Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dilated cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease characterized by ventricular chamber dilation and impaired systolic function, leading to progressive heart failure.
| Exam domain | One-glance essentials |
|---|---|
| Definition / diagnosis |
|
| Epidemiology / risks |
|
| Core mechanism |
|
| Clinical picture |
|
| Investigations |
|
| Management |
|
| Complications |
|
| Prevention / follow-up |
|
| Exam traps |
|
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (DCM definition, familial DCM, aetiological DDx, diagnostic tests) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCMP definition and clinical presentation) [3] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (two severe consequences of DCM; LMNA mutations; familial DCM criteria) [4] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (causes of heart failure, structural DDx) [5] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion.pdf (alcohol and cardiovascular disease) [6] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Q8 — anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf (Case 1 — myocarditis → DCM, endomyocardial biopsy) [8] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p533–535, DCM aetiology table) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Fever and a murmur: Valvular heart diseases; Infective endocarditis.pdf (LV dilatation causing MR; complications of valvular disease including thromboembolism) [10] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Q8 — murmur secondary to dilatation, functional MR) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCMP aetiology and clinical presentation) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p22, cardiogenic shock causes including ADHF from DCMP) [13] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (Framingham Criteria, sensitivity/specificity of HF signs) [14] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p535–537, DCM investigations and CXR/ECG/Echo/MRI findings) [15] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf (Q waves in DCM 10–13%, epsilon wave in ARVC) [16] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf (CXR findings in HF — CT ratio, upper lobe diversion, Kerley B lines) [17] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p293, BNP interpretation, endomyocardial biopsy indications, Dallas criteria) [18] Senior notes: learning_points_output.txt (Three Cases of Dyspnea learning points — coronary assessment mandatory) [19] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion.pdf (indications for invasive coronary angiography) [20] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf (CTCA false positives, cardiac MRI LGE patterns, MINOCA) [21] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (diagnostic tests for DCM, amyloidosis clues, sarcoidosis clues, familial DCM criteria, genetic testing) [22] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (ICD indications; relationship between LVEF and arrhythmia risk) [23] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCM complications listed: arrhythmia, thromboembolism, sudden cardiac death) [24] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (diagnostic tests for DCM, amyloidosis clues)
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a myocardial disease characterised by dilatation and impaired contraction of the left ventricle (± right ventricle) in the absence of abnormal loading conditions (e.g. coronary artery disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease) sufficient to explain the observed myocardial abnormality [1][2].
Breaking down the name:
- "Dilated" → the ventricle is enlarged (increased end-diastolic volume)
- "Cardio-" → heart
- "-myo-" → muscle
- "-pathy" → disease
The key concept: the ventricle balloons out, its walls become relatively thin (though LV mass may be increased or normal), and the muscle cannot squeeze effectively → systolic dysfunction (reduced ejection fraction, HFrEF). This is a structural and pathological diagnosis, not a clinical syndrome — contrast this with heart failure, which is the clinical syndrome that DCM commonly produces [1].
"Cardiomyopathy is defined as a myocardial disorder in which the heart muscle is structurally and functionally abnormal in the absence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, valvular disease, and congenital heart disease sufficient to explain the observed myocardial abnormality." [1]
Heart Failure vs Cardiomyopathy — A Critical Distinction
Heart failure is a clinical syndrome; cardiomyopathy is an anatomic and pathologic diagnosis. Cardiomyopathies can cause heart failure, but cardiomyopathies do not 100% lead to heart failure all the time. Conversely, heart failure can occur without cardiomyopathy (e.g. thyrotoxicosis → high-output heart failure with a structurally normal heart) [1].
- DCM is the most common cardiomyopathy, accounting for ~60% of all cardiomyopathies [1][2][3].
- Prevalence: 1:250 to 1:500 individuals [1]. Previously estimated at ~1:2500, but echocardiographic screening studies suggest the true prevalence is much higher.
- Incidence: ~5–8 per 100,000 per year (variable across populations).
- Majority present between 20–60 years of age [3].
- Sex: Male > Female (~3:1 in most series), partly because X-linked forms (e.g. dystrophinopathies) affect males, and partly because alcohol-related DCM is more common in men.
- Race/Ethnicity: Higher incidence in African Americans (~2.5× compared to Caucasians). In Hong Kong, familial DCM with LMNA mutations is proportionally more important than in Western populations [1].
- DCM is the leading indication for heart transplantation worldwide.
| Category | Specific Risk Factors |
|---|---|
| Genetic / Familial | Family history of DCM or sudden cardiac death < 50 y/o; neuromuscular disease (Duchenne, Becker, myotonic dystrophy); known sarcomere or cytoskeletal gene mutations |
| Infectious | Prior viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, HHV-6, HIV) |
| Toxic / Drug | Alcohol (chronic heavy use), anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin) – dose-dependent cardiotoxicity, cocaine, methamphetamine, trastuzumab |
| Metabolic / Endocrine | Thyrotoxicosis, hypothyroidism, phaeochromocytoma, acromegaly, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies (thiamine/beriberi, selenium/Keshan disease, carnitine) |
| Autoimmune / Inflammatory | SLE, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic myocarditis, coeliac disease |
| Infiltrative | Haemochromatosis (iron overload), amyloidosis (though more commonly restrictive) |
| Pregnancy | Peripartum cardiomyopathy (last month of pregnancy to 5 months postpartum) |
| Tachycardia-mediated | Chronic uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia (e.g. persistent AF with fast ventricular rate) |
| Radiation | Mediastinal radiotherapy (e.g. for Hodgkin lymphoma) |
Hong Kong Focus
In HK, key aetiologies to keep in mind:
- Viral myocarditis → DCM (Coxsackie, adenovirus — episodic outbreaks)
- Alcoholic cardiomyopathy (significant contributor)
- Familial DCM with LMNA mutations being more important in Chinese populations [1]
- Anthracycline-induced in childhood cancer survivors (very testable — see AOS Paeds Q8 [4])
- Iron overload in thalassaemia major patients receiving chronic transfusions (relevant in HK where thalassaemia trait prevalence ~8%)
4. Anatomy and Cardiac Function — What Goes Wrong
The left ventricle is a thick-walled muscular pump. Its wall consists of three layers:
- Endocardium (innermost, lines the cavity)
- Myocardium (the muscle itself — cardiomyocytes arranged in spiral bundles)
- Epicardium (outermost, continuous with pericardium)
Cardiomyocytes are connected end-to-end by intercalated discs (containing gap junctions for electrical coupling and desmosomes for mechanical coupling). The cytoskeleton of each myocyte includes:
- Sarcomere proteins (actin, myosin, troponins, titin) → the contractile machinery
- Cytoskeletal proteins (desmin, dystrophin, lamin A/C) → structural scaffolding connecting the sarcomere to the sarcolemma (cell membrane) and nucleus
- Nuclear envelope proteins (lamin A/C) → maintain nuclear shape and gene regulation
In DCM, the fundamental problem is loss of effective myocardial contractility:
- Cardiomyocytes are damaged, die, or become dysfunctional
- The ventricle cannot generate adequate systolic pressure
- The residual volume at end-systole increases → the ventricle dilates (Frank-Starling mechanism initially compensates)
- Wall stress increases by Laplace's Law: Wall stress = (Pressure × Radius) / (2 × Wall thickness)
- As radius ↑ and wall thickness stays the same or ↓ → wall stress ↑ dramatically
- This further impairs contraction and increases myocardial oxygen demand
- The mitral valve annulus dilates with the LV → functional mitral regurgitation (the valve leaflets are intrinsically normal but can no longer coapt)
- Eventually, biventricular dilatation may occur
"When visualizing a dilated left ventricle, and a reduced LVEF that cannot be explained by the severity of coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, or hypertension" — that is DCM [1].
5. Aetiology and Pathophysiology
DCM is a very clinically heterogeneous disease, as it can be caused by an array of different aetiologies [1]:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CAUSES OF DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Idiopathic (~50%) │
│ └─ 50% of "idiopathic" have +ve FHx │
│ → Familial DCM (~15-30% of all DCM) │
│ 2. Infectious (9%) — viral myocarditis │
│ 3. Ischaemic (7%) — occult CAD │
│ 4. Toxic — alcohol, anthracyclines, cocaine │
│ 5. Metabolic/Endocrine │
│ 6. Autoimmune │
│ 7. Infiltrative — haemochromatosis │
│ 8. Neuromuscular — Duchenne, Becker, MyD │
│ 9. Peripartum │
│10. Tachycardia-mediated │
│11. Others — ESRF on HD, deficiencies │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘Three key factors in the pathogenesis of DCM [1]:
- Genetic factors → altered gene products (e.g. truncated titin, defective lamin A/C, absent dystrophin)
- Alterations of the immune system (autoantibodies against cardiac myosin, β-adrenergic receptors, mitochondrial proteins)
- Viral infection / myocarditis + viral persistence (direct cytopathic effect + immune-mediated damage)
"Not an all-or-none — i.e. genetic factors alone are enough to cause DCM" [1]. These factors interact: a genetically predisposed individual may develop overt DCM after a viral trigger, while another with the same mutation may never manifest disease (variable penetrance).
- Idiopathic DCM constitutes ~35–50% of all DCM [1][3].
- However, 50% of patients with idiopathic DCM have a positive family history → so not truly idiopathic [1].
- Familial DCM = 15–30% of all DCM [1][3].
- Diagnostic criteria for familial DCM [1]:
- ≥2 first- or second-degree relatives with DCM, OR
- A first-degree relative who had sudden death at < 50 y/o with DCM clinically proven following autopsy
Onset of familial DCM: ~20 to 50 years old [1].
Genetics:
- > 90% autosomal dominant inheritance [1][3]
-
40 genes implicated; most commonly affect myocyte cytoskeletal proteins [3]
- Most common gene: Titin (TTN) — 20–25% of familial DCM cases [1]
- Lamin A/C (LMNA) — 6% of cases, but more important in Chinese [1]
- LMNA mutations are associated with conduction disease and malignant arrhythmias → higher risk of sudden cardiac death
- Other genes: MYH7, TNNT2, DES (desmin), SCN5A, PLN (phospholamban), RBM20
- May be part of a greater syndrome [1]:
- Duchenne muscular dystrophy (X-linked, dystrophin gene, Xp21) → virtually all boys develop DCM by teens
- Becker muscular dystrophy (partial dystrophin expression, milder course)
- Myotonic dystrophy (CTG repeat expansion, DMPK gene)
- Mitochondrial diseases
Three challenges preventing diagnosis of familial DCM [1]:
- Incomplete family history (many people in HK waive autopsy)
- Variable age-related penetrance (some present young, some old, some never)
- Reduced penetrance (carrier with normal echo at one point may develop DCM later)
This is a critically important pathway, especially for exams:
Common viral infections known to cause DCM [1]:
- Enteroviruses, especially Coxsackie A/B
- Herpesviruses / adenoviruses / parvovirus B19
The sequence: Viral infection → myocarditis → viral persistence causing chronic cardiac disease → chronic dilated cardiomyopathy [1].
Pathophysiology in three phases:
| Phase | Timing | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Acute viral injury | Days 0–3 | Virus directly invades cardiomyocytes → cell lysis, release of intracellular contents (troponin), innate immune activation |
| Phase 2: Immune-mediated injury | Days 4–14 | T-cell mediated destruction of infected (and bystander) myocytes; cytokine storm; autoantibody generation against exposed cardiac antigens (molecular mimicry) |
| Phase 3: Chronic remodelling | Weeks–months–years | Ongoing autoimmune injury + viral persistence in myocardium → fibrosis, myocyte hypertrophy, progressive ventricular dilatation → DCM |
"Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is believed to be a sequelae of myocarditis" — "Usually viral, creating immune response" [5].
Fulminant Myocarditis
Fulminant myocarditis is the acute, rapidly progressive form — "fulminant heart failure acute, always on the news for heart transplant calls" [5]. Paradoxically, patients who survive fulminant myocarditis with mechanical support have a BETTER long-term prognosis than those with acute non-fulminant myocarditis, because the vigorous immune response may more effectively clear the virus.
- Results from direct ethanol toxicity to cardiomyocytes and its metabolite acetaldehyde
- Typically requires > 80 g/day of alcohol for > 5 years (though threshold varies)
- Mechanism: ethanol disrupts mitochondrial function, increases oxidative stress, impairs calcium handling, causes myocyte apoptosis and fibrosis
- Alcohol has a J-curve relationship with cardiovascular disease: mild intake may decrease risk (HDL-raising, anticoagulant effects), but higher levels → direct cytotoxicity [6]
- Associated cardiovascular conditions: CAD, atrial fibrillation, alcoholic dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertension [6]
- Partially reversible with abstinence (LVEF may improve by 10–15% over 6–12 months)
- Anthracyclines (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin) → dose-dependent, cumulative cardiotoxicity
- Mechanism: generation of free radicals → oxidative damage to cardiomyocyte mitochondria and DNA; topoisomerase 2β inhibition in cardiomyocytes; iron-mediated Fenton reaction
- Risk increases significantly above cumulative doxorubicin dose > 400–450 mg/m²
- May present years to decades after chemotherapy — very relevant for childhood cancer survivors [4]
- Prevention: dose limitation, dexrazoxane (iron chelator that reduces free radical formation), liposomal formulations
- DCM developing in the last month of pregnancy to 5 months postpartum in a woman without prior cardiac disease
- Incidence: ~1:1000 to 1:4000 pregnancies (varies widely by population; higher in Africa and Haiti)
- Pathophysiology: incompletely understood; likely involves:
- Abnormal prolactin cleavage → 16-kDa prolactin fragment → antiangiogenic and proapoptotic to cardiomyocytes
- Autoimmune factors, oxidative stress, genetic susceptibility (TTN mutations found in ~15%)
- ~50% recover LVEF within 6 months; ~25% progress to severe DCM; mortality ~5–10%
- Subsequent pregnancies carry risk of recurrence, especially if LVEF has not normalised
- Sustained rapid heart rate (typically > 100 bpm for weeks to months) → progressive LV dysfunction
- Mechanisms: chronic calcium overload, energy depletion, neurohormonal activation, myocyte remodelling
- Reversible with rate or rhythm control
- Common culprits: uncontrolled AF, atrial flutter, incessant SVT, frequent PVCs (> 15–20% PVC burden)
- Haemochromatosis (iron overload → preferential deposition in ventricle → restrictive then dilated pattern; important in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia in HK)
- Sarcoidosis (granulomatous infiltration of myocardium → conduction disease + DCM)
- HIV cardiomyopathy (direct viral injury + opportunistic infections + ART toxicity)
- Thyroid disease (thyrotoxicosis → high-output state → eventually dilated; hypothyroidism → pericardial effusion + myocardial oedema)
- Nutritional deficiencies: thiamine (wet beriberi), selenium (Keshan disease), carnitine
6. Classification
Four morphological types of cardiomyopathy [1][2]:
| Type | Chamber | Key Feature | Dysfunction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dilated (DCM) | LV dilatation | ↑LV mass, N/↓ wall thickness | Systolic dysfunction |
| Hypertrophic (HCM) | LV wall thickened | Inappropriate LV wall thickness ± LVOT obstruction | Diastolic dysfunction (systolic preserved early) |
| Restrictive (RCM) | Normal or ↓ cavity | ↑ myocardial stiffness | Diastolic dysfunction |
| Arrhythmogenic RV (ARVC) | RV ± LV | Fibro-adipose replacement | RV dysfunction, arrhythmias |
"Systolic dysfunction is characteristic of dilated cardiomyopathy" [1]. "Diastolic dysfunction is characteristic of HCM and RCM" [1].
Can also be classified by aetiology as above:
- Primary (genetic/idiopathic/familial) vs. Secondary (acquired)
- When all identifiable causes are excluded → idiopathic DCM
7. Clinical Features
DCM may present in several ways [3]:
| Presentation | Details |
|---|---|
| Unexplained premature heart failure (most common) | SOBOE, ↓exercise tolerance, orthopnoea, PND, peripheral oedema |
| Incidental finding of cardiomegaly | On CXR done for other reasons |
| Arrhythmia | AF, ventricular tachycardia, heart block (especially LMNA) |
| Thromboembolism | Stroke, peripheral embolism from intracardiac thrombus |
| Sudden cardiac death | May be the first presentation — especially in younger patients |
| Family screening | Identified during cascade screening of an index case |
7.2 Symptoms (with pathophysiological basis)
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Dyspnoea on exertion (SOBOE) — most common presenting symptom (sensitivity 66% [8]) | ↓CO → ↑LV end-diastolic pressure → ↑LA pressure → ↑pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure → transudation of fluid into pulmonary interstitium and alveoli → ↓gas exchange → stimulates J-receptors (juxtacapillary) in lung parenchyma → sensation of breathlessness. During exertion, venous return increases further, worsening congestion. |
| Orthopnoea (specificity ~80% [8]) | Lying flat → redistribution of blood from lower extremities and splanchnic circulation to the central compartment → ↑preload → ↑LVEDP → pulmonary congestion. Sitting up allows gravity to pool blood in lower extremities, reducing preload. Ask: "How many pillows do you sleep with?" |
| Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea (PND) (specificity ~80% [8]) | Recumbency → gradual reabsorption of peripheral oedema and redistribution of blood centrally → progressive ↑pulmonary congestion → patient awakens gasping for air 1–3 hours after falling asleep. Differs from orthopnoea in that it is delayed. |
| Cough (especially nocturnal, or with exertion) | Pulmonary oedema fluid irritates bronchial mucosa. May produce pink frothy sputum in severe/acute decompensation (acute pulmonary oedema — fluid tinged with red blood cells). |
| Wheezing ("cardiac asthma") | Peribronchial oedema from pulmonary venous congestion → bronchial wall swelling → airway narrowing → wheeze. Important DDx of asthma/COPD in older patients. |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Fatigue / decreased exercise tolerance | ↓CO → inadequate oxygen delivery to skeletal muscles during exertion → early anaerobic metabolism → fatigue |
| Dizziness / presyncope | ↓CO → ↓cerebral perfusion. Worse on standing (orthostatic) or during exertion. |
| Nocturia | Supine position at night → ↑renal perfusion (blood redistributes centrally) → ↑GFR → ↑urine output at night (when awake and upright during the day, the low CO preferentially diverts blood away from kidneys) |
| Poor concentration / confusion (in severe cases) | ↓cerebral perfusion from critically low CO |
DCM initially affects the LV, but chronic LV failure → ↑pulmonary artery pressure → RV pressure overload → eventually RV dilatation and failure (biventricular failure).
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Peripheral oedema (bilateral ankle/pedal oedema, worsening through the day) | ↑systemic venous pressure (back-pressure from failing RV) → ↑hydrostatic pressure in peripheral capillaries → fluid transudation into interstitial space. Gravity-dependent: ankles when upright, sacral when recumbent. |
| Abdominal distension / bloating | Ascites from ↑hepatic sinusoidal pressure (portal hypertension from hepatic venous congestion) |
| Right upper quadrant pain / hepatomegaly | Hepatic venous congestion → distension of Glisson's capsule (the hepatic capsule has nociceptors; the liver parenchyma itself does not). |
| Anorexia / early satiety / nausea | Bowel wall oedema from splanchnic venous congestion → impaired absorption and motility. Hepatic congestion may also contribute via ↓synthetic function. |
| Weight gain | Fluid retention (total body water excess) |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Palpitations | Atrial dilatation → AF. Ventricular dilatation → re-entrant circuits and triggered activity → VT. Scar/fibrosis → substrate for arrhythmias. |
| Syncope | VT → ↓CO → cerebral hypoperfusion. Also possible with complete heart block (especially LMNA mutations). |
| Sudden cardiac death | Sustained VT/VF → circulatory arrest. DCM is one of the leading causes of SCD in young adults. |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Stroke symptoms (hemiplegia, aphasia, etc.) | Stasis in dilated, poorly contracting ventricle → mural thrombus formation (Virchow's triad: stasis + endothelial injury + hypercoagulability) → embolism to cerebral arteries |
| Peripheral embolism (acute limb ischaemia, mesenteric ischaemia) | Same mechanism — thrombus from LV to systemic arteries |
| Pulmonary embolism | RV dilatation + stasis → thrombus in right heart → PE (less common than systemic embolism from LV) |
Paediatric Presentation
In infants and children with DCM (e.g. from myocarditis, metabolic disease, or familial), symptoms are different [9]:
- Infants: tachypnoea/diaphoresis during feeds, easy fatigability/irritability, ↓volume of feeding, poor weight gain, failure to thrive
- Young children: GI symptoms (abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, ↓appetite), FTT, recurrent cough/wheeze
- Older children: exercise intolerance, chest pain, syncope, palpitation, oedema
7.3 Signs (with pathophysiological basis)
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Dyspnoea at rest (in severe HF) | Pulmonary congestion at rest when LVEDP is severely elevated |
| Cachexia (cardiac cachexia in advanced DCM) | Chronic inflammation (↑TNF-α, IL-6), ↓absorption from gut congestion, ↑metabolic demand, neurohormonal activation → muscle wasting |
| Peripheral cyanosis | ↓CO → ↑oxygen extraction in periphery → ↑deoxyhemoglobin in capillary blood |
| Cool extremities, delayed capillary refill | ↓CO → sympathetic vasoconstriction → preferential diversion of blood to vital organs |
| Diaphoresis | Sympathetic activation from ↓CO |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Tachycardia (specificity > 90% [8]) | Compensatory sympathetic activation → ↑HR to maintain CO (CO = HR × SV; if SV ↓, HR must ↑) |
| Low blood pressure / narrow pulse pressure | ↓SV → ↓systolic BP. Pulse pressure = systolic - diastolic; with ↓SV, systolic drops more than diastolic → narrow pulse pressure. |
| Pulsus alternans | Beat-to-beat alternation in pulse amplitude — indicates severe LV dysfunction. Mechanism: alternating strong and weak contractions due to variable calcium cycling in failing myocytes. |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Elevated JVP / neck vein distension (specificity > 90% [8]) | ↑RA pressure from RV failure → transmitted back to internal jugular vein. The JVP reflects RA pressure. |
| Hepatojugular reflux (abdominojugular reflux) | Pressing on the liver → displaces blood centrally → transiently ↑RA pressure. In normal heart, the RV can accommodate this. In RV failure, it cannot → sustained JVP rise > 4 cm for > 10 seconds. |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Displaced apex beat (laterally and inferiorly) | LV dilatation → the apex (formed by LV) shifts to the left and downward. Normal apex: 5th intercostal space, mid-clavicular line. A displaced apex is the cardinal sign that the LV is enlarged. |
| Diffuse, thrusting apex [3] | Dilated LV produces a broad, sustained, heaving impulse (contrast with HCM which has a sustained but non-displaced apex) |
| Left parasternal heave | If RV is also dilated → RV hypertrophy/dilatation lifts the sternum |
| S3 gallop (third heart sound) (specificity > 90% [8]) | Rapid ventricular filling in early diastole → tensing of the chordae tendineae when the dilated, volume-overloaded ventricle reaches its elastic limit. A low-pitched sound heard just after S2. Pathological S3 is the hallmark of a dilated, failing ventricle. |
| S4 (fourth heart sound) | Late diastolic sound from atrial contraction into a stiff/non-compliant ventricle. Absent in AF (no coordinated atrial contraction). |
| Functional mitral regurgitation (pansystolic murmur at apex, radiating to axilla) [3] | LV dilatation → annular dilatation + papillary muscle displacement → mitral leaflets fail to coapt → regurgitation. The valve itself is structurally normal — the problem is geometric. |
| Functional tricuspid regurgitation (pansystolic murmur at left lower sternal border) [2] | RV dilatation → tricuspid annular dilatation → same mechanism as functional MR |
AOS Paeds Q8: "A 10-year-old girl with history of chemotherapy for acute leukaemia… apex at 6th intercostal space over left anterior axillary line, murmur at apex and left lower sternal border, liver 4 cm below costal margin" → diagnosis: cardiomyopathy (anthracycline-induced DCM). The displaced apex + murmur (functional MR) + hepatomegaly (RV failure) clinches it [4].
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Bibasal fine crackles (crepitations) (specificity > 90% [8]) | Fluid in alveoli from pulmonary oedema → crackles as alveoli pop open during inspiration. Bibasal because fluid gravitates to lung bases. |
| Pleural effusion (dullness to percussion, ↓breath sounds at base) | ↑pulmonary capillary pressure → transudative effusion. Often bilateral but may be right-sided or larger on right (right pleural surface drains into both systemic and pulmonary veins). |
| Wheeze ("cardiac asthma") | Peribronchial oedema → airway narrowing |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Hepatomegaly (tender, smooth, regular edge) | Hepatic venous congestion → distension. Tender because capsule is stretched. |
| Ascites | ↑hydrostatic pressure in hepatic sinusoids → transudation into peritoneal cavity. Also ↓albumin synthesis in congested liver contributes. |
| Pulsatile liver | Severe TR → systolic pulsation transmitted retrogradely through hepatic veins to liver |
| Sign | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Bilateral pitting ankle oedema (specificity > 90% [8]) | ↑systemic venous pressure → ↑capillary hydrostatic pressure → fluid transudation. Pitting = interstitial fluid that has not yet organised into fibrosis. Gravity-dependent. |
| Sacral oedema (in bedbound patients) | Same mechanism — sacrum is the most dependent point when lying down |
| ECG Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Poor R-wave progression (or reversed R-wave progression in precordial leads) | Dilated LV → loss of anterior electrical forces. May mimic anterior MI. |
| Low voltage | Dilated, poorly contracting myocardium generates weaker electrical signals; may also indicate pericardial effusion. "Highlights underlying cardiomyopathy" [5]. |
| P mitrale (broad, bifid P wave in lead II) | LA dilatation from chronic ↑LVEDP transmitted back to LA |
| P pulmonale (peaked P wave in lead II) | RA dilatation from secondary pulmonary hypertension and RV failure |
| Left ventricular hypertrophy (voltage criteria) | LV remodelling with eccentric hypertrophy |
| Left bundle branch block (LBBB) | Fibrosis/dilatation disrupts the left bundle → dyssynchronous contraction → further ↓efficiency |
| Atrial fibrillation | Atrial dilatation → substrate for AF |
| Ventricular arrhythmias (PVCs, VT) | Myocardial fibrosis and stretch → re-entrant circuits |
| Non-specific ST-T changes | Subendocardial ischaemia from ↑wall stress and ↑myocardial oxygen demand |
CXR findings of left heart failure correlate with left atrial pressure [10]:
| LA Pressure | CXR Finding |
|---|---|
| 10–15 mmHg | Upper lobe pulmonary venous diversion (cephalization of blood flow) |
| 15–20 mmHg | Kerley B lines (thickened interlobular septa from interstitial oedema), peribronchial cuffing |
| > 25 mmHg | Alveolar oedema (bilateral perihilar "bat-wing" opacification) |
Additional CXR findings:
- Cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio > 0.5)
- Pleural effusions (blunting of costophrenic angles)
- Prominent pulmonary arteries (if pulmonary hypertension)
The classic mnemonic for CXR findings of heart failure: Alveolar oedema, B-lines (Kerley B), Cardiomegaly, Diversion (upper lobe), Effusion (pleural).
Two severe consequences of dilated cardiomyopathy [1]:
- Heart failure
- Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias
Additionally: 3. Thromboembolism (stroke, systemic embolism) 4. Functional valvular regurgitation (MR/TR) 5. Secondary pulmonary hypertension
Standard investigations for cardiomyopathy [2]:
| Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ECG | Arrhythmia, chamber enlargement, conduction disease, low voltage |
| CXR | Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion |
| Echocardiography | LV size & EF, MR/TR, wall motion, thrombus |
| Exercise test / Holter | Look for arrhythmias |
| Coronary angiography | Rule out ischaemic heart disease |
| Cardiac MRI | Tissue characterisation (fibrosis, inflammation, iron) |
| Endomyocardial biopsy | Gold standard for myocarditis (Dallas criteria); specific infiltrative diseases |
| Blood tests | CBC, LRFT, TFT, iron studies, autoantibodies, BNP/NT-proBNP |
| Genetic testing | When familial DCM suspected |
LVEF in DCM: typically < 30% [2]. (Compare: HCM 30–50%, RCM > 50%)
High Yield Summary
- DCM = most common cardiomyopathy (~60%) — dilated LV with reduced systolic function (LVEF often < 30%)
- Definition requires exclusion of CAD, VHD, CHD, and hypertension as sufficient explanations
- Aetiologies: "IDIOTIC" mnemonic — Idiopathic/Inherited, Drugs (anthracyclines), Infectious (viral myocarditis), Overload (iron/haemochromatosis), Toxic (alcohol, cocaine), Immune (SLE, sarcoid), Cardiometabolic (thyroid, peripartum, tachycardia-mediated)
- ~50% are idiopathic; of these, 50% have familial basis → TTN (most common gene), LMNA (important in Chinese)
- Pathogenesis = genetic + immune + viral factors → altered myocardial function → dilatation
- Viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B) → chronic DCM is a key pathway
- Clinical presentation: HF symptoms (SOBOE, orthopnoea, PND, oedema), arrhythmia (AF, VT, SCD), thromboembolism (stroke)
- Key signs: displaced thrusting apex, S3 gallop, functional MR/TR, bibasal crackles, raised JVP, peripheral oedema
- ECG clues: poor R-wave progression, low voltage, LBBB, AF, P mitrale/pulmonale
- CXR: cardiomegaly + pulmonary congestion (ABCDE mnemonic)
- Two severe consequences: heart failure and sudden cardiac death
Active Recall - Dilated Cardiomyopathy (Definition, Epidemiology, Aetiology, Clinical Features)
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (DCM and familial DCM sections) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (Cardiology p41, Cardiomyopathy table) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, Dilated Cardiomyopathy section) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Q8 — anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf (Case 1 — myocarditis/DCM, ECG features) [6] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion (alcohol and cardiovascular disease) [7] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p201, HF classification) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (sensitivity/specificity of HF signs) [9] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p197, paediatric heart failure) [10] Senior notes: learning_points_output.txt (Three Cases of Dyspnea learning points — CXR correlates with LA pressure)
Differential Diagnosis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
A patient with DCM typically presents with one or more of the following clinical pictures:
- A dilated, poorly contracting left ventricle with reduced LVEF on echocardiography
- Clinical heart failure (SOBOE, orthopnoea, PND, oedema)
- Arrhythmia (AF, VT, syncope, palpitations)
- Cardiomegaly on CXR
- Thromboembolism (stroke in a young patient)
The differential diagnosis must therefore address two distinct but overlapping questions:
Question 1: Is this truly DCM, or is there another cause of the dilated, failing ventricle that would change management? (i.e. DDx of a dilated LV with reduced LVEF)
Question 2: What is the underlying aetiology of the DCM itself? (i.e. DDx within DCM — because the definition of DCM requires exclusion of sufficient CAD, VHD, CHD, and hypertension)
A. Differential Diagnosis of a Dilated Left Ventricle with Reduced Ejection Fraction
This is the clinical scenario you face when echo shows a big heart with poor squeeze. The key point from the Inherited Cardiac Conditions lecture:
"A diagnosis of DCM is predicated on visualizing a dilated left ventricle, and a reduced LVEF that cannot be explained by the severity of coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, or hypertension" [1]
So before you label someone as having DCM, you must systematically exclude the "big four" mimics:
- The most important mimic to exclude — and in many populations, the most common cause of LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction
- Why it mimics DCM: Extensive myocardial infarction (especially anterior STEMI from LAD occlusion) → loss of functioning myocardium → LV remodelling and dilatation → reduced EF. The end-result looks identical to DCM on echo.
- Key differentiating features:
- History of angina, prior MI, or CAD risk factors (smoking, DM, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, family history of premature CAD)
- Regional wall motion abnormalities on echo (DCM tends to show global hypokinesis; ischaemic cardiomyopathy shows segmental akinesis/dyskinesis corresponding to coronary territories)
- ECG: pathological Q waves in a coronary territory distribution
- Coronary angiography (or CT coronary angiogram) is the definitive test to rule out significant CAD [1][12]
"Diagnosis requires excluding coronary artery disease via catheterization" [10]
Why coronary angiography is essential
You cannot diagnose "idiopathic DCM" without proving the coronaries are clean. Even in a young patient with no risk factors, occult CAD can cause a dilated, failing heart. "Ischaemic cardiomyopathy accounts for ~7% of DCM cases — the majority with overt CAD, but can be occult" [3]. This is why coronary assessment (invasive or CT) is part of every DCM workup.
- Chronic severe mitral or aortic regurgitation → chronic volume overload → LV dilatation → eventually systolic dysfunction
- MR: volume overload from regurgitant flow → LV dilates to accommodate increased preload → eventually contractile function fails [11]
- AR: combined volume and pressure overload → massive LV dilatation ("cor bovinum") → late systolic failure
- Key differentiating features:
- Significant murmur on auscultation (though functional MR from DCM also produces a murmur — the question is: did the valve disease come first, or did the dilatation come first?)
- Echo: structural valve abnormality (flail leaflet, prolapse, calcification, rheumatic changes) vs. structurally normal valve with annular dilatation
- Severity of regurgitation disproportionate to degree of LV dilatation suggests primary valve disease
In the Cardiology Interactive Tutorial Case 1: "mitral valve prolapse → mitral regurgitation → volume overload of LV → LV enlargement/dilatation and failure" — this is valvular cardiomyopathy, not primary DCM [11]
- Chronic poorly controlled hypertension → LV pressure overload → concentric hypertrophy initially (HFpEF) → but if untreated or with superimposed insults → "further worsening of myocardial ischaemia, may result in dilatation" [13] → eccentric remodelling → dilated LV with reduced EF
- Key differentiating features:
- History of long-standing hypertension, often poorly controlled
- LVH on ECG or echo
- Evidence of hypertensive end-organ damage (retinopathy, nephropathy, proteinuria)
- The degree of hypertension should be "sufficient to explain" the observed dysfunction
- Large left-to-right shunts (VSD, AVSD, PDA) → chronic LV volume overload → LV dilatation [9][14]
- In children/adolescents: "Unoperated CHD, repaired or palliated CHD with late ventricular dysfunction" [14]
- Key differentiating features:
- History of childhood cardiac diagnosis/surgery
- Echo: structural abnormality (septal defect, abnormal great vessel connections)
AOS Paeds Q8: the answer is cardiomyopathy, NOT VSD — "VSD less likely to cause RV failure at this age" (10-year-old). The prior chemotherapy history and displaced apex point to anthracycline-induced DCM [4].
| Condition | Why It Mimics DCM | Key Differentiating Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Myocarditis (acute) | Acutely dilated LV with reduced EF; may have preceding viral illness | Preceding flu-like illness, fever, elevated troponin/CRP, cardiac MRI showing myocardial oedema + late gadolinium enhancement in a non-coronary pattern [5][12] |
| Takotsubo cardiomyopathy ("broken heart" / stress cardiomyopathy) | Acutely reduced EF with apical ballooning mimicking anterior STEMI | Triggered by intense emotional/physical stress; characteristic apical ballooning with hyperkinetic base; clean coronaries; typically resolves within weeks [15] |
| Constrictive pericarditis | May present with RHF symptoms and cardiomegaly | Echo/CT: thickened pericardium, septal bounce, respiratory variation in Doppler flows; key is that myocardium itself is normal |
| Pericardial effusion | CXR shows enlarged cardiac silhouette mimicking cardiomegaly | Echo immediately differentiates: fluid around heart vs. dilated chambers |
| High-output heart failure | LV may dilate in chronic high-output states | Identify underlying cause: thyrotoxicosis, severe anaemia, AV fistula, Paget's disease, beriberi [7]. LV is hyperdynamic initially, not globally hypokinetic. |
| Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy | Chronic uncontrolled tachycardia (AF, SVT, frequent PVCs) → tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy | LVEF improves dramatically with rate/rhythm control — this is a reversible cause [3] |
B. Differential Diagnosis Within DCM — Aetiological Classification
Once you have confirmed that the LV is dilated with reduced EF and excluded sufficient CAD, VHD, CHD, and hypertension, you have DCM. The next question is: what caused it?
"DCM is a very clinically heterogeneous disease, as it can be caused by an array of different aetiologies" [1]:
Let me walk through the aetiological DDx systematically, because in clinical practice (and in exams), the aetiology determines specific management:
- Idiopathic DCM constitutes ~35–50% of all DCM [1][15]
- 50% of "idiopathic" DCM has a positive family history → familial DCM [1]
- Clues for familial aetiology:
- Young patient (onset 20–50 years old) [1]
- Family history of DCM, premature sudden cardiac death, heart transplant, pacemaker/ICD
- Lamin A/C (LMNA) mutation: prominent conduction disease (AV block, AF) + arrhythmias, often before significant dilatation — more important in Chinese [1]
- Neuromuscular features (limb-girdle weakness, calf pseudohypertrophy → think dystrophinopathy)
- Key investigation: Genetic counselling + 3-generation family tree + genetic screening [12]
- "Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is believed to be a sequelae of myocarditis — usually viral, creating immune response" [5]
- Clues: preceding febrile/flu-like illness weeks to months before HF symptoms; younger patient; elevated inflammatory markers
- Coxsackie B is the classic culprit [1][12]
- Key investigation: Cardiac MRI (oedema, LGE in non-ischaemic pattern); endomyocardial biopsy is gold standard (Dallas criteria) but has risk of perforation and is reserved for specific scenarios [5][12]
- "Majority of myocarditis has no specific treatment — except for immunosuppressive-susceptible myocarditis (giant cell myocarditis, autoimmune myocarditis)" [5]
- Clues: heavy alcohol intake (typically 7–8 drinks/day for > 5 years) [15]; other features of alcohol excess (liver disease, macrocytosis, elevated GGT)
- "Ethanol has direct cytotoxic effect on the heart" [6]
- Partially reversible with abstinence — this is why identifying it matters
- Also a/w AF, hypertension [6]
- Thyrotoxicosis → high-output state → eventually DCM (hyperthyroid cardiomyopathy)
- Hypothyroidism → pericardial effusion + myocardial dysfunction
- Phaeochromocytoma → catecholamine-mediated cardiomyopathy (catecholamine excess is directly toxic to myocytes)
- Acromegaly → LVH → cardiomyopathy with diastolic HF, but can progress to DCM [16]
- Nutritional: thiamine deficiency (wet beriberi) — classically in alcoholics and post-bariatric surgery; selenium deficiency (Keshan disease); carnitine deficiency
- SLE, scleroderma, polymyositis → autoimmune myocarditis → DCM [15]
- Sarcoidosis → granulomatous myocardial infiltration → conduction disease + DCM; FDG-PET scan is the key investigation [12]
- Giant cell myocarditis → rapidly progressive, high mortality; responds to immunosuppression — one of the rare indications for endomyocardial biopsy [5]
- Eosinophilic myocarditis → peripheral eosinophilia, responds to immunosuppression
- Haemochromatosis (iron overload) → iron deposition in myocardium → initially restrictive, then dilated pattern. Extremely relevant in HK for transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients.
- Clues: bronze skin, diabetes, hepatomegaly, elevated ferritin/transferrin saturation
- Cardiac MRI T2 mapping* is the key investigation (T2* < 20 ms indicates cardiac iron loading)
- Amyloidosis → usually restrictive pattern, but can have elements of dilatation
- Clues: DCM developing in last month of pregnancy to 5 months postpartum in a previously well woman
- Risk factors: multiparity, older maternal age, African descent, pre-eclampsia, twin pregnancy
- ~50% recover; risk of recurrence in future pregnancies
- Clues: chronic uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia (persistent AF, incessant SVT, high PVC burden > 15–20%)
- Key feature: LVEF improves dramatically after rate/rhythm control — a reversible cause
- Must be suspected in any patient with new DCM + concurrent tachyarrhythmia
| Clinical Clue | Think About |
|---|---|
| Young patient, family history of DCM or SCD | Familial DCM (TTN, LMNA) |
| Preceding viral illness | Post-viral myocarditis |
| Heavy alcohol use | Alcoholic cardiomyopathy |
| Prior chemotherapy (especially childhood cancer survivor) | Anthracycline-induced DCM |
| Pregnancy/postpartum | Peripartum cardiomyopathy |
| Prominent conduction disease (AV block, LBBB) | LMNA mutation, sarcoidosis, Chagas |
| Proximal muscle weakness, elevated CK | Muscular dystrophy (Duchenne, Becker) |
| Bronze skin, diabetes, hepatomegaly | Haemochromatosis |
| Low voltage ECG + thick LV wall | Amyloidosis |
| Peripheral eosinophilia | Eosinophilic myocarditis |
| Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, erythema nodosum | Sarcoidosis |
| Weight loss, tremor, heat intolerance, AF | Thyrotoxicosis |
| Persistent AF or SVT with fast ventricular rate | Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy |
| Cocaine or methamphetamine use | Toxic cardiomyopathy |
| Regional wall motion abnormalities on echo | Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (not true DCM) |
Remember: DCM is just one cause of heart failure. When a patient presents with clinical heart failure, the full aetiological DDx for the underlying cause includes:
"After obtaining a diagnosis of HF, you would like to also find the cause" [8]:
- Heart rhythm disorders (bradycardia, tachycardia, loss of AV synchrony) [8]
- Congenital anomalies (volume/pressure overload) [8]
- Pericardial disease (constrictive filling) [8]
- Systemic pressure overload (hypertension) [8]
- Pulmonary pressure overload (pulmonary hypertension) [8]
- Valvular disease (pressure/volume overload) [8]
- Myocardial disease (cardiomyopathies, past MI → loss of contractile forces or impaired relaxation) [8]
- High-output states (anaemia, thyrotoxicosis, AV fistula, Paget's, beriberi) [14]
The Final Common Path
"The final common path of all cardiac diseases is heart failure. Heart failure is not a diagnosis — instead it will be secondary to many cardiac pathologies." [8] So when you see heart failure, you must always ask: what is causing it? DCM is one answer, but it is not the only one.
E. DDx by Presentation Mode
Since DCM can present in different ways, here is the differential diagnosis organised by clinical presentation:
| DDx | Key Differentiating Feature |
|---|---|
| Idiopathic / Familial DCM | Family history, young onset (20–50), genetic testing |
| Viral myocarditis → DCM | Preceding viral illness, inflammatory markers, cardiac MRI |
| Peripartum cardiomyopathy | Temporal relationship to pregnancy |
| Substance-induced | Alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine history |
| Inherited metabolic | Fabry disease (X-linked, angiokeratomas, corneal verticillata), glycogen storage |
| Muscular dystrophy | Proximal weakness, elevated CK |
| DDx | Key Differentiating Feature |
|---|---|
| DCM | Global hypokinesis on echo |
| Pericardial effusion | "Water bottle" silhouette on CXR; echo shows fluid, not dilated chambers |
| Severe valvular disease (MR, AR) | Significant murmur, structural valve abnormality on echo |
| Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | Regional WMA, Q waves, CAD risk factors |
| DDx | Key Differentiating Feature |
|---|---|
| DCM causing AF | Large LV with global hypokinesis; AF is secondary |
| Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy | AF came first; LVEF recovers with rate control |
| Mitral stenosis | Rheumatic history; loud S1, opening snap, mid-diastolic rumble; normal LV |
| Thyrotoxicosis | Weight loss, tremor, heat intolerance; elevated fT3/fT4; AF |
| HCM | Thick septum/LV wall on echo; dagger-like Q waves on ECG |
| DDx | Key Differentiating Feature |
|---|---|
| DCM (especially familial with LMNA) | Dilated LV, reduced EF, conduction disease |
| HCM | Thick LV, LVOT obstruction, asymmetric septal hypertrophy |
| ARVC | RV dilatation/dysfunction, epsilon waves, T-wave inversion V1–V3 |
| Long QT syndrome / Brugada | Characteristic ECG patterns; structurally normal heart |
| WPW with AF | Delta wave on ECG; fast pre-excited AF |
| Anomalous coronary artery | Exercise-induced ischaemia in young; CT/MRI angiography |
| Myocarditis | Acute illness, troponin elevation, MRI findings |
Exam Pitfall — Functional MR Does Not Equal Primary Valvular Disease
A common mistake: seeing a pansystolic murmur at the apex in a patient with a dilated LV and labelling them as "mitral regurgitation causing DCM." In reality, if the valve is structurally normal and the MR is secondary to annular dilatation from LV enlargement, this is functional MR secondary to DCM, not primary valvular disease. The AOS Paeds question makes this exact point: "Murmur could be due to mitral regurgitation secondary to dilation" [4]. The treatment is to treat the DCM (heart failure therapy), not to replace the valve.
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of DCM
- Before diagnosing DCM, exclude the "big four": ischaemic cardiomyopathy (CAD), valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertension — each must be insufficient to explain the observed LV dysfunction
- Coronary assessment is mandatory — invasive angiography or CT coronary angiogram
- Ischaemic cardiomyopathy: regional WMA on echo vs. global hypokinesis in DCM
- Functional MR/TR is secondary to DCM (structurally normal valve) — do not confuse with primary valve disease
- Aetiological DDx within DCM: use clinical clues (FHx → familial; viral illness → myocarditis; alcohol → ACM; chemo → anthracycline; pregnancy → PPCM; conduction disease → LMNA/sarcoid; muscle weakness → dystrophy; bronze skin → haemochromatosis)
- Reversible causes to never miss: alcoholic CM (abstinence), tachycardia-mediated CM (rate control), thyrotoxicosis (treat thyroid), peripartum (may recover)
- Heart failure is the final common path of all cardiac diseases — always ask what is causing it
Active Recall - DDx of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (DCM definition, familial DCM, aetiological DDx, diagnostic tests) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCMP aetiology and clinical presentation) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Q8 — anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, functional MR) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf (Case 1 — myocarditis → DCM, endomyocardial biopsy) [6] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion.pdf (alcohol and cardiovascular disease) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Syncope and irregular heartbeat.pdf (DDx of palpitation including cardiomyopathy) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (causes of heart failure, structural DDx) [9] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p197, paediatric heart failure causes) [10] Senior notes: learning_points_output.txt (Three Cases of Dyspnea learning points) [11] Senior notes: Block A - Cardiology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (Case 1, MVP → MR → LV dilatation) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (diagnostic tests for DCM, amyloidosis clues) [13] Senior notes: Block A - High blood pressure: hypertension.pdf (LVH → dilatation) [14] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p203–204, causes of HF in children and adults) [15] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p533–535, DCM aetiology table) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p111, acromegaly complications including cardiomyopathy)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm and Investigations for Dilated Cardiomyopathy
A. Diagnostic Criteria — How Do We Diagnose DCM?
There is no single "diagnostic criteria set" for DCM the way there is for, say, infective endocarditis (Modified Duke Criteria). DCM is fundamentally a diagnosis of exclusion — you confirm structural and functional abnormalities on imaging, then systematically exclude other causes of LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction.
The diagnosis rests on two pillars:
LV end-diastolic volume/diameter > 2 standard deviations from normal according to age- and body-surface-area-corrected nomograms + LVEF < 50% [1]
In practical terms:
- LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) > 55 mm in adults (but must be indexed to BSA — LVEDDI > 33 mm/m² in men, > 32 mm/m² in women is dilated)
- LVEF < 50% — though in established DCM, LVEF is typically < 30% [2]
- ↑LV mass but with normal or ↓ wall thickness [3] — this is key: the ventricle is big and heavy (more total muscle), but the wall is thin relative to the chamber size (because it is stretched out). Compare with HCM where wall thickness is disproportionately ↑.
"A diagnosis of DCM is predicated on a dilated left ventricle and a reduced LVEF that cannot be explained by the severity of coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, or hypertension" [1]
This means you must have performed adequate investigation to rule out:
- Coronary artery disease — via coronary angiography or CT coronary angiogram
- Valvular heart disease — via echocardiography (any MR/TR should be functional/secondary, not primary)
- Congenital heart disease — via echocardiography and clinical assessment
- Hypertension — via BP measurement and assessment of end-organ damage
Only when these four conditions are insufficient to explain the observed LV dysfunction can the label "DCM" be applied.
Familial DCM is diagnosed when [1]:
- ≥ 2 first- or second-degree relatives have DCM, OR
- A first-degree relative had sudden death at < 50 years old with DCM clinically proven at autopsy
B. Diagnosing Heart Failure — The Clinical Syndrome That DCM Produces
Since DCM most commonly presents as heart failure, you also need the clinical diagnostic criteria for HF:
"Heart failure is a clinical diagnosis → made using the Framingham Criteria" [8]
Requires the simultaneous presence of at least 2 major criteria, OR 1 major + 2 minor criteria [8]:
| Major Criteria | Minor Criteria |
|---|---|
| Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea | Bilateral ankle oedema |
| Neck vein distension (JVP elevation) | Night cough |
| Rales (crackles) | Dyspnoea on ordinary exertion |
| Acute pulmonary oedema | Hepatomegaly |
| S3 gallop | Pleural effusion |
| Increased central venous pressure ( > 16 cmH₂O) | Decrease in vital capacity by ⅓ from maximum |
| Hepatojugular reflux | Tachycardia (HR > 120 bpm) |
| Cardiomegaly on CXR | |
| Weight loss > 4.5 kg in 5 days in response to treatment |
Two Different Framingham Scores
Do not confuse: "Framingham Risk Score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease" (predicts 10-year CVD risk) with "Framingham Criteria for Heart Failure" (clinical diagnostic criteria for HF). Both come from the Framingham Heart Study, but they serve completely different purposes [8].
When the diagnosis of HF is uncertain, natriuretic peptides are invaluable:
- BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-BNP) are released from ventricular myocytes in response to wall stretch
- BNP > 400 pg/mL is suggestive of HF; BNP < 100 pg/mL has a strong negative predictive value for HF [17]
- NT-proBNP thresholds are age-dependent [17]:
- Age < 50: > 450 pg/mL for HF
- Age 50–75: > 900 pg/mL for HF
- Age > 75: > 1800 pg/mL for HF
- Why age-dependent? Older patients have higher baseline natriuretic peptide levels due to age-related decline in renal clearance and increased ventricular stiffness.
The approach follows a logical cascade: clinical suspicion → confirm HF → confirm LV dilatation + reduced EF → exclude alternative causes → identify DCM aetiology.
D. Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown
Blood tests in DCM serve three purposes: (1) confirm/exclude HF, (2) assess end-organ damage and comorbidities, (3) identify the underlying aetiology.
| Test | Purpose | Key Findings in DCM |
|---|---|---|
| CBC | Exclude anaemia as cause/exacerbating factor of HF; assess for macrocytosis (alcohol), eosinophilia (eosinophilic myocarditis) | May show normocytic anaemia of chronic disease; ↑MCV in alcohol |
| LRFT (Liver and Renal Function Tests) | Hepatic congestion → ↑bilirubin, ↑ALT/AST, ↓albumin; renal impairment from ↓CO → ↑creatinine, ↑urea; cardiorenal syndrome | ↑transaminases from hepatic congestion; ↑creatinine from renal hypoperfusion |
| TFT (Thyroid Function Tests) | Thyrotoxicosis → high-output HF → DCM; hypothyroidism → myocardial dysfunction; amiodarone-induced thyroid disease | Abnormal fT3/fT4/TSH identifies treatable/reversible cause |
| Fasting glucose / HbA1c, lipid profile | Assess cardiovascular risk factors; diabetes as comorbidity | Risk factor identification |
| Iron studies (ferritin, transferrin saturation) | Haemochromatosis — iron overload cardiomyopathy | Ferritin > 300 μg/L + transferrin sat > 45% → suspect iron overload |
| BNP / NT-proBNP | Distinguish HF from other causes of dyspnoea; strong negative predictive value [17] | Elevated in proportion to wall stress; used if diagnosis uncertain |
| Cardiac troponin (cTnI/cTnT) | Myocardial necrosis — suggests acute myocarditis; also prognostic in chronic HF | Elevated in myocarditis but absence does not rule it out [17] |
| CRP / ESR | Inflammatory markers — elevated in myocarditis, sarcoidosis, autoimmune | ↑ in active inflammation |
| Viral serology | Identify viral aetiology (Coxsackie, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, HIV, HCV) | Rising titres suggest recent infection |
| Autoantibodies (ANA, dsDNA, ENA) | Autoimmune causes (SLE, scleroderma) | Positive in autoimmune-related DCM |
| Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation | Amyloidosis (AL type — monoclonal protein) | Monoclonal band → suspect AL amyloidosis |
| 24-hour urine protein / immunofixation electrophoresis | AL amyloidosis workup | Free light chains in urine |
| Erythrocyte transketolase activity | Thiamine (B1) deficiency (wet beriberi) | ↓ activity confirms B1 deficiency |
| ACE levels | Sarcoidosis (elevated in ~60% of active sarcoidosis, but not specific) | ↑ ACE + clinical features → further workup |
Investigations for cardiomyopathy: ECG, CXR, ECHO, exercise test / Holter monitoring (look for arrhythmias), coronary angiography (to rule out IHD), endomyocardial biopsy [2]
The ECG in DCM is usually abnormal, but there are no specific diagnostic features [1]. Its role is to:
- Detect arrhythmias (AF, VT, conduction disease)
- Provide clues to the underlying aetiology
- Guide management (LBBB → CRT candidacy)
| ECG Finding | Pathophysiological Basis | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation [1] | LA dilatation from chronic ↑LVEDP → substrate for AF (multiple wavelet re-entry) | Very common; increases thromboembolic risk; may be cause (tachycardia-mediated CM) or consequence of DCM |
| AV block [1] | Fibrosis of conduction system; particularly associated with LMNA mutations and sarcoidosis | LMNA mutations: prominent conduction disease often precedes LV dilatation; requires early ICD consideration |
| Left bundle branch block (LBBB) [1] | LV dilatation and fibrosis → disruption of left bundle → dyssynchronous contraction | Important for CRT candidacy (LBBB + QRS > 150 ms + LVEF ≤ 35% = strong CRT indication) |
| Poor R-wave progression [5] | "Reversed R wave, V2 bigger than V3, or V4 greater" — loss of anterior forces from dilated LV | May mimic anterior MI; does not necessarily mean CAD |
| Low voltage [5] | "Highlights underlying cardiomyopathy" — dilated, poorly contracting myocardium generates weaker signals; also pericardial effusion | If low voltage + thick walls on echo → "CLASSICAL FOR AMYLOIDOSIS" [1] |
| P mitrale (broad, bifid P wave) [5] | LA dilatation | Suggests chronically elevated LVEDP |
| P pulmonale (peaked P wave) [5] | RA dilatation from secondary pulmonary hypertension | Indicates RV involvement |
| Ventricular hypertrophy criteria [5] | LV eccentric remodelling | Sokal-Lyon or Cornell voltage criteria |
| Q waves (10–13% of DCM) [18] | "Q waves not specific for MI — dilated cardiomyopathy 10 to 13%" — extensive myocardial fibrosis can produce pathological Q waves without CAD | Important not to assume Q waves = prior MI; must correlate with coronary assessment |
| Ventricular arrhythmias (PVCs, NSVT, VT) | Myocardial scar/fibrosis → re-entrant circuits | Risk factor for sudden cardiac death; indicates need for Holter/ICD assessment |
GC High-Yield — Q Waves in DCM
Q waves are present in 10–13% of DCM cases and do NOT necessarily indicate prior MI [18]. The mechanism is extensive myocardial fibrosis creating electrically silent zones. Always confirm with coronary assessment before attributing Q waves to CAD.
GC High-Yield — Epsilon Wave
"Epsilon wave is specific for ARVC — a very focal area of conduction delay" [18]. If you see epsilon waves (small deflections at the end of the QRS in V1–V3), think ARVC, not DCM.
CXR provides rapid, bedside assessment of cardiac size and pulmonary congestion.
| CXR Finding | Pathophysiological Basis | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiomegaly (CT ratio > 0.5) | LV ± RV dilatation | "Increase in CT ratio, but have to be careful in obese patients, patients with poor inspiratory effort, and AP films" [19] — AP films and poor inspiration can falsely enlarge the cardiac silhouette |
| Upper lobe pulmonary venous diversion (cephalisation) | "LVEDP increase → blood backflow → more pressure in pulmonary vasculature → upper lobe venous diversion" [19]. At LAP 10–15 mmHg. Normal lower lobe vessels are larger due to gravity; when LAP ↑, blood preferentially redistributes to upper lobes. | Earliest CXR sign of LHF |
| Kerley B lines | "Septal lines in interlobar septa" [19] — interstitial oedema thickens the interlobular septa. At LAP 15–20 mmHg. | Short (1–2 cm) horizontal lines at lung periphery, best seen at costophrenic angles |
| Peribronchial cuffing | "Donut-shaped, any swelling over bronchi" [19] — peribronchial oedema makes bronchi appear thick-walled when viewed end-on | Non-specific but supports pulmonary congestion |
| Alveolar oedema | Fluid fills alveoli when LAP > 25 mmHg | Bilateral perihilar "bat-wing" opacification |
| Pleural effusion | Transudate from ↑pulmonary capillary pressure | Blunting of costophrenic angles; may be bilateral |
| Heart failure CXR mnemonic: ABCDE | Alveolar oedema, B lines (Kerley B), Cardiomegaly, Diversion (upper lobe), Effusion | [2] |
Echo is the single most important investigation in DCM. It confirms the diagnosis, assesses severity, identifies complications, and helps distinguish DCM from its mimics.
Echocardiographic findings in DCM [2][3][15][20]:
| Parameter | Finding in DCM | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| LV dimensions | Dilatation of LV (LVEDD > 55 mm, LVEDDI > 33 mm/m² in men) | Confirms dilatation — the "D" in DCM |
| LVEF | Decreased (typically < 30% in established DCM; < 50% for diagnosis) [2] | Quantifies systolic dysfunction; guides device therapy (ICD if ≤ 35%, CRT if ≤ 35% + LBBB) |
| Wall motion | Global hypokinesis (all segments move poorly) vs. regional WMA (specific segments) | Global = DCM; Regional = suggests ischaemic cause [20]. However, some DCM (e.g. sarcoidosis) can have regional patterns. |
| Wall thickness | Normal or ↓ (despite ↑LV mass) | Thin walls in a big chamber — contrast with HCM (thick walls). If thick walls + low voltage on ECG → think amyloidosis. |
| Atrial size | LA dilatation (± RA dilatation) → 4-chamber dilatation in advanced DCM [20] | Reflects chronically elevated filling pressures; substrate for AF |
| Valvular assessment | Functional MR and TR (structurally normal valves with regurgitation due to annular dilatation and papillary muscle displacement) | Do NOT confuse with primary valve disease. If severe structural valve abnormality → may be valvular cardiomyopathy, not primary DCM. |
| Diastolic function | Often shows restrictive filling pattern (elevated E/A ratio, short deceleration time, elevated E/e') | Indicates severely elevated filling pressures; poor prognostic sign |
| RV size and function | ↓ RV function, RV dilatation in advanced/biventricular disease | Important for prognosis and transplant assessment |
| Intracardiac thrombus | LV apex thrombus (most common site) | Low-flow state → stasis → thrombus formation. Indicates need for anticoagulation. |
| Pericardial effusion | May be present | Consider myocarditis, hypothyroidism, or pericardial involvement |
| Estimated PA systolic pressure | Often elevated (secondary pulmonary hypertension) | From TR jet velocity using Bernoulli equation |
Cardiac MRI (CMR) has become the second most important imaging modality after echo. Its unique advantage is tissue characterisation — it can tell you not just the structure, but what the tissue is made of.
"Cardiac MRI is going to the forefront" [5]
| CMR Technique | What It Detects | Clinical Application in DCM |
|---|---|---|
| Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) | Fibrosis/scar — gadolinium washes out of normal myocardium but is retained in fibrotic/scarred tissue | Pattern of LGE helps distinguish aetiology [1][15]: |
| - Mid-wall linear LGE (especially septal) → classic for idiopathic/genetic DCM | ||
| - "Patchy mid-wall LGE → suggests myocarditis" [15] | ||
| - Subendocardial LGE in coronary territory → ischaemic | ||
| - "Dyskinesia with LGE at anterobasal septum → cardiac sarcoidosis" [15] | ||
| - Subepicardial LGE → myocarditis [21] | ||
| T2-weighted imaging (oedema) | Myocardial oedema — water content ↑ in acute inflammation | "Edema is important in CM — a lot of cardiomyopathies have an active oedematous 'hot' phase, without an elevated troponin" [1] → detects active myocarditis even when troponin is normal |
| T2 mapping* | Iron content — shorter T2* indicates iron overload | T2 < 20 ms → cardiac iron overload* (haemochromatosis, transfusion-dependent thalassaemia). T2* < 10 ms → severe, requiring urgent chelation. |
| T1 mapping + ECV | Diffuse fibrosis (which LGE misses because LGE requires a "normal" reference region); extracellular volume expansion | Elevated native T1 and ECV in amyloidosis, diffuse fibrosis |
| Functional assessment | LVEF, volumes, wall motion — gold standard accuracy | More accurate than echo for LVEF measurement, especially when echo windows are poor |
LGE Pattern Recognition — High Yield for Exams
The LGE pattern is a powerful clue to aetiology:
- Ischaemic: subendocardial or transmural, in a coronary territory
- Myocarditis: subepicardial or mid-wall, non-coronary distribution (often inferolateral)
- Genetic/idiopathic DCM: mid-wall, often septal, linear
- Sarcoidosis: patchy, often basal septum, with associated wall motion abnormality
- Amyloidosis: diffuse subendocardial (may be difficult to null on TI scout)
This is not optional. You cannot diagnose DCM without assessing the coronary arteries.
| Modality | Indication | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| CT Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) | First-line non-invasive coronary assessment; excellent negative predictive value for ruling out significant CAD | "Assess coronary arteries — since to achieve diagnosis of DCM you need to show that the degree of CAD does not adequately explain the reduced LVEF" [1]. Limitation: "False positives from calcified plaques" [21] in patients with heavy coronary calcification. |
| Invasive Coronary Angiography | Gold standard for coronary assessment; indicated when CTCA is inconclusive, high pre-test probability of CAD, or when intervention is planned | "Coronary angiogram — not the CT coronary angiogram → this is the fluoro where they inject contrast" [22]. Allows direct visualisation + simultaneous PCI if needed. |
"Diagnosis requires excluding coronary artery disease via catheterization" [10]
Indications for invasive coronary angiography in the DCM workup [22]:
- Angina or risk factors for CAD in the setting of depressed LVEF
- Non-invasive testing results with high-risk features
- For diagnostic purposes, in the individual in whom the results of non-invasive testing are unclear
| Investigation | Purpose in DCM | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour Holter monitor | Detect arrhythmias (AF, NSVT, VT, heart block) that may be paroxysmal and missed on a single ECG | High burden of ventricular ectopy ( > 15–20% PVC burden → consider tachycardia-mediated CM); NSVT → risk stratification for ICD |
| Exercise test | "Risk stratification, quantifying degree of functional impairment, detecting underlying ischaemic disease, evaluating candidates for cardiac transplantation" [20] | Exercise capacity (peak VO₂) < 14 mL/kg/min → consider transplant referral |
"Endomyocardial biopsy is gold standard, but has risk for cardiac perforation" [5]. "Routine biopsy is NOT indicated in most cases" [17].
Why not do it in everyone? Because:
- The procedure carries a ~1% risk of cardiac perforation (RV free wall is thin)
- "Majority of myocarditis has no specific treatment, so it just helps you diagnose, but treatment will just be like that for other heart failure" [5]
- Sampling error — inflammation may be patchy, so a negative biopsy does not exclude myocarditis
Indications for EMB [17]:
- New-onset HF < 2 weeks with normal-size or dilated LV and haemodynamic compromise (suspected fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis)
- New-onset HF of 2 weeks – 3 months with dilated LV and new ventricular arrhythmia, 2nd/3rd degree heart block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1–2 weeks (suspected giant cell myocarditis)
- Suspected specific infiltrative/inflammatory disease where histology will change management (sarcoidosis, eosinophilic myocarditis, amyloidosis)
Histopathological criteria (Dallas Criteria for Myocarditis) [17]:
- Evidence of inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium
- Infiltrates associated with myocyte necrosis or degeneration of adjacent myocytes not typical of ischaemic damage
Immunohistochemical criteria [17]:
- Abnormal inflammatory infiltrate defined as ≥ 14 leucocytes/mm² including up to 4 monocytes/mm² with presence of CD3-positive T-lymphocytes ≥ 7 cells/mm²
Why right heart biopsy? The biopsy is taken from the RV septum — the LV free wall is thicker but harder to access safely, and the septum is at lower risk of perforation than the RV free wall [5].
| Modality | Indication | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|
| 99mTc-pyrophosphate (PYP) scan | Transthyretin (TTR) cardiac amyloidosis [1] | Grade 2–3 myocardial uptake confirms TTR amyloidosis with high specificity (provided AL amyloidosis excluded by SPEP/UPEP/free light chains). "Not in Moodle slide, but in video — TTR amyloidosis actually quite common, 10% of patients with HFpEF have this → have to know since there are treatments" [1] |
| FDG-PET scan | Cardiac sarcoidosis [1] | Focal FDG uptake in myocardium indicates active granulomatous inflammation. "Ask patient to stop carbs, and have high fat, high protein diet for a couple of days before" [1] — this suppresses physiological myocardial glucose uptake so that only inflamed tissue lights up. |
| Gallium-67 scan | Sarcoidosis (alternative to FDG-PET) | Uptake in active granulomas |
| Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) | Assess for ischaemia when coronary assessment is equivocal | Ischaemia → cold spots under stress; infarct → cold spots at rest and stress [23] |
| When to Consider | What to Order | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Idiopathic DCM (after all other causes excluded) | Genetic counselling → 3-generation family tree → genetic screening [1] | >90% AD inheritance; most common gene = TTN (20–25%); LMNA (6%, more important in Chinese) [1] |
| Familial DCM confirmed by family screening | Cascade genetic testing of at-risk relatives | Positive gene test → screen first-degree relatives with echo ± Holter every 1–3 years, even if asymptomatic (variable age-related penetrance) |
| DCM with prominent conduction disease | LMNA testing specifically | LMNA carriers have high risk of malignant arrhythmias → lower threshold for ICD even with EF > 35% |
| DCM with neuromuscular features | Dystrophin gene testing | Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy |
| Suspected Aetiology | Investigation | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Amyloidosis | "Small complex / Low QRS voltages on ECG, with a very thickened LV wall → CLASSICAL FOR AMYLOIDOSIS" [1] → then: SPEP, UPEP, serum free light chains, 99mTc-PYP scan, ± endomyocardial or fat pad biopsy | AL: monoclonal protein; TTR: Tc-PYP uptake |
| Sarcoidosis | "AV block on ECG, lots of infiltration at septum, lots of lymph nodes on CT → classical for sarcoidosis" [1] → ACE levels, FDG-PET, endomyocardial biopsy, lymph node biopsy | Non-caseating granulomas on biopsy; FDG uptake in myocardium |
| Haemochromatosis | Iron studies (ferritin, transferrin sat), HFE gene testing, cardiac MRI T2 mapping* | T2* < 20 ms = iron overload |
| Thiamine deficiency | Erythrocyte transketolase activity | ↓ activity = B1 deficiency |
| Peripartum CM | Clinical diagnosis based on timing (last month to 5 months postpartum) | Diagnosis of exclusion |
| Tachycardia-mediated CM | Document pre-existing tachyarrhythmia; observe LVEF recovery after rate/rhythm control | LVEF improves dramatically (often normalises) |
| Investigation | What It Tells You | Essential or Selective? |
|---|---|---|
| CBC, LRFT, TFT, glucose, lipids | Comorbidities, end-organ damage, reversible causes | Essential — every patient |
| BNP / NT-proBNP | Confirm/exclude HF; prognostic | Essential if diagnosis uncertain |
| Cardiac troponin | Myocardial necrosis (myocarditis) | Essential — every patient |
| 12-lead ECG | Arrhythmia, conduction disease, LVH, Q waves, LBBB | Essential — every patient |
| CXR | Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion | Essential — every patient |
| Echocardiography | THE key investigation — LV size, EF, valves, WMA, thrombus | Essential — every patient |
| Coronary assessment (CTCA or invasive) | Exclude ischaemic cause | Essential — every patient |
| Cardiac MRI | Tissue characterisation (fibrosis, oedema, iron) | Essential in most — selective if echo alone is conclusive |
| Holter / exercise test | Arrhythmia detection, functional capacity | Selective — based on symptoms |
| Iron studies | Haemochromatosis | Selective — if clinically suspected |
| Autoantibodies | Autoimmune causes | Selective — if clinically suspected |
| Viral serology | Viral myocarditis | Selective — if clinically suspected |
| Genetic testing | Familial DCM | Selective — if idiopathic or FHx positive |
| Endomyocardial biopsy | Histological diagnosis (myocarditis, infiltrative) | Selective — specific indications only |
| Nuclear imaging | TTR amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, ischaemia | Selective — guided by clinical clues |
"Many tests are for disease exclusion → don't have to do all of them, just select based on the particular patient" [1]
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of DCM
- DCM is a diagnosis of exclusion — dilated LV + reduced EF + exclusion of sufficient CAD, VHD, CHD, hypertension
- Echo diagnostic criteria: LVEDDI > 2 SD above normal for age/BSA + LVEF < 50% (typically < 30%)
- HF is diagnosed clinically using Framingham Criteria (≥ 2 major, or 1 major + 2 minor); BNP/NT-proBNP helps when uncertain
- ECG has no specific features but is usually abnormal: AF, LBBB, poor R-wave progression, low voltage, Q waves (10–13%)
- Coronary assessment is mandatory — you cannot diagnose DCM without excluding CAD
- Cardiac MRI LGE pattern distinguishes aetiologies: mid-wall = genetic/idiopathic; subepicardial = myocarditis; subendocardial = ischaemic; basal septal = sarcoidosis
- Low voltage ECG + thick walls on echo = amyloidosis (voltage-mass mismatch)
- Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for myocarditis (Dallas criteria) but is NOT routine — reserved for fulminant presentations or when histology changes management
- Genetic testing indicated in idiopathic DCM — TTN and LMNA are the most important genes; LMNA more important in Chinese
- Tailor investigations to the individual patient — not every patient needs every test
Active Recall - Diagnosis and Investigations of DCM
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (diagnostic tests for DCM, amyloidosis clues, sarcoidosis clues, familial DCM criteria, genetic testing) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (Cardiology p41, cardiomyopathy investigations) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCMP definition and clinical presentation) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf (ECG features of HF, myocarditis diagnosis, endomyocardial biopsy) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (Framingham Criteria, sensitivity/specificity of HF signs) [10] Senior notes: learning_points_output.txt (Three Cases of Dyspnea learning points — coronary assessment mandatory) [15] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p535–537, DCM investigations and CXR/ECG/Echo/MRI findings) [17] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p293, BNP interpretation, endomyocardial biopsy indications, Dallas criteria) [18] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf (Q waves in DCM 10–13%, epsilon wave in ARVC) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to CVS investigations (including ECG).pdf (CXR findings in HF — CT ratio, upper lobe diversion, Kerley B lines) [20] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p217, echocardiography findings in HF/DCM, exercise test purposes) [21] Senior notes: Block A - Chest Pain - Department of Radiology.pdf (CTCA false positives, cardiac MRI LGE patterns, MINOCA) [22] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion.pdf (indications for invasive coronary angiography) [23] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p57, myocardial perfusion imaging interpretation)
Management of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
The management of DCM rests on two fundamental pillars:
"Treatment algorithm same as that of HFrEF — 4 pillars in the chronic phase, loop diuretics/inotropes in the acute phase" [1]
"Guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure + identify and treat underlying cause of DCM" [15]
This makes intuitive sense: DCM produces a dilated, poorly contracting ventricle (LVEF typically < 30%) → the clinical syndrome is heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Therefore, the management is identical to HFrEF management, with additional aetiology-specific therapies layered on top.
Five principles of management in DCM [1]:
- Treatment algorithm same as that of HFrEF (4 pillars + acute management)
- ICD implantation for those with very poor LVEF
- Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for ventricles which are dyssynchronous
- Specific therapies (immunosuppressants for autoimmune disease; no exercise after myocarditis)
- LVAD / Heart transplant for intractable ventricular arrhythmias or heart failure
Treatment aims [24]:
- ↑Quality of life (symptomatic)
- ↑Life expectancy (prognostic)
These apply to every patient with DCM regardless of severity:
| Measure | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Weight reduction | Obesity increases cardiac workload (↑preload, ↑afterload, ↑metabolic demand) |
| Exercise | Moderate regular aerobic exercise improves functional capacity, quality of life, and reduces hospitalisation in stable HFrEF (HF-ACTION trial). "Balance basic physical activity vs risk from exercise" [9] |
| Stop smoking | Smoking → vasoconstriction, ↑HR, ↑CO demand, oxidative stress |
| Avoid alcohol/other cardiotoxins [24] | Alcohol is directly myotoxic; even in non-alcoholic DCM, alcohol worsens LV function. Also avoid cocaine, NSAIDs (fluid retention + ↑afterload), non-DHP CCBs in low EF |
| Low-sodium diet | Na⁺ retention → fluid overload → worsening congestion. Aim < 2 g Na⁺/day |
| Fluid restriction | Typically 1.5–2 L/day in patients with hyponatraemia or refractory congestion [9] |
| Daily weights | Weight gain > 1.5–2 kg over 2–3 days → early detection of fluid retention → prompt diuretic adjustment [24] |
| Treat exacerbating factors | HTN (to 130/80), hyperlipidaemia, DM, arrhythmia, anaemia, OSA [24] |
| Immunization | Annual influenza + pneumococcal + COVID vaccination — respiratory infections are common HF decompensation triggers |
| Anticoagulation | Consider if AF, LV thrombus, or very low EF with intracardiac stasis (discussed below) |
"No exercise for 3–6 months after myocarditis" [1] — because exercise during active myocardial inflammation increases the risk of malignant arrhythmias and accelerates myocyte necrosis.
"Leisure-time activities only if high risk for life-threatening arrhythmias" [1] — competitive sports are generally contraindicated in DCM with significant LV dysfunction.
D. Pharmacological Treatment — The Four Pillars of HFrEF
This is the backbone of DCM treatment. Since DCM = HFrEF, the pharmacological approach is identical.
"For heart failure, the 4 pillars" [25]
The modern approach (2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA, 2023 ESC guidelines) recommends early initiation and rapid up-titration of all four pillars simultaneously, rather than the traditional sequential "stepladder" approach. The rationale: each drug class acts on a different pathophysiological target, and the mortality benefit is additive.
Why? In HFrEF, ↓CO activates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) as a compensatory mechanism. While initially helpful (↑BP, ↑Na⁺ retention), chronic RAAS activation is maladaptive: angiotensin II causes vasoconstriction (↑afterload), aldosterone causes Na⁺/water retention (↑preload), both promote myocardial fibrosis and remodelling. Blocking RAAS → ↓afterload, ↓preload, ↓remodelling → improved survival.
| Drug | Mechanism | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| ACEi (e.g. ramipril, enalapril, perindopril) | Inhibits angiotensin-converting enzyme → ↓angiotensin II, ↓aldosterone, ↑bradykinin (vasodilator) | First-line for HFrEF; indicated in all patients with LVEF ≤ 40% unless contraindicated [24][26]. Landmark trials: CONSENSUS, SOLVD. |
| ARB (e.g. valsartan, candesartan, losartan) | Blocks AT1 receptor → same effect as ACEi but without bradykinin accumulation | Recommended for patients who are intolerant of ACEi (typically due to cough — caused by ↑bradykinin in ACEi) [26]. Landmark: Val-HeFT, CHARM. |
| ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan) | Sacubitril = neprilysin inhibitor (↑natriuretic peptides → vasodilation, natriuresis, ↓fibrosis) + valsartan (ARB). Dual mechanism. | "PARADIGM trial, valsartan-sacubitril" [25]. ARNI is now preferred over ACEi/ARB in NYHA II–IV HFrEF (20% reduction in cardiovascular death vs enalapril). Requires 36-hour washout from ACEi before starting (risk of angioedema). |
Side effects: Hypotension, hyperkalaemia, cough (ACEi only), angioedema (rare but serious), renal impairment [26].
Contraindications [26]:
- High-grade bilateral renal artery stenosis (why? Both kidneys depend on angiotensin II to maintain GFR via efferent arteriolar constriction → blocking RAAS → GFR crashes → acute kidney injury)
- Azotaemia (significant renal impairment — relative CI; monitor K⁺ and creatinine)
- Pregnancy (teratogenic — causes renal agenesis, oligohydramnios)
- Hyperkalaemia (K⁺ > 5.5 mmol/L)
- Previous angioedema with ACEi (→ use ARB; if angioedema with ARB too → use hydralazine + isosorbide dinitrate)
Why? In HFrEF, chronic sympathetic activation is maladaptive: ↑HR → ↓diastolic filling time → ↓coronary perfusion → ↑myocardial O₂ demand; catecholamines are directly toxic to myocytes; β₁ stimulation promotes arrhythmias and remodelling. Beta-blockers antagonise these effects → proven survival benefit.
| Drug | Specifics |
|---|---|
| Bisoprolol | "More cardioselective, as opposed to metoprolol. So even in patients with asthma, can still try bisoprolol, won't affect airway" [25] |
| Carvedilol | Non-selective β-blocker + α₁-blocker → additional vasodilation (↓afterload). Proven in COPERNICUS trial. |
| Metoprolol succinate | Extended-release formulation. "Metoprolol tartrate is short-acting and is usually taken at least twice a day — no clinical outcome benefit" [25]. Only succinate (extended-release) has proven mortality benefit in HFrEF (MERIT-HF trial). |
Only these three beta-blockers have Level A evidence for mortality reduction in HFrEF. Do NOT substitute with atenolol, propranolol, or short-acting metoprolol tartrate.
For patients with reduced EF: consider bisoprolol / carvedilol / metoprolol succinate [27]
Indications [26]:
- LVEF ≤ 40% (all HFrEF patients)
- Post-MI with LV dysfunction
- Rate control in AF
Side effects: Bradycardia, hypotension, syncope, fatigue, bronchospasm, impaired glucose tolerance [26].
Contraindications [26]:
- AV block (2nd/3rd degree), sinus node dysfunction, symptomatic bradycardia
- Bronchial asthma (relative — bisoprolol safest; carvedilol worst due to β₂ blockade)
- Vasospastic angina, severe PAD, Raynaud phenomenon
- Acute decompensated HF (start only when stable and euvolaemic — "start low, go slow")
- Depression (relative)
Start Low, Go Slow
Beta-blockers in HFrEF must be initiated at very low doses and uptitrated slowly (e.g. bisoprolol 1.25 mg → 2.5 → 3.75 → 5 → 7.5 → 10 mg). Starting at full dose in a patient with poor LVEF will acutely worsen heart failure because you are removing the compensatory sympathetic drive before the long-term remodelling benefit kicks in. The mortality benefit takes weeks to months.
Why? Aldosterone escapes ACEi/ARB blockade over time ("aldosterone breakthrough"). Aldosterone promotes Na⁺/water retention, K⁺ wasting, myocardial fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, and baroreceptor dysfunction. MRAs block these effects.
| Drug | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Spironolactone (25–50 mg daily) | Non-selective MRA; also blocks androgen receptors → gynaecomastia, breast tenderness in men. RALES trial: 30% mortality reduction. |
| Eplerenone (25–50 mg daily) | Selective MRA; no anti-androgenic side effects. EMPHASIS-HF trial. Preferred in men experiencing gynaecomastia on spironolactone. |
Indications: HFrEF NYHA II–IV, LVEF ≤ 35%, already on ACEi/ARB + BB [24].
Side effects: Hyperkalaemia (must monitor K⁺ and renal function), renal impairment, gynaecomastia (spironolactone).
Contraindications:
- K⁺ > 5.0 mmol/L at initiation
- eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²
- Concomitant K⁺-sparing diuretics + K⁺ supplements without monitoring
"SGLT2i interesting since it's an antidiabetic → cardioprotective effects by diuresis" [25]
Why? Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors ("gliflozins" — the name tells you: "gli" = glucose, "flozin" = sodium-glucose transport inhibition) were initially developed as antidiabetics but have shown remarkable cardiovascular benefits independent of glycaemic control:
- Osmotic diuresis (↓preload without activating RAAS — unlike loop diuretics)
- Natriuresis (↓Na⁺ reabsorption in proximal tubule)
- ↓Myocardial fibrosis and inflammation
- Improved myocardial energy metabolism (ketone bodies as fuel for failing heart)
- Renoprotective (↓intraglomerular pressure via tubuloglomerular feedback)
| Drug | Key Trials |
|---|---|
| Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily | DAPA-HF: 26% reduction in composite of CV death + worsening HF, regardless of diabetes status |
| Empagliflozin 10 mg daily | EMPEROR-Reduced: 25% reduction in composite endpoint |
"Very safe, rarely causes hypoglycaemia and hypotension" [25]
Side effects: Genital mycotic infections (candidiasis — ↑glucose in urine = bacterial/fungal growth), urinary tract infections, volume depletion, euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (rare but important).
Contraindications:
- eGFR < 20 mL/min/1.73m² (updated 2023; previously < 30)
- Type 1 diabetes (risk of DKA)
- Recurrent urogenital infections
The 4 Pillars of HFrEF — Must Know for Exams
| Pillar | Drug Class | Key Drug | Primary Mechanism | Key Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAAS inhibitor | ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan) preferred; ACEi/ARB if ARNI unavailable | ↓Afterload, ↓preload, ↓remodelling | 20% ↓CV death |
| 2 | Beta-blocker | Bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate | ↓HR, ↓catecholamine toxicity, ↓arrhythmias | 34% ↓mortality |
| 3 | MRA | Spironolactone or eplerenone | ↓Aldosterone effects, ↓fibrosis | 30% ↓mortality |
| 4 | SGLT2i | Dapagliflozin or empagliflozin | Osmotic diuresis, ↓fibrosis, cardio-renoprotection | 25% ↓CV death + HF hospitalisation |
All four should be initiated in ALL patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%) as soon as possible, regardless of aetiology.
E. Symptom Relief — Diuretics
Diuretics are not one of the four pillars because they have no proven mortality benefit, but they are essential for symptom management in congested patients.
| Drug | Dose | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide ("furo" = furyl ring, "semide" = sulphonamide derivative) | 20–80 mg PO/IV, up to 400–600 mg/day in refractory cases | "Patients treated with diuretics chronically require a higher dose in acute setting — total daily dose = 2.5× usual maintenance total daily oral dose" [28] |
| Bumetanide | 1–2 mg PO/IV | ~40× more potent than furosemide |
| Torsemide | 10–20 mg PO | Better oral bioavailability than furosemide |
Mechanism: Inhibit Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl⁻ co-transporter in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle → massive natriuresis → fluid removal → ↓preload → relief of congestion.
Additional mechanisms [28]:
- "Preload = fluid removal by diuresis reduces preload"
- "Initial morphine-like effect that induces transient venodilation leading to a fall in cardiac filling pressures and decreased pulmonary congestion prior to onset of diuresis mediated by enhanced release of prostaglandins" [28]
Side effects: Hypotension, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, metabolic alkalosis, ototoxicity (high-dose IV), AKI [28].
Key principle: Use the minimum dose required to maintain euvolaemia. Over-diuresis → hypovolaemia → ↓CO → renal hypoperfusion → cardiorenal syndrome.
- Metolazone or hydrochlorothiazide — used as adjuncts to loop diuretics in diuretic-resistant oedema (sequential nephron blockade)
- Block Na⁺-Cl⁻ co-transporter in the distal convoluted tubule
F. Add-On Pharmacological Therapies
These are used in specific populations or when the four pillars are insufficient:
- Indicated as an alternative when ACEi/ARB/ARNI are contraindicated (bilateral renal artery stenosis, severe renal impairment, angioedema) [25]
- Particularly beneficial in African American patients (A-HeFT trial) — can be added on top of standard quadruple therapy
- Hydralazine = arteriolar vasodilator (↓afterload); Isosorbide dinitrate = venodilator (↓preload)
- Together they mimic some of the effects of ACEi without affecting RAAS
- Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator — enhances the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway [25]
- Indicated in patients with recent HF hospitalisation despite optimal quadruple therapy (VICTORIA trial)
- Modest additional benefit
- Cardiac glycoside: inhibits Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase → ↑intracellular Ca²⁺ → ↑contractility (positive inotrope) + vagotonic effect → ↓HR
- "Seldom used due to narrow therapeutic index" [9]
- No mortality benefit, but ↓HF hospitalisation (DIG trial)
- Role: symptomatic relief in patients with persistent symptoms despite optimal therapy; rate control in AF
- Therapeutic drug monitoring essential (therapeutic range 0.5–0.8 ng/mL; toxicity risk ↑ with hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, renal impairment)
- Selective If channel inhibitor → ↓HR without ↓contractility or ↓BP
- Indicated when: sinus rhythm, HR ≥ 70 bpm despite maximum tolerated beta-blocker, LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA II–IV
- SHIFT trial: ↓composite of CV death + HF hospitalisation
- Indicated for:
- AF (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 2 in men, ≥ 3 in women → DOAC or warfarin)
- LV thrombus on echo (warfarin for at least 3–6 months)
- Very low LVEF with intracardiac stasis (controversial; no routine anticoagulation for sinus rhythm DCM without thrombus) [24]
Indications [28]:
- Adjuncts to diuretics for patients without adequate response
- Patients with urgent need for afterload reduction (hypertensive emergency, acute MR/AR)
Contraindications [28]:
- Hypotension
- Suspected RV infarction
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) — nitrates ↓preload → ↓LV cavity size → ↑LVOT obstruction
- Constrictive pericarditis
- Intake of PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) within 24 hours — severe hypotension due to synergistic vasodilation
| Drug | Mechanism | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Dobutamine | β₁ agonist → ↑contractility, ↑HR; mild β₂ → peripheral vasodilation | First-line inotrope if adequate filling pressure. "IV dobutamine if adequate filling pressure" [29] |
| Milrinone | PDE3 inhibitor → ↑cAMP → ↑contractility + vasodilation ("inodilator") | Useful when patient is already on beta-blockers (works independently of β-receptors). Risk of hypotension. |
| Levosimendan | Calcium sensitiser → ↑contractility without ↑myocardial O₂ demand + K⁺-ATP channel opener → vasodilation | Unique advantage: does not increase arrhythmia risk. Available in some centres. |
| Dopamine | Dose-dependent: low dose (renal vasodilation) → moderate (β₁ → ↑CO) → high (α₁ → vasoconstriction) | Used when combined inotropic + vasopressor support needed |
Inotropes are a bridge (to recovery, to device, or to transplant) — they are NOT a long-term solution. Chronic inotrope use increases mortality due to arrhythmias and myocardial oxygen mismatch.
G. Device Therapy
Why? DCM patients with very low LVEF are at high risk of sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). ICDs detect and terminate these arrhythmias with overdrive pacing or defibrillation.
| Setting | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Primary prevention | NYHA II–III, LVEF ≤ 35% (may be considered in LVEF 31–35%) after optimal medical therapy for ≥ 3 months post-MI (ischaemic) or ≥ 6 months (non-ischaemic / DCM), with life expectancy > 1 year [8][15] |
| Secondary prevention | Survivors of VT/VF arrest or haemodynamically significant sustained VT [15] |
"Shown to reduce sudden cardiac death in patients with HFrEF — as ejection fraction goes down lower, the indication becomes stronger, since the chance of lethal ventricular arrhythmias increases with reducing LVEF" [8]
Why 6 months for non-ischaemic DCM? Because some causes of DCM (especially myocarditis, tachycardia-mediated, peripartum) may recover LVEF with medical therapy alone. Implanting an ICD too early means subjecting a potentially recovering patient to device-related risks (infection, inappropriate shocks, lead complications).
Special consideration — LMNA mutations: Patients with LMNA-related DCM have a particularly high arrhythmia burden and may need ICD even with LVEF > 35%. A LMNA risk calculator exists to guide decision-making.
Why? In ~30% of HFrEF patients, the ventricles contract dyssynchronously (typically due to LBBB — the left ventricle depolarises late → the septum and lateral wall do not contract together → mechanical inefficiency → worsening HF). CRT = biventricular pacing: a lead in the RV + a lead in the coronary sinus (pacing the LV lateral wall) → synchronises contraction → ↑cardiac efficiency.
"Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (biventricular pacing) should be considered for patients with ALL of the following:" [8]
- NYHA III despite optimal medical therapy (also now recommended for NYHA II)
- Sinus rhythm
- Widened QRS ( > 120 ms) → left bundle branch block
- LVEF ≤ 35% & LVD > 5.5 cm
CRT improves mechanical synchrony resulting in [15]:
- Improved coordination and relaxation of cardiac chambers
- Increased LV filling time
- Decreased septal dyskinesia
- Decreased MR
Why mainly LBBB? "Data shows that seems more beneficial for LBBB patients, but not RBBB patients" [8]. This is because LBBB causes the most pronounced mechanical dyssynchrony (delayed lateral wall activation). RBBB dyssynchrony is less amenable to correction by biventricular pacing.
CRT device types:
- CRT-P (pacemaker) — biventricular pacing only
- CRT-D (defibrillator) — biventricular pacing + ICD function (most patients who meet CRT criteria also meet ICD criteria)
H. Surgical / Advanced Therapies
- A mechanical pump implanted in the LV apex that continuously draws blood from the LV and delivers it to the ascending aorta, bypassing the failing ventricle
- "LVAD is a pump with battery → in public only for patients bridged to transplant, but in private just need to pay" [1]
| Strategy | Indication |
|---|---|
| Bridge to transplant (BTT) | Patient meets transplant criteria but no donor available; LVAD maintains end-organ perfusion until a heart becomes available |
| Bridge to recovery | Potentially reversible causes (e.g. acute myocarditis) where the heart may recover if given mechanical support |
| Destination therapy | Patient not eligible for transplant but has refractory HF; LVAD as permanent treatment |
"Common indication of cardiac transplantation" [15] — DCM is the leading indication for heart transplant worldwide.
Indications:
- Refractory NYHA IV HF despite optimal medical therapy + devices
- Peak VO₂ < 12–14 mL/kg/min on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
- Recurrent life-threatening arrhythmias not controlled by ICD
- Intractable angina not amenable to revascularisation
Contraindications:
- Active infection / malignancy
- Irreversible pulmonary hypertension (PVR > 5 Wood units → fixed)
- Severe peripheral or cerebrovascular disease
- Active substance abuse / psychiatric illness precluding compliance
- Age (relative — typically < 65–70, but assessed case by case)
"Mechanical circulatory support (e.g. IABP, LVAD, ECMO) for potentially reversible pump dysfunction" [9]:
- IABP (intra-aortic balloon pump): inflates during diastole (↑coronary perfusion), deflates during systole (↓afterload). Bridge in cardiogenic shock.
- VA-ECMO (veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation): drains venous blood, oxygenates it, and returns it to the arterial system. Used in refractory cardiogenic shock, fulminant myocarditis.
- Impella: percutaneous axial-flow pump placed across the aortic valve.
| Aetiology | Specific Treatment | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Alcoholic CM | Absolute abstinence | Direct toxin removal → LVEF may improve by 10–15% over 6–12 months. Continued drinking → progressive deterioration. |
| Myocarditis (viral) | "Non-specific, supportive, same for other heart failure" [5]; no exercise for 3–6 months [1] | Allow the immune system to clear the virus and inflammation to resolve. Exercise during active myocarditis → ↑myocyte necrosis → ↑arrhythmia risk. |
| Autoimmune myocarditis | "Immunosuppressives for those rare cases — giant cell myocarditis, autoimmune myocarditis" [5]; immunosuppressants for autoimmune disease (sarcoidosis, eosinophilic myocarditis) [1] | Giant cell myocarditis: cyclosporine + steroids ± azathioprine. Eosinophilic: steroids. Sarcoidosis: steroids ± methotrexate/azathioprine. "90+% cases of myocarditis, immunosuppressive is neutral, not detrimental, but also not good" [5] |
| Tachycardia-mediated CM | Rate/rhythm control (cardioversion, ablation, AV node blockers) | Reversible — LVEF normalises once tachycardia is controlled |
| Iron overload | Iron chelation (deferasirox, deferoxamine, deferiprone) | Remove iron from myocardium; monitor with serial cardiac MRI T2* |
| Thyrotoxicosis | Treat hyperthyroidism (antithyroid drugs, RAI, surgery) | Remove high-output stimulus |
| Peripartum CM | Standard HFrEF therapy; bromocriptine (experimental — inhibits 16-kDa prolactin fragment); contraception counselling | ~50% recover; future pregnancies carry risk of recurrence |
| Chagas disease | Benznidazole; standard HFrEF therapy | Eradicate Trypanosoma cruzi; HF management |
ACC/AHA Staging-Based Management [24]:
| Stage | Definition | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Stage A (at risk) | Risk factors but no structural heart disease or HF | "Good control of HTN + lipid disorders + other comorbidities" [24]; lifestyle modification |
| Stage B (structural heart disease, no HF S/S) | E.g. asymptomatic DCM found on screening | "ACEi/ARB + BB if prior MI and/or reduced LVEF" [24]; ICD if asymptomatic ischaemic CM, ≥ 40 days post-MI, LVEF ≤ 30% [24]; "Avoid non-DHP CCB if low LVEF + no symptoms of HF after MI" [24] |
| Stage C (structural heart disease with HF S/S) | Symptomatic HF | Four pillars (ARNI/ACEi/ARB + BB + MRA + SGLT2i) + diuretics for congestion + ICD/CRT as indicated |
| Stage D (refractory HF) | Intractable symptoms despite optimal therapy | Above + IV inotropes, LVAD, heart transplant, palliative care [9] |
Non-DHP CCBs Are Contraindicated in HFrEF
"Avoid non-DHP CCB if low LVEF" [24]. Diltiazem and verapamil have negative inotropic effects → can precipitate acute decompensation in patients with reduced LVEF. Only amlodipine (DHP CCB) is safe in HFrEF (PRAISE trial showed no harm), but it has no mortality benefit and is used only for concomitant hypertension/angina.
| Drug | Key Contraindications |
|---|---|
| ACEi/ARB/ARNI | Bilateral renal artery stenosis, pregnancy, K⁺ > 5.5, prior angioedema, severe renal impairment. ARNI: concurrent ACEi use (36-hour washout needed). |
| Beta-blockers | Severe bradycardia, 2nd/3rd degree AV block, acute decompensated HF (initiate only when stable), severe asthma |
| MRA | K⁺ > 5.0, eGFR < 30 |
| SGLT2i | eGFR < 20, T1DM |
| Loop diuretics | Hypovolaemia, severe hypokalaemia, anuria |
| Nitrates | Hypotension, RV infarction, HOCM, PDE5i use within 24 hours |
| Non-DHP CCB | HFrEF (LVEF < 40%), severe bradycardia, AV block |
| Digoxin | Hypokalaemia (↑toxicity risk), severe renal impairment (adjust dose), 2nd/3rd degree AV block, HCM/HOCM |
High Yield Summary — Management of DCM
- DCM management = HFrEF management + treat the underlying cause
- Four pharmacological pillars: ARNI (or ACEi/ARB) + beta-blocker (bisoprolol/carvedilol/metoprolol succinate) + MRA (spironolactone/eplerenone) + SGLT2i (dapagliflozin/empagliflozin)
- All four pillars should be initiated early — each reduces mortality through different mechanisms; benefits are additive
- Diuretics (loop) for symptom relief from congestion — no mortality benefit
- ICD: primary prevention when LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA II–III, after ≥ 3 months (ischaemic) or ≥ 6 months (non-ischaemic) of optimal medical therapy
- CRT: LVEF ≤ 35% + LBBB + QRS > 120 ms + NYHA II–III despite optimal therapy
- LVAD / Heart transplant for refractory end-stage HF
- Aetiology-specific: abstinence for alcohol; exercise restriction for myocarditis; immunosuppression for giant cell/eosinophilic myocarditis/sarcoidosis; chelation for iron overload; rate control for tachycardia-mediated CM
- Avoid: non-DHP CCBs, NSAIDs, and excessive alcohol in HFrEF
- ARNI preferred over ACEi (PARADIGM trial); only three beta-blockers have evidence (bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate)
Active Recall - Management of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (5 principles of DCM management, specific therapies, exercise restriction, LVAD) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Three Cases of Dyspnea.pdf (myocarditis treatment — supportive, immunosuppressives for rare cases) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (ICD indications, CRT indications, non-pharmacological HF treatment) [9] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (p200, HF management by stage, mechanical circulatory support) [15] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p535–537, ICD and CRT indications, cardiac transplantation) [24] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p219, HFrEF management by ACC/AHA stage, general measures) [25] Senior notes: Block A - Clinical Pharmacology of anti-HT and anti-HF medications.pdf (4 pillars, SGLT2i, ARNI/PARADIGM, bisoprolol selectivity, hydralazine-ISDN, vericiguat) [26] Senior notes: Block A - WCS32 Chest pain on exertion.pdf (ACEi/ARB indications, side effects, contraindications; BB indications, side effects, contraindications) [27] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p11, beta-blocker choices in reduced EF) [28] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p220, loop diuretics mechanism and dosing, nitrate indications and contraindications) [29] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p22, cardiogenic shock management, dobutamine)
Complications of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Two severe consequences of dilated cardiomyopathy [1]:
- Heart failure
- Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias
Additionally, the triad of complications listed by Ryan Ho for DCM presentations reads: "Arrhythmia, thromboembolism, sudden cardiac death" [3]. These three — plus the progressive heart failure itself and secondary organ damage — form the major complications of DCM. Let us work through each systematically from first principles.
This is the most common complication and the usual reason patients with DCM present to medical attention.
Why does it happen?
- The fundamental defect in DCM is loss of myocardial contractility → ↓stroke volume → the ventricle dilates to compensate (Frank-Starling mechanism) → wall stress increases (Laplace's law) → more energy is needed just to maintain baseline function → the heart enters a vicious cycle of remodelling
- Compensatory neurohormonal activation (RAAS, sympathetic nervous system, ADH) is initially beneficial but chronically maladaptive: promotes further fibrosis, myocyte hypertrophy, apoptosis, fluid retention, and vasoconstriction
- The result is a progressively dilating, poorly squeezing heart that cannot meet the body's metabolic demands
Clinical manifestations by side of failure:
| Left Heart Failure (Backward) | Left Heart Failure (Forward) | Right Heart Failure |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary congestion → dyspnoea, orthopnoea, PND, cough, "cardiac asthma" | ↓CO → fatigue, exercise intolerance, dizziness, renal hypoperfusion → oliguria, nocturia | Systemic venous congestion → peripheral oedema, hepatomegaly, ascites, JVP elevation |
Progressive stages:
- Initially isolated LV failure → over months to years → chronic ↑pulmonary artery pressure → RV pressure overload → RV dilatation and failure → biventricular failure → refractory end-stage HF
- Cardiogenic shock may occur acutely in the setting of decompensation triggers (infection, arrhythmia, medication non-compliance, excess salt/fluid intake) or in fulminant myocarditis [29]
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)
Patients with chronic compensated DCM may experience episodes of acute decompensation precipitated by:
- Dietary indiscretion (salt/fluid excess)
- Non-adherence to medications
- New-onset or uncontrolled AF
- Intercurrent infection (pneumonia is a common trigger)
- Anaemia
- Renal dysfunction
- Thyroid disease
Recognising and treating the precipitant is just as important as treating the acute HF itself.
2. Arrhythmias
Arrhythmias are among the most dangerous complications of DCM because they can cause sudden death and because they worsen heart failure.
Why does DCM predispose to arrhythmias?
- Structural remodelling: myocyte stretch, fibrosis (scar), and chamber dilatation create an abnormal electrophysiological substrate — slow conduction through fibrotic tissue + areas of re-entry = arrhythmia circuits
- Neurohormonal activation: ↑catecholamines lower the threshold for triggered activity and automaticity
- Electrolyte disturbances: diuretic use → hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia → ↑arrhythmia susceptibility
- Specific genetic substrates: LMNA mutations are particularly associated with conduction disease and malignant ventricular arrhythmias
- The most common sustained arrhythmia in DCM — occurs in 25–40% of patients
- Why? Chronic ↑LVEDP → ↑LA pressure → LA dilatation → structural and electrical remodelling of atrial myocardium → multiple wavelet re-entry → AF
- Consequences:
- Loss of atrial "kick" → ↓LV filling by ~20–25% → ↓CO → worsening HF symptoms (particularly devastating in a ventricle that is already struggling)
- Rapid ventricular rate → ↓diastolic filling time → further ↓CO; chronic tachycardia itself worsens DCM (tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy superimposed on existing DCM)
- Thromboembolism → stasis in dilated, fibrillating atria → thrombus formation → stroke, peripheral embolism [30]
- Management: Rate control (beta-blocker or digoxin; avoid non-DHP CCBs in low EF), ± rhythm control (amiodarone, catheter ablation), and anticoagulation based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc score
-
A major cause of sudden cardiac death in DCM [1]
-
Non-sustained VT (NSVT): runs of ≥ 3 consecutive ventricular beats lasting < 30 seconds. Very common on Holter monitoring in DCM (up to 40–70% of patients). A marker of increased SCD risk.
-
Sustained VT: lasting ≥ 30 seconds or requiring intervention to terminate. Haemodynamically significant → syncope, cardiogenic shock, or degeneration to VF.
-
Ventricular fibrillation (VF): disorganised ventricular activity → no cardiac output → cardiac arrest → death within minutes if not defibrillated
-
Why? In DCM, the dilated, fibrotic myocardium creates areas of slow conduction interspersed with normal tissue → re-entrant circuits. Myocyte stretch also → afterdepolarisations (triggered activity). Autonomic imbalance (↑sympathetic tone) further lowers the arrhythmia threshold.
"As the ejection fraction goes down lower, the indication for ICD becomes stronger — since the chance of lethal ventricular arrhythmias increases with reducing LVEF" [8]
- Prevention: ICD implantation for primary prevention (LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA II–III, after ≥ 6 months of optimal medical therapy in non-ischaemic DCM) [8]; beta-blockers; correction of electrolytes; avoidance of pro-arrhythmic drugs
- AV block (1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree) and bundle branch block (LBBB most common) can occur from fibrosis of the conduction system
- LMNA mutations are particularly associated with progressive conduction disease — AV block may be the first manifestation, even before LV dilatation becomes apparent [1]
- LBBB itself causes ventricular dyssynchrony → worsens mechanical efficiency → further ↓EF (this is the rationale for CRT)
- Complete heart block → haemodynamic compromise, syncope; may require permanent pacemaker
Sudden cardiac death is one of two severe consequences of DCM [1].
-
Defined as unexpected death due to cardiac cause within 1 hour of symptom onset
-
Mechanism: Almost always ventricular tachyarrhythmia (sustained VT → VF → asystole). Less commonly, bradyarrhythmia (complete heart block, especially LMNA)
-
Epidemiology: Annual incidence of SCD in DCM is ~2–4% per year (higher with lower LVEF). SCD may be the first presentation of DCM — patient was asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, then collapses suddenly
-
Risk factors for SCD in DCM:
- LVEF ≤ 35%
- NSVT on Holter
- Prior cardiac arrest or sustained VT
- Syncope of unknown origin
- LMNA or other high-risk genetic mutations
- Extensive mid-wall fibrosis on cardiac MRI (LGE)
- Family history of SCD
-
Prevention: ICD (primary or secondary), optimal medical therapy (four pillars — especially beta-blockers which have anti-arrhythmic properties), electrolyte optimisation, avoidance of QT-prolonging drugs
SCD in Young Adults
DCM (along with HCM and ARVC) is one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death in young adults (< 35 years). When a young athlete or otherwise healthy individual dies suddenly, the post-mortem differential includes HCM (most common structural cause of SCD in athletes), ARVC, DCM, anomalous coronary arteries, myocarditis, and channelopathies (Long QT, Brugada). This is why "a 1st degree relative who had sudden death at < 50 y/o, with DCM clinically proven following an autopsy" triggers cascade screening for familial DCM [1].
4. Thromboembolism
Thromboembolism is a recognised complication listed in DCM presentations: "Arrhythmia, thromboembolism, sudden cardiac death" [3].
Why does DCM predispose to thromboembolism?
Apply Virchow's triad — all three components are present in DCM:
| Virchow's Triad Element | How DCM Contributes |
|---|---|
| Stasis | Severely impaired LV contractility → blood pools in the dilated, hypokinetic LV (especially at the apex); AF → blood stagnates in dilated atria |
| Endothelial injury/dysfunction | Chronic stretching → endothelial damage; underlying myocarditis → direct endothelial inflammation; neurohormonal activation → endothelial dysfunction |
| Hypercoagulability | Chronic HF is a pro-thrombotic state: ↑fibrinogen, ↑von Willebrand factor, ↑platelet activation, impaired fibrinolysis |
- LV apex is the most common site for thrombus formation — the apex is the most distal point from the mitral valve and has the lowest flow velocity, especially when apical wall motion is severely impaired
- LV thrombus can embolise to:
- Cerebral arteries → stroke (embolic ischaemic stroke — cardioembolic aetiology). This is one of the most devastating complications.
- Mesenteric arteries → acute mesenteric ischaemia
- Renal arteries → renal infarction
- Peripheral arteries → acute limb ischaemia
- Detection: Transthoracic echo (TTE) with contrast enhancement; cardiac MRI has higher sensitivity
- Management: Anticoagulation with warfarin (target INR 2.0–3.0) for at least 3–6 months if LV thrombus is found; DOACs increasingly used but less evidence for LV thrombus specifically
- When AF complicates DCM, the left atrial appendage (LAA) becomes a prime site for thrombus formation
- Stroke risk assessed by CHA₂DS₂-VASc score; most DCM patients with AF will score ≥ 2 and require anticoagulation
- DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) are preferred over warfarin for AF-related stroke prevention (except in mitral stenosis or mechanical valves)
- Less commonly, RV dilatation and stasis → right-sided thrombus → PE
- Also, immobility from severe HF → DVT → PE
5. Functional Valvular Regurgitation
Why does DCM cause valvular regurgitation?
The valve leaflets themselves are structurally normal — the problem is geometric:
- LV dilatation → mitral annulus stretches → the leaflets can no longer coapt (meet in the middle during systole)
- Additionally, papillary muscles are displaced laterally and apically by the dilated LV → this tethers the leaflets and prevents them from closing properly
- The result: a pansystolic murmur at the apex, radiating to the axilla — identical to primary MR in sound, but the mechanism is entirely different
- "Left ventricular dilatation → enlarged MV ring leading to regurgitation" [30]
- Consequence: MR creates a volume load on an already failing LV (some blood goes backward into LA during systole → more blood returns in diastole → further LV dilatation → worsens MR → vicious cycle). This is sometimes called the "mitral regurgitation begets mitral regurgitation" phenomenon.
- Management: Treat the DCM (HFrEF therapy → ↓LV size → ↓annular dilatation → ↓MR); CRT can ↓MR by resynchronising contraction; percutaneous edge-to-edge repair (MitraClip) for selected patients with severe functional MR refractory to medical therapy
AOS Paeds Q8: "Murmur could be due to mitral regurgitation secondary to dilation" [4] — the key exam point is that functional MR is a consequence of DCM, not the cause.
- Same mechanism on the right side: RV dilatation → tricuspid annular dilatation → leaflet malcoaptation → TR
- Worsens RV volume overload → further RV dilatation → worsens TR → vicious cycle
- Contributes to systemic congestion (hepatomegaly, ascites, peripheral oedema)
Why?
- Chronic ↑LVEDP → ↑LA pressure → ↑pulmonary venous pressure → passive ↑pulmonary artery pressure (post-capillary pulmonary hypertension)
- Over time, chronically elevated pulmonary pressures → reactive pulmonary arteriolar remodelling (medial hypertrophy, intimal fibrosis) → a fixed component of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension develops on top of the post-capillary component → "combined pre- and post-capillary PH"
- The fixed component may become irreversible — this is critical for transplant assessment because fixed pulmonary hypertension with PVR > 5 Wood units is a contraindication to heart transplant (the donor RV cannot overcome high fixed pulmonary resistance → acute RV failure post-transplant)
Clinical consequences:
- RV pressure overload → RV hypertrophy → eventually RV dilatation and failure → biventricular failure
- Exertional syncope (inability to ↑CO during exercise in the setting of fixed high PVR)
- Functional TR (from RV dilatation)
Why?
- ↓CO from DCM → ↓renal perfusion → ↓GFR → acute or chronic kidney injury
- Simultaneously, venous congestion (↑CVP) → ↑renal venous pressure → ↑intra-renal interstitial pressure → further ↓GFR
- This bidirectional heart-kidney interaction is called cardiorenal syndrome
- Types relevant to DCM:
- Type 1: acute HF → AKI
- Type 2: chronic HF → chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- Clinical consequences:
- ↓renal function limits the dose of RAAS inhibitors and diuretics
- Diuretic resistance (need higher doses or combination diuretics)
- Fluid and electrolyte disturbances (hyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis, uraemia)
- Worse prognosis
Why?
- RV failure → ↑systemic venous pressure → ↑hepatic venous pressure → hepatic sinusoidal congestion → centrilobular necrosis (zone 3 of the hepatic acinus is most susceptible because it receives the least oxygenated blood and is most exposed to back-pressure)
Clinical spectrum:
| Stage | Manifestation |
|---|---|
| Acute congestion | Tender hepatomegaly, ↑ALT/AST (can be dramatically elevated in acute "shock liver" / ischaemic hepatitis when CO suddenly drops) |
| Chronic congestion | Mild ↑bilirubin, mild ↑ALP, ↓albumin, prolonged INR (impaired synthetic function); the liver becomes firm and non-tender over time |
| Cardiac cirrhosis | Long-standing congestion → fibrosis → frank cirrhosis (nutmeg liver); may develop portal hypertension, ascites |
- Definition: Involuntary, non-oedematous weight loss > 5% over 6–12 months in a patient with chronic HF
- Why?
- ↑metabolic demand (increased work of breathing, neurohormonal activation)
- ↓nutrient absorption (gut wall oedema from splanchnic congestion)
- Chronic inflammation: ↑TNF-α ("cachectin"), ↑IL-6 → skeletal muscle catabolism
- Anorexia from hepatic congestion and medication side effects
- Clinical significance: An independent predictor of mortality in HF — indicates advanced, end-stage disease
Why?
- Turbulent flow across structurally abnormal valves (functional MR/TR in DCM) → endothelial damage → non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) → provides a nidus for bacterial adhesion during bacteraemia
- However, the risk is lower than in primary valvular disease (rheumatic, prosthetic, congenital) because the valve leaflets themselves are normal in DCM; the turbulence is moderate compared to high-velocity jets in, say, aortic stenosis
- Still, IE should be considered in any DCM patient who develops unexplained fever + new or changing murmur
Often overlooked but critically important:
- Depression: present in 20–40% of HF patients; independently increases mortality (reduces medication compliance, exercise, and self-care)
- Anxiety: common, especially in patients with ICDs (fear of shocks)
- Reduced quality of life: exercise limitation, dietary restrictions, frequent hospitalisations, inability to work
- Sexual dysfunction: from disease itself + beta-blockers + anxiety
- Caregiver burden: family members often bear significant psychological and practical load
| Complication | Mechanism in DCM | Key Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Heart failure (progressive) | ↓Contractility → neurohormonal activation → remodelling → further ↓EF | Dyspnoea, orthopnoea, PND, oedema, cardiogenic shock |
| Atrial fibrillation | LA dilatation → re-entry circuits | Palpitation, worsening HF, thromboembolic stroke |
| Ventricular arrhythmias | Fibrosis + stretch → re-entry; catecholamines → triggered activity | Palpitation, syncope, VT/VF, SCD |
| Sudden cardiac death | Sustained VT/VF → circulatory arrest | Collapse; may be first presentation |
| Thromboembolism | Stasis in dilated, hypokinetic chambers + endothelial dysfunction + hypercoagulability | Stroke, peripheral embolism, PE |
| Functional MR/TR | Annular dilatation + papillary muscle displacement → leaflet malcoaptation | Murmurs; worsening HF; volume overload |
| Secondary pulmonary hypertension | Chronic ↑LA pressure → reactive pulmonary vascular remodelling | RV failure, exertional syncope |
| Cardiorenal syndrome | ↓CO → ↓renal perfusion; ↑CVP → ↑renal venous pressure | AKI/CKD, diuretic resistance, electrolyte derangement |
| Congestive hepatopathy → cardiac cirrhosis | RV failure → hepatic venous congestion → centrilobular necrosis → fibrosis | Hepatomegaly, ↑LFTs, eventually cirrhosis |
| Cardiac cachexia | ↑TNF-α, gut congestion, anorexia, ↑metabolic demand | Wasting, sarcopenia, poor prognosis |
| Conduction disease | Fibrosis of conduction system; genetic (LMNA) | AV block, LBBB, need for pacemaker |
| Infective endocarditis | Turbulent flow across functional MR/TR valves | Fever + new/changing murmur + emboli |
| Depression / psychosocial | Chronic disease burden, medication side effects, functional limitation | ↓Compliance, ↓QoL, ↑mortality |
High Yield Summary — Complications of DCM
- The two cardinal complications are heart failure and sudden cardiac death — both cause the majority of DCM-related mortality
- AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia (~25–40%); worsens HF and causes stroke
- Ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) → SCD; risk increases as LVEF decreases → rationale for ICD
- Thromboembolism arises from all three elements of Virchow's triad; LV apical thrombus → stroke is the most feared embolic event
- Functional MR is secondary to LV dilatation (structurally normal valve) → creates a vicious cycle of volume overload → further dilatation → worse MR
- Secondary pulmonary hypertension → RV failure → biventricular failure; fixed PVR is a contraindication to heart transplant
- Cardiorenal syndrome (Type 2) → limits RAAS inhibitor and diuretic doses → worsens prognosis
- Cardiac cachexia indicates end-stage disease and independently predicts mortality
- LMNA mutations carry particularly high risk of conduction disease and malignant arrhythmias
Active Recall - Complications of DCM
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - Inherited Cardiac conditions.pdf (two severe consequences of DCM; LMNA mutations; familial DCM criteria) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Cardiology.pdf (p169, DCM complications listed: arrhythmia, thromboembolism, sudden cardiac death) [4] AOS material: AOS - Paeds.pdf (Q8 — murmur secondary to dilatation, functional MR) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Shortness of breath on exertion: heart failure.pdf (ICD indications; relationship between LVEF and arrhythmia risk) [29] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p22, cardiogenic shock causes including ADHF from DCMP) [30] Senior notes: Block A - Fever and a murmur: Valvular heart diseases; Infective endocarditis.pdf (LV dilatation causing MR; complications of valvular disease including thromboembolism)
High Yield Summary
- DCM = most common cardiomyopathy (~60%) — dilated LV with reduced systolic function (LVEF often < 30%)
- Definition requires exclusion of CAD, VHD, CHD, and hypertension as sufficient explanations
- Aetiologies: "IDIOTIC" mnemonic — Idiopathic/Inherited, Drugs (anthracyclines), Infectious (viral myocarditis), Overload (iron/haemochromatosis), Toxic (alcohol, cocaine), Immune (SLE, sarcoid), Cardiometabolic (thyroid, peripartum, tachycardia-mediated)
- ~50% are idiopathic; of these, 50% have familial basis → TTN (most common gene), LMNA (important in Chinese)
- Pathogenesis = genetic + immune + viral factors → altered myocardial function → dilatation
- Viral myocarditis (Coxsackie B) → chronic DCM is a key pathway
- Clinical presentation: HF symptoms (SOBOE, orthopnoea, PND, oedema), arrhythmia (AF, VT, SCD), thromboembolism (stroke)
- Key signs: displaced thrusting apex, S3 gallop, functional MR/TR, bibasal crackles, raised JVP, peripheral oedema
- ECG clues: poor R-wave progression, low voltage, LBBB, AF, P mitrale/pulmonale
- CXR: cardiomegaly + pulmonary congestion (ABCDE mnemonic)
- Two severe consequences: heart failure and sudden cardiac death
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of DCM
- Before diagnosing DCM, exclude the "big four": ischaemic cardiomyopathy (CAD), valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertension — each must be insufficient to explain the observed LV dysfunction
- Coronary assessment is mandatory — invasive angiography or CT coronary angiogram
- Ischaemic cardiomyopathy: regional WMA on echo vs. global hypokinesis in DCM
- Functional MR/TR is secondary to DCM (structurally normal valve) — do not confuse with primary valve disease
- Aetiological DDx within DCM: use clinical clues (FHx → familial; viral illness → myocarditis; alcohol → ACM; chemo → anthracycline; pregnancy → PPCM; conduction disease → LMNA/sarcoid; muscle weakness → dystrophy; bronze skin → haemochromatosis)
- Reversible causes to never miss: alcoholic CM (abstinence), tachycardia-mediated CM (rate control), thyrotoxicosis (treat thyroid), peripartum (may recover)
- Heart failure is the final common path of all cardiac diseases — always ask what is causing it
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of DCM
- DCM is a diagnosis of exclusion — dilated LV + reduced EF + exclusion of sufficient CAD, VHD, CHD, hypertension
- Echo diagnostic criteria: LVEDDI > 2 SD above normal for age/BSA + LVEF < 50% (typically < 30%)
- HF is diagnosed clinically using Framingham Criteria (≥ 2 major, or 1 major + 2 minor); BNP/NT-proBNP helps when uncertain
- ECG has no specific features but is usually abnormal: AF, LBBB, poor R-wave progression, low voltage, Q waves (10–13%)
- Coronary assessment is mandatory — you cannot diagnose DCM without excluding CAD
- Cardiac MRI LGE pattern distinguishes aetiologies: mid-wall = genetic/idiopathic; subepicardial = myocarditis; subendocardial = ischaemic; basal septal = sarcoidosis
- Low voltage ECG + thick walls on echo = amyloidosis (voltage-mass mismatch)
- Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for myocarditis (Dallas criteria) but is NOT routine — reserved for fulminant presentations or when histology changes management
- Genetic testing indicated in idiopathic DCM — TTN and LMNA are the most important genes; LMNA more important in Chinese
- Tailor investigations to the individual patient — not every patient needs every test
High Yield Summary — Management of DCM
- DCM management = HFrEF management + treat the underlying cause
- Four pharmacological pillars: ARNI (or ACEi/ARB) + beta-blocker (bisoprolol/carvedilol/metoprolol succinate) + MRA (spironolactone/eplerenone) + SGLT2i (dapagliflozin/empagliflozin)
- All four pillars should be initiated early — each reduces mortality through different mechanisms; benefits are additive
- Diuretics (loop) for symptom relief from congestion — no mortality benefit
- ICD: primary prevention when LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA II–III, after ≥ 3 months (ischaemic) or ≥ 6 months (non-ischaemic) of optimal medical therapy
- CRT: LVEF ≤ 35% + LBBB + QRS > 120 ms + NYHA II–III despite optimal therapy
- LVAD / Heart transplant for refractory end-stage HF
- Aetiology-specific: abstinence for alcohol; exercise restriction for myocarditis; immunosuppression for giant cell/eosinophilic myocarditis/sarcoidosis; chelation for iron overload; rate control for tachycardia-mediated CM
- Avoid: non-DHP CCBs, NSAIDs, and excessive alcohol in HFrEF
- ARNI preferred over ACEi (PARADIGM trial); only three beta-blockers have evidence (bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate)
High Yield Summary — Complications of DCM
- The two cardinal complications are heart failure and sudden cardiac death — both cause the majority of DCM-related mortality
- AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia (~25–40%); worsens HF and causes stroke
- Ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) → SCD; risk increases as LVEF decreases → rationale for ICD
- Thromboembolism arises from all three elements of Virchow's triad; LV apical thrombus → stroke is the most feared embolic event
- Functional MR is secondary to LV dilatation (structurally normal valve) → creates a vicious cycle of volume overload → further dilatation → worse MR
- Secondary pulmonary hypertension → RV failure → biventricular failure; fixed PVR is a contraindication to heart transplant
- Cardiorenal syndrome (Type 2) → limits RAAS inhibitor and diuretic doses → worsens prognosis
- Cardiac cachexia indicates end-stage disease and independently predicts mortality
- LMNA mutations carry particularly high risk of conduction disease and malignant arrhythmias
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a genetic myocardial disorder characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy, often involving the interventricular septum, that can cause diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is a heritable myocardial disease characterized by fibrofatty replacement of ventricular myocardium, predisposing to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.