deficiencies |
| DHR / NBT test | Normal (oxidative burst intact) | Excludes CGD |
| Genetic testing (ITGB2) | Biallelic pathogenic variants | Definitive confirmation [5] |
| Blood cultures / wound cultures | Bacteria (Staph, Pseudomonas, E. coli) or fungi | Guides antibiotic therapy |
| CRP / ESR | Elevated during infection | Non-specific |
| HIV PCR (infants) | Negative | Excludes secondary cause |
| CXR | Pneumonia; normal thymus | Baseline; excludes SCID |
| Tissue biopsy | Absent neutrophilic infiltrate at infection site | Pathognomonic if seen |
| Blood group (LAD-II) | Bombay phenotype (Oh) | Specific for LAD-II |
| Platelet aggregation (LAD-III) | Absent aggregation (Glanzmann-like) | Specific for LAD-III |
-
Age-appropriate blood volumes: In neonates and infants, blood volumes are small (approximately 80 mL/kg). Take the minimum volume needed — coordinate investigations to minimise blood draws. Flow cytometry can be performed on very small volumes (< 1 mL).
-
Newborn screening: Currently, ITGB2 is NOT part of routine newborn screening programmes (including Hong Kong's). However, TREC-based newborn screening for SCID is being increasingly implemented — this would NOT detect LAD (TREC measures T-cell production, which is normal in LAD).
-
Parental consent: All genetic testing in children requires informed parental consent. Explain the purpose (diagnosis, family planning), the implications (carrier status, prenatal testing), and privacy considerations. For older children with capacity, seek assent as well.
-
Sample handling: Flow cytometry samples must be processed within hours of collection (ideally < 24 hours) — leukocyte surface markers can degrade. Ensure the sample reaches the immunology laboratory promptly.
-
Timing of CBC: If an infant is acutely unwell with sepsis, the WCC will be elevated in most infants regardless of LAD. The distinguishing feature of LAD is that the neutrophilia persists even after infection resolution — check a CBC between infections too.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of LAD
-
CBC is your entry point: ANC high → leukocyte adhesion deficiency [7]. Persistent marked neutrophilia (WCC often > 50,000) even between infections is the hallmark.
-
Gold standard: Flow cytometry for CD18 expression — absent (< 2%, severe) or reduced (2–30%, moderate) confirms LAD-I.
-
Distinguish from CGD: DHR/NBT test is NORMAL in LAD (oxidative burst intact) but ABNORMAL in CGD.
-
Genetic confirmation: ITGB2 sequencing for LAD-I — essential for family counselling, prenatal diagnosis, and HSCT planning [5].
-
LAD-II clues: Normal CD18 but absent CD15s (sLeX) on flow cytometry + Bombay blood group + intellectual disability.
-
LAD-III clues: Normal CD18 expression but impaired integrin activation + Glanzmann-like platelet dysfunction.
-
Many IEIs require tailored investigations — always consult immunology when clinically suspicious [7].
-
Genetic testing has an important role in: diagnosis, family studies, prognostication, prenatal diagnosis [5].
Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations of LAD
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.411, Phagocyte defects — LAD section) [2] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (PID classification — phagocyte defects, CGD, DHR test) [3] Lecture slides: GC 096. Why do I always get sick.pdf (p.19, p.21 — first-line investigations, exclude secondary immunodeficiency) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9 — CGD vs LAD distinction) [5] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf (p.10 — approach to diagnosis of PID, genetic testing roles; p.43 — phagocyte defects, LAD, DHR/NBT for CGD) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (p.46–47 — leukocytosis, age-specific WCC normal ranges, neutrophilia causes including LAD) [7] Lecture slides: GC 144. A child with recurrent infections Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf (p.50 — CBC findings in PID, IgGAME findings, lymphocyte subsets) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p.389–390 — leukocytosis, age-specific WCC ranges, clinical evaluation of raised WCC)
Management of Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Paediatric Setting
Management of LAD follows the general principles for managing all severe primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in children. Think of it in three layers:
- Curative therapy — Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is the only established cure for severe LAD-I
- Supportive/bridging therapy — keep the child alive and as infection-free as possible until definitive treatment
- Emerging/experimental therapy — gene therapy (still largely research-stage)
The management approach differs based on severity (severe vs. moderate LAD-I) and subtype (LAD-I vs. LAD-II vs. LAD-III).
Treatment for severe phagocytic defects (including CGD): HSCT [2]
Curative Therapy: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
HSCT replaces the patient's defective haematopoietic system (including all leukocytes) with donor-derived stem cells that carry a functional ITGB2 gene. The donor's neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes will express normal CD18 → normal β2-integrin expression → restored adhesion and tissue migration.
This is the only curative treatment for severe LAD-I and LAD-III.
HSCT is the treatment for severe combined immunodeficiency, CGD, and other severe PIDs [2]
| Indication | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Severe LAD-I (CD18 < 2%) | Without HSCT, mortality approaches 60–80% by age 2 years from overwhelming sepsis |
| LAD-III | Combines life-threatening infections with severe bleeding tendency; HSCT corrects both |
| Moderate LAD-I with life-threatening or recurrent severe infections despite maximal medical therapy | Quality of life consideration; some moderate patients can be managed conservatively, but those with severe periodontitis, recurrent deep infections, or failure to thrive benefit from HSCT |
This hierarchy is the same as for all paediatric HSCT indications. The reason for the order is that better HLA matching → lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft failure:
| Priority | Donor Type | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) | Best outcomes (> 90% long-term survival). Sibling has 25% chance of being HLA-identical. Must confirm sibling is NOT affected (genetic testing) and NOT just a carrier. |
| 2nd | HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) | Searched through international registries (e.g. BMDP in Hong Kong). Good outcomes if 10/10 or 9/10 HLA match. |
| 3rd | Haploidentical donor (haplo-HSCT) | Usually a parent (guaranteed 50% HLA match). Requires T-cell depletion or post-transplant cyclophosphamide to prevent severe GVHD. Outcomes improving with modern protocols. |
| 4th | Cord blood transplant | Alternative unrelated donor source. Advantages: rapid availability, lower GVHD risk. Disadvantages: slower engraftment, limited cell dose. |
Before HSCT, a conditioning regimen is given to:
- Create "space" in the bone marrow for donor cells to engraft
- Suppress the host immune system to prevent rejection of the graft
For LAD, either myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) can be used:
| Regimen | Agents | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| Myeloablative | Busulfan + cyclophosphamide ± ATG | Standard for matched donors; higher engraftment rates but more toxicity |
| Reduced-intensity | Fludarabine + melphalan or treosulfan | Preferred if patient has significant organ damage from recurrent infections, or for haploidentical/cord blood grafts; lower toxicity but higher risk of mixed chimerism |
Paediatric dosing considerations: All conditioning agents are dosed based on body weight (mg/kg) or body surface area (mg/m²) in children. Busulfan requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in children because pharmacokinetics are highly variable with age — neonates and infants metabolise busulfan differently from older children.
| Factor | Outcome |
|---|---|
| MSD HSCT | > 90% overall survival |
| MUD HSCT | 75–85% overall survival |
| Haploidentical | 60–80% (improving with newer protocols) |
| Age at transplant | Earlier transplant (before accumulated organ damage) → better outcomes |
| Pre-transplant infection status | Active infection at time of transplant → worse outcomes; ideally control infections first |
Timing is Critical in Severe LAD-I
In severe LAD-I (CD18 < 2%), HSCT should be performed as early as possible — ideally within the first year of life, before the child accumulates life-threatening infections that increase transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Every episode of severe infection risks death or organ damage. The immunology and transplant teams should be involved from the time of diagnosis.
After transplant, careful monitoring is essential:
- Engraftment: Check CBC daily → rising neutrophil count (ANC > 500 for 3 consecutive days) indicates engraftment, usually by day +14 to +28. In LAD specifically, confirm CD18 expression on donor-derived neutrophils by flow cytometry.
- Chimerism: PCR-based chimerism studies to determine proportion of donor vs. host cells. Mixed chimerism is acceptable if CD18+ neutrophils are sufficient (even partial donor engraftment can correct the phenotype because even a moderate percentage of CD18-expressing neutrophils provides clinical benefit).
- Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD): Monitor for skin rash, diarrhoea, liver dysfunction → acute GVHD; scleroderma-like skin changes, dry eyes/mouth, bronchiolitis obliterans → chronic GVHD.
- Infection surveillance: Patient remains immunocompromised for months post-transplant during immune reconstitution. Prophylaxis against bacterial, viral (CMV, EBV), and fungal infections is essential.
- Vaccination schedule: All previous vaccinations are "lost" after myeloablative HSCT → re-vaccination begins 6–12 months post-transplant per transplant centre protocol. Live vaccines (e.g. MMR, varicella) deferred until ≥ 24 months post-transplant and only if no active GVHD and no ongoing immunosuppression.
Supportive/Bridging Therapy
These measures are instituted from the time of diagnosis and maintained until HSCT (in severe cases) or lifelong (in moderate cases managed conservatively).
Why: Without functional neutrophil tissue migration, the child is defenceless against bacterial and fungal infections. Prophylactic antibiotics reduce the frequency and severity of breakthrough infections.
| Agent | Dose (Paediatric) | Target Organisms | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole / TMP-SMX) | TMP 5 mg/kg/day in 1–2 divided doses (max 320 mg/day) | Broad-spectrum: S. aureus, Gram-negatives, Pneumocystis jirovecii | First-line prophylaxis; also provides PJP prophylaxis. Used across many PIDs including CGD. |
| Itraconazole or Posaconazole | Itraconazole: 5 mg/kg/day (oral solution preferred for better bioavailability in children) | Aspergillus, Candida | Antifungal prophylaxis — particularly important if child has had prior fungal infections |
Treatment for Hyper-IgE syndrome: Septrin + IVIG + secukinumab; for CGD: Septrin + Itraconazole + HSCT [2]
The principle is analogous — co-trimoxazole (Septrin) is the backbone of prophylaxis across phagocyte defects.
Contraindications to co-trimoxazole:
- Sulfonamide allergy (rare but important — causes Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TEN)
- Severe renal impairment (dose adjustment needed)
- G6PD deficiency (sulfonamides can trigger haemolysis — relevant in Hong Kong where G6PD deficiency is prevalent, approximately 4% of males)
- Neonates < 2 months (risk of kernicterus due to bilirubin displacement)
Hong Kong Alert: G6PD and Co-trimoxazole
In Hong Kong, neonatal G6PD screening is universal. Before starting co-trimoxazole in any neonate or infant, CHECK the newborn screening result for G6PD status. If G6PD-deficient, use an alternative agent (e.g. amoxicillin-clavulanate for bacterial prophylaxis; discuss with immunology).
When a child with LAD develops an acute infection, treatment must be:
- Empiric and broad-spectrum (cover Gram-positives, Gram-negatives, and consider fungi)
- Intravenous initially (poor tissue penetration is already a problem → ensure high serum drug levels)
- Prolonged (infections heal slowly because even with antibiotics killing bacteria, the wound healing process is impaired without neutrophils)
- Culture-directed as soon as microbiology results return
| Clinical Scenario | Empiric Regimen (Paediatric Dosing) |
|---|---|
| Skin/soft tissue infection | IV piperacillin-tazobactam (Tazocin) 100 mg/kg/dose q6–8h OR IV meropenem 20 mg/kg/dose q8h; add vancomycin 15 mg/kg/dose q6h if MRSA risk |
| Pneumonia | IV ceftriaxone 50–100 mg/kg/day + consider antifungal cover |
| Omphalitis (neonatal) | IV flucloxacillin + gentamicin (cover Staph + Gram-negatives); narrow based on cultures |
| Perianal infection | Broad Gram-negative and anaerobic cover: meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam + metronidazole |
| Suspected fungal infection | IV amphotericin B (liposomal formulation preferred in paediatrics: 3–5 mg/kg/day) or IV caspofungin (loading 70 mg/m² day 1, then 50 mg/m² daily) |
Surgical debridement may be needed for necrotic wounds or spreading soft-tissue infections, but wound healing will be poor — plan for prolonged wound care.
Why: In life-threatening infections unresponsive to antibiotics, donor granulocyte transfusions can temporarily provide functional neutrophils that CAN migrate into tissue (because they have normal CD18).
Indications:
- Severe, refractory infection not responding to optimal antimicrobials
- Bridge to HSCT when transplant is imminent but infection is out of control
Limitations:
- Short-lived (transfused neutrophils survive only 6–24 hours)
- Risk of transfusion reactions (fever, rigors, TRALI)
- HLA alloimmunisation (can jeopardise future HSCT — use irradiated, CMV-negative products if possible)
- Logistically difficult — requires a willing donor, apheresis collection, and rapid administration
Paediatric consideration: Irradiation of granulocyte products is essential to prevent transfusion-associated GVHD in immunodeficient children.
Why this is generally NOT helpful in LAD: G-CSF stimulates the bone marrow to produce more neutrophils. In LAD, the problem is NOT neutrophil production (they already have too many neutrophils) — the problem is that neutrophils cannot adhere and migrate. Giving G-CSF would simply increase the already sky-high peripheral neutrophil count without clinical benefit.
Exception: In some moderate LAD-I cases, very high-dose G-CSF has been tried to increase the absolute number of neutrophils to the point where even the small percentage with residual CD18 expression can provide some tissue defence. This is anecdotal and not standard practice.
- Meticulous daily skin care: Regular bathing, moisturisation, prompt attention to any skin break
- Wound management: Aggressive cleaning, debridement of necrotic tissue, negative-pressure wound therapy if needed
- Avoid unnecessary skin breaks: Minimise venepuncture, avoid intramuscular injections where possible (use IV or subcutaneous routes)
- Dental hygiene: Regular dental review from the time of tooth eruption (6 months); chlorhexidine mouthwash in older children; aggressive periodontal care
| Vaccine Type | Recommendation in LAD | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Live vaccines (BCG, MMR, VZV, OPV, rotavirus, LAIV) | CONTRAINDICATED in severe LAD-I | Although the primary defect is in neutrophils, not adaptive immunity, severely immunocompromised children should not receive live vaccines. BCG is particularly relevant in Hong Kong where it is given at birth — if LAD is suspected prenatally or at birth, withhold BCG until diagnosis is clarified. |
| Inactivated vaccines (DTaP, IPV, Hep B, pneumococcal conjugate, meningococcal, influenza inactivated) | Recommended — follow standard childhood schedule | Adaptive immunity (T and B cells) is intact in LAD → vaccine responses should be adequate. However, even with good antibody responses, the child remains susceptible to infections because neutrophil tissue defence is absent. |
| Pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines | Especially recommended | Encapsulated bacteria are important pathogens; maximise humoral protection |
- Chronic infections → catabolic state → failure to thrive
- Plot growth on standard WHO/Hong Kong growth charts at every visit
- Dietitian involvement if weight faltering
- Ensure adequate caloric, protein, and micronutrient intake
- Consider nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding if oral intake is insufficient
- Genetic counselling: AR inheritance → 25% recurrence risk. Discuss carrier testing for parents and siblings. Offer prenatal diagnosis for future pregnancies.
- Psychological support: Chronic illness in a child places enormous stress on the family. Social work referral, peer support groups (e.g. Primary Immunodeficiency Association of Hong Kong).
- Education: Teach parents to recognise early signs of infection (fever, redness, swelling — noting that pus will be absent), when to seek urgent medical care, and how to administer prophylactic medications.
- School integration: When the child is old enough, liaise with school about infection control precautions, avoiding contact with actively infectious classmates.
Subtype-Specific Management
- Oral fucose supplementation: This is unique to LAD-II. The defect is in the GDP-fucose transporter → impaired fucosylation of selectin ligands. Oral fucose (given as dietary supplement) can bypass the defective transporter to some extent by providing excess substrate.
- Dose: Typically 25–150 mg/kg/dose given 3–5 times daily (no standardised dosing — titrated to clinical and laboratory response)
- Monitoring: Check CD15s (sLeX) expression on neutrophils by flow cytometry; assess neutrophil rolling function; clinical response (reduction in infection frequency)
- Response is variable: Some patients show improved selectin-mediated rolling and reduced infections; others show minimal response
- Does NOT correct the intellectual disability, short stature, or Bombay blood group (these reflect fucosylation defects in other tissues/systems)
- HSCT is generally NOT performed for LAD-II because the disease is milder than severe LAD-I and the neurological features are not corrected by transplant.
- HSCT: Curative for both the immunodeficiency AND the bleeding tendency (corrects defective integrin activation in both leukocytes and platelets by replacing the haematopoietic system)
- Platelet transfusions: For acute bleeding episodes (pending HSCT)
- Avoid antiplatelet agents: Aspirin and NSAIDs are contraindicated as they further impair already-defective platelet function
Emerging Therapies
- Rationale: Since LAD-I is caused by a single-gene defect (ITGB2), it is an ideal candidate for gene therapy — introduce a functional copy of ITGB2 into the patient's own haematopoietic stem cells, then reinfuse them.
- Approach: Ex vivo gene therapy using lentiviral vectors to transduce autologous CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells with a functional ITGB2 cDNA.
- Current status (2025–2026): Phase I/II clinical trials are ongoing. Early results show feasibility and partial correction of CD18 expression, but long-term safety and durability of engraftment are still being evaluated.
- Advantages over HSCT: No need for a donor; no risk of GVHD; reduced conditioning intensity may be possible.
- Limitations: Insertional mutagenesis risk (though lower with lentiviral vectors than earlier retroviral vectors); may not achieve 100% correction; very expensive; limited availability.
- No established role in LAD management currently
- Research is ongoing into whether modulating the immune response can provide any benefit, but this is not standard practice
| Management Component | Severe LAD-I | Moderate LAD-I | LAD-II | LAD-III |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSCT | First-line, curative, urgent | If severe infections despite medical therapy | Generally not indicated | Curative, recommended |
| Prophylactic antibiotics | Yes (co-trimoxazole ± antifungal) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Aggressive infection treatment | Yes — IV broad-spectrum | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Oral fucose | No | No | Yes — first-line trial | No |
| Wound care | Intensive | Intensive | Standard | Intensive |
| Live vaccines | Contraindicated | Contraindicated in severe cases; consider in mild cases with immunology guidance | Generally avoid | Contraindicated |
| Granulocyte transfusions | Rescue therapy | Rarely needed | No | Rescue therapy |
| Platelet transfusions | No | No | No | Yes — for bleeding |
| Gene therapy | Experimental/trial | Experimental | Not applicable | Experimental |
| Dental care | Essential | Essential (severe periodontitis) | Standard | Essential |
| Genetic counselling | Essential | Essential | Essential | Essential |
High Yield Summary — Management of LAD
-
Curative treatment: HSCT is the only established cure for severe LAD-I and LAD-III [2]. Matched sibling donor is preferred; matched unrelated and haploidentical options available if no sibling match.
-
Timing: Transplant as early as possible in severe LAD-I (ideally < 1 year of age) before accumulated infection-related organ damage.
-
Prophylaxis: Co-trimoxazole (antibacterial + PJP cover) ± itraconazole (antifungal). Check G6PD status before starting co-trimoxazole in Hong Kong.
-
Acute infections: Treat aggressively with IV broad-spectrum antibiotics; prolonged courses needed; culture-directed therapy; consider granulocyte transfusions for refractory infections.
-
Live vaccines contraindicated in severe LAD — particularly relevant for BCG at birth in Hong Kong.
-
LAD-II: Unique management with oral fucose supplementation; HSCT generally not indicated; neurological features not correctable.
-
LAD-III: HSCT corrects both immunodeficiency and bleeding; platelet transfusions for acute bleeding.
-
Gene therapy: Promising but experimental (phase I/II trials ongoing as of 2025–2026). Potential to become standard in the future.
-
Family-centred care: Genetic counselling for AR inheritance (25% recurrence risk), prenatal diagnosis, carrier testing, psychological support.
Active Recall - Management of LAD
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.411, Phagocyte defects — LAD section) [2] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (PID classification — treatment column: HSCT for SCID, CGD; Septrin + Itraconazole for CGD; Septrin + IVIG for HIES) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9 — CGD vs LAD distinction)
Complications of Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Paediatric Setting
The complications of LAD stem directly from two fundamental pathophysiological consequences of defective leukocyte adhesion:
- Uncontrolled infections — neutrophils cannot reach tissues → bacteria and fungi proliferate unchecked
- Impaired wound healing — the inflammatory and reparative phases of healing both depend on leukocyte tissue infiltration
Additionally, complications arise from the treatment itself (particularly HSCT) and from the chronic disease burden on the growing child and family.
Impaired adhesion of affected inflammatory cells within the vasculature; inability to migrate into tissues → Recurrent infection — Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa [9]
Remember that immunodeficiency not just infection susceptible, also increased risk for autoimmune diseases, malignancy etc. [2]
A. Infectious Complications
These are the most common and most dangerous complications, and the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in LAD.
Why: Without neutrophil tissue surveillance, local infections rapidly become systemic. Bacteria enter the bloodstream from any infected focus (skin, umbilical stump, lungs, gut). The child lacks the ability to contain infection locally because abscess formation (which walls off bacteria) requires neutrophil accumulation — something that cannot happen in LAD.
- Common organisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enteric Gram-negatives (E. coli, Klebsiella) [9]
- Clinical features: High fever, tachycardia, tachypnoea, hypotension → septic shock. Paradoxically, localising signs may be absent or minimal (no abscess, no fluctuance, no pus) even though the child is critically unwell.
- In neonates (age group: neonatal): Sepsis may present with non-specific signs — temperature instability (hypothermia or fever), poor feeding, lethargy, apnoea, jaundice. The very high WCC in LAD can be misinterpreted as "reactive leukocytosis from sepsis" rather than the underlying diagnosis.
- Mortality: Overwhelming sepsis is the leading cause of death in severe LAD-I (CD18 < 2%) — without HSCT, up to 60–80% die by age 2 years [1].
Why: Without neutrophils to contain and kill bacteria in skin and subcutaneous tissue, infections spread along fascial planes → necrotising fasciitis, cellulitis, and spreading gangrene. Unlike in immunocompetent children where necrotising fasciitis is typically caused by Group A Streptococcus and presents with erythema, blistering, and crepitus, in LAD the infection may spread insidiously because the normal inflammatory response (redness, swelling, warmth, pus) is blunted.
- Sites: Any site of skin breach — including minor wounds, insect bites, venepuncture sites, and surgical sites
- Clinical significance: May require extensive surgical debridement, but wound healing post-operatively is also impaired → creates a vicious cycle of surgery → poor healing → re-infection → more surgery
Why: The umbilical stump in the first days/weeks of life is colonised by bacteria. Normally, neutrophils migrate into the cord stump to control this. In LAD, bacteria invade the devitalised tissue unchecked → omphalitis [1]. If untreated, infection can spread to:
- Peritoneum → peritonitis
- Portal vein → portal vein thrombosis / pylephlebitis
- Bloodstream → neonatal sepsis
Usually present with omphalitis with delayed umbilical cord separation [1]
Why: The respiratory epithelium is constantly exposed to inhaled pathogens. Alveolar macrophages provide some defence, but neutrophils are the dominant effector cells for clearing bacterial pneumonia. Without neutrophil tissue entry, bacterial pneumonia becomes recurrent and difficult to treat.
- Recurrent episodes can lead to chronic lung damage (see structural complications below)
- Organisms: S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella, Aspergillus spp. [9]
Why: The perianal region is heavily colonised with enteric bacteria. Minor mucosal breaks from stooling → bacterial entry → perianal abscess, perirectal abscess, or cellulitis. Because neutrophils cannot contain these, they spread and become chronic.
- Perianal fissures and fistulae may develop
- Chronic perianal sepsis significantly impairs quality of life
Why: BCG (Mycobacterium bovis BCG) is a live attenuated vaccine given at birth in Hong Kong. In children with phagocyte defects, BCG can disseminate because phagocytes cannot effectively control even attenuated mycobacteria.
- Although disseminated BCG is more classically associated with CGD and SCID [2], it can also occur in LAD, particularly if the infant has very severe disease
- Presents with regional lymphadenitis (axillary, if BCG was given in the left arm), progressive lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and eventually systemic dissemination with fever, weight loss, and multi-organ involvement
- Prevention: If LAD is suspected antenatally or at birth (e.g. family history), withhold BCG until diagnosis is clarified
Why: Neutrophils are the primary defence against filamentous fungi (e.g. Aspergillus) and are important for mucosal defence against Candida. Without neutrophil tissue surveillance:
- Invasive aspergillosis: Pulmonary, disseminated
- Invasive candidiasis: Oral, oesophageal, systemic
- These are life-threatening and require prolonged IV antifungal therapy
B. Structural / Chronic Organ Damage Complications
These arise from cumulative tissue destruction due to recurrent, poorly controlled infections and impaired healing.
Why: Every phase of wound healing is compromised in LAD:
- Inflammatory phase (days 1–4): Requires neutrophil infiltration for debridement and bacterial clearance → absent in LAD
- Proliferative phase (days 4–21): Monocyte/macrophage infiltration drives granulation tissue formation and angiogenesis → also impaired (monocytes also require β2-integrins)
- Remodelling phase (weeks to months): Depends on prior phases being completed
Result: Wounds remain open, become secondarily infected, enlarge → chronic non-healing ulcers. Surgical wounds dehisce. Even minor procedures (e.g. circumcision, ear piercing, venepuncture) can become complicated.
Poor wound healing with absent pus formation [1]
Why: The gingival crevice (the groove between the tooth and gum) is constantly colonised by bacteria. Normal gingival health depends on a continuous stream of neutrophils migrating into the crevicular fluid — this is one of the highest rates of neutrophil emigration in the body. In LAD:
- No neutrophil gingival surveillance → bacteria proliferate in periodontal pockets
- Progressive destruction of the periodontium (gingiva, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone)
- Primary teeth: May become loose and fall out prematurely (typically by age 3–5 years in moderate LAD-I)
- Permanent teeth: Severe periodontitis → early loss of permanent dentition if untreated
Leukocyte adhesion deficiency → periodontitis [5]
This is particularly prominent in moderate LAD-I (CD18 2–30%) where children survive infancy but suffer from progressive, destructive periodontal disease throughout childhood and adolescence.
Why: Recurrent pneumonias → inadequate bacterial clearance → chronic infection → bronchial wall destruction → irreversible bronchial dilation (bronchiectasis)
- Mechanism: Each episode of pneumonia causes some parenchymal damage. Because healing is impaired AND infections are incompletely resolved, a cycle of infection → damage → more infection develops.
- Clinical features: Chronic productive cough, recurrent chest infections, progressive decline in lung function
- Monitoring: Regular chest imaging (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests in older children
- Relevance: Even after HSCT, structural lung damage (bronchiectasis) is irreversible — this underscores the importance of early transplantation before lung damage accumulates
- Chronic skin infections → extensive scarring, contractures
- Facial and limb scarring from recurrent soft tissue infections
- Impacts body image and psychosocial wellbeing, particularly in older children and adolescents
C. Complications of Treatment
HSCT, while curative, carries significant risks — particularly in children who may already be debilitated by recurrent infections.
| Complication | Mechanism | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) — acute | Donor T cells attack host tissues (skin, GI, liver) | Skin rash, diarrhoea, hepatitis; graded I–IV |
| GVHD — chronic | Immune dysregulation resembling autoimmunity | Scleroderma-like skin, dry eyes/mouth, bronchiolitis obliterans, liver fibrosis |
| Graft failure / rejection | Host immune system rejects donor cells | Falling counts, loss of chimerism; may require second transplant |
| Infection during immunosuppression | Conditioning + immunosuppressive drugs → profound immunodeficiency during engraftment period | Bacterial, viral (CMV, EBV, adenovirus), fungal infections; may be fatal |
| Veno-occlusive disease / sinusoidal obstruction syndrome | Busulfan/cyclophosphamide toxicity → hepatic sinusoidal endothelial damage | Hepatomegaly, jaundice, fluid retention, weight gain; occurs in first 3–4 weeks post-transplant |
| Secondary malignancy | Long-term risk from conditioning agents; EBV-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) | Lymphoma (usually EBV-associated B-cell); monitored by EBV viral load |
| Growth impairment | Total body irradiation (if used) or high-dose alkylating agents → damage to growth plates, endocrine organs | Short stature, GH deficiency; endocrine follow-up needed |
| Infertility | Gonadal toxicity from conditioning | May affect long-term fertility; counsel families pre-transplant (fertility preservation options limited in young children) |
| Immune reconstitution delay | Takes 6–24 months for full immune recovery | Vulnerable period; requires prophylactic antimicrobials and deferred re-vaccination |
Mixed Chimerism — A Unique Aspect of HSCT for LAD
In LAD, even partial donor chimerism can be clinically sufficient. Why? Because if even 20–30% of circulating neutrophils are donor-derived (and express normal CD18), this provides enough tissue surveillance to prevent most infections. This is different from SCID where full donor chimerism is often needed for T-cell reconstitution. Stable mixed chimerism after HSCT for LAD is often acceptable — as long as the proportion of CD18-expressing neutrophils remains clinically adequate.
| Drug | Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Co-trimoxazole | Haemolytic anaemia in G6PD-deficient patients | Sulfonamide is an oxidant → triggers haemolysis in G6PD deficiency |
| Co-trimoxazole | Bone marrow suppression (rare, idiosyncratic) | Direct toxicity to haematopoietic precursors |
| Co-trimoxazole | Stevens-Johnson syndrome / TEN | Sulfonamide hypersensitivity (type IV reaction) |
| Itraconazole | Hepatotoxicity | Direct hepatocyte injury; monitor LFTs |
| Itraconazole | QT prolongation (in combination with other drugs) | Inhibition of cardiac potassium channels |
| Amphotericin B | Nephrotoxicity, hypokalaemia | Binds ergosterol but also cholesterol in renal tubular cells → tubular damage |
D. Developmental, Growth, and Psychosocial Complications
Why: Chronic infection → elevated metabolic demands + poor oral intake (painful gingivitis, systemic illness) + nutrient malabsorption (if GI infections) → caloric deficit → growth failure.
- Assessment: Plot weight, length/height, and head circumference on age-appropriate growth charts (WHO for 0–2 years; CDC or local HK charts for > 2 years) at every visit
- Intervention: Dietitian involvement, caloric supplementation, NG/gastrostomy feeding if needed
Why: In LAD-II, the defective GDP-fucose transporter affects fucosylation of glycoproteins throughout the body, not just on leukocytes. In the brain, fucosylated glycoproteins are essential for neuronal migration, synapse formation, and myelination during development → intellectual disability and psychomotor delay.
- This is a feature of LAD-II specifically — mental retardation, short stature [5]
- NOT a feature of LAD-I or LAD-III (the brain develops normally because CD18 / Kindlin-3 are not required for brain development)
- Chronic illness burden: Frequent hospitalisations, painful procedures, medication burden → anxiety, depression, behavioural issues in the child
- School absenteeism: Recurrent infections → missed school → academic difficulties
- Family impact: Parental stress, financial burden (especially if one parent needs to become a full-time caregiver), impact on siblings
- Body image: Scarring, disfigurement, short stature → low self-esteem in older children/adolescents
- Grief and bereavement: In severe LAD-I, some children die despite treatment — the family may need bereavement support; siblings may also be carriers
17. Severe Bleeding Tendency
Why: In LAD-III, Kindlin-3 is required for activation of all integrins, including αIIbβ3 (GPIIb/IIIa) on platelets. Without Kindlin-3, platelet αIIbβ3 cannot undergo the conformational change needed to bind fibrinogen → defective platelet aggregation → clinical picture identical to Glanzmann thrombasthenia.
- Manifestations: Mucocutaneous bleeding (epistaxis, gingival bleeding, petechiae, ecchymoses), excessive bleeding from minor wounds, GI bleeding, menorrhagia in adolescent girls
- Contrast with LAD-I: LAD-I has NO bleeding tendency because platelet integrins are unaffected (CD18 is a leukocyte-specific integrin)
- Management: Platelet transfusions for active bleeding; avoid antiplatelet agents (aspirin, NSAIDs); consider recombinant factor VIIa for refractory bleeding
| Category | Complication | LAD-I | LAD-II | LAD-III | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infectious | Overwhelming sepsis | +++ | + | +++ | No neutrophil tissue defence |
| Necrotising soft tissue infection | +++ | + | +++ | Uncontrolled bacterial spread | |
| Omphalitis (neonatal) | +++ | + | +++ | Impaired cord separation process | |
| Disseminated BCG | + | - | + | Live vaccine dissemination | |
| Invasive fungal infection | ++ | + | ++ | Absent neutrophil antifungal defence | |
| Structural | Non-healing wounds | +++ | + | +++ | Impaired all phases of healing |
| Severe periodontitis | +++ (moderate type) | + | ++ | Absent gingival neutrophil surveillance | |
| Bronchiectasis | ++ | + | ++ | Cumulative lung damage from infections | |
| Treatment | GVHD (post-HSCT) | ++ | - | ++ | Donor T cells vs. host |
| Drug toxicity | + | + | + | Co-trimoxazole, antifungals | |
| Developmental | Failure to thrive | ++ | + | ++ | Chronic infection catabolic state |
| Intellectual disability | - | +++ | - | Defective brain glycoprotein fucosylation | |
| Haematological | Severe bleeding | - | - | +++ | Defective platelet integrin activation |
| Psychosocial | Chronic disease burden | +++ | + | +++ | Frequent hospitalisation, scarring |
| Phenotype | Without HSCT | With HSCT |
|---|---|---|
| Severe LAD-I (< 2%) | Median survival < 2 years; death from sepsis | > 75–90% long-term survival (depending on donor type and timing) |
| Moderate LAD-I (2–30%) | May survive to adulthood with significant morbidity (periodontitis, chronic infections, scarring) | Excellent outcomes if transplanted; some managed conservatively |
| LAD-II | Milder infection phenotype; intellectual disability and short stature are the dominant issues | HSCT generally not indicated; fucose supplementation may help |
| LAD-III | High mortality from combined infection + bleeding | Good outcomes with HSCT (corrects both defects) |
High Yield Summary — Complications of LAD
-
Leading cause of death: Overwhelming sepsis — organisms include Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [9]. Without HSCT, severe LAD-I mortality approaches 60–80% by age 2.
-
Hallmark complications: Absent pus formation, poor wound healing, omphalitis with delayed cord separation [1] — these are directly caused by neutrophils being unable to leave the vasculature.
-
Structural damage: Chronic non-healing ulcers, severe periodontitis with premature tooth loss, bronchiectasis from recurrent pneumonias — all irreversible, emphasising need for early HSCT.
-
LAD-II unique: Intellectual disability and short stature due to global fucosylation defect [5]; not corrected by HSCT.
-
LAD-III unique: Severe bleeding tendency (Glanzmann thrombasthenia-like) from defective platelet integrin activation.
-
HSCT complications: GVHD, graft failure, infection during immune reconstitution, veno-occlusive disease, secondary malignancy, growth/fertility impairment.
-
Hong Kong specific: Disseminated BCG disease possible if BCG given at birth before diagnosis; check G6PD before prescribing co-trimoxazole.
-
Immunodeficiency → not just infection susceptible, also increased risk for autoimmune diseases, malignancy [2] — though malignancy risk in LAD specifically is less prominent than in other PIDs (e.g. WAS, ataxia-telangiectasia).
Active Recall - Complications of LAD
References
[1] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p.411, Phagocyte defects — LAD section) [2] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (PID classification — phagocyte defects, treatment, autoimmune/malignancy risk) [5] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf (p.43 — congenital phagocyte defects, LAD, periodontitis, short stature) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p.389 — leukocytosis, age-specific WCC ranges, neutrophilia causes including LAD) [9] Lecture slides: GC 100. Defense against microbes.pdf (p.22 — LAD syndromes: impaired adhesion, recurrent infection with Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa)
High Yield Summary
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD) — Key Points for Exams:
-
Definition: AR-inherited primary immunodeficiency with defective leukocyte adhesion → neutrophils cannot leave bloodstream → recurrent severe infections without pus.
-
Most common type: LAD-I — deficiency of CD18 (β2-integrin subunit) due to ITGB2 gene mutation.
-
Cardinal features: Delayed umbilical cord separation + omphalitis + marked leukocytosis/neutrophilia + absent pus formation + poor wound healing [1].
-
Pathophysiology: CD18 absent → β2-integrins (LFA-1, Mac-1, p150,95) absent → no firm adhesion to endothelium → no neutrophil extravasation → no tissue defence.
-
Key investigation: Flow cytometry showing absent/reduced CD18 expression on leukocytes + persistent neutrophilia.
-
Distinguish from CGD: CGD has PUS and GRANULOMAS (neutrophils reach tissue but can't kill); LAD has NO PUS (neutrophils can't reach tissue at all) [1][4].
-
Treatment: HSCT is curative for severe LAD-I. Prophylactic antibiotics and aggressive treatment of infections are essential bridges.
-
LAD-II: Defective fucosylation → no selectin rolling → also has intellectual disability, short stature, Bombay blood group.
-
LAD-III: Defective Kindlin-3 → all integrin activation impaired → LAD-I features PLUS Glanzmann thrombasthenia-like bleeding.
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of LAD
-
Most important differential: CGD — distinguished by presence of PUS and GRANULOMAS (neutrophils reach tissue in CGD but can't kill), NORMAL WCC, and catalase-positive organisms. LAD has NO pus, VERY HIGH WCC [1][4].
-
Other phagocyte defects: Severe congenital neutropenia (very LOW neutrophil count — opposite of LAD), cyclic neutropenia (periodic), Chediak-Higashi (albinism + giant granules).
-
Other PIDs: SCID (low lymphocytes, all infections), Hyper-IgE (cold abscesses with pus, high IgE, pneumatoceles), WAS (eczema + micro-thrombocytopenia).
-
Always exclude secondary immunodeficiency first: HIV, malignancy, immunosuppression, diabetes, protein-losing states [3].
-
Non-immune causes of delayed cord separation: Normal variant (up to 3–4 weeks), urachal anomaly, omphalomesenteric duct remnant.
-
LAD subtype differentiation: LAD-II = intellectual disability + Bombay blood group; LAD-III = bleeding tendency (Glanzmann-like).
-
First investigation: CBC with differential — the neutrophil count pattern immediately narrows the differential.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of LAD
-
CBC is your entry point: ANC high → leukocyte adhesion deficiency [7]. Persistent marked neutrophilia (WCC often > 50,000) even between infections is the hallmark.
-
Gold standard: Flow cytometry for CD18 expression — absent (< 2%, severe) or reduced (2–30%, moderate) confirms LAD-I.
-
Distinguish from CGD: DHR/NBT test is NORMAL in LAD (oxidative burst intact) but ABNORMAL in CGD.
-
Genetic confirmation: ITGB2 sequencing for LAD-I — essential for family counselling, prenatal diagnosis, and HSCT planning [5].
-
LAD-II clues: Normal CD18 but absent CD15s (sLeX) on flow cytometry + Bombay blood group + intellectual disability.
-
LAD-III clues: Normal CD18 expression but impaired integrin activation + Glanzmann-like platelet dysfunction.
-
Many IEIs require tailored investigations — always consult immunology when clinically suspicious [7].
-
Genetic testing has an important role in: diagnosis, family studies, prognostication, prenatal diagnosis [5].
High Yield Summary — Management of LAD
-
Curative treatment: HSCT is the only established cure for severe LAD-I and LAD-III [2]. Matched sibling donor is preferred; matched unrelated and haploidentical options available if no sibling match.
-
Timing: Transplant as early as possible in severe LAD-I (ideally < 1 year of age) before accumulated infection-related organ damage.
-
Prophylaxis: Co-trimoxazole (antibacterial + PJP cover) ± itraconazole (antifungal). Check G6PD status before starting co-trimoxazole in Hong Kong.
-
Acute infections: Treat aggressively with IV broad-spectrum antibiotics; prolonged courses needed; culture-directed therapy; consider granulocyte transfusions for refractory infections.
-
Live vaccines contraindicated in severe LAD — particularly relevant for BCG at birth in Hong Kong.
-
LAD-II: Unique management with oral fucose supplementation; HSCT generally not indicated; neurological features not correctable.
-
LAD-III: HSCT corrects both immunodeficiency and bleeding; platelet transfusions for acute bleeding.
-
Gene therapy: Promising but experimental (phase I/II trials ongoing as of 2025–2026). Potential to become standard in the future.
-
Family-centred care: Genetic counselling for AR inheritance (25% recurrence risk), prenatal diagnosis, carrier testing, psychological support.
High Yield Summary — Complications of LAD
-
Leading cause of death: Overwhelming sepsis — organisms include Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [9]. Without HSCT, severe LAD-I mortality approaches 60–80% by age 2.
-
Hallmark complications: Absent pus formation, poor wound healing, omphalitis with delayed cord separation [1] — these are directly caused by neutrophils being unable to leave the vasculature.
-
Structural damage: Chronic non-healing ulcers, severe periodontitis with premature tooth loss, bronchiectasis from recurrent pneumonias — all irreversible, emphasising need for early HSCT.
-
LAD-II unique: Intellectual disability and short stature due to global fucosylation defect [5]; not corrected by HSCT.
-
LAD-III unique: Severe bleeding tendency (Glanzmann thrombasthenia-like) from defective platelet integrin activation.
-
HSCT complications: GVHD, graft failure, infection during immune reconstitution, veno-occlusive disease, secondary malignancy, growth/fertility impairment.
-
Hong Kong specific: Disseminated BCG disease possible if BCG given at birth before diagnosis; check G6PD before prescribing co-trimoxazole.
-
Immunodeficiency → not just infection susceptible, also increased risk for autoimmune diseases, malignancy [2] — though malignancy risk in LAD specifically is less prominent than in other PIDs (e.g. WAS, ataxia-telangiectasia).
Inherited Complement Deficiencies
Inherited complement deficiencies are genetic disorders in which one or more components of the complement system are absent or dysfunctional, typically presenting in childhood with recurrent severe bacterial infections (especially encapsulated organisms such as Neisseria), autoimmune conditions resembling systemic lupus erythematosus, or recurrent angioedema, depending on which complement component is affected.
Mendelian Susceptibility To Mycobacterial Disease
Mendelian Susceptibility to Mycobacterial Disease (MSMD) is a group of rare inherited immunodeficiencies, typically presenting in infancy or early childhood, caused by mutations in the IL-12/IFN-γ axis that result in selective vulnerability to weakly virulent mycobacteria (such as BCG vaccine strains and nontuberculous mycobacteria) and certain other intracellular organisms.