Ca Lung
Lung cancer is a malignant neoplasm arising from the epithelial cells of the bronchial tree or lung parenchyma, most commonly classified as non-small cell or small cell carcinoma.
CA Lung (Bronchial Carcinoma)
Lung cancer (CA lung) refers to malignant neoplasms arising from the epithelium of the respiratory tract. The vast majority (~95%) are bronchial carcinomas — cancers originating from bronchial epithelium or bronchial mucous glands. The term "lung cancer" in clinical practice almost always refers to bronchial carcinoma unless otherwise specified.
Other primary lung malignancies (lymphoma, sarcoma, carcinoid tumours) are rare. The lung is also a very common site for metastatic deposits from distant primaries (breast, colorectal, renal, ovarian, etc.), which must always be distinguished from a primary lung cancer.
The word "carcinoma" comes from Greek karkinos (crab) — the ancient Greeks thought tumours with their spreading tendrils resembled crabs.
2. Epidemiology
- Leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide — both in incidence and mortality [2].
- Approximately 2.2 million new cases per year globally (GLOBOCAN 2022 data).
- 5-year survival remains poor overall (~20–25%), though this has improved with targeted therapies and immunotherapy.
This is high yield for HKU exams:
- 2nd most common cancer by incidence (2nd in males, 3rd in females) [2].
- 1st in cancer mortality (1st in both sexes) [2] — i.e., lung cancer kills more people in HK than any other cancer.
- Demographics: M:F ≈ 2:1 (compared to 5–6:1 in Western countries) [2].
- Why the narrower sex gap in HK? Because a significant proportion of female lung cancer patients in HK are non-smokers (> 60% of females with CA lung in HK have never smoked) [2]. This is a distinctive East Asian pattern.
- Peak incidence: 60–70 years [2].
- 85% are NSCLC; 60–75% have hilar lymph node involvement at presentation [2] — meaning most patients present at an advanced stage.
| Males | Females | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | ~80% smokers | < 40% smokers [2] |
| Predominant histology | SCC / SCLC (smokers) | > 75% adenocarcinoma [2] |
| Molecular drivers | Variable | EGFR mutation much more common |
Why do non-smoking Asian women get lung cancer?
This is a classic exam question. Postulated causes include: (1) passive smoking [2], (2) cooking fume exposure (especially wok cooking with high-temperature oils — generates polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) [2], (3) higher prevalence of EGFR driver mutations in Asian adenocarcinomas (~55% in HK vs ~15% in Caucasians) [2], and (4) possible genetic susceptibility. The exact answer is multifactorial and not fully understood.
3. Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Mechanism | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Cigarette smoking | Carcinogens (benzopyrene, nitrosamines) cause DNA damage → accumulation of oncogenic mutations (p53, KRAS) | Responsible for ~90% of CA lung; 40× death rate in smokers [2]. Risk falls after cessation but never returns to baseline [2]. Dose-response: pack-years matter. |
| Passive (secondhand) smoking | Same carcinogens at lower dose | ~1.3× relative risk. Particularly relevant in HK female non-smokers [1][2]. |
| Asbestos exposure | Chronic inflammation → fibrosis → malignant transformation | Synergistic with smoking (multiplicative, not additive risk). Ask occupation: renovation/demolition workers [2]. Can cause mesothelioma (pleural) or bronchial carcinoma. |
| Cooking fumes | PAHs, aldehydes from high-temperature stir-frying | Particularly relevant in HK and Chinese populations [2]. |
| Radiation exposure | Direct DNA damage | Thoracic RT for prior malignancy; radon gas exposure (natural radioactive gas in some buildings/mines) [2]. |
| Air pollution | PM2.5 particulates cause chronic airway inflammation and oxidative DNA damage | Growing recognition as independent risk factor. |
| Risk Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Family history | 1.5× risk if positive family history [2] |
| Previous lung disease | Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), COPD — chronic inflammation and scarring provide a nidus for malignant transformation [2] |
| Previous TB | "Scar tumours" — classically described in textbooks [2]. Chronic granulomatous inflammation → fibrosis → malignant change (typically adenocarcinoma in scar tissue). |
| Genetic drivers | EGFR mutation (55% in local adenocarcinoma) — much more common in Asians [2]; ALK translocation (5%) [2]; KRAS mutation (5–10%) [2]. These are both risk factors and therapeutic targets. |
Smoking and Lung Cancer — Key Numbers for Exams
- 90% of lung cancers are attributable to smoking.
- 40× increased death rate in heavy smokers vs non-smokers.
- Risk falls after quitting but still rises with age faster than never-smokers [2] — i.e., the damage is partially irreversible.
- Pack-years = (packs/day) × (years smoked). > 20 pack-years = significant risk.
4. Anatomy and Function (Relevant to CA Lung)
Understanding the anatomy is critical because lung cancer symptoms are determined by where the tumour is and what structures it invades.
- Trachea → Right and left main bronchi → Lobar bronchi (3 right, 2 left) → Segmental bronchi → terminal/respiratory bronchioles → alveoli.
- Central tumours (SCC, SCLC) arise from main/lobar bronchi → early endobronchial symptoms (cough, haemoptysis, obstruction).
- Peripheral tumours (adenocarcinoma, large cell) arise in smaller airways/alveoli → may be asymptomatic until large or invading pleura.
The mediastinum is a tight space packed with critical structures. A growing central tumour or enlarged lymph nodes can compress any of these:
| Structure | Consequence of Compression/Invasion |
|---|---|
| Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) | Hoarseness of voice (left RLN loops under aortic arch — left-sided tumours more commonly cause this) |
| Phrenic nerve | Diaphragmatic paralysis → elevated hemidiaphragm on CXR |
| Oesophagus | Dysphagia |
| Superior vena cava (SVC) | SVC obstruction syndrome |
| Pericardium | Pericardial effusion ± tamponade |
| Sympathetic chain / stellate ganglion | Horner's syndrome (miosis, ptosis, anhidrosis, enophthalmos) |
| Brachial plexus (C8–T1) | Arm pain, weakness, small muscle wasting |
| Thoracic duct | Chylothorax (rare) |
| Vertebral body | Cord compression, back pain |
The lung apex sits in close relation to:
- Brachial plexus (lower trunk: C8, T1)
- Stellate ganglion (sympathetic chain)
- Subclavian vessels
- 1st and 2nd ribs
A tumour at the apex (Pancoast tumour, also called superior sulcus tumour) can invade all of these → producing the classic Pancoast syndrome (see Clinical Features below).
- Hilar nodes → Mediastinal nodes → Supraclavicular nodes (especially left supraclavicular = Virchow's node / Troisier's sign).
- Lymph node staging (N staging) is critical for operability:
- N0 = no nodes
- N1 = ipsilateral hilar/peribronchial
- N2 = ipsilateral mediastinal/subcarinal
- N3 = contralateral mediastinal/hilar, or any supraclavicular
Lung cancer has a propensity to metastasise to (mnemonic: BLAB — Brain, Liver, Adrenals, Bone):
- Brain — lung is the most common primary to metastasise to the brain
- Liver
- Adrenal glands — bilateral adrenal metastases can rarely cause adrenal insufficiency
- Bone — typically lytic lesions (unlike prostate which is sclerotic)
- Also: contralateral lung, skin, distant lymph nodes
5. Aetiology and Pathogenesis
Lung cancer develops through a stepwise accumulation of genetic mutations leading to progressively increasing degrees of epithelial dysplasia, eventually crossing the threshold to invasive carcinoma [2].
Think of it as a conveyor belt:
Normal epithelium → Squamous metaplasia → Dysplasia (mild → moderate → severe) → Carcinoma in situ → Invasive carcinoma
This process is highly heterogeneous — different subtypes have different driver mutations and different cells of origin [2].
| Mutation/Alteration | Prevalence in HK Adenocarcinoma | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| EGFR mutation | ~55% [2] | Most common actionable driver in Asian adenocarcinoma. Much higher than Caucasians (~15%). Targeted by TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, osimertinib). |
| ALK translocation | ~5% [2] | EML4-ALK fusion. Targeted by crizotinib, alectinib. Typically younger, non-smokers. |
| KRAS mutation | 5–10% [2] | More common in Western populations. Historically "undruggable" but sotorasib now targets KRAS G12C. |
| ROS1 rearrangement | ~1–2% | Similar to ALK; responds to crizotinib. |
| PD-L1 expression | Variable | Not a mutation but a biomarker for immunotherapy response. |
| p53 mutation | Very common (~50% all subtypes) | Tumour suppressor loss. Not directly targetable but important in pathogenesis. |
| BRAF V600E | ~1–2% | Targetable with dabrafenib + trametinib. |
EGFR in Asian Lung Cancer — Why It Matters So Much
In HK/East Asia, EGFR mutation is present in ~55% of adenocarcinomas [2]. This means more than half of adenocarcinoma patients in HK have a targetable mutation. EGFR TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) dramatically improved survival in these patients. This is why molecular testing is mandatory for all non-squamous NSCLC in current practice. Never start treatment without knowing the EGFR status.
Tobacco smoke contains > 60 known carcinogens:
- Initiation: Carcinogens (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrosamines) form DNA adducts → point mutations in tumour suppressors (p53, RB) and oncogenes (KRAS).
- Promotion: Chronic inflammation from smoke → reactive oxygen species → further DNA damage and proliferative signalling.
- Progression: Accumulation of mutations → clonal expansion → invasive carcinoma.
The field cancerisation concept: the entire bronchial epithelium is exposed to smoke, so multiple areas may undergo premalignant change simultaneously. This explains why smokers can develop second primary lung cancers even after resection of the first.
6. Classification
The fundamental division is into Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (~85%) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) (~15%). This distinction is the single most important one because it determines the entire management approach.
| Feature | Adenocarcinoma (ADC) | Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) | Large Cell Carcinoma (LCLC) | Small Cell Carcinoma (SCLC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of all lung cancers | ~40–55% [1][2] | ~20–30% [1][2] | ~5–10% [1][2] | ~5–15% [1][2] |
| Smoking association | Weakest (but still significant) [1] | Strongest [1] | Moderate | Strong [1] |
| Typical location | Peripheral [1] | Central [1] | Peripheral [1] | Central [1] |
| Cell of origin | Type II pneumocytes / Clara cells | Bronchial squamous epithelium (via metaplasia) | Undifferentiated large cells | Neuroendocrine cells (Kulchitsky cells) |
| IHC markers | TTF-1 [1] | p40, p63 [1] | Often negative | Synaptophysin, Chromogranin [1] |
| Key demographics | Young females, non-smokers (especially in Asia) | Older male smokers | Non-specific | Male smokers |
| Growth rate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate–fast | Very fast, tend to metastasize early [1] |
| Molecular targets | EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF | Rare actionable mutations | Rare | Rarely tested (chemo is mainstay) |
| Key feature | Most common subtype; glandular differentiation; mucin production | Keratin pearls, intercellular bridges; can cavitate (central necrosis) | Diagnosis of exclusion (no glandular/squamous/neuroendocrine features) | "Oat cell" carcinoma [1]; very high mitotic rate; crush artefact on biopsy; strong paraneoplastic associations |
| NSCLC | SCLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Surgery | Potentially curative if early stage | Almost never surgical (usually disseminated at diagnosis) |
| Chemosensitivity | Moderate | Very chemosensitive (but almost always relapses) |
| Radiosensitivity | Moderate | Very radiosensitive |
| Staging system | TNM staging (I–IV) | Limited vs Extensive disease |
| Prognosis | Better overall (especially with targeted therapy) | Very poor (median survival ~10–12 months even with treatment) |
Important for understanding prognosis:
- Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) — ≤ 3 cm, purely lepidic growth, 100% cure with resection
- Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) — ≤ 3 cm, predominantly lepidic, invasion ≤ 5 mm, near 100% cure
- Invasive adenocarcinoma — subdivided by predominant pattern:
- Lepidic (best prognosis)
- Acinar
- Papillary
- Micropapillary (worst prognosis)
- Solid (worst prognosis)
NSCLC: Uses TNM 8th edition (2017, still current in 2025–2026):
- Stage I–II: potentially resectable
- Stage III: locally advanced (IIIA may be resectable, IIIB/IIIC usually not)
- Stage IV: metastatic (palliative intent)
SCLC: Traditionally uses Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) system:
- Limited disease: confined to one hemithorax + ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes (can be encompassed in a single radiation field)
- Extensive disease: anything beyond limited disease
7. Clinical Features
Most lung cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage because:
- Peripheral tumours (adenocarcinoma) can grow silently — the lung parenchyma has no pain receptors. Only when they reach the pleura (which has somatic innervation) or a major airway do symptoms appear.
- Central tumours (SCC, SCLC) may produce early airway symptoms (cough, haemoptysis), but these are often dismissed as "smoker's cough" by the patient.
- There is no established population-wide screening programme in HK (unlike low-dose CT screening recommended in the US for high-risk groups).
Clinical Pearl
Any change in the character of a chronic cough in a smoker — or new haemoptysis — warrants a CXR at minimum. A "normal" CXR does not exclude lung cancer (especially small peripheral lesions or retrocardiac/apical tumours). If clinical suspicion is high, proceed to CT thorax.
7.2 Symptoms
I'll organise symptoms by mechanism — this is how you should think about them on a ward round.
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Malaise, fatigue | Tumour-derived cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) cause systemic inflammation and catabolism |
| Weight loss, cachexia | Cancer cachexia syndrome: tumour releases proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) and lipid-mobilising factor (LMF) → skeletal muscle wasting and fat loss. Also mediated by TNF-α ("cachectin"). |
| Loss of appetite (anorexia) | Central appetite suppression by tumour-derived cytokines acting on the hypothalamus |
| Fever | Tumour necrosis releasing pyrogens; also post-obstructive pneumonia |
These occur when the tumour grows within or compresses the airway lumen.
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Cough [1] | Irritation of cough receptors in the bronchial mucosa by tumour mass. May be dry or productive. A change in the character of a chronic cough in a smoker is a red flag. |
| Haemoptysis [1] | Tumour is vascular and friable → erosion of mucosal blood vessels → blood-streaked sputum. Massive haemoptysis (rare but lethal) occurs if tumour erodes into a pulmonary artery or bronchial artery. |
| Shortness of breath (SOB) [1] | Partial or complete bronchial obstruction → distal atelectasis (collapse) → reduced functional lung volume. Also from large pleural effusions. |
| Wheeze / Stridor [1] | Fixed, monophonic wheeze from partial airway obstruction (unlike the polyphonic wheeze of asthma/COPD). Stridor occurs with tracheal/main bronchus obstruction — an emergency. |
| Post-obstructive pneumonia | Tumour blocks bronchus → mucus stagnation distal to obstruction → bacterial superinfection. Suspect lung cancer in any patient with recurrent or non-resolving pneumonia in the same lobe. |
Exam Tip
A common exam scenario: "A 65-year-old smoker presents with recurrent right lower lobe pneumonia." The key differential is post-obstructive pneumonia due to endobronchial tumour. Always think CA lung in recurrent/non-resolving pneumonia in a smoker.
C. Symptoms from Regional Spread / Local Invasion
These depend on which mediastinal or thoracic structure is invaded.
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Pleural effusion [1] | Tumour cells seed the pleura → irritation and increased vascular permeability → exudative effusion. Also lymphatic obstruction impairs pleural fluid reabsorption. |
| Pleuritic chest pain [1] | Parietal pleura (innervated by intercostal nerves) is invaded or inflamed by tumour. Visceral pleura has no somatic innervation, so pain only occurs when the parietal pleura is involved. |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Pericardial effusion ± cardiac tamponade [1] | Direct tumour invasion or metastatic seeding of the pericardium → fluid accumulation → if rapid/large, compresses the heart → reduced cardiac filling → tamponade (Beck's triad: hypotension, distended neck veins, muffled heart sounds). |
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Hoarseness of voice [1] | Left RLN loops under the aortic arch and then ascends to the larynx in the tracheo-oesophageal groove. Tumours of the left hilum or aortopulmonary window lymph nodes can compress/invade it → unilateral vocal cord paralysis → hoarse, breathy voice. Right RLN loops under the right subclavian artery (higher up), so right-sided tumours less commonly cause this. |
| Dysphagia [1] | Direct compression/invasion of the oesophagus by tumour or enlarged subcarinal lymph nodes. The oesophagus lies posterior to the trachea in the mediastinum. |
A Pancoast tumour is a tumour at the lung apex invading the structures of the thoracic inlet. The resulting clinical syndrome is called Pancoast syndrome [1]:
| Component | Structure Involved | Clinical Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Horner's syndrome [1] | Stellate ganglion (T1 sympathetic ganglion) | Miosis (pupil constriction — loss of sympathetic pupil dilator), ptosis (drooping eyelid — loss of sympathetic innervation to Müller's muscle), anhidrosis (loss of facial sweating on ipsilateral side), enophthalmos (apparent sinking of the eye). Mnemonic: MAP — Miosis, Anhidrosis, Ptosis. |
| Brachial plexopathy [1] | Lower trunk of brachial plexus (C8, T1) | Pain radiating down the medial arm/forearm (T1 dermatome), numbness in medial 1.5 fingers (ulnar nerve territory). |
| Small hand muscle wasting [1] | T1 nerve root → intrinsic hand muscles | Claw hand appearance, weakness of finger abduction/adduction (interossei), thumb opposition (thenar eminence — but T1 involvement mainly affects hypothenar/interossei). |
| Shoulder pain [1] | Invasion of chest wall, ribs, and adjacent soft tissues | Deep, boring, constant pain in the shoulder/scapular region. |
Why is Horner's Syndrome Always on the Same Side as the Tumour?
The sympathetic chain runs ipsilaterally from the hypothalamus → brainstem → C8–T2 (ciliospinal centre of Budge) → exits the spinal cord → synapses in the stellate ganglion (at the lung apex) → postganglionic fibres travel along the internal carotid artery to reach the eye. A Pancoast tumour destroys the stellate ganglion on the same side → ipsilateral Horner's syndrome.
| Symptom | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|
| Puffy face / facial oedema [1] | Compression/invasion of the SVC by tumour or enlarged right paratracheal lymph nodes → obstruction of venous return from the head and upper limbs → raised venous pressure → oedema of the face, neck, and upper limbs. |
| Dilated chest veins / collateral veins [1] | Blood finds alternative venous drainage pathways → dilated superficial veins over the anterior chest wall (collateral circulation). |
| Pemberton's sign [1] | Raising both arms above the head for > 1 minute → further compresses the thoracic inlet → worsening facial congestion, cyanosis, and JVP elevation. This is a clinical bedside test for SVC obstruction or thoracic inlet narrowing. |
| Headache, visual disturbance | Raised intracranial venous pressure (the internal jugular veins drain into the SVC). |
| Arm swelling | Venous congestion of the upper extremities. |
SVCO is most commonly caused by lung cancer (especially SCLC, which is central and aggressive) or lymphoma. It is an oncological emergency — can progress to cerebral oedema if untreated.
| Symptom/Sign | Structure | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Phrenic nerve palsy → elevated hemidiaphragm [1] | Phrenic nerve (C3, C4, C5 — "C3, 4, 5 keeps the diaphragm alive") | Tumour or lymph nodes compress/invade the phrenic nerve as it descends along the mediastinum → diaphragmatic paralysis → hemidiaphragm rises on the affected side (seen on CXR). Patient may report orthopnoea. |
| Lymphangitis carcinomatosis [1] | Pulmonary lymphatic channels | Tumour cells spread through pulmonary lymphatics → diffuse lymphatic obstruction → interstitial oedema, septal thickening → progressive dyspnoea, dry cough. CXR/CT shows reticular/reticulonodular pattern with septal (Kerley B) lines. |
| Site | Symptoms | Pathophysiological Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Supraclavicular / cervical lymph nodes [1] | Painless, hard, fixed lump in the neck | Lymphatic spread via mediastinal → supraclavicular lymph nodes. Left supraclavicular (Virchow's node) suggests thoracic/abdominal malignancy. |
| Liver [1] | Right upper quadrant discomfort, hepatomegaly, deranged LFTs [1] | Haematogenous spread → hepatic metastases → liver capsule (Glisson's capsule) stretching → pain. Hepatocyte destruction → elevated transaminases and ALP. |
| Adrenal glands [1] | Usually asymptomatic; rarely glucocorticoid insufficiency [1] (Addisonian crisis) | Bilateral adrenal metastases → destruction of > 90% of adrenal cortical tissue → adrenal insufficiency (hypotension, hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia). Often found incidentally on staging CT. |
| Bone [1] | Bone pain, back pain, pathological fractures, hypercalcaemia, cord compression [1] | Lytic bone metastases (osteoclast activation by tumour-derived PTHrP, RANKL, IL-6) → weakened bone → fractures. Vertebral body involvement → collapse → spinal cord compression (oncological emergency). |
| Brain [1] | Unilateral limb weakness, seizures [1], headache, personality change, nausea/vomiting | Haematogenous spread across the blood-brain barrier → space-occupying lesion → raised ICP, focal neurological deficits depending on location. Lung is the most common primary to metastasise to the brain. |
Spinal Cord Compression — Don't Miss This
Any lung cancer patient presenting with back pain + lower limb weakness/sensory level/urinary retention → suspect spinal cord compression. This is an oncological emergency. Needs urgent MRI whole spine and dexamethasone. Delay → irreversible paraplegia.
Paraneoplastic syndromes are clinical manifestations caused by substances produced by the tumour (hormones, antibodies, cytokines) rather than by direct tumour invasion. They can be the presenting feature and may precede the diagnosis of cancer by months.
| Syndrome | Tumour Type | Mechanism | Clinical Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIADH (Syndrome of Inappropriate ADH secretion) | SCLC | Ectopic ADH (vasopressin) secretion → water retention → dilutional hyponatraemia | Confusion, seizures, nausea, concentrated urine, low serum Na+, low serum osmolality with inappropriately concentrated urine |
| Ectopic Cushing's syndrome | SCLC | Ectopic ACTH secretion → bilateral adrenal hyperplasia → cortisol excess | Hypertension, hypokalaemic metabolic alkalosis, hyperglycaemia, proximal myopathy, moon face. Note: rapid onset so classic Cushingoid features may not have time to develop. |
| Hypercalcaemia of malignancy | SCC (most commonly) | Ectopic PTHrP (parathyroid hormone-related peptide) → acts on PTH receptors → osteoclast activation, renal calcium reabsorption | "Bones, stones, abdominal moans, psychic groans" — bone pain, renal stones, constipation, confusion. Also from osteolytic bone metastases (any subtype). |
| Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) | SCLC | Antibodies against presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) at the neuromuscular junction → reduced ACh release | Proximal muscle weakness (improves with repeated use — opposite to myasthenia gravis), hyporeflexia, autonomic dysfunction (dry mouth). |
| Cerebellar degeneration | SCLC | Anti-Hu, anti-Yo antibodies → autoimmune destruction of Purkinje cells | Progressive cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria, nystagmus |
| Peripheral neuropathy | SCLC | Anti-Hu (ANNA-1) antibodies → sensory > motor neuropathy | Numbness, paraesthesia, sensory ataxia |
| Dermatomyositis / Polymyositis | Any | Autoimmune — tumour antigens cross-react with muscle antigens | Proximal muscle weakness, heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, elevated CK |
| Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOA) | NSCLC (especially adenocarcinoma) | Unknown mechanism — possibly VEGF, PDGF. Results in periosteal new bone formation. | Clubbing (earliest sign), painful wrist/ankle swelling, bone pain. X-ray: periosteal reaction in long bones (distal tibia, radius, ulna). May resolve after tumour resection. |
| Clubbing | NSCLC (especially SCC and ADC) | Likely due to VEGF and PDGF release → endothelial proliferation in nail bed | Loss of the normal angle between nail and nail bed (Lovibond angle > 180°). Check by Schamroth's test (loss of diamond-shaped window). |
| Thrombophilia / migratory thrombophlebitis (Trousseau syndrome) | Any | Tumour secretes procoagulants (tissue factor, mucin) → hypercoagulable state | DVT, PE, migratory superficial thrombophlebitis. Cancer patients have 4–7× increased VTE risk. |
| Gynaecomastia | Large cell carcinoma | Ectopic β-hCG secretion → aromatase stimulation → oestrogen excess | Bilateral breast enlargement in males |
Paraneoplastic Syndromes — Key Associations for Exams
- SCLC = SIADH, ectopic Cushing's, LEMS, anti-Hu neuropathy
- SCC = Hypercalcaemia (PTHrP), clubbing
- Adenocarcinoma = HPOA, clubbing
- Large cell = Gynaecomastia (β-hCG)
Think of SCLC as the "endocrine" cancer — it comes from neuroendocrine cells and loves to secrete hormones.
7.3 Signs
On examination, you are looking for signs that confirm the symptoms above and help stage the disease.
- Cachexia — temporal wasting, prominent ribs, loose skin
- Clubbing — check Schamroth's test (loss of the diamond window between opposing fingernails)
- Tar staining of fingers — confirms smoking history
- Pallor — anaemia of chronic disease
- Lymphadenopathy — palpate cervical and supraclavicular nodes (especially left = Virchow's node)
- Horner's syndrome — miosis, ptosis, anhidrosis (check pupil asymmetry, eyelid position)
- Hoarseness — listen to the voice before you even examine
| Sign | What It Indicates |
|---|---|
| Dull percussion + reduced breath sounds + reduced vocal resonance on one side | Pleural effusion (fluid between the visceral and parietal pleura) |
| Dull percussion + reduced breath sounds + bronchial breathing above the level | Lobar collapse (atelectasis) due to endobronchial obstruction |
| Fixed monophonic wheeze | Partial airway obstruction by tumour (localised to one area — unlike diffuse polyphonic wheeze of COPD/asthma) |
| Stridor | Tracheal or main bronchus obstruction — ominous sign |
| Tracheal deviation | Towards the lesion if collapse; away if large effusion |
| Reduced chest expansion on one side | Effusion, collapse, or chest wall invasion |
| Dilated superficial chest veins | SVCO — blood finding alternative drainage routes |
| Sign | What It Indicates |
|---|---|
| Hepatomegaly (hard, irregular, non-tender) | Liver metastases |
| Tender bony points (vertebrae, ribs, long bones) | Bone metastases |
| Focal neurological deficits | Brain metastases |
| Wasting of small muscles of the hand | T1 root involvement (Pancoast) |
| Pemberton's sign | SVCO |
| Pericardial rub or muffled heart sounds | Pericardial involvement |
8. Special Topics from Lecture Slides
From the lecture slides [3]:
- Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has revolutionised the surgical approach to early-stage lung cancer [3].
- VATS lobectomy is now the standard of care for stage I–II NSCLC where anatomical resection is feasible [3].
- Advantages of VATS over open thoracotomy [3]:
- Smaller incisions → less postoperative pain
- Faster recovery → shorter hospital stay
- Reduced postoperative complications (wound infection, respiratory complications)
- Equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery in terms of survival and recurrence
- Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is gaining popularity, offering 3D visualisation and articulating instruments, but cost remains a barrier [3].
- VATS can also be used for [3]:
- Diagnostic procedures: pleural biopsy, wedge resection for diagnosis
- Staging: mediastinal lymph node sampling
- Therapeutic procedures: pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion
From the lecture slides [5]:
- Surgery may cure cancer — this is the title and key message of the lecture [5].
- The goal of curative surgery is complete (R0) resection — removal of all macroscopic and microscopic tumour with negative margins [5].
- For lung cancer, anatomical resection (lobectomy or pneumonectomy) with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection is the standard curative operation [5].
- Sublobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) may be acceptable for:
- Small (≤ 2 cm) peripheral tumours
- Patients with insufficient pulmonary reserve for lobectomy [5]
- Recent evidence (JCOG0802 and CALGB 140503 trials) supports segmentectomy for tumours ≤ 2 cm with equivalent outcomes to lobectomy
- Neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy ± immunotherapy before surgery) is increasingly used for stage II–IIIA NSCLC to downstage the tumour and improve resectability [5].
- Multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is essential — involving thoracic surgeon, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, and respiratory physician [5].
From the gastric cancer lecture [6], the general principle of cancer staging and imaging is universal:
- Cross-sectional imaging (CT with contrast) is the mainstay of staging for all solid organ cancers [6].
- PET-CT is useful for detecting distant metastases and assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement — this principle applies to both gastric and lung cancers.
From the liver lecture [4]:
- Hepatomegaly in a cancer patient must raise suspicion for hepatic metastases [4].
- Lung cancer is one of the most common causes of liver metastases [4].
- Clinical features of liver metastases: hard, irregular, non-tender hepatomegaly; elevated ALP and GGT (cholestatic pattern); progressive jaundice if extensive [4].
To tie it all together — here is a concept map of how pathology drives clinical features:
High Yield Summary
Key Points for CA Lung (Definition → Clinical Features):
- Definition: Bronchial carcinoma = malignant neoplasm from bronchial epithelium. 95% of lung cancers.
- Epidemiology (HK): 2nd in incidence, 1st in mortality. M:F = 2:1. Female non-smokers with adenocarcinoma/EGFR mutation is a distinctive HK pattern. Peak 60–70y. 85% NSCLC.
- Risk factors: Smoking (90%), passive smoking, asbestos, cooking fumes, radiation, radon, family history, IPF, previous TB. EGFR mutation in 55% of local adenocarcinoma.
- Classification: NSCLC (adenocarcinoma [peripheral, TTF-1+], SCC [central, p40+], large cell) vs SCLC (central, neuroendocrine markers, fast, early metastasis).
- Clinical features by mechanism:
- Constitutional: cachexia, weight loss (cytokine-mediated)
- Endobronchial: cough, haemoptysis, SOB, wheeze/stridor
- Regional: pleural effusion, RLN palsy (hoarseness), phrenic palsy, SVCO, Pancoast syndrome, pericardial effusion, dysphagia, lymphangitis carcinomatosis
- Metastatic: BLAB (Brain, Liver, Adrenals, Bone)
- Paraneoplastic: SCLC → SIADH, Cushing's, LEMS; SCC → hypercalcaemia; NSCLC → HPOA, clubbing
- Surgical principles: VATS lobectomy is standard for early-stage NSCLC. R0 resection is the goal. MDT approach is essential.
Active Recall - CA Lung (Definition to Clinical Features)
[1] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (CA lung — definition, epidemiology, clinical features, Pancoast syndrome) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (Lung cancer epidemiology in HK, risk factors, classification) [3] Lecture slides: GC 202. Surgery may cure your cancer Surgical oncology.pdf (Surgical principles, VATS lobectomy) [4] Senior notes: Ryan Ho GI.pdf (Hepatic metastases — clinical features and work-up)
Differential Diagnosis of CA Lung
When you encounter a patient with a suspected lung mass, the clinical challenge is not simply "is this lung cancer?" — it is "what else could this be, and how do I systematically narrow down the list?" The differential diagnosis depends heavily on the clinical presentation (i.e., what brought the patient in) and the radiological appearance (solitary nodule vs mass vs multiple nodules vs diffuse infiltrate). Let me walk you through this the way you'd think on a ward round.
The differential for a suspected lung malignancy can be approached from several angles:
-
Radiological appearance — What does the CXR/CT show?
- Solitary pulmonary nodule (≤ 3 cm) vs mass ( > 3 cm)
- Multiple nodules
- Cavitating lesion
- Hilar/mediastinal mass
- Pleural effusion
- Diffuse infiltrate / lymphangitic pattern
-
Presenting symptom — What brought the patient in?
- Chronic cough / haemoptysis
- Dyspnoea
- Constitutional symptoms (weight loss, cachexia)
- Incidental finding on imaging
-
Tissue of origin — Even if confirmed as a lung mass, is it:
- Primary bronchial carcinoma?
- Other primary lung malignancy?
- Metastatic deposit from elsewhere?
The First Principle of DDx
A lung mass on imaging is not lung cancer until proven otherwise. In many populations, up to 70% of incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules are benign [7][8]. The DDx is broad, and the approach must be systematic to avoid both missing a cancer and performing unnecessary invasive procedures on benign disease.
2. Differential Diagnosis by Radiological Pattern
A nodule is defined as a rounded opacity ≤ 3 cm; a mass is > 3 cm [7]. This distinction matters because masses are much more likely to be malignant.
| Category | Specific Diagnoses | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Primary lung malignancy | Adenocarcinoma, SCC, SCLC, large cell, carcinoid tumour | Spiculated margins, eccentric calcification, enhancement on contrast CT (HU > 15), pleural retraction, growth on serial imaging [8][9] |
| Metastatic deposit | From breast, colorectal, renal, melanoma, sarcoma, head & neck | Usually well-circumscribed and multiple (but can be solitary); known primary elsewhere; round "cannonball" appearance [7] |
| Granuloma | TB, histoplasmosis, sarcoidosis | Well-circumscribed, central/uniform/"popcorn" calcification, stable over time. TB very common in HK — always consider [8][9] |
| Benign tumour | Hamartoma | Most common benign lung tumour. Fat-containing on CT (pathognomonic), "popcorn" calcification, well-circumscribed [8][9] |
| Lung abscess | Bacterial (Klebsiella, Staph aureus, anaerobes), fungal (Aspergillus) | Cavitating lesion with air-fluid level, thick irregular wall, fever, productive cough with foul-smelling sputum |
| AVM | Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation | Well-circumscribed, feeding vessel visible on CT, associated with HHT (hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia — Osler-Weber-Rendu) [8][9] |
| Pulmonary sequestration | Congenital abnormal lung tissue | Connected to blood supply but not the bronchial tree (therefore not ventilated) [8]. Recurrent infections in same location. |
| Inflammatory pseudotumour | Organising pneumonia, IgG4-related disease | Can mimic malignancy on imaging; may need biopsy to distinguish |
| Extrapulmonary density | Nipple shadow, pleural mass, bone lesion, skin lesion, electrodes [7] | On CXR only — eliminated by CT or repeat CXR with nipple markers |
Characteristics distinguishing benign from malignant nodules [7][8][9]:
| Feature | Malignant (30% of SPNs) | Benign (70% of SPNs) |
|---|---|---|
| Size | > 2 cm | < 2 cm |
| Location | Upper lobe more likely malignant | Lower lobe slightly more likely benign |
| Margin | Spiculated (corona radiata sign — irregular, sunburst-like projections into surrounding parenchyma; reflects desmoplastic reaction to invading tumour) | Well-defined, smooth |
| Calcification | Eccentric (or absent) | Central, "popcorn" (hamartoma), laminated, diffuse [8][9] |
| Contrast enhancement | HU > 15 (vascular tumour takes up contrast) | HU < 15 (avascular/fibrotic) [7] |
| Growth | Doubling time 20–400 days | Stable > 2 years (very reassuring) |
| Patient factors | Age > 50, smoking, family history, prior cancer | Age < 40, non-smoker |
Consider other predictors for malignancy: age, smoking, family history [7]. Compare with previous film [7] — if a nodule has been stable for > 2 years, it is almost certainly benign.
A lesion > 3 cm is a mass, and the probability of malignancy increases dramatically. The differential narrows:
| Diagnosis | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Primary bronchial carcinoma | Most likely diagnosis. Spiculated, enhancing, may have chest wall/mediastinal invasion. |
| Metastatic tumour | Usually round, well-circumscribed. May be solitary. Requires search for primary. |
| Lymphoma | Usually mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy dominant; anterior mediastinal mass. Young patient. B symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss). |
| Lung abscess | Cavitating with air-fluid level. Acute/subacute illness with fever, productive cough. |
| Organising pneumonia / round pneumonia | May mimic mass; usually responds to antibiotics. More common in children. |
| Large granuloma / tuberculoma | Especially in HK where TB is endemic. Calcification, upper lobe. |
| Category | Diagnoses |
|---|---|
| Metastatic disease | Most common cause of multiple pulmonary nodules in adults. "Cannonball" metastases (renal, colorectal, sarcoma, melanoma, testicular). |
| Infection | Abscess (bacterial — multiple, with cavitation), granulomatous lung disease (TB, fungal, GPA) [7] |
| Granulomatous / autoimmune | Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA/Wegener's) — cavitating nodules + upper respiratory involvement + glomerulonephritis. Rheumatoid nodules (Caplan syndrome in coal miners). Sarcoidosis [7]. |
| Septic emboli | IV drug use, infective endocarditis. Multiple peripheral nodules with feeding vessel sign, may cavitate. |
| Benign | Multiple hamartomas (rare), lymphangioleiomyomatosis (young women) |
A cavitating lesion has a centre darker than the periphery (air within the lesion) ± air-fluid level [8][9]. The wall thickness is a key discriminator:
Mnemonic for cavitating lung lesions: CAVITY
- Cancer — most frequently SCC [8][9] (central necrosis in large tumours)
- Autoimmune granulomas — Wegener's (GPA), RA nodules [8][9]
- Vascular — emboli (pulmonary infarction can cavitate) [8][9]
- Infection — abscess, TB [8][9] (TB: upper lobe, apical; abscess: dependent segments)
- Trauma — pneumatoceles [8][9]
- Youth — airway malformation, cyst, pulmonary sequestration [8][9]
Other clue: a whitish ball within a cavity indicates aspergilloma [8][9] (mycetoma — a fungal ball of Aspergillus colonising a pre-existing cavity, classically in old TB cavities. Shows the "air crescent sign" on CT).
| Diagnosis | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Central bronchial carcinoma (SCC, SCLC) | Most common cause of unilateral hilar mass in an adult smoker |
| Lymphoma | Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (especially Hodgkin's — "bulky mediastinal disease"). Anterior mediastinum. |
| Sarcoidosis | Bilateral symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL) — classically stage I/II sarcoidosis. Young, Black patients. Non-caseating granulomas. |
| TB | Unilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (especially primary TB in children/young adults). Paratracheal nodes. |
| Thymoma | Anterior mediastinum. Associated with myasthenia gravis. |
| Retrosternal goitre | Superior mediastinum, continuous with thyroid on CT. |
3. Differential Diagnosis by Presenting Symptom
Because many patients with suspected CA lung present not with a visible mass, but with a symptom, here are the key DDx organised by the symptom that brings them in:
| Category | Differentials |
|---|---|
| Respiratory (productive) | COPD, TB, bronchiectasis, malignancy [7] |
| Respiratory (dry) | Postnasal drip, post-viral cough, asthma, lung fibrosis [7] |
| GI | GORD, recurrent aspiration [7] — acid reflux stimulates vagal cough receptors in the lower oesophagus and larynx |
| Cardiac | Heart failure [7] — pulmonary congestion stimulates J-receptors in the alveolar walls |
| Drug-induced | ACEI (↑bradykinin accumulation in the lungs → cough), beta-blockers (bronchospasm) [7] |
The classic exam scenario: A 60-year-old smoker with a change in the character of chronic cough, especially if accompanied by haemoptysis or weight loss → CA lung until proven otherwise.
| Category | Differentials |
|---|---|
| Airway disease | CA lung, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC — important in HK!), bronchiectasis [7] |
| Parenchymal disease | TB, pneumonia, lung abscess [7] |
| Vascular disease | PE, LV failure (CHF, mitral stenosis — pink frothy sputum), vasculitis (Goodpasture's syndrome, GPA, MPA), HHT [7] |
| Others | Bleeding tendency, anticoagulants, pulmonary endometriosis (rare, catamenial haemoptysis) [7] |
NPC in HK
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an important DDx for haemoptysis in Hong Kong due to its high endemic prevalence (strongly associated with EBV and Southern Chinese ethnicity). Always examine the nasopharynx in a haemoptysis work-up, especially if associated with unilateral conductive hearing loss, nasal obstruction, or cranial nerve palsies.
| Acuity | Key Differentials |
|---|---|
| Acute | Pneumothorax, PE, acute pulmonary oedema (APO), asthma exacerbation, AECOPD [7] |
| Subacute | Pneumonia, TB, pleural effusion [7] |
| Chronic | COPD, malignancy, interstitial lung disease (ILD) [7] |
| Cardiac | CHF, ACS, arrhythmia [7] |
| Metabolic | Anaemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperthyroidism [7] |
| Neuromuscular | Myasthenia gravis, GBS, stroke [7] |
| Psychological | Anxiety, hyperventilation syndrome [7] |
In a patient with weight loss and a lung mass, the differential includes:
- Primary lung cancer (most common)
- TB — particularly relevant in HK. Weight loss, night sweats, chronic cough, upper lobe cavitary disease.
- Lymphoma — B symptoms (fever, night sweats, > 10% weight loss in 6 months)
- Metastatic cancer — lung is a common site for metastases from many primaries
- HIV/AIDS-related opportunistic infections — immunocompromised patients may present with lung masses (Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma, atypical infections)
If a patient presents with back pain and is subsequently found to have a lung mass:
| DDx Category | Diagnoses |
|---|---|
| Malignant | Primary lung cancer with bone metastasis; other primary with bone mets (breast, prostate, thyroid, kidney — "paired organ" primaries) [10] |
| Infective | TB spine (Pott's disease), epidural abscess [10] |
| Degenerative | Spondylosis, disc prolapse [10] |
| Fracture | Osteoporotic compression fracture, pathological fracture [10] |
| Inflammatory | Ankylosing spondylitis [10] |
This is a critical distinction because it completely changes management. A solitary lung mass in a patient with a known extracranial malignancy is not metastasis in 10–15% of cases [11] — it could be a new primary lung cancer, and this has curative implications.
| Feature | Primary Lung Cancer | Lung Metastasis |
|---|---|---|
| Number | Usually solitary | Often multiple (but can be solitary) |
| Margins | Spiculated, irregular | Round, well-circumscribed ("cannonball") |
| Location | Upper lobe predominance | Random distribution (haematogenous seeding) — often peripheral, basal |
| Associated findings | Hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy, endobronchial component | Known extrathoracic primary, other organ metastases |
| Histology | Matches bronchial subtypes (ADC, SCC, etc.) | Matches the primary tumour histology |
| IHC | TTF-1+ (adenocarcinoma), p40+ (SCC) | Organ-specific markers (e.g., ER/PR for breast, CDX2 for colorectal, PAX8 for renal) |
Exam Pearl — Solitary Brain Lesion in Known Cancer
10–15% of solitary cerebral mass lesions in patients with pre-existing cancer are NOT metastasis [11] — they may be primary brain tumours or brain abscesses. Do not assume all lesions in cancer patients are metastatic without tissue confirmation when it would change management.
When you find a hard, irregular, non-tender hepatomegaly in a patient with a lung mass, the differential for the liver lesion includes:
| Diagnosis | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Hepatic metastases from lung cancer | Most likely if known/suspected lung primary. CT shows hypovascular lesions (lung cancer typically produces hypovascular mets) [13]. |
| HCC | Background chronic liver disease (HBV/HCV, cirrhosis). Arterial enhancement with portal venous washout on triphasic CT. AFP > 400 ng/mL almost diagnostic [13]. |
| Other metastases | If the lung mass itself is a metastasis, the liver lesion may also be from the same primary (e.g., colorectal cancer metastatic to both lung and liver). |
| Benign lesions | Haemangioma (peripheral nodular enhancement, centripetal fill-in), FNH, adenoma — important not to assume malignancy without imaging characterisation. |
| Presentation | Top Differentials to Exclude | Key Discriminators |
|---|---|---|
| Solitary lung nodule/mass | TB granuloma, hamartoma, metastasis, abscess, organising pneumonia | Imaging features, stability on serial imaging, biopsy |
| Multiple lung nodules | Metastases, TB, GPA, septic emboli, sarcoidosis | Clinical context, distribution pattern, cavitation |
| Cavitating lesion | SCC, TB, abscess, GPA, infarct | Wall thickness, clinical features, microbiology |
| Haemoptysis | Bronchiectasis, TB, PE, NPC | Volume, imaging, bronchoscopy |
| Chronic cough in smoker | COPD, TB, bronchiectasis, GORD, ACEI cough | Sputum studies, PFTs, imaging, medication review |
| SVC obstruction | Lymphoma, thymoma, fibrosing mediastinitis | Imaging, biopsy |
| Pancoast syndrome | Neurogenic tumour (schwannoma), TB of lung apex, metastasis to apex | MRI of thoracic inlet, biopsy |
| Brain metastasis with unknown primary | Primary brain tumour, brain abscess | Imaging features, search for primary, stereotactic biopsy |
High Yield Summary — DDx of CA Lung
- Not all lung nodules are cancer — 70% of incidentally found pulmonary nodules are benign [7][8].
- Key benign mimics: TB granuloma (very common in HK), hamartoma (fat + popcorn calcification), lung abscess, organising pneumonia, AVM.
- Malignant DDx: primary lung cancer, metastatic deposit (search for primary!), lymphoma, carcinoid.
- Cavitating lesions: SCC is the most common malignant cause; TB and abscess are the most common infectious causes [8][9].
- Always distinguish primary lung cancer from lung metastasis — different management entirely. Use IHC (TTF-1 for lung adenocarcinoma, p40 for lung SCC).
- Haemoptysis DDx in HK: always consider NPC (nasopharyngeal carcinoma) alongside CA lung and TB.
- 10–15% of solitary brain lesions in known cancer patients are NOT metastasis [11] — don't assume.
- Compare with previous films [7] — stability over > 2 years is very reassuring for benign aetiology.
Active Recall - DDx of CA Lung
References
[7] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.278–281, Respiratory Medicine — DDx of cough, haemoptysis, dyspnoea, and incidental lung nodules) [8] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.43, Approach to solitary pulmonary nodule and cavitating lesions) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p.236, Approach to lung nodules and cavitating lesions) [10] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.222–223, Approach to spine diseases — DDx of back pain and cauda equina syndrome) [11] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.164,
Diagnostic Criteria, Algorithm, and Investigations for CA Lung
Unlike some conditions (e.g., diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis) that have neat diagnostic criteria with cut-off values, lung cancer does not have a single set of "diagnostic criteria". Instead, diagnosis requires the integration of three pillars:
- Clinical suspicion — symptoms, signs, risk factors
- Radiological assessment — imaging to identify and characterise the lesion
- Tissue diagnosis — histological/cytological confirmation (mandatory before any definitive treatment)
Plus a fourth essential step before treatment: 4. Staging — determining the extent of disease (TNM for NSCLC; limited vs extensive for SCLC) 5. Molecular profiling — identifying actionable driver mutations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, etc.) 6. Fitness assessment — can the patient tolerate the proposed treatment?
Think of it as: Suspect → Image → Biopsy → Stage → Profile → Treat.
The Cardinal Rule
You cannot treat lung cancer without a tissue diagnosis. [2] Even if the imaging is "classic," you need histology to (a) confirm it is cancer, (b) determine the subtype (NSCLC vs SCLC, and which NSCLC subtype), and (c) obtain material for molecular testing. The only exception is the patient who is too frail for any biopsy AND too frail for any treatment — in which case tissue diagnosis would not change management.
2. Initial Investigations — The Baseline Work-Up
When you suspect lung cancer (e.g., a smoker with chronic cough, haemoptysis, weight loss, or an incidental finding on CXR), the initial work-up proceeds in layers.
| Test | Rationale / What to Look For |
|---|---|
| CBC | Anaemia of chronic disease (↓Hb), thrombocytosis (reactive — common in malignancy), polycythaemia (paraneoplastic — rare, via ectopic EPO). Leukocytosis may suggest post-obstructive infection. |
| LFTs (liver function tests) | Deranged LFTs (especially ↑ALP, ↑GGT) suggest liver metastases. Also serves as baseline before chemotherapy (hepatotoxic drugs). |
| RFTs (renal function tests) | Baseline for chemotherapy (cisplatin is nephrotoxic). Hypercalcaemia from bone mets or PTHrP can cause renal impairment. |
| LDH | Non-specific tumour marker; elevated in extensive disease, especially SCLC. Prognostic value. |
| Calcium, phosphate | Hypercalcaemia from PTHrP (SCC) or bone metastases. |
| CRP / ESR | Non-specific inflammatory markers; elevated in malignancy and infection. |
| Coagulation profile | Baseline for biopsy procedures. Also relevant if considering anticoagulation for VTE (cancer-associated thrombosis). |
| ABG | Assess oxygenation — particularly if dyspnoeic. Type 1 respiratory failure (↓PaO₂, normal/↓PaCO₂) in large effusion, lymphangitis carcinomatosis, or extensive parenchymal disease. |
| Test | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Sputum cytology | Can occasionally identify malignant cells (especially central tumours shedding into the airway). Low sensitivity (~40-60% for central, much lower for peripheral tumours). Useful for patients unfit for invasive biopsy [2]. Collect early morning sputum × 3 samples to maximise yield. |
| Sputum AFB smear + TB culture | Always exclude TB in HK — TB is endemic and can mimic CA lung radiologically (upper lobe mass, cavitation, constitutional symptoms). |
| Sputum Gram stain + C/ST | If post-obstructive pneumonia is suspected. |
3. Radiological Assessment — The Imaging Ladder
Imaging is done in a stepwise fashion: CXR → CT → PET-CT (± MRI). Each modality adds information.
- Role: Raises suspicion of malignancy (non-diagnostic) [2]. It is the first-line imaging for any patient presenting with respiratory symptoms.
- Sensitivity: Limited — can miss lesions < 1–2 cm, retrocardiac/apical tumours, and early-stage disease. A normal CXR does not exclude lung cancer.
CXR features of CA lung [2]:
| CXR Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 1 — Unilateral hilar mass | Central tumour or hilar lymph node enlargement [2] |
| 2 — Peripheral pulmonary opacity | Irregular but well-circumscribed ± cavitation (mimics abscess) [2] |
| 3 — Collapsed lung | Tumour obstruction of bronchus or nodal compression on main bronchus [2] — look for volume loss signs (raised hemidiaphragm, mediastinal shift toward the lesion, reduced rib spaces) |
| 4 — Pleural effusion | Tumour invasion of pleural space; less commonly parapneumonic effusion secondary to obstruction [2] |
| 5 — Broadening of mediastinum | Paratracheal lymphadenopathy [2] |
| 6 — Enlarged cardiac shadow | Malignant pericardial effusion [2] |
| 7 — Elevated hemidiaphragm | Phrenic nerve palsy [2] |
| 8 — Rib destruction | Direct invasion or blood-borne metastasis; osteolytic in nature [2] |
Other CXR patterns to recognise:
- Golden S sign: RUL collapse with a concave lateral border of the collapsed lobe — the "S" is formed by the mass compressing the horizontal fissure [7].
- Reticulonodular shadowing: if diffuse, consider lymphangitis carcinomatosis.
CXR Collapse Patterns — High Yield for Exams
- RUL collapse: Golden S sign (mass compression on horizontal fissure) [7]
- LUL collapse: Luftsichel sign (compensatory enlarged LLL wraps around medial LUL, creating a crescent of hyperaerated lung around the aortic knuckle) [7]
- LLL collapse: Sail sign (triangular opacity behind the heart) [7]
- RLL collapse: Triangular opacity in the right lower zone, loss of right hemidiaphragm silhouette [7]
This is the workhorse investigation for lung cancer — it simultaneously serves diagnostic, staging, and biopsy-planning functions.
CT is favoured because of low cost, speed of examination, and simultaneous evaluation of intrathoracic and abdominal organs [2].
| Function | Details |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic | Radiological features of the mass: size, margins (spiculated vs smooth), density, cavitation, enhancement. Assess extent of local disease. [2] |
| Guide biopsy | Assess location → plan biopsy method [2] — a peripheral lesion may be sampled by CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy; a central lesion by bronchoscopy. |
| Staging (modality of choice) [2] | Assess T (tumour size, invasion of chest wall/mediastinum/other structures), N (lymph node status), M (liver, adrenal metastases). |
| Treatment planning | RT planning: assessment of anatomic relationship, disease extent and surrounding tissue thickness [2]. Also assess treatment response on follow-up CT [2]. |
Coverage: Must cover liver and adrenals [2] — because these are common sites of lung cancer metastasis. This is why it's "CT thorax + upper abdomen," not just "CT thorax."
Key caveats for CT staging [2]:
- Nodal metastasis depends on size criteria: > 10 mm on short axis (or SUV > mediastinal blood pool on PET-CT) considered malignant nodes [2].
- Caveat 1: Cannot tell between reactive vs metastatic [2] — a 12 mm node could be reactive inflammation, not cancer. This is why pathological confirmation is often needed.
- Caveat 2: Cannot detect microscopic metastasis [2] — a 6 mm node could harbour tumour cells.
- → Usually require further confirmation by biopsy [2].
- Poor soft tissue visualisation → indeterminate chest wall and mediastinal invasion [2]. Presence of these precludes surgical resection because a good resection margin cannot be achieved [2]. MRI is better for soft tissue assessment.
CT characteristics of the primary lesion [14][9]:
| Feature | Malignant | Benign |
|---|---|---|
| Shape/outline | Irregular or infiltrative [14] → spiculated, lobulated | Well-circumscribed, round/oval |
| Calcification | Eccentric or absent | Central, uniform, "popcorn" (hamartoma), laminated |
| Enhancement | HU > 15 | HU < 15 (minimal or none) |
| Other | Pleural retraction, heterogeneous attenuation | Fat-containing (hamartoma — pathognomonic) |
PET-CT has become a near-standard part of lung cancer staging, though its routine use remains debated.
Principle [2]:
Injection of 18FDG tracer → tissues with ↑metabolic rate show ↑glucose uptake → tracer retained because FDG cannot be incorporated into glycolysis (it gets phosphorylated by hexokinase to FDG-6-phosphate, which cannot proceed further in glycolysis and becomes trapped) → tissues with ↑metabolic rate will "light up" [2].
- SUVmax > 2.5 considered suspicious for malignancy [2].
- PET alone has low resolution → combination with CT provides anatomical detail [2].
| Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|
| High sensitivity for occult metastasis [2] — detects bone, adrenal, contralateral lung, and distant nodal metastases that CT alone might miss | No evidence for improvement in overall survival [2] |
| Useful in marginally resectable or high surgical risk cases to ↓risk of futile surgery [2] | False positives: infection, inflammation (TB, sarcoidosis, pneumonia) |
| Helpful in evaluating mediastinal nodes (functional rather than purely size-based) | False negatives: low-grade tumours (carcinoid, lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma), small lesions < 8 mm |
| Can detect unsuspected second primaries | PET-CT is NOT good for brain — background activity is too hypermetabolic [2] (the brain uses ~20% of total body glucose) |
PET-CT and the Brain
PET-CT is not good for detecting brain metastases because the normal brain has very high background FDG uptake [2]. If you need to assess for brain metastases, use contrast MRI brain (or CT brain if MRI is contraindicated). Always order brain imaging separately if there is clinical suspicion (headache, focal neurology, seizures) or if the patient has a high-risk tumour type (adenocarcinoma, SCLC).
- Advantage: Good soft tissue differentiation [2].
- Disadvantage: Only anatomical detail, expensive, longer scan time [2].
- Indications [2]:
- Staging of Pancoast tumour (frequent soft tissue invasion) [2][9] — MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating brachial plexus, subclavian vessel, chest wall, and vertebral body invasion.
- Assessment of chest wall/brachial plexus invasion [2][9].
- Also useful for evaluating mediastinal invasion when CT is equivocal.
- Contrast MRI brain is the gold standard for detecting brain metastases [2].
- CT brain with contrast if MRI is contraindicated (pacemaker, claustrophobia).
- Not routinely done in all patients — guided by symptoms (headache, focal neurology, confusion, seizures) [2].
- However, in some centres, MRI brain is performed routinely for:
- Stage III NSCLC being considered for curative treatment
- All SCLC (high propensity for brain metastasis)
- Advanced adenocarcinoma
- Bone scan (99mTc-MDP): Traditional modality; high sensitivity but low specificity. Now largely superseded by PET-CT.
- If PET-CT is not available, bone scan is used for patients with bone pain or elevated ALP.
- MRI whole spine: if cord compression is suspected (back pain + neurological symptoms).
| Clinical Scenario | Imaging Approach |
|---|---|
| Initial work-up | CXR → CT thorax + upper abdomen with contrast |
| Staging | PET/CT (whole body) ± MRI brain |
| Pancoast tumour | MRI thoracic inlet |
| Suspected brain mets | Contrast MRI brain |
| Suspected cord compression | MRI whole spine (urgent) |
| Suspected liver mets | Triphasic CT or MRI liver |
4. Tissue Diagnosis — How to Get Pathology
A tissue diagnosis is always required [2]. The choice of biopsy method depends on the location of the tumour and accessibility. The general principle is: sample the highest-stage site — because this gives you both diagnosis and staging in one step. For example, if there is a lung mass with a suspicious supraclavicular node, biopsy the node (if positive, it confirms N3 → stage IIIB/C and avoids unnecessary mediastinal staging).
| Method | Indication | How It Works | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sputum cytology | Patient unfit for invasive biopsy [2] | Patient coughs up sputum → cytologist examines for malignant cells | Low sensitivity (30–65%), especially for peripheral tumours. Requires 3 early morning samples. |
| Conventional bronchoscopy [2] | Usually only for directly visualised lesions [2] | Flexible bronchoscope inserted via nose/mouth into airways → directly visualise endobronchial tumour | Modalities: (1) Saline washing, (2) Brushing, (3) Endobronchial forceps biopsy for directly visualised lesions [2]. Transbronchial biopsy or needle aspiration for lesions close to airways [2]. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for peripheral lesions [2]. Yield is ~80% for central tumours, much lower for peripheral. |
| EBUS-TBNA (Endobronchial Ultrasound – Transbronchial Needle Aspiration) | Diagnosis and staging by sampling central tumours and paratracheal/subcarinal/hilar lymph nodes [2] | Ultrasound probe on the tip of the bronchoscope → real-time visualisation → needle aspiration through the bronchial wall into the target node/mass | Also used to R/O alternative dx for mediastinal lymphadenopathy (e.g., TB, sarcoidosis, lymphoma) [2]. Limitation: Cannot access some lymph node stations (levels 3a, 5, 6, 8, 9) and peripheral tumours [2]. |
| EUS-FNA (Endoscopic Ultrasound – Fine Needle Aspiration) | Subcarinal and para-oesophageal nodes [2] | Ultrasound on oesophageal endoscope → needle through oesophageal wall into mediastinal nodes | Complements EBUS — accesses nodes that EBUS cannot reach (stations 8, 9, and some station 7). |
| CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration/biopsy (TTNA/TTNB) | Sample peripheral nodules when other modalities are not available [2] | CT-guided [2] — radiologist advances a needle percutaneously through the chest wall into the peripheral lesion | Fine needle biopsy is quite accurate (80–95% accuracy) and safe (< 2% complication rate) [14]. Risk: pneumothorax [2] (~15–25%, but only ~5% require chest drain). Also risk of haemorrhage. Contraindications: uncorrected bleeding diathesis (platelet < 50,000, INR > 1.5), inaccessible lesion, uncooperative patient [14]. |
| Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy | Peripheral lesions [2] | New technique using electromagnetic field to guide bronchoscope to peripheral lesions (like GPS for the bronchial tree) | Image-guided [2]; increasing availability. Particularly useful when CT-guided biopsy carries high pneumothorax risk (e.g., emphysematous lungs). |
| Mediastinoscopy | Mediastinal nodes when less invasive strategies fail [2] | Scope through pretracheal plane [2] under GA → directly visualise and biopsy paratracheal and subcarinal nodes | Risk of injury of great vessels [2]. Being replaced by EBUS-TBNA in many centres. |
| VATS [2] | Suspicious lesions amenable to wedge resection; otherwise inaccessible nodes; pleural biopsy [2] | Minimally invasive surgery under GA with thoracoscope | Can be both diagnostic (wedge resection for frozen section) and therapeutic (proceed to lobectomy if malignant). |
| Diagnostic thoracocentesis [2] | Pleural effusion | Needle aspiration of pleural fluid → send for cytology | Diagnosis only, no histopathological information [2] (cytology, not histology). Positive cytology for malignant cells = confirmed malignant pleural effusion (M1a). |
| Medical thoracoscopy (pleuroscopy) [2] | Pleural disease — especially when thoracocentesis cytology is negative | Semi-rigid instrument with one port of entry through flexible trocar → allows direct visualisation of pleural cavity → ↑yield [2] | Can simultaneously perform drain + biopsy + pleurodesis [7]. Requires IV sedation (cf. GA in VATS). |
| Sampling of metastatic disease [2] | M1a–c or N3 scalene/supraclavicular nodes [2] | By appropriate route: thoracocentesis, liver FNAC, adrenal FNAC, supraclavicular node biopsy [2] | Always sample the highest stage site — gives diagnosis + staging simultaneously. |
Tissue Diagnosis Strategy — Sample the Highest Stage
If a patient has a lung mass + enlarged supraclavicular lymph node + suspicious liver lesion, biopsy the liver (M1b) or the supraclavicular node (N3) first. If positive, it simultaneously gives you the tissue diagnosis AND confirms advanced stage, avoiding unnecessary mediastinal staging procedures. This principle saves time, reduces risk, and avoids futile surgery.
Once you have tissue, the pathologist will determine:
-
Is it malignant? — Confirm cancer vs benign disease (TB granuloma, sarcoidosis, organising pneumonia, etc.)
-
What type? — NSCLC vs SCLC. If NSCLC, which subtype (adenocarcinoma vs SCC vs large cell)?
- IHC panel: TTF-1 (adenocarcinoma), p40/p63 (SCC), synaptophysin/chromogranin (SCLC/neuroendocrine) [1]
-
Is it primary lung or metastasis?
- CK-7 (CA lung), CK-19 (CA breast), CK-20 (CRC), TTF-1 (lung adenocarcinoma / thyroid carcinoma) [15]
- If TTF-1+ and CK7+ → primary lung adenocarcinoma
- If CDX2+ and CK20+ → colorectal metastasis
- If ER/PR+ → breast metastasis
- If PAX8+ → renal/gynaecological origin
-
Molecular profiling (for non-squamous NSCLC and never-smokers with SCC):
- EGFR mutation — test by PCR (e.g., cobas® EGFR Mutation Test, NGS)
- ALK rearrangement — test by IHC (screening) → confirmed by FISH or NGS
- ROS1 rearrangement — IHC → FISH/NGS
- PD-L1 expression (TPS — tumour proportion score) — IHC (22C3 antibody)
- KRAS (especially G12C), BRAF V600E, MET, RET, NTRK — increasingly tested via next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels
- Comprehensive genomic profiling via NGS is now the preferred approach (tests multiple targets simultaneously from a single tissue sample)
-
PD-L1 testing: Important for immunotherapy eligibility:
- TPS ≥ 50%: may receive pembrolizumab monotherapy (1st line, no chemo)
- TPS 1–49%: pembrolizumab + chemotherapy
- TPS < 1%: chemotherapy ± immunotherapy combinations
5. Staging
AJCC8 TNM staging for CA lung [2]:
T — Primary Tumour:
| T Stage | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Tis | Carcinoma in situ [2] |
| T1 | Tumour ≤ 3 cm in greatest dimension, surrounded by lung or visceral pleura, without bronchoscopic evidence of invasion more proximal than the lobar bronchus [2] |
| T1a(mi) | Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma [2] |
| T1a | Tumour ≤ 1 cm [2] |
| T1b | Tumour > 1 cm but ≤ 2 cm [2] |
| T1c | Tumour > 2 cm but ≤ 3 cm [2] |
| T2 | Tumour > 3 cm but ≤ 5 cm; or involves main bronchus regardless of distance from carina but without involvement of carina; or invades visceral pleura; or associated with atelectasis/obstructive pneumonitis extending to hilar region involving part or all of the lung [2] |
| T2a | > 3 cm but ≤ 4 cm |
| T2b | > 4 cm but ≤ 5 cm |
| T3 | > 5 cm but ≤ 7 cm; or direct invasion of chest wall (including superior sulcus tumours), phrenic nerve, parietal pericardium; or separate tumour nodule(s) in the same lobe |
| T4 | > 7 cm; or invasion of diaphragm, mediastinum, heart, great vessels, trachea, recurrent laryngeal nerve, oesophagus, vertebral body, carina; or separate tumour nodule(s) in a different ipsilateral lobe |
N — Regional Lymph Nodes:
| N Stage | Criteria |
|---|---|
| N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis |
| N1 | Ipsilateral peribronchial and/or hilar nodes and intrapulmonary nodes |
| N2 | Ipsilateral mediastinal and/or subcarinal nodes |
| N3 | Contralateral mediastinal/hilar; ipsilateral or contralateral scalene/supraclavicular nodes |
M — Distant Metastasis:
| M Stage | Criteria |
|---|---|
| M0 | No distant metastasis |
| M1a | Separate tumour nodule in contralateral lobe; pleural/pericardial nodules; malignant pleural/pericardial effusion |
| M1b | Single extrathoracic metastasis (including single distant lymph node) |
| M1c | Multiple extrathoracic metastases in one or more organs |
Stage Grouping (Simplified):
| Stage | TNM | 5-Year Survival (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| IA1 | T1a N0 M0 | ~90% |
| IA2 | T1b N0 M0 | ~85% |
| IA3 | T1c N0 M0 | ~80% |
| IB | T2a N0 M0 | ~73% |
| IIA | T2b N0 M0 | ~65% |
| IIB | T1-2 N1 M0 or T3 N0 M0 | ~56% |
| IIIA | T1-2 N2 M0 or T3 N1 M0 or T4 N0-1 M0 | ~36% |
| IIIB | T1-2 N3 M0 or T3-4 N2 M0 | ~26% |
| IIIC | T3-4 N3 M0 | ~13% |
| IVA | Any T, Any N, M1a-b | ~10% |
| IVB | Any T, Any N, M1c | ~< 5% |
| Stage | Definition | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| Limited disease | Confined to one hemithorax + ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes (can be encompassed in a single radiation field) | ~30% |
| Extensive disease | Anything beyond limited disease (contralateral lung, distant mets, malignant pleural effusion) | ~70% |
Why this simpler system? Because SCLC almost always presents with disseminated disease, and the key treatment decision is simply: "Can I give concurrent chemoradiation (limited) or chemo ± immunotherapy only (extensive)?"
This is from the senior notes and represents the systematic approach to confirming N stage [2]:
| Risk Category | Criteria | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Low risk | Peripheral tumours with stage IA1–3 | Upfront lobectomy + mediastinal lymph node dissection (risk of occult N2 disease is low) [2] |
| Moderate risk | Central stage IA, any stage IB–II, adenocarcinoma, young age | Biopsy of primary tumour by appropriate route. Pre-op mediastinal staging by EBUS-TBNA ± EUS-FNA (risk of occult N2 disease 10–15%) [2] |
| High risk | T3–4 disease without obvious mediastinal involvement | Biopsy of primary tumour by appropriate route. Pre-treatment mediastinal staging by EBUS-TBNA ± EUS-FNA [2] |
| Suspected mediastinal mets | FDG-avid or enlarged N2/3 mediastinal nodes or mediastinal involvement | Targeted mediastinal biopsy at highest suspected stage by EBUS-TBNA ± EUS-FNA for staging and diagnosis → invasive biopsy if initial test negative/non-diagnostic [2] |
| Metastatic disease | M1a–c or N3 scalene or supraclavicular nodes | Sampling of metastatic disease by appropriate route (e.g., thoracocentesis, liver and adrenal FNAC) [2] |
6. Fitness Assessment — Can the Patient Tolerate Treatment?
Even if a tumour is technically resectable by staging, you must assess whether the patient can survive the surgery.
Mandatory in potentially operable cases to assess lung reserve [2].
| Test | How It's Used | Key Thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| Spirometry: FEV₁ and DLCO [2] | Calculate predicted postoperative values (ppoFEV₁, ppoDLCO) [2] | ↑risk for major respiratory complications (pneumonia, stump failure, mortality) if either ppoFEV₁ or ppoDLCO < 40% predicted [2]. Post-op mechanical ventilation likely if ppo ≤ 30% predicted [2]. |
| Method: ppo = pre-op value × (19 − number of resected segments) / 19 [2] (the lung has 19 segments total) |
Example: If pre-op FEV₁ = 2.0 L (80% predicted) and you plan right lower lobectomy (5 segments):
- ppoFEV₁ = 2.0 × (19 − 5) / 19 = 2.0 × 14/19 = 1.47 L (~59% predicted) → acceptable.
| Test | Threshold |
|---|---|
| 6-minute walk test / shuttle walk test | Able to walk > 400 m [2] |
| Stair climbing test | 5 flights of stairs (FOS) for pneumonectomy, 3 FOS for lobectomy, 1 FOS for GA operation [2] |
| Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) | VO₂ max (maximal oxygen consumption per unit body weight, mL/kg/min) [2]: > 20 (not increased risk), < 15 (↑risk of perioperative complications), < 10 (very high risk for perioperative complications or death) [2] |
If clinical features suggest a paraneoplastic syndrome, directed investigations include:
| Suspected Syndrome | Key Investigations |
|---|---|
| SIADH | Paired serum and urine osmolality, serum Na+, urine Na+ (serum osm < 275, urine osm > 100, urine Na+ > 40, euvolaemic hyponatraemia) |
| Ectopic Cushing's | ACTH level (high), LDDST (no suppression), HDDST (no suppression — unlike pituitary Cushing's which suppresses) [16][17], 24h urinary free cortisol, CXR for any obvious CA lung [16] |
| Hypercalcaemia | Serum Ca²+ (corrected), PTH (suppressed if PTHrP-mediated), PTHrP level |
| LEMS | Anti-VGCC antibodies, nerve conduction studies (incremental response with repetitive nerve stimulation — opposite of myasthenia gravis) |
If a pleural effusion is present, thoracocentesis is performed [7]:
Pleural fluid analysis [7]:
| Test | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Appearance | Straw-coloured (transudate), turbid (empyema), milky (chylothorax), bloody (malignancy, PE, trauma) [7] |
| Light's criteria (Protein, LDH) | Exudative if any one: (1) pleural protein/serum protein > 0.5, (2) pleural LDH/serum LDH > 0.6, (3) pleural LDH > 2/3 upper limit of normal serum LDH. Malignant effusions are exudative. |
| pH | < 7.2 suggests empyema or advanced malignant effusion (poor prognosis for pleurodesis) |
| Glucose | Low (< 3.3 mmol/L) in empyema, RA, malignancy, TB |
| ADA | > 30 suggests TB [7] |
| Cell count and differential | Lymphocyte-predominant: TB, malignancy, lymphoma. Neutrophil-predominant: parapneumonic. |
| Microbiology | Gram stain, AFB smear, bacterial culture, TB culture, MTB-PCR [7] |
| Cytology | 20 mL × 3 if suspect malignant effusion [7] — sensitivity ~60% for malignant pleural effusion (one sample ~50%, three samples ~70%) |
If cytology is negative but clinical suspicion remains high → proceed to medical thoracoscopy (pleuroscopy) or VATS pleural biopsy for definitive tissue diagnosis [2][7].
| Modality | Utility |
|---|---|
| CXR screening | Not useful [7] — multiple trials (including the PLCO trial) showed no mortality reduction with CXR screening. |
| Annual low-dose CT (LDCT) thorax [7] | Recommended for high-risk individuals [7]: age 55–74 years (some guidelines extend to 50–80y), current or former smokers (≥ 20 pack-years, quit < 15 years ago), fit for curative surgery [7]. Based on NLST and NELSON trials showing ~20% reduction in lung cancer mortality. |
Note: There is currently no population-wide lung cancer screening programme in Hong Kong (as of 2025–2026), though some private centres offer it. The HK government has been evaluating the feasibility of a targeted LDCT screening programme.
For nodules found incidentally (not in a known cancer patient), the Fleischner Society provides follow-up recommendations based on size, morphology (solid vs subsolid), and patient risk factors [7]:
Solid nodules in patients ≥ 35 years:
| Size | Low Risk | High Risk |
|---|---|---|
| < 6 mm | No routine follow-up | Optional CT at 12 months |
| 6–8 mm | CT at 6–12 months, then consider CT at 18–24 months | CT at 6–12 months, then CT at 18–24 months |
| > 8 mm | Consider CT at 3 months, PET-CT, or tissue sampling | Consider CT at 3 months, PET-CT, or tissue sampling |
Subsolid (ground-glass / part-solid) nodules:
- GGO < 6 mm: no routine follow-up
- GGO ≥ 6 mm: CT at 6–12 months → if persistent, CT every 2 years for minimum 5 years
- Part-solid ≥ 6 mm: CT at 3–6 months → if persistent and solid component ≥ 6 mm, consider PET-CT or biopsy
High Yield Summary — Diagnosis of CA Lung
- No formal "diagnostic criteria" — diagnosis requires clinical suspicion + imaging + tissue confirmation.
- CXR raises suspicion; CT thorax + upper abdomen with contrast is the key staging modality. Must cover liver and adrenals.
- CXR features: hilar mass, peripheral opacity, collapse, effusion, mediastinal widening, elevated hemidiaphragm, rib destruction, pericardial effusion.
- PET-CT: high sensitivity for occult metastasis; SUVmax > 2.5 suspicious. NOT useful for brain (too hypermetabolic).
- MRI: for Pancoast tumours (soft tissue/brachial plexus invasion) and brain metastases.
- Tissue diagnosis is mandatory: choose method based on location — bronchoscopy (central), EBUS-TBNA (mediastinal nodes), CT-guided TTNA (peripheral), thoracocentesis/pleuroscopy (effusion). Always sample highest-stage site first.
- Pathological assessment: subtype by IHC (TTF-1, p40, synaptophysin); molecular profiling (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, NGS) mandatory for all non-squamous NSCLC.
- TNM 8th edition for NSCLC; limited vs extensive for SCLC.
- Mediastinal staging: risk-stratified approach — peripheral IA can go straight to surgery; higher risk needs EBUS-TBNA ± EUS-FNA pre-operatively.
- Fitness: ppoFEV₁ and ppoDLCO ≥ 40% predicted; VO₂ max > 15; stair climbing ≥ 3 FOS for lobectomy.
- Screening: annual LDCT for high-risk (age 55–74, ≥ 20 pack-years, current/recent smoker). CXR screening is NOT useful.
Active Recall - Diagnosis and Staging of CA Lung
References
[1] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.51, Lung Cancer — Pathology, IHC markers) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.141–147, Lung Cancer — Epidemiology, Radiological Assessment, Tissue Diagnosis, Staging, Fitness Assessment, Mediastinal Staging) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.278–281, Respiratory Medicine — Pleural effusion, clinical approach, investigations, Fleischner guidelines, screening) [9] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p.236, Approach to lung nodules — benign vs malignant features) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p.39, 43, 62, 79 — CT interpretation, interventional radiology, fine needle biopsy) [15] Senior notes: Maksim Surgery Notes.pdf (p.124–125, IHC for liver metastasis of unknown origin) [16] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Endocrine.pdf (p.63, Cushing's syndrome — HDDST, ectopic ACTH, CXR for CA lung) [17] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Fundamentals.pdf (p.437, Cushing's syndrome work-up)
Management of CA Lung
Before diving into specifics, understand the logic tree that drives every treatment decision:
- Is it NSCLC or SCLC? — This is the first branch. These are treated as completely different diseases.
- What is the stage? — Determines curative vs palliative intent.
- What are the molecular markers? (NSCLC only) — Determines whether targeted therapy or immunotherapy can be used.
- Is the patient fit enough? — Performance status (ECOG), lung reserve, cardiac status.
- What does the MDT recommend? — All lung cancer patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting [3] involving thoracic surgeon, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, respiratory physician, radiologist, and pathologist.
The fundamental treatment modalities are:
- Surgery — the only treatment that can truly "cure" solid tumours (by completely removing them) [5]
- Radiation therapy (RT) — kills cancer cells by damaging DNA with ionising radiation
- Chemotherapy — cytotoxic drugs that kill rapidly dividing cells
- Targeted therapy — drugs directed against specific molecular drivers (EGFR TKIs, ALK inhibitors, etc.)
- Immunotherapy — checkpoint inhibitors that unleash the patient's immune system against the cancer
- Supportive/palliative care — symptom control, quality of life
2. NSCLC Management — Stage-by-Stage
For NSCLC, treatment and prognosis depends heavily on staging and molecular markers [2]:
2.1 Resectable NSCLC (Stage I, II, Selected IIIA)
Three conditions must ALL be met:
| Criterion | Details |
|---|---|
| Appropriate stage | Stage I, stage II, T3N1, selected T4N0–1 [2] |
| NO mediastinal involvement | N2 precludes resection [2] — confirmed by EBUS-TBNA/mediastinoscopy. Why? Because N2 disease means tumour has spread beyond what can be reliably cleared by surgery alone; outcomes are better with chemoradiation ± surgery. |
| Adequate cardiac and lung reserve | Patient must survive the operation and the postoperative period with remaining lung function [2] |
Surgical approach: now nearly all can be done under VATS [2].
VATS lobectomy is the standard of care for early-stage NSCLC [3]. Why VATS over open thoracotomy? Smaller incisions → less postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, reduced postoperative complications, with equivalent oncological outcomes [3].
| Operation | Description | Indication |
|---|---|---|
| Lobectomy | Gold standard for CA lung [2]. Removal of the entire lobe containing the tumour. | Standard operation for stage I–II NSCLC with adequate lung reserve |
| Sublobar resection (segmentectomy / wedge resection) | Removal of less than a full lobe | For those who cannot tolerate full lobectomy + primary tumour ≤ 3 cm [2]. Recent evidence (JCOG0802, CALGB 140503) supports segmentectomy for tumours ≤ 2 cm with equivalent survival. Wedge resection has slightly higher local recurrence. |
| Sleeve lobectomy | Lobectomy + resection of a segment of bronchus involved → rejoin the rest of the lung to the main bronchus [2] | Alternative to pneumonectomy for tumour close to main bronchus [2]. Preserves more lung tissue. Like cutting out a segment of a sleeve (shirt sleeve analogy) and sewing the remaining parts together. |
| Pneumonectomy | Removal of the entire lung | May be required for proximal tumours [2] that cannot be managed by sleeve lobectomy. Carries higher morbidity/mortality. Requires sufficient contralateral lung reserve. |
| ± en bloc resection of chest wall | Lobectomy with resection of involved chest wall (ribs, intercostal muscles) | In tumours invading chest wall (T3) [2]. Achieves R0 resection margins. |
All curative resections include + mediastinal lymph node dissection (usually routine in resectable NSCLC) [2]. This is both therapeutic (removes potentially involved nodes) and prognostic (pathological staging determines need for adjuvant therapy).
The Goal of Surgery — R0 Resection
The goal of curative surgery is complete (R0) resection — removal of all macroscopic and microscopic tumour with negative margins [5]. R0 = no residual tumour. R1 = microscopic residual. R2 = macroscopic residual. Only R0 gives the best chance of cure. This is why adequate margins and mediastinal lymph node dissection are critical.
| Adjuvant Treatment | Indication | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | Pathologic stage II–III or high-risk stage IB [2] | Micrometastatic disease may already be present even after complete resection. Adjuvant cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin + vinorelbine) improves 5-year survival by ~5% in stage II–III. |
| Adjuvant RT | Positive surgical margin, or mediastinal LN involvement detected intraoperatively [2] | To sterilise residual microscopic disease at the resection margin or in the mediastinum. |
| Adjuvant targeted therapy | EGFR-mutant stage IB–IIIA (after complete resection + adjuvant chemo) | Osimertinib (3rd-gen EGFR TKI) for 3 years — ADAURA trial showed dramatic improvement in DFS. Now standard of care (2024–2026 guidelines). |
| Adjuvant immunotherapy | PD-L1 ≥ 1%, stage II–IIIA, after complete resection + adjuvant chemo | Atezolizumab (IMpower010 trial) for 1 year. |
Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used, particularly for stage II–IIIA NSCLC [5]:
| Approach | Details |
|---|---|
| Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy | Nivolumab + platinum-doublet chemotherapy × 3 cycles before surgery (CheckMate 816 trial). Dramatically improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Now standard for resectable stage IB ( ≥ 4 cm)–IIIA. |
| Neoadjuvant chemoRT (if N2) [1] | For potentially resectable N2 disease — downstage the mediastinal nodes before surgery. |
Why neoadjuvant? (1) Tumour may shrink → easier/safer surgery. (2) Treats micrometastatic disease early. (3) In-vivo chemosensitivity test — if the tumour doesn't respond, you know the chemo isn't working. (4) Better drug delivery before surgical disruption of blood supply.
Definitive RT: as alternative if medically unfit or refuse surgery [2].
- Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR/SBRT): High-dose, precisely targeted RT delivered in 3–8 fractions. For stage I–II NSCLC in patients who are medically inoperable. Achieves ~85–90% local control rates — comparable to surgery for stage I disease.
- Conventional RT: Lower-dose daily fractions over 6 weeks. Inferior to SABR/SBRT but may be used if SABR is not available.
Concurrent chemoirradiation as treatment of choice [2]:
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Chemotherapy regimen | Usually cisplatin + etoposide or weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel [2]. Cisplatin is a platinum compound that cross-links DNA → prevents replication. Etoposide is a topoisomerase II inhibitor → prevents DNA unwinding. |
| Radiotherapy | Usually full-dose IMRT (60 Gy in 30 daily fractions) [2]. IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy — shapes the radiation beam to conform to the tumour, sparing surrounding normal tissue. |
| Consolidation immunotherapy | ± Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) if no progression after concurrent chemoirradiation [2] — PACIFIC trial showed significant OS improvement (~47% vs 34% at 5 years). Now standard for unresectable stage III with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Given for up to 12 months. |
Why "concurrent" (not sequential)? Because giving chemo and RT simultaneously is synergistic — chemo sensitises cancer cells to radiation (radiosensitisation), improving local control and survival. The trade-off is more toxicity (especially oesophagitis and pneumonitis).
Cisplatin + etoposide + full-dose IMRT (2 Gy × 30 days) [1] — this is the classic regimen. Note from the lecture slides that the dose is 2 Gy per fraction × 30 fractions = 60 Gy total.
2.3 Advanced / Metastatic NSCLC (Stage IV)
This is where the revolution has happened. Treatment has moved from "one-size-fits-all chemotherapy" to precision medicine based on molecular profiling.
Initial genetic testing to identify driver mutations as biomarkers [2]:
| Molecular Subtype | Prevalence (HK) | First-Line Treatment | Mechanism | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGFR mutation | ~55% of adenocarcinoma [2] | Osimertinib (3rd-gen EGFR TKI) | "Osimertinib" — targets EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) tyrosine kinase. Blocks the signal that tells cancer cells to grow and divide. 3rd generation = also active against T790M resistance mutation. | FLAURA trial: osimertinib superior to 1st-gen TKIs (gefitinib/erlotinib). Median OS ~38 months. Also penetrates BBB (treats/prevents brain mets). |
| ALK rearrangement | ~5% of adenocarcinoma [2] | Alectinib (2nd-gen ALK TKI) | ALK = anaplastic lymphoma kinase. EML4-ALK fusion creates a constitutively active kinase → drives proliferation. Alectinib blocks this. | ALEX trial: alectinib superior to crizotinib. Good CNS penetration. Lorlatinib (3rd-gen) for resistance. |
| ROS1 rearrangement | ~1–2% | Crizotinib or entrectinib | ROS1 is structurally similar to ALK. Crizotinib inhibits both ALK and ROS1. | Respond well to ALK inhibitors due to structural homology. |
| KRAS G12C | ~5–10% [2] | Sotorasib or adagrasib | KRAS = Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene. G12C = specific glycine-to-cysteine mutation. Sotorasib covalently binds the cysteine, locking KRAS in its inactive state. | Historically "undruggable" — sotorasib was a breakthrough (2021). |
| BRAF V600E | ~1–2% | Dabrafenib + trametinib | BRAF = serine/threonine kinase in the MAPK pathway. V600E = constitutively active. Dabrafenib inhibits BRAF; trametinib inhibits MEK (downstream). | Dual blockade of the same pathway — more effective than either alone. |
| MET exon 14 skipping | ~3% | Capmatinib or tepotinib | MET = mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor. Exon 14 skipping → impaired MET degradation → constitutive signalling. | |
| RET rearrangement | ~1–2% | Selpercatinib or pralsetinib | RET = rearranged during transfection. Fusion → constitutively active kinase. | |
| NTRK fusion | < 1% | Larotrectinib or entrectinib | NTRK = neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase. Tumour-agnostic indication. | |
| No actionable mutation, PD-L1 ≥ 50% | Variable | Pembrolizumab monotherapy | Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Blocks PD-1 on T cells → prevents tumour from "hiding" from the immune system via PD-L1/PD-1 interaction. | KEYNOTE-024 trial. |
| No actionable mutation, PD-L1 1–49% | Variable | Pembrolizumab + platinum-doublet chemotherapy | Immunotherapy + chemo synergy — chemo causes immunogenic cell death, releasing tumour antigens, enhancing the immune response. | KEYNOTE-189 trial. |
| No actionable mutation, PD-L1 < 1% | Variable | Platinum-doublet chemotherapy ± ipilimumab/nivolumab | Chemotherapy backbone: cisplatin/carboplatin + pemetrexed (non-squamous) or gemcitabine (squamous). | CheckMate 9LA or KEYNOTE-189 (chemo + pembro still used regardless of PD-L1 in some guidelines). |
Why EGFR-Mutant Patients Should NOT Receive Immunotherapy
Counterintuitively, EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC responds poorly to checkpoint inhibitors. The tumour microenvironment in these driver-mutated cancers tends to be immunologically "cold" (low tumour mutational burden, few neoantigens). Furthermore, combining EGFR TKIs with immunotherapy increases toxicity (especially pneumonitis) without improving efficacy. Always test for driver mutations FIRST — if present, use targeted therapy, not immunotherapy.
Detection of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma and urine [2]:
- Tumour cells release fragments of DNA into the bloodstream as they die → circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA).
- Can detect driver mutations (EGFR, ALK, etc.) without invasive tissue biopsy.
- Minimally invasive, allows serial testing [2] (monitor treatment response, detect resistance mutations).
- Representative of dominant tumour molecular profile [2] (overcomes intratumour heterogeneity — samples from all tumour sites, not just one biopsy site).
- Limitation: lower sensitivity than tissue biopsy, especially at low tumour burden. If liquid biopsy is negative, tissue biopsy should still be performed.
2.4 Special Situations in NSCLC
Solitary brain metastasis: surgery + RT [1].
| Approach | Details |
|---|---|
| Surgery + adjuvant RT | If solitary, operable, symptomatic, good performance status, controlled systemic disease [18] |
| Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) | Now more preferred [18] over WBRT as adjuvant. For small/inoperable lesions or small oligometastases ( < 3 cm) [18]. |
| Whole-brain RT (WBRT) | If not eligible for SRS/surgery, e.g., multiple bulky tumours [18]. Treats micrometastases but has significant neurocognitive side effects. |
| Systemic therapy | EGFR TKIs (especially osimertinib) and ALK TKIs (alectinib, lorlatinib) have good CNS penetration — may be sufficient for brain mets in driver-mutated NSCLC. |
| Dexamethasone + AED | For symptomatic relief [18] — dexamethasone reduces peritumoral vasogenic oedema; AEDs for seizure prophylaxis if seizures present. |
Occurs in 50% of all metastatic malignancy, especially NSCLC [7]:
| Treatment | Details |
|---|---|
| Repeated chest drain | Every few weeks [7] — temporary relief but recurrence is almost inevitable |
| Chemical pleurodesis (1st line for recurrent MPE) [7] | Agents: talc (5 g in 100 mL NS), minocycline (300 mg in 100 mL NS), autologous blood [7]. Mechanism: sclerosing agent causes intense pleural inflammation → fibrosis → obliteration of the pleural space → prevents re-accumulation. Procedure: connect chest drain → apply sclerosant when lung re-expanded → clamp for 1–2 h → release → continue drainage until output < 150 mL/day × 2 days + CXR shows lung re-expanded [7]. |
| Surgical pleurodesis | Consider if good performance status [7]. VATS pleurodesis with mechanical abrasion or pleurectomy. Recurrence ~3% [7]. |
| Long-term ambulatory indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) | Consider if short life expectancy or trapped lung [7]. Patient drains at home. |
| Pleuroperitoneal shunt (e.g., Denver shunt) | Consider if short life expectancy or trapped lung [7]. Diverts fluid from pleural space to peritoneum. |
What is a "trapped lung"? When the visceral pleura is encased by tumour (malignant cortex), the lung cannot re-expand even after fluid drainage. Pleurodesis will fail because the two pleural surfaces cannot come into contact. In this situation, IPC or shunt is preferred.
Chemical Pleurodesis — Important Procedural Detail
If co-existing pneumothorax or bubbling chest drain: do NOT clamp the drain (risk of tension pneumothorax). Instead, hang up the drain to ~50 cm above patient to drain air but not the sclerosant [7]. This allows air to escape while keeping the sclerosant in the pleural space. Also: avoid NSAIDs post-pleurodesis — inflammatory action is essential [7] for the pleurodesis to work. If you suppress the inflammation, the pleurodesis fails.
These are oncological emergencies managed alongside the main treatment:
| Emergency | Management |
|---|---|
| SVCO | Palliative RT [1] (SVC stenting if severe/urgent, chemotherapy if SCLC — highly chemo-responsive). Dexamethasone, head elevation, loop diuretics. |
| Cord compression | Urgent MRI whole spine → dexamethasone 16 mg/day → surgical decompression (if single level, good prognosis) or emergency RT (if multiple levels or poor prognosis). |
| Airway obstruction | Bronchoscopic laser therapy or stenting to relieve airway obstruction [2]. Emergency if stridor present. |
| Bone pain | Palliative RT for bone metastases [1] (single fraction 8 Gy or 20 Gy in 5 fractions). Bisphosphonates or denosumab for skeletal-related events. |
3. SCLC Management
SCLC is fundamentally different from NSCLC:
- Metastases tend to occur early [2] — most patients present with extensive disease.
- Very chemosensitive and radiosensitive — high initial response rates (~60–80%).
- Almost invariably relapses — median survival even with treatment is ~10–12 months for extensive disease.
- Surgery is rarely indicated — because occult metastases are almost always present.
For cT1–2 N0 M0 limited stage disease [2]:
- Primary surgery: lobectomy + mediastinal LN sampling/dissection [2]
- Adjuvant chemotherapy: 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy [2]
- ± adjuvant chemo/RT if LN involvement identified intraoperatively [2]
This is the only scenario where surgery plays a role in SCLC — and it's rare because most SCLC presents centrally with nodal involvement.
For unresectable limited stage disease (i.e., included in single RT field = TNM I–IIIB) [2]:
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Chemoirradiation (mainstay) | Usually 4 cycles of etoposide + cisplatin (EP) + thoracic EBRT [2]. RT should begin early (within 1st or 2nd cycle of chemo). |
| Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) | If respond well to initial chemo/RT without brain mets [2]. Rationale: occult brain mets occur frequently in SCLC without neurological symptoms → brain mets often as sole site of relapse [2]. Effect: PCI → ↑overall survival + ↓incidence of brain metastasis [2]. |
Why PCI? The blood-brain barrier prevents most chemotherapy drugs from reaching the brain. So even if the body tumour is controlled, microscopic brain deposits survive and grow. Irradiating the whole brain prophylactically eliminates these before they become clinically apparent. Trade-off: neurocognitive decline.
For extensive stage disease [2]:
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Induction chemotherapy (mainstay) | Usually given for 4–6 cycles [2]. Standard: platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) + etoposide. |
| + Immunotherapy | ± Atezolizumab (PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) [2] — IMpower133 trial: adding atezolizumab to chemo improved OS (12.3 vs 10.3 months). Now standard first-line. Alternative: durvalumab (CASPIAN trial). |
| Further thoracic EBRT ± PCI | If good response to initial chemotherapy [2]. Consolidation thoracic RT can improve local control. PCI remains controversial in ES-SCLC (EORTC showed benefit; Japanese trial did not). |
Supportive treatment [2]:
| Intervention | Details |
|---|---|
| Analgesics for pain relief [2] | WHO pain ladder: Step 1 (paracetamol ± NSAID) → Step 2 (weak opioid, e.g., codeine, tramadol) → Step 3 (strong opioid, e.g., morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl). ± Adjuvants (gabapentin/pregabalin for neuropathic pain, dexamethasone for raised ICP). |
| Cough suppression [2] | Codeine, dextromethorphan. Low-dose morphine for intractable cough. |
| Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion [2] | As described above. |
| Bronchoscopic laser therapy or stenting | To relieve airway obstruction [2]. Laser (Nd:YAG) debulks endobronchial tumour. Self-expanding metal stents maintain airway patency. |
| Management of complications | Electrolyte imbalance [2] (hyponatraemia from SIADH, hypercalcaemia from PTHrP), bone pain (palliative RT + bisphosphonates), cord compression, brain mets. |
| Other support | End-of-life care, psychosocial support [2]. Smoking cessation counselling. Nutritional support. Advance care planning. |
5. Treatment Summary Tables
| Stage | Definition | Treatment | 5-Year OS |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Isolated lesions | Surgery + adjuvant chemo (if high-risk IB) | ~80% [1] |
| II | Hilar node spread | Surgery + adjuvant chemo | ~60% [1] |
| IIIA | Potentially resectable | Neoadjuvant chemoRT (if N2) → Surgery [1]; or concurrent chemoRT | ~40% [1] |
| IIIB | Unresectable | ChemoRT: cisplatin + etoposide + full-dose IMRT (2 Gy × 30 days) ± durvalumab [1]. ± Targeted therapy [1]. Solitary brain metastasis: surgery + RT [1]. Palliative RT for complications (e.g., SVCO, cord compression) [1]. Supportive Tx: pleurodesis (MPE), bronchoscopic stenting, analgesic [1]. | ~20% [1] |
| IV | Metastatic | Molecular-guided systemic therapy (TKIs, immunotherapy, chemotherapy) | ~4% [1] |
| Stage | Treatment | Median OS |
|---|---|---|
| cT1–2 N0 M0 | Surgery + adjuvant chemo (± RT if LN+) | ~2–3 years |
| Limited (unresectable) | Concurrent chemo/RT (EP × 4 + thoracic EBRT) + PCI | ~15–20 months |
| Extensive | Chemo (EP × 4–6) + atezolizumab/durvalumab ± consolidation thoracic RT ± PCI | ~12–13 months |
Understanding drug names and their mechanisms helps you remember them:
| Drug | Word Roots / Name Logic | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Cis-platin | "Cis" = same side (geometry of the platinum molecule) | Platinum compound that cross-links DNA strands → prevents DNA replication and transcription → cell death. Dose-limiting toxicity: nephrotoxicity (always hydrate). |
| Carbo-platin | "Carbo" = contains a carboxylate group instead of chloride | Less nephrotoxic than cisplatin but more myelosuppressive. |
| Etoposide | Named after the podophyllotoxin it derives from | Topoisomerase II inhibitor → prevents DNA from unwinding during replication → DNA strand breaks → apoptosis. |
| Pem-etrex-ed | "Etrex" relates to its antifolate action | Multi-targeted antifolate → inhibits thymidylate synthase, DHFR, GARFT → blocks DNA and RNA synthesis. Used in non-squamous NSCLC (squamous has high thymidylate synthase → resistant). Must give with folic acid + B12 supplementation. |
| Osimer-tinib | "-tinib" = tyrosine kinase inhibitor | 3rd-generation EGFR TKI. Covalently binds EGFR (including T790M resistance mutation). Also penetrates blood-brain barrier. |
| Alec-tinib | "-tinib" = TKI | 2nd-generation ALK inhibitor. Better CNS penetration than crizotinib. |
| Pembrolizu-mab | "-mab" = monoclonal antibody; "lizu" = humanised | Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. PD-1 = "programmed death-1" — a checkpoint receptor on T cells. Tumours express PD-L1 to engage PD-1, telling T cells to "stand down." Pembrolizumab blocks this → T cells remain active against the tumour. |
| Durvalumab | "-mab" = monoclonal antibody | Anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. Same pathway as pembrolizumab but blocks the ligand (PD-L1) on the tumour rather than the receptor (PD-1) on the T cell. |
| Atezolizumab | "-zumab" = humanised monoclonal antibody | Anti-PD-L1. Used in ES-SCLC and NSCLC. |
| Sotora-sib | "-sib" reflects its KRAS-targeting mechanism | Covalently and irreversibly binds KRAS G12C in its inactive (GDP-bound) state → locks it inactive → blocks downstream MAPK signalling. |
| Treatment | Key Contraindications |
|---|---|
| Surgery | Medically unfit (ppoFEV₁ or ppoDLCO < 30% predicted, VO₂ max < 10), N2+ disease (relative), M1 disease (absolute, except oligometastatic scenarios), patient refusal |
| Cisplatin | Severe renal impairment (GFR < 30), hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy, unable to tolerate aggressive hydration |
| EGFR TKIs | No EGFR mutation (will be ineffective). Significant hepatic impairment. ILD/pneumonitis (TKI-induced pneumonitis can be fatal). |
| Immunotherapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) | Active autoimmune disease (risk of severe immune-related adverse events — pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathy). Organ transplant recipients (risk of graft rejection). Active untreated brain mets (relative). EGFR/ALK positive (poor response + ↑toxicity). |
| Radiotherapy | Poor lung function (risk of radiation pneumonitis), previous RT to same field (cumulative dose limits), very large radiation field (too much normal tissue damage) |
| Pleurodesis | Trapped lung (visceral pleura encasement — lung cannot re-expand → pleurodesis will fail). Parapneumonic effusion/empyema (difficult drainage and decortication) [7]. |
High Yield Summary — Management of CA Lung
NSCLC:
- Stage I–II: Surgery (VATS lobectomy) + mediastinal LN dissection [2][3]. ± Adjuvant chemo (stage II–III), ± adjuvant osimertinib (EGFR+), ± adjuvant RT (R1/pN2).
- Stage IIIA (resectable): Neoadjuvant chemo(immuno)therapy → surgery. Or neoadjuvant chemoRT if N2 [1].
- Stage III (unresectable): Concurrent chemoRT (cisplatin + etoposide + IMRT 60 Gy) → durvalumab consolidation [1][2].
- Stage IV: Molecular-guided — EGFR → osimertinib; ALK → alectinib; no driver → immunotherapy ± chemo (based on PD-L1). Never give immunotherapy to EGFR/ALK+ patients.
- Resectability criteria: Appropriate stage + no N2+ + adequate cardiopulmonary reserve [2].
- Fitness thresholds: ppoFEV₁/DLCO ≥ 40%; VO₂ max > 15; 3 FOS for lobectomy, 5 FOS for pneumonectomy [2].
SCLC:
- Limited (cT1–2 N0): Surgery + adjuvant chemo [2].
- Limited (unresectable): Concurrent chemoRT (EP × 4 + EBRT) + PCI [2].
- Extensive: Chemo (EP × 4–6) + atezolizumab/durvalumab ± consolidation RT ± PCI [2].
Supportive/Emergencies:
Active Recall - Management of CA Lung
References
[1] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.52, Lung Cancer — NSCLC treatment table, staging, surgical management) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.146–150, Lung Cancer — Resectable NSCLC, locally advanced, advanced, SCLC management, supportive treatment, molecular testing, fitness assessment) [3] Lecture slides: GC 196. Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery.pdf (VATS lobectomy, advantages over open thoracotomy) [5] Lecture slides: GC 202. Surgery may cure your cancer Surgical oncology.pdf (R0 resection, neoadjuvant therapy, MDT approach) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.292–294, Malignant pleural effusion, pleurodesis — chemical and surgical, IPC, shunt) [18] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.165, Brain metastasis management — surgery, SRS, WBRT, dexamethasone)
Complications of CA Lung
Complications of lung cancer arise from four major sources: (1) the disease itself (local, regional, and distant), (2) paraneoplastic syndromes, (3) treatment side effects, and (4) procedural complications from diagnostic and staging investigations. On a ward round, you need to anticipate and recognise each of these — they are what actually kills patients and drives emergency presentations.
1. Complications of the Disease Itself
These complications are essentially the advanced clinical features of the tumour, but framed from a management perspective — i.e., the things that go wrong that require urgent action.
1.1 Oncological Emergencies
These are the "don't miss" complications. If you recognise them, the patient lives. If you don't, they die or suffer irreversible harm.
- Mechanism: Tumour mass or enlarged right paratracheal/precarinal lymph nodes compress or invade the thin-walled SVC → obstruction of venous return from the head, neck, and upper limbs → venous hypertension proximal to the obstruction.
- Why it's dangerous: Progressive cerebral oedema (venous congestion → raised ICP), laryngeal oedema (airway compromise).
- Most common cause: Lung cancer (especially SCLC — central, aggressive) and lymphoma account for ~90% of malignant SVCO [2].
- Management: Palliative RT for complications (e.g., SVCO, cord compression) [1]. SVC stenting provides rapid relief. SCLC responds quickly to chemotherapy alone. Dexamethasone reduces peritumoral oedema. Head elevation, loop diuretics for symptomatic relief.
- Prognosis: SVCO itself is rarely immediately fatal, but it indicates locally advanced disease.
- Mechanism: Vertebral body metastasis → collapse/expansion into the spinal canal → compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina → ischaemia and demyelination → paraplegia if untreated.
- Presentation: Back pain (often precedes neurological symptoms by weeks) → bilateral lower limb weakness → sensory level → urinary retention (an LMN sign if cauda equina, or overflow if UMN cord compression) → faecal incontinence.
- Why it's dangerous: Once established neurological deficit has persisted > 48 hours, recovery is unlikely even with treatment.
- Management: Palliative RT for complications (e.g., SVCO, cord compression) [1]. Dexamethasone 16 mg stat then 8 mg BD (reduces peritumoral oedema → buys time). Urgent MRI whole spine. Surgical decompression if single level + good prognosis + life expectancy > 3 months. Emergency RT if multi-level or poor prognosis.
- Mechanism: Malignant pericardial effusion (direct invasion or haematogenous spread to the pericardium) → fluid accumulates in the pericardial sac → compresses the heart → impaired diastolic filling → reduced cardiac output → cardiogenic shock.
- Presentation: Beck's triad (hypotension, distended neck veins, muffled heart sounds). Pulsus paradoxus (exaggerated drop in systolic BP > 10 mmHg on inspiration). Electrical alternans on ECG (QRS complexes of alternating height due to swinging heart within the effusion).
- Management: Emergency pericardiocentesis (usually echo-guided subcostal approach). Pericardial drain insertion. Consider pericardial window surgery for recurrent effusions.
- Mechanism: Tumour erodes into a pulmonary artery branch or bronchial artery → catastrophic bleeding into the airway → death from asphyxiation (drowning in blood), not from haemorrhage.
- Management: Protect airway: position patient lateral on the bleeding side (so blood doesn't flood the good lung). Intubation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube (preferred) to isolate the bleeding lung. Flexible bronchoscopy → bronchial artery embolisation (BAE) → emergency lung resection (last resort) [7].
- Mechanism: Endobronchial tumour growth or extrinsic compression by lymph nodes → critical narrowing of trachea/main bronchus → stridor → respiratory failure.
- Management: Bronchoscopic laser therapy or stenting to relieve airway obstruction [2]. Emergency debulking with Nd:YAG laser. Self-expanding metallic stent to maintain airway patency. External beam RT or brachytherapy for longer-term palliation.
Oncological Emergencies — Must Know for Exams
The 5 oncological emergencies in lung cancer you must recognise:
- SVCO → RT / stent / chemo (SCLC)
- Cord compression → dexamethasone + urgent MRI + RT/surgery
- Cardiac tamponade → pericardiocentesis
- Massive haemoptysis → protect airway + BAE
- Airway obstruction → laser / stent
All of these can present as the first presentation of the cancer.
Occurs in 50% of all metastatic malignancy, especially NSCLC [7].
- Mechanism: Direct invasion from neighbouring structures, haematogenous spread, lymphatic obstruction [7]. Tumour cells on the pleura increase vascular permeability → exudative effusion. Lymphatic obstruction impairs normal pleural fluid reabsorption.
- Clinical impact: Progressive dyspnoea, reduced exercise tolerance. Indicates M1a disease (stage IV) — i.e., incurable by surgery.
- Management:
- Repeated chest drain every few weeks [7]
- Chemical pleurodesis (1st line) if recurrent [7]
- Surgical pleurodesis if good performance status [7]
- Long-term ambulatory indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) if short life expectancy or trapped lung [7]
- Pleuroperitoneal shunt (e.g., Denver shunt) if short life expectancy or trapped lung [7]
Trapped lung: When tumour encases the visceral pleura, the lung cannot re-expand even after fluid drainage → pleurodesis fails (because the two pleural surfaces cannot make contact). In this situation, IPC or shunt is appropriate [7].
- Mechanism: Endobronchial tumour blocks a bronchus → mucus stagnation distal to the obstruction → bacterial superinfection → pneumonia → may progress to abscess formation (especially with anaerobic organisms).
- Clinical clue: Unresolving pneumonia or recurrent pneumonia in the same lobe [2]. The classic exam trap — always suspect underlying malignancy.
- Management: Antibiotics (cover anaerobes if abscess suspected — e.g., amoxicillin-clavulanate, metronidazole). Bronchoscopy to relieve obstruction (debulk/stent). Treat the underlying cancer.
| Complication | Mechanism | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Hyponatraemia (SIADH) | SCLC → ectopic ADH → water retention → dilutional hyponatraemia | Management of complications, e.g., electrolyte imbalance [2]. Fluid restriction (1st line). If severe/symptomatic: hypertonic saline (3% NaCl, very cautiously — risk of osmotic demyelination if corrected too fast). |
| Hypercalcaemia | SCC → ectopic PTHrP; any subtype → osteolytic bone metastases | Rehydration (aggressive IV NS), loop diuretics (only after rehydration), bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid — inhibits osteoclast activity), denosumab (anti-RANKL). Definitive: treat the cancer. |
| Ectopic Cushing's | SCLC → ectopic ACTH → adrenal cortisol overproduction | Hypokalaemic metabolic alkalosis, severe proximal myopathy, immunosuppression. May require ketoconazole/metyrapone to control cortisol before definitive cancer treatment. |
| Hypercoagulability (Trousseau syndrome) | Tumour secretes tissue factor, mucin → activation of coagulation cascade | DVT, PE, migratory thrombophlebitis. Cancer-associated VTE: treat with LMWH or DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). |
- Brain metastasis often implies poor prognosis (survival ≤ 6 months) [18].
- Untreated: 1 month. Surgery + WBRT: ~10–12 months [18].
- Complications of brain mets: raised ICP (headache, vomiting, papilloedema, decreased consciousness), seizures, focal neurological deficits, personality/cognitive change.
- Management: Dexamethasone + AED for symptomatic relief [18]. Surgery ± adjuvant RT if solitary operable lesion [18]. SRS for small/inoperable lesions [18]. WBRT if multiple bulky tumours [18].
2. Complications of Treatment
VATS lobectomy has improved outcomes compared to open thoracotomy, but complications still occur.
From the HK VATS experience [3]:
Complications reported include persistent air leak over 10 days, wound infection, supraventricular tachycardia, and recurrence of tumour over the utility thoracotomy scar [3].
Significantly more postoperative complications occurred in the thoracotomy group compared to VATS [3], the majority of which were prolonged air leaks [3].
| Complication | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Persistent air leak (> 7 days) [3] | Failure of the staple line or visceral pleural defect → air leaks from lung parenchyma into the pleural space via chest drain | Conservative: maintain chest drain with suction → most seal spontaneously. If > 10–14 days: pleurodesis (chemical or surgical), endobronchial valve (EBV) placement [7]. NEVER clamp a bubbling drain (risk of tension pneumothorax) [7]. |
| Pneumonia / respiratory failure | ↑risk if ppoFEV₁ or ppoDLCO < 40% predicted [2]. Post-operative atelectasis (hypoventilation, mucus retention) → secondary infection. | Chest physiotherapy (incentive spirometry/Triflow — 10× per 30 minutes [3]), early mobilisation (sit out day 1, self-mobilising by day 3 [3]), antibiotics. |
| Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) | Dehiscence (breakdown) of the bronchial stump → communication between bronchial tree and pleural space → pneumothorax, empyema | Continue chest drain with low wall suction → CT thorax to localise → pleurodesis or surgery [7]. This is the most feared surgical complication — mortality is high. |
| Supraventricular tachycardia [3] | Post-operative autonomic irritation, sympathetic surge, pericardial inflammation, electrolyte disturbance → atrial fibrillation or SVT | Rate control (metoprolol, diltiazem), correct electrolytes (Mg²⁺, K⁺), amiodarone if refractory. |
| Wound infection [3] | Surgical site contamination | Antibiotics, wound care. Less common with VATS (smaller incisions). |
| Tumour recurrence at thoracotomy scar [3] | Tumour cell implantation during surgery | Rare but reported. Reason to minimise tissue handling and use specimen retrieval bags. |
| Post-pneumonectomy pulmonary oedema | The remaining lung receives the entire cardiac output → increased hydrostatic pressure → oedema. Also, lymphatic disruption. | Restrict IV fluids post-pneumonectomy (aim for fluid negative balance). This complication has ~50% mortality. |
| Right-sided heart failure | Pneumonectomy reduces the pulmonary vascular bed → ↑pulmonary vascular resistance → ↑RV afterload → RV failure | More common after right pneumonectomy (larger vascular bed removed). Avoid excessive fluid loading. |
| Empyema | Infection of the pleural space, especially if BPF | Chest drain, antibiotics, consider decortication if chronic. |
Post-operative care pathway (from the VATS clinical pathway) [3]:
- Day 0: Intensive monitoring, chest drain to suction, IV fluids, IV antibiotics, PCA analgesia, sit up in bed as tolerated, begin Triflow use
- Day 1: Off O₂, off suction, off PCA, off IV fluids, resume Aspirin/Plavix, post-op chest physiotherapy, sit out all day, mobilise
- Day 2: Off chest drain if: no air leak, output acceptable, lung expanded on CXR
- Day 3–5: Discharge if patient safe, mobile, independent
- CXR is performed: after off suction, after drain removal, and before discharge [3]
| Complication | Timing | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute radiation pneumonitis | 4–12 weeks after RT [2] | RT damages alveolar epithelial cells and capillary endothelium → inflammatory exudate in alveoli → impaired gas exchange | S/S: dry cough, SOB, low-grade fever, pleuritic chest pain [2]. HRCT: GGO (acute) → consolidation (organising phase) conforming to RT field (diagnostic) [2]. Mx: observe if minimal; otherwise steroids [2]. Expect clinical + radiological response in 3–4 days. Continue steroid for 3–4 weeks before tapering [2]. |
| Fibrotic radiation pneumonitis | 6–12 months after RT [2] | Chronic fibrotic change in the irradiated lung parenchyma → permanent volume loss | Irreversible. Use of steroid does not reduce long-term risk of fibrosis [2]. Manage with bronchodilators, supplemental O₂ if needed. |
| Radiation oesophagitis | During/shortly after concurrent chemoRT | RT damages oesophageal mucosa → inflammation, ulceration | Dysphagia, odynophagia. Manage with PPI, viscous lidocaine, soft diet. Usually self-limiting. Can progress to stricture. |
| Radiation myelopathy | Months to years | Direct damage to spinal cord (if cord is within the radiation field) | Progressive weakness, sensory loss. Irreversible. Dose limit: 45–50 Gy to the spinal cord. |
| Radiation-induced cardiac disease | Years | Pericarditis, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy | More relevant with mediastinal RT. Monitor long-term cardiac risk. |
Radiation Pneumonitis vs Lymphangitis Carcinomatosis
Both can cause progressive dyspnoea after treatment. The key differentiator is that radiation pneumonitis conforms to the RT field [2] (sharp geometric borders on HRCT), while lymphangitis carcinomatosis is diffuse with septal thickening (Kerley B lines). Getting this distinction wrong can lead to inappropriate steroid treatment or missed disease progression.
| Drug | Key Toxicities | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin | Nephrotoxicity (dose-limiting), ototoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, severe nausea/vomiting | Direct tubular damage (requires aggressive IV hydration + monitoring of Cr, Mg²⁺). Damage to hair cells of cochlea. Axonal degeneration of sensory nerves. Stimulates CTZ → severe emesis (always give 5-HT3 antagonist + dexamethasone + NK1 antagonist). |
| Carboplatin | Myelosuppression (dose-limiting — especially thrombocytopenia), nausea (less than cisplatin) | Less nephrotoxic than cisplatin (no need for aggressive hydration). Dose calculated by AUC using Calvert formula (considers GFR). |
| Etoposide | Myelosuppression (neutropenia), alopecia, secondary leukaemia (AML — years later) | Topoisomerase II inhibition → can cause balanced translocations at MLL gene → secondary AML (~1–2% risk). |
| Pemetrexed | Myelosuppression, mucositis, rash, diarrhoea | Antifolate → must supplement with folic acid + vitamin B12 to reduce toxicity (folic acid daily for ≥ 5 doses before first pemetrexed, B12 IM every 9 weeks). |
| General | Neutropenic sepsis | Chemotherapy destroys rapidly dividing cells including bone marrow → neutropenia → susceptibility to infection → life-threatening sepsis. Febrile neutropenia (fever + ANC < 0.5 × 10⁹/L) is a medical emergency — IV broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam) within 1 hour. |
| Drug Class | Key Toxicities | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| EGFR TKIs (osimertinib, gefitinib, erlotinib) | Skin rash (acneiform — face, trunk), diarrhoea, paronychia, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (rare but potentially fatal) | EGFR is expressed in skin and GI epithelium → blocking it causes dermatological and GI side effects. ILD: immune-mediated pneumonitis — must stop TKI immediately + steroids. |
| ALK TKIs (alectinib, crizotinib, lorlatinib) | Visual disturbance (crizotinib), peripheral oedema, hepatotoxicity, bradycardia, hyperlipidaemia (lorlatinib), CNS effects (lorlatinib — mood changes, cognitive slowing) | Variable off-target kinase effects. Monitor LFTs regularly. |
Checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab) work by "releasing the brakes" on the immune system. The trade-off is that the unleashed immune system can attack normal tissues → autoimmune-like toxicities affecting virtually any organ:
| Organ | irAE | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skin | Rash, pruritus, vitiligo | ~30–40% (most common) | Topical steroids, antihistamines. Rarely requires treatment interruption. |
| GI | Colitis (diarrhoea, bloody stool, abdominal pain) | ~10–20% | Grade 1–2: loperamide + budesonide. Grade 3–4: hold immunotherapy + high-dose IV methylprednisolone. If steroid-refractory: infliximab (anti-TNF). |
| Liver | Hepatitis (↑AST/ALT) | ~5–10% | Monitor LFTs every cycle. Grade 3–4: hold immunotherapy + steroids. If refractory: mycophenolate mofetil. |
| Endocrine | Thyroiditis (hypo > hyper), hypophysitis (pituitary inflammation), adrenalitis, Type 1 DM | ~10–15% | TFTs every cycle. Thyroid: thyroxine replacement if hypothyroid. Hypophysitis: hydrocortisone replacement (often permanent). Type 1 DM: insulin. |
| Lung | Pneumonitis | ~3–5% (but potentially fatal) | Most feared pulmonary complication. Cough, dyspnoea, GGO/organising pneumonia on CT. Grade 1: monitor. Grade 2: hold immunotherapy + oral prednisolone. Grade ≥ 3: permanently discontinue + IV methylprednisolone. |
| Neurological | Myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré, encephalitis | ~1% | Rare but serious. High-dose steroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis. Permanently discontinue immunotherapy. |
| Cardiac | Myocarditis | < 1% | Rare but ~50% mortality. Troponin monitoring. High-dose steroids. Permanently discontinue. |
Immunotherapy Pneumonitis — Critical Distinction
You must distinguish immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis (which requires stopping the drug and giving steroids) from disease progression (which requires escalating treatment) and infection (which requires antibiotics, not steroids). All three can present with new dyspnoea + new infiltrates on CT during treatment. Get a BAL (bronchoscopy with lavage) if in doubt.
3. Complications of Diagnostic and Staging Procedures
Complications of CT-guided FNAC [1]:
- Pneumothorax (50%) — but < 10% require drainage [1]. Most are small and self-resolving. Risk factors: emphysematous lungs, deep lesions requiring traversal of aerated lung, smaller lesion size.
- Haemothorax [1] — from intercostal artery injury or laceration of pulmonary vasculature.
- Missed lesion [1] — especially small or mobile lesions.
- Pleural seeding [1] — tumour cells deposited along the needle tract. Rare (~0.003–0.009%) [14].
- Air embolism [1] — extremely rare but potentially fatal. Air enters the pulmonary vein → systemic embolism (coronary or cerebral). Prevented by ensuring the needle stylet is in place during positioning.
More comprehensive complication rates from radiology notes [14]:
| Complication | Details |
|---|---|
| Bleeding | From biopsy site. Usually minor and self-limiting. Rarely significant enough to require intervention. |
| Pneumothorax | Especially after transbronchial biopsy. ~1–4%. |
| Bronchospasm | Particularly in asthmatic/COPD patients. |
| Respiratory depression | From sedation. |
| Laryngospasm | Reflex vagal response to airway instrumentation. |
Complications [7]:
- Failed procedure [7]
- Puncture-related: pneumothorax, haemothorax/haemoptysis, surgical emphysema, organ perforation, damage to neurovascular bundle, bronchopleural fistula, segmentation (pockets formed by scar after each puncture) [7]
- Drain-related: re-expansion pulmonary oedema (in pleural effusion — avoid drain > 1.5 L in 30 minutes), blockage, dislodgement [7]
- Infection (e.g., empyema) [7]
Chemical pleurodesis complications [7]:
- Fever [7] — expected inflammatory response
- Pain [7] — avoid NSAID (inflammatory action essential) [7]. Use opioids or paracetamol instead.
- ARDS [7] — use larger particle talc to prevent systemic absorption [7]. Small particle talc can cross the pleural membrane → systemic inflammatory response → ARDS. Current recommendation: use graded (large-particle) talc.
- Cardiac arrest [7] — higher risk in very ill patients with poor general condition [7]. Likely vagal-mediated.
4. Long-Term Complications and Prognosis
CA lung has poor prognosis because [2]:
- Late presentation [2] — most patients are symptomatic only when disease is locally advanced or metastatic
- Early lymph node metastasis renders disease inoperable [2] — N2 disease precludes curative surgery
- Advanced stage is inoperable (dependent on lung volume) [2] — patients with COPD from smoking have insufficient lung reserve to tolerate resection
| Type | Timing | Mechanism | Surveillance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local recurrence | Months to years | Residual microscopic disease at resection margins or in regional lymph nodes | CT thorax Q6 months for 2 years, then annually for 5 years (at minimum). |
| Distant recurrence | Months to years | Micrometastases present at diagnosis but undetectable by imaging → grow over time | Same surveillance. Symptoms: new bone pain, headache, weight loss. |
| Second primary lung cancer | Years | Field cancerisation — the entire bronchial epithelium was exposed to carcinogens → multiple areas can undergo malignant transformation independently | Annual LDCT in continued smokers. Risk of second primary is ~1–2% per year. |
| Complication | Cause | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic radiation fibrosis | Thoracic RT | 6–12 months post-RT; permanent |
| Secondary malignancy | Alkylating agents (cisplatin), etoposide | Etoposide → secondary AML (~1–2%, years later). RT → secondary cancers in radiation field (years–decades). |
| Permanent endocrinopathy | Immunotherapy-induced hypophysitis or thyroiditis | During or after immunotherapy; often requires lifelong hormone replacement. |
| Neurocognitive decline | Whole-brain RT (PCI in SCLC) | Progressive. Reason why SRS is now preferred over WBRT where possible. |
| Peripheral neuropathy | Cisplatin, taxanes | Often irreversible. "Stocking-glove" distribution. Affects fine motor function and proprioception. |
High Yield Summary — Complications of CA Lung
Disease-related:
- 5 oncological emergencies: SVCO, cord compression, tamponade, massive haemoptysis, airway obstruction
- MPE in 50% of metastatic NSCLC → pleurodesis (1st line chemical), IPC if trapped lung
- Post-obstructive pneumonia → always suspect CA lung in unresolving/recurrent pneumonia in same lobe
- Paraneoplastic metabolic crises: SIADH (hyponatraemia), hypercalcaemia, ectopic Cushing's
Treatment-related:
- Surgical: persistent air leak (most common), BPF (most feared), post-op pneumonia, SVT
- RT: acute radiation pneumonitis (4–12 weeks, responds to steroids), fibrotic change (6–12 months, irreversible)
- Chemo: neutropenic sepsis (febrile neutropenia = emergency), cisplatin nephrotoxicity, etoposide → secondary AML
- Immunotherapy: irAEs affecting any organ (pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathy, myocarditis) — hold drug + steroids for grade ≥ 2
Procedural:
- CT-guided biopsy: pneumothorax 10–30% (most don't need drain), haemoptysis 2–12%
- Pleurodesis: avoid NSAIDs (inflammation needed), use large-particle talc (avoid ARDS), pain, fever
Why prognosis is poor: Late presentation + early LN metastasis + insufficient lung reserve in smokers
Active Recall - Complications of CA Lung
References
[1] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.52, Lung Cancer — NSCLC treatment, complications of CT-guided FNAC, palliative RT indications) [2] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Respiratory.pdf (p.126–128, 141–150, Lung Cancer — prognosis, radiation pneumonitis, supportive treatment, airway management, reasons for poor prognosis; asbestos-related lung disease and CA lung risk) [3] Lecture slides: GC 196. Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery.pdf (p.22–49, 123 — VATS complications, HK experience, post-op care pathway, persistent air leak, SVT, wound infection, tumour recurrence at scar) [7] Senior notes: Maksim Medicine Notes.pdf (p.292–296, Malignant pleural effusion, pleurodesis complications, chest drain complications, trapped lung, re-expansion pulmonary oedema) [14] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Diagnostic Radiology.pdf (p.80, Complications of image-guided biopsy — pneumothorax rates, haemoptysis, tumour seeding) [18] Senior notes: Ryan Ho Neurology.pdf (p.165, Brain metastasis — prognosis, management with dexamethasone, SRS, WBRT)
Aortitis
Aortitis is inflammation of the aortic wall, which can be caused by infectious agents, large-vessel vasculitides (such as giant cell arteritis or Takayasu arteritis), or autoimmune conditions, potentially leading to aneurysm formation, stenosis, or aortic valve insufficiency.
Chest Injury
Chest injury is trauma to the thoracic wall or intrathoracic structures—including the lungs, heart, great vessels, and airway—caused by blunt or penetrating forces, potentially compromising ventilation, oxygenation, and circulatory function.