Immunology

Chronic Granulomatous Disease

Chronic Granulomatous Disease is a primary immunodeficiency, typically presenting in early childhood, caused by defective NADPH oxidase in phagocytes resulting in an inability to generate the respiratory burst needed to kill catalase-positive organisms, leading to recurrent severe bacterial and fungal infections with granuloma formation.

Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) in Paediatrics


Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) is a primary immunodeficiency (PID) — now more formally grouped under Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) — classified under phagocyte and innate immunity defects [1][2]. It is caused by defects in the phagocyte NADPH oxidase complex, which results in the inability of phagocytes (neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages) to produce superoxide and other reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby rendering them unable to destroy ingested microbes, particularly catalase-positive organisms [1][2][3][4].

Let's break down the name:

  • Chronic → the disease is lifelong and causes persistent, smouldering infections
  • Granulomatous → the hallmark pathological finding is granuloma formation, which arises because phagocytes cannot kill the ingested organisms and instead wall them off in frustrated chronic inflammation
  • Disease → it is a systemic disorder, not confined to one organ

Key Concept: CGD is NOT a problem of phagocyte number or migration — neutrophil counts are typically normal or elevated. The defect is in the killing machinery (the respiratory/oxidative burst) within the phagocyte.


2. Epidemiology and Risk Factors

  • Estimated incidence: approximately 1 in 200,000 to 1 in 250,000 live births worldwide
  • In Hong Kong, CGD is rare but recognised; the HKU Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine maintains a registry of primary immunodeficiencies, and CGD cases are diagnosed periodically

  • Usually presents in infancy or early childhood (most within the first 2–5 years of life)
  • X-linked forms tend to present earlier and more severely than autosomal recessive forms
  • Rarely, milder autosomal recessive variants can present in adolescence or even young adulthood (so-called "variant CGD")

  • Majority (~60–65%) are X-linked recessive → predominantly affects males [3][4]
  • The remainder (~35–40%) are autosomal recessive → affects males and females equally

  • Family history of CGD or recurrent severe infections/early death from infection in male relatives (for X-linked form)
  • Consanguinity increases risk of autosomal recessive forms (relevant in some Hong Kong families of South Asian or Middle Eastern descent)

  • BCG vaccination is given routinely at birth in Hong Kong → this is critically important because CGD patients are at high risk of disseminated BCG disease (BCGosis), which can be an early presenting feature [3][4]
  • Tuberculosis remains endemic in Hong Kong, adding another layer of risk for CGD patients

High Yield – HK-specific

In Hong Kong, where neonatal BCG vaccination is universal, BCG dissemination or a severe/prolonged local BCG reaction (e.g., BCG scar > 1–1.5 cm, persistent BCG lymphadenitis, BCG abscess) in an infant should always raise suspicion for CGD (or other T-cell/phagocyte defects such as SCID or MSMD).


3. Anatomy and Function: The NADPH Oxidase System

To understand CGD from first principles, you need to understand the phagocyte respiratory (oxidative) burst.

When a neutrophil (or macrophage/monocyte) engulfs a microbe into a phagosome, two killing mechanisms operate:

  1. Oxygen-dependent (oxidative) killing — the dominant mechanism
  2. Oxygen-independent killing — via lysozyme, defensins, lactoferrin, etc.

The NADPH oxidase complex (also called phagocyte oxidase or phox) is the enzyme responsible for the respiratory burst:

NADPH + 2O₂ → NADP⁺ + H⁺ + 2O₂⁻ (superoxide)

Superoxide (O₂⁻) is then converted to other ROS:

  • Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) — via superoxide dismutase
  • Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) — via myeloperoxidase (MPO) + Cl⁻ (this is essentially "bleach")
  • Hydroxyl radicals (OH·)

These ROS are poured into the phagosome to kill the ingested microbe.

The NADPH oxidase is a multi-subunit enzyme assembled from components in two locations:

LocationSubunitGeneInheritance if mutated
Membrane-bound (phagosome/cell membrane)gp91phox (NOX2) — the catalytic coreCYBBX-linked recessive
p22phoxCYBAAutosomal recessive
Cytosolic (recruited upon activation)p47phoxNCF1Autosomal recessive
p67phoxNCF2Autosomal recessive
p40phoxNCF4Autosomal recessive (rare)

Upon phagocyte activation, the cytosolic subunits translocate to the membrane and assemble with the membrane-bound subunits to form the active oxidase complex.

High Yield – Genetics

The majority (~60%) of CGD cases are X-linked, caused by mutations in the CYBB gene encoding gp91phox (NOX2) [1][3][4][5]. This is the catalytic subunit — its absence abolishes the entire oxidative burst. The remaining ~40% are autosomal recessive, most commonly due to mutations in NCF1 (p47phox), which tend to produce a milder phenotype with residual oxidase activity.

This is one of the most commonly asked exam questions, and the logic is elegant:

  • Catalase-negative bacteria (e.g., Streptococcus) produce their own H₂O₂ as a metabolic byproduct. Even in a CGD patient whose phagocytes cannot generate their own H₂O₂, the bacterium's H₂O₂ can still be used by the MPO system to generate HOCl → the bacterium essentially "kills itself"
  • Catalase-positive bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Nocardia) destroy their own H₂O₂ using their catalase enzyme → in CGD patients, there is no H₂O₂ from either source → the phagocyte cannot kill these organisms at all

This is why CGD patients are specifically susceptible to catalase-positive organisms — the catalase enzyme in these bacteria neutralises any residual H₂O₂, leaving the phagocyte completely defenceless.


4. Aetiology and Pathophysiology

Genetic FormGeneProteinProportionSeverityResidual oxidase
X-linked CGDCYBBgp91phox (NOX2)~65%Most severeUsually absent
AR CGD (p47phox)NCF1p47phox~25%MilderSome residual
AR CGD (p67phox)NCF2p67phox~5%SevereUsually absent
AR CGD (p22phox)CYBAp22phox~5%SevereUsually absent
AR CGD (p40phox)NCF4p40phoxVery rareMildPartial

Key pathophysiological consequences:

  1. Recurrent severe infections — because catalase-positive organisms survive inside phagocytes
  2. Granuloma formation — because the immune system's "Plan B" when it cannot kill an organism is to wall it off. Macrophages become epithelioid cells, fuse into giant cells, and are surrounded by T lymphocytes and fibroblasts → this forms a granuloma. In CGD, granulomas are non-caseating (unlike TB granulomas) and can form in virtually any organ [3][4]
  3. Excessive inflammation — the defective NADPH oxidase also impairs the normal resolution of inflammation. Recent research shows that ROS are needed for the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and for signalling macrophage efferocytosis (clearance of apoptotic neutrophils). Without ROS, inflammation persists → this contributes to the inflammatory/autoimmune complications of CGD

Important Pathophysiology Point

CGD is not just an immunodeficiency — it is also an inflammatory/dysregulatory disease. The granulomas in CGD can cause obstruction of hollow organs (GI tract, ureters, oesophagus) even without active infection. This is why many CGD patients need anti-inflammatory therapy (corticosteroids) in addition to antimicrobials.


5. Classification

  • X-linked recessive (~65%) — CYBB mutations [1][3][4]
  • Autosomal recessive (~35%) — NCF1, NCF2, CYBA, NCF4 mutations

  • "Classic" CGD: < 1% residual NADPH oxidase activity → severe phenotype
  • "Variant" CGD: 1–10% residual activity → milder phenotype, later presentation, better prognosis

(See table in Section 4)

  • CGD falls under Table 5: Congenital defects of phagocyte number or function → specifically under defects of the respiratory burst
  • This places CGD in the broader category of Phagocyte and Innate Immunity Defects within the Inborn Errors of Immunity [1][2]

6. Clinical Features

A. Symptoms (with pathophysiological basis)

CGD is characterised by recurrent catalase-positive bacterial and fungal infections [1][2][3][4]

Infection TypeCommon OrganismsPathophysiological Basis
Pneumonia (most common infection)Aspergillus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia, Serratia marcescens, NocardiaLungs are constantly exposed to inhaled fungi/bacteria; without oxidative killing, organisms proliferate in alveolar macrophages
Skin and soft tissue abscessesS. aureus, SerratiaSkin is a barrier site; catalase-positive commensals can invade and are not cleared
Lymphadenitis (often suppurative)S. aureus, mycobacteriaLymph nodes drain infected tissue; organisms persist in resident macrophages
Liver/hepatic abscessS. aureus, AspergillusLiver's reticuloendothelial system (Kupffer cells) traps organisms but cannot kill them
OsteomyelitisS. aureus, Aspergillus, SerratiaHaematogenous spread to bone
Perianal abscess/fistulaGut floraPerianal region exposed to faecal organisms; poor clearance leads to abscess formation
Disseminated BCG disease / TBMycobacterium bovis (BCG), M. tuberculosisMycobacteria are catalase-positive obligate intracellular organisms; the NADPH oxidase is critical for mycobacterial killing

HK Exam High Yield

The classic paediatric presentation in Hong Kong: an infant with prolonged/severe reaction to neonatal BCG vaccination (e.g., large ulcerating BCG scar, BCG lymphadenitis that doesn't resolve, or disseminated BCGosis) PLUS recurrent skin abscesses or lymphadenitis. Always think CGD in this scenario [3][4][6].

The "SCARE" organisms of CGD (mnemonic for common pathogens):

  • S — Serratia marcescens
  • C — Candida species (less common than Aspergillus)
  • A — Aspergillus species (leading cause of mortality)
  • R — Rest of catalase-positive organisms (Nocardia, Burkholderia cepacia)
  • E — (Enteric) Salmonella, Klebsiella

An alternative well-known mnemonic: "PLACESS" — Pseudomonas, Listeria, Aspergillus, Candida, E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens

Granuloma formation is the other hallmark of CGD [3][4]:

  • GI tract granulomas (CGD colitis): can mimic Crohn's disease — presents with chronic diarrhoea, abdominal pain, poor weight gain, perianal disease, strictures, obstruction

    • Why? The GI tract is constantly exposed to commensal organisms; in CGD, the persistent inability to clear these triggers chronic granulomatous inflammation of the bowel wall
    • This is a major differential diagnosis pitfall — young children diagnosed with "early-onset Crohn's" should be screened for CGD
  • Genitourinary tract granulomas: can obstruct the ureters → hydronephrosis, or obstruct the bladder outlet → urinary retention

    • Why? Granulomas form along the urinary tract and physically narrow the lumen
  • Oesophageal/gastric outlet obstruction: granulomas can cause dysphagia or vomiting

  • Hepatic granulomas: contribute to hepatomegaly and may cause portal hypertension over time

  • Chronic infection → catabolic state → poor weight gain and linear growth failure
  • CGD colitis → malabsorption
  • This is a common presenting feature in infants/young children

  • Recurrent fevers — from chronic/recurrent infections
  • Fatigue, malaise — chronic inflammation and anaemia of chronic disease

SignPathophysiological Basis
HepatosplenomegalyReticuloendothelial system hyperplasia from chronic infection + hepatic granulomas + extramedullary haematopoiesis [3][4]
Lymphadenopathy (often suppurative)Chronic antigenic stimulation and granuloma formation in lymph nodes; failure to clear draining organisms [3][4][6]
Skin abscesses and scarringRecurrent skin infections with poor healing; scars from previous drained abscesses [6]
Perianal sepsis/fistulaeChronic infection with gut commensals in the perianal region [3][4]
BCG scar abnormalityIn HK: enlarged (>1–1.5 cm), ulcerated, or persistently inflamed BCG scar; ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy [3][4][6]
Gingivitis/stomatitisOral mucosa chronically exposed to organisms; poor mucosal immune clearance [6]
ClubbingChronic suppurative lung disease (bronchiectasis from recurrent pneumonia)
Failure to thriveChronic infection + CGD colitis + malabsorption
Granulomatous skin lesionsNon-infectious granuloma formation in the dermis

AOS Exam Stem – Classic Presentation

A 2-year-old boy with recurrent cervical lymphadenitis since 6 months old, refractory to antibiotics, culture growing Staphylococcus aureus. On examination: BCG scar 2 cm, scars over previous lymphadenitis sites, palpable axillary lymph node, inflamed gums, perianal sepsis, hepatosplenomegaly. CBC normal but IgG elevated. Diagnosis = CGD [6].

Key features that point to CGD over other PIDs:

  • Normal neutrophil count (excludes LAD, which has persistent neutrophilia)
  • Elevated IgG (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia from chronic antigenic stimulation — expected in CGD)
  • Pus formation present (excludes LAD, where pus is characteristically ABSENT)
  • Catalase-positive organism (S. aureus)
  • Large BCG scar + axillary LN (BCG dissemination)

FeatureCGDLeukocyte Adhesion Deficiency (LAD)
Neutrophil countNormal or elevatedMarkedly elevated (neutrophilia) — because neutrophils are trapped in vessels
Pus formationPresent (neutrophils arrive but can't kill)Absent (neutrophils can't leave the vessels)
Wound healingImpaired (granulomas)Severely impaired
Hallmark presentationRecurrent abscesses, granulomasOmphalitis with delayed cord separation
PathophysiologyDefective killing (NADPH oxidase)Defective adhesion/migration (CD18 deficiency)

Age GroupKey Clinical Pointers
NeonateSevere/prolonged BCG site reaction (HK-specific); omphalitis is more suggestive of LAD but can occasionally occur
Infant (1–12 months)BCG lymphadenitis/dissemination; failure to thrive; early skin abscesses
Toddler/Preschool (1–5 years)Recurrent pneumonia (especially fungal); liver abscess; suppurative lymphadenitis; CGD colitis
School-age/AdolescentMay present with "Crohn's-like" colitis; recurrent osteomyelitis; variant CGD may present late

The gold-standard screening test for CGD is the Dihydrorhodamine (DHR) flow cytometry assay or the older Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) test [1][2]. Both assess the ability of neutrophils to generate an oxidative burst.

  • NBT test: Neutrophils are incubated with NBT dye → if NADPH oxidase is functional, superoxide reduces yellow NBT to blue-black formazan deposits. In CGD, no colour change occurs.
  • DHR flow cytometry: More sensitive and quantitative; DHR is oxidised to fluorescent rhodamine 123 by ROS. In CGD, there is absent or markedly reduced fluorescence. Can also identify X-linked carrier females (who show a bimodal pattern due to random X-inactivation — lyonisation).

DomainKey Points
DefinitionDefect in phagocyte NADPH oxidase → inability to generate ROS → cannot kill catalase-positive organisms
Genetics~65% X-linked (CYBB), ~35% AR (NCF1 > NCF2 > CYBA > NCF4)
PathologyRecurrent infections + non-caseating granuloma formation
OrganismsCatalase-positive: S. aureus, Aspergillus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Nocardia, BCG/TB
Key presentationsPneumonia, skin abscess, lymphadenitis, liver abscess, perianal sepsis, CGD colitis, BCG dissemination
Key signsHSM, lymphadenopathy, abnormal BCG scar, FTT
Key HK featureDisseminated BCG disease in a neonate/infant
Screening testDHR flow cytometry or NBT test

High Yield Summary

  1. CGD = defective NADPH oxidase → no respiratory burst → cannot kill catalase-positive organisms
  2. ~65% X-linked (CYBB/gp91phox), ~35% autosomal recessive
  3. Catalase-positive pathogens: "SCARE" — Serratia, Candida, Aspergillus, Rest (Nocardia/Burkholderia), E. coli/S. aureus
  4. Two hallmarks: (a) recurrent severe pyogenic infections and (b) granuloma formation
  5. Common sites: lung, skin, lymph nodes, liver
  6. Clinical features: lymphadenitis, hepatosplenomegaly, skin/perianal abscess, BCG dissemination, CGD colitis (mimics Crohn's)
  7. In HK: suspect CGD in any infant with severe BCG reaction + recurrent infections
  8. Screening: DHR flow cytometry (gold standard) or NBT test
  9. Distinguish from LAD: CGD has normal neutrophil count and PRESENT pus; LAD has neutrophilia and ABSENT pus
  10. IgG is typically ELEVATED in CGD (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia from chronic stimulation) — do NOT confuse with hypogammaglobulinaemia

Active Recall - Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)


[1] Lecture slides: Block C - A child with recurrent infections_ Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf (p28: IEI / Phagocyte and Innate Defects 1: Chronic granulomatous disease) [2] Lecture slides: GC 144. A child with recurrent infections Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf [3] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p411: CGD section under Phagocyte defect) [4] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p637: Phagocytic defect — CGD) [5] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (p1: CGD — CYBB gene, NADPH oxidase) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9: CGD clinical vignette)

Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) in Paediatrics


The differential diagnosis of CGD is best approached from two angles simultaneously:

  1. The presenting complaint angle: "What else presents with recurrent severe infections, granulomas, hepatosplenomegaly, or abscess formation in a child?"
  2. The mechanistic angle: "What other primary immunodeficiencies (or secondary causes) could mimic CGD's pattern of infections?"

The key is recognising which pattern of infection the child has, because different immune defects produce different infection signatures. Let me walk you through this systematically.


Before listing specific differentials, it is essential to understand the logic that drives the differential. The type, site, and organism of recurrent infections points to the arm of immunity that is defective [3][7]:

Immune DefectTypical OrganismsTypical SitesOnset
Phagocyte defect (CGD, LAD, SCN)Skin commensals, fungi, catalase-positive bacteriaSkin, lung, lymph nodes, liver, boneEarly childhood
Antibody (B-cell) defectEncapsulated bacteria (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae), Giardia, enterovirusesSinopulmonary, GIAfter 4–6 months (maternal IgG wanes)
Combined T+B cell defect (SCID)Opportunistic: PJP, CMV, Candida, disseminated BCGDisseminated, lung, GIFirst weeks–months of life
Complement defectEncapsulated bacteria (Neisseria, S. pneumoniae)Meninges, blood (bacteraemia)Any age
Innate/cytokine pathway (e.g., MSMD)Mycobacteria (including BCG, NTM), SalmonellaDisseminatedAfter BCG or mycobacterial exposure

GC High Yield – Defence Against Microbes

GC 100 lecture emphasises that CGD is characterised by defects in intracellular killing due to abnormal respiratory burst oxidase activity, and susceptibility to organisms with strong catalase reactions: Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Burkholderia cepacia, Chromobacterium violaceum, Nocardia, Aspergillus [7]. Any differential must be assessed against this specific organism profile.



C. Specific Differential Diagnoses

1. Other Phagocyte / Innate Immunity Defects

This is the most important differential to distinguish from CGD at the bedside:

FeatureCGDLAD
Molecular defectNADPH oxidase (killing)CD18 adhesion molecule (migration) [3]
Neutrophil countNormalMarkedly elevated (neutrophilia) — neutrophils cannot exit the blood vessels, so they accumulate [3]
Pus formationPresent (neutrophils arrive but cannot kill)Absent (neutrophils cannot arrive at all) [3]
Wound healingImpaired by granulomasSeverely impaired
Classic presentationRecurrent abscesses, lymphadenitisOmphalitis with delayed umbilical cord separation [3]
Granuloma formationYesNo

Why the distinction matters: Both cause recurrent bacterial infections in early life. But if the exam stem says "absent pus" or "delayed cord separation" or "persistent neutrophilia" → think LAD. If it says "granulomas", "pus-forming abscesses", "catalase-positive organisms", and normal neutrophil count → think CGD.

AOS Exam Discriminator

In the AOS Question 9 stem [6], the key features pointing to CGD over LAD were: (1) normal CBC including differential WCC, (2) draining pus present (culture grew S. aureus), (3) granulomatous features (hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenitis), (4) BCG scar 2 cm with axillary lymph node. LAD would have persistent neutrophilia and absent pus formation.

  • Defect: Arrested neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow → very low or absent circulating neutrophils (ANC typically < 0.2 × 10⁹/L)
  • Organisms: Similar to CGD — bacterial and fungal infections — but the mechanism is different (too few phagocytes rather than dysfunctional phagocytes)
  • Key differentiator: The absolute neutrophil count is profoundly low in SCN vs. normal in CGD
  • Granulomas: Absent (you need functioning macrophages to form granulomas, and the issue in SCN is neutrophil numbers, not macrophage function)

This is a commonly tested differential, especially against CGD:

FeatureCGDHIES
IgE levelNormal or mildly elevatedMarkedly elevated (often > 2000 IU/mL)
IgG levelElevated (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia)Normal
EczemaAbsentPresent (severe) [3]
PneumatocelesAbsent (but may get bronchiectasis)Present (lung cysts from prior staphylococcal pneumonia) [3]
Skeletal featuresAbsentRetained primary teeth, scoliosis, minimal-trauma fractures [3]
Facial featuresNormalCoarse facies
OrganismsCatalase-positive bacteria + fungi (especially Aspergillus)Primarily S. aureus (skin/lung), Candida (mucocutaneous)
GranulomasHallmarkNot a feature

Why HIES can be confused with CGD: Both present with recurrent S. aureus skin abscesses and pneumonia in young children. The distinguishing features are the markedly elevated IgE, eczema, pneumatoceles, and skeletal anomalies in HIES versus the granulomas, hepatosplenomegaly, catalase-positive fungal infections (Aspergillus), and BCG dissemination in CGD [3][6].

AOS Exam Point

In the AOS Question 9 stem [6], Hyper-IgE syndrome was a distractor. The answer was CGD because: the child had hepatosplenomegaly, perianal sepsis, BCG dissemination, and S. aureus lymphadenitis — but NO eczema, pneumatoceles, or skeletal features. IgG was elevated (expected in CGD from chronic stimulation), not IgE.

  • Defect: Mutations in the IL-12/IFN-γ axis (e.g., STAT1, IL12RB1, IFNGR1/2) → defective macrophage activation [5]
  • Organisms: Mycobacteria (BCG, NTM, M. tuberculosis) and Salmonella — but NOT typically Staphylococcus or Aspergillus
  • Key differentiator: MSMD patients have a very narrow susceptibility spectrum (essentially mycobacteria and salmonella only) whereas CGD patients get infections from a much broader range of catalase-positive organisms
  • Overlap with CGD: Both can present with disseminated BCG disease in Hong Kong infants after neonatal vaccination — this is the main point of confusion
  • How to tell them apart: In CGD, you will also see staphylococcal abscesses, aspergillosis, perianal sepsis, and granulomas in multiple organs. In MSMD, infections are restricted to mycobacteria/salmonella. The DHR test is normal in MSMD but abnormal in CGD [5]

In a Hong Kong infant with disseminated BCG but no other types of infection, consider MSMD. If the child ALSO has staphylococcal abscesses and fungal infections, CGD is far more likely.

2. Antibody (B-cell) Deficiency Disorders

These typically present later (after 4–6 months when maternal IgG wanes) and with a different infection pattern — sinopulmonary infections with encapsulated bacteria rather than skin abscesses with catalase-positive organisms.

  • Defect: Btk mutation → arrested B-cell development → panhypogammaglobulinaemia [3][4]
  • Organisms: Encapsulated bacteria (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae), enteroviruses, Giardia
  • Key differentiator from CGD: In XLA, IgG is profoundly low with absent B cells and absent tonsils. In CGD, IgG is elevated [3][6]. XLA patients do NOT get catalase-positive organism infections or granulomas. They get sinopulmonary infections and chronic enteroviral meningoencephalitis.
  • Most common form of severe antibody deficiency [4][5]
  • Overlap with CGD: CVID can cause granulomatous disease (granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease / GLILD) and splenomegaly [5]
  • Key differentiator: CVID has low IgG, low IgA [4], and recurrent sinopulmonary infections with encapsulated bacteria — NOT catalase-positive organisms. DHR test is normal. The granulomas in CVID are a secondary inflammatory feature, not from defective phagocyte killing.
  • Defect: Failure of class-switch recombination (e.g., CD40L mutation in X-linked form) [5]
  • Organisms: Opportunistic infections including PJP, Cryptosporidium (because CD40L is also needed for T-cell-mediated macrophage activation) + encapsulated bacteria
  • Key differentiator: Elevated IgM with low IgG/IgA/IgE [3][5]. Sclerosing cholangitis from Cryptosporidium is characteristic. CGD has elevated IgG and the organism profile is different.

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID)
  • Defect: Impaired B and T cell development [3][4]
  • Organisms: Opportunistic — PJP, CMV, Candida, disseminated BCG
  • Key differentiators from CGD:
    • SCID presents much earlier (often weeks of life) and is far more severe — FTT, intractable diarrhoea, oral thrush from birth
    • Lymphopenia (low absolute lymphocyte count) is the hallmark — CGD has normal lymphocytes [3]
    • Absent thymic shadow on CXR [3]
    • SCID patients do NOT typically form granulomas (they lack the T cells needed for granuloma organisation)
    • Fatal without treatment (HSCT or gene therapy) [3]

High Yield Discriminator

A common exam mistake: confusing SCID with CGD because both can present with disseminated BCG in HK neonates. Remember — SCID has lymphopenia and absent thymic shadow; CGD has normal lymphocytes and normal thymus. SCID infants look profoundly unwell from very early in life with FTT and oral thrush; CGD infants tend to present with focal infections (abscesses, lymphadenitis) rather than overwhelming systemic sepsis [3][6].

4. Syndromic Immunodeficiencies with Overlapping Features

  • Triad: Immunodeficiency + thrombocytopenia + eczema [3]
  • Key differentiator: Presence of small platelets (low MPV) on CBC and eczema from infancy. CGD does not cause thrombocytopenia or eczema. WAS has combined B + T cell dysfunction, not a phagocyte defect.
  • Triad: Conotruncal cardiac anomalies + hypoplastic thymus (T-cell deficiency) + hypoplastic parathyroid (hypocalcaemia) [3]
  • Key differentiator: Dysmorphic features (micrognathia, low-set ears, hypertelorism), congenital heart disease, and neonatal hypocalcaemia. The immunodeficiency is primarily T-cell mediated, not phagocyte.

5. Non-Immunodeficiency Differentials

These conditions can mimic specific aspects of CGD presentation:

  • Why it's a differential: CGD colitis can be indistinguishable from Crohn's disease clinically and histologically — both cause non-caseating granulomatous inflammation of the bowel with perianal disease, strictures, fistulae, and growth failure
  • Key differentiator: Very early onset (< 2 years) "Crohn's" should prompt screening for CGD (and IL-10 receptor deficiency). True Crohn's in paediatrics typically presents in older children/adolescents. CGD colitis will also have the extra-intestinal features (recurrent abscesses, pneumonia, hepatosplenomegaly)
  • Practical point: All children diagnosed with very-early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD, onset < 6 years) should be screened for underlying PID including CGD (DHR test) and IL-10/IL-10R deficiency
  • Why it's a differential: TB causes granulomas, lymphadenitis, hepatosplenomegaly — overlapping with CGD
  • Key differentiator: TB is a single-organism infection. CGD patients have recurrent infections with multiple different organisms across multiple episodes. Also, TB granulomas are typically caseating while CGD granulomas are non-caseating
  • HK context: TB is endemic; always exclude active TB, but remember that a child with recurrent different types of infections (bacterial + fungal + mycobacterial) likely has an underlying immunodeficiency
  • Why it's a differential: Non-caseating granulomas in multiple organs [9]
  • Key differentiator: Sarcoidosis is extremely rare in young children (more common in adolescents/adults); elevated ACE, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, uveitis. No recurrent pyogenic infections. DHR test normal.
  • HIV infection: Can cause recurrent infections, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, FTT — similar presentation to CGD
  • Key differentiator: HIV serological testing; HIV causes CD4 T-cell depletion (opportunistic infections like PJP, CMV) rather than phagocyte dysfunction. DHR test is normal in HIV.
  • Malignancy (e.g., leukaemia, lymphoma): Can present with lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, recurrent infections
  • Key differentiator: Abnormal CBC (blasts, cytopenias), LDH elevation, abnormal blood film [6]

ConditionKey OrganismCBC FindingIg ProfileGranulomasDistinguishing Feature
CGDCatalase-positive bacteria, fungiNormal neutrophilsElevated IgGYesDHR/NBT absent burst; BCG dissemination + abscesses
LADBacteria (similar sites)Marked neutrophiliaNormalNoAbsent pus; delayed cord separation
SCNBacteria, fungiSevere neutropeniaNormalNoANC < 0.2 × 10⁹/L
HIESS. aureus, CandidaNormal or eosinophiliaIgE markedly elevatedNoEczema, pneumatoceles, skeletal anomalies
XLAEncapsulated bacteriaNormalPanhypogammaglobulinaemiaNoAbsent B cells, absent tonsils
SCIDOpportunistic (PJP, CMV)LymphopeniaLowNoAbsent thymic shadow; fatal without HSCT
MSMDMycobacteria, Salmonella onlyNormalNormalYesNarrow susceptibility; normal DHR
Crohn'sN/AMay have anaemia/↑CRPNormalYesNo recurrent pyogenic infections; older onset
Hyper-IgMPJP, CryptosporidiumMay have neutropenia↑IgM, ↓IgG/A/ENoSclerosing cholangitis

When you see a child with recurrent severe infections, ask yourself:

  1. What organisms? → Catalase-positive = CGD; encapsulated = antibody/complement; opportunistic = T-cell/combined
  2. Is there pus? → Present = CGD or neutropenia (if ANC low); absent = LAD
  3. What is the neutrophil count? → Normal = CGD; high = LAD; very low = SCN
  4. What is the IgG? → Elevated = CGD (chronic stimulation); low = antibody deficiency; very high IgE = HIES
  5. Are there granulomas? → Yes = CGD, MSMD, sarcoidosis, or Crohn's; No = most other PIDs
  6. Is the lymphocyte count normal? → Low = SCID; normal = phagocyte or antibody defect
  7. Any dysmorphic features? → Yes = syndromic PID (DiGeorge, WAS)
  8. Was there BCG dissemination? → CGD, SCID, or MSMD in the HK context [7][8]

High Yield Summary – Differential Diagnosis of CGD

  1. The most important bedside differentials for CGD are LAD and Hyper-IgE syndrome — distinguish by pus formation (present in CGD, absent in LAD), neutrophil count (normal in CGD, high in LAD), and IgE (normal in CGD, very high in HIES)
  2. SCID can overlap with CGD through BCG dissemination in HK neonates — distinguish by lymphocyte count (low in SCID, normal in CGD) and thymic shadow (absent in SCID)
  3. MSMD is the key differential for isolated mycobacterial susceptibility — CGD has a broader organism spectrum
  4. CGD colitis mimics Crohn's disease — screen all very-early-onset IBD for CGD with DHR test
  5. The DHR/NBT test is the definitive discriminator — absent oxidative burst = CGD; normal burst = look elsewhere
  6. In CGD, IgG is typically ELEVATED (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia) — this distinguishes it from all antibody deficiency conditions
  7. Key organisms in CGD (GC 100): S. aureus, Serratia marcescens, Burkholderia cepacia, Chromobacterium violaceum, Nocardia, Aspergillus — all are catalase-positive

Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of CGD


References

[3] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p410–411: Primary immunodeficiency classification, CGD, LAD, WAS, DiGeorge, SCID, XLA, CVID, Hyper-IgM) [4] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p637–640: PID etiology — CGD, LAD, complement, XLA, CVID, SCID; History and PE for PID) [5] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (p1–3: CGD, CVID, Hyper-IgM, MSMD, phagocytic defects classification) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9: CGD clinical vignette — distinguishing from HIES, LAD, SCID) [7] Lecture slides: GC 100. Defense against microbes.pdf (p19: CGD — X-linked, defects in intracellular killing, catalase-positive organisms) [8] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf (p39: Clinical presentation of CGD — organs in contact with outside world, pneumonia most common, S. aureus/Aspergillus/Burkholderia; p51: CYBB mutation in CGD) [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p181: CGD listed under bronchiectasis aetiology; p231: Sarcoidosis as granulomatous differential)

Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)


Unlike some immunodeficiencies (e.g., CVID, which has formal ESID criteria [8]), CGD does not have a single consensus "checklist" of diagnostic criteria. Instead, diagnosis relies on a clinical-functional-genetic triad:

  1. Clinical suspicion — compatible clinical phenotype (recurrent catalase-positive infections ± granulomatous inflammation)
  2. Functional confirmation — demonstration of absent or markedly reduced neutrophil oxidative burst on DHR flow cytometry or NBT test
  3. Genetic confirmation — identification of a pathogenic mutation in one of the NADPH oxidase genes (CYBB, CYBA, NCF1, NCF2, NCF4)

Practical Diagnostic Standard

In clinical practice and for exams, the diagnosis of CGD is established by demonstrating absent or severely reduced oxidative burst on the DHR flow cytometry assay, which is considered the gold-standard screening/diagnostic test. Genetic testing then confirms the specific subtype and inheritance pattern [4][5][8].

Working Diagnostic Criteria (ESID/IUIS-aligned)

CriterionDetails
A. ClinicalRecurrent severe infections with catalase-positive bacteria and/or fungi, AND/OR granulomatous disease of skin/GI/GU/lung/liver, AND/OR family history consistent with CGD
B. FunctionalAbsent or markedly reduced oxidative burst on DHR flow cytometry (stimulation index < 30, or residual activity < 5% of normal; absent fluorescence shift) OR absent colour change on NBT test
C. GeneticIdentification of biallelic (AR) or hemizygous (X-linked) pathogenic mutation in CYBB, CYBA, NCF1, NCF2, or NCF4
  • Definitive diagnosis: B + C (functional defect confirmed with identified mutation)
  • Probable diagnosis: A + B (clinical phenotype with absent oxidative burst, pending genetic confirmation)
  • Possible/suspected: A alone with pending functional testing

The algorithm proceeds through three phases: clinical suspicion → functional screening → genetic confirmation and subtyping.

GC 144 High Yield – Initial Screening Investigations

GC 144 lecture (2024 update) provides a systematic screening framework for IEI [10]:

CBC findings in IEI:

  • ALC low < 3000 (< 1 year) or < 1000 (> 1 year) → severe combined immunodeficiencies
  • ANC < 1 → severe congenital neutropenia
  • ANC high → leukocyte adhesion deficiency
  • PLT low → Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome

Ig findings in IEI:

  • Low IgG/A/M → agammaglobulinaemia (e.g., XLA)
  • High IgE → Hyper-IgE syndrome, primary atopic disorder
  • High IgM → Hyper-IgM syndrome
  • High IgG/A/M → chronic granulomatous disease

This last point is critical: in CGD, immunoglobulins are characteristically ELEVATED (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia), not low. This is because chronic antigenic stimulation from persistent infections drives B-cell activation and antibody production [6][10].


C. Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown

TIER 1: Baseline Screening Investigations

These are ordered for any child with suspected immunodeficiency and help narrow the differential.

ParameterExpected in CGDRationale
Total WBCNormal or mildly elevatedThe bone marrow produces cells normally; inflammation may drive mild leukocytosis
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)NormalThe defect is in killing, not in production or migration. This distinguishes CGD from SCN (low ANC) and LAD (high ANC) [6][10]
Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)NormalT and B cells are unaffected. If ALC is low → think SCID, not CGD [10]
HaemoglobinMay show anaemia of chronic diseaseChronic infection/inflammation → hepcidin-mediated iron sequestration
PlateletsNormalDistinguishes from WAS (thrombocytopenia with small platelets) [10]
ESR / CRPElevated during active infectionNon-specific markers of inflammation

The CBC in CGD is characteristically NORMAL — this is a key exam point. A normal CBC does NOT exclude a serious immunodeficiency. [6][10]

ParameterExpected in CGDRationale
IgGElevatedPolyclonal B-cell activation from chronic antigenic stimulation [6][10]
IgANormal or elevatedSame mechanism
IgMNormal or elevatedSame mechanism
IgENormalNot markedly elevated (distinguishes from HIES where IgE is very high)

Critical Exam Pitfall

Do NOT be fooled by elevated IgG in CGD — this does NOT mean the child has an autoimmune condition or antibody excess disorder. It is a reactive polyclonal response to chronic infection. Conversely, low immunoglobulins should steer you away from CGD and towards antibody deficiency disorders (XLA, CVID, Hyper-IgM) [6][10].

  • Usually unremarkable in CGD
  • Important to exclude blasts (leukaemia) or abnormal morphology
  • In acute infection, may see toxic granulation and left shift (band forms)
SubsetExpected in CGDRationale
CD3+ T cellsNormalT-cell development is unaffected
CD4+ T cellsNormal
CD8+ T cellsNormal
CD19+ / CD20+ B cellsNormalB cells present and functional (contrast with XLA where B cells are absent)
CD16+/CD56+ NK cellsNormal

Why order this? To exclude combined immunodeficiencies (SCID, DiGeorge) where T-cell counts are reduced, and agammaglobulinaemias where B cells are absent [10].


TIER 2: Definitive Functional Testing

This is the single most important investigation for diagnosing CGD [4][5][10].

Principle:

  • Neutrophils are isolated and stimulated in vitro with PMA (phorbol myristate acetate) — a potent activator of protein kinase C, which triggers the NADPH oxidase
  • The non-fluorescent dye dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR) is loaded into the cells
  • If the oxidative burst is functional → ROS (specifically H₂O₂) oxidise DHR to rhodamine 123, which is intensely fluorescent green
  • Flow cytometry measures the fluorescence shift of the neutrophil population after stimulation

Interpretation:

ResultFluorescence PatternInterpretation
NormalBright uniform shift to high fluorescenceNormal oxidative burst
Classic CGD (X-linked, gp91phox or p67phox/p22phox null)No shift — cells remain non-fluorescentComplete absence of oxidative burst
Variant CGD (e.g., p47phox AR)Dim shift — intermediate fluorescenceResidual oxidative burst (partial defect)
X-linked carrier femaleBimodal pattern — two distinct populations (one normal, one absent)Due to random X-inactivation (lyonisation) — some neutrophils express normal gp91phox, others do not

Advantages of DHR over NBT:

  • Quantitative — can measure the degree of residual oxidase activity (important for variant CGD)
  • Can identify carriers — the bimodal pattern in X-linked carrier females is clearly visualised
  • High throughput — automated flow cytometry is faster than manual NBT reading
  • More sensitive — can detect partial defects that NBT might miss

GC High Yield

The DHR flow cytometry test is the investigation of choice for CGD. It is listed as the key functional test for phagocytic defects in both GC 144 and the Investigations of Immunological Disorders 2025 lecture [5][8][10]. "Low dihydrorhodamine reduction (DHR)" is explicitly listed as the diagnostic finding for CGD in the phagocytic defects category [5].

Principle:

  • Neutrophils are stimulated and incubated with yellow, soluble nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) dye
  • If the oxidative burst is functional → superoxide reduces NBT to insoluble blue-black formazan granules visible under light microscopy
  • In CGD → no colour change (neutrophils remain pale)

Interpretation:

ResultAppearanceInterpretation
Normal≥ 90% of neutrophils show blue-black formazan depositsNormal oxidative burst
CGD< 5% of neutrophils show colour changeAbsent oxidative burst
X-linked carrier~50% positive, ~50% negative (variable due to lyonisation)Carrier status

The NBT test is a qualitative, semi-quantitative test — it tells you "yes or no" for each cell, but is less precise than DHR for measuring residual activity. It is still widely used in resource-limited settings and is conceptually important for exams [4].

Exam Favourite

"Phagocyte oxidative response correlates with ability of leukocyte to kill bacteria. A negative response is seen in chronic granulomatous disease (CGD)." — this exact phrasing appears in the Felix Lai paediatrics notes for the NBT/DHR test [4].


TIER 3: Genetic Confirmation and Subtyping

Once functional testing confirms absent/reduced oxidative burst, genetic testing is essential for:

  • Confirming the diagnosis definitively
  • Determining the inheritance pattern (X-linked vs. AR) — critical for genetic counselling
  • Prognostication (X-linked generally more severe than p47phox AR)
  • Planning treatment (certain mutations may be more amenable to gene therapy)
  • Carrier detection and prenatal/preimplantation genetic diagnosis for future pregnancies

Approach:

MethodApplication
Targeted Sanger sequencingIf DHR pattern strongly suggests a specific subunit (e.g., absent burst in a male → likely CYBB)
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel / Whole exome sequencing (WES)Increasingly the first-line genetic approach; can identify mutations across all known CGD genes simultaneously [5][8]
Protein expression by Western blot or flow cytometryCan assess whether a specific NADPH oxidase subunit protein is expressed (e.g., anti-gp91phox antibody staining) — helps guide which gene to sequence

The Investigations of Immunological Disorders 2025 lecture highlights that for CGD, the classical approach identifies the CYBB mutation, but NGS can confirm this and may identify atypical variants [8].

For X-linked CGD:

  • Mother: DHR flow cytometry shows bimodal pattern (due to random X-inactivation / lyonisation — approximately half her neutrophils have the normal X active and produce ROS, the other half have the mutant X active and do not)
  • Genetic testing confirms heterozygous CYBB mutation
  • Important for genetic counselling: 50% of her sons will be affected, 50% of her daughters will be carriers

For AR CGD:

  • Both parents are carriers (heterozygous) — they have normal DHR results (one functional allele is sufficient)
  • Genetic testing confirms heterozygous state in each parent
  • 25% recurrence risk for each subsequent pregnancy

TIER 4: Infection Work-Up and Complication Assessment

These are not diagnostic of CGD per se, but are critical in the initial assessment and ongoing monitoring of a child with confirmed or suspected CGD.

InvestigationPurposeExpected Findings in CGD
Blood cultureIdentify bacteraemia/fungaemiaS. aureus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Salmonella
Wound/abscess cultureIdentify causative organismCatalase-positive organisms [7]
Sputum/BAL culturePneumonia aetiologyAspergillus (culture + galactomannan), S. aureus, Burkholderia cepacia
Galactomannan antigen (serum/BAL)Screen for invasive aspergillosisElevated in invasive Aspergillus infection — important because Aspergillus is the leading cause of mortality in CGD
Beta-D-glucanBroad fungal screeningElevated in invasive fungal infection
Mycobacterial culture (blood, tissue)Disseminated BCG/TBAFB smear + culture; may take 4–8 weeks on solid media
Tissue biopsy cultureDeep-seated infections (liver abscess, osteomyelitis)Organism identification guides targeted therapy
ModalityIndicationKey Findings
CXRBaseline + acute respiratory symptomsConsolidation (pneumonia), hilar lymphadenopathy, bronchiectasis (chronic lung disease). Note: thymic shadow should be PRESENT in CGD (distinguishes from SCID where thymus is absent) [4]
CT chestSuspected invasive pulmonary aspergillosis or chronic lung diseaseHalo sign (ground-glass opacity surrounding a nodule — early invasive aspergillosis), air-crescent sign (later stage), consolidation, bronchiectasis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy
CT/USS abdomenHepatosplenomegaly evaluation, liver/splenic abscessLiver abscesses (often multiple, small), splenomegaly, abdominal lymphadenopathy, ureteric obstruction from granulomas, bowel wall thickening (CGD colitis)
MRIOsteomyelitis, brain abscessOsteomyelitis in vertebrae/ribs/small bones; ring-enhancing lesions in brain (rare but serious)
InvestigationFindings
Colonoscopy with biopsyNon-caseating granulomas, cryptitis, ulceration — may be indistinguishable from Crohn's disease histologically. Pigmented lipid-laden macrophages (containing undigested material due to defective killing) can be a clue
Faecal calprotectinElevated (marker of intestinal inflammation)
MR enterographyStrictures, fistulae, bowel wall thickening

TierInvestigationKey Finding in CGDPurpose
1 — ScreeningCBC with differentialNormal ANC, normal ALC, normal plateletsExclude SCN, LAD, SCID, WAS [10]
ImmunoglobulinsElevated IgG/A/MExclude antibody deficiency; characteristic of CGD [6][10]
Lymphocyte subsetsNormal T, B, NK cellsExclude SCID, XLA
2 — FunctionalDHR flow cytometryAbsent or markedly reduced fluorescence shiftGold standard diagnostic test [4][5][8][10]
NBT testNo blue-black formazan formationClassic alternative functional test
3 — GeneticTargeted sequencing / NGSPathogenic mutation in CYBB, NCF1, NCF2, CYBA, or NCF4Definitive diagnosis, inheritance pattern, genetic counselling [5][8]
Carrier DHR / genetic testingBimodal DHR pattern or heterozygous mutation in motherFamily screening
4 — ComplicationsMicrobiology (cultures, galactomannan)Catalase-positive organisms, AspergillusGuide antimicrobial therapy
CT chest/abdomenAbscesses, bronchiectasis, granulomasAssess organ damage
Colonoscopy + biopsyNon-caseating granulomas, colitisCGD colitis evaluation

  1. Age-appropriate normal values: Always reference age-specific ranges for lymphocyte counts, immunoglobulin levels, and neutrophil counts. In infants < 1 year, ALC < 3000/μL is abnormal (suggestive of SCID); in children > 1 year, ALC < 1000/μL is the threshold [10].

  2. Neonatal screening: Currently, newborn screening for CGD is NOT part of routine neonatal screening programmes (unlike SCID, which can be detected by TREC assay). However, in HK where neonatal BCG is universal, clinical vigilance for abnormal BCG reactions is effectively a form of "clinical screening" for phagocyte defects.

  3. Sedation/anaesthesia for procedures: Paediatric patients may require sedation for bronchoscopy, colonoscopy, or CT imaging. Ensure appropriate paediatric anaesthetic support and fasting protocols.

  4. Family-centred approach: When disclosing a CGD diagnosis, involve both parents, explain the genetic inheritance (especially X-linked implications for future pregnancies), and arrange genetic counselling. Discuss the implications for siblings (carrier testing for sisters in X-linked CGD).

  5. Consent/assent: For older children/adolescents with variant CGD diagnosed later, ensure age-appropriate assent for invasive investigations (e.g., colonoscopy, bone marrow biopsy if needed).


High Yield Summary – Diagnosis of CGD

  1. CGD diagnosis = clinical suspicion + functional confirmation (DHR flow cytometry) + genetic testing
  2. DHR flow cytometry is the gold-standard screening/diagnostic test — absent fluorescence shift confirms CGD; bimodal pattern identifies X-linked carriers
  3. NBT test is the classic alternative — absent blue-black formazan formation in CGD
  4. CBC is characteristically NORMAL in CGD — normal neutrophils, normal lymphocytes, normal platelets
  5. Immunoglobulins are ELEVATED (particularly IgG) in CGD — polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia from chronic infection [GC 144: "High IgGAM → chronic granulomatous disease"]
  6. Genetic confirmation: CYBB mutation (X-linked, ~65%) identified by Sanger sequencing or NGS
  7. Always assess for complications: CT chest for pulmonary aspergillosis, CT abdomen for liver abscess, colonoscopy for CGD colitis
  8. Galactomannan antigen is important for screening for invasive aspergillosis — the leading cause of death in CGD
  9. Many IEIs require tailored investigations and cannot be picked up by initial screening tests — always consult immunology when clinically suspicious [GC 144]

Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations of CGD


References

[4] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p641: Phagocyte oxidative response in CGD — DHR/NBT; leukocyte adhesion defect testing; CXR thymic shadow) [5] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (p1, p3: CGD — CYBB gene, low DHR reduction, Septrin/Itraconazole/HSCT; MSMD — STAT1/IFN-gamma pathway) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9: CGD clinical vignette — normal CBC, elevated IgG, S. aureus, BCG scar) [7] Lecture slides: GC 100. Defense against microbes.pdf (p19: CGD — X-linked, catalase-positive organisms) [8] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf (p39: Clinical presentation of CGD; p51: CYBB mutation confirmed by NGS; p16: ESID diagnostic criteria for CVID as comparator) [10] Lecture slides: GC 144. A child with recurrent infections Primary immunodeficiencies.pdf (p50: CBC findings in IEI — ALC, ANC, PLT thresholds; Ig findings — High IgGAM in CGD; lymphocyte subsets; "always consult immunology when clinically suspicious")

Management Algorithm and Treatment Modalities for Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)


The management of CGD is built on four pillars, and it helps to think of them as a layered defence strategy — because the patient's own oxidative-burst defence is broken, we must substitute it at multiple levels:

  1. Lifelong antimicrobial prophylaxis — reduce the frequency and severity of infections
  2. Acute infection treatment — aggressive, early, targeted therapy when breakthrough infections occur
  3. Immunomodulation / anti-inflammatory therapy — control the dysregulated granulomatous inflammation
  4. Curative therapy — haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or gene therapy to permanently correct the defect


A. Pillar 1: Lifelong Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

The rationale is straightforward: since the patient's phagocytes cannot kill catalase-positive organisms, we must minimise the microbial burden they encounter. Prophylaxis dramatically reduces infection frequency and has transformed survival from < 50% at age 10 (historical) to > 90% reaching adulthood.

Cotrimoxazole is the first-line antibacterial prophylactic agent in CGD [5].

ParameterDetails
DrugTMP-SMX (Septrin)
Paediatric doseTMP 5 mg/kg/day in 1–2 divided doses (max 320 mg TMP/day)
RouteOral
DurationLifelong (unless HSCT or gene therapy achieves cure)
MechanismSynergistic inhibition of bacterial folate synthesis at two sequential steps: TMP inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, SMX inhibits dihydropteroate synthase → bactericidal against many catalase-positive organisms (S. aureus, Serratia, Nocardia, Burkholderia)
Why TMP-SMX specifically?(1) Broad gram-positive and gram-negative cover including key CGD pathogens, (2) Good tissue and intracellular penetration — critical because CGD organisms survive inside phagocytes, (3) Concentrates in skin, lung, and GI tract — the sites most affected in CGD, (4) Well-tolerated in children, (5) Cheap and widely available
Side effectsBone marrow suppression (monitor CBC), rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (rare), GI upset, hepatotoxicity
ContraindicationsSulfonamide allergy, severe renal impairment, G6PD deficiency (relative — can cause haemolysis), neonates < 2 months (risk of kernicterus from sulfonamide displacement of bilirubin)

Why is this high yield?

GC / Block C High Yield

Jerry's immunodeficiencies notes explicitly list the management of CGD as: Septrin + Itraconazole + HSCT [5]. This three-word answer is the exam core.

If TMP-SMX intolerant: alternatives include ciprofloxacin or dicloxacillin, though evidence is less robust.

Itraconazole is the first-line antifungal prophylactic agent in CGD [5].

ParameterDetails
DrugItraconazole (an azole antifungal)
Paediatric dose5 mg/kg/day once daily (oral solution preferred for better absorption in children; max 200 mg/day)
RouteOral
DurationLifelong
MechanismInhibits fungal lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) → blocks ergosterol synthesis → destabilises fungal cell membrane → fungistatic/fungicidal against Aspergillus species (the leading cause of death in CGD)
Why itraconazole specifically?(1) Good activity against Aspergillus (the most lethal pathogen in CGD), (2) Oral formulation suitable for long-term paediatric use, (3) Well-established evidence base in CGD trials showing ~70% reduction in fungal infections
Side effectsHepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs), GI upset (nausea, diarrhoea), negative inotropic effect (avoid in heart failure), drug interactions (CYP3A4 inhibitor — interacts with many drugs)
MonitoringSerum itraconazole trough levels (target > 0.5 μg/mL for prophylaxis), LFTs at baseline and periodically
ContraindicationsConcomitant use with certain CYP3A4 substrates (e.g., midazolam, some statins), severe hepatic impairment, congestive heart failure

If itraconazole intolerant or refractory: posaconazole (better tolerated, broader spectrum) or voriconazole may be used.

Paediatric formulation note: Itraconazole oral solution (10 mg/mL) has better bioavailability than capsules in children because it does not require gastric acid for absorption. Always prescribe the solution for young children, and take on an empty stomach (unlike capsules, which need food).

ParameterDetails
DrugRecombinant human IFN-γ-1b (Imukin / Actimmune)
Paediatric dose50 μg/m² BSA subcutaneously three times per week
RouteSubcutaneous injection
DurationLifelong (if tolerated and used)
MechanismIFN-γ enhances macrophage activation, upregulates MHC class II expression, and partially augments residual NADPH oxidase activity in some variant CGD patients. It also enhances non-oxidative killing mechanisms. The net effect is improved (though not normalised) microbicidal function
EvidenceA landmark RCT in 1991 showed ~70% reduction in serious infections with IFN-γ prophylaxis. However, subsequent real-world data have been mixed, and use varies between centres
Side effectsFlu-like symptoms (fever, myalgia, headache — especially initially), injection site reactions, fatigue, elevated transaminases
Current statusNot universally used. Some centres (particularly in North America) include it as part of the prophylactic triad (TMP-SMX + itraconazole + IFN-γ). European and some Asian centres (including HK) may not routinely use it, particularly if the patient is well-controlled on dual antimicrobial prophylaxis or if HSCT is planned early
ContraindicationsHypersensitivity; use with caution in patients with seizure disorders or cardiac disease

B. Pillar 2: Treatment of Acute Infections

Acute infections in CGD are emergencies — they can progress rapidly to life-threatening disease because the immune system cannot contain them. The key principles are:

  1. Low threshold for investigation and treatment — any fever in a CGD patient warrants urgent blood cultures, inflammatory markers, and imaging
  2. Empirical broad-spectrum cover while awaiting cultures
  3. Prolonged treatment courses — infections are harder to clear; courses are typically weeks to months, not days
  4. Source control — surgical drainage of abscesses when indicated

ScenarioEmpirical TherapyRationale
Skin/soft tissue abscessIV anti-staphylococcal agent (e.g., flucloxacillin or vancomycin if MRSA risk) + surgical drainageS. aureus is the most common skin pathogen; abscesses need drainage as antibiotics alone cannot penetrate the avascular abscess cavity
PneumoniaBroad-spectrum IV (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) + cover for Aspergillus (voriconazole) pending culturesMust cover gram-positives, gram-negatives (Serratia, Burkholderia), and fungi simultaneously until organism identified
Liver abscessIV meropenem or similar + consider CT/USS-guided percutaneous drainageCGD liver abscesses are often small, multiple, and caused by S. aureus; may need prolonged IV then oral step-down (6–12 weeks total)
LymphadenitisIV anti-staphylococcal agent; biopsy/excision if not respondingCulture specimen essential; granulomatous lymphadenitis may need prolonged therapy
OsteomyelitisIV then prolonged oral therapy (6–12 weeks minimum)Serratia and Aspergillus are important causes of CGD osteomyelitis

Aspergillus species are the leading cause of death in CGD.

AgentDoseNotes
VoriconazoleLoading: 9 mg/kg IV q12h × 2 doses (children 2–12y); Maintenance: 8 mg/kg IV q12h (then step down to oral 9 mg/kg q12h)First-line for invasive aspergillosis. Paediatric dosing is HIGHER per kg than adults due to more rapid hepatic clearance. Monitor trough levels (target 1–5.5 μg/mL). Watch for visual disturbances, hepatotoxicity, photosensitivity
Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome)3–5 mg/kg/day IVAlternative or combination therapy for severe/refractory aspergillosis. Less nephrotoxic than conventional amphotericin. Monitor renal function, electrolytes (hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia)
Caspofungin70 mg/m² loading then 50 mg/m²/day IVEchinocandin — used as salvage/combination therapy; inhibits beta-glucan synthesis in fungal cell wall

Paediatric dosing alert: Voriconazole dosing in children aged 2–12 is approximately DOUBLE the adult weight-based dose because children have higher CYP2C19 activity and faster hepatic clearance. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is mandatory.

ScenarioTreatmentDuration
Disseminated BCG (BCGosis)Multi-drug anti-mycobacterial therapy: isoniazid + rifampicin + ethambutol ± a fluoroquinolone (note: BCG is intrinsically resistant to pyrazinamide)6–12 months minimum; guided by clinical and microbiological response
Pulmonary / disseminated TBStandard anti-TB regimen adapted for drug susceptibility; typically isoniazid + rifampicin + pyrazinamide + ethambutol initiallyProlonged (9–12 months or longer in immunocompromised host)

HK-specific consideration: In Hong Kong, where TB is endemic and BCG is given at birth, CGD patients may present with BCG lymphadenitis/dissemination as their first infection [3][5][6]. Early aggressive anti-mycobacterial treatment is critical. All subsequent live vaccines are contraindicated in CGD.

  • In severe, life-threatening infections that are not responding to antimicrobial therapy, granulocyte transfusions (from normal donors whose neutrophils have intact oxidative burst) can be considered
  • This provides temporary normal neutrophil killing function to the patient
  • Logistically challenging (granulocytes have a very short shelf-life and must be irradiated); reserved for salvage situations

C. Pillar 3: Anti-Inflammatory / Immunomodulatory Therapy

This pillar addresses the granulomatous complications of CGD, which can cause significant morbidity independent of infection.

IndicationMechanism in CGDDose/Regimen
CGD colitis (granulomatous inflammation of GI tract mimicking Crohn's)Suppress macrophage activation and granuloma formation; reduce inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6)Prednisolone 1–2 mg/kg/day (max 60 mg) for induction, then taper over weeks–months
GI/GU obstruction from granulomasReduce granuloma size to relieve obstructionSame; may need prolonged low-dose maintenance
Hypercalcaemia from granulomasReduce calcitriol production by activated mononuclear cells — granulomatous macrophages express 1α-hydroxylase that converts 25-OH-vitamin D to 1,25-(OH)₂-vitamin D (calcitriol) → glucocorticoids suppress this [11]Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day

Cross-Reference: Hypercalcaemia in CGD

The Block A lecture on hypercalcaemia explicitly lists "chronic granulomatous disease" as an indication for glucocorticoids in hypercalcaemia management, because granulomatous macrophages endogenously overproduce calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D), and glucocorticoids reduce this calcitriol production by activated mononuclear cells [11]. This is a commonly tested cross-topic point.

Risks of steroids in CGD: This is a genuine clinical dilemma — corticosteroids are immunosuppressive and CGD patients are already immunodeficient. Therefore:

  • Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration
  • Always ensure the patient is on antimicrobial prophylaxis
  • Monitor closely for breakthrough infections
  • Consider steroid-sparing agents early

AgentIndicationNotes
AzathioprineMaintenance of remission in CGD colitisActs as purine antimetabolite → suppresses lymphocyte proliferation. Check TPMT activity before starting. Paediatric dose: 1–2.5 mg/kg/day
Anti-TNF therapy (Infliximab/Adalimumab)Refractory CGD colitis not responding to corticosteroids + azathioprineUsed in severe cases; similar to Crohn's management. Must be used with extreme caution given underlying immunodeficiency — increased infection risk
MethotrexateAlternative steroid-sparing agentLess commonly used in CGD than in standard Crohn's

D. Pillar 4: Curative Therapy

HSCT is the only currently established curative treatment for CGD [5][12].

ParameterDetails
PrincipleReplace the patient's defective haematopoietic system (including all phagocyte precursors) with donor stem cells that produce phagocytes with functional NADPH oxidase
Donor typesMatched sibling donor (MSD) — best outcome; Matched unrelated donor (MUD); Haploidentical donor (parent/sibling) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide
ConditioningMyeloablative conditioning (e.g., busulfan + fludarabine ± serotherapy) to ablate the patient's own bone marrow and prevent graft rejection. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) may be used in patients with significant organ damage
OutcomesOverall survival > 90% with MSD in children if transplanted early before significant organ damage. Outcomes improve the younger the patient is and the fewer complications they have accumulated
Indications(1) Severe/recurrent infections despite optimal prophylaxis, (2) Life-threatening fungal infection (invasive aspergillosis), (3) Severe CGD colitis refractory to medical therapy, (4) Early transplant in X-linked CGD (which has worse prognosis) even before major complications develop — increasingly recommended
ComplicationsGraft-versus-host disease (GVHD), graft failure, transplant-related mortality, infections during engraftment, veno-occlusive disease, long-term effects (infertility, growth impairment, secondary malignancy)

Paediatric HSCT Principles

Paediatric indications for allogeneic HSCT are generally for benign (non-malignant) diseases — CGD is one of the classic paediatric HSCT indications, alongside thalassaemia major, sickle cell disease, SCID, and Fanconi anaemia [12]. This contrasts with adults, where HSCT is predominantly for haematological malignancies.

The trend in 2024–2026 is towards earlier transplant in CGD, particularly for X-linked disease, before organ damage accumulates. The decision involves balancing transplant risks against the cumulative morbidity of lifelong infections and granulomatous complications.

ParameterDetails
PrincipleCorrect the genetic defect in situ by inserting a functional copy of the mutated gene (typically CYBB) into the patient's own haematopoietic stem cells using a viral vector (lentiviral), then re-infusing the corrected cells
Advantage over HSCTNo need for a donor; no risk of GVHD; autologous cells
Current status (2025–2026)Multiple clinical trials ongoing worldwide. Lentiviral vector-based gene therapy for X-linked CGD has shown promising early results with sustained engraftment of corrected neutrophils and restoration of oxidative burst. Not yet standard of care but rapidly approaching it
ChallengesRisk of insertional mutagenesis (leukaemia from vector integration near oncogenes — seen in early retroviral trials), durability of correction, myeloid-biased expression needed, conditioning still required, very expensive
Paediatric relevanceChildren are ideal candidates because their bone marrow is more proliferative and gene-corrected cells may engraft and expand more effectively

MeasureRationale
Avoidance of live vaccinesCGD patients cannot handle live organisms — BCG, oral polio, rotavirus, varicella, MMR (inactivated alternatives should be used where available). Killed/inactivated vaccines are safe and should be given on schedule
Avoidance of environmental exposuresGarden mulch, compost, hay, construction sites (dusty environments harbour Aspergillus spores); swimming in stagnant water
Dental hygieneAggressive oral care to prevent gingivitis (a common CGD problem) and dental abscess
Nutritional supportMonitor growth closely; CGD colitis and chronic infection can cause FTT; involve dietitian
Psychological supportChronic disease in a child — address impact on schooling, social participation, and family dynamics. Family-centred care approach essential
Genetic counsellingExplain inheritance pattern (X-linked vs. AR), implications for siblings and future pregnancies, carrier testing for mother/sisters, option for prenatal diagnosis or PGD
Transition planningFor adolescents approaching adulthood — plan transfer to adult immunology services; discuss fertility implications (especially if HSCT with myeloablative conditioning is planned — offer fertility preservation in older children/adolescents)

IntervalAssessment
Every 3–6 monthsClinical review (growth, infection log, medication adherence), CBC, CRP/ESR, LFTs (itraconazole monitoring), itraconazole trough levels
AnnuallyPulmonary function tests (if old enough), chest imaging (CXR or low-dose CT if chronic lung disease), abdominal USS (liver/spleen size, abscess screening), review of prophylactic regimen
As clinically indicatedCT chest (suspected aspergillosis), colonoscopy (GI symptoms), galactomannan/beta-D-glucan, microbiological cultures

PillarTreatmentKey Drug/Intervention
ProphylaxisAntibacterialCotrimoxazole (Septrin) [5]
AntifungalItraconazole [5]
ImmunomodulatoryIFN-γ (selected centres)
Acute infectionBacterialCulture-directed IV antibiotics; prolonged courses
Fungal (Aspergillus)Voriconazole (first-line) ± AmBisome
MycobacterialMulti-drug anti-TB regimen
Anti-inflammatoryCGD colitis / obstruction / hypercalcaemiaCorticosteroids (± azathioprine, anti-TNF)
CurativeHSCTAllogeneic HSCT (MSD preferred) [5][12]
Gene therapyLentiviral vector gene correction (emerging)
SupportiveAvoid live vaccines, environmental precautions, genetic counselling, MDT care

High Yield Summary – Management of CGD

  1. The three-word exam answer for CGD management: Septrin + Itraconazole + HSCT [5]
  2. Cotrimoxazole (TMP-SMX) is lifelong antibacterial prophylaxis — good intracellular penetration, covers S. aureus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Nocardia
  3. Itraconazole is lifelong antifungal prophylaxis — critical because Aspergillus is the leading cause of death. Use oral solution in children for better bioavailability
  4. IFN-γ is an adjunctive prophylactic agent — enhances residual phagocyte function; not universally used
  5. Voriconazole is first-line for acute invasive aspergillosis — paediatric dosing is approximately double the adult per-kg dose; mandatory TDM
  6. Corticosteroids are used for granulomatous complications (CGD colitis, GI/GU obstruction, hypercalcaemia) but with extreme caution given underlying immunodeficiency
  7. HSCT is the only established cure — best outcomes in young children with matched sibling donors transplanted before significant organ damage
  8. Gene therapy is the emerging curative option — lentiviral vector correction of CYBB; promising trials but not yet standard of care
  9. All live vaccines are contraindicated in CGD — inactivated vaccines should be given on schedule
  10. Paediatric HSCT is predominantly for benign diseases — CGD is a classic paediatric indication alongside thalassaemia, SCD, SCID, and Fanconi anaemia

Active Recall - Management of CGD


References

[3] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p411: CGD — inheritance, pathophysiology, clinical features, common sites) [5] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (p1, p3: CGD management — Septrin, Itraconazole, HSCT; CYBB gene; DHR as diagnostic test) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9: CGD clinical vignette — normal CBC, elevated IgG, BCG scar, S. aureus lymphadenitis) [11] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (p11: Glucocorticoids for hypercalcaemia in chronic granulomatous disease — reduce calcitriol production by activated mononuclear cells) [12] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count_ acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf (p28: Paediatric indications for allogeneic HSCT — benign diseases including thalassaemia, SCD, Fanconi anaemia)

Complications of Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)


The complications of CGD arise from two intertwined but conceptually distinct pathological processes — and understanding this duality is the key to understanding everything that goes wrong in these patients:

  1. Infectious complications — because phagocytes cannot kill catalase-positive organisms
  2. Inflammatory/granulomatous complications — because the defective NADPH oxidase also impairs normal resolution of inflammation, leading to excessive, persistent granuloma formation even in the absence of identifiable infection

Many complications are simultaneously infectious AND inflammatory, making them challenging to manage. Let me walk through each organ system systematically.


A. Pulmonary Complications

The lungs are the organ most commonly affected in CGD across all age groups [8].

  • Most common type of infection in all age groups is pneumonia, typically caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus species, Burkholderia cepacia, and enteric gram-negative bacteria [8]
  • Why the lungs? The lungs are in continuous contact with the external environment via inhaled air → constant exposure to airborne bacteria and fungal spores (especially Aspergillus conidia). Normal alveolar macrophages would kill these organisms via the oxidative burst; in CGD, they survive and proliferate [3][8]
  • Each episode of pneumonia causes cumulative parenchymal damage

  • This is the single leading cause of mortality in CGD
  • Aspergillus fumigatus conidia (spores) are ubiquitous in the environment — we all inhale them daily. In healthy individuals, alveolar macrophages and neutrophils kill conidia through the oxidative burst. In CGD, these spores germinate into invasive hyphae that penetrate pulmonary tissue
  • Clinical features: Insidious fever, chest pain, non-productive cough, haemoptysis; may present with the "halo sign" on CT chest (ground-glass opacity surrounding a pulmonary nodule — represents haemorrhagic infarction around invading hyphae)
  • Complications of IPA: Lung abscess, empyema, invasion into chest wall or mediastinum, haematogenous dissemination to brain (cerebral aspergillosis — usually fatal)

GC 100 High Yield

GC 100 explicitly lists Aspergillus as one of the key organisms CGD patients are susceptible to, due to its strong catalase reaction [7]. Invasive aspergillosis should always be at the top of your differential when a CGD patient presents with pulmonary symptoms.

  • Mechanism: Recurrent pneumonia → chronic airway inflammation → destruction of bronchial wall elastic tissue and smooth muscle → irreversible airway dilatation
  • This is a cumulative, progressive complication — the more pneumonia episodes, the worse the bronchiectasis
  • Leads to chronic productive cough, recurrent exacerbations, and progressive decline in lung function
  • Paediatric impact: Impairs exercise tolerance, school attendance, growth; may eventually require consideration of lung transplantation in severe cases (though HSCT ideally prevents progression to this stage)

  • Non-infectious granulomas can form in the lung parenchyma and mediastinal lymph nodes
  • May be mistaken for malignancy or sarcoidosis on imaging
  • Can cause restrictive lung physiology if extensive

B. Gastrointestinal Complications

The GI tract is the second major system affected, and these complications are among the most debilitating.

  • Prevalence: Occurs in approximately 30–50% of CGD patients
  • Pathophysiology: The GI tract is constantly exposed to trillions of commensal bacteria. In CGD, the defective neutrophil oxidative burst fails to contain these organisms at the mucosal barrier → chronic granulomatous inflammation of the bowel wall
  • Additionally, NADPH oxidase is now known to play a role in neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and in signalling the resolution of inflammation. Without this, inflammation becomes self-perpetuating
  • CGD colitis is clinically and histologically almost indistinguishable from Crohn's disease — both produce non-caseating granulomas, transmural inflammation, skip lesions, strictures, and fistulae
  • Symptoms: Chronic diarrhoea (which may be bloody), abdominal pain, perianal disease (fissures, fistulae, abscesses), weight loss, failure to thrive [3][6]
  • Why this matters clinically: Any child with very-early-onset IBD (< 6 years) should be screened for CGD (DHR test) and other monogenic causes of IBD (e.g., IL-10/IL-10R deficiency)

  • Granulomas can form anywhere along the GI tract and cause luminal narrowing/obstruction:
    • Oesophageal granulomas → dysphagia
    • Gastric outlet obstruction → persistent vomiting
    • Small bowel strictures → sub-acute intestinal obstruction
    • Colonic strictures → constipation, obstruction
  • These obstructive complications often respond to corticosteroids (which shrink granulomas) but may require surgical intervention if medical therapy fails

  • Perianal abscess and sepsis are common presenting features of CGD [3][6]
  • Perianal fistulae may develop — analogous to perianal Crohn's
  • Why? The perianal region is exposed to a high microbial load from faecal flora; defective neutrophil killing allows bacterial invasion of the perianal tissue → abscess → chronic fistula formation

  • Liver is a common site of infection in CGD [3][8]
  • Mechanism: The liver's reticuloendothelial system (Kupffer cells) filters bacteria from the portal venous blood. In CGD, Kupffer cells (which are macrophages with defective NADPH oxidase) trap but cannot kill organisms → intracellular survival → abscess formation
  • Typically caused by Staphylococcus aureus (most common hepatic abscess organism in CGD)
  • CGD liver abscesses have unique characteristics:
    • Often multiple, small, and densely packed (unlike the single large pyogenic abscess in immunocompetent patients)
    • May be very dense/firm on imaging, making percutaneous drainage difficult (the dense granulomatous tissue creates a "caseous" consistency)
    • Require prolonged IV antibiotic therapy (often 6–12 weeks) ± surgical drainage

  • Hepatosplenomegaly is a near-universal finding in CGD [3][6]
  • Mechanism: Chronic reticuloendothelial hyperplasia (macrophage expansion in liver and spleen from persistent antigenic stimulation) + hepatic granulomas + extramedullary haematopoiesis
  • Over years, hepatic granulomas can cause portal hypertension via progressive hepatic fibrosis → ascites, varices, splenomegaly worsening

C. Genitourinary Complications

  • Granulomas can form along the urinary tract, causing:
    • Ureteric obstruction → hydronephrosis → renal impairment if bilateral
    • Bladder outlet obstruction → urinary retention, overflow incontinence
  • These are non-infectious granulomatous complications — they respond to corticosteroids
  • Often detected incidentally on abdominal USS/CT during routine surveillance

  • Less common than skin/lung infections, but recurrent UTIs can occur
  • May be complicated by obstructing granulomas

D. Musculoskeletal Complications

  • CGD patients are susceptible to osteomyelitis, particularly in the small bones of the hands/feet, ribs, and vertebrae
  • Common organisms: Aspergillus (most common cause of CGD osteomyelitis — unlike in immunocompetent children where S. aureus dominates), Serratia marcescens, S. aureus
  • Why these sites? Haematogenous seeding to metaphyseal regions with sluggish blood flow (same principle as standard paediatric osteomyelitis, but with different organisms)
  • Requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy (6–12 weeks minimum)

  • Less common than osteomyelitis; may occur by contiguous spread from adjacent osteomyelitis or haematogenous seeding

E. Lymphoreticular Complications

  • Cutaneous abscess and lymphadenitis is the next most common presentation after pneumonia [8]
  • Lymph nodes draining infected sites become involved; organisms persist within nodal macrophages
  • Often requires prolonged antibiotics ± surgical excision/drainage
  • The AOS exam stem describes this classic picture: recurrent cervical lymphadenitis since 6 months old, difficult to treat, culture growing S. aureus [6]

  • In Hong Kong, where neonatal BCG vaccination is universal, CGD patients are at particular risk of:
    • Local BCGitis: enlarged, ulcerating BCG scar ( > 1.5 cm), ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy [6]
    • Disseminated BCGosis: M. bovis BCG spreads via bloodstream to multiple organs (lung, liver, bone marrow, lymph nodes) → can be fatal if untreated
  • BCG dissemination in a Hong Kong infant is one of the most important presenting features of CGD [3][6]
  • Requires prolonged multi-drug anti-mycobacterial therapy (isoniazid + rifampicin + ethambutol; pyrazinamide is ineffective against M. bovis)

F. Central Nervous System Complications

  • Rare but devastating complication
  • Usually caused by Aspergillus (cerebral aspergillosis) via haematogenous dissemination from pulmonary focus
  • Presents with headache, seizures, focal neurological deficits, altered consciousness
  • High mortality; requires aggressive IV antifungal therapy (voriconazole crosses the blood-brain barrier well) ± neurosurgical drainage
  • Why Aspergillus reaches the brain: Aspergillus hyphae are angioinvasive — they invade blood vessel walls, enter the bloodstream, and seed distant organs including the brain

  • Less common than brain abscess; can be bacterial or fungal
  • Again highlights the importance of aggressive prophylaxis and early treatment

G. Metabolic Complications

  • Mechanism: Granulomatous macrophages express 1α-hydroxylase, which converts 25-hydroxyvitamin D to active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) → increased intestinal calcium absorption + increased bone resorption → hypercalcaemia
  • This is the same mechanism seen in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis (any granulomatous disease)
  • Glucocorticoids are specifically indicated for hypercalcaemia in CGD because they reduce calcitriol production by activated mononuclear cells [11]
  • Clinical features in children: Polyuria, polydipsia, constipation, abdominal pain, irritability, poor feeding, failure to thrive. Severe hypercalcaemia can cause renal stones, nephrocalcinosis, and cardiac arrhythmias

Cross-Topic Exam Point

The Block A hypercalcaemia lecture explicitly lists "chronic granulomatous disease" alongside lymphoma as indications for glucocorticoids in hypercalcaemia management. The mechanism is endogenous overproduction of calcitriol by activated mononuclear cells, and glucocorticoids reduce this calcitriol production [11]. This is a frequently tested cross-topic connection.

  • Persistent chronic inflammation → elevated hepcidin → sequestration of iron in macrophages → reduced iron availability for erythropoiesis → normocytic, normochromic anaemia with low serum iron but normal/elevated ferritin
  • Contributes to fatigue and poor exercise tolerance

H. Growth and Developmental Complications

  • Multiple contributing factors:
    • Chronic infection → catabolic state → increased energy expenditure
    • CGD colitis → malabsorption of nutrients
    • Recurrent hospitalisations → missed meals, psychosocial stress
    • Chronic steroid use (for granulomatous complications) → growth suppression
  • Monitoring: Regular plotting on growth charts; involvement of paediatric dietitian

  • Chronic illness from infancy → repeated hospitalisations, missed school, social isolation
  • Anxiety and depression (especially in adolescents who understand their diagnosis)
  • Impact on family — parental anxiety, sibling effects, financial burden
  • Management: Multidisciplinary team including clinical psychologist, social worker, school liaison

I. Autoimmune and Inflammatory Complications

Recent research has revealed that CGD is not purely an immunodeficiency — it also has a significant immune dysregulatory component:

  • CGD patients have an increased incidence of:
    • Discoid lupus-like skin lesions (particularly in X-linked carrier females)
    • Autoimmune cytopenias (less common than in CVID but reported)
    • Inflammatory arthritis
  • Why? The NADPH oxidase-derived ROS play a role in regulating T-cell activation and in the resolution of inflammation via clearance of apoptotic cells (efferocytosis). Without proper ROS signalling, there is impaired immune tolerance → predisposition to autoimmunity

  • Mothers and sisters who are carriers of X-linked CGD (heterozygous CYBB mutations) can develop:
    • Discoid lupus
    • Photosensitive rash
    • Oral ulcers
    • Raynaud's phenomenon
  • Mechanism: Due to random X-inactivation (lyonisation), some carriers have a skewed X-inactivation pattern resulting in a larger proportion of non-functional neutrophils. Even with partial oxidase function, the dysregulated inflammation can manifest as lupus-like disease
  • Carriers are generally NOT susceptible to the severe infections seen in affected males, but should be monitored

If the patient undergoes curative HSCT:

  • Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) — acute or chronic
  • Graft failure / rejection
  • Infection during engraftment (profound neutropenia)
  • Veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS) — especially with busulfan conditioning
  • Late effects: Growth impairment, endocrine dysfunction (hypothyroidism, gonadal failure), infertility, secondary malignancy
  • Paediatric consideration: Fertility preservation should be discussed and offered to adolescents before myeloablative conditioning

DrugKey Side Effects
Cotrimoxazole (long-term)Bone marrow suppression, rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, hepatotoxicity
Itraconazole (long-term)Hepatotoxicity, negative inotropy, drug interactions (CYP3A4 inhibitor)
VoriconazoleVisual disturbances, hepatotoxicity, photosensitivity, periostitis (long-term)
CorticosteroidsGrowth suppression, adrenal suppression, osteopenia, glucose intolerance, increased infection risk (in an already immunodeficient child)

FactorImpact on Prognosis
Genetic subtypeX-linked (gp91phox-null) has worse prognosis than AR (p47phox) — less residual oxidase activity
Age at diagnosisEarlier diagnosis → earlier prophylaxis and HSCT consideration → better outcomes
Adherence to prophylaxisStrict adherence to TMP-SMX + itraconazole dramatically reduces infection frequency
Access to HSCTCurative HSCT transforms prognosis — > 90% survival with MSD in children
Organ damagePre-existing bronchiectasis, hepatic fibrosis, or chronic aspergillosis worsens transplant outcomes
OverallWith modern prophylaxis, median survival has improved to > 40 years (from < 10 years historically). With early HSCT, life expectancy approaches normal

SystemComplicationsKey Point
PulmonaryRecurrent pneumonia, invasive aspergillosis (leading cause of death), bronchiectasis, pulmonary granulomasAspergillus is the #1 killer [7][8]
GICGD colitis (mimics Crohn's), obstruction, perianal disease, liver abscess, HSM, portal hypertensionScreen VEO-IBD for CGD
GUUreteric/bladder obstruction from granulomas, hydronephrosisResponds to steroids
MSKOsteomyelitis (Aspergillus, Serratia), septic arthritisProlonged Rx needed
LymphoreticularSuppurative lymphadenitis, BCG dissemination (HK-specific)BCGosis = presenting feature [3][6]
CNSBrain abscess (Aspergillus), meningitisRare but devastating
MetabolicHypercalcaemia (granulomatous calcitriol production), anaemia of chronic diseaseTreat with steroids [11]
GrowthFTT, growth failure, psychosocial impactMDT approach
AutoimmuneDiscoid lupus (especially carriers), inflammatory arthritisROS needed for immune tolerance
Treatment-relatedGVHD, graft failure, drug toxicityMonitor closely

High Yield Summary – Complications of CGD

  1. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is the leading cause of death in CGD — Aspergillus is catalase-positive and angioinvasive, can disseminate to the brain
  2. CGD colitis is clinically indistinguishable from Crohn's disease — non-caseating granulomas, transmural inflammation, perianal disease; screen all VEO-IBD for CGD
  3. BCG dissemination is a critical early complication in Hong Kong where neonatal BCG is universal — may be the presenting feature of CGD
  4. Hepatic abscesses are common — typically caused by S. aureus; often multiple, small, and dense; require prolonged IV antibiotics
  5. Hypercalcaemia occurs because granulomatous macrophages express 1α-hydroxylase → excess calcitriol production → treat with glucocorticoids
  6. Hepatosplenomegaly is near-universal — from reticuloendothelial hyperplasia, hepatic granulomas, and chronic antigenic stimulation
  7. GU obstruction from granulomas can cause hydronephrosis — non-infectious complication that responds to corticosteroids
  8. X-linked carrier females can develop discoid lupus — due to skewed X-inactivation and dysregulated inflammation
  9. Failure to thrive is multifactorial — chronic infection, CGD colitis/malabsorption, steroid side effects, psychosocial factors
  10. Modern prophylaxis and early HSCT have transformed prognosis — median survival now > 40 years; > 90% survival with MSD HSCT in children

Active Recall - Complications of CGD


References

[3] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p411: CGD — recurrent pyogenic infections, common sites: lung, skin, LNs, liver; lymphadenitis, hepatosplenomegaly, skin/perianal abscess, TB/BCG dissemination) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Question 9: CGD clinical vignette — recurrent cervical lymphadenitis, S. aureus, BCG scar 2 cm, perianal sepsis, hepatosplenomegaly) [7] Lecture slides: GC 100. Defense against microbes.pdf (p19: CGD — susceptible to organisms with strong catalase reactions: S. aureus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Chromobacterium violaceum, Nocardia, Aspergillus) [8] Lecture slides: Investigations of Imm Disorders 2025.pdf (p39: CGD clinical presentation — organs in contact with outside world, contiguous and haematogenous spread, 2/3 present in first year, pneumonia most common, S. aureus/Aspergillus/Burkholderia/enteric gram-negatives; cutaneous abscess and lymphadenitis next most common) [11] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (p11: Glucocorticoids indicated for hypercalcaemia in chronic granulomatous disease — endogenous overproduction of calcitriol; reduce calcitriol production by activated mononuclear cells)

High Yield Summary

  1. CGD = defective NADPH oxidase → no respiratory burst → cannot kill catalase-positive organisms
  2. ~65% X-linked (CYBB/gp91phox), ~35% autosomal recessive
  3. Catalase-positive pathogens: "SCARE" — Serratia, Candida, Aspergillus, Rest (Nocardia/Burkholderia), E. coli/S. aureus
  4. Two hallmarks: (a) recurrent severe pyogenic infections and (b) granuloma formation
  5. Common sites: lung, skin, lymph nodes, liver
  6. Clinical features: lymphadenitis, hepatosplenomegaly, skin/perianal abscess, BCG dissemination, CGD colitis (mimics Crohn's)
  7. In HK: suspect CGD in any infant with severe BCG reaction + recurrent infections
  8. Screening: DHR flow cytometry (gold standard) or NBT test
  9. Distinguish from LAD: CGD has normal neutrophil count and PRESENT pus; LAD has neutrophilia and ABSENT pus
  10. IgG is typically ELEVATED in CGD (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia from chronic stimulation) — do NOT confuse with hypogammaglobulinaemia

High Yield Summary – Differential Diagnosis of CGD

  1. The most important bedside differentials for CGD are LAD and Hyper-IgE syndrome — distinguish by pus formation (present in CGD, absent in LAD), neutrophil count (normal in CGD, high in LAD), and IgE (normal in CGD, very high in HIES)
  2. SCID can overlap with CGD through BCG dissemination in HK neonates — distinguish by lymphocyte count (low in SCID, normal in CGD) and thymic shadow (absent in SCID)
  3. MSMD is the key differential for isolated mycobacterial susceptibility — CGD has a broader organism spectrum
  4. CGD colitis mimics Crohn's disease — screen all very-early-onset IBD for CGD with DHR test
  5. The DHR/NBT test is the definitive discriminator — absent oxidative burst = CGD; normal burst = look elsewhere
  6. In CGD, IgG is typically ELEVATED (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia) — this distinguishes it from all antibody deficiency conditions
  7. Key organisms in CGD (GC 100): S. aureus, Serratia marcescens, Burkholderia cepacia, Chromobacterium violaceum, Nocardia, Aspergillus — all are catalase-positive

High Yield Summary – Diagnosis of CGD

  1. CGD diagnosis = clinical suspicion + functional confirmation (DHR flow cytometry) + genetic testing
  2. DHR flow cytometry is the gold-standard screening/diagnostic test — absent fluorescence shift confirms CGD; bimodal pattern identifies X-linked carriers
  3. NBT test is the classic alternative — absent blue-black formazan formation in CGD
  4. CBC is characteristically NORMAL in CGD — normal neutrophils, normal lymphocytes, normal platelets
  5. Immunoglobulins are ELEVATED (particularly IgG) in CGD — polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia from chronic infection [GC 144: "High IgGAM → chronic granulomatous disease"]
  6. Genetic confirmation: CYBB mutation (X-linked, ~65%) identified by Sanger sequencing or NGS
  7. Always assess for complications: CT chest for pulmonary aspergillosis, CT abdomen for liver abscess, colonoscopy for CGD colitis
  8. Galactomannan antigen is important for screening for invasive aspergillosis — the leading cause of death in CGD
  9. Many IEIs require tailored investigations and cannot be picked up by initial screening tests — always consult immunology when clinically suspicious [GC 144]

High Yield Summary – Management of CGD

  1. The three-word exam answer for CGD management: Septrin + Itraconazole + HSCT [5]
  2. Cotrimoxazole (TMP-SMX) is lifelong antibacterial prophylaxis — good intracellular penetration, covers S. aureus, Serratia, Burkholderia, Nocardia
  3. Itraconazole is lifelong antifungal prophylaxis — critical because Aspergillus is the leading cause of death. Use oral solution in children for better bioavailability
  4. IFN-γ is an adjunctive prophylactic agent — enhances residual phagocyte function; not universally used
  5. Voriconazole is first-line for acute invasive aspergillosis — paediatric dosing is approximately double the adult per-kg dose; mandatory TDM
  6. Corticosteroids are used for granulomatous complications (CGD colitis, GI/GU obstruction, hypercalcaemia) but with extreme caution given underlying immunodeficiency
  7. HSCT is the only established cure — best outcomes in young children with matched sibling donors transplanted before significant organ damage
  8. Gene therapy is the emerging curative option — lentiviral vector correction of CYBB; promising trials but not yet standard of care
  9. All live vaccines are contraindicated in CGD — inactivated vaccines should be given on schedule
  10. Paediatric HSCT is predominantly for benign diseases — CGD is a classic paediatric indication alongside thalassaemia, SCD, SCID, and Fanconi anaemia

High Yield Summary – Complications of CGD

  1. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is the leading cause of death in CGD — Aspergillus is catalase-positive and angioinvasive, can disseminate to the brain
  2. CGD colitis is clinically indistinguishable from Crohn's disease — non-caseating granulomas, transmural inflammation, perianal disease; screen all VEO-IBD for CGD
  3. BCG dissemination is a critical early complication in Hong Kong where neonatal BCG is universal — may be the presenting feature of CGD
  4. Hepatic abscesses are common — typically caused by S. aureus; often multiple, small, and dense; require prolonged IV antibiotics
  5. Hypercalcaemia occurs because granulomatous macrophages express 1α-hydroxylase → excess calcitriol production → treat with glucocorticoids
  6. Hepatosplenomegaly is near-universal — from reticuloendothelial hyperplasia, hepatic granulomas, and chronic antigenic stimulation
  7. GU obstruction from granulomas can cause hydronephrosis — non-infectious complication that responds to corticosteroids
  8. X-linked carrier females can develop discoid lupus — due to skewed X-inactivation and dysregulated inflammation
  9. Failure to thrive is multifactorial — chronic infection, CGD colitis/malabsorption, steroid side effects, psychosocial factors
  10. Modern prophylaxis and early HSCT have transformed prognosis — median survival now > 40 years; > 90% survival with MSD HSCT in children

On this page

No Headings