Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is a malignant neoplasm arising from the glandular epithelial cells of the prostate, most commonly adenocarcinoma, typically affecting older men and often characterized by slow growth and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.

Exam domainOne-glance essentials
Definition / diagnosis
  • Malignant epithelial neoplasm of the prostate; >95% are adenocarcinoma [1]
  • Usually arises in the peripheral zone, so early disease is often asymptomatic [1]
Epidemiology / risks
  • Increasing age is the strongest risk factor; disease is rare before 40 [1]
  • Higher risk with Black ethnicity, family history, BRCA2/BRCA1, ATM, CHEK2 or Lynch syndrome [1]
  • Obesity and smoking are associated with worse-risk disease; exercise may reduce risk [1]
Core mechanism
  • Androgen-dependent growth is mediated chiefly by intraprostatic DHT and the androgen receptor [1]
  • Spread is direct to bladder or seminal vesicles, lymphatic to pelvic/para-aortic nodes, and haematogenous via Batson plexus [1]
  • Bone metastases classically involve vertebrae, pelvis and ribs and are osteoblastic [1]
Clinical picture
  • Early cancer is commonly asymptomatic; LUTS are typically late because the peripheral zone is distant from the urethra [1]
  • DRE may show a hard irregular nodule, asymmetric induration or loss of the median sulcus [1]
  • Advanced disease may present with axial bone pain, pathological fracture, obstructive uropathy or cord compression [1]
Investigations
  • PSA is organ-specific but not tumour-specific; PSA 4–10 ng/mL is a grey zone, while PSA ≥10 ng/mL carries roughly 50% cancer risk [1]
  • Abnormal DRE warrants biopsy regardless of PSA; mpMRI is useful for localisation, local staging and targeted biopsy [1]
  • Definitive diagnosis requires image-guided biopsy; report Gleason score/ISUP Grade Group and stage [1]
Management
  • Low-risk disease with life expectancy >10 years: active surveillance with PSA, DRE, MRI and repeat biopsy [1]
  • Frail or older patients with limited life expectancy: watchful waiting, with ADT for symptomatic or clinically significant progression [1]
  • Fit patients with localised disease may undergo radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy; metastatic disease requires ADT-based systemic therapy [1]
Complications
  • Local progression can cause bladder outlet obstruction, acute retention, haematuria, ureteric obstruction and renal failure [1]
  • Vertebral metastasis can cause spinal cord compression: treat as an oncological emergency with urgent steroids, whole-spine MRI and decompression/RT as indicated [1]
  • Radical treatment risks erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence; ADT causes vasomotor, sexual, bone and metabolic toxicity [1]
Prevention / follow-up
  • Use shared decision-making for risk-adapted PSA assessment rather than indiscriminate testing [1]
  • Consider earlier assessment in men with strong family history or hereditary risk, particularly BRCA-associated risk [1]
  • During active surveillance, maintain scheduled PSA, DRE, MRI and biopsy follow-up; treat on objective progression [1]
Exam traps
  • PSA is not cancer-specific: BPH, prostatitis/UTI, retention, ejaculation, cycling and instrumentation can raise it [1]
  • Do not mistake BPH-type LUTS for early cancer, or a normal PSA for exclusion of cancer [1]
  • Gleason 3+4 and 4+3 are not equivalent; the predominant pattern changes grade and prognosis [1]
  • Low-grade PIN needs no repeat biopsy, whereas high-grade PIN carries a 13–27% cancer risk and warrants re-biopsy [1]

References

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer section)

Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a malignant neoplasm arising from the epithelial cells of the prostate gland. > 95% of prostate cancers are adenocarcinoma [1][2]. The name itself is straightforward: "prostate" = the walnut-shaped gland below the bladder; "carcinoma" = cancer of epithelial origin; "adeno-" = glandular. So adenocarcinoma of the prostate = a cancer arising from the glandular epithelial cells of the prostate.

It is a disease of enormous clinical importance because it is extremely common, often indolent (slow-growing), yet can be lethal when advanced. The central clinical challenge is distinguishing clinically significant cancers that need treatment from indolent ones that can be safely observed — this is the core tension in prostate cancer management.

Key Concept

Prostate cancer overwhelmingly arises in the peripheral zone of the prostate. This has two critical clinical implications: (1) it is palpable on DRE (the peripheral zone is posteriorly located, abutting the rectum), and (2) it does not cause early obstructive urinary symptoms (unlike BPH, which arises in the transitional zone surrounding the urethra). Therefore, prostate cancer often presents late or is found incidentally.


2. Epidemiology

  • Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in men globally [3].
  • There is enormous geographic variation: highest incidence in North America, Northern/Western Europe, Australia, and Caribbean (particularly Afro-Caribbean populations); lowest in Asia.
  • This variation is partly genetic (ethnicity) and partly environmental/dietary (westernised diet, screening practices).

This is what matters for your exams:

  • Prostate cancer is the 3rd most common cancer among males in Hong Kong [2][3].
  • Lifetime risk: approximately 1 in 26–30 [2][4].
  • Annual incidence: ~2,300 new cases per year [2].
  • Incidence rate: 56.6 per 100,000 males; mortality rate: 12.1 per 100,000 males (4.9% of male cancer deaths, ranking 5th) [4].
  • Used to be rare in HK but now has increasing incidence, probably due to ageing population, westernised lifestyle, and increased health awareness with increased screening PSA tests [4].
  • 40–50% are diagnosed at stage I–II in HK (this proportion is higher in the West due to more widespread screening) [4].
  • 1/3 of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease [2].

  • More common in advanced age; one of the strongest relationships between age and any human malignancy [4].
  • Rare before age 40 [4].
  • Incidence rises steeply after age 50 and peaks in men aged 70–80.
  • Autopsy studies show occult (clinically insignificant) prostate cancer in ~30% of men aged 50 and ~70% of men aged 80 — this underlines the concept that many men die with prostate cancer, not of it.

High Yield: In HK, prostate cancer is the 3rd most common male cancer with rising incidence. The key drivers are ageing, westernisation, and increased PSA testing.


3. Anatomy and Function of the Prostate

Understanding prostate anatomy is essential for understanding why BPH and prostate cancer behave differently, why DRE can detect prostate cancer, and how cancer spreads.

The prostate is a walnut-sized exocrine gland (~20g in young adults) located:

  • Inferior to the urinary bladder
  • Anterior to the rectum (hence palpable on DRE)
  • Surrounding the prostatic urethra (the first segment of the urethra after the bladder neck)
  • Superior to the external urethral sphincter and pelvic floor

The ejaculatory ducts (formed by the union of the vas deferens and seminal vesicle duct) pass through the prostate to open at the verumontanum (seminal colliculus) on the posterior wall of the prostatic urethra.

This is the modern anatomical classification and is critical for exams:

Zone% of Glandular TissueClinical Significance
Peripheral zone65%Common site of prostate cancer (70–80% arise here) and prostatitis [1][4][5]
Transitional zone10%Common site of BPH (median lobe enlargement) [1][5]
Central zone25%Surrounds ejaculatory ducts; ~8% of cancers arise here [4]
Anterior fibromuscular stromaNon-glandularContains no prostatic glands: anterior cancers arise from adjacent glandular zones and may extend into this stroma; anterior lesions can be undersampled by conventional transrectal biopsy
Periurethral zoneSmallSurrounds prostatic urethra; site of periurethral BPH nodules

Why does prostate cancer present late?

Because 70–80% of cancers arise in the peripheral zone, which is located posteriorly and away from the urethra. The cancer can grow substantially before it compresses the urethra enough to cause obstructive symptoms. In contrast, BPH arises in the transitional zone which directly surrounds the urethra, so even small amounts of hyperplasia can cause significant obstruction. This is why BPH causes early LUTS but prostate cancer often does not.

The prostate gland produces prostatic fluid, which constitutes about 20–30% of seminal fluid. Key components include:

  • Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA): a serine protease whose function is to liquefy the semen coagulum after ejaculation, facilitating sperm motility [2]. PSA is organ-specific but NOT cancer-specific — this is crucial for understanding PSA's limitations as a tumour marker.
  • Citric acid, zinc, fibrinolysin, acid phosphatase
  • Prostatic secretions are slightly acidic (pH ~6.5)

  • The prostate is an androgen-dependent organ.
  • Testosterone (from the testes, and a small amount from the adrenals) is converted to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) within the prostate by the enzyme 5α-reductase [1].
  • DHT is the primary intraprostatic androgen and is ~5× more potent than testosterone at binding the androgen receptor (AR).
  • Both prostatic epithelial cells and stromal cells express androgen receptors and depend on DHT for growth and survival [1].
  • This androgen dependence is the basis for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer — remove the androgen signal, and prostate cancer cells undergo apoptosis (at least initially).

High Yield: The prostate depends on DHT (converted from testosterone by 5α-reductase). This is the basis for ADT in prostate cancer AND 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride/dutasteride) in BPH.

  • Arterial supply: Branches of the internal iliac artery (inferior vesical artery)
  • Venous drainage: The prostatic venous plexus (of Santorini) drains into the internal iliac veins and, critically, communicates with the vertebral venous plexus (Batson's plexus) [1][2].
    • Batson's plexus is a valveless venous system that runs along the vertebral column. Because it lacks valves, blood can flow in either direction depending on intra-abdominal pressure. This provides a direct route for haematogenous spread of prostate cancer to the vertebral bodies and axial skeleton — explaining the classic pattern of osteoblastic bone metastases in the spine, pelvis, and ribs.
  • Lymphatic drainage: Obturator and internal iliac nodes → external iliac → common iliac → para-aortic nodes

Batson's Plexus — Why Prostate Cancer Loves Bone

The prostatic venous plexus communicates with the valveless vertebral venous plexus (Batson's plexus). When intra-abdominal pressure increases (e.g., straining, coughing), venous blood is shunted retrograde into the vertebral venous system, carrying tumour cells with it. This is why prostate cancer preferentially metastasises to the axial skeleton (vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, skull) rather than the appendicular skeleton.


4. Etiology and Risk Factors

4.1 Non-Modifiable Risk Factors

  • One of the strongest relationships between age and any human malignancy [4].
  • Aging is the MOST important risk factor [1].
  • Rare before age 40 [4].
  • The mechanism: with ageing, there is cumulative exposure to androgens, accumulation of somatic mutations, epigenetic changes, chronic inflammation, and telomere shortening in prostatic epithelial cells.

  • Blacks > Caucasians > Asians [4].
  • African-American men have the highest incidence and mortality worldwide — they develop cancer earlier, present with higher-grade disease, and have worse outcomes even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. This is thought to reflect both genetic susceptibility and differences in androgen metabolism.
  • Asian men (including Hong Kong Chinese) historically have lower rates, but this gap is narrowing with westernisation [4].

  • 2× risk if 1 first-degree relative affected; 4.5× risk if 2 first-degree relatives affected [4].
  • Risk is higher if the affected relative was diagnosed at a young age.
  • 5–10% of prostate cancers are hereditary [4].

  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations [1][4]:
    • BRCA2 is a stronger risk factor for prostate cancer than BRCA1 [1].
    • BRCA2 carriers have ~3–8× increased risk and tend to develop more aggressive, higher-grade disease.
    • These are tumour suppressor genes involved in homologous recombination DNA repair. When both alleles are lost (germline mutation + somatic "second hit"), DNA damage accumulates → malignant transformation.
    • BRCA mutations also confer sensitivity to PARP inhibitors (e.g., olaparib) — a therapeutic target in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
  • Other heritable mutations: ATM, CHEK2, Lynch syndrome (HNPCC = hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) [4].
  • TMPRSS2-ETS fusion gene: present in ~50% of prostate cancers [2]. TMPRSS2 is an androgen-regulated gene; when fused with ETS family transcription factors (e.g., ERG), it drives androgen-dependent overexpression of oncogenic transcription factors.

4.2 Modifiable/Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors

  • Growth of prostate cancer is stimulated by androgens [4].
  • The role of 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) is debated — they reduce overall prostate cancer incidence but there was concern about increasing high-grade cancer detection (likely a detection bias rather than a true increase) [4].

  • Obesity: small increased risk [4] — likely through altered hormonal milieu (higher oestrogen from aromatisation, insulin resistance, IGF-1 signalling).
  • Regular physical exercise decreases risk [4].

  • Evidence is generally weak [4].
  • Potentially protective: selenium, lycopene (tomatoes), vitamin E, green tea, possibly coffee [4].
  • Potentially harmful: dietary fat (linked to obesity), isoflavonoids (soybean products — note: this is debated) [4].
  • High animal fat intake may increase risk; high vegetable intake may be protective [1].

  • Smoking is listed as a risk factor [1][2] — associated with higher-grade disease and worse prognosis rather than significantly increased incidence.

  • Chronic prostatitis/inflammation: may contribute to carcinogenesis through oxidative stress and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) → prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) → carcinoma sequence.

Risk Factors Summary Mnemonic: 'AGE BRCA FAT'

  • Age (most important)
  • Genetics (BRCA2 > BRCA1, TMPRSS2-ETS, ATM, CHEK2, Lynch)
  • Ethnicity (Black > White > Asian)
  • BRCA2 (aggressive disease, PARP inhibitor target)
  • Relatives (FHx — number and age of affected first-degree relatives)
  • Cancer history (Lynch syndrome association)
  • Androgens (hormonal stimulation)
  • Fat (dietary fat, obesity)
  • Activity (lack of exercise)
  • Tobacco (smoking — worse prognosis)

5. Pathophysiology

The current model of prostate carcinogenesis involves a stepwise progression:

  1. Normal epithelium → chronic inflammation and oxidative stress
  2. Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy (PIA) → a regenerative lesion in response to chronic injury; increased cell proliferation with incomplete differentiation
  3. Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) → the recognised pre-malignant lesion
    • High-grade PIN (PIN 2/3): architecturally benign prostatic acini and ducts lined by atypical cells [4]
    • Focal HGPIN alone does not require repeat biopsy; reassess persistent PSA/DRE/MRI concern
    • Low-grade PIN (PIN 1): NO clinical significance, does NOT require repeat biopsy [4]
  4. Invasive adenocarcinoma → localised → locally advanced → metastatic

Other pre-malignant/atypical findings:

  • Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia [4]
  • Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate [4] — this is actually a marker of aggressive disease and is often found alongside high-grade invasive cancer.

  • Prostate cancer cells initially depend on androgen receptor (AR) signalling for survival and proliferation → this is androgen-sensitive (castration-sensitive) disease.
  • Testosterone → DHT (by 5α-reductase) → DHT binds AR → AR translocates to nucleus → activates transcription of genes promoting proliferation (e.g., PSA gene, TMPRSS2).
  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) works by removing this signal → cancer cells undergo apoptosis.
  • However, over time (months to years), cancer cells develop mechanisms to bypass androgen dependence:
    • AR gene amplification or mutation (can be activated by low androgen levels or even anti-androgens)
    • Intracrine androgen synthesis (tumour cells produce their own androgens)
    • AR splice variants (e.g., AR-V7) that are constitutively active without ligand binding
    • Activation of alternative signalling pathways (PI3K/AKT, Wnt, glucocorticoid receptor)
  • This leads to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which is the lethal form of the disease.

AlterationFrequencySignificance
TMPRSS2-ERG fusion~50%Androgen-driven oncogene expression [2]
PTEN loss~40%Loss of tumour suppressor → PI3K/AKT activation
TP53 mutation~20% (higher in CRPC)Loss of cell cycle checkpoint
RB1 loss~10–20% in CRPCNeuroendocrine differentiation
BRCA2/ATM/DNA repair defects~20–25% of mCRPCSensitivity to PARP inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy
AR amplification/mutationCommon in CRPCDrives castration resistance
SPOP mutation~10%Mutually exclusive with TMPRSS2-ERG; distinct molecular subtype

This is critical for understanding staging and clinical presentation:

ModeRouteCommon Sites
Direct extensionLocal invasionBladder, seminal vesicles [1]; rectum (rare due to Denonvilliers' fascia)
Lymphatic spreadRegional lymphaticsObturator nodes → internal iliac → external iliac → common iliac → pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes [1]
Haematogenous spreadProstatic venous plexus → vertebral venous plexus (Batson's plexus)Bone (most common: vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, long bones), liver, lung, adrenal [1][2]

Why are prostate cancer bone metastases osteoBLASTIC?

Most bone metastases from solid tumours are osteolytic (e.g., breast, lung, kidney). Prostate cancer is a classic exception — it typically produces osteoblastic (sclerotic) metastases. The mechanism: prostate cancer cells secrete factors such as endothelin-1, BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins), and Wnt ligands that stimulate osteoblast activity and new (but disorganised) bone formation. This results in dense, sclerotic lesions on imaging. PSA itself may also play a role by cleaving parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), reducing osteoclast activation. Note that in practice, there is often a mixed osteoblastic-osteolytic pattern, but the osteoblastic component predominates.


6. Classification

  • Adenocarcinoma (95%) [1][4] — the overwhelmingly dominant type
  • Other histological variants [4]:
    • Ductal adenocarcinoma
    • Mucinous adenocarcinoma
    • Signet ring cell carcinoma
    • Small cell carcinoma (neuroendocrine) — highly aggressive, may not produce PSA, treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
    • Sarcomatoid carcinoma
    • Squamous cell carcinoma (very rare)
    • Transitional cell carcinoma (extension from bladder)

6.2 Gleason Grading System

This is one of the most important concepts in prostate cancer and is extremely high yield.

  • Commonly used system for classifying histologic characteristics of prostate cancer [1].
  • Developed by Donald Gleason in the 1960s–70s, based entirely on architectural pattern (how glands are arranged), NOT nuclear features.
  • The pathologist identifies the primary (most prevalent) pattern and the secondary (second most prevalent) pattern, each graded 1–5.
  • Gleason score = primary pattern + secondary pattern (range: 2–10) [1].
  • Gleason 8–10 is considered high-grade [1].

PatternDescriptionDifferentiation
1Small, uniform glands, closely packedWell differentiated
2More stroma between glands; still fairly uniformModerately differentiated
3Distinctly infiltrative margins; variable gland sizeModerate
4Irregular masses of neoplastic glands; fused/cribriform glandsPoorly differentiated
5Only occasional gland formation; sheets/cords of cells, comedonecrosisPoorly differentiated / Anaplastic

In modern practice (2014 ISUP modified Gleason), patterns 1 and 2 are essentially never assigned on needle biopsy — the minimum Gleason score on biopsy is 3+3 = 6.

The ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) introduced Grade Groups to simplify Gleason scoring and better stratify prognosis:

Grade GroupGleason ScoreGleason PatternPrognosis
1≤ 6≤ 3+3Excellent (most indolent)
273+4Good (predominantly well-formed glands with some fused)
374+3Intermediate (predominantly poorly formed/fused glands)
484+4, 3+5, 5+3Poor
59–104+5, 5+4, 5+5Very poor (most aggressive)

[2][4]

Why does Gleason 3+4 ≠ 4+3?

Students often assume Gleason 7 is Gleason 7. This is wrong. A Gleason 3+4 = 7 (Grade Group 2) has a significantly better prognosis than Gleason 4+3 = 7 (Grade Group 3). The primary (dominant) pattern matters more — if the majority of the tumour is pattern 4 (poorly formed/fused glands), the biology is more aggressive. This distinction changes management: 3+4 may be suitable for active surveillance in select cases, while 4+3 generally warrants definitive treatment.

6.3 TNM Staging (AJCC 8th Edition, 2017)

StageDescription
T1Clinically inapparent (not palpable, not visible on imaging)
T1aIncidental finding in ≤ 5% of resected tissue (e.g., TURP specimen)
T1bIncidental finding in > 5% of resected tissue
T1cIdentified by needle biopsy (e.g., due to elevated PSA)
T2Organ-confined, palpable
T2aInvolves ≤ half of one lobe
T2bInvolves > half of one lobe
T2cInvolves both lobes
T3Extracapsular extension
T3aExtracapsular extension (unilateral or bilateral) or microscopic bladder neck invasion
T3bInvasion of seminal vesicle(s)
T4Fixed or invades adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles (e.g., external sphincter, rectum, levator muscles, pelvic wall)

StageDescription
N0No regional lymph node metastasis
N1Regional lymph node metastasis (obturator, internal/external iliac, presacral)

StageDescription
M0No distant metastasis
M1aNon-regional lymph node metastasis (e.g., para-aortic, inguinal)
M1bBone metastasis
M1cOther sites (lung, liver, adrenal, brain) with or without bone disease

Localised prostate cancer is stratified into risk groups to guide management:

Risk GroupCriteria (any of the following)
LowT1–T2a AND Gleason ≤ 6 (Grade Group 1) AND PSA < 10
IntermediateT2b–T2c OR Gleason 7 (Grade Group 2–3) OR PSA 10–20
HighT3a OR Gleason 8–10 (Grade Group 4–5) OR PSA > 20
Very HighT3b–T4, primary Gleason pattern 5, > 4 cores with Gleason 8–10, or ≥ 2 high-risk features

7. Clinical Features

As discussed above, 70–80% of cancers arise in the peripheral zone, away from the urethra. The cancer can grow silently for years without compressing the urethra. Many prostate cancers are discovered incidentally through PSA testing or DRE screening before any symptoms develop. When symptoms do occur, they often indicate locally advanced or metastatic disease.

7.2 Symptoms

  • Incidental findings: abnormal DRE, elevated PSA [2]
  • Increasingly, prostate cancer is detected before symptoms develop because of routine or opportunistic PSA testing.

Obstructive LUTS are late findings because cancer arises in the peripheral zone [2].

LUTS occur when the cancer grows large enough to compress the urethra or invade the bladder neck/trigone:

Voiding (Obstructive) Symptoms:

  • Hesitancy (difficulty initiating micturition) — the enlarged prostate compresses the prostatic urethra, increasing urethral resistance
  • Weak stream / decreased force — same mechanism
  • Intermittency (stop-start stream) — detrusor struggles against obstruction
  • Straining to void
  • Terminal dribbling
  • Incomplete emptying
  • Urinary retention (acute or chronic) — complete obstruction

Storage (Irritative) Symptoms:

  • Frequency and urgency — secondary detrusor overactivity from chronic obstruction, or direct tumour invasion of the bladder wall/trigone irritating detrusor muscle
  • Nocturia — same mechanism
  • Urge incontinence

Note: These symptoms are indistinguishable from BPH on history alone. You cannot differentiate BPH from prostate cancer based on LUTS pattern — that's why DRE and PSA are essential.

  • Haematuria / haemospermia [2] — cancer eroding into the prostatic urethra or ejaculatory ducts, disrupting blood vessels.
  • Haemospermia (blood in the semen) is usually benign, but new-onset haemospermia in an older man should raise suspicion for prostate cancer.

  • New-onset erectile dysfunction [2] — may indicate local invasion of the neurovascular bundles (of Walsh) that run posterolateral to the prostate and are responsible for cavernous nerve-mediated erection.

  • Perineal/pelvic pain — perineural invasion (prostate cancer has a particular tropism for perineural invasion) or direct extension into pelvic floor muscles
  • Rectal symptoms (tenesmus, rectal bleeding — rare because Denonvilliers' fascia acts as a barrier between the prostate and rectum)
  • Ureteric obstruction → hydronephrosis → flank pain, renal impairment — from local extension into the trigone/ureteric orifices or bulky pelvic lymphadenopathy compressing ureters
  • Lower limb oedema — bulky pelvic lymphadenopathy compressing iliac veins or lymphatics

Metastatic sites: bone (vertebra via Batson's venous plexus), liver, adrenal [2]

  • Bone pain (most common symptom of metastatic prostate cancer):
    • Persistent, dull, deep ache, often in the lower back, pelvis, hips
    • Worse at night (unlike mechanical back pain)
    • Pathophysiology: osteoblastic metastases stimulate periosteal nerve stretching and local inflammation
  • Pathological fractures — weakened bone (despite being osteoblastic, the new bone is structurally disorganised and weak)
  • Spinal cord compression (oncological emergency):
    • Back pain → progressive lower limb weakness → sensory level → urinary retention/incontinence
    • From vertebral body collapse or epidural tumour extension compressing the spinal cord
  • Bone marrow failure (pancytopenia) — extensive marrow infiltration by metastatic disease (leukoerythroblastic blood film)
  • Constitutional symptoms: weight loss, fatigue, anorexia — cytokine-mediated cancer cachexia
  • Hypercalcaemia — less common in prostate cancer than in other bone-metastasising cancers because osteoblastic lesions tend to sequester calcium rather than release it (in fact, prostate cancer patients may even be hypocalcaemic from avid bone uptake)

7.3 Signs

DRE is the single most important physical examination for prostate cancer.

DRE findings in prostate cancer (only 25% of cancers are palpable) [2]:

  • Asymmetrically enlarged prostate
  • Hard, irregular nodule (in contrast to BPH, which is smooth, firm, and rubbery with a symmetrically enlarged gland)
  • Loss of the midline sulcus (the normal median groove between the two lobes is obliterated by tumour)
  • Fixed (cannot be moved — suggests extracapsular extension)
  • Surface may be nodular or craggy

Why only 25% palpable? Because:

  1. Many cancers are small (T1c — detected by PSA, not palpable)
  2. Anterior tumours (20–30%) are beyond the reach of the examining finger
  3. DRE can only assess the posterior and lateral aspects of the prostate

DRE Pearl

A normal DRE does NOT exclude prostate cancer. Up to 75% of prostate cancers are impalpable at diagnosis. Conversely, an abnormal DRE warrants further investigation regardless of the PSA level — approximately 25% of men with prostate cancer have a PSA in the "normal" range ( < 4 ng/mL).

  • Palpable bladder — if urinary retention has developed from obstruction
  • Lower limb lymphoedema — bulky pelvic lymphadenopathy
  • Bony tenderness — metastatic bone disease (percussion tenderness over spine)
  • Neurological signs — if spinal cord compression (upper motor neuron signs below the level of compression: hyperreflexia, upgoing plantars, sensory level, urinary retention)
  • Cachexia — advanced/metastatic disease
  • Pallor — anaemia from bone marrow infiltration or chronic disease

8. PSA — Prostate-Specific Antigen (Detailed Discussion)

PSA is so central to prostate cancer that it deserves its own section.

  • PSA is a serine protease (kallikrein-3) produced by prostatic epithelial cells.
  • Function: to liquefy the semen coagulum after ejaculation [2].
  • It is organ-specific (produced only by prostatic tissue) but NOT tumour-specific [2] — it is elevated in many non-malignant conditions.

  • Arbitrary cutoff: PSA < 4 ng/mL [2] is traditionally considered "normal."
  • Higher PSA levels = greater chance of prostate cancer AND higher risk of advanced disease [2].
  • The upper normal limit should be age-related [2]:
AgeSuggested Upper Limit of PSA
40–492.5 ng/mL
50–593.5 ng/mL
60–694.5 ng/mL
70–796.5 ng/mL

Factors that INCREASE PSA [2]:

  • Prostate cancer
  • BPH
  • Acute urinary retention (AROU)
  • UTI / prostatitis
  • Vigorous cycling
  • Recent ejaculation ( < 48 hours)
  • DRE (modest transient rise — debated whether clinically significant)
  • Prostate biopsy, TURP (significant rise)

Factors that DECREASE PSA [2]:

  • Castration (surgical or medical)
  • 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) — approximately halve PSA levels; must double the measured PSA for true estimate
  • Prostate radiotherapy

Because PSA alone has limited specificity (especially in the "grey zone" of 4–10 ng/mL, where only ~25% of men actually have cancer), several PSA derivatives have been developed:

DerivativeConcept
Free-to-Total PSA ratioCancer cells produce more complexed (bound) PSA; low free/total ratio ( < 25%) suggests cancer
PSA densityPSA ÷ prostate volume (on TRUS/MRI); > 0.15 suggests cancer (BPH produces PSA proportional to gland size, cancer produces disproportionately more)
PSA velocityRate of PSA rise over time; > 0.75 ng/mL/year is suspicious
Prostate Health Index (PHI)Combines total PSA, free PSA, and [-2]proPSA (p2PSA, a cancer-specific PSA isoform); PHI > 35 → proceed to prostate biopsy [2]

Benefits of PSA screening [3]:

  • May reduce prostate cancer mortality (ERSPC trial showed 20% relative reduction in prostate cancer mortality at 16 years in the screened group)

Harms of PSA screening [3]:

  • False positives leading to anxiety and unnecessary biopsies
  • Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent cancers (many low-grade cancers detected by screening would never have caused symptoms or death)
  • Complications from biopsy and treatment (incontinence, erectile dysfunction)

Screening is a shared decision for asymptomatic men, separate from investigating symptoms or an abnormal examination. Hong Kong CEWG finds insufficient evidence to recommend for or against population-based PSA/DRE screening and advises informed individual discussion. CEWG summary.

EAU offers risk-adapted early detection to informed men with life expectancy of at least 15 years: consider PSA from age 50 at average risk, 45 with family history or African ancestry, and 40 for BRCA2 carriers. Follow-up depends on baseline PSA and risk. These are EAU thresholds, not an HK population programme. EAU diagnostic evaluation.

High Yield: PSA is organ-specific but NOT tumour-specific. The "grey zone" is PSA 4–10 ng/mL. Use PHI, free/total PSA ratio, MRI, and clinical context to decide on biopsy. Screening is controversial — shared decision-making is key.


Indications for prostate biopsy [2]:

  • Elevated PSA > 10 ng/mL
  • Abnormal DRE
  • PHI > 35
  • Early prostate cancer on active surveillance (for re-staging)
  • Abnormal MRI prostate (PI-RADS 4–5)

Approach [2]:

  • Transrectal (with TRUS or MRI guidance)
  • Transperineal (with TPUS or MRI guidance) — increasingly preferred due to lower infection risk
  • "Fusion biopsy": combines pre-biopsy MRI images with real-time ultrasound for targeted biopsies of suspicious lesions [2]

Preparation: Check MSU 1 week prior; treat UTI if positive [2]

Technique: Take 12–18 random systematic biopsies (sampling all zones) plus targeted biopsies of MRI-suspicious lesions [2]

Complications [2]:

  • Bleeding: haematuria, PR bleeding, haemospermia
  • Infection: < 0.5% for transperineal; ~5% for transrectal (antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone required for transrectal approach)
  • Acute urinary retention (1–2%): from pain and swelling of the prostate

High Yield Summary

Definition: Adenocarcinoma (95%) arising predominantly from the peripheral zone of the prostate.

Epidemiology (HK): 3rd most common male cancer; rising incidence; lifetime risk ~1/26–30; 1/3 present with locally advanced/metastatic disease.

Risk Factors: Age (most important) > ethnicity (Black > White > Asian) > family history (2× if 1 FDR, 4.5× if 2 FDR) > genetics (BRCA2, TMPRSS2-ERG, ATM, Lynch) > androgens > obesity/diet > smoking.

Anatomy: Peripheral zone (65%, cancer), Transitional zone (10%, BPH), Central zone (25%), Anterior fibromuscular stroma. Cancer in peripheral zone → late symptoms, palpable on DRE.

Spread: Direct (bladder, seminal vesicles) → Lymphatic (pelvic → para-aortic LN) → Haematogenous (Batson's plexus → axial skeleton: osteoblastic bone mets).

Gleason/Grade Groups: Gleason score = primary + secondary pattern (1–5). Grade Groups 1–5 (ISUP 2014). Gleason 3+4 ≠ 4+3 (different grade groups, different prognosis!).

Clinical Features: Often asymptomatic early. LUTS are late (peripheral zone origin). DRE: hard, irregular, nodule, loss of midline sulcus (only 25% palpable). Metastatic: bone pain (axial skeleton), cord compression, pathological fractures.

PSA: Organ-specific, NOT tumour-specific. Cutoff 4 ng/mL (age-adjusted). Grey zone 4–10 → PHI, free/total ratio, MRI. Factors ↑PSA: cancer, BPH, UTI, AROU, ejaculation, cycling. Factors ↓PSA: castration, 5ARI, RT.

Screening: Shared decision-making; HK CEWG does not recommend a universal programme. EAU considers PSA from 50 at average risk, 45 for family history/African ancestry and 40 for BRCA2, with life expectancy ≥15 years.


Active Recall - Prostate Cancer (Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Classification, Clinical Features)

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer section) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.5 Urological neoplasm — Prostate cancer) [3] Lecture slides: GC 183. Common urological malignancies and their presentations - Nov 7.pdf (p35 — Benefits and Harms of PSA Screening, EAU 2025 guidelines) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p180 — Section 8.4.2 Carcinoma of the Prostate) [5] Lecture slides: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.pdf (p3 — McNeal's zonal anatomy; p5 — Etiology and risk factors; p6 — Pathophysiology)

Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Before diving into the list, let's think about this from first principles. A patient doesn't walk into clinic saying "I have prostate cancer." They present with one (or more) of the following clinical scenarios, and our job is to figure out whether prostate cancer is the cause:

  1. An elevated PSA (incidental or screening)
  2. An abnormal DRE finding (hard nodule, asymmetry, loss of midline sulcus)
  3. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) — voiding and/or storage symptoms
  4. Haematuria or haemospermia
  5. Bone pain or pathological fractures (metastatic presentation)
  6. Obstructive uropathy / renal failure

Each scenario has a different differential diagnosis. The art is knowing which diagnoses to consider for each presentation and how to distinguish them. Let's work through this systematically.



Differential Diagnosis by Clinical Scenario

PSA is organ-specific but NOT tumour-specific [1][2]. This means anything that affects the prostate — benign or malignant — can raise PSA. The differential for an elevated PSA is essentially: "What is happening to the prostate?"

ConditionWhy PSA is ElevatedDistinguishing Features
Prostate cancerMalignant epithelial cells produce PSA; disrupted glandular architecture allows more PSA to leak into the bloodstreamOften asymptomatic; abnormal DRE (hard, irregular nodule); PSA typically > 10 ng/mL carries ~50% cancer risk [1]; low free/total PSA ratio; PHI > 35 [2]
BPHIncreased prostatic tissue mass → more PSA production proportional to gland volumeSmooth, symmetrically enlarged, firm prostate on DRE with intact median groove [6]; predominantly voiding LUTS; PSA density < 0.15 (PSA appropriate for gland size)
UTI / Acute prostatitisInflammation and infection cause release of intracellular PSA into the bloodstream through disrupted epithelial barriersFever, dysuria, frequency, perineal pain; irritative symptoms with dysuria, associated with pyuria and significant bacteriuria on urine culture [6]; tender, boggy prostate on DRE (do NOT massage vigorously — risk of bacteraemia)
Acute urinary retention (AROU)Bladder overdistension causes back-pressure on the prostate; prostatic congestion releases PSAHistory of sudden inability to void; palpable distended bladder; Do NOT take PSA during AROU → can cause false elevation (defer PSA 4–6 weeks) [7]
Recent ejaculation ( < 48h)Ejaculation causes prostatic secretion release and transient PSA leakAsk about recent sexual activity before interpreting PSA [2]
Vigorous cyclingPerineal pressure on the prostate causes microtrauma and PSA releaseHistory of cycling before blood draw [2]
DRE / Prostate biopsy / TURPPhysical manipulation disrupts prostatic tissue, releasing PSAIatrogenic — history of recent procedure [2]
5α-reductase inhibitorsThese decrease PSA (roughly halve it) — must double the measured value for accurate interpretationDrug history (finasteride, dutasteride) [2]

Critical Clinical Point

A common exam mistake is to see a PSA of 6 ng/mL and immediately jump to "prostate cancer." Remember: PSA 4–10 ng/mL is the "grey zone" — only about 20–25% of men in this range actually have cancer [1]. You must consider BPH, prostatitis, AROU, and other causes. Use PHI, free/total PSA ratio, MRI, and clinical context to decide whether to biopsy. Conversely, ~15% of men with PSA < 4 ng/mL DO have prostate cancer — PSA alone cannot rule it out.


DRE is performed to assess prostate size, symmetry, consistency, surface, tenderness, and median groove [4][6]. An abnormality on DRE narrows the differential:

FindingConditionExplanation
Hard, irregular nodule; asymmetric induration; loss of midline sulcus; fixed to pelvic wallProstate cancerCancer creates a hard, irregular mass due to desmoplastic reaction and dense cellular proliferation in the peripheral zone [2][4]
Smooth, symmetrically enlarged ( > 3 finger breadths), firm, intact median groove, no nodulesBPHBenign hyperplasia of the transitional zone produces diffuse, symmetric enlargement with preserved architecture [6]
Tender, boggy, warm prostateAcute prostatitisInflammation and oedema make the gland soft/boggy and exquisitely tender; be gentle — vigorous examination risks bacteraemia
Firm, irregular, non-tenderGranulomatous prostatitisCan mimic cancer on DRE; caused by BCG therapy (intravesical), TB, sarcoidosis, or post-TURP granulomas; PSA may be elevated
Hard, gritty feelProstatic calculiCalcified corpora amylacea within the gland; usually incidental and asymptomatic; detected on imaging
Asymmetrically enlarged irregular prostate with loss of median sulcus → consistent with CA prostate; symmetrical enlargement and firmness → consistent with BPHComparisonThis distinction is the classic DRE teaching point [1]

High Yield: An abnormal DRE is an indication for prostate biopsy regardless of PSA level [2]. Approximately 25% of men with prostate cancer detected by abnormal DRE have PSA < 4 ng/mL.


Bladder outlet obstruction typically presents with predominantly voiding symptoms; overactive bladder typically presents with predominantly storage symptoms [1].

This is the most common clinical scenario — an older man presenting with LUTS. The differential is broad:

ConditionType of LUTSKey Distinguishing FeaturesPathophysiology
BPHPredominantly voiding (hesitancy, weak stream, intermittency, incomplete emptying)Most common cause; smooth enlarged prostate on DRE; IPSS symptom score; uroflowmetry Qmax < 15 mL/s [6]Transitional zone hyperplasia → mechanical compression of prostatic urethra + dynamic smooth muscle tone (α1-mediated)
Prostate cancerObstructive LUTS are late findings [2]Often asymptomatic; hard irregular nodule on DRE; elevated PSA; cancer arises in peripheral zone so LUTS occur only when tumour is largeLarge peripheral zone cancer compresses the urethra; or cancer invades bladder neck/trigone
Urethral strictureVoiding symptoms; very weak/spraying streamHistory of prior instrumentation, trauma, or STDs [6]; younger men more common; retrograde urethrogram for diagnosisFibrotic narrowing of the urethra reduces luminal diameter
Bladder neck contractureVoiding symptomsUsually from prior urological surgery or RT for CA prostate [6]; history of TURP, radical prostatectomy, or pelvic radiationPost-surgical/post-radiation scarring at the bladder neck
UTI / Acute prostatitisUsually irritative symptoms with dysuria [6]Fever; pyuria; positive urine culture; tender prostate on DRE in prostatitisInfection causes mucosal inflammation → detrusor irritation → storage symptoms
Overactive bladder (OAB)Predominantly storage (frequency, urgency, urge incontinence)Exclude infection/stone/tumour first [2]; frequency-volume chart shows frequent voiding of small volumes; normal prostate on DRE; good flow rate on uroflowmetry [2]; diagnosis of exclusionDetrusor overactivity — involuntary detrusor contractions during bladder filling
Bladder cancerIrritative symptoms (in situ) → obstructive symptoms (tumour obstructing ureteric orifice/bladder neck) [8]Painless gross haematuria is the hallmark [8]; risk factors: smoking, occupational chemical exposure; diagnosed by cystoscopy ± biopsyTumour mass within the bladder irritates detrusor (CIS) or mechanically obstructs outflow
Neurogenic bladderVariable (detrusor overactivity → storage; detrusor underactivity → voiding)Underlying neurological conditions, e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury [6]; abnormal neurological examination; urodynamics diagnosticDisruption of neural pathways controlling the detrusor-sphincter coordination
Chronic constipationVoiding symptoms (extrinsic compression)History of constipation; faecal loading on abdominal examination/X-rayLoaded rectum physically compresses the prostatic urethra
DrugsVariableDrug history: codeine, beta-blockers, anticholinergics, TCAs [6] causing urinary retention; or diuretics causing frequencyPharmacological effects on detrusor or sphincter function

The LUTS DDx Approach

When an older man presents with LUTS, think systematically: (1) Is this obstructive/voiding? → BPH, stricture, cancer, bladder neck contracture, drugs, constipation. (2) Is this storage/irritative? → OAB, UTI, bladder cancer, neurogenic. (3) Is there an overlap? → Many conditions cause mixed symptoms; secondary detrusor changes from chronic obstruction can cause storage symptoms on top of voiding symptoms. Always check DRE + PSA + urinalysis as a minimum in any man with LUTS.


Painless gross haematuria in age > 35 = malignancy until proven otherwise [9].

The differential depends on whether the haematuria is glomerular or non-glomerular, and where in the urinary tract it originates:

ConditionFeaturesDistinguishing Clues
Bladder cancerPainless gross haematuria throughout the stream [8]; irritative LUTS; constitutional symptomsMost important diagnosis to exclude; risk factors: smoking, chemical exposure; flexible cystoscopy is gold standard [8]
Prostate cancerHaematuria / haemospermia ( < 1%) — uncommon, can also be due to BPH [4]Usually with elevated PSA and abnormal DRE; terminal haematuria (from prostatic urethra)
BPHHaematuria can occur from BPH [4] — diagnosis by exclusion after malignancy excludedSmooth enlarged prostate; diagnosis of exclusion [9]
UTI / ProstatitisDysuria, frequency, fever; positive urine culturePyuria, bacteriuria on urinalysis
UrolithiasisUnilateral flank colic radiating to groin [9]; often with microscopic haematuriaCT KUB diagnostic; irritative symptoms if bladder stone
Renal cell carcinomaClassic triad: flank pain, painless haematuria, palpable flank mass (rare) [9]Constitutional symptoms; paraneoplastic syndromes (polycythaemia, hypercalcaemia)
Upper tract urothelial carcinomaSimilar to bladder cancer but originating in renal pelvis/ureterCT urogram with delayed phase shows filling defect

For haemospermia specifically: most cases are benign and self-limiting (idiopathic, post-ejaculatory trauma, seminal vesiculitis). However, new-onset haemospermia in a man > 40 warrants investigation for prostate cancer, seminal vesicle pathology, or infection.


When a patient presents with back pain, bone pain, or a pathological fracture, the differential for the underlying malignancy includes:

ConditionType of Bone LesionKey Features
Prostate cancerOsteoblastic (sclerotic)Elderly male; elevated PSA; axial skeleton predominance (Batson's plexus); often multifocal
Breast cancerMixed (osteoblastic + osteolytic)Female; known breast cancer history; can also be osteoblastic
Lung cancerOsteolyticSmoking history; CXR/CT chest abnormality; weight loss
Renal cell carcinomaOsteolytic (highly vascular)Haematuria; flank mass; hypervascular mets on imaging
Multiple myelomaOsteolytic (punched-out lesions); NO blastic responseBone pain, anaemia, renal failure, hypercalcaemia (CRAB) [10]; protein electrophoresis shows M-spike
LymphomaVariableLymphadenopathy; B symptoms; variable imaging appearance
Thyroid cancer (follicular)OsteolyticThyroid mass; thyroglobulin elevated

Osteoblastic vs Osteolytic — A Quick Rule

The classic osteoblastic bone metastases: Prostate and Breast (can be either). Remember "Prostate = Productive (blastic)" and "Lung, Kidney, Thyroid, Myeloma = Lytic (destructive)." Prostate cancer bone metastases are osteoblastic because cancer cells secrete endothelin-1 and BMPs that stimulate osteoblasts.


Prostate cancer can cause obstructive uropathy and renal failure due to ureteric/trigone invasion [4]. The differential for post-renal AKI in a male includes [11]:

ConditionMechanism
BPHBladder outlet obstruction → chronic retention → bilateral hydronephrosis
CA prostateLocal invasion of trigone/ureteric orifices, or bulky pelvic lymphadenopathy compressing ureters [11]
Bladder neck tumour / CA bladderTumour obstructing ureteric orifices or bladder outlet [11]
Urinary stonesBilateral ureteric obstruction (or unilateral in a single kidney)
Retroperitoneal fibrosisRare; idiopathic or drug-related (methysergide, ergotamine); encases ureters
Neurogenic bladderDetrusor failure → chronic retention → bilateral hydronephrosis

This is one of the most commonly tested comparisons:

FeatureBPHProstate CancerAcute Prostatitis
Age> 50 (50% have LUTS at 50)> 50 (rare < 40)Any age (often younger)
ZoneTransitional (periurethral)PeripheralPeripheral / diffuse
SymptomsEarly voiding LUTSLate LUTS / asymptomatic / metastaticIrritative LUTS + dysuria + systemic symptoms
DRESmooth, symmetric, firm, intact median groove [6]Hard, irregular, asymmetric, nodule, loss of median sulcus, fixed [2]Tender, boggy, warm, swollen
PSAMildly elevated (proportional to gland size); PSA density < 0.15Disproportionately elevated; low free/total ratioElevated (inflammation-driven); do NOT biopsy acutely
RelationshipDoes NOT predispose to prostate cancer [1]Independent diseaseCan coexist; must exclude cancer after infection treated
BiopsyNot needed (clinical + uroflowmetry diagnosis)Needed for definitive diagnosisContraindicated acutely (risk of sepsis); consider after treatment

BPH Does NOT Cause Prostate Cancer

A very common student misconception. BPH does NOT predispose to prostate cancer [1]. They arise in different zones (transitional vs peripheral) and have different pathogeneses (stromal-epithelial growth factor-mediated hyperplasia vs malignant transformation from somatic mutations). They can and often do coexist in the same patient (both are common in elderly men), but one does not lead to the other. An elevated PSA in BPH is due to the increased mass of benign tissue, not malignant transformation.


Imagine: 72-year-old man, PSA = 7.5 ng/mL, normal DRE, no LUTS.

How do you think through the differential?

  1. PSA is in the grey zone (4–10 ng/mL) → only ~20–25% chance of cancer [1]
  2. Normal DRE → rules out palpable peripheral zone cancer (but does NOT exclude cancer)
  3. The elevated PSA could be from: BPH (most likely given age), subclinical prostatitis, recent activity (ejaculation, cycling), or early prostate cancer
  4. Next steps: repeat PSA in a few weeks [4]; check PHI (if PSA 4–10 + normal DRE → PHI; if PHI > 35 → prostate biopsy [2]); consider mpMRI prostate (PI-RADS scoring); ask about confounders (ejaculation, cycling, UTI)
  5. The challenge of CA prostate is not to diagnose a case but to correctly risk-stratify them [4] — distinguishing those needing treatment from those who can be safely observed

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

By presentation:

  • Elevated PSA: BPH (most common cause), prostatitis/UTI, AROU, recent ejaculation/cycling, prostate cancer. PSA is organ-specific but NOT tumour-specific.
  • Abnormal DRE: BPH (smooth, symmetric, firm) vs prostate cancer (hard, irregular, nodule, loss of sulcus) vs prostatitis (tender, boggy) vs granulomatous prostatitis (mimics cancer).
  • LUTS: BPH (#1 cause in elderly men), OAB, UTI/prostatitis, urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture, neurogenic bladder, bladder cancer, drugs, constipation. Prostate cancer causes LUTS late.
  • Haematuria: Bladder cancer (#1 to exclude), RCC, BPH, UTI, stones. Painless gross haematuria > 35yo = malignancy until proven otherwise.
  • Bone pain: Prostate cancer (osteoblastic), lung/breast/renal cancer (usually osteolytic), myeloma (punched-out lytic), lymphoma.
  • Obstructive uropathy: BPH, prostate cancer (trigone/ureteric invasion), bladder cancer, stones, retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Key distinction: BPH vs Prostate Cancer — different zones (transitional vs peripheral), different DRE findings, different PSA profiles. BPH does NOT predispose to cancer. They commonly coexist.


Active Recall - Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

References

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer section; BPH section) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.5 Urological neoplasm — Prostate cancer; Overactive bladder; Bladder cancer) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p180–182 — Section 8.4.2 Carcinoma of the Prostate: clinical features, evaluation, biopsy) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p173 — BPH diagnosis and differential diagnosis) [7] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p352 — Urinary retention workup: do NOT take PSA in AROU) [8] Senior notes: maxim.md (Bladder cancer — clinical features, investigations) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p340, p342 — Haematuria differential diagnosis and clinical approach) [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Chemical Path.pdf (p23 — Hypercalcaemia in malignancy, multiple myeloma CRAB) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p25 — Post-renal AKI causes including BPH, CA prostate, bladder neck tumour)

Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Criteria, Algorithm & Investigations

Faculty pathology checkpoint: Basic pathological assessment of prostate specimens requires specimen type and tumour extent, Gleason score/Grade Group, pattern 4/5 and adverse cribriform/intraductal morphology, and—in prostatectomy—extraprostatic extension, seminal-vesicle invasion, margins and nodes. Modern needle-biopsy grading uses the predominant pattern plus the highest additional pattern; it is not always simply the two most common patterns.

Before we get into the nuts and bolts, understand the fundamental principle that governs prostate cancer diagnosis. Unlike most cancers where you find it and treat it, prostate cancer has a unique diagnostic challenge:

The challenge of CA prostate is not to diagnose a case but to correctly risk-stratify them such that those requiring treatment can be offered timely treatment and those who do not can have their treatment deferred to decrease complications [4].

This is because prostate cancer spans a vast biological spectrum — from indolent, clinically insignificant tumours (which many men will die with, not of) to highly aggressive, lethal disease. The entire diagnostic pathway is designed to answer two questions: (1) Is there cancer? and (2) If so, how dangerous is it?


Diagnostic Criteria

There is no single "diagnostic criterion" for prostate cancer the way there is for, say, diabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 7.0). Instead, diagnosis follows a stepwise pathway from clinical suspicion to tissue confirmation:

Clinical suspicion arises from:

  • Elevated PSA (the most common trigger in the modern era)
  • Abnormal DRE (hard, irregular nodule; loss of midline sulcus; asymmetric induration) [2][4]
  • Symptoms suggestive of locally advanced or metastatic disease (bone pain, haematuria, obstructive uropathy)
  • Incidental finding on TURP specimen or imaging

Repeat a moderately raised PSA after excluding transient causes when clinically appropriate. Assess DRE, family history, PSA density and whether finding cancer would change care. Obtain prostate MRI before biopsy for suspected organ-confined disease; a PSA above 10 alone does not bypass that pathway. Clear locally advanced disease or a patient unsuitable for curative treatment may justify a limited biopsy without MRI.

A negative MRI reduces risk but does not exclude significant cancer. EAU permits PSA monitoring with PI-RADS 1–2 only when clinical suspicion is low (including PSA density < 0.20 ng/mL/cc and no family history). With PI-RADS 3, its biopsy-omission threshold is stricter: very low clinical suspicion, density < 0.10 and no family history. Otherwise consider biopsy. EAU diagnostic evaluation.

Definitive diagnosis is established by an image-guided needle biopsy [1]. Tissue confirmation is normally required; exceptionally, an unequivocal advanced presentation and prohibitive biopsy risk may lead to an MDT decision to treat without biopsy. The biopsy provides:

  1. Histological confirmation of adenocarcinoma
  2. Gleason grading (architectural pattern → Grade Group 1–5)
  3. Extent of disease (number of positive cores, percentage of core involvement, presence of perineural invasion)

Once cancer is confirmed, staging investigations are performed based on risk stratification to determine T, N, M status and guide management.

The Diagnostic 'Triad' of Prostate Cancer

The three pillars that determine diagnosis AND risk stratification are:

  1. PSA level (biochemical)
  2. DRE findings (clinical T stage)
  3. Gleason score / ISUP Grade Group (histological — from biopsy)

All three are needed together. No single element is sufficient alone.


The pathway separates cancer detection from staging:


Investigation Modalities — Detailed Breakdown

We will organise investigations into three phases: (A) Initial workup (suspicion and confirmation), (B) Tissue diagnosis (biopsy), and (C) Staging investigations (extent of disease).


A. Initial Workup Investigations

TestPurposeKey Findings & Interpretation
PSA (total)Trigger for further investigation; correlates with cancer risk and stagePSA < 4 ng/mL = traditionally "normal" [1]; PSA 4–10 = grey zone, ~20–25% chance of cancer [1]; PSA ≥ 10 = ~50% chance of cancer [1]. Higher PSA = greater chance of cancer AND higher risk of advanced disease [2]
CBC with differentialsAssess for anaemia (bone marrow infiltration, chronic disease) and infectionAnaemia → metastatic bone marrow infiltration; leukocytosis → UTI/prostatitis (confounder for elevated PSA) [1]
RFTAssess renal functionElevated creatinine → obstructive uropathy from bladder outlet obstruction or ureteric invasion [1][6]
LFT (including ALP)Serum ALP level to evaluate for bone metastasis [1]Elevated ALP (bone isoenzyme) → osteoblastic bone metastases; also elevated in Paget's disease, osteomalacia
Serum Ca²⁺Evaluate for bone metastasis [1]Hypercalcaemia less common in prostate cancer than other bone-metastasising cancers (osteoblastic lesions sequester calcium); if present, consider concurrent PTHrP or other cause [10]
UrinalysisEvaluate for haematuria; exclude UTIHaematuria → further urological workup; pyuria/bacteriuria → UTI causing elevated PSA [1]

These are strategies to improve PSA accuracy when the total PSA is in the equivocal range, where the pre-test probability of cancer is only ~20–25%:

TestPrincipleThresholdInterpretation
PSA densityPSA ÷ estimated prostate volume (on TRUS/MRI) [4]> 0.15 ng/mL/cc suggestive of CA prostate [4]A large BPH prostate will produce PSA proportional to its volume; cancer produces disproportionately more PSA for the same volume
PSA velocityRise in PSA level per year (requires 3 serial readings over ≥ 12–24 months) [1][4]> 0.75 ng/mL/year suggestive of CA prostate [1][4]Cancer causes PSA to rise more rapidly than benign conditions. However, velocity has limited standalone value
% Free PSA (free/total ratio)CA prostate gives increased bound PSA relative to free PSA [4]↓ free/total ratio suggests cancer [4]; fPSA < 10% → 56% cancer probability; fPSA > 25% → 8% cancer probability [1]Cancer cells release more complexed (α1-antichymotrypsin-bound) PSA; free PSA is higher in BPH
Prostate Health Index (PHI)Index derived from [-2]proPSA + % free PSA + total PSA [4]PHI > 35 → proceed to prostate biopsy [2][-2]proPSA is a cancer-specific isoform; ↑ [-2]proPSA + ↓ % fPSA in CA prostate [4]. Used at QMH [4]
PSA doubling time (PSADT)Rate at which PSA doubles≤ 3 years considered pathological [4]Important in monitoring after treatment (post-prostatectomy or post-RT biochemical recurrence)
PCA3 testGene-based urine test for PCA3/PSA mRNA ratio [4]No universal cutoffPCA3 is highly overexpressed (66×) in almost ALL CA prostate but not in benign disease [4]; role in screening/diagnosis still being explored

Free/Total PSA Ratio — Understanding from First Principles

PSA exists in the blood in two forms: free PSA (unbound) and complexed PSA (bound to protease inhibitors like α1-antichymotrypsin). In BPH, the glandular architecture is preserved, so PSA is released normally → higher proportion of free PSA. In cancer, the disrupted architecture and altered cellular processing lead to more complexed PSA being released → lower free/total ratio. So a low free/total ratio ( < 25%) favours cancer, while a high ratio ( > 25%) favours benign disease.

DRE: insensitive (cannot detect small cancers and cancers in other areas) and non-specific (30% PPV only) [4]

FindingInterpretation
Asymmetric indurationSuggestive of cancer [4]
Frank hard irregular nodule fixed to pelvic wallHighly suggestive of cancer, possibly locally advanced (T3–T4) [4]
Obliteration of median grooveCancer has grown across both lobes [4]
Normal: smooth, firm, symmetric, intact median grooveConsistent with BPH or normal prostate [6]

DRE can theoretically obtain T staging [4]: T1 (impalpable), T2 (palpable, confined), T3 (extracapsular — firm extension beyond gland), T4 (fixed to pelvic wall/invading adjacent structures).

Limitations [1]:

  • Stage T1 cancers are by definition non-palpable
  • Only detects tumours in the posterior and lateral aspects of the prostate
  • Cannot detect anterior zone tumours (20–30% of cancers)
  • Traditional cutoff for PSA ≥ 4 with DRE: Sensitivity = 59%, Specificity = 94%, PPV = 5–30% [1]

B. Tissue Diagnosis — Prostate Biopsy

Prostate biopsy indications: only when it changes the plan of management or oncological outcome [4]:

IndicationRationale
DRE abnormality suggestive of CA prostateHard nodule, asymmetric induration → high suspicion [4][3]
Elevated PSA if it would affect treatment decision (life expectancy > 10 years)Only biopsy if the result will change management [4][1]
Clinically metastatic disease if diagnosis is doubtfulTo confirm histology for treatment planning [4]
Abnormal MRI prostate (PI-RADS 4–5) [2]Elevated PSA with suspicious lesion on MRI [3]
PHI > 35 [2]In grey zone PSA with normal DRE

Non-indications for biopsy [4]:

  • No clinically obvious disease (e.g., asymptomatic + marginal PSA increase)
  • Does not prolong survival (e.g., short life expectancy < 10 years)
  • Clinically metastatic disease + diagnosis obvious — e.g., hard nodule on DRE + sky-high PSA + bone lesions on imaging → can skip biopsy and proceed directly with staging/treatment [4]
ApproachDescriptionAdvantagesDisadvantages
Transrectal (TRUS-guided)Needle passes through rectal wall into prostateTraditional; widely availableHigher infectious risk because the needle traverses rectal flora; anterior sampling can be more difficult. Use locally appropriate infection-prevention measures
Transperineal (TPUS/MRI-guided)Needle passes through perineal skin into prostateGood anterior/apical access and lower infectious risk; local anaesthesia is feasible. Antibiotic policy follows local protocolSlightly more painful; may need GA/sedation
MRI-TRUS fusion biopsyCombines pre-biopsy MRI images with real-time ultrasound [2]Targeted biopsies of MRI-suspicious lesions + systematic biopsies; better detection of clinically significant cancerRequires pre-biopsy MRI; operator-dependent; available in specialised centres [4]
  • Check MSU 1 week prior to procedure; treat UTI if positive [2]
  • 12-core systematic biopsy with labelling from different areas of the prostate [2][4] — this samples all zones systematically
  • Plus targeted biopsies of any MRI-suspicious lesion (PI-RADS 3–5)
  • Labelling cores by location is important because it guides resection margin planning in subsequent prostatectomy [4]
FindingSignificanceAction
Benign prostatic tissueNo cancerReassure; continue PSA monitoring
Low-grade PIN (PIN 1)NO clinical significance [4]Does NOT require repeat biopsy [4]
High-grade PINA precursor lesion, not invasive cancerFocal HGPIN alone does not require immediate repeat biopsy; persistent PSA/DRE/MRI concern determines reassessment
Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP)Suspicious glands insufficient for a definitive cancer diagnosisFurther risk assessment, MRI and consideration of repeat targeted/systematic sampling
AdenocarcinomaCancer confirmedGleason grading → ISUP Grade Group → risk stratification → staging

Bleeding (haematuria and haematospermia), pain, infection/sepsis and urinary retention are the main biopsy complications. Rates vary with route and definitions; do not combine the senior-note figures of “3% overall” and “25% fever” as one cohort. Fever after biopsy requires prompt assessment for infection.

Biopsy route and repeat biopsy

Transperineal biopsy avoids passage through rectal flora and improves access to anterior targets. Transrectal ultrasound-guided sampling can reach anterior tissue, but may undersample it. An isolated focal HGPIN result is not an automatic repeat-biopsy indication. See the AUA/SUO early-detection guideline.


C. Staging Investigations

Once prostate cancer is histologically confirmed, staging investigations are selected based on risk stratification. Not every patient needs every test — this is a tiered approach:

ModalityFindingsRole
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) prostateTypically T2W-hypointense lesion [4]; shows tumour location, size, extracapsular extension (T3a), seminal vesicle invasion (T3b)Good sensitivity for detection/localisation of high-grade (GS ≥ 7) tumour [4]; can be used for detection or guidance for biopsy [4]; best modality for local T staging
DREClinical T staging (T1–T4)Initial clinical staging; low sensitivity but contributes to staging
TRUSNo TRUS finding consistently indicates cancer with certainty; NOT used for staging [1]; cancer can be hyperechoic, isoechoic, or hypoechoicPrimarily used for biopsy guidance, NOT for staging; low sensitivity and specificity [1]

Multiparametric (mp) MRI uses multiple imaging sequences to characterise prostate tissue [1]:

SequenceWhat It ShowsCancer Appearance
T2-weighted (T2W)Anatomical detail; zonal anatomyHypointense lesion in the normally hyperintense peripheral zone [4]
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)Water molecule diffusion; restricted in dense cellular tissueHigh signal on DWI / low ADC values → restricted diffusion in cancer (dense cellularity)
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)Vascular permeability and perfusionEarly, rapid enhancement → tumour neoangiogenesis

PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging — Reporting and Data System) v2.1 Scoring:

PI-RADS ScoreInterpretationAction
1Very low suspicion (clinically significant cancer very unlikely)Consider omission only if overall clinical risk is low
2Low suspicionConsider omission only if overall clinical risk is low
3EquivocalConsider biopsy based on clinical context (PSA, density, DRE)
4High suspicion (clinically significant cancer likely)Proceed to biopsy [2]
5Very high suspicion (clinically significant cancer highly likely)Proceed to biopsy [2]

mpMRI Before Biopsy — The Modern Paradigm

The current EAU 2024/2025 guidelines recommend mpMRI before biopsy in most cases. This is a major shift from the old practice of "elevated PSA → straight to TRUS biopsy." The rationale: mpMRI can (1) identify men who do NOT need a biopsy (PI-RADS 1–2 with low clinical risk, avoiding unnecessary biopsies and their complications), (2) identify suspicious lesions for targeted biopsy (improving detection of clinically significant cancer), and (3) reduce detection of clinically insignificant cancer (reducing overdiagnosis). Indications for mpMRI include: guide targeted prostate biopsy in patients with elevated PSA but negative TRUS biopsy, which has been shown to result in reduction in number of unnecessary biopsies, higher yield of significant cancer, and fewer biopsy cores [1].

ModalityFindingsRole
CT abdomen + pelvisEvaluation of regional lymph node enlargement [1]; CT-directed biopsy of pathologically enlarged nodesStandard for nodal staging in intermediate/high-risk; limited sensitivity (relies on size criteria: > 8–10mm short axis)
68Ga-PSMA PET-CTProstate-specific tracer; newer modality to visualise small metastasis [4]Far superior sensitivity for detecting small nodal and distant metastases compared to conventional CT; increasingly the gold standard for staging intermediate-to-high-risk disease
mpMRICan detect pelvic lymphadenopathyPrimarily for local staging but contributes to nodal assessment
ModalityFindingsRole
Bone scan (99mTc-MDP)Confirms bony metastasis [12]; increased uptake at sites of osteoblastic activity (vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, femur); superscan = intense symmetric bone activity with diminished renal/soft tissue activity [12]Traditional standard for bone staging; high sensitivity but low specificity (also picks up fractures, arthritis, Paget's)
68Ga-PSMA PET-CTPSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) overexpressed on prostate cancer cells → prostate-specific tracer [4]Newer modality; visualises small metastases [4] missed by bone scan and CT; detects both skeletal and soft-tissue metastases in one scan; becoming first-line staging for high-risk disease (EAU 2024)
CT chest/abdomen/pelvisVisceral metastases (lung, liver, adrenal), lymphadenopathyStandard cross-sectional imaging for staging
X-ray pelvis and lumbar spineOsteosclerotic metastasis [1]; bone metastasis in CA prostate is predominantly OSTEOBLASTIC [1]Simple initial investigation for bone pain; largely superseded by bone scan/PSMA PET
11C-acetate or 11C-choline PETAlternative PET tracers for CA prostate [12]Used in some centres; choline PET has been largely supplanted by PSMA PET
MRI spineVertebral metastases, cord compressionUsed when spinal cord compression suspected; better soft tissue detail than CT

Principle: bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals (99mTc-MDP) are analogues of calcium/phosphate that are adsorbed onto bone surface. Adsorption rate is affected by osteoblastic activity and vascularity [12].

This is why bone scan is excellent for detecting prostate cancer metastases (which are osteoblastic) but may miss purely osteolytic lesions (e.g., multiple myeloma). The superscan pattern — intense symmetric bone uptake with absent renal activity — indicates widespread metastatic disease and should not be confused with a "normal" scan [12].

PSMA PET-CT — The Game Changer

68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is transforming prostate cancer staging and recurrence detection. PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is a transmembrane protein massively overexpressed on prostate cancer cells (not to be confused with PSA, which is a secreted protease). Gallium-68 labelled PSMA ligand binds to cancer cells with high specificity, allowing detection of tiny metastases (even at PSA levels as low as 0.2–0.5 ng/mL in biochemical recurrence). The EAU 2024/2025 guidelines increasingly recommend PSMA PET-CT over conventional bone scan + CT for staging of intermediate and high-risk localised, as well as metastatic, prostate cancer.


Staging investigation: risk stratification determines treatment and extent of staging workup [4]:

Risk GroupRequired Staging Investigations
Low risk (T1–T2a, GS ≤ 6, PSA < 10)Usually NO further staging needed (risk of occult metastasis < 5%); mpMRI may be done for active surveillance planning
Intermediate risk (T2b–T2c, GS 7, PSA 10–20)mpMRI prostate (local staging); consider bone scan/PSMA PET-CT if PSA > 10 or Grade Group ≥ 3
High risk (T3a, GS 8–10, PSA > 20)mpMRI prostate + CT abdomen/pelvis (or PSMA PET-CT) + bone scan (or PSMA PET-CT)
Very high risk / MetastaticPSMA PET-CT (preferred) or CT + bone scan; MRI spine if cord compression suspected

AJCC8 staging of CA prostate [4]:

Prognostic Staging Groups integrate TNM + PSA + Gleason/ISUP Grade Group:

AJCC 8 prognostic stageRequired combination (PSA in ng/mL)
IcT1–T2a or pT2, N0M0; PSA < 10; Grade Group 1
IIAcT1–T2a or pT2, N0M0, PSA 10–<20, GG1; or cT2b–T2c, N0M0, PSA <20, GG1
IIBT1–T2, N0M0; PSA <20; GG2
IICT1–T2, N0M0; PSA <20; GG3 or GG4
IIIAT1–T2, N0M0; PSA ≥20; GG1–4
IIIBT3–T4, N0M0; any PSA; GG1–4
IIICAny T, N0M0; any PSA; GG5
IVAAny T, N1M0; any PSA/grade
IVBAny T/N, M1; any PSA/grade

A single PSA or grade row cannot be read independently of TNM. NCI AJCC 8 tables.

Clinical vs Pathological Staging

Clinical staging is assigned at diagnosis based on DRE, imaging, and biopsy findings — this guides initial treatment decisions. Pathological staging is assigned only after radical prostatectomy based on histological examination of the surgical specimen. Patients who do NOT undergo prostatectomy (e.g., treated with radiation or ADT) are NOT assigned a pathological stage, and treatment decisions remain based on clinical stage [1]. Note that there is no pathological T1 — because T1 is by definition "clinically inapparent," and once the prostate is removed, the tumour becomes apparent.


CategoryInvestigationPurpose
BloodsPSA (total ± free/total ratio), CBC, RFT, LFT (ALP), Ca²⁺Screening, baseline, metastatic workup
PSA derivativesPHI, PSA density, PSA velocity, PCA3Improve specificity in grey zone
Physical examDREClinical T staging, trigger for biopsy
Imaging — Pre-biopsympMRI prostateLesion detection, PI-RADS scoring, biopsy guidance
TissueProstate biopsy (transperineal preferred)Definitive diagnosis + Gleason grading
Staging — LocalmpMRI prostateT staging (ECE, SVI)
Staging — NodalCT A+P or PSMA PET-CTN staging
Staging — MetastaticBone scan or PSMA PET-CT, CT chest, XR pelvis/spineM staging
SpecialMRI spine (cord compression), PSMA PET-CT (biochemical recurrence)As clinically indicated

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Diagnostic pathway: Clinical suspicion (PSA + DRE) → Confirmatory workup (PSA derivatives, mpMRI) → Tissue diagnosis (prostate biopsy) → Risk stratification (PSA + T-stage + Grade Group) → Staging investigations (tiered by risk).

PSA interpretation: No value excludes cancer. Confirm unexpected elevation when appropriate, then combine PSA density, DRE, family history and MRI to decide on biopsy.

MRI: PI-RADS 4–5 usually prompts targeted sampling; PI-RADS 1–2 permits monitoring only when clinical risk is sufficiently low. MRI generally precedes biopsy for suspected organ-confined disease.

Biopsy: Transperineal preferred (lower infection, accesses all zones). 12-core systematic + targeted. Complications: fever, bleeding, urosepsis, AROU.

Histology: Focal HGPIN alone does not mandate repeat biopsy; persistent clinical/MRI risk does. ASAP warrants further evaluation.

Staging: AJCC 8th edition TNM + PSA + Grade Group = Prognostic Stage I–IV. Staging workup extent depends on risk group. PSMA PET-CT is replacing conventional bone scan + CT.

Key principle: The challenge is not just finding cancer — it's correctly risk-stratifying it so you treat those who need it and observe those who don't.


Active Recall - Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

References

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer section — investigations, PSA, TRUS, mpMRI, staging) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.5 Urological neoplasm — Prostate cancer: investigations, biopsy, PHI) [3] Lecture slides: GC 183. Common urological malignancies and their presentations - Nov 7.pdf (p36 — Investigation: mpMRI, biopsy indications) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p179–183 — PSA derivatives, clinical features, evaluation, biopsy, AJCC8 staging) [6] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p173 — BPH diagnosis, relevant investigations) [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Chemical Path.pdf (p23 — Hypercalcaemia in malignancy) [12] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p68, p74, p77, p79 — Bone scan, PET/CT, PET/MR, interventional radiology biopsy)

Management of Prostate Cancer

Faculty outcomes checkpoint: The Concept of Watchful Waiting and Active Surveillance deck compares treatment strategies. At 15 years in ProtecT, prostate-cancer mortality was low without a significant difference between active monitoring, surgery and RT, but metastases/progression were more frequent with monitoring. Its PSA-led monitoring was not identical to modern MRI/biopsy-based active surveillance. ProtecT primary report.

  • Metastatic hormone-sensitive disease: continue ADT and intensify with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) when fit. Established triplets use ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide or abiraterone, particularly for fit patients with de novo high-volume disease. Do not assume any ARPI–docetaxel combination has the same evidence. Prostate RT has a role in newly diagnosed low-volume M1 disease. (EAU treatment guideline.)
  • Darolutamide + ADT without docetaxel is also an approved mCSPC option (ARANOTE; FDA 2025).
  • PSMA-positive mCRPC after an ARPI: lutetium-177–PSMA can now be used in patients appropriate to delay taxane chemotherapy; it is no longer exclusively a post-docetaxel treatment. Select using approved PSMA imaging. (FDA expanded indication.)
  • PARP selection is gene- and regimen-specific: test germline and tumour HRR alterations; BRCA-associated evidence is stronger than assuming every HRR alteration predicts equal benefit. Continue ADT in mCRPC and avoid automatic sequential switching between similar ARPIs after resistance. Non-metastatic CRPC has its own ARPI pathway.

Management of prostate cancer is arguably the most nuanced in all of oncology. Unlike most cancers where "find it and treat it aggressively" is the default, prostate cancer management is governed by a fundamental tension:

Many men die with prostate cancer, not of it. The challenge is to treat aggressively enough to cure those who will die of their cancer, while avoiding over-treatment (and its devastating side effects) in those whose cancer would never have caused harm.

This means management decisions hinge on three things:

  1. Disease risk (PSA + T-stage + Gleason/Grade Group)
  2. Patient fitness and life expectancy (age, comorbidities)
  3. Patient preference (quality of life vs quantity of life)


Summary Table (EAU 2024/2025 Recommendations)

Risk / StageTreatment OptionsKey Details
Old / frail patientsWatchful waiting [3]Palliative intent; start hormonal treatment (ADT) when symptomatic or high PSA [3]
Low risk (cT1–T2a, GS ≤ 6, PSA < 10)Active surveillance [3][4]Curative intent; defer radical treatment and treatment-related morbidities; stringent protocol with regular DRE, PSA, MRI and biopsy [3]
Intermediate riskRadical prostatectomy (robotic) OR radiotherapy with adjuvant LHRHa [3]RP ± extended PLND; EBRT + neoadjuvant/concomitant ADT [4]
High riskRadical prostatectomy (robotic) OR radiotherapy with adjuvant LHRHa [3]RP + ePLND; EBRT + long-term adjuvant ADT (2–3 years) [4]
Locally advancedDefinitive RT + long-term ADT, with systemic intensification where indicated; selected patients may undergo RP as part of multimodal careMDT selection considers resectability, nodal status, fitness and patient preference; no general preference for surgery simply because salvage surgery after RT is difficult
Metastatic: Low volumeADT + ARPI + Radiotherapy [3]ARPIs: Enzalutamide / Apalutamide / Abiraterone [3]
Metastatic: High volumeADT + docetaxel + darolutamide or abiraterone in suitable fit patients [3]High volume metastasis: ≥ 4 bone mets including 1 outside the vertebral column and pelvis or visceral mets [3]
Castration-resistant (CRPC)Continue ADT + add 2nd-line agents [4]Abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, 223Ra, 177Lu-PSMA, sipuleucel-T [4]

[3][4]


Detailed Treatment Modalities

1. Deferred Treatment (Conservative)

The rationale for deferred treatment is that CA prostate is a slow-growing disease; there is little difference in survival between active treatment or watchful waiting within 5 years [4].

FeatureDetail
IntentCurative — to individualise and defer radical treatment until progression [4]
Patient selectionSurgically fit, life expectancy > 10 years [4]
Tumour criteriaLow risk: cT1–T2a, GS < 7 (Grade Group 1), PSA < 10 [4]
Monitoring protocolDRE, PSA, re-biopsy, mpMRI [3][4]; stringent protocol with regular DRE, PSA, MRI and biopsy [3]
Triggers for treatmentBiopsy-confirmed upgrading or increasing tumour extent. Rising PSA/short doubling time prompts MRI and reassessment rather than automatic radical treatment
Outcomes90% overall survival, 99.7% cancer-specific survival [4]

Why does this work? Grade Group 1 (Gleason ≤ 6) prostate cancer has an extremely low risk of metastasis or cancer-specific death within 10–15 years. The "cost" of radical treatment (incontinence, erectile dysfunction) outweighs the marginal survival benefit in this group. AS allows intervention only when the biology declares itself as more aggressive.

Active Surveillance vs Watchful Waiting

Students frequently confuse these two. They are fundamentally different:

  • Active surveillance = curative intent. You monitor closely and treat radically (surgery/RT) when reassessment confirms progression warranting treatment. The patient is fit for treatment. Think of it as "holding your sword ready."
  • Watchful waiting = palliative intent. You do NOT monitor as stringently. You treat symptoms when they arise (usually with ADT). The patient is NOT fit for curative treatment or has limited life expectancy. Think of it as "putting your sword away."
FeatureActive SurveillanceWatchful Waiting
IntentCurativePalliative
PatientsSurgically fit, > 10y life expectancySurgically unfit, < 10y life expectancy
TumourLow risk (cT1–2a, GS < 7, PSA < 10)Any asymptomatic tumour
MonitoringProtocol-based PSA, examination, MRI and repeat biopsyIndividualised clinical follow-up and symptom assessment; no routine curative surveillance-biopsy protocol
Treatment triggerDisease progressionSymptomatic → offer palliative Tx

[4]

  • Palliative intent for old fragile patients [3]
  • Offer palliative treatment for symptoms or impending complications; consider earlier ADT selectively for aggressive progression. A single high PSA is not a universal trigger
  • Limited life expectancy reduces the opportunity to benefit from radical treatment; interpret trial outcomes using the enrolled risk group and follow-up, rather than claiming that treatment never improves survival
  • Risk of disease progression to require palliative intervention is approximately 40–50% over 10 years, but many will die of other causes first

2. Radical Prostatectomy (RP)

"Robotic-assisted resection of prostate gland + seminal vesicles + ampulla of vas deferens ± pelvic LN dissection" [2]

  • Primarily localised cT1–2 disease; selected locally advanced M0 disease after multidisciplinary review
  • Confirmed histological diagnosis [1]
  • Life expectancy > 10 years [1]
  • Patients fully counselled and aware of possible complications and alternative treatment options [1]
  • PSA ≥20 or Grade Group 4–5 does not automatically exclude surgery. Selected high-risk M0 patients can undergo RP as part of multimodal management after appropriate staging and counselling. MRI may show the primary cancer; “negative MRI” is not an eligibility requirement. EAU treatment guideline.
  • Life expectancy < 10 years (no survival benefit from surgery)
  • Unfit for general anaesthesia
  • T4 disease (fixed tumour invading rectum, levators, pelvic wall — technically not resectable)
  • Extensive nodal or distant metastatic disease (surgery alone will not be curative)
  • Patient preference against surgery

Open (retropubic/perineal), laparoscopic, or robotic — none has clearly shown superiority over others [4], though robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is now the most widely used approach worldwide due to improved ergonomics, 3D visualisation, and possibly lower blood loss.

Open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches remain options; surgeon experience and patient selection matter, and access varies.

  • Resection of: prostate, prostatic urethra, seminal vesicles, part of vas deferens [4]
  • ePLND when indicated by nodal risk samples external iliac, obturator and internal iliac basins. It improves pathological staging; a routine survival benefit from dissection itself is unproven. “Up to the aortic bifurcation” is not the standard extended pelvic template.

Three surgical goals [1]:

  1. Excise cancer completely with a clear margin
  2. Maintain continence by preserving the external sphincter — the external urethral sphincter sits at the prostatic apex and must be carefully preserved during apical dissection
  3. Maintain potency by sparing autonomic nerves in the neurovascular bundles — cavernous nerves lie immediately posterolateral to the prostatic capsule [1]

Nerve-sparing technique may be used in most patients to ↓ risk of erectile dysfunction, but is contraindicated if there is high risk of extracapsular extension [4] — because the neurovascular bundles abut the prostatic capsule, and preserving them in the setting of T3a disease risks leaving cancer behind.

Positive margins, extraprostatic extension and seminal-vesicle invasion increase recurrence risk. Many patients with undetectable postoperative PSA can have PSA surveillance with early salvage RT; selected very high-risk cases may merit adjuvant RT. pN1 decisions incorporate nodal burden, pathology and postoperative PSA, with observation or ADT ± RT selected by the MDT.

After RP, biochemical recurrence is commonly defined as PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL confirmed on repeat testing; after RT, the Phoenix definition is nadir +2 ng/mL. These definitions are not instructions to delay useful salvage therapy: AUA/ASTRO/SUO advises salvage RT at PSA ≤0.5, with earlier treatment considered for high-risk recurrence. A negative PSMA PET must not by itself withhold prostate-bed salvage RT. Salvage guideline.

ComplicationFrequencyMechanism
Erectile dysfunction30% even with good nerve sparing [4]; 50% overall [2]Damage to cavernous nerves in neurovascular bundles; even "nerve-sparing" causes neuropraxia (stretching/bruising of nerves) that may take 6–24 months to recover
Urinary incontinence50% early (immediate post-op), 5–10% long-term [4]; stress urinary incontinence 10% [2]Damage to the external urethral sphincter during apical dissection; managed with pelvic floor muscle exercises or artificial sphincter [1]
Anastomotic stricture5–10% [4]Scarring at the vesicourethral anastomosis (bladder neck-to-urethral stump junction) — bladder neck contracture [1]
Bleeding5–10% [4]The dorsal venous complex (plexus of Santorini) overlies the prostate apex; division during surgery risks haemorrhage
Rectal injury< 5% [4]Prostate is immediately anterior to the rectum; Denonvilliers' fascia is the plane of dissection
General perioperativeMortality < 0.3% [4]MI, DVT [1], infection
Urine leaksUncommonAnastomotic leak in the early post-op period

Post-op care: Foley catheter should be placed for ≥ 7 days post-op [4] to allow the vesicourethral anastomosis to heal.

Why Does RP Cause Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction?

The prostate sits at the crossroads of continence and potency:

  • Continence: The prostatic urethra is supported by the internal sphincter (bladder neck) above and the external sphincter (rhabdosphincter) below. RP removes the prostate AND bladder neck → the patient relies entirely on the external sphincter for continence. Any damage to this during apical dissection → stress urinary incontinence.
  • Potency: The cavernous nerves (parasympathetic fibres from S2–S4 that mediate erection) run in the neurovascular bundles immediately posterolateral to the prostatic capsule. Even with nerve-sparing technique, traction and neuropraxia are inevitable → erectile dysfunction. Recovery depends on age, baseline function, and nerve preservation quality.

3. Radiotherapy (RT)

Avoids the risk of surgery and general anaesthesia, but provides equivalent oncological control [2].

TypeDescriptionIndications
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) / Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT)High-energy photon beams delivered from outside the body; IMRT allows precise dose shaping to conform to the prostate while sparing surrounding tissuesLocalised or locally advanced disease; primary treatment or adjuvant after RP
Interstitial brachytherapyRadioactive seeds (e.g., I-125 or Pd-103) permanently implanted into the prostate, delivering radiation from withinLow-to-intermediate risk localised disease; rarely done in HK [4]
  • Localised or locally advanced disease [4]
  • Older patients [2] — avoids surgical risks
  • Alternative to RP for any localised disease (patient preference)
  • Adjuvant after RP for positive margins or pT3 disease
  • Salvage after biochemical recurrence post-RP
  • Unfavourable intermediate risk: RT generally combines with 4–6 months ADT; favourable intermediate-risk patients may receive RT without ADT after individual assessment
  • Adjuvant ADT × 2–3 years if high-risk localised or locally advanced [4]

Why combine ADT with RT? ADT causes tumour shrinkage (cytoreduction) → smaller radiation target; it also induces apoptosis in cancer cells, making them more radiosensitive; and it controls micrometastatic disease systemically. Randomised trials (e.g., EORTC 22863, RTOG 9202) have shown significant survival benefit from adding long-term ADT to RT in high-risk disease.

ComplicationMechanism
Erectile dysfunction: up to 30% [4]Radiation damage to the neurovascular bundles and penile vasculature; onset is gradual (6–36 months post-RT), unlike RP where ED is immediate
Radiation cystitis: up to 10% [4]Radiation injury to the bladder mucosa → frequency, urgency, dysuria, haematuria
Radiation proctitis: up to 10% [4]Radiation injury to the anterior rectal wall → diarrhoea, tenesmus, PR bleeding
GI symptoms [1]Proctitis, enteritis, diarrhoea, frequency, urgency, tenesmus
UG symptoms [1]Cystitis, urethritis, frequency, urgency, dysuria
↓ Stress urinary incontinence compared to RP, but similar ED rates [2]RT preserves the sphincter mechanism (no dissection near the sphincter)
↑ Irritative symptoms (FUN: frequency, urgency, nocturia) [2]Radiation-induced detrusor overactivity and mucosal inflammation

RP vs RT — How to Counsel Patients

Oncological outcomes between radiotherapy and radical surgery are equally favourable and the choice of treatment is up to the patient [1]. But the side effect profiles differ:

  • RP: Higher risk of incontinence and immediate ED, but these improve over time; no radiation exposure; provides pathological staging
  • RT: Lower risk of incontinence; ED develops gradually; higher risk of long-term cystitis/proctitis; no pathological staging; prior RT renders subsequent operation difficult [4] (complicates salvage surgery if cancer recurs)

In general: younger, fitter patients tend to prefer RP (definitive removal, pathological staging, preserves RT as a salvage option); older patients or those prioritising continence may prefer RT.


4. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Prostate cancer cells depend on androgen receptor (AR) signalling for survival and proliferation. Testosterone (mainly from testes) is converted to DHT (by 5α-reductase) in the prostate → DHT binds AR → activates transcription of pro-survival genes. Remove the androgen signal → cancer cells undergo apoptosis. This is the basis of ADT, first demonstrated by Charles Huggins (Nobel Prize, 1966).

ModalityMechanismKey Details
Bilateral orchiectomy (surgical castration)Removes the testes → eliminates > 90% of testosterone productionGOLD STANDARD but rarely done nowadays due to effective medical therapy [1]; irreversible; psychological impact; immediate castrate testosterone levels
GnRH agonists (e.g., Goserelin, Leuprolide)Initially ↑↑ LH and FSH (stimulates testes to produce testosterone) → "flare" → then downregulation of GnRH receptors in the pituitary → ↓ LH and FSH → ↓ testosterone [1]Most widely used form of ADT; requires anti-androgen cover for first 2–4 weeks to prevent flare; depot injections (monthly or 3-monthly)
GnRH antagonists (e.g., Degarelix, Relugolix)Directly blocks GnRH receptors → ↓ testosterone without initial rise [1]No flare phenomenon → preferred when flare is dangerous (e.g., impending cord compression, severe bone pain); Relugolix is an oral GnRH antagonist (newer)

> 90% of male hormones (testosterone) originate from the testes; < 10% (DHEA, DHEA-S, androstenedione) originate from the adrenals [1]

GnRH Agonist Flare — Why It Happens and Why It Matters

GnRH agonists (like goserelin) initially stimulate the pituitary because they are agonists — they cause a surge of LH/FSH release, which in turn causes a testosterone surge ("flare") lasting 1–2 weeks. In a patient with widespread bone metastases or impending cord compression, this flare can cause catastrophic worsening — increased bone pain, cord compression, or ureteric obstruction.

Solution: Either (1) use a GnRH antagonist (no flare) or (2) cover with an anti-androgen (e.g., bicalutamide) for the first 2–4 weeks to block the testosterone flare at the receptor level.

AgentGenerationMechanismRole
Flutamide / Nilutamide / Bicalutamide1st generationBlock ligand binding to androgen receptor [1]Block disease flare that may occur with the rise of serum testosterone associated with GnRH agonist therapy [1]; also used in combined androgen blockade (CAB)
Enzalutamide / Apalutamide / Darolutamide2nd generation (next-generation anti-androgens)Block AR signalling at multiple steps: inhibit AR nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and coactivator recruitmentUsed in mCRPC and now upfront in mHSPC; much more potent than 1st-generation agents
AgentMechanismIndication
Abiraterone + PrednisoloneCYP17 inhibitor [4] — blocks CYP17A1 enzyme in the adrenal glands, testes, and tumour cells, preventing synthesis of androgens (and cortisol, hence need for prednisolone to prevent adrenal insufficiency and mineralocorticoid excess)mHSPC (upfront with ADT); mCRPC [4]
EnzalutamideInhibitor of androgen receptor signalling [4] — potent AR antagonist; blocks AR nuclear translocation and DNA bindingmHSPC (upfront with ADT); mCRPC [3][4]
ApalutamideSimilar to enzalutamide; potent AR antagonistmHSPC; nmCRPC (non-metastatic CRPC) [3]

Side effects of testosterone-lowering agents [1]:

Side EffectMechanism
Hot flushesLoss of testosterone disrupts hypothalamic thermoregulation (similar to menopausal hot flashes)
FatigueMultifactorial: anaemia, loss of muscle mass, metabolic changes
Erectile dysfunctionLoss of androgen-mediated libido and penile vascular function
Loss of libidoTestosterone is the primary driver of male sexual desire
AnaemiaAndrogens stimulate erythropoiesis; their removal → ↓ RBC production
GynecomastiaAltered androgen/oestrogen ratio → oestrogen-mediated breast tissue proliferation; also a side effect of anti-androgens [1]
↓ Lean body mass, ↑ body fat, ↓ muscle strength [4]Androgens are anabolic; their loss causes sarcopenia and fat redistribution
↑ Risk of cardiovascular disease and ↑ insulin resistance [4]Metabolic syndrome from androgen deprivation
Osteoporosis → pathological fracturesAndrogens maintain bone density; their loss → accelerated bone resorption
Cognitive changes, depressionAndrogens have neuroprotective and mood-regulating effects

5. Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

This is newly diagnosed metastatic disease that has NOT yet been treated with ADT (or is still responding to ADT).

The modern approach [3][4]:

  • Traditional approach: ADT monotherapy first → add others if CRPC [2] — this is outdated
  • New approach: upfront combination therapy [2][3] — multiple landmark trials (CHAARTED, LATITUDE, STAMPEDE, ENZAMET, TITAN, ARASENS) have proven that upfront intensification dramatically improves survival

Treatment by metastatic volume [3]:

VolumeDefinitionTreatment
Low volumeDoes not meet the CHAARTED high-volume definition (no visceral metastases; bone pattern below the high-volume threshold)ADT + ARPI (Enzalutamide / Apalutamide / Abiraterone) + Radiotherapy to the primary tumour [3]
High volume≥ 4 bone metastases including ≥ 1 outside the vertebral column and pelvis, OR visceral metastases [3]ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide or abiraterone in suitable fit patients [3]

Why treat the primary tumour with RT in low-volume disease? The STAMPEDE trial showed that in patients with low metastatic burden, adding radiotherapy to the prostate (while on systemic ADT) improved overall survival — likely because the primary tumour is a source of ongoing seeding of metastatic clones.

Definition of CRPC [4]:

  • Castrate level of testosterone ( < 50 ng/dL) — i.e., the patient IS on ADT
  • PLUS disease progression defined as:
    • Biochemical progression: 3 consecutive rises in PSA 1 week apart with 2 × 50% increase over nadir and one PSA > 2 ng/mL
    • Radiological progression: ≥ 2 new bone lesions on bone scan or enlarging soft tissue lesion
    • Symptomatic progression alone is NOT sufficient to diagnose CRPC [4]

Mechanism: either tumour cells becoming testosterone-independent or autonomous androgen secretion [4] — through AR gene amplification, AR splice variants (AR-V7), intracrine androgen synthesis, or activation of alternative growth pathways.

Treatment of CRPC [4]: Usually continue ADT + add 2nd-line treatment:

AgentMechanismKey Points
Abiraterone + prednisoneCYP17 inhibitor [4]Blocks adrenal and intratumoral androgen synthesis
EnzalutamideInhibitor of androgen receptor signalling [4]Blocks AR at multiple levels even in CRPC
DocetaxelTaxane chemotherapy; stabilises microtubules → prevents mitotic spindle disassembly → cell cycle arrest and apoptosisFirst-line chemotherapy for mCRPC [4]; also used upfront in high-volume mHSPC
CabazitaxelSemi-synthetic taxaneSecond-line chemotherapy after docetaxel failure; active against docetaxel-resistant cells
223-Radium (Alpharadin)Localises to bone → emits α-particles to relieve skeletal symptoms [4]Calcium mimetic taken up by bone → delivers high-energy, short-range alpha radiation to bone metastases; improves OS in symptomatic bone-predominant mCRPC
177Lu-PSMANewer treatment that localises to CaP cells [4]Lutetium-177 labelled PSMA ligand → binds PSMA on cancer cells → delivers beta radiation to tumour; VISION trial showed OS benefit in PSMA-positive mCRPC
Sipuleucel-TDendritic cell vaccine programmed to target prostatic acid phosphatase [4]Immunotherapy; autologous dendritic cells activated ex vivo with PAP-GM-CSF fusion protein; modest survival benefit (~4 months); mainly used in US
PARP inhibitors (Olaparib, Rucaparib)Synthetic lethality in tumours with homologous recombination repair defects (BRCA1/2, ATM)Indicated in mCRPC with BRCA/HRD mutations; cancer cells with BRCA loss cannot repair double-strand DNA breaks → PARP inhibition blocks the backup repair pathway → cell death

Prostate cancer has a particular tropism for bone, and skeletal complications (pain, fractures, cord compression) are a major source of morbidity. Bone-directed therapies are used alongside systemic treatment:

Bisphosphonates and RANK-Ligand Inhibitors
AgentMechanismIndication
Bisphosphonates (e.g., zoledronic acid)Bind to hydroxyapatite on bone surfaces → inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorptionPrevent skeletal-related events (SREs) in mCRPC with bone metastases; also prevent ADT-related osteoporosis
Denosumab (RANK-ligand inhibitor)Monoclonal antibody against RANKL → prevents RANKL from activating RANK on osteoclast precursors → inhibits osteoclast differentiation and functionSuperior to zoledronic acid in preventing SREs in mCRPC; does not require renal dose adjustment

Side effects: osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ — hence dental review before starting), hypocalcaemia (supplement calcium and vitamin D), atypical femoral fractures.


Palliative treatment options [4]:

SymptomManagement
Bone symptomsOsteoclast inhibition (bisphosphonate, denosumab), palliative RT, analgesics [4]
Spinal cord compressionHigh-dose steroids (dexamethasone), decompressive surgery, palliative RT [4] — oncological emergency
Urinary symptoms (obstruction)May consider TURP to relieve obstruction [4]; catheterisation; ureteric stenting for ureteric obstruction
PainWHO analgesic ladder; palliative RT for focal bone pain; radionuclides (223Ra) for diffuse bone pain
AnaemiaTransfusion; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents if appropriate

Depletion of androgens by surgical means [1]:

  • > 90% of male hormones (testosterone) originate from the testes; < 10% (DHEA, DHEA-S, androstenedione) originate from the adrenals [1]
  • GOLD STANDARD but rarely done nowadays due to effective medical therapy and more widespread use of hormones [1]
  • Advantages: immediate castrate levels, 100% compliance, one-time procedure, low cost
  • Disadvantages: irreversible, psychological impact, visible loss (though subcapsular orchiectomy preserves the testicular shell)

Prognosis [4]:

Stage5-Year Survival
LocalisedAlmost 100%
Locally advancedAlmost 100%
Metastatic~29%

This stark difference between localised/locally advanced (~100%) and metastatic (~29%) underlines why early detection and correct risk stratification matter — but also why over-treating indolent localised disease with its attendant morbidity must be avoided.


High Yield Summary — Management of Prostate Cancer

Conservative:

  • Active surveillance: Curative intent; low-risk disease; fit patient > 10y life expectancy; monitor with DRE/PSA/MRI/re-biopsy; base treatment change on confirmed progression, not a PSA rise alone.
  • Watchful waiting: Palliative intent; unfit/elderly patient < 10y life expectancy; treat symptoms with ADT when they arise.

Localised disease (curative):

  • Low risk: Active surveillance (preferred); RP or RT as alternatives
  • Intermediate risk: RP ± ePLND; or RT with 4–6 months ADT for unfavourable disease (ADT may be omitted for favourable disease)
  • High risk: RP + ePLND; or EBRT + long-term adjuvant ADT (2–3y)

Locally advanced: Selected RP with pathology/PSA-guided postoperative care; or EBRT + ADT; or ADT alone if unfit.

Metastatic (mHSPC):

  • Low volume: ADT + ARPI + RT to primary
  • High volume (≥ 4 bone mets incl. 1 outside the vertebral column and pelvis, or visceral mets): ADT + ARPI + docetaxel

CRPC (castrate testosterone + progression): Continue ADT + add abiraterone/enzalutamide/docetaxel/cabazitaxel/223Ra/177Lu-PSMA/PARP inhibitors.

ADT: GnRH agonist (cover flare with anti-androgen) or GnRH antagonist (no flare). Side effects: hot flushes, ED, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, CVD risk, gynecomastia.

RP complications: ED (30–50%), incontinence (5–10% long-term), anastomotic stricture, bleeding, rectal injury.

RT complications: ED (30%), cystitis/proctitis (10%), less incontinence than RP.

Prognosis: Localised ~100% 5y survival; metastatic ~29%.


Active Recall - Management of Prostate Cancer

References

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer — treatment section: conservative, medical, surgical, radiotherapy, orchiectomy) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.5 — Prostate cancer management: localised and advanced disease) [3] Lecture slides: GC 183. Common urological malignancies and their presentations - Nov 7.pdf (p41–43 — Prostate cancer treatment: localised, watchful waiting, active surveillance, metastatic) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p184–186 — Approach to treatment, deferred treatment, locoregional treatment, systemic therapy, CRPC, prognosis)

Complications of Prostate Cancer

Complications of prostate cancer can be organised into three broad categories that are conceptually distinct and must be understood separately:

  1. Complications of the disease itself (local progression and metastatic disease)
  2. Complications of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy)
  3. Complications of diagnostic procedures (biopsy) and screening (overdiagnosis)

Understanding why each complication occurs — from first principles — is far more useful than memorising a list. Each complication has a clear pathophysiological basis rooted in anatomy, tumour biology, or the mechanism of the treatment that caused it.


A. Complications of the Disease Itself

These complications arise because the cancer either grows locally (compressing or invading adjacent structures) or metastasises distantly.

A1. Local Complications

  • Mechanism: Although prostate cancer arises in the peripheral zone (and therefore causes LUTS late), large tumours or those with central/transitional zone extension eventually compress or invade the prostatic urethra and bladder neck → increased urethral resistance → voiding difficulty → ultimately acute urinary retention (AROU).
  • Clinical presentation: Progressive voiding LUTS (hesitancy, weak stream, incomplete emptying) → AROU (inability to void, suprapubic pain, palpable distended bladder)
  • Management: Urethral catheterisation; if failed, suprapubic catheter; may consider TURP to relieve obstruction [4] (palliative TURP — note that this does NOT cure the cancer, it simply debulks the intraprostatic component to relieve the obstruction)
  • Mechanism: Cancer invading the bladder trigone or ureteric orifices → unilateral or bilateral ureteric obstruction → hydronephrosis → obstructive nephropathy → post-renal AKI [11]. Alternatively, bulky pelvic lymphadenopathy can extrinsically compress the ureters.
  • Clinical presentation: May be silent (bilateral chronic partial obstruction → gradual renal impairment detected on bloods); or acute with flank pain if sudden complete obstruction
  • Key point: Post-renal disease is rapidly reversible if recognised early, but prolonged obstruction progresses to tubulointerstitial fibrosis (i.e., irreversible intrinsic renal disease) [11]
  • Management: Ureteric stenting (retrograde via cystoscopy, or antegrade via percutaneous nephrostomy) to relieve obstruction; treat underlying cancer
  • Mechanism: Tumour eroding into the prostatic urethra or ejaculatory ducts disrupts vascular integrity → blood in the urine or semen
  • Haematuria or haemospermia ( < 1%): uncommon, can also be due to BPH [4]
  • Management: Usually conservative (tumour-directed treatment will reduce bleeding); severe haematuria may require bladder irrigation, cystoscopy with fulguration, or palliative RT
  • Direct extension: stromal invasion through prostatic capsule → urethra, bladder base, seminal vesicles [4]
  • Rectal invasion is rare because Denonvilliers' fascia acts as a natural barrier between the prostate and rectum, but can occur in T4 disease → tenesmus, rectal bleeding, fistula formation
  • Neurovascular bundle invasion → new-onset erectile dysfunction (cavernous nerves immediately posterolateral to prostate capsule)
  • Lower limb lymphoedema → lymphoedema due to pelvic lymphadenopathy or lymph node metastases [4]; bulky inguinal/pelvic nodes obstruct lymphatic drainage

A2. Metastatic Complications

Vertebral metastasis is the commonest metastatic site [4]. Reason: Batson's plexus connects prostatic venous plexus to internal vertebral plexus [4].

ComplicationMechanismManagement
Bone painOsteoblastic metastases cause periosteal stretching, microfractures, and local inflammatory mediator release; typically dull, deep, progressive, worse at nightAnalgesics (WHO ladder), palliative RT (excellent for focal pain), osteoclast inhibition (bisphosphonate, denosumab) [4]
Pathological fracturesDespite being osteoblastic, new bone is structurally disorganised and weak → fractures through vertebral bodies, pelvis, proximal femurOrthopaedic fixation if long bone; vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty if vertebral; treat underlying disease
Spinal cord compression (SCC)Vertebral body collapse or epidural tumour extension compresses the spinal cord → oncological emergencyHigh-dose steroids (dexamethasone), decompressive surgery, palliative RT [4]
HypercalcaemiaLess common in prostate cancer than other bone-metastasising cancers (osteoblastic lesions sequester calcium); when present, usually due to PTHrP secretion or massive disease burden [10][14]IV normal saline rehydration, bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid), calcitonin, treat underlying disease [14]
Bone marrow failureExtensive marrow infiltration by metastatic deposits → crowding out of normal haematopoietic cells → pancytopenia (anaemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia)Transfusion support; treat underlying cancer; leukoerythroblastic blood film on peripheral smear

This is an oncological emergency that demands immediate recognition and treatment. Delay of even hours can result in irreversible paraplegia.

  • Epidemiology: prostate cancer accounts for ~20% of all malignant cord compression [15]; > 90% vertebral, especially thoracic [15]
  • Routes of spread: haematogenous (most common), direct invasion, lymphatics [15]
  • Presentation: bone pain and tenderness → motor/sensory symptoms → sphincter disturbance (late) [15]
    • The classic sequence is: back pain (often the first symptom, present for weeks before neurological signs) → radiculopathy (band-like pain in a dermatomal distribution) → motor weakness (upper motor neuron pattern below the level: spasticity, hyperreflexia, upgoing plantars) → sensory level (loss of sensation below the compression) → sphincter dysfunction (urinary retention, faecal incontinence — this is a LATE sign and indicates severe cord damage)
  • Investigations [15]:
    • MRI of the entire spine: confirm extradural compressive lesion
    • Important to image the entire spine because 33% have multilevel involvement [15]
    • Plain X-ray: may show osteolytic/osteoblastic lesions, vertebral collapse, pedicle erosion (the "winking owl" sign — loss of one pedicle on AP view)
  • Management [15]:
    • Dexamethasone 4 mg IV Q6H if neurological symptoms present — reduces peritumoral oedema and buys time
    • Surgical decompression + stabilisation followed by RT if unstable spine
    • RT alone if stable spine OR unfavourable prognosis

Spinal Cord Compression — The Golden Rule

If a patient with known prostate cancer develops new back pain — especially if it is progressive, worse at night, and associated with ANY neurological symptom (even subtle leg weakness or altered sensation) — treat it as cord compression until proven otherwise. Get an urgent MRI of the entire spine and start dexamethasone immediately. Once the patient becomes paraplegic, recovery is unlikely even with treatment.

  • Liver metastases: hepatomegaly, deranged LFTs, RUQ pain, jaundice (late) [4]
  • Lung metastases: usually asymptomatic (incidental CXR/CT finding); late: cough, haemoptysis, breathlessness [16]
  • Adrenal metastases: usually asymptomatic; rarely symptomatic adrenal insufficiency [16]
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC): uncommon but reported in advanced prostate cancer; the mechanism involves release of tissue factor and procoagulant substances from tumour cells

B. Complications of Treatment

Complications of radical prostatectomy [1][3][4]:

ComplicationFrequencyMechanismManagement
Erectile dysfunction30% even with good nerve sparing [4]; 50% overall [2]Damage to cavernous nerves lying immediately posterolateral to the prostatic capsule [1]; even nerve-sparing causes neuropraxia (stretch injury) with potential recovery over 6–24 monthsPDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil) or penile prosthesis [1]; vacuum erection device; intracavernosal injections (alprostadil)
Stress urinary incontinence50% early (immediate post-op), 5–10% long-term [4]; 10% [2]Damage to the external urethral sphincter during apical dissection; the patient loses the internal sphincter (bladder neck is removed with prostate) and relies entirely on the external sphincterPelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegels) first-line; artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) for refractory cases [1]
Anastomotic (bladder neck) stricture5–10% [4]Scarring at the vesicourethral anastomosis (where the bladder neck is re-joined to the urethral stump) → fibrotic narrowingEndoscopic incision/dilation; rarely requires repeat surgery
Bleeding5–10% [4]Division of the dorsal venous complex (Santorini's plexus) overlying the prostatic apex; prostatic arterial branchesIntra-operative haemostasis; transfusion if significant
Rectal injury< 5% [4]Prostate sits immediately anterior to the rectum; the posterior dissection plane (Denonvilliers' fascia) is thin → inadvertent perforationIntra-operative primary repair; temporary diverting colostomy if large injury
General perioperativeMortality < 0.3%MI, DVT [1], pulmonary embolism, wound infection, anaesthetic complicationsStandard VTE prophylaxis, cardiac risk assessment
Urine leaksUncommonAnastomotic leak early post-op; usually resolves with prolonged catheter drainageKeep Foley for ≥ 7 days [4]; re-catheterise if detected late
Ureteral injuryRareDuring dissection of the bladder base, the ureteric orifices may be inadvertently injuredIntra-operative recognition and reimplantation

Anejaculation is universal after RP because the seminal vesicles, vas deferens ampullae, and prostatic urethra are all removed — there is no ejaculatory apparatus remaining. Orgasm is typically NOT affected [17], as orgasmic sensation is mediated by somatic sensory nerves (pudendal nerve) that are usually preserved.

Retrograde Ejaculation vs Anejaculation — Know the Difference

  • After TURP (for BPH): retrograde ejaculation (40–60%) — the bladder neck is resected, so semen flows backwards into the bladder instead of out through the urethra. The patient still produces semen but it goes the "wrong way."
  • After radical prostatectomy: anejaculation (100%) — the entire prostate, seminal vesicles, and ejaculatory ducts are removed. There is NO semen produced at all. The patient is infertile. This is fundamentally different from retrograde ejaculation.

Complications of radiotherapy [1][4]:

ComplicationFrequencyMechanism
Erectile dysfunctionUp to 30% [4]Radiation damage to the neurovascular bundles and penile vasculature; onset is gradual (6–36 months), unlike RP where ED is immediate
Radiation cystitisUp to 10% [4]Radiation injury to the bladder urothelium → mucosal oedema, telangiectasia, ulceration → frequency, urgency, dysuria, haematuria [1]
Radiation proctitisUp to 10% [4]Radiation injury to the anterior rectal wall (rectum is immediately posterior to the prostate) → diarrhoea, tenesmus, PR bleeding [1]
Irritative LUTSCommonRadiation-induced inflammation of the prostatic urethra and bladder → detrusor overactivity and mucosal irritation; GI: proctitis, enteritis, diarrhoea, frequency, urgency, tenesmus; UG: cystitis, urethritis, frequency, urgency, dysuria [1]
Urethral strictureLateRadiation-induced fibrosis of the urethra
Secondary malignancyVery rare, lateRadiation-induced carcinogenesis (bladder cancer, rectal cancer) — typically > 10 years after treatment
Lower stress incontinence rate compared to RP [2]—RT preserves the external sphincter (no surgical dissection near the sphincter); however, increased irritative symptoms (FUN: frequency, urgency, nocturia) [2]

ADT removes the androgen signal that is essential for multiple physiological functions beyond the prostate. This creates a constellation of side effects that is essentially a male hypogonadal syndrome:

Side EffectMechanismManagement
Hot flushes [1]Loss of testosterone disrupts hypothalamic thermoregulatory set-point (analogous to menopausal hot flashes from oestrogen withdrawal)Medroxyprogesterone acetate, venlafaxine, gabapentin
Erectile dysfunction / loss of libido [1]Testosterone is the primary driver of male sexual desire and contributes to erectile function; its removal → loss of sexual interest and abilityPDE5 inhibitors (limited effect without libido); psychosexual counselling
Gynecomastia [1]Androgen deprivation shifts the androgen/oestrogen ratio in favour of oestrogen (aromatisation of residual adrenal androgens) → oestrogen-stimulated breast tissue proliferationProphylactic breast irradiation, tamoxifen
Osteoporosis → pathological fracturesAndrogens maintain bone density; their removal → accelerated osteoclastic resorption → bone mineral density loss (~4% per year on ADT)Bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronic acid) or RANK-ligand inhibitor (denosumab) for prevention of bone loss [1]; calcium and vitamin D supplementation; weight-bearing exercise; baseline and serial DEXA scans
↓ Lean body mass, ↑ body fat, ↓ muscle strength [4]Androgens are anabolic hormones that maintain muscle mass; their loss → sarcopenia and central adiposityResistance exercise; dietary counselling
↑ Risk of cardiovascular disease and ↑ insulin resistance [4]ADT causes a metabolic syndrome-like picture: dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, central obesity, increased inflammatory markersMonitor metabolic parameters (glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile); cardiovascular risk factor management; exercise; GnRH antagonists (relugolix) may have lower cardiovascular risk than GnRH agonists
Anaemia [1]Androgens stimulate erythropoiesis (both directly on marrow and via EPO production); their removal → decreased RBC productionMonitor Hb; transfusion if symptomatic; ESAs rarely used
Fatigue [1]Multifactorial: anaemia, loss of muscle mass, metabolic changes, psychological impactExercise (strongest evidence); address other contributing factors
Cognitive impairment / depressionAndrogens have neuroprotective and mood-regulatory roles; their removal → mood disturbance, impaired concentration, depressionScreening and psychological support; consider intermittent ADT in appropriate patients

Bone Health in ADT — Don't Forget!

Men on long-term ADT lose bone at a rate comparable to postmenopausal women. Without intervention, up to 20% will sustain an osteoporotic fracture within 5 years. Current guidelines recommend: baseline DEXA scan at initiation of ADT, calcium (1200 mg/day) and vitamin D (800–1000 IU/day) supplementation, weight-bearing exercise, and consideration of bisphosphonate or denosumab if the patient is at high fracture risk (T-score ≤ -2.5 or other risk factors).

  • GnRH agonists cause an initial testosterone surge ("flare") for 1–2 weeks before receptor downregulation achieves castrate levels [1]
  • In patients with extensive bone metastases or impending cord compression, this flare can cause catastrophic worsening: increased bone pain, cord compression, ureteric obstruction, DIC
  • Prevention: Anti-androgen cover (e.g., bicalutamide) for the first 2–4 weeks; or use a GnRH antagonist (no flare)

ComplicationMechanism
Myelosuppression (neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia) [1]Taxanes disrupt microtubule dynamics in rapidly dividing cells → bone marrow suppression → infection risk (febrile neutropenia), bleeding, fatigue
Peripheral neuropathyMicrotubule stabilisation in sensory neurons → axonal transport disruption → painful paraesthesiae (dose-limiting)
FatigueMultifactorial: anaemia, cytokine release, metabolic effects
GI toxicityNausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis — rapidly dividing GI epithelial cells are affected
Fluid retention / oedemaDocetaxel-specific; mechanism not fully understood; premedication with dexamethasone reduces incidence
Allergic/hypersensitivity reactionsPolysorbate 80 (vehicle for docetaxel) can trigger reactions; premedication required

ComplicationMechanismPrevention
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)Inhibition of osteoclasts impairs normal bone remodelling in the jaw (which has high turnover due to mastication and dental procedures) → exposed necrotic boneDental review and dental work BEFORE starting therapy; avoid invasive dental procedures while on treatment; good oral hygiene
HypocalcaemiaPotent osteoclast inhibition → reduced calcium release from bone → serum calcium dropsSupplement calcium and vitamin D; monitor serum calcium
Atypical femoral fracturesProlonged suppression of bone remodelling → accumulation of microdamage in cortical bone → stress fractures in the subtrochanteric regionRare with short-term use; consider drug holiday after 3–5 years in osteoporosis (less relevant in cancer setting)
Renal toxicity (bisphosphonates)IV bisphosphonates (especially zoledronic acid) are nephrotoxic; require adequate hydration and dose adjustment for renal impairmentCheck creatinine before each dose; avoid if CrCl < 30 (zoledronic acid)

C. Complications of Diagnostic Procedures

Complications of prostate biopsy (~3% overall) [4]:

ComplicationFrequencyMechanism
Fever1 in 4 (common despite prophylactic antibiotics) [4]Transient bacteraemia from rectal flora (especially transrectal approach)
Bleeding: PR bleed, haematochezia, haemospermia, haematuria~1% [4]Needle traverses vascular prostatic tissue
Urosepsis~1% (uncommon but can be severe) [4]Rectal bacteria seeded into prostate and bloodstream; give prophylactic gentamicin beforehand [4]; infection < 0.5% for transperineal, ~5% for transrectal (antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone required) [2]
AROU1–2% [2]Pain and swelling of the prostate from procedure-related inflammation → obstruction of prostatic urethra
Prostatitis and prostatic abscess [1]RareBacterial seeding during transrectal biopsy

Harms of PSA screening [3][1]:

HarmExplanation
OverdiagnosisDetection by screening of conditions that would not have become clinically significant [1] — many low-grade cancers detected by screening would never cause symptoms or death in the patient's lifetime
OvertreatmentAggressive therapy including radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are provided even with early-staged disease [1] → complications include urinary incontinence, bowel dysfunction and sexual dysfunction [1][3]
False positives leading to anxiety and unnecessary biopsies [3]Elevated PSA from benign causes → patient undergoes biopsy (with its own risks) → no cancer found → but significant psychological distress throughout
Psychological harmBeing diagnosed with prostate cancer is psychologically distressing; negative biopsy result is also distressing since it cannot completely rule out cancer given the high false-negative biopsy rate [1]

CRPC represents the final common pathway of prostate cancer and is the lethal phase of the disease. Complications at this stage are the culmination of treatment resistance and widespread disease:

  • Progressive bone disease: increasing pain, pathological fractures, cord compression, hypercalcaemia
  • Visceral metastases: liver failure (hepatic mets), respiratory failure (pulmonary mets)
  • Bone marrow failure: pancytopenia from extensive marrow infiltration → infections, bleeding, transfusion dependence
  • Cancer cachexia: progressive weight loss, sarcopenia, anorexia — mediated by tumour-derived cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) disrupting metabolic homeostasis
  • Thromboembolic disease: prostate cancer is a prothrombotic state → DVT, PE
  • Treatment toxicity: cumulative side effects of multiple lines of systemic therapy (chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity from ADT)

High Yield Summary — Complications of Prostate Cancer

Disease complications:

  • Local: BOO/AROU (late, peripheral zone), obstructive uropathy/renal failure (trigone/ureteric invasion), haematuria, local invasion (bladder, seminal vesicles, neurovascular bundles)
  • Metastatic: Bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression (emergency: dexamethasone + MRI whole spine + decompression/RT), bone marrow failure, hypercalcaemia (less common in prostate cancer), liver/lung/adrenal mets

Treatment complications:

  • RP: ED (30–50%), stress incontinence (5–10% long-term), anastomotic stricture (5–10%), bleeding (5–10%), rectal injury ( < 5%), anejaculation (100%)
  • RT: ED (30%, gradual onset), radiation cystitis/proctitis (up to 10%), lower incontinence than RP, secondary malignancy (rare, late)
  • ADT: Hot flushes, ED, loss of libido, gynecomastia, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome (obesity, CVD risk, insulin resistance), anaemia, fatigue, cognitive changes
  • GnRH agonist flare: Testosterone surge → bone pain crisis, cord compression, ureteric obstruction. Prevent with anti-androgen cover or use GnRH antagonist.
  • Chemotherapy: Myelosuppression, neuropathy, GI toxicity, fatigue
  • Bone-directed therapy: ONJ, hypocalcaemia, atypical fractures, renal toxicity

Diagnostic complications:

  • Biopsy: Bleeding/haematospermia, infection/sepsis and urinary retention; frequency depends on biopsy route and definitions
  • Screening harms: Overdiagnosis, overtreatment (incontinence, ED, bowel dysfunction), false positives, anxiety

Active Recall - Complications of Prostate Cancer

References

[1] Senior notes: felixlai.md (Prostate cancer — complications of surgery, radiotherapy, ADT, bisphosphonates, screening harms, biopsy complications) [2] Senior notes: maxim.md (Section 2.5 — Prostate cancer: RP complications, RT complications, biopsy complications) [3] Lecture slides: GC 183. Common urological malignancies and their presentations - Nov 7.pdf (p35 — Harms of PSA screening; p45 — Complication of surgery) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Urogenital.pdf (p182 — Biopsy complications; p185 — RP complications, RT complications; p186 — ADT side effects, CRPC management, palliative treatment, prognosis; p177 — TURP complications) [10] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Chemical Path.pdf (p23 — Hypercalcaemia of malignancy mechanisms) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Critical Care.pdf (p25 — Post-renal AKI: BPH, CA prostate as causes) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p44 — Hypercalcaemia of malignancy management) [15] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p170 — Spinal cord tumours: extradural metastatic tumours from prostate cancer, presentation, investigation, management) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p143, p151 — Metastatic spread to lungs, bone, brain, adrenals; secondary tumours of the lungs) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Psychiatry.pdf (p233 — Prostate surgery and ejaculatory function: radical prostatectomy causes anejaculation but orgasm typically NOT affected)

High Yield Summary

Definition: Adenocarcinoma (95%) arising predominantly from the peripheral zone of the prostate.

Epidemiology (HK): 3rd most common male cancer; rising incidence; lifetime risk ~1/26–30; 1/3 present with locally advanced/metastatic disease.

Risk Factors: Age (most important) > ethnicity (Black > White > Asian) > family history (2× if 1 FDR, 4.5× if 2 FDR) > genetics (BRCA2, TMPRSS2-ERG, ATM, Lynch) > androgens > obesity/diet > smoking.

Anatomy: Peripheral zone (65%, cancer), Transitional zone (10%, BPH), Central zone (25%), Anterior fibromuscular stroma. Cancer in peripheral zone → late symptoms, palpable on DRE.

Spread: Direct (bladder, seminal vesicles) → Lymphatic (pelvic → para-aortic LN) → Haematogenous (Batson's plexus → axial skeleton: osteoblastic bone mets).

Gleason/Grade Groups: Gleason score = primary + secondary pattern (1–5). Grade Groups 1–5 (ISUP 2014). Gleason 3+4 ≠ 4+3 (different grade groups, different prognosis!).

Clinical Features: Often asymptomatic early. LUTS are late (peripheral zone origin). DRE: hard, irregular, nodule, loss of midline sulcus (only 25% palpable). Metastatic: bone pain (axial skeleton), cord compression, pathological fractures.

PSA: Organ-specific, NOT tumour-specific. Cutoff 4 ng/mL (age-adjusted). Grey zone 4–10 → PHI, free/total ratio, MRI. Factors ↑PSA: cancer, BPH, UTI, AROU, ejaculation, cycling. Factors ↓PSA: castration, 5ARI, RT.

Screening: Shared decision-making; HK CEWG does not recommend a universal programme. EAU considers PSA from 50 at average risk, 45 for family history/African ancestry and 40 for BRCA2, with life expectancy ≥15 years.

High Yield Summary — Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

By presentation:

  • Elevated PSA: BPH (most common cause), prostatitis/UTI, AROU, recent ejaculation/cycling, prostate cancer. PSA is organ-specific but NOT tumour-specific.
  • Abnormal DRE: BPH (smooth, symmetric, firm) vs prostate cancer (hard, irregular, nodule, loss of sulcus) vs prostatitis (tender, boggy) vs granulomatous prostatitis (mimics cancer).
  • LUTS: BPH (#1 cause in elderly men), OAB, UTI/prostatitis, urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture, neurogenic bladder, bladder cancer, drugs, constipation. Prostate cancer causes LUTS late.
  • Haematuria: Bladder cancer (#1 to exclude), RCC, BPH, UTI, stones. Painless gross haematuria > 35yo = malignancy until proven otherwise.
  • Bone pain: Prostate cancer (osteoblastic), lung/breast/renal cancer (usually osteolytic), myeloma (punched-out lytic), lymphoma.
  • Obstructive uropathy: BPH, prostate cancer (trigone/ureteric invasion), bladder cancer, stones, retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Key distinction: BPH vs Prostate Cancer — different zones (transitional vs peripheral), different DRE findings, different PSA profiles. BPH does NOT predispose to cancer. They commonly coexist.

High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Diagnostic pathway: Clinical suspicion (PSA + DRE) → Confirmatory workup (PSA derivatives, mpMRI) → Tissue diagnosis (prostate biopsy) → Risk stratification (PSA + T-stage + Grade Group) → Staging investigations (tiered by risk).

PSA interpretation: No value excludes cancer. Confirm unexpected elevation when appropriate, then combine PSA density, DRE, family history and MRI to decide on biopsy.

MRI: PI-RADS 4–5 usually prompts targeted sampling; PI-RADS 1–2 permits monitoring only when clinical risk is sufficiently low. MRI generally precedes biopsy for suspected organ-confined disease.

Biopsy: Transperineal preferred (lower infection, accesses all zones). 12-core systematic + targeted. Complications: fever, bleeding, urosepsis, AROU.

Histology: Focal HGPIN alone does not mandate repeat biopsy; persistent clinical/MRI risk does. ASAP warrants further evaluation.

Staging: AJCC 8th edition TNM + PSA + Grade Group = Prognostic Stage I–IV. Staging workup extent depends on risk group. PSMA PET-CT is replacing conventional bone scan + CT.

Key principle: The challenge is not just finding cancer — it's correctly risk-stratifying it so you treat those who need it and observe those who don't.

High Yield Summary — Management of Prostate Cancer

Conservative:

  • Active surveillance: Curative intent; low-risk disease; fit patient > 10y life expectancy; monitor with DRE/PSA/MRI/re-biopsy; base treatment change on confirmed progression, not a PSA rise alone.
  • Watchful waiting: Palliative intent; unfit/elderly patient < 10y life expectancy; treat symptoms with ADT when they arise.

Localised disease (curative):

  • Low risk: Active surveillance (preferred); RP or RT as alternatives
  • Intermediate risk: RP ± ePLND; or RT with 4–6 months ADT for unfavourable disease (ADT may be omitted for favourable disease)
  • High risk: RP + ePLND; or EBRT + long-term adjuvant ADT (2–3y)

Locally advanced: Selected RP with pathology/PSA-guided postoperative care; or EBRT + ADT; or ADT alone if unfit.

Metastatic (mHSPC):

  • Low volume: ADT + androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) + RT to primary
  • High volume (≥ 4 bone mets incl. 1 outside the vertebral column and pelvis, or visceral mets): ADT + ARPI + docetaxel

CRPC (castrate testosterone + progression): Continue ADT + add abiraterone/enzalutamide/docetaxel/cabazitaxel/223Ra/177Lu-PSMA/PARP inhibitors.

ADT: GnRH agonist (cover flare with anti-androgen) or GnRH antagonist (no flare). Side effects: hot flushes, ED, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, CVD risk, gynecomastia.

RP complications: ED (30–50%), incontinence (5–10% long-term), anastomotic stricture, bleeding, rectal injury.

RT complications: ED (30%), cystitis/proctitis (10%), less incontinence than RP.

Prognosis: Localised ~100% 5y survival; metastatic ~29%.

High Yield Summary — Complications of Prostate Cancer

Disease complications:

  • Local: BOO/AROU (late, peripheral zone), obstructive uropathy/renal failure (trigone/ureteric invasion), haematuria, local invasion (bladder, seminal vesicles, neurovascular bundles)
  • Metastatic: Bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression (emergency: dexamethasone + MRI whole spine + decompression/RT), bone marrow failure, hypercalcaemia (less common in prostate cancer), liver/lung/adrenal mets

Treatment complications:

  • RP: ED (30–50%), stress incontinence (5–10% long-term), anastomotic stricture (5–10%), bleeding (5–10%), rectal injury ( < 5%), anejaculation (100%)
  • RT: ED (30%, gradual onset), radiation cystitis/proctitis (up to 10%), lower incontinence than RP, secondary malignancy (rare, late)
  • ADT: Hot flushes, ED, loss of libido, gynecomastia, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome (obesity, CVD risk, insulin resistance), anaemia, fatigue, cognitive changes
  • GnRH agonist flare: Testosterone surge → bone pain crisis, cord compression, ureteric obstruction. Prevent with anti-androgen cover or use GnRH antagonist.
  • Chemotherapy: Myelosuppression, neuropathy, GI toxicity, fatigue
  • Bone-directed therapy: ONJ, hypocalcaemia, atypical fractures, renal toxicity

Diagnostic complications:

  • Biopsy: Bleeding/haematospermia, infection/sepsis and urinary retention; frequency depends on biopsy route and definitions
  • Screening harms: Overdiagnosis, overtreatment (incontinence, ED, bowel dysfunction), false positives, anxiety

On this page

No Headings