NSTEMI
Definition and clinical overview of Nstemi.
| Exam domain | One-glance essentials |
|---|---|
| Definition / diagnosis |
|
| Epidemiology / risks |
|
| Core mechanism |
|
| Clinical picture |
|
| Investigations |
|
| Management |
|
| Complications |
|
| Prevention / follow-up |
|
| Exam traps |
|
References
[1] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [3] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf
NSTEMI (Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)
NSTEMI stands for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Let's break that name down:
- Non-ST-Elevation: The ECG does not show persistent ST-segment elevation (which would indicate transmural, full-thickness ischaemia). Instead, there may be ST depression, T-wave inversion, or even a normal ECG.
- Myocardial: "myo" (muscle) + "cardial" (heart) → heart muscle.
- Infarction: "infarctus" (Latin: to stuff/block) → tissue death due to interrupted blood supply.
So NSTEMI = death of heart muscle cells confirmed by elevated cardiac biomarkers (troponin), but without the ECG pattern of persistent ST-elevation.
Key Definitional Distinction (High Yield)
NSTEMI is distinguished from unstable angina (UA) by the presence of elevated cardiac troponin. Both UA and NSTEMI sit under the umbrella of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The distinction from STEMI is that incomplete blockage will result in NSTEMI → antithrombotic therapy, while complete blockage will result in STEMI → thrombolysis / primary PCI [1][2].
The ACS Spectrum
All three entities — UA, NSTEMI, and STEMI — are part of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) [1][3]:
| Feature | Unstable Angina (UA) | NSTEMI | STEMI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Troponin | Normal | Elevated | Elevated |
| ECG | ST depression / T-wave inversion / normal | ST depression / T-wave inversion / normal | Persistent ST elevation or new LBBB |
| Coronary occlusion | Partial / transient | Partial (incomplete) | Complete |
| Myocardial necrosis | No | Yes (subendocardial) | Yes (typically transmural) |
The Fourth Universal Definition of MI (2018, reaffirmed 2025) classifies MI into 5 types — NSTEMI most commonly falls under Type 1 (spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque event) or Type 2 (MI secondary to supply–demand mismatch without acute plaque rupture).
2. Epidemiology
- With medical treatment nowadays, mortality is reducing. However, STEMI is still the diagnosed subtype of ACS causing the most mortality [1].
- Undetermined cases (missed diagnoses) are actually the even bigger killers [1].
- NSTEMI now accounts for roughly 60–70% of all MI presentations globally (and the proportion is rising, as STEMI incidence falls due to better primary prevention and statin use).
- In Hong Kong, coronary heart disease is the 3rd leading cause of death (after cancer and pneumonia). The Hospital Authority reports ~6,000–7,000 ACS admissions per year, with NSTEMI comprising the majority.
- Males more common than females for IHD overall [4]. However, women with NSTEMI tend to present later, with more atypical symptoms, and have worse outcomes adjusted for age.
- Incidence of NSTEMI is increasing (ageing population, better troponin assays detecting smaller MIs, increased awareness).
- In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI is lower than STEMI (~3–5% vs ~6–8%), but 6-month and long-term mortality is equivalent or even higher for NSTEMI, because NSTEMI patients tend to be older with more comorbidities (DM, CKD, prior MI).
High Yield Exam Point
For stable angina without treatment, 10–20% progress to MI or unstable angina. For those who are treated, this risk drops to 0.8% [4]. This underscores the importance of secondary prevention.
3. Risk Factors
Risk factors for NSTEMI are essentially the risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease:
| Risk Factor | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Age | Males ≥ 45 y, Females ≥ 55 y (post-menopausal loss of oestrogen's vasoprotective effect) |
| Male sex | Oestrogen has anti-atherogenic properties (↑HDL, ↓LDL oxidation, endothelial NO production) |
| Family history of premature CAD | Early death in a 1st-degree relative: Male < 55 y, Female < 65 y [3] |
| Genetics | Polygenic risk scores; specific loci (9p21.3 locus) |
| Risk Factor | Mechanism of Atherogenesis |
|---|---|
| Hypertension | Endothelial shear stress → endothelial dysfunction → ↑LDL infiltration, ↑inflammation |
| Dyslipidaemia (↑LDL, ↓HDL, ↑TG) | LDL penetrates intima → oxidised LDL → macrophage foam cells → fatty streak → plaque |
| Diabetes mellitus | Hyperglycaemia → advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) → endothelial dysfunction + accelerated atherosclerosis; also associated with ↑platelet reactivity and prothrombotic state |
| Smoking | Direct endothelial toxicity, ↑oxidative stress, ↑fibrinogen, ↓HDL, ↑platelet aggregation |
| Obesity (esp. central) | Insulin resistance → metabolic syndrome → atherogenic dyslipidaemia, inflammation |
| Physical inactivity | ↓AMPK activation → ↓glucose uptake, ↓FFA metabolism; contributes to obesity and insulin resistance [5] |
| Chronic kidney disease | Uraemic toxins, endothelial dysfunction, accelerated calcification — note: CKD is a risk factor for arterial thrombosis [6] |
Arterial vs Venous Thrombosis Risk Factors (Exam Favourite)
Hypercholesterolaemia, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic renal impairment, Male gender → increase risk of arterial thrombosis only (not venous) [6].
Antiphospholipid syndrome (lupus anticoagulant) → classical example of a condition that increases risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis [6].
Inherited thrombophilias (Protein C/S deficiency, Factor V Leiden, Antithrombin deficiency) → risk for VTE only, not arterial thrombosis. Hence if you have a patient with recurrent stroke or MI, no point checking for inherited causes [6].
Hong Kong has some specific epidemiological considerations:
- High prevalence of Type 2 DM (~10% of the adult population) [5]
- Rising rates of obesity and metabolic syndrome
- Historically lower smoking rates in women, but increasing in younger demographics
- Relatively lower rates of familial hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis compared to Western populations (likely underdiagnosis rather than true lower prevalence)
4. Anatomy and Function — Coronary Arteries
Understanding NSTEMI requires knowing which arteries supply which territories, because the ECG changes and clinical consequences depend on the affected territory.
| Artery | Territory Supplied | ECG Leads | Clinical Consequence of Occlusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | Anterior wall, anterior septum, apex | V1–V4 (± V5–V6) | Anterior MI; large territory → high risk of LV dysfunction, cardiogenic shock |
| LCx | Lateral wall, posterior wall (if left-dominant) | I, aVL, V5–V6 | Lateral MI; may be "electrically silent" |
| RCA | Inferior wall, RV, SA node (60%), AV node (80%) | II, III, aVF | Inferior MI; RV infarction; bradycardia/AV block |
| Left Main | Essentially entire LV | Widespread ST changes | Haemodynamic catastrophe |
LAD = the "widow maker" because LAD territory represents the largest area of myocardium at risk.
This is critical to understanding NSTEMI. The subendocardium is the innermost layer of the myocardium, and it is the most vulnerable to ischaemia for three reasons:
- Highest wall stress: During systole, intramyocardial pressure is greatest at the subendocardium (it's compressed against the blood in the LV cavity). This compresses the intramural vessels.
- Last to receive blood: Coronary arteries penetrate from epicardium → endocardium. The subendocardium is at the distal end of the perfusion gradient.
- Highest oxygen demand: The subendocardium contracts most vigorously.
Therefore, partial occlusion of a coronary artery → the subendocardium is the first zone to become ischaemic and then necrotic → subendocardial infarction → NSTEMI. This is why NSTEMI does not produce ST elevation (ST elevation requires transmural, full-thickness ischaemia reaching the epicardium).
5. Aetiology and Pathophysiology
5.1 Aetiological Classification
NSTEMI results from myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatch leading to myocyte necrosis. The causes can be categorised [2][3][7]:
Plaque rupture causes thrombosis within coronary vessel → blockage of blood supply to the heart [2]. Stable plaque causes pain upon exertion, whilst rupture may cause complete occlusion of the vessel suddenly, leading to myocardial infarction [2].
Pathophysiology of atherosclerotic NSTEMI — step by step:
- Accumulation of LDL in arterial intima → induces innate inflammatory reaction [7]
- Recruits macrophages which engulf LDL and become foam cells [7]
- Formation of fibroatheroma with accumulation of macrophage foam cells along with cellular necrosis → further inflammation and distortion of intima [7]
- The fibrous cap overlying the lipid-rich necrotic core may be thin ("vulnerable plaque") or thick ("stable plaque")
- Plaque rupture or erosion → exposure of subendothelial collagen and tissue factor to flowing blood
- Platelet adhesion (via GPIb–vWF and GPIa/IIa–collagen) → platelet activation (release of TXA₂, ADP) → platelet aggregation (via GPIIb/IIIa–fibrinogen bridges)
- Simultaneous activation of the coagulation cascade → thrombin generation → fibrin mesh
- Non-occlusive (partial) thrombus or transient occlusion with spontaneous lysis → subendocardial ischaemia → NSTEMI
If the thrombus is completely occlusive and persistent → transmural ischaemia → STEMI.
Unstable plaque has a thinner fibrous cap + growing core, causing plaque rupture → thrombus formation → occlusion [7].
These produce NSTEMI through mechanisms other than classical plaque rupture [3][7]:
| Mechanism | Examples | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary spasm | Prinzmetal's variant angina, Cocaine-induced | Intense focal vasospasm → transient complete or near-complete occlusion; cocaine blocks noradrenaline reuptake → excessive α-adrenergic vasoconstriction |
| Coronary dissection | Aortic dissection (Type A) with retrograde extension, Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), Connective tissue disease (Marfan's, Ehlers-Danlos) | Intimal tear → false lumen compresses true lumen → ↓flow |
| Coronary embolism | AF, Atrial myxoma | Embolus lodges in coronary artery → acute occlusion |
| Coronary arteritis/Vasculitis | Takayasu arteritis (large-vessel), Polyarteritis nodosa (medium-vessel), Kawasaki disease (medium-vessel), EGPA (small-vessel) | Inflammatory narrowing ± thrombosis of coronary vessels |
| Coronary artery anomalies | Anomalous origin, myocardial bridging | Abnormal anatomy → intermittent compression or kinking |
Ischaemia without plaque rupture (imbalance between blood supply and demand) [7]:
| ↓ Supply | ↑ Demand |
|---|---|
| Anaemia (↓O₂ carrying capacity) | Thyrotoxicosis (↑metabolic rate, ↑HR) |
| Hypotension / shock | Hypertension (↑afterload → ↑wall stress → ↑O₂ demand) |
| Hypoxaemia (e.g. severe pneumonia, PE) | Tachyarrhythmias (↓diastolic filling time → ↓coronary perfusion AND ↑demand) |
| Coronary spasm | Aortic stenosis (↑LV pressure → subendocardial compression) |
| Condition | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Takotsubo (Stress) cardiomyopathy | Catecholamine surge → direct myocyte toxicity + microvascular spasm |
| Myocarditis | Viral/autoimmune inflammation → myocyte necrosis → troponin rise |
Type 1 vs Type 2 MI (Exam Favourite)
Type 1 MI = Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion with thrombus → acute coronary event. This is the "classic" MI.
Type 2 MI = Myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatch without acute plaque disruption (e.g., severe sepsis with tachycardia in a patient with stable CAD → subendocardial ischaemia → troponin rise).
The distinction matters because Type 1 MI needs antithrombotic therapy ± revascularisation, while Type 2 MI needs treatment of the underlying trigger (e.g., treat the sepsis, correct the anaemia).
5.2 Pathophysiology — The Full Picture
- ST elevation occurs when there is transmural ischaemia — the entire thickness of the myocardial wall is ischaemic, creating a "current of injury" that shifts the ST segment upward.
- In NSTEMI, the thrombus is non-occlusive → some blood still gets through → only the subendocardium (the most vulnerable layer) undergoes ischaemia/necrosis.
- Subendocardial ischaemia produces ST depression (because the injury current vector points away from the recording electrode) or T-wave inversion (repolarisation abnormality from ischaemic but not yet dead tissue).
- Troponin I and Troponin T are structural proteins of the cardiac sarcomere (part of the thin filament regulatory complex that controls actin-myosin interaction).
- When myocytes die, their cell membranes lose integrity → troponin leaks into the bloodstream.
- High-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) assays can detect very small amounts of necrosis, which is why the 0h/1h or 0h/3h algorithm is now standard for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
- A troponin rise above the 99th percentile of a normal reference population with a rise and/or fall pattern is diagnostic of MI.
Critical Concept: Troponin Rise vs Myocardial Injury vs MI
Not every troponin elevation = MI!
- Myocardial injury = any troponin elevation above the 99th percentile (can be from heart failure, PE, sepsis, myocarditis, renal failure, etc.)
- Myocardial infarction = troponin elevation with a rise and/or fall pattern + clinical evidence of ischaemia (symptoms, ECG changes, imaging evidence, or angiographic evidence of thrombus)
Students commonly mistake an isolated troponin rise in a septic patient for MI. Always check for clinical ischaemic context!
6. Classification
| Type | Mechanism | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | Spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, ulceration, erosion, or dissection → intraluminal thrombus | Classic NSTEMI from plaque event |
| Type 2 | MI secondary to ischaemic imbalance (supply ↓ or demand ↑) without acute plaque event | Severe anaemia + stable CAD → troponin rise |
| Type 3 | MI resulting in death before biomarkers obtained or before biomarker levels rise | Sudden cardiac death with symptoms of ischaemia |
| Type 4a | MI related to PCI (within 48h) | Troponin rise > 5× 99th percentile after PCI |
| Type 4b | MI related to stent thrombosis | Confirmed on angiography or autopsy |
| Type 5 | MI related to CABG | Troponin rise > 10× 99th percentile after CABG |
Risk scores (GRACE, TIMI) classify NSTEMI patients into low, intermediate, and high risk to guide the urgency of invasive strategy (discussed in the management section later).
7. Clinical Features
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Chest pain / discomfort — typically retrosternal, squeezing/pressure/tightness/heaviness; may be described as "band-like" or "elephant sitting on chest" | Myocardial ischaemia → accumulation of adenosine, bradykinin, lactate → stimulation of cardiac afferent C-fibres (unmyelinated) → referred pain via T1–T5 sympathetic afferents. The pain is visceral, hence poorly localised and "ill-defined." |
| Pain lasting > 20 minutes and not fully relieved by rest or GTN | Distinguishes ACS from stable angina (which resolves within minutes of rest/GTN). Persistent ischaemia → ongoing myocyte death → sustained pain. |
| Radiation to left arm, jaw, neck, back, or epigastrium | Convergence of cardiac afferent nerve fibres with somatic afferents from dermatomes C8–T5 in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord → brain misinterprets visceral signal as coming from somatic territory (referred pain). Left arm (T1–T2) and jaw (trigeminal–cervical convergence) are classic. |
| Dyspnoea | LV dysfunction from ischaemic myocardium → ↑LV end-diastolic pressure → pulmonary venous congestion → stimulation of juxtacapillary (J) receptors → sensation of breathlessness. May be the primary or sole symptom ("anginal equivalent"). |
| Diaphoresis (sweating) | Sympathetic nervous system activation in response to pain + haemodynamic compromise → activation of sudomotor (sweat gland) fibres |
| Nausea and vomiting | (a) Vagal activation from inferior wall ischaemia (RCA territory → afferents to dorsal motor nucleus of vagus), (b) Pain-mediated nausea via area postrema |
| Dizziness and pre-syncope/syncope | ↓Cardiac output from acute LV dysfunction, or arrhythmias (VT/VF, complete heart block) → cerebral hypoperfusion |
| Fatigue and weakness | ↓Cardiac output → inadequate systemic perfusion |
| Palpitations | Arrhythmias triggered by ischaemia (ischaemic myocardium is electrically unstable → re-entry circuits, automaticity) |
6 non-chest pain symptoms of IHD: Dyspnoea, Non-chest locations of discomfort, Mid-epigastric/abdominal pain, Diaphoresis, Excessive fatigue and weakness, Dizziness and syncope [4].
Atypical Presentations — Do Not Miss!
Causes of painless MI: DM, Complete infarct (> 6h) [7].
Other groups with atypical presentations:
- Elderly: may present with dyspnoea, confusion, or syncope rather than chest pain
- Women: more likely to have nausea, back pain, jaw pain, fatigue as predominant symptoms
- Diabetic patients: autonomic neuropathy → impaired cardiac pain perception → "silent MI"
- Post-operative patients: pain may be masked by anaesthesia/analgesia
In exams, if a diabetic elderly woman presents with acute dyspnoea and sweating but no chest pain — think ACS until proven otherwise!
Symptom Pattern in NSTEMI vs Unstable Angina vs STEMI
Unstable angina is defined as any one of: [7]
- Resting angina > 20 min
- New-onset angina that markedly limits normal activity
- Increasing angina that is more frequent, lasts longer, or occurs with less exertion than previous angina
The quality of symptoms is identical for UA and NSTEMI — you cannot distinguish them clinically. The distinction requires troponin.
STEMI tends to have more severe, longer-lasting pain (> 30 min), more likely to have haemodynamic compromise, but there is significant overlap.
7.2 Signs
Physical examination in NSTEMI may be entirely normal in a haemodynamically stable patient. However, signs may be present and are important to look for:
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Tachycardia | Sympathetic activation from pain and ↓stroke volume (compensatory ↑HR to maintain cardiac output) |
| Hypertension (may be present initially) | Sympathetic-mediated vasoconstriction and ↑HR in response to pain and stress |
| Hypotension (ominous sign) | Significant LV dysfunction → ↓cardiac output → ↓BP; or RV infarction → ↓preload to LV |
| Bradycardia (especially inferior NSTEMI) | Vagal activation (Bezold-Jarisch reflex): stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the ischaemic inferoposterior LV → afferent vagal fibres → ↑parasympathetic tone → ↓HR |
| S3 gallop | Rapid ventricular filling into a dilated, poorly compliant LV → sudden deceleration of blood flow produces an audible low-frequency sound in early diastole. Indicates significant LV systolic dysfunction. |
| S4 gallop | Atrial contraction against a stiff, non-compliant LV (from ischaemic diastolic dysfunction) → audible in late diastole. |
| New systolic murmur (apical pansystolic) | Papillary muscle dysfunction or rupture → acute mitral regurgitation. The posteromedial papillary muscle (supplied solely by PDA) is more vulnerable than the anterolateral (dual supply from LAD + LCx). |
| Lung crepitations (crackles) | LV failure → ↑pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure → transudation of fluid into alveoli (pulmonary oedema) |
| Elevated JVP | RV infarction (especially with inferior NSTEMI) or acute LV failure → backward failure into RV → ↑CVP |
| Cool, clammy peripheries | Sympathetic vasoconstriction to redistribute blood centrally due to ↓cardiac output |
| Diaphoresis (visible sweating) | As above — sympathetic activation |
| Sign | Significance |
|---|---|
| Xanthelasma / tendon xanthomas | Suggest underlying dyslipidaemia (especially familial hypercholesterolaemia) [8] |
| Arcus senilis (if < 50 y) | Possible familial hypercholesterolaemia |
| Absent / weak peripheral pulses | Concurrent peripheral arterial disease (PAD) → indicates diffuse atherosclerosis |
| Absent R. dorsalis pedis pulse, weak L. dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses | Peripheral vascular disease indicating widespread atherosclerosis [9] |
| Carotid bruit | Carotid atherosclerosis (e.g., soft L. carotid bruit [9]) |
| Aortic ejection systolic murmur | Aortic sclerosis/stenosis from atherosclerosis or calcification [9] |
| Fundoscopic changes (hypertensive/diabetic retinopathy) | End-organ damage from HTN or DM |
| Nicotine staining of fingers | Smoking — major risk factor |
High Yield: What to Look For on Examination
Physical examination in NSTEMI should include:
- Haemodynamic status: BP (both arms for aortic dissection), HR, SpO₂, perfusion
- Cardiac auscultation: new murmurs (MR from papillary muscle dysfunction), S3/S4
- Lungs: crackles (pulmonary oedema)
- JVP: elevated (RV involvement or LV failure)
- Peripheral pulses and bruits: concurrent PAD, aortic dissection (pulse deficit)
- Risk factor stigmata: xanthomas, nicotine staining, diabetic foot
Risk factor assessment + exclude other diagnoses [3].
| Killip Class | Clinical Finding | In-Hospital Mortality |
|---|---|---|
| I | No heart failure | ~6% |
| II | Mild HF: S3 gallop, lung crackles < 50% of lung fields, elevated JVP | ~17% |
| III | Acute pulmonary oedema | ~38% |
| IV | Cardiogenic shock: SBP < 90 mmHg, signs of peripheral hypoperfusion | ~80% |
This classification is quick, bedside, and prognostically powerful. It is used in both STEMI and NSTEMI.
8. Pathophysiology of ECG Changes in NSTEMI
Understanding why certain ECG patterns occur is essential:
- Subendocardial ischaemia creates an injury current vector pointing from epicardium → endocardium (i.e., away from the surface electrode).
- This causes the ST segment to be depressed in the leads overlying the ischaemic territory.
- ST depression is the ECG hallmark of NSTEMI, along with T-wave inversion [3][7].
- Represents repolarisation abnormality.
- Ischaemic but still viable (not yet fully necrotic) myocardium has delayed repolarisation → the epicardium repolarises before the ischaemic subendocardium → inversion of the normal repolarisation vector → T-wave inversion.
- Deep, symmetrical T-wave inversion in the anterior leads (V1–V4) = Wellens' syndrome → critical proximal LAD stenosis. This is a surgical/interventional emergency despite minimal troponin rise — the patient is between events.
- Up to 30–50% of NSTEMI patients may have a normal or non-diagnostic initial ECG.
- This does not exclude the diagnosis — serial ECGs and troponins are essential.
Repeated ECG is important to assess serial changes [3]. 12-lead ECG stat and repeat at least daily ×3 days (more frequently in severe cases) [8].
| Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Why subendocardial necrosis in NSTEMI? | Partial occlusion → subendocardium dies first (highest wall stress, furthest from epicardial arteries, highest O₂ demand) |
| Why no ST elevation? | Only subendocardium involved → injury current points away from electrode → ST depression (not elevation) |
| Why troponin rises? | Myocyte necrosis → loss of cell membrane integrity → troponin leaks into blood |
| Why pain? | Ischaemia → adenosine, lactate, bradykinin → stimulate cardiac C-fibres → referred pain via T1–T5 |
| Why diaphoresis? | Sympathetic activation from pain and haemodynamic compromise → sudomotor fibre activation |
| UA vs NSTEMI? | Same mechanism, same symptoms — but NSTEMI has enough myocyte death to produce detectable troponin rise |
High Yield Summary
- NSTEMI = myocardial necrosis (↑troponin) WITHOUT persistent ST elevation on ECG.
- NSTEMI sits within the ACS spectrum alongside UA (no troponin rise) and STEMI (ST elevation + troponin rise).
- Commonest cause: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus → subendocardial ischaemia.
- Incomplete coronary occlusion → NSTEMI; Complete occlusion → STEMI [2].
- Risk factors: HTN, DM, dyslipidaemia, smoking, obesity, FHx, male sex, age, CKD.
- Symptoms: Chest pain (> 20 min, not relieved by rest/GTN), dyspnoea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope. Atypical in DM, elderly, women.
- Signs: May be normal. Look for haemodynamic compromise (↓BP, ↑HR, S3, crackles), new murmur (papillary muscle dysfunction → MR), JVP elevation.
- ECG: ST depression, T-wave inversion, or normal. Never persistent ST elevation.
- Troponin: Rise and/or fall pattern + clinical ischaemia = MI. Isolated troponin rise ≠ MI.
- Type 1 MI (plaque event) vs Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) — different management.
Active Recall - NSTEMI Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Aetiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Features
[1] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (Section: Type 2 DM) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Coronary artery disease section) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Approach to Acute Chest Pain) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (Case 2)
Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI
The challenge with NSTEMI is that it presents with chest pain (or an anginal equivalent) + troponin elevation + non-ST-elevation ECG changes — but none of these features is unique to NSTEMI. The differential diagnosis therefore works on two levels:
- Differentials of the chest pain itself (what else could cause this presentation?)
- Differentials of troponin elevation (what else raises troponin besides Type 1 MI?)
A systematic, anatomically-based approach is the safest way to avoid missing a life-threatening mimic.
Risk factor assessment, exclude other diagnoses [3]. Target Hx and PE to rule out other life-threatening emergencies: aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, perforated peptic ulcer / oesophagus [10].
Have to remember that not all chest pain is AMI, could originate from beyond the heart [2].
The approach is best thought of anatomically, working outward from the heart:
2. Life-Threatening Differentials — "Cannot Miss" Diagnoses
These must be actively excluded in every patient presenting with acute chest pain, because delayed diagnosis is fatal [2][7][10][11]:
CANNOT-Miss Diagnoses in Acute Chest Pain (High Yield GC Exam Content)
The following must be excluded urgently:
- Aortic dissection [7][11]
- Pulmonary embolism [7][11]
- Tension / massive pneumothorax [10][11]
- Perforated peptic ulcer / oesophagus [10]
These share overlapping features with NSTEMI (chest pain, haemodynamic compromise, troponin elevation) but require completely different management. Giving antiplatelet/anticoagulation to a patient with aortic dissection, for example, can be catastrophic.
| Feature | How it differs from NSTEMI | Why (Pathophysiology) |
|---|---|---|
| Very sudden onset, maximal at onset [7][12] | NSTEMI pain typically builds over minutes | Aortic dissection = sudden intimal tear → instantaneous propagation of dissection flap; NSTEMI = gradual thrombus formation |
| Tearing / ripping quality | NSTEMI = squeezing, pressure, heaviness | Different pain receptors: aortic adventitial nociceptors vs cardiac C-fibres |
| Radiates to the back (interscapular) [2][7] | NSTEMI radiates to left arm, jaw | Posterior aorta involved → back pain via thoracic somatic afferents |
| Pulse deficit / BP discrepancy between arms | Not seen in NSTEMI | False lumen compresses branch arteries (subclavian, carotid) → asymmetric perfusion |
| Aortic regurgitation murmur (Type A) | Not a feature of NSTEMI | Dissection flap disrupts aortic valve annulus → acute AR |
| Widened mediastinum on CXR | CXR usually normal in NSTEMI | Haematoma around aorta expands the mediastinal silhouette |
Aortic dissection (Type A) with retrograde extension can cause coronary dissection → secondary NSTEMI/STEMI [7]. This is a trap: the ST changes are real, but the primary diagnosis is dissection, and PCI is not the answer — the patient needs surgery.
ECG: Differentiate aortic dissection from AMI [11]. CXR: Differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax [11]. Cardiac enzymes (cTnT, cTnI, CK-MB) should be checked [11].
| Feature | How it differs from NSTEMI | Why (Pathophysiology) |
|---|---|---|
| Pleuritic pain, worse on deep inspiration / coughing [2] | NSTEMI pain is not pleuritic | PE → pulmonary infarction → inflammation of visceral/parietal pleura → worsened by respiratory movement |
| Haemoptysis [2][12] | Not a feature of NSTEMI | Pulmonary infarction → haemorrhagic necrosis of lung parenchyma → blood-stained sputum |
| Acute dyspnoea disproportionate to chest pain | NSTEMI dyspnoea proportional to LV dysfunction | PE → acute V/Q mismatch → hypoxaemia → dyspnoea out of proportion |
| Unilateral leg swelling [3] | Not a feature of NSTEMI | DVT (source of embolus) → venous outflow obstruction → unilateral oedema |
| Sinus tachycardia, S1Q3T3, RBBB on ECG | ST depression / T-wave inversion in NSTEMI | RV pressure overload from acute pulmonary HTN → RV strain pattern; S1Q3T3 = right heart strain |
| Risk factors: immobilisation, recent surgery, OCP, malignancy, long-haul travel | NSTEMI risk factors = atherosclerotic | Inherited thrombophilias → VTE risk, NOT arterial thrombosis risk [6] |
Key investigation: D-dimer → very sensitive but not very specific. High negative predictive value → if negative, can rule out. If positive, require more definitive diagnosis [13][14]. Age-adjusted cut-off (age × 10 for patients > 50 y) [13].
Critically: massive PE can cause troponin elevation (RV strain → subendocardial ischaemia of the RV) and ST depression, mimicking NSTEMI. The clinical context (pleuritic pain, risk factors for VTE, unilateral leg swelling) and CTPA are the keys to differentiation.
| Feature | How it differs from NSTEMI | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Sudden onset, maximum at onset | NSTEMI builds gradually | Sudden air leak into pleural space |
| Pleuritic chest pain + severe dyspnoea | NSTEMI pain is not pleuritic | Pleural irritation + lung collapse |
| Hyperresonance on percussion [3] | Normal percussion in NSTEMI | Air-filled pleural space transmits percussion energy without dampening |
| Absent breath sounds on affected side | Bilateral breath sounds in NSTEMI | No aerated lung under stethoscope |
| Tracheal deviation to opposite side (tension) | Not present in NSTEMI | Positive intrapleural pressure pushes mediastinum contralaterally |
This is a clinical (not biochemical) diagnosis. Do not wait for CXR in tension pneumothorax — decompress immediately.
3. Other Cardiac Differentials
The most important immediate differentiation. The distinction is made by ECG:
STEMI → complete occlusion of artery, require immediate opening up of artery as soon as possible. NSTEMI → lumen is reduced, but blood flow is still possible, so you can get away with giving anti-platelet / anti-thrombotics, with or without revascularization [1].
Why is it important to differentiate between STEMI and non-STEMI? Treatment is different [1].
| Feature | STEMI | NSTEMI |
|---|---|---|
| ECG | Persistent ST elevation (≥ 2 contiguous leads) or new LBBB [7] | ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads [10] |
| Coronary occlusion | Complete | Partial |
| Management | Immediate reperfusion (primary PCI < 120 min or thrombolysis < 12h) | Antithrombotic therapy ± invasive strategy (timing based on risk) |
NEW LBBB — have to be careful for patients with chest pain → should be managed the same as patients with ST elevation [13].
Check ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR which suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10].
ECG Mimics of STEMI (False Positives)
DDx of ST elevation [10]:
- STEMI: convex ST elevation, associated with Q waves
- Acute pericarditis: diffuse concave ST elevation and PR depression
- LVH with strain pattern: concave ST elevation in V1–V3, associated with LVH features
- LBBB
Also: Brugada syndrome, early repolarisation pattern, ventricular aneurysm (persistent ST elevation post-MI), hyperkalaemia.
ST-segment elevation indicates full thickness cardiac muscle injury, pathological Q-wave indicates muscle necrosis, and T-wave inversion indicates muscle ischaemia [15].
Clinically indistinguishable from NSTEMI — same symptoms, same ECG changes. The only difference:
| UA | NSTEMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Troponin | Normal (no myocyte necrosis) | Elevated (myocyte necrosis has occurred) |
When is ACS considered NSTEMI? Clinical features of unstable angina, AND elevation of cardiac markers, AND no ST-segment elevation on 12-lead ECG [1].
With modern high-sensitivity troponin assays, many patients previously labelled as "UA" are now reclassified as NSTEMI because even tiny amounts of necrosis are detected. The practical importance: NSTEMI warrants more aggressive antithrombotic and often invasive strategy compared to confirmed UA.
| Feature | How it differs from NSTEMI | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Preceding viral prodrome (fever, myalgia, URI symptoms days before) | No prodrome in NSTEMI | Viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B, Parvovirus B19, SARS-CoV-2) → direct viral myocyte injury + immune-mediated damage |
| Young patient without cardiac risk factors | NSTEMI patients typically have ≥ 1 risk factor | Myocarditis affects young, otherwise healthy individuals |
| Diffuse ST/T changes (not following a single coronary territory) | NSTEMI changes follow coronary distribution | Inflammation is diffuse, not limited to one artery's territory |
| Troponin elevated (can be marked) | Also elevated in NSTEMI | Myocyte necrosis from inflammation → troponin leak |
| Cardiac MRI: myocardial oedema + late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in non-coronary distribution (typically mid-wall or epicardial, not subendocardial) | NSTEMI LGE is subendocardial | Inflammatory process affects myocardium in a non-vascular pattern |
Diagnosis of myocarditis: cardiac MRI going to forefront. Endomyocardial biopsy is gold standard [16].
Aggravated by respiratory movement, sharp, knife-like (pleuritic pain). Radiates to the trapezius ridge (characteristic site of pericardial pain). Sitting up or leaning forward may ease pain (MI pain not positional) [2].
| Feature | Pericarditis | NSTEMI |
|---|---|---|
| Pain character | Sharp, pleuritic | Dull, squeezing, pressure |
| Positional | Eased by sitting up / leaning forward | Not positional |
| Radiation | Trapezius ridge | Left arm, jaw |
| ECG | Diffuse concave ST elevation + PR depression [10] | ST depression / T-wave inversion |
| Troponin | May be mildly elevated (myopericarditis) | Elevated |
| Pericardial rub | Present (pathognomonic) | Absent |
The key pathophysiological difference: pericarditis = inflammation of the pericardial sac (friction between inflamed visceral and parietal pericardium → rub); NSTEMI = intracoronary thrombus → myocyte death.
- "Takotsubo" = Japanese for "octopus trap," named for the apical ballooning shape of the LV on ventriculography.
- Triggered by intense emotional or physical stress → catecholamine surge → direct myocyte toxicity + microvascular spasm.
- Mimics anterior STEMI (ST elevation in precordial leads, troponin elevation, apical wall motion abnormality) but coronary angiography shows no obstructive coronary disease.
- Predominantly affects post-menopausal women.
- Important differential because the treatment is supportive (not antithrombotic/PCI).
4. Gastrointestinal Differentials
For a chief complaint of epigastric pain, the most sinister non-GI causes that must be excluded immediately: Myocardial infarction, Pulmonary embolism, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Abdominal aortic aneurysm (ruptured) [17].
This works both ways — GI conditions can mimic NSTEMI, and NSTEMI can present as epigastric pain (especially inferior wall ischaemia, which shares vagal innervation with the upper GI tract via T7–T10 dermatomes).
GERD: Unrelated to exertion. Worsened when lying down. Relieved by swallowing (warm water) [7].
| Feature | GERD / Oesophageal Spasm | NSTEMI |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship to meals | Post-prandial, worse lying down | May occur at any time (though post-prandial worsening possible due to blood flow diversion to gut) |
| Relieved by | Antacids, warm water | GTN (but oesophageal spasm may also respond to GTN — a classic trap!) |
| Exertion | No relationship | Typically worsened by exertion |
| Troponin | Normal | Elevated |
Angina pectoris is a differential diagnosis of GERD [18]. PPI empirical trial can be considered as initial diagnostic step in patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) [18].
Exam Trap: GTN Response
GTN relieves oesophageal spasm as well as angina (both involve smooth muscle relaxation via NO pathway). Therefore, response to GTN does NOT confirm a cardiac origin of chest pain. Always use troponin and ECG to differentiate.
- Peptic ulcer: epigastric tenderness, relationship to food (worse/better), NSAID/aspirin use [17].
- Perforation: sudden-onset severe epigastric pain → board-like rigidity → erect CXR shows free air under diaphragm.
- Acute pancreatitis: epigastric pain radiating to the back, elevated amylase/lipase.
PE findings to look for: PE → unilateral lower limb swelling; Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness; Pneumothorax → hyperresonance [3].
5. Other Differentials
- Worsen with movement [7] and reproducible on palpation (point tenderness over a rib or costochondral junction).
- NSTEMI pain is never reproducible on chest wall palpation.
- Costochondritis (Tietze syndrome): localised tenderness at costochondral junctions.
- Pathophysiology: somatic pain from musculoskeletal structures travels via intercostal nerves (well-localised, sharp, positional) — completely different from the visceral, poorly-localised cardiac pain of NSTEMI.
- Thoracic nerve root distribution. Precedes typical vesicular rash of herpes zoster [7].
- Reactivation of VZV in dorsal root ganglia → dermatomal pain (burning, lancinating) that can precede the rash by days → may initially mimic NSTEMI.
- Key: unilateral, dermatomal distribution; rash appears later.
- Diagnosis of exclusion.
- Hyperventilation → respiratory alkalosis → ↓ionised calcium → paraesthesias, carpopedal spasm.
- Associated with anxiety, sense of impending doom, palpitations — but ECG normal and troponin normal.
This is a critical conceptual point for avoiding over-diagnosis of NSTEMI:
| Cause of Troponin Elevation | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) | Tachycardia, sepsis, anaemia, hypotension → subendocardial ischaemia in setting of stable CAD |
| Acute heart failure | ↑Wall stress → subendocardial ischaemia + myocyte stretch → troponin leak |
| Pulmonary embolism | RV pressure overload → RV subendocardial ischaemia |
| Myocarditis | Direct inflammatory myocyte necrosis |
| Takotsubo cardiomyopathy | Catecholamine-mediated myocyte injury |
| Sepsis / critical illness | Multifactorial: microvascular dysfunction, catecholamine toxicity, hypoperfusion |
| Kidney disease | Concomitant cardiac-renal disease + decreased troponin fragment clearance → falsely high troponin level [13] |
| Cardiac contusion (trauma) | Direct mechanical myocyte injury |
| Post-cardiac procedures (PCI, CABG, ablation) | Periprocedural myocyte injury (Type 4 / Type 5 MI) |
| Aortic dissection | Coronary malperfusion (if dissection extends into coronary ostia) |
| Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | LVOT obstruction → subendocardial ischaemia; myocyte disarray |
| Rhabdomyolysis | Cross-reactivity with some troponin assays (rare with high-sensitivity assays) |
Troponin: Very specific for myocardial injury. But not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions [13]. Even if not for myocardial injury, some rarer extra-cardiac causes can cause false positives: heterophile antibody + genetic issues [13].
High Yield: Systematic Approach to Elevated Troponin
When you find elevated troponin, ask yourself three questions:
- Is there clinical evidence of ischaemia? (Symptoms, ECG changes, imaging)
- If yes → MI (then classify Type 1 vs Type 2)
- If no → Myocardial injury (not MI) — look for the underlying cause
- Is there a rise-and-fall pattern? (acute process) vs chronically elevated (e.g., CKD, HF)?
- Does the clinical picture fit an acute coronary event? (risk factors, ECG, echo)
| Diagnosis | Key Distinguishing Feature from NSTEMI |
|---|---|
| STEMI | Persistent ST elevation or new LBBB on ECG |
| Unstable Angina | Normal troponin (no myocyte necrosis) |
| Aortic dissection | Sudden onset, tearing/ripping, radiates to back, pulse deficit, BP discrepancy |
| Pulmonary embolism | Pleuritic pain, haemoptysis, unilateral leg swelling, risk factors for VTE |
| Tension pneumothorax | Hyperresonance, absent breath sounds, tracheal deviation |
| Pericarditis | Sharp pleuritic pain, eased by leaning forward, radiates to trapezius ridge, diffuse concave ST elevation + PR depression, friction rub |
| Myocarditis | Viral prodrome, young, diffuse ECG changes, CMR shows non-coronary LGE pattern |
| Takotsubo | Post-menopausal woman, intense emotional/physical stress, apical ballooning, no obstructive CAD on angiography |
| GERD | Unrelated to exertion, worse lying down, relieved by antacids/warm water |
| Peptic ulcer / perforation | Epigastric tenderness, NSAID use, free air on CXR if perforated |
| Musculoskeletal | Reproducible on palpation, positional, sharp |
| Herpes zoster | Dermatomal distribution, precedes vesicular rash |
| Panic attack | Young, anxious, hyperventilation, normal ECG and troponin |
ACS approach: A = Abnormal ECG, C = Clinical features, S = Stable patient [3].
Compatible clinical features: Chest pain, SOB, collapse. ECG changes. +/- Cardiac enzyme changes [1].
Step 1: Stabilise the patient (ABC, vitals, IV access, monitoring)
Step 2: Take a focused history using SOCRATES for the pain + associated symptoms + risk factors
Step 3: Perform targeted examination:
- PE → unilateral lower limb swelling (for PE)
- Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness
- Pneumothorax → hyperresonance [3]
- Pulse deficit, BP in both arms (aortic dissection)
- Pericardial rub (pericarditis)
- New murmur (MR from papillary muscle dysfunction, AR from dissection)
Step 4: Obtain stat 12-lead ECG → differentiate STEMI vs NSTE-ACS vs other
Step 5: Bloods including troponin (0h, repeat at 1h or 3h), CBC, RFT, LFT, lipid profile, coagulation, D-dimer (if PE suspected)
Step 6: CXR — differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax [11]; look for pulmonary oedema, pneumonia, widened mediastinum
Step 7: Integrate clinical, ECG, and biomarker findings → working diagnosis
If certain STEMI, can immediately send patient to the cath lab. If stable, then have to determine more things → any high-risk features? (troponin elevation, GRACE score) [3].
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI
- NSTEMI must be distinguished from STEMI (ECG: persistent ST elevation or new LBBB → STEMI) and from UA (troponin: normal → UA).
- Life-threatening mimics that CANNOT be missed: Aortic dissection (tearing, back, pulse deficit), PE (pleuritic, haemoptysis, leg swelling), Tension pneumothorax (hyperresonance, absent breath sounds), Perforated viscus.
- Cardiac mimics: Pericarditis (positional, pleuritic, trapezius ridge, rub), Myocarditis (young, viral prodrome, diffuse ECG), Takotsubo (post-menopausal, stress, apical ballooning, clean coronaries).
- GI mimics: GERD (not exertional, worse lying down), peptic ulcer, pancreatitis. Remember: MI must be excluded as a sinister non-GI cause of epigastric pain.
- Troponin elevation ≠ NSTEMI: Always consider Type 2 MI, myocarditis, PE, HF, CKD, sepsis. Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury but not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions.
- Approach: Stabilise → SOCRATES + risk factors → targeted exam → ECG → troponin (serial) → CXR → integrate.
Active Recall - NSTEMI Differential Diagnosis
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [6] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [11] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [13] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf [14] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf [15] Lecture slides: GC 088. Sudden Severe Chest Pain.pdf [16] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf [17] Senior notes: Block A - Upper abdominal pain_ peptic ulcer; pancreatitis and gallstone.pdf [18] Senior notes: Block A - Indigestion and 'heartburn'_ nausea and vomiting; gastric motility problems; benign esophageal lesions.pdf
Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for NSTEMI
1. Diagnostic Criteria for Myocardial Infarction (Fourth Universal Definition)
The diagnosis of NSTEMI rests on satisfying the Universal Definition of MI criteria, which apply to all MI types. Let's break this down from first principles — why each criterion exists.
Diagnostic Criteria for MI — High Yield (GC Exam Content)
Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values, preferably cardiac troponin (cTn), with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) [7][10][12]
PLUS at least one of the following: [7][10][12]
- Symptoms of ischaemia (clinical)
- New or presumed new significant ST-segment–T wave (ST–T) changes or new LBBB (ECG)
- Development of pathological Q waves in the ECG (ECG)
- New loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality (imaging — e.g. echocardiography, cardiac MRI)
- Identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy
| Criterion | Pathophysiological Rationale |
|---|---|
| Troponin rise and/or fall | Myocyte necrosis → release of structural troponin proteins (cTnI/cTnT) into blood. The rise and/or fall pattern distinguishes acute injury from chronically elevated troponin (e.g. CKD). A single elevated value could be chronic — you need a dynamic change. |
| Symptoms of ischaemia | Myocardial ischaemia → adenosine/lactate/bradykinin accumulation → cardiac C-fibre stimulation → chest pain or anginal equivalents. Confirms the clinical context. |
| ST-T changes or new LBBB | Ischaemic myocardium has altered electrical properties → abnormal depolarisation/repolarisation → ECG changes. New LBBB alters conduction and can mask or mimic ischaemia. |
| Pathological Q waves | Q waves represent electrically silent (dead) myocardium → the depolarisation wavefront moves away from necrotic tissue → negative deflection. |
| Imaging evidence | Echo or CMR showing new wall motion abnormality = ischaemic myocardium not contracting properly. Confirms structural consequence of ischaemia. |
| Intracoronary thrombus | Direct visualisation of the culprit lesion on angiography = definitive proof of the mechanism. |
For the diagnosis to be NSTEMI (rather than STEMI or UA):
- Troponin: Elevated (above 99th percentile URL with rise/fall pattern) — this separates NSTEMI from UA
- ECG: No persistent ST elevation — this separates NSTEMI from STEMI. Instead: ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads, or even a normal ECG [10]
2. Biomarkers — Cardiac Troponin
Cardiac troponins: gold standard for myocardial ischaemia [10].
What is troponin? Troponin is a regulatory protein complex in the cardiac sarcomere (troponin I, T, and C). When myocytes die, troponin leaks into the blood through the disrupted cell membrane.
High-sensitivity assays (hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI) can detect much smaller amounts of troponin, enabling:
- Earlier detection of MI (within 1–3 hours of symptom onset)
- Detection of very small MIs that older assays would miss
- But also detection of non-MI causes of myocardial injury (lower specificity)
Diagnostic cut-off of hsTnT: positive if baseline > 14 ng/L and > 100% rise 3–6h later [10].
Troponin: rises early and stays long [1]. AMI: peak at 24–48h, return to baseline over 5–14 days [10].
| Marker | Onset of Rise | Peak | Return to Baseline | Clinical Utility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hs-cTnT/I | 1–3 hours | 24–48 hours | 5–14 days | Gold standard for MI diagnosis; early detection |
| CK-MB | 3–4 hours | 12–24 hours | 48–72 hours | Better at detecting reinfarction due to shorter half-life [7] — if troponin is already elevated from index MI, a re-rise of CK-MB indicates re-infarction |
| Myoglobin | 1–2 hours | 6–8 hours | 24 hours | First marker to rise [10] but not cardiac-specific (also from skeletal muscle). Rarely used now. |
CK-MB is cardiac-specific (cf. CK-MM for skeletal muscles, CK-BB for brain / GI tract smooth muscles) [10].
Even though troponin is high-sensitivity, CK-MB has value in having shorter half-life. Since in acute phase, you would expect both to elevate. Yet if the patient is presenting late, 48 hours after onset of the AMI, then you would only see +ve troponin, with −ve CKMB → helps with the timeline [1].
This is important:
- Early presentation (< 24h): Both troponin and CK-MB elevated → acute MI
- Late presentation (48–72h): Troponin still elevated, CK-MB normalised → MI happened days ago
- Re-infarction: CK-MB re-rises (shorter half-life allows detection of a second peak), while troponin may still be elevated from the first event → > 20% increase in cTnI/TnT value (a 2nd plateau) indicates reinfarction [7]
Roles of biochemical markers of ACS [7]:
- Risk prediction and prognosis: Categorize patients into high and low risk groups
- Selection of site of care: CCU vs. outpatient
- Selection of therapeutic intervention: Aggressive vs. conservative
- ACS evaluation: Any troponin level > URL = myocardial damage
- Detection of reinfarction
- Assessment of reperfusion: When coronary arteries are reperfused, cardiac markers in blood will gradually wash out and decrease
- Estimation of infarct size: Magnitude and temporal course of markers
Troponin Specificity — Exam Trap
Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury. But not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions [13].
Kidney disease can cause raised troponin → concomitant cardiac-renal disease + decreased troponin fragment clearance → falsely high troponin level [13].
Other causes of troponin elevation without Type 1 MI: heart failure, PE, myocarditis, sepsis, cardiac contusion, post-procedure, Takotsubo.
Always interpret troponin in clinical context!
Modern practice uses the ESC 0h/1h algorithm (or 0h/3h if the 1h assay is not available) for rapid triage of patients presenting with chest pain. This is based on high-sensitivity troponin.
The logic is simple:
- Very low troponin at 0h AND minimal change at 1h → Rule out MI → safe for discharge with outpatient follow-up
- Very high troponin at 0h OR significant rise at 1h → Rule in MI → admit and treat as NSTEMI
- Intermediate values → Observe zone → repeat troponin at 3h, serial ECGs, clinical reassessment
The specific thresholds depend on the assay used (hs-cTnT vs hs-cTnI) — you do not need to memorise exact numbers for exams, but understand the principle:
For patients with borderline hs-troponin, consider: Angiography, Coronary CT angiography (CCTA), Stress testing [1].
ACS approach: A = Abnormal ECG, C = Clinical features, S = Stable patient [3].
If certain STEMI, can immediately send patient to the cath lab. If stable, then have to determine more things → any high-risk features? (troponin elevation, GRACE score — 9 factors for prognostication) [3].
If delayed beyond 24h, can give P2Y12 inhibitors → ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel [3].
5. Individual Investigation Modalities
5.1 Electrocardiogram (ECG)
The most important first-line investigation. Must be done within 10 minutes of first medical contact.
NSTEMI: ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads (do NOT correlate with location of infarct) [10].
| ECG Finding | Significance | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| ST depression | Subendocardial ischaemia | Partial occlusion → injury current vector points away from surface electrode → negative ST shift |
| T-wave inversion | Repolarisation abnormality from ischaemic tissue | Delayed repolarisation in ischaemic subendocardium → reversed T-wave vector |
| Usually widespread: subendocardial ischaemia [10] | NSTEMI ST depression is often diffuse | Subendocardial ischaemia is not localised to one coronary territory because the subendocardium is a circumferential "at-risk" zone |
| If localised: more likely reciprocal change — look for ST elevation in other leads [10] | May actually be a STEMI! | Localised ST depression = mirror image of ST elevation in the opposite wall |
| ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10] | Ominous finding | Left main stenosis → global subendocardial ischaemia → diffuse ST depression. aVR is the only lead that "looks at" the LV cavity from above → it sees the reciprocal of global depression as elevation |
| Normal ECG | Does NOT exclude NSTEMI | Up to 30–50% of NSTEMI patients have initial normal ECG; serial ECGs essential |
Wellens' syndrome: critical proximal LAD stenosis [10]
- Recent Hx of angina, but ECG taken pain-free (pain = NSTEMI)
- Type A (25%): biphasic T waves in V2–V3
- Type B (75%): deeply and symmetrically inverted T waves in V2–V3
- Troponin should be normal (rule out NSTEMI)
- High risk: mean time of extensive anterior MI = 8 days
This is a pre-infarction pattern — the patient is sitting on a time bomb. Stress testing is contraindicated (can precipitate massive anterior MI). Patient needs urgent angiography.
Q waves not specific for MI: HOCM can cause Q waves (V1–V3 for massive septal hypertrophy), Dilated cardiomyopathy (10–13%) [13].
NEW LBBB — have to be careful for patients with chest pain → should be managed the same as patients with ST elevation [13].
Pericardial Disease → widespread upward concave ST elevation (not convex like STEMI) [13].
ST-segment elevation indicates full-thickness cardiac muscle injury, pathological Q-wave indicates muscle necrosis, and T-wave inversion indicates muscle ischaemia [15].
ECG Interpretation Must-Knows for NSTEMI (High Yield)
- ST depression and T-wave inversion in NSTEMI do NOT reliably localise the infarct (unlike STEMI where they do) [10]
- Always check aVR — ST elevation > 1mm in aVR = left main or severe triple vessel disease [10]
- Look for De Winter T waves (depressed ST take-off with hyperacute T wave in precordial leads): proximal LAD occlusion, Tx as anterior STEMI [10]
- Repeated ECG important to assess serial changes [3] — 12-lead ECG stat and repeat at least daily ×3 days [8]
CXR: usually non-diagnostic in ACS; look for other causes (e.g. aortic dissection, PE, pneumonia or pneumothorax) [8].
| CXR Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Normal | Most common finding in isolated NSTEMI |
| Pulmonary oedema (upper lobe diversion, Kerley B lines, bat-wing opacities, pleural effusion) | Indicates LV failure complicating MI → Killip class II–III |
| Cardiomegaly | Pre-existing heart failure or dilated cardiomyopathy |
| Widened mediastinum | Suggests aortic dissection [11][19] — must be excluded before giving antithrombotic therapy |
| Pneumothorax | Alternative diagnosis — CXR differentiates from MI |
| Consolidation | Pneumonia as alternative/contributing diagnosis |
CXR: Differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax. Widening of mediastinum (erect PA = 6cm, supine AP = 8cm) [11].
Bedside echocardiography is a key investigation in NSTEMI for:
| Purpose | What to Look For | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) | Hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis of a myocardial segment | Ischaemic/infarcted myocardium cannot contract normally → segment-specific abnormality confirms ischaemic territory |
| LV systolic function (LVEF) | Global ejection fraction | LVEF is an important prognostic parameter [8] — lower LVEF = worse prognosis |
| Mechanical complications | New MR (papillary muscle dysfunction/rupture), VSD (septal rupture), free wall rupture with tamponade | Acute MI can damage structural components of the heart |
| RV involvement | RV dilatation, RV dysfunction | Inferior NSTEMI may involve RV → different haemodynamic management (avoid nitrates, give fluids) |
| Alternative diagnoses | Pericardial effusion (pericarditis), aortic dissection flap, aortic regurgitation | Look for aortic regurgitation, pericardial effusion and presence of dissection flap [11] |
| Test | Rationale |
|---|---|
| CBC | Anaemia (→ Type 2 MI from supply-demand mismatch), leukocytosis (infection, stress response), thrombocytopenia (baseline before anticoagulation) |
| RFT (U/Cr/eGFR) | CKD worsens prognosis; renal function affects drug dosing (enoxaparin, fondaparinux, DOAC dose adjustment); contrast nephropathy risk if proceeding to angiography |
| LFT | Baseline; hepatic congestion from RHF; drug metabolism |
| Lipid profile | Should be taken ≤ 24 hours [8] of admission (lipid levels drop after 24h due to acute phase response). Guides statin therapy. |
| Fasting glucose / HbA1c | Screen for diabetes (major risk factor); hyperglycaemia at presentation = poor prognosis |
| Coagulation (aPTT/INR) | Baseline for heparin therapy [8]; exclude coagulopathy |
| NT-proBNP | Prognostic marker; elevated = LV dysfunction = worse outcome. Very sensitive, not very specific for heart failure [20] |
| TFT | Thyrotoxicosis can precipitate or exacerbate ACS (↑O₂ demand) |
High sensitivity for stenosis detection. A normal CTA can reliably rule out disease [1].
Concept of "TRIPLE RULE-OUT" → CCTA can help you rule out: Myocardial infarction, Pulmonary embolism, Aortic dissection [1].
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Principle | IV contrast bolus + ECG-gated CT → 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries |
| Sensitivity for significant stenosis | ~95–99% (excellent rule-out) |
| Specificity | ~65–83% (lower — false positives from calcified plaques [21]) |
| Calcium scoring | Non-contrast CT, draw circles around areas of calcium → good for prognostication [21] |
| Best use | Low-to-intermediate pre-test probability patients; rule out CAD in the ED |
| Limitations | Radiation (reduce with ECG trigger, low dose) [1]; calcium deposits create false positives [21]; cannot assess haemodynamic significance of a lesion (need FFR for that) |
Coronary imaging has a very low false negative rate → high sensitivity, can be used to confidently rule out issues. But the problem with high sensitivity is that there is a tradeoff — lower specificity → even if you see some abnormal findings, will require further workup before diagnosis [4].
Stress testing is primarily for stable chest pain or for risk stratification after NSTEMI (not in the acute phase when the patient is unstable). It identifies inducible ischaemia.
Objective of stress testing is to help you reach diagnosis → diagnose ischaemia of the myocardium [4].
| Method | Principle | Key Findings | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise ECG (ETT) | Patient exercises on treadmill (Bruce protocol) → monitor ECG for ischaemic changes | 2mm ST depression = positive [9]; Duke Treadmill Score for prognostication | Stop antihypertensive on the day of test. Exercise until target HR reached: HR = (220 − age) × 0.8 [10]. False positive in young females [4] |
| Stress echocardiography | Exercise or dobutamine → echo before and after → look for new RWMA | New wall motion abnormality = ischaemia | Alternative to exercise: dobutamine (C/I: recent MI), adenosine (C/I: asthma) [10] |
| Radionuclide MPI (SPECT) | Inject radiotracer (thallium-201 or technetium-99m) → gamma camera detects perfusion defects at stress vs rest | Fixed defect = scar; Reversible defect = ischaemia (viable but underperfused territory) | After pharmacological stress test, can either do cardiac MRI or SPECT [9] |
| Stress cardiac MRI | Adenosine/dobutamine + gadolinium CMR | Perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities, late gadolinium enhancement (scar vs viable) | Best for viability assessment; no radiation |
When to Use Which Test
Choice of Ix generally dependent on pre-test probability of CAD [8]:
- Low pre-test probability → CCTA (excellent NPV to rule out)
- Intermediate pre-test probability → Functional stress testing (ETT, stress echo, SPECT, stress CMR)
- High pre-test probability or known CAD → Go directly to invasive coronary angiography
The patient did not have a contraindication for stress test, BUT had quite severe symptoms warranting coronary imaging → so skip the stress test, go directly for coronary imaging [4].
The definitive diagnostic test for coronary artery disease. A catheter is threaded (usually from radial or femoral artery) into the coronary ostia → contrast injected → real-time fluoroscopic imaging of the coronary lumen.
Not the CT coronary angiogram → this is the fluoro where they inject contrast. Just one invasive investigation exists for CAD confirmation [4].
Indications for invasive coronary angiography [4]:
- Unacceptable angina despite medical therapy (for consideration of revascularisation)
- Non-invasive testing results with high-risk features
- Angina or risk factors for CAD in the setting of depressed LVEF
- Diagnostic purposes when non-invasive testing results are unclear
In NSTEMI, the timing of angiography depends on risk stratification (see next section).
| Finding on Angiography | Significance |
|---|---|
| Significant stenosis ≥ 50% | Defines significant CAD (for left main); ≥ 70% for other vessels (flow-limiting) |
| Thrombus at culprit lesion | Confirms Type 1 MI mechanism |
| Multi-vessel disease | Worse prognosis; may need CABG over PCI |
| Left main disease or severe 3-vessel disease | Directly go for CABG [10] |
MINOCA: subepicardial LGE [21] → suggests myocarditis rather than ischaemic MI.
| Application | What CMR Shows |
|---|---|
| Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic injury | Subendocardial LGE = ischaemic (follows coronary territory); mid-wall/epicardial LGE = myocarditis/non-ischaemic |
| Viability assessment | Transmural LGE > 50% = non-viable (won't benefit from revascularisation); < 50% = viable (will recover with revascularisation) |
| Takotsubo vs MI | Apical ballooning without coronary territory LGE |
| LVEF and volumes | Gold standard for LV function quantification |
6. Risk Stratification Tools
Once NSTEMI is confirmed, risk stratification determines the urgency and type of invasive strategy.
The most validated tool for NSTEMI risk stratification. It predicts in-hospital and 6-month mortality.
8 variables:
| Variable | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Age | Older patients have less cardiac reserve |
| Heart rate | Tachycardia = sympathetic activation / haemodynamic compromise |
| Systolic BP | Hypotension = cardiogenic shock |
| Creatinine | CKD = worse prognosis, drug dosing issues |
| Killip class | Clinical heart failure severity |
| Cardiac arrest at admission | Indicates severe arrhythmia / haemodynamic collapse |
| ST-segment deviation | ECG evidence of ischaemia |
| Elevated cardiac biomarkers | Confirms myocyte necrosis |
| GRACE Score | Risk | In-Hospital Mortality | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 109 | Low | < 1% | Conservative or selective invasive |
| 109–140 | Intermediate | 1–3% | Invasive within 72h |
| > 140 | High | > 3% | Early invasive within 24h |
7 binary variables (1 point each):
| Variable | Point |
|---|---|
| Age ≥ 65 | 1 |
| ≥ 3 CAD risk factors | 1 |
| Known CAD (≥ 50% stenosis) | 1 |
| Aspirin use in past 7 days | 1 |
| ≥ 2 anginal episodes in 24h | 1 |
| ST deviation ≥ 0.5mm | 1 |
| Elevated cardiac markers | 1 |
Score 0–2 = low risk; 3–4 = intermediate; 5–7 = high risk.
For patients with borderline hs-troponin: Angiography, Coronary CT angiography (CCTA), Stress testing [1].
When the troponin is borderline or the diagnosis is uncertain:
- CCTA: Excellent for anatomical rule-out (triple rule-out) [1]
- Stress testing: Identifies inducible ischaemia in patients with resolved symptoms
- Cardiac MRI: Differentiates ischaemic from non-ischaemic causes (myocarditis, Takotsubo)
| Step | Investigation | Key Findings / Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Immediate | 12-lead ECG (within 10 min) | ST depression, T-wave inversion, normal, or rule out STEMI |
| 2. Immediate | hs-cTn at 0h | Detect myocyte necrosis |
| 3. 1–3h | Repeat hs-cTn at 1h (or 3h) | Rise/fall pattern → confirm/exclude MI |
| 4. Baseline | CBC, RFT, LFT, lipid, glucose/HbA1c, coagulation, NT-proBNP, TFT | Identify comorbidities, risk factors, baseline for therapy |
| 5. Baseline | CXR | Exclude aortic dissection, pneumothorax; assess for pulmonary oedema |
| 6. Early | Echocardiography | RWMA, LVEF, complications, alternative diagnoses |
| 7. Serial | Repeat ECG (daily × 3d, more if severe) | Detect evolving changes |
| 8. Risk stratification | GRACE / TIMI score | Determine urgency of invasive strategy |
| 9. Definitive | Invasive coronary angiography | Visualise culprit lesion; guide revascularisation |
| 10. If uncertain | CCTA, stress test, or cardiac MRI | Rule out CAD; differentiate ischaemic vs non-ischaemic injury |
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis and Investigations of NSTEMI
- Diagnostic criteria for MI = rise/fall of troponin above 99th URL + at least one of: ischaemic symptoms, new ST-T changes or LBBB, pathological Q waves, imaging RWMA, or angiographic thrombus.
- NSTEMI = criteria met + no persistent ST elevation + troponin elevated (separates from UA where troponin is normal).
- hs-cTn is the gold standard biomarker. Use the 0h/1h (or 0h/3h) algorithm for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
- CK-MB retains value for timeline (late presentation) and reinfarction detection (shorter half-life).
- ECG in NSTEMI: ST depression / T-wave inversion in ≥ 2 contiguous leads; usually widespread (subendocardial). Always check aVR for left main pattern.
- Wellens' syndrome (biphasic or deeply inverted T waves in V2–V3, pain-free) = critical proximal LAD stenosis. Stress test contraindicated. Urgent angiography needed.
- CCTA: Triple rule-out (MI, PE, aortic dissection). High sensitivity → great for ruling out. False positives from calcified plaques.
- GRACE score is the validated risk stratification tool → determines urgency of invasive strategy.
- Troponin elevation ≠ MI. Not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions. Interpret in clinical context.
Active Recall - NSTEMI Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf [9] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [11] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [13] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf [15] Lecture slides: GC 088. Sudden Severe Chest Pain.pdf [19] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [21] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf
Management of NSTEMI
The management of NSTEMI is fundamentally different from STEMI. The key concept to understand from first principles:
NSTEMI → lumen is reduced, but blood flow is still possible, so you can get away with giving anti-platelet / anti-thrombotics, with or without revascularization [1]. STEMI → complete occlusion of artery, require immediate opening up of artery as soon as possible [1].
This means NSTEMI management is a two-phase process: (1) stabilise with antithrombotic and anti-ischaemic therapy, then (2) risk-stratify to decide the timing and need for invasive strategy. There is no "door-to-balloon" race as in STEMI — instead, it is a calibrated approach based on risk.
Initial management (SAQ!!) [10]:
- Admit CCU for high-risk cases
- Complete bed rest + NPO for first 12h
- Close monitoring: BP/P, IO Q1h, cardiac monitoring with defibrillator standby
| Measure | Details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Bed rest | 12–24 hours if uncomplicated [7] | ↓Myocardial O₂ demand by ↓physical activity → limit infarct extension |
| Oxygen | Routine O₂ in the first 6h; nasal prongs if hypoxic or in cardiac failure [7][22]. Target SpO₂ > 94%. Do NOT give high-flow O₂ routinely if SpO₂ is normal | Supplemental O₂ improves myocardial oxygenation in hypoxic patients. However, hyperoxia causes coronary vasoconstriction and may paradoxically increase infarct size — hence only give if SpO₂ < 94%. |
| Morphine | 2–5mg IV ± stool softeners with BP and RR monitoring. Indicated when symptoms are not immediately relieved by nitrates [7] | Morphine = potent analgesic + anxiolytic + mild vasodilator (↓preload). Reduces sympathetic drive from pain → ↓HR, ↓BP → ↓O₂ demand. Monitor for respiratory depression and hypotension. |
| Relieve anxiety | Explanation or diazepam 2–5mg PO TDS [7] | Anxiety → catecholamine surge → ↑HR, ↑BP → ↑O₂ demand |
| Stool softeners | Avoid straining [7] | Valsalva manoeuvre during straining → vagal stimulation → bradycardia and hypotension in an already vulnerable heart |
| Monitoring | BP/Pulse Q1H, I/O chart Q1H, cardiac monitor [7] | Detect arrhythmias (VT/VF), haemodynamic deterioration, and complications early |
| NPO | First 12 hours [10] | In case urgent angiography/PCI or intubation needed |
Important: Do NOT Give Fibrinolytics in NSTEMI
Fibrinolytics is ONLY indicated in STEMI but NOT UA/NSTEMI [7]. This is a critical distinction.
Why? In NSTEMI the thrombus is non-occlusive (partial). Fibrinolytics break down fibrin clots → this could paradoxically destabilise the partially occlusive thrombus, expose more thrombogenic subendothelial surface, and cause more harm than good. Additionally, the risk of haemorrhagic stroke (~1%) is not justified when the artery is not fully occluded. NSTEMI patients benefit from antiplatelet + anticoagulant therapy ± planned invasive strategy instead.
3. Anti-Thrombotic Therapy
The thrombus in NSTEMI is a mixture of platelet-rich white thrombus and fibrin-rich red thrombus. Therefore, management targets both arms:
Summary of medical treatment: Anti-thrombotic = Aspirin + P2Y12 antagonist (DAPT) / GP IIb/IIIa antagonist + LMW heparin [7].
3.1 Antiplatelet Therapy — Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT)
- "A" = acetylsalicylic acid; "spirin" from Spiraea (meadowsweet plant).
- Mechanism: Irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) → blocks synthesis of thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) in platelets → ↓platelet aggregation. Since platelets are anucleate (no DNA → cannot make new COX-1), the inhibition lasts the entire 7–10 day lifespan of the platelet.
| Detail | |
|---|---|
| Loading dose | 162–325mg (QMH = 320mg) [7] |
| Maintenance dose | NSTEMI = 80–100mg daily [7] |
| Indication | Recommended for all patients without contraindications [1] |
| Side effects | GI upset [4], GI bleeding, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease |
| Contraindications | Active GI bleed, true aspirin allergy (not just intolerance), severe bleeding diathesis |
P2Y12 is an ADP receptor on the platelet surface. When ADP binds P2Y12 → platelet activation and aggregation. Blocking P2Y12 → ↓platelet activation.
Dual antiplatelet therapy recommended: Aspirin + P2Y12 receptor inhibitor [1].
| Drug | Mechanism | Loading Dose | Maintenance | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clopidogrel ("clo-PID-oh-grel") | Irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor; prodrug requiring CYP2C19 hepatic activation | 600mg [7] | 75mg daily [7][1] | Cheaper; weaker inhibition. CYP2C19 poor metabolisers (common in East Asians — "East Asian Paradox" [4]) have reduced drug activation → diminished antiplatelet effect. 75mg daily if aspirin is not tolerated due to hypersensitivity or GI intolerance [1] |
| Ticagrelor ("ti-CAG-re-lor") | Reversible direct P2Y12 inhibitor; not a prodrug (no CYP2C19 dependence) | 180mg [7] | 90mg BD [7][1] | More potent and consistent than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel in NSTEMI [3]. Side effects: dyspnoea (adenosine reuptake inhibition), bradycardia |
| Prasugrel ("PRA-su-grel") | Irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor; prodrug (different metabolic pathway from clopidogrel) | 60mg [7] | 10mg daily [7] | Most potent. Higher bleeding risk. Contraindicated if prior stroke/TIA, age > 75, weight < 60kg |
If delayed beyond 24h, can give P2Y12 inhibitors → ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel [3].
Pharmacogenomics and P2Y12 Inhibitors (High Yield)
If we can do genetic testing for all patients, then can dictate drugs of choice based on their CYP2C19 [23]. Clopidogrel is a prodrug → requires CYP2C19 for activation. CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (*2, *3) are common in East Asians (~15–20% are poor metabolisers) → these patients get inadequate antiplatelet effect from clopidogrel.
In Hong Kong, CYP2C19 testing is not yet routinely done since more evidence is required [23]. Ticagrelor bypasses this problem entirely (not a prodrug).
- "GP IIb/IIIa" = glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, the final common pathway receptor for platelet aggregation. Fibrinogen bridges between activated GP IIb/IIIa receptors on adjacent platelets → platelet plug.
- GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban) block this receptor → potent inhibition of platelet aggregation.
| Drug | Detail |
|---|---|
| Abciximab | Monoclonal antibody fragment; longest duration; used as pre-med if heavy clot load at PCI |
| Eptifibatide | Cyclic peptide; shorter duration |
| Tirofiban | Non-peptide; shortest duration |
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor is not routinely added unless evidence of ongoing ischaemia in the presence of DAPT (persistent chest pain, ECG evidence of ischaemia) [10]. Consult cardiologist to consider GP IIb/IIIa antagonist [7].
The antiplatelets shown to be class 2b evidence [3] — meaning benefit is uncertain; used selectively.
The coagulation cascade generates thrombin → converts fibrinogen to fibrin → stabilises the platelet plug. Anticoagulation targets this arm.
Unfractionated heparin given in the cath lab, fondaparinux/enoxaparin given at bedside [3].
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enoxaparin (Clexane) — Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) | Binds antithrombin III → potentiates its inhibition of Factor Xa (predominantly) and thrombin | Age ≤ 75: IV 30mg bolus then SC 1mg/kg Q12H. Age > 75: NO loading, SC 0.75mg/kg Q12H [7] | Prescribe up to 8 days or until coronary revascularisation [7]. Predictable pharmacokinetics; no routine aPTT monitoring needed. Dose adjust for CKD. |
| Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) | Binds antithrombin III → inhibits thrombin (Factor IIa) and Factor Xa equally | IV bolus then infusion; monitor aPTT (target 1.5–2.5× control) | Shorter half-life, reversible with protamine → preferred in cath lab (easy to control during procedure). |
| Fondaparinux — Ultra-Low Molecular Weight Heparin | Selective Factor Xa inhibitor via antithrombin III | 2.5mg SC daily | Lowest bleeding risk among anticoagulants. Preferred if conservative (non-invasive) management planned. Cannot be used as sole anticoagulant during PCI (need UFH supplement). |
Side effects of heparin: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), osteoporosis, hyperkalaemia [10].
Choice of Anticoagulant — Practical Guide
- Going to cath lab soon → UFH (short-acting, controllable, reversible with protamine)
- Medical management / awaiting invasive strategy → Enoxaparin (convenient SC dosing, predictable)
- Conservative strategy / high bleeding risk → Fondaparinux (lowest bleeding, but needs UFH top-up if going for PCI)
4. Anti-Ischaemic Therapy
The goal: ↓myocardial O₂ demand and/or ↑O₂ supply to limit infarct extension and relieve symptoms.
Anti-ischaemic = Nitrates + β-blocker / CCB [7].
- "Nitro-" = nitrogen; nitrates release nitric oxide (NO) → activates guanylyl cyclase → ↑cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation.
- Predominantly venodilators (at low doses) → ↓preload → ↓LV wall stress → ↓O₂ demand.
- At higher doses: also arteriolar dilation (↓afterload) and coronary artery dilation (↑O₂ supply).
| Formulation | Dose | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Sublingual GTN | 0.4–0.8mg SL Q5min × 3 | Acute symptom relief |
| IV nitroglycerin (Isoket) | 2–10mg/hr IV [22] | IV TNG indicated in the first 48h for persistent ischaemia, heart failure, or hypertension [22]. Begin with lowest dose, step up till pain relieved. Watch BP/P; keep SBP > 100mmHg [22] |
| Isosorbide dinitrate (Isordil) | 10–30mg TDS PO [22] | Longer-acting oral maintenance |
| Isosorbide mononitrate (Imdur) | 60–120mg daily PO [22] | Once-daily sustained release |
Nitrates (long acting or short acting) → in the presence of angina [1] (secondary prevention).
Contraindications of Nitrates
5 contraindications in the use of nitrates [2]:
- RV infarction — nitrates ↓preload → RV is preload-dependent → catastrophic ↓CO
- Use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil/Viagra) in the previous 24 hours — PDE5 inhibitors also work via cGMP → synergistic vasodilation → severe hypotension
- Hypotension — further ↓BP → shock
- Tachycardia — reflex tachycardia from vasodilation worsens ischaemia
- Bradycardia — may worsen haemodynamic compromise
- "Beta" refers to β-adrenergic receptors. β₁ receptors are predominantly in the heart.
- Mechanism: Block β₁ receptors → ↓heart rate + ↓contractility + ↓BP → ↓myocardial O₂ demand. Also ↑diastolic filling time → ↑coronary perfusion time.
Beta-blocker (cardio-selective): proven survival benefit, ↓HR/BP/contractility and improve coronary perfusion [10].
| Drug | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol | 25mg BD oral [10], titrate to HR < 70 | Cardio-selective (β₁ selective) |
| Atenolol | 25–100mg daily | Cardio-selective; renally excreted |
| Bisoprolol / Carvedilol / Metoprolol succinate | Variable | If reduced EF: consider these [10] — evidence for mortality benefit in HFrEF |
Reduce HR and BP (titrate to HR < 70) [22].
Contraindications of Beta-Blockers
Contraindications of beta-blockers [10]:
- Poor ventricular function (acute decompensation; though long-term BB is beneficial in chronic HFrEF)
- Acute pulmonary oedema
- Heart block (2nd / 3rd degree) — β-blockers ↓AV conduction → worsen block
- Asthma / COPD — β₂ blockade → bronchospasm (even "selective" β₁ blockers lose selectivity at high doses)
Also: severe bradycardia (HR < 50), cardiogenic shock, severe peripheral vascular disease, phaeochromocytoma without prior α-blockade.
- Mechanism: Block L-type voltage-gated calcium channels → ↓Ca²⁺ entry into smooth muscle and cardiac cells.
| Subclass | Example | Effect | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-dihydropyridine (rate-limiting) | Diltiazem, Verapamil | ↓HR, ↓contractility, ↓BP, coronary vasodilation | If there are contraindications to beta-blockers, or if there is no heart failure [1]. Alternative: rate-limiting CCB (diltiazem / verapamil) [10] |
| Dihydropyridine | Amlodipine, Nifedipine | Predominantly vasodilation (↓afterload); reflex ↑HR if short-acting | Avoid short-acting nifedipine in ACS (reflex tachycardia → ↑O₂ demand). Long-acting amlodipine acceptable for BP control |
Verapamil 5–15mg IV slowly (C/I if BP low or on BB, beware of post-conversion angina) [12]. Never combine verapamil/diltiazem with beta-blockers — risk of severe bradycardia, AV block, and negative inotropy → haemodynamic collapse.
5. Other Early Therapies
- "Statin" = inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis → ↓intracellular cholesterol → ↑LDL receptor expression → ↑LDL clearance from blood.
- Pleiotropic effects (beyond lipid lowering): anti-inflammatory (↓hs-CRP), endothelial stabilisation, plaque stabilisation (↑fibrous cap thickness, ↓lipid core), antithrombotic.
Should be given regardless of baseline LDL-C level in the absence of contraindications [22].
Other therapy = ACEI + Statins [7].
| Drug | Dose | Intensity |
|---|---|---|
| Atorvastatin | 40–80mg daily | High-intensity (preferred in ACS) |
| Rosuvastatin | 20–40mg daily | High-intensity |
Start within 24 hours of presentation. High-intensity statin is the standard in ACS — the goal is maximal plaque stabilisation early.
Side effects: Myalgia/myopathy (↑CK), rhabdomyolysis (rare), hepatotoxicity (↑ALT), new-onset diabetes.
Contraindications: Active liver disease, pregnancy, concomitant use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors with certain statins.
- ACEI ("A-C-E-I" = Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor): Blocks conversion of angiotensin I → angiotensin II → ↓vasoconstriction, ↓aldosterone secretion → ↓afterload, ↓preload, ↓myocardial remodelling.
- ARB (Angiotensin Receptor Blocker): Blocks AT₁ receptor directly → same downstream effects.
ACEI should be administered within the first 24 hours if LVEF < 40% and in the absence of hypotension or contraindications [22].
ACEI → for patients with congestive heart failure, LV dysfunction (EF < 40%), hypertension, diabetes [1].
ARBs are recommended for patients who have indications for, but are intolerant of, ACE inhibitors [4][22].
Contraindications of ACEI / ARB
Contraindications [4]:
- High-grade bilateral renal artery stenosis
- Azotaemia (severely elevated creatinine)
- Pregnancy
- Hyperkalaemia (K⁺ > 5.5)
- Hypotension (SBP < 90)
- History of angioedema (especially for ACEI)
Side effects of ACEI: Cough (ACEI-specific, due to ↑bradykinin), syncope, hypotension, angioedema, hyperkalaemia [4].
Proton pump inhibitors for patients at high risk of GI bleeding [22].
Why? Patients on DAPT + anticoagulation have significantly ↑GI bleeding risk. PPIs (e.g. omeprazole, pantoprazole) inhibit the gastric H⁺/K⁺ ATPase → ↓gastric acid → gastroprotection.
Add PPI when using 2 or more antithrombotics [24].
Note: Omeprazole inhibits CYP2C19 → can reduce clopidogrel activation. Pantoprazole is preferred when clopidogrel is used (less CYP2C19 interaction).
6. Invasive Strategy — Coronary Angiography ± Revascularisation
Very high risk / high risk features (Consult Cardiologists) [22]:
- Haemodynamic instability
- Cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure
- Recurrent/refractory chest pain despite medical treatment
- Life-threatening arrhythmias
- Established NSTEMI diagnosis
- Dynamic new or presumably new contiguous ST/T segment changes
- GRACE risk score > 140
| Risk Category | Criteria | Timing of Angiography |
|---|---|---|
| Very high risk | Haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, refractory pain, life-threatening arrhythmia, mechanical complications | Immediate (< 2 hours) |
| High risk | GRACE > 140, dynamic ST changes, troponin rise, established NSTEMI [22] | Early (< 24 hours) |
| Intermediate risk | DM, CKD, LVEF < 40%, prior PCI/CABG, GRACE 109–140 | Within 72 hours |
| Low risk | No high-risk features, symptoms resolved, normal serial troponin | Non-invasive testing first → selective invasive if positive |
Immediate revascularization if haemodynamically unstable / mechanical complications [10].
- "Percutaneous" = through the skin; "coronary" = heart arteries; "intervention" = treatment.
- A catheter is threaded into the culprit coronary artery → balloon angioplasty ± stent deployment to restore lumen patency.
Stent types:
- Bare-metal stent (BMS): Metal scaffold only; higher restenosis rate (~20–30%); requires shorter DAPT (1–3 months)
- Drug-eluting stent (DES): Coated with antiproliferative drug (sirolimus, everolimus, paclitaxel) → inhibits neointimal hyperplasia → lower restenosis (~5–10%); requires longer DAPT
You really want to make sure there is no re-thrombosis in your stent [1] — hence the extended DAPT duration.
Indications for CABG over PCI in NSTEMI:
ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10].
- Left main disease (> 50% stenosis)
- Severe triple-vessel disease (especially with diabetes or reduced LVEF)
- Complex anatomy not amenable to PCI
- Failed PCI
Graft types:
- Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) → LAD: Gold standard; > 90% patency at 10 years (arterial graft)
- Saphenous vein graft (SVG): ~50% patency at 10 years (venous grafts degenerate faster)
7. Secondary Prevention (Long-Term)
After the acute phase of ACS, treatment modalities in secondary prevention: Antiplatelet therapy, Anti-ischaemic therapy, Risk factor control, Lipid-lowering therapies [1].
Maintained over 12 months, unless there are contraindications or excessive bleeding risk [1]:
- Ticagrelor 90mg BID
- Clopidogrel 75mg/day
Try to maintain for 12 months → if really cannot due to bleeding risk, maintain at least for 3–6 months [1].
For patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI → 6 months. For patients with acute MI who underwent PCI → 12 months still required [24].
Left main artery stenting → extended double antiplatelet beyond 12 months has better outcomes [24].
AF with MI → triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, DOAC) [24]:
- Not recommended for the long term, since bleeding risk is unacceptable
- No more than 30 days
- Then step down to dual therapy (DOAC + single antiplatelet) for up to 12 months
- Then lifelong anticoagulation alone (DOAC)
Statin should be used in all patients unless contraindicated [22]. Target LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L (or > 50% reduction from baseline) per 2019 ESC guidelines.
For patients who develop heart failure post-NSTEMI (LVEF ≤ 40%), the four pillars of HFrEF apply [22]:
| Pillar | Drug Class | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACEI/ARB → Consider switching to ARNI if persistent HF symptoms despite ACEI/ARB [22] | Sacubitril/valsartan |
| 2 | Beta-blocker | Bisoprolol, Carvedilol, Metoprolol succinate |
| 3 | Aldosterone blocker (MRA) | Should be used in patients without significant renal dysfunction or hyperkalaemia, already on therapeutic ACEI + BB, with LVEF ≤ 40% + diabetes or HF [22] |
| 4 | SGLT2 inhibitor | Consider SGLT2 inhibitor in heart failure [22] — e.g. Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin |
Consider ARNI: Stop ACEI 36 hours before initiating ARNI [22] (to avoid dual RAAS blockade → angioedema risk).
| Risk Factor | Target | Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Smoking | Complete cessation | Counselling, NRT, varenicline |
| BP | < 130/80 mmHg (per 2024 ESC) | ACEI/ARB first-line in post-MI |
| Diabetes | HbA1c < 7% (individualised) | Optimise OHAs; SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA preferred (cardiovascular benefit) |
| LDL-C | < 1.4 mmol/L or > 50% ↓ | High-intensity statin ± ezetimibe ± PCSK9 inhibitor |
| Weight | BMI < 25 | Diet, exercise, GLP-1 RA if indicated |
| Exercise | Cardiac rehabilitation | Supervised exercise programme post-MI |
Very high risk angina patients: on top of low-dose aspirin (81–100mg daily), add rivaroxaban/Factor Xa inhibitor 2.5mg twice daily [4] — the COMPASS regimen for very high-risk patients with stable CAD post-ACS.
For patients with severely reduced LVEF post-NSTEMI:
| Device | Indication | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) | Prophylactic ICD in NYHA II–III with LVEF < 30% (may be considered LVEF 31–35%) [20]. Following 3 months of optimal medical therapy in patients with PMHx of MI [20] | Low LVEF → high risk of lethal ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) → ICD terminates these automatically |
| CRT (Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy) | NYHA III despite optimal medical therapy + sinus rhythm + widened QRS (> 120ms, especially LBBB) + LVEF < 35% + LVD > 5.5cm [20] | LBBB → LV dyssynchrony → inefficient contraction → CRT biventricular pacing restores synchrony |
| Phase | Component | Agents | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate | General measures | O₂ (if SpO₂ < 94%), morphine, bed rest, monitoring | CCU admission for high risk |
| Immediate | Antiplatelet (DAPT) | Aspirin 320mg load → 80–100mg daily + Ticagrelor 180mg → 90mg BD (or Clopidogrel 600mg → 75mg daily) | 12 months unless bleeding risk too high |
| Immediate | Anticoagulant | Enoxaparin 1mg/kg SC Q12H (or UFH in cath lab, or Fondaparinux 2.5mg SC daily) | Up to 8 days or until revascularisation |
| Immediate | Anti-ischaemic | Nitrates (SL/IV) + Beta-blocker (metoprolol, titrate HR < 70) | CCB if BB contraindicated; avoid nitrates in RV infarct |
| Within 24h | Statin | Atorvastatin 80mg or Rosuvastatin 20–40mg | Regardless of baseline LDL |
| Within 24h | ACEI/ARB | If LVEF < 40%, HT, DM, CKD | ARB if ACEI intolerant |
| Within 24h | PPI | Pantoprazole preferred | If on ≥ 2 antithrombotics |
| Risk-stratified | Invasive strategy | Angiography ± PCI / CABG | Timing by GRACE score |
| Long-term | Secondary prevention | DAPT 12 months, BB, ACEI/ARB, statin, risk factor control | 4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40% |
High Yield Summary — NSTEMI Management
- NSTEMI management = antithrombotic (DAPT + anticoagulant) + anti-ischaemic (nitrate + BB) + early statin + ACEI/ARB if indicated.
- NEVER give fibrinolytics in NSTEMI — only for STEMI.
- DAPT = Aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in most cases) for 12 months post-ACS.
- Timing of invasive strategy guided by GRACE score: very high risk < 2h, high risk < 24h, intermediate < 72h, low risk = selective.
- Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmia, refractory pain.
- 5 contraindications for nitrates: RV infarct, PDE5 inhibitor use, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia.
- BB contraindications: acute pulmonary oedema, poor ventricular function (acute), heart block (2nd/3rd degree), asthma/COPD.
- ACEI contraindications: bilateral renal artery stenosis, azotaemia, pregnancy, angioedema, hyperkalaemia.
- Secondary prevention: DAPT, BB, ACEI/ARB, high-intensity statin, risk factor control. 4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40%.
- AF + ACS = triple therapy (max 30 days) → dual therapy (up to 12 months) → lifelong anticoagulation alone.
Active Recall - NSTEMI Management
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [22] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf [23] Senior notes: Introduction to Clinical pharmacology (I) (Pharmaco-Genomics, Precision Medicine).pdf [24] Senior notes: Block A - Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelets and anticoagulation.pdf
Complications of NSTEMI
Complications of NSTEMI are best understood as logical, downstream consequences of myocardial necrosis. Although NSTEMI involves subendocardial (partial-thickness) infarction — as opposed to the transmural damage of STEMI — significant complications can still occur, particularly when the infarct is large, when treatment is delayed, or when the patient has pre-existing cardiac disease. The complications are also time-dependent: some occur in minutes to hours ("early"), others over days to weeks ("subacute"), and some develop over months to years ("late").
The overarching principle: dead myocardium cannot contract, cannot conduct electricity properly, and (if enough of it dies) structurally weakens the ventricular wall. Every complication flows from one or more of these three consequences.
| Mechanism | Early (minutes–hours) | Subacute (days–weeks) | Late (weeks–months–years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical instability | Ventricular arrhythmia (VT/VF), AF, bradycardia/AV block | Persistent arrhythmia | Sudden cardiac death from scar-related re-entry VT |
| Pump failure | Acute pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shock | Progressive heart failure | Chronic HFrEF, ischaemic cardiomyopathy |
| Mechanical disruption | — | Papillary muscle rupture (MR), ventricular septal rupture (VSD), free wall rupture (tamponade) | Ventricular aneurysm |
| Thrombotic | — | LV mural thrombus → systemic embolism (stroke) | Recurrent MI, stent thrombosis |
| Inflammatory | — | Pericarditis (early), Dressler syndrome (late) | — |
| Iatrogenic / procedure-related | PCI complications | Stent thrombosis, access-site bleeding | In-stent restenosis |
Complications of MI: Refractory angina, Cardiogenic shock, Acute pulmonary oedema, Ventricular arrhythmia [10].
2. Electrical Complications (Arrhythmias)
Ischaemic and necrotic myocardium is electrically unstable. Why?
- Ischaemic cells cannot maintain normal ionic gradients (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase fails due to ATP depletion) → K⁺ leaks out of cells into the extracellular space → local hyperkalaemia → altered resting membrane potential.
- Dead cells become electrically inert, creating boundaries between healthy and necrotic tissue → differences in refractoriness and conduction velocity → conditions ripe for re-entry circuits → VT/VF.
- Autonomic imbalance: pain and stress → catecholamine surge → ↑automaticity → ectopic foci fire.
ECG: peaked T, widening of QRS, loss of P, sine wave, asystole — this sequence describes progressive hyperkalaemia effects on the heart, analogous to the ionic derangement in the peri-infarct zone [25].
| Type | Features | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Non-sustained VT | Short runs (< 30s), often self-terminating | Correct electrolytes (K⁺ > 4.0, Mg²⁺ > 1.0); beta-blocker; monitor |
| Sustained monomorphic VT (stable) | Amiodarone 150mg IV over 10 min, repeat if needed, then 600–1200mg infusion/24h. Lignocaine 50–100mg IV bolus, then 1–4mg/min infusion. Procainamide 20–30mg/min loading, then 1–4mg/min infusion. Synchronized cardioversion starting with 100J [12] | |
| Sustained polymorphic VT | Irregular wide-complex tachycardia; often degenerates into VF | Unsynchronized cardioversion starting with 200J [12] |
| VF | Prompt defibrillation with reference to ACLS algorithm [12] | Immediate defibrillation → CPR → adrenaline → amiodarone → address reversible causes (4Hs and 4Ts) |
Treat as VT until proven otherwise in the setting of ACS [12]. This is a vital principle — any wide-complex tachycardia in a patient with known or suspected MI should be treated as VT.
Cardiac arrest causes: Coronary artery disease (85%): myocardial ischaemia, AMI, prior MI with myocardial scarring [26]. This statistic tells you that ischaemic heart disease (and by extension, MI) is the single most common cause of sudden cardiac death.
| Type | Significance | Management |
|---|---|---|
| AF / Atrial flutter | Common and frequently transient; can be a sign of impending or overt LVF [12] | Digoxin 0.25mg IV/PO stat, then 0.25mg PO Q8H ×2 more doses as loading; maintenance 0.0625–0.25mg daily. Diltiazem 10–15mg IV over 5–10 min, then 5–15 µg/kg/min. Amiodarone 5mg/kg IV over 60 min, then 600–900mg/24h [12] |
| PSVT | Uncommon; may worsen ischaemia | Cardioversion if severe haemodynamic compromise. ATP 10–20mg IV bolus → verapamil 5–15mg IV slowly (C/I if BP low or on BB, beware of post-conversion angina) [12] |
Why does AF occur post-MI? Acute ischaemia → ↑left atrial pressure (from LV dysfunction) → atrial stretch → triggers AF. Also, catecholamine surge and inflammatory mediators contribute.
| Type | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Symptomatic sinus bradycardia | Excessive vagal tone (Bezold-Jarisch reflex), especially in inferior MI (RCA supplies SA node in ~60% of people) | Atropine 0.3–0.6mg IV bolus. Pacing if unresponsive to atropine [12] |
| 1st-degree AV block | ↑Vagal tone or AV nodal ischaemia | Conservative [12] — usually benign and transient |
| Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) | AV nodal ischaemia (AV node supplied by RCA in ~80%) | Conservative [12] — usually transient in inferior MI |
| Mobitz Type II | Below-AV-node (His-Purkle) ischaemia; implies larger infarct | Pacing [12] — high risk of progression to complete heart block |
| Complete (3rd degree) heart block | Extensive conduction system necrosis | Pacing [12]. Conservative Tx under careful monitoring as alternative if inferior MI with narrow QRS escape rhythm and adequate rate [12] |
Other indications for temporary pacing: bifascicular block + 1st-degree AV block, alternating BBB / RBBB + alternating LAFB/LPFB (anterior infarct → ↑risk of sudden asystole) [12].
Inferior-posterior MI causing a complete AV block — Treatment is different → pacing before revascularization? [27].
Why Is AV Block More Common in Inferior MI?
The AV node is supplied by the RCA in ~80% of people (and by the LCx in the remainder). Inferior MI (usually RCA territory) → AV nodal ischaemia → varying degrees of AV block. These are usually reversible because the AV node has a good collateral blood supply and the block is often functional (vagal) rather than structural.
In contrast, conduction block in anterior MI (LAD territory) implies extensive septal necrosis involving the His-Purkinje system → this is structural damage, usually irreversible, and carries a much worse prognosis.
3. Pump Failure — Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock
Pump failure mechanism: downward spiral exacerbating myocardial ischaemia [12]:
- ↓Systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → ↓supply → ischaemia
- ↓Diastolic function → ↑pulmonary congestion → hypoxaemia → ischaemia
Indicates extensive myocardial damage → poor prognosis (↑likelihood of other complications) [12].
This is a vicious cycle: necrotic myocardium cannot contract → remaining myocardium must work harder → ↑O₂ demand of viable tissue → more ischaemia → more necrosis → progressive pump failure.
- Pathophysiology: Loss of contractile myocardium → ↓LVEF → ↑LV end-diastolic pressure → ↑pulmonary capillary pressure → fluid transudation into alveoli → pulmonary oedema → hypoxaemia → further ischaemia.
- Clinical features: Acute dyspnoea, orthopnoea, pink frothy sputum, bilateral crackles, S3 gallop, tachycardia.
- Killip classification (introduced in Part 1) grades the severity: Killip III = frank pulmonary oedema.
- Defined as: SBP < 90 mmHg (or need for vasopressors) + signs of end-organ hypoperfusion (altered consciousness, oliguria, cold clammy extremities, elevated lactate).
- Occurs when > 40% of LV myocardium is lost.
- In-hospital mortality remains ~40–50% despite modern therapy.
- Management: Inotropes (e.g. IV dobutamine) if adequate filling pressure. Fluid resuscitation ± vasopressors if low filling pressure [19]. Mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella, ECMO) as bridge to revascularisation.
Watch out for other causes: mechanical complications, arrhythmia, excessive use of anti-HTN [12]. Not all post-MI hypotension is pure pump failure — always consider mechanical rupture or arrhythmia.
4. Mechanical Complications
These are the most dramatic and often fatal complications. They result from structural weakening of necrotic myocardium. Although more classically associated with STEMI (transmural necrosis), they can occur in NSTEMI, particularly with larger subendocardial infarcts.
Timing: Typically days 3–7 post-MI (when necrotic tissue is softest, before scar formation begins — "the danger zone of myocardial softening").
- Pathophysiology: The papillary muscles anchor the mitral valve leaflets via chordae tendineae. They are vulnerable because they are at the most distal end of the coronary perfusion pathway (subendocardial). The posteromedial papillary muscle is supplied by a single artery (PDA, usually from RCA), making it much more vulnerable than the anterolateral papillary muscle (dual supply from LAD + LCx).
- Presentation: Sudden-onset severe dyspnoea, new loud pansystolic murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla, flash pulmonary oedema.
- Diagnosis: Echocardiography (flail mitral leaflet, severe MR jet on Doppler).
- Management: Haemodynamic stabilisation (vasodilators to ↓afterload, IABP) → emergent surgical mitral valve repair/replacement.
Look for complications of IHD: Cardiomegaly, Heart failure, Mitral regurgitation [4].
- Pathophysiology: Full-thickness necrosis of the interventricular septum → physical rupture → left-to-right shunt (blood flows from high-pressure LV → low-pressure RV).
- Presentation: New harsh pansystolic murmur at the left sternal border (different location from MR murmur which is at the apex), acute RV volume overload → biventricular failure.
- Diagnosis: Echocardiography with colour Doppler (visualises the shunt); step-up in O₂ saturation from RA to RV on right heart catheterisation.
- Management: Haemodynamic support (IABP) → urgent surgical repair or percutaneous closure.
- Pathophysiology: Full-thickness necrosis of the LV free wall → rupture → blood leaks into pericardial space → acute cardiac tamponade.
- Presentation: Sudden haemodynamic collapse, pulseless electrical activity (PEA), Beck's triad (hypotension, muffled heart sounds, raised JVP).
- This is almost always rapidly fatal unless recognised immediately and treated with emergency pericardiocentesis + surgical repair.
- Subacute "contained" rupture: A pseudoaneurysm forms when the rupture is sealed by adherent pericardium or thrombus → presents more gradually with persistent chest pain and haemodynamic instability.
- Pathophysiology: The necrotic wall segment heals with thin, fibrotic scar tissue → under systemic pressure, the scar bulges outward during systole (paradoxical motion) → true aneurysm (all layers of the wall present, unlike pseudoaneurysm).
- Clinical significance:
- Reduces effective LVEF (part of the stroke volume goes into the aneurysm)
- Stasis within the aneurysm → mural thrombus → systemic embolism (stroke)
- Substrate for re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (scar border zone)
- Persistent ST elevation on ECG (the scar tissue creates a permanent injury current)
- Management: Anticoagulation if mural thrombus; surgical aneurysmectomy if refractory arrhythmia or severe HF.
How to Distinguish MR from VSD Post-MI at the Bedside
Both present with a new pansystolic murmur + acute haemodynamic deterioration. Key differences:
| Feature | Papillary Muscle Rupture (MR) | Ventricular Septal Rupture (VSD) |
|---|---|---|
| Location of murmur | Apex, radiating to axilla | Left sternal border, radiating to right sternal border |
| Thrill | Uncommon | Often present at left sternal border |
| PA catheter | Large V waves in PCWP tracing | Step-up in O₂ saturation from RA → RV |
| Infarct territory | Usually inferior (posteromedial papillary muscle) | Anterior (septal) or inferior |
Echocardiography is definitive for both.
5. Thrombotic Complications
- Pathophysiology: Akinetic or dyskinetic myocardial segments create blood stasis within the LV cavity → thrombus formation (Virchow's triad: stasis + endothelial injury + hypercoagulability from the inflammatory response). The thrombus adheres to the damaged endocardium.
- Risk factors: Large anterior MI (akinetic apex), LVEF < 40%, ventricular aneurysm, AF.
- Consequence: Dislodgement → systemic embolism → ischaemic stroke (most feared), mesenteric ischaemia, limb ischaemia.
- Detection: Echocardiography (TTE or TEE).
- Management: Therapeutic anticoagulation (warfarin or DOAC) for ≥ 3–6 months if mural thrombus detected.
Post-ACS ischaemia indicated by symptoms/ECG changes + new rise in cTn > 20% or to > 5× ULN (if normal baseline) [12].
Cause of post-PCI MI: side branch occlusion (60%), stent complications, microembolization [12].
High risk → prompt coronary angiography/PCI + IV GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (if dynamic ECG changes) [12].
In thrombolysis patients, up to 50% have post-infarct angina (because of residual stenosis) [12].
6. Pericardial Complications
- Timing: Days 1–3 post-MI.
- Pathophysiology: Transmural (or near-transmural) necrosis → inflammation extends to the adjacent visceral pericardium → acute pericarditis.
- Clinical features: Pleuritic chest pain (sharp, worse lying flat, better leaning forward), pericardial friction rub, diffuse ST elevation on ECG (different from the localised ST changes of MI).
- Management: Aspirin (high-dose, 650mg Q4–6H); avoid NSAIDs (may impair scar formation and increase risk of myocardial rupture in the acute post-MI period); avoid corticosteroids (same concern).
- Important: Must differentiate from recurrent MI (recurrent ischaemic pain) — ECG and troponin serial measurements help.
- Timing: 2–10 weeks post-MI (late complication).
- Pathophysiology: Autoimmune-mediated pericarditis. Myocardial necrosis exposes intracellular antigens (e.g. cardiac myosin) to the immune system → autoantibody formation → immune complex deposition in the pericardium → inflammation.
- Clinical features: Fever, pleuritic chest pain, pericardial effusion ± pleural effusion, elevated ESR/CRP.
- Management: NSAIDs (safer at this stage — scar has formed), colchicine, short course corticosteroids if refractory.
- Now rare in the modern era (incidence < 1%) because early reperfusion therapy limits the extent of myocardial necrosis → less antigen exposure.
Since most NSTEMI patients undergo coronary angiography ± PCI, awareness of procedural complications is essential:
| Category | Complication | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular (access site) | Access site bleeding, retroperitoneal bleeding, haematoma, AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm [7] | Retroperitoneal bleeding: femoral access with artery puncture. Diagnosed with haemodynamic compromise (↑HR ↓BP) [7] |
| Coronary artery | Dissection and acute closure, intramural haematoma (6.7%), perforation (0.2–0.6%), side branch occlusion (up to 19%) [12] | Coronary artery perforation: requires inflation of perfusion balloon catheter to buy time for pericardiocentesis and haemodynamic stabilisation. Emergency insertion of covered stent [7] |
| Stent-related | Stent thrombosis (1–2%): acute event, usually presents with severe STEMI or cardiac death [12] | Due to thrombus formation at exposed stent surface before endothelialization. Majority occurs < 30d. Prevention: DAPT until endothelialization [12] |
| In-stent restenosis (ISR): chronic event, usually presents with recurrent stable angina [12] | Due to intimal proliferation → gradual re-stenosis. Usually ≥ 6–9 months. Prevention: drug-eluting stent (DES) [12] | |
| Stent infection: associated with mycotic aneurysm and spontaneous coronary artery perforation [7] | Very rare | |
| Systemic | Stroke, contrast-induced AKI, bacteraemia, anticoagulation-associated bleeding [12] | Ischaemic stroke: dislodgement of thrombus, calcific material or atherosclerotic plaques during catheter manipulation. Haemorrhagic stroke: acquired hemostatic abnormalities from antiplatelet regimens [7] |
| Contrast-related | Contrast-induced AKI: manifests within 48h and peaks at Day 3–5 [7] | Especially in CKD, DM, dehydration. Prevention: adequate hydration, minimise contrast volume, hold nephrotoxic drugs |
Stent Thrombosis vs In-Stent Restenosis — Key Distinction
These are frequently confused by students:
| Stent Thrombosis | In-Stent Restenosis | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Thrombus on exposed stent surface | Neointimal hyperplasia (tissue overgrowth) |
| Timing | Usually < 30 days (before endothelialization) | ≥ 6–9 months |
| Presentation | Acute STEMI or sudden cardiac death | Recurrent stable angina |
| Prevention | DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) | Drug-eluting stent (DES) |
| Trigger | Cessation of DAPT | Progressive tissue growth |
Stent thrombosis is associated with cessation of DAPT [7] — this is why patients are counselled never to stop DAPT prematurely without consulting their cardiologist.
8. Long-Term Complications
- Pathophysiology: Extensive myocardial necrosis → replacement fibrosis (scar) → loss of contractile mass → progressive LV dilatation (remodelling) → HFrEF.
- This is the most common long-term consequence of MI and the reason why secondary prevention (ACEI/ARB, BB, statin, SGLT2i, MRA) is so critical.
- The final common path of all cardiac diseases is: Heart failure [20].
Prophylactic ICD placement should be considered in patients with NYHA II–III (LVEF < 30%), may be considered in LVEF 31–35%. Following 3 months of optimal medical therapy in patients with PMHx of MI [20]. The chance of lethal ventricular arrhythmias increases with reducing LVEF [20].
- Late VT/VF from scar-related re-entry circuits.
- This is why prophylactic ICD is indicated in patients with severely depressed LVEF post-MI (see management section).
ICD: Primary prevention in patients with low LVEF, CAD ± inducible VT on electrophysiology study. Secondary prevention of VT/VF in patients who have already had an episode [20].
- Residual atherosclerotic disease → risk of recurrent plaque rupture at the same or a different site.
- This is why lifelong secondary prevention is essential.
| Category | Complication | Timing | Mechanism | Key Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrhythmia | VT/VF | Early | Electrical instability of ischaemic/necrotic tissue | Defibrillation, amiodarone, ICD |
| AF | Early–subacute | Atrial stretch from ↑LVEDP, catecholamine surge | Rate/rhythm control | |
| AV block | Early | AV nodal ischaemia (RCA territory) | Atropine, pacing | |
| Pump failure | Acute pulmonary oedema | Early | ↓LVEF → ↑LVEDP → pulmonary congestion | Diuretics, vasodilators, inotropes |
| Cardiogenic shock | Early | > 40% LV loss → ↓CO | Inotropes, MCS, revascularisation | |
| Mechanical | MR (papillary muscle rupture) | Day 3–7 | Necrosis of posteromedial papillary muscle | Surgical repair |
| VSR | Day 3–7 | Septal necrosis → rupture | Surgical/percutaneous closure | |
| Free wall rupture | Day 3–7 | LV free wall necrosis | Emergency surgery | |
| Ventricular aneurysm | Weeks–months | Scar tissue bulges → paradoxical motion | Anticoagulation, aneurysmectomy | |
| Thrombotic | Mural thrombus → stroke | Days–weeks | Stasis in akinetic LV | Anticoagulation |
| Recurrent MI | Any time | Residual plaque disease | Secondary prevention | |
| Pericardial | Early pericarditis | Day 1–3 | Transmural necrosis → pericardial inflammation | High-dose aspirin |
| Dressler syndrome | Week 2–10 | Autoimmune anti-cardiac antigen response | NSAIDs, colchicine | |
| PCI-related | Stent thrombosis | < 30 days | Thrombus on bare stent surface | DAPT |
| In-stent restenosis | ≥ 6–9 months | Neointimal hyperplasia | DES, repeat PCI | |
| Long-term | Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | Months–years | Progressive LV remodelling | 4 pillars of HFrEF, ICD, CRT |
High Yield Summary — Complications of NSTEMI
- Arrhythmias are the most common early complication. Any wide-complex tachycardia in ACS = treat as VT until proven otherwise. VF requires immediate defibrillation.
- Pump failure = ↓LVEF → pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock. Downward spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia.
- Mechanical complications (papillary muscle rupture, VSR, free wall rupture) occur typically day 3–7 when necrotic tissue is softest. New pansystolic murmur post-MI = emergency echocardiography.
- Mural thrombus forms in akinetic segments → systemic embolism (stroke). Screen with echo; treat with anticoagulation.
- Pericarditis: Early (day 1–3, inflammatory) vs Dressler syndrome (week 2–10, autoimmune). Dressler now rare due to early reperfusion.
- PCI complications: Stent thrombosis (< 30d, acute STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs In-stent restenosis (≥ 6–9 months, recurrent angina, prevented by DES).
- Long-term: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (chronic HFrEF), sudden cardiac death from scar-related VT. ICD indicated if LVEF < 30% after 3 months of optimal medical therapy post-MI.
Active Recall - Complications of NSTEMI
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [19] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [22] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf [25] Senior notes: Block A - Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders.pdf [26] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (Section: Cardiac Arrest) [27] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Data Interpretation.pdf
High Yield Summary
- NSTEMI = myocardial necrosis (↑troponin) WITHOUT persistent ST elevation on ECG.
- NSTEMI sits within the ACS spectrum alongside UA (no troponin rise) and STEMI (ST elevation + troponin rise).
- Commonest cause: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus → subendocardial ischaemia.
- Incomplete coronary occlusion → NSTEMI; Complete occlusion → STEMI [2].
- Risk factors: HTN, DM, dyslipidaemia, smoking, obesity, FHx, male sex, age, CKD.
- Symptoms: Chest pain (> 20 min, not relieved by rest/GTN), dyspnoea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope. Atypical in DM, elderly, women.
- Signs: May be normal. Look for haemodynamic compromise (↓BP, ↑HR, S3, crackles), new murmur (papillary muscle dysfunction → MR), JVP elevation.
- ECG: ST depression, T-wave inversion, or normal. Never persistent ST elevation.
- Troponin: Rise and/or fall pattern + clinical ischaemia = MI. Isolated troponin rise ≠ MI.
- Type 1 MI (plaque event) vs Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) — different management.
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI
- NSTEMI must be distinguished from STEMI (ECG: persistent ST elevation or new LBBB → STEMI) and from UA (troponin: normal → UA).
- Life-threatening mimics that CANNOT be missed: Aortic dissection (tearing, back, pulse deficit), PE (pleuritic, haemoptysis, leg swelling), Tension pneumothorax (hyperresonance, absent breath sounds), Perforated viscus.
- Cardiac mimics: Pericarditis (positional, pleuritic, trapezius ridge, rub), Myocarditis (young, viral prodrome, diffuse ECG), Takotsubo (post-menopausal, stress, apical ballooning, clean coronaries).
- GI mimics: GERD (not exertional, worse lying down), peptic ulcer, pancreatitis. Remember: MI must be excluded as a sinister non-GI cause of epigastric pain.
- Troponin elevation ≠ NSTEMI: Always consider Type 2 MI, myocarditis, PE, HF, CKD, sepsis. Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury but not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions.
- Approach: Stabilise → SOCRATES + risk factors → targeted exam → ECG → troponin (serial) → CXR → integrate.
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis and Investigations of NSTEMI
- Diagnostic criteria for MI = rise/fall of troponin above 99th URL + at least one of: ischaemic symptoms, new ST-T changes or LBBB, pathological Q waves, imaging RWMA, or angiographic thrombus.
- NSTEMI = criteria met + no persistent ST elevation + troponin elevated (separates from UA where troponin is normal).
- hs-cTn is the gold standard biomarker. Use the 0h/1h (or 0h/3h) algorithm for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
- CK-MB retains value for timeline (late presentation) and reinfarction detection (shorter half-life).
- ECG in NSTEMI: ST depression / T-wave inversion in ≥ 2 contiguous leads; usually widespread (subendocardial). Always check aVR for left main pattern.
- Wellens' syndrome (biphasic or deeply inverted T waves in V2–V3, pain-free) = critical proximal LAD stenosis. Stress test contraindicated. Urgent angiography needed.
- CCTA: Triple rule-out (MI, PE, aortic dissection). High sensitivity → great for ruling out. False positives from calcified plaques.
- GRACE score is the validated risk stratification tool → determines urgency of invasive strategy.
- Troponin elevation ≠ MI. Not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions. Interpret in clinical context.
High Yield Summary — NSTEMI Management
- NSTEMI management = antithrombotic (DAPT + anticoagulant) + anti-ischaemic (nitrate + BB) + early statin + ACEI/ARB if indicated.
- NEVER give fibrinolytics in NSTEMI — only for STEMI.
- DAPT = Aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in most cases) for 12 months post-ACS.
- Timing of invasive strategy guided by GRACE score: very high risk < 2h, high risk < 24h, intermediate < 72h, low risk = selective.
- Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmia, refractory pain.
- 5 contraindications for nitrates: RV infarct, PDE5 inhibitor use, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia.
- BB contraindications: acute pulmonary oedema, poor ventricular function (acute), heart block (2nd/3rd degree), asthma/COPD.
- ACEI contraindications: bilateral renal artery stenosis, azotaemia, pregnancy, angioedema, hyperkalaemia.
- Secondary prevention: DAPT, BB, ACEI/ARB, high-intensity statin, risk factor control. 4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40%.
- AF + ACS = triple therapy (max 30 days) → dual therapy (up to 12 months) → lifelong anticoagulation alone.
High Yield Summary — Complications of NSTEMI
- Arrhythmias are the most common early complication. Any wide-complex tachycardia in ACS = treat as VT until proven otherwise. VF requires immediate defibrillation.
- Pump failure = ↓LVEF → pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock. Downward spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia.
- Mechanical complications (papillary muscle rupture, VSR, free wall rupture) occur typically day 3–7 when necrotic tissue is softest. New pansystolic murmur post-MI = emergency echocardiography.
- Mural thrombus forms in akinetic segments → systemic embolism (stroke). Screen with echo; treat with anticoagulation.
- Pericarditis: Early (day 1–3, inflammatory) vs Dressler syndrome (week 2–10, autoimmune). Dressler now rare due to early reperfusion.
- PCI complications: Stent thrombosis (< 30d, acute STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs In-stent restenosis (≥ 6–9 months, recurrent angina, prevented by DES).
- Long-term: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (chronic HFrEF), sudden cardiac death from scar-related VT. ICD indicated if LVEF < 30% after 3 months of optimal medical therapy post-MI.
Unstable Angina
Unstable angina is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by new-onset, worsening, or rest angina due to coronary plaque disruption and thrombosis without myocardial necrosis.
STEMI
ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is an acute complete occlusion of a coronary artery resulting in transmural myocardial ischemia, characterized by persistent ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram and requiring emergent reperfusion therapy.