HIV
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is a retrovirus that targets CD4+ T lymphocytes, progressively destroying the immune system and, if untreated, leading to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
HIV / AIDS
HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency Virus. The name tells you exactly what it does:
- "Human" → species-specific (only infects humans)
- "Immunodeficiency" → it causes deficiency (weakening) of the immune system
- "Virus" → the causative agent
AIDS stands for Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome:
- "Acquired" → not inherited; you get it from somewhere
- "Immunodeficiency" → weakening of the immune system
- "Syndrome" → a collection of signs, symptoms and diseases that occur together
HIV is a retrovirus that selectively infects and destroys CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes, leading to progressive immunodeficiency [1]. When the immune system is sufficiently depleted (classically CD4 < 200 cells/μL), the patient becomes vulnerable to opportunistic infections (OIs) and certain malignancies — this constellation is what we call AIDS [1][2].
Key Concept
HIV is the virus. AIDS is the clinical syndrome that results from advanced, untreated HIV infection. Not everyone with HIV has AIDS — with modern antiretroviral therapy (ART), most people living with HIV never progress to AIDS.
2. Epidemiology
- ~39 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) worldwide (UNAIDS 2024 estimate)
- ~1.3 million new infections per year (declining from peak of 3.4 million in 1996)
- Sub-Saharan Africa carries the heaviest burden (~65% of all PLHIV)
- Since the introduction of combination ART (cART) in the mid-1990s, AIDS-related deaths have declined dramatically
In Hong Kong, the main risk groups are men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexual contacts [1][3].
- As of 2024, there are approximately 12,000+ reported HIV/AIDS cases cumulatively in HK
- MSM account for the majority of new diagnoses in recent years (~60–70%) [1]
- Heterosexual transmission remains significant (~25–30%)
- Injection drug use (IDU) accounts for a smaller but important proportion [1]
- Late diagnosis remains a problem — a significant proportion present with CD4 < 200 at first diagnosis ("late presenters")
- HIV-2 is very rare in Hong Kong; almost all cases are HIV-1 [1]
- Bimodal age distribution of new diagnoses: young MSM (20s–30s) and older heterosexual men (40s–50s)
- Male-to-female ratio approximately 4–5:1 in HK
- Vertical (mother-to-child) transmission is now very rare in HK due to screening and prophylaxis [1]
3. Risk Factors
Understanding risk factors requires understanding routes of transmission:
- Unprotected anal intercourse (highest per-act risk among sexual routes: receptive anal ~1.4%, insertive anal ~0.1%) [1]
- Unprotected vaginal intercourse (receptive vaginal ~0.08%, insertive vaginal ~0.04%)
- Presence of other STIs (especially ulcerative diseases like syphilis, HSV-2, chancroid) — disrupted mucosa + local inflammation recruit more CD4+ cells to the site [4]
- Multiple sexual partners
- Commercial sex without condom use
Why does HSV-2 increase HIV acquisition risk by 2–4×? [4] Because genital ulcers disrupt the mucosal barrier AND the inflammatory response recruits CD4+ T cells and dendritic cells to the ulcer site — the very cells HIV targets. This creates a "welcome mat" for HIV.
- Higher viral load in the source = higher transmission risk (this is the single most important determinant) [1]
- Undetectable viral load = Untransmittable (U=U): validated by PARTNER study
- Circumcision reduces female-to-male transmission by ~50–60%
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces risk by >99% when taken consistently
- Co-infection with STIs (as above)
High Yield – Needle-Stick Injury
For needle-stick injury (accidental occupational exposure): [1][3]
- Risk of HIV seroconversion is ~0.3% for percutaneous exposure (hollow-bore needle)
- Risk is ~0.09% for mucous membrane exposure
- Risk is negligible for intact skin exposure
- Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) should be initiated ASAP, ideally within 1–2 hours, no later than 72 hours [1][3]
- These will be discussed in detail in the Management section
4. Anatomy and Function: The Immunological Targets
To understand HIV, you must understand what it destroys.
- CD4+ T cells are the "conductors of the immune orchestra" — they coordinate both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses
- They recognise antigens presented by MHC class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs)
- Subtypes:
- Th1: activates macrophages, promotes cell-mediated immunity (critical for intracellular pathogens — TB, fungi, viruses)
- Th2: promotes B-cell differentiation and antibody production
- Th17: important for mucosal immunity and defence against extracellular bacteria and fungi
- Treg: regulatory function, prevents autoimmunity
- Normal CD4 count: 500–1500 cells/μL [1]
- CD4 < 200 cells/μL = AIDS-defining threshold [1][2]
- Monocytes/Macrophages: express CD4 and CCR5; serve as viral reservoirs (long-lived)
- Dendritic cells (especially follicular dendritic cells): trap virus and present to CD4+ T cells in lymph nodes — ironically facilitating infection
- Microglial cells in the CNS: leads to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND)
- Lymph nodes are the primary site of HIV replication during the asymptomatic phase
- Even when peripheral blood viral load is low, massive replication continues in lymphoid tissue (this explains why lymphadenopathy is common in HIV)
- GALT (Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue): massive CD4+ T-cell depletion occurs early in the gut, leading to disruption of the mucosal barrier and microbial translocation (chronic immune activation)
5. Etiology (Virology)
HIV belongs to the family Retroviridae, genus Lentivirus [1].
- "Retro-" → refers to reverse transcription (RNA → DNA, the reverse of the central dogma)
- "Lenti-" → Latin for "slow" — these viruses cause slowly progressive disease
| Feature | HIV-1 | HIV-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Global distribution | Worldwide (>95% of infections) | Mainly West Africa |
| Virulence | Higher | Lower |
| Transmission efficiency | Higher | Lower |
| Progression to AIDS | Faster (median ~10 years untreated) | Slower (many never progress) |
| Viral load | Higher | Lower |
| Response to NNRTIs | Sensitive | Intrinsically resistant |
| Relevance to HK | Almost all cases [1] | Very rare [1] |
Understanding the structure is critical because each component is a drug target:
Envelope (lipid bilayer from host cell membrane)
├── gp120 (surface glycoprotein) → binds CD4 receptor
├── gp41 (transmembrane glycoprotein) → mediates membrane fusion
│
Matrix (p17) → lines inner surface of envelope
│
Capsid (p24) → core protein, encloses the genome
│ ├── 2 copies of single-stranded RNA genome
│ ├── Reverse transcriptase (RT) → converts RNA to DNA
│ ├── Integrase → integrates viral DNA into host genome
│ └── Protease → cleaves polyproteins into functional proteins| Structural Component | Gene | Function | Drug Target? |
|---|---|---|---|
| gp120 | env | Binds CD4 receptor on host cell | Attachment inhibitors (fostemsavir) |
| gp41 | env | Mediates fusion of viral and host membranes | Fusion inhibitors (enfuvirtide) |
| p24 (capsid) | gag | Core structural protein; measured in Ag/Ab combo tests [1] | Capsid inhibitors (lenacapavir) |
| Reverse transcriptase | pol | Converts viral RNA → DNA | NRTIs, NNRTIs |
| Integrase | pol | Integrates proviral DNA into host chromosome | INSTIs (dolutegravir, bictegravir) |
| Protease | pol | Cleaves gag-pol polyprotein into functional proteins | PIs (darunavir, atazanavir) |
| p17 (matrix) | gag | Structural | No |
This is the foundation for understanding ART — every drug class interrupts a specific step:
| Step | Drug Class | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Attachment | Attachment inhibitors | Fostemsavir |
| 2. Co-receptor binding | CCR5 antagonists | Maraviroc [1] |
| 3. Fusion | Fusion inhibitors | Enfuvirtide (T-20) [1] |
| 4. Uncoating / Capsid | Capsid inhibitors | Lenacapavir (long-acting, q6months) |
| 5. Reverse transcription | NRTIs (nucleoside RT inhibitors) | Tenofovir (TDF/TAF), emtricitabine (FTC), abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT) [1] |
| 5. Reverse transcription | NNRTIs (non-nucleoside RT inhibitors) | Efavirenz (EFV), nevirapine (NVP), rilpivirine, doravirine [1] |
| 6. Integration | Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) | Dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), raltegravir (RAL), cabotegravir [1] |
| 9–11. Maturation | Protease inhibitors (PIs) | Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) [1] |
Why the 'Boosting' with Ritonavir or Cobicistat?
Protease inhibitors are heavily metabolised by CYP3A4 in the liver. Ritonavir (or cobicistat) is a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor — adding a low dose "boosts" the PI level by slowing its metabolism, allowing lower doses and better drug levels. This is why you see "/r" or "/c" after PI names.
- HIV uses CD4 as its primary receptor but also requires a co-receptor [1]:
- CCR5 (a chemokine receptor on macrophages and memory T cells): used by R5-tropic (macrophage-tropic) strains — predominant in early infection [1]
- CXCR4 (on T cells): used by X4-tropic (T-cell-tropic) strains — associated with later disease and more rapid CD4 decline [1]
- Dual-tropic viruses can use both
Individuals homozygous for the CCR5-Δ32 deletion are highly resistant to HIV-1 infection (because the virus cannot bind the co-receptor). This is found in ~1% of Northern Europeans. The "Berlin patient" (Timothy Ray Brown) was cured of HIV by receiving a bone marrow transplant from a CCR5-Δ32 homozygous donor. [1]
6. Pathophysiology
- HIV crosses mucosal barriers and infects dendritic cells and CD4+ T cells at the site of entry [1]
- Virus is transported to regional lymph nodes within 2 days
- Massive viral replication occurs → viraemia peaks at 2–4 weeks post-exposure (viral load can reach millions of copies/mL) [1]
- Widespread dissemination to all lymphoid organs, especially GALT [1]
- Massive depletion of gut mucosal CD4+ T cells (the gut contains the majority of the body's CD4+ T cells — up to 60% are destroyed in the first few weeks)
- Acute retroviral syndrome occurs in 40–90% of patients at this stage (see Clinical Features below) [1]
- Immune response develops (CTLs + antibodies) → viral load decreases to a "set point" [1]
- After acute infection, the immune system partially controls viral replication
- The viral load stabilises at a "set point" — this set point is a strong predictor of disease progression [1]
- Higher set point → faster progression to AIDS
- The set point is determined by host immune responses (HLA type, CTL activity) and viral factors
- Clinically silent but immunologically and virologically ACTIVE [1]
- Massive viral turnover occurs in lymph nodes (10 billion virions produced/day, CD4 T cells destroyed and regenerated daily) [1]
- CD4 count declines gradually at a rate of ~50–80 cells/μL/year without treatment [1]
- The immune system compensates for a while by increasing CD4 production, but eventually the regenerative capacity is exhausted
- This phase lasts a median of 8–10 years without treatment [1][2]
- Some patients are "long-term non-progressors" (maintain high CD4 for >10 years) or "elite controllers" (maintain undetectable VL without ART) — these are rare and related to host genetic factors (e.g., HLA-B57, HLA-B27)
Multiple mechanisms contribute:
- Direct viral cytopathic effect: productive infection → cell lysis
- Apoptosis of infected cells: viral proteins (especially Vpr) induce programmed cell death
- Bystander apoptosis: uninfected CD4+ cells die due to chronic immune activation and exposure to viral proteins (gp120 binding to CD4 can trigger apoptosis even without productive infection)
- CTL-mediated killing: cytotoxic T cells kill HIV-infected CD4+ cells
- Syncytium formation: gp120/gp41 on infected cells binds CD4/co-receptors on uninfected cells → cell fusion → multinucleated giant cells that die
- Pyroptosis: abortive infection of resting CD4+ cells triggers inflammatory cell death via caspase-1 activation → releases IL-1β → drives inflammation and attracts more CD4+ cells (a vicious cycle)
- Thymic damage: HIV infects thymic epithelial cells → impairs new T-cell generation
This is now recognised as the central driver of disease progression:
- Chronic immune activation is caused by: [1]
- Persistent viral replication
- Microbial translocation from the damaged gut (LPS and other microbial products leak into the bloodstream)
- Co-infections (CMV, EBV, etc.)
- Residual viral proteins
- Leads to: T-cell exhaustion, accelerated ageing of the immune system, increased risk of non-AIDS events (cardiovascular disease, malignancy, neurocognitive decline) even when on ART
7. Classification
| Stage | Clinical Features |
|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Asymptomatic, persistent generalised lymphadenopathy (PGL) |
| Stage 2 | Mild: weight loss < 10%, minor mucocutaneous manifestations, recurrent URTIs, herpes zoster |
| Stage 3 | Advanced: weight loss > 10%, unexplained chronic diarrhoea > 1 month, unexplained persistent fever > 1 month, oral candidiasis, oral hairy leukoplakia, pulmonary TB, severe bacterial infections |
| Stage 4 (AIDS) | Severe: HIV wasting syndrome, PCP, oesophageal candidiasis, extrapulmonary TB, Kaposi sarcoma, CNS toxoplasmosis, HIV encephalopathy, cryptococcal meningitis, CMV retinitis, PML, etc. |
This is an exhaustive list — know the common ones in bold:
Opportunistic Infections:
- Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) — most common OI in HIV [2]
- Oesophageal/tracheal/bronchial candidiasis
- Cerebral toxoplasmosis
- Cryptococcal meningitis
- CMV disease (retinitis, colitis, oesophagitis) — excluding liver, spleen, lymph nodes
- Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC/MAI) — disseminated
- Extrapulmonary or disseminated TB
- Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) — due to JC virus [5]
- Chronic intestinal cryptosporidiosis (> 1 month)
- Chronic intestinal isosporiasis (> 1 month)
- Disseminated histoplasmosis
- Disseminated coccidioidomycosis
- Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei — important in Southeast Asia/Southern China/Hong Kong [7]
- Recurrent Salmonella bacteraemia
- Recurrent bacterial pneumonia (≥2 episodes in 12 months)
Malignancies:
- Kaposi sarcoma — most common malignancy related to HIV [2] (caused by HHV-8)
- Primary CNS lymphoma (EBV-driven)
- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (including Burkitt lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary effusion lymphoma)
- Invasive cervical cancer
Other:
- HIV wasting syndrome (involuntary weight loss > 10% + chronic diarrhoea or chronic weakness and fever)
- HIV encephalopathy (AIDS dementia complex)
High Yield – OIs and CD4 Thresholds
| CD4 Threshold | Opportunistic Infections/Conditions |
|---|---|
| < 500 | Kaposi sarcoma, TB (pulmonary), oral hairy leukoplakia, herpes zoster (multidermatomal) |
| < 200 | PCP (most common OI), oesophageal candidiasis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) |
| < 100 | Cerebral toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, microsporidiosis, oesophageal candidiasis |
| < 50 | Disseminated MAC, CMV retinitis/disease, disseminated Talaromyces marneffei [1][7] |
8. Clinical Features
Occurs 2–6 weeks after exposure in 40–90% of patients [1]. This is the time of peak viraemia before the immune response develops.
Think of it like a severe "mono-like" illness:
Symptoms (with pathophysiological basis):
| Symptom | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Fever (most common, >80%) [1] | Cytokine release (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) from massive viral replication and immune activation |
| Fatigue/malaise | Systemic inflammatory response |
| Pharyngitis (sore throat) | Viral replication in oropharyngeal lymphoid tissue |
| Myalgia/arthralgia | Circulating immune complexes and cytokine-mediated inflammation |
| Headache | Meningeal inflammation (aseptic meningitis occurs in some cases) |
| Rash (erythematous maculopapular, non-pruritic, on trunk/face/extremities including palms/soles) | Immune complex deposition in skin + direct viral effect on dermal cells |
| Weight loss | Catabolism from systemic inflammation |
| Night sweats | Cytokine-mediated thermoregulatory dysfunction |
| Painful mucosal ulcers (oral, genital, oesophageal) | Direct viral cytopathic effect on mucosal epithelium; highly characteristic |
| Diarrhoea | GALT destruction + viral replication in gut epithelium |
| Nausea/vomiting | Systemic cytokine effect, possibly hepatic inflammation |
Signs (with pathophysiological basis):
| Sign | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Generalised lymphadenopathy [1][6] | Viral trapping and immune activation in lymph nodes; lymphoid hyperplasia |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | Reticuloendothelial system activation; virus replication in macrophages of liver and spleen |
| Oral/genital ulcers | Direct viral cytopathic effect on mucosa |
| Maculopapular rash (often involving palms and soles) | Immune-mediated (reminds you of secondary syphilis — always check for syphilis co-infection!) |
| Aseptic meningitis (neck stiffness in some) | HIV crosses BBB and directly infects microglial cells; meningeal inflammation |
| Thrombocytopenia | Immune-mediated platelet destruction, direct megakaryocyte infection |
| Leukopenia then lymphocytosis | Initial lymphocyte destruction then CD8+ T-cell expansion as immune response develops |
| Transaminitis (raised ALT/AST) | Hepatocyte inflammation from viral replication or immune response |
The acute retroviral syndrome is often missed because it mimics infectious mononucleosis (EBV), influenza, or secondary syphilis. Always have a high index of suspicion in patients with risk factors! [1]
High Yield – Clinical Pearl
A common exam mistake: not considering acute HIV in a patient presenting with a "mono-like" illness (fever, sore throat, lymphadenopathy, rash) with negative Monospot test. If Monospot/EBV is negative, think HIV! The presence of mucosal ulcers is a helpful distinguishing feature (uncommon in EBV).
- Patient is generally well
- May have persistent generalised lymphadenopathy (PGL) [1]: defined as palpable lymph nodes ≥ 1 cm at ≥ 2 non-contiguous extra-inguinal sites for ≥ 3 months
- Why? Because lymph nodes are the primary site of viral replication — chronic antigenic stimulation causes follicular hyperplasia
- Symmetrical, non-tender, rubbery, mobile nodes — most commonly cervical, axillary, occipital
- PGL itself does NOT indicate progression
- Minor skin conditions may appear: seborrhoeic dermatitis (due to immune dysregulation), recurrent herpes simplex, warts, molluscum contagiosum
- Some patients develop haematological abnormalities: mild thrombocytopenia (immune-mediated — anti-platelet antibodies, similar mechanism to ITP)
As CD4 declines (typically 200–500), conditions appear that are not AIDS-defining but indicate immune compromise:
Symptoms and Signs (with pathophysiological basis):
| Feature | CD4 Range | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Oral candidiasis (thrush) | < 300–500 | Loss of Th17 cells in oral mucosa → impaired defence against Candida albicans |
| Oral hairy leukoplakia (white, corrugated lesions on lateral tongue, cannot be scraped off unlike candida) | < 300–500 | EBV replication in tongue epithelium due to local immune deficiency |
| Herpes zoster (shingles) — especially multidermatomal or recurrent | < 500 | Failure of cell-mediated immunity to contain latent VZV in dorsal root ganglia → reactivation |
| Seborrhoeic dermatitis (greasy, scaly patches on face/scalp) | Any | Immune dysregulation → failure to control Malassezia yeast on skin |
| Recurrent vaginal candidiasis | < 500 | As above (Th17 dysfunction) |
| Cervical dysplasia/carcinoma in situ (HPV-related) | < 500 | Impaired immune surveillance against HPV-infected cells |
| Constitutional symptoms: fever > 38.5°C for > 1 month, diarrhoea > 1 month, weight loss > 10% | < 200–500 | Chronic immune activation, microbial translocation, catabolic state |
| Peripheral neuropathy | Any | Multifactorial: direct HIV neurotoxicity (gp120 toxicity to dorsal root ganglia neurons), immune-mediated, drug-related (ddI, d4T) |
| ITP (immune thrombocytopenic purpura) | Any | Anti-platelet antibodies + direct megakaryocyte infection → thrombocytopenia |
| Bacillary angiomatosis (vascular skin lesions due to Bartonella) | < 200 | Impaired cell-mediated immunity allows Bartonella henselae/quintana proliferation in skin vasculature |
8.4 AIDS (CDC Category C / WHO Stage 4)
CD4 < 200 cells/μL or AIDS-defining illness [1][2]. This is when the life-threatening opportunistic infections and malignancies appear.
| Condition | CD4 | Key Features | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) | < 200 | Insidious onset of dry cough, progressive dyspnoea, fever; CXR: bilateral perihilar ground-glass opacities; elevated LDH [1][2] | P. jirovecii (a fungus) proliferates in alveoli when CD4+ T cells cannot mount granulomatous response → alveolar filling with foamy exudates → impaired gas exchange |
| Pulmonary TB | < 350 (any CD4) | Cough, fever, weight loss, night sweats; CXR may be atypical (lower lobe, diffuse infiltrates, no cavitation) at low CD4 [1] | M. tuberculosis cannot be contained by weakened cell-mediated immunity; atypical CXR because inability to form proper granulomas |
| Bacterial pneumonia (recurrent) | Any | Typical presentation with productive cough, fever, consolidation | Impaired opsonisation and B-cell dysfunction |
| Condition | CD4 | Key Features | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral toxoplasmosis | < 100 | Headache, fever, focal neurological deficits, seizures; CT/MRI: multiple ring-enhancing lesions [1] | Toxoplasma gondii reactivation from latent cysts in brain tissue; failure of T-cell-mediated immune surveillance |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | < 100 | Insidious headache, fever, altered mental status; raised ICP; CSF: raised opening pressure, India ink positive, CrAg positive [1] | Cryptococcus neoformans disseminates from lungs to CNS; polysaccharide capsule evades phagocytosis |
| Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) | < 200 | Insidious onset of focal neurological deficits without fever; MRI: non-enhancing white matter lesions [1][5] | JC virus reactivation → infects and lyses oligodendrocytes → demyelination |
| Primary CNS lymphoma | < 50 | Similar to toxoplasmosis but usually solitary ring-enhancing lesion; EBV-driven | EBV-driven B-cell lymphoproliferation in CNS due to loss of T-cell surveillance |
| HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) / AIDS dementia complex | < 200 | Subcortical dementia: psychomotor slowing, memory impairment, behavioural changes, later motor dysfunction | HIV infects microglia and macrophages in CNS → release of neurotoxic factors (gp120, Tat) → neuronal injury |
| CMV encephalitis | < 50 | Rapidly progressive encephalitis, cranial nerve palsies | CMV reactivation with direct CNS infection |
| Condition | CD4 | Key Features | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oesophageal candidiasis | < 200 | Odynophagia (painful swallowing), dysphagia; white plaques on endoscopy | Candida invasion of oesophageal mucosa; loss of local immune defence |
| CMV colitis/oesophagitis | < 50 | Bloody diarrhoea, abdominal pain; endoscopy shows deep ulcers | CMV infection of endothelial cells and mucosal cells → vasculitis and mucosal necrosis |
| Cryptosporidium | < 100 | Chronic watery diarrhoea > 1 month | Intracellular protozoan adheres to intestinal epithelium → secretory diarrhoea |
| Microsporidiosis | < 100 | Chronic diarrhoea, wasting | Intracellular parasites infect enterocytes |
| Isospora belli | < 100 | Chronic diarrhoea | Similar to Cryptosporidium |
| MAC (GI involvement) | < 50 | Chronic diarrhoea, weight loss, fever, anaemia | Mycobacterium avium complex infects lamina propria macrophages → malabsorption |
| Condition | Key Features | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|
| Kaposi sarcoma (KS) | Violaceous (purple) papules/plaques/nodules on skin, oral mucosa, or viscera; may involve lungs/GI tract [2] | HHV-8 (KSHV) infects endothelial cells → viral oncoproteins + angiogenic factors → vascular tumour proliferation; most common malignancy in HIV [2] |
| Molluscum contagiosum (giant/disseminated) | Multiple umbilicated papules, often > 100 | Poxvirus; failure of cell-mediated immunity to contain → widespread dissemination |
| Pruritic papular eruption (PPE) | Chronic itchy papules on extremities | Eosinophilic folliculitis variant; immune dysregulation |
| Disseminated fungal infections (Talaromyces marneffei) | Umbilicated papules (mimicking molluscum), fever, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy; CD4 < 50 [7] | Endemic dimorphic fungus in Southeast Asia/Southern China; inhaled conidia → disseminated infection when CD4 < 100; skin lesions are characteristic [7] |
| Condition | CD4 | Key Features | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMV retinitis | < 50 | Painless, progressive visual loss; "pizza pie" or "cottage cheese and ketchup" fundoscopy appearance (haemorrhages + exudates) | CMV reactivation → infects retinal cells → full-thickness retinal necrosis |
| HIV retinopathy | Any | Cotton wool spots, microaneurysms | HIV-related microvasculopathy |
| Feature | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Anaemia (most common haem abnormality) | Multifactorial: anaemia of chronic disease, bone marrow infiltration (MAC, lymphoma), drug-related (AZT), parvovirus B19 |
| Thrombocytopenia | Immune-mediated (anti-GP IIb/IIIa antibodies), direct megakaryocyte infection, TTP, drug-related |
| Neutropenia | Bone marrow suppression, drug-related (AZT, ganciclovir, TMP-SMX), infiltration |
| Lymphopenia | Direct CD4 depletion (the hallmark of HIV) |
| Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | EBV/HHV-8 driven lymphoproliferation + loss of immune surveillance |
| Condition | Features | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) | Proteinuria (often nephrotic range), progressive renal failure; more common in Black patients | Collapsing variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) — HIV infects renal epithelial cells directly → podocyte injury and proliferation |
| HIV immune-complex kidney disease (HIVICK) | Various patterns (membranoproliferative, IgA nephropathy, lupus-like) | Immune complex deposition from chronic immune activation |
IRIS occurs when a patient starts ART and the recovering immune system mounts an exaggerated inflammatory response against previously subclinical or treated OIs [1].
-
Two types: [1]
- Paradoxical IRIS: worsening of a known, treated OI after starting ART
- Unmasking IRIS: previously undiagnosed OI becomes clinically apparent after ART initiation
-
Typically occurs 2–12 weeks after starting ART [1]
-
Risk factors: low baseline CD4 (especially < 50), high baseline VL, rapid immune recovery, pre-existing OI
-
Common OIs involved: TB-IRIS (most common), MAC, cryptococcal meningitis, PML, KS, CMV
Why does IRIS happen? Before ART, the immune system was too weak to "see" the pathogen. When ART restores CD4+ T cells, they suddenly recognise the OI antigens and mount a massive inflammatory response — fever, lymphadenopathy, worsening of the OI symptoms.
| Phase | Duration | Viral Load | CD4 Count | Key Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse period | ~10 days | Undetectable | Normal | None; virus establishing in local tissues |
| Acute infection | 2–6 weeks | Very high (10⁶–10⁷) | Transient drop | Acute retroviral syndrome (40–90%) |
| Seroconversion | 2–12 weeks | Declining to set-point | Recovering | Antibodies become detectable |
| Clinical latency | 8–10 years (median) [1][2] | Set-point (10³–10⁵) | Gradual decline (~50–80/year) | Asymptomatic ± PGL |
| Early symptomatic | Variable | Rising | 200–500 | Oral candidiasis, zoster, constitutional symptoms |
| AIDS | 1–2 years if untreated | High | < 200 [2] | OIs, malignancies, wasting |
High Yield Summary
- HIV is a lentivirus (retrovirus) that targets CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells [1]
- Transmission: sexual (MSM > heterosexual in HK), parenteral (IVDU, needlestick 0.3%), vertical [1]
- Three phases: acute infection → clinical latency (8–10 years) → AIDS [2]
- Magic number: CD4 = 200 cells/μL defines AIDS [2]
- Most common OI: PCP; most common malignancy: Kaposi sarcoma (HHV-8) [2]
- gp120 binds CD4; gp41 mediates fusion; co-receptors are CCR5 (early) and CXCR4 (late) [1]
- p24 antigen is the earliest detectable marker in acute infection [1]
- Acute retroviral syndrome mimics EBV/mono — mucosal ulcers are a distinguishing feature [1]
- IRIS occurs 2–12 weeks after ART initiation in patients with low CD4 and pre-existing OIs [1]
- Talaromyces marneffei is an important AIDS-defining OI in Southeast Asia/Southern China/HK [7]
- Needle-stick injury risk: 0.3% percutaneous; PEP within 72 hours (ideally 1–2 hours) [1][3]
- U=U: Undetectable viral load = Untransmittable [1]
Active Recall - HIV Overview, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Features
[1] Lecture slides: GC 061. HIV positive_HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf; Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [3] Lecture slides: GC 107. Protect yourself and your patients.pdf [4] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Herpes Simplex Virus section); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (HSV section) [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Encephalitis section — PML) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Lymphadenopathy section); Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Lymphadenopathy section) [7] AOS material: AOS - Microbio.pdf (Talaromyces marneffei EMQ)
The differential diagnosis of HIV is context-dependent — it depends on how the patient presents. HIV is a great mimicker; conversely, many conditions mimic HIV. We need to think about DDx in several clinical scenarios:
- DDx of acute retroviral syndrome (the acute presentation)
- DDx of chronic HIV / generalised lymphadenopathy (the subacute/chronic presentation)
- DDx of AIDS-defining conditions (when the patient presents with an OI or malignancy)
- DDx of cytopaenias in an HIV patient (haematological mimics)
1. DDx of Acute Retroviral Syndrome (Acute HIV Infection)
Acute HIV presents as a "mono-like" illness — fever, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, rash, myalgia. The key DDx is therefore the infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome.
The differential diagnosis of atypical lymphocytes / infectious mononucleosis-like syndromes includes: [8]
| Condition | Key Distinguishing Features | Why It Mimics HIV |
|---|---|---|
| EBV infectious mononucleosis (most common cause) [8][9] | Triad: fever, tonsillar pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy; posterior cervical LN predominant; positive heterophile antibody (Monospot); atypical lymphocytosis; splenomegaly common; amoxicillin rash | Overlapping symptoms: fever, pharyngitis, LAP, rash, fatigue. However, mucosal ulcers are uncommon in EBV (a distinguishing feature for acute HIV) |
| CMV mononucleosis [8][9] | Often milder than EBV; less prominent pharyngitis; hepatitis more common; Monospot NEGATIVE; CMV IgM/PCR positive | Very similar systemic illness but pharyngitis less prominent |
| Primary HIV infection | Mucosal ulcers (oral/genital), rash involving palms/soles, higher rate of diarrhoea; Monospot NEGATIVE; 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo test or HIV RNA positive | — |
| Acute viral hepatitis (HAV, HBV) [8] | Jaundice, markedly elevated transaminases (ALT > 1000), GI symptoms predominate | Can present with fever, malaise, lymphadenopathy and atypical lymphocytes |
| Secondary syphilis | Rash involving palms and soles (also seen in acute HIV!); condylomata lata; history of chancre; positive VDRL/RPR and TPHA [10] | Shares the palm/sole rash, generalised LAP, mucosal patches — always check syphilis serology alongside HIV |
| Toxoplasmosis [8] | Cervical lymphadenopathy predominant; usually milder; positive toxoplasma IgM | Can cause mono-like illness with LAP |
| HHV-6 / HHV-7 infection [9] | Usually in children (roseola); milder in adults | Rare cause of adult mono-like illness |
| Drug reaction (phenytoin, carbamazepine, isoniazid, minocycline) [9] | Mononucleosis syndrome with atypical lymphocytosis can be induced by anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine) or antibiotics (isoniazid, minocycline) [9]; temporal relationship with drug initiation; may have rash, eosinophilia, hepatitis (DRESS syndrome) | Drug-induced pseudo-lymphoma / DRESS can closely mimic |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) [8] | Blasts can mimic atypical lymphocytes if you don't look at the blood film clearly [8]; pancytopaenia, blasts on PBS, bone pain | In a young patient with lymphadenopathy, fever, and "atypical lymphocytes" — make sure those aren't blasts! |
High Yield Exam Pearl
10% of mononucleosis syndromes are NOT caused by EBV — agents include CMV, HIV, HHV-6, HHV-7, HBV, adenovirus, rubella and toxoplasmosis [9]. If the Monospot is negative, always test for HIV — especially if there are mucosal ulcers or a compatible risk history. Diagnostic testing is particularly important if the patient is pregnant since CMV, HIV and toxoplasmosis have adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. [9]
| Feature | Acute HIV | EBV Mono |
|---|---|---|
| Mucosal ulcers (oral/genital) | Common (key distinguishing feature) | Rare |
| Rash distribution | Trunk + palms/soles | Trunk (or amoxicillin-induced) |
| Pharyngitis | Present but non-exudative | Exudative, tonsillar |
| Lymphadenopathy | Generalised | Posterior cervical > others |
| Splenomegaly | Less common | Common |
| Heterophile antibody (Monospot) | Negative | Positive (~85%) |
| Diarrhoea | More common | Uncommon |
| Atypical lymphocytes | Present | Present (more prominent) |
| Transaminitis | Mild | Common |
HIV is an important cause of persistent generalised lymphadenopathy (PGL). The DDx of generalised LAP is broad:
Differential diagnosis of generalised lymphadenopathy: [6][8]
| Category | Conditions | Why It Matters for HIV |
|---|---|---|
| Infective | Viral: primary HIV infection, EBV, CMV [6]; Bacterial: syphilis (secondary), typhoid fever; Mycobacterial: TB (esp miliary), MOTT; Fungal: Cryptococcus, Talaromyces marneffei; Parasitic: Toxoplasmosis [6][8] | HIV itself causes PGL; but in an HIV patient, new LAP may indicate an OI (TB, fungal) or malignancy |
| Neoplastic | Low-grade lymphoma (waxing-and-waning LAP), high-grade lymphoma (rapidly growing, systemic symptoms), lymphoid leukaemia, metastatic carcinoma [6] | HIV-associated NHL is AIDS-defining; Hodgkin lymphoma also increased |
| Inflammatory | Castleman disease, Kikuchi disease, SLE, RA, sarcoidosis [6] | These are important non-HIV causes to consider |
| Drug reactions | Phenytoin (classical), hydralazine, serum sickness [6] | Always check drug history |
Approach to lymphadenopathy: [6]
- History: LN characteristics (rapid enlargement, tenderness = reactive vs painless/hard = malignant), constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, night sweats), exposure history (sexual, IVDU, travel), medications
- Examination: site, size ( > 1 cm abnormal), consistency, fixation, tenderness, drainage basin, hepatosplenomegaly
- Ix: CBC/D, viral studies, serology, imaging (CXR, CT), biopsy if indicated
3. DDx by Organ-System Presentation in Known/Suspected HIV
When a patient with known HIV presents with a new problem, the DDx shifts towards OIs and malignancies, stratified by CD4 count. But we must also consider non-HIV-related causes and drug side effects.
| Condition | CD4 | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| PCP | < 200 | Subacute dry cough, progressive SOBOE, bilateral perihilar GGO on CXR, elevated LDH, elevated β-D-glucan [11] |
| Pulmonary TB | Any (but atypical CXR at low CD4) | Productive cough, night sweats, weight loss; cavitating upper lobe lesion at high CD4, diffuse infiltrates at low CD4 |
| Bacterial pneumonia | Any | Acute onset, productive cough, lobar consolidation |
| Kaposi sarcoma (pulmonary) | < 200 | Nodular infiltrates, pleural effusion, cutaneous KS lesions usually present |
| Lymphoma (pulmonary) | < 200 | Mass lesion, mediastinal LAP |
| CMV pneumonitis | < 50 | Diffuse interstitial pattern; often co-exists with PCP |
| Non-HIV: heart failure, PE, drug reaction | Any | Standard clinical assessment |
| Condition | CD4 | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebral toxoplasmosis | < 100 | Multiple ring-enhancing lesions on CT/MRI, positive toxoplasma IgG (reactivation), response to empirical therapy |
| Primary CNS lymphoma | < 50 | Usually solitary ring-enhancing lesion, EBV+ in CSF, no response to toxo therapy |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | < 100 | Insidious headache, raised ICP, positive CSF CrAg/India ink |
| PML (JC virus) [5] | < 200 | Non-enhancing white matter lesions on MRI, no mass effect, focal neuro deficits without fever |
| HIV encephalopathy | < 200 | Subcortical dementia, psychomotor slowing |
| TB meningitis | < 350 | Basal meningeal enhancement, cranial nerve palsies, CSF lymphocytic with low glucose |
| CMV encephalitis | < 50 | Rapidly progressive, periventricular enhancement |
| Neurosyphilis | Any | Pupillary abnormalities (Argyll Robertson), positive CSF VDRL |
| Condition | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Kaposi sarcoma | Violaceous papules/plaques, non-blanching, can be mucosal |
| Talaromyces marneffei [7] | Umbilicated papules (look like molluscum), fever, hepatosplenomegaly; CD4 < 100; important in SE Asia/Southern China/HK [7] |
| Molluscum contagiosum (giant/disseminated) | Umbilicated papules but no systemic features (unlike Talaromyces); look similar but Talaromyces has central necrotic umbilication + systemic illness |
| Bacillary angiomatosis (Bartonella) | Vascular papules/nodules, can mimic KS; responds to antibiotics |
| Disseminated HSV/VZV | Vesicular, dermatomal (VZV) or clustered (HSV); may be disseminated if CD4 < 200 [12] |
| Seborrhoeic dermatitis | Greasy scaly patches on nasolabial folds, scalp |
| Secondary syphilis | Copper-coloured macules on palms/soles, condylomata lata [10] |
| Drug eruption | Temporal relationship with medication; common with NNRTIs (nevirapine, efavirenz), cotrimoxazole, abacavir |
| Pruritic papular eruption | Chronic itchy papules on extremities |
HIV infection can be associated with dysplastic haematopoiesis and variable cytopaenia [13] — this is important because it enters the DDx of MDS.
| Condition | Key Features | How to Distinguish from HIV |
|---|---|---|
| MDS [13] | Pancytopaenia with macrocytosis in elderly; dysplastic marrow | BM biopsy shows dysplasia, characteristic cytogenetics; HIV can also cause dysplastic haematopoiesis but BM should not have MDS-defining cytogenetic abnormalities [13] |
| Aplastic anaemia [13] | Pancytopaenia with hypocellular marrow | BM biopsy: hypocellular marrow with fat replacement, no dysplasia; check viral serology including HIV [14] |
| B12/folate deficiency [13] | Macrocytic anaemia, hypersegmented neutrophils | Check B12, folate levels; should check in all patients with suspected MDS [13] |
| Drug-induced (AZT, cotrimoxazole, ganciclovir) | Temporal relationship with drug | Resolve on drug withdrawal |
| Immune thrombocytopaenic purpura (ITP) | Isolated thrombocytopaenia | HIV-associated ITP responds to ART |
| TTP | Pentad: MAHA, thrombocytopaenia, renal dysfunction, neuro symptoms, fever | Schistocytes on PBS, very low ADAMTS13 |
| Bone marrow infiltration (MAC, lymphoma, KS, Talaromyces) | Pancytopaenia + hepatosplenomegaly | BM biopsy shows infiltration |
| CD4 | Infectious | Non-Infectious |
|---|---|---|
| Any | Salmonella, Shigella, C. difficile, Giardia | ART side effects (PIs), lactose intolerance |
| < 200 | Cryptosporidium, Microsporidium, Isospora | HIV enteropathy |
| < 100 | CMV colitis, MAC | Lymphoma (GI) |
| < 50 | Disseminated MAC | KS (GI) |
| Condition | Features |
|---|---|
| Oral candidiasis (thrush) | White plaques that CAN be scraped off → leaving erythematous base |
| Oral hairy leukoplakia | White, corrugated lesions on lateral tongue, CANNOT be scraped off (EBV-driven) |
| Aphthous ulcers | Painful, shallow ulcers on non-keratinised mucosa |
| HSV stomatitis | Vesicles → shallow painful ulcers, often on keratinised mucosa (hard palate, gingiva) |
| KS | Violaceous plaques/nodules on palate or gingiva |
| Oral syphilitic patches | Painless mucous patches |
Sometimes a patient presents with features of immunodeficiency (recurrent OIs, low CD4) but is HIV-negative. Consider:
| Condition | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Primary immunodeficiency (e.g., CVID, Hyper-IgM syndrome) | CVID: late-onset hypogammaglobulinaemia, recurrent sinopulmonary infections, autoimmune cytopaenias [15]; Hyper-IgM: CD40L mutation [15] |
| Idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopaenia (ICL) | CD4 < 300 on ≥ 2 occasions, no HIV or other identifiable cause; can develop OIs similar to HIV/AIDS |
| Secondary immunodeficiency (non-HIV) | Immunosuppressive drugs, malignancy (lymphoma, leukaemia), solid organ transplant, HSCT, severe malnutrition |
| HTLV-1 infection | Another retrovirus; causes adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma and tropical spastic paraparesis; endemic in Japan, Caribbean |
6. Important Co-Infections and Overlapping DDx in Hong Kong Context
- Both HIV and syphilis are transmitted sexually and frequently co-exist [10]
- Secondary syphilis and acute HIV BOTH cause: generalised LAP, rash involving palms/soles, mucosal lesions, fever
- Always test for syphilis when diagnosing HIV, and always test for HIV when diagnosing syphilis [10]
- Syphilis can accelerate HIV progression, and HIV alters the natural history of syphilis (faster progression to neurosyphilis)
- Bidirectional relationship: HIV immunosuppression increases risk of TB activation; TB induces host TNF-α response which increases HIV viraemia [16]
- Co-infection leads to higher mortality than either alone [16]
- TB in the immunocompromised is harder to diagnose because many tests rely on intact host immune response (e.g., TST may be negative) [16]
- Recommendation: early bronchoscopy for respiratory specimen if pulmonary TB suspected in HIV [16]
- Share parenteral and sexual transmission routes
- HBV co-infection: tenofovir-based ART treats both; risk of HBV flare if ART containing tenofovir/emtricitabine is stopped
- HCV co-infection: more common in IVDU and MSM; accelerates liver fibrosis; genotypes 1 and 6 most common in HK [17]; DAAs are effective but check for drug interactions with ART
High Yield Summary – DDx of HIV
- Acute HIV mimics EBV infectious mononucleosis — if Monospot negative, test for HIV. Mucosal ulcers are a distinguishing feature of acute HIV.
- 10% of mononucleosis syndromes are not EBV — consider CMV, HIV, HHV-6/7, HBV, toxoplasmosis, drug reactions [9]
- Blasts on PBS can mimic atypical lymphocytes — do not mistake ALL for a viral mono-like illness [8]
- HIV causes dysplastic haematopoiesis and cytopaenias — enters the DDx of MDS [13]
- Always co-test for syphilis when testing for HIV (and vice versa) — overlapping presentations and risk factors [10]
- HIV and TB have a bidirectional synergy — co-infection is worse than either alone; diagnosis of TB is harder in HIV [16]
- Talaromyces marneffei is an important DDx for disseminated skin papules + fever in an HIV patient in SE Asia/HK (CD4 < 100) [7]
- In the CNS: toxoplasmosis (multiple ring-enhancing) vs primary CNS lymphoma (solitary ring-enhancing) vs PML (non-enhancing white matter) vs cryptococcal meningitis (raised ICP, CrAg+)
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of HIV
[1] Lecture slides: GC 061. HIV positive_HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf; Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Encephalitis section — PML) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (Lymphadenopathy section); Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Lymphadenopathy section) [7] AOS material: AOS - Microbio.pdf (Talaromyces marneffei EMQ) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Generalised Lymphadenopathy_ Differential diagnosis and principle of management.pdf [9] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Infectious Mononucleosis section); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Infectious Mononucleosis section) [10] Lecture slides: Dermatology STD Teaching by Dr KM Ho 2.pdf [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (PJP section) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Dermatology PBL 1.pdf (Disseminated herpes zoster) [13] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (MDS section — HIV as DDx) [14] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Aplastic anaemia diagnosis — HIV serology); MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Aplastic anaemia diagnosis) [15] Senior notes: Jerry's immunodeficiencies.pdf (CVID, Hyper-IgM) [16] Senior notes: Gen Clerk Anaes + Microbiology Summary.pdf (TB in the immunocompromised, HIV and TB) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (Hepatitis C section)
Before diving into specific tests, understand the core logic:
- HIV diagnosis is a serological/virological diagnosis — you cannot diagnose HIV clinically. The clinical features prompt you to test, but the test confirms.
- The "window period" is the time between infection and when a given test becomes positive. Different test generations have different window periods.
- gp41 and gp120 are important parts of the HIV envelope — crucial for HIV testing [2] — because antibody-based tests detect antibodies against these envelope proteins and the core protein p24.
- Two key questions after diagnosis: (a) How advanced is the disease? (CD4 count) (b) How much virus is there? (viral load)
2. HIV Testing Modalities
HIV tests have evolved over "generations" — each generation detects earlier markers and therefore shortens the window period:
| Generation | What It Detects | Window Period | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st generation | IgG antibodies only (using viral lysate antigen) | ~6–8 weeks | Historical; no longer in routine use |
| 2nd generation | IgG antibodies (using recombinant/synthetic antigens) | ~4–6 weeks | Improved specificity over 1st gen |
| 3rd generation | IgG + IgM antibodies | ~3–4 weeks | Detects IgM earlier, shortens window |
| 4th generation (Ag/Ab combo test) | IgG + IgM antibodies AND p24 antigen | ~2 weeks (range 14–18 days) | Current standard of care; p24 antigen appears before antibodies [1][2] |
| 5th generation | IgG, IgM, p24 Ag — reported SEPARATELY | ~2 weeks | Can distinguish acute (p24 only) from established (Ab+) infection |
Why is the 4th-generation test the current standard? Because during acute HIV infection, there is massive viral replication — p24 (capsid protein) is released into the blood before the immune system generates detectable antibodies [2]. By detecting p24 antigen AND antibodies simultaneously, the 4th-gen test closes most of the diagnostic "window."
High Yield – The Window Period Concept
The window period is the Achilles' heel of HIV testing. During this period, the patient is highly infectious (peak viraemia) but may test negative on antibody-only tests.
Timeline of marker detection after infection:
- HIV RNA (viral load) — detectable ~10–14 days (by NAT/PCR)
- p24 antigen — detectable ~14–18 days (by 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo)
- HIV IgM — detectable ~21–28 days (by 3rd-gen)
- HIV IgG — detectable ~28–42 days (by 1st/2nd-gen)
- Rapid/point-of-care tests (antibody-only) — positive ~3–12 weeks
If you suspect acute HIV (within the first 2 weeks) and the 4th-gen test is negative, request HIV RNA (NAT/PCR) to close the residual window. [1]
2.2 Specific Test Types
| Test | Principle | Use |
|---|---|---|
| 4th-generation HIV Ag/Ab combination immunoassay (e.g., ARCHITECT, VITROS) | ELISA/CMIA detecting anti-HIV-1/2 antibodies + p24 antigen | First-line screening test; high sensitivity (~99.7%) and specificity (~99.5%) [1] |
| HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation immunoassay | Distinguishes between HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies | Confirmatory test after reactive screening; replaces Western blot in modern algorithms [1] |
| Test | Principle | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) | Immunochromatographic strip detecting HIV-1/2 antibodies from finger-prick blood or oral fluid | Result in 15–30 minutes; useful for outreach, VCT clinics, ED, needle-stick injury initial assessment [1][18] |
| Oral fluid rapid test (e.g., OraQuick) | Detects antibodies in oral mucosal transudate | Convenient but slightly lower sensitivity than blood-based rapid tests; longer window period |
POCT for HIV provides rapid result but is ANTIBODY-ONLY — it will miss acute infection in the window period. A negative rapid test in a high-risk patient with acute symptoms should be followed up with a 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo test and/or HIV RNA PCR. [18]
| Test | Principle | Use |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 RNA PCR (viral load / NAT) | RT-PCR quantifying HIV-1 RNA copies/mL | Earliest detection (~10 days post-exposure); used for: (1) diagnosis of acute HIV when Ag/Ab is negative, (2) monitoring treatment response, (3) confirming diagnosis in neonates [1] |
| HIV DNA PCR (proviral DNA) | Detects integrated HIV DNA in host cells | Mainly used for infant diagnosis (maternal antibodies cross placenta, making serological tests unreliable until 18 months) |
| Test | Principle | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Western blot | Detects antibodies against specific HIV proteins (p24, gp41, gp120, gp160) separated by electrophoresis | Previously the gold-standard confirmatory test but now REPLACED in most guidelines by HIV-1/2 differentiation immunoassay because it has higher false-negative and indeterminate rates in early infection [1] |
| Step | Test | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo immunoassay | High sensitivity to catch all positives (including false positives) [1] |
| Confirmation | HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay | Confirms true positive AND differentiates HIV-1 from HIV-2 [1] |
| Tie-breaker | HIV-1 RNA NAT (PCR) | Resolves discordant or indeterminate results; confirms acute infection [1] |
3. Diagnostic Algorithm
This is the current standard approach used in most settings, including Hong Kong:
High Yield – Understanding the Algorithm Logic
Why three steps?
- Step 1 (4th-gen Ag/Ab combo): Maximises sensitivity — catches both established (antibody+) and acute (p24 antigen+) infections. But has a small false-positive rate (~0.3–0.5%).
- Step 2 (Differentiation immunoassay): Confirms the diagnosis AND tells you whether it's HIV-1 or HIV-2 (this matters because HIV-2 is intrinsically resistant to NNRTIs).
- Step 3 (HIV-1 RNA NAT): Only needed when Step 2 is negative/indeterminate despite a reactive Step 1 — this scenario occurs in acute infection (p24 antigen is positive but antibodies haven't developed yet) or false positive Step 1.
- In Hong Kong, voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) is available at Social Hygiene Service (SHS) clinics and NGO testing sites [1]
- Pre-test and post-test counselling is essential (informed consent before testing; discussion of result implications, window period, partner notification) [1]
- In HK, a reactive screening test is confirmed by a second method — typically the differentiation immunoassay or HIV-1 RNA [1]
- Rapid tests are available at some outreach sites but must be confirmed by laboratory-based tests [18]
4. Investigations After HIV Diagnosis — Baseline Assessment
Once HIV is confirmed, a comprehensive workup is needed to:
- Stage the disease (how bad is the immune damage?)
- Guide ART selection (resistance? co-infections? organ function?)
- Screen for complications (OIs? malignancies? metabolic?)
| Investigation | What It Tells You | Key Findings & Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| CD4+ T-cell count (absolute and %) | Degree of immunosuppression — the single most important prognostic marker for OI risk [1][2] | Normal: 500–1500 cells/μL; < 500: increased risk of certain conditions; < 200: AIDS (high risk of PCP, oesophageal candidiasis); < 100: toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis; < 50: CMV retinitis, disseminated MAC, Talaromyces marneffei [1][2] |
| CD4 percentage | More stable than absolute count (less affected by diurnal variation, intercurrent illness) | < 14% = AIDS-defining regardless of absolute count; useful when absolute count is discordant |
| CD4:CD8 ratio | Normally > 1; inverted in HIV | Inversion ( < 1) reflects CD4 depletion and CD8 expansion (CTL response to HIV); not used for staging but a marker of immune activation |
| Investigation | What It Tells You | Key Findings & Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 RNA viral load (quantitative PCR) | Amount of circulating virus — the most important marker for monitoring ART response [1] | At diagnosis: establishes baseline (typically 10³–10⁶ copies/mL); On ART: goal is "undetectable" ( < 50 copies/mL by 6 months of effective ART); Treatment failure: VL > 200 copies/mL on 2 consecutive tests |
| HIV genotypic resistance testing | Identifies mutations in RT, protease, integrase genes conferring drug resistance | Should be done at baseline BEFORE starting ART (to avoid prescribing a regimen the virus is already resistant to); also done at treatment failure [1] |
| HIV tropism testing (co-receptor tropism) | Determines whether virus uses CCR5 or CXCR4 | Only needed if considering maraviroc (CCR5 antagonist) — only effective against R5-tropic virus |
High Yield – CD4 vs Viral Load
CD4 count tells you where the patient is now (current immune status, risk of OIs).
Viral load tells you where the patient is going (rate of disease progression, response to treatment).
Think of it like a train: CD4 = your current position on the track; VL = the speed of the train heading towards the cliff (AIDS). ART slows and stops the train.
| Investigation | Rationale | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| CBC with differential | Detect cytopaenias (anaemia, thrombocytopaenia, neutropaenia, lymphopaenia — all common in HIV) [1] | Lymphopaenia is the hallmark; anaemia is the most common haematological abnormality; thrombocytopaenia may indicate HIV-associated ITP |
| Renal function (RFT: Cr, eGFR, electrolytes) | Baseline before ART (some drugs are nephrotoxic, e.g., tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/TDF) | eGFR < 60 → avoid TDF, consider TAF (tenofovir alafenamide) instead |
| Liver function (LFT: ALT, AST, ALP, bilirubin, albumin) | Screen for hepatitis co-infection, baseline before hepatotoxic drugs (NNRTIs, PIs) | Elevated transaminases → investigate for hepatitis B/C co-infection |
| Fasting glucose and lipid profile | HIV and ART (especially PIs, efavirenz) increase metabolic risk | Baseline for cardiovascular risk assessment; monitor on ART |
| HLA-B5701 testing* | Screen for abacavir hypersensitivity | HLA-B5701 positive → CONTRAINDICATION to abacavir* (risk of severe, potentially fatal hypersensitivity reaction); must be done before prescribing abacavir [1] |
| G6PD status | Screen before dapsone or co-trimoxazole (for PCP prophylaxis) | G6PD deficiency → risk of haemolysis with sulphonamides (co-trimoxazole) and dapsone [11] |
| Urinalysis (dipstick + microscopy) | Screen for proteinuria (HIVAN), haematuria (glomerulonephritis) | Proteinuria → quantify with urine PCR; consider renal biopsy if nephrotic range |
This is critical because co-infections alter management and prognosis:
| Investigation | Rationale | Key Findings & Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc | Screen for HBV co-infection (shared transmission routes) [1] | If HBsAg+: need full HBV workup (HBV DNA, HBeAg); ART should include tenofovir + emtricitabine (treats both HIV and HBV); NEVER stop anti-HBV component without replacing it → risk of severe HBV flare |
| Anti-HCV (± HCV RNA if positive) | Screen for HCV co-infection [1] | If anti-HCV+: check HCV RNA to confirm active infection; HCV accelerates liver fibrosis in HIV co-infection [17] |
| Syphilis serology (VDRL/RPR + TPHA/FTA-Abs) | Screen for syphilis co-infection [1][10] | High rates of co-infection, especially in MSM; if positive, stage and treat appropriately; consider LP for neurosyphilis if late latent/unknown duration or neurological symptoms |
| Toxoplasma IgG | Assess risk of cerebral toxoplasmosis reactivation | If IgG+: latent infection present → need prophylaxis when CD4 < 100 |
| CMV IgG | Assess risk of CMV reactivation | If IgG+: at risk of CMV retinitis when CD4 < 50 → need regular fundoscopy |
| Hepatitis A IgG | Assess immunity | If IgG-: vaccinate (especially MSM, liver disease) |
| Tuberculosis screening | TST or IGRA + CXR | IGRA (e.g., QuantiFERON) preferred over TST in HIV because: (1) not affected by BCG vaccination, (2) requires only one visit; BUT both IGRA and TST can be false-negative in advanced immunosuppression (CD4 < 200) because both tests rely on functional T-cell response [16][19] |
High Yield – HBV/HIV Co-Infection Trap
If a patient has HIV/HBV co-infection and is on an ART regimen containing tenofovir + emtricitabine (which also suppresses HBV), you must NEVER stop these drugs without substituting another HBV-active agent. Abrupt cessation → immune reconstitution + loss of HBV suppression → severe HBV flare → hepatic decompensation → death. This is a frequently tested exam point. [1]
| Investigation | Rationale |
|---|---|
| CXR | Screen for pulmonary TB, PCP, other pulmonary pathology; baseline before ART [1] |
| Cervical Pap smear (women) | Screen for HPV-related cervical dysplasia/carcinoma (increased risk in HIV) — annually in HIV+ women |
| Anal Pap smear (MSM) | Screen for HPV-related anal dysplasia (high rates of anal cancer in HIV+ MSM) |
| Fundoscopy | Baseline; repeat regularly when CD4 < 50 to screen for CMV retinitis |
| Bone density (DEXA) | Consider in patients > 50 or with risk factors (some ART, e.g., TDF, associated with ↓BMD) |
| Pregnancy test (women of childbearing age) | Certain ART drugs may have teratogenic potential (historically efavirenz; dolutegravir now considered safe but was initially flagged) |
| OI | Key Investigation | Diagnostic Finding |
|---|---|---|
| PCP [11] | Induced sputum or BAL for silver stain/IF/PCR; serum β-D-glucan; serum LDH; HRCT | Cannot be cultured; characteristic cysts on silver/IF stain; β-D-glucan sensitivity ~95%, specificity ~86%; elevated LDH (> 500); bilateral perihilar GGO on CXR/HRCT [11] |
| Cerebral toxoplasmosis | CT/MRI brain; toxoplasma IgG serology | Multiple ring-enhancing lesions with surrounding oedema on contrast CT/MRI; positive IgG (reactivation); empirical treatment trial (clinical + radiological response in 2 weeks supports diagnosis) |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | LP: opening pressure, India ink, CSF CrAg (cryptococcal antigen), CSF culture; serum CrAg | Raised opening pressure ( > 25 cmH₂O); positive India ink (budding encapsulated yeast); positive CrAg (sensitivity > 99% in serum and CSF); CSF: lymphocytic, mildly raised protein, low/normal glucose |
| TB | Sputum AFB smear (×3), sputum culture, GeneXpert MTB/RIF (rapid NAT) [16] | GeneXpert detects MTB DNA AND rifampicin resistance within 2 hours; CXR may be atypical (no cavitation, lower lobe, miliary) at low CD4 [16] |
| CMV retinitis | Fundoscopy; CMV PCR (blood) | "Pizza pie" / "cottage cheese and ketchup" appearance on fundoscopy; positive CMV PCR supports but fundoscopy is the primary diagnostic tool |
| Talaromyces marneffei [7] | Blood culture, skin biopsy for histology + culture | Dimorphic fungus; grows as mould at 25°C and yeast at 37°C; characteristic central septation on histology; blood culture positive in ~70%; skin papules show central necrotic umbilication [7] |
| PML [5] | MRI brain; CSF JC virus PCR | Non-enhancing, non-mass-effect white matter lesions on MRI (characteristically involving subcortical U-fibres); positive JC virus PCR in CSF (sensitivity ~75%, specificity ~95%) [5] |
| MAC (disseminated) | Blood culture (mycobacterial); bone marrow biopsy + culture | Positive mycobacterial blood culture (gold standard); AFB on bone marrow biopsy |
| Kaposi sarcoma | Clinical appearance + skin biopsy | HHV-8 (KSHV) detected by immunohistochemistry (LANA-1) on biopsy; biopsy shows spindle cell proliferation with slit-like vascular spaces |
| Investigation | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 RNA viral load | At baseline, 4 weeks after starting/changing ART, then every 3–6 months | Goal: undetectable ( < 50 copies/mL) by 6 months; persistent viraemia → assess adherence, then resistance testing [1] |
| CD4 count | At baseline, then every 3–6 months until stable | Once CD4 > 350 for > 1 year with suppressed VL, can reduce frequency to every 12 months; once CD4 > 500 for > 2 years, some guidelines say monitoring optional |
| RFT, LFT, fasting glucose, lipids | Every 6–12 months | Monitor for ART toxicity and metabolic complications |
| HBV DNA (if co-infected) | Every 6–12 months | Ensure HBV suppression on tenofovir-based ART |
| Syphilis serology | Annually (more frequently in high-risk MSM) | Screen for reinfection |
5. Special Diagnostic Scenarios
- Maternal IgG antibodies cross the placenta → serological tests (antibody-based) are UNRELIABLE until 18 months [1]
- Use HIV DNA PCR or HIV RNA PCR (virological tests) for diagnosis in infants
- Testing schedule: at birth, 4–6 weeks, and 4–6 months
- Two positive virological tests on separate samples confirm HIV infection in an infant
- Elite controllers maintain undetectable viral loads without ART
- They are HIV antibody-positive (4th-gen test will be reactive)
- Viral load may be undetectable or very low — does NOT mean they are uninfected
- CD4 counts are typically preserved
- Many patients in Hong Kong present late with CD4 < 200 and an AIDS-defining illness
- Always test for HIV in patients presenting with PCP, TB (especially extrapulmonary), candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, Kaposi sarcoma, unexplained weight loss, chronic diarrhoea, or persistent generalised lymphadenopathy [1][11]
- The OI itself may be the first clue to underlying HIV
- Traditional approach: "opt-in" — patient must specifically consent to HIV testing
- Modern approach (recommended by WHO, CDC): "opt-out" — HIV testing is offered as routine to all patients in healthcare settings, with the option to decline
- In HK, voluntary testing with informed consent remains the standard, but there is a push towards normalising HIV testing in clinical settings [1]
| Clinical Scenario | Initial Test | Follow-Up if Positive | Follow-Up if Negative but High Suspicion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine screening / VCT | 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo | Differentiation immunoassay → confirm | Repeat in 3 months (window period) |
| Acute retroviral syndrome | 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo + HIV-1 RNA PCR simultaneously | Differentiation immunoassay | If 4th-gen negative: HIV-1 RNA PCR; if RNA also negative, repeat in 2–4 weeks |
| Needle-stick injury | Rapid test on source + 4th-gen on exposed HCW (baseline) | Follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months | Start PEP if source is positive/high-risk (don't wait for results) [1][3] |
| Infant < 18 months | HIV DNA or RNA PCR | Repeat for confirmation | Serological tests unreliable due to maternal antibodies |
| Patient with OI / AIDS-defining illness | 4th-gen Ag/Ab combo | CD4 + VL + full baseline workup | Very rarely false-negative at AIDS stage (established antibodies) |
High Yield Summary – Diagnosis of HIV
- 4th-generation Ag/Ab combination immunoassay is the standard first-line screening test — detects both p24 antigen and HIV-1/2 antibodies; window period ~2 weeks [1]
- Confirmatory test: HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay (replaces Western blot) [1]
- If screening reactive but confirmatory negative/indeterminate: HIV-1 RNA NAT → resolves acute infection vs false positive [1]
- CD4 count is the key marker of immunological status and OI risk; CD4 < 200 = AIDS [2]
- Viral load (HIV-1 RNA) is the key marker for monitoring treatment response; goal is < 50 copies/mL [1]
- Baseline workup includes: CD4, VL, resistance testing, HLA-B5701, G6PD, CBC, RFT, LFT, fasting glucose/lipids, HBV/HCV/syphilis serology, toxoplasma IgG, CXR, TB screening* [1]
- Rapid/POCT tests are antibody-only → will miss acute infection in the window period [18]
- In neonates < 18 months: use virological tests (HIV DNA/RNA PCR), NOT serological tests [1]
- IGRA preferred over TST for TB screening in HIV, but BOTH can be false-negative at low CD4 [16][19]
- Always test for HIV in patients with OIs (PCP, TB, cryptococcal meningitis, toxoplasmosis, KS) — these may be the first presentation [1]
- HLA-B5701 must be checked before prescribing abacavir* [1]
- Never stop tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV/HBV co-infected patients without substituting another HBV-active agent [1]
Active Recall - HIV Diagnosis, Investigations and Algorithm
[1] Lecture slides: GC 061. HIV positive_HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf; Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [3] Lecture slides: GC 107. Protect yourself and your patients.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Encephalitis section — PML) [7] AOS material: AOS - Microbio.pdf (Talaromyces marneffei EMQ) [10] Lecture slides: Dermatology STD Teaching by Dr KM Ho 2.pdf [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (PJP section) [16] Senior notes: Gen Clerk Anaes + Microbiology Summary.pdf (TB in the immunocompromised, HIV and TB) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (Hepatitis C section) [18] Lecture slides: GC 158. Point-of-care testing (POCT).pdf [19] Senior notes: Gen Clerk Anaes + Microbiology Summary.pdf (Immunological diagnosis of TB — TST and IGRA)
The management of HIV rests on five pillars:
- Antiretroviral therapy (ART) — suppress the virus
- Prophylaxis of opportunistic infections (OIs) — prevent OIs at specific CD4 thresholds
- Treatment of OIs — when they occur
- Prevention of transmission — to others (treatment as prevention, PEP, PrEP, partner notification)
- Long-term monitoring and management of comorbidities — metabolic, cardiovascular, psychosocial
2. Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
The current recommendation (WHO 2025, DHHS, BHIVA, IAS): START ART IN ALL HIV-POSITIVE INDIVIDUALS REGARDLESS OF CD4 COUNT [1][2].
This is based on landmark trials:
- START trial (2015): demonstrated benefit of immediate ART (at CD4 > 500) vs deferred ART — reduced serious AIDS and non-AIDS events by 57%
- TEMPRANO trial (2015): similar findings in West Africa
- Universal test-and-treat: the current global strategy — diagnose and start ART as early as possible
Why treat everyone regardless of CD4?
- Clinical benefit: earlier treatment prevents immune damage, reduces non-AIDS events (CVD, renal disease, neurocognitive decline driven by chronic immune activation)
- Prevention benefit: undetectable viral load = untransmittable (U=U) — ART prevents onward transmission
- Public health benefit: reducing community viral load decreases epidemic spread
Exceptions / timing nuances for starting ART:
| Scenario | When to Start ART | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Most patients | Start ASAP, ideally same day or within 7 days of diagnosis ("rapid ART initiation") [1] | Early treatment is better; delays lose patients to follow-up |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | Delay ART by 4–6 weeks | Early ART causes severe IRIS with raised ICP — high mortality |
| TB meningitis | Delay ART by 4–8 weeks | Similar IRIS risk with devastating CNS inflammation |
| Pulmonary TB (CD4 < 50) | Start ART within 2 weeks of TB treatment [1] | Benefit of early immune reconstitution outweighs IRIS risk |
| Pulmonary TB (CD4 > 50) | Start ART within 8 weeks of TB treatment [1] | Lower urgency; allows TB drugs to stabilise first |
| Other OIs | Generally start ART within 2 weeks of OI treatment | Early ART improves survival in most OIs |
High Yield – When NOT to Start ART Immediately
The key exceptions to immediate ART are cryptococcal meningitis and TB meningitis — in both cases, IRIS in the CNS is catastrophic (raised ICP → brain herniation; worsening meningeal inflammation → death). For these, defer ART by 4–6 weeks to allow OI treatment to reduce pathogen burden first. [1]
| Goal | Target | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Virological | Undetectable viral load ( < 50 copies/mL) | Within 6 months of starting ART [1] |
| Immunological | CD4 count recovery (variable; may not fully normalise if treatment started late) | Gradual rise — expect ~100–150 cells/μL increase per year on effective ART |
| Clinical | Prevent OIs, reduce AIDS and non-AIDS morbidity/mortality | Ongoing |
| Prevention | U=U (undetectable = untransmittable) | Once VL undetectable for ≥ 6 months |
ART always involves a COMBINATION of drugs (cART — combination antiretroviral therapy), typically 2–3 agents from different classes [1].
Why combination therapy? HIV has an extraordinarily high mutation rate (due to error-prone reverse transcriptase — ~1 mutation per replication cycle). Monotherapy allows rapid selection of resistant mutants. Combining drugs with different mechanisms makes it virtually impossible for a single viral variant to be resistant to all drugs simultaneously. This is the same logic as TB treatment.
The backbone of modern ART: [1]
| Component | Agents | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 2 NRTIs ("backbone") | Tenofovir (TDF or TAF) + emtricitabine (FTC) or abacavir (ABC) + lamivudine (3TC) [1] | Inhibit reverse transcription; nucleoside analogues incorporated into growing DNA chain → chain termination |
| + 1 "anchor" drug | INSTI (preferred): dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC) [1]; or NNRTI: efavirenz (EFV), rilpivirine, doravirine; or boosted PI: darunavir/r (DRV/r) | The "third drug" that completes the regimen; INSTIs are preferred due to high potency, high barrier to resistance, excellent tolerability |
The WHO and most international guidelines now recommend INSTI-based regimens as preferred first-line [1]:
| Regimen | Components | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|
| TDF/FTC + DTG (or TAF/FTC + DTG) | Tenofovir + emtricitabine + dolutegravir | WHO preferred first-line globally; high potency, high barrier to resistance, once-daily dosing, well tolerated, safe in pregnancy (neural tube defect risk now shown to be minimal) [1] |
| TAF/FTC/BIC (single-tablet regimen: Biktarvy) | Tenofovir alafenamide + emtricitabine + bictegravir | Single tablet, once daily; high barrier to resistance; TAF has less renal and bone toxicity than TDF; very widely used in developed settings |
| ABC/3TC + DTG | Abacavir + lamivudine + dolutegravir (Triumeq) | Single tablet; but requires HLA-B5701 testing first (contraindicated if positive); not suitable if HBV co-infection (ABC/3TC does not suppress HBV)* [1] |
2.5 Drug Classes — Mechanisms, Key Side Effects, Contraindications
"Nucleoside" → structural analogues of natural nucleosides; they get phosphorylated intracellularly, then incorporated into the growing viral DNA chain by reverse transcriptase, causing chain termination (because they lack the 3'-OH needed for the next phosphodiester bond).
| Drug | Key Side Effects | Contraindications / Cautions |
|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) | Nephrotoxicity (proximal tubular dysfunction / Fanconi syndrome), decreased bone mineral density [1] | Avoid if eGFR < 60; monitor RFT; consider TAF instead |
| Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) | Less nephrotoxic and bone-sparing than TDF; may cause weight gain, lipid changes | Preferred over TDF if renal/bone concerns |
| Emtricitabine (FTC) | Headache, skin hyperpigmentation (palms/soles); generally very well tolerated | Active against HBV — do not stop abruptly in co-infection |
| Lamivudine (3TC) | Generally very well tolerated; similar to FTC | Active against HBV — same warning as FTC; low barrier to HBV resistance |
| Abacavir (ABC) | Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (fever, rash, GI symptoms, respiratory symptoms — can be fatal on rechallenge) [1] | CONTRAINDICATED if HLA-B5701 positive* [1]; also associated with slightly increased cardiovascular risk |
| Zidovudine (AZT) | Bone marrow suppression (macrocytic anaemia, neutropaenia); GI intolerance; headache; lipoatrophy; lactic acidosis (rare) [1] | Avoid if pre-existing anaemia/neutropaenia; largely replaced by newer NRTIs but still used in PMTCT in some settings |
Why the emphasis on AZT toxicity? [1] AZT (zidovudine) was the first antiretroviral (1987). While historically important, its toxicity profile (especially bone marrow suppression causing macrocytic anaemia — because it interferes with mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma in erythroid precursors) means it is no longer preferred. However, it is still used in some PMTCT (prevention of mother-to-child transmission) protocols and in resource-limited settings.
Class Effect – Mitochondrial Toxicity
NRTIs can inhibit human mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (in addition to HIV reverse transcriptase), leading to mitochondrial dysfunction. This manifests as: lactic acidosis, hepatic steatosis, lipoatrophy, peripheral neuropathy, pancreatitis [1]. The risk is highest with older NRTIs (d4T > ddI > AZT) and very low with modern NRTIs (TDF, TAF, FTC, ABC).
NNRTIs bind directly to reverse transcriptase at an allosteric site (non-competitive inhibition), causing a conformational change that inactivates the enzyme. Unlike NRTIs, they do NOT need intracellular phosphorylation.
| Drug | Key Side Effects | Contraindications / Cautions |
|---|---|---|
| Efavirenz (EFV) | CNS/neuropsychiatric effects (vivid dreams, dizziness, insomnia, depression — usually resolve in 2–4 weeks); rash; dyslipidaemia; teratogenicity debated (previously avoided in 1st trimester, now considered acceptable) [1] | Low barrier to resistance (single K103N mutation); potent CYP inducer (many drug interactions); avoid with rifampicin caution |
| Nevirapine (NVP) | Severe hepatotoxicity (especially in women with CD4 > 250 or men with CD4 > 400); severe rash including SJS/TEN [1] | Contraindicated in women with CD4 > 250 and men with CD4 > 400 due to hepatotoxicity risk [1] |
| Rilpivirine (RPV) | Generally well tolerated; QTc prolongation (rare) | Requires food for absorption; cannot be used with PPIs; only suitable if VL < 100,000 and CD4 > 200 |
| Doravirine | Well tolerated; less CNS effects than EFV | Active against some NNRTI-resistant strains (K103N) |
Why do NNRTIs have a low barrier to resistance? A single point mutation (e.g., K103N for EFV/NVP) in the NNRTI-binding pocket is enough to confer high-level resistance to the entire class. This is why NNRTIs are no longer preferred as first-line "anchor" drugs — replaced by INSTIs which have a higher barrier to resistance.
HIV protease cleaves the gag-pol polyprotein into functional structural proteins and enzymes during viral maturation. PIs block this step → immature, non-infectious virions are produced.
Always given with a pharmacokinetic "booster" (ritonavir /r or cobicistat /c) to inhibit CYP3A4 and increase PI levels [1].
| Drug | Key Side Effects | Contraindications / Cautions |
|---|---|---|
| Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) | GI intolerance (diarrhoea, nausea); dyslipidaemia; insulin resistance; contains a sulfonamide moiety — caution in sulfa allergy | Major drug interactions via CYP3A4 (ritonavir is a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor) [1]; numerous interactions with statins, anticonvulsants, antifungals, etc. |
| Atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) | Unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia (inhibits UGT1A1 — same enzyme as in Gilbert syndrome) → painless jaundice, scleral icterus; nephrolithiasis [1] | Needs acidic environment for absorption → avoid with PPIs |
| Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) | GI intolerance, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance | Mainly used in paediatric formulations and resource-limited settings |
PI Drug Interactions – Exam Favourite
Ritonavir and cobicistat are potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. This means PIs interact with a huge number of drugs metabolised by CYP3A4:
- Simvastatin and lovastatin: CONTRAINDICATED (risk of rhabdomyolysis)
- Rifampicin: CONTRAINDICATED with PIs (massive CYP induction reduces PI levels to subtherapeutic — use rifabutin instead)
- Ergot alkaloids: contraindicated
- Midazolam (oral), triazolam: contraindicated (excessive sedation)
- Corticosteroids (inhaled/injected fluticasone): risk of iatrogenic Cushing syndrome
HIV integrase inserts the proviral DNA into the host chromosome. INSTIs block this step by chelating the metal ions (Mg²⁺) at the integrase active site.
INSTIs are now the preferred "anchor" drug class for first-line ART [1].
| Drug | Key Side Effects | Contraindications / Cautions |
|---|---|---|
| Dolutegravir (DTG) | Insomnia, headache, weight gain; rare: elevated creatinine (inhibits renal tubular OCT2 transporter — NOT true nephrotoxicity); rare neuropsychiatric effects [1] | Very high barrier to resistance; safe in pregnancy (initial concerns about neural tube defects were not confirmed in larger studies); interacts with polyvalent cations (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Al³⁺, Fe²⁺) — take 2h before or 6h after antacids/supplements |
| Bictegravir (BIC) | Similar to DTG; generally very well tolerated; weight gain | High barrier to resistance; only available as fixed-dose combination (Biktarvy) |
| Raltegravir (RAL) | Generally well tolerated; rare: rhabdomyolysis, CK elevation | Lower barrier to resistance than DTG/BIC; twice-daily dosing (less convenient) |
| Cabotegravir (CAB) | Injection site reactions; weight gain | Available as long-acting injectable (IM every 2 months) — for both treatment and PrEP; revolutionary for adherence |
Why are INSTIs now preferred over NNRTIs and PIs? [1]
- Higher barrier to resistance (especially DTG and BIC)
- Fewer drug interactions (unlike PIs which interact with everything via CYP3A4)
- Better tolerability (fewer CNS effects than EFV, fewer GI effects than PIs)
- Rapid viral suppression (faster time to undetectable VL)
| Drug | Mechanism | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Maraviroc [1] | CCR5 antagonist — blocks binding of gp120 to CCR5 co-receptor | Only effective against R5-tropic virus; requires tropism testing; reserved for treatment-experienced patients |
| Enfuvirtide (T-20) [1] | Fusion inhibitor — blocks gp41-mediated membrane fusion | Subcutaneous injection twice daily; reserved for multi-drug resistant HIV; poorly tolerated (injection site reactions) |
| Fostemsavir | Attachment inhibitor — blocks gp120-CD4 binding | For heavily treatment-experienced patients with multi-drug resistant HIV |
| Drug | Mechanism | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Lenacapavir | Inhibits HIV capsid at multiple stages (nuclear import, integration, assembly) | Long-acting (subcutaneous injection every 6 months); approved for multi-drug resistant HIV; also under investigation for PrEP |
| Class | Mechanism | Preferred Agent | Key Toxicity | Key Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRTI | Chain termination of viral DNA | TDF or TAF + FTC [1] | TDF: nephrotoxicity, ↓BMD; ABC: hypersensitivity if HLA-B*5701+ | FTC/3TC: HBV flare if stopped |
| NNRTI | Allosteric inhibition of RT | Doravirine (or EFV) | EFV: CNS effects; NVP: hepatotoxicity | Low barrier to resistance |
| PI | Block viral protease / maturation | DRV/r [1] | Dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, GI | CYP3A4 inhibition (massive) |
| INSTI | Block integrase / integration | DTG or BIC [1] | Weight gain, ↑Cr (DTG, not true nephrotox) | Polyvalent cations |
| CCR5 antagonist | Block co-receptor binding | Maraviroc | Hepatotoxicity (rare) | Requires tropism testing |
| Fusion inhibitor | Block gp41-mediated fusion | Enfuvirtide | Injection site reactions | Reserved for MDR HIV |
| Capsid inhibitor | Multistage capsid interference | Lenacapavir | Injection site reactions | Long-acting q6 months |
3. Management of Opportunistic Infections (OIs)
3.1 OI Prophylaxis
Prophylaxis is given at specific CD4 thresholds to prevent OIs before they occur, and discontinued once CD4 recovers on ART [1][2].
| OI | CD4 Threshold to Start | Preferred Regimen | When to Stop |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCP | CD4 < 200 (or CD4% < 14%, or oral candidiasis, or prior AIDS-defining illness) [1][11] | Co-trimoxazole (TMP-SMX) 1 SS tablet daily or 1 DS tablet daily [11] | CD4 > 200 for ≥ 3 months on ART |
| Toxoplasmosis | CD4 < 100 AND toxoplasma IgG positive | Co-trimoxazole 1 DS tablet daily (same drug, higher dose than PCP prophylaxis — covers both) | CD4 > 200 for ≥ 3 months |
| MAC | CD4 < 50 | Azithromycin 1200 mg weekly (or clarithromycin 500 mg BD) | CD4 > 100 for ≥ 3 months; rule out active MAC before starting prophylaxis |
| TB (latent TB) | Positive IGRA/TST regardless of CD4 (after ruling out active TB) | Isoniazid 300 mg daily × 9 months (+ pyridoxine) or rifapentine + isoniazid × 3 months | Complete course |
| Cryptococcus | Not routinely in HK; in high-prevalence settings: CD4 < 100 with positive serum CrAg | Fluconazole | CD4 > 100 for ≥ 3 months |
Co-trimoxazole (TMP-SMX, brand name Septrin) is the workhorse of OI prophylaxis — a single DS tablet daily can prevent PCP, toxoplasmosis, and provides additional protection against some bacterial infections and Isospora. Must check G6PD status before prescribing because the sulphamethoxazole component is a sulphonamide and can cause haemolysis in G6PD deficiency [11].
High Yield – PCP Prophylaxis Alternatives
If the patient cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole (e.g., sulfa allergy, G6PD deficiency, severe rash):
| OI | Regimen | When to Stop |
|---|---|---|
| PCP (after treated episode) | Co-trimoxazole (same as primary) | CD4 > 200 for ≥ 3 months |
| Toxoplasmosis | Co-trimoxazole (chronic suppressive) or pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine + leucovorin | CD4 > 200 for ≥ 6 months + completed initial therapy + asymptomatic |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | Fluconazole 200 mg daily (consolidation/maintenance) | CD4 > 100 for ≥ 12 months with undetectable VL |
| CMV retinitis | Valganciclovir (chronic maintenance) | CD4 > 100 for ≥ 3–6 months + ophthalmological clearance |
| MAC | Clarithromycin or azithromycin + ethambutol | CD4 > 100 for ≥ 6 months + completed ≥ 12 months treatment |
| OI | Treatment | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| PCP [11] | Co-trimoxazole (TMP 15–20 mg/kg/day, divided q6–8h) IV then PO × 21 days [11]; if PaO₂ < 70 mmHg or A-a gradient > 35: add adjunctive corticosteroids (prednisone 40 mg BD × 5 days, then taper) [11] | Co-trimoxazole is the most effective drug for PCP [11]; give IV until clinically stable then switch to PO; watch for fluid overload with IV dilution [11]; steroids reduce mortality in severe PCP by damping excessive inflammation |
| Cerebral toxoplasmosis | Pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine + leucovorin (folinic acid) × 6 weeks | Leucovorin prevents bone marrow toxicity of pyrimethamine; if sulfa-allergic: pyrimethamine + clindamycin |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | Induction: amphotericin B + flucytosine × 2 weeks → Consolidation: fluconazole 400 mg daily × 8 weeks → Maintenance: fluconazole 200 mg daily | Therapeutic LP (serial) to manage raised ICP (target opening pressure < 20 cmH₂O); delay ART by 4–6 weeks |
| CMV retinitis | Valganciclovir PO (or ganciclovir IV); intravitreal ganciclovir/foscarnet for sight-threatening lesions | Monitor CBC (ganciclovir causes neutropaenia) |
| Disseminated MAC | Clarithromycin (or azithromycin) + ethambutol ± rifabutin | Lifelong treatment until immune reconstitution on ART |
| Oesophageal candidiasis | Fluconazole 200 mg daily × 14–21 days [2] | If fluconazole-resistant: itraconazole or voriconazole or IV echinocandin |
| Talaromyces marneffei [7] | Induction: amphotericin B × 2 weeks → Maintenance: itraconazole 200 mg BD × 10 weeks, then 200 mg daily | Endemic to SE Asia/Southern China/HK; blood culture positive in ~70% [7] |
| TB | Standard RIPE regimen (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) × 2 months then RI × 4–7 months | Drug interactions: rifampicin is a potent CYP3A4 inducer → reduces levels of PIs (contraindicated together), NNRTIs (dose adjust EFV), INSTIs (increase DTG to 50 mg BD) [1] |
High Yield – ART and TB Drug Interactions
Rifampicin is a potent CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 inducer. This creates major problems with ART: [1]
- PIs: CONTRAINDICATED with rifampicin (PI levels reduced to subtherapeutic → use rifabutin instead, which is a weaker inducer)
- EFV: can be used with rifampicin (dose may need adjustment)
- DTG: increase dose from 50 mg OD to 50 mg BD when co-administered with rifampicin
- Rifabutin: preferred rifamycin when using PI-based ART (weaker CYP inducer; can be dose-adjusted)
4. Prevention of HIV Transmission
4.1 Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
| Exposure Type | Risk | PEP Indicated? |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous injury (hollow-bore needle) from HIV+ source | ~0.3% [1][3] | YES |
| Mucous membrane exposure to HIV+ blood/fluid | ~0.09% [1][3] | YES |
| Intact skin exposure | Negligible | No |
| Sexual exposure (unprotected receptive anal) | ~1.4% | YES |
| Sexual exposure (unprotected vaginal) | ~0.08% (receptive) | YES (case-by-case) |
| Human bite (blood in saliva) | Very low | Case-by-case |
- Start ASAP — ideally within 1–2 hours of exposure, absolutely no later than 72 hours [1][3]
- Duration: 28 days [1]
- Preferred regimen: TDF/FTC + DTG (or TDF/FTC + RAL) — same as treatment regimen [1]
- Baseline testing of exposed person: HIV Ag/Ab, HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, CBC, RFT, LFT
- Follow-up HIV testing: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months post-exposure [1][3]
PrEP is the use of ART by HIV-negative individuals at high risk to prevent HIV acquisition [1].
| PrEP Modality | Regimen | Efficacy | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral daily PrEP | TDF/FTC 1 tablet daily [1] | *** > 99% when taken consistently*** | Must confirm HIV-negative before starting; renal monitoring (TDF nephrotoxicity); 3-monthly HIV testing and STI screening |
| On-demand PrEP ("2-1-1") | TDF/FTC: 2 tablets 2–24h before sex, 1 tablet 24h after, 1 tablet 48h after | ~86% effective (IPERGAY study) | Only validated for MSM; not for vaginal sex |
| Long-acting injectable PrEP | Cabotegravir IM every 2 months | Superior to oral TDF/FTC (HPTN 083, 084) | Preferred for those with adherence challenges; longer tail-off period → need bridging oral PrEP if discontinued |
| Lenacapavir SC | SC injection every 6 months | PURPOSE 1 & 2 trials: near 100% efficacy | Newest option; under regulatory review in many settings |
Who should be offered PrEP? [1]
- MSM with inconsistent condom use, multiple partners, or history of STIs
- Serodiscordant couples (HIV+ partner not on ART or VL not suppressed)
- Transgender individuals at high risk
- IVDU (especially if sharing needles)
- Sex workers
If a person with HIV achieves and maintains an undetectable viral load ( < 200 copies/mL, ideally < 50) on ART, they CANNOT sexually transmit HIV [1].
This was proven by the PARTNER 1, PARTNER 2, and HPTN 052 studies — zero linked transmissions among thousands of serodiscordant couples when the HIV+ partner was virally suppressed.
Without intervention, MTCT risk is 15–45%. With comprehensive PMTCT, risk is < 1%. [1]
| Intervention | Details |
|---|---|
| Maternal ART | Start/continue ART throughout pregnancy and lifelong; aim for undetectable VL by delivery [1] |
| Intrapartum management | If VL undetectable near delivery → vaginal delivery acceptable; if VL > 50–1000: consider elective C-section at 38 weeks [1] |
| Neonatal prophylaxis | AZT (zidovudine) syrup for the neonate × 4–6 weeks (low-risk); if high-risk: AZT + 3TC + NVP [1] |
| Avoidance of breastfeeding | In HK and resource-rich settings: formula feeding recommended [1]; in resource-limited settings where formula feeding is not safe/feasible: exclusive breastfeeding + maternal ART is acceptable |
| Measure | Details |
|---|---|
| Condom use | Male and female condoms; consistent use reduces risk by ~80% |
| Partner notification | Inform sexual and needle-sharing partners; offer testing |
| Harm reduction for IVDU | Needle exchange programmes, opioid substitution therapy (methadone) |
| Blood product screening | Universal donor screening in HK — risk now < 1:5,000,000 |
| Male circumcision | Reduces female-to-male transmission by ~50–60% (VMMC programmes in sub-Saharan Africa) |
6. Treatment Failure and Switching
| Type | Definition | Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Virological failure | VL > 200 copies/mL on 2 consecutive tests ≥ 4 weeks apart after ≥ 6 months on ART | Non-adherence (most common!), drug resistance, drug interactions, malabsorption |
| Immunological failure | CD4 fails to rise or drops below baseline despite suppressed VL | Multifactorial; does NOT automatically warrant switch |
| Clinical failure | New or recurrent OI despite ≥ 6 months on ART | May indicate virological failure or IRIS |
The most common cause of virological failure is non-adherence, NOT drug resistance [1]. Always assess and optimise adherence before assuming resistance. Adherence > 95% is needed for reliable viral suppression.
If first-line fails (INSTI-based): [1]
- Switch to a boosted PI-based regimen (e.g., DRV/r) + 2 new NRTIs (guided by resistance testing)
- If first-line was NNRTI-based (in settings still using NNRTIs first-line): switch to DTG-based regimen + optimised NRTI backbone
Third-line / salvage regimens (for multi-drug resistant HIV):
- Use newer agents: darunavir/r, dolutegravir (if not previously used), maraviroc (if R5-tropic), enfuvirtide, fostemsavir, ibalizumab (anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody), lenacapavir
- Always guided by resistance testing; aim for at least 2 fully active drugs in the new regimen
HIV-positive individuals are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable diseases but have impaired vaccine responses. Key principles:
| Vaccine | Recommendation | Caution |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza | Annual | Safe; may have reduced response at low CD4 |
| Pneumococcal (PCV13 + PPSV23) | Yes (PCV13 first, then PPSV23 ≥ 8 weeks later) | Response may be suboptimal at CD4 < 200 |
| Hepatitis A | If non-immune (IgG negative), especially MSM, liver disease | May need booster |
| Hepatitis B | If non-immune (anti-HBs negative) — higher dose or additional doses may be needed | Check anti-HBs post-vaccination; response may be poor at low CD4 |
| HPV | Recommended for HIV+ individuals up to age 45 | 3-dose schedule |
| COVID-19 | Yes; mRNA vaccines preferred | May have reduced response at CD4 < 200 |
| Live vaccines (MMR, varicella, yellow fever, BCG) | CONTRAINDICATED if CD4 < 200 [1] | Risk of vaccine-strain disease in severe immunosuppression |
High Yield – Live Vaccines in HIV
Live vaccines (BCG, MMR, varicella, oral polio, yellow fever) are generally CONTRAINDICATED in HIV patients with CD4 < 200 due to risk of disseminated vaccine-strain infection. If CD4 > 200 and patient is on stable ART, some live vaccines (MMR, varicella) may be given after careful consideration. BCG is always contraindicated in known HIV-positive individuals. [1]
| Domain | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Counselling | Pre-test and post-test counselling for all HIV tests [1]; disclosure support; adherence counselling |
| Mental health | Screen for depression, anxiety, substance use; HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; suicide risk |
| Partner notification | Encourage disclosure to sexual partners; offer provider-assisted partner notification |
| Stigma reduction | Normalise HIV as a manageable chronic disease; address workplace and social discrimination |
| Substance use | Harm reduction, opioid substitution therapy, alcohol cessation support |
| Sexual health | Regular STI screening; condom use counselling; PrEP for serodiscordant partners |
| Reproductive health | Safe conception counselling for serodiscordant couples; PMTCT |
High Yield Summary – Management of HIV
- Start ART in ALL HIV+ individuals regardless of CD4 — ideally same-day or within 7 days [1]
- Preferred first-line: TDF/FTC (or TAF/FTC) + DTG (or BIC) — INSTI-based regimens [1]
- Key exceptions to immediate ART: cryptococcal meningitis and TB meningitis — delay 4–6 weeks [1]
- PCP prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole when CD4 < 200; stop when CD4 > 200 for ≥ 3 months [1][11]
- HLA-B5701 must be checked before prescribing abacavir (contraindicated if positive)* [1]
- Nevirapine contraindicated in women with CD4 > 250 and men with CD4 > 400 (hepatotoxicity) [1]
- Rifampicin contraindicated with PIs; increase DTG dose to 50 mg BD with rifampicin [1]
- PEP: start within 1–2 hours (max 72 hours); TDF/FTC + DTG × 28 days [1][3]
- PrEP: TDF/FTC daily (or cabotegravir IM q2 months) for high-risk HIV-negative individuals [1]
- U=U: undetectable viral load = untransmittable [1]
- PMTCT: maternal ART + neonatal AZT prophylaxis + formula feeding → MTCT < 1% [1]
- Most common cause of treatment failure is non-adherence, NOT drug resistance [1]
- Live vaccines contraindicated if CD4 < 200 [1]
- Co-trimoxazole workhorse: covers PCP + toxoplasmosis + some bacterial infections; check G6PD first [11]
Active Recall - HIV Management
[1] Lecture slides: GC 061. HIV positive_HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf; Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [3] Lecture slides: GC 107. Protect yourself and your patients.pdf [7] AOS material: AOS - Microbio.pdf (Talaromyces marneffei EMQ) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (PJP section)
Complications of HIV/AIDS can be broadly divided into:
- Complications of uncontrolled HIV (opportunistic infections, malignancies, organ damage)
- Complications of ART (drug toxicities, metabolic syndrome, IRIS)
- Long-term complications in the ART era (non-AIDS events — CVD, renal, bone, neurocognitive, malignancy)
The key insight is that in the modern era, with effective ART, patients with HIV live near-normal lifespans — but they now face a new spectrum of complications related to chronic immune activation, ART toxicity and accelerated ageing.
1. Opportunistic Infections (OIs)
These are the defining complications of AIDS. They occur because progressive CD4+ T-cell depletion cripples cell-mediated immunity, allowing normally controlled pathogens to cause disease.
Different pathogens require different degrees of immunosuppression to cause disease. The CD4 count acts as a "gate" — as it drops lower, more "doors" open to increasingly aggressive pathogens:
| CD4 Threshold | Pathophysiology | OIs That Appear |
|---|---|---|
| < 500 | Early loss of immune surveillance; reactivation of latent infections with high pathogen burden | Pulmonary TB, oral candidiasis, oral hairy leukoplakia, herpes zoster (multidermatomal), Kaposi sarcoma, bacterial pneumonia [1][2] |
| < 200 | Critical loss of Th1 responses → cannot form granulomas, cannot control intracellular pathogens | PCP (most common OI) [2], oesophageal candidiasis, PML, wasting syndrome, cervical cancer |
| < 100 | Severe immunodeficiency → reactivation of latent parasitic and fungal infections | Cerebral toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, microsporidiosis, Talaromyces marneffei [7] |
| < 50 | Profound immunodeficiency → disseminated infections, end-organ viral disease | CMV retinitis/colitis, disseminated MAC, disseminated Talaromyces marneffei, primary CNS lymphoma [1][7] |
Why is PCP the most common OI? [2] Pneumocystis jirovecii is ubiquitous — virtually all humans are exposed by age 2. A competent immune system (specifically CD4+ Th1 cells and alveolar macrophages) keeps it in check. When CD4 drops below 200, the alveolar immune defence collapses, and P. jirovecii proliferates in the alveoli, filling them with a characteristic foamy eosinophilic exudate → impaired gas exchange → progressive respiratory failure.
| OI | Key Complications if Untreated | Mortality Without Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| PCP | Progressive type 1 respiratory failure, ARDS, pneumothorax (especially with cystic disease) | 20–40% even with treatment in severe cases; near 100% without treatment |
| Cryptococcal meningitis | Raised intracranial pressure (due to impaired CSF reabsorption by polysaccharide-laden arachnoid granulations) → brain herniation; blindness; cranial nerve palsies | ~100% without treatment; 10–30% with optimal treatment |
| Cerebral toxoplasmosis | Seizures, brain herniation from mass effect, permanent neurological deficits | High without treatment |
| CMV retinitis | Progressive retinal necrosis → permanent blindness; retinal detachment | Inevitable progression without treatment |
| Disseminated MAC | Severe wasting, anaemia, hepatic failure | High without treatment |
| TB (pulmonary and extrapulmonary) | Dissemination, meningitis, drug resistance; bidirectional synergy with HIV: TB increases HIV viraemia via TNF-α, HIV accelerates TB progression [16] | Highest mortality among co-infected patients |
| Talaromyces marneffei [7] | Disseminated infection with skin papules, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, bone marrow infiltration, respiratory failure | Near 100% without treatment; important cause of death in SE Asia/HK at CD4 < 100 [7] |
| PML (JC virus) [5] | Progressive, irreversible neurological deficits (no specific antiviral therapy); only treatment is immune reconstitution via ART | Median survival 6 months without ART; some stabilisation with ART |
2. HIV-Associated Malignancies
These are directly linked to the degree of immunosuppression and are considered AIDS-defining regardless of CD4 count:
| Malignancy | Causative Agent | Pathophysiology | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaposi sarcoma (KS) | HHV-8 (KSHV) | HHV-8 infects endothelial cells → viral oncoproteins (vIL-6, vFLIP, LANA-1) promote angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and immune evasion; most common malignancy in HIV [2] | Violaceous papules/plaques/nodules on skin (face, trunk, lower limbs, oral palate); can involve lungs, GI tract, lymph nodes; may cause lymphoedema (from lymphatic obstruction) |
| Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) | EBV (in many subtypes), HHV-8 (in primary effusion lymphoma) | Loss of T-cell immune surveillance → unchecked EBV-driven B-cell proliferation → lymphomagenesis; aggressive subtypes predominate (DLBCL, Burkitt) | High-grade, often extranodal (CNS, GI, bone marrow); may present with rapidly growing masses, B symptoms |
| Primary CNS lymphoma | EBV-driven | Same mechanism as systemic NHL but confined to CNS; occurs at very low CD4 ( < 50) | Solitary ring-enhancing lesion on MRI; CSF EBV PCR positive; DDx cerebral toxoplasmosis (which is typically multiple lesions) |
| Invasive cervical cancer | HPV (types 16, 18) | HIV-mediated loss of immune surveillance against HPV-infected cervical epithelium → persistent HPV infection → CIN → invasive cancer | Accelerated progression from CIN to cancer; screen with Pap smear + HPV testing annually |
With ART extending lifespans, these are now a leading cause of morbidity and mortality:
| Malignancy | Association | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Hodgkin lymphoma | EBV-driven; incidence paradoxically highest at CD4 200–350 | Requires some residual immune response for the characteristic inflammatory milieu (Reed-Sternberg cells + reactive infiltrate) |
| Anal cancer | HPV (especially in MSM) | Same HPV-driven mechanism as cervical cancer; high HPV prevalence in HIV+ MSM; screen with anal Pap smear |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | HBV/HCV co-infection | Accelerated liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV or HIV/HBV co-infection → cirrhosis → HCC |
| Lung cancer | Smoking (higher prevalence in PLHIV); chronic immune activation | Higher incidence even after adjusting for smoking; chronic inflammation may contribute |
| Skin cancers (SCC, BCC) | UV exposure + immunosuppression | Loss of immune surveillance against UV-damaged keratinocytes |
Key insight: With effective ART, AIDS-defining malignancies (KS, NHL) have decreased dramatically. However, non-AIDS-defining cancers (Hodgkin lymphoma, lung, liver, anal) now account for a growing proportion of cancer-related deaths in PLHIV.
3. Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS)
IRIS is a paradoxical clinical deterioration that occurs after starting ART, caused by the recovering immune system mounting an exaggerated inflammatory response against pre-existing (subclinical or treated) OIs [1].
- Before ART: the immune system is too weak to "see" pathogens — high pathogen burden with minimal inflammation
- After ART: rapid CD4+ T-cell recovery → newly functional T cells recognise abundant pathogen antigens → massive inflammatory response → clinical worsening
- Essentially, it is a "too much, too fast" immune response
| Type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Paradoxical IRIS | Worsening of a known, treated OI after starting ART | Patient with TB on treatment → starts ART → develops worsening fever, enlarging lymph nodes, new pleural effusion |
| Unmasking IRIS | Previously undiagnosed OI becomes clinically apparent after ART | Patient starts ART → develops cryptococcal meningitis that was previously subclinical |
- Low baseline CD4 (especially < 50 cells/μL) [1]
- High baseline viral load
- Pre-existing OI at the time of ART initiation (especially with high pathogen burden)
- Rapid CD4 recovery and VL decline on ART
- Short interval between OI treatment and ART start
| OI | IRIS Manifestation | Danger |
|---|---|---|
| TB-IRIS (most common) | Paradoxical worsening: fever, enlarging lymph nodes, new pleural/pericardial effusion, worsening pulmonary infiltrates | Can be severe but rarely fatal |
| Cryptococcal IRIS | Raised ICP, seizures, new/worsening meningeal symptoms | Can be fatal — brain herniation; this is why ART is delayed 4–6 weeks in cryptococcal meningitis [1] |
| MAC-IRIS | Focal lymphadenitis (suppurative), osteomyelitis | Usually manageable |
| KS-IRIS | Paradoxical worsening/flare of KS lesions, pulmonary KS | Can be fatal (pulmonary oedema from KS) |
| PML-IRIS | Paradoxical worsening of neurological deficits, contrast enhancement on MRI (normally PML does NOT enhance) | May cause severe disability |
| CMV-IRIS | Immune recovery uveitis/vitritis (inflammation in eye) — occurs as CD4 recovers | Risk of visual loss |
| HBV/HCV-IRIS | Hepatitis flare | Can cause hepatic decompensation |
| Severity | Approach |
|---|---|
| Mild IRIS | Continue ART; symptomatic treatment (NSAIDs, antipyretics) |
| Moderate IRIS | Continue ART; consider short course of corticosteroids (prednisone 1–2 mg/kg, tapered over 2–4 weeks) |
| Severe/life-threatening IRIS (e.g., CNS IRIS) | Continue ART if possible; corticosteroids essential; treat the underlying OI aggressively; in extreme cases may need to temporarily interrupt ART |
IRIS is NOT a reason to stop ART permanently — interrupting ART allows viral rebound, further CD4 decline, and ultimately death. The goal is to manage IRIS while continuing ART whenever possible.
4. Complications of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
| Complication | Mechanism | Implicated Drugs |
|---|---|---|
| Dyslipidaemia (↑TG, ↑LDL, ↓HDL) | PI-mediated inhibition of lipid metabolism enzymes (SREBP degradation), altered hepatic lipid handling | PIs (lopinavir > atazanavir), EFV; less with INSTIs [1] |
| Insulin resistance / Diabetes mellitus | PI-mediated inhibition of GLUT-4 glucose transporter; lipodystrophy-related insulin resistance | PIs (older agents), d4T |
| Lipodystrophy | Lipoatrophy (fat loss in face, limbs, buttocks) due to mitochondrial toxicity of NRTIs; Lipohypertrophy (fat accumulation in dorsocervical pad "buffalo hump", trunk, breasts) due to PIs/NNRTIs | Lipoatrophy: d4T, AZT (thymidine analogues); Lipohypertrophy: PIs, EFV; largely avoided with modern NRTIs (TDF/TAF) and INSTIs [1] |
| Weight gain | Incompletely understood; related to immune reconstitution, direct INSTI effect, switch from EFV | INSTIs (DTG, BIC); TAF more than TDF |
| Lactic acidosis | NRTI inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma → impaired oxidative phosphorylation → anaerobic glycolysis → lactate accumulation | d4T > ddI > AZT > other NRTIs; rare with TDF/TAF/FTC/ABC [1] |
| Organ | Complication | Mechanism | Implicated Drugs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kidney | Proximal renal tubular dysfunction (Fanconi syndrome), decreased eGFR | TDF is concentrated in proximal tubular cells → mitochondrial toxicity → tubular injury | TDF [1]; switch to TAF if renal decline |
| Bone | Decreased bone mineral density, osteoporosis, increased fracture risk | TDF → renal phosphate wasting + direct osteoblast toxicity; chronic immune activation | TDF > TAF; PIs |
| Liver | Hepatotoxicity, hepatic steatosis | Direct drug toxicity; immune-mediated (NVP); mitochondrial toxicity (NRTIs) | NVP (especially in women CD4 > 250), EFV, PIs; HBV flare if TDF/FTC stopped in co-infection [1] |
| CNS | Neuropsychiatric effects (vivid dreams, insomnia, dizziness, depression, suicidality) | Direct CNS penetration and effects on serotonin/dopamine receptors | EFV (most common); DTG (less common) [1] |
| Bone marrow | Macrocytic anaemia, neutropaenia | Inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma in erythroid/myeloid precursors | AZT (zidovudine) [1] |
| Heart | Possible increased cardiovascular risk | Endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidaemia | ABC (debated); PIs (via dyslipidaemia) |
| Skin | Rash, SJS/TEN, hypersensitivity | Immune-mediated | NVP (severe rash/SJS), EFV, ABC (if HLA-B5701+)* [1] |
This deserves special mention because it is a frequently tested exam point: [1]
- Occurs in ~5–8% of patients carrying HLA-B5701* [1]
- Multisystem reaction: fever, rash (maculopapular), GI symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain), respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, cough), malaise
- Typically occurs within first 6 weeks of treatment
- Worsens with each dose — must stop immediately
- RECHALLENGE IS CONTRAINDICATED — can cause fatal anaphylactic-like reaction (hypotension, renal failure, death) [1]
- Prevention: test HLA-B5701 before prescribing; if positive, never use abacavir*
High Yield – Drug Hypersensitivity Prevention
HLA-B5701 testing before abacavir* is one of the best examples of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice — it has virtually eliminated abacavir hypersensitivity in settings where testing is routine. This is analogous to HLA-B5801 testing before allopurinol and HLA-B1502 testing before carbamazepine. [1]
5. Long-Term Complications in the ART Era (Non-AIDS Events)
With modern ART, most PLHIV do not die of AIDS. Instead, they face an increased burden of "non-AIDS events" driven by:
- Chronic immune activation (even with suppressed VL, residual viral proteins, microbial translocation from damaged GALT, and co-infections drive ongoing inflammation)
- Accelerated immune ageing (immunosenescence)
- ART toxicity (metabolic effects as above)
- Traditional risk factors (smoking, alcohol, substance use are more prevalent in PLHIV)
| Factor | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| HIV itself | Chronic immune activation → endothelial dysfunction, arterial inflammation, accelerated atherosclerosis; HIV-infected macrophages in vessel walls |
| ART | PI-associated dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance; ABC possibly increases MI risk (debated) |
| Traditional risk factors | Higher prevalence of smoking, substance use, hypertension in PLHIV |
| Result | 1.5–2× increased risk of MI, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease compared to age-matched HIV-negative individuals |
Management: Cardiovascular risk assessment (Framingham/QRISK), aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (smoking cessation, statins [avoid simvastatin/lovastatin with PIs — use atorvastatin or rosuvastatin instead], BP control, glycaemic control).
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Pathology | Collapsing variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) — HIV directly infects podocytes and tubular epithelial cells → podocyte injury, proliferation, and detachment → collapse of glomerular tuft |
| Epidemiology | Much more common in Black patients (APOL1 risk alleles) |
| Presentation | Nephrotic-range proteinuria, progressive renal failure, typically normal-sized or enlarged kidneys (unlike most causes of CKD where kidneys are small) |
| Treatment | ART is the mainstay — viral suppression halts and may reverse HIVAN; ACEi/ARB for proteinuria reduction |
| Severity | Features |
|---|---|
| Asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI) | Abnormal neuropsychological testing but no functional impairment; most common form in ART era |
| Mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) | Mild cognitive deficits with mild functional impairment |
| HIV-associated dementia (HAD) | Subcortical dementia: psychomotor slowing, impaired concentration and memory, apathy, later motor dysfunction (ataxia, tremor, spasticity) |
Pathophysiology of HAND: HIV crosses the BBB within monocytes ("Trojan horse" mechanism) and infects microglia and perivascular macrophages. These release neurotoxic factors (gp120, Tat, quinolinic acid, TNF-α) → neuronal injury, dendritic pruning, synaptic dysfunction. Even with suppressed VL in blood, the CNS may act as a sanctuary site with low-level viral replication.
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Osteoporosis/osteopaenia | Multifactorial: chronic inflammation (↑IL-6, TNF-α → ↑osteoclast activity), TDF (renal phosphate wasting), PIs (↑osteoclast differentiation), vitamin D deficiency (common in PLHIV), traditional risk factors |
| Avascular necrosis (femoral head) | Associated with corticosteroid use (for IRIS, PCP), PI use, HIV itself |
| Management | DEXA scanning in patients > 50 or with risk factors; calcium + vitamin D supplementation; switch from TDF to TAF; bisphosphonates if indicated |
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| HBV/HCV co-infection | Accelerated fibrosis progression → cirrhosis → HCC; HIV/HCV co-infection has faster fibrosis progression than HCV mono-infection [17] |
| ART hepatotoxicity | NVP, EFV, PIs can all cause hepatotoxicity |
| NAFLD/NASH | Metabolic syndrome from ART + HIV-related metabolic dysregulation |
| HBV flare | If tenofovir/emtricitabine stopped without substituting another HBV-active agent → loss of HBV suppression + immune reconstitution → severe hepatitis flare [1] |
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Anaemia (most common haem abnormality) | Multifactorial: anaemia of chronic disease (↑hepcidin from chronic inflammation), AZT-induced bone marrow suppression, parvovirus B19 (pure red cell aplasia), bone marrow infiltration (MAC, lymphoma), nutritional (iron, B12, folate deficiency) |
| Thrombocytopaenia | Immune-mediated (anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies — mechanism similar to ITP); direct megakaryocyte infection; drug-induced; TTP (rare); bone marrow infiltration |
| Neutropaenia | Drug-induced (AZT, ganciclovir, co-trimoxazole), bone marrow infiltration, HIV itself |
| Lymphoma (NHL, HL) | As discussed above — loss of immune surveillance + EBV/HHV-8-driven lymphoproliferation |
| Bloodborne infections from previous blood products/IVDU | HIV patients historically acquired HBV, HCV from shared needles or contaminated blood products [20]; risk reduced with screening and harm reduction |
| Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Depression | Most common psychiatric comorbidity; multifactorial: psychosocial (stigma, isolation, diagnosis burden), biological (chronic inflammation, HIV neurotoxicity), drug-related (EFV) |
| Anxiety disorders | Related to diagnosis, stigma, health anxiety |
| Substance use disorders | Both a risk factor for and complication of HIV; IVDU, chemsex |
| Suicidality | Increased risk, especially around diagnosis; need active screening |
| EFV-related neuropsychiatric effects | Vivid dreams, insomnia, dizziness, depression; usually resolves in 2–4 weeks but can persist [1] |
| Complication | Details |
|---|---|
| Failure to thrive / growth retardation | Chronic inflammation, recurrent infections, malabsorption |
| Developmental delay | HIV encephalopathy; direct CNS infection in developing brain |
| Recurrent infections | Bacterial (pneumonia, otitis media, sinusitis); OIs at lower CD4 thresholds than adults |
| Lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis (LIP) | Chronic diffuse lymphocytic infiltration of lungs; characteristic of paediatric HIV (CDC category B); CXR shows bilateral reticulonodular infiltrates |
| Parotid enlargement | Lymphoepithelial cysts; common in paediatric HIV |
| Before ART | Early ART Era | Modern ART Era |
|---|---|---|
| OIs (PCP, crypto, toxo, MAC, CMV, TB) | IRIS, metabolic syndrome, lipodystrophy | Non-AIDS events (CVD, CKD, osteoporosis, HAND, NADMs) |
| AIDS-defining malignancies (KS, NHL, CNS lymphoma) | Drug toxicities (d4T neuropathy, AZT anaemia, NVP hepatotoxicity) | Weight gain (INSTIs), accelerated ageing |
| Wasting, dementia | HBV/HCV co-infection complications | Chronic immune activation despite viral suppression |
| Death within 1–2 years of AIDS diagnosis | Improved survival but significant morbidity | Near-normal lifespan with ongoing comorbidity burden |
High Yield Summary – Complications of HIV/AIDS
- Most common OI: PCP (CD4 < 200); most common malignancy: Kaposi sarcoma (HHV-8) [2]
- CD4 thresholds for OIs: < 200 (PCP), < 100 (toxo, crypto, Talaromyces), < 50 (CMV, MAC) [1]
- IRIS: paradoxical worsening 2–12 weeks after starting ART; TB-IRIS most common; crypto-IRIS can be fatal [1]
- Abacavir hypersensitivity: multi-system reaction in HLA-B5701+ patients; rechallenge contraindicated* [1]
- TDF nephrotoxicity (Fanconi syndrome); AZT bone marrow suppression; NVP hepatotoxicity; EFV neuropsychiatric effects; PI dyslipidaemia [1]
- In the ART era, non-AIDS events (CVD, CKD, osteoporosis, HAND, NADMs) are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality — driven by chronic immune activation, ART toxicity, and traditional risk factors
- HIV/HCV co-infection → accelerated liver fibrosis [17]
- HBV flare if tenofovir/emtricitabine stopped without substitution [1]
- Talaromyces marneffei: important fatal OI in SE Asia/HK at CD4 < 100 [7]
- HIVAN: collapsing FSGS; more common in Black patients; ART is the mainstay of treatment
- HAND persists even on ART due to CNS sanctuary site; subcortical dementia pattern
- Statins interaction with PIs: simvastatin/lovastatin contraindicated (rhabdomyolysis); use atorvastatin/rosuvastatin [1]
Active Recall - Complications of HIV/AIDS
[1] Lecture slides: GC 061. HIV positive_HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf; Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [2] Senior notes: Block A - HIV positive_ HIV related diseases, accidental needle prick injury.pdf [5] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (Encephalitis section — PML) [7] AOS material: AOS - Microbio.pdf (Talaromyces marneffei EMQ) [16] Senior notes: Gen Clerk Anaes + Microbiology Summary.pdf (TB in the immunocompromised, HIV and TB) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (Hepatitis C section) [20] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Haemophilia section — bloodborne infections)
High Yield Summary
- HIV is a lentivirus (retrovirus) that targets CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells [1]
- Transmission: sexual (MSM > heterosexual in HK), parenteral (IVDU, needlestick 0.3%), vertical [1]
- Three phases: acute infection → clinical latency (8–10 years) → AIDS [2]
- Magic number: CD4 = 200 cells/μL defines AIDS [2]
- Most common OI: PCP; most common malignancy: Kaposi sarcoma (HHV-8) [2]
- gp120 binds CD4; gp41 mediates fusion; co-receptors are CCR5 (early) and CXCR4 (late) [1]
- p24 antigen is the earliest detectable marker in acute infection [1]
- Acute retroviral syndrome mimics EBV/mono — mucosal ulcers are a distinguishing feature [1]
- IRIS occurs 2–12 weeks after ART initiation in patients with low CD4 and pre-existing OIs [1]
- Talaromyces marneffei is an important AIDS-defining OI in Southeast Asia/Southern China/HK [7]
- Needle-stick injury risk: 0.3% percutaneous; PEP within 72 hours (ideally 1–2 hours) [1][3]
- U=U: Undetectable viral load = Untransmittable [1]
High Yield Summary – DDx of HIV
- Acute HIV mimics EBV infectious mononucleosis — if Monospot negative, test for HIV. Mucosal ulcers are a distinguishing feature of acute HIV.
- 10% of mononucleosis syndromes are not EBV — consider CMV, HIV, HHV-6/7, HBV, toxoplasmosis, drug reactions [9]
- Blasts on PBS can mimic atypical lymphocytes — do not mistake ALL for a viral mono-like illness [8]
- HIV causes dysplastic haematopoiesis and cytopaenias — enters the DDx of MDS [13]
- Always co-test for syphilis when testing for HIV (and vice versa) — overlapping presentations and risk factors [10]
- HIV and TB have a bidirectional synergy — co-infection is worse than either alone; diagnosis of TB is harder in HIV [16]
- Talaromyces marneffei is an important DDx for disseminated skin papules + fever in an HIV patient in SE Asia/HK (CD4 < 100) [7]
- In the CNS: toxoplasmosis (multiple ring-enhancing) vs primary CNS lymphoma (solitary ring-enhancing) vs PML (non-enhancing white matter) vs cryptococcal meningitis (raised ICP, CrAg+)
High Yield Summary – Diagnosis of HIV
- 4th-generation Ag/Ab combination immunoassay is the standard first-line screening test — detects both p24 antigen and HIV-1/2 antibodies; window period ~2 weeks [1]
- Confirmatory test: HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay (replaces Western blot) [1]
- If screening reactive but confirmatory negative/indeterminate: HIV-1 RNA NAT → resolves acute infection vs false positive [1]
- CD4 count is the key marker of immunological status and OI risk; CD4 < 200 = AIDS [2]
- Viral load (HIV-1 RNA) is the key marker for monitoring treatment response; goal is < 50 copies/mL [1]
- Baseline workup includes: CD4, VL, resistance testing, HLA-B5701, G6PD, CBC, RFT, LFT, fasting glucose/lipids, HBV/HCV/syphilis serology, toxoplasma IgG, CXR, TB screening* [1]
- Rapid/POCT tests are antibody-only → will miss acute infection in the window period [18]
- In neonates < 18 months: use virological tests (HIV DNA/RNA PCR), NOT serological tests [1]
- IGRA preferred over TST for TB screening in HIV, but BOTH can be false-negative at low CD4 [16][19]
- Always test for HIV in patients with OIs (PCP, TB, cryptococcal meningitis, toxoplasmosis, KS) — these may be the first presentation [1]
- HLA-B5701 must be checked before prescribing abacavir* [1]
- Never stop tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV/HBV co-infected patients without substituting another HBV-active agent [1]
High Yield Summary – Management of HIV
- Start ART in ALL HIV+ individuals regardless of CD4 — ideally same-day or within 7 days [1]
- Preferred first-line: TDF/FTC (or TAF/FTC) + DTG (or BIC) — INSTI-based regimens [1]
- Key exceptions to immediate ART: cryptococcal meningitis and TB meningitis — delay 4–6 weeks [1]
- PCP prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole when CD4 < 200; stop when CD4 > 200 for ≥ 3 months [1][11]
- HLA-B5701 must be checked before prescribing abacavir (contraindicated if positive)* [1]
- Nevirapine contraindicated in women with CD4 > 250 and men with CD4 > 400 (hepatotoxicity) [1]
- Rifampicin contraindicated with PIs; increase DTG dose to 50 mg BD with rifampicin [1]
- PEP: start within 1–2 hours (max 72 hours); TDF/FTC + DTG × 28 days [1][3]
- PrEP: TDF/FTC daily (or cabotegravir IM q2 months) for high-risk HIV-negative individuals [1]
- U=U: undetectable viral load = untransmittable [1]
- PMTCT: maternal ART + neonatal AZT prophylaxis + formula feeding → MTCT < 1% [1]
- Most common cause of treatment failure is non-adherence, NOT drug resistance [1]
- Live vaccines contraindicated if CD4 < 200 [1]
- Co-trimoxazole workhorse: covers PCP + toxoplasmosis + some bacterial infections; check G6PD first [11]
High Yield Summary – Complications of HIV/AIDS
- Most common OI: PCP (CD4 < 200); most common malignancy: Kaposi sarcoma (HHV-8) [2]
- CD4 thresholds for OIs: < 200 (PCP), < 100 (toxo, crypto, Talaromyces), < 50 (CMV, MAC) [1]
- IRIS: paradoxical worsening 2–12 weeks after starting ART; TB-IRIS most common; crypto-IRIS can be fatal [1]
- Abacavir hypersensitivity: multi-system reaction in HLA-B5701+ patients; rechallenge contraindicated* [1]
- TDF nephrotoxicity (Fanconi syndrome); AZT bone marrow suppression; NVP hepatotoxicity; EFV neuropsychiatric effects; PI dyslipidaemia [1]
- In the ART era, non-AIDS events (CVD, CKD, osteoporosis, HAND, NADMs) are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality — driven by chronic immune activation, ART toxicity, and traditional risk factors
- HIV/HCV co-infection → accelerated liver fibrosis [17]
- HBV flare if tenofovir/emtricitabine stopped without substitution [1]
- Talaromyces marneffei: important fatal OI in SE Asia/HK at CD4 < 100 [7]
- HIVAN: collapsing FSGS; more common in Black patients; ART is the mainstay of treatment
- HAND persists even on ART due to CNS sanctuary site; subcortical dementia pattern
- Statins interaction with PIs: simvastatin/lovastatin contraindicated (rhabdomyolysis); use atorvastatin/rosuvastatin [1]