EndocrinologyMetabolic Bone

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration, leading to increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures.

Exam domainOne-glance essentials
Definition / diagnosis
  • Low bone mass plus microarchitectural deterioration → fragility fractures [1][2]
  • Operational DXA definition: T-score ≤ −2.5 at hip or spine [1]
Epidemiology / risks
  • Age, postmenopausal state, low body weight, family history, smoking, alcohol and immobility [2][3]
  • Glucocorticoids are the key drug cause; exclude endocrine, malabsorptive, renal and myeloma causes [2]
Core mechanism
  • Oestrogen loss shifts the RANKL/OPG axis toward osteoclast activity and net resorption [3]
  • Trabecular bone turns over rapidly, so vertebral bone is affected early
Clinical picture
  • Silent until fragility fracture [1][2]
  • Vertebral fracture is most common, distal radius often earliest, and hip fracture most serious; look for height loss and kyphosis
Investigations
  • Central DXA of hip and spine; use T-score after menopause/age ≥ 50 and Z-score in younger patients [1][3]
  • FRAX estimates 10-year fracture probability; labs seek secondary causes [2]
  • ALP is usually normal—raised ALP suggests osteomalacia, Paget disease or metastasis
Management
  • Exercise, fall prevention, adequate calcium/vitamin D and treatment of secondary causes [1][2]
  • Oral bisphosphonate first line for most; denosumab/IV zoledronate if unsuitable; very high risk may need anabolic-first therapy [2][3]
Complications
  • Hip fracture → mortality, immobility, delirium, VTE and loss of independence [2]
  • Vertebral-fracture cascade → chronic pain, kyphosis and restrictive lung disease
  • Antiresorptives: ONJ/atypical femoral fracture; denosumab withdrawal → rebound vertebral fractures [4]
Prevention / follow-up
  • Weight-bearing/resistance exercise, falls review, smoking cessation and alcohol moderation [2][3]
  • Bone protection should accompany sustained glucocorticoid exposure when indicated; reassess adherence and fracture risk
Exam traps
  • Fragility fracture can establish clinical osteoporosis even without a T-score ≤ −2.5 [1][2]
  • Vertebral collapse above T5 suggests malignancy
  • Never stop denosumab without follow-on antiresorptive therapy [4]

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf, p22, p31 [2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf [3] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf, p47–50 [4] Lecture slides: GC 079 (supp-2) STOPP-START-V3.pdf

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis literally breaks down from Greek/Latin roots: "osteo" = bone, "porosis" = porous/passage. So the name itself tells you: porous bone.

"A systemic skeletal disease characterised by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture" — WHO definition [1][2]

There are four key words in this definition (as emphasised on the GC lecture slide): low bone mass, microarchitectural deterioration, increased bone fragility, and susceptibility to fracture [2].

The NIH (2001) consensus definition adds nuance:

"Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterised by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture. Bone strength reflects the integration of bone density and bone quality." [3][4]

This is important because it acknowledges that bone strength ≠ bone density alone. Bone quality (microarchitecture, turnover rate, mineralisation, microdamage accumulation, collagen cross-linking) also matters — explaining why some patients fracture even at "normal" BMD.

Medical/operational definition (what you use in practice):

A T-score ≤ −2.5 SD below the peak bone mass of a young healthy adult of the same sex, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, or forearm [1][2][5].

Osteoporosis vs Osteomalacia — Don't Confuse!

FeatureOsteoporosisOsteomalacia
Core problemReduced bone mass (quantity ↓) but normal mineral-to-osteoid ratioReduced bone mineralisation (quality ↓) — excess unmineralised osteoid
ALPUsually normalElevated (secondary hyperPTH drives osteoblast activity)
Most common causeAgeing / postmenopausal oestrogen deficiencyVitamin D deficiency
Bone histologyThinned trabeculae, normal mineralisationWidened osteoid seams, defective mineralisation

In osteoporosis, the bone that remains is normally mineralised — there's just less of it. In osteomalacia, there's plenty of osteoid but it fails to mineralise properly [2].


2. Epidemiology

  • Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease [2]
  • 1 osteoporotic fracture occurs every 3 seconds worldwide [2]
  • Lifetime fracture risk:
    • 1 in 3 postmenopausal women [2][5]
    • 1 in 5 men aged ≥ 50 years [2]
    • Overall lifetime risk as high as 40% [2]

Prevalence in HK women (1995): 60–69 years: 1 in 6; 70–79 years: 1 in 5; ≥80 years: 1 in 4 [4]

  • Hong Kong has an ageing population — the prevalence is expected to rise substantially
  • Hip fracture is a major burden: Hong Kong reports approximately 4,000–5,000 hip fractures per year in the elderly
  • Vertebral fractures are even more common but frequently undiagnosed (only ~1/3 come to clinical attention)

Fracture SiteTypical Age PatternNotes
Distal radius (Colles')Peaks age 50–65Often first osteoporotic fracture; "FOOSH" mechanism (Fall On OutStretched Hand)
Vertebral (compression)Increases steadily from age 55+Most common osteoporotic fracture overall; often clinically silent
Hip (femoral neck / intertrochanteric)Rises exponentially > 70Most serious — 20–30% 1-year mortality in the elderly
  • Common sites of osteoporotic fractures: wrist, vertebrae, hip [2]
  • Female predominance — loss of ovarian function at menopause leading to oestrogen deficiency precipitates rapid bone loss [3]

3. Anatomy and Bone Biology

Normal bone is composed of trabecular bone (20% of mass, 80% of bone turnover) and cortical bone (80% of mass, 20% of bone turnover) [4]

PropertyTrabecular (Cancellous/Spongy) BoneCortical (Compact) Bone
LocationVertebral bodies, metaphyses of long bones, pelvisShafts (diaphyses) of long bones, outer shell
Proportion of skeletal mass~20%~80%
Proportion of bone turnover~80%~20%
Surface area : volumeVery highLow
Susceptibility to metabolic changesVery high (explains why vertebral fractures occur early — trabecular bone responds quickly to hormonal changes)Lower

Why does this matter? Because trabecular bone has a much higher turnover rate, it is the first to be affected by states that increase bone resorption (e.g., oestrogen deficiency). This is why:

  • Vertebral fractures (trabecular-rich) occur earlier in postmenopausal women
  • Distal radius (metaphysis = trabecular) is also affected early
  • Hip fractures increase later because the femoral neck has a mix of cortical and trabecular bone

Bone remodelling occurs within basic multicellular units (BMUs) containing osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes [4]

The remodelling cycle has two phases:

  1. Osteoclastic resorption (30–40 days): Osteoclasts (derived from haematopoietic precursors) excavate bone, forming a resorption pit (Howship's lacuna). They signal osteoblasts to arrive [4].
  2. Bone formation (≈150 days): Osteoblasts (derived from mesenchymal stem cells) lay down osteoid, which subsequently mineralises to form new bone [4].

Key point: Resorption is fast (~1 month) but formation is slow (~5 months). This asymmetry means anything that increases turnover rate will tip the balance towards net bone loss, because resorption outpaces formation.

Osteoporosis is a disease of bone turnover: resorption > production [5]

This is the master regulatory system of osteoclastogenesis and is the pharmacological target for several drugs:

  • RANKL (Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κB Ligand): Expressed by osteoblasts/stromal cells; binds to RANK on osteoclast precursors → stimulates osteoclast differentiation, activation, and survival [4]
  • Osteoprotegerin (OPG): A soluble decoy receptor secreted by osteoblasts; competitively inhibits the RANK–RANKL interaction → prevents osteoclastogenesis [4]
  • M-CSF (Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor): Secreted by osteoblasts; promotes differentiation of osteoclast precursors [4]

The RANKL : OPG ratio determines net bone remodelling:

  • High RANKL : OPG ratio → favours resorption → bone loss
  • Low RANKL : OPG ratio → favours formation → bone preservation

Factors that ↑RANKL: dexamethasone, 1,25-(OH)₂D₃, PTH, PGE₂ → favours resorption [4]
Factors that ↓RANKL: 17β-oestradiol → favours formation [4]

FactorEffect on RANKLEffect on OPGNet Effect
Oestrogen (17β-oestradiol)↓↑Protects bone
Glucocorticoids↑↓Bone loss
PTH (chronic ↑)↑VariableBone loss
1,25-(OH)₂D₃↑↑Context-dependent
PGE₂↑↑Variable

Oestrogen acts to increase bone formation and decrease bone resorption by [4]:

  • ↓ osteoblast apoptosis by ↓ TGF-β secretion
  • ↓ osteoblast-induced osteoclastogenesis by ↓ cytokine secretion and ↓ RANKL expression
  • ↑ osteoclast apoptosis by ↑ TNF-α secretion

So oestrogen does three things simultaneously:

  1. Keeps osteoblasts alive longer → more bone formation
  2. Prevents osteoblasts from activating osteoclasts → less resorption
  3. Kills osteoclasts faster → less resorption

When oestrogen drops at menopause, all three protective mechanisms are lost simultaneously, leading to rapid bone loss in the first 5–10 years postmenopause (up to 2–3% per year at the spine).

  • Peak bone mass is achieved at approximately age 25–30 [3][5]
  • After peak, there is a slow, inevitable decline in BMD with age (~0.5–1% per year)
  • In women, there is an accelerated phase of bone loss (2–3% per year) for 5–10 years after menopause, after which it decelerates
  • Higher peak bone mass = larger "bone bank" = lower risk of osteoporosis later
  • Factors that determine peak bone mass: genetics (60–80%), nutrition (calcium, vitamin D), physical activity, hormonal status

4. Risk Factors

From the GC lecture slide [1]:

Clinical risk factors of osteoporosis:

  • Female sex
  • Increasing age
  • Low body weight ( < 45 kg)
  • Family history of osteoporosis or fragility fracture
  • Premature menopause (age < 40) or early menopause (age 40–45)
  • Low calcium intake
  • Lack of exercise or sedentary lifestyle
  • Smoking
  • Excessive alcohol intake ( > 3 standard drinks per day)
  • Lack of sun exposure
  • Prolonged immobilisation

Non-modifiable risk factors:

  • Female sex — lower peak bone mass, plus oestrogen withdrawal at menopause
  • Increasing age — cumulative bone loss; also increased fall risk
  • Family history of osteoporosis or fragility fracture (genetics account for 60–80% of BMD variance)
  • Ethnicity — Caucasian and Asian populations at higher risk than African populations (higher peak bone mass in African populations)
  • Smaller bone frame — less reserve for bone mass [3]

Modifiable risk factors:

  • Low body weight ( < 45 kg) — low mechanical loading stimulus; also low adipose tissue = less peripheral oestrogen conversion [1]
  • Smoking — directly toxic to osteoblasts; anti-oestrogenic; reduces intestinal calcium absorption [1][3]
  • Excessive alcohol intake ( > 3 standard drinks/day) — directly suppresses osteoblast function; increases fall risk [1]
  • Low calcium intake / Lack of sun exposure — leads to vitamin D insufficiency → secondary hyperparathyroidism → increased resorption [1]
  • Lack of exercise or sedentary lifestyle — bone responds to mechanical loading (Wolff's law); immobility leads to disuse osteoporosis [1]
  • Prolonged immobilisation — extreme example of above (e.g., bedbound patients, spinal cord injury) [1]

Initial evaluation of osteoporosis — Drug history: [1]

  • Increased risk of osteoporosis: glucocorticoid, PPI, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones
  • Increased risk of fall: hypnotics, diuretics

Past health: prolonged sex hormone deficiency (age of menopause, use of HRT), type 1 diabetes, anorexia nervosa, rheumatological diseases, GI disease / malabsorption syndrome (gastrectomy, intestinal bypass, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease) [1]

Organised systematically:

CategoryCausesMechanism
EndocrineCushing's syndrome, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism, type 1 DM, acromegalyGlucocorticoid excess → direct osteoblast inhibition + ↑RANKL; excess thyroid hormone → accelerated turnover; PTH → resorption; oestrogen/testosterone ↓ → loss of bone protection
GI / MalabsorptionCoeliac disease, Crohn's disease, gastrectomy, intestinal bypass, cholestatic liver disease (PBC, PSC), pancreatic insufficiencyImpaired calcium and vitamin D absorption → secondary hyperPTH → increased bone resorption
RheumatologicalRA, ankylosing spondylitis, SLEChronic inflammation (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α all ↑RANKL); also chronic steroid use for treatment
HaematologicalMultiple myeloma, mastocytosisMyeloma cells secrete RANKL and inhibit OPG; also local osteolysis
RenalCKD (renal osteodystrophy)↓ 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ synthesis → hypocalcaemia → secondary hyperPTH → ↑ bone resorption
PulmonaryCOPDOften multifactorial: systemic inflammation, steroid use, physical inactivity, smoking, low BMI
DrugsGlucocorticoids (most important), PPI, anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone), cyclosporine, aromatase inhibitors, GnRH agonists, heparin (long-term)Glucocorticoids: ↓ osteoblast function, ↑ osteoclastogenesis, ↓ intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption, ↑ renal Ca²⁺ excretion; PPIs: ↓ gastric acid → ↓ calcium absorption; Anticonvulsants: ↑ hepatic vitamin D catabolism via CYP450 induction; TZDs: divert mesenchymal stem cells from osteoblast to adipocyte lineage
NutritionalAnorexia nervosa, chronic malnutritionLow body weight, hypogonadism (hypothalamic amenorrhoea), low calcium/vitamin D intake
OtherProlonged immobilisation, organ transplantation, osteogenesis imperfecta (genetic)Immobilisation: absence of mechanical loading; Transplant: immunosuppressant drugs

Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis (GIOP)

Glucocorticoids are the most common drug cause of secondary osteoporosis. They attack bone from multiple angles:

  1. ↓ Osteoblast differentiation and function (direct suppression)
  2. ↑ Osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis
  3. ↑ RANKL, ↓ OPG → net osteoclastogenesis
  4. ↓ Intestinal calcium absorption and ↑ renal calcium excretion → secondary hyperPTH
  5. ↓ GnRH → hypogonadism → loss of sex hormone protection

Bone loss is most rapid in the first 3–6 months of glucocorticoid therapy. Any patient expected to be on ≥ 5 mg prednisolone equivalent for ≥ 3 months should be assessed for prophylaxis (calcium + vitamin D ± bisphosphonate).

Osteoporosis causes fragile bones, but fractures require a force — most commonly a fall. Therefore, fall prevention is equally important as treating bone density.

Fall risk assessment is critical in the elderly [4]:

  • Agility, hearing, eyesight, postural sway
  • Gait
  • Mobility, muscle strength

Risk factors for falls:

  • Intrinsic: visual impairment, vestibular dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy (diabetic), muscle weakness / sarcopenia, cognitive impairment, postural hypotension, previous falls
  • Extrinsic (environmental): poor lighting, loose rugs, wet floors, lack of handrails, inappropriate footwear
  • Medications that ↑ fall risk: hypnotics, diuretics [1], antihypertensives (postural hypotension), opioids, antipsychotics, antidepressants (SSRIs), anticonvulsants

5. Etiology and Pathophysiology

Primary Osteoporosis (most common):

  • Type I (Postmenopausal): Women within 15–20 years of menopause; primarily trabecular bone loss; driven by oestrogen deficiency
  • Type II (Senile/Age-related): Both sexes, age > 70; involves both cortical and trabecular bone; driven by age-related decline in osteoblast function + secondary hyperparathyroidism (from vitamin D deficiency and renal impairment)

Secondary Osteoporosis: Due to an identifiable underlying cause (see table above)

5.2 Pathophysiology — From First Principles

The fundamental equation of bone health:

Net Bone Mass = Bone Formation − Bone Resorption

In osteoporosis, resorption exceeds formation → net bone loss → reduced bone mass → weakened microarchitecture → fracture.

  1. Menopause → abrupt oestrogen withdrawal
  2. Loss of oestrogen's triple protective effect (see Section 3.5)
  3. ↑ RANKL expression, ↓ OPG → surge in osteoclastogenesis
  4. ↓ Osteoclast apoptosis → osteoclasts live longer, resorb more
  5. Accelerated bone turnover with resorption >> formation
  6. Trabecular bone affected first (higher turnover) → vertebral and distal radius fractures
  7. Rate of loss: 2–3% per year at spine for first 5–10 years post-menopause, then decelerates
  1. ↓ Osteoblast number and function with age (fewer mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into osteoblasts; more differentiate into adipocytes)
  2. ↓ Vitamin D synthesis: less sun exposure + ↓ capacity of ageing skin to synthesise vitamin D₃ + ↓ renal 1α-hydroxylase activity → ↓ 1,25-(OH)₂D₃
  3. ↓ Calcium absorption from gut (both from low vitamin D and age-related intestinal resistance to calcitriol)
  4. Mild hypocalcaemia → secondary hyperparathyroidism → ↑ PTH → ↑ bone resorption
  5. Both cortical and trabecular bone affected → hip fractures (cortical + trabecular) become more common

See the callout above (Section 4.3). Key: the earliest and most dramatic effect is suppression of osteoblast function, not just increased resorption. This distinguishes GIOP from postmenopausal osteoporosis and explains why GIOP patients can fracture at higher T-scores (the bone quality is worse even before density drops markedly).


6. Classification

CategoryT-scoreInterpretation
Normal≥ −1.0Normal bone density
Osteopenia (low bone mass)Between −1.0 and −2.5Below normal; increased fracture risk but not diagnostic of osteoporosis
Osteoporosis≤ −2.5Diagnostic threshold
Established (severe) osteoporosis≤ −2.5 + at least one fragility fractureHighest risk category

By age 60, approximately half of women will have low bone mass or osteoporosis [4]

ScoreCompared ToUsed InWhen to Suspect Secondary Cause
T-scorePeak bone mass of a young healthy adult of the same sex [4]Postmenopausal women, men ≥ 50 yearsT-score ≤ −2.5
Z-scoreNormal individuals of the same age, sex, and ethnicity [6]Premenopausal women, men < 50 years, childrenZ-score ≤ −2.0 (suggests a secondary cause beyond expected age-related changes) [6]

Why T-score and Not Z-score?

BMD is compared to the peak bone mass of young adults rather than to age-matched peers because even though bone loss is "universal" with ageing, it still increases fracture risk. If you used Z-scores in elderly patients, most would look "normal" compared to peers — but they'd still be fracturing. T-score captures the absolute deficit in bone strength [4].

TypePrimarySecondary
CauseAgeing / postmenopausal oestrogen lossIdentifiable underlying condition or drug
SubtypesType I (postmenopausal), Type II (senile)Endocrine, GI, renal, drugs, rheumatological, haematological, etc.
DemographicsMost common overallSuspect if Z-score ≤ −2.0 or osteoporosis in a young patient

7. Clinical Features

Clinically silent until the occurrence of fracture [2]

This is the key clinical paradox: osteoporosis itself produces no symptoms. It is a "silent disease" — patients feel well until they fracture. The clinical features discussed below are all consequences of fractures or findings on examination/investigation.

7.2 Symptoms

  • Asymptomatic (most common presentation): incidental finding of osteopenia on X-ray done for another reason [6]
  • No pain, no deformity — this is why screening is necessary in at-risk populations

SymptomDetailsPathophysiological Basis
Acute back painSudden onset, often mid-thoracic or thoracolumbar junction; may follow trivial activity (e.g., bending, coughing, lifting)Vertebral compression fracture — collapse of weakened vertebral body causes periosteal stretching and nerve root irritation
Chronic back painDull, aching, may be persistentAltered spinal biomechanics from multiple compression fractures → paraspinal muscle fatigue, facet joint arthrosis
Progressive height lossPatients report getting shorter over years; may measure > 4 cm loss from maximal heightSequential vertebral compression fractures → loss of vertebral body height; each fractured vertebra can lose 15–20% height
Wrist pain after fallPain, swelling, deformity of distal forearm after fall on outstretched handColles' fracture (distal radius) — the distal radius metaphysis is rich in trabecular bone; "dinner fork" deformity
Hip/groin pain after fallInability to weight-bear, shortened and externally rotated legProximal femoral fracture (hip fracture) — femoral neck or intertrochanteric; cannot weight-bear because the mechanical integrity of the hip joint is disrupted
Reduced exercise toleranceDifficulty with activities of daily livingMultiple vertebral fractures → kyphosis → ↓ thoracic cage volume → restrictive lung physiology → reduced respiratory reserve
Early satiety / abdominal discomfortFeeling full after small meals; abdominal bloatingSevere kyphosis → rib cage impinges on pelvis → compresses abdominal cavity

  • Fear of falling → activity avoidance → social isolation → deconditioning → paradoxically increased fall and fracture risk
  • Depression and anxiety — body image concerns from kyphosis, chronic pain, loss of independence
  • Loss of self-confidence and reduced quality of life

SignDetailsPathophysiological Basis
Kyphosis (dowager's hump)Increased thoracic curvature, rounded upper backMultiple anterior wedge compression fractures of thoracic vertebrae → progressive forward angulation; loss of vertebral body height anteriorly > posteriorly
Height lossObjective loss > 4 cm from historical maximum or > 2 cm since last measurementVertebral compression → ↓ spinal column height
Rib–pelvis distance reducedCan be < 2 fingerbreadths (normally ≥ 2 fingerbreadths between lowest rib and iliac crest)Severe vertebral height loss → trunk shortening → ribs approach pelvis
Horizontal abdominal skin folds"Concertina" skin creases on the abdomenTrunk shortening forces skin to fold horizontally
Tenderness over spinous processesLocalised tenderness on percussion over affected vertebraAcute or subacute vertebral fracture → local inflammation and periosteal irritation
Paraspinal muscle spasmBilateral paravertebral muscle tightnessReflex guarding to splint a fractured or unstable vertebral segment
Loss of teeth / poor dentitionEarly sign sometimes noted in clinical assessmentOsteoporosis of the mandible/maxilla → loss of alveolar bone → tooth loosening [4]
Signs of secondary causesCushingoid habitus, thyroid goitre, muscle wasting, pallor, stigmata of chronic liver disease, signs of hypogonadism, signs of myeloma (anaemia, bone tenderness)Each cause has its own pathophysiology — always search for treatable secondary causes

7.4 Osteoporotic Fracture Types — Clinical Details

  • Most common osteoporotic fracture
  • Most occur at T6–T8 and T12–L1 (thoracolumbar junction) — because these are the transition points of the spinal curvature where mechanical stress concentrates
  • Only ~1/3 are clinically apparent (come to medical attention); the rest are discovered incidentally on imaging
  • Morphology: wedge (most common — anterior height loss), biconcave/codfish (central endplate collapse), or crush (total height loss)
  • Red flag: fractures above T5 are unusual for osteoporosis → suspect malignancy (bone metastasis) if fracture is above T5, especially with constitutional symptoms [7]

Vertebral Fracture Above T5 = Think Malignancy

The thoracic spine above T5 is relatively protected by the rib cage and is less weight-bearing. Osteoporotic fractures are uncommon here. If you see a compression fracture at T3, T4, or above — think metastatic disease (breast, lung, prostate, thyroid, kidney — the "BLT with a Kosher Pickle" mnemonic) or myeloma.

  • Fracture of the distal radial metaphysis with dorsal displacement and dorsal angulation of the distal fragment → "dinner fork" deformity
  • Mechanism: fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH)
  • Often the first osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women (age 50–65)
  • Should trigger assessment for underlying osteoporosis

  • The most serious osteoporotic fracture
  • Two main subtypes:
    • Femoral neck (intracapsular): risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head because the fracture disrupts the retinacular blood supply
    • Intertrochanteric (extracapsular): generally good blood supply; less AVN risk but significant blood loss
  • Mortality: 20–30% within 1 year (from complications: pneumonia, PE, deconditioning, delirium)
  • Morbidity: 50% lose ability to walk independently; 25% require long-term nursing care
  • Usually requires surgical fixation (DHS, intramedullary nail, hemiarthroplasty, or THA depending on subtype)

  • Proximal humerus, pelvis (sacral insufficiency fractures), ribs
  • These are less commonly tested but can occur with osteoporosis

X-ray features: decreased bone density, cortical thinning, loss of trabeculae [7]

X-ray FindingDescriptionPathophysiological Basis
Generalised osteopeniaIncreased radiolucency (bones look "washed out")↓ Mineralised bone mass → less X-ray absorption → more radiolucent
Cortical thinningThin cortices, especially at metacarpal diaphyses or vertebraeEndosteal resorption exceeds periosteal apposition
"Picture-framing"Only the cortical outline is visible, with loss of internal trabecular markingsLoss of trabecular bone within vertebral body, leaving only the outer cortical shell
Codfish sign (biconcave vertebra)Vertebral endplates bow inward → vertebral body appears biconvex like a fishWeak endplates cannot resist intradiscal pressure → endplates are pushed inward by nucleus pulposus
Wedge compression fractureAnterior height < posterior height by > 20%Anterior column fails under axial load in a flexed spine
Crush fractureEntire vertebral body height lossComplete vertebral body failure
RetropulsionPosterior vertebral body fragment displaced into spinal canalMore severe fracture; can cause spinal cord/cauda equina compression — needs urgent assessment
Lumbar kyphosisLoss of normal lumbar lordosis; sometimes thoracic kyphosis exaggeratedMultiple compression fractures alter spinal alignment [7]

X-ray Is NOT a Screening Tool for Osteoporosis

X-ray can detect osteopenia, but it is insensitive — approximately 30–40% of bone mass must be lost before it becomes visible on plain films. DXA is the gold standard for screening and diagnosis. X-ray is used for detecting fractures and excluding other causes of back pain (metastasis, infection, Paget's disease).

From the GC lecture slide [1]:

Initial evaluation of osteoporosis — Detailed history of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and/or fractures:

  • Smoking and alcohol
  • Personal / parental history of fracture(s)
  • Fall risk
  • Estimate daily dietary calcium intake
  • Past health: prolonged sex hormone deficiency (age of menopause, use of HRT), type 1 diabetes, anorexia nervosa, rheumatological diseases, GI disease / malabsorption syndrome (gastrectomy, intestinal bypass, Crohn's disease, coeliac disease)
  • Drug history
    • Increased risk of osteoporosis: glucocorticoid, PPI, anticonvulsants, thiazolidinediones
    • Increased risk of fall: hypnotics, diuretics

Physical examination approach [4]:

  • Height and weight — document serial height measurements; BMI < 19 or weight < 45 kg increases risk
  • Dental exam — loss of teeth and need for dentures (early sign of mandibular osteoporosis)
  • Observe posture and estimate degree of kyphosis
  • Examine for tenderness along the spine (percussion tenderness = possible acute fracture)
  • Signs of secondary osteoporosis:
    • Signs of endocrine disease (e.g., Cushingoid features, thyroid eye signs)
    • Signs of myeloma (anaemia, bone tenderness, hypercalcaemia)
    • Signs of hypogonadism
  • Fall assessment (critical in elderly):
    • Agility, hearing, eyesight, postural sway
    • Gait — observe for shuffling, wide base, Trendelenburg
    • Mobility, muscle strength — grip strength, chair stand test ("timed up and go")

8. FRAX Score (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool)

FRAX is a prognostic tool for assessing 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture [2]

  • Available online (https://frax.shef.ac.uk) — country-specific algorithms (including Hong Kong)
  • Uses clinical risk factors ± femoral neck BMD
  • Estimates:
    • 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (hip, spine, forearm, proximal humerus)
    • 10-year probability of hip fracture specifically

Age, sex, BMI, previous fragility fracture, parental history of hip fracture, current smoking, glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid arthritis, secondary osteoporosis, alcohol ≥ 3 units/day, femoral neck BMD (optional)

FRAX applies only to postmenopausal women or men ≥ 50 years who have NOT been treated. It does NOT apply to premenopausal women or younger adults [2]

Other limitations:

  • Does not account for dose of glucocorticoids (just yes/no)
  • Does not account for number of prior fractures
  • Does not account for fall risk (a major limitation)
  • Underestimates risk in patients with very high number of vertebral fractures

High Yield Summary

  1. Definition: Osteoporosis = low bone mass + microarchitectural deterioration → increased fragility → fractures. Operationally defined as T-score ≤ −2.5 by DXA.

  2. Epidemiology: Most common metabolic bone disease. 1 in 3 postmenopausal women; 1 in 5 men > 50. Major burden in Hong Kong's ageing population.

  3. Bone biology: Trabecular bone (20% mass, 80% turnover) affected first. RANK/RANKL/OPG axis is the master regulator of osteoclastogenesis. Oestrogen protects bone via ↓RANKL, ↑OPG, ↑osteoclast apoptosis, and ↓osteoblast apoptosis.

  4. Risk factors: Female, ageing, low weight ( < 45 kg), family history, premature menopause, low calcium, sedentary, smoking, alcohol > 3 drinks/day, no sun exposure, immobilisation. Drugs: glucocorticoids (#1), PPI, anticonvulsants, TZDs. Fall risk: hypnotics, diuretics.

  5. Secondary causes: Endocrine (Cushing's, hyperthyroidism, hyperPTH), GI malabsorption, CKD, myeloma, RA, drugs.

  6. Clinical features: Silent until fracture. Three classic fracture sites: vertebrae (most common, often silent), distal radius (earliest), hip (most serious, 20–30% 1-year mortality). Signs: kyphosis, height loss, picture-framing and codfish sign on X-ray.

  7. T-score: Normal ≥ −1; Osteopenia −1 to −2.5; Osteoporosis ≤ −2.5; Severe = ≤ −2.5 + fragility fracture. Z-score used in premenopausal women/men < 50.

  8. FRAX: 10-year fracture probability. For postmenopausal women and men ≥ 50 only.

  9. Vertebral fracture above T5 → suspect malignancy, not osteoporosis.


Active Recall - Osteoporosis (Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Features)

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (slides on learning objectives, clinical risk factors, initial evaluation) [2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (definition, epidemiology, clinical presentation, FRAX) [3] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Medicine) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p. 1656–1658, definition, epidemiology, risk factors) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p. 47–49, bone remodelling, RANKL/OPG axis, hormonal regulation, DXA interpretation, clinical approach) [5] Lecture slides: Orthopaedic Basic Sciences_Prof. Kevlin Sin Chi CHEUNG.pdf (p. 33–34, definition, disease of bone turnover) [6] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p. 107, definition, aetiology, investigations, T-score/Z-score) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 215, pathological/fragility fracture, X-ray features, bisphosphonate side effects)

Differential Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

When a patient presents with features suggestive of osteoporosis — a fragility fracture, height loss, kyphosis, or an incidental finding of low BMD — the clinical question is not simply "does this patient have osteoporosis?" but rather a layered set of questions:

  1. Is this truly osteoporosis, or is it another metabolic bone disease that looks similar? (e.g., osteomalacia, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy)
  2. If the patient has a fracture, is it an osteoporotic fragility fracture, or is there another cause of pathological fracture? (e.g., metastatic bone disease, myeloma, primary bone tumour)
  3. If this is osteoporosis, is it primary or secondary? (i.e., is there an underlying treatable cause driving the bone loss?)

These three layers demand different differential diagnosis lists and different clinical approaches. Let's work through each systematically.


When you find low BMD on DXA or generalised osteopenia on X-ray, the differential is not limited to osteoporosis. Other conditions can mimic or coexist:

ConditionKey Distinguishing FeaturesWhy It Mimics Osteoporosis
Osteomalacia↑ ALP, ↓ 25(OH)D, ↓ Ca²⁺, ↓/↓ PO₄³⁻; Looser zones (pseudofractures) on X-ray; bone pain and proximal myopathy; abnormal histology showing unmineralised osteoid [2]Both cause diffuse osteopenia on X-ray and fragility fractures. But osteomalacia has defective mineralisation (quality issue) vs. osteoporosis which has reduced mass (quantity issue) with normal mineralisation
Paget's disease↑ ALP with normal Ca/PO₄; localised bone enlargement, deformity; mixed lytic/sclerotic on X-ray; bone scan shows focal ↑ uptake [4]Can coexist with osteoporosis; both cause fractures and bone pain. But Paget's has disorganised remodelling leading to enlarged, deformed, structurally weak bone, not generalised thin bone
Renal osteodystrophy (CKD-MBD)CKD (↑ creatinine, ↓ eGFR); secondary hyperPTH (↑ PTH); ↓ 1,25-(OH)₂D₃; ↑ PO₄³⁻; vascular calcification; "rugger jersey spine" on X-ray [8]CKD causes secondary hyperPTH → increased resorption → osteopenia. But the biochemical profile (↑ PTH, ↑ PO₄, ↓ Ca) and renal function abnormalities distinguish it
Primary hyperparathyroidism↑ Ca²⁺, ↑ PTH (or inappropriately normal PTH in the face of hypercalcaemia); "bones, stones, abdominal groans, psychiatric overtones"; subperiosteal resorption on X-ray (pathognomonic); osteitis fibrosa cystica (brown tumours) [9]PTH excess drives osteoclastic resorption → osteoporosis, especially cortical bone. The hypercalcaemia and elevated PTH distinguish it from primary osteoporosis
Multiple myelomaBone pain (often back pain), anaemia, ↑ ESR, ↑ total protein with ↓ albumin, monoclonal band on serum protein electrophoresis, Bence Jones proteinuria, lytic lesions (no sclerosis) on skeletal survey, ↑ Ca²⁺, renal impairment [6]Myeloma cells secrete RANKL and inhibit OPG → focal and generalised osteolysis. Presents with bone pain, fractures, and osteopenia — can easily be mistaken for osteoporosis
Metastatic bone diseaseConstitutional symptoms (weight loss, fatigue); known primary malignancy (breast, lung, prostate, thyroid, kidney); mixed lytic/blastic lesions; fracture above T5 = suspect malignancy [7]; ↑ ALP in blastic metsPathological fractures from metastases mimic fragility fractures. The level of the fracture and clinical context are key distinguishing features
Osteogenesis imperfectaYoung patient; blue sclerae, dentinogenesis imperfecta, hearing loss; multiple fractures from childhood; family history; generalised osteopeniaGenetic collagen disorder (type I collagen defect) causing fragile bones. Osteoporosis in a young patient without secondary causes should prompt consideration
MastocytosisUrticaria pigmentosa (skin lesions), flushing, anaphylaxis; diffuse osteoporosis; ↑ serum tryptaseMast cell infiltration of bone marrow → cytokine-mediated osteoclast activation → osteoporosis
HomocystinuriaMarfanoid habitus, ectopia lentis (downward), intellectual disability, thromboembolic events; osteoporosis in young adultsElevated homocysteine interferes with collagen cross-linking → structurally weak bone

The Big Three Mimics You Must Not Miss

When evaluating a patient with apparent osteoporosis, always exclude:

  1. Osteomalacia — check ALP, 25(OH)D, Ca²⁺, PO₄³⁻. ALP is normal in osteoporosis but elevated in osteomalacia.
  2. Multiple myeloma — check ESR, serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), urine Bence Jones protein. Especially in men > 50 or anyone with disproportionate bone pain, anaemia, or hypercalcaemia.
  3. Metastatic bone disease — suspect if fracture is above T5, there are constitutional symptoms, or the patient has a history of malignancy [7].

These three are commonly tested and commonly missed in clinical practice.


A pathological fracture is a fracture that occurs in diseased bone, due to malignant or non-malignant conditions (e.g., osteoporosis). A fragility fracture is a subtype of pathological fracture — fracture resulting from low energy trauma that would not ordinarily result in fracture (defined as forces equivalent to a fall from standing height or less) [7]

When a patient presents with a fracture from minimal trauma, you need to differentiate:

CategoryExamplesClues
Osteoporosis (most common)Vertebral compression, Colles', hip fracturePostmenopausal woman / elderly man; typical fracture sites (below T5 for vertebral); no constitutional symptoms; low T-score on DXA
Bone metastasisSuspect if fracture above T5, constitutional symptoms [7]History of primary malignancy; weight loss; multiple lesions; mixed lytic/blastic on X-ray; ↑ ALP
Multiple myelomaVertebral compression, lytic lesionsBack pain + anaemia + ↑ ESR + ↑ Ca²⁺ + renal impairment; pure lytic lesions (myeloma suppresses osteoblasts → no blastic response → bone scan may be falsely negative)
Primary bone tumourOsteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing's sarcomaUsually younger patients; localised bone swelling; aggressive features on X-ray (sunburst, Codman triangle, periosteal reaction)
OsteomalaciaLooser zones (pseudofractures), especially bilateral at femoral necks, pubic rami, ribs, scapulae↑ ALP, ↓ 25(OH)D, proximal myopathy, bone tenderness
Paget's diseaseFracture through pagetic bone (chalk-stick fracture of femur)Elderly; localised bone enlargement and deformity; ↑ ALP
InfectionPathological fracture through osteomyelitis / TB spineFever, localised warmth, ↑ WCC, ↑ CRP; TB: cold abscess, gibbus deformity
Osteogenesis imperfectaMultiple fractures from childhoodBlue sclerae, FHx, young age

Since the GC lecture case is "back pain in an elderly woman" [1], the differential of back pain is highly relevant and frequently tested:

The differential diagnosis of back pain is broad [10]:

  • Degeneration (spondylosis): e.g., OA spine, facet joint arthritis
  • Prolapsed intervertebral disc
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Muscle / ligamentous injury: muscle strain
  • Fractures / injuries: compression fractures, spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis
  • Infection: TB spine, epidural abscess
  • Tumour: primary, metastases (e.g., lung, breast, prostate)
  • Inflammation: ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, RA
  • Extra-spinal causes / Referred pain: e.g., pancreatitis, AAA, urological/gynaecological causes, herpes zoster

For an elderly woman presenting with acute back pain, the top differentials to prioritise are:

  1. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture — most common; may follow trivial trauma or none at all
  2. Metastatic bone disease — especially breast, lung, prostate, thyroid, kidney; ask about constitutional symptoms, weight loss, known primary
  3. Multiple myeloma — back pain + anaemia + ↑ ESR/Ca²⁺ in an elderly patient is myeloma until proven otherwise
  4. Degenerative disease — spondylosis, disc disease; chronic, mechanical pattern
  5. Infection — TB spine (Pott's disease), epidural abscess; fever, risk factors
  6. Referred pain — AAA (pulsatile abdominal mass), renal pathology, pancreatitis

Atypical back pain → consider (1) multiple myeloma and (2) bony metastasis of cancer [11]


Once osteoporosis is confirmed (by T-score ≤ −2.5 or fragility fracture), you must systematically exclude secondary causes, especially in:

  • Premenopausal women or men < 50 years with osteoporosis
  • Z-score ≤ −2.0 (suggests a secondary cause beyond expected age-related changes) [6]
  • Patients with rapid bone loss, severe osteoporosis, or poor response to treatment

Secondary causes of osteoporosis [6]:

  • Endocrine: DM, Cushing's, hyperthyroidism, acromegaly
  • GI: cholestasis (e.g., PBC, PSC), pancreatic insufficiency
  • Pulmonary: COPD
  • Renal: CKD (secondary hyperPTH)
  • Haematological: myeloma
  • Autoimmune: IBD, AS, RA
  • Drugs: corticosteroids, PPI, cyclosporine

A useful screening battery for secondary causes:

InvestigationWhat It Screens For
CBCAnaemia (myeloma, chronic disease), raised WCC (malignancy, infection)
ESRMyeloma, chronic inflammation
Liver and renal function testsChronic liver disease (PBC, PSC), CKD
Ca²⁺, PO₄³⁻, ALPPrimary hyperPTH (↑ Ca, ↓ PO₄, ↑ ALP); osteomalacia (↓ Ca, ↓ PO₄, ↑ ALP); Paget's (↑ ALP, normal Ca/PO₄)
25(OH)DVitamin D deficiency → osteomalacia or secondary hyperPTH
PTHPrimary or secondary hyperPTH
TFTHyperthyroidism (accelerated bone turnover)
Testosterone (in men)Hypogonadism
Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)Myeloma (monoclonal band)
24-hour urine cortisol or overnight DSTCushing's syndrome
Coeliac serology (anti-tTG)Coeliac disease (malabsorption)

Underlying causes: CBC, LRFT, CaPO₄, ALP, ESR, TFT, Ig pattern [6]



FeatureOsteoporosisOsteomalaciaMyelomaMetastasesPaget'sPrimary Hyperparathyroidism
ALPNormal↑Normal/↑↑ (blastic)Markedly ↑↑
Ca²⁺Normal↓ or normal↑↑ or normalNormal (↑ if immobilised)↑
PO₄³⁻Normal↓NormalNormalNormal↓
PTHNormal↑ (secondary)NormalNormalNormal↑ or inappropriately normal
25(OH)DNormal or ↓↓↓NormalNormalNormalNormal
ESRNormalNormalMarkedly ↑↑NormalNormal
SPEPNormalNormalM-bandNormalNormalNormal
X-rayOsteopenia, codfish vertebraLooser zones, osteopeniaPunched-out lytic lesions (no sclerosis)Mixed lytic/blasticEnlarged/deformed bone, mixed phaseSubperiosteal resorption, "salt and pepper" skull
Bone scanDiffuse ↓ uptakeDiffuse ↑ uptake (superscan)May be falsely negative (pure lytic)Multiple focal ↑ uptakeFocal ↑ uptakeGeneralised ↑ uptake
Typical patientPostmenopausal womanElderly, housebound, dietary deficiencyElderly, M > FKnown primary cancerElderly, M = FPostmenopausal woman

Myeloma and Bone Scan — A Classic Pitfall

Multiple myeloma produces purely lytic lesions because myeloma cells secrete DKK-1 which inhibits osteoblast differentiation. Since bone scans rely on osteoblastic activity for uptake, myeloma lesions may be missed on bone scan. Use a skeletal survey (X-ray) or whole-body low-dose CT or PET-CT instead for myeloma staging. This is a frequently examined point.


This distinction is so commonly tested that it deserves extra emphasis.

OsteoporosisOsteomalacia
ProblemLow bone mass (quantity ↓) with normal mineral-to-osteoid ratioDefective mineralisation of osteoid (quality ↓)
PathophysiologyResorption > formation → less bone overall, but what remains is normally mineralised [6]Vitamin D deficiency → ↓ Ca²⁺ absorption → secondary hyperPTH → osteoid laid down but cannot mineralise [2]
ALPNormalElevated (osteoblasts are active laying down osteoid, but it fails to mineralise → ALP released from overactive osteoblasts) [2]
Bone painUsually painless until fractureDiffuse bone pain and tenderness (unmineralised osteoid is mechanically weak and periosteum is stretched)
Proximal myopathyAbsentPresent (vitamin D deficiency causes proximal muscle weakness — vitamin D receptors on muscle fibres)
X-rayOsteopenia, codfish vertebra, compression fracturesOsteopenia + Looser zones (pseudofractures — radiolucent lines perpendicular to cortex at sites of stress, e.g., femoral neck, pubic rami, scapula, ribs)
DiagnosisDXA (T-score ≤ −2.5)Bone biopsy (gold standard — widened osteoid seams with defective mineralisation); biochemistry: ↓ 25(OH)D, ↑ ALP, ↓ Ca, ↓ PO₄, ↑ PTH

ALP is high in osteomalacia due to the consequent secondary hyperparathyroidism from the vitamin D deficiency [2]


For exam purposes, you must know these red flags that suggest an alternative diagnosis [10][11]:

Red FlagSuggests
Fracture above T5Malignancy (metastasis, myeloma) [7]
Night pain (wakes from sleep)Malignancy, infection
Constitutional symptoms (weight loss, fever, night sweats)Malignancy, TB, infection
Progressive neurological deficitCord compression (tumour, epidural abscess, large disc prolapse)
Bowel/bladder dysfunction, saddle anaesthesiaCauda equina syndrome — surgical emergency
History of malignancyMetastatic bone disease
Age < 20 or > 55 with new-onset back painWider differential needed
Thoracic pain (not thoracolumbar junction)Less common for degenerative causes; think infection, malignancy
Morning stiffness > 30 minutesInflammatory spondyloarthropathy (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis)
IV drug use, immunosuppressionVertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess

High Yield Summary

  1. Three layers of DDx: (a) Is this osteoporosis or another metabolic bone disease? (b) Is this fracture osteoporotic or from another cause? (c) Is the osteoporosis primary or secondary?

  2. Three mimics you must not miss: Osteomalacia (↑ ALP, ↓ 25-OH-D), multiple myeloma (↑ ESR, M-band on SPEP, pure lytic lesions), metastatic bone disease (fracture above T5, constitutional symptoms).

  3. Osteoporosis vs osteomalacia: ALP is normal in osteoporosis, elevated in osteomalacia. Osteoporosis = quantity problem (less bone, normally mineralised); osteomalacia = quality problem (plenty of osteoid, poorly mineralised).

  4. Myeloma bone scan pitfall: Myeloma produces purely lytic lesions → bone scan (which relies on osteoblastic uptake) may be falsely negative. Use skeletal survey or low-dose whole-body CT instead.

  5. Vertebral fracture above T5 → think malignancy, not osteoporosis.

  6. Z-score ≤ −2.0 in premenopausal women or men < 50 → investigate for secondary causes.

  7. Screening battery for secondary osteoporosis: CBC, LRFT, Ca/PO₄/ALP, 25(OH)D, PTH, TFT, ESR, SPEP, ± testosterone (men), ± coeliac serology, ± cortisol.

  8. Red flags in back pain: night pain, constitutional symptoms, neurological deficit, fracture above T5, saddle anaesthesia, bladder/bowel dysfunction.


Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (learning objectives, diagnostic criteria slide) [2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (definition, osteomalacia distinction, ALP in osteomalacia) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p. 49–53, DXA interpretation, approach to established osteoporosis, Paget's disease) [6] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p. 107, aetiology, secondary causes, investigations, Z-score) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 215, pathological/fragility fracture definition, DDx bone metastasis if above T5, X-ray features) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Chronic Kidney Disease and its Complications.pdf (CKD-MBD, renal osteodystrophy) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (primary hyperparathyroidism, bones stones groans overtones) [10] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 222–223, differential diagnoses of back pain, red flags) [11] Senior notes: Block A – Nephrology Data Interpretation.pdf (atypical back pain DDx: myeloma, bony metastasis)

Diagnostic Criteria, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Investigations for Osteoporosis


1. Diagnostic Criteria

There are two parallel ways to diagnose osteoporosis — one based on bone mineral density (BMD) and one based on clinical events (fractures). Understanding why both exist is important: osteoporosis is a silent disease, so we need a quantitative threshold to diagnose it before a fracture occurs. But if a patient has already fractured from minimal trauma, the diagnosis is clinically obvious regardless of their T-score.

From the GC lecture slide [1]:

How is osteoporosis diagnosed?

Diagnostic CategoryDefinition
NormalBMD within 1 SD of the young adult mean (T-score ≥ −1.0)
OsteopeniaBMD > 1 SD below the young adult mean, but < 2.5 SD below this value (T-score < −1.0 and > −2.5)
OsteoporosisBMD ≥ 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (T-score ≤ −2.5)
Severe (established) osteoporosisBMD ≥ 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (T-score ≤ −2.5) in the presence of ≥ 1 fragility fractures

Why −2.5 SD? This threshold was chosen because the prevalence of osteoporosis defined by T-score ≤ −2.5 roughly matches the lifetime fracture risk in postmenopausal women (~30%). It's a statistical cut-off, not a biological on/off switch — fracture risk is a continuum.

DXA is the only means for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis based on the WHO definition [2]

Clinical definition: Low-trauma / low-energy fracture in a postmenopausal woman or elderly — defined as a fracture that occurs from a fall from standing height or lower [1][2]

This means: if a 70-year-old woman falls from standing and fractures her hip, she has osteoporosis clinically — even before you get a DXA. This clinical definition is important because:

  • Many patients are diagnosed after their first fracture
  • In resource-limited settings, DXA may not be available
  • It guides immediate treatment decisions

ScoreFormulaReference PopulationClinical UseWhen to Suspect Secondary Cause
T-score(Patient BMD − Young adult mean BMD) / SD of young adult BMD [4]Peak bone mass of a young healthy adult of the same sexPostmenopausal women, men ≥ 50 yearsT-score ≤ −2.5
Z-score(Patient BMD − Age-matched mean BMD) / SD of age-matched BMDNormal individuals of the same age, sex, and ethnicityPremenopausal women, men < 50 years, childrenZ-score ≤ −2.0 [6]

Why T-score for postmenopausal women? Because even though bone loss is "expected" with ageing, it still increases fracture risk. Comparing to age-matched peers would falsely reassure elderly patients.

Why Z-score for younger patients? In premenopausal women or young men, you expect normal bone density. If the Z-score is ≤ −2.0, it means their BMD is worse than expected for their age → a secondary cause is driving the bone loss and must be investigated [6].

For every reduction of 1 SD in BMD, the fracture risk increases by 1.5 to 2 times overall [2]

More specifically:

  • 1 SD ↓ BMD (by DXA at spine/hip/forearm) = 2× ↑ risk of hip fracture [4]

This gradient of risk makes BMD a continuous prognostic variable, not just a binary diagnostic tool.


2. Investigation Modalities

Investigations in osteoporosis serve three purposes:

  1. Confirm the diagnosis → DXA
  2. Detect fractures → X-ray, VFA
  3. Exclude secondary causes and mimics → laboratory panel

DXA (sometimes written "DEXA") is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis [1][2].

How it works: DXA fires two X-ray beams at different energy levels through bone. Bone absorbs more of one energy than the other depending on its mineral content. By comparing absorption of the two beams, the machine calculates areal BMD (g/cm²) — the amount of mineral per unit area of bone scanned.

Central DXA at the hip and spine — these are the locations where fractures have the greatest impact on life, and BMD measurements at these regions of interest are the best predictors of fracture risk for the corresponding sites [2]

Sites measured:

  • Lumbar spine (L1–L4, anteroposterior view) — predominantly trabecular bone; best for monitoring treatment response (earliest changes seen here)
  • Proximal femur — includes femoral neck and total hip; best predictor of hip fracture risk
  • Distal 1/3 radius — used when spine/hip cannot be measured (e.g., bilateral hip replacement, severe degenerative spine disease, hyperparathyroidism, very obese patients) [9][12]

Interpretation: Report the lowest T-score from any of the measured sites for diagnosis.

DXA Pitfalls — False Elevations

DXA can overestimate BMD at the lumbar spine in elderly patients due to:

  • Degenerative changes (osteophytes, disc space narrowing) → extra calcium in the field
  • Aortic calcification → adds mineral density artifact
  • Vertebral compression fractures → sclerotic bone at fracture site

If the lumbar spine BMD seems paradoxically high in an elderly patient with obvious osteoporosis elsewhere, rely on the hip BMD instead. The hip is less affected by these artifacts.

Who should be screened with DXA?

  • All women ≥ 65 years and men ≥ 70 years (universal screening)
  • Postmenopausal women < 65 and men 50–69 with risk factors
  • Anyone with a fragility fracture
  • Anyone on long-term glucocorticoids (≥ 5 mg prednisolone for ≥ 3 months)
  • Anyone with diseases known to cause secondary osteoporosis
  • Monitoring response to treatment (repeat DXA at 1–2 year intervals)

FRAX is a prognostic tool for assessing 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture [2]

  • Uses clinical risk factors ± femoral neck BMD
  • Country-specific algorithms (including Hong Kong)
  • Outputs: 10-year probability of (a) major osteoporotic fracture (hip, spine, forearm, proximal humerus) and (b) hip fracture

Applies only to postmenopausal women or men ≥ 50 years who have NOT been treated. Does NOT apply to premenopausal women or younger adults [2]

Limitations:

  • Does not account for dose of glucocorticoids (just yes/no)
  • Does not account for number or recency of prior fractures
  • Does not include fall risk
  • May underestimate in patients with very high fracture burden

Clinical utility: Used to guide treatment decisions in patients with osteopenia (T-score −1.0 to −2.5) — if the FRAX score exceeds a country-specific threshold, treatment is recommended even without a T-score ≤ −2.5.

X-ray is NOT a screening tool for osteoporosis (needs ~30–40% bone loss to be visible) but is essential for:

  • Detecting fractures — vertebral compression fractures, hip fractures, Colles' fractures
  • Excluding other causes of bone pain — metastases, myeloma lytic lesions, Paget's disease, infection

XR spine: thinning of cortex, codfish sign (biconcave vertebra), compression fracture [6]

X-ray features of osteoporosis:

FindingDescriptionWhy It Happens
Generalised osteopeniaIncreased radiolucency↓ Mineral mass → less X-ray absorption
Cortical thinningThin cortices with "picture-framing" of vertebraeEndosteal resorption exceeds periosteal apposition
Codfish vertebraBiconcave vertebral bodyWeak endplates bow inward under pressure from nucleus pulposus
Wedge fractureAnterior height loss > 20% compared to posteriorAnterior column fails under flexion loading
Crush fractureLoss of entire vertebral body heightComplete structural failure
Loss of trabeculaeSparse internal bone patternTrabecular bone resorbed preferentially

  • VFA by DXA: A lateral spine image obtained during the DXA scan to detect prevalent vertebral fractures
  • Advantages: lower radiation dose than standard lateral spine X-ray; done at the same visit as BMD measurement
  • Limitations: lower image resolution than conventional X-ray; may miss upper thoracic fractures
  • Indicated when vertebral fracture is suspected but conventional radiography has not been done

Vertebral spine assessment (X-ray or Vertebral Fracture Assessment by DXA) is recommended in evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism and suspected osteoporosis [12]

ModalityWhat It MeasuresClinical Use
Quantitative CT (QCT)Volumetric bone density (true 3D, g/cm³) [6]More accurate than DXA (no 2D areal artifact); can separate trabecular from cortical bone; higher radiation dose; not widely available for routine screening
Trabecular bone score (TBS)Bone quality — textural analysis of DXA spine image [6]Indirectly assesses microarchitecture; can be added to FRAX to improve fracture prediction; useful when T-score alone is borderline
MRIMarrow composition, fracture acuity, cord compressionDifferentiating acute vs. chronic vertebral fractures (marrow oedema on STIR); evaluating neurological compromise; detecting marrow infiltration (myeloma, metastases)
Bone scan (scintigraphy)Osteoblastic activityUseful for Paget's disease, metastatic survey; NOT useful for myeloma (pure lytic lesions → falsely negative); can show "superscan" in metabolic bone diseases

3. Laboratory Investigations

From the GC lecture slide [1]:

Laboratory investigations:

Diagnostic testTo detect or exclude
1. Complete blood countAnaemia (myeloma / coeliac disease)
2. Renal and liver function testsRenal or liver failure, alcohol abuse
3. Calcium, phosphate and parathyroid hormone (PTH)Primary hyperparathyroidism, myeloma
4. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)Osteomalacia, Paget's disease
5. 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (25OHD)Vitamin D deficiency, osteomalacia
6. TSH ± fT4Hyperthyroidism
7. Testosterone (in men)Male hypogonadism
8. Fasting glucose and HbA1cDiabetes mellitus
9. 24hr urine for calciumHypercalciuria

Selected patients:

  • Bone turnover markers, serum protein electrophoresis, serum and/or urinary cortisol, prolactin, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies

Let me explain why each investigation is ordered — from first principles:

InvestigationWhat It Screens ForReasoning
CBCAnaemia → myeloma, chronic disease, coeliac diseaseMyeloma causes bone marrow infiltration → normocytic anaemia; coeliac disease causes iron/folate malabsorption → microcytic or megaloblastic anaemia
Renal function (Cr, eGFR)CKD → renal osteodystrophyCKD → ↓ 1α-hydroxylase → ↓ 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ → ↓ Ca²⁺ absorption → secondary hyperPTH → ↑ bone resorption
Liver function (albumin, bilirubin, transaminases)Chronic liver disease (PBC, PSC, alcohol), alcohol abuseCholestasis → malabsorption of vitamin D (fat-soluble); albumin needed for corrected calcium interpretation; alcohol directly suppresses osteoblasts
Calcium, phosphatePrimary hyperparathyroidism (↑ Ca, ↓ PO₄), myeloma (↑ Ca), osteomalacia (↓ Ca, ↓ PO₄)These are cheap, essential, and distinguish the major metabolic bone diseases from each other
PTHPrimary hyperPTH (↑ PTH with ↑ Ca); secondary hyperPTH (↑ PTH with ↓ Ca)PTH is the key branching point in the diagnostic algorithm for metabolic bone disease
ALPOsteomalacia (↑ ALP); Paget's disease (markedly ↑ ALP)ALP is released from overactive osteoblasts. In osteoporosis, ALP is normal because osteoblast activity is not increased. Elevated ALP should make you think of another diagnosis
25(OH)DVitamin D deficiency / osteomalacia25(OH)D is the best measure of vitamin D stores (it has a long half-life ~2–3 weeks). Low levels → impaired calcium absorption → secondary hyperPTH → bone loss
TSH ± fT4HyperthyroidismThyroid hormone excess accelerates bone turnover (both formation and resorption, but resorption > formation) → net bone loss
Testosterone (in men)Male hypogonadismTestosterone (and its aromatisation to oestrogen) is protective for male bone. Hypogonadism is the leading cause of osteoporosis in young men
Fasting glucose / HbA1cDiabetes mellitusType 1 DM → reduced bone quality (insulin is anabolic for bone); Type 2 DM → paradoxically normal/high BMD but increased fracture risk (altered bone quality, microangiopathy, falls)
24hr urine calciumHypercalciuriaSome patients have idiopathic hypercalciuria → obligate renal calcium loss → negative calcium balance → secondary hyperPTH → bone loss. Also needed to exclude familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) if calcium is mildly elevated

In selected patients: bone turnover markers, serum protein electrophoresis, serum and/or urinary cortisol, prolactin, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies [1]

InvestigationWhen to OrderWhat It Screens For
Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)Elderly patient with disproportionate bone pain, anaemia, ↑ ESR, ↑ Ca²⁺Multiple myeloma — monoclonal M-band
Serum/urinary cortisol (24hr UFC or overnight DST)Clinical features of Cushing's; osteoporosis with unusual features for age [13]Cushing's syndrome — excess cortisol is a potent cause of secondary osteoporosis
Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG)Unexplained malabsorption, iron/folate deficiency, low BMD in younger patientCoeliac disease → gluten-triggered villous atrophy → malabsorption of calcium and vitamin D [2]
ProlactinAmenorrhoea, galactorrhoea, visual field defectProlactinoma → hyperprolactinaemia → hypogonadism → bone loss
Bone turnover markersMonitoring treatment response; assessing fracture riskFormation markers: P1NP (procollagen type 1 N-propeptide), osteocalcin, bone-specific ALP. Resorption markers: CTX (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen), NTX. Useful to check treatment adherence/response at 3–6 months (faster change than DXA)

When to Order SPEP — The 'Myeloma Screen'

Order serum protein electrophoresis in any patient with osteoporosis PLUS:

  • Disproportionate bone pain (especially back pain)
  • Anaemia out of proportion to other findings
  • ↑ ESR (often very high, > 100 mm/hr)
  • Hypercalcaemia
  • Renal impairment
  • Age > 50, especially males

Myeloma can masquerade as "osteoporosis" for months before being diagnosed. The SPEP is cheap and catches it.

OsteoporosisOsteomalaciaPrimary HyperPTHCKD-MBDMyelomaPaget's
Ca²⁺Normal↓ or N↑↓ or N↑ or NNormal
PO₄³⁻Normal↓↓↑NormalNormal
ALPNormal↑↑↑Normal or ↑Markedly ↑
PTHNormal↑ (2°)↑ (1°)↑ (2°)NormalNormal
25(OH)DNormal or ↓↓↓NormalNormal or ↓NormalNormal
ESRNormalNormalNormalVariableMarkedly ↑Normal
eGFRNormalNormalNormal or ↓↓↓Normal or ↓Normal

The key discriminators are ALP (normal in osteoporosis, elevated in almost everything else), calcium (distinguishes hyperPTH and myeloma), and PTH (separates primary from secondary hyperPTH from non-PTH causes).


This algorithm synthesises the diagnostic approach — from clinical suspicion through to confirmed diagnosis and aetiology classification:


5. Who to Investigate and When

Patient GroupIndication
All women ≥ 65 yearsUniversal screening
All men ≥ 70 yearsUniversal screening
Postmenopausal women < 65 with risk factorsTargeted screening (use FRAX to decide if unclear)
Men 50–69 with risk factorsTargeted screening
Any patient with a fragility fractureConfirm diagnosis + quantify severity + baseline for monitoring
Chronic glucocorticoid users (≥ 5 mg prednisolone equivalent for ≥ 3 months)Before or at initiation of therapy, then annually
Conditions causing secondary osteoporosisAt diagnosis of the condition, then periodically
Monitoring treatment responseRepeat DXA at 1–2 year intervals

  • Acute back pain in elderly → rule out vertebral compression fracture
  • After a fall → detect fracture (hip, wrist, humerus, pelvis)
  • Suspected malignancy or Paget's → characterise the lesion

  • MRI spine: If neurological deficit (cord compression), if need to distinguish acute vs. chronic fracture (marrow oedema on STIR/T2), or if metastatic disease suspected
  • Bone scan: Metastatic survey (but NOT for myeloma), Paget's disease assessment
  • CT: When MRI contraindicated; skeletal survey for myeloma (whole-body low-dose CT now preferred over conventional skeletal survey)

6. Interpretation Pearls

ALP is normal in osteoporosis [1]

This is the single most useful biochemical distinction:

  • Normal ALP → osteoporosis (or myeloma, which also has normal ALP)
  • Elevated ALP → osteomalacia, Paget's, hyperPTH, or metastatic bone disease (blastic type)

Why is ALP normal in osteoporosis? Because ALP is an osteoblast marker. In osteoporosis, the problem is that resorption exceeds formation, but osteoblasts are not hyperactive — they're either normal or suppressed. In osteomalacia and Paget's, osteoblasts are working overtime (laying down osteoid in osteomalacia; disorganised remodelling in Paget's), so ALP rises.

Always use albumin-corrected calcium when interpreting serum calcium:

Corrected Ca²⁺ = Total Ca²⁺ + 0.02 × (40 − albumin in g/L) [14]

Why? About 50% of serum calcium is bound to albumin. If albumin is low (e.g., nephrotic syndrome, chronic liver disease, malnutrition), total calcium will appear falsely low even though the biologically active ionised calcium fraction is normal. The correction adjusts for this.

Marker TypeExamplesWhat They ReflectClinical Use
Formation markersP1NP (most recommended), osteocalcin, bone-specific ALPOsteoblast activityMonitor treatment response (should ↑ with anabolic agents, ↓ with antiresorptives); ↓ by 3–6 months confirms treatment adherence
Resorption markersCTX, NTX, TRAP-5bOsteoclast activityShould ↓ with antiresorptive therapy; used to monitor adherence/response faster than DXA (which takes 1–2 years to show change)

Bone Turnover Markers — Practical Points

  • CTX is best measured fasting, before 10am (there is diurnal variation and postprandial suppression)
  • A significant drop in CTX (> 25–30%) at 3 months after starting a bisphosphonate confirms the drug is working and the patient is adherent
  • These markers do NOT diagnose osteoporosis — they are for monitoring and risk stratification

StepActionPurpose
1. Clinical assessmentHistory (risk factors, fracture history, secondary causes, drugs, falls) + examination (height, kyphosis, tenderness, secondary cause signs, fall assessment)Identify at-risk patients, guide investigations
2. DXA scanCentral DXA at hip + spine; T-score for postmenopausal women / men ≥ 50; Z-score for younger patientsConfirm diagnosis, quantify severity
3. FRAX scoreCalculate 10-year fracture probability (if T-score in osteopenia range)Guide treatment decisions in borderline cases
4. Laboratory panelCBC, LRFT, Ca/PO₄/ALP, PTH, 25(OH)D, TSH, testosterone (men), fasting glucose/HbA1c, 24hr urine CaExclude secondary causes and metabolic bone disease mimics
5. Selected investigationsSPEP, cortisol, anti-tTG, prolactin, bone turnover markers — as clinically indicatedTarget specific secondary causes
6. ImagingX-ray (fracture detection), VFA (vertebral fracture screen), MRI/CT (if neurological concern or malignancy suspected)Detect fractures, exclude malignancy

High Yield Summary

  1. Two ways to diagnose osteoporosis: (a) T-score ≤ −2.5 on DXA; (b) fragility fracture in a postmenopausal woman or elderly patient (clinical definition).

  2. DXA is the only means for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis (WHO). Central DXA at hip and spine — use the lowest T-score for diagnosis.

  3. T-score for postmenopausal women / men ≥ 50; Z-score for premenopausal women / men < 50 / children. Z-score ≤ −2.0 → suspect secondary cause.

  4. FRAX estimates 10-year fracture risk; used for treatment decisions in osteopenia. Applies only to postmenopausal women / men ≥ 50, untreated.

  5. ALP is NORMAL in osteoporosis — elevated ALP → think osteomalacia, Paget's, or blastic metastases.

  6. Laboratory panel (GC slide): CBC, LRFT, Ca/PO₄/PTH, ALP, 25(OH)D, TSH ± fT4, testosterone (men), fasting glucose/HbA1c, 24hr urine Ca. Selected: SPEP (myeloma), cortisol (Cushing's), anti-tTG (coeliac), bone turnover markers.

  7. 1 SD ↓ BMD = 2× ↑ hip fracture risk.

  8. Bone turnover markers (CTX, P1NP) are for monitoring treatment response (faster than DXA), not diagnosis.

  9. Severe/established osteoporosis = T-score ≤ −2.5 PLUS ≥ 1 fragility fracture.


Active Recall - Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for Osteoporosis

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (diagnostic categories slide p.22, laboratory investigations slide p.31) [2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (WHO definition, clinical definition, DXA as gold standard, FRAX, anti-tTG rationale) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p. 49, T-score formula, DXA interpretation, 1 SD = 2× hip fracture risk, approach to established osteoporosis) [6] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p. 107, T-score/Z-score, investigations for underlying causes, QCT, TBS) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 215, pathological fracture, DDx bone metastasis above T5) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (hyperPTH workup, 3-site DXA including distal 1/3 radius) [12] Senior notes: MBBS Final MB (Surgery) (Felix PY Lai).pdf (p. 1023, DEXA scan sites, hyperPTH case workup) [13] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Chemical Path.pdf (p. 29, Cushing syndrome diagnostic approach, indications for testing including osteoporosis) [14] Senior notes: Endocrine Interactive Tutorial.pdf (corrected calcium formula, albumin-calcium relationship)

Management of Osteoporosis


The objective of treating osteoporosis is to: (1) reduce the likelihood of fragility fractures by strengthening the skeleton, (2) decrease fall frequency, or (3) both [2]

This dual-pronged approach is critical to understand. Fracture = fragile bone + force (usually a fall). You can prevent fractures by either making the bone stronger (pharmacotherapy) or reducing the force applied (fall prevention), or ideally both.


From the GC lecture slide [1] and senior notes [2]:

For postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 years, therapy is indicated if:

  1. Prior hip or vertebral fracture
  2. BMD T-score ≤ −2.5 at the spine or proximal femur
  3. BMD T-score between −1.0 and −2.5 (low bone mass / osteopenia) AND one of the following:
    • 10-year risk of major fracture ≥ 20% (calculated by FRAX)
    • 10-year risk of hip fracture ≥ 3% (calculated by FRAX)

Additional indications [4][6]:

  • Established fragility fracture (regardless of T-score)
  • Other high-risk features: recurrent falls, rapid bone loss on serial DXA

Key Point — Treat the Patient, Not Just the T-Score

A patient with a prior vertebral compression fracture should receive pharmacotherapy even if their T-score is in the osteopenic range. The clinical fracture already proves the bone is failing — waiting for the DXA to hit −2.5 is missing the point.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: Any patient expected to take ≥ 5 mg prednisolone equivalent for ≥ 3 months should receive prophylaxis (calcium + vitamin D + bisphosphonate) — bone loss is fastest in the first 3–6 months.



4. Non-Pharmacological Management

Non-pharmacological measures apply to ALL patients — they form the foundation of treatment [2][4][6]

Calcium and vitamin D rich diet ± supplements (to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism) [6]

Recommended Daily IntakeRationale
Calcium1000 mg/day (men and premenopausal women); 1200 mg/day (postmenopausal women) [4]Calcium is the raw mineral substrate for bone mineralisation. Inadequate intake → mild hypocalcaemia → secondary hyperPTH → ↑ bone resorption. Supplementation closes this gap.
Vitamin D600–800 IU/day (general); 800–1000 IU/day (elderly, institutionalised, vitamin D deficient) [4][15]Vitamin D is required for intestinal calcium absorption. Without it, even adequate calcium intake is wasted. Deficiency is extremely common in Hong Kong elderly (limited sun exposure, dark clothing, housebound).

Calcium sources: milk, yogurt, salmon, broccoli, orange. Vitamin D sources: fortified milk, egg, fish [6]

Practical points:

  • Dietary calcium is preferred over supplements where possible — calcium supplements in high doses ( > 500 mg at once) may increase cardiovascular risk (controversial but prudent to advise dietary sources first)
  • If supplements are needed, give calcium carbonate with meals (needs gastric acid for absorption) or calcium citrate (can be taken without food — better option for patients on PPIs, as PPI use can decrease calcium absorption [4])
  • Always replenish vitamin D before starting antiresorptive therapy — starting a bisphosphonate or denosumab in a vitamin D–deficient patient can precipitate symptomatic hypocalcaemia

Vitamin D supplement in older people with confirmed 25-hydroxycholecalciferol deficiency ( < 50 nmol/L) who are housebound or experiencing falls or with osteopenia [16]

Regular weight-bearing exercise [4][6]

  • Mechanism: Mechanical loading on bone stimulates osteoblast activity (Wolff's law — bone remodels in response to the forces placed on it). Impact and gravitational forces stimulate mechanosensory osteocytes embedded in bone matrix → they signal osteoblasts via sclerostin downregulation → more bone formation.
  • Examples: Walking, jogging, dancing, stair climbing, resistance/strength training
  • NOT: Swimming and cycling (non-weight-bearing — good for cardiovascular fitness but do not load bone)
  • Additional benefits: improves muscle strength, balance, and coordination → reduces fall risk

Fall prevention and rehabilitation [6]

This is often under-emphasised but is arguably as important as pharmacotherapy in the elderly. Components include:

  • Medication review: stop or reduce hypnotics, diuretics, and other drugs that increase fall risk [1]
  • Vision assessment and correction: refer for ophthalmology/optometry review
  • Home safety evaluation: remove loose rugs, improve lighting, install handrails and grab bars, non-slip mats
  • Physiotherapy: balance training, gait retraining, Tai Chi (evidence-based for fall reduction), muscle strengthening
  • Assistive devices: walking aids (stick → tripod → walking frame → rollator) as appropriate
  • Postural hypotension management: review antihypertensives, advise slow position changes
  • Footwear: low heels, high surface contact area [15]

Treatment of osteoporosis reduces hip fractures in single interventions in the falls prevention literature [15]

Quit smoking and alcohol [6] Sunlight exposure — especially important in institutionalised patients [4]

  • Smoking: directly toxic to osteoblasts, anti-oestrogenic, reduces intestinal calcium absorption
  • Alcohol: > 3 units/day directly suppresses osteoblast function AND increases fall risk

Always treat the underlying condition if secondary osteoporosis is identified:

  • Cushing's syndrome → control hypercortisolism
  • Hyperthyroidism → normalise thyroid function
  • Hypogonadism → hormone replacement
  • Coeliac disease → gluten-free diet
  • Primary hyperparathyroidism → parathyroidectomy if indicated
  • CKD-MBD → phosphate binders, vitamin D analogues, PTH control [8]

5. Pharmacological Management — Drug Classes

Osteoporosis drugs are classified by mechanism:

CategoryDrugsMechanism
Antiresorptive (↓ osteoclast activity)Bisphosphonates, denosumab, SERMs, calcitoninReduce bone breakdown
Anabolic (↑ osteoblast activity)Teriparatide, abaloparatideStimulate new bone formation
Dual actionRomosozumabBoth ↑ formation AND ↓ resorption

Name breakdown: "bis" = two, "phosphonate" = phosphate group. Bisphosphonates have two phosphonate groups that bind avidly to hydroxyapatite on the bone surface.

Bisphosphonates attach to bone surface and inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption [17]

Mechanism of action (detailed):

  1. Bisphosphonates are incorporated into bone matrix by binding to hydroxyapatite at sites of active resorption
  2. When osteoclasts resorb the bone, they ingest the bisphosphonate
  3. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate) inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) in the mevalonate pathway within osteoclasts
  4. This blocks prenylation of small GTPases (Ras, Rho, Rac) → osteoclast cytoskeletal disruption, loss of ruffled border, inability to form resorption pits → osteoclast apoptosis
  5. Net result: reduced bone resorption → preservation and gradual increase in BMD

Pharmacokinetics: bound to bone (40–60%); remainder excreted unchanged through kidney (both glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion) [17]

This renal excretion is critical — bisphosphonates are contraindicated in severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30–35 mL/min).

Commonly used bisphosphonates:

DrugRouteDosingKey Points
AlendronateOral70 mg once weekly (or 10 mg daily)Most commonly prescribed; first-line in most guidelines [18]
RisedronateOral35 mg once weekly (or 5 mg daily, or 150 mg monthly)Similar efficacy to alendronate; may have slightly less GI irritation
Zoledronic acid (zoledronate)IV5 mg IV once yearlyMost potent; best for compliance issues, GI intolerance, or post-hip fracture (give within 2 weeks of surgical fixation)
IbandronateOral or IV150 mg oral monthly or 3 mg IV every 3 monthsLess evidence for hip fracture reduction than alendronate/risedronate/zoledronate

Instructions for oral bisphosphonates (extremely important for efficacy and safety):

  • Take on an empty stomach, first thing in the morning
  • Swallow with a full glass of plain water (not mineral water, juice, or tea)
  • Remain upright (sitting or standing) for ≥ 30 minutes after taking
  • Do not eat, drink, or take other medications for ≥ 30 minutes after
  • Why? Oral bisphosphonates have extremely poor bioavailability (~1%) — food, calcium, and other minerals chelate them and prevent absorption. The upright posture prevents oesophageal irritation/ulceration.

Side effects:

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis — side effects: GI upset (most common), jaw osteonecrosis, atypical femoral fractures [7]

Side EffectMechanismRisk Factors
GI upset (most common)Direct irritation of oesophageal/gastric mucosa (especially oral forms)Non-compliance with upright posture instructions; pre-existing oesophageal disease
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)Bisphosphonate-related suppression of bone turnover in the mandible/maxilla → avascular necrosis after dental proceduresProlonged use; dental extraction/implant surgery; IV bisphosphonates (higher risk than oral); concomitant corticosteroids, chemotherapy; poor dental hygiene
Atypical femoral fracturesOver-suppression of bone turnover ("frozen bone") → accumulation of microdamage in cortical bone → stress fracture at subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femurProlonged use ( > 5 years); prodromal thigh pain (must ask about this on follow-up)
Flu-like symptoms (acute phase reaction)Activation of γδ T-cells by mevalonate pathway intermediates; occurs mainly with IV bisphosphonates (especially first dose of zoledronate)First infusion
Renal impairmentTubular toxicity with IV high-dose; collapsing FSGS associated with IV high-dose [17]Pre-existing renal impairment; rapid IV infusion
Oesophageal ulceration/strictureDirect chemical injury to oesophageal mucosaOral forms; not staying upright; swallowed with insufficient water
Hypocalcaemia↓ Bone resorption → ↓ calcium release from boneVitamin D deficiency (always replenish first); renal impairment

Drug Holiday for Bisphosphonates

Because of the risk of atypical femoral fractures and ONJ with prolonged use, current guidelines recommend a bisphosphonate "drug holiday" after:

  • 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy
  • 3 years of IV zoledronate therapy

During the holiday (typically 1–3 years), the bisphosphonate stored in bone continues to provide residual antiresorptive effect. Re-assess with DXA and clinical risk factors; restart if BMD declines significantly or a new fracture occurs.

Patients at very high risk (prior vertebral fracture, T-score still very low) may not be good candidates for a drug holiday and should be switched to another agent (e.g., denosumab or an anabolic agent).

Contraindications to oral bisphosphonates:

  • Oesophageal disorders (stricture, achalasia, inability to remain upright)
  • Hypocalcaemia (must correct first)
  • eGFR < 30–35 mL/min
  • Pregnancy/breastfeeding
  • Known hypersensitivity

Contraindications to IV bisphosphonates:

  • eGFR < 35 mL/min [9]
  • Hypocalcaemia (correct first)

Name breakdown: "de" = against, "nos" = ? (brand derivation), "umab" = fully human monoclonal antibody.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANKL. RANKL causes increased formation, function and survival of osteoclasts → inhibiting RANKL leads to less osteoclasts → less bone resorption, calcium levels fall [9]

Mechanism: Denosumab binds to RANKL (Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κB Ligand) and prevents it from binding to RANK on osteoclast precursors. This is essentially a pharmacological mimic of osteoprotegerin (OPG) — the body's natural RANKL decoy receptor.

Dosing: 60 mg subcutaneous injection every 6 months

Advantages over bisphosphonates:

  • Not excreted through kidneys — can be given to CKD patients (this is a major advantage when bisphosphonates are contraindicated due to renal impairment) [9]
  • No GI side effects
  • Simple dosing (twice yearly injection)
  • Consistently superior BMD gains at most sites

Side effects:

  • Hypocalcaemia (must ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation; higher risk in CKD)
  • ONJ and atypical femoral fractures (similar to bisphosphonates, but lower incidence)
  • Infections (slightly increased risk of cellulitis, skin infections — RANKL/RANK pathway has roles in immune function)

Critical issue — Rebound effect on discontinuation:

Anti-resorptive treatment after discontinuation of at least two doses of denosumab (rebound increased bone turnover markers, BMD loss, and increased risk of vertebral fracture following denosumab discontinuation) [16]

This is a key exam point: unlike bisphosphonates (which remain stored in bone for years after stopping), denosumab is a circulating antibody that is cleared within ~6 months. When you stop denosumab:

  • RANKL is suddenly unopposed → massive surge in osteoclastogenesis
  • Rapid BMD loss (can lose all the gains from years of therapy within 12–18 months)
  • Rebound vertebral fractures — multiple vertebral compression fractures can occur
  • Must transition to a bisphosphonate (e.g., zoledronate or alendronate) before or at the time of denosumab discontinuation to prevent rebound

Never Simply Stop Denosumab

If a patient on denosumab needs to discontinue (for any reason), always transition to a bisphosphonate to consolidate the BMD gains and prevent the rebound resorption surge. Failing to do this can result in catastrophic multiple vertebral fractures. This is one of the most commonly examined drug safety points for osteoporosis.

Name breakdown: "ral" = brand prefix, "oxifene" = oestrogen-receptor modulator.

Mechanism: Raloxifene is a SERM that acts as an oestrogen agonist on bone (mimics oestrogen's bone-protective effects → ↓ osteoclast activity) but as an oestrogen antagonist on breast and uterine tissue (anti-oestrogenic → no increased breast or endometrial cancer risk, actually reduces breast cancer risk).

Indications:

  • Postmenopausal osteoporosis in women at moderate fracture risk
  • Particularly useful if the patient also has elevated breast cancer risk (dual benefit)

Efficacy: Reduces vertebral fracture risk by ~30–40%, but no proven reduction in hip fracture — so it is a second-line agent for most patients.

Side effects / Contraindications:

  • Increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) — DVT, PE (oestrogen agonist effect on coagulation)
  • Hot flushes (anti-oestrogenic effect centrally)
  • Leg cramps
  • Contraindicated: active or past VTE, immobilisation, pregnancy

Name breakdown: "teri" = brand, "paratide" = parathyroid peptide.

Mechanism: Teriparatide is a recombinant fragment of PTH (amino acids 1–34). This seems paradoxical — doesn't PTH cause bone resorption? The key is the pattern of exposure:

  • Chronic continuous PTH elevation (as in hyperparathyroidism) → predominantly bone resorption
  • Intermittent pulsatile PTH exposure (as with once-daily injection) → predominantly bone formation

The intermittent pulse of PTH stimulates osteoblasts more than osteoclasts → increased osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and survival → new bone formation (especially trabecular bone). It literally builds new bone, unlike antiresorptives which only slow bone loss.

Dosing: 20 μg subcutaneous injection once daily (self-administered)

Duration: Maximum 2 years — there is a theoretical concern about osteosarcoma based on animal studies (rats given high-dose continuous PTH developed osteosarcoma). This risk has not been confirmed in humans, but the time limit remains.

Anti-resorptive treatment after discontinuation of teriparatide/abaloparatide treatment for osteoporosis [16]

Critical point: After completing the 2-year course, the BMD gains will be lost unless you consolidate with an antiresorptive agent (bisphosphonate or denosumab). This is called the "anabolic-first, then antiresorptive" sequential strategy.

Indications:

  • Very high fracture risk: multiple vertebral fractures, very low T-score ( < −3.0 to −3.5), fracture on existing antiresorptive therapy
  • Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (severe cases)
  • Patients who have failed or cannot tolerate bisphosphonates/denosumab

Contraindications:

  • Open epiphyses (children/adolescents)
  • Pre-existing hypercalcaemia
  • Severe renal impairment (PTH fragments accumulate)
  • Unexplained ↑ ALP
  • Prior radiation therapy to the skeleton
  • Bone metastases or skeletal malignancy
  • Paget's disease
  • Pregnancy/breastfeeding

Side effects:

  • Transient hypercalcaemia
  • Nausea, dizziness, leg cramps
  • Injection site reactions
  • Theoretical osteosarcoma risk (from animal data)

Name breakdown: "romo" = brand, "sozumab" = sclerostin-targeting monoclonal antibody ("so" = sclerostin, "zu" = humanised, "mab" = monoclonal antibody).

Mechanism: Sclerostin is a protein produced by osteocytes that inhibits the Wnt signalling pathway in osteoblasts → suppresses bone formation. Romosozumab binds and neutralises sclerostin → dual effect:

  1. ↑ Bone formation (Wnt pathway disinhibited → osteoblast activation)
  2. ↓ Bone resorption (through downstream effects on RANKL/OPG balance)

This unique dual mechanism produces the most rapid BMD gains of any osteoporosis therapy.

Dosing: 210 mg subcutaneous monthly for 12 months (limited duration)

Key clinical consideration: Must be followed by antiresorptive therapy to consolidate gains.

Contraindications / Cautions:

  • Cardiovascular risk: Clinical trials showed a signal of increased MI and stroke → contraindicated in patients with recent MI/stroke (within 1 year) or high cardiovascular risk
  • Hypocalcaemia (correct first)
  • Hypersensitivity

Side effects:

  • Injection site reactions
  • Arthralgia
  • Headache
  • ONJ and atypical femoral fractures (rare, as with all antiresorptives)
  • Cardiovascular events (the main concern)

Mechanism: Oestrogen directly protects bone by ↓ RANKL, ↑ OPG, ↓ osteoblast apoptosis, ↑ osteoclast apoptosis (as detailed in Part 1).

Current role in osteoporosis: HRT is effective for fracture prevention but is no longer recommended as first-line osteoporosis therapy due to the increased risk of:

  • Breast cancer (with combined oestrogen + progesterone HRT beyond 5 years)
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Stroke
  • Cardiovascular events (in older postmenopausal women starting HRT late)

When to consider: Women with menopausal symptoms (vasomotor, urogenital) who are within 10 years of menopause or under age 60 and who also need osteoporosis prevention. In this window, the benefit–risk ratio is more favourable.

Mechanism: Calcitonin (from salmon = "sal-calcitonin") directly inhibits osteoclast activity by binding to calcitonin receptors on osteoclasts → ↓ resorption. Also has analgesic properties for vertebral fracture pain.

Calcitonin: relatively weak agent but works rapidly within hours. Not first-line; given subcutaneously every 12 hours. Tachyphylaxis is a limitation [9]

Current role: Rarely used for osteoporosis treatment due to weak antiresorptive effect and tachyphylaxis. Main indication now is short-term pain management in acute vertebral compression fractures (nasal spray).

Concerns: Long-term use associated with a possible slight increase in cancer risk → regulatory agencies have restricted its use to short courses.


The traditional approach was to start with antiresorptives. The current paradigm for very high-risk patients favours an "anabolic-first" strategy:

Why anabolic-first? Starting with an anabolic agent builds new bone architecture. If you start with an antiresorptive first and then switch to an anabolic agent later, the anabolic effect is blunted (the osteoclasts are already suppressed, and the coupled formation signal is weakened). The best BMD outcomes are achieved by: build bone first → preserve it with antiresorptive.


DrugClassRoute/FrequencyFracture ReductionKey Side EffectsKey Contraindications
AlendronateBisphosphonateOral weeklyVertebral, hip, non-vertebralGI upset, ONJ, atypical femoral fractureOesophageal disease, eGFR < 30–35
RisedronateBisphosphonateOral weekly/monthlyVertebral, hip, non-vertebralSame as alendronateSame as alendronate
ZoledronateBisphosphonateIV yearlyVertebral, hip, non-vertebralFlu-like reaction, renal toxicity, ONJeGFR < 35
DenosumabAnti-RANKL mAbSC every 6 monthsVertebral, hip, non-vertebralHypocalcaemia, infections, rebound on discontinuationMust not stop without bisphosphonate transition
RaloxifeneSERMOral dailyVertebral onlyVTE, hot flushesActive/past VTE
TeriparatideAnabolic (PTH 1-34)SC daily × 2 years maxVertebral, non-vertebralHypercalcaemia, nauseaPaget's, skeletal malignancy, open epiphyses
RomosozumabAnti-sclerostinSC monthly × 12 monthsVertebral, hip, non-vertebralCV events, ONJRecent MI/stroke, high CV risk
HRTOestrogen ± progesteroneOral/transdermalVertebral, hip, non-vertebralVTE, breast cancer, strokeBreast cancer, VTE, late postmenopause
CalcitoninDirect osteoclast inhibitorSC/nasalVertebral (weak)Tachyphylaxis, nauseaLong-term use (cancer risk)

8. Special Populations

  • Any patient on ≥ 5 mg prednisolone for ≥ 3 months should receive calcium + vitamin D + bisphosphonate from the start
  • Alendronate or risedronate (oral) or zoledronate (IV) are first-line
  • Teriparatide is preferred in severe GIOP (it counteracts the primary mechanism — glucocorticoids mainly suppress osteoblasts, and teriparatide stimulates them)

  • Same pharmacological agents are used (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, teriparatide all have evidence in men)
  • Always check testosterone — hypogonadism is a common and treatable cause
  • Consider testosterone replacement if hypogonadal (but testosterone alone is usually insufficient; combine with osteoporosis-specific therapy)

  • Bisphosphonates contraindicated if eGFR < 30–35 mL/min
  • Denosumab can be used (not renally excreted) [9] — but monitor calcium closely (high risk of hypocalcaemia in CKD)
  • CKD stage 4–5: bone disease is often renal osteodystrophy/CKD-MBD rather than simple osteoporosis → consult nephrology; may need phosphate binders, calcitriol, cinacalcet rather than standard osteoporosis drugs [8]

Bone mineral density should be assessed at time of diagnosis of PBC and at 2-yearly intervals thereafter. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Bisphosphonate therapy if evidence of osteoporosis — alendronate [18]

  • Pioglitazone (thiazolidinedione) — diverts mesenchymal stem cells from osteoblast to adipocyte lineage → ↓ bone formation [19]
  • Canagliflozin (SGLT2i) — may cause low bone mass, increased fracture risk [19]
  • These two drugs share the side effect of increasing fracture risk and should be avoided in patients with osteoporosis [19]

ModalityTimingWhat to Look For
DXA1–2 years after starting therapy (some sources say 6 months is too early [6])Stable or ↑ BMD = treatment success; significant ↓ BMD = non-adherence, wrong diagnosis, or treatment failure
Bone turnover markers (CTX, P1NP)3–6 months after starting antiresorptive↓ CTX by > 25–30% confirms drug is working and patient is adherent (faster feedback than DXA)
Clinical assessmentEvery visitHeight measurement, new pain, new fractures, medication adherence, side effects
Fracture occurrenceOngoingAny new fracture on treatment → reassess; may need to escalate to anabolic agent

High Yield Summary

  1. Indications for pharmacotherapy: Prior fragility fracture (regardless of T-score); T-score ≤ −2.5; osteopenia + FRAX ≥ 20% major / ≥ 3% hip.

  2. ALL patients: Calcium 1000–1200 mg/day + Vitamin D 800 IU/day, weight-bearing exercise, fall prevention, quit smoking/alcohol, treat secondary causes.

  3. First-line: Oral bisphosphonate (alendronate or risedronate). If intolerant → IV zoledronate or denosumab. Very high risk → anabolic-first (teriparatide × 2 years or romosozumab × 12 months → then antiresorptive).

  4. Bisphosphonate side effects: GI upset (most common), ONJ, atypical femoral fractures (prolonged use), renal toxicity (IV). Drug holiday after 5 years oral / 3 years IV.

  5. Denosumab: Anti-RANKL mAb, SC q6months. Can be used in CKD (not renally excreted). NEVER stop without transitioning to bisphosphonate — rebound vertebral fractures.

  6. Teriparatide: Anabolic (intermittent PTH), max 2 years. Must consolidate with antiresorptive afterwards.

  7. Romosozumab: Dual action (anti-sclerostin). Contraindicated in recent MI/stroke.

  8. GIOP: Start bisphosphonate + Ca/VitD from the beginning if ≥ 5 mg prednisolone for ≥ 3 months.

  9. Drugs to avoid in osteoporosis: Pioglitazone, canagliflozin (both increase fracture risk).

  10. Monitor: DXA at 1–2 years; bone turnover markers at 3–6 months for early adherence/response check.


Active Recall - Management of Osteoporosis

References

[1] Lecture slides: GC 031. Back pain in an elderly woman_osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (whom to treat slide, laboratory investigations slide) [2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (indications for therapy, goals of management, non-pharmacological and pharmacological principles) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p. 50, treatment of osteoporosis, non-pharmacological measures, indications, calcium/vitamin D recommendations, bone turnover markers) [6] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p. 109, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy indications, monitoring) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 215, bisphosphonate side effects) [8] Senior notes: Block A - Chronic Kidney Disease and its Complications.pdf (CKD-MBD spectrum, secondary hyperPTH pathogenesis) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (denosumab mechanism, RANKL inhibition, IV bisphosphonate side effects, calcitonin role) [15] Lecture slides: Management of Falls in Older Persons - Moncada LV 2011 (AAFP).pdf (fall prevention, calcium/vitamin D in falls, bisphosphonates for fracture reduction) [16] Lecture slides: GC 079 (supp-2) STOPP-START-V3.pdf (START criteria: vitamin D supplementation, anti-resorptive after denosumab/teriparatide discontinuation) [17] Senior notes: Block A - Drugs and the Kidney.pdf (bisphosphonate pharmacokinetics, tubular toxicity, collapsing FSGS) [18] Lecture slides: Teaching Clinic - Non-viral chronic liver diseases (Prof. Yuen Man Fung) 2.pdf (PBC management — BMD monitoring, bisphosphonate therapy) [19] Senior notes: Block A - Deterioration of eyesight in a diabetic patient_ diabetic complications.pdf (pioglitazone and canagliflozin — avoid in osteoporosis, fracture risk)

Complications of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis itself is a "silent" disease — the complications are what make it devastating. The entire clinical burden of osteoporosis is carried by its fractures and their downstream consequences. You can organise complications into: (A) fracture-related complications (the direct result of weakened bone breaking), (B) chronic deformity-related complications (from accumulated fractures), (C) psychosocial complications, and (D) treatment-related complications (iatrogenic). Let's work through each systematically.


Fractures are the defining complication. The three classic sites — vertebrae, hip, and distal radius [2] — each carry their own unique complication profile.

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, yet the majority (~2/3) are clinically silent or present insidiously. Their complications are cumulative:

ComplicationMechanism (from first principles)
Acute back painFracture of the vertebral body stretches the periosteum (richly innervated) and irritates adjacent nerve roots. Pain can be severe enough to require hospitalisation.
Chronic back painAltered spinal biomechanics from vertebral height loss → abnormal loading of facet joints, paraspinal muscles, and ligaments → chronic pain syndrome. Multiple compression fractures create a self-reinforcing cycle of pain and immobility.
Progressive kyphosis (dowager's hump)Each anterior wedge fracture tips the spine forward by a few degrees. Multiple fractures compound → exaggerated thoracic kyphosis. This changes the entire posture and centre of gravity. [4]
Height lossSequential vertebral body height loss. Can lose > 10–15 cm cumulatively.
Restrictive lung diseaseSevere kyphosis ↓ thoracic cage volume → ↓ total lung capacity and vital capacity → exertional dyspnoea, reduced exercise tolerance, ↑ risk of respiratory infections. Each vertebral fracture reduces FVC by ~9%.
Abdominal compressionExtreme kyphosis causes the lower ribs to impinge on the iliac crests → reduced abdominal cavity volume → early satiety, abdominal discomfort, bloating, constipation.
Spinal cord / cauda equina compressionPosterior retropulsion of a fractured vertebral body fragment into the spinal canal → neurological emergency. Signs: lower limb weakness, saddle anaesthesia, bowel/bladder dysfunction. More common with burst-type fractures than simple wedge fractures. [7]
Fracture cascadeOne vertebral fracture increases the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures by 5-fold ("vertebral fracture begets vertebral fracture"). The altered biomechanics from one fracture concentrate stress on adjacent vertebrae.

The Vertebral Fracture Cascade — High Yield

A single vertebral fracture increases the risk of another vertebral fracture within the next year by approximately 5 times. This is why treatment should be initiated immediately after the first vertebral fracture — delaying even a few months allows the cascade to begin. The concept of an "imminent fracture risk" (highest risk in the first 1–2 years post-fracture) drives the current push for early and aggressive treatment in patients with incident vertebral fractures.

Vertebroplasty — a palliative procedure for patients with collapsed vertebral bodies due to osteoporosis — can be considered for pain relief [20]

Hip fractures are the most serious complication of osteoporosis. They carry enormous mortality and morbidity.

ComplicationMechanismKey Numbers
MortalityImmobilisation → pneumonia, PE, pressure sores, delirium, sepsis. Surgical stress in frail elderly → cardiac events, decompensation.20–30% 1-year mortality — i.e., roughly 1 in 4 elderly patients who sustain a hip fracture will die within a year [2]
Loss of independenceHip fracture → inability to weight-bear → prolonged bed rest → deconditioning → loss of mobility50% of patients never regain pre-fracture mobility; ~25% require long-term institutional care
Venous thromboembolism (DVT/PE)Immobilisation → venous stasis (Virchow's triad) → DVT → potential PE. The elderly are already at elevated thrombotic risk.Without thromboprophylaxis, DVT rate is 40–60% after hip fracture surgery. This is why all hip fracture patients receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (LMWH or DOACs).
PneumoniaImmobility, pain-limited deep breathing, supine positioning → atelectasis → secondary infection. Aspiration risk in confused/delirious patients.Most common cause of death in hip fracture patients
Pressure injuries (decubitus ulcers)Immobility + malnutrition + incontinence → sustained pressure over bony prominences (sacrum, heels, greater trochanter) → tissue ischaemia → necrosisCan develop within 24–48 hours in elderly patients
DeliriumMultifactorial: pain, medication effects (opioids), unfamiliar environment, infection, electrolyte disturbance, pre-existing cognitive vulnerabilityOccurs in 35–65% of elderly hip fracture patients; associated with worse outcomes
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral headSpecific to intracapsular (femoral neck) fractures — the fracture disrupts the retinacular blood supply (medial circumflex femoral artery → lateral epiphyseal artery) to the femoral head → ischaemic necrosisRisk is highest with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden III/IV). This is why displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly are treated with arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty or THA) rather than fixation.
Non-unionIntracapsular fractures have poor blood supply + synovial fluid inhibits clot formation at fracture site → impaired healingMore common with intracapsular than extracapsular fractures
Implant failureOsteoporotic bone provides poor screw purchase → fixation devices may cut out, especially in femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracturesRisk factor for re-operation; augmentation techniques (e.g., cement augmentation) can be considered

Hip Fracture — Complications of Immobility (Mnemonic: 'The DEATHLY Complications')

  • Delirium
  • Embolism (DVT/PE)
  • Atelectasis / pneumonia
  • Thrombus (DVT)
  • Haemorrhage (surgical)
  • Loss of independence
  • Yielding to death (mortality 20–30% at 1 year)

These are complications of immobility from ANY cause in the elderly, but hip fracture is the prototype.

Though less devastating than hip fracture, Colles' fractures have their own complications:

ComplicationMechanism
MalunionHeals in dorsal angulation → cosmetic deformity ("dinner fork"), reduced grip strength, limited wrist ROM
Median nerve injury (acute carpal tunnel syndrome)Swelling at fracture site compresses the median nerve within the carpal tunnel → acute-onset paraesthesia/numbness in thumb, index, and middle fingers
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, formerly "Sudeck's atrophy" / reflex sympathetic dystrophy)Disproportionate pain, swelling, vasomotor changes, trophic changes in the hand/wrist after fracture → pathogenesis not fully understood but involves peripheral and central sensitisation, neurogenic inflammation, and sympathetic dysfunction
Extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon ruptureAttritional rupture 4–8 weeks after fracture due to tendon rubbing over the rough fracture site or ischaemia from disrupted blood supply at Lister's tubercle
StiffnessProlonged immobilisation in cast → adhesions, muscle wasting, joint capsule contracture → loss of wrist and finger ROM

  • Proximal humerus: difficulty with overhead activities; rotator cuff dysfunction; axillary nerve injury
  • Rib fractures: pain with breathing → splinting → atelectasis → pneumonia
  • Pelvic (sacral insufficiency) fractures: severe pain, difficulty with mobility, may mimic cauda equina syndrome or visceral pathology

These are the cumulative consequences of untreated or poorly treated osteoporosis over years:

ComplicationPathophysiology
Progressive spinal deformity (kyphosis + height loss)Multiple vertebral fractures → progressive forward curvature → altered biomechanics → further fractures
Chronic pain syndromeMultifactorial: mechanical pain from deformity, myofascial pain from compensatory muscle use, neuropathic pain from nerve root irritation
Functional limitation and disabilityCannot bend, lift, walk normally → dependent on others for ADLs → loss of independence
Respiratory compromiseKyphosis ↓ lung volumes (see above) → chronic dyspnoea, increased respiratory infection risk
GI compromiseKyphosis ↓ abdominal volume → early satiety, weight loss, constipation
SarcopeniaPain and immobility → disuse muscle atrophy → further weakness → further falls → further fractures (a vicious cycle)

These are profoundly underestimated but significantly affect quality of life:

ComplicationMechanism
Depression and anxietyChronic pain, body image change (kyphosis, height loss), loss of independence, fear of future fractures
Social isolationFear of falling → avoidance of social activities → withdrawal → loneliness
Loss of self-confidence and self-esteemDependence on others, altered appearance, inability to perform previously easy tasks
Fear of falling ("ptophobia")A paradoxical complication: fear leads to activity avoidance → deconditioning → weakness → actually increased fall and fracture risk
Caregiver burdenFamily members must provide care → financial stress, relationship strain, caregiver burnout

These are complications arising from osteoporosis therapy rather than the disease itself. They are frequently tested in exams.

ComplicationMechanismWhen It Occurs
GI upset (most common)Direct chemical irritation of oesophageal/gastric mucosa by oral bisphosphonatesOngoing; related to non-compliance with administration instructions
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)Bisphosphonate-mediated suppression of bone turnover in the highly remodelling mandible/maxilla → exposed bone fails to heal after dental procedures → necrosis, secondary infectionProlonged use (usually > 3–5 years); higher risk with IV than oral; dental extraction/surgery is a trigger; concomitant glucocorticoids [7][9]
Atypical femoral fracturesOver-suppression of bone turnover → "frozen bone" → accumulation of microdamage in cortical bone → stress fracture at subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femurProlonged use ( > 5 years); may present with prodromal thigh pain weeks before complete fracture [7]
Acute phase reaction (flu-like symptoms)IV zoledronate causes γδ T-cell activation via mevalonate pathway intermediates → cytokine release (IL-6, TNF-α) → fever, myalgia, arthralgiaMainly after first IV dose; self-limiting (24–72 hours)
Renal toxicityTubular toxicity or collapsing FSGS with IV high-dose bisphosphonates [17]Risk in patients with pre-existing renal impairment; dose-dependent
Oesophageal ulceration / strictureDirect chemical caustic injury to oesophageal mucosaOral forms; related to non-compliance with upright posture after taking
HypocalcaemiaReduced calcium release from bone (resorption suppressed) in a patient with inadequate calcium/vitamin D storesCan be prevented by ensuring vitamin D and calcium adequacy before starting treatment

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: side effects — GI upset (most common), jaw osteonecrosis, atypical femoral fractures [7]

ComplicationMechanism
Rebound vertebral fractures on discontinuationDenosumab is a circulating antibody cleared within 6 months. Stopping it → unopposed RANKL surge → massive osteoclastogenesis → rapid BMD loss → multiple vertebral fractures. Must transition to bisphosphonate before stopping [16]
Hypocalcaemia↓ Bone resorption → ↓ calcium release; especially dangerous in CKD patients
ONJ and atypical femoral fracturesSame mechanism as bisphosphonates; lower incidence but still reported
InfectionsRANKL/RANK pathway participates in immune cell function; RANKL inhibition may slightly increase infection risk (cellulitis, UTI)

Question 29 from 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ: A 75-year-old woman who had a history of multiple fragility fractures decided to start teriparatide for her osteoporosis. Which of the following is a known side effect of teriparatide? Answer: B. Dizziness [21]

ComplicationMechanism
DizzinessTransient orthostatic hypotension (PTH causes vasodilation) — this is a tested exam point [21]
Transient hypercalcaemiaPTH increases bone resorption (even though net effect is anabolic with intermittent dosing) → mild ↑ Ca²⁺
Nausea, headache, leg crampsPhysiological effects of PTH pulses
Theoretical osteosarcoma riskIn animal studies (rats), high-dose continuous PTH caused osteosarcoma. Not confirmed in humans, but limits treatment duration to 2 years maximum

Past Paper Point — Teriparatide Side Effects

The 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ tested teriparatide side effects. The key side effect to know is dizziness (from orthostatic hypotension). Note that atypical femoral fracture and gastroesophageal reflux are bisphosphonate-related, and hypocalcaemia is more associated with denosumab/bisphosphonates, not teriparatide (teriparatide actually causes transient hyper-calcaemia, not hypo-calcaemia) [21].

ComplicationMechanism
Cardiovascular events (MI, stroke)Sclerostin may have cardiovascular protective roles; inhibiting it may increase CV risk. Clinical trial signal showed higher MI and stroke rates in the romosozumab group.
ONJ, atypical femoral fracturesShared class effect with all anti-remodelling agents
Injection site reactionsLocal immune response

When osteoporosis is secondary to glucocorticoid use (e.g., in GCA, RA, dermatological conditions), the steroid itself creates a cycle of complications:

Increased infections and osteoporosis with steroids. Recommend fracture prevention and GI prophylaxis. [22]

In the context of GCA treatment: corticosteroid side effects to consider include osteoporosis, DM, hepatitis, increased CV risk — hence the need for bisphosphonates or more potent agents for bone protection [10]


Osteoporosis → Fragility Fracture → Immobility → 
├── Deconditioning + Sarcopenia → ↑ Fall risk → ↑ Fracture risk (cycle repeats)
├── DVT/PE → Mortality
├── Pneumonia → Mortality
├── Pressure ulcers → Infection → Sepsis
├── Delirium → ↑ Length of stay, ↑ Mortality
├── Depression / Fear of falling → Activity avoidance → More deconditioning
└── Loss of independence → Institutionalisation → Further decline

This cascade illustrates why prevention of the first fracture is the single most important goal in osteoporosis management. Once the cascade begins, it is difficult to interrupt.


CategoryKey ComplicationsMost Important Numbers
Vertebral fractureChronic pain, kyphosis, height loss, restrictive lung disease, GI compression, fracture cascade, cord compression5× risk of next vertebral fracture after the first
Hip fractureMortality, DVT/PE, pneumonia, delirium, pressure ulcers, AVN, non-union, loss of independence20–30% 1-year mortality; 50% never regain pre-fracture mobility
Distal radius fractureMalunion, carpal tunnel, CRPS, EPL rupture, stiffnessOften the first osteoporotic fracture (age 50–65)
Chronic deformityProgressive kyphosis, chronic pain, respiratory/GI compromise, sarcopeniaCumulative and progressive over years
PsychosocialDepression, social isolation, fear of falling, caregiver burdenOften under-recognised; significantly affects quality of life
Treatment-relatedBisphosphonate: GI upset, ONJ, atypical femoral fracture, renal toxicity. Denosumab: rebound fractures on stopping. Teriparatide: dizziness, hypercalcaemia. Romosozumab: CV events.ONJ and atypical fractures are time-dependent (prolonged use)

High Yield Summary

  1. Fractures are the only complication of osteoporosis — everything else is a downstream consequence of fractures or their treatment.

  2. Hip fracture is the most serious: 20–30% 1-year mortality; 50% never regain pre-fracture mobility; complications include DVT/PE, pneumonia, delirium, pressure ulcers, AVN.

  3. Vertebral fractures are the most common, often silent; complications include kyphosis, height loss, chronic pain, restrictive lung disease, and the fracture cascade (5× risk of next vertebral fracture).

  4. Immobility complications (from any fracture): DVT/PE, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, delirium, deconditioning → vicious cycle.

  5. Treatment complications (high yield for exams):

    • Bisphosphonates: GI upset (MC), ONJ (prolonged use), atypical femoral fractures (prolonged use), renal toxicity (IV)
    • Denosumab: rebound vertebral fractures on discontinuation (must transition to bisphosphonate)
    • Teriparatide: dizziness (past paper point), transient hypercalcaemia
    • Romosozumab: cardiovascular events (contraindicated in recent MI/stroke)
  6. Psychosocial: depression, fear of falling (paradoxically increases fall risk), social isolation, loss of independence.

  7. The vicious cycle: fracture → immobility → deconditioning → sarcopenia → more falls → more fractures.


Active Recall - Complications of Osteoporosis

References

[2] Senior notes: Block A - Back pain in an elderly woman_ osteoporosis and related fractures.pdf (fracture sites, clinical presentation, learning objectives) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p. 49, clinical effects of osteoporosis — kyphosis, tenderness, fall assessment) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p. 214–215, fracture complications, bisphosphonate side effects, compartment syndrome, pathological fracture) [9] Senior notes: Block A - Confused and dehydrated_ hypercalcaemia; hypocalcaemia.pdf (bisphosphonate IV side effects — flu-like, renal impairment, ONJ, atypical fractures; denosumab mechanism) [10] Senior notes: Block A - Rheumatology Interactive Tutorial.pdf (GCA management — steroid complications including osteoporosis; bisphosphonates for bone protection) [16] Lecture slides: GC 079 (supp-2) STOPP-START-V3.pdf (anti-resorptive after denosumab discontinuation — rebound risk) [17] Senior notes: Block A - Drugs and the Kidney.pdf (bisphosphonate renal toxicity — tubular toxicity, collapsing FSGS) [20] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p. 89, vertebroplasty for collapsed vertebral bodies due to osteoporosis) [21] Past papers: 2023 Fourth Summative MCQ.pdf (Q29, teriparatide side effect = dizziness) [22] Lecture slides: Derm General Clerkship 2026 Part2.pdf (p. 9, immunosuppression risk — increased infections and osteoporosis with steroids, recommend fracture prevention)

High Yield Summary

  1. Definition: Osteoporosis = low bone mass + microarchitectural deterioration → increased fragility → fractures. Operationally defined as T-score ≤ −2.5 by DXA.

  2. Epidemiology: Most common metabolic bone disease. 1 in 3 postmenopausal women; 1 in 5 men > 50. Major burden in Hong Kong's ageing population.

  3. Bone biology: Trabecular bone (20% mass, 80% turnover) affected first. RANK/RANKL/OPG axis is the master regulator of osteoclastogenesis. Oestrogen protects bone via ↓RANKL, ↑OPG, ↑osteoclast apoptosis, and ↓osteoblast apoptosis.

  4. Risk factors: Female, ageing, low weight ( < 45 kg), family history, premature menopause, low calcium, sedentary, smoking, alcohol > 3 drinks/day, no sun exposure, immobilisation. Drugs: glucocorticoids (#1), PPI, anticonvulsants, TZDs. Fall risk: hypnotics, diuretics.

  5. Secondary causes: Endocrine (Cushing's, hyperthyroidism, hyperPTH), GI malabsorption, CKD, myeloma, RA, drugs.

  6. Clinical features: Silent until fracture. Three classic fracture sites: vertebrae (most common, often silent), distal radius (earliest), hip (most serious, 20–30% 1-year mortality). Signs: kyphosis, height loss, picture-framing and codfish sign on X-ray.

  7. T-score: Normal ≥ −1; Osteopenia −1 to −2.5; Osteoporosis ≤ −2.5; Severe = ≤ −2.5 + fragility fracture. Z-score used in premenopausal women/men < 50.

  8. FRAX: 10-year fracture probability. For postmenopausal women and men ≥ 50 only.

  9. Vertebral fracture above T5 → suspect malignancy, not osteoporosis.

High Yield Summary

  1. Three layers of DDx: (a) Is this osteoporosis or another metabolic bone disease? (b) Is this fracture osteoporotic or from another cause? (c) Is the osteoporosis primary or secondary?

  2. Three mimics you must not miss: Osteomalacia (↑ ALP, ↓ 25-OH-D), multiple myeloma (↑ ESR, M-band on SPEP, pure lytic lesions), metastatic bone disease (fracture above T5, constitutional symptoms).

  3. Osteoporosis vs osteomalacia: ALP is normal in osteoporosis, elevated in osteomalacia. Osteoporosis = quantity problem (less bone, normally mineralised); osteomalacia = quality problem (plenty of osteoid, poorly mineralised).

  4. Myeloma bone scan pitfall: Myeloma produces purely lytic lesions → bone scan (which relies on osteoblastic uptake) may be falsely negative. Use skeletal survey or low-dose whole-body CT instead.

  5. Vertebral fracture above T5 → think malignancy, not osteoporosis.

  6. Z-score ≤ −2.0 in premenopausal women or men < 50 → investigate for secondary causes.

  7. Screening battery for secondary osteoporosis: CBC, LRFT, Ca/PO₄/ALP, 25(OH)D, PTH, TFT, ESR, SPEP, ± testosterone (men), ± coeliac serology, ± cortisol.

  8. Red flags in back pain: night pain, constitutional symptoms, neurological deficit, fracture above T5, saddle anaesthesia, bladder/bowel dysfunction.

High Yield Summary

  1. Two ways to diagnose osteoporosis: (a) T-score ≤ −2.5 on DXA; (b) fragility fracture in a postmenopausal woman or elderly patient (clinical definition).

  2. DXA is the only means for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis (WHO). Central DXA at hip and spine — use the lowest T-score for diagnosis.

  3. T-score for postmenopausal women / men ≥ 50; Z-score for premenopausal women / men < 50 / children. Z-score ≤ −2.0 → suspect secondary cause.

  4. FRAX estimates 10-year fracture risk; used for treatment decisions in osteopenia. Applies only to postmenopausal women / men ≥ 50, untreated.

  5. ALP is NORMAL in osteoporosis — elevated ALP → think osteomalacia, Paget's, or blastic metastases.

  6. Laboratory panel (GC slide): CBC, LRFT, Ca/PO₄/PTH, ALP, 25(OH)D, TSH ± fT4, testosterone (men), fasting glucose/HbA1c, 24hr urine Ca. Selected: SPEP (myeloma), cortisol (Cushing's), anti-tTG (coeliac), bone turnover markers.

  7. 1 SD ↓ BMD = 2× ↑ hip fracture risk.

  8. Bone turnover markers (CTX, P1NP) are for monitoring treatment response (faster than DXA), not diagnosis.

  9. Severe/established osteoporosis = T-score ≤ −2.5 PLUS ≥ 1 fragility fracture.

High Yield Summary

  1. Indications for pharmacotherapy: Prior fragility fracture (regardless of T-score); T-score ≤ −2.5; osteopenia + FRAX ≥ 20% major / ≥ 3% hip.

  2. ALL patients: Calcium 1000–1200 mg/day + Vitamin D 800 IU/day, weight-bearing exercise, fall prevention, quit smoking/alcohol, treat secondary causes.

  3. First-line: Oral bisphosphonate (alendronate or risedronate). If intolerant → IV zoledronate or denosumab. Very high risk → anabolic-first (teriparatide × 2 years or romosozumab × 12 months → then antiresorptive).

  4. Bisphosphonate side effects: GI upset (most common), ONJ, atypical femoral fractures (prolonged use), renal toxicity (IV). Drug holiday after 5 years oral / 3 years IV.

  5. Denosumab: Anti-RANKL mAb, SC q6months. Can be used in CKD (not renally excreted). NEVER stop without transitioning to bisphosphonate — rebound vertebral fractures.

  6. Teriparatide: Anabolic (intermittent PTH), max 2 years. Must consolidate with antiresorptive afterwards.

  7. Romosozumab: Dual action (anti-sclerostin). Contraindicated in recent MI/stroke.

  8. GIOP: Start bisphosphonate + Ca/VitD from the beginning if ≥ 5 mg prednisolone for ≥ 3 months.

  9. Drugs to avoid in osteoporosis: Pioglitazone, canagliflozin (both increase fracture risk).

  10. Monitor: DXA at 1–2 years; bone turnover markers at 3–6 months for early adherence/response check.

High Yield Summary

  1. Fractures are the only complication of osteoporosis — everything else is a downstream consequence of fractures or their treatment.

  2. Hip fracture is the most serious: 20–30% 1-year mortality; 50% never regain pre-fracture mobility; complications include DVT/PE, pneumonia, delirium, pressure ulcers, AVN.

  3. Vertebral fractures are the most common, often silent; complications include kyphosis, height loss, chronic pain, restrictive lung disease, and the fracture cascade (5× risk of next vertebral fracture).

  4. Immobility complications (from any fracture): DVT/PE, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, delirium, deconditioning → vicious cycle.

  5. Treatment complications (high yield for exams):

    • Bisphosphonates: GI upset (MC), ONJ (prolonged use), atypical femoral fractures (prolonged use), renal toxicity (IV)
    • Denosumab: rebound vertebral fractures on discontinuation (must transition to bisphosphonate)
    • Teriparatide: dizziness (past paper point), transient hypercalcaemia
    • Romosozumab: cardiovascular events (contraindicated in recent MI/stroke)
  6. Psychosocial: depression, fear of falling (paradoxically increases fall risk), social isolation, loss of independence.

  7. The vicious cycle: fracture → immobility → deconditioning → sarcopenia → more falls → more fractures.

On this page

No Headings