Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia is an aggressive hematologic malignancy characterized by clonal proliferation of immature myeloid precursors (blasts) in the bone marrow, leading to bone marrow failure and cytopenias.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a clonal malignant disease of the haematopoietic system [1] arising from precursor cells committed to the myeloid line of cellular development — that is, the erythroid, granulocytic, monocytic, or megakaryocytic lineages [2][3].
Let's break down the name:
- Acute → ≥20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow [1] (this is the pathological definition that distinguishes acute from chronic leukemia — it is NOT about time course)
- Myeloid → from Greek myelos (marrow); refers to the non-lymphoid lineage of blood cells
- Leukemia → from Greek leukos (white) + haima (blood); literally "white blood"
The core biology is:
- Clonal proliferation of myeloid precursors with a reduced capacity to differentiate into more mature cellular elements [2][3]
- (↑) Accumulation of leukemic blasts (immature forms) in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other tissues [2][3]
- (↓) Reduction in production of normal RBCs, mature granulocytes (neutrophils), and platelets [2][3]
Acute vs Chronic Leukemia — The 20% Rule
Unlike many other chronic/acute diseases, the distinction is NOT based on time — it is based on the pathological definition [1]:
- Acute leukemia: ≥20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow
- Chronic leukemia: < 20% blasts
In chronic leukemia, maturation is not impaired → blasts can grow into more mature cells → uncontrolled proliferation + impaired apoptosis [1].
In acute leukemia, maturation IS impaired → blasts are arrested at an immature stage → impaired maturation + uncontrolled proliferation + impaired apoptosis [1].
Chronic leukemia can transform into acute leukemia if left untreated (acquiring more mutations over time) [1].
2. Epidemiology
- Most common acute leukemia in adults, accounting for ~80% of acute leukemia cases in adults [2][3][4]
- Incidence: 3–5 per 100,000 [4], and increases with age [2][3][4]
- Median age at diagnosis: ~65 years [2][3][4]
- Male-to-female ratio = 5:3 [2][3][4]
- Very rare in childhood [2][3] — in paediatric populations, ALL dominates (80% of childhood leukemia), while AML accounts for only ~15% of childhood leukemia [2][3]
- Overall, acute leukemia (AML + ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy, accounting for ~30% of paediatric cancers [2][3]
- AML is not a common disease in absolute numbers [5]
- Approximately 150–200 new cases of AML per year in the entire Hong Kong population (based on Hong Kong Cancer Registry data)
- Disease follows the same age-increasing pattern as global data, with the bulk of cases in elderly patients
- Given HK's ageing population, the incidence burden is expected to rise
High Yield — Epidemiology Exam Points
- AML = most common acute leukemia in ADULTS (80%)
- ALL = most common acute leukemia in CHILDREN (80%)
- AML median age at diagnosis = 65 years
- Incidence increases with age
3. Anatomy and Function of Normal Haematopoiesis (Relevant Review)
To understand AML, you need to understand normal haematopoiesis — because AML is fundamentally a disease of arrested differentiation at the level of the myeloid progenitor.
Key points:
- The bone marrow is the primary site of haematopoiesis in adults
- The HSC sits at the apex: self-renewing, multipotent
- The CMP gives rise to all myeloid lineages (neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, RBCs, platelets)
- In AML, the malignant clone arises from the CMP or downstream progenitors, becoming arrested at the blast stage
- The leukemic blasts proliferate uncontrollably and physically crowd out normal haematopoietic precursors in the marrow space
- This leads to pancytopenia (reduced RBCs, neutrophils, and platelets) despite paradoxically high total WBC counts
- The blasts themselves are non-functional — they cannot perform phagocytosis, oxygen transport, or clotting
- The spleen acts as a filter for abnormal/old blood cells and a site of extramedullary haematopoiesis
- In AML, splenomegaly can occur due to infiltration by leukemic blasts or compensatory extramedullary haematopoiesis
- However, hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy are more common presenting features in ALL than AML [6]
4. Etiology and Risk Factors
Most cases of AML arise de novo without an identifiable cause. However, several well-established risk factors are recognised [2][3][4][5]:
| Condition | Mechanism | AML Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) | Extra chromosome 21 alters GATA1 and other transcription factors | 15–20× increased risk [2][3] |
| Fanconi anaemia | Defective DNA repair (autosomal recessive) | High risk of MDS/AML |
| Bloom syndrome | Defective DNA helicase → chromosomal instability | Increased risk |
| Li-Fraumeni syndrome | TP53 germline mutation → impaired tumour suppression | Increased risk |
| Dyskeratosis congenita | Telomere maintenance defect | Via aplastic anaemia → AML |
Why do DNA repair defects predispose to AML? Because haematopoietic stem cells are among the most rapidly dividing cells in the body. Each cell division is an opportunity for replication errors. If DNA repair mechanisms are impaired, mutations accumulate faster, driving malignant transformation.
- Chemical exposure [2][3][4]: especially benzene (occupational exposure in petrochemical, rubber, shoe industries)
- Benzene metabolites (hydroquinone, catechol) cause oxidative DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in HSCs
- Radiation exposure [2][3]: ionising radiation causes double-strand DNA breaks
- Historical evidence: atomic bomb survivors, therapeutic radiation
- Smoking [2][3]: tobacco smoke contains benzene and other carcinogens; ~1.2× increased risk
This is a critically important category and is poor prognosis [4]:
-
Alkylating agents (e.g., cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide) [2][3]
- Cause DNA cross-linking → chromosomal deletions (del(5q), del(7q))
- Latency: 5–7 years after exposure
- Often preceded by MDS phase
-
Topoisomerase II inhibitors (e.g., etoposide, doxorubicin) [2][3]
- Cause balanced translocations (e.g., 11q23/MLL rearrangements)
- Latency: 1–3 years after exposure
- Often present as overt AML without preceding MDS
Therapy-Related AML: Two Patterns
| Feature | Alkylating agent type | Topoisomerase II inhibitor type |
|---|---|---|
| Latency | 5–7 years | 1–3 years |
| Preceding MDS? | Yes, common | No, usually direct AML |
| Cytogenetics | del(5q), del(7q), complex | 11q23 (MLL), t(15;17), t(8;21) |
| Prognosis | Poor | Variable |
- Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [2][3][4] → the classic "pre-leukemic" state; ~30% transform to AML
- Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) [2][3][4], particularly CML (blast crisis)
- All forms of MPN share potential to progress to blastic transformation [5]
- Aplastic anaemia [2][3] → chronic stem cell stress + immunosuppressive therapy → clonal evolution
- Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) [2][3] → clonal haematopoietic disorder with overlap to MDS/AML
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Genetic syndromes | Down syndrome, Fanconi anaemia, Bloom syndrome |
| Chemical exposure | Benzene, pesticides |
| Radiation | Ionising radiation |
| Smoking | Tobacco |
| Prior therapy | Alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors |
| Pre-leukemic conditions | MDS, MPN (esp. CML), aplastic anaemia, PNH |
5. Pathophysiology
AML pathogenesis is classically explained by the "two-hit hypothesis" [4]:
-
Class I mutations: confer proliferative advantage [4]
- Examples: FLT3-ITD, c-Kit, RAS mutations
- These activate signalling pathways (e.g., RAS/MAPK, PI3K/AKT) that promote cell survival and proliferation
- Why? FLT3 (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase normally expressed on haematopoietic progenitors. The ITD (internal tandem duplication) mutation causes constitutive (always-on) activation → uncontrolled proliferation
-
Class II mutations: impair haematopoietic differentiation [4]
- Examples: CEBPA mutations, PML-RARA (t(15;17)), AML1-ETO (t(8;21)), CBFB-MYH11 (inv(16))
- These block the transcription factors needed for myeloid cells to mature
- Why? C/EBPα is a transcription factor essential for granulocytic differentiation. Loss-of-function mutations arrest cells at the blast stage
The two-hit model states that BOTH types of mutation are needed for full leukemic transformation:
- Class I alone → proliferation without differentiation block → MPN-like picture
- Class II alone → differentiation block without proliferation → MDS-like picture
- Class I + Class II → proliferation AND differentiation block → AML
Once both hits occur, the consequences are:
- Marrow replacement → normal haematopoietic precursors are crowded out → pancytopenia
- Blast release into blood → circulating blasts → can infiltrate organs
- Ineffective haematopoiesis → even non-leukemic progenitors are suppressed by the tumour microenvironment (cytokine dysregulation)
APL deserves special mention because of its unique pathophysiology and treatment:
- Caused by t(15;17)(q24;q21) creating the PML-RARA fusion gene
- RARα (retinoic acid receptor alpha) normally promotes granulocytic differentiation when bound by retinoic acid
- The PML-RARα fusion protein acts as a dominant negative — it recruits histone deacetylases and blocks transcription of differentiation genes → promyelocytes cannot mature
- APL cells express tissue factor (Factor III) on their surface and release procoagulant granules → triggers DIC [7]
DIC in APL: the APL cells express tissue factor (the initiator of the extrinsic pathway). This leads to excessive activation of the coagulation cascade → too much thrombin → too much fibrin formation → fibrin clots block blood vessels + excessive consumption of coagulation factors → bleeding tendency + fibrin clots trap platelets → thrombocytopenia [7]. The clotting profile classically shows PT elevated (Factor VII has shortest half-life, consumed first), APTT initially preserved (Factor VIII is an acute phase reactant, stays high), low fibrinogen, high D-dimer [7].
6. Classification
The FAB classification was the original morphological system. While largely superseded by the WHO classification, it remains referenced, especially in clinical practice and exams:
| FAB Subtype | Name | Key Features | % of AML |
|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | Minimally differentiated AML | No morphological maturation; requires immunophenotyping | 3% |
| M1 | AML without maturation | Blasts with minimal granules | 15–20% |
| M2 | AML with maturation | Auer rods, a/w t(8;21) | 25–30% |
| M3 | Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) | t(15;17), PML-RARA, hypergranular promyelocytes, DIC, Auer rods (faggot cells) | 5–10% |
| M4 | Acute myelomonocytic leukemia | Both granulocytic and monocytic differentiation | 20% |
| M4Eo | M4 with eosinophilia | a/w inv(16) or t(16;16) | — |
| M5 | Acute monocytic/monoblastic leukemia | Gum hypertrophy, skin infiltration, CNS involvement | 10% |
| M6 | Acute erythroleukemia | Erythroid predominance | 5% |
| M7 | Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia | a/w Down syndrome in children | 5% |
The WHO classification integrates morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics. The key categories [4][8]:
-
AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities [4]
- t(15;17) — PML-RARA (APL) → good prognosis with ATRA
- t(8;21) — RUNX1-RUNX1T1 → favourable
- inv(16)/t(16;16) — CBFB-MYH11 → favourable
- Mutated NPM1 → favourable (most common mutation in AML, ~30%)
- FLT3-ITD → adverse prognosis
- Biallelic CEBPA mutation → favourable
- Note: Diagnosis can be made by blast cells even if < 20% when specific leukemia-associated cytogenetic/molecular genetic abnormalities are present [4]
-
AML with myelodysplasia-related changes [4]
- Microscopic features of dysplasia in at least 50% cells in ≥2 lineages
- Poor prognosis [4]
-
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-AML) [4]
- AML arising after prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy
- Poor prognosis [4]
-
AML, not otherwise specified (NOS) [4]
-
Myeloid sarcoma [4]
- Resembles a solid tumour but composed of myeloid blast cells
- Prominent extramedullary disease (e.g., cutaneous or gingival infiltration), occurs in < 1% [4]
-
Myeloid proliferation related to Down syndrome [4]
- Transient abnormal myelopoiesis (in neonates)
- Myeloid leukemia
This is crucial for prognosis and treatment decisions:
| Risk Group | Genetic Abnormalities | Approx. 5-year OS |
|---|---|---|
| Favourable | t(8;21), inv(16)/t(16;16), mutated NPM1 (without FLT3-ITD), biallelic CEBPA | 60–70% |
| Intermediate | Normal cytogenetics (without other defining mutations), t(9;11) | 40–50% |
| Adverse | Complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities), del(5q), del(7q)/monosomy 7, FLT3-ITD (high ratio), TP53 mutation, RUNX1 mutation, ASXL1 mutation | 10–20% |
7. Clinical Features
The clinical presentation of AML reflects two fundamental processes:
- Bone marrow failure (from replacement by non-functional blasts)
- Organ infiltration by leukemic cells
7.1 Symptoms
| Cytopenia | Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Anaemia (↓RBC) | Fatigue, lethargy, pallor, dyspnoea on exertion | Blasts crowd out erythroid precursors → ↓RBC production → ↓O₂ carrying capacity → tissue hypoxia. General fatigue is present in the majority of patients and often precedes diagnosis for months [4] |
| Thrombocytopenia (↓Platelets) | Easy bruising, petechiae, mucosal bleeding (gum bleeding, epistaxis), menorrhagia | Blasts crowd out megakaryocytes → ↓platelet production → impaired primary haemostasis |
| Neutropenia (↓Functional neutrophils) | Recurrent infections, fever, sore throat, mouth ulcers | Despite high total WBC, the mature functional neutrophils are reduced → impaired innate immunity → susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections |
Key concept: The total WBC count may be HIGH (due to circulating blasts), NORMAL, or LOW — but the functional neutrophil count is almost always low. This is why patients get infections despite having a "high white cell count."
- Bone pain — leukemic blast expansion within the medullary cavity stretches the periosteum (pain-sensitive)
- Headache, nausea/vomiting, visual changes, cranial nerve palsies — CNS infiltration (more common in M5 monocytic subtype and in the paediatric population)
- Gum swelling/pain — gingival infiltration (characteristic of M5 monocytic AML) [4][8]
- Skin nodules (leukemia cutis) — dermal blast infiltration
- When WBC is extremely high (typically > 100 × 10⁹/L)
- Headache, blurred vision/visual changes, confusion, dyspnoea [8]
- Why? Large, "sticky" myeloid blasts (larger than lymphoid blasts) aggregate in small vessels → microvascular occlusion → ischaemia
- Particularly affects the lungs (dyspnoea, hypoxia) and brain (altered mental status, stroke-like symptoms)
- This is a haematological emergency
- Fever (may be due to infection OR cytokine release from blasts)
- Weight loss, night sweats (less prominent than in lymphomas, but present)
- Anorexia, malaise
7.2 Signs
| Sign | Finding | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Pallor | Conjunctival pallor, skin pallor | ↓Hb → ↓RBC mass |
| Petechiae/Purpura | Non-blanching pinpoint (petechiae) or larger (purpura) spots | ↓Platelets → capillary bleeding into skin |
| Ecchymoses | Large bruises | ↓Platelets + possible DIC |
| Mucosal bleeding | Gum bleeding, epistaxis | ↓Platelets |
| Fever | Temperature ≥38°C | Neutropenia → infection (or cytokine-mediated) |
| Oral ulcers/candidiasis | White patches, ulceration | Neutropenia → impaired mucosal immunity |
| Signs of infection | Cellulitis, pneumonia, perianal abscess | Functional neutropenia |
| Sign | Finding | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatosplenomegaly | Palpable liver/spleen | Blast infiltration + extramedullary haematopoiesis. NOTE: Less prominent in AML than ALL [6] — this is an important distinguishing feature |
| Lymphadenopathy | Palpable lymph nodes | Less common in AML than ALL [6]; if present, consider monocytic variants |
| Gum hypertrophy | Swollen, spongy, bleeding gums | Characteristic of AML-M5 (monocytic/monoblastic) [4][8] — monocytic blasts have tropism for gingival tissue |
| Skin infiltration (leukemia cutis) | Violaceous papules/nodules | Dermal infiltration by blasts, particularly in M5 |
| Fundoscopic findings | Retinal haemorrhages, Roth spots, cotton-wool spots | ↓Platelets + hyperviscosity → retinal vessel damage [8] |
| Testicular enlargement | Painless testicular swelling | Blast infiltration (much less common in AML than ALL — this is an uncommon presenting feature in AML [6]) |
| Cranial nerve palsies | Facial palsy, other CN deficits | Leptomeningeal/parenchymal infiltration |
- Oozing from venepuncture sites
- Widespread petechiae and ecchymoses
- Gangrenous changes in severe cases (microvascular thrombosis)
- Tachypnoea, hypoxia (pulmonary leucostasis)
- Altered mental status, papilloedema (cerebral leucostasis)
- Priapism (rarely — penile vascular stasis)
AML vs ALL — Clinical Feature Comparison
| Feature | AML | ALL |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Adults (median 65y) | Children (peak 2–5y) |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | Less prominent | Up to 50% [6] |
| Lymphadenopathy | Less prominent | Up to 50% [6] |
| Testicular involvement | Rare | Uncommon but recognised [6] |
| Mediastinal mass | Rare | 50–75% in T-ALL [6] |
| Gum hypertrophy | Characteristic (M5) | Rare |
| DIC | Characteristic (M3/APL) | Rare |
| CNS involvement | Less common (except M5) | More common |
High Yield Clinical Feature Pearls
- Gum hypertrophy = think AML-M5 (monocytic) [4][8]
- DIC at presentation = think APL (AML-M3) [4][7]
- Leucostasis is an emergency — more common in AML than ALL because myeloid blasts are larger and stickier
- Fundoscopy: haemorrhage, Roth spots, cotton wool spots [8]
- Bone pain in AML = periosteal stretching from expanding blast population
APL is singled out because of its unique features and because it is the most curable subtype of AML if recognised and treated promptly:
- t(15;17)(q24;q21) → PML-RARA fusion [4]
- Presents with severe coagulopathy (DIC) → can be fatal within hours if not treated
- Clotting profile: PT ↑, APTT initially preserved, fibrinogen ↓, D-dimer ↑ [7]
- Why is PT elevated first? After APL cells express tissue factor (Factor III, initiator of extrinsic pathway), Factor VII (shortest half-life of all coagulation factors) is consumed first → PT rises before APTT [7]
- Why is APTT initially preserved? Factor VIII is an acute phase reactant — in the acute phase, Factor VIII supply is high, buffering the intrinsic pathway [7]
- If left untreated, all clotting factors eventually deplete → APTT also rises [7]
- Morphology: Hypergranular promyelocytes with Auer rods (crystallised granules), often seen in bundles called "faggot cells"
- Treatment: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) ± arsenic trioxide (ATO) — targeted therapy that overcomes the differentiation block by pharmacological doses of retinoic acid
APL is a Haematological Emergency
If you suspect APL (pancytopenia + DIC + hypergranular blasts/Auer rods), start ATRA immediately — do NOT wait for cytogenetic confirmation. The DIC can be rapidly fatal. ATRA induces differentiation of the arrested promyelocytes, resolving the DIC.
| Pathophysiological Process | Clinical Consequence |
|---|---|
| Blast accumulation → crowding out normal haematopoiesis | Anaemia, thrombocytopenia, functional neutropenia |
| ↓ Functional neutrophils | Infections (bacterial > fungal) |
| ↓ Platelets | Bleeding tendency |
| ↓ RBCs | Fatigue, pallor, dyspnoea |
| Blast infiltration of organs | Hepatosplenomegaly, gum hypertrophy (M5), skin nodules, bone pain, CNS symptoms |
| Tissue factor release (APL) | DIC → bleeding + microthrombosis |
| Very high blast count → leucostasis | Pulmonary/cerebral ischaemia (emergency) |
| Cytokine release | Fever, night sweats, weight loss |
High Yield Summary
- Definition: AML = clonal malignant proliferation of myeloid precursors with ≥20% blasts in BM/PB (except specific genetic subtypes)
- Epidemiology: Most common acute leukemia in adults (80%); median age 65; M > F (5:3); rare in children
- Risk Factors: Genetic (Down, Fanconi, Bloom), environmental (benzene, radiation, smoking), therapy-related (alkylating agents → 5–7y latency; topo-II inhibitors → 1–3y), pre-leukemic (MDS, MPN, aplastic anaemia, PNH)
- Pathophysiology: Two-hit hypothesis — Class I (proliferation: FLT3, RAS) + Class II (differentiation block: CEBPA, PML-RARA)
- Classification: WHO 2022 integrates genetics; ELN 2022 for risk stratification (favourable: t(8;21), inv(16), mutated NPM1; adverse: complex karyotype, FLT3-ITD high, TP53)
- Clinical Features:
- BM failure: anaemia (fatigue), thrombocytopenia (bleeding), neutropenia (infection)
- Organ infiltration: hepatosplenomegaly (less than ALL), gum hypertrophy (M5), skin, CNS, bone pain
- DIC: hallmark of APL (M3) — PT↑, APTT initially preserved, fibrinogen↓, D-dimer↑
- Leucostasis: WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L → emergency (pulmonary, cerebral)
- APL (M3): t(15;17)/PML-RARA → DIC → start ATRA immediately; most curable subtype
Active Recall - Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Definition to Clinical Features)
[1] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count: acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML section) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML section) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2.1.1 — AML) [5] Senior notes: Block A - Splenomegaly: common causes of splenomegaly; myeloproliferative diseases.pdf [6] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (ALL section — comparison features) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf (DIC/APL case) [8] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (Acute leukaemia section)
Differential Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Before listing differentials, let's think about why AML can be confused with other conditions. AML typically presents with some combination of:
- Pancytopenia (or cytopenias) ± circulating blasts
- Organomegaly / tissue infiltration
- Constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss)
- High or low WBC count
Any condition that shares one or more of these features enters the differential. The key clinical question is always: "Are these blasts, and if so, are they myeloid?" — because the answer determines everything downstream.
The differential diagnosis can be organised by the presenting clinical scenario:
Detailed Differential Diagnoses
This is the single most important differential — because both are acute leukemias presenting with pancytopenia, blasts, and organ infiltration.
| Feature | AML | ALL |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Adults (median 65y) | Children (peak 2–5y) [6] |
| Cytochemistry | MPO/Sudan Black B positive [6][9][10] | MPO/Sudan Black B negative [6][9][10] |
| Auer rods | Present (pathognomonic of myeloblasts) [4][9][10] | Absent |
| Blast morphology (PBS) | Granules, increased cytoplasm [10] | No granules, scant cytoplasm, high N:C ratio [10] |
| Immunophenotyping | CD34, HLA-DR, CD117, CD13, CD33 [4] | TdT+, CD10+ (B-ALL), CD3+ (T-ALL) [6] |
| Organomegaly | Less prominent | More prominent (hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy up to 50%) [1][6] |
| Mediastinal mass | Rare | 50–75% in T-ALL [6] |
| CNS involvement | Less common (except M5) [1] | More common [1][6] |
| Testicular involvement | Rare | Uncommon but recognised [6] |
| Gum hypertrophy | Characteristic (M5) [1][4] | Rare |
| DIC | Characteristic (APL/M3) | Rare |
Why is this distinction critical? Treatment regimens are completely different. AML uses anthracycline-based induction ("7+3"), while ALL uses multi-agent protocols with CNS prophylaxis. Giving the wrong regimen is potentially fatal.
High Yield — GC Lecture: Distinguishing AML from ALL
The approach to distinguish AML from ALL follows the 5-step MCICM framework [1][9]:
- Morphology: PBS and BM aspirate — look for granules, Auer rods (→ AML)
- Cytochemistry: MPO/Sudan Black B positive = myeloid [1][9][10]; no specific marker for lymphoid [9]
- Immunophenotyping: flow cytometry for cell surface markers
- Cytogenetics: karyotyping, FISH
- Molecular genetics: PCR, sequencing
Auer rods confirm myeloblastic nature, i.e. a diagnosis of AML [9][11]. Faggot cells (abnormal promyelocytes with numerous Auer rods) → APML, a haematological emergency [9][11].
A subtle but important exam point: some ALL cells may co-express myeloid markers or even be mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) [4]. Conversely, ~20% of AML will co-express lymphoid markers, but these do not influence prognosis [4]. This is why immunophenotyping alone is not sufficient — you need the full MCICM workup.
Common Exam Pitfall
Atypical lymphocytes (seen in infectious mononucleosis / EBV) can mimic lymphoblasts if you don't look at the blood film carefully [12]. Atypical lymphocytes are NOT neoplastic — they result from lymphocyte activation due to viral infections (EBV prototypical), autoimmune disease, etc. — NOT to be mistaken as blasts or lymphoma cells [9][11].
MDS is the classic "pre-leukemic" state and sits on a spectrum with AML.
| Feature | AML | MDS |
|---|---|---|
| Blast count | ≥20% in PB or BM | < 20% blasts [8] |
| Differentiation | Arrested at blast stage | Impaired but not fully arrested (ineffective/dysmorphic haematopoiesis) [8] |
| Bone marrow | Replaced by blasts | Hypercellular with trilineage dysplasia [8] |
| Peripheral blood | Pancytopenia ± blasts | Pancytopenia (progressive decline in cell counts) [8] |
| PBS features | Blasts, Auer rods | Hypolobulated neutrophils (Pelger-Huët anomaly), hypogranular neutrophils, macrocytosis ( > 100 fL), nucleated RBCs [10] |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | May be present | NO hepatosplenomegaly [8] |
| Transformation | — | May transform to AML (~30%) [8] |
Why is this a key differential? The blast count may be marginal (i.e., approaching 20%), especially with BM regeneration after chemotherapy or G-CSF injection — this does not always imply AML transformation [4]. The 20% threshold is somewhat arbitrary, and serial monitoring is needed.
From first principles: MDS is a disorder of ineffective haematopoiesis — the marrow IS making cells, but they are dysplastic and die before release into the circulation (intramedullary apoptosis). This is why the marrow is hypercellular but the peripheral blood is cytopenic. In AML, the problem shifts to maturation arrest — blasts cannot differentiate at all.
CML in blast crisis is an essential differential — it is critical to identify the underlying condition because BCR-ABL TKIs (e.g., imatinib) may still have a role [4].
| Feature | De novo AML | CML blast crisis |
|---|---|---|
| History | No prior haematological diagnosis | Known CML or newly discovered CML features |
| BCR-ABL | Absent | Present (Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22)) |
| PBS | Blasts | Blasts + basophilia + entire granulocytic spectrum visible |
| Splenomegaly | Variable, often mild | Often massive splenomegaly |
| Blast lineage | Myeloid | 2/3 myeloid, 1/3 lymphoid |
Why does this matter? If you treat CML blast crisis like de novo AML with standard chemotherapy alone, you miss the opportunity to use a TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) targeting BCR-ABL. The TKI is the cornerstone of CML treatment and dramatically improves outcomes.
From first principles: CML starts as a chronic phase disorder driven by the BCR-ABL fusion oncoprotein (constitutive tyrosine kinase → proliferative advantage). Over time, additional mutations accumulate (similar to the two-hit model), and the disease transforms through an accelerated phase into blast crisis (≥20% blasts). This is why chronic leukemia transforms into acute leukemia if left untreated — leukemic cells acquire more and more mutations over time [1].
Aplastic anaemia presents with pancytopenia resulting from bone marrow hypoplasia or aplasia [13], which overlaps with the pancytopenia of AML.
| Feature | AML | Aplastic Anaemia |
|---|---|---|
| Bone marrow | Hypercellular, replaced by blasts | Hypocellular with fat infiltration ( > 90%) [13] |
| Blasts | ≥20% | Absent — no malignant cells, just absence of normal cells [13] |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | May be present | NO hepatosplenomegaly [13] |
| Lymphadenopathy | May be present | NO lymphadenopathy [13] |
| Reticulocytes | Low | Low |
| PBS | Blasts visible | Normal morphology, just reduced counts |
Why no hepatosplenomegaly in aplastic anaemia? The spleen's job is to filter and destroy abnormal RBCs. In aplastic anaemia, there isn't even a functional bone marrow producing RBCs — the spleen has nothing to recognise as abnormal, so no splenomegaly. For lymphadenopathy — there is no malignant component producing cells that infiltrate lymph nodes [13].
The critical distinction is the bone marrow biopsy: hypercellular with blasts = AML; hypocellular "empty" marrow with fat = aplastic anaemia. However, remember that aplastic anaemia itself is a risk factor for developing AML [2][3].
Vitamin B12 and folate deficiency can cause pancytopenia with prominent erythroid elements — this may mimic erythroleukaemia (AML-M6) [4].
| Feature | AML (esp. M6) | Megaloblastic Anaemia |
|---|---|---|
| MCV | Variable | Markedly elevated ( > 100 fL, often > 110) |
| Bone marrow | ≥20% blasts | Megaloblastic changes (large erythroid precursors with immature nuclei), NO blasts |
| PBS | Blasts | Hypersegmented neutrophils (≥5 lobes), macro-ovalocytes, NO blasts |
| Serum B12/folate | Normal | Low |
| Response to treatment | Requires chemotherapy | Responds to B12/folate replacement |
Why the confusion? In severe B12/folate deficiency, the bone marrow can be hypercellular with abundant erythroid precursors that look "immature" — because DNA synthesis is impaired (thymidine synthesis requires folate), so the nucleus lags behind the cytoplasm in maturation (nuclear-cytoplasmic dyssynchrony). This can superficially resemble the erythroid hyperplasia of AML-M6. The key is: there are no true blast cells, and hypersegmented neutrophils on the PBS are the giveaway for megaloblastic anaemia.
A leukemoid reaction is a marked reactive leukocytosis (WBC > 50 × 10⁹/L, sometimes > 100) that mimics CML or even AML clinically.
| Feature | AML | Leukemoid Reaction |
|---|---|---|
| Cause | Clonal malignancy | Severe infection/sepsis, burns, haemorrhage |
| PBS | Blasts (≥20%) | Left shift (band cells, metamyelocytes, myelocytes) [9][11] but NO blasts |
| LAP score | Low or absent | High (leukocyte alkaline phosphatase) |
| Splenomegaly | Variable | Usually absent |
| Cytogenetics | May be abnormal | Normal |
| Resolution | Requires treatment | Resolves with treatment of underlying cause |
From first principles: Left shift means abundant immature forms of the granulocyte series (band cells, metamyelocytes, myelocytes) — this indicates severe infection/sepsis or CML [9][11]. A left shift is the marrow's attempt to rapidly mobilise neutrophils in response to infection. Crucially, it does NOT include blasts — blasts in the peripheral blood are always abnormal [9][11].
| Feature | AML | PMF |
|---|---|---|
| Marrow | Hypercellular with blasts | Fibrotic (sclerotic) with dry tap on aspirate |
| PBS | Blasts | Leukoerythroblastic picture: left shift + nucleated RBCs + tear-drop RBCs [9][11] |
| Spleen | Variable | Massive splenomegaly (extramedullary haematopoiesis) |
| Blasts | ≥20% | < 20% (unless transforming) |
A leukoerythroblastic picture (left shift in granulocyte series + nucleated RBCs ± tear-drop RBCs) indicates marrow infiltration — by primary myelofibrosis or any metastatic cancer [9][11].
Metastatic carcinoma (breast, prostate, lung, neuroblastoma in children) can infiltrate the marrow, causing:
- Pancytopenia
- Leukoerythroblastic blood film
- Bone pain
The key distinction from AML: there are no myeloid blasts, and the infiltrating cells are non-haematopoietic (epithelial, neuronal, etc.), identifiable on trephine biopsy with appropriate immunohistochemistry.
Myeloma can cause pancytopenia (from marrow replacement by clonal plasma cells) with bone pain, mimicking AML. However:
- PBS shows rouleaux formation, not blasts
- Serum protein electrophoresis shows monoclonal M-spike [14]
- Bone marrow shows clonal plasma cells, not myeloblasts
- CRAB criteria (Calcium elevated, Renal insufficiency, Anaemia, Bone lesions) [14]
High-grade lymphomas (e.g., Burkitt lymphoma, DLBCL) can present with marrow involvement, cytopenias, and circulating abnormal cells. Distinguished by:
- Immunophenotype: lymphoid markers (CD20+, CD19+)
- Cytogenetics: lymphoma-specific translocations (e.g., t(8;14) for Burkitt)
- Clinical: prominent lymphadenopathy, extranodal masses
| Differential | Key Distinguishing Feature |
|---|---|
| ALL | MPO/SBB negative, no Auer rods, TdT+, more organomegaly |
| MDS | < 20% blasts, dysplastic features (Pelger-Huët), no hepatosplenomegaly |
| CML blast crisis | BCR-ABL positive, Philadelphia chromosome, prior CML history, basophilia |
| Aplastic anaemia | Hypocellular marrow, no blasts, no organomegaly |
| B12/folate deficiency | Hypersegmented neutrophils, low B12/folate, no blasts, responds to replacement |
| Leukemoid reaction | Left shift but NO blasts, high LAP score, resolves with infection treatment |
| PMF / MPN | Leukoerythroblastic picture, tear-drop cells, massive splenomegaly, dry tap |
| Solid tumour marrow infiltration | Leukoerythroblastic picture, non-haematopoietic cells on trephine biopsy |
| Multiple myeloma | M-spike, clonal plasma cells, CRAB features, rouleaux |
| Lymphoma | Lymphoid markers, lymphoma-specific translocations, lymphadenopathy |
High Yield — GC Lecture: Workup for Suspected Acute Leukemia
Three steps in any patient with suspected acute leukemia [1][15]:
- Make diagnosis
- Watch out for haematological emergencies
- Prepare patient for treatment
Workup [15]:
- CBP + differential (WBC high/normal/low) + manual count
- Clotting profile, D-dimer, fibrinogen (DIC in APL)
- Biochemistry — renal function, potassium, calcium, phosphate, urate, LDH (features of tumour lysis syndrome)
- Bone marrow examination + cytogenetics + molecular/NGS
- CXR (disease-related complications, infections)
- ECG, echocardiogram (before anthracycline)
- Hepatitis serology, HIV
- G6PD (risk of oxidative haemolysis with co-trimoxazole)
- Arrange central venous catheter insertion
- HLA typing for patients with high-risk disease and candidates for HSCT
The definitive distinction between AML and its mimics requires the MCICM approach [1][9]:
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of AML
- Most important differential: ALL — distinguish by cytochemistry (MPO/SBB+ = myeloid), Auer rods (pathognomonic of AML), and immunophenotyping
- MDS vs AML: The 20% blast threshold is the dividing line; MDS has dysplastic features, < 20% blasts, and no hepatosplenomegaly
- CML blast crisis: Always check for BCR-ABL/Philadelphia chromosome — TKI therapy changes management
- Aplastic anaemia: Hypocellular "empty" marrow vs hypercellular blast-filled marrow
- B12/folate deficiency: Can mimic erythroleukaemia — look for hypersegmented neutrophils and check B12/folate levels
- Leukemoid reaction: Left shift but NO blasts; resolves with treatment of underlying infection
- MCICM is the 5-step framework: Morphology, Cytochemistry, Immunophenotyping, Cytogenetics, Molecular genetics
- APL (faggot cells + DIC) is a haematological emergency — start ATRA before confirmation
Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of AML
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count: acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML section) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML section) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2.1.1 — AML) [6] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (ALL section) [8] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (MDS and Acute leukaemia sections) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2 — Leukaemia approach) [10] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (High WBC evaluation) [12] Senior notes: Block A - Generalised Lymphadenopathy: Differential diagnosis and principle of management.pdf [13] Senior notes: Block A - Family history of anaemia: inherited causes of anaemia; haemolytic anaemia; aplastic anaemia.pdf [14] Senior notes: Block A - An old man with bone pain and anaemia: multiple myeloma; monoclonal gammopathy.pdf [15] Lecture slides: GC 060. High white cell count.pdf (Workup for suspected acute leukaemia)
Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigation Modalities
Diagnostic Criteria for AML
The diagnosis of AML is fundamentally about answering two questions:
- Is this acute leukemia? (i.e., are there enough blasts?)
- Are the blasts myeloid? (i.e., not lymphoid)
High Yield — GC Lecture: Core Diagnostic Criteria for AML
Diagnosis of AML requires BOTH of the following [2][3]:
Criterion 1 — Evidence of blast accumulation (one of):
- ≥20% blasts of the total cells in the peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate (from a 500-cell differential count) [2][3][4]
- Leukemia with certain genetic abnormalities such as those with t(8;21), inv(16), or t(15;17) and myeloid sarcoma are considered diagnostic of AML without regard to the blast count [2][3][4]
Criterion 2 — Leukemic cells must be of myeloid origin (demonstrated by any of):
This threshold is somewhat arbitrary but clinically validated. It distinguishes AML from MDS (which also has blasts, but < 20%). Below 20%, the disease behaves more indolently (MDS pattern); above 20%, the biology shifts to aggressive blast proliferation requiring urgent chemotherapy. The count is performed on a 500-cell differential to ensure statistical reliability.
Because certain cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities are so specific to AML biology that their presence defines the disease regardless of blast percentage [2][3][4]:
| AML-Defining Genetic Abnormality | Fusion Gene | Why Diagnostic? |
|---|---|---|
| t(8;21)(q22;q22) | RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (AML1-ETO) | Blocks myeloid differentiation at a specific stage; virtually never seen outside AML |
| inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16) | CBFB-MYH11 | Disrupts core binding factor needed for normal haematopoiesis; AML-specific |
| t(15;17)(q24;q21) | PML-RARA | Diagnostic of APL [4]; creates the dominant-negative retinoic acid receptor block |
These are sometimes called "AML-defining recurrent genetic abnormalities". Even if the blast count is 10%, finding t(15;17) means the patient has APL and needs immediate treatment.
Additionally, myeloid sarcoma (an extramedullary tumour composed of myeloid blasts) is diagnostic of AML regardless of blast count in blood or marrow [4].
WHO 5th Edition / ICC 2022 Update
The 2022 WHO and ICC classifications have expanded the list of AML-defining genetic abnormalities beyond the classic three above. Additional entities include AML with NPM1 mutation, AML with biallelic CEBPA mutation, AML with BCR-ABL1, and others. The principle remains the same: if you have a defining genetic abnormality, the diagnosis is AML regardless of blast count. For HKUMed exams, the three classic translocations [t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)] remain the must-know list.
The diagnostic workup follows a structured sequence. Think of it as a funnel — from clinical suspicion through morphology, then lineage confirmation, then genetic characterisation for prognosis and treatment.
Investigation Modalities: Systematic Breakdown
The investigations for AML diagnosis can be categorised into:
- Baseline blood tests (CBC, PBS, biochemistry, clotting)
- The MCICM framework (Morphology, Cytochemistry, Immunophenotyping, Cytogenetics, Molecular genetics)
- Pre-treatment workup (organ function, infection screening, HLA typing)
This is always the first investigation — it tells you "something is wrong" before you know exactly what.
| Parameter | Typical Findings in AML | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Haemoglobin | Normochromic normocytic anaemia (NcNc) [2][3][4] | Blast crowding out erythroid precursors → ↓ RBC production. Normocytic because the problem is not synthesis (cf. iron deficiency = microcytic) but production failure |
| Reticulocyte count | Normal or decreased [2][3] | The marrow cannot produce reticulocytes because it's replaced by blasts — this is an inappropriately low reticulocyte response for the degree of anaemia |
| WBC | Variable — may be high, normal, or low [4][6][9] | WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L in ~20% of cases; WBC < 5 × 10⁹/L in 25–40% [4][6][9]. The WBC is high because blasts are counted as "white cells" by automated counters — but the functional neutrophils are actually low |
| Platelets | Thrombocytopenia [2][3][4] | Megakaryocyte precursors are crowded out by blasts |
Why can WBC be LOW in AML? In some cases (especially APL), the blasts are "sticky" and remain in the marrow, with relatively few spilling into the peripheral blood. APL classically presents with pancytopenia rather than high WBC [1]. The automated counter sees low total WBC because not many blasts have escaped into circulation.
The PBS is where you first see the disease. It provides morphological clues before the bone marrow is done.
- Circulating myeloblasts (present in 95% of cases) [2][3]: immature myeloid cells with large nuclei and prominent nucleoli with variable amount of pale blue cytoplasm with Wright-Giemsa stain [2][3]
- Granules present in the cytoplasm (distinguishing from ALL blasts which have NO granules) [10]
- Increased cytoplasm (relatively lower N:C ratio compared to ALL) due to concomitant increase in nuclear size [10]
- > 20% blasts, large cells ~3× the size of normal lymphocytes → open chromatin [10]
- Positive for cytochemical staining (MPO/SBB) [10]
PBS findings specifically in APL [10]:
- Bilobed (reniform/kidney-shaped) nucleus [10]
- Auer rods — pink or red rod-like granular structures in cytoplasm [2][3]; pathognomonic of myeloblasts [2][3]
- Faggot cells → once having 3 or more Auer rods [10][11] — abnormal promyelocytes with numerous Auer rods → indicates APML, a haematological emergency [9][11]
- Giant platelets + schistocytes (due to DIC) [10]
- Absolute thrombocytopenia [10]
PBS findings in ALL (for comparison) [10]:
- No granules [10]
- Decreased cytoplasm (high N:C ratio) [10]
- > 20% blasts, large cells ~3× the size of normal → open chromatin [10]
- Negative for cytochemical staining (MPO/SBB) [10]
Auer rods are normally difficult to distinguish between myelo-/lymphoblasts morphologically, but the presence of Auer rods confirms myeloblastic nature, i.e., a diagnosis of AML [9][11]. This is because Auer rods are crystallised azurophilic granules containing myeloperoxidase — a myeloid-specific enzyme. Lymphoblasts do not produce these granules.
This is the definitive diagnostic investigation and provides material for the entire MCICM workup.
- Site: typically posterior iliac crest; alternative sites include anterior iliac crest and sternum (sternum for aspiration only) [11][16]
- Two procedures done together 1–2 cm apart [11][16]:
- Only absolute contraindication: severe bleeding disorders (severe haemophilia, DIC) [11][16]
- Thrombocytopenia of any severity is NOT a contraindication — just top up platelets to > 20 × 10⁹/L prior [11][16]
- Complications are uncommon (0.05–0.07%): most commonly pain, infection, bleeding [11][16]
Practical Point
Consult haematology for cytogenetic and molecular studies BEFORE doing the bone marrow [6][9]. Why? Because the aspirate must be sent to multiple laboratories (cytogenetics, molecular, flow cytometry) simultaneously. If you do the marrow without pre-arranging these, the sample may be handled incorrectly or insufficient material may be obtained for all tests.
Key BM findings in AML [2][3][4]:
- Hypercellular bone marrow [2][3]
- ≥20% of blasts [2][3][4]
- Presence of Auer rods [2][3] — pathognomonic of myeloblasts, pink or red rod-like granular structure in cytoplasm [2][3]
D. The MCICM Framework — Special Haematological Investigations
This is the systematic approach used to fully characterise any haematological malignancy.
MCICM = Morphology, Cytochemistry, Immunophenotyping, Cytogenetics, Molecular genetics [1][6][9][11]
Already covered above under PBS and BM aspirate/trephine.
Key morphological principle [11][16]:
- PBS: number/morphology of different cell types, presence of blasts, changes in other cell lines (e.g., dacrocytes, giant platelets)
- Marrow: aspirate for cytology, trephine for marrow cellularity, pattern of involvement, marrow fibrosis, bone structure
Purpose: to determine whether blasts are of myeloid lineage [2][3][11][16]
| Stain | Target | Positive in | Negative in | Appearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myeloperoxidase (MPO) | MPO enzyme in azurophilic granules | AML (myeloid lineage) | ALL (lymphoid) | Dark staining [4], 'rim of positivity' due to staining of granular contents in the periphery [11][16] |
| Sudan Black B (SBB) | Phospholipids in granules | AML (myeloid lineage) | ALL (lymphoid) | Dark black granular staining |
There are no good cytochemical markers for lymphoid lineage [9][11][16] — the previous use of acid phosphatase for T cells is now obsolete. This is why immunophenotyping (flow cytometry) is essential for confirming ALL.
From first principles: Why does MPO stain myeloid cells? Because myeloperoxidase is an enzyme stored in azurophilic (primary) granules of granulocytic cells. It catalyses the production of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) during the respiratory burst — a critical part of neutrophil killing. Lymphocytes don't have granules and don't perform respiratory burst, so they don't contain MPO.
Auer rods → essentially granules, and will stain positive for MPO/SBB stains [10]. This is why Auer rods are pathognomonic of myeloid lineage.
Purpose: identification of cell surface antigens to confirm lineage and subtype [2][3][11][16]
Two techniques:
- Flow cytometry: performed on peripheral blood or marrow aspirate (cells in suspension) [9][11]
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC): performed on trephine biopsy only (cells in tissue sections) [9][11]
Key surface markers for AML [2][3][4]:
| Marker | Meaning / What It Identifies |
|---|---|
| CD34 | Haematopoietic stem cell / blast marker |
| HLA-DR | Present on most AML blasts (ABSENT in APL — important!) |
| CD117 (c-Kit) | Myeloid progenitor marker |
| CD13 | Myeloid lineage |
| CD33 | Myeloid lineage (target of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, an antibody-drug conjugate) |
Monocytic lineage markers (for AML-M4/M5) [2][3]:
- CD11b, CD64, CD14, CD15
Key surface markers for ALL (for comparison) [4][6]:
- TdT (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) — important marker for diagnosis and prognostication [4][6]
- CD10 (CALLA), CD19, CD20 — B-cell ALL
- CD3, CD7 — T-cell ALL
APL Immunophenotype Trap
APL (M3) has a distinctive immunophenotype: CD34 negative, HLA-DR negative (unlike most other AML subtypes). This is because the malignant cells are arrested at the promyelocyte stage, which has already lost these early progenitor markers. If you see blasts that are CD34−/HLA-DR− with hypergranular morphology, think APL immediately.
Purpose: detection of gross chromosomal abnormalities [2][3][6][9]
Two techniques:
- Conventional karyotyping with G-banding: visualises all chromosomes; detects translocations, deletions, inversions, complex karyotypes
- FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation): targeted probes for specific abnormalities (faster, but only detects what you're looking for)
Why cytogenetics is critically important in AML [4]:
- Certain cytogenetic abnormalities are diagnostic of AML (even if blast count < 20%)
- Karyotype/FISH is a major determinant of prognosis [4]
- Allows monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) [4]
Key cytogenetic abnormalities and their associations [2][3]:
| Chromosomal Abnormality | Genetic Alteration | Usual Morphology | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| t(8;21) | AML1-ETO (RUNX1-RUNX1T1) | Myeloblasts with differentiation | Favourable [2][3] |
| t(15;17) | PML-RARA | Promyelocytic | Favourable (with ATRA/ATO) [2][3] |
| inv(16) or t(16;16) | CBFB-MYH11 | Myeloblasts plus abnormal eosinophils with dysplastic basophilic granules | Favourable [2][3] |
| t(9;11) | MLL-AF9 | Monocytic | Intermediate |
| del(5q), del(7q), complex | Various | Variable | Adverse |
| t(9;22) | BCR-ABL1 | Variable | Adverse (CML blast crisis must be excluded) |
High Yield Exam Point
The presence of certain cytogenetic abnormalities is sufficient for diagnosis of AML regardless of the blast count [2][3]:
- t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1-RUNX1T1
- t(15;17)(q22;q12); PML-RARA (APL)
- inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11
This means a patient with only 12% blasts but inv(16) on karyotype has AML and should be treated as such.
Purpose: detection of specific gene mutations that confer prognostic significance and may influence post-remission therapy choices [4]
Techniques: PCR, RT-PCR, next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Key mutations in AML [2][3][4]:
| Gene | Significance |
|---|---|
| FLT3 (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3) | Predicts prognosis (depends on exact mutation) [4]; FLT3-ITD = adverse; newer FLT3 TKIs (e.g., midostaurin, gilteritinib) available [4] |
| NPM1 (nucleophosmin) | Most common mutation in AML (~30%); favourable prognosis (if without FLT3-ITD high ratio) |
| CEBPA | Biallelic mutation = favourable prognosis |
| IDH1/IDH2 | Targetable with IDH inhibitors (enasidenib, ivosidenib) |
| KIT | Adverse in core binding factor AML [t(8;21), inv(16)] |
| TP53 | Adverse prognosis; associated with complex karyotype, therapy-related AML |
| RUNX1, ASXL1, DNMT3A | Adverse prognosis markers |
| WT1 | Useful as MRD monitoring marker |
Molecular genetics confers prognostic significance and may influence post-remission therapy choices [4]. For instance, finding FLT3-ITD means the patient should receive a FLT3 inhibitor (midostaurin) in addition to standard chemotherapy. Finding IDH mutations opens the door to IDH inhibitors. This is the era of precision oncology.
E. Biochemistry and Clotting — Assessing Complications
These are not diagnostic of AML per se but are critical for identifying haematological emergencies and pre-treatment baseline.
High Yield — GC Lecture: Workup for Suspected Acute Leukemia
Workup [15]:
- CBP + differential (WBC high/normal/low) + manual count
- Clotting profile, D-dimer, fibrinogen (DIC in APL)
- Biochemistry — renal function, potassium, calcium, phosphate, urate, LDH (features of tumour lysis syndrome)
- Bone marrow examination + cytogenetics + molecular/NGS
- CXR (disease-related complications, infections)
- ECG, echocardiogram (before anthracycline)
- Hepatitis serology, HIV
- G6PD (risk of oxidative haemolysis with co-trimoxazole)
- Arrange central venous catheter insertion
- HLA typing for patients with high-risk disease and candidates for HSCT
Purpose: look for evidence of DIC (especially in APL) [2][3][15]
| Test | Finding in DIC (APL) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| PT | Elevated | Factor VII (shortest half-life) consumed first via extrinsic pathway activation by tissue factor on APL cells [7] |
| APTT | Initially preserved, then elevated | Factor VIII (acute phase reactant) buffers intrinsic pathway initially [7] |
| Fibrinogen | Low | Consumed in excessive clot formation |
| D-dimer | Elevated | Fibrin degradation products from fibrinolysis of microthrombi |
Purpose: look for evidence of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) [2][3][15]
| Test | Finding in TLS | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Potassium | Hyperkalaemia | Intracellular K⁺ released from lysed cells |
| Phosphate | Hyperphosphataemia | Intracellular phosphate released from lysed cells |
| Calcium | Hypocalcaemia | Calcium binds to excess phosphate → calcium-phosphate precipitation |
| Uric acid | Elevated | Purine catabolism from DNA release → xanthine oxidase → uric acid |
| LDH | Elevated | Non-specific marker of cell turnover/lysis |
| Creatinine/Urea | Elevated | Uric acid and calcium-phosphate crystals deposit in renal tubules → acute kidney injury |
| Investigation | Rationale |
|---|---|
| ECG + Echocardiogram (TTE) | Before anthracycline use [2][3] — anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin) cause dose-dependent cardiotoxicity; need baseline LVEF |
| CXR | Disease-related complications and infections [15] — look for mediastinal mass, pneumonia, pulmonary infiltrates |
| Hepatitis serology (HBV, HCV) + HIV | Risk of reactivation during immunosuppressive chemotherapy [15] — HBV especially common in HK; antiviral prophylaxis needed if HBsAg+ |
| G6PD | Risk of oxidative haemolysis with co-trimoxazole [15] — co-trimoxazole is used for PCP (Pneumocystis) prophylaxis during chemotherapy; if G6PD deficient, use alternative (e.g., dapsone with caution, or pentamidine) |
| HLA typing | For patients with high-risk disease who are candidates for HSCT [15] — need to identify matched donors early |
| Central venous catheter | For IV drug administration [15] — chemotherapy agents are vesicants; central line (e.g., Hickman, PICC) ensures safe delivery |
| Lumbar puncture | For CNS assessment — particularly in M5 (monocytic) subtypes or if CNS symptoms are present; sends CSF for cytology and flow cytometry |
| Phase | Investigation | Key Findings | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | CBC + differential | NcNc anaemia, thrombocytopenia, WBC variable | Suspect haematological malignancy |
| Initial | PBS (manual) | Blasts ≥20%, ± Auer rods, ± faggot cells | Confirm acute leukemia; Auer rods = AML |
| Initial | Clotting profile | PT↑, fibrinogen↓, D-dimer↑ | Screen for DIC (APL) |
| Initial | Biochemistry | ↑K⁺, ↑PO₄³⁻, ↓Ca²⁺, ↑urate, ↑LDH | Screen for TLS |
| MCICM-M | BM aspirate + trephine | Hypercellular, ≥20% blasts, Auer rods | Confirm diagnosis |
| MCICM-C | MPO / SBB staining | Positive = myeloid | Lineage determination |
| MCICM-I | Flow cytometry | CD34, CD117, CD13, CD33 | Lineage confirmation + subtyping |
| MCICM-C | Karyotype + FISH | t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17), complex | Diagnosis + prognosis + MRD monitoring |
| MCICM-M | Molecular (PCR/NGS) | FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, IDH, TP53 | Prognosis + targeted therapy selection |
| Pre-Rx | ECG + Echo, CXR, Hep/HIV, G6PD, HLA | Baseline organ function | Treatment readiness |
APL (AML-M3) is a haematological emergency requiring immediate recognition [17].
Diagnostic approach to suspected APL [1][10]:
- Clinical suspicion: pancytopenia + bleeding out of proportion to platelet count [1] + DIC
- PBS: abnormal promyelocytes with bilobed (reniform) nucleus, Auer rods, faggot cells (≥3 Auer rods), + MPO/SBB positive [10]
- Clotting: evidence of DIC (PT↑, fibrinogen↓, D-dimer↑) — bleeding symptoms are out of proportion to the platelet amounts [1]
- Gold standard: cytogenetics — characterised by t(15;17)(q22;q21) → resultant PML-RARA fusion protein creates a differentiation block [1]
APL Emergency Rule
The combination of pancytopenia with circulating promyelocytes, DIC with low fibrinogen, and t(15;17) translocation mandates urgent ATRA therapy even before formal diagnosis to prevent fatal bleeding complications [17]. Do NOT wait for cytogenetics to come back before starting ATRA — clinical and morphological suspicion is enough.
High Yield Summary — Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations
- Diagnostic criteria: ≥20% blasts in PB/BM (OR AML-defining genetic abnormality: t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)) + myeloid lineage confirmed by Auer rods, MPO+, or myeloid immunophenotype
- MCICM framework: Morphology → Cytochemistry → Immunophenotyping → Cytogenetics → Molecular genetics
- PBS in AML: Myeloblasts with granules, Auer rods (pathognomonic), MPO/SBB positive; APL: faggot cells + bilobed nucleus
- PBS in ALL: Lymphoblasts WITHOUT granules, NO Auer rods, MPO/SBB negative
- Flow cytometry markers: AML = CD34, CD117, CD13, CD33; ALL = TdT, CD10, CD19 (B), CD3 (T)
- Cytogenetics: t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17) are diagnostic of AML even with < 20% blasts; karyotype is a major prognostic determinant
- Molecular: FLT3-ITD (adverse), NPM1 (favourable), CEBPA biallelic (favourable), TP53 (adverse)
- Pre-treatment: ECG/Echo (anthracycline cardiotoxicity), Hep serology (HBV reactivation risk), G6PD (co-trimoxazole risk), HLA typing (HSCT candidates)
- APL emergency: Start ATRA immediately on clinical suspicion — do not wait for cytogenetics
Active Recall - Diagnostic Criteria and Investigations for AML
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count: acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML Diagnosis section) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML Diagnosis section) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2.1.1 — AML laboratory features and diagnosis) [6] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (Acute Leukemia section) [7] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf (DIC/APL case) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2 — Leukaemia approach and MCICM) [10] Senior notes: Block A - Introduction to Haematological investigations (CBP, Clotting).pdf (PBS findings in AML, ALL, APL) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (High WBC evaluation and marrow examination) [15] Lecture slides: GC 060. High white cell count.pdf (Workup for suspected acute leukaemia) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section on marrow examination techniques) [17] Senior notes: Learning_Points_All_Lectures.txt (APL as haematological emergency)
Management Algorithm and Treatment Modalities
Before diving into specifics, understand the strategic logic behind AML treatment. Think of it like a military operation against a rapidly proliferating enemy:
- Stabilise the patient first — address haematological emergencies that can kill within hours (DIC, leucostasis, febrile neutropenia, tumour lysis)
- Destroy the bulk of disease — intensive induction chemotherapy to achieve complete remission (CR)
- Eliminate residual disease — post-remission/consolidation therapy to prevent relapse
- Decide intensity based on risk — balance the risk of relapse (determined by molecular profile) against the risk of treatment-related mortality (determined by age, comorbidities, fitness)
The entire treatment pathway is guided by genetic characterisation — this is why the MCICM workup from the diagnostic section is not just diagnostic but also therapeutic. Your genetic results literally determine which drugs the patient receives and whether they need a transplant.
Phase 1: Initial Stabilisation and General Management
This happens before any definitive chemotherapy. Think of it as "keeping the patient alive long enough to treat the leukemia."
High Yield — GC Lecture: Workup for Suspected Acute Leukemia
In any patient with suspected acute leukemia, 3 steps [15]:
- Make diagnosis
- Watch out for haematological emergencies
- Prepare patient for treatment
General support: adequate nutrition, antiemetic, analgesia [4][6][9]
| Measure | Details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Sepsis workup ± Abx if febrile or evidence of infection | Blood cultures (peripheral + central line), urine C/S, CXR; start empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics immediately | Febrile neutropenia is a medical emergency — ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L + fever → empirical Abx within 1 hour [17]. Delayed treatment significantly increases mortality |
| Blood product support | RBC transfusion if symptomatic anaemia [4][6][9] | Maintain Hb to relieve symptoms (typically target ~70–80 g/L, or higher if symptomatic) |
| PLT transfusion if PLT ≤10, or ≤20 if fever/bleeding [4][6][9] | Prophylactic: prevent spontaneous haemorrhage; therapeutic threshold lower than surgical patients | |
| FFP if bleeding due to DIC [4][6][9] | Replace consumed clotting factors in DIC (especially APL) | |
| Prevent TLS | Ensure adequate hydration + start allopurinol or febuxostat [4][6][9] | Hydration increases renal uric acid clearance; allopurinol inhibits xanthine oxidase → blocks uric acid production |
| Infection control | Reverse isolation, face mask, hand hygiene, low bacteria diet [1] | Profound neutropenia means the patient's innate immunity is essentially absent; environmental bacteria become lethal threats |
| Central venous catheter | Hickman catheter if indicated [4][6][9][15] | Chemotherapy agents are vesicants (cause tissue necrosis if extravasated); central line ensures safe IV delivery and allows blood sampling |
Must-Check Before Starting Allopurinol
Check for HLA-B5801 before starting allopurinol → risk of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN)* [1]. This is particularly relevant in Hong Kong, where the prevalence of HLA-B5801 in the Han Chinese population is approximately 6–8%. If positive, use febuxostat (a non-purine xanthine oxidase inhibitor that does not carry the same HLA-B5801 risk) or rasburicase instead.
G6PD Check — Why It Matters
G6PD status must be checked [6][9][15] because:
- Co-trimoxazole (Septrin) used for PCP prophylaxis is an oxidative drug → can cause haemolytic crisis in G6PD-deficient patients
- Rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase for TLS) generates hydrogen peroxide during uric acid breakdown → also contraindicated in G6PD deficiency
Five haematological emergencies that can arise during acute leukemia [1]:
| Emergency | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Septic shock | Neutropenia → overwhelming infection → systemic inflammatory response → haemodynamic collapse | Resuscitation (fluids, vasopressors) + immediate empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics [1] |
| Neutropenic sepsis | ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L + fever ≥38°C → infection with impaired immune clearance | Immediate empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics [1][17] — typically piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem; add vancomycin if line infection suspected |
| Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) | Rapid cell death → release of intracellular contents (K⁺, PO₄³⁻, nucleic acids) → hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemia, hyperuricaemia, hypocalcaemia → cardiac arrhythmia + AKI | Hydration + urate-lowering agents (allopurinol, febuxostat, rasburicase) [1][4][6][9] |
| Leucostasis | WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L → myeloid blasts aggregate in microvasculature (lungs, brain) → ischaemia | Urgent leukapheresis + adjunctive chemotherapy [1][4][6][9]. Avoid blood transfusion until WBC is lowered [4][6] — transfusing packed RBCs increases blood viscosity and worsens leucostasis |
| DIC in APL | APL cells release tissue factor + procoagulants → excessive coagulation cascade activation → consumptive coagulopathy + fibrinolysis | ATRA + arsenic trioxide (ATO) specifically + supportive transfusion (platelets, FFP, cryoprecipitate) [1][4] |
Why avoid blood transfusion in leucostasis? Packed red cells increase blood viscosity. When the WBC is already > 100 × 10⁹/L and blasts are clogging microvessels, adding more viscosity with RBCs is like throwing fuel on a fire. Reduce the blast count first with leukapheresis or hydroxyurea, THEN transfuse as needed.
Why is leukapheresis only a temporary measure? Blasts grow so fast that the moment you remove them, they'll come back — so adjunctive chemotherapy is always needed [1]. Leukapheresis is a bridge to buy time.
Phase 2: Definitive Treatment — Non-APL AML
Subsequent management is guided by genetic changes (predicts prognosis → determines aggressiveness) [4][6][9]
The treatment of non-APL AML follows a phased approach:
2A. Induction Therapy — Achieving Complete Remission (CR)
Goal: Destroy the bulk of leukemic cells to achieve CR.
First decision point: Is the patient fit for intensive chemotherapy? [4]
This is assessed by:
- Performance status (ECOG/WHO)
- Age (generally < 60–65 years for intensive regimens; though this is not an absolute cutoff)
- Comorbidities (cardiac, renal, hepatic function)
- Risk of treatment-related mortality (TRM)
The standard induction regimen is "7+3" [4][2]:
- 7 days of continuous infusion cytarabine (also called ara-C)
- 3 days of IV anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone) [4]
Let's break down why these drugs work:
| Drug | Class | Mechanism | Why Used in AML |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytarabine (ara-C) | Antimetabolite (pyrimidine analogue) | Incorporates into DNA during S-phase → blocks DNA synthesis → cell death | AML blasts are rapidly dividing; cytarabine targets the S-phase of cell cycle, killing actively proliferating cells |
| Anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin) | Topoisomerase II inhibitor + DNA intercalator | Intercalates into DNA → inhibits topoisomerase II → prevents DNA unwinding → double-strand breaks → apoptosis. Also generates free radicals → direct cellular damage | Potent cytotoxic activity against myeloid blasts; synergistic with cytarabine |
Additional agents based on molecular profile [4]:
- FLT3 inhibitor (e.g., midostaurin) added for FLT3-mutant AML [4] — Why? FLT3-ITD drives constitutive proliferation signalling; midostaurin blocks this, improving CR rates and survival
- Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) for CD33+ AML [4] — an antibody-drug conjugate: anti-CD33 antibody delivers cytotoxic calicheamicin directly to CD33-expressing blasts
- CPX-351 (liposomal cytarabine + daunorubicin) for older patients with high-risk features [4] — optimised drug ratio in liposomal formulation improves efficacy in secondary AML/MDS-related AML
Expected effects of induction [4][6][9]:
- Severe BM hypoplasia requiring intensive support and in-patient care [4][6][9]
- Marked BM hypocellularity and peripheral pancytopenia are EXPECTED [4]
- The induction chemotherapy destroys both leukemic AND normal haematopoietic cells → the patient enters a "nadir" period of profound cytopenia lasting 2–4 weeks
- During this time, the patient is extremely vulnerable to infection and bleeding
High Yield — GC Lecture: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis During Induction
Prolonged bone marrow suppression is associated with very high incidence of infections, especially S. viridans sepsis and S. viridans shock syndrome as well as fungal infection such as Aspergillus infection [2]:
- Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for bacterial infections [2]
- Prophylactic antifungals (fluconazole/itraconazole) for fungal infections [2]
- Treatment for suspected infections: antibiotics for fever and neutropenia; antifungals for prolonged fever and neutropenia [2]
- Acyclovir for HSV-seropositive patients [4]
BM trephine biopsy is usually performed at ~7 days after the final dose of induction chemotherapy [4]
Complete Remission (CR) is defined as [4]:
- No residual leukemia: BM blasts < 5%, no circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease
- Good cell count recovery: ANC ≥1.0 × 10⁹/L, PLT ≥100 × 10⁹/L
- If cell counts not fully recovered but morphological CR → classified as CRi (CR with incomplete haematological recovery)
Partial Remission (PR) [4]:
- All haematological criteria of CR PLUS
- BM blast percentage: ≥50% decrease in BM blast percentage, now 5–25%
Treatment failure: defined as no CR or CRi after 2 courses of intensive induction [4]
Low-intensity treatment options [4]:
- Azacitidine ± venetoclax (the current standard for unfit patients; venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor that promotes apoptosis of leukemic cells)
- Decitabine
- Low-dose cytarabine
Best supportive care for patients with very poor general condition [4]:
- May include hydroxyurea (to control WBC count) [4]
- Palliative intent: symptom management, transfusion support, infection management
Why azacitidine? Azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent (HMA). In AML/MDS, tumour suppressor genes are often silenced by DNA hypermethylation. Azacitidine inhibits DNA methyltransferase → reduces methylation of CpG islands → re-activates silenced tumour suppressor genes → promotes differentiation and apoptosis of leukemic cells. Combined with venetoclax (which directly triggers mitochondrial apoptosis), this achieves surprisingly good response rates even in older/unfit patients.
2B. Post-Remission / Consolidation Therapy — Preventing Relapse
Without post-remission therapy, virtually all AML patients will relapse within a median of 4–8 months [4]. This is because even after achieving CR (< 5% blasts morphologically), there are still millions of residual leukemic cells lurking below the detection threshold of conventional microscopy — this is called measurable residual disease (MRD).
The choice of post-remission therapy depends on risk stratification [4] — balancing:
- Risk of relapse with consolidation chemo alone (predicted by molecular profile)
- Risk of morbidity/mortality associated with treatment (predicted by age + comorbidities)
For patients with relapse risk > 35–40% and acceptable risk for myeloablation [4]
Phase 3: Allogeneic HSCT — The Definitive Weapon
Indicated in young adults with unfavourable risk AML or relapse cases after complete remission (CR) [2]:
- AML/ALL: CR1 but with high risk for relapse (post-induction), CR2 or beyond [4]
- Adverse-risk cytogenetics/molecular profile
- Refractory or relapsed disease
Key Exam Point: Autologous vs Allogeneic HSCT in AML
Autologous HSCT has NO demonstrated benefits compared with chemotherapy in AML [2]. Why? Because:
- Autologous HSCT uses the patient's own stem cells → no graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect
- The harvested stem cells may be contaminated with residual leukemic cells
- Only allogeneic HSCT provides the critical GvL effect
Allogeneic HSCT after remission is associated with a significantly lower relapse risk but there is associated risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality [2].
- Myeloablative conditioning: high-dose chemo/radiation wipes out the diseased marrow completely
- T-cells in donor graft induce a graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect against residual disease that has survived the conditioning [2]
The GvL effect is actually the most important therapeutic component — donor T-cells recognise leukemic cells as "foreign" (because they express recipient-specific alloantigens) and destroy them. This is why allogeneic (not autologous) HSCT reduces relapse rates.
HLA typing is required [2]:
- CANNOT accept HLA mismatch in bone marrow transplantation [2]
- Matching for HLA Class I and II genes at allelic level is crucial [2]
- Must include: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1 [2]
- HLA-DPA1/B1, HLA-DQA1/B1 extended in some centres [2]
ALWAYS ask for family members such as siblings for potential allogeneic HSCT candidates [2]
| Donor Type | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Matched sibling donor | Long-term disease-free survival in ~2/3 of patients [2] — best outcomes |
| Matched unrelated donor (MUD) | May also be effective but carries risk of significant GVHD as well as myeloablative complications [2] |
| Haploidentical donor | Increasingly used with post-transplant cyclophosphamide protocols; GVHD risk mitigated |
Arrange HLA typing for siblings if HSCT anticipated [4][6][9][15] CMV-negative blood only for potential HSCT recipients if patient is CMV-negative [4]
| Domain | Factors |
|---|---|
| Disease factors | Nature and status of condition; previous response to non-transplant treatment; prognosis if no transplant [4] |
| Patient factors | Age (usually < 60y in HK) [4]; performance status; comorbidities; latent infections; psychological assessment |
| Donor factors | HLA match level; donor age; CMV status |
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) may be considered for older patients or those with comorbidities [4] — this uses lower-dose conditioning to reduce TRM while still allowing engraftment and GvL effect.
When AML doesn't respond to induction or relapses after CR, the prognosis is significantly worse. Options include:
- Re-induction with alternative chemotherapy regimens (e.g., FLAG-IDA: fludarabine + cytarabine + G-CSF + idarubicin)
- Targeted therapies based on molecular profile (FLT3 inhibitors, IDH inhibitors)
- Clinical trials
- Allo-HSCT if achievable
Special Protocol: APL (AML-M3) Management
APL is managed completely differently from other AML subtypes because of its unique biology.
APL is a medical emergency with a high rate of early mortality — associated with increased risk of life-threatening bleeding, especially intracranial bleeding [4]
Induction therapy uses differentiating agents to induce terminal differentiation of arrested promyelocytes into mature neutrophils [4]:
| Risk Category | Induction Regimen |
|---|---|
| Low risk (WBC ≤ 10 × 10⁹/L) | ATRA + arsenic trioxide (ATO) [4] |
| High risk (WBC > 10 × 10⁹/L) | ATRA + conventional chemo (cytarabine + daunorubicin) [4] |
How do ATRA and ATO work?
| Drug | Name Breakdown | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| ATRA | All-Trans Retinoic Acid — "all-trans" = specific stereoisomer; "retinoic acid" = vitamin A derivative | At pharmacological doses, ATRA binds the PML-RARα fusion protein and recruits co-activators instead of co-repressors → switches on differentiation genes → arrested promyelocytes mature into neutrophils. This bypasses the dominant-negative block |
| ATO | Arsenic trioxide (As₂O₃) | Degrades the PML-RARα oncoprotein directly → induces apoptosis of APL cells. Also promotes differentiation at lower concentrations |
Hong Kong is leading in this regard — we have oral arsenic [1]. Oral ATO formulations have been developed and shown to be effective, offering a more convenient administration route.
If you tide them over the acute period with no ICH, then the prognosis is good — so you CANNOT miss APL [1]
Coagulopathy: controlled by platelet + FFP + cryoprecipitate transfusion [4]
- Maintain platelets > 30–50 × 10⁹/L (higher threshold than other AML)
- Maintain fibrinogen > 1.5 g/L
Differentiation syndrome [4]:
- Dexamethasone 10 mg IV Q12h × ≥3 days as prophylaxis [4]
- Pathogenesis: due to production of inflammatory cytokines by large burden of maturing myeloid cells [4]
- Why does this happen? ATRA and ATO work by forcing promyelocytes to differentiate. The massive wave of differentiating cells releases inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α), causing a systemic inflammatory response
- S/S: dyspnoea, fever, peripheral oedema, hypotension, pleuro-pericardial effusion, acute renal failure, jaundice [4]
Differentiation Syndrome — Don't Confuse With Infection
A patient on ATRA developing fever + dyspnoea + pulmonary infiltrates could be differentiation syndrome OR infection. Both can be fatal. The key is: differentiation syndrome typically occurs 2–21 days after starting ATRA, often with rising WBC. Treat empirically with dexamethasone. If suspected, you can temporarily hold ATRA but must restart once stabilised.
| Feature | AML (non-APL) | APL | ALL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | 7+3 (cytarabine + anthracycline) | ATRA + ATO (low risk) or ATRA + chemo (high risk) | Multi-agent: cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, L-asparaginase [1] |
| Consolidation | IDAC ± allo-HSCT | ATRA/ATO or ATRA/anthracycline | Continued multi-agent chemo |
| Maintenance | Not standard in AML (except APL/FLT3+) | ATRA ± ATO maintenance | Low-intensity oral chemotherapy for 2–3 years [4][6][9] |
| CNS prophylaxis | Not routine (except M5) | Not routine | Intrathecal methotrexate [1] |
| HSCT | For high-risk or relapsed cases | Generally not needed | For high-risk or relapsed cases [1] |
Key Distinction: AML vs ALL Maintenance
AML does NOT typically use prolonged maintenance therapy (unlike ALL, which requires 2–3 years of oral maintenance) [4][6][9]. Why? Because AML blasts are less responsive to low-dose oral agents and the biology doesn't support prolonged suppressive therapy the way ALL does. The exception is FLT3-mutant AML (maintenance with FLT3 inhibitor) and APL (ATRA/ATO maintenance).
| Drug | Key Side Effects | Contraindications |
|---|---|---|
| Cytarabine | Myelosuppression, cerebellar toxicity (high dose), conjunctivitis | Severe hepatic dysfunction; use steroid eye drops prophylactically at high dose |
| Anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin) | Dose-dependent cardiotoxicity (cumulative) → dilated cardiomyopathy; myelosuppression | Pre-existing severe cardiac dysfunction; ECG + echocardiogram (TTE) required before use [2][3][15] |
| ATRA | Differentiation syndrome, pseudotumour cerebri (headache, papilloedema), dry skin/lips | Not absolute; requires close monitoring for differentiation syndrome |
| Arsenic trioxide (ATO) | QTc prolongation, differentiation syndrome, hepatotoxicity | Pre-existing long QT syndrome; monitor ECG |
| Midostaurin (FLT3 inhibitor) | GI toxicity (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea), myelosuppression | Use only in FLT3-mutant AML |
| Venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor) | TLS (especially in CLL; lower risk in AML), neutropenia | G6PD deficiency (for rasburicase co-use); TLS prophylaxis essential |
| Allopurinol | SJS/TEN in HLA-B5801 carriers* [1] | Must check HLA-B5801 before starting* [1] |
| Rasburicase | Anaphylaxis, haemolysis | G6PD deficiency (generates H₂O₂) [6][9][15] |
| Co-trimoxazole (PCP prophylaxis) | Myelosuppression, rash, haemolysis | G6PD deficiency [6][9][15] |
High Yield Summary — AML Management
- Initial stabilisation: address emergencies FIRST — febrile neutropenia (Abx within 1 hour), DIC in APL (ATRA immediately), leucostasis (leukapheresis + avoid RBC transfusion), TLS (hydration + allopurinol/rasburicase after checking HLA-B*5801 and G6PD)
- Fit patients: Intensive induction with 7+3 (7d cytarabine + 3d anthracycline) ± FLT3 inhibitor/GO based on molecular profile → assess CR at Day 14 BM biopsy
- Unfit patients: Low-intensity therapy (azacitidine ± venetoclax, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine) or best supportive care
- Post-remission: Favourable risk → IDAC consolidation; Adverse risk → allo-HSCT; Intermediate → clinical judgment
- Allo-HSCT: for high-risk/relapsed AML; GvL effect is the key mechanism; autologous HSCT has NO benefit in AML; HLA matching is critical
- APL protocol: ATRA + ATO (low risk) or ATRA + chemo (high risk); differentiation syndrome managed with dexamethasone; 90% cure rate
- AML does NOT use prolonged maintenance (unlike ALL's 2–3 year maintenance); NO routine CNS prophylaxis (unlike ALL)
- Pre-treatment checks: ECG/Echo (anthracycline cardiotoxicity), G6PD (co-trimoxazole/rasburicase risk), HLA-B*5801 (allopurinol SJS/TEN risk), HBV serology (reactivation risk), HLA typing (HSCT candidates)
Active Recall - AML Management
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count: acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML Management section) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML Management section) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2.1.1 — AML management, APL, HSCT) [6] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (Acute Leukemia general management section) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2 — Leukaemia general management) [15] Lecture slides: GC 060. High white cell count.pdf (Workup for suspected acute leukaemia) [17] Senior notes: Learning_Points_All_Lectures.txt (Febrile neutropenia as medical emergency; APL emergency recognition)
Complications of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Complications in AML arise from three sources:
- The disease itself — what the leukemia does to the body
- Treatment-related toxicity — what the chemotherapy/HSCT does to the body
- Late effects — long-term consequences of survival
Understanding these categories from first principles makes them easy to recall: leukemia crowds out normal marrow (→ cytopenia complications) and infiltrates organs (→ organ complications); chemotherapy is inherently cytotoxic and non-selective (→ collateral damage to normal tissues); and HSCT introduces immunological conflict between donor and host (→ GVHD and immune-related complications).
A. Disease-Related Complications
These are complications caused directly by AML biology — they can present at diagnosis or develop during the disease course.
- Mechanism: Leukemic blasts replace normal granulocytic precursors → functional neutropenia despite potentially high total WBC → impaired innate immunity → overwhelming susceptibility to infections
- Febrile neutropenia is a medical emergency requiring blood cultures and broad-spectrum antibiotics within one hour. ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L combined with fever necessitates urgent empirical therapy, as delayed treatment significantly increases mortality [17]
| Pathogen Category | Common Organisms | Clinical Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial | Gram-negative bacilli (E. coli, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella); Gram-positive cocci (S. viridans, Staph) | Early neutropenia; line-related infections |
| Fungal | Aspergillus species, Candida species | Prolonged fever and neutropenia — fungal infection must be considered when fever persists despite broad-spectrum antibiotics [2] |
| Viral | HSV reactivation, VZV, CMV (especially post-HSCT) | Immunosuppression, particularly T-cell depletion |
Why S. viridans? Prolonged bone marrow suppression is associated with very high incidence of infections, especially S. viridans sepsis and S. viridans shock syndrome [2]. S. viridans is part of the normal oral flora. Chemotherapy-induced mucositis (destruction of the oral mucosa barrier) allows these commensal bacteria to translocate into the bloodstream. In a neutropenic patient with no functional neutrophils to contain them, this becomes lethal bacteraemia.
Why Aspergillus? Aspergillus spores are ubiquitous in the environment (soil, water, air ducts). In immunocompetent individuals, alveolar macrophages and neutrophils destroy inhaled spores. In prolonged neutropenia, these spores germinate into hyphae that invade lung tissue → invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). This is why HEPA-filtered rooms and antifungal prophylaxis are standard of care during induction.
- Mechanism: Megakaryocytes are replaced by blasts → thrombocytopenia → impaired primary haemostasis → spontaneous bleeding
- Most common sites: mucocutaneous (gum bleeding, epistaxis, petechiae), GI, GU
- Life-threatening sites: CNS (intracranial haemorrhage), pulmonary
Bleeding in APL is particularly dangerous [1][6]:
- DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) — driven by tissue factor release and primary hyperfibrinolysis from APL cells [1][4]
- Bleeding symptoms are out of proportion to the platelet count [1] — because DIC consumes clotting factors AND platelets simultaneously
- ICH (intracranial haemorrhage) is the leading cause of early death in APL [4] — untreated APL has a median survival of < 1 month; the patient CAN die in front of you from ICH [4]
-
Mechanism: Rapid spontaneous or chemotherapy-induced destruction of large numbers of blast cells → massive release of intracellular contents:
- K⁺ → hyperkalaemia (cardiac arrhythmia risk)
- Phosphate → hyperphosphataemia (calcium-phosphate complex precipitation → hypocalcaemia → tetany, seizures)
- Nucleic acids → purine catabolism → hyperuricaemia (uric acid crystals deposit in renal tubules → acute uric acid nephropathy → AKI)
- LDH → elevated as a marker of cell lysis
-
Risk factors: high tumour burden (WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L), high LDH, pre-existing renal impairment, monocytic subtypes (M4/M5)
-
Prevention: hydration + allopurinol or febuxostat or rasburicase [6][9]
-
Check HLA-B5801 before starting allopurinol* [1]; check G6PD before rasburicase [6][9][15]
TLS Electrolyte Pattern — Easy Mnemonic
"Everything goes UP except calcium": ↑K⁺, ↑PO₄³⁻, ↑uric acid, ↑LDH, ↑creatinine — but ↓Ca²⁺ (because calcium binds to the excess phosphate).
- Headache, vision change, SOB [8] — due to microvascular occlusion by large, adhesive myeloid blasts
- Typically when WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L (~20% of AML patients at presentation)
- More common in AML than ALL because myeloid blasts are larger and stickier
- Organ damage: pulmonary leucostasis (ARDS-like picture), cerebral leucostasis (stroke, altered consciousness), renal impairment
- Avoid blood transfusion until WBC is lowered [4][6] — adding RBCs increases viscosity
- Management: urgent leukapheresis + cytoreductive chemotherapy
- CNS infiltration: headache, cranial nerve palsies, meningism — more common in M5 (monocytic) and paediatric AML
- Gum infiltration: gum hypertrophy (AML-M5) [1][4][8] — monocytic blasts have tropism for gingival tissue
- Skin infiltration (leukemia cutis): violaceous nodules/papules
- Ocular: haemorrhage, Roth spots, cotton wool spots [8] — from thrombocytopenia + blast infiltration of retinal vessels
- Bone pain: periosteal stretching from expanding blast population within the medullary cavity
Already discussed extensively in prior sections — most characteristic of APL (AML-M3). The fundamental problem: release of procoagulants from leukemic blasts [1] → excessive coagulation cascade activation → simultaneous thrombosis AND bleeding.
B. Treatment-Related Complications
These complications arise from the inherent toxicity of chemotherapy and supportive treatments. Chemotherapy is designed to kill rapidly dividing cells, but it is not specific to leukemic cells — all rapidly dividing normal cells (bone marrow, GI mucosa, hair follicles) are also damaged.
- Severe BM hypoplasia requiring intensive support and in-patient care [4][6][9]
- Marked BM hypocellularity and peripheral pancytopenia are EXPECTED after induction [4]
- The "nadir" period (2–4 weeks post-induction) is when the patient is most vulnerable to infection and bleeding
- This is a planned complication — you EXPECT it and manage it supportively:
This deserves its own section because it is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality during AML treatment.
Prolonged bone marrow suppression is associated with very high incidence of infections, especially: [2]
- S. viridans sepsis and S. viridans shock syndrome
- Fungal infection such as Aspergillus infection
| Phase | Duration | Predominant Pathogens | Prophylaxis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early neutropenia (0–2 weeks post-chemo) | ANC < 0.5 | Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive cocci, Candida | Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for bacterial infections [2] |
| Prolonged neutropenia ( > 2 weeks) | Persistent ANC < 0.5 | Aspergillus, other moulds | Prophylactic antifungals (fluconazole/itraconazole) [2] |
| Recovery phase | Rising ANC | Reactivation viruses (HSV, CMV) | Acyclovir |
Treatment for suspected infections: antibiotics for fever and neutropenia; antifungals for prolonged fever and neutropenia [2]
- Mechanism: Cytotoxic chemotherapy destroys rapidly dividing mucosal epithelial cells → mucosal barrier breakdown
- Oral mucositis: painful ulceration of the oropharyngeal mucosa → impaired nutrition, portal of entry for oral flora (→ S. viridans bacteraemia)
- Non-oral mucositis: abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea (GI mucosal damage)
- Management: oral care protocols, ice cubes, analgesics, ± TPN if severe
- Mechanism: Anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin) generate free radicals via iron-dependent redox cycling → direct myocardial cell injury → myocyte apoptosis → progressive dilated cardiomyopathy
- Dose-dependent — cumulative lifetime dose must be tracked (e.g., daunorubicin > 550 mg/m²)
- ECG + echocardiogram (TTE) required before anthracycline use [2][3][15] — to establish baseline LVEF
- Can be acute (arrhythmias during infusion) or chronic (progressive HF months to years later)
- Cardioprotection: dexrazoxane (iron chelator that reduces free radical formation); dose monitoring; liposomal formulations
This is critically important in Hong Kong given the high HBV carrier prevalence (~7–8% in the general adult population).
- Mechanism: Immunosuppressive chemotherapy suppresses the immune surveillance that keeps HBV in check → viral replication surges → when immune reconstitution occurs post-chemotherapy, there is a massive immune flare against HBV-infected hepatocytes → severe hepatitis, potentially fulminant liver failure
- Hepatitis B serology (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs ± HBV DNA) must be checked before chemotherapy [4][6][9][15] — risk of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy
- Potentially dangerous and fatal, especially in patients with decompensated liver disease or abnormal immune systems (lymphoma, leukemia) [18]
- Anti-CD20 (rituximab) and anti-CD52 (alemtuzumab) are also capable of reactivating occult hepatitis B [18] — can be FATAL [18]
- Reactivation can even occur in patients who are anti-HBs positive (i.e., previously cleared infection / "occult" HBV) [18]
- Prevention: Antiviral prophylaxis (entecavir or tenofovir) for all HBsAg+ patients before chemotherapy; monitor HBV DNA in anti-HBc+ patients
HBV Reactivation — HK Context
In Hong Kong, most reactivations are related to patients with haematological malignancies receiving treatment [18]. Always check full HBV serology panel BEFORE starting chemotherapy. If HBsAg+, start antiviral prophylaxis. If HBsAg− but anti-HBc+, monitor HBV DNA regularly and consider prophylaxis if high-risk immunosuppression is planned.
- Occurs in patients treated with ATRA or ATO for APL
- Pathogenesis: production of inflammatory cytokines by large burden of maturing myeloid cells [4]
- S/S: dyspnoea, fever, peripheral oedema, hypotension, pleuro-pericardial effusion, acute renal failure, jaundice [4]
- Timing: typically 2–21 days after starting ATRA, often with rising WBC
- Management: dexamethasone 10 mg IV Q12h × ≥3 days [4]; temporarily hold ATRA if severe
| Drug | Specific Complication | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Allopurinol | SJS/TEN | HLA-B5801 mediated hypersensitivity* [1] |
| Rasburicase | Haemolytic crisis | Generates H₂O₂ → oxidative stress in G6PD-deficient patients [6][9][15] |
| Co-trimoxazole | Haemolytic crisis | Oxidative drug in G6PD deficiency [6][9][15] |
| Cytarabine (high dose) | Cerebellar toxicity | Direct neurotoxicity to Purkinje cells → ataxia, dysarthria, nystagmus |
| Methotrexate (intrathecal) | Leukoencephalopathy | Direct CNS toxicity |
C. HSCT-Related Complications
For patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT, there is a distinct spectrum of complications. These arise from the conditioning regimen (myeloablative chemo/radiation), the immunological mismatch between donor and recipient, and prolonged immunosuppression.
| Complication | Mechanism | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Cytopenia-related | Conditioning destroys the recipient's marrow; engraftment takes weeks | Anaemia, bleeding (26% in first year, 9% life-threatening; sites: lung 16%, GI 14%, CNS 12%), neutropenic infections [4] |
| Oral mucositis | Conditioning regimen directly damages oral mucosa | Management: ice cubes, pre-treatment by laser, IV palifermin ± TPN [4] |
| Non-oral mucositis | GI mucosal damage | Abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea; Mx: dexamethasone, ondansetron, ± IV nutrition [4] |
| Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of liver (also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, SOS) | Conditioning damages hepatic venous endothelium → endothelial swelling + micro-thrombosis in hepatic sinusoids → outflow obstruction | Painful hepatomegaly, ascites, jaundice ± fulminant liver failure; Mx: ursodeoxycholic acid/heparin for prophylaxis, defibrotide + supportive care [4] |
| Graft rejection (host-versus-graft) | Residual recipient T-cells attack donor HSCs | Primary graft failure (never engrafts) or secondary graft failure (engrafts then rejected) |
| Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) | Donor T-cells attack recipient tissues (skin, liver, GI tract) | Typically within first 100 days; skin rash → diarrhoea → jaundice. Grading I–IV. Mx: steroids, calcineurin inhibitors |
Why does VOD happen? The high-dose conditioning regimen (alkylating agents, total body irradiation) is directly toxic to the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium. The damaged endothelium swells, activates coagulation, and forms micro-thrombi. These block the hepatic venular outflow → congestion → hepatocyte necrosis → the classic triad of painful hepatomegaly, ascites, and jaundice.
| Complication | Mechanism | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular disease | 5% at 5 years, 9% at 15 years [4]; most common cause of morbidity/non-relapse mortality | Caused by: (1) metabolic effects of immunosuppressant use, (2) increased coincident CV risk factors, (3) chronic GVHD [4] |
| Endocrine dysfunction | Direct gonadal/thyroid/pancreatic damage from conditioning ± chronic GVHD | T2DM (3× risk post-allogeneic HSCT), hypothyroidism, hypogonadism (due to active cGVHD and conditioning), infertility [4] |
| Osteoporosis and AVN | Chronic corticosteroid use for GVHD management | Steroid-induced osteoporosis, avascular necrosis of femoral head [4] |
| Second malignancy | Mutagenic conditioning + chronic immunosuppression | Relapse of primary disease; post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD); post-treatment MDS and acute leukemia; solid organ tumours (e.g., SCC of skin/oral cavity) [4] |
| Cataract | Total body irradiation during conditioning [4] | Posterior subcapsular cataract; may require surgical correction |
| Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) | Donor T-cells mount a chronic immune response against recipient tissues | Mimics autoimmune disease — skin fibrosis (scleroderma-like), sicca syndrome, bronchiolitis obliterans (lung), chronic hepatitis, mucosal erosions. Affects ~22% at 15 years [4] |
| Late infections | Chronic immunosuppression + cGVHD impairs humoral and cellular immunity | Encapsulated organisms, VZV reactivation, Pneumocystis; vaccination schedules needed post-HSCT |
Overall prognosis of HSCT [4]:
- Allogeneic HSCT: 75% long-term survival; 80% at 15 years for those who survived ≥2 years; 9.9× mortality compared to general population (highest years 2–5 post-HSCT); 29% relapse; 22% chronic GVHD [4]
- Autologous HSCT: 80% overall survival at 20 years for those who survived ≥5 years; 4–9× mortality compared to general population [4]
Prognosis depends on age ( > 60 = poor prognosis), genetic/molecular abnormalities, and initial response to chemotherapy (initial remission rate 70–80%, but half of them might relapse) [8]
- Relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure in AML
- Without post-remission therapy, virtually all AML patients will relapse within a median of 4–8 months [4]
- Risk of relapse is determined by molecular risk stratification (ELN 2022):
- Favourable risk: relapse rate ~35%
- Intermediate risk: ~50%
- Adverse risk: ~70–80%
- Relapsed/refractory AML carries a significantly worse prognosis than de novo AML
- Salvage options: re-induction chemotherapy (FLAG-IDA, MEC), targeted therapies (FLT3/IDH inhibitors), allo-HSCT, clinical trials [4]
AML patients receive numerous blood product transfusions throughout their treatment course, creating cumulative risk for transfusion complications:
- Iron overload (transfusional haemosiderosis): each unit of packed RBCs delivers ~250 mg iron; chronic transfusion → iron deposition in liver, heart, endocrine organs → cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, diabetes. May require iron chelation (deferasirox, deferoxamine) in long-term survivors
- Alloimmunisation: repeated transfusions → development of antibodies against minor RBC/HLA antigens → increasingly difficult to find compatible blood
- Transfusion-associated GVHD (TA-GVHD): viable donor lymphocytes in blood products engraft in severely immunosuppressed recipients → attack recipient tissues → usually fatal. Prevention: irradiated blood products for immunocompromised patients [19]
- Febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR): cytokines from donor WBCs; most common reaction
- TACO/TRALI: volume overload vs immune-mediated acute lung injury
| Category | Complication | Key Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Disease | Infections (neutropenic) | Functional neutropenia → impaired innate immunity |
| Disease | Bleeding / DIC | Thrombocytopenia; tissue factor release (APL) |
| Disease | TLS | Cell lysis → ↑K⁺, ↑PO₄, ↑uric acid, ↓Ca²⁺ → AKI |
| Disease | Leucostasis | WBC > 100 → microvascular occlusion (lung, brain) |
| Disease | Organ infiltration | Blast invasion of CNS, gums, skin, bone |
| Treatment | BM suppression | Expected; manage with transfusion + prophylaxis |
| Treatment | Neutropenic infections | S. viridans, Aspergillus; Abx + antifungals |
| Treatment | Mucositis | Chemotherapy destroys rapidly dividing mucosal cells |
| Treatment | Anthracycline cardiotoxicity | Free radical-mediated myocyte injury; dose-dependent |
| Treatment | HBV reactivation | Immunosuppression removes immune surveillance of HBV |
| Treatment | Differentiation syndrome | ATRA-induced cytokine release from maturing cells |
| Treatment | Drug hypersensitivity | Allopurinol (SJS/TEN, HLA-B*5801); rasburicase/TMP-SMX (G6PD haemolysis) |
| HSCT | Acute GVHD | Donor T-cells attack recipient skin, liver, GI |
| HSCT | Chronic GVHD | Chronic alloimmune response → autoimmune-like features |
| HSCT | VOD/SOS | Conditioning damages hepatic sinusoidal endothelium |
| HSCT | Second malignancy | Mutagenic conditioning + chronic immunosuppression |
| HSCT | CVD, endocrine, infertility | Long-term effects of conditioning + immunosuppressants |
| General | Relapse | Residual leukemic cells re-expand; risk depends on molecular profile |
High Yield Summary — Complications of AML
- Febrile neutropenia: most dangerous acute complication — ANC < 0.5 + fever → blood cultures + broad-spectrum Abx within 1 hour; S. viridans and Aspergillus are characteristic pathogens
- DIC in APL: tissue factor release from APL cells → consumptive coagulopathy → ICH is leading cause of early death; ATRA + ATO + transfusion support
- TLS: ↑K⁺, ↑PO₄, ↑uric acid, ↓Ca²⁺ → AKI; prevent with hydration + allopurinol (check HLA-B*5801) / rasburicase (check G6PD)
- Leucostasis: WBC > 100 → microvascular occlusion; avoid RBC transfusion; leukapheresis + chemo
- Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: dose-dependent, cumulative; baseline Echo required
- HBV reactivation: critical in HK; check full HBV panel before chemo; antiviral prophylaxis if HBsAg+
- Differentiation syndrome: ATRA/ATO-treated APL; fever + dyspnoea + oedema + rising WBC; dexamethasone
- HSCT complications: early (GVHD, VOD, infections); late (CVD = leading non-relapse mortality, second malignancy, endocrine dysfunction, chronic GVHD)
- Relapse: initial remission rate 70–80% but half relapse; prognosis depends on molecular risk group
Active Recall - Complications of AML
References
[1] Senior notes: Block A - High white cell count: acute and chronic leukaemia; bone marrow transplantation; immunogenetics.pdf [2] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML Supportive care section) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Pediatrics) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (Hematological Disease — AML section) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Sections 3.2.1.1 AML management, 5.2.2 HSCT complications) [6] Senior notes: Adrian Lui Pediatrics Notes.pdf (Acute Leukemia investigations and general management) [8] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (Acute leukaemia clinical features and prognosis) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Haemtology.pdf (Section 3.2 — general management) [15] Lecture slides: GC 060. High white cell count.pdf (Workup for suspected acute leukaemia) [17] Senior notes: Learning_Points_All_Lectures.txt (Febrile neutropenia as medical emergency) [18] Senior notes: Block A - I am a hepatitis B carrier.pdf (HBV reactivation with immunosuppressive therapy) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Fever after a blood transfusion: transfusion and related problems.pdf (TA-GVHD, irradiated blood products)
High Yield Summary
- Definition: AML = clonal malignant proliferation of myeloid precursors with ≥20% blasts in BM/PB (except specific genetic subtypes)
- Epidemiology: Most common acute leukemia in adults (80%); median age 65; M > F (5:3); rare in children
- Risk Factors: Genetic (Down, Fanconi, Bloom), environmental (benzene, radiation, smoking), therapy-related (alkylating agents → 5–7y latency; topo-II inhibitors → 1–3y), pre-leukemic (MDS, MPN, aplastic anaemia, PNH)
- Pathophysiology: Two-hit hypothesis — Class I (proliferation: FLT3, RAS) + Class II (differentiation block: CEBPA, PML-RARA)
- Classification: WHO 2022 integrates genetics; ELN 2022 for risk stratification (favourable: t(8;21), inv(16), mutated NPM1; adverse: complex karyotype, FLT3-ITD high, TP53)
- Clinical Features:
- BM failure: anaemia (fatigue), thrombocytopenia (bleeding), neutropenia (infection)
- Organ infiltration: hepatosplenomegaly (less than ALL), gum hypertrophy (M5), skin, CNS, bone pain
- DIC: hallmark of APL (M3) — PT↑, APTT initially preserved, fibrinogen↓, D-dimer↑
- Leucostasis: WBC > 100 × 10⁹/L → emergency (pulmonary, cerebral)
- APL (M3): t(15;17)/PML-RARA → DIC → start ATRA immediately; most curable subtype
High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of AML
- Most important differential: ALL — distinguish by cytochemistry (MPO/SBB+ = myeloid), Auer rods (pathognomonic of AML), and immunophenotyping
- MDS vs AML: The 20% blast threshold is the dividing line; MDS has dysplastic features, < 20% blasts, and no hepatosplenomegaly
- CML blast crisis: Always check for BCR-ABL/Philadelphia chromosome — TKI therapy changes management
- Aplastic anaemia: Hypocellular "empty" marrow vs hypercellular blast-filled marrow
- B12/folate deficiency: Can mimic erythroleukaemia — look for hypersegmented neutrophils and check B12/folate levels
- Leukemoid reaction: Left shift but NO blasts; resolves with treatment of underlying infection
- MCICM is the 5-step framework: Morphology, Cytochemistry, Immunophenotyping, Cytogenetics, Molecular genetics
- APL (faggot cells + DIC) is a haematological emergency — start ATRA before confirmation
High Yield Summary — Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations
- Diagnostic criteria: ≥20% blasts in PB/BM (OR AML-defining genetic abnormality: t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)) + myeloid lineage confirmed by Auer rods, MPO+, or myeloid immunophenotype
- MCICM framework: Morphology → Cytochemistry → Immunophenotyping → Cytogenetics → Molecular genetics
- PBS in AML: Myeloblasts with granules, Auer rods (pathognomonic), MPO/SBB positive; APL: faggot cells + bilobed nucleus
- PBS in ALL: Lymphoblasts WITHOUT granules, NO Auer rods, MPO/SBB negative
- Flow cytometry markers: AML = CD34, CD117, CD13, CD33; ALL = TdT, CD10, CD19 (B), CD3 (T)
- Cytogenetics: t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17) are diagnostic of AML even with < 20% blasts; karyotype is a major prognostic determinant
- Molecular: FLT3-ITD (adverse), NPM1 (favourable), CEBPA biallelic (favourable), TP53 (adverse)
- Pre-treatment: ECG/Echo (anthracycline cardiotoxicity), Hep serology (HBV reactivation risk), G6PD (co-trimoxazole risk), HLA typing (HSCT candidates)
- APL emergency: Start ATRA immediately on clinical suspicion — do not wait for cytogenetics
High Yield Summary — AML Management
- Initial stabilisation: address emergencies FIRST — febrile neutropenia (Abx within 1 hour), DIC in APL (ATRA immediately), leucostasis (leukapheresis + avoid RBC transfusion), TLS (hydration + allopurinol/rasburicase after checking HLA-B*5801 and G6PD)
- Fit patients: Intensive induction with 7+3 (7d cytarabine + 3d anthracycline) ± FLT3 inhibitor/GO based on molecular profile → assess CR at Day 14 BM biopsy
- Unfit patients: Low-intensity therapy (azacitidine ± venetoclax, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine) or best supportive care
- Post-remission: Favourable risk → IDAC consolidation; Adverse risk → allo-HSCT; Intermediate → clinical judgment
- Allo-HSCT: for high-risk/relapsed AML; GvL effect is the key mechanism; autologous HSCT has NO benefit in AML; HLA matching is critical
- APL protocol: ATRA + ATO (low risk) or ATRA + chemo (high risk); differentiation syndrome managed with dexamethasone; 90% cure rate
- AML does NOT use prolonged maintenance (unlike ALL's 2–3 year maintenance); NO routine CNS prophylaxis (unlike ALL)
- Pre-treatment checks: ECG/Echo (anthracycline cardiotoxicity), G6PD (co-trimoxazole/rasburicase risk), HLA-B*5801 (allopurinol SJS/TEN risk), HBV serology (reactivation risk), HLA typing (HSCT candidates)
High Yield Summary — Complications of AML
- Febrile neutropenia: most dangerous acute complication — ANC < 0.5 + fever → blood cultures + broad-spectrum Abx within 1 hour; S. viridans and Aspergillus are characteristic pathogens
- DIC in APL: tissue factor release from APL cells → consumptive coagulopathy → ICH is leading cause of early death; ATRA + ATO + transfusion support
- TLS: ↑K⁺, ↑PO₄, ↑uric acid, ↓Ca²⁺ → AKI; prevent with hydration + allopurinol (check HLA-B*5801) / rasburicase (check G6PD)
- Leucostasis: WBC > 100 → microvascular occlusion; avoid RBC transfusion; leukapheresis + chemo
- Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: dose-dependent, cumulative; baseline Echo required
- HBV reactivation: critical in HK; check full HBV panel before chemo; antiviral prophylaxis if HBsAg+
- Differentiation syndrome: ATRA/ATO-treated APL; fever + dyspnoea + oedema + rising WBC; dexamethasone
- HSCT complications: early (GVHD, VOD, infections); late (CVD = leading non-relapse mortality, second malignancy, endocrine dysfunction, chronic GVHD)
- Relapse: initial remission rate 70–80% but half relapse; prognosis depends on molecular risk group
Non-megaloblastic Anaemia
Non-megaloblastic anaemia is a form of macrocytic anaemia in which large red blood cells occur without the hypersegmented neutrophils or abnormal nuclear maturation seen in megaloblastic anaemia, typically caused by conditions such as liver disease, hypothyroidism, alcoholism, or myelodysplastic syndromes.
Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Acute promyelocytic leukemia is a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia characterized by the t(15;17) translocation producing the PML-RARα fusion protein, leading to accumulation of abnormal promyelocytes and a high risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation.