CardiologyIschaemic Heart DiseaseAcute Coronary Syndrome

NSTEMI

Definition and clinical overview of Nstemi.

Exam domainOne-glance essentials
Definition / diagnosis
  • NSTEMI = acute MI with a rise/fall in troponin above the 99th percentile plus ischaemic evidence, without persistent ST elevation [2]
  • Troponin elevation separates NSTEMI from unstable angina [1]
Epidemiology / risks
  • Major risks: age, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, CKD and premature family history [2]
  • Older adults, women and patients with diabetes may present atypically or painlessly [2]
Core mechanism
  • Plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus → subendocardial necrosis [1]
  • Type 2 MI is supply-demand mismatch without acute plaque disruption; treat the trigger [2]
Clinical picture
  • Pressure/heaviness > 20 minutes, often at rest and incompletely relieved by GTN [1]
  • Dyspnoea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope or fatigue may replace chest pain [1]
Investigations
  • Obtain 12-lead ECG promptly and repeat serially: ST depression, T-wave inversion or a normal ECG are possible [1]
  • Serial high-sensitivity troponin confirms a dynamic rise/fall; isolated elevation is myocardial injury, not necessarily MI [2]
  • Echo assesses RWMA/LVEF; GRACE guides invasive timing [3]
Management
  • DAPT + anticoagulation, anti-ischaemic therapy, high-intensity statin and ACEI/ARB when indicated [2][3]
  • Very high risk → immediate invasive strategy; high risk/GRACE > 140 → early angiography [3]
  • Revascularise by PCI or CABG according to anatomy [3]
Complications
  • Early: VT/VF, AV block, acute pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock [2]
  • Days 3–7: new murmur/collapse suggests papillary rupture, VSR or free-wall rupture [2]
  • Late: ischaemic cardiomyopathy, mural thrombus/embolism and scar-related VT [2]
Prevention / follow-up
  • Continue DAPT for the indicated post-ACS period, then antiplatelet therapy; never stop early without review [3]
  • Cardiac rehabilitation plus smoking, BP, diabetes and LDL control reduces recurrence [1]
Exam traps
  • Fibrinolysis is not indicated in NSTEMI [3]
  • A normal initial ECG or troponin does not exclude NSTEMI; repeat both [1]
  • Exclude aortic dissection before antithrombotics when pain is abrupt, tearing or associated with pulse/BP asymmetry [2]

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [3] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf

NSTEMI (Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)


NSTEMI stands for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Let's break that name down:

  • Non-ST-Elevation: The ECG does not show persistent ST-segment elevation (which would indicate transmural, full-thickness ischaemia). Instead, there may be ST depression, T-wave inversion, or even a normal ECG.
  • Myocardial: "myo" (muscle) + "cardial" (heart) → heart muscle.
  • Infarction: "infarctus" (Latin: to stuff/block) → tissue death due to interrupted blood supply.

So NSTEMI = death of heart muscle cells confirmed by elevated cardiac biomarkers (troponin), but without the ECG pattern of persistent ST-elevation.

Key Definitional Distinction (High Yield)

NSTEMI is distinguished from unstable angina (UA) by the presence of elevated cardiac troponin. Both UA and NSTEMI sit under the umbrella of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The distinction from STEMI is that incomplete blockage will result in NSTEMI → antithrombotic therapy, while complete blockage will result in STEMI → thrombolysis / primary PCI [1][2].

The ACS Spectrum

All three entities — UA, NSTEMI, and STEMI — are part of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) [1][3]:

FeatureUnstable Angina (UA)NSTEMISTEMI
TroponinNormalElevatedElevated
ECGST depression / T-wave inversion / normalST depression / T-wave inversion / normalPersistent ST elevation or new LBBB
Coronary occlusionPartial / transientPartial (incomplete)Complete
Myocardial necrosisNoYes (subendocardial)Yes (typically transmural)

ACS includes: Unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI [1][3].

The Fourth Universal Definition of MI (2018, reaffirmed 2025) classifies MI into 5 types — NSTEMI most commonly falls under Type 1 (spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque event) or Type 2 (MI secondary to supply–demand mismatch without acute plaque rupture).


2. Epidemiology

  • With medical treatment nowadays, mortality is reducing. However, STEMI is still the diagnosed subtype of ACS causing the most mortality [1].
  • Undetermined cases (missed diagnoses) are actually the even bigger killers [1].
  • NSTEMI now accounts for roughly 60–70% of all MI presentations globally (and the proportion is rising, as STEMI incidence falls due to better primary prevention and statin use).
  • In Hong Kong, coronary heart disease is the 3rd leading cause of death (after cancer and pneumonia). The Hospital Authority reports ~6,000–7,000 ACS admissions per year, with NSTEMI comprising the majority.
  • Males more common than females for IHD overall [4]. However, women with NSTEMI tend to present later, with more atypical symptoms, and have worse outcomes adjusted for age.
  • Incidence of NSTEMI is increasing (ageing population, better troponin assays detecting smaller MIs, increased awareness).
  • In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI is lower than STEMI (~3–5% vs ~6–8%), but 6-month and long-term mortality is equivalent or even higher for NSTEMI, because NSTEMI patients tend to be older with more comorbidities (DM, CKD, prior MI).

High Yield Exam Point

For stable angina without treatment, 10–20% progress to MI or unstable angina. For those who are treated, this risk drops to 0.8% [4]. This underscores the importance of secondary prevention.


3. Risk Factors

Risk factors for NSTEMI are essentially the risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease:

Risk FactorExplanation
AgeMales ≥ 45 y, Females ≥ 55 y (post-menopausal loss of oestrogen's vasoprotective effect)
Male sexOestrogen has anti-atherogenic properties (↑HDL, ↓LDL oxidation, endothelial NO production)
Family history of premature CADEarly death in a 1st-degree relative: Male < 55 y, Female < 65 y [3]
GeneticsPolygenic risk scores; specific loci (9p21.3 locus)

Risk FactorMechanism of Atherogenesis
HypertensionEndothelial shear stress → endothelial dysfunction → ↑LDL infiltration, ↑inflammation
Dyslipidaemia (↑LDL, ↓HDL, ↑TG)LDL penetrates intima → oxidised LDL → macrophage foam cells → fatty streak → plaque
Diabetes mellitusHyperglycaemia → advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) → endothelial dysfunction + accelerated atherosclerosis; also associated with ↑platelet reactivity and prothrombotic state
SmokingDirect endothelial toxicity, ↑oxidative stress, ↑fibrinogen, ↓HDL, ↑platelet aggregation
Obesity (esp. central)Insulin resistance → metabolic syndrome → atherogenic dyslipidaemia, inflammation
Physical inactivity↓AMPK activation → ↓glucose uptake, ↓FFA metabolism; contributes to obesity and insulin resistance [5]
Chronic kidney diseaseUraemic toxins, endothelial dysfunction, accelerated calcification — note: CKD is a risk factor for arterial thrombosis [6]

Arterial vs Venous Thrombosis Risk Factors (Exam Favourite)

Hypercholesterolaemia, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic renal impairment, Male gender → increase risk of arterial thrombosis only (not venous) [6].

Antiphospholipid syndrome (lupus anticoagulant) → classical example of a condition that increases risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis [6].

Inherited thrombophilias (Protein C/S deficiency, Factor V Leiden, Antithrombin deficiency) → risk for VTE only, not arterial thrombosis. Hence if you have a patient with recurrent stroke or MI, no point checking for inherited causes [6].

Hong Kong has some specific epidemiological considerations:

  • High prevalence of Type 2 DM (~10% of the adult population) [5]
  • Rising rates of obesity and metabolic syndrome
  • Historically lower smoking rates in women, but increasing in younger demographics
  • Relatively lower rates of familial hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis compared to Western populations (likely underdiagnosis rather than true lower prevalence)

4. Anatomy and Function — Coronary Arteries

Understanding NSTEMI requires knowing which arteries supply which territories, because the ECG changes and clinical consequences depend on the affected territory.

ArteryTerritory SuppliedECG LeadsClinical Consequence of Occlusion
LADAnterior wall, anterior septum, apexV1–V4 (± V5–V6)Anterior MI; large territory → high risk of LV dysfunction, cardiogenic shock
LCxLateral wall, posterior wall (if left-dominant)I, aVL, V5–V6Lateral MI; may be "electrically silent"
RCAInferior wall, RV, SA node (60%), AV node (80%)II, III, aVFInferior MI; RV infarction; bradycardia/AV block
Left MainEssentially entire LVWidespread ST changesHaemodynamic catastrophe

LAD = the "widow maker" because LAD territory represents the largest area of myocardium at risk.

This is critical to understanding NSTEMI. The subendocardium is the innermost layer of the myocardium, and it is the most vulnerable to ischaemia for three reasons:

  1. Highest wall stress: During systole, intramyocardial pressure is greatest at the subendocardium (it's compressed against the blood in the LV cavity). This compresses the intramural vessels.
  2. Last to receive blood: Coronary arteries penetrate from epicardium → endocardium. The subendocardium is at the distal end of the perfusion gradient.
  3. Highest oxygen demand: The subendocardium contracts most vigorously.

Therefore, partial occlusion of a coronary artery → the subendocardium is the first zone to become ischaemic and then necrotic → subendocardial infarction → NSTEMI. This is why NSTEMI does not produce ST elevation (ST elevation requires transmural, full-thickness ischaemia reaching the epicardium).


5. Aetiology and Pathophysiology

5.1 Aetiological Classification

NSTEMI results from myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatch leading to myocyte necrosis. The causes can be categorised [2][3][7]:

Plaque rupture causes thrombosis within coronary vessel → blockage of blood supply to the heart [2]. Stable plaque causes pain upon exertion, whilst rupture may cause complete occlusion of the vessel suddenly, leading to myocardial infarction [2].

Pathophysiology of atherosclerotic NSTEMI — step by step:

  1. Accumulation of LDL in arterial intima → induces innate inflammatory reaction [7]
  2. Recruits macrophages which engulf LDL and become foam cells [7]
  3. Formation of fibroatheroma with accumulation of macrophage foam cells along with cellular necrosis → further inflammation and distortion of intima [7]
  4. The fibrous cap overlying the lipid-rich necrotic core may be thin ("vulnerable plaque") or thick ("stable plaque")
  5. Plaque rupture or erosion → exposure of subendothelial collagen and tissue factor to flowing blood
  6. Platelet adhesion (via GPIb–vWF and GPIa/IIa–collagen) → platelet activation (release of TXA₂, ADP) → platelet aggregation (via GPIIb/IIIa–fibrinogen bridges)
  7. Simultaneous activation of the coagulation cascade → thrombin generation → fibrin mesh
  8. Non-occlusive (partial) thrombus or transient occlusion with spontaneous lysis → subendocardial ischaemia → NSTEMI

If the thrombus is completely occlusive and persistent → transmural ischaemia → STEMI.

Unstable plaque has a thinner fibrous cap + growing core, causing plaque rupture → thrombus formation → occlusion [7].

These produce NSTEMI through mechanisms other than classical plaque rupture [3][7]:

MechanismExamplesPathophysiology
Coronary spasmPrinzmetal's variant angina, Cocaine-inducedIntense focal vasospasm → transient complete or near-complete occlusion; cocaine blocks noradrenaline reuptake → excessive α-adrenergic vasoconstriction
Coronary dissectionAortic dissection (Type A) with retrograde extension, Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), Connective tissue disease (Marfan's, Ehlers-Danlos)Intimal tear → false lumen compresses true lumen → ↓flow
Coronary embolismAF, Atrial myxomaEmbolus lodges in coronary artery → acute occlusion
Coronary arteritis/VasculitisTakayasu arteritis (large-vessel), Polyarteritis nodosa (medium-vessel), Kawasaki disease (medium-vessel), EGPA (small-vessel)Inflammatory narrowing ± thrombosis of coronary vessels
Coronary artery anomaliesAnomalous origin, myocardial bridgingAbnormal anatomy → intermittent compression or kinking

Ischaemia without plaque rupture (imbalance between blood supply and demand) [7]:

↓ Supply↑ Demand
Anaemia (↓O₂ carrying capacity)Thyrotoxicosis (↑metabolic rate, ↑HR)
Hypotension / shockHypertension (↑afterload → ↑wall stress → ↑O₂ demand)
Hypoxaemia (e.g. severe pneumonia, PE)Tachyarrhythmias (↓diastolic filling time → ↓coronary perfusion AND ↑demand)
Coronary spasmAortic stenosis (↑LV pressure → subendocardial compression)

ConditionMechanism
Takotsubo (Stress) cardiomyopathyCatecholamine surge → direct myocyte toxicity + microvascular spasm
MyocarditisViral/autoimmune inflammation → myocyte necrosis → troponin rise

Type 1 vs Type 2 MI (Exam Favourite)

Type 1 MI = Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion with thrombus → acute coronary event. This is the "classic" MI.

Type 2 MI = Myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatch without acute plaque disruption (e.g., severe sepsis with tachycardia in a patient with stable CAD → subendocardial ischaemia → troponin rise).

The distinction matters because Type 1 MI needs antithrombotic therapy ± revascularisation, while Type 2 MI needs treatment of the underlying trigger (e.g., treat the sepsis, correct the anaemia).

5.2 Pathophysiology — The Full Picture

  • ST elevation occurs when there is transmural ischaemia — the entire thickness of the myocardial wall is ischaemic, creating a "current of injury" that shifts the ST segment upward.
  • In NSTEMI, the thrombus is non-occlusive → some blood still gets through → only the subendocardium (the most vulnerable layer) undergoes ischaemia/necrosis.
  • Subendocardial ischaemia produces ST depression (because the injury current vector points away from the recording electrode) or T-wave inversion (repolarisation abnormality from ischaemic but not yet dead tissue).

  • Troponin I and Troponin T are structural proteins of the cardiac sarcomere (part of the thin filament regulatory complex that controls actin-myosin interaction).
  • When myocytes die, their cell membranes lose integrity → troponin leaks into the bloodstream.
  • High-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) assays can detect very small amounts of necrosis, which is why the 0h/1h or 0h/3h algorithm is now standard for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
  • A troponin rise above the 99th percentile of a normal reference population with a rise and/or fall pattern is diagnostic of MI.

Critical Concept: Troponin Rise vs Myocardial Injury vs MI

Not every troponin elevation = MI!

  • Myocardial injury = any troponin elevation above the 99th percentile (can be from heart failure, PE, sepsis, myocarditis, renal failure, etc.)
  • Myocardial infarction = troponin elevation with a rise and/or fall pattern + clinical evidence of ischaemia (symptoms, ECG changes, imaging evidence, or angiographic evidence of thrombus)

Students commonly mistake an isolated troponin rise in a septic patient for MI. Always check for clinical ischaemic context!


6. Classification

ACS → Unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI [1][3]

TypeMechanismExample
Type 1Spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, ulceration, erosion, or dissection → intraluminal thrombusClassic NSTEMI from plaque event
Type 2MI secondary to ischaemic imbalance (supply ↓ or demand ↑) without acute plaque eventSevere anaemia + stable CAD → troponin rise
Type 3MI resulting in death before biomarkers obtained or before biomarker levels riseSudden cardiac death with symptoms of ischaemia
Type 4aMI related to PCI (within 48h)Troponin rise > 5× 99th percentile after PCI
Type 4bMI related to stent thrombosisConfirmed on angiography or autopsy
Type 5MI related to CABGTroponin rise > 10× 99th percentile after CABG

Risk scores (GRACE, TIMI) classify NSTEMI patients into low, intermediate, and high risk to guide the urgency of invasive strategy (discussed in the management section later).


7. Clinical Features

SymptomPathophysiological Basis
Chest pain / discomfort — typically retrosternal, squeezing/pressure/tightness/heaviness; may be described as "band-like" or "elephant sitting on chest"Myocardial ischaemia → accumulation of adenosine, bradykinin, lactate → stimulation of cardiac afferent C-fibres (unmyelinated) → referred pain via T1–T5 sympathetic afferents. The pain is visceral, hence poorly localised and "ill-defined."
Pain lasting > 20 minutes and not fully relieved by rest or GTNDistinguishes ACS from stable angina (which resolves within minutes of rest/GTN). Persistent ischaemia → ongoing myocyte death → sustained pain.
Radiation to left arm, jaw, neck, back, or epigastriumConvergence of cardiac afferent nerve fibres with somatic afferents from dermatomes C8–T5 in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord → brain misinterprets visceral signal as coming from somatic territory (referred pain). Left arm (T1–T2) and jaw (trigeminal–cervical convergence) are classic.
DyspnoeaLV dysfunction from ischaemic myocardium → ↑LV end-diastolic pressure → pulmonary venous congestion → stimulation of juxtacapillary (J) receptors → sensation of breathlessness. May be the primary or sole symptom ("anginal equivalent").
Diaphoresis (sweating)Sympathetic nervous system activation in response to pain + haemodynamic compromise → activation of sudomotor (sweat gland) fibres
Nausea and vomiting(a) Vagal activation from inferior wall ischaemia (RCA territory → afferents to dorsal motor nucleus of vagus), (b) Pain-mediated nausea via area postrema
Dizziness and pre-syncope/syncope↓Cardiac output from acute LV dysfunction, or arrhythmias (VT/VF, complete heart block) → cerebral hypoperfusion
Fatigue and weakness↓Cardiac output → inadequate systemic perfusion
PalpitationsArrhythmias triggered by ischaemia (ischaemic myocardium is electrically unstable → re-entry circuits, automaticity)

6 non-chest pain symptoms of IHD: Dyspnoea, Non-chest locations of discomfort, Mid-epigastric/abdominal pain, Diaphoresis, Excessive fatigue and weakness, Dizziness and syncope [4].

Atypical Presentations — Do Not Miss!

Causes of painless MI: DM, Complete infarct (> 6h) [7].

Other groups with atypical presentations:

  • Elderly: may present with dyspnoea, confusion, or syncope rather than chest pain
  • Women: more likely to have nausea, back pain, jaw pain, fatigue as predominant symptoms
  • Diabetic patients: autonomic neuropathy → impaired cardiac pain perception → "silent MI"
  • Post-operative patients: pain may be masked by anaesthesia/analgesia

In exams, if a diabetic elderly woman presents with acute dyspnoea and sweating but no chest pain — think ACS until proven otherwise!

Symptom Pattern in NSTEMI vs Unstable Angina vs STEMI

Unstable angina is defined as any one of: [7]

  • Resting angina > 20 min
  • New-onset angina that markedly limits normal activity
  • Increasing angina that is more frequent, lasts longer, or occurs with less exertion than previous angina

The quality of symptoms is identical for UA and NSTEMI — you cannot distinguish them clinically. The distinction requires troponin.

STEMI tends to have more severe, longer-lasting pain (> 30 min), more likely to have haemodynamic compromise, but there is significant overlap.

7.2 Signs

Physical examination in NSTEMI may be entirely normal in a haemodynamically stable patient. However, signs may be present and are important to look for:

SignPathophysiological Basis
TachycardiaSympathetic activation from pain and ↓stroke volume (compensatory ↑HR to maintain cardiac output)
Hypertension (may be present initially)Sympathetic-mediated vasoconstriction and ↑HR in response to pain and stress
Hypotension (ominous sign)Significant LV dysfunction → ↓cardiac output → ↓BP; or RV infarction → ↓preload to LV
Bradycardia (especially inferior NSTEMI)Vagal activation (Bezold-Jarisch reflex): stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the ischaemic inferoposterior LV → afferent vagal fibres → ↑parasympathetic tone → ↓HR
S3 gallopRapid ventricular filling into a dilated, poorly compliant LV → sudden deceleration of blood flow produces an audible low-frequency sound in early diastole. Indicates significant LV systolic dysfunction.
S4 gallopAtrial contraction against a stiff, non-compliant LV (from ischaemic diastolic dysfunction) → audible in late diastole.
New systolic murmur (apical pansystolic)Papillary muscle dysfunction or rupture → acute mitral regurgitation. The posteromedial papillary muscle (supplied solely by PDA) is more vulnerable than the anterolateral (dual supply from LAD + LCx).
Lung crepitations (crackles)LV failure → ↑pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure → transudation of fluid into alveoli (pulmonary oedema)
Elevated JVPRV infarction (especially with inferior NSTEMI) or acute LV failure → backward failure into RV → ↑CVP
Cool, clammy peripheriesSympathetic vasoconstriction to redistribute blood centrally due to ↓cardiac output
Diaphoresis (visible sweating)As above — sympathetic activation

SignSignificance
Xanthelasma / tendon xanthomasSuggest underlying dyslipidaemia (especially familial hypercholesterolaemia) [8]
Arcus senilis (if < 50 y)Possible familial hypercholesterolaemia
Absent / weak peripheral pulsesConcurrent peripheral arterial disease (PAD) → indicates diffuse atherosclerosis
Absent R. dorsalis pedis pulse, weak L. dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulsesPeripheral vascular disease indicating widespread atherosclerosis [9]
Carotid bruitCarotid atherosclerosis (e.g., soft L. carotid bruit [9])
Aortic ejection systolic murmurAortic sclerosis/stenosis from atherosclerosis or calcification [9]
Fundoscopic changes (hypertensive/diabetic retinopathy)End-organ damage from HTN or DM
Nicotine staining of fingersSmoking — major risk factor

High Yield: What to Look For on Examination

Physical examination in NSTEMI should include:

  1. Haemodynamic status: BP (both arms for aortic dissection), HR, SpO₂, perfusion
  2. Cardiac auscultation: new murmurs (MR from papillary muscle dysfunction), S3/S4
  3. Lungs: crackles (pulmonary oedema)
  4. JVP: elevated (RV involvement or LV failure)
  5. Peripheral pulses and bruits: concurrent PAD, aortic dissection (pulse deficit)
  6. Risk factor stigmata: xanthomas, nicotine staining, diabetic foot

Risk factor assessment + exclude other diagnoses [3].

Killip ClassClinical FindingIn-Hospital Mortality
INo heart failure~6%
IIMild HF: S3 gallop, lung crackles < 50% of lung fields, elevated JVP~17%
IIIAcute pulmonary oedema~38%
IVCardiogenic shock: SBP < 90 mmHg, signs of peripheral hypoperfusion~80%

This classification is quick, bedside, and prognostically powerful. It is used in both STEMI and NSTEMI.


8. Pathophysiology of ECG Changes in NSTEMI

Understanding why certain ECG patterns occur is essential:

  • Subendocardial ischaemia creates an injury current vector pointing from epicardium → endocardium (i.e., away from the surface electrode).
  • This causes the ST segment to be depressed in the leads overlying the ischaemic territory.
  • ST depression is the ECG hallmark of NSTEMI, along with T-wave inversion [3][7].

  • Represents repolarisation abnormality.
  • Ischaemic but still viable (not yet fully necrotic) myocardium has delayed repolarisation → the epicardium repolarises before the ischaemic subendocardium → inversion of the normal repolarisation vector → T-wave inversion.
  • Deep, symmetrical T-wave inversion in the anterior leads (V1–V4) = Wellens' syndrome → critical proximal LAD stenosis. This is a surgical/interventional emergency despite minimal troponin rise — the patient is between events.

  • Up to 30–50% of NSTEMI patients may have a normal or non-diagnostic initial ECG.
  • This does not exclude the diagnosis — serial ECGs and troponins are essential.

Repeated ECG is important to assess serial changes [3]. 12-lead ECG stat and repeat at least daily ×3 days (more frequently in severe cases) [8].


ConceptExplanation
Why subendocardial necrosis in NSTEMI?Partial occlusion → subendocardium dies first (highest wall stress, furthest from epicardial arteries, highest O₂ demand)
Why no ST elevation?Only subendocardium involved → injury current points away from electrode → ST depression (not elevation)
Why troponin rises?Myocyte necrosis → loss of cell membrane integrity → troponin leaks into blood
Why pain?Ischaemia → adenosine, lactate, bradykinin → stimulate cardiac C-fibres → referred pain via T1–T5
Why diaphoresis?Sympathetic activation from pain and haemodynamic compromise → sudomotor fibre activation
UA vs NSTEMI?Same mechanism, same symptoms — but NSTEMI has enough myocyte death to produce detectable troponin rise

High Yield Summary

  1. NSTEMI = myocardial necrosis (↑troponin) WITHOUT persistent ST elevation on ECG.
  2. NSTEMI sits within the ACS spectrum alongside UA (no troponin rise) and STEMI (ST elevation + troponin rise).
  3. Commonest cause: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus → subendocardial ischaemia.
  4. Incomplete coronary occlusion → NSTEMI; Complete occlusion → STEMI [2].
  5. Risk factors: HTN, DM, dyslipidaemia, smoking, obesity, FHx, male sex, age, CKD.
  6. Symptoms: Chest pain (> 20 min, not relieved by rest/GTN), dyspnoea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope. Atypical in DM, elderly, women.
  7. Signs: May be normal. Look for haemodynamic compromise (↓BP, ↑HR, S3, crackles), new murmur (papillary muscle dysfunction → MR), JVP elevation.
  8. ECG: ST depression, T-wave inversion, or normal. Never persistent ST elevation.
  9. Troponin: Rise and/or fall pattern + clinical ischaemia = MI. Isolated troponin rise ≠ MI.
  10. Type 1 MI (plaque event) vs Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) — different management.

Active Recall - NSTEMI Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Aetiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Features


[1] Lecture slides: GC 028. Accelerating chest pain_Acute coronary.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (Section: Type 2 DM) [6] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Coronary artery disease section) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Approach to Acute Chest Pain) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (Case 2)

Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI

The challenge with NSTEMI is that it presents with chest pain (or an anginal equivalent) + troponin elevation + non-ST-elevation ECG changes — but none of these features is unique to NSTEMI. The differential diagnosis therefore works on two levels:

  1. Differentials of the chest pain itself (what else could cause this presentation?)
  2. Differentials of troponin elevation (what else raises troponin besides Type 1 MI?)

A systematic, anatomically-based approach is the safest way to avoid missing a life-threatening mimic.


Risk factor assessment, exclude other diagnoses [3]. Target Hx and PE to rule out other life-threatening emergencies: aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, perforated peptic ulcer / oesophagus [10].

Have to remember that not all chest pain is AMI, could originate from beyond the heart [2].

The approach is best thought of anatomically, working outward from the heart:


2. Life-Threatening Differentials — "Cannot Miss" Diagnoses

These must be actively excluded in every patient presenting with acute chest pain, because delayed diagnosis is fatal [2][7][10][11]:

CANNOT-Miss Diagnoses in Acute Chest Pain (High Yield GC Exam Content)

The following must be excluded urgently:

  1. Aortic dissection [7][11]
  2. Pulmonary embolism [7][11]
  3. Tension / massive pneumothorax [10][11]
  4. Perforated peptic ulcer / oesophagus [10]

These share overlapping features with NSTEMI (chest pain, haemodynamic compromise, troponin elevation) but require completely different management. Giving antiplatelet/anticoagulation to a patient with aortic dissection, for example, can be catastrophic.

FeatureHow it differs from NSTEMIWhy (Pathophysiology)
Very sudden onset, maximal at onset [7][12]NSTEMI pain typically builds over minutesAortic dissection = sudden intimal tear → instantaneous propagation of dissection flap; NSTEMI = gradual thrombus formation
Tearing / ripping qualityNSTEMI = squeezing, pressure, heavinessDifferent pain receptors: aortic adventitial nociceptors vs cardiac C-fibres
Radiates to the back (interscapular) [2][7]NSTEMI radiates to left arm, jawPosterior aorta involved → back pain via thoracic somatic afferents
Pulse deficit / BP discrepancy between armsNot seen in NSTEMIFalse lumen compresses branch arteries (subclavian, carotid) → asymmetric perfusion
Aortic regurgitation murmur (Type A)Not a feature of NSTEMIDissection flap disrupts aortic valve annulus → acute AR
Widened mediastinum on CXRCXR usually normal in NSTEMIHaematoma around aorta expands the mediastinal silhouette

Aortic dissection (Type A) with retrograde extension can cause coronary dissection → secondary NSTEMI/STEMI [7]. This is a trap: the ST changes are real, but the primary diagnosis is dissection, and PCI is not the answer — the patient needs surgery.

ECG: Differentiate aortic dissection from AMI [11]. CXR: Differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax [11]. Cardiac enzymes (cTnT, cTnI, CK-MB) should be checked [11].

FeatureHow it differs from NSTEMIWhy (Pathophysiology)
Pleuritic pain, worse on deep inspiration / coughing [2]NSTEMI pain is not pleuriticPE → pulmonary infarction → inflammation of visceral/parietal pleura → worsened by respiratory movement
Haemoptysis [2][12]Not a feature of NSTEMIPulmonary infarction → haemorrhagic necrosis of lung parenchyma → blood-stained sputum
Acute dyspnoea disproportionate to chest painNSTEMI dyspnoea proportional to LV dysfunctionPE → acute V/Q mismatch → hypoxaemia → dyspnoea out of proportion
Unilateral leg swelling [3]Not a feature of NSTEMIDVT (source of embolus) → venous outflow obstruction → unilateral oedema
Sinus tachycardia, S1Q3T3, RBBB on ECGST depression / T-wave inversion in NSTEMIRV pressure overload from acute pulmonary HTN → RV strain pattern; S1Q3T3 = right heart strain
Risk factors: immobilisation, recent surgery, OCP, malignancy, long-haul travelNSTEMI risk factors = atheroscleroticInherited thrombophilias → VTE risk, NOT arterial thrombosis risk [6]

Key investigation: D-dimer → very sensitive but not very specific. High negative predictive value → if negative, can rule out. If positive, require more definitive diagnosis [13][14]. Age-adjusted cut-off (age × 10 for patients > 50 y) [13].

Critically: massive PE can cause troponin elevation (RV strain → subendocardial ischaemia of the RV) and ST depression, mimicking NSTEMI. The clinical context (pleuritic pain, risk factors for VTE, unilateral leg swelling) and CTPA are the keys to differentiation.

FeatureHow it differs from NSTEMIWhy
Sudden onset, maximum at onsetNSTEMI builds graduallySudden air leak into pleural space
Pleuritic chest pain + severe dyspnoeaNSTEMI pain is not pleuriticPleural irritation + lung collapse
Hyperresonance on percussion [3]Normal percussion in NSTEMIAir-filled pleural space transmits percussion energy without dampening
Absent breath sounds on affected sideBilateral breath sounds in NSTEMINo aerated lung under stethoscope
Tracheal deviation to opposite side (tension)Not present in NSTEMIPositive intrapleural pressure pushes mediastinum contralaterally

This is a clinical (not biochemical) diagnosis. Do not wait for CXR in tension pneumothorax — decompress immediately.


3. Other Cardiac Differentials

The most important immediate differentiation. The distinction is made by ECG:

STEMI → complete occlusion of artery, require immediate opening up of artery as soon as possible. NSTEMI → lumen is reduced, but blood flow is still possible, so you can get away with giving anti-platelet / anti-thrombotics, with or without revascularization [1].

Why is it important to differentiate between STEMI and non-STEMI? Treatment is different [1].

FeatureSTEMINSTEMI
ECGPersistent ST elevation (≥ 2 contiguous leads) or new LBBB [7]ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads [10]
Coronary occlusionCompletePartial
ManagementImmediate reperfusion (primary PCI < 120 min or thrombolysis < 12h)Antithrombotic therapy ± invasive strategy (timing based on risk)

NEW LBBB — have to be careful for patients with chest pain → should be managed the same as patients with ST elevation [13].

Check ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR which suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10].

ECG Mimics of STEMI (False Positives)

DDx of ST elevation [10]:

  • STEMI: convex ST elevation, associated with Q waves
  • Acute pericarditis: diffuse concave ST elevation and PR depression
  • LVH with strain pattern: concave ST elevation in V1–V3, associated with LVH features
  • LBBB

Also: Brugada syndrome, early repolarisation pattern, ventricular aneurysm (persistent ST elevation post-MI), hyperkalaemia.

ST-segment elevation indicates full thickness cardiac muscle injury, pathological Q-wave indicates muscle necrosis, and T-wave inversion indicates muscle ischaemia [15].

Clinically indistinguishable from NSTEMI — same symptoms, same ECG changes. The only difference:

UANSTEMI
TroponinNormal (no myocyte necrosis)Elevated (myocyte necrosis has occurred)

When is ACS considered NSTEMI? Clinical features of unstable angina, AND elevation of cardiac markers, AND no ST-segment elevation on 12-lead ECG [1].

With modern high-sensitivity troponin assays, many patients previously labelled as "UA" are now reclassified as NSTEMI because even tiny amounts of necrosis are detected. The practical importance: NSTEMI warrants more aggressive antithrombotic and often invasive strategy compared to confirmed UA.

FeatureHow it differs from NSTEMIWhy
Preceding viral prodrome (fever, myalgia, URI symptoms days before)No prodrome in NSTEMIViral myocarditis (Coxsackie B, Parvovirus B19, SARS-CoV-2) → direct viral myocyte injury + immune-mediated damage
Young patient without cardiac risk factorsNSTEMI patients typically have ≥ 1 risk factorMyocarditis affects young, otherwise healthy individuals
Diffuse ST/T changes (not following a single coronary territory)NSTEMI changes follow coronary distributionInflammation is diffuse, not limited to one artery's territory
Troponin elevated (can be marked)Also elevated in NSTEMIMyocyte necrosis from inflammation → troponin leak
Cardiac MRI: myocardial oedema + late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in non-coronary distribution (typically mid-wall or epicardial, not subendocardial)NSTEMI LGE is subendocardialInflammatory process affects myocardium in a non-vascular pattern

Diagnosis of myocarditis: cardiac MRI going to forefront. Endomyocardial biopsy is gold standard [16].

Aggravated by respiratory movement, sharp, knife-like (pleuritic pain). Radiates to the trapezius ridge (characteristic site of pericardial pain). Sitting up or leaning forward may ease pain (MI pain not positional) [2].

FeaturePericarditisNSTEMI
Pain characterSharp, pleuriticDull, squeezing, pressure
PositionalEased by sitting up / leaning forwardNot positional
RadiationTrapezius ridgeLeft arm, jaw
ECGDiffuse concave ST elevation + PR depression [10]ST depression / T-wave inversion
TroponinMay be mildly elevated (myopericarditis)Elevated
Pericardial rubPresent (pathognomonic)Absent

The key pathophysiological difference: pericarditis = inflammation of the pericardial sac (friction between inflamed visceral and parietal pericardium → rub); NSTEMI = intracoronary thrombus → myocyte death.

  • "Takotsubo" = Japanese for "octopus trap," named for the apical ballooning shape of the LV on ventriculography.
  • Triggered by intense emotional or physical stress → catecholamine surge → direct myocyte toxicity + microvascular spasm.
  • Mimics anterior STEMI (ST elevation in precordial leads, troponin elevation, apical wall motion abnormality) but coronary angiography shows no obstructive coronary disease.
  • Predominantly affects post-menopausal women.
  • Important differential because the treatment is supportive (not antithrombotic/PCI).

4. Gastrointestinal Differentials

For a chief complaint of epigastric pain, the most sinister non-GI causes that must be excluded immediately: Myocardial infarction, Pulmonary embolism, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Abdominal aortic aneurysm (ruptured) [17].

This works both ways — GI conditions can mimic NSTEMI, and NSTEMI can present as epigastric pain (especially inferior wall ischaemia, which shares vagal innervation with the upper GI tract via T7–T10 dermatomes).

GERD: Unrelated to exertion. Worsened when lying down. Relieved by swallowing (warm water) [7].

FeatureGERD / Oesophageal SpasmNSTEMI
Relationship to mealsPost-prandial, worse lying downMay occur at any time (though post-prandial worsening possible due to blood flow diversion to gut)
Relieved byAntacids, warm waterGTN (but oesophageal spasm may also respond to GTN — a classic trap!)
ExertionNo relationshipTypically worsened by exertion
TroponinNormalElevated

Angina pectoris is a differential diagnosis of GERD [18]. PPI empirical trial can be considered as initial diagnostic step in patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) [18].

Exam Trap: GTN Response

GTN relieves oesophageal spasm as well as angina (both involve smooth muscle relaxation via NO pathway). Therefore, response to GTN does NOT confirm a cardiac origin of chest pain. Always use troponin and ECG to differentiate.

  • Peptic ulcer: epigastric tenderness, relationship to food (worse/better), NSAID/aspirin use [17].
  • Perforation: sudden-onset severe epigastric pain → board-like rigidity → erect CXR shows free air under diaphragm.
  • Acute pancreatitis: epigastric pain radiating to the back, elevated amylase/lipase.

PE findings to look for: PE → unilateral lower limb swelling; Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness; Pneumothorax → hyperresonance [3].


5. Other Differentials

  • Worsen with movement [7] and reproducible on palpation (point tenderness over a rib or costochondral junction).
  • NSTEMI pain is never reproducible on chest wall palpation.
  • Costochondritis (Tietze syndrome): localised tenderness at costochondral junctions.
  • Pathophysiology: somatic pain from musculoskeletal structures travels via intercostal nerves (well-localised, sharp, positional) — completely different from the visceral, poorly-localised cardiac pain of NSTEMI.

  • Thoracic nerve root distribution. Precedes typical vesicular rash of herpes zoster [7].
  • Reactivation of VZV in dorsal root ganglia → dermatomal pain (burning, lancinating) that can precede the rash by days → may initially mimic NSTEMI.
  • Key: unilateral, dermatomal distribution; rash appears later.

  • Diagnosis of exclusion.
  • Hyperventilation → respiratory alkalosis → ↓ionised calcium → paraesthesias, carpopedal spasm.
  • Associated with anxiety, sense of impending doom, palpitations — but ECG normal and troponin normal.

This is a critical conceptual point for avoiding over-diagnosis of NSTEMI:

Cause of Troponin ElevationMechanism
Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch)Tachycardia, sepsis, anaemia, hypotension → subendocardial ischaemia in setting of stable CAD
Acute heart failure↑Wall stress → subendocardial ischaemia + myocyte stretch → troponin leak
Pulmonary embolismRV pressure overload → RV subendocardial ischaemia
MyocarditisDirect inflammatory myocyte necrosis
Takotsubo cardiomyopathyCatecholamine-mediated myocyte injury
Sepsis / critical illnessMultifactorial: microvascular dysfunction, catecholamine toxicity, hypoperfusion
Kidney diseaseConcomitant cardiac-renal disease + decreased troponin fragment clearance → falsely high troponin level [13]
Cardiac contusion (trauma)Direct mechanical myocyte injury
Post-cardiac procedures (PCI, CABG, ablation)Periprocedural myocyte injury (Type 4 / Type 5 MI)
Aortic dissectionCoronary malperfusion (if dissection extends into coronary ostia)
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathyLVOT obstruction → subendocardial ischaemia; myocyte disarray
RhabdomyolysisCross-reactivity with some troponin assays (rare with high-sensitivity assays)

Troponin: Very specific for myocardial injury. But not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions [13]. Even if not for myocardial injury, some rarer extra-cardiac causes can cause false positives: heterophile antibody + genetic issues [13].

High Yield: Systematic Approach to Elevated Troponin

When you find elevated troponin, ask yourself three questions:

  1. Is there clinical evidence of ischaemia? (Symptoms, ECG changes, imaging)
    • If yes → MI (then classify Type 1 vs Type 2)
    • If no → Myocardial injury (not MI) — look for the underlying cause
  2. Is there a rise-and-fall pattern? (acute process) vs chronically elevated (e.g., CKD, HF)?
  3. Does the clinical picture fit an acute coronary event? (risk factors, ECG, echo)

DiagnosisKey Distinguishing Feature from NSTEMI
STEMIPersistent ST elevation or new LBBB on ECG
Unstable AnginaNormal troponin (no myocyte necrosis)
Aortic dissectionSudden onset, tearing/ripping, radiates to back, pulse deficit, BP discrepancy
Pulmonary embolismPleuritic pain, haemoptysis, unilateral leg swelling, risk factors for VTE
Tension pneumothoraxHyperresonance, absent breath sounds, tracheal deviation
PericarditisSharp pleuritic pain, eased by leaning forward, radiates to trapezius ridge, diffuse concave ST elevation + PR depression, friction rub
MyocarditisViral prodrome, young, diffuse ECG changes, CMR shows non-coronary LGE pattern
TakotsuboPost-menopausal woman, intense emotional/physical stress, apical ballooning, no obstructive CAD on angiography
GERDUnrelated to exertion, worse lying down, relieved by antacids/warm water
Peptic ulcer / perforationEpigastric tenderness, NSAID use, free air on CXR if perforated
MusculoskeletalReproducible on palpation, positional, sharp
Herpes zosterDermatomal distribution, precedes vesicular rash
Panic attackYoung, anxious, hyperventilation, normal ECG and troponin

ACS approach: A = Abnormal ECG, C = Clinical features, S = Stable patient [3].

Compatible clinical features: Chest pain, SOB, collapse. ECG changes. +/- Cardiac enzyme changes [1].

Step 1: Stabilise the patient (ABC, vitals, IV access, monitoring)

Step 2: Take a focused history using SOCRATES for the pain + associated symptoms + risk factors

Step 3: Perform targeted examination:

  • PE → unilateral lower limb swelling (for PE)
  • Peptic ulcers → epigastric tenderness
  • Pneumothorax → hyperresonance [3]
  • Pulse deficit, BP in both arms (aortic dissection)
  • Pericardial rub (pericarditis)
  • New murmur (MR from papillary muscle dysfunction, AR from dissection)

Step 4: Obtain stat 12-lead ECG → differentiate STEMI vs NSTE-ACS vs other

Step 5: Bloods including troponin (0h, repeat at 1h or 3h), CBC, RFT, LFT, lipid profile, coagulation, D-dimer (if PE suspected)

Step 6: CXR — differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax [11]; look for pulmonary oedema, pneumonia, widened mediastinum

Step 7: Integrate clinical, ECG, and biomarker findings → working diagnosis

If certain STEMI, can immediately send patient to the cath lab. If stable, then have to determine more things → any high-risk features? (troponin elevation, GRACE score) [3].


High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI

  1. NSTEMI must be distinguished from STEMI (ECG: persistent ST elevation or new LBBB → STEMI) and from UA (troponin: normal → UA).
  2. Life-threatening mimics that CANNOT be missed: Aortic dissection (tearing, back, pulse deficit), PE (pleuritic, haemoptysis, leg swelling), Tension pneumothorax (hyperresonance, absent breath sounds), Perforated viscus.
  3. Cardiac mimics: Pericarditis (positional, pleuritic, trapezius ridge, rub), Myocarditis (young, viral prodrome, diffuse ECG), Takotsubo (post-menopausal, stress, apical ballooning, clean coronaries).
  4. GI mimics: GERD (not exertional, worse lying down), peptic ulcer, pancreatitis. Remember: MI must be excluded as a sinister non-GI cause of epigastric pain.
  5. Troponin elevation ≠ NSTEMI: Always consider Type 2 MI, myocarditis, PE, HF, CKD, sepsis. Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury but not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions.
  6. Approach: Stabilise → SOCRATES + risk factors → targeted exam → ECG → troponin (serial) → CXR → integrate.

Active Recall - NSTEMI Differential Diagnosis


References

[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [6] Senior notes: Block A - Leg swelling and chest pain_ deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; Thrombophilia.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [11] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [13] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf [14] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf [15] Lecture slides: GC 088. Sudden Severe Chest Pain.pdf [16] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf [17] Senior notes: Block A - Upper abdominal pain_ peptic ulcer; pancreatitis and gallstone.pdf [18] Senior notes: Block A - Indigestion and 'heartburn'_ nausea and vomiting; gastric motility problems; benign esophageal lesions.pdf

Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for NSTEMI


1. Diagnostic Criteria for Myocardial Infarction (Fourth Universal Definition)

The diagnosis of NSTEMI rests on satisfying the Universal Definition of MI criteria, which apply to all MI types. Let's break this down from first principles — why each criterion exists.

Diagnostic Criteria for MI — High Yield (GC Exam Content)

Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values, preferably cardiac troponin (cTn), with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) [7][10][12]

PLUS at least one of the following: [7][10][12]

  1. Symptoms of ischaemia (clinical)
  2. New or presumed new significant ST-segment–T wave (ST–T) changes or new LBBB (ECG)
  3. Development of pathological Q waves in the ECG (ECG)
  4. New loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality (imaging — e.g. echocardiography, cardiac MRI)
  5. Identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy

CriterionPathophysiological Rationale
Troponin rise and/or fallMyocyte necrosis → release of structural troponin proteins (cTnI/cTnT) into blood. The rise and/or fall pattern distinguishes acute injury from chronically elevated troponin (e.g. CKD). A single elevated value could be chronic — you need a dynamic change.
Symptoms of ischaemiaMyocardial ischaemia → adenosine/lactate/bradykinin accumulation → cardiac C-fibre stimulation → chest pain or anginal equivalents. Confirms the clinical context.
ST-T changes or new LBBBIschaemic myocardium has altered electrical properties → abnormal depolarisation/repolarisation → ECG changes. New LBBB alters conduction and can mask or mimic ischaemia.
Pathological Q wavesQ waves represent electrically silent (dead) myocardium → the depolarisation wavefront moves away from necrotic tissue → negative deflection.
Imaging evidenceEcho or CMR showing new wall motion abnormality = ischaemic myocardium not contracting properly. Confirms structural consequence of ischaemia.
Intracoronary thrombusDirect visualisation of the culprit lesion on angiography = definitive proof of the mechanism.

For the diagnosis to be NSTEMI (rather than STEMI or UA):

  • Troponin: Elevated (above 99th percentile URL with rise/fall pattern) — this separates NSTEMI from UA
  • ECG: No persistent ST elevation — this separates NSTEMI from STEMI. Instead: ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads, or even a normal ECG [10]

2. Biomarkers — Cardiac Troponin

Cardiac troponins: gold standard for myocardial ischaemia [10].

What is troponin? Troponin is a regulatory protein complex in the cardiac sarcomere (troponin I, T, and C). When myocytes die, troponin leaks into the blood through the disrupted cell membrane.

High-sensitivity assays (hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI) can detect much smaller amounts of troponin, enabling:

  • Earlier detection of MI (within 1–3 hours of symptom onset)
  • Detection of very small MIs that older assays would miss
  • But also detection of non-MI causes of myocardial injury (lower specificity)

Diagnostic cut-off of hsTnT: positive if baseline > 14 ng/L and > 100% rise 3–6h later [10].

Troponin: rises early and stays long [1]. AMI: peak at 24–48h, return to baseline over 5–14 days [10].

MarkerOnset of RisePeakReturn to BaselineClinical Utility
hs-cTnT/I1–3 hours24–48 hours5–14 daysGold standard for MI diagnosis; early detection
CK-MB3–4 hours12–24 hours48–72 hoursBetter at detecting reinfarction due to shorter half-life [7] — if troponin is already elevated from index MI, a re-rise of CK-MB indicates re-infarction
Myoglobin1–2 hours6–8 hours24 hoursFirst marker to rise [10] but not cardiac-specific (also from skeletal muscle). Rarely used now.

CK-MB is cardiac-specific (cf. CK-MM for skeletal muscles, CK-BB for brain / GI tract smooth muscles) [10].

Even though troponin is high-sensitivity, CK-MB has value in having shorter half-life. Since in acute phase, you would expect both to elevate. Yet if the patient is presenting late, 48 hours after onset of the AMI, then you would only see +ve troponin, with −ve CKMB → helps with the timeline [1].

This is important:

  • Early presentation (< 24h): Both troponin and CK-MB elevated → acute MI
  • Late presentation (48–72h): Troponin still elevated, CK-MB normalised → MI happened days ago
  • Re-infarction: CK-MB re-rises (shorter half-life allows detection of a second peak), while troponin may still be elevated from the first event → > 20% increase in cTnI/TnT value (a 2nd plateau) indicates reinfarction [7]

Roles of biochemical markers of ACS [7]:

  • Risk prediction and prognosis: Categorize patients into high and low risk groups
  • Selection of site of care: CCU vs. outpatient
  • Selection of therapeutic intervention: Aggressive vs. conservative
  • ACS evaluation: Any troponin level > URL = myocardial damage
  • Detection of reinfarction
  • Assessment of reperfusion: When coronary arteries are reperfused, cardiac markers in blood will gradually wash out and decrease
  • Estimation of infarct size: Magnitude and temporal course of markers

Troponin Specificity — Exam Trap

Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury. But not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions [13].

Kidney disease can cause raised troponin → concomitant cardiac-renal disease + decreased troponin fragment clearance → falsely high troponin level [13].

Other causes of troponin elevation without Type 1 MI: heart failure, PE, myocarditis, sepsis, cardiac contusion, post-procedure, Takotsubo.

Always interpret troponin in clinical context!


Modern practice uses the ESC 0h/1h algorithm (or 0h/3h if the 1h assay is not available) for rapid triage of patients presenting with chest pain. This is based on high-sensitivity troponin.

The logic is simple:

  • Very low troponin at 0h AND minimal change at 1h → Rule out MI → safe for discharge with outpatient follow-up
  • Very high troponin at 0h OR significant rise at 1h → Rule in MI → admit and treat as NSTEMI
  • Intermediate values → Observe zone → repeat troponin at 3h, serial ECGs, clinical reassessment

The specific thresholds depend on the assay used (hs-cTnT vs hs-cTnI) — you do not need to memorise exact numbers for exams, but understand the principle:

For patients with borderline hs-troponin, consider: Angiography, Coronary CT angiography (CCTA), Stress testing [1].


ACS approach: A = Abnormal ECG, C = Clinical features, S = Stable patient [3].

If certain STEMI, can immediately send patient to the cath lab. If stable, then have to determine more things → any high-risk features? (troponin elevation, GRACE score — 9 factors for prognostication) [3].

If delayed beyond 24h, can give P2Y12 inhibitors → ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel [3].


5. Individual Investigation Modalities

5.1 Electrocardiogram (ECG)

The most important first-line investigation. Must be done within 10 minutes of first medical contact.

NSTEMI: ST depression and/or prominent T-wave inversion (> 1mm) in 2 contiguous leads (do NOT correlate with location of infarct) [10].

ECG FindingSignificancePathophysiology
ST depressionSubendocardial ischaemiaPartial occlusion → injury current vector points away from surface electrode → negative ST shift
T-wave inversionRepolarisation abnormality from ischaemic tissueDelayed repolarisation in ischaemic subendocardium → reversed T-wave vector
Usually widespread: subendocardial ischaemia [10]NSTEMI ST depression is often diffuseSubendocardial ischaemia is not localised to one coronary territory because the subendocardium is a circumferential "at-risk" zone
If localised: more likely reciprocal change — look for ST elevation in other leads [10]May actually be a STEMI!Localised ST depression = mirror image of ST elevation in the opposite wall
ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10]Ominous findingLeft main stenosis → global subendocardial ischaemia → diffuse ST depression. aVR is the only lead that "looks at" the LV cavity from above → it sees the reciprocal of global depression as elevation
Normal ECGDoes NOT exclude NSTEMIUp to 30–50% of NSTEMI patients have initial normal ECG; serial ECGs essential

Wellens' syndrome: critical proximal LAD stenosis [10]

  • Recent Hx of angina, but ECG taken pain-free (pain = NSTEMI)
  • Type A (25%): biphasic T waves in V2–V3
  • Type B (75%): deeply and symmetrically inverted T waves in V2–V3
  • Troponin should be normal (rule out NSTEMI)
  • High risk: mean time of extensive anterior MI = 8 days

This is a pre-infarction pattern — the patient is sitting on a time bomb. Stress testing is contraindicated (can precipitate massive anterior MI). Patient needs urgent angiography.

Development of new pathological Q waves [2]:

  • Any Q wave in V2–V3 ≥ 0.02 seconds
  • QS complex in V2–V3
  • Q wave ≥ 0.03 seconds and ≥ 0.1 mV deep, or QS complex in any two contiguous leads of I, aVL, V6, V4–V6, II, III, aVF [2]

Q waves not specific for MI: HOCM can cause Q waves (V1–V3 for massive septal hypertrophy), Dilated cardiomyopathy (10–13%) [13].

NEW LBBB — have to be careful for patients with chest pain → should be managed the same as patients with ST elevation [13].

Pericardial Disease → widespread upward concave ST elevation (not convex like STEMI) [13].

ST-segment elevation indicates full-thickness cardiac muscle injury, pathological Q-wave indicates muscle necrosis, and T-wave inversion indicates muscle ischaemia [15].

ECG Interpretation Must-Knows for NSTEMI (High Yield)

  1. ST depression and T-wave inversion in NSTEMI do NOT reliably localise the infarct (unlike STEMI where they do) [10]
  2. Always check aVR — ST elevation > 1mm in aVR = left main or severe triple vessel disease [10]
  3. Look for De Winter T waves (depressed ST take-off with hyperacute T wave in precordial leads): proximal LAD occlusion, Tx as anterior STEMI [10]
  4. Repeated ECG important to assess serial changes [3] — 12-lead ECG stat and repeat at least daily ×3 days [8]

CXR: usually non-diagnostic in ACS; look for other causes (e.g. aortic dissection, PE, pneumonia or pneumothorax) [8].

CXR FindingSignificance
NormalMost common finding in isolated NSTEMI
Pulmonary oedema (upper lobe diversion, Kerley B lines, bat-wing opacities, pleural effusion)Indicates LV failure complicating MI → Killip class II–III
CardiomegalyPre-existing heart failure or dilated cardiomyopathy
Widened mediastinumSuggests aortic dissection [11][19] — must be excluded before giving antithrombotic therapy
PneumothoraxAlternative diagnosis — CXR differentiates from MI
ConsolidationPneumonia as alternative/contributing diagnosis

CXR: Differentiate aortic dissection from pneumothorax. Widening of mediastinum (erect PA = 6cm, supine AP = 8cm) [11].

Bedside echocardiography is a key investigation in NSTEMI for:

PurposeWhat to Look ForWhy
Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA)Hypokinesis, akinesis, or dyskinesis of a myocardial segmentIschaemic/infarcted myocardium cannot contract normally → segment-specific abnormality confirms ischaemic territory
LV systolic function (LVEF)Global ejection fractionLVEF is an important prognostic parameter [8] — lower LVEF = worse prognosis
Mechanical complicationsNew MR (papillary muscle dysfunction/rupture), VSD (septal rupture), free wall rupture with tamponadeAcute MI can damage structural components of the heart
RV involvementRV dilatation, RV dysfunctionInferior NSTEMI may involve RV → different haemodynamic management (avoid nitrates, give fluids)
Alternative diagnosesPericardial effusion (pericarditis), aortic dissection flap, aortic regurgitationLook for aortic regurgitation, pericardial effusion and presence of dissection flap [11]

Initial investigations [10][8]:

TestRationale
CBCAnaemia (→ Type 2 MI from supply-demand mismatch), leukocytosis (infection, stress response), thrombocytopenia (baseline before anticoagulation)
RFT (U/Cr/eGFR)CKD worsens prognosis; renal function affects drug dosing (enoxaparin, fondaparinux, DOAC dose adjustment); contrast nephropathy risk if proceeding to angiography
LFTBaseline; hepatic congestion from RHF; drug metabolism
Lipid profileShould be taken ≤ 24 hours [8] of admission (lipid levels drop after 24h due to acute phase response). Guides statin therapy.
Fasting glucose / HbA1cScreen for diabetes (major risk factor); hyperglycaemia at presentation = poor prognosis
Coagulation (aPTT/INR)Baseline for heparin therapy [8]; exclude coagulopathy
NT-proBNPPrognostic marker; elevated = LV dysfunction = worse outcome. Very sensitive, not very specific for heart failure [20]
TFTThyrotoxicosis can precipitate or exacerbate ACS (↑O₂ demand)

High sensitivity for stenosis detection. A normal CTA can reliably rule out disease [1].

Concept of "TRIPLE RULE-OUT" → CCTA can help you rule out: Myocardial infarction, Pulmonary embolism, Aortic dissection [1].

AspectDetail
PrincipleIV contrast bolus + ECG-gated CT → 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries
Sensitivity for significant stenosis~95–99% (excellent rule-out)
Specificity~65–83% (lower — false positives from calcified plaques [21])
Calcium scoringNon-contrast CT, draw circles around areas of calcium → good for prognostication [21]
Best useLow-to-intermediate pre-test probability patients; rule out CAD in the ED
LimitationsRadiation (reduce with ECG trigger, low dose) [1]; calcium deposits create false positives [21]; cannot assess haemodynamic significance of a lesion (need FFR for that)

Coronary imaging has a very low false negative rate → high sensitivity, can be used to confidently rule out issues. But the problem with high sensitivity is that there is a tradeoff — lower specificity → even if you see some abnormal findings, will require further workup before diagnosis [4].

Stress testing is primarily for stable chest pain or for risk stratification after NSTEMI (not in the acute phase when the patient is unstable). It identifies inducible ischaemia.

Objective of stress testing is to help you reach diagnosis → diagnose ischaemia of the myocardium [4].

MethodPrincipleKey FindingsNotes
Exercise ECG (ETT)Patient exercises on treadmill (Bruce protocol) → monitor ECG for ischaemic changes2mm ST depression = positive [9]; Duke Treadmill Score for prognosticationStop antihypertensive on the day of test. Exercise until target HR reached: HR = (220 − age) × 0.8 [10]. False positive in young females [4]
Stress echocardiographyExercise or dobutamine → echo before and after → look for new RWMANew wall motion abnormality = ischaemiaAlternative to exercise: dobutamine (C/I: recent MI), adenosine (C/I: asthma) [10]
Radionuclide MPI (SPECT)Inject radiotracer (thallium-201 or technetium-99m) → gamma camera detects perfusion defects at stress vs restFixed defect = scar; Reversible defect = ischaemia (viable but underperfused territory)After pharmacological stress test, can either do cardiac MRI or SPECT [9]
Stress cardiac MRIAdenosine/dobutamine + gadolinium CMRPerfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities, late gadolinium enhancement (scar vs viable)Best for viability assessment; no radiation

When to Use Which Test

Choice of Ix generally dependent on pre-test probability of CAD [8]:

  • Low pre-test probability → CCTA (excellent NPV to rule out)
  • Intermediate pre-test probability → Functional stress testing (ETT, stress echo, SPECT, stress CMR)
  • High pre-test probability or known CAD → Go directly to invasive coronary angiography

The patient did not have a contraindication for stress test, BUT had quite severe symptoms warranting coronary imaging → so skip the stress test, go directly for coronary imaging [4].

The definitive diagnostic test for coronary artery disease. A catheter is threaded (usually from radial or femoral artery) into the coronary ostia → contrast injected → real-time fluoroscopic imaging of the coronary lumen.

Not the CT coronary angiogram → this is the fluoro where they inject contrast. Just one invasive investigation exists for CAD confirmation [4].

Indications for invasive coronary angiography [4]:

  • Unacceptable angina despite medical therapy (for consideration of revascularisation)
  • Non-invasive testing results with high-risk features
  • Angina or risk factors for CAD in the setting of depressed LVEF
  • Diagnostic purposes when non-invasive testing results are unclear

In NSTEMI, the timing of angiography depends on risk stratification (see next section).

Finding on AngiographySignificance
Significant stenosis ≥ 50%Defines significant CAD (for left main); ≥ 70% for other vessels (flow-limiting)
Thrombus at culprit lesionConfirms Type 1 MI mechanism
Multi-vessel diseaseWorse prognosis; may need CABG over PCI
Left main disease or severe 3-vessel diseaseDirectly go for CABG [10]

MINOCA: subepicardial LGE [21] → suggests myocarditis rather than ischaemic MI.

ApplicationWhat CMR Shows
Ischaemic vs non-ischaemic injurySubendocardial LGE = ischaemic (follows coronary territory); mid-wall/epicardial LGE = myocarditis/non-ischaemic
Viability assessmentTransmural LGE > 50% = non-viable (won't benefit from revascularisation); < 50% = viable (will recover with revascularisation)
Takotsubo vs MIApical ballooning without coronary territory LGE
LVEF and volumesGold standard for LV function quantification

6. Risk Stratification Tools

Once NSTEMI is confirmed, risk stratification determines the urgency and type of invasive strategy.

The most validated tool for NSTEMI risk stratification. It predicts in-hospital and 6-month mortality.

8 variables:

VariableWhy It Matters
AgeOlder patients have less cardiac reserve
Heart rateTachycardia = sympathetic activation / haemodynamic compromise
Systolic BPHypotension = cardiogenic shock
CreatinineCKD = worse prognosis, drug dosing issues
Killip classClinical heart failure severity
Cardiac arrest at admissionIndicates severe arrhythmia / haemodynamic collapse
ST-segment deviationECG evidence of ischaemia
Elevated cardiac biomarkersConfirms myocyte necrosis
GRACE ScoreRiskIn-Hospital MortalityStrategy
< 109Low< 1%Conservative or selective invasive
109–140Intermediate1–3%Invasive within 72h
> 140High> 3%Early invasive within 24h

7 binary variables (1 point each):

VariablePoint
Age ≥ 651
≥ 3 CAD risk factors1
Known CAD (≥ 50% stenosis)1
Aspirin use in past 7 days1
≥ 2 anginal episodes in 24h1
ST deviation ≥ 0.5mm1
Elevated cardiac markers1

Score 0–2 = low risk; 3–4 = intermediate; 5–7 = high risk.


For patients with borderline hs-troponin: Angiography, Coronary CT angiography (CCTA), Stress testing [1].

When the troponin is borderline or the diagnosis is uncertain:

  • CCTA: Excellent for anatomical rule-out (triple rule-out) [1]
  • Stress testing: Identifies inducible ischaemia in patients with resolved symptoms
  • Cardiac MRI: Differentiates ischaemic from non-ischaemic causes (myocarditis, Takotsubo)

StepInvestigationKey Findings / Purpose
1. Immediate12-lead ECG (within 10 min)ST depression, T-wave inversion, normal, or rule out STEMI
2. Immediatehs-cTn at 0hDetect myocyte necrosis
3. 1–3hRepeat hs-cTn at 1h (or 3h)Rise/fall pattern → confirm/exclude MI
4. BaselineCBC, RFT, LFT, lipid, glucose/HbA1c, coagulation, NT-proBNP, TFTIdentify comorbidities, risk factors, baseline for therapy
5. BaselineCXRExclude aortic dissection, pneumothorax; assess for pulmonary oedema
6. EarlyEchocardiographyRWMA, LVEF, complications, alternative diagnoses
7. SerialRepeat ECG (daily × 3d, more if severe)Detect evolving changes
8. Risk stratificationGRACE / TIMI scoreDetermine urgency of invasive strategy
9. DefinitiveInvasive coronary angiographyVisualise culprit lesion; guide revascularisation
10. If uncertainCCTA, stress test, or cardiac MRIRule out CAD; differentiate ischaemic vs non-ischaemic injury

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis and Investigations of NSTEMI

  1. Diagnostic criteria for MI = rise/fall of troponin above 99th URL + at least one of: ischaemic symptoms, new ST-T changes or LBBB, pathological Q waves, imaging RWMA, or angiographic thrombus.
  2. NSTEMI = criteria met + no persistent ST elevation + troponin elevated (separates from UA where troponin is normal).
  3. hs-cTn is the gold standard biomarker. Use the 0h/1h (or 0h/3h) algorithm for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
  4. CK-MB retains value for timeline (late presentation) and reinfarction detection (shorter half-life).
  5. ECG in NSTEMI: ST depression / T-wave inversion in ≥ 2 contiguous leads; usually widespread (subendocardial). Always check aVR for left main pattern.
  6. Wellens' syndrome (biphasic or deeply inverted T waves in V2–V3, pain-free) = critical proximal LAD stenosis. Stress test contraindicated. Urgent angiography needed.
  7. CCTA: Triple rule-out (MI, PE, aortic dissection). High sensitivity → great for ruling out. False positives from calcified plaques.
  8. GRACE score is the validated risk stratification tool → determines urgency of invasive strategy.
  9. Troponin elevation ≠ MI. Not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions. Interpret in clinical context.

Active Recall - NSTEMI Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations


References

[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf [9] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [11] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [13] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf [15] Lecture slides: GC 088. Sudden Severe Chest Pain.pdf [19] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [21] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf

Management of NSTEMI

The management of NSTEMI is fundamentally different from STEMI. The key concept to understand from first principles:

NSTEMI → lumen is reduced, but blood flow is still possible, so you can get away with giving anti-platelet / anti-thrombotics, with or without revascularization [1]. STEMI → complete occlusion of artery, require immediate opening up of artery as soon as possible [1].

This means NSTEMI management is a two-phase process: (1) stabilise with antithrombotic and anti-ischaemic therapy, then (2) risk-stratify to decide the timing and need for invasive strategy. There is no "door-to-balloon" race as in STEMI — instead, it is a calibrated approach based on risk.



Initial management (SAQ!!) [10]:

  • Admit CCU for high-risk cases
  • Complete bed rest + NPO for first 12h
  • Close monitoring: BP/P, IO Q1h, cardiac monitoring with defibrillator standby
MeasureDetailsRationale
Bed rest12–24 hours if uncomplicated [7]↓Myocardial O₂ demand by ↓physical activity → limit infarct extension
OxygenRoutine O₂ in the first 6h; nasal prongs if hypoxic or in cardiac failure [7][22]. Target SpO₂ > 94%. Do NOT give high-flow O₂ routinely if SpO₂ is normalSupplemental O₂ improves myocardial oxygenation in hypoxic patients. However, hyperoxia causes coronary vasoconstriction and may paradoxically increase infarct size — hence only give if SpO₂ < 94%.
Morphine2–5mg IV ± stool softeners with BP and RR monitoring. Indicated when symptoms are not immediately relieved by nitrates [7]Morphine = potent analgesic + anxiolytic + mild vasodilator (↓preload). Reduces sympathetic drive from pain → ↓HR, ↓BP → ↓O₂ demand. Monitor for respiratory depression and hypotension.
Relieve anxietyExplanation or diazepam 2–5mg PO TDS [7]Anxiety → catecholamine surge → ↑HR, ↑BP → ↑O₂ demand
Stool softenersAvoid straining [7]Valsalva manoeuvre during straining → vagal stimulation → bradycardia and hypotension in an already vulnerable heart
MonitoringBP/Pulse Q1H, I/O chart Q1H, cardiac monitor [7]Detect arrhythmias (VT/VF), haemodynamic deterioration, and complications early
NPOFirst 12 hours [10]In case urgent angiography/PCI or intubation needed

Important: Do NOT Give Fibrinolytics in NSTEMI

Fibrinolytics is ONLY indicated in STEMI but NOT UA/NSTEMI [7]. This is a critical distinction.

Why? In NSTEMI the thrombus is non-occlusive (partial). Fibrinolytics break down fibrin clots → this could paradoxically destabilise the partially occlusive thrombus, expose more thrombogenic subendothelial surface, and cause more harm than good. Additionally, the risk of haemorrhagic stroke (~1%) is not justified when the artery is not fully occluded. NSTEMI patients benefit from antiplatelet + anticoagulant therapy ± planned invasive strategy instead.


3. Anti-Thrombotic Therapy

The thrombus in NSTEMI is a mixture of platelet-rich white thrombus and fibrin-rich red thrombus. Therefore, management targets both arms:

Summary of medical treatment: Anti-thrombotic = Aspirin + P2Y12 antagonist (DAPT) / GP IIb/IIIa antagonist + LMW heparin [7].

3.1 Antiplatelet Therapy — Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT)

  • "A" = acetylsalicylic acid; "spirin" from Spiraea (meadowsweet plant).
  • Mechanism: Irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) → blocks synthesis of thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) in platelets → ↓platelet aggregation. Since platelets are anucleate (no DNA → cannot make new COX-1), the inhibition lasts the entire 7–10 day lifespan of the platelet.
Detail
Loading dose162–325mg (QMH = 320mg) [7]
Maintenance doseNSTEMI = 80–100mg daily [7]
IndicationRecommended for all patients without contraindications [1]
Side effectsGI upset [4], GI bleeding, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease
ContraindicationsActive GI bleed, true aspirin allergy (not just intolerance), severe bleeding diathesis

P2Y12 is an ADP receptor on the platelet surface. When ADP binds P2Y12 → platelet activation and aggregation. Blocking P2Y12 → ↓platelet activation.

Dual antiplatelet therapy recommended: Aspirin + P2Y12 receptor inhibitor [1].

DrugMechanismLoading DoseMaintenanceKey Features
Clopidogrel ("clo-PID-oh-grel")Irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor; prodrug requiring CYP2C19 hepatic activation600mg [7]75mg daily [7][1]Cheaper; weaker inhibition. CYP2C19 poor metabolisers (common in East Asians — "East Asian Paradox" [4]) have reduced drug activation → diminished antiplatelet effect. 75mg daily if aspirin is not tolerated due to hypersensitivity or GI intolerance [1]
Ticagrelor ("ti-CAG-re-lor")Reversible direct P2Y12 inhibitor; not a prodrug (no CYP2C19 dependence)180mg [7]90mg BD [7][1]More potent and consistent than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel in NSTEMI [3]. Side effects: dyspnoea (adenosine reuptake inhibition), bradycardia
Prasugrel ("PRA-su-grel")Irreversible P2Y12 inhibitor; prodrug (different metabolic pathway from clopidogrel)60mg [7]10mg daily [7]Most potent. Higher bleeding risk. Contraindicated if prior stroke/TIA, age > 75, weight < 60kg

If delayed beyond 24h, can give P2Y12 inhibitors → ticagrelor and clopidogrel over prasugrel [3].

Pharmacogenomics and P2Y12 Inhibitors (High Yield)

If we can do genetic testing for all patients, then can dictate drugs of choice based on their CYP2C19 [23]. Clopidogrel is a prodrug → requires CYP2C19 for activation. CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles (*2, *3) are common in East Asians (~15–20% are poor metabolisers) → these patients get inadequate antiplatelet effect from clopidogrel.

In Hong Kong, CYP2C19 testing is not yet routinely done since more evidence is required [23]. Ticagrelor bypasses this problem entirely (not a prodrug).

  • "GP IIb/IIIa" = glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, the final common pathway receptor for platelet aggregation. Fibrinogen bridges between activated GP IIb/IIIa receptors on adjacent platelets → platelet plug.
  • GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban) block this receptor → potent inhibition of platelet aggregation.
DrugDetail
AbciximabMonoclonal antibody fragment; longest duration; used as pre-med if heavy clot load at PCI
EptifibatideCyclic peptide; shorter duration
TirofibanNon-peptide; shortest duration

GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor is not routinely added unless evidence of ongoing ischaemia in the presence of DAPT (persistent chest pain, ECG evidence of ischaemia) [10]. Consult cardiologist to consider GP IIb/IIIa antagonist [7].

The antiplatelets shown to be class 2b evidence [3] — meaning benefit is uncertain; used selectively.

The coagulation cascade generates thrombin → converts fibrinogen to fibrin → stabilises the platelet plug. Anticoagulation targets this arm.

Unfractionated heparin given in the cath lab, fondaparinux/enoxaparin given at bedside [3].

DrugMechanismDoseNotes
Enoxaparin (Clexane) — Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH)Binds antithrombin III → potentiates its inhibition of Factor Xa (predominantly) and thrombinAge ≤ 75: IV 30mg bolus then SC 1mg/kg Q12H. Age > 75: NO loading, SC 0.75mg/kg Q12H [7]Prescribe up to 8 days or until coronary revascularisation [7]. Predictable pharmacokinetics; no routine aPTT monitoring needed. Dose adjust for CKD.
Unfractionated Heparin (UFH)Binds antithrombin III → inhibits thrombin (Factor IIa) and Factor Xa equallyIV bolus then infusion; monitor aPTT (target 1.5–2.5× control)Shorter half-life, reversible with protamine → preferred in cath lab (easy to control during procedure).
Fondaparinux — Ultra-Low Molecular Weight HeparinSelective Factor Xa inhibitor via antithrombin III2.5mg SC dailyLowest bleeding risk among anticoagulants. Preferred if conservative (non-invasive) management planned. Cannot be used as sole anticoagulant during PCI (need UFH supplement).

Side effects of heparin: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), osteoporosis, hyperkalaemia [10].

Choice of Anticoagulant — Practical Guide

  • Going to cath lab soon → UFH (short-acting, controllable, reversible with protamine)
  • Medical management / awaiting invasive strategy → Enoxaparin (convenient SC dosing, predictable)
  • Conservative strategy / high bleeding risk → Fondaparinux (lowest bleeding, but needs UFH top-up if going for PCI)

4. Anti-Ischaemic Therapy

The goal: ↓myocardial O₂ demand and/or ↑O₂ supply to limit infarct extension and relieve symptoms.

Anti-ischaemic = Nitrates + β-blocker / CCB [7].

  • "Nitro-" = nitrogen; nitrates release nitric oxide (NO) → activates guanylyl cyclase → ↑cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation.
  • Predominantly venodilators (at low doses) → ↓preload → ↓LV wall stress → ↓O₂ demand.
  • At higher doses: also arteriolar dilation (↓afterload) and coronary artery dilation (↑O₂ supply).
FormulationDoseUse
Sublingual GTN0.4–0.8mg SL Q5min × 3Acute symptom relief
IV nitroglycerin (Isoket)2–10mg/hr IV [22]IV TNG indicated in the first 48h for persistent ischaemia, heart failure, or hypertension [22]. Begin with lowest dose, step up till pain relieved. Watch BP/P; keep SBP > 100mmHg [22]
Isosorbide dinitrate (Isordil)10–30mg TDS PO [22]Longer-acting oral maintenance
Isosorbide mononitrate (Imdur)60–120mg daily PO [22]Once-daily sustained release

Nitrates (long acting or short acting) → in the presence of angina [1] (secondary prevention).

Contraindications of Nitrates

5 contraindications in the use of nitrates [2]:

  1. RV infarction — nitrates ↓preload → RV is preload-dependent → catastrophic ↓CO
  2. Use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil/Viagra) in the previous 24 hours — PDE5 inhibitors also work via cGMP → synergistic vasodilation → severe hypotension
  3. Hypotension — further ↓BP → shock
  4. Tachycardia — reflex tachycardia from vasodilation worsens ischaemia
  5. Bradycardia — may worsen haemodynamic compromise

  • "Beta" refers to β-adrenergic receptors. β₁ receptors are predominantly in the heart.
  • Mechanism: Block β₁ receptors → ↓heart rate + ↓contractility + ↓BP → ↓myocardial O₂ demand. Also ↑diastolic filling time → ↑coronary perfusion time.

Beta-blocker (cardio-selective): proven survival benefit, ↓HR/BP/contractility and improve coronary perfusion [10].

DrugDoseNotes
Metoprolol25mg BD oral [10], titrate to HR < 70Cardio-selective (β₁ selective)
Atenolol25–100mg dailyCardio-selective; renally excreted
Bisoprolol / Carvedilol / Metoprolol succinateVariableIf reduced EF: consider these [10] — evidence for mortality benefit in HFrEF

Reduce HR and BP (titrate to HR < 70) [22].

Contraindications of Beta-Blockers

Contraindications of beta-blockers [10]:

  • Poor ventricular function (acute decompensation; though long-term BB is beneficial in chronic HFrEF)
  • Acute pulmonary oedema
  • Heart block (2nd / 3rd degree) — β-blockers ↓AV conduction → worsen block
  • Asthma / COPD — β₂ blockade → bronchospasm (even "selective" β₁ blockers lose selectivity at high doses)

Also: severe bradycardia (HR < 50), cardiogenic shock, severe peripheral vascular disease, phaeochromocytoma without prior α-blockade.

  • Mechanism: Block L-type voltage-gated calcium channels → ↓Ca²⁺ entry into smooth muscle and cardiac cells.
SubclassExampleEffectWhen to Use
Non-dihydropyridine (rate-limiting)Diltiazem, Verapamil↓HR, ↓contractility, ↓BP, coronary vasodilationIf there are contraindications to beta-blockers, or if there is no heart failure [1]. Alternative: rate-limiting CCB (diltiazem / verapamil) [10]
DihydropyridineAmlodipine, NifedipinePredominantly vasodilation (↓afterload); reflex ↑HR if short-actingAvoid short-acting nifedipine in ACS (reflex tachycardia → ↑O₂ demand). Long-acting amlodipine acceptable for BP control

Verapamil 5–15mg IV slowly (C/I if BP low or on BB, beware of post-conversion angina) [12]. Never combine verapamil/diltiazem with beta-blockers — risk of severe bradycardia, AV block, and negative inotropy → haemodynamic collapse.


5. Other Early Therapies

  • "Statin" = inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis → ↓intracellular cholesterol → ↑LDL receptor expression → ↑LDL clearance from blood.
  • Pleiotropic effects (beyond lipid lowering): anti-inflammatory (↓hs-CRP), endothelial stabilisation, plaque stabilisation (↑fibrous cap thickness, ↓lipid core), antithrombotic.

Should be given regardless of baseline LDL-C level in the absence of contraindications [22].

Other therapy = ACEI + Statins [7].

DrugDoseIntensity
Atorvastatin40–80mg dailyHigh-intensity (preferred in ACS)
Rosuvastatin20–40mg dailyHigh-intensity

Start within 24 hours of presentation. High-intensity statin is the standard in ACS — the goal is maximal plaque stabilisation early.

Side effects: Myalgia/myopathy (↑CK), rhabdomyolysis (rare), hepatotoxicity (↑ALT), new-onset diabetes.

Contraindications: Active liver disease, pregnancy, concomitant use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors with certain statins.

  • ACEI ("A-C-E-I" = Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor): Blocks conversion of angiotensin I → angiotensin II → ↓vasoconstriction, ↓aldosterone secretion → ↓afterload, ↓preload, ↓myocardial remodelling.
  • ARB (Angiotensin Receptor Blocker): Blocks AT₁ receptor directly → same downstream effects.

ACEI should be administered within the first 24 hours if LVEF < 40% and in the absence of hypotension or contraindications [22].

ACEI → for patients with congestive heart failure, LV dysfunction (EF < 40%), hypertension, diabetes [1].

ARBs are recommended for patients who have indications for, but are intolerant of, ACE inhibitors [4][22].

DrugDose
Lisinopril5–20mg daily [22]
Ramipril2.5–10mg daily [22]
Perindopril (Acertil)2–8mg daily [22]
Contraindications of ACEI / ARB

Contraindications [4]:

  • High-grade bilateral renal artery stenosis
  • Azotaemia (severely elevated creatinine)
  • Pregnancy
  • Hyperkalaemia (K⁺ > 5.5)
  • Hypotension (SBP < 90)
  • History of angioedema (especially for ACEI)

Side effects of ACEI: Cough (ACEI-specific, due to ↑bradykinin), syncope, hypotension, angioedema, hyperkalaemia [4].

Proton pump inhibitors for patients at high risk of GI bleeding [22].

Why? Patients on DAPT + anticoagulation have significantly ↑GI bleeding risk. PPIs (e.g. omeprazole, pantoprazole) inhibit the gastric H⁺/K⁺ ATPase → ↓gastric acid → gastroprotection.

Add PPI when using 2 or more antithrombotics [24].

Note: Omeprazole inhibits CYP2C19 → can reduce clopidogrel activation. Pantoprazole is preferred when clopidogrel is used (less CYP2C19 interaction).


6. Invasive Strategy — Coronary Angiography ± Revascularisation

Very high risk / high risk features (Consult Cardiologists) [22]:

  • Haemodynamic instability
  • Cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure
  • Recurrent/refractory chest pain despite medical treatment
  • Life-threatening arrhythmias
  • Established NSTEMI diagnosis
  • Dynamic new or presumably new contiguous ST/T segment changes
  • GRACE risk score > 140
Risk CategoryCriteriaTiming of Angiography
Very high riskHaemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, refractory pain, life-threatening arrhythmia, mechanical complicationsImmediate (< 2 hours)
High riskGRACE > 140, dynamic ST changes, troponin rise, established NSTEMI [22]Early (< 24 hours)
Intermediate riskDM, CKD, LVEF < 40%, prior PCI/CABG, GRACE 109–140Within 72 hours
Low riskNo high-risk features, symptoms resolved, normal serial troponinNon-invasive testing first → selective invasive if positive

Immediate revascularization if haemodynamically unstable / mechanical complications [10].

  • "Percutaneous" = through the skin; "coronary" = heart arteries; "intervention" = treatment.
  • A catheter is threaded into the culprit coronary artery → balloon angioplasty ± stent deployment to restore lumen patency.

Stent types:

  • Bare-metal stent (BMS): Metal scaffold only; higher restenosis rate (~20–30%); requires shorter DAPT (1–3 months)
  • Drug-eluting stent (DES): Coated with antiproliferative drug (sirolimus, everolimus, paclitaxel) → inhibits neointimal hyperplasia → lower restenosis (~5–10%); requires longer DAPT

You really want to make sure there is no re-thrombosis in your stent [1] — hence the extended DAPT duration.

Indications for CABG over PCI in NSTEMI:

ST elevation (> 1mm) in aVR suggests left main / severe triple vessel disease → directly go for CABG [10].

  • Left main disease (> 50% stenosis)
  • Severe triple-vessel disease (especially with diabetes or reduced LVEF)
  • Complex anatomy not amenable to PCI
  • Failed PCI

Graft types:

  • Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) → LAD: Gold standard; > 90% patency at 10 years (arterial graft)
  • Saphenous vein graft (SVG): ~50% patency at 10 years (venous grafts degenerate faster)

7. Secondary Prevention (Long-Term)

After the acute phase of ACS, treatment modalities in secondary prevention: Antiplatelet therapy, Anti-ischaemic therapy, Risk factor control, Lipid-lowering therapies [1].

Maintained over 12 months, unless there are contraindications or excessive bleeding risk [1]:

  • Ticagrelor 90mg BID
  • Clopidogrel 75mg/day

Try to maintain for 12 months → if really cannot due to bleeding risk, maintain at least for 3–6 months [1].

For patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI → 6 months. For patients with acute MI who underwent PCI → 12 months still required [24].

Left main artery stenting → extended double antiplatelet beyond 12 months has better outcomes [24].

AF with MI → triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, DOAC) [24]:

  • Not recommended for the long term, since bleeding risk is unacceptable
  • No more than 30 days
  • Then step down to dual therapy (DOAC + single antiplatelet) for up to 12 months
  • Then lifelong anticoagulation alone (DOAC)

Beta-blockers unless contraindicated — cornerstone [1].

ACEI → for patients with congestive heart failure, LV dysfunction (EF < 40%), hypertension, diabetes [1].

Calcium-channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) → if there are contraindications to beta-blockers, or if there is no heart failure [1].

Statin should be used in all patients unless contraindicated [22]. Target LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L (or > 50% reduction from baseline) per 2019 ESC guidelines.

For patients who develop heart failure post-NSTEMI (LVEF ≤ 40%), the four pillars of HFrEF apply [22]:

PillarDrug ClassExample
1ACEI/ARB → Consider switching to ARNI if persistent HF symptoms despite ACEI/ARB [22]Sacubitril/valsartan
2Beta-blockerBisoprolol, Carvedilol, Metoprolol succinate
3Aldosterone blocker (MRA)Should be used in patients without significant renal dysfunction or hyperkalaemia, already on therapeutic ACEI + BB, with LVEF ≤ 40% + diabetes or HF [22]
4SGLT2 inhibitorConsider SGLT2 inhibitor in heart failure [22] — e.g. Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin

Consider ARNI: Stop ACEI 36 hours before initiating ARNI [22] (to avoid dual RAAS blockade → angioedema risk).

Risk FactorTargetIntervention
SmokingComplete cessationCounselling, NRT, varenicline
BP< 130/80 mmHg (per 2024 ESC)ACEI/ARB first-line in post-MI
DiabetesHbA1c < 7% (individualised)Optimise OHAs; SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA preferred (cardiovascular benefit)
LDL-C< 1.4 mmol/L or > 50% ↓High-intensity statin ± ezetimibe ± PCSK9 inhibitor
WeightBMI < 25Diet, exercise, GLP-1 RA if indicated
ExerciseCardiac rehabilitationSupervised exercise programme post-MI

Very high risk angina patients: on top of low-dose aspirin (81–100mg daily), add rivaroxaban/Factor Xa inhibitor 2.5mg twice daily [4] — the COMPASS regimen for very high-risk patients with stable CAD post-ACS.


For patients with severely reduced LVEF post-NSTEMI:

DeviceIndicationRationale
ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)Prophylactic ICD in NYHA II–III with LVEF < 30% (may be considered LVEF 31–35%) [20]. Following 3 months of optimal medical therapy in patients with PMHx of MI [20]Low LVEF → high risk of lethal ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) → ICD terminates these automatically
CRT (Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy)NYHA III despite optimal medical therapy + sinus rhythm + widened QRS (> 120ms, especially LBBB) + LVEF < 35% + LVD > 5.5cm [20]LBBB → LV dyssynchrony → inefficient contraction → CRT biventricular pacing restores synchrony

PhaseComponentAgentsKey Points
ImmediateGeneral measuresO₂ (if SpO₂ < 94%), morphine, bed rest, monitoringCCU admission for high risk
ImmediateAntiplatelet (DAPT)Aspirin 320mg load → 80–100mg daily + Ticagrelor 180mg → 90mg BD (or Clopidogrel 600mg → 75mg daily)12 months unless bleeding risk too high
ImmediateAnticoagulantEnoxaparin 1mg/kg SC Q12H (or UFH in cath lab, or Fondaparinux 2.5mg SC daily)Up to 8 days or until revascularisation
ImmediateAnti-ischaemicNitrates (SL/IV) + Beta-blocker (metoprolol, titrate HR < 70)CCB if BB contraindicated; avoid nitrates in RV infarct
Within 24hStatinAtorvastatin 80mg or Rosuvastatin 20–40mgRegardless of baseline LDL
Within 24hACEI/ARBIf LVEF < 40%, HT, DM, CKDARB if ACEI intolerant
Within 24hPPIPantoprazole preferredIf on ≥ 2 antithrombotics
Risk-stratifiedInvasive strategyAngiography ± PCI / CABGTiming by GRACE score
Long-termSecondary preventionDAPT 12 months, BB, ACEI/ARB, statin, risk factor control4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40%

High Yield Summary — NSTEMI Management

  1. NSTEMI management = antithrombotic (DAPT + anticoagulant) + anti-ischaemic (nitrate + BB) + early statin + ACEI/ARB if indicated.
  2. NEVER give fibrinolytics in NSTEMI — only for STEMI.
  3. DAPT = Aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in most cases) for 12 months post-ACS.
  4. Timing of invasive strategy guided by GRACE score: very high risk < 2h, high risk < 24h, intermediate < 72h, low risk = selective.
  5. Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmia, refractory pain.
  6. 5 contraindications for nitrates: RV infarct, PDE5 inhibitor use, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia.
  7. BB contraindications: acute pulmonary oedema, poor ventricular function (acute), heart block (2nd/3rd degree), asthma/COPD.
  8. ACEI contraindications: bilateral renal artery stenosis, azotaemia, pregnancy, angioedema, hyperkalaemia.
  9. Secondary prevention: DAPT, BB, ACEI/ARB, high-intensity statin, risk factor control. 4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40%.
  10. AF + ACS = triple therapy (max 30 days) → dual therapy (up to 12 months) → lifelong anticoagulation alone.

Active Recall - NSTEMI Management


References

[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - Sudden severe chest pain_ acute myocardial infarction; aortic dissection.pdf [3] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Medicine.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [22] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf [23] Senior notes: Introduction to Clinical pharmacology (I) (Pharmaco-Genomics, Precision Medicine).pdf [24] Senior notes: Block A - Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelets and anticoagulation.pdf

Complications of NSTEMI

Complications of NSTEMI are best understood as logical, downstream consequences of myocardial necrosis. Although NSTEMI involves subendocardial (partial-thickness) infarction — as opposed to the transmural damage of STEMI — significant complications can still occur, particularly when the infarct is large, when treatment is delayed, or when the patient has pre-existing cardiac disease. The complications are also time-dependent: some occur in minutes to hours ("early"), others over days to weeks ("subacute"), and some develop over months to years ("late").

The overarching principle: dead myocardium cannot contract, cannot conduct electricity properly, and (if enough of it dies) structurally weakens the ventricular wall. Every complication flows from one or more of these three consequences.


MechanismEarly (minutes–hours)Subacute (days–weeks)Late (weeks–months–years)
Electrical instabilityVentricular arrhythmia (VT/VF), AF, bradycardia/AV blockPersistent arrhythmiaSudden cardiac death from scar-related re-entry VT
Pump failureAcute pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shockProgressive heart failureChronic HFrEF, ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Mechanical disruption—Papillary muscle rupture (MR), ventricular septal rupture (VSD), free wall rupture (tamponade)Ventricular aneurysm
Thrombotic—LV mural thrombus → systemic embolism (stroke)Recurrent MI, stent thrombosis
Inflammatory—Pericarditis (early), Dressler syndrome (late)—
Iatrogenic / procedure-relatedPCI complicationsStent thrombosis, access-site bleedingIn-stent restenosis

Complications of MI: Refractory angina, Cardiogenic shock, Acute pulmonary oedema, Ventricular arrhythmia [10].


2. Electrical Complications (Arrhythmias)

Ischaemic and necrotic myocardium is electrically unstable. Why?

  • Ischaemic cells cannot maintain normal ionic gradients (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase fails due to ATP depletion) → K⁺ leaks out of cells into the extracellular space → local hyperkalaemia → altered resting membrane potential.
  • Dead cells become electrically inert, creating boundaries between healthy and necrotic tissue → differences in refractoriness and conduction velocity → conditions ripe for re-entry circuits → VT/VF.
  • Autonomic imbalance: pain and stress → catecholamine surge → ↑automaticity → ectopic foci fire.

ECG: peaked T, widening of QRS, loss of P, sine wave, asystole — this sequence describes progressive hyperkalaemia effects on the heart, analogous to the ionic derangement in the peri-infarct zone [25].

TypeFeaturesManagement
Non-sustained VTShort runs (< 30s), often self-terminatingCorrect electrolytes (K⁺ > 4.0, Mg²⁺ > 1.0); beta-blocker; monitor
Sustained monomorphic VT (stable)Amiodarone 150mg IV over 10 min, repeat if needed, then 600–1200mg infusion/24h. Lignocaine 50–100mg IV bolus, then 1–4mg/min infusion. Procainamide 20–30mg/min loading, then 1–4mg/min infusion. Synchronized cardioversion starting with 100J [12]
Sustained polymorphic VTIrregular wide-complex tachycardia; often degenerates into VFUnsynchronized cardioversion starting with 200J [12]
VFPrompt defibrillation with reference to ACLS algorithm [12]Immediate defibrillation → CPR → adrenaline → amiodarone → address reversible causes (4Hs and 4Ts)

Treat as VT until proven otherwise in the setting of ACS [12]. This is a vital principle — any wide-complex tachycardia in a patient with known or suspected MI should be treated as VT.

Cardiac arrest causes: Coronary artery disease (85%): myocardial ischaemia, AMI, prior MI with myocardial scarring [26]. This statistic tells you that ischaemic heart disease (and by extension, MI) is the single most common cause of sudden cardiac death.

TypeSignificanceManagement
AF / Atrial flutterCommon and frequently transient; can be a sign of impending or overt LVF [12]Digoxin 0.25mg IV/PO stat, then 0.25mg PO Q8H ×2 more doses as loading; maintenance 0.0625–0.25mg daily. Diltiazem 10–15mg IV over 5–10 min, then 5–15 µg/kg/min. Amiodarone 5mg/kg IV over 60 min, then 600–900mg/24h [12]
PSVTUncommon; may worsen ischaemiaCardioversion if severe haemodynamic compromise. ATP 10–20mg IV bolus → verapamil 5–15mg IV slowly (C/I if BP low or on BB, beware of post-conversion angina) [12]

Why does AF occur post-MI? Acute ischaemia → ↑left atrial pressure (from LV dysfunction) → atrial stretch → triggers AF. Also, catecholamine surge and inflammatory mediators contribute.

TypeMechanismManagement
Symptomatic sinus bradycardiaExcessive vagal tone (Bezold-Jarisch reflex), especially in inferior MI (RCA supplies SA node in ~60% of people)Atropine 0.3–0.6mg IV bolus. Pacing if unresponsive to atropine [12]
1st-degree AV block↑Vagal tone or AV nodal ischaemiaConservative [12] — usually benign and transient
Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach)AV nodal ischaemia (AV node supplied by RCA in ~80%)Conservative [12] — usually transient in inferior MI
Mobitz Type IIBelow-AV-node (His-Purkle) ischaemia; implies larger infarctPacing [12] — high risk of progression to complete heart block
Complete (3rd degree) heart blockExtensive conduction system necrosisPacing [12]. Conservative Tx under careful monitoring as alternative if inferior MI with narrow QRS escape rhythm and adequate rate [12]

Other indications for temporary pacing: bifascicular block + 1st-degree AV block, alternating BBB / RBBB + alternating LAFB/LPFB (anterior infarct → ↑risk of sudden asystole) [12].

Inferior-posterior MI causing a complete AV block — Treatment is different → pacing before revascularization? [27].

Why Is AV Block More Common in Inferior MI?

The AV node is supplied by the RCA in ~80% of people (and by the LCx in the remainder). Inferior MI (usually RCA territory) → AV nodal ischaemia → varying degrees of AV block. These are usually reversible because the AV node has a good collateral blood supply and the block is often functional (vagal) rather than structural.

In contrast, conduction block in anterior MI (LAD territory) implies extensive septal necrosis involving the His-Purkinje system → this is structural damage, usually irreversible, and carries a much worse prognosis.


3. Pump Failure — Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock

Pump failure mechanism: downward spiral exacerbating myocardial ischaemia [12]:

  • ↓Systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → ↓supply → ischaemia
  • ↓Diastolic function → ↑pulmonary congestion → hypoxaemia → ischaemia

Indicates extensive myocardial damage → poor prognosis (↑likelihood of other complications) [12].

This is a vicious cycle: necrotic myocardium cannot contract → remaining myocardium must work harder → ↑O₂ demand of viable tissue → more ischaemia → more necrosis → progressive pump failure.

  • Pathophysiology: Loss of contractile myocardium → ↓LVEF → ↑LV end-diastolic pressure → ↑pulmonary capillary pressure → fluid transudation into alveoli → pulmonary oedema → hypoxaemia → further ischaemia.
  • Clinical features: Acute dyspnoea, orthopnoea, pink frothy sputum, bilateral crackles, S3 gallop, tachycardia.
  • Killip classification (introduced in Part 1) grades the severity: Killip III = frank pulmonary oedema.

  • Defined as: SBP < 90 mmHg (or need for vasopressors) + signs of end-organ hypoperfusion (altered consciousness, oliguria, cold clammy extremities, elevated lactate).
  • Occurs when > 40% of LV myocardium is lost.
  • In-hospital mortality remains ~40–50% despite modern therapy.
  • Management: Inotropes (e.g. IV dobutamine) if adequate filling pressure. Fluid resuscitation ± vasopressors if low filling pressure [19]. Mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella, ECMO) as bridge to revascularisation.

Watch out for other causes: mechanical complications, arrhythmia, excessive use of anti-HTN [12]. Not all post-MI hypotension is pure pump failure — always consider mechanical rupture or arrhythmia.


4. Mechanical Complications

These are the most dramatic and often fatal complications. They result from structural weakening of necrotic myocardium. Although more classically associated with STEMI (transmural necrosis), they can occur in NSTEMI, particularly with larger subendocardial infarcts.

Timing: Typically days 3–7 post-MI (when necrotic tissue is softest, before scar formation begins — "the danger zone of myocardial softening").

  • Pathophysiology: The papillary muscles anchor the mitral valve leaflets via chordae tendineae. They are vulnerable because they are at the most distal end of the coronary perfusion pathway (subendocardial). The posteromedial papillary muscle is supplied by a single artery (PDA, usually from RCA), making it much more vulnerable than the anterolateral papillary muscle (dual supply from LAD + LCx).
  • Presentation: Sudden-onset severe dyspnoea, new loud pansystolic murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla, flash pulmonary oedema.
  • Diagnosis: Echocardiography (flail mitral leaflet, severe MR jet on Doppler).
  • Management: Haemodynamic stabilisation (vasodilators to ↓afterload, IABP) → emergent surgical mitral valve repair/replacement.

Look for complications of IHD: Cardiomegaly, Heart failure, Mitral regurgitation [4].

  • Pathophysiology: Full-thickness necrosis of the interventricular septum → physical rupture → left-to-right shunt (blood flows from high-pressure LV → low-pressure RV).
  • Presentation: New harsh pansystolic murmur at the left sternal border (different location from MR murmur which is at the apex), acute RV volume overload → biventricular failure.
  • Diagnosis: Echocardiography with colour Doppler (visualises the shunt); step-up in O₂ saturation from RA to RV on right heart catheterisation.
  • Management: Haemodynamic support (IABP) → urgent surgical repair or percutaneous closure.

  • Pathophysiology: Full-thickness necrosis of the LV free wall → rupture → blood leaks into pericardial space → acute cardiac tamponade.
  • Presentation: Sudden haemodynamic collapse, pulseless electrical activity (PEA), Beck's triad (hypotension, muffled heart sounds, raised JVP).
  • This is almost always rapidly fatal unless recognised immediately and treated with emergency pericardiocentesis + surgical repair.
  • Subacute "contained" rupture: A pseudoaneurysm forms when the rupture is sealed by adherent pericardium or thrombus → presents more gradually with persistent chest pain and haemodynamic instability.

  • Pathophysiology: The necrotic wall segment heals with thin, fibrotic scar tissue → under systemic pressure, the scar bulges outward during systole (paradoxical motion) → true aneurysm (all layers of the wall present, unlike pseudoaneurysm).
  • Clinical significance:
    • Reduces effective LVEF (part of the stroke volume goes into the aneurysm)
    • Stasis within the aneurysm → mural thrombus → systemic embolism (stroke)
    • Substrate for re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (scar border zone)
    • Persistent ST elevation on ECG (the scar tissue creates a permanent injury current)
  • Management: Anticoagulation if mural thrombus; surgical aneurysmectomy if refractory arrhythmia or severe HF.

How to Distinguish MR from VSD Post-MI at the Bedside

Both present with a new pansystolic murmur + acute haemodynamic deterioration. Key differences:

FeaturePapillary Muscle Rupture (MR)Ventricular Septal Rupture (VSD)
Location of murmurApex, radiating to axillaLeft sternal border, radiating to right sternal border
ThrillUncommonOften present at left sternal border
PA catheterLarge V waves in PCWP tracingStep-up in O₂ saturation from RA → RV
Infarct territoryUsually inferior (posteromedial papillary muscle)Anterior (septal) or inferior

Echocardiography is definitive for both.


5. Thrombotic Complications

  • Pathophysiology: Akinetic or dyskinetic myocardial segments create blood stasis within the LV cavity → thrombus formation (Virchow's triad: stasis + endothelial injury + hypercoagulability from the inflammatory response). The thrombus adheres to the damaged endocardium.
  • Risk factors: Large anterior MI (akinetic apex), LVEF < 40%, ventricular aneurysm, AF.
  • Consequence: Dislodgement → systemic embolism → ischaemic stroke (most feared), mesenteric ischaemia, limb ischaemia.
  • Detection: Echocardiography (TTE or TEE).
  • Management: Therapeutic anticoagulation (warfarin or DOAC) for ≥ 3–6 months if mural thrombus detected.

Post-ACS ischaemia indicated by symptoms/ECG changes + new rise in cTn > 20% or to > 5× ULN (if normal baseline) [12].

Cause of post-PCI MI: side branch occlusion (60%), stent complications, microembolization [12].

High risk → prompt coronary angiography/PCI + IV GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (if dynamic ECG changes) [12].

In thrombolysis patients, up to 50% have post-infarct angina (because of residual stenosis) [12].


6. Pericardial Complications

  • Timing: Days 1–3 post-MI.
  • Pathophysiology: Transmural (or near-transmural) necrosis → inflammation extends to the adjacent visceral pericardium → acute pericarditis.
  • Clinical features: Pleuritic chest pain (sharp, worse lying flat, better leaning forward), pericardial friction rub, diffuse ST elevation on ECG (different from the localised ST changes of MI).
  • Management: Aspirin (high-dose, 650mg Q4–6H); avoid NSAIDs (may impair scar formation and increase risk of myocardial rupture in the acute post-MI period); avoid corticosteroids (same concern).
  • Important: Must differentiate from recurrent MI (recurrent ischaemic pain) — ECG and troponin serial measurements help.

  • Timing: 2–10 weeks post-MI (late complication).
  • Pathophysiology: Autoimmune-mediated pericarditis. Myocardial necrosis exposes intracellular antigens (e.g. cardiac myosin) to the immune system → autoantibody formation → immune complex deposition in the pericardium → inflammation.
  • Clinical features: Fever, pleuritic chest pain, pericardial effusion ± pleural effusion, elevated ESR/CRP.
  • Management: NSAIDs (safer at this stage — scar has formed), colchicine, short course corticosteroids if refractory.
  • Now rare in the modern era (incidence < 1%) because early reperfusion therapy limits the extent of myocardial necrosis → less antigen exposure.

Since most NSTEMI patients undergo coronary angiography ± PCI, awareness of procedural complications is essential:

Complications of PCI [7][12]:

CategoryComplicationDetails
Vascular (access site)Access site bleeding, retroperitoneal bleeding, haematoma, AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm [7]Retroperitoneal bleeding: femoral access with artery puncture. Diagnosed with haemodynamic compromise (↑HR ↓BP) [7]
Coronary arteryDissection and acute closure, intramural haematoma (6.7%), perforation (0.2–0.6%), side branch occlusion (up to 19%) [12]Coronary artery perforation: requires inflation of perfusion balloon catheter to buy time for pericardiocentesis and haemodynamic stabilisation. Emergency insertion of covered stent [7]
Stent-relatedStent thrombosis (1–2%): acute event, usually presents with severe STEMI or cardiac death [12]Due to thrombus formation at exposed stent surface before endothelialization. Majority occurs < 30d. Prevention: DAPT until endothelialization [12]
In-stent restenosis (ISR): chronic event, usually presents with recurrent stable angina [12]Due to intimal proliferation → gradual re-stenosis. Usually ≥ 6–9 months. Prevention: drug-eluting stent (DES) [12]
Stent infection: associated with mycotic aneurysm and spontaneous coronary artery perforation [7]Very rare
SystemicStroke, contrast-induced AKI, bacteraemia, anticoagulation-associated bleeding [12]Ischaemic stroke: dislodgement of thrombus, calcific material or atherosclerotic plaques during catheter manipulation. Haemorrhagic stroke: acquired hemostatic abnormalities from antiplatelet regimens [7]
Contrast-relatedContrast-induced AKI: manifests within 48h and peaks at Day 3–5 [7]Especially in CKD, DM, dehydration. Prevention: adequate hydration, minimise contrast volume, hold nephrotoxic drugs

Stent Thrombosis vs In-Stent Restenosis — Key Distinction

These are frequently confused by students:

Stent ThrombosisIn-Stent Restenosis
MechanismThrombus on exposed stent surfaceNeointimal hyperplasia (tissue overgrowth)
TimingUsually < 30 days (before endothelialization)≥ 6–9 months
PresentationAcute STEMI or sudden cardiac deathRecurrent stable angina
PreventionDAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor)Drug-eluting stent (DES)
TriggerCessation of DAPTProgressive tissue growth

Stent thrombosis is associated with cessation of DAPT [7] — this is why patients are counselled never to stop DAPT prematurely without consulting their cardiologist.


8. Long-Term Complications

  • Pathophysiology: Extensive myocardial necrosis → replacement fibrosis (scar) → loss of contractile mass → progressive LV dilatation (remodelling) → HFrEF.
  • This is the most common long-term consequence of MI and the reason why secondary prevention (ACEI/ARB, BB, statin, SGLT2i, MRA) is so critical.
  • The final common path of all cardiac diseases is: Heart failure [20].

Prophylactic ICD placement should be considered in patients with NYHA II–III (LVEF < 30%), may be considered in LVEF 31–35%. Following 3 months of optimal medical therapy in patients with PMHx of MI [20]. The chance of lethal ventricular arrhythmias increases with reducing LVEF [20].

  • Late VT/VF from scar-related re-entry circuits.
  • This is why prophylactic ICD is indicated in patients with severely depressed LVEF post-MI (see management section).

ICD: Primary prevention in patients with low LVEF, CAD ± inducible VT on electrophysiology study. Secondary prevention of VT/VF in patients who have already had an episode [20].

  • Residual atherosclerotic disease → risk of recurrent plaque rupture at the same or a different site.
  • This is why lifelong secondary prevention is essential.

CategoryComplicationTimingMechanismKey Management
ArrhythmiaVT/VFEarlyElectrical instability of ischaemic/necrotic tissueDefibrillation, amiodarone, ICD
AFEarly–subacuteAtrial stretch from ↑LVEDP, catecholamine surgeRate/rhythm control
AV blockEarlyAV nodal ischaemia (RCA territory)Atropine, pacing
Pump failureAcute pulmonary oedemaEarly↓LVEF → ↑LVEDP → pulmonary congestionDiuretics, vasodilators, inotropes
Cardiogenic shockEarly> 40% LV loss → ↓COInotropes, MCS, revascularisation
MechanicalMR (papillary muscle rupture)Day 3–7Necrosis of posteromedial papillary muscleSurgical repair
VSRDay 3–7Septal necrosis → ruptureSurgical/percutaneous closure
Free wall ruptureDay 3–7LV free wall necrosisEmergency surgery
Ventricular aneurysmWeeks–monthsScar tissue bulges → paradoxical motionAnticoagulation, aneurysmectomy
ThromboticMural thrombus → strokeDays–weeksStasis in akinetic LVAnticoagulation
Recurrent MIAny timeResidual plaque diseaseSecondary prevention
PericardialEarly pericarditisDay 1–3Transmural necrosis → pericardial inflammationHigh-dose aspirin
Dressler syndromeWeek 2–10Autoimmune anti-cardiac antigen responseNSAIDs, colchicine
PCI-relatedStent thrombosis< 30 daysThrombus on bare stent surfaceDAPT
In-stent restenosis≥ 6–9 monthsNeointimal hyperplasiaDES, repeat PCI
Long-termIschaemic cardiomyopathyMonths–yearsProgressive LV remodelling4 pillars of HFrEF, ICD, CRT

High Yield Summary — Complications of NSTEMI

  1. Arrhythmias are the most common early complication. Any wide-complex tachycardia in ACS = treat as VT until proven otherwise. VF requires immediate defibrillation.
  2. Pump failure = ↓LVEF → pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock. Downward spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia.
  3. Mechanical complications (papillary muscle rupture, VSR, free wall rupture) occur typically day 3–7 when necrotic tissue is softest. New pansystolic murmur post-MI = emergency echocardiography.
  4. Mural thrombus forms in akinetic segments → systemic embolism (stroke). Screen with echo; treat with anticoagulation.
  5. Pericarditis: Early (day 1–3, inflammatory) vs Dressler syndrome (week 2–10, autoimmune). Dressler now rare due to early reperfusion.
  6. PCI complications: Stent thrombosis (< 30d, acute STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs In-stent restenosis (≥ 6–9 months, recurrent angina, prevented by DES).
  7. Long-term: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (chronic HFrEF), sudden cardiac death from scar-related VT. ICD indicated if LVEF < 30% after 3 months of optimal medical therapy post-MI.

Active Recall - Complications of NSTEMI


References

[1] Senior notes: Block A - Accelerating chest pain_ Acute Coronary Syndromes.pdf [4] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion_ ischaemic heart disease; angina pectoris.pdf [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf [10] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf [19] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf [20] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion_ heart failure.pdf [22] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf [25] Senior notes: Block A - Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders.pdf [26] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (Section: Cardiac Arrest) [27] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Data Interpretation.pdf

High Yield Summary

  1. NSTEMI = myocardial necrosis (↑troponin) WITHOUT persistent ST elevation on ECG.
  2. NSTEMI sits within the ACS spectrum alongside UA (no troponin rise) and STEMI (ST elevation + troponin rise).
  3. Commonest cause: Atherosclerotic plaque rupture/erosion → non-occlusive thrombus → subendocardial ischaemia.
  4. Incomplete coronary occlusion → NSTEMI; Complete occlusion → STEMI [2].
  5. Risk factors: HTN, DM, dyslipidaemia, smoking, obesity, FHx, male sex, age, CKD.
  6. Symptoms: Chest pain (> 20 min, not relieved by rest/GTN), dyspnoea, diaphoresis, nausea, syncope. Atypical in DM, elderly, women.
  7. Signs: May be normal. Look for haemodynamic compromise (↓BP, ↑HR, S3, crackles), new murmur (papillary muscle dysfunction → MR), JVP elevation.
  8. ECG: ST depression, T-wave inversion, or normal. Never persistent ST elevation.
  9. Troponin: Rise and/or fall pattern + clinical ischaemia = MI. Isolated troponin rise ≠ MI.
  10. Type 1 MI (plaque event) vs Type 2 MI (supply-demand mismatch) — different management.

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of NSTEMI

  1. NSTEMI must be distinguished from STEMI (ECG: persistent ST elevation or new LBBB → STEMI) and from UA (troponin: normal → UA).
  2. Life-threatening mimics that CANNOT be missed: Aortic dissection (tearing, back, pulse deficit), PE (pleuritic, haemoptysis, leg swelling), Tension pneumothorax (hyperresonance, absent breath sounds), Perforated viscus.
  3. Cardiac mimics: Pericarditis (positional, pleuritic, trapezius ridge, rub), Myocarditis (young, viral prodrome, diffuse ECG), Takotsubo (post-menopausal, stress, apical ballooning, clean coronaries).
  4. GI mimics: GERD (not exertional, worse lying down), peptic ulcer, pancreatitis. Remember: MI must be excluded as a sinister non-GI cause of epigastric pain.
  5. Troponin elevation ≠ NSTEMI: Always consider Type 2 MI, myocarditis, PE, HF, CKD, sepsis. Troponin is very specific for myocardial injury but not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions.
  6. Approach: Stabilise → SOCRATES + risk factors → targeted exam → ECG → troponin (serial) → CXR → integrate.

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis and Investigations of NSTEMI

  1. Diagnostic criteria for MI = rise/fall of troponin above 99th URL + at least one of: ischaemic symptoms, new ST-T changes or LBBB, pathological Q waves, imaging RWMA, or angiographic thrombus.
  2. NSTEMI = criteria met + no persistent ST elevation + troponin elevated (separates from UA where troponin is normal).
  3. hs-cTn is the gold standard biomarker. Use the 0h/1h (or 0h/3h) algorithm for rapid rule-in/rule-out.
  4. CK-MB retains value for timeline (late presentation) and reinfarction detection (shorter half-life).
  5. ECG in NSTEMI: ST depression / T-wave inversion in ≥ 2 contiguous leads; usually widespread (subendocardial). Always check aVR for left main pattern.
  6. Wellens' syndrome (biphasic or deeply inverted T waves in V2–V3, pain-free) = critical proximal LAD stenosis. Stress test contraindicated. Urgent angiography needed.
  7. CCTA: Triple rule-out (MI, PE, aortic dissection). High sensitivity → great for ruling out. False positives from calcified plaques.
  8. GRACE score is the validated risk stratification tool → determines urgency of invasive strategy.
  9. Troponin elevation ≠ MI. Not all myocardial injuries are myocardial infarctions. Interpret in clinical context.

High Yield Summary — NSTEMI Management

  1. NSTEMI management = antithrombotic (DAPT + anticoagulant) + anti-ischaemic (nitrate + BB) + early statin + ACEI/ARB if indicated.
  2. NEVER give fibrinolytics in NSTEMI — only for STEMI.
  3. DAPT = Aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor preferred over clopidogrel in most cases) for 12 months post-ACS.
  4. Timing of invasive strategy guided by GRACE score: very high risk < 2h, high risk < 24h, intermediate < 72h, low risk = selective.
  5. Very high risk features: haemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmia, refractory pain.
  6. 5 contraindications for nitrates: RV infarct, PDE5 inhibitor use, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia.
  7. BB contraindications: acute pulmonary oedema, poor ventricular function (acute), heart block (2nd/3rd degree), asthma/COPD.
  8. ACEI contraindications: bilateral renal artery stenosis, azotaemia, pregnancy, angioedema, hyperkalaemia.
  9. Secondary prevention: DAPT, BB, ACEI/ARB, high-intensity statin, risk factor control. 4 pillars of HFrEF if LVEF ≤ 40%.
  10. AF + ACS = triple therapy (max 30 days) → dual therapy (up to 12 months) → lifelong anticoagulation alone.

High Yield Summary — Complications of NSTEMI

  1. Arrhythmias are the most common early complication. Any wide-complex tachycardia in ACS = treat as VT until proven otherwise. VF requires immediate defibrillation.
  2. Pump failure = ↓LVEF → pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock. Downward spiral: ↓systolic function → ↓coronary perfusion → more ischaemia.
  3. Mechanical complications (papillary muscle rupture, VSR, free wall rupture) occur typically day 3–7 when necrotic tissue is softest. New pansystolic murmur post-MI = emergency echocardiography.
  4. Mural thrombus forms in akinetic segments → systemic embolism (stroke). Screen with echo; treat with anticoagulation.
  5. Pericarditis: Early (day 1–3, inflammatory) vs Dressler syndrome (week 2–10, autoimmune). Dressler now rare due to early reperfusion.
  6. PCI complications: Stent thrombosis (< 30d, acute STEMI, prevented by DAPT) vs In-stent restenosis (≥ 6–9 months, recurrent angina, prevented by DES).
  7. Long-term: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (chronic HFrEF), sudden cardiac death from scar-related VT. ICD indicated if LVEF < 30% after 3 months of optimal medical therapy post-MI.

On this page

No Headings