NephrologyGlomerular DiseasesNephritic Spectrum

Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus in which immune complex deposition in the kidneys causes glomerular inflammation, potentially leading to renal failure.

Exam domainOne-glance essentials
Definition / diagnosis
  • Immune-complex renal disease in SLE affecting glomeruli, tubulointerstitium and vessels [1][2]
  • ISN/RPS classes I–VI; class III/IV proliferative disease is inflammatory, class V is membranous [2]
Epidemiology / risks
  • More frequent/severe in Asian ancestry, younger onset and males; high anti-dsDNA and low complement track risk/activity [2]
  • Delay to diagnosis and high chronicity index predict irreversible loss [2]
Core mechanism
  • Anti-nuclear immune complexes deposit by compartment → complement activation → inflammation or podocyte injury [2]
  • Subendothelial deposits drive proliferative nephritis; subepithelial deposits drive class V nephrosis [2]
Clinical picture
  • Microscopic haematuria/proteinuria, hypertension, nephritic/nephrotic syndrome or unexplained renal impairment [2]
  • Class IV is commonly severe and may present as RPGN [2]
Investigations
  • Biopsy when proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, active sediment with persistent haematuria, or otherwise unexplained creatinine rise [2]
  • Anti-dsDNA + C3/C4 monitor activity; ANA/ENA are not serial activity markers [2]
  • Biopsy class plus activity/chronicity indices directs treatment [2]
Management
  • Hydroxychloroquine for SLE and RAAS blockade for proteinuric disease [1][3]
  • Active class III/IV → glucocorticoid plus MMF- or cyclophosphamide-based induction, then maintenance [3]
  • Class V treatment depends on proteinuria/risk; class VI receives CKD/ESKD care, not futile induction [3]
Complications
  • CKD/ESKD, crescentic RPGN, nephrotic thrombosis and antiphospholipid/TMA vascular injury [2][3]
  • Infection and glucocorticoid/cytotoxic toxicity are major treatment harms [3]
Prevention / follow-up
  • Monitor BP, urine protein/sediment, eGFR, anti-dsDNA and complement; reinforce HCQ adherence [2][3]
  • Vaccination, infection screening/prophylaxis and fertility/teratogenic counselling before immunosuppression [3]
Exam traps
  • Full-house IF (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) strongly supports lupus nephritis [1]
  • Rising CRP in treated SLE should heighten concern for infection, not be assumed to be flare [2]
  • Histology, not proteinuria alone, determines induction strategy [3]

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 046. Facial rash and painful fingers_SLE.pdf (p53 — lupus diagnostic framework); GC 057. Glomerular and Tubulo-interstitial Diseases and Acute Kidney Injury.pdf (p10, p16) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology.pdf (p69–75 — SLE/lupus nephritis presentation and monitoring); Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p87–88) [3] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024.pdf (p441–442 — lupus nephritis); Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p88–89 — management)

Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is renal inflammation caused by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), resulting from the deposition of circulating immune complexes (composed of nuclear antigens, anti-nuclear antibodies [especially anti-dsDNA], and complement) in the glomeruli, tubulointerstitium, and renal vasculature, leading to complement-mediated damage, leukocyte infiltration, activation of procoagulant factors, and release of cytokines [1][2].

Breaking the name down:

  • Lupus — from Latin "lupus" (wolf), referring to the destructive skin lesions historically likened to wolf bites
  • Nephritis — "nephro" (kidney) + "-itis" (inflammation)

So lupus nephritis literally means "kidney inflammation caused by lupus."

Why is Lupus Nephritis Important?

LN is one of the most serious organ manifestations of SLE. It occurs in roughly 50% of SLE patients and is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality. Without treatment, proliferative forms (Class III/IV) can progress to ESRD within months. Management is guided by histological class on renal biopsy — this is a core exam concept [1][2].


2. Epidemiology

  • ~50% of SLE patients develop clinically significant lupus nephritis during their disease course [2][3]
  • In some cohorts (especially Asian and Afro-Caribbean populations), the prevalence is even higher — up to 60–80% when subclinical disease detected on protocol biopsies is included
  • Lupus nephritis is more common and more severe in Orientals — this is directly relevant to Hong Kong practice [3]
  • Juvenile-onset SLE has a particularly high incidence of renal involvement (up to 80%), and it tends to be more aggressive [2]

FactorDetail
SexFemale predominance (9:1) reflecting SLE demographics [2][3]
AgePeak onset 20–40 years; juvenile SLE has higher renal involvement
EthnicityAfro-Caribbean > Asian/Oriental > Caucasian (both incidence and severity)
Hong Kong contextSLE is relatively common in Chinese populations; LN is a major cause of secondary glomerulonephritis

  • Juvenile SLE (childhood-onset) [2]
  • Male sex (paradoxically — while SLE is 9× commoner in females, males with SLE have a higher risk of developing renal involvement and worse renal outcomes) [2]
  • Afro-Caribbean or Asian ethnicity
  • High anti-dsDNA titres and low C3/C4 (serological markers of active disease)
  • Delay in diagnosis or treatment of SLE
  • Genetic factors: HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, complement deficiencies (C1q, C2, C4)
  • Socioeconomic factors: poor access to healthcare, non-adherence

High Yield — Risk Factors

Risk factors for lupus nephritis: juvenile SLE, male sex [2]. Remember: while SLE itself is female-predominant, being male with SLE actually portends worse renal disease. This is a classic exam trick.


3. Anatomy and Function — Relevance to Lupus Nephritis

Understanding where immune complexes deposit — and why different deposit locations produce different clinical syndromes — is absolutely fundamental to understanding lupus nephritis classification.

The nephron is the functional unit of the kidney. Around 1 million nephrons at birth. Blood goes through the glomerulus and gives rise to the cell-free filtrate (urine). Normally no plasma protein or red cells in the urine. [4]

The glomerulus consists of:

Bowman's capsule (parietal epithelial cells)
  └── Urinary/Bowman's space
       └── Glomerular capillary tuft
            ├── Endothelial cells (fenestrated — allow filtration)
            ├── Glomerular basement membrane (GBM) — the main filtration barrier
            ├── Podocytes (visceral epithelial cells) — with foot processes and slit diaphragms
            └── Mesangium (mesangial cells + matrix) — structural support & phagocytic function

Three layers, from capillary lumen → urinary space:

  1. Fenestrated endothelium — allows passage of plasma but blocks blood cells
  2. Glomerular basement membrane (GBM) — negatively charged; prevents large and anionic molecules (like albumin) from passing
  3. Podocyte foot processes and slit diaphragms — the final barrier; prevent protein leakage

This is the key to understanding the ISN/RPS classification:

Deposit LocationMechanismClinical Consequence
MesangialMesangial cells phagocytose and process immune complexes → mild inflammationMild disease (Class I–II): microscopic haematuria, mild proteinuria
Subendothelial (between endothelium and GBM)Deposits are in direct contact with circulating blood → robust inflammatory response → complement activation, neutrophil/monocyte recruitmentNephritic picture: haematuria, RBC casts, hypertension, AKI → Class III/IV
Subepithelial (between GBM and podocytes)Deposits damage podocyte foot processes → disruption of slit diaphragm → massive protein leak; but deposits are "hidden" from circulating blood so less inflammatory cell recruitmentNephrotic picture: heavy proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome → Class V

Deposit Location → Clinical Syndrome

Mesangial deposits → activate complement → nephritic-like; subepithelial deposit → nephrotic-like [2]. This is the single most important concept for understanding why different LN classes present differently. Subendothelial deposits cause the most inflammation because they are directly accessible to circulating immune cells.


4. Etiology (Focus on Hong Kong)

Lupus nephritis is, by definition, a manifestation of SLE. Therefore, the etiology of LN is the etiology of SLE with renal tropism:

Pathogenesis of SLE: loss of self-tolerance in immune system secondary to predisposing genetic factors and environmental triggers [3]

a) Genetic predisposition:

  • HLA-B8, DR2, DR3 [2][3]
  • Complement deficiencies (C1q deficiency → strongest single-gene risk; C2, C4) — impaired clearance of immune complexes and apoptotic debris
  • Other susceptibility genes: IRF5, STAT4, ITGAM, BLK

b) Hormonal factors:

  • Estrogen and progesterone promote B cell survival and autoantibody production [2]
  • This explains the female predominance and flares during pregnancy/OCP use

c) Environmental triggers:

  • Infections: EBV (molecular mimicry between EBNA-1 and Sm/Ro antigens), parvovirus B19, HIV-1 [3]
  • UV light — induces apoptosis of keratinocytes, exposing nuclear antigens on cell surfaces [3]
  • Drugs: hydralazine, procainamide, isoniazid (drug-induced lupus — though this rarely causes significant nephritis)
  • Stress, chemical agents

d) Immune dysregulation:

B lymphocyte changes:

  • Autoantibody production due to reaction to self-antigens (e.g. dsDNA, RNPs) — usually present on surface of cells activated or undergoing apoptosis [3]
  • Activation by helper T cells [3]
  • Auto-antibodies form immune complex (consists of nuclear antigens, IgG and antinuclear antibodies) → deposit in tissues and organs, especially kidney → activate complement system to cause inflammation and tissue damage [3]

T lymphocyte changes:

  • ↓ cytotoxic and suppressor T cells [3]
  • ↑ helper T cell population → ↑ production of autoantibodies [3]

Defective phagocytosis:

  • Defective phagocytosis of immune complexes or apoptotic cells → persistence of self-antigen presentation and immune complexes mediates tissue damage [3]

  • SLE is relatively common in the Chinese population (prevalence ~6 in 10,000) [3]
  • Lupus nephritis is a recognized cause of CKD in Hong Kong — listed alongside diabetes, hypertension, IgA nephropathy, chronic pyelonephritis, etc. [5]
  • In HK renal registries, SLE/lupus nephritis accounts for a notable proportion of glomerulonephritis-related ESRD
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) use is prevalent and can complicate management (nephrotoxic herbs, e.g. aristolochic acid causing additional tubulointerstitial injury)

5. Pathophysiology of Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis results from deposition of circulating immune complexes. This activates the complement cascade leading to complement-mediated damage, leukocyte infiltration, activation of procoagulant factors, and release of cytokines [1][2].

Step 1: Immune Complex Formation

  • Anti-dsDNA antibodies bind circulating nucleosomal DNA (released from apoptotic cells that are not properly cleared)
  • These form immune complexes of variable size
  • Immune complexes may also form in situ — anti-dsDNA binds to nucleosomes already "planted" in the GBM or mesangium

Step 2: Deposition in Glomeruli

  • The glomerulus is particularly vulnerable because:
    • High blood flow (receives ~25% of cardiac output)
    • Fenestrated endothelium allows immune complex access to the GBM
    • The mesangium acts as a filter for circulating macromolecules
  • Where immune complexes deposit determines the histological class and clinical presentation (see table in Section 3.3)

Step 3: Complement Activation

  • Immune complexes activate the classical complement pathway (C1q → C4 → C2 → C3 → C5–C9)
  • This generates:
    • C3a, C5a — anaphylatoxins → recruit neutrophils and monocytes
    • C5b-9 (MAC) — membrane attack complex → direct cell lysis
    • C3b — opsonization
  • Complement consumption explains why C3 and C4 are low in active lupus nephritis [3]

Step 4: Inflammatory Response

  • Recruited leukocytes release:
    • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) — direct tissue damage
    • Proteases — degrade GBM
    • Cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1) — amplify inflammation
    • Procoagulant factors — microthrombosis in glomerular capillaries
  • Endocapillary proliferation: endothelial and mesangial cell proliferation narrows capillary lumens → ↓ GFR → oliguria
  • Crescent formation: severe inflammation → rupture of GBM → fibrin leak into Bowman's space → parietal epithelial cell proliferation → "crescents" (hallmark of RPGN)

Step 5: Progression to Chronic Damage

  • Repeated inflammation → glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis
  • Chronicity index: degree of sclerosis, fibrosis → prevent further worsening by CV risk control (ACEI, statins) [2]
  • Eventually → advanced sclerosing (Class VI) → ESRD [1][2]

MarkerPathophysiological RoleClinical Utility
Anti-dsDNAMajor component of pathogenic immune complexesHigh specificity for SLE (~60%); use for diagnosis AND monitoring of disease progression, esp. for lupus nephritis [3]
C3, C4Consumed by classical pathway activation during IC-mediated inflammationLow in active disease; use for diagnosis AND monitoring [3]
C1q antibodiesMay impair C1q-mediated clearance of ICAssociated with proliferative LN; some centers use for monitoring

Anti-dsDNA and Complement — Monitoring Tip

Anti-dsDNA for diagnosis and monitoring; C3/C4 for diagnosis and monitoring. Rising anti-dsDNA + falling C3/C4 = impending lupus nephritis flare. [3] ANA and anti-ENA have NO role in monitoring disease activity [3].

Not all immune complexes are preformed in the circulation. Some form in situ:

  • Nucleosomal antigens bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans in the GBM
  • Circulating anti-dsDNA then binds these "planted" antigens
  • This mechanism may be particularly important in Class V (membranous) LN, where subepithelial deposits are less likely to arrive as large preformed complexes

6. Classification — ISN/RPS Classification (2003, Revised 2018)

This is the WHO/ISN/RPS classification used universally. Overlapping of classes is common [1].

One etiology (SLE) may produce a variety of histologic patterns — this is why renal biopsy is essential [6].

ClassNameLight Microscopy (LM)IF / EMClinical PresentationNotes
IMinimal mesangialNormal (LM)Mesangial immune deposits (EM/IF)Normal / minimal urinary abnormalitiesRarely biopsied
IIMesangial proliferativeMesangial hypercellularity with expansion of mesangial matrixMesangial immune depositsMicroscopic haematuria / proteinuriaGenerally good prognosis
IIIFocal nephritis< 50% glomeruli affectedSubendothelial and mesangial immune depositsHaematuria / proteinuria / ↓GFR / hypertension / ± nephroticActive (A), chronic (C), or A/C
IVDiffuse nephritis≥ 50% glomeruli affected with crescent formationSubendothelial and mesangial deposits; Full-house staining (ALL IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C1q)Haematuria / proteinuria / ↓GFR / hypertension / ± nephroticMOST common and MOST severe form; presents as RPGN (crescentic GN) [1]
IV-G: GlobalIV-S: SegmentalSub-classified by extent
VMembranous nephritisThickened glomerular capillary wallSubepithelial and mesangial immune depositsProteinuria / nephrotic syndromePresents as membranous GN [1]
VIAdvanced sclerosingGlobal sclerosis of nearly all glomerular capillaries—ESRDIrreversible damage

Full-House Staining — Pathognomonic

Full-house staining on IF (ALL IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C1q) is virtually pathognomonic for lupus nephritis (especially Class IV) [1]. No other glomerulonephritis reliably shows deposition of all five immunoreactants. If you see full-house staining on a histology question — think lupus.

Renal biopsy reports include: [2]

  • Histology (class)
  • Activity index: proliferation & inflammation → determines intensity of treatment
  • Chronicity index: degree of sclerosis, fibrosis → prevents further worsening by CV risk control (ACEI, statins)
IndexComponentsClinical Significance
Activity Index (0–24)Endocapillary proliferation, cellular crescents, karyorrhexis/fibrinoid necrosis, glomerular leukocyte infiltration, wire loop deposits, interstitial inflammationHigh AI → aggressive immunosuppression needed
Chronicity Index (0–12)Glomerulosclerosis, fibrous crescents, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosisHigh CI → less likely to respond to immunosuppression; focus on renoprotection

High Yield — Activity vs. Chronicity

A high activity index means the disease is "hot" and treatable with immunosuppression. A high chronicity index means the horse has already bolted — scarring is irreversible, and you focus on slowing further decline (RAAS blockade, BP control, lipid control). Repeat biopsy if disease progresses [2].

  • Classes are not static — patients can transition between classes over time
  • Class II → Class IV (if disease flares)
  • Class IV → Class VI (if inadequately treated)
  • Mixed classes are common: Class III + V or Class IV + V [2]

7. Clinical Features

  • Clinical features of lupus nephritis exist on a spectrum from completely asymptomatic (Class I) to fulminant RPGN (Class IV)
  • Often discovered incidentally on routine urinalysis in a known SLE patient
  • Clinical features are variable: microscopic haematuria, proteinuria, AKI [2]
  • Always look for extra-renal SLE features to help make the diagnosis

SymptomPathophysiological BasisLN Class Association
AsymptomaticMinimal immune complex deposition with preserved GFRClass I, II
Frothy/foamy urineHeavy proteinuria (> 3.5 g/day) → excess protein lowers urine surface tensionClass III (partial), IV, V
Tea/cola-coloured urine (macroscopic haematuria)GBM disruption → RBCs leak into Bowman's space and urine; dysmorphic RBCs/casts give dark colourClass III, IV
Reduced urine output (oliguria)Endocapillary proliferation and crescent formation narrow/obliterate capillary lumens → ↓ GFR → ↓ urine productionClass III, IV (especially RPGN)
Periorbital and leg swelling (oedema)Two mechanisms: (1) nephrotic: hypoalbuminaemia → ↓ oncotic pressure → fluid leaks to interstitium; (2) nephritic: salt and water retention due to ↓ GFRClass III, IV (nephritic); V (nephrotic)
Weight gainFluid retention from salt/water retention and/or hypoalbuminaemiaIII, IV, V
Fatigue / malaiseUraemia (in AKI/CKD); anaemia (chronic disease, haemolytic); general SLE constitutional symptomsAny class with renal impairment
Nausea, poor appetiteUraemia → stimulates chemoreceptor trigger zoneClass IV (if AKI severe), VI
HeadacheHypertension from fluid overload and RAAS activationIII, IV
DyspnoeaFluid overload → pulmonary oedema; or concomitant SLE pleuritis/shrinking lungAdvanced III, IV
Flank/loin painRenal capsular distension (if kidneys acutely swollen); renal vein thrombosis (if nephrotic + APLS)Uncommon; consider thrombosis

Associated SLE symptoms (often coexist and help clinch the diagnosis):

  • Hair loss, oral ulcers, rashes (photosensitivity) → lupus nephritis [7]
  • Joint pain (bilateral small hand joints) — arthralgia/arthritis [7]
  • Constitutional: fever, weight loss, poor appetite [2][3]

SignPathophysiological BasisClinical Note
Hypertension (BP > 140/90)↓ GFR → Na+/water retention → volume expansion; RAAS activation from renal ischaemiaA 34-year-old with SLE features and BP 152/92 should raise alarm for lupus nephritis [7]
Peripheral oedema (pitting, bilateral lower limbs)Hypoalbuminaemia (nephrotic) or Na+/water retention (nephritic)Sacral oedema if bedridden
Periorbital oedemaLow oncotic pressure → fluid accumulates in loose periorbital tissue; classically worse in the morningMore suggestive of nephrotic syndrome
AscitesSevere hypoalbuminaemia → transudative ascitesIn severe nephrotic syndrome
Pleural effusion / pulmonary oedemaFluid overload ± low oncotic pressureBilateral basal crackles, ↓ air entry
PallorAnaemia of chronic disease; haemolytic anaemia (AIHA in SLE); erythropoietin deficiency (CKD)Check reticulocyte count, Coombs test
Malar (butterfly) rashAcute cutaneous lupus — immune complex deposition in dermal-epidermal junction, UV-triggeredErythematous maculopapular rash in butterfly distribution over cheeks and bridge of nose, sparing nasolabial fold [2]
Oral ulcersMucosal vasculitisUsually painless [2]
AlopeciaNon-scarring (active SLE); scarring (discoid lupus)
ArthritisSymmetrical non-erosive small joint polyarthritis resembling RA [3]Morning stiffness typically in minutes (cf. > 1 hr in RA)
Livedo reticularisVasospasm / microthrombosis — especially if APLS coexistsPurple reticular pattern on skin
Raynaud's phenomenonVasospasm of digital arteries → white → blue → redPresent in ~20% of SLE

  • Urine multistix: RBC 3+ and protein 3+ → classic nephritic picture [7]
  • Dysmorphic RBCs on urine microscopy → confirm glomerular origin
  • RBC casts — pathognomonic of glomerulonephritis
  • WBC casts — may be present (active inflammation)

This summary ties together the classification and clinical features:

ClassClinical SyndromeKey Features
INormal / subclinicalNo symptoms; normal urinalysis or minimal changes detectable only on biopsy
IIAsymptomatic urinary abnormalitiesMicroscopic haematuria / proteinuria [1]
IIIAcute nephritic syndrome ± nephrotic featuresHaematuria / proteinuria / ↓GFR / hypertension / ± nephrotic [1]
IVAcute nephritic syndrome / RPGNMOST common and MOST severe; presents as RPGN (crescentic GN) [1]; rapid ↓GFR over days–weeks
VNephrotic syndromeProteinuria / nephrotic syndrome; presents as membranous GN [1]; insidious onset, often without haematuria
VIChronic kidney disease / ESRDIrreversible; shrunken kidneys; symptoms of uraemia

The Classic Exam Vignette

A 34-year-old Chinese lady with good past health presented with generalised malaise, pain over bilateral small hand joints and lower limb swelling. BP 152/92 mmHg. Urine multistix: RBC 3+ and protein 3+. [7]

This is lupus nephritis until proven otherwise. The triad of: (1) young female, (2) joint pain + constitutional symptoms, (3) nephritic urine + hypertension = classic presentation. Next steps: autoimmune serologies (ANA, anti-dsDNA, C3/C4) and renal biopsy.

APLS occurs in ~30% of SLE [2]. This is relevant to lupus nephritis because:

  • APLS can cause renal vein thrombosis → acute flank pain, worsening proteinuria
  • APLS can cause thrombotic microangiopathy in renal vessels → independent contributor to renal damage
  • Presence of APLS antibodies necessitates anticoagulation

8. Approach to a Patient Suspected of Lupus Nephritis

  1. Duration and onset of urinary symptoms (acute vs. insidious)
  2. SLE-related symptoms: rashes (malar, discoid, photosensitivity), oral ulcers, alopecia, joint pain, Raynaud's, serositis (pleurisy/pericarditis), neuropsychiatric symptoms
  3. Drug history: NSAIDs (common in MSK complaints — can worsen renal function), steroids, immunosuppressants, TCM [7]
  4. Obstetric history: recurrent miscarriages (APLS), complications of pregnancy
  5. Family history: autoimmune diseases, SLE
  6. Constitutional symptoms: fever, weight loss, fatigue
  7. Previous investigations: ANA status, prior renal function

  1. Vitals: BP (hypertension), temperature (fever → active SLE or infection)
  2. Fluid status: oedema (peripheral, periorbital, sacral), JVP, lung bases
  3. Skin: malar rash, discoid lesions, oral ulcers, alopecia, vasculitic rash, livedo reticularis
  4. Joints: swelling, tenderness (symmetrical small joints)
  5. Cardiopulmonary: pericardial rub, pleural effusion
  6. Abdomen: ascites, hepatosplenomegaly (rarely)
  7. Fundoscopy: if hypertensive — hypertensive retinopathy; if APLS — retinal vessel thrombosis

This is critically important because management is guided by histology [2]:

Indications for renal biopsy: [2]

  • Proteinuria > 0.5 g/day
  • Persistent haematuria
  • Raised creatinine not attributed to another mechanism

When to Biopsy — The 0.5g Rule

Many students forget that the threshold for biopsy in SLE is proteinuria > 0.5 g/day (not the 3.5 g nephrotic range). This is because even "moderate" proteinuria in SLE may indicate Class III/IV disease requiring aggressive immunosuppression. Don't wait for nephrotic-range proteinuria!


High Yield Summary

Definition: Lupus nephritis = renal inflammation in SLE caused by immune complex deposition in glomeruli → complement activation → tissue damage.

Epidemiology: ~50% of SLE patients; more common and severe in Asians and Afro-Caribbeans; risk factors include juvenile SLE, male sex, high anti-dsDNA, low complement.

Pathophysiology: Anti-dsDNA + nuclear antigens → immune complexes → deposit in mesangium (Class I/II), subendothelium (Class III/IV), subepithelium (Class V) → complement activation → inflammation ± podocyte injury.

Classification: ISN/RPS 6 classes:

  • Class I (minimal mesangial) → normal
  • Class II (mesangial proliferative) → microscopic haematuria/proteinuria
  • Class III (focal, < 50%) → nephritic ± nephrotic
  • Class IV (diffuse, ≥ 50%) → MOST common and MOST severe; RPGN
  • Class V (membranous) → nephrotic
  • Class VI (advanced sclerosing) → ESRD

Full-house staining (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) is pathognomonic for LN (esp. Class IV).

Activity index → guides immunosuppression intensity. Chronicity index → guides renoprotective strategy.

Biopsy indications: proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, persistent haematuria, unexplained ↑Cr.

Monitoring: Anti-dsDNA (↑ = active) + C3/C4 (↓ = active). ANA/anti-ENA NOT for monitoring.


Active Recall - Lupus Nephritis (Definition to Clinical Features)

[1] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Lupus nephritis section (p1000, p1728) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — Rheumatology, Lupus nephritis (p314–317) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology — SLE section (p69–75) [4] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrotology Teaching Clinic RTD — Normal kidney anatomy (p3) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chronic Kidney Disease and its Complications — Causes of CKD (p8) [6] Lecture slides: GC 057. Glomerular and Tubulo-interstitial Diseases and Acute Kidney Injury (p10) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrology Interactive Tutorial — Case 1 (p1)

Differential Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis

When you are faced with a patient who has features suspicious for lupus nephritis — say, a young woman with haematuria, proteinuria, hypertension, oedema, and perhaps some extra-renal clues — you need a systematic framework. The differential diagnosis operates at two levels:

  1. Level 1 — What is causing this glomerulonephritis? (i.e., DDx of the presenting clinical syndrome — nephritic, nephrotic, RPGN, or asymptomatic urinary abnormalities)
  2. Level 2 — Is it really lupus nephritis, or is this a different renal pathology in an SLE patient? (i.e., non-LN causes of renal dysfunction in SLE)

We will work through both levels systematically.


1. Level 1 — Differential Diagnosis by Clinical Syndrome

Lupus nephritis can present as virtually any glomerular syndrome. The DDx therefore depends on how the patient presents.

Nephritic syndrome is a common presentation of most proliferative glomerulonephritides (GN) [7].

The key diagnostic question: What is causing haematuria + proteinuria + hypertension + oedema + impaired renal function?

Differential diagnosis of acute nephritic syndrome: [7][8][9]

DiagnosisKey Distinguishing FeaturesComplementSerology
Lupus nephritisYoung female, SLE features (rash, arthritis, oral ulcers, alopecia, serositis), characteristic rash and arthritis suggest SLE [8][9]↓ C3/C4ANA +, anti-dsDNA +, anti-Sm +
Post-streptococcal GN (PSGN)URTI 7–10 days before [8][9]; children 2–10 yr; self-limiting↓ C3 (normalises by 4 weeks; if persists → consider lupus nephritis / MPGN) [2]ASOT ↑, anti-DNase B ↑
IgA nephropathySynpharyngitic haematuria (gross haematuria within 1–2 days of URTI — i.e., concurrent not delayed) [8][9]; commonest primary GNNormal C3/C4 (IgA-IgG IC does NOT activate complement) [8]↑ Serum IgA (50%)
ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA)Palpable purpura/petechial rash suggest vasculitis; triad of sinusitis, pulmonary infiltrates and nephritis suggest Wegener's [8][9]; older patientsNormal C3/C4ANCA + (c-ANCA/PR3 for GPA; p-ANCA/MPO for MPA)
Anti-GBM disease / Goodpasture syndromeHaemoptysis suggests pulmonary haemorrhage [8][9]; older patients (bimodal: young males, elderly)Normal C3/C4Anti-GBM +
Membranoproliferative GN (MPGN)Chronic; a/w HCV, cryoglobulinaemia, malignancy↓ C3/C4HCV Ab, cryocrit
Infective endocarditis-associated GNPersistent fever + new murmur; embolic phenomena↓ C3/C4Blood cultures +; echocardiogram
Cryoglobulinaemic GNPurpura, arthralgia, neuropathy; a/w HCV↓ C3/C4Cryocrit +
HSP / IgA vasculitisChildren; palpable purpura (lower limbs), abdominal pain, arthralgiaNormal C3/C4Clinical diagnosis

High Yield — Complement Levels as the Great Discriminator

Serum complement level is important in helping narrow the differential diagnosis: [8][9]

  • ↓ C3/C4 generally indicates IC-mediated GN → DDx: MPGN, PSGN, lupus, cryoglobulinaemia, IE and shunt nephritis [8][9]
  • Normal C3/C4 generally indicates non-IC-mediated GN (except IgAN) → DDx: PAN, Goodpasture, HSP/IgAN, ANCA-related renal vasculitis [8][9]

This single test dramatically narrows your differential. Lupus nephritis causes low C3 AND C4 (classical pathway consumption). PSGN typically only drops C3 (alternative pathway).

When lupus nephritis presents as nephrotic syndrome (heavy proteinuria, hypoalbuminaemia, oedema, hyperlipidaemia), the DDx shifts:

DiagnosisAge GroupDistinguishing Features
Minimal change disease (MCD)Children (most common cause); adults tooSelective proteinuria, normal complement, responds to steroids
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)Any ageNon-selective proteinuria, may have haematuria; HIV-associated (collapsing variant) [10]
Membranous nephropathy (primary)Adults > 40Anti-PLA2R antibody positive (~70%); a/w malignancy in elderly
Lupus nephritis Class VYoung femalesSLE features, anti-dsDNA +, ↓ C3/C4, full-house staining on biopsy
Diabetic nephropathyDiabetic patientsLong-standing DM, progressive proteinuria, retinopathy coexists
AmyloidosisOlder adultsCongo red +, apple-green birefringence; a/w myeloma, chronic inflammation
Membranous nephropathy (secondary)Any ageHBV most often induces membranous nephropathy; HCV most often induces MPGN [10]; malignancy; drugs (gold, penicillamine)

Age-based DDx for nephrotic and nephritic syndromes: [2]

AgeNephroticNephritic
< 15yMCD, FSGSPSGN, IgAN/HSP
15–40yMCD, FSGS, MembranousIgAN, PSGN, Lupus nephritis, RPGN
> 40yMCD, Membranous, DM, AmyloidosisPSGN, IgAN, RPGN

RPGN is a clinical syndrome but NOT a specific etiology of GN [2][11]. When LN presents as RPGN (creatinine doubling over days to weeks), the DDx is classified by IF staining pattern: [8][11]

TypeIF PatternCauseComplementKey Serology
Type ILinearAnti-GBM diseaseNormalAnti-GBM +
Type IIGranularImmune complex-mediated: SLE (LN), IgAN, PSGN, cryoglobulinaemia↓ (in LN, PSGN, MPGN)ANA, anti-dsDNA, ASOT, cryocrit
Type IIINegative (pauci-immune)ANCA-associated vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA)NormalANCA +

Lupus nephritis causing RPGN falls under Type II (granular IF) — it can complicate most GN commonly associated with nephritic syndrome (e.g. SLE, IgAN, PSGN) as an extreme form due to extensive endothelial injury [11].

High Yield — RPGN Classification by IF

Classification of RPGN is based on IF staining pattern: [8][11]

  • Type I (linear staining) = anti-GBM disease
  • Type II (granular staining) = immune complex RPGN — this is where lupus nephritis falls
  • Type III (negative staining) = pauci-immune RPGN, usually ANCA-positive

This classification directly determines management. Lupus nephritis RPGN = high-dose steroids + cyclophosphamide/MMF. Anti-GBM = plasmapheresis. ANCA-vasculitis = rituximab/cyclophosphamide.


Not every renal problem in an SLE patient is lupus nephritis. Renal involvement in SLE is NOT limited to glomerular disease — may have tubulointerstitial (tubulointerstitial nephritis) or vascular (RVT, RAS due to antiphospholipid syndrome) involvement [12].

DiagnosisMechanismClue
Lupus nephritis (Class I–VI)IC deposition in glomeruliActive sediment (dysmorphic RBCs, casts), proteinuria, ↑anti-dsDNA, ↓C3/C4
Drug-induced AKI (NSAIDs)NSAIDs inhibit prostanoid production → impaired regulation of renal blood flow [13]; also cause TIN and GNAsk for drug history — NSAIDs possible given MSK complaints [7]; bland sediment; eosinophiluria if TIN
Drug-induced TINHypersensitivity reaction to drugs (NSAIDs, antibiotics, PPIs)Fever, rash, eosinophilia, eosinophiluria, WBC casts; may mimic LN flare
Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)APLS-associated or TTP-like; microthrombi in renal vesselsSchistocytes on blood film, ↓ platelets, ↑ LDH, ↓ haptoglobin
Antiphospholipid nephropathyMicrovascular thrombosis in renal arteries/arteriolesHypertension, bland sediment, APLS antibodies +; biopsy shows thrombotic lesions
Renal vein thrombosisNephrotic syndrome → hypercoagulable state; or APLSAcute flank pain, haematuria, sudden ↑ proteinuria; CT venography diagnostic
Lupus tubulointerstitial nephritisIC deposition in tubular basement membranesTubular dysfunction (↓ concentration ability) [12]; distal RTA (Type 1)
Hypertensive nephrosclerosisChronic hypertension → afferent arteriolar sclerosisLong-standing HTN, proteinuria < 1 g/day, bland sediment
InfectionImmunosuppressed patients → UTI, sepsisFever, pyuria, positive urine culture, ↑ CRP (active SLE doesn't usually evoke ↑CRP — CRP elevation likely due to infection [3])
TCM nephrotoxicityAristolochic acid, heavy metalsHistory of TCM use; tubular injury pattern

CRP — The Infection Discriminator

Active SLE does not usually evoke ↑ CRP. If CRP is elevated, think infection [3]. This is a very useful clinical pearl — most autoimmune diseases raise ESR but SLE characteristically keeps CRP normal unless there is concomitant infection, serositis, or active arthritis.


3. Approach to Narrowing the Differential

The workup for glomerulonephritis includes: [14]

  • Autoimmune markers: ANA, Anti-dsDNA, C3/4, ANCA, Anti-GBM, CRP, cryoglobulins
  • Exclude infective causes (e.g. HBV/HCV/HIV/VDRL/malaria)
  • Malignancy screen (e.g. tumour markers, SIEP) especially in elderly
  • Renal biopsy: LM/IF/EM findings → Diagnosis, guide treatment decisions and prognosis

Suggestive clinical findings to ask about: [8][9]

CluePoints Towards
Relationship with URTI: URTI 7–10 days before = PSGN; concurrent = IgAN [8][9]PSGN vs. IgA nephropathy
Palpable purpura / petechial rash → vasculitis [8][9]ANCA vasculitis, HSP, cryoglobulinaemia
Haemoptysis → pulmonary haemorrhage [8][9]Goodpasture, GPA, MPA
Triad of sinusitis, pulmonary infiltrates and nephritis → Wegener's (GPA) [8][9]GPA
Characteristic rash and arthritis → SLE [8][9]Lupus nephritis
Hair loss, oral ulcers, rashes, photosensitivity [7]Lupus nephritis
Drug history — NSAIDs [7]Drug-induced AKI / TIN

Renal biopsy is necessary for most cases of nephritic syndrome [8][9] unless kidneys are very small on ultrasound (suggesting chronic irreversible disease).

Immunofluorescence pattern is the most helpful for diagnosis: [8][9]

IF PatternDiagnosis
Full-house (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q)Lupus nephritis (virtually pathognomonic) [1]
Dominant IgAIgA nephropathy / HSP nephritis
Linear IgG along GBMAnti-GBM disease
Granular IgG + C3Immune complex GN (PSGN, MPGN, cryoglobulinaemia)
Pauci-immune (negative/minimal)ANCA-associated vasculitis

The differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis is best understood as three concentric circles:

  1. Innermost circle: Confirming it is lupus nephritis → SLE features + active sediment + anti-dsDNA ↑ + C3/C4 ↓ + full-house IF on biopsy
  2. Middle circle: Other glomerulonephritides that mimic the same clinical syndrome → use complement, serology, and IF pattern to differentiate
  3. Outermost circle: Non-GN renal pathologies in SLE patients → drug-induced (NSAIDs), TMA/APLS nephropathy, TIN, infection, hypertensive nephrosclerosis

High Yield Summary

DDx of Lupus Nephritis — Key Framework:

  1. By complement level:

    • Low C3/C4 (IC-mediated): Lupus nephritis, PSGN, MPGN, cryoglobulinaemia, IE
    • Normal C3/C4 (non-IC): ANCA vasculitis, anti-GBM disease, IgA nephropathy, HSP
  2. By RPGN IF pattern:

    • Type I (linear) = Anti-GBM
    • Type II (granular) = Lupus nephritis, PSGN, IgAN, cryoglobulinaemia
    • Type III (pauci-immune) = ANCA vasculitis
  3. Non-LN renal disease in SLE:

    • Drug-induced (NSAIDs), APLS nephropathy/TMA, TIN, infection, hypertensive nephrosclerosis
  4. Key discriminators:

    • Full-house IF staining = lupus nephritis
    • CRP ↑ in SLE = think infection, not flare
    • URTI 7–10 days before = PSGN; concurrent = IgAN
    • Characteristic rash + arthritis = SLE
  5. Renal biopsy is the definitive investigation — needed for most cases of nephritic syndrome.


Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis

References

[1] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Lupus nephritis section (p1000, p1728) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — Nephrology, GN section (p229–233) and Lupus nephritis (p315–317) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology — SLE section (p70, p73, p75) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrology Interactive Tutorial — Case 1 (p1) [8] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes — Nephritic syndrome evaluation (p325–326) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital — GN evaluation (p63); Ryan Ho Fundamentals — GN evaluation (p360–361) [10] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — GN diagnosis (p995, p1008); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) — GN diagnosis (p402, p415, p421) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals — RPGN (p361); Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes — RPGN (p326) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital — Lupus nephritis (p87) [13] Senior notes: Block A – Nephrology Data Interpretation — Drug-induced AKI (p11) [14] Lecture slides: Introduction-kidney-Ix (p23) [15] Lecture slides: GC 057. Glomerular and Tubulo-interstitial Diseases and Acute Kidney Injury (p16) [16] Lecture slides: GC_Interactive tutorial (Nephr case 1) student copy (p1)

Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Lupus Nephritis


1. Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of lupus nephritis requires two things: (A) establishing that the patient has SLE, and (B) confirming that the kidney is involved and determining the histological class. Let's work through both.

1.1 Establishing the Diagnosis of SLE

Before you can diagnose lupus nephritis, you need to confirm the patient has lupus. Two major classification systems are used:

Classification criteria: EULAR/ACR criteria 2019 — 7 clinical domains + 3 immunological domains. SLE if ANA positive + total score of ≥ 10 [2].

  • Entry criterion: ANA positive (≥ 1:80 on HEp-2 cells or equivalent)
  • If ANA is negative, you cannot classify the patient as SLE under this system
  • Then, additive weighted scoring across 10 domains; each domain counts its highest-weighted criterion only
  • Total score ≥ 10 → classified as SLE

Key renal domain scoring in 2019 EULAR/ACR:

FindingScore
Proteinuria > 0.5 g/24h+4
Class II or V LN on biopsy+8
Class III or IV LN on biopsy+10 (highest single-criterion score)

This tells you how heavily renal involvement weighs in the classification — a patient with biopsy-proven Class III/IV LN and positive ANA already scores ≥ 10 on that criterion alone.

SLICC criteria: 4 out of 17 criteria including at least 1 clinical criterion and 1 immunological criterion (OR) biopsy-proven lupus nephritis with +ve ANA or anti-dsDNA [1][3][17].

This is a critical point:

High Yield — SLICC Shortcut

Under SLICC criteria, biopsy-proven lupus nephritis with positive ANA or anti-dsDNA is sufficient to diagnose SLE — even if the patient does not meet 4 out of 17 criteria [1][3][17]. This reflects the clinical reality that some patients present first with isolated nephritis before developing other SLE manifestations.

Advantages of SLICC over ACR: allows diagnosis solely based on biopsy-proven lupus nephritis; avoids duplication of correlated cutaneous features; includes more cutaneous, neurologic and immunologic criteria; greater sensitivity (97% vs 83%) but lower specificity (84% vs 96%) [3].

SLICC Renal criterion [1][17]:

  • Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine protein representing 500 mg protein/24 hours
  • Red blood cell casts

SLICC Immunological criteria (at least 1 needed) [1][17]:

CriterionNotes
ANAAbove lab reference range
Anti-dsDNAAbove lab reference range (except ELISA: 2× above)
Anti-SmPositive
Antiphospholipid AbLupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-GPI, or false-positive VDRL
Low complementLow C3, low C4, or low CH50
Direct Coombs testPositive (in absence of haemolytic anaemia)

Once SLE is established (or strongly suspected), the question is: when does renal involvement warrant a biopsy?

Indications for renal biopsy in SLE [2][12]:

  • Proteinuria > 0.5 g/day (or uPCR > 50 mg/mmol)
  • Persistent haematuria (especially with dysmorphic RBCs or RBC casts)
  • Raised creatinine not attributed to another mechanism

This is important because management is guided by histology [2]. You cannot treat lupus nephritis properly without knowing the class.

Timing: generally recommend immediately (delayed biopsy associated with ↑ risk of ESRD) [12].

High Yield — Diagnostic Criteria for Lupus Nephritis Itself

Strictly speaking, the "diagnostic criteria" for lupus nephritis are:

  1. Clinical evidence of SLE (or at minimum, positive ANA/anti-dsDNA)
  2. Evidence of renal involvement: proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, active urinary sediment, unexplained rising Cr
  3. Renal biopsy confirming immune complex-mediated GN with characteristic LN histology

There is no standalone "diagnostic criteria set" for LN apart from SLE criteria + biopsy-confirmed renal disease classified by ISN/RPS.


Here is the systematic approach to a patient with suspected lupus nephritis:

2.1 Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Step 1 — Clinical Suspicion

  • Young female with nephritic or nephrotic features
  • Ask about autoimmune features: hair loss, oral ulcers, rashes, photosensitivity → lupus nephritis [7]
  • Ask about drug history: NSAIDs possible given MSK complaints [7]
  • Investigate bilateral small hand joints + specific involvement [7]

Step 2 — Screening Serology

  • ANA is the entry criterion — if negative, SLE is essentially excluded (sensitivity > 95%) [2][3]
  • ANA: most sensitive, entry criteria for diagnosis [2]
  • ANA titre ≥ 1:80 as cut-off in QMH [3]

Step 3 — Confirmatory Serology

  • Anti-dsDNA: highly specific, for diagnosis AND monitoring [2][3]
  • Anti-dsDNA: occurs in ~60% of patients with SLE; highly specific; titre correlates with overall disease activity; may be associated with lupus nephritis [18]
  • C3/C4: low in active disease (esp. C3) — consumption of complement for opsonization of IC [2]
  • Full autoimmune panel: anti-Sm, anti-ENA (Ro, La, RNP), antiphospholipid antibodies

Step 4 — Assess Renal Involvement

  • Urinalysis: dipstick for blood and protein; urine microscopy for dysmorphic RBCs and casts
  • Quantify proteinuria: spot uPCR or 24-hour urine protein
  • RFT: serum creatinine, urea, eGFR

Step 5 — Renal Biopsy (if criteria met)

  • USG kidneys: exclude concomitant abnormalities (e.g. renal stones); confirm kidneys are not shrunken before proceeding to renal biopsy [1]
  • Normal clotting and haemostatic parameters including platelet count must be ensured before proceeding to renal biopsy [1]
  • Biopsy is processed for LM, IF, and EM — all three are needed

Step 6 — Classify and Plan Treatment

  • ISN/RPS classification (Class I–VI)
  • Activity index + Chronicity index [2]
  • Repeat biopsy if disease progresses [2][12]

3. Investigation Modalities — Systematic Approach

InvestigationWhat to Look ForInterpretation
Urine dipstickBlood, proteinRBC 3+ and protein 3+ = nephritic picture [7]; protein alone = nephrotic
Urine microscopyDysmorphic RBCs, RBC casts → glomerular haematuria [8][9]RBC casts are pathognomonic of glomerulonephritis; WBC casts suggest interstitial nephritis or pyelonephritis
BP measurementHypertensionBP 152/92 in a young woman → consider nephritis [7]
Fluid statusOedema, JVP, lung basesNephritic (volume overload) vs. nephrotic (oncotic) oedema

3.2 Blood Investigations

InvestigationExpected Finding in LNWhy
CBC with differential [8]NcNc anaemia with ↓ Hct (anaemia of chronic disease or AIHA); leukopenia (< 4000); lymphopenia (< 1000); thrombocytopenia (< 100,000)SLE causes pancytopenia via autoantibodies (Type II HSR) and bone marrow suppression; haemolytic anaemia via anti-RBC antibodies
RFT (Cr, urea, eGFR) [8][4]Raised creatinine, raised urea, ↓ eGFRDocument degree of renal impairment [8]; Cr > 250 μmol/L at diagnosis in RPGN
Serum albuminLow (< 30 g/L if nephrotic)Heavy proteinuria → urinary albumin loss → hypoalbuminaemia
LFT↓ Albumin; check to rule out ↓ production from liver disease [3]Check LFT to rule out decreased production in liver disease when interpreting low complement [3]
Lipid profileHyperlipidaemia (if nephrotic)Liver compensates for albumin loss by ↑ lipoprotein synthesis
ESRUsually increased [8]Non-specific marker of inflammation; elevated by ↑ immunoglobulins
CRPUsually normal or mildly elevatedActive SLE doesn't evoke ↑ CRP → if elevated, likely infection [3]; may be elevated in serositis, arthritis, or vasculitis
DAT (Direct Coombs)May be positiveAutoimmune haemolytic anaemia in SLE
Clotting profile↑ APTT (if lupus anticoagulant present)APLS coexists in ~30% of SLE; paradoxically, ↑ APTT = thrombotic risk
FBG/lipidsScreen CV riskScreen and control CVS risk factors [2]

ESR vs CRP in SLE — A Critical Distinction

In most inflammatory diseases, ESR and CRP rise together. In SLE, ESR rises but CRP stays normal during flares. This is because CRP is an acute-phase reactant driven by IL-6, and SLE flares produce relatively little IL-6 compared to infections.

If CRP is elevated in SLE → think infection, not flare [3]. This principle helps you distinguish a lupus flare from infection in a febrile immunosuppressed patient — a life-or-death distinction on the ward.

Work up for glomerulonephritis includes autoimmune markers: ANA, Anti-dsDNA, C3/4, ANCA, Anti-GBM, CRP, cryoglobulins [14].

MarkerResult in LNSensitivity/SpecificityRoleClinical Notes
ANAPositive (usually ≥ 1:160)Most sensitive (> 95% in SLE) but non-specific [2][3]Entry criterion for diagnosis; NOT for monitoring [3]+ve in 5–15% of normal population; also +ve in other CTDs
Anti-dsDNAPositive (elevated titre)Highly specific (~60% sensitivity) [3][18]For diagnosis AND monitoring (esp. lupus nephritis) [2][3][18]Titre correlates with overall disease activity [18]
Anti-SmPositive in 10–30%Most specific for SLE [2]Diagnosis; associated with neurological involvement
C3/C4Low (both, due to classical pathway)N/AFor diagnosis AND monitoring [2][3]Low in active disease → consumption of C' for opsonization of IC [2]
Anti-ENA panel (Ro, La, RNP)VariableNot specific/sensitive for SLE individuallyDiagnosis and prognosis on complicationsIf negative, repeat regularly; if positive, no need to repeat (no correlation with disease activity) [3]
Antiphospholipid AbPositive in ~40% of SLEN/AScreen for APLSLupus anticoagulant (most thrombogenic), anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-GPI

Monitoring of disease activity: NO role for ANA and anti-ENA [3].

Anti-dsDNA: occurs in ~60% of patients with SLE. Highly specific for SLE. Is one of the classification criteria for SLE. Titre correlates with overall disease activity. May be associated with lupus nephritis. [18]

Exclude infective causes (e.g. HBV/HCV/HIV/VDRL/malaria) [14]:

TestPurpose
HBV serology (HBsAg, HBeAg)HBV → membranous nephropathy; also important before starting immunosuppression (risk of reactivation)
HCV serology (anti-HCV)HCV → MPGN / cryoglobulinaemia
HIV serologyHIV → collapsing FSGS
VDRLSyphilis → membranous nephropathy; also false-positive VDRL is a criterion for APLS

Malignancy screen (e.g. tumour markers, SIEP) especially in elderly [14]:

  • Serum/urine immunofixation electrophoresis (SIEP) and serum free light chains → amyloidosis, myeloma

Other serologies to distinguish from DDx:

TestPurpose
ANCA (and subtypes) [8][9]Screen for ANCA vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA)
Anti-GBM [8][9]Screen for anti-GBM disease / Goodpasture
ASOT (anti-streptolysin O) [8][9]Confirm recent streptococcal infection (PSGN)
Cryocrit [8][9]Cryoglobulinaemia
Blood culture [8][9]Infective endocarditis

InvestigationExpected FindingInterpretation
Urine dipstickBlood +++, Protein +++Screening; not quantitative
Urine microscopyDysmorphic RBCs, RBC casts [8][9]RBC casts = diagnostic of intrarenal/glomerular origin [15]; proteinuria + haematuria + dysmorphic RBC + RBC casts = proliferative glomerular disease (nephritic pattern) [15]
24-hour urine protein> 0.5 g/day (biopsy threshold); may be nephrotic (> 3.5 g/day)Likely to show heavy proteinuria in nephrotic range in active LN [1]
Spot uPCR (urine protein:creatinine ratio)> 50 mg/mmol (≈ 0.5 g/day)Convenient alternative to 24h collection
Creatinine clearance (24h urine)ReducedLikely to show impaired renal function [1]
Urine cultureNegative (sterile pyuria)Rule out UTI; pyuria + negative culture = "sterile pyuria" (consider interstitial nephritis or GN)

Interpreting Urinalysis Findings

Urinalysis interpretation: [15]

  • Proteinuria + Haematuria + Dysmorphic RBC + RBC casts → Proliferative glomerular disease (nephritic pattern)
  • Heavy proteinuria + NO haematuria → Non-proliferative glomerular disease (nephrotic pattern) / DM nephropathy / Amyloidosis
  • Granular or epithelial cell casts + Renal tubular epithelial cells → Tubulointerstitial nephritis / ATN
  • Pyuria → UTI / Interstitial nephritis / Nephrolithiasis

InvestigationPurposeExpected Finding
USG kidneysExclude concomitant abnormalities such as renal stones; confirm kidneys are not shrunken before proceeding to renal biopsy [1]Normal-sized kidneys in active LN; shrunken kidneys = chronic damage (Class VI / CKD — biopsy less useful)
CXRScreen for pulmonary involvement (pleural effusion, pulmonary oedema, pulmonary haemorrhage if Goodpasture/vasculitis in DDx)Pleural effusion (SLE serositis or fluid overload); bilateral infiltrates if pulmonary haemorrhage
CT thorax / DLCOFor pulmonary involvement if cough ± haemoptysis [8][9]Pulmonary haemorrhage → ↑ DLCO (counter-intuitively, because blood in alveoli absorbs CO)
EchocardiogramSLE cardiac involvement; for IE if persistent fever + murmur [8][9]Pericardial effusion, Libman-Sacks endocarditis (sterile vegetations), valvular dysfunction

3.5 Renal Biopsy — The Gold Standard

Renal biopsy: LM/IF/EM findings → Diagnosis, guide treatment decisions and prognosis [14].

Renal biopsy is necessary for most cases of nephritic syndrome unless very small kidney on USG [8][9].

ItemRationale
Normal clotting and haemostatic parameters including platelet count [1]Biopsy involves puncturing a highly vascularised organ; SLE patients may have thrombocytopenia or APLS
USG kidneys: confirm not shrunken [1]Shrunken kidneys = chronic irreversible disease; biopsy unlikely to change management
BP controlled↓ Risk of post-biopsy haemorrhage
Stop anticoagulants/antiplatelets↓ Bleeding risk
ModalityWhat It ShowsKey LN Findings
Light Microscopy (LM)Overall architecture, cellularity, sclerosis, crescentsMesangial expansion (Class II); endocapillary proliferation (III/IV); crescents (IV); thickened capillary walls / "wire loops" (IV); global sclerosis (VI)
Immunofluorescence (IF)Pattern and type of immune depositsFull-house staining: ALL IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C1q (pathognomonic of LN, esp. Class IV) [1]; mesangial deposits (I/II); subendothelial (III/IV); subepithelial (V)
Electron Microscopy (EM)Precise location of deposits; foot process effacementElectron-dense deposits in mesangium, subendothelium, or subepithelium; reticular aggregates (tubuloreticular inclusions) — virtually pathognomonic of LN (interferon footprint)

Immunofluorescence pattern is most helpful for diagnosis [8][9].

ClassLMIFEMActivity/Chronicity
INormalMesangial immune depositsMesangial dense deposits—
IIMesangial hypercellularity + matrix expansionMesangial immune depositsMesangial ± rare subepithelial/subendothelialLow AI, low CI
III< 50% glomeruli: segmental/global endocapillary proliferation, fibrinoid necrosisSubendothelial + mesangial depositsSubendothelial + mesangialActive (A), Chronic (C), or A/C
IV≥ 50% glomeruli: diffuse endocapillary proliferation, crescents, wire loopsFull-house stainingSubendothelial (massive) + mesangialHighest AI; variable CI
VThickened glomerular capillary wallSubepithelial + mesangial depositsSubepithelial "spike and dome"Low AI unless combined with III/IV
VIGlobal sclerosis of nearly all (≥ 90%) glomerular capillariesVariable, often attenuatedScarredVery high CI

Wire Loops and Tubuloreticular Inclusions

"Wire loop" lesions on LM = thickened capillary walls due to massive subendothelial immune complex deposits (Class IV). They look like loops of wire under the microscope because the GBM is so thickened.

Tubuloreticular inclusions (TRIs) on EM = organised structures within endothelial cell endoplasmic reticulum, thought to be an "interferon footprint." While not exclusive to LN, they are very suggestive and support the diagnosis.

Repeat biopsy if disease progresses [2]:

  • Development of active sediments in a patient with previous lupus membranous nephropathy [12]
  • Slowly rising serum Cr or persistent proteinuria but with inactive urine sediments → to rule out non-immunological progression into Class VI LN (where immunosuppression is not helpful) [12]
  • NOT done if high clinical likelihood of a certain subtype, e.g. ↓↓ C3/C4 with recurrent glomerular haematuria → can treat empirically as flare of proliferative LN [12]

InvestigationWhen to OrderExpected Finding If Positive
ASOT / anti-DNase BRecent URTI 7–10 days priorConfirms recent strep infection → PSGN
Throat swabAcute pharyngitisGroup A Streptococcus
ANCA + subtypesSuspected vasculitisc-ANCA/PR3 → GPA; p-ANCA/MPO → MPA
Anti-GBM AbHaemoptysis + nephritisLinear IgG on IF → Goodpasture
CryocritPurpura + HCV + nephritisCryoglobulins → cryoglobulinaemic GN
Blood culturePersistent fever + murmurIE-associated GN

Persistently low C3 > 8 weeks raises the possibility of lupus nephritis or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis [19].

DiseaseC3C4Explanation
Lupus nephritis↓↓Classical pathway activation (C1q → C4 → C2 → C3) consumes both
PSGN↓NormalPredominantly alternative pathway activation; C3 normalises by 4–8 weeks
MPGN (Type I)↓↓Classical pathway
MPGN (C3 glomerulopathy)↓↓NormalAlternative pathway dysregulation
Cryoglobulinaemia↓↓↓Classical pathway; C4 characteristically very low
Anti-GBMNormalNormalNot complement-mediated
ANCA vasculitisNormalNormalPauci-immune
IgA nephropathyNormalNormalIgA does not efficiently activate complement

Investigation CategoryTestsKey Findings in LN
BedsideUrine dipstick, BP, fluid assessmentBlood +++, Protein +++, HTN, oedema
UrineMicroscopy, 24h protein/uPCR, CrClDysmorphic RBCs, RBC casts, proteinuria > 0.5 g/d
Basic bloodsCBC, RFT, albumin, ESR/CRP, LFTPancytopenia, ↑ Cr, ↓ albumin, ↑ ESR with normal CRP
AutoimmuneANA, anti-dsDNA, C3/C4, anti-Sm, anti-ENA, APLS AbANA+, anti-dsDNA+, ↓ C3/C4
Exclude other causesHBV/HCV/HIV, VDRL, ANCA, anti-GBM, ASOT, cryocritNegative (if LN); positive → alternative DDx
ImagingUSG kidneys, CXRNormal-sized kidneys, ± pleural effusion/pulmonary oedema
BiopsyLM, IF, EMClass-specific findings; full-house IF; activity + chronicity indices

High Yield Summary

Diagnostic Criteria:

  • EULAR/ACR 2019: ANA+ entry criterion + total score ≥ 10 (Class III/IV LN scores 10 alone)
  • SLICC 2012: 4/17 criteria (≥ 1 clinical + ≥ 1 immunological) OR biopsy-proven LN with ANA/anti-dsDNA+

Biopsy Indications:

  • Proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, persistent haematuria, raised Cr not otherwise explained
  • Pre-biopsy: USG (confirm normal size), clotting, platelet count

Key Serological Workup:

  • ANA (screening), anti-dsDNA (diagnosis + monitoring), C3/C4 (diagnosis + monitoring)
  • ANA/anti-ENA NOT for monitoring; anti-dsDNA + C3/C4 ARE for monitoring
  • CRP ↑ → think infection, not SLE flare

Biopsy Interpretation:

  • Full-house staining (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) is pathognomonic of LN
  • Activity Index → determines immunosuppression intensity
  • Chronicity Index → determines renoprotective strategy
  • Repeat biopsy if disease progresses

Complement Interpretation:

  • Low C3 + C4 → lupus nephritis, MPGN, cryoglobulinaemia
  • Low C3 only → PSGN (normalises by 4–8 weeks; if persists → consider LN/MPGN)
  • Normal C3/C4 → ANCA vasculitis, anti-GBM, IgAN

Active Recall - Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm and Investigations for Lupus Nephritis

References

[1] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Case study (p1734); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — Case study (p728) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — Rheumatology, SLE investigations and Lupus nephritis (p315, p317) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology — SLE diagnostic workup, SLICC criteria, ANA/anti-dsDNA/complement interpretation (p73–75) [4] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrotology Teaching Clinic RTD — Diagnosis of renal diseases (p3) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrology Interactive Tutorial — Case 1 (p1) [8] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes — Nephritic syndrome evaluation (p325) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals — GN evaluation (p360); Ryan Ho Urogenital — GN evaluation (p63) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital — Lupus nephritis diagnostic evaluation and repeat biopsy indications (p88) [14] Lecture slides: Introduction-kidney-Ix (p23); Lecture slides: Nephrology - ntroduction to Renal Investigation (p23) [15] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Urinalysis interpretation (p928) [17] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — SLICC criteria (p1723); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — SLICC criteria (p717) [18] Lecture slides: GC 046. Facial rash and painful fingers_SLE (p53) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Glomerular and Tubulo-interstitial Diseases and Acute Kidney Injury — PSGN complement (p19)

Management Algorithm and Treatment Modalities for Lupus Nephritis

Management of lupus nephritis is one of the most commonly tested SAQ topics in HKUMed summatives. The overarching principle is straightforward: management is guided by histology [2]. You cannot properly treat lupus nephritis without a renal biopsy telling you the ISN/RPS class, the activity index, and the chronicity index. Treatment then follows a two-phase strategy — induction (hit hard, induce remission) followed by maintenance (keep remission, minimise drug toxicity).



2. Non-Immunosuppressive Therapy — For ALL Classes

Non-immunosuppressive therapy in ALL instances of CKD [12]. These measures apply to every lupus nephritis patient regardless of class. Think of them as the "foundation" upon which immunosuppression is built.

HCQ: indicated for ALL SLE patients unless contraindicated [1][3][20].

Name breakdown: Hydroxychloroquine — "hydroxy" = hydroxylated derivative of "chloroquine" (originally an anti-malarial). It is an immunomodulator, NOT an immunosuppressant.

FeatureDetail
IndicationALL patients [1][20]
BenefitsReduces flare rate, organ damage and mortality; VERY effective in relieving constitutional symptoms, MSS and skin manifestations [1][20]
MechanismInhibits TLR7/9 signalling in plasmacytoid dendritic cells → ↓ interferon-α production → ↓ B cell activation and autoantibody production; also stabilises lysosomes, inhibits antigen presentation
Dosage< 5 mg/kg/day (2020 updated ophthalmology guideline lowered from previous 6.5 mg/kg limit to reduce retinal toxicity risk)
Key side effectsGI disturbances (MOST common side effect necessitating discontinuation — nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea) [1][20]
Retinopathy (Bull's eye maculopathy) — baseline ophthalmological examination required; annual screening required after 5 years of usage [1][20]
Hyperpigmentation; myopathy and neuropathy; corneal deposition [1][20]
Special noteHCQ is NOT immunosuppressive [1][20]; smoking associated with poor response to HCQ [2][3]

High Yield — HCQ for ALL SLE Patients

HCQ is the backbone of SLE management. It should be given to ALL patients with SLE unless contraindicated. It reduces flares, prevents organ damage, improves survival, has anti-thrombotic properties, and improves lipid profiles. In lupus nephritis specifically, HCQ has been shown to reduce the risk of renal flares and improve renal survival. Never forget to prescribe it.

Anti-proteinuric therapy by ACEI/ARB: indicated in ALL glomerulopathy [21].

FeatureDetail
Mechanism↓ intraglomerular pressure → ↓ proteinuria, which is associated with ↓ rate of GFR decline [21]
Proteinuria goalUACR < 500–1000 mg/g or 24h protein < 1 g/day; if cannot be achieved, aim ≥ 50–60% ↓ urine protein to non-nephrotic range [12]
Additional benefitsACEI/ARB ↓ efferent arteriolar tone → ↓ glomerular hypertension → renoprotection; also may ↓ hepatic lipoprotein production by reducing albumin loss [21]
MonitoringCheck K+ and Cr 1–2 weeks after initiation — expect small Cr rise (up to 30% acceptable); hyperkalaemia risk
ContraindicationsBilateral renal artery stenosis; pregnancy; severe hyperkalaemia

Chronic kidney disease → ACEI or ARB is a compelling indication for these drugs in hypertension management [22].

Aggressive BP control: indicated in all patients with CKD. More intensive BP lowering associated with ↓ mortality and ↓ risk of ESRD [12].

  • BP target: 120–125/ < 80 for HBPM, 125–130/ < 80 for office BP [12]
  • First-line: ACEI/ARB (dual benefit: BP + anti-proteinuric)
  • Add CCB or diuretic if needed

Lipid-lowering therapy: indicated in all CKD patients as CKD is a major RF for CVD [12].

  • Statins are first-line; weak evidence that statins may slow CKD progression [12]
  • Chronicity index (degree of sclerosis, fibrosis) → prevent further worsening by CV risk control (ACEI, statins) [2]

Anti-oedema therapy: salt restriction and diuretics [21]:

  • Dietary sodium restricted to ~2 g/day
  • Loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide) usually preferred; can add thiazide or K+-sparing if inadequate [21]
  • Monitor: fluid status (avoid hypovolaemia from underfilling) and serum K+

Anticoagulation may be considered in high-risk nephrotic syndrome patients [12]:

  • Nephrotic syndrome is a hypercoagulable state (loss of antithrombin III, protein C/S in urine; ↑ hepatic production of fibrinogen)
  • Prophylactic anticoagulation not routinely indicated unless thrombosis occurs or very high risk (e.g. serum albumin < 20 g/L + membranous pattern)
  • If APLS coexists (30% of SLE) → anticoagulation may be needed independently

General care for all SLE patients: [2][3]

  • Sun protection: avoid UV light, use umbrella, long-sleeve clothes, SPF15+ sun lotion [2]
  • Exercise and smoking cessation (affect response to HCQ) [2]
  • Vaccination (pneumococcal vaccination indicated for ALL as pneumococcal infection is common [21]; avoid live vaccines on immunosuppression)
  • Screen and control CVS risk factors [2]
  • Avoid offending drugs and OCP [2]
  • Infection control [3]
  • Regular monitoring: check BP and urine dipstick every visit; regular blood test on disease activity (anti-dsDNA, C3/4, ESR, CBC, L/RFT) [3]
  • Eye check before HCQ and every year after 5 years [3]
  • Counselling: explain disease, drug compliance, pregnancy issues and fertility issues; poor compliance is a major RF of poor prognosis [3]

3. Immunosuppressive Therapy — Class-Specific

Indications of immunosuppressants (EULAR): [2]

  • Active Class III / IV
  • Class III + V / Class IV + V
  • Pure Class V + proteinuria > 1 g/day despite anti-proteinurics (e.g. ACEI)

For Class V alone with concurrent proliferative LN (i.e., Class III+V or IV+V), should be treated according to the proliferative lesion [12].

This is the table you need to know cold for exams:

ClassManagementDetails
I — Minimal mesangialConservative Tx (BP control, RAAS inhibitor, HCQ) [2]No treatment (probably will not have a biopsy done due to minimal proteinuria) [1]
II — Mesangial proliferativeConservative Tx (BP control, RAAS inhibitor, HCQ) [2]Consider low-dose steroids if proteinuria > 1 g/day, ↑ anti-dsDNA or ↓ C3 [2]
III — Focal (< 50%)Induction + Maintenance immunosuppressionSee below
IV — Diffuse (≥ 50%)Induction + Maintenance immunosuppressionMOST common and MOST severe form [1]
V — MembranousImmunosuppression if proteinuria > 1 g/day despite ACEIMedium-dose steroids + steroid-sparing
VI — Advanced sclerosingESRD planning [2]Dialysis or transplantation (patient already in ESRD) [1]; immunosuppression NOT helpful [12]

3.3 Induction Therapy — Class III/IV (The Most Important Regimen)

Induction (6 months): high-dose steroid + IV MMF / cyclophosphamide [2].

Goal: Rapidly suppress active inflammation to prevent irreversible glomerular damage.

High-dose: 1 mg/kg/day (oral prednisolone) ± Pulse: IV methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 days [1][3][12].

RouteDoseWhen
IV pulse methylprednisolone0.5–1 g/day for 3 days [3]Severe/life-threatening major organ involvement; RPGN presentation
Oral prednisolone1 mg/kg/day (high-dose) [1]After IV pulse, then taper gradually
TaperUsually reduce by 5–10 mg every 1–2 weeksAim ≤ 7.5 mg/day by 3–6 months

Why high-dose steroids? Glucocorticoids are the most rapidly acting immunosuppressants available. They:

  • Suppress NF-κB → ↓ cytokine production (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α)
  • ↓ T and B cell activation
  • ↓ Neutrophil migration and adhesion
  • ↓ Complement-mediated damage

But they have devastating long-term side effects (osteoporosis, diabetes, cataracts, AVN, infection, Cushingoid features), hence the need for a steroid-sparing agent.

MMF: lupus nephritis (preferred over CYC) [1][20].

Name breakdown: Mycophenolate = "myco" (from fungus, as it was originally isolated from Penicillium) + "phenolate" (chemical structure). Mofetil = morpholinoethyl ester prodrug.

FeatureDetail
MechanismInhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) → blocks de novo purine synthesis → selectively inhibits T and B lymphocyte proliferation (lymphocytes uniquely depend on the de novo pathway, unlike other cells which can use the salvage pathway)
DoseInduction: 2–3 g/day (divided BD)
PregnancyCategory D — teratogenic; must use contraception [1][20]
Side effectsDiarrhoea, abdominal pain, constipation, nausea and vomiting, anaemia, leukopenia [1][20]
Advantages over CYCSimilar efficacy for induction; better tolerated; no gonadal toxicity; preferred in young women
MonitoringCBC (leucopenia), LFT

CYC: lupus nephritis, CNS diseases [1][20].

Name breakdown: Cyclo- (ring structure) + phosph- (phosphorus) + amide (nitrogen-containing). It is an alkylating agent — it cross-links DNA strands, preventing cell division.

FeatureDetail
MechanismAlkylates DNA → cross-links prevent replication → cytotoxic to rapidly dividing cells (especially lymphocytes)
RouteIV pulse (preferred — less cumulative toxicity) or oral
RegimenEuro-Lupus protocol: IV 500 mg Q2W × 6 doses (lower dose, similar efficacy, fewer side effects) OR NIH protocol: IV 0.5–1 g/m² monthly × 6 months
PregnancyCategory X — absolute contraindication in pregnancy [1][20]
Side effectsGonadal toxicity (consider sperm and egg banking): male oligospermia, female infertility/premature ovarian failure (premature menopause) [1][20]
Teratogenicity [1][20]
Bladder toxicity: haemorrhagic cystitis, bladder cancer [1][20] — give MESNA (2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) with IV CYC to bind acrolein and prevent urothelial damage
Secondary malignancy: leukaemia, lymphoma [1][20]
Myelosuppression: neutropenia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia [1][20]
Alopecia [1][20]
MonitoringCBC (nadir WBC at 10–14 days post dose); urinalysis (haemorrhagic cystitis); fertility counselling

MMF vs CYC — Which to Choose?

Current KDIGO 2024 and EULAR/ERA-EDTA guidelines consider MMF and CYC as equivalent first-line options for induction in Class III/IV LN. In practice:

  • MMF is preferred in young women of childbearing age (no gonadal toxicity, no Category X)
  • CYC is preferred in severe/rapidly progressive disease (especially RPGN), high chronicity index, or non-adherent patients (IV dosing ensures compliance)
  • If resistant to induction therapy: use MMF if fail CYC; use CYC if fail MMF; use rituximab if failed both [12]

Maintenance (≥ 2 years): low-dose steroid + MMF / azathioprine [2].

Goal: Prevent relapse while minimising long-term drug toxicity.

AgentDetails
PrednisoloneTaper to ≤ 5–7.5 mg/day; ideally withdraw completely if remission sustained
MMF (preferred)1–2 g/day; superior to AZA in preventing relapse in most trials
Azathioprine (AZA)2 mg/kg/day; alternative to MMF; safer in pregnancy (Category D but acceptable in pregnancy with monitoring, unlike CYC Category X)
Azathioprine (AZA)

AZA: lupus nephritis, diseases refractory to HCQ [1][20].

Name breakdown: Aza- (nitrogen) + thio- (sulphur) + purine (the target metabolic pathway).

FeatureDetail
MechanismProdrug → converted to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) → inhibits purine synthesis → ↓ lymphocyte proliferation
Important pharmacogenomicsCheck TPMT (thiopurine methyltransferase) genotype/activity before starting — deficiency → accumulation of toxic metabolites → severe myelosuppression
Side effectsHepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, pancreatitis [1][20]
Drug interactionNEVER co-prescribe with allopurinol (inhibits xanthine oxidase → ↑ 6-MP levels → fatal pancytopenia). If allopurinol needed, switch to febuxostat or reduce AZA dose by 75%.
PregnancyCategory D but widely used in pregnancy when benefits outweigh risks

Class V induction: medium-dose steroids + steroid-sparing agents (azathioprine) [1].

FeatureDetail
Steroid doseMedium dose = 0.5–0.75 mg/kg/day [1] (lower than Class III/IV)
Steroid-sparingMMF or AZA; some centres use calcineurin inhibitors (CNI — tacrolimus/ciclosporin) for pure membranous LN
MaintenanceLow-dose steroid + MMF/AZA [1]

Why lower-dose steroids for Class V? Class V is a non-proliferative, predominantly nephrotic picture. The inflammatory component is less severe than Class III/IV (subepithelial deposits are "hidden" from circulating blood). You still need immunosuppression for heavy proteinuria, but the intensity can be lower.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in Class V: CNI have modulatory effects on podocytes [23] — tacrolimus stabilises podocyte cytoskeleton independently of its immunosuppressive action, which is particularly relevant in membranous disease where podocyte injury is the primary pathology. Used as add-on or alternative in refractory Class V.

Class III + V / Class IV + V → should be treated according to the proliferative lesion [2][12].

This means: treat as Class III/IV (high-dose induction) even though there is a membranous component. The proliferative element is the more dangerous component.

3.7 Refractory / Resistant Disease

If resistant to induction therapy: [12]

  • Use MMF if fail cyclophosphamide
  • Use cyclophosphamide if fail MMF
  • Use rituximab if failed both

Name breakdown: Ri-tuxi-mab → "rituxi" from chimeric anti-CD20 + "-mab" (monoclonal antibody).

FeatureDetail
MechanismAnti-CD20 monoclonal antibody → depletes B lymphocytes (CD20 is expressed on mature B cells but not plasma cells or stem cells) → ↓ autoantibody production, ↓ B cell antigen presentation
IndicationRefractory LN (failed both MMF and CYC); also used in ANCA vasculitis
Dose375 mg/m² weekly × 4 or 1000 mg × 2 doses (2 weeks apart)
Side effectsInfusion reactions; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML — rare but fatal); hepatitis B reactivation (screen before use); infection
MonitoringImmunoglobulin levels; HBV status; CBC

Anti-BAFF (belimumab) [3] — newer biologic approved for active SLE including lupus nephritis:

FeatureDetail
MechanismMonoclonal antibody against BAFF (B-cell activating factor, also called BLyS) → inhibits B cell survival and differentiation → ↓ autoantibody production
IndicationAdd-on to standard therapy (steroids + MMF or CYC) in active LN; BLISS-LN trial showed improved renal response when added to standard induction
SignificanceFirst biologic specifically approved for lupus nephritis (2020); represents a major advance

A newer calcineurin inhibitor specifically studied in lupus nephritis (AURORA trial):

FeatureDetail
MechanismCNI — inhibits calcineurin → ↓ T cell activation; also direct podocyte-stabilising effect
IndicationActive Class III, IV, or V LN, added to standard MMF + steroids
AdvantageDoes not require drug level monitoring (unlike tacrolimus/ciclosporin); fixed dosing
Side effectsNephrotoxicity (vasoconstriction of afferent arteriole); hypertension; GI symptoms; tremor

2024–2026 KDIGO Update — Multi-Target Therapy

Current best practice for Class III/IV (and V) lupus nephritis increasingly favours multi-target therapy: steroids + MMF + either belimumab or voclosporin (or both in severe cases). The BLISS-LN and AURORA trials demonstrated superior complete renal response rates when these agents are added to standard induction. This is the direction of the field, though exam questions may still test the "classic" regimen (steroids + MMF/CYC).


4. Special Treatment Considerations

Pregnancy issues and fertility issues must be discussed [3].

DrugPregnancy SafetyNotes
HCQSafe — continue throughout pregnancyReduces flares during pregnancy; ↓ risk of neonatal lupus
PrednisoloneAcceptable with cautionMetabolised by placental 11β-HSD2; minimal fetal exposure; but ↑ risk of GDM, PROM
AZAAcceptable (Category D but used)Fetal liver lacks enzyme to convert to active metabolite → relatively protected
MMFCategory D — TERATOGENIC — STOP before conceptionSwitch to AZA at least 3 months before planned pregnancy
CYCCategory X — ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATION [1][20]Gonadal toxicity: consider sperm and egg banking before starting [1][20]
Voclosporin/tacrolimusLimited data; generally avoidedTacrolimus has been used in pregnancy for transplant patients
Rituximab/belimumabAvoid in pregnancyInsufficient safety data; risk of neonatal B cell depletion
ACEI/ARBCONTRAINDICATED in pregnancyFetotoxic — oligohydramnios, renal dysgenesis, pulmonary hypoplasia

Immunosuppressed patients are at high risk for infections:

  • Screen for latent TB before starting immunosuppression (CXR, IGRA/Mantoux)
  • Screen for HBV — risk of reactivation on immunosuppression; give prophylactic entecavir/tenofovir if HBsAg+
  • PCP prophylaxis (co-trimoxazole) if on high-dose steroids + another immunosuppressant
  • Avoid live vaccines on immunosuppression (BCG, MMR, varicella, oral polio, yellow fever)
  • Pneumococcal vaccination indicated for ALL [21]

Cyclophosphamide gonadal toxicity: consider sperm and egg banking [1][20].

  • GnRH agonists (e.g. leuprolide) can be co-administered with CYC to suppress ovarian function and reduce gonadal toxicity — evidence is moderate but commonly done in practice
  • Young women should be counselled before CYC and offered oocyte/embryo cryopreservation

When lupus nephritis presents as RPGN (rapidly progressive, creatinine doubling in days):

  • Can give empirical pulse IV methylprednisolone before renal biopsy if indicated [11]
  • Do NOT wait for biopsy results to start treatment — delay risks irreversible damage
  • After biopsy confirms Class IV with crescents → formal induction regimen
  • Consider plasmapheresis if concomitant APLS with TMA or concurrent anti-GBM disease

Responsiveness to treatment is usually indicated by: [12]

  • Substantial ↓ urine protein excretion (e.g. ≤ 0.33 g/day, ≤ 0.5 g/day or < 1 g/day)
  • Improvement or stabilisation of serum creatinine
  • Improvement of urinary sediment (e.g. ≤ 5 or 10 RBCs/HPF, no casts)
ResponseDefinition
Complete renal responseProteinuria < 0.5 g/day (or uPCR < 50 mg/mmol) + normal or near-normal GFR + inactive sediment
Partial renal response≥ 50% ↓ proteinuria to sub-nephrotic levels + stable/improved GFR
No responseFailure to achieve partial response by 6–12 months

Regular monitoring: check BP and urine dipstick every visit; regular blood test on disease activity (anti-dsDNA, C3/4, ESR, CBC, L/RFT) [3].

ParameterFrequencyPurpose
Anti-dsDNA + C3/C4Every 1–3 monthsDisease activity; rising anti-dsDNA + falling C3/C4 = impending flare
Urine dipstick + uPCREvery visitMonitor proteinuria response
Serum Cr + eGFREvery 1–3 monthsMonitor renal function
CBCEvery 2–4 weeks (during induction); Q1–3 months (maintenance)Drug toxicity (myelosuppression from AZA/MMF/CYC)
LFTQ3–6 monthsAZA hepatotoxicity
Eye examinationBefore HCQ and every year after 5 years [3]HCQ retinopathy (bull's eye maculopathy)
BPEvery visitRenoprotection
Lipids, HbA1cAnnuallyCVS risk; steroid-induced diabetes

ClassInductionMaintenanceKey Points
INoneHCQ + RAAS inhibitorRarely biopsied
IIConservative ± low-dose steroidsHCQ + RAAS inhibitorSteroids if proteinuria > 1g/day, ↑ anti-dsDNA, ↓ C3 [2]
III/IVHigh-dose steroids (1 mg/kg/day ± IV pulse) + MMF or CYC × 6 monthsLow-dose steroids + MMF or AZA for ≥ 2 years± Belimumab or voclosporin (multi-target)
V (pure)Medium-dose steroids (0.5–0.75 mg/kg/day) + MMF or AZALow-dose steroids + MMF or AZAOnly if proteinuria > 1g/day despite ACEI [2]
III+V / IV+VTreat as Class III/IVTreat as Class III/IVProliferative component dictates treatment [2][12]
VINone (immunosuppression not helpful)ESRD planningDialysis / transplant [1]

High Yield Summary

Management Principles:

  1. Management is guided by histology — you need a renal biopsy [2]
  2. HCQ for ALL SLE patients [1][20]
  3. RAAS blockade (ACEI/ARB) for ALL proteinuric CKD [12][21]
  4. Aggressive BP control, lipid control, CVS risk management for ALL [12]

Class III/IV (Active Proliferative) — The Big One:

  • Induction (6 months): high-dose steroids + MMF or CYC [2]
  • Maintenance (≥ 2 years): low-dose steroids + MMF or AZA [2]
  • Refractory: switch MMF ↔ CYC; then rituximab [12]

Class V (Pure Membranous):

  • Only treat if proteinuria > 1g/day despite ACEI
  • Medium-dose steroids + MMF/AZA [1]

Class VI (Advanced Sclerosing):

  • ESRD planning — immunosuppression NOT helpful [1][12]

Key Drug Points:

  • MMF: preferred over CYC (especially in young women); Category D
  • CYC: Category X; gonadal toxicity — offer fertility preservation
  • AZA: check TPMT; NEVER co-prescribe with allopurinol
  • Belimumab and voclosporin: newer add-on agents improving outcomes

Active Recall - Management of Lupus Nephritis

References

[1] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — LN classification and treatment (p1000, p1732, p1734); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — LN treatment (p722, p726, p728) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — Lupus nephritis management, WHO classification (p315, p317) [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Rheumatology — SLE management, monitoring, general care (p76) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrology Interactive Tutorial — Case 1 (p1) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals — RPGN management (p361) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital — Lupus nephritis management, non-IS and IS therapy (p88–89) [20] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — HCQ, immunosuppressants table (p1732); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — same table (p726) [21] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals — General approach to GN management (p368) [22] Senior notes: Block A - High blood pressure: hypertension — Compelling indications for ACEI/ARB (p42) [23] Senior notes: Block A - Glomerular and Tubulo-interstitial Diseases and AKI — CNI and podocytes (p24)

Complications of Lupus Nephritis

Complications of lupus nephritis can be organised into three categories: (A) complications of the disease itself (renal and extra-renal), (B) complications of the nephrotic/nephritic syndrome, and (C) complications of treatment. In practice, many patients suffer from a mixture of all three simultaneously, making this one of the most complex conditions to manage long-term.


1. Complications of the Disease — Renal

This is the most feared complication of lupus nephritis.

  • Overt renal disease occurs in ≥ 1/3 of SLE patients → 25% develop ESRD within ≤ 10 years [12]
  • Lupus nephritis is one of the major causes of morbidity/mortality in SLE patients [12]
  • Renal failure is one of the major causes of morbidity/mortality in SLE patients [12]

Why does LN progress to CKD?

  • Repeated episodes of active inflammation cause irreversible glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis
  • Irreversible damage to some nephrons leads to compensatory hyperfiltration in remaining nephrons → raises intraglomerular pressure → non-immunological glomerular injury → progressive glomerulosclerosis [8] — a vicious cycle
  • This is reflected in the chronicity index on biopsy: the higher it is, the more irreversible damage has occurred [2]
  • Ultimately, Class III/IV can progress to Class VI (advanced sclerosing) → global sclerosis of nearly all glomerular capillaries → ESRD [1]

Complications of CKD [5]:

  • Fluid retention
  • Metabolic acidosis
  • High blood pressure
  • Normochromic normocytic anaemia (loss of erythropoietin production)
  • Secondary hyperparathyroidism
  • Bone disease (CKD-MBD)

When ESRD is reached, the patient requires renal replacement therapy: dialysis or kidney transplantation [1]. Importantly, SLE can recur in a transplanted kidney, though this is relatively uncommon.

Long-term complications following kidney transplant include: [24]

  • Infections (CMV, PJP, BK virus, MTB)
  • Malignancy (PTLD — B-cell lymphoma, EBV-related)
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Drug-related side effects
  • Chronic allograft injury
  • Recurrence of primary disease — lupus nephritis can recur in the allograft, though rates are low (~2–9%)

Class IV LN (and occasionally Class III) can present or progress to RPGN — rapidly declining renal function leading to ESRD in days to weeks [11].

Why does RPGN develop?

  • Severe endothelial injury → GBM rupture → massive movement of plasma products into Bowman's space → massive influx of macrophages/T cells → release of proinflammatory cytokines → formation of cellular crescent [11]
  • Followed by fibroblast proliferation and replacement by fibrous crescent (unlikely to respond to immunosuppressive treatment) [11] — meaning the window for treatment is narrow. Once crescents become fibrous, the damage is irreversible.

This is a nephrological emergency requiring immediate treatment with pulse IV methylprednisolone ± cyclophosphamide or rituximab [11].

Lupus nephritis is NOT limited to glomerular disease — it can affect glomerulus, tubules, interstitium and blood vessels at the same time [4][12].

  • Tubulointerstitial nephritis: immune complex deposition in tubular basement membranes → tubular dysfunction (e.g. ↓ concentration ability [12], renal tubular acidosis — typically distal/Type 1 RTA)
  • This can contribute to hypokalaemia, metabolic acidosis, and nephrocalcinosis
  • TIN worsens prognosis independently of glomerular class

  • Renal vascular disease due to immune complex deposits or microvascular thrombosis [12]
  • Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA): especially in patients with concurrent APLS (present in ~30% of SLE) [2] — microthrombi in glomerular capillaries and arterioles cause additional ischaemic renal damage
  • Renal artery stenosis: rare; can be associated with APLS
  • Renal vein thrombosis: nephrotic syndrome creates a hypercoagulable state (see below)

2. Complications of the Nephrotic/Nephritic Syndrome

These are not unique to lupus nephritis — they complicate any glomerular disease presenting with nephrotic or nephritic features — but they are particularly important in LN because of the overlap with SLE-related prothrombotic and immunocompromised states.

Pulmonary embolism — especially in lupus membranous nephropathy or antiphospholipid syndrome [25].

ComplicationMechanismClinical Note
DVT / PENephrotic syndrome → loss of antithrombin III, protein C, protein S in urine + ↑ hepatic production of fibrinogen and clotting factors → hypercoagulable stateRisk compounded by APLS (present in ~30% SLE)
Renal vein thrombosisHypercoagulability by compensatory production of clotting factors by liver [26]Sudden ↑ proteinuria, flank pain, AKI; diagnose with Doppler USG or CT angiography

Renal vein thrombosis management: [26]

  • If AKI: thrombolysis ± embolectomy
  • If non-AKI: LMWH/UFH → warfarin for minimum 6–12 months while still nephrotic

SBP (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis — especially in children with nephrotic syndrome): due to loss of immunoglobulins in urine [26].

  • SLE itself is immunocompromising (immune dysregulation + complement deficiency from consumption)
  • Immunosuppressive therapy further impairs host defence
  • Fever in SLE = sepsis until proven otherwise [2]
  • Investigation: septic workup, CRP
  • Management: withhold immunosuppressants, stress-dose steroids, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics [2]

Common infections in immunosuppressed SLE patients:

  • Bacterial: pneumonia (pneumococcal, Pseudomonas), UTI, skin infections
  • Viral: CMV, herpes zoster, BK virus
  • Fungal: Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) — prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole if on high-dose steroids + another immunosuppressant
  • Mycobacterial: TB — screen before starting immunosuppression

Resistant oedema pathophysiology: [26]

  • Poor drug/diet compliance
  • Furosemide malabsorption due to gut wall oedema

Management of resistant oedema: [26]

  • Change to IV furosemide
  • Add thiazide/potassium-sparing diuretics
  • IV albumin (as adjunct to overcome underfilling and restore diuretic response)

AKI in nephrotic syndrome: [26]

  • Hypovolaemia due to over-diuresis
  • ATN (acute tubular necrosis)
  • Crescentic transformation (RPGN)

Management: lower dose/withhold diuretics, rehydration [26].

  • Nephrotic syndrome → hepatic compensation for albumin loss → ↑ lipoprotein synthesis → hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia
  • Increased CVS risk (accelerated coronary atherosclerosis) [2]:
    • Disease-related: chronic inflammation, HT due to lupus nephritis, APS [2]
    • Treatment-related: steroids [2]
  • Long-term management: CV risk modifications [26]

Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia require monitoring, prevention and treatment as associated complications [1][27].


3. Complications of Treatment

This is a high-yield exam topic. The case vignette typically presents a lupus nephritis patient on treatment who develops a new problem — and you must determine whether it is a disease flare, an infection, or a drug side effect.

ComplicationMechanismClinical Relevance to LN
Cushingoid featuresExogenous cortisol → fat redistribution (moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity)Physical exam: Cushingoid [27]
Osteoporosis↓ Osteoblast activity + ↑ osteoclast activity + ↓ Ca²⁺ absorptionOsteoporosis: treatment-related (steroids) [2]; give calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonate
AVN (avascular necrosis)Steroid-induced fat embolism or lipocyte hypertrophy in subchondral bone → ↓ blood supplyAVN hip: active disease or steroid-induced [2]; right hip particularly painful on climbing stairs [27] — MRI is diagnostic
Diabetes mellitus↑ Hepatic gluconeogenesis + ↓ peripheral insulin sensitivityMonitor HbA1c; SGLT2i may have dual benefit (glycaemic + renoprotective)
InfectionsImpaired neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte functionPatient is immunocompromised — SLE itself + corticosteroids + azathioprine [27]
CataractsPosterior subcapsular — mechanism not fully understood (? oxidative damage to lens proteins)Annual eye screening
Peptic ulcer / GI bleed↓ Prostaglandin-mediated gastric mucosal protectionAnaemia: micro (GI bleed due to steroid use) [2]; co-prescribe PPI
HypertensionMineralocorticoid effect → Na⁺/H₂O retentionCompounds LN-related HTN
PsychosisDirect CNS effects of glucocorticoidsDDx of psychosis in SLE: disease (neuropsychiatric lupus) vs. steroid-induced [2]

Complications of treatment: leukopenia, infection, alopecia (cyclophosphamide), amenorrhoea (cyclophosphamide) [1][27].

ComplicationMechanismPrevention
Gonadal toxicity: oligospermia (male), premature ovarian failure (female) [1][20]Alkylating agent destroys rapidly dividing germ cellsConsider sperm and egg banking; GnRH agonists may reduce ovarian damage
Haemorrhagic cystitisAcrolein (CYC metabolite) is directly toxic to urotheliumMESNA (binds acrolein); adequate hydration; monitor urinalysis
Bladder cancerChronic acrolein exposure → urothelial carcinogenesisLong-term urinalysis surveillance
Secondary malignancy (leukaemia, lymphoma) [1][20]Alkylation of haematopoietic stem cell DNA → mutagenesisMinimise cumulative dose; use Euro-Lupus protocol
Myelosuppression (neutropenia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia) [1][20]Non-selective cytotoxicity to bone marrowMonitor CBC; nadir WBC 10–14 days post dose
Alopecia [1][20][27]Destruction of rapidly dividing hair follicle cellsUsually reversible
Teratogenicity (Category X) [1][20]DNA alkylation in developing fetusAbsolute contraindication in pregnancy

MMF is used as first-line treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis because of lower frequency of adverse effects compared to cyclophosphamide, e.g. premature ovarian failure and haemorrhagic cystitis [28].

  • Diarrhoea, abdominal pain, constipation, nausea and vomiting [1][20]
  • Anaemia, leukopenia [1][20]
  • Teratogenic — Category D; must use effective contraception

  • Hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, pancreatitis [1][20]
  • Interaction with allopurinol (fatal pancytopenia if co-prescribed)
  • Check TPMT before starting

Cyclosporine A side effects: [1][20]

  • Nephrotoxicity (paradoxically — the drug used to treat kidney disease can damage kidneys via afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction)
  • Tremor, hirsutism/hypertrichosis, gum hyperplasia
  • Hyperkalaemia
  • HT/DM/hyperlipidaemia

Rituximab: [1][20]

  • Reactivation of HBV/TB (screen before use)
  • Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) — JC virus reactivation; rare but devastating

Belimumab: [1][20]

  • B-cell depletion — infection risk

While not "complications of lupus nephritis" per se, these coexisting SLE manifestations significantly worsen the overall prognosis and must be actively monitored:

ComplicationRelevance
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS)Present in ~30%; causes thrombosis (DVT/PE, stroke), recurrent miscarriage; worsens renal prognosis via TMA
Neuropsychiatric lupusSeizures, psychosis, myelitis, neuropathy — DDx: active disease vs. steroid-induced vs. infection vs. metabolic [2][28]
Libman-Sacks endocarditisPathognomonic: atypical sterile valvular vegetations [2]; risk of embolic stroke
SerositisPleurisy, pericarditis — pleuritic chest pain exacerbated by deep breathing [27]; DDx: lupus flare vs. infection vs. PE
Pulmonary complicationsPleurisy (up to 93%); acute pneumonitis (1–2%); ILD (3–9%); PE (especially in membranous LN or APLS); pulmonary arterial hypertension [25]
HaematologicalAnaemia: micro (GI bleed from steroids) vs. normo (ACD) vs. macro (AIHA); neutropenia; thrombocytopenia [2]

Poor prognostic factors in SLE: [1][2][27]

  • Male sex
  • Young age
  • Older age at presentation
  • Hypertension
  • Renal disease (especially diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis — Class IV)
  • Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies
  • Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  • High overall disease activity
  • Lupus nephritis itself [2]
  • APLS [2]

Disease activity and flares (relapses) are indicated by: [1][27]

  • Clinical: fever, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, organ-specific involvement (especially lupus nephritis)
  • Biochemical: leukopenia (lymphopenia), ↑ ESR, ↑ anti-dsDNA, ↓ C3/C4 level

This is the most commonly examined complication scenario:

Case: A 35-year-old lady diagnosed with SLE 3 years ago (polyarthritis, malar rash, lupus nephritis), treated with prednisolone + azathioprine, now presents with fever, chills, chest pain worse on deep breathing, and hip pain [27].

Q: What are the possible causes of fever? [27]

  • Relapse of underlying SLE
  • Infection due to immunocompromised state
    • SLE itself is immunocompromising
    • Patient is taking corticosteroids and azathioprine

Q: What are the possible causes of chest pain? [27]

  • Serositis (manifestation of lupus or secondary to chest infection)
  • Pulmonary embolism ± infarction

Q: What about the hip pain? [2]

  • AVN hip: active disease or steroid-induced — investigate with MRI
  • DDx: septic arthritis (immunosuppressed patient)

Q: What complications require attention? [1][27]

  • Hypertension
  • Hyperlipidaemia
  • Complications of treatment: leukopenia, infection, alopecia (CYC), amenorrhoea (CYC)

High Yield Summary

Complications of Lupus Nephritis — Three Categories:

1. Disease complications:

  • Progression to CKD/ESRD (25% within 10 years) — via glomerulosclerosis, hyperfiltration injury
  • RPGN — crescentic transformation; nephrological emergency
  • TIN — tubular dysfunction, RTA
  • Renal vascular disease — TMA (especially with APLS), renal vein thrombosis

2. Nephrotic/nephritic syndrome complications:

  • Thromboembolic events (DVT/PE, renal vein thrombosis) — hypercoagulable state ± APLS
  • Infection — loss of immunoglobulins + immunosuppression
  • Resistant oedema, AKI from over-diuresis, hyperlipidaemia/accelerated CVD

3. Treatment complications:

  • Steroids: Cushingoid, osteoporosis, AVN, DM, infection, cataracts, psychosis
  • CYC: gonadal toxicity, haemorrhagic cystitis, secondary malignancy, myelosuppression, alopecia
  • MMF: GI side effects, myelosuppression, teratogenicity
  • AZA: hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, pancreatitis; NEVER with allopurinol
  • CNI: nephrotoxicity, tremor, gum hyperplasia, HT/DM
  • Rituximab: HBV/TB reactivation, PML

Key Exam Scenarios:

  • Fever in treated LN = infection until proven otherwise
  • Hip pain in LN = steroid-induced AVN vs. septic arthritis vs. active disease
  • Poor prognostic factors: male sex, young age, Class IV disease, APLS, high disease activity

Active Recall - Complications of Lupus Nephritis

References

[1] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — LN classification, treatment, prognosis, case studies (p1733–1735); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — same sections (p727–729) [2] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — SLE clinical features, disease monitoring, poor prognostic factors, special considerations (p314–317) [4] Senior notes: Block A - Nephrotology Teaching Clinic RTD — Lupus nephritis affecting multiple compartments (p5) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Chronic Kidney Disease and its Complications — CKD complications and causes (p8, p23) [8] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes — Glomerulosclerosis mechanism (p328) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals — RPGN pathogenesis and crescent formation (p361) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital — Lupus nephritis renal involvement, management (p87–89) [20] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Drug side effects table (p1732–1733); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — same (p726–727) [24] Senior notes: Block A - Renal Replacement Therapies — Long-term transplant complications (p36) [25] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory — Respiratory manifestations of SLE (p128) [26] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes — Nephrotic syndrome complications and management (p230–232) [27] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai) — Case 2 (p1735); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai) — Case 2 (p729) [28] Lecture slides: Handbook of Internal Medicine 2024 — Lupus nephritis and NPSLE (p441–442)

High Yield Summary

Definition: Lupus nephritis = renal inflammation in SLE caused by immune complex deposition in glomeruli → complement activation → tissue damage.

Epidemiology: ~50% of SLE patients; more common and severe in Asians and Afro-Caribbeans; risk factors include juvenile SLE, male sex, high anti-dsDNA, low complement.

Pathophysiology: Anti-dsDNA + nuclear antigens → immune complexes → deposit in mesangium (Class I/II), subendothelium (Class III/IV), subepithelium (Class V) → complement activation → inflammation ± podocyte injury.

Classification: ISN/RPS 6 classes:

  • Class I (minimal mesangial) → normal
  • Class II (mesangial proliferative) → microscopic haematuria/proteinuria
  • Class III (focal, < 50%) → nephritic ± nephrotic
  • Class IV (diffuse, ≥ 50%) → MOST common and MOST severe; RPGN
  • Class V (membranous) → nephrotic
  • Class VI (advanced sclerosing) → ESRD

Full-house staining (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) is pathognomonic for LN (esp. Class IV).

Activity index → guides immunosuppression intensity. Chronicity index → guides renoprotective strategy.

Biopsy indications: proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, persistent haematuria, unexplained ↑Cr.

Monitoring: Anti-dsDNA (↑ = active) + C3/C4 (↓ = active). ANA/anti-ENA NOT for monitoring.

High Yield Summary

DDx of Lupus Nephritis — Key Framework:

  1. By complement level:

    • Low C3/C4 (IC-mediated): Lupus nephritis, PSGN, MPGN, cryoglobulinaemia, IE
    • Normal C3/C4 (non-IC): ANCA vasculitis, anti-GBM disease, IgA nephropathy, HSP
  2. By RPGN IF pattern:

    • Type I (linear) = Anti-GBM
    • Type II (granular) = Lupus nephritis, PSGN, IgAN, cryoglobulinaemia
    • Type III (pauci-immune) = ANCA vasculitis
  3. Non-LN renal disease in SLE:

    • Drug-induced (NSAIDs), APLS nephropathy/TMA, TIN, infection, hypertensive nephrosclerosis
  4. Key discriminators:

    • Full-house IF staining = lupus nephritis
    • CRP ↑ in SLE = think infection, not flare
    • URTI 7–10 days before = PSGN; concurrent = IgAN
    • Characteristic rash + arthritis = SLE
  5. Renal biopsy is the definitive investigation — needed for most cases of nephritic syndrome.

High Yield Summary

Diagnostic Criteria:

  • EULAR/ACR 2019: ANA+ entry criterion + total score ≥ 10 (Class III/IV LN scores 10 alone)
  • SLICC 2012: 4/17 criteria (≥ 1 clinical + ≥ 1 immunological) OR biopsy-proven LN with ANA/anti-dsDNA+

Biopsy Indications:

  • Proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, persistent haematuria, raised Cr not otherwise explained
  • Pre-biopsy: USG (confirm normal size), clotting, platelet count

Key Serological Workup:

  • ANA (screening), anti-dsDNA (diagnosis + monitoring), C3/C4 (diagnosis + monitoring)
  • ANA/anti-ENA NOT for monitoring; anti-dsDNA + C3/C4 ARE for monitoring
  • CRP ↑ → think infection, not SLE flare

Biopsy Interpretation:

  • Full-house staining (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q) is pathognomonic of LN
  • Activity Index → determines immunosuppression intensity
  • Chronicity Index → determines renoprotective strategy
  • Repeat biopsy if disease progresses

Complement Interpretation:

  • Low C3 + C4 → lupus nephritis, MPGN, cryoglobulinaemia
  • Low C3 only → PSGN (normalises by 4–8 weeks; if persists → consider LN/MPGN)
  • Normal C3/C4 → ANCA vasculitis, anti-GBM, IgAN

High Yield Summary

Management Principles:

  1. Management is guided by histology — you need a renal biopsy [2]
  2. HCQ for ALL SLE patients [1][20]
  3. RAAS blockade (ACEI/ARB) for ALL proteinuric CKD [12][21]
  4. Aggressive BP control, lipid control, CVS risk management for ALL [12]

Class III/IV (Active Proliferative) — The Big One:

  • Induction (6 months): high-dose steroids + MMF or CYC [2]
  • Maintenance (≥ 2 years): low-dose steroids + MMF or AZA [2]
  • Refractory: switch MMF ↔ CYC; then rituximab [12]

Class V (Pure Membranous):

  • Only treat if proteinuria > 1g/day despite ACEI
  • Medium-dose steroids + MMF/AZA [1]

Class VI (Advanced Sclerosing):

  • ESRD planning — immunosuppression NOT helpful [1][12]

Key Drug Points:

  • MMF: preferred over CYC (especially in young women); Category D
  • CYC: Category X; gonadal toxicity — offer fertility preservation
  • AZA: check TPMT; NEVER co-prescribe with allopurinol
  • Belimumab and voclosporin: newer add-on agents improving outcomes

High Yield Summary

Complications of Lupus Nephritis — Three Categories:

1. Disease complications:

  • Progression to CKD/ESRD (25% within 10 years) — via glomerulosclerosis, hyperfiltration injury
  • RPGN — crescentic transformation; nephrological emergency
  • TIN — tubular dysfunction, RTA
  • Renal vascular disease — TMA (especially with APLS), renal vein thrombosis

2. Nephrotic/nephritic syndrome complications:

  • Thromboembolic events (DVT/PE, renal vein thrombosis) — hypercoagulable state ± APLS
  • Infection — loss of immunoglobulins + immunosuppression
  • Resistant oedema, AKI from over-diuresis, hyperlipidaemia/accelerated CVD

3. Treatment complications:

  • Steroids: Cushingoid, osteoporosis, AVN, DM, infection, cataracts, psychosis
  • CYC: gonadal toxicity, haemorrhagic cystitis, secondary malignancy, myelosuppression, alopecia
  • MMF: GI side effects, myelosuppression, teratogenicity
  • AZA: hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, pancreatitis; NEVER with allopurinol
  • CNI: nephrotoxicity, tremor, gum hyperplasia, HT/DM
  • Rituximab: HBV/TB reactivation, PML

Key Exam Scenarios:

  • Fever in treated LN = infection until proven otherwise
  • Hip pain in LN = steroid-induced AVN vs. septic arthritis vs. active disease
  • Poor prognostic factors: male sex, young age, Class IV disease, APLS, high disease activity

On this page

No Headings