Unstable Angina
Unstable angina is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by new-onset, worsening, or rest angina due to coronary plaque disruption and thrombosis without myocardial necrosis.
| Exam domain | One-glance essentials |
|---|---|
| Definition / diagnosis |
|
| Epidemiology / risks |
|
| Core mechanism |
|
| Clinical picture |
|
| Investigations |
|
| Management |
|
| Complications |
|
| Prevention / follow-up |
|
| Exam traps |
|
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [3] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf
Unstable Angina
Unstable angina (UA) is a clinical syndrome within the spectrum of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) characterised by myocardial ischaemia that occurs without myocardial necrosis (i.e. cardiac biomarkers remain normal). The name itself tells you the story: "unstable" = the clinical pattern is unpredictable and escalating, unlike stable angina where the threshold for pain is reproducible; "angina" = from Latin angere ("to choke/strangle"), referring to the strangling chest discomfort of myocardial ischaemia.
Unstable angina is defined as anginal pain with at least one of the following features: [1][2]
- Is of new onset and severe (markedly limits normal activity)
- Occurs at rest or with minimal exertion (resting angina > 20 minutes)
- Pain is worsening in the severity and length of each episode (increasing angina — more frequent, longer, or lower threshold than previous angina)
UA vs NSTEMI — The Critical Distinction
Both unstable angina and NSTEMI present identically in terms of symptoms and may have identical ECG findings (ST depression, T-wave inversion, or even a normal ECG). The only difference is whether there is elevation of cardiac biomarkers (troponin). If troponin is elevated → NSTEMI. If troponin is normal on serial measurements → unstable angina. This is why they are grouped as NSTE-ACS (Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) [1][2].
The conditions encapsulated within acute coronary syndrome are: [1]
- NSTE-ACS
- Unstable angina
- Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
- STE-ACS
- STEMI
Global & Hong Kong Context
- IHD remains the number one cause of death in men and women (27% of deaths) [3]
- Angina is most common in middle-aged and elderly men. Among persons 60 to 79 years of age, approximately 25% of men and 16% of women have coronary heart disease, and these figures rise to 37% and 23% among men and women > 80 years of age, respectively [3]
- The incidence of coronary heart disease and angina in women after menopause is similar to that of men — because oestrogen's protective effect on the vasculature (promoting NO-mediated vasodilation, favourable lipid profiles) is lost [3]
- The initial manifestation of IHD is angina pectoris in 50%, and about 50% of patients presenting to the hospital with acute coronary syndrome have preceding angina [3]
- Within 12 months of initial diagnosis, 10% to 20% of patients with diagnosis of stable angina progress to MI or unstable angina [3][4]
- In Hong Kong, coronary heart disease is a leading cause of death, consistently ranking as one of the top 3 killers. The prevalence is driven by high rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and an ageing population. Hong Kong has a relatively high prevalence of Type 2 DM (~10% of the adult population), making diabetic coronary artery disease particularly relevant.
- With the widespread availability of high-sensitivity troponin assays (hs-TnT/hs-TnI) in modern Hong Kong hospitals, many patients who would previously have been classified as "unstable angina" are now reclassified as NSTEMI. Therefore, the proportion diagnosed as pure UA has decreased over time — but the concept remains crucial for clinical reasoning and exam purposes.
3. Risk Factors
Risk factors for unstable angina are essentially the risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (since UA is almost always caused by acute plaque events on a background of coronary atherosclerosis):
- Age: risk increases with age (men > 45, women > 55)
- Male sex: men have earlier and higher rates of CAD; women catch up post-menopause
- Family history of premature CVD: first-degree relative with CVD at age < 55 (male) or < 65 (female) [5]
- Note: the definition of "early death" for family history differs slightly between papers, but the commonly used cut-offs are male < 55, female < 65 [5]
- Hypertension — chronic pressure injury to endothelium accelerates atherosclerosis [6]
- Diabetes mellitus — hyperglycaemia causes endothelial dysfunction, promotes oxidative stress, accelerates atheroma formation; also leads to a pro-thrombotic state
- Hyperlipidaemia (↑LDL, ↓HDL, ↑triglycerides) — LDL is the primary substrate that accumulates in the arterial intima to form the atherosclerotic plaque [7]
- Cigarette smoking — damages endothelium, promotes platelet aggregation, ↑CO levels reducing O₂ carrying capacity, ↑sympathetic tone
- Obesity / abdominal obesity — associated with insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, pro-inflammatory state
- Sedentary lifestyle / lack of exercise
- Chronic kidney disease — accelerated atherosclerosis, pro-thrombotic milieu, disordered calcium-phosphate metabolism [6]
Risk Factors — Arterial vs Venous Thrombosis
A common exam trap: Hypercholesterolaemia, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic renal impairment, and Male gender are risk factors for arterial thrombosis only, NOT venous thrombosis [6]. Conversely, inherited thrombophilias (Factor V Leiden, Protein C/S deficiency, etc.) increase risk of VTE but NOT arterial thrombosis. The exception is antiphospholipid syndrome (lupus anticoagulant) and hyperhomocysteinaemia which can cause BOTH arterial and venous thrombosis [6].
Predisposing factors that might trigger AMI (and by extension, UA/ACS) in an individual: [8]
- Unusual heavy exercise
- Emotional stress
- Progression from unstable angina (to MI)
- Surgical procedures
- Infection e.g. pneumonia
- Circadian Periodicity — Peak incidence between 0600–1200 [8]
The "4 E's" mnemonic for triggers of angina: [8][9]
- Exercise
- Emotion
- Environment (cold/hot)
- Eating (post-prandial — blood is diverted to splanchnic circulation, reducing coronary perfusion relative to demand)
4. Anatomy & Function — Coronary Artery Supply
Understanding which coronary artery is involved determines which myocardial territory is at risk:
| Artery | Territory Supplied | ECG Leads |
|---|---|---|
| Left Anterior Descending (LAD) | Anterior wall, anterior septum, apex of LV | V1–V4 (anterior), V5–V6 (lateral) |
| Left Circumflex (LCx) | Lateral and posterior wall of LV | I, aVL (high lateral), V5–V6 |
| Right Coronary Artery (RCA) | Inferior wall of LV, RV, SA node (in ~60%), AV node (in ~80% — right dominant) | II, III, aVF (inferior) |
| Left Main Stem (LMS) | Gives rise to LAD and LCx — disease here is the most dangerous ("widow-maker") | Diffuse ST changes, aVR elevation |
Mortality: 1 vessel disease < 2 vessel disease < 3 vessel disease < left main stem disease [7]
- Right dominant (~85%): RCA gives rise to the posterior descending artery (PDA)
- Left dominant (~8%): LCx gives rise to PDA
- Co-dominant (~7%): both RCA and LCx contribute
- Coronary arteries fill primarily during diastole (especially the LV subendocardium), because during systole the contracting myocardium compresses intramural vessels. This is why tachycardia (shortened diastole) worsens angina — less filling time.
- The subendocardium is the most vulnerable zone to ischaemia because it has the highest wall tension and is furthest from the epicardial supply.
5. Etiology
Atherosclerosis of coronary artery is by far the most common aetiology of IHD [4][7]
The pathogenesis involves:
- Accumulation of LDL in arterial intima which induces innate inflammatory reaction [7]
- Recruits macrophages which engulf LDL and become foam cells [7]
- Formation of fibroatheroma with accumulation of macrophage foam cells along with cellular necrosis which causes further inflammation and distortion of intima [7]
The progression of atherosclerotic lesions: [2]
- Fatty streaks: slightly raised yellow deposits — earliest lesion, even found in teenagers
- Atheromatous plaque: fibrous cap + necrotic lipid-rich centre
- Unstable (vulnerable) plaque: thinner fibrous cap + growing necrotic core, which is prone to:
- Plaque rupture → thrombus formation → occlusion ← This is the key event in UA/NSTEMI/STEMI
- Aneurysm: pressure atrophy of tunica media
- Atheroembolism
Stable vs Unstable Plaque — The Critical Concept
The distinction between stable angina and ACS is fundamentally about plaque biology, not just the degree of stenosis:
- Stable plaque = thick fibrous cap, small lipid core → causes fixed stenosis → stable angina (predictable, exertional chest pain)
- Unstable (vulnerable) plaque = thin fibrous cap, large lipid-rich necrotic core, heavy inflammatory infiltrate → prone to rupture or erosion → exposed subendothelial collagen and tissue factor → platelet adhesion and activation → thrombus formation → dynamic obstruction → ACS
In UA, the thrombus is usually non-occlusive (white/platelet-rich thrombus) or transiently occlusive with spontaneous lysis. In STEMI, the thrombus is typically occlusive (red/fibrin-rich thrombus).
Significant CAD is usually defined as stenosis ≥ 50% on invasive coronary angiography [7]
Stenosis < 70% are typically not flow-limiting and are rarely the cause of angina or ischaemia and thus do not require revascularisation [7]
However, in UA, a plaque that was previously only 40–50% stenotic can rupture and suddenly cause near-total occlusion via superimposed thrombus — this is why many patients with ACS have lesions that were not previously "significant" on angiography.
Non-atherosclerotic CAD: [7]
- Spasm = Prinzmetal's variant angina / Cocaine-induced — Prinzmetal angina is a vasospastic angina that classically causes transient ST elevation and occurs at rest, often in the early morning
- Dissection = Aortic dissection (Type A) with retrograde extension / Connective tissue disease (Marfan's syndrome / Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) — spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognised cause, especially in young women
- Embolism = AF / Atrial myxoma
- Vasculitis = Takayasu arteritis (large-vessel) / Polyarteritis nodosa (medium-vessel) / Kawasaki disease (medium-vessel) / EGPA (small-vessel)
Ischaemia without plaque rupture (imbalance between blood supply and demand): [7]
- Anaemia — reduced O₂ carrying capacity
- Hypertension — increased afterload → increased myocardial O₂ demand
- Aortic stenosis — LV pressure overload → LVH → increased O₂ demand with compromised subendocardial perfusion
- Thyrotoxicosis — ↑metabolic rate, ↑HR → ↑O₂ demand
The causes of imbalance between blood supply and demand include: [9]
- Coronary artery stenosis
- Coronary spasm
- Anaemia, thyrotoxicosis
- Aortic stenosis, hypertension
6. Pathophysiology of Unstable Angina
-
Vulnerable plaque rupture or erosion: The thin fibrous cap of a lipid-rich plaque cracks (rupture) or endothelial cells are denuded (erosion). Inflammatory cells (especially macrophages) within the plaque secrete matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade collagen in the fibrous cap, weakening it.
-
Thrombogenic core exposure: The lipid-rich necrotic core contains high concentrations of tissue factor (a potent activator of the extrinsic coagulation cascade). Subendothelial collagen is also exposed, which activates platelets via von Willebrand factor (vWF) binding to platelet GPIb receptors.
-
Platelet activation and aggregation: Activated platelets release ADP and thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂), recruiting more platelets. Platelet aggregation occurs via cross-linking of GPIIb/IIIa receptors by fibrinogen. This forms a "white thrombus" (platelet-rich).
-
Partial/dynamic obstruction: In UA, the thrombus does NOT completely occlude the artery (or if it does, it lyses spontaneously or rapidly). This creates intermittent or partial flow reduction, explaining:
- Why pain comes and goes
- Why troponin remains normal (no irreversible necrosis — ischaemia is transient)
- Why ECG may show transient ST depression or T-wave changes that resolve
-
Additional vasospasm: Thrombus and activated platelets release serotonin and TXA₂, which cause local vasoconstriction, further reducing blood flow. This is why the obstruction is "dynamic" — it fluctuates.
-
Myocardial ischaemia: Reduced coronary flow → O₂ supply < demand → anaerobic metabolism → accumulation of lactic acid, adenosine, bradykinin and other metabolites → stimulation of cardiac sympathetic afferent nerve fibres (travelling with C7–T4 nerve roots) → perception of chest pain (angina).
The cardiac sympathetic afferent fibres enter the spinal cord at C7–T4 levels, sharing pathways with somatic afferents from the chest wall, left arm (especially ulnar aspect), jaw, and shoulder. The brain cannot always distinguish the source — this is referred pain (viscerosomatic convergence). This is why angina typically radiates to the jaw, left arm, or shoulder.
| Feature | Stable Angina | Unstable Angina |
|---|---|---|
| Plaque | Stable, thick fibrous cap | Unstable, thin cap → ruptures/erodes |
| Obstruction | Fixed stenosis (≥ 70%) | Dynamic — thrombus ± vasospasm |
| Ischaemia trigger | Only when demand ↑ (exertion) | At rest or minimal exertion |
| Thrombus | No acute thrombus | Non-occlusive (or transiently occlusive) thrombus |
| Troponin | Normal | Normal (if elevated → NSTEMI) |
| ECG | Normal at rest; ischaemic changes on stress test | May show ST depression / T-wave inversion at rest |
| Pathology term | Fixed stenosis | Acute plaque changes: superimposed thrombosis, embolisation, coronary spasm [7] |
7. Classification
ACS is classified into: [1]
- NSTE-ACS
- Unstable angina (normal troponin)
- NSTEMI (elevated troponin)
- STE-ACS
- STEMI (ST elevation + elevated troponin)
Four categories of patients presenting with angina in ACS: [1]
- Rest angina — pain at rest, typically > 20 minutes
- New-onset angina — recent onset (within ~2 months) with at least CCS Class III severity
- Increasing (crescendo) angina — previously stable angina that has become more frequent, more severe, longer in duration, or provoked by less exertion
- Post-MI angina — recurrence of angina within 2 weeks of MI
The Braunwald Classification is used to risk stratify patients with unstable angina [1][10]
The Braunwald Classification uses the following parameters to stratify patients with unstable angina: History, Character of Pain, Clinical Findings, ECG, and Cardiac Markers [1]
| Feature | High Risk | Intermediate Risk | Low Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| History | Accelerating tempo of ischaemic symptoms in preceding 48 hrs | Prior MI, peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, CABG, or prior aspirin use | |
| Character of Pain | Prolonged ongoing (> 20 min) rest pain | Prolonged (> 20 min) rest angina, now resolved, with moderate or high likelihood of CAD | New-onset or progressive CCS Class III or IV angina the past 2 weeks |
| Clinical Findings | Pulmonary oedema; New or worsening MR murmur; S3 or new/worsening rales; Hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia; Age > 75 years | Age > 70 years | |
| ECG | Angina at rest with transient ST-segment changes > 0.05 mV; New or presumed new BBB; Sustained ventricular tachycardia | T-wave inversions > 0.2 mV; Pathological Q waves | Normal or unchanged ECG during an episode of chest discomfort |
| Cardiac Markers | Elevated (TnT or TnI > 0.1 ng/mL) | Slightly elevated (TnT > 0.01 but < 0.1 ng/mL) | Normal |
Braunwald Classification — High Yield for Exams
The Braunwald Classification is a classic exam topic. Note that if a patient has accelerating symptoms in the preceding 48 hours, ongoing rest pain > 20 minutes, haemodynamic instability (hypotension, pulmonary oedema, new MR murmur, S3), transient ST changes, or elevated troponin, they are high risk. The case in the GC lecture notes explicitly states: "If applying back to the case, this patient is very high risk" [1].
This classification grades the functional severity of angina (used for both stable and unstable angina to describe the threshold):
| CCS Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | Asymptomatic |
| I | Angina with strenuous exertion |
| II | Angina with moderate exertion (slight limitation of ordinary activities) |
| III | Angina with mild exertion (great limitation) → indicated for treatment |
| IV | Angina at rest |
8. Clinical Features
A. Symptoms
The symptoms of unstable angina are best understood through the lens of transient, dynamic myocardial ischaemia (partial coronary occlusion ± vasospasm) without necrosis.
Clinical characteristics of angina pectoris — Unstable angina: [9]
- More severe pain
- Lower tolerance for exertion or at rest
- < 20 minutes (though can be variable)
The pain differs from stable angina in several key ways:
| Feature | Stable Angina | Unstable Angina |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Predictable — with exertion | At rest or with minimal exertion; may be new-onset |
| Duration | < 2–10 minutes [9] | Up to 20 minutes (if > 30 min, suspect MI) |
| Frequency | Stable pattern | Increasing frequency, severity, or duration (crescendo pattern) |
| Response to rest/GTN | Relieved within 5 minutes | May not be fully relieved [7] |
Quality of chest pain (same as all angina — the mechanism is identical):
- Typically dull, constricting, choking, 'heavy' [11]
- Described as squeezing, crushing, burning, aching or even as breathlessness [11]
- Patients often emphasise it is a discomfort not a pain [11]
- Levine's sign: characteristic gesture of a clenched fist on chest when describing angina [11] — the patient places a clenched fist over the sternum to demonstrate the "crushing" nature
Location: Retrosternal / substernal / central chest
Radiation: Left arm (ulnar aspect) [8], jaw, neck, shoulder, back, epigastrium — due to referred pain via C7–T4 dermatomes (viscerosomatic convergence as discussed above)
Nature of chest pain in acute MI (and by extension severe UA): Severe, maybe intolerable; Prolonged, usually > 30 minutes; Nature: constricting, crushing, compressing, heavy weight; Radiation: left arm (ulnar aspect) [8]
30 Minutes — The Key Time Boundary
30 minutes is the cutoff time between stable/unstable angina and MI [12]. Pain lasting > 30 minutes strongly suggests myocardial necrosis (MI), not just ischaemia. However, this is a guideline, not an absolute rule — always check troponin.
Associated symptoms: SOB, weakness, dizziness, palpitation, nausea, vomiting [8]
-
Dyspnoea — Ischaemic myocardium becomes stiff and non-compliant (diastolic dysfunction) → ↑LV filling pressure → pulmonary congestion → sensation of breathlessness. Some patients, especially the elderly and diabetics, present with dyspnoea as the primary or sole symptom ("angina equivalent").
-
Nausea and vomiting — particularly with inferior ischaemia (RCA territory). Mechanism: Bezold-Jarisch reflex — ischaemia stimulates vagal afferents in the inferoposterior wall of the LV → vagal efferent discharge → bradycardia, hypotension, and nausea/vomiting. The Bezold-Jarisch reflex has a cardioprotective effect by inducing vasodilation of the coronary arteries [8].
-
Diaphoresis (sweating) — sympathetic nervous system activation in response to pain and haemodynamic stress
-
Palpitations — ischaemia can trigger arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular ectopics, AF, VT)
-
Dizziness / presyncope / syncope — reduced cardiac output from ischaemic LV dysfunction, or arrhythmias, or the Bezold-Jarisch reflex
-
Anxiety / sense of impending doom — catecholamine surge
Important to recognise, especially in certain populations:
- Elderly: may present with dyspnoea, confusion, or syncope rather than chest pain
- Diabetics: Causes of painless MI: DM [2] — autonomic neuropathy blunts the perception of ischaemic pain. Can present with sudden-onset heart failure, unexplained hypotension, or "silent" ischaemia
- Women: more often present with atypical symptoms — fatigue, nausea, dyspnoea, pain in back/jaw rather than classic central crushing chest pain
B. Signs (Physical Examination)
Physical examination is frequently unremarkable in UA [7]. However, the purpose of examination is threefold:
- Look for haemodynamic compromise (indicating high-risk ACS)
- Identify risk factors and comorbidities
- Exclude other causes of chest pain
- Patient may appear anxious, pale, diaphoretic (sympathetic activation from ischaemic pain)
- Levine's sign if observed during history
- Check body habitus: truncal obesity, BMI (risk factor assessment)
- Blood pressure: May be elevated (sympathetic response to pain) or hypotensive (cardiogenic shock, Bezold-Jarisch reflex) — hypertension is also a risk factor
- Heart rate: Tachycardia (sympathetic activation, pain) or bradycardia (inferior ischaemia → vagal activation / Bezold-Jarisch reflex)
- Oxygen saturation: Usually normal unless significant LV dysfunction → pulmonary oedema
- Temperature: Typically normal (unlike in MI where a low-grade fever may develop 24–48h later due to myocardial necrosis and inflammation)
Physical examination may reveal: [7][11]
- Evidence of VHD, esp. AS, AR, HOCM — AS and HOCM can cause angina even without coronary atherosclerosis (increased O₂ demand from LVH and outflow obstruction)
- Risk factors: HTN, DM
- LV dysfunction: cardiomegaly (displaced apex beat), gallop rhythm (S3 or S4)
- S3 = rapid ventricular filling into a dilated, non-compliant ventricle → suggests LV systolic dysfunction (high-risk feature in Braunwald classification)
- S4 = atrial contraction against a stiff ventricle → diastolic dysfunction (common in hypertensive/ischaemic hearts)
- Other arterial diseases: carotid bruit, signs of PVD (presence of all peripheral pulses) [7]
- Absent R. dorsalis pedis pulse, weak L. dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses — as in the interactive tutorial case [12] — peripheral arterial disease is a marker of generalised atherosclerosis
- Soft L. carotid bruit [12] — suggests carotid atherosclerosis, confirming systemic disease
- 2/6 ejection systolic murmur over aortic area [12] — could be aortic sclerosis/stenosis (common in elderly with generalised atherosclerosis)
- New or worsening MR murmur — in the setting of ACS, a new MR murmur is a HIGH-RISK feature (Braunwald) — may indicate papillary muscle ischaemia/dysfunction or acute mitral regurgitation
Signs indicating high-risk / haemodynamic compromise: [10]
- Pulmonary oedema (rales/crackles on auscultation)
- Hypotension
- New S3 gallop
- New or worsening MR murmur
- Bradycardia or tachycardia
- PE → unilateral lower limb swelling ± tenderness [5]
- Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness [5]
- Pneumothorax → hyperresonance [5]
- Aortic dissection → BP discrepancy between arms, early diastolic murmur of AR, absent pulses
- Pericarditis → pericardial friction rub
Approach to ACS — The 'A-C-S' Framework
The approach to ACS is: [5]
- A — Abnormal ECG
- C — Clinical (symptoms + signs)
- S — Stable patient (haemodynamic stability assessment)
If certain STEMI, can immediately send patient to the cath lab. If stable, then determine more things → any high-risk features? (troponin elevation, GRACE score — 9 factors for prognostication) [5]
| Feature | Unstable Angina | NSTEMI | STEMI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathology | Non-occlusive thrombus ± spasm | Non-occlusive or transiently occlusive thrombus → subendocardial necrosis | Occlusive thrombus → transmural necrosis |
| Chest Pain | < 20 min, rest or crescendo | Prolonged (> 20–30 min) | Prolonged (> 30 min), severe |
| Troponin | Normal | Elevated | Elevated |
| ECG | ST depression, T-wave inversion, or normal | ST depression, T-wave inversion | ST elevation or new LBBB |
| Myocardial necrosis | No | Yes (subendocardial) | Yes (transmural) |
| Urgency | Urgent (admit, monitor, risk stratify) | Urgent (early invasive strategy within 24–72h based on risk) | Emergency (immediate reperfusion — PCI within 90–120 min or fibrinolysis within 30 min) |
High Yield Summary
- Unstable angina = ACS with ischaemic symptoms (new-onset severe, rest angina > 20 min, or crescendo pattern) but normal troponin and no ST elevation
- Pathophysiology: Vulnerable plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus ± vasospasm → transient myocardial ischaemia without necrosis
- Risk factors = standard atherosclerotic risk factors (HTN, DM, HLD, smoking, age, FHx, CKD, obesity, sedentary)
- 4 E's trigger angina: Exercise, Emotion, Environment, Eating
- Braunwald Classification risk-stratifies UA using History, Character of Pain, Clinical Findings, ECG, Cardiac Markers — high risk includes accelerating symptoms in 48h, ongoing rest pain > 20 min, haemodynamic instability, transient ST changes, elevated troponin
- Key distinguishing feature from NSTEMI: troponin is normal. With hs-troponin assays, many former "UA" cases are reclassified as NSTEMI
- CCS grading classifies angina functional severity (0–IV)
- Physical exam is often unremarkable — look for haemodynamic compromise (high risk), cardiovascular risk factors, and exclude other diagnoses
- Signs of high risk: pulmonary oedema, hypotension, new S3, new MR murmur, brady/tachycardia
- Within 12 months of initial diagnosis of stable angina, 10–20% progress to MI or unstable angina
Active Recall - Unstable Angina: Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Etiology, Pathophysiology & Clinical Features
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf (p9, p24) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p7) [3] GC Lecture slides: GC 032. Chest pain on exertion_ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p9) [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p7) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf (p1–2) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf (p6) [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p384, p395); Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p115, p120) [8] GC Lecture slides: GC 088. Sudden Severe Chest Pain.pdf (p10); Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p5) [9] GC Lecture slides: CFB (MED05) Cardiovascular (I) Physical Examination (History Taking).pdf (p19) [10] GC Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf (p32) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p199, p202–203) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (p5)
Differential Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
When a patient presents with acute chest pain suspicious for unstable angina, the clinical challenge is twofold:
- Is this truly ACS? — You must differentiate UA from other life-threatening and benign causes of acute chest pain.
- If it is ACS, which type? — You must distinguish UA from NSTEMI and STEMI, because management differs.
The differential diagnosis of unstable angina is therefore essentially the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain, organised anatomically and by pathophysiology. The key principle taught in the GC lectures is:
"Don't just have one differential diagnosis when you hear chest pain — think of anatomy." [13]
Diagnosis based on history alone may be difficult → generally divided into: [11][14]
- Typical: chest pain typical of a cardiac origin
- Atypical: chest pain not typical of a cardiac origin, but cannot be attributed to a certain cause
- Non-cardiac: chest pain typical of a non-cardiac cause
B. Systematic Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain
The following table is the master list. I have grouped differentials by organ system, then separated them into life-threatening ("cannot miss") versus relatively benign categories, because this is exactly how you should think in the ED — rule out the killers first.
| System | Condition | Key Distinguishing Features from UA | Why You Cannot Miss It |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVS | Acute Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI / STEMI) | Troponin elevated (NSTEMI/STEMI); ST elevation (STEMI); pain usually > 30 min, not relieved by rest/GTN [7][15] | Myocardial necrosis is ongoing — delay = more dead muscle |
| Vascular | Aortic dissection | Very sudden onset; tearing/ripping pain radiating to back (interscapular); BP discrepancy between arms; sweating, syncope, focal neurological signs [15][16] | Can cause aortic rupture, tamponade, stroke, coronary malperfusion; giving antiplatelets/anticoagulants (as you would for ACS) would be catastrophic |
| Pulmonary | Pulmonary embolism | Pleuritic chest pain (worse on inspiration); acute dyspnoea; haemoptysis; unilateral leg swelling ± tenderness (DVT source); sinus tachycardia, S1Q3T3 on ECG [5][17] | Can cause cardiogenic shock, death; requires anticoagulation, not antiplatelet |
| Pulmonary | Tension / massive pneumothorax | Sudden onset; severe SOB; hyperresonance on percussion; absent breath sounds; tracheal deviation (tension) [5] | Tension pneumothorax = obstructive shock; needs immediate needle decompression |
| Pulmonary | Pneumonia | Pleuritic pain; fever; productive cough; consolidation on CXR | Sepsis risk |
| CVS | Myopericarditis ± cardiac tamponade | Sharp, stabbing, pleuritic pain; radiates to trapezius ridge; worse lying down, better sitting up/leaning forward; pericardial rub on auscultation [8][15] | Tamponade (Beck's triad: hypotension, muffled heart sounds, raised JVP) is immediately life-threatening |
| CVS | Acute decompensated heart failure | SOB, orthopnoea, PND; bilateral crepitations; elevated JVP; peripheral oedema | Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema |
The Big Three 'Cannot Miss' Diagnoses in Acute Chest Pain
Aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and pneumothorax are the three diagnoses you CANNOT miss [7]. These are the conditions where misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis leads to rapid deterioration and death. Additionally, giving ACS treatment (antiplatelets + anticoagulants) to a patient with aortic dissection is dangerous — this is a classic exam pitfall.
For a chief complaint of epigastric pain (which can be an atypical presentation of UA/MI), the most sinister non-GI causes you must exclude immediately are: myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, diabetic ketoacidosis, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm [13]
| System | Condition | Key Distinguishing Features from UA |
|---|---|---|
| CVS | Stable angina | Predictable exertional chest pain lasting < 2–10 min; relieved by rest or sublingual nitrate ≤ 5 min; reproducible threshold [14][15] |
| GI | GERD / oesophageal spasm | Retrosternal burning; unrelated to exertion; worse when lying flat; relieved by antacids/warm water; some foods trigger; nitrates sometimes relieve (oesophageal spasm — important mimic!) [15][18] |
| GI | Peptic ulcer disease | Epigastric tenderness; related to meals (hunger pain vs post-prandial); NSAID/aspirin use; haematemesis/melaena [5][13] |
| Chest wall | Musculoskeletal pain / costochondritis | Reproducible tenderness on palpation; worsened by specific movements; pain AFTER exertion (not during) [2][14] |
| Chest wall | Thoracic herpes zoster | Thoracic nerve root distribution; unilateral; burning/sharp; precedes typical vesicular rash [7] |
| Chest wall | Rib fracture / rib tumour | Localised tenderness; history of trauma [7] |
| Psychological | Panic attack / anxiety disorder | Situational; associated with hyperventilation, paraesthesia, tremor; young patient; diagnosis of exclusion [2] |
This table directly from the CFB (MED05) Cardiovascular History Taking lecture is extremely high yield for in-house papers — it is how examiners expect you to differentiate these conditions:
| Angina | Myocardial Infarction | Aortic Dissection | Pericardial Pain | Oesophageal Pain | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Retrosternal | Retrosternal | Interscapular / retrosternal | Retrosternal or left-sided | Retrosternal or epigastric |
| Onset | Progressive ↑ in intensity over 1–2 minutes | Rapid over a few minutes | Very sudden | Gradual; postural change may suddenly aggravate | Over 1–2 minutes; can be sudden (spasm) |
| Character | Constricting, heavy | Constricting, heavy | Tearing or ripping | Sharp, 'stabbing', pleuritic | Gripping, tight or burning |
| Radiation | Sometimes arm(s), neck, epigastrium | Often to arm(s), neck, jaw, sometimes epigastrium | Back, between shoulders | Left shoulder or back | Often to back, sometimes to arms |
| Associated features | Breathlessness | Sweating, nausea, vomiting, breathlessness, feeling of impending death (angor animi) | Sweating, syncope, focal neurological signs, signs of limb/mesenteric ischaemia | Flu-like prodrome, breathlessness, fever | Heartburn, acid reflux |
| Timing | Intermittent, episodes lasting 2–10 minutes | Acute presentation; prolonged duration | Acute presentation; prolonged duration | Acute presentation; variable duration | Intermittent, often at night-time; variable duration |
| Exacerbating / Relieving | Triggered by emotion, exertion, especially if cold, windy. Relieved by rest, TNG | Stress and exercise rare triggers, usually spontaneous. Not relieved by rest or TNG | Spontaneous. No manoeuvres relieve pain | Sitting up/lying down may affect intensity. NSAIDs help | Lying flat/some foods may trigger. Not relieved by rest; nitrates sometimes relieve |
| Severity | Mild to moderate | Usually severe | Very severe | Can be severe | Usually mild but oesophageal spasm can mimic MI |
GERD / Oesophageal Spasm — The Great Mimic
Oesophageal spasm can mimic MI [15] — the pain can be retrosternal, tight/gripping, radiate to the back or arms, and is even sometimes relieved by nitrates (because nitrates also relax smooth muscle of the oesophagus). This is why a PPI empirical trial can be considered as initial diagnostic step in patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) [18]. However, you must always exclude cardiac causes first before attributing chest pain to GERD.
Once you suspect ACS, the next step is to determine where on the ACS spectrum the patient falls. This is critical because management differs:
Why is it important to differentiate between STEMI and non-STEMI? [1]
- Treatment is different
- STEMI → complete occlusion of artery, require immediate opening up of artery as soon as possible
- NSTEMI → lumen is reduced, but blood flow is still possible, so you can get away with giving anti-platelet / anti-thrombotics, with or without revascularisation
Given the wide spectrum of clinical presentation of ACS, what can you use to stratify these patients into working diagnoses? [1]
- ECG changes:
- NSTE-ACS: Normal ECG or ST-segment depression
- STEMI: ST-segment elevation
- Malignant arrhythmias
| Feature | Unstable Angina | NSTEMI | STEMI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coronary thrombosis | Subtotal occlusion | Subtotal occlusion | Total occlusion |
| History | Angina that is new-onset, crescendo or at rest, usually lasting < 30 min | Angina at rest | Angina at rest |
| Troponin / CK-MB | Negative | Positive | Positive |
| ECG | NO ST elevation ± ST depression ± T wave inversion | NO ST elevation ± ST depression ± T wave inversion | ST elevation |
What can be used to obtain a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome? [1]
- Compatible clinical features (chest pain, SOB, collapse)
- ECG changes
- ± Cardiac enzyme changes
"It's a spectrum → the ECG changes come earlier, indicate ischaemia to the myocardium, whereas once damage is pronounced enough, your assays will be capable of detecting the presence of appropriate biomarkers in the blood" [1]
Three differential diagnoses for acute myocardial infarction, and the features that differentiate them from AMI: [8]
-
Acute pericarditis — differs because:
- Aggravated by respiratory movement, sharp, knife-like (pleuritic pain)
- Radiates to the trapezius ridge (characteristic site of pericardial pain)
- Sitting up or leaning forward may ease pain (MI pain is not positional)
-
Pulmonary embolism — differs because:
- Haemoptysis
- Pleuritic pain, worse on deep inspiration / coughing
-
Aortic dissection — differs because:
- Radiation to back, ripping or tearing sensation
These are important to consider in the differential, particularly in younger patients or those without typical atherosclerotic risk factors:
-
Prinzmetal variant angina (vasospastic angina) [4]:
- Focal transient vasospasm; occurs at rest, common after cold exposure; cyclical in nature
- Typical patient: middle-aged female
- ECG: episodic ST-segment elevations (not depression!)
- Caused by coronary artery spasm with or without superimposed CAD
- Can be provoked on angiography with acetylcholine and reversed with nitroglycerin
-
Congenital coronary anomalies [4]:
- Accounts for 6 to 17% of sudden death in athletes
- Symptoms: chest pain, exertional syncope, sudden cardiac death
- Physical examination and ECG: no abnormalities detected
- Require CT coronary angiogram, MRI, or coronary angiogram for diagnosis
-
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) [19]:
- Causes angina due to LVH + LVOTO → increased O₂ demand with compromised subendocardial perfusion
- Angina (70–80%); dyspnoea on exertion (90%); syncope (20%); presyncope (50%)
- Differentiated by: ejection systolic murmur that increases with Valsalva (unlike AS), family history of sudden death
-
Aortic stenosis [19]:
- Classic triad: angina, syncope, heart failure
- Angina occurs due to LVH and increased O₂ demand, even with normal coronary arteries
- Ejection systolic murmur at aortic area radiating to carotids; slow-rising pulse
Five causes of symptom progression resulting in NSTE-ACS: [1]
- Non-occlusive thrombus on pre-existing plaque — the classic mechanism
- Dynamic obstruction (coronary spasm or vasoconstriction) — Prinzmetal-type mechanism
- Progressive mechanical obstruction — gradual plaque growth narrowing the lumen further
- Increased demand → Type 2 myocardial infarction — supply-demand mismatch (e.g. sepsis, tachycardia, anaemia, thyrotoxicosis) causing ischaemia on top of pre-existing moderate CAD
- Infection / inflammation — systemic inflammatory states can destabilise plaques and increase O₂ demand simultaneously
Type 1 vs Type 2 MI — A Crucial Distinction
Type 1 MI: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion with thrombosis → primary coronary event. This is the "classic" MI.
Type 2 MI: Myocardial ischaemia/necrosis caused by a supply-demand mismatch without acute plaque disruption (e.g. severe anaemia, sepsis, tachyarrhythmia, respiratory failure, hypotension, aortic stenosis). The coronary arteries may have some baseline disease but the acute event is triggered by the systemic insult, not plaque rupture. Treatment is directed at the underlying cause, not urgent catheterisation.
-
Always get an ECG within 10 minutes of presentation with chest pain — this is the single most important initial investigation to stratify ACS.
-
Serial troponin is essential — a single normal troponin does NOT rule out ACS. Repeat troponin 6–12 hours later if 1st Tn is normal [14]. With high-sensitivity troponin assays (hs-cTnT/I), many centres now use a 0/1h or 0/3h rule-out algorithm.
-
CXR is usually non-diagnostic in ACS — look for other causes (e.g. aortic dissection, PE, pneumonia, or pneumothorax) [14]
-
The case can be deliberately very ambiguous — 30 minutes is the cutoff time between stable and unstable angina [12]. In the cardiology interactive tutorial, the patient's rest pain occurring after dinner could represent post-prandial angina (blood shunting to splanchnic circulation) or true unstable angina — clinical judgement and risk factor assessment determine the working diagnosis.
-
Not all patients will have the classical "playing tennis then collapse" story; they can be: oligo/asymptomatic, increasing chest pain, persistent chest pain, cardiogenic shock / acute heart failure, or cardiac arrest [1]
-
Physical examination in UA should focus on: risk factor assessment, exclude other diagnosis [5]:
- PE → unilateral lower limb swelling
- Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness
- Pneumothorax → hyperresonance
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
- Life-threatening differentials to rule out FIRST: STEMI/NSTEMI, aortic dissection, PE, tension pneumothorax, pericarditis with tamponade
- Common benign mimics: GERD/oesophageal spasm (can be relieved by nitrates — trap!), musculoskeletal pain (reproducible on palpation), panic attack
- Other cardiac mimics: Prinzmetal variant angina (ST elevation at rest, vasospasm), HOCM, aortic stenosis, congenital coronary anomalies
- Differentiating within ACS: ECG (ST elevation → STEMI) + serial troponin (positive → NSTEMI, negative → UA)
- NSTE-ACS has 5 causes of symptom progression: non-occlusive thrombus, dynamic obstruction, progressive mechanical obstruction, increased demand (Type 2 MI), infection/inflammation
- Use SOCRATES to systematically characterise the pain and differentiate causes
- Aortic dissection is the most dangerous mimic — tearing pain to back, sudden onset, giving anticoagulants is contraindicated
- Approach to ACS: A (Abnormal ECG), C (Clinical), S (Stable patient)
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf (p7–10) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p5, p7) [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p12, p56) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf (p1–2) [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p384, p393, p395, p399) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p6) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p199, p203) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (p5) [13] Senior notes: Block A - Upper abdominal pain_ peptic ulcer; pancreatitis and gallstone.pdf (p2–3) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p54–55, p58, p128) [15] Lecture slides: CFB (MED05) Cardiovascular (I) Physical Examination (History Taking).pdf (p15) [16] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf (p1) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (p131) [18] Senior notes: Block A - Indigestion and 'heartburn'_ nausea and vomiting; gastric motility problems; benign esophageal lesions.pdf (p5) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (p11); MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p531)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm & Investigations for Unstable Angina
A. Diagnostic Criteria — How Do We Actually Diagnose Unstable Angina?
Unlike STEMI, which has clear-cut ECG criteria, and unlike MI in general, which has a formal "Universal Definition," unstable angina is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis. There is no single definitive test that says "this is unstable angina." Instead, it is diagnosed by a combination of clinical features, ECG findings, and — critically — the absence of biomarker elevation. Let me walk you through this from first principles.
UA is diagnosed when a patient presents with anginal pain with at least one of the following features: [1]
- Is of new onset and severe (at least CCS Class III — markedly limits normal activity)
- Occurs at rest or with minimal exertion (resting angina > 20 minutes)
- Pain is worsening in the severity and length of each episode (crescendo/increasing angina)
AND:
In other words, the diagnosis is made by demonstrating:
- A clinical presentation consistent with acute myocardial ischaemia
- No ST elevation on ECG (otherwise → STEMI)
- No elevation of cardiac biomarkers on serial testing (otherwise → NSTEMI)
UA is a Diagnosis of Exclusion Within ACS
Think of it this way: you first diagnose ACS based on symptoms + ECG. Then you exclude STEMI (no ST elevation) and exclude NSTEMI (no troponin rise). What remains is unstable angina. This is why serial troponin is essential — you cannot diagnose UA on a single troponin sample.
Understanding the MI definition helps you understand precisely where UA sits:
Criteria for acute myocardial infarction: [7][20]
(1) Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values, preferably cardiac troponin (cTn), with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL)
(+ At least one of the following): (2) Symptoms of ischaemia (3) Investigations:
- New or presumed new significant ST-segment–T wave (ST–T) changes
- New left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- Development of pathological Q waves in the ECG
- New loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality on imaging
- Identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy
The critical point: criterion (1) — troponin elevation — is mandatory for the diagnosis of MI. If troponin is normal on serial testing but the patient has ischaemic symptoms and/or ECG changes, the diagnosis is unstable angina, not MI.
The 3rd/4th Universal Definition classifies MI into 5 types: [14]
| Type | Description | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spontaneous MI due to primary coronary event (plaque erosion/rupture/fissuring/dissection) | Atherothrombotic; classic ACS |
| 2 | MI secondary to ischaemia due to imbalance between O₂ demand and supply (coronary spasm, anaemia, hypotension) | Supply-demand mismatch; treat the underlying cause |
| 3 | Sudden cardiac death | Death before biomarkers could be obtained |
| 4a | MI associated with PCI | cTn > 5× 99th URL |
| 4b | MI associated with stent thrombosis | Verified stent thrombosis |
| 5 | MI associated with CABG | cTn > 10× 99th URL |
Why does this matter for UA? Because some patients presenting with "unstable angina" actually have Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch from anaemia, sepsis, tachyarrhythmia) — the troponin may be elevated but the mechanism is not plaque rupture. The management differs fundamentally: you treat the underlying cause (transfuse for anaemia, rate-control for tachycardia) rather than rushing to the cath lab.
B. Risk Stratification Scores
Once you diagnose UA (or NSTE-ACS in general), you must risk stratify to guide the urgency and intensity of treatment. Two main scores are used:
The Braunwald Classification is used to risk stratify patients with unstable angina [1][10]
Parameters: History, Character of Pain, Clinical Findings, ECG, Cardiac Markers [1]
| Feature | High Risk | Intermediate Risk | Low Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| History | Accelerating tempo of ischaemic symptoms in preceding 48 hrs | Prior MI, peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, CABG, or prior aspirin use | — |
| Character of Pain | Prolonged ongoing (> 20 min) rest pain | Prolonged (> 20 min) rest angina, now resolved, with moderate or high likelihood of CAD | New-onset or progressive CCS Class III or IV angina the past 2 weeks |
| Clinical Findings | Pulmonary oedema; New or worsening MR murmur; S3 or new/worsening rales; Hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia; Age > 75 years | Age > 70 years | — |
| ECG | Angina at rest with transient ST-segment changes > 0.05 mV; New or presumed new BBB; Sustained ventricular tachycardia | T-wave inversions > 0.2 mV; Pathological Q waves | Normal or unchanged ECG during an episode of chest discomfort |
| Cardiac Markers | Elevated (TnT or TnI > 0.1 ng/mL) | Slightly elevated (TnT > 0.01 but < 0.1 ng/mL) | Normal |
Braunwald Classification — Exam Pearl
Note an apparent paradox: the "High Risk" Braunwald category includes patients with elevated troponin. Strictly, these patients would now be classified as NSTEMI rather than UA. The Braunwald classification pre-dates high-sensitivity troponin assays and was designed when the UA/NSTEMI boundary was less sharp. For exam purposes, know the classification as taught in the GC lectures [10], but understand that in modern practice the elevated-troponin patients are NSTEMI.
The GRACE score uses 9 factors for prognostication [5]. It is the preferred risk stratification tool in current ESC guidelines for NSTE-ACS:
| Factor | Why It Is Included |
|---|---|
| Age | Older age → worse prognosis |
| Heart rate | Tachycardia = sympathetic activation, haemodynamic stress |
| Systolic blood pressure | Hypotension = poor cardiac output, cardiogenic shock |
| Serum creatinine | Renal impairment = worse prognosis, drug handling issues |
| Killip class | Heart failure classification → haemodynamic compromise |
| Cardiac arrest at admission | Most severe presentation |
| ST-segment deviation | ECG evidence of ischaemia |
| Elevated cardiac enzymes | Myocardial necrosis → NSTEMI (not pure UA) |
| In-hospital PCI | Whether revascularisation was performed |
The GRACE score stratifies patients into:
- Low risk (GRACE score < 109): 6-month mortality < 3%
- Intermediate risk (GRACE 109–140): 6-month mortality 3–8%
- High risk (GRACE > 140): 6-month mortality > 8% → early invasive strategy recommended
D. Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown
Why is ECG the first investigation? Because it is fast (available in minutes), non-invasive, cheap, and provides the single most important piece of information for triaging ACS: is there ST elevation?
Timing: Perform 12-lead ECG as soon as possible [14] — ideally within 10 minutes of first medical contact (ESC guidelines).
What to look for in UA/NSTE-ACS:
| Finding | Significance | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| ST depression (horizontal or downsloping) | Subendocardial ischaemia | Ischaemia preferentially affects the subendocardium → the injury vector points away from the epicardial surface → ST depression on surface ECG |
| T-wave inversion | Ischaemia or recent ischaemic injury | Altered repolarisation in ischaemic myocardium |
| Normal ECG | Does NOT rule out UA | Ischaemia may be transient, resolved, or in a territory not well-represented by standard 12-lead positions |
| New or presumed new BBB | High-risk feature (Braunwald) [10] | Ischaemia affecting the conduction system |
| Transient ST-segment changes > 0.05 mV | High-risk feature [10] | Dynamic ischaemia — thrombus is partially occluding then lysing |
STEMI diagnostic criteria: ST elevation in two contiguous leads, with specific thresholds of 2 mm in V1–V3 for men and 1.5 mm for women [21]. If these criteria are met → it is STEMI, not UA.
Serial ECGs Are Essential
Repeated ECG is important to assess serial changes [5]. A single normal ECG does NOT exclude ACS. The ECG should be repeated at least daily × 3 days (more frequently in severe cases) [14]. During active chest pain, compare the ECG to the pain-free baseline — dynamic changes are highly suggestive of ischaemia.
ECG findings for key differentials:
- Concave upward ST elevation + PR depression → benign early repolarisation or acute pericarditis; ST/T ratio > 0.25 suggests acute pericarditis [22]
- Pathological Q waves: indicate old/previous MI — any Q wave in V2–V3 ≥ 0.02 seconds is abnormal; Q wave ≥ 0.03 seconds and ≥ 0.1 mV deep or QS complex in any two contiguous leads [8]
For ST depression, there is a lower threshold for V2–V3 than for other leads [22]
Why troponin? Cardiac troponins (cTnT and cTnI) are structural proteins of the sarcomere — they are released into the bloodstream when cardiomyocytes undergo necrosis. They are the most sensitive and specific markers of myocardial injury.
Rationale behind biochemical markers: Cellular contents of damaged cells (e.g. intracellular enzymes) are leaked into the ECF and plasma directly or via lymphatics in cellular necrosis [20]
In unstable angina: troponin is NORMAL — because by definition, there is ischaemia without necrosis.
Key principles:
| Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| When to test | Cardiac enzymes daily × 3 days; repeat troponin 6–12h later if 1st Tn is normal [14] |
| hs-cTn algorithms | Modern high-sensitivity troponin allows 0h/1h or 0h/3h rapid rule-out/rule-in algorithms. If both 0h and 1h values are below the assay-specific rule-out threshold AND delta is minimal → ACS unlikely (very high NPV) |
| Threshold for MI | Any troponin level > URL (99th percentile upper reference limit) = myocardial damage [20] |
| Rise and/or fall pattern | A dynamic change (rise and/or fall) is crucial — chronic low-level elevation (e.g. in CKD, HF) does NOT necessarily indicate acute MI. You need a delta (change over time) |
| Reinfarction detection | CK-MB is better at detecting reinfarction due to its shorter half-life; > 20% increase in cTnI/TnT value indicates reinfarction [20] |
| Reperfusion assessment | When coronary arteries are reperfused, cardiac markers will gradually wash out and decrease [20] |
Roles of biochemical markers of ACS: [20]
- Risk prediction and prognosis — categorise patients into high and low-risk groups
- Selection of site of care: Coronary care unit / Out-patient settings
- Selection of therapeutic intervention: Aggressive / Conservative therapy
- ACS evaluation — any troponin level > URL = myocardial damage
- Detection of reinfarction
- Assessment of reperfusion
- Estimation of infarct size — magnitude and temporal course of markers
With hs-Troponin, Pure UA Is Becoming Rarer
Nowadays, we have POC troponin assays, can get results in 20 mins [1]. With the increasing sensitivity of modern hs-cTn assays, many patients previously diagnosed as "UA" now show tiny troponin elevations and are reclassified as NSTEMI. Pure unstable angina (completely normal serial hs-troponin) now represents a smaller proportion of NSTE-ACS. However, the concept remains important for clinical reasoning.
Baseline evaluation blood tests: [14][4]
| Test | Rationale |
|---|---|
| CBC | Anaemia can exacerbate ischaemia (↓ O₂ delivery); leukocytosis may suggest infection/inflammation; thrombocytopenia is a baseline before anticoagulation |
| L/RFT (Liver and Renal Function Tests) | Renal impairment is a prognostic factor (GRACE score); baseline before contrast and drug dosing (heparin, ACEI) |
| Lipid profile (fasting, ideally within ≤ 24h) | Assess risk factor; guide statin therapy; LDL target |
| Fasting glucose, HbA1c | Screen for/assess diabetes control — a major risk factor and prognostic marker |
| TFT | Thyrotoxicosis may exacerbate angina [14] — increased O₂ demand |
| aPTT / INR | Baseline for heparin therapy [14] |
| hs-CRP | Inflammation plays a big role in CAD → can help predict risk [4] |
| BNP / NT-proBNP | Assess cardiac function; elevated levels suggest LV dysfunction and worse prognosis |
CXR is usually non-diagnostic in ACS — look for other causes (e.g. aortic dissection, PE, pneumonia, or pneumothorax) [14]
Specifically in UA/ACS, CXR may show:
- Pulmonary oedema (upper lobe venous diversion, Kerley B lines, peribronchial cuffing, pleural effusions) — if present, indicates LV failure = high-risk feature
- Widened mediastinum → raise suspicion for aortic dissection (but widened mediastinum is not specific — a lot of patients above age 70 have this due to fat accumulation [16])
- Normal — most common finding in UA
- Cardiomegaly (CT ratio > 0.5) — suggests pre-existing cardiac disease; does not specify which heart compartment is enlarged [23]
Baseline echocardiography recommended for all patients [14]
| What to Assess | Why | Finding in UA |
|---|---|---|
| LVEF | Strongest predictor of long-term survival; LVEF < 50% associated with ↑↑ event risk regardless of severity of ischaemia [14] | May be normal or reduced |
| Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) | Hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis of specific wall segments indicates ischaemia or previous infarction | Transient RWMA during pain → highly suggestive of ischaemia; may be normal between episodes |
| Valvular heart disease | AS, MR (new or worsening = high-risk) | Identify structural causes of angina (e.g. severe AS) |
| Complications | Pericardial effusion, mural thrombus, ventricular aneurysm | Usually not seen in UA (no infarction) |
Stress testing is used when the diagnosis of CAD is uncertain — it is more relevant to stable angina workup than to acute UA, but may be performed after stabilisation in intermediate/low-risk UA patients to guide further management.
Non-invasive investigation algorithm for patients with chest pain: [3]
Choices of Stress Testing — Comparison: [3]
| Stress ECG | Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (SPECT) | Stress Echo | Cardiac MRI Perfusion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical difficulty | + | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Ease of interpretation | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | 50–80 | 65–90 | 65–90 | 70–90 |
| Diagnostic specificity (%) | 80–95 | 90–95 | 90–95 | 90–95 |
| Risk stratification | ++ | ++ | ++ | + |
| Identification of hibernating myocardium | − | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Identification of ischaemic territory | + | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| Limitations | Conduction or repolarisation anomalies | Radiation exposure | Diagnostic images not possible in all patients | Claustrophobia and incompatibility with devices |
| Cost | + | +++ | ++ | +++ |
Exercise Treadmill Test (ETT) details:
- Bruce protocol: 7-stage test with treadmill increasing speed and grade [2]
- Exercise until target HR reached (HR = (220 − age) × 0.8), symptomatic, or ST-T changes [2]
- Positive finding: Ischaemic: planar / downsloping ST depression [2]
- Duke treadmill score: based on exercise time, presence of angina, max net ST segment changes [2]
- Stop antihypertensive on the day of test [2]
After doing pharmacological stress test, you can either do cardiac MRI or SPECT [12]
Pharmacological stress agents:
- Dobutamine (β₁ agonist → ↑HR, ↑contractility → ↑O₂ demand) — C/I: recent MI [2]
- Adenosine / regadenoson (coronary vasodilator → "steals" blood from ischaemic territory) — C/I: asthma (adenosine can cause bronchospasm) [2]
Stress testing risk stratification for prognosis: [14]
- High risk = area of ischaemia > 10% (> 10% for SPECT, ≥ 3 LV segments for echo)
- Intermediate risk = area of ischaemia 1–10%
- Low risk = no ischaemia
- Non-invasive anatomical assessment of coronary arteries
- Excellent negative predictive value — very good at ruling out significant CAD
- Calcium score (non-contrast CT): draw circles around areas of calcium; good for prognostication [16]
- Issue: calcified plaques create false positives [16] — heavily calcified arteries can obscure the lumen, making stenosis appear worse than it is
- Most useful for patients with low-to-intermediate pre-test probability where you want to rule out CAD non-invasively
The gold standard for defining coronary anatomy. A catheter is inserted (usually via radial or femoral artery) and contrast is injected directly into the coronary ostia under fluoroscopy.
Indications for invasive coronary angiogram: [3][4]
- Unacceptable angina despite medical therapy (for consideration of revascularisation)
- Non-invasive testing results with high-risk features
- Angina or risk factors for CAD in the setting of depressed LVEF
- For diagnostic purposes, in the individual in whom the results of non-invasive testing are unclear
In the context of NSTE-ACS (including UA):
- If stable, then determine high-risk features → if yes, proceed to invasive procedures [5]
- This patient has T-wave changes, no high risk features → are we really thinking of unstable angina? Yes, since symptoms and signs are compatible → so still go with invasive procedures [5]
Key findings on angiography:
- Degree and location of stenosis (1-vessel, 2-vessel, 3-vessel, left main stem disease)
- Mortality: 1 vessel disease < 2 vessel disease < 3 vessel disease < left main stem disease [14]
- Significant CAD: stenosis ≥ 50% on invasive coronary angiography [7]
- Thrombus burden, culprit lesion identification
- Can proceed directly to PCI if indicated
- Assesses both structure and function
- Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE): identifies areas of fibrosis/scar (infarction) vs viable myocardium
- Subepicardial LGE → myocarditis pattern [16]
- Subendocardial or transmural LGE → infarction pattern
- Stress perfusion MRI: identifies ischaemic territories with high sensitivity and specificity
- Particularly useful in MINOCA (MI with No Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis) [14] — helps differentiate myocarditis, takotsubo, microvascular disease from true atherosclerotic ACS
- No late GDE in certain patients → may need further workup [16]
D-dimer is a fibrin/blood clot degradation product. It is not very specific (cannot rule in) but is quite sensitive (can rule out) [24]
Used only to exclude pulmonary embolism as a differential, NOT for diagnosing UA. Only for patients who are haemodynamically stable [23]. Many conditions cause elevated D-dimer (VTE, DIC, surgery, cancer, pregnancy, infection, chronic inflammation, liver/renal disease) [24].
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | History (SOCRATES) + Physical Examination | Clinical diagnosis of ACS; identify risk factors; exclude other causes |
| 2 | 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes | Rule out STEMI; identify ST depression / T-wave changes |
| 3 | Serial troponin (0h, repeat 1–3h or 6–12h) | Differentiate UA (normal) from NSTEMI (elevated) |
| 4 | Basic bloods (CBC, L/RFT, lipid, glucose, HbA1c, TFT, aPTT/INR) | Identify exacerbating factors, risk factors, baseline for drugs |
| 5 | CXR | Exclude other causes; assess for pulmonary oedema |
| 6 | Echocardiography | LVEF (prognostic), RWMA, valvular disease |
| 7 | Risk stratification (Braunwald / GRACE) | Guide urgency of invasive vs conservative strategy |
| 8 | Non-invasive stress testing OR invasive coronary angiography | Based on risk stratification; confirm anatomy; guide revascularisation |
Admit CCU if high-risk (ongoing chest pain, ↓BP, APO, ventricular arrhythmia). Bed rest with continuous ECG monitoring. 12-lead ECG stat and repeat at least daily × 3 days. Cardiac enzymes daily × 3 days. [14]
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
- UA = clinical ACS + no ST elevation + normal serial troponin. It is diagnosed by excluding STEMI and NSTEMI.
- ECG within 10 minutes is the critical first step. Look for ST depression, T-wave inversion, or a normal ECG. Dynamic/transient changes are high-risk.
- Serial troponin (not a single measurement!) is mandatory — repeat at 1–3h (hs-cTn) or 6–12h. Normal serial troponin = UA; any elevation = NSTEMI.
- Braunwald Classification (History, Pain character, Clinical findings, ECG, Cardiac markers) and GRACE score (9 factors) are used for risk stratification.
- Basic bloods: CBC, L/RFT, lipids, glucose/HbA1c, TFT, aPTT/INR, BNP, hs-CRP.
- CXR excludes other causes and detects pulmonary oedema.
- Echo for LVEF (strongest predictor of long-term survival), RWMA, and valvular disease.
- Stress testing after stabilisation in low/intermediate-risk patients; choose modality based on ability to exercise and baseline ECG interpretability.
- Invasive coronary angiography for high-risk features, failed medical therapy, or inconclusive non-invasive tests.
- GRACE score > 140 = high risk → early invasive strategy. GRACE < 109 = low risk → conservative medical management.
Active Recall - Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm & Investigations for Unstable Angina
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf (p8–10, p24) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p5, p7) [3] Lecture slides: GC 032. Chest pain on exertion_ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p42, p44, p48) [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p21, p31) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf (p2) [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p384, p393) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p17) [10] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf (p32) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (p5) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p58, p116, p120, p127–128, p142) [16] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf (p2) [20] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p400) [21] Senior notes: Learning_Points_All_Lectures.txt (Cardiology section) [22] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Data Interpretation.pdf (p1, p7) [23] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf (p7) [24] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf (p23)
Management of Unstable Angina
Before diving into specifics, let's establish the management philosophy. The management of unstable angina is essentially the management of NSTE-ACS (since UA and NSTEMI are managed along the same pathway — the key difference being the urgency of invasive intervention).
Aims of Treatment: Relieve symptoms, monitor for complications, improve long-term prognosis [25]
Think of management in four phases:
- Immediate stabilisation (ABC, monitoring, initial medications)
- Acute anti-ischaemic and antithrombotic therapy (the pharmacological "bridge")
- Risk-stratified invasive vs conservative strategy (coronary angiography ± revascularisation)
- Secondary prevention (long-term medications + lifestyle modification to prevent recurrence)
In the management of AMI / ACS, the 4 principles of management are: [8]
- General measures (bed rest, O₂, morphine, CCU care ± resuscitation)
- Early presentation: opening of infarct-related artery
- Other measures: antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB
- Complications management and rehabilitation
Management of UA / NSTEMI: [25]
| Step | Detail | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Admit CCU for very high risk / high risk cases | Continuous telemetry monitoring | Detect arrhythmias early; prevent sudden death |
| 2. Bed rest with continuous ECG monitoring | Reduce myocardial O₂ demand | Resting heart → less work → less ischaemia |
| 3. ECG stat and repeat at least daily for 3 days | More frequently in severe cases to look for evolution to MI | Dynamic ECG changes guide treatment escalation |
| 4. Serial cardiac injury markers | hs-troponin: Consider ESC Rapid "rule-in" and "rule-out" algorithms using hs-troponin: the 0h/1h algorithm (blood draw at 0h and 1hr) | Differentiate UA from NSTEMI; detect evolving MI |
| 5. CXR, CBP, R/LFT, lipid profile (within 24 hours), aPTT, INR | Baseline for heparin Rx | Identify precipitants; baseline before drugs |
| 6. Allay anxiety | Explain nature of disease to patient | Reduces sympathetic drive → reduces O₂ demand |
| 7. Morphine IV | When symptoms are not immediately relieved by nitrate e.g. Morphine 2–5 mg IV (monitor BP) | Analgesic + anxiolytic + venodilator (↓preload) |
| 8. Correct any precipitating factors | Anaemia, hypoxia, tachyarrhythmia | These increase O₂ demand or decrease supply |
| 9. Stool softener | Prevent Valsalva | Straining ↑ intrathoracic pressure → ↓venous return → reflex tachycardia → ↑O₂ demand |
| 10. Supplemental oxygen | For hypoxia (SaO₂ < 90%) | Only if hypoxic — routine O₂ in normoxic ACS patients may cause harm (coronary vasoconstriction from hyperoxia) |
| 11. Consult cardiologist | Consider urgent coronary angiogram / revascularisation, mechanical circulatory support if refractory to medical therapy or develop shock | Risk stratification and definitive management |
Very high risk / high risk features (consult cardiologists): [25]
- Haemodynamic instability
- Cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure
- Recurrent/refractory chest pain despite medical treatment
- Life-threatening arrhythmias
- Established NSTEMI diagnosis
- Dynamic new or presumably new contiguous ST/T segment changes
- GRACE risk score > 140
D. Phase 2 — Acute Pharmacotherapy
This is divided into antithrombotic therapy and anti-ischaemic therapy. Think of it as: antithrombotic drugs attack the thrombus (the cause), while anti-ischaemic drugs address the symptom (the ischaemia).
I. Antithrombotic Therapy
The thrombus in UA/NSTEMI is a platelet-rich "white thrombus" on a ruptured plaque. Therefore, we target both platelet aggregation (antiplatelets) and the coagulation cascade (anticoagulants).
Specific drug treatment — Antithrombotic Therapy: [25]
- a) Aspirin 160–320 mg loading, then 80–100 mg daily
- b) Clopidogrel 300–600 mg stat, then 75 mg daily OR Ticagrelor 180 mg stat, then 90 mg BD
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | Irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) → blocks synthesis of thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) → TXA₂ normally promotes platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction, so blocking it = less clotting | 160–320 mg loading, then 80–100 mg daily [25] | Aspirin in the absence of contraindications [3]; irreversible effect lasts the platelet lifespan (~7–10 days); withdrawal → 5 days considered sufficient [26] |
| Clopidogrel (Plavix) | Irreversibly inhibits P2Y12 ADP receptor on platelets → ADP normally activates platelets and amplifies aggregation; blocking this = reduced platelet activation | 300–600 mg loading, then 75 mg daily [25] | Pro-drug requiring hepatic activation (CYP2C19); genetic polymorphisms affect response ("East Asian Paradox" — higher proportion of CYP2C19 poor metabolisers in East Asians) [4]; Clopidogrel when aspirin is contraindicated [3] |
| Ticagrelor | Reversibly inhibits P2Y12 ADP receptor — does NOT require hepatic activation (direct-acting) | 180 mg loading, then 90 mg BD [25] | More potent and predictable than clopidogrel; reversible binding means faster offset (important if urgent surgery needed); side effects: dyspnoea (adenosine reuptake inhibition), bradycardia |
| Prasugrel | Irreversibly inhibits P2Y12 ADP receptor — pro-drug but more efficient activation than clopidogrel | 60 mg loading, then 10 mg daily | More potent than clopidogrel; higher bleeding risk; C/I: prior stroke/TIA, age ≥ 75, body weight < 60 kg |
If delayed beyond 24h, can give P2Y12 inhibitors → ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel [5]
DAPT Duration — A Nuanced Decision
Dual antiplatelet therapy recommended, maintained over 12 months, unless there are contraindications or excessive bleeding risk [1]:
- Ticagrelor 90 mg BID
- Clopidogrel 75 mg/day, or 75 mg daily if aspirin is not tolerated due to hypersensitivity or GI intolerance
Try to maintain for 12 months → if really cannot due to bleeding risk, maintain at least for 3–6 months. You really want to make sure there is no re-thrombosis in your stent [1]
Current guidelines (2023 ESC) allow shortened DAPT (1–3 months) followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk, and extended DAPT (> 12 months) in patients at high ischaemic risk with low bleeding risk. This is a complicated decision — bleeding risk vs ischaemic risk [26].
GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban):
- Block the final common pathway of platelet aggregation (GPIIb/IIIa receptor cross-linking by fibrinogen)
- GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor is not routinely added unless evidence of ongoing ischaemia in the presence of DAPT (persistent chest pain, ECG evidence of ischaemia) [2]
- Used primarily during PCI if heavy thrombus burden is seen on angiography
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enoxaparin (Clexane, LMWH) | Activates antithrombin → preferentially inhibits Factor Xa (with some anti-IIa activity) | 1 mg/kg SC Q12h [25] | Predictable pharmacokinetics; no routine monitoring needed (can check anti-Xa levels in renal impairment); given at bedside [5] |
| Nadroparin (Fraxiparine, LMWH) | Similar to enoxaparin | Weight-based: 0.4 mL BD if < 50 kg, 0.5 mL BD if 50–59 kg, 0.6 mL BD if > 60 kg [25] | Alternative LMWH |
| Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) | Activates antithrombin → inhibits Factor IIa (thrombin) and Factor Xa equally | IV infusion, dose adjusted by aPTT | Given in the cath lab [5]; short half-life allows quick reversibility (important peri-procedurally); Protamine as the antidote, rapidly reverses effects [26] |
| Fondaparinux (ULMWH) | Selective Factor Xa inhibitor via antithrombin activation | 2.5 mg SC daily | Given at bedside [5]; lower bleeding risk than enoxaparin; preferred in conservative strategy (ESC guidelines); C/I: CrCl < 20 mL/min |
Side effects of heparin: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, osteoporosis, hyperkalaemia [2]
The antiplatelets shown to be class 2b evidence [5] — meaning moderate evidence supports their use in this setting.
AF with MI → triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, OAC) → not recommended for the long term, since bleeding risk is unacceptable → no more than 30 days [26]
Add PPI when using 2 or more antithrombotics [26]
After 1 month, step down to dual therapy (OAC + single antiplatelet, usually clopidogrel) for up to 12 months, then OAC monotherapy lifelong.
II. Anti-Ischaemic Therapy
The goal here is to restore the balance between myocardial O₂ supply and demand — either increase supply (coronary vasodilation) or decrease demand (↓HR, ↓contractility, ↓preload, ↓afterload).
Anti-Ischaemic Therapy — Nitrates: [3][25]
Mechanism: Nitrates are metabolised to nitric oxide (NO) → activates guanylyl cyclase → ↑cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation:
- Venodilatation (major effect) → ↓preload → ↓LV end-diastolic volume → ↓wall tension → ↓O₂ demand
- Coronary vasodilatation → ↑supply by dilating coronary arteries and redistributing perfusion from epicardial to endocardial sites [14]
- Modest arteriodilatation → ↓afterload
| Formulation | Indication | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sublingual TNG | For ongoing ischaemic discomfort | 1 tab/puff Q5 min for 3 doses [25] | Rapid onset (1–3 min); take sitting (standing → syncope; supine → ↑VR → ↑preload) |
| IV TNG / Isosorbide dinitrate (Isoket) | First 48h for persistent ischaemia, heart failure, or hypertension | 2–10 mg/hr IV; begin with lowest dose, step up till pain relieved; keep SBP > 100 mmHg [25] | Continuous infusion allows precise titration |
| Isosorbide dinitrate (Isordil) | Oral maintenance | 10–30 mg TDS [25] | Need nitrate-free interval (8–10h) to prevent tolerance |
| Isosorbide mononitrate (Elantan / Imdur) | Oral maintenance | 20–40 mg BD (Elantan) or 60–120 mg daily (Imdur) [25] | More reliable pharmacokinetics |
Short-acting nitrates — to relieve acute anginal pain; use prophylactically to improve exercise tolerance and prevent exercise-induced ischaemia [3]
Long-acting nitrates — as monotherapy or in combination with β-blockers or CCBs, are used to prevent or reduce the frequency of angina [3]
Side Effects: hypotension, syncope, tachycardia, headache, and facial flushing. Less common is methaemoglobinaemia [3]
Contraindications: [3]
- HOCM — nitrates ↓preload → worsens LVOT obstruction (less blood in LV → septum and mitral valve leaflet come closer together → more obstruction)
- Concomitant administration on the same day with selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-5) such as sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil — both nitrates and PDE-5 inhibitors work via the cGMP pathway → profound, potentially fatal hypotension
- SBP < 90 mmHg
Nitrate Tolerance
Long-term continuous nitrate use leads to nitrate tolerance — decreased efficacy over time. The mechanism involves depletion of sulfhydryl groups needed for NO generation, oxidative stress, and neurohormonal counter-regulation. This is why a nitrate-free or nitrate-low interval of 8–10 hours is mandatory [14]. Typically, the patch is removed overnight or the evening dose is omitted.
Anti-ischaemic Agents: β-Blockers [3]
Mechanism: Block β₁ adrenergic receptors on cardiomyocytes:
- Negative chronotropy (↓HR) → ↓O₂ demand + ↑diastolic filling time → ↑coronary perfusion
- Negative inotropy (↓contractility) → ↓O₂ demand
- Negative dromotropy (↓AV conduction) → useful in rate control
- Net effect: ↓myocardial O₂ demand → ↓ischaemia
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Indications | First-line monotherapy or in combination with CCB or nitrates to prevent or reduce the frequency of angina; for patients with systolic LV failure (EF < 40%), heart failure and prior MI; ventricular rate control in AF [3] |
| Usual regimen | Metoprolol 25 mg BD oral / atenolol; titrate to HR < 70 [2][25]; if reduced EF: bisoprolol / carvedilol / metoprolol succinate |
| Side effects | Bradycardia, syncope, hypotension, bronchial spasm, impaired glucose tolerance [3] |
| Contraindications | AV block, sinus node dysfunction; bronchial asthma; vasospasm angina, PAD, Raynaud phenomenon; depression [3] |
Additional contraindications from notes [2]:
- Poor ventricular function (acute decompensated HF)
- Acute pulmonary oedema
- Heart block (2nd / 3rd degree)
- Asthma / COPD
β-blockers — reduce HR and BP (titrate to HR < 70) [25]
Anti-ischaemic Agents: CCBs [3]
Mechanism: Block L-type calcium channels → reduce intracellular calcium in smooth muscle and cardiomyocytes:
- Non-dihydropyridines (verapamil, diltiazem): predominantly cardiac effects → ↓HR, ↓contractility, ↓AV conduction (similar to beta-blockers)
- Dihydropyridines (amlodipine, nifedipine): predominantly vascular effects → vasodilation → ↓afterload; reflex tachycardia possible (avoid short-acting nifedipine in ACS)
Three types of calcium antagonists: phenylalkylamine (verapamil-like), benzothiazepine (diltiazem-like), and dihydropyridine (nifedipine-like) [3]
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Indications | As monotherapy (β-blockers contraindicated or intolerant) or in combination with β-blockers or nitrates; vasospasm angina; ventricular rate control in AF [3] |
| Side effects | Bradycardia (non-dihydropyridine CCBs), syncope, hypotension, peripheral oedema, headache, dizziness, and constipation [3] |
| Contraindications | AV block, sinus node dysfunction and HF (non-dihydropyridine CCBs) [3] |
Non-DHP CCBs + Beta-Blockers = Danger
Combining non-dihydropyridine CCBs (verapamil/diltiazem) with beta-blockers carries a significant risk of severe bradycardia and heart block, because both agents depress the SA node and AV node. If you need to add a CCB to a beta-blocker, use a dihydropyridine (e.g. amlodipine) instead.
Secondary prevention — Anti-ischaemic Therapy: [1][10]
- Beta-blockers unless contraindicated
- ACEI for patients with CHF, LV dysfunction (EF < 40%), hypertension, or diabetes
- Calcium antagonists (diltiazem or verapamil) if contraindications to beta-blockers and no heart failure
- Nitrates (long-acting or short-acting as PRN) in the presence of angina
III. Other Acute Therapies
Hydroxymethyl glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin): Should be given regardless of baseline LDL-C level in the absence of contraindications [25]
Mechanism: Inhibit HMG-CoA reductase → rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis → ↓hepatic cholesterol → ↑LDL receptor expression → ↑LDL clearance from blood. Additionally, statins have pleiotropic effects: anti-inflammatory (↓CRP), antithrombotic, improve endothelial function, and stabilise atherosclerotic plaques.
- Aim LDL < 1.8 mmol/L and/or > 50% reduction [14]
- Start high-intensity statin early (e.g. atorvastatin 40–80 mg or rosuvastatin 20–40 mg)
- If target not reached: add ezetimibe (blocks intestinal cholesterol absorption) — most commonly used second-line therapy [27]; or PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab, alirocumab)
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI): Should be administered within the first 24 hours if LVEF < 40% and in the absence of hypotension or contraindications [25]
Angiotensin receptor blocker should be used if patient is intolerant of ACEI [25]
Mechanism: ACEI blocks conversion of angiotensin I → angiotensin II → reduces vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion, and cardiac remodelling. ARBs block AT1 receptors directly.
Indications of ACEI in IHD: [4]
- Hypertension
- Diabetes mellitus
- Left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less
- Or CKD, unless contraindicated
Side effects: cough (ACEI), syncope, hypotension, angioedema, hyperkalaemia [4]
Contraindications: high-grade bilateral renal artery stenosis, azotaemia, pregnancy [4]
Proton pump inhibitors for patients at high risk of GI bleeding [25]
Rationale: DAPT (especially aspirin) significantly increases GI bleeding risk. PPI reduces gastric acid production → protects gastric mucosa. Note that omeprazole has a drug interaction with clopidogrel (inhibits CYP2C19 activation of clopidogrel) — use pantoprazole or rabeprazole instead.
Morphine IV when symptoms are not immediately relieved by nitrate [25]
Mechanism: μ-opioid receptor agonist → analgesia, anxiolysis, venodilation (↓preload). Be cautious: can cause respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea/vomiting, and may delay absorption of oral antiplatelets.
This is where risk stratification (GRACE score, Braunwald classification) directly guides management:
Management of NSTEMI / UA: [2]
- Immediate revascularisation if haemodynamically unstable / mechanical complications
- Risk assessment to determine need of revascularisation
| Risk Category | Criteria | Strategy | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very high risk | Haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, acute HF, life-threatening arrhythmias, recurrent/refractory chest pain [25] | Immediate invasive: coronary angiogram → revascularisation | Within 2 hours |
| High risk | Established NSTEMI, dynamic ST/T changes, GRACE > 140 [25]; ST segment changes ≥ 0.1 mV, new BBB, elevated troponin > 0.1 ng/mL, TIMI ≥ 3 [2] | Early invasive: coronary angiogram → revascularisation (PCI / CABG) | Within 24 hours |
| Intermediate risk | GRACE 109–140; diabetes; CKD; LVEF < 40%; prior PCI/CABG | Invasive strategy | Within 72 hours |
| Low risk | No high-risk features; GRACE < 109; normal serial troponin; no dynamic ECG changes | Conservative / selective invasive: optimal medical therapy ± non-invasive stress testing | Elective if symptoms recur or stress test positive |
Revascularisation Options
| Modality | Indication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) | 1- or 2-vessel disease without left main involvement; culprit lesion intervention | Stent deployment (drug-eluting stent, DES, preferred over bare-metal stent); requires DAPT post-procedure |
| CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) | 3-vessel disease, left main stem disease; complex multi-vessel disease (high SYNTAX score); diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease | Surgical; provides more complete revascularisation; internal mammary artery graft to LAD has excellent long-term patency |
Mortality: 1 vessel disease < 2 vessel disease < 3 vessel disease < left main stem disease [14]
PCI vs CABG — When to Choose Which
Current ESC/ACC guidelines recommend using the SYNTAX score (based on coronary anatomy complexity) to guide the PCI vs CABG decision. Low SYNTAX score (≤ 22) → PCI is reasonable. High SYNTAX score (> 32) → CABG preferred. Intermediate SYNTAX (23–32) → Heart Team discussion. For left main stem disease and 3-vessel disease with diabetes, CABG generally has better long-term outcomes.
Thrombolysis is NOT used in NSTEMI / UA [2] — this is a critical distinction from STEMI management. In UA/NSTEMI the artery is not fully occluded; fibrinolysis does not improve outcomes and increases bleeding risk.
F. Phase 4 — Secondary Prevention
After the acute phase of ACS, the treatment modalities in secondary prevention are: [1]
- Antiplatelet therapy
- Anti-ischaemic therapy
- Risk factor control
- Lipid-lowering therapies
| Drug Class | Agent | Duration | Key Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | 75–100 mg daily | Lifelong | All patients without contraindications [1] |
| P2Y12 inhibitor | Ticagrelor 90 mg BID or Clopidogrel 75 mg daily | 12 months (minimum 3–6 months if high bleeding risk) [1] | In combination with aspirin (DAPT) |
| Beta-blocker | Metoprolol / bisoprolol / carvedilol | Long-term if prior MI or HF | Cornerstone; unless contraindicated [1] |
| ACEI | Ramipril / perindopril | Long-term | CHF, LV dysfunction (EF < 40%), hypertension, diabetes [1] |
| ARB | Valsartan / candesartan | Long-term (if ACEI intolerant) | Same indications as ACEI; if not tolerated due to cough [1] |
| Statin | Atorvastatin / rosuvastatin | Lifelong | All patients; aim LDL < 1.8 mmol/L |
| Nitrates (PRN or long-acting) | SL GTN / ISMN | As needed | In the presence of angina [1] |
| CCB (non-DHP) | Diltiazem / verapamil | If BB contraindicated | If contraindications to beta-blockers and no heart failure [1] |
For very high risk angina patients, add rivaroxaban/Factor Xa inhibitor 2.5 mg twice daily on top of low-dose aspirin (81–100 mg daily) [4] — the COMPASS trial showed benefit in stable high-risk CAD/PAD patients.
General measures: [14]
-
Lifestyle: stop smoking, regular exercise (but not beyond point of discomfort)
-
Treat precipitating factors: thyrotoxicosis, anaemia
-
Manage risk factors:
- DM: aim HbA1c < 7%, consider SGLT2i or GLP-1a — SGLT2i (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) and GLP-1 agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide) have proven cardiovascular benefits independent of glucose lowering
- HTN: aim < 140/90, use BB if indicated
- Lipids: ↓LDL to < 1.8 mmol/L with lifestyle and drug
-
Cardiac rehabilitation: structured exercise programme, psychological support, education
-
Weight management: aim BMI < 25 kg/m²; waist circumference targets
-
Diet: Mediterranean diet; reduce salt intake, saturated fats, refined sugars
-
Alcohol: moderate consumption only
-
Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination: reduce risk of infection-triggered ACS
| Drug Class | Acute Phase | Secondary Prevention | Mechanism | Major C/I |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | Loading 160–320 mg | 80–100 mg daily (lifelong) | Irreversible COX-1 inhibition → ↓TXA₂ | Active GI bleeding, aspirin allergy |
| P2Y12 inhibitor | Loading (clopidogrel 300–600 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg) | Maintenance 12 months | Blocks P2Y12 ADP receptor → ↓platelet activation | Active bleeding; prasugrel C/I in prior stroke |
| LMWH / UFH | Acute phase only | Discontinued after revascularisation or discharge | Activate antithrombin → ↓Xa / IIa | HIT; active major bleeding; severe renal impairment (dose adjust LMWH) |
| Nitrates | SL/IV for acute pain | Long-acting PRN | NO → ↓preload, coronary vasodilation | HOCM; PDE-5 inhibitors; SBP < 90 |
| Beta-blockers | Oral, titrate to HR < 70 | Long-term | ↓HR, ↓contractility → ↓O₂ demand | Asthma, AV block, acute decompensated HF, vasospastic angina |
| CCBs | If BB contraindicated | Long-term if needed | ↓Ca²⁺ entry → vasodilation ± ↓HR | HF (non-DHP); AV block (non-DHP) |
| ACEI / ARB | Within 24h if LVEF < 40% | Long-term if indicated | Block RAAS → ↓remodelling, ↓afterload | Bilateral RAS; pregnancy; hyperkalaemia |
| Statin | High-intensity, early | Lifelong | HMG-CoA reductase inhibition → ↓LDL + pleiotropic | Active liver disease; myopathy |
| PPI | If DAPT or high GI bleed risk | As needed | ↓Gastric acid → mucosal protection | Avoid omeprazole with clopidogrel |
| Morphine | Acute pain if nitrate-refractory | Not used | μ-opioid agonist → analgesia + venodilation | Respiratory depression; hypotension |
High Yield Summary — Management of Unstable Angina
- Aims: Relieve symptoms, monitor for complications, improve long-term prognosis
- Immediate: Admit CCU if high risk; bed rest; continuous ECG; serial troponin (0h/1h algorithm); correct precipitants (anaemia, hypoxia, tachyarrhythmia); O₂ only if SaO₂ < 90%
- Antithrombotic: DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor — ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel) + anticoagulant (enoxaparin at bedside, UFH in cath lab, fondaparinux for conservative strategy)
- Anti-ischaemic: Nitrates (SL/IV) → beta-blocker (titrate HR < 70) → CCB if BB contraindicated → ACEI/ARB if LVEF < 40% or DM/HTN/CKD
- Risk stratify (GRACE score, Braunwald) → very high/high risk → early invasive (angiography within 2–24h); low risk → conservative medical therapy ± non-invasive stress testing
- Fibrinolysis is NOT used in UA/NSTEMI
- Secondary prevention: DAPT × 12 months (minimum 3–6 months) → lifelong aspirin; statin (LDL < 1.8); BB; ACEI/ARB if indicated; lifestyle modification; cardiac rehabilitation
- PCI vs CABG: guided by coronary anatomy (SYNTAX score), number of vessels, LMS involvement, diabetes status
- Special situations: AF + ACS → triple therapy ≤ 30 days then dual therapy; add PPI when ≥ 2 antithrombotics
- Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, acute HF, refractory chest pain, life-threatening arrhythmias, NSTEMI, dynamic ST/T changes, GRACE > 140
Active Recall - Management of Unstable Angina
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf (p37) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p9, p11) [3] Lecture slides: GC 032. Chest pain on exertion_ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p59, p62, p63, p65) [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p32, p39) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf (p2) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p18) [10] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf (p55) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p120, p122, p138–139) [25] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf (p24–25) [26] Senior notes: Block A - Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelets and anticoagulation.pdf (p1, p6) [27] Senior notes: Block A - Three cases of lipid disorders.pdf (p3)
Complications of Unstable Angina
Unstable angina occupies a unique position in the ACS spectrum: by definition, there is ischaemia without necrosis. Therefore, the classical "complications of MI" (ventricular septal rupture, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture, Dressler syndrome, ventricular aneurysm) do not directly occur in isolated UA — those require actual myocardial necrosis. However, the major danger of unstable angina is precisely that it sits on the brink of these catastrophic events.
The complications of UA can be conceptualised in three categories:
- Progression of the underlying disease — the most feared complication is UA evolving into MI (NSTEMI or STEMI), which then carries its own cascade of complications
- Complications of the acute ischaemic episode itself — arrhythmias, haemodynamic compromise, heart failure
- Complications of treatment — bleeding from antithrombotic therapy, procedural complications from PCI/CABG
Let me walk through each systematically.
B. Complication 1 — Progression to Myocardial Infarction
This is the most important complication and the entire reason we treat UA so aggressively.
Pathophysiology: The non-occlusive thrombus in UA can propagate, organise, or be joined by further platelet aggregation and vasospasm, eventually completely occluding the coronary artery → transmural ischaemia → myocardial necrosis → MI.
Within 12 months of initial diagnosis of stable angina, 10 to 20% of patients progress to MI or unstable angina [4]. From UA itself, the short-term risk of progression to MI is significant — this is exactly why risk stratification (Braunwald, GRACE) and early treatment are so critical.
Progression from unstable angina is listed as a predisposing factor for AMI [8].
- UA → NSTEMI: The partial thrombus causes sufficient sustained ischaemia to produce subendocardial necrosis → troponin rises. This is actually what happens in a large proportion of patients initially diagnosed as UA — serial hs-troponin reveals small elevations, reclassifying them as NSTEMI.
- UA → STEMI: The thrombus becomes fully occlusive → transmural infarction → ST elevation on ECG. This is the worst-case scenario and requires immediate reperfusion (primary PCI or fibrinolysis).
The complications that follow MI are extensive and are classically taught as an SAQ topic:
Complications of MI: [2]
Early Complications (First 72 Hours)
Arrhythmias are the most common complications of MI — usually due to scar tissue after MI [2]
Why do arrhythmias occur? Ischaemic/infarcted myocardium is electrically unstable. The acidotic, hypoxic cells have altered ion channel function — infarcted muscles are acidotic → K⁺ influx + Ca²⁺ efflux [14] → this changes resting membrane potential and repolarisation, creating:
- Re-entry circuits (ischaemic tissue conducts slowly → allows re-entrant loops)
- Enhanced automaticity (ischaemic cells can spontaneously depolarise)
- Triggered activity (delayed after-depolarisations from Ca²⁺ overload)
| Type | Comments and Management |
|---|---|
| Ventricular ectopics | Most common arrhythmia post-MI [2]; usually benign; treat only if symptomatic or haemodynamically significant |
| SVT / AF / Atrial flutter | Common and frequently transient, can be a sign of impending or overt LVF [14]; rate control with digoxin, diltiazem, or amiodarone |
| Ventricular tachycardia (VT) | Treat as VT until proven otherwise in the setting of ACS [14]; if haemodynamically stable: amiodarone 150 mg IV over 10 minutes [14]; if unstable: synchronised cardioversion starting with 100 J [14] |
| Ventricular fibrillation (VF) | Prompt defibrillation with reference to ACLS algorithm [14]; occurs in ~15% of MIs; most common cause of sudden death within the first hour |
| Sinus bradycardia | Atropine 0.3–0.6 mg IV bolus; pacing if unresponsive to atropine [14]; more common with inferior MI (RCA supplies SA node in ~60%) |
| AV block | Conservative if 1st degree or Mobitz type I 2nd degree AV block; Pacing if Mobitz type II 2nd degree or complete heart block [14]; anterior MI with heart block carries worse prognosis (indicates extensive septal necrosis) |
Pump failure mechanism: downward spiral exacerbating myocardial ischaemia [14]:
- ↓Systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → ↓supply → ischaemia
- ↓Diastolic function → ↑pulmonary congestion → hypoxaemia → ischaemia
Indicates extensive myocardial damage → poor prognosis (↑likelihood of other complications) [14]
This can manifest as:
- Acute pulmonary oedema (APO) — LV failure → ↑LVEDP → ↑pulmonary capillary pressure → fluid leaks into alveoli → bilateral crackles, dyspnoea, pink frothy sputum
- Cardiogenic shock — when > 40% of LV myocardium is damaged → inadequate cardiac output → end-organ hypoperfusion → SBP < 90 mmHg, cool extremities, altered mental status, oliguria; mortality 40–70% even with revascularisation
Ventricular dysfunction: ischaemic APO [2]
Killip Classification — Grading Heart Failure Post-MI
The Killip classification grades the severity of heart failure in the setting of MI:
| Killip Class | Clinical Findings | Mortality |
|---|---|---|
| I | No signs of HF | ~6% |
| II | Mild HF: S3 gallop, crackles in lower lung fields, JVP elevation | ~17% |
| III | Acute pulmonary oedema | ~38% |
| IV | Cardiogenic shock | ~80% |
This classification is used in the GRACE risk score to prognosticate ACS patients.
These are mechanical complications of MI — they are devastating but fortunately rare in pure UA (since they require myocardial necrosis). However, if UA progresses to MI, these must be on your radar:
| Complication | Timing | Pathophysiology | Clinical Features | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) | Day 3–5 (or day 1 with fibrinolysis) | Necrotic interventricular septum ruptures → L-to-R shunt | New harsh pansystolic murmur at left sternal edge; acute haemodynamic deterioration; step-up in O₂ saturation from RA to RV on catheterisation | Emergency surgical repair or percutaneous device closure |
| Papillary muscle rupture | Day 2–7 | Necrosis of papillary muscle (usually posteromedial, supplied by single artery — PDA) → acute severe MR | New pansystolic murmur at apex radiating to axilla; acute pulmonary oedema; cardiogenic shock | Emergency MV replacement + CABG |
| LV free wall rupture | Day 3–7 | Transmural necrosis → weakened wall ruptures → haemopericardium → cardiac tamponade | Sudden haemodynamic collapse; PEA; Beck's triad (hypotension, muffled heart sounds, raised JVP) | Emergency pericardiocentesis + surgical repair (usually fatal) |
| Pericarditis (early) | Day 1–4 | Transmural infarction → inflammation extends to pericardium | Pleuritic chest pain, worse lying down, better sitting forward; pericardial friction rub | NSAIDs or aspirin (high dose); avoid anticoagulants if possible (risk of haemopericardium) |
Post-MI mechanical complications are indications for CABG: [2]
- Ventricular septal rupture (VSR)
- LV free wall rupture / aneurysm
| Complication | Timing | Pathophysiology | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ventricular aneurysm | Weeks–months | Occurs in 8–15% with STEMI, esp for those with persistent occlusion; 70–85% located at anterior or apical walls → due to LAD total occlusion without collateral [14] | Acute decompensated HF with angina (wasted mechanical energy to enlarge aneurysm); ventricular arrhythmia; systemic embolisation: mural thrombus occurs in > 50% [14] |
| Dressler syndrome | 2–10 weeks | Autoimmune pericarditis — antimyocardial antibodies formed against necrotic myocardial antigens | Fever, pleuritic chest pain, pericardial effusion, elevated ESR/CRP; responds to NSAIDs/colchicine |
| LV remodelling / chronic HF | Weeks–months | Neurohormonal activation (RAAS, sympathetic) → ventricular dilatation, fibrosis, hypertrophy → progressive systolic dysfunction | Exertional dyspnoea, fatigue, peripheral oedema; prevented/slowed by ACEI/ARB, beta-blockers, MRA |
| Mural thrombus / systemic embolisation | Days–weeks | Stagnant blood over akinetic/aneurysmal myocardium → thrombus formation | Stroke, limb ischaemia, mesenteric ischaemia; oral anticoagulation if documented mural thrombus [14] |
Ventricular aneurysm diagnosis: [14]
- Paradoxical impulse on chest wall (outward when systole)
- ECG: persistent ↑ST and Q despite reperfusion
- CXR: unusual bulge from cardiac silhouette
- Echo: diagnostic
Ventricular aneurysm management: [14]
- Oral anticoagulation if documented mural thrombus
- Aneurysmectomy + CABG if intractable VAs or heart failure refractory to medical therapy
C. Complication 2 — Complications of Ischaemia Without Necrosis (Directly from UA)
Even without progression to MI, the ischaemic episode itself can cause:
Transient ischaemia can trigger the same arrhythmogenic mechanisms (re-entry, enhanced automaticity) described above, albeit usually more transiently. Patients with UA can develop:
- Ventricular ectopic beats
- Non-sustained VT
- Supraventricular tachycardia / AF (new-onset AF during ACS is a sign of poor prognosis)
- Bradycardia (especially if inferior territory ischaemia → vagal activation via Bezold-Jarisch reflex)
This is precisely why continuous ECG monitoring is mandated for all ACS patients [25].
Ischaemic myocardium becomes "stunned" — it is viable but temporarily non-contractile. This can cause:
- Transient regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) on echocardiography
- Reduced LVEF during ischaemic episodes
- Acute pulmonary oedema if ischaemia is severe or prolonged
- These features are reversible once ischaemia resolves (unlike infarction)
Refractory angina is listed as a high-risk complication [2]. Despite maximal medical therapy (DAPT + heparin + nitrates + beta-blockers), some patients continue to have:
- Recurrent chest pain
- Dynamic ECG changes
- These patients need urgent coronary angiography and revascularisation [25]
Post-ACS ischaemia is indicated by symptoms/ECG changes + new rise in cTn > 20% or to > 5× ULN [14]
D. Complication 3 — Treatment-Related Complications
The most feared treatment complication. The combination of DAPT + anticoagulation creates a significant bleeding risk.
Main side effect of antiplatelet: GI upset (aspirin), bleeding [4]
| Bleeding Site | Mechanism | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| GI bleeding | Aspirin inhibits COX-1 → ↓prostaglandin → ↓mucosal protection; compounded by heparin | Haematemesis, melaena, drop in Hb |
| Intracranial haemorrhage | Most feared complication; risk ↑ with age, hypertension, prior stroke | Headache, altered consciousness, focal neurology |
| Access site bleeding | Femoral or radial puncture site haemorrhage post-catheterisation | Manual compression to attain haemostasis; reverse or stop anticoagulation [28] |
| Retroperitoneal bleeding | Femoral access with artery puncture; diagnosed with haemodynamic compromise (↑HR, ↓BP) [28] | Flank pain, unexplained hypotension, dropping Hb with no visible blood loss |
Prevention:
Complications of PCI: overall mortality < 0.5% [2][14]
| Category | Complication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary artery related | Coronary artery dissection and acute closure | Dissections found up to 50% after PTCA immediately due to guidewire passage or controlled injury; routine use of stenting for any dissection [28] |
| Coronary artery perforation | Requires inflation of perfusion balloon at perforation site + pericardiocentesis + emergency covered stent [28] | |
| Stent-related | Stent thrombosis (1–2%) | Acute event, presents with severe STEMI or cardiac death; due to thrombus at exposed stent surface before endothelialisation; prevention: DAPT; associated with cessation of DAPT [14][28] |
| In-stent restenosis (ISR, ~15%) | Chronic event, presents with recurrent stable angina; due to intimal proliferation (elastic recoil + neointimal hyperplasia); usually ≥ 6–9 months after stenting; prevention: drug-eluting stent (DES) [14] | |
| Stent infection | Very rare; associated with mycotic aneurysm and spontaneous coronary artery perforation [28] | |
| Systemic | Stroke | Ischaemic: dislodgement of thrombus/calcific material/atherosclerotic plaques; haemorrhagic: from antiplatelet regimens [28] |
| Contrast-induced AKI | Manifests within 48 hours, peaks at Day 3–5 [28]; risk ↑ with CKD, diabetes, dehydration | |
| Myocardial ischaemia/infarction | Peri-procedural MI following PCI [28]; side branch occlusion (60% of post-PCI MI) |
Stent Thrombosis vs In-Stent Restenosis — A Classic Exam Distinction
| Feature | Stent Thrombosis | In-Stent Restenosis |
|---|---|---|
| Pathology | Thrombus on exposed stent surface | Neointimal proliferation |
| Timing | Majority < 30 days [14]; can be acute, subacute, late | ≥ 6–9 months [14] |
| Presentation | Severe STEMI or cardiac death [14] | Recurrent stable angina [14] |
| Prevention | DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) | Drug-eluting stent (DES) |
| Risk factor | Cessation of DAPT [28] | Bare-metal stent use |
| Drug | Important Side Effects | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | GI upset, GI bleeding, Reye syndrome (in children) | COX-1 inhibition → ↓mucosal prostaglandins → ↓gastroprotection |
| Clopidogrel | Bleeding, TTP (very rare) | Irreversible platelet inhibition; CYP2C19 polymorphism affects efficacy |
| Ticagrelor | Dyspnoea, bradycardia, bleeding | Adenosine reuptake inhibition (dyspnoea); direct P2Y12 inhibition |
| Heparin | Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), osteoporosis, hyperkalaemia [2] | HIT: antibodies against PF4-heparin complex → paradoxical thrombosis |
| Beta-blockers | Bradycardia, syncope, hypotension, bronchial spasm, impaired glucose tolerance [3] | β₁ blockade (cardiac) + some β₂ blockade (bronchial) |
| Nitrates | Hypotension, syncope, tachycardia, headache, facial flushing, methaemoglobinaemia [3] | Venodilation → ↓preload → ↓BP; NO → headache/flushing; chronic NO → oxidises Hb |
| ACEI | Cough, syncope, hypotension, angioedema, hyperkalaemia [4] | Bradykinin accumulation (cough, angioedema); ↓aldosterone → K⁺ retention |
| Statins | Myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, hepatotoxicity | Impaired muscle cell energy metabolism (↓coenzyme Q10) |
Even if a patient with UA does not progress to MI, the underlying atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is a chronic condition with long-term complications:
- Chronic stable angina — if risk factors are not controlled, the underlying plaque continues to grow → fixed stenosis → exertional angina
- Recurrent ACS — another plaque event at the same or different coronary artery
- Ischaemic cardiomyopathy — repeated episodes of ischaemia → myocardial hibernation → progressive LV dysfunction → chronic heart failure
- Sudden cardiac death — from lethal ventricular arrhythmias in the context of ischaemic myocardium or from a new MI
- Peripheral and cerebrovascular disease — atherosclerosis is a systemic disease; patients with coronary disease frequently have concurrent carotid stenosis, PAD, renal artery disease
For those treated, the risk of progression drops to 0.8% → very good [4] — highlighting the dramatic benefit of optimal medical therapy and secondary prevention.
| Category | Complications | Key Point |
|---|---|---|
| Progression to MI | UA → NSTEMI → STEMI | Most important complication; the reason for aggressive treatment |
| Arrhythmias | VE, VT/VF, AF, bradycardia, heart block | Most common complication of MI; ischaemic myocardium is electrically unstable |
| Pump failure | APO, cardiogenic shock | Downward spiral: ↓function → ↓perfusion → more ischaemia |
| Mechanical | VSR, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture, ventricular aneurysm | Only with MI (necrosis required); surgical emergencies |
| Pericarditis | Early (transmural inflammation) and late (Dressler syndrome) | Pleuritic pain; distinguish from recurrent ischaemia |
| Thromboembolism | Mural thrombus → stroke, limb/mesenteric ischaemia | Anticoagulate if mural thrombus documented |
| LV remodelling / chronic HF | Dilatation, fibrosis, progressive dysfunction | Prevented by ACEI/ARB + beta-blocker + MRA |
| Treatment-related | Bleeding (GI, ICH, access site, retroperitoneal), PCI complications (stent thrombosis, ISR, dissection, perforation, contrast AKI), drug side effects | Monitor, prevent with PPI, radial access, DES, DAPT compliance |
High Yield Summary — Complications of Unstable Angina
- The single most important complication of UA is progression to MI (NSTEMI or STEMI) — this is the entire rationale for aggressive antithrombotic therapy and early risk stratification.
- Arrhythmias are the most common complication of MI — ischaemic myocardium is electrically unstable due to altered ion channel function (K⁺ influx, Ca²⁺ efflux in acidotic cells).
- Pump failure creates a vicious spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia; ↓diastolic function → pulmonary congestion → hypoxaemia.
- Mechanical complications (VSR, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) require myocardial necrosis — they do not occur in pure UA but are devastating if UA progresses to MI.
- Ventricular aneurysm: 8–15% of STEMI; 70–85% at anterior/apical walls; complications include HF, VT, and systemic embolisation from mural thrombus.
- Stent thrombosis (acute, presents as STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs in-stent restenosis (chronic, presents as stable angina, prevented by DES) — classic exam distinction.
- Bleeding is the most important treatment complication; mitigated by PPI, radial access, careful risk-benefit of DAPT duration.
- Retroperitoneal bleeding: femoral access complication diagnosed by haemodynamic compromise (↑HR, ↓BP) with no visible blood loss.
- Secondary prevention dramatically reduces the long-term risk: untreated stable angina has 10–20% annual progression to MI; treated, this drops to 0.8%.
Active Recall - Complications of Unstable Angina
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf (p9) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p11–13) [3] Lecture slides: GC 032. Chest pain on exertion_ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p62, p63, p65) [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf (p7, p39) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf (p18) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p124, p127, p139, p142, p144) [25] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf (p24) [26] Senior notes: Block A - Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelets and anticoagulation.pdf (p6) [28] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p412)
High Yield Summary
- Unstable angina = ACS with ischaemic symptoms (new-onset severe, rest angina > 20 min, or crescendo pattern) but normal troponin and no ST elevation
- Pathophysiology: Vulnerable plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus ± vasospasm → transient myocardial ischaemia without necrosis
- Risk factors = standard atherosclerotic risk factors (HTN, DM, HLD, smoking, age, FHx, CKD, obesity, sedentary)
- 4 E's trigger angina: Exercise, Emotion, Environment, Eating
- Braunwald Classification risk-stratifies UA using History, Character of Pain, Clinical Findings, ECG, Cardiac Markers — high risk includes accelerating symptoms in 48h, ongoing rest pain > 20 min, haemodynamic instability, transient ST changes, elevated troponin
- Key distinguishing feature from NSTEMI: troponin is normal. With hs-troponin assays, many former "UA" cases are reclassified as NSTEMI
- CCS grading classifies angina functional severity (0–IV)
- Physical exam is often unremarkable — look for haemodynamic compromise (high risk), cardiovascular risk factors, and exclude other diagnoses
- Signs of high risk: pulmonary oedema, hypotension, new S3, new MR murmur, brady/tachycardia
- Within 12 months of initial diagnosis of stable angina, 10–20% progress to MI or unstable angina
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
- Life-threatening differentials to rule out FIRST: STEMI/NSTEMI, aortic dissection, PE, tension pneumothorax, pericarditis with tamponade
- Common benign mimics: GERD/oesophageal spasm (can be relieved by nitrates — trap!), musculoskeletal pain (reproducible on palpation), panic attack
- Other cardiac mimics: Prinzmetal variant angina (ST elevation at rest, vasospasm), HOCM, aortic stenosis, congenital coronary anomalies
- Differentiating within ACS: ECG (ST elevation → STEMI) + serial troponin (positive → NSTEMI, negative → UA)
- NSTE-ACS has 5 causes of symptom progression: non-occlusive thrombus, dynamic obstruction, progressive mechanical obstruction, increased demand (Type 2 MI), infection/inflammation
- Use SOCRATES to systematically characterise the pain and differentiate causes
- Aortic dissection is the most dangerous mimic — tearing pain to back, sudden onset, giving anticoagulants is contraindicated
- Approach to ACS: A (Abnormal ECG), C (Clinical), S (Stable patient)
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Unstable Angina
- UA = clinical ACS + no ST elevation + normal serial troponin. It is diagnosed by excluding STEMI and NSTEMI.
- ECG within 10 minutes is the critical first step. Look for ST depression, T-wave inversion, or a normal ECG. Dynamic/transient changes are high-risk.
- Serial troponin (not a single measurement!) is mandatory — repeat at 1–3h (hs-cTn) or 6–12h. Normal serial troponin = UA; any elevation = NSTEMI.
- Braunwald Classification (History, Pain character, Clinical findings, ECG, Cardiac markers) and GRACE score (9 factors) are used for risk stratification.
- Basic bloods: CBC, L/RFT, lipids, glucose/HbA1c, TFT, aPTT/INR, BNP, hs-CRP.
- CXR excludes other causes and detects pulmonary oedema.
- Echo for LVEF (strongest predictor of long-term survival), RWMA, and valvular disease.
- Stress testing after stabilisation in low/intermediate-risk patients; choose modality based on ability to exercise and baseline ECG interpretability.
- Invasive coronary angiography for high-risk features, failed medical therapy, or inconclusive non-invasive tests.
- GRACE score > 140 = high risk → early invasive strategy. GRACE < 109 = low risk → conservative medical management.
High Yield Summary — Management of Unstable Angina
- Aims: Relieve symptoms, monitor for complications, improve long-term prognosis
- Immediate: Admit CCU if high risk; bed rest; continuous ECG; serial troponin (0h/1h algorithm); correct precipitants (anaemia, hypoxia, tachyarrhythmia); O₂ only if SaO₂ < 90%
- Antithrombotic: DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor — ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel) + anticoagulant (enoxaparin at bedside, UFH in cath lab, fondaparinux for conservative strategy)
- Anti-ischaemic: Nitrates (SL/IV) → beta-blocker (titrate HR < 70) → CCB if BB contraindicated → ACEI/ARB if LVEF < 40% or DM/HTN/CKD
- Risk stratify (GRACE score, Braunwald) → very high/high risk → early invasive (angiography within 2–24h); low risk → conservative medical therapy ± non-invasive stress testing
- Fibrinolysis is NOT used in UA/NSTEMI
- Secondary prevention: DAPT × 12 months (minimum 3–6 months) → lifelong aspirin; statin (LDL < 1.8); BB; ACEI/ARB if indicated; lifestyle modification; cardiac rehabilitation
- PCI vs CABG: guided by coronary anatomy (SYNTAX score), number of vessels, LMS involvement, diabetes status
- Special situations: AF + ACS → triple therapy ≤ 30 days then dual therapy; add PPI when ≥ 2 antithrombotics
- Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, acute HF, refractory chest pain, life-threatening arrhythmias, NSTEMI, dynamic ST/T changes, GRACE > 140
High Yield Summary — Complications of Unstable Angina
- The single most important complication of UA is progression to MI (NSTEMI or STEMI) — this is the entire rationale for aggressive antithrombotic therapy and early risk stratification.
- Arrhythmias are the most common complication of MI — ischaemic myocardium is electrically unstable due to altered ion channel function (K⁺ influx, Ca²⁺ efflux in acidotic cells).
- Pump failure creates a vicious spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia; ↓diastolic function → pulmonary congestion → hypoxaemia.
- Mechanical complications (VSR, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) require myocardial necrosis — they do not occur in pure UA but are devastating if UA progresses to MI.
- Ventricular aneurysm: 8–15% of STEMI; 70–85% at anterior/apical walls; complications include HF, VT, and systemic embolisation from mural thrombus.
- Stent thrombosis (acute, presents as STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs in-stent restenosis (chronic, presents as stable angina, prevented by DES) — classic exam distinction.
- Bleeding is the most important treatment complication; mitigated by PPI, radial access, careful risk-benefit of DAPT duration.
- Retroperitoneal bleeding: femoral access complication diagnosed by haemodynamic compromise (↑HR, ↓BP) with no visible blood loss.
- Secondary prevention dramatically reduces the long-term risk: untreated stable angina has 10–20% annual progression to MI; treated, this drops to 0.8%.
Chronic Coronary Syndrome (Previously Stable Angina)
Chronic coronary syndrome is a long-term clinical condition characterized by stable atherosclerotic plaque burden in the coronary arteries causing episodic or persistent myocardial ischemia, typically manifesting as exertional angina or ischemic equivalents.
NSTEMI
Definition and clinical overview of Nstemi.